User talk:GiovanniPen

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, GiovanniPen!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:01, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot YouTube

[edit]

Ciao Giovanni, ti scrivo in merito al File:BarbascuraX video.jpg.

Tu hai caricato questo file in CC-BY usando il tag {{Youtube}}, ma a me non sembra proprio che quel video sia stato rilasciato con licenza Creative Commons (dove lo leggi?). Di default, a meno che l'autore non carichi il video esplicitamente con una certa licenza, tutti i diritti sono riservati, e quindi lo screenshot è incompatibile con la licenza di Wikimedia Commons. Horcrux (talk) 10:26, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao, ho contattato l'autore del video per chiedere conferma ed era come immaginavo quindi conforme alle linee guida e compatibile per i diritti privacy etc
anche l'altra immagine presente nella voce in it.wiki che non è stata caricata da me ha gli stessi attributi (mi pare) quindi per questo prima della conferma pensavo fosse tutto ok senza pormi troppi problemi GiovanniPen (talk) 13:51, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ciao, dunque:
  1. Se rispondi nella tua pagina di discussione, devi ricordarti di pingarmi, altrimenti non mi arriva la notifica della tua risposta.
  2. Come su Wikipedia, anche su Commons il discorso "ho contattato XYZ" non sta né in cielo né in terra. Tutte le comunicazioni extra-wiki devono essere ufficializzate tramite VTRS.
  3. Attualmente, quella del video non è una licenza aperta, a meno che non sia indicato esplicitamente nella descrizione (possibilmente, tramite gli appositi strumenti forniti da YouTube, altrimenti a mano).
  4. L'altra immagine a cui fai riferimento (suppongo questa) è stata tratta da un video in cui la licenza CC-BY è applicata correttamente (clicca qui e dà un'occhiata alla descrizione).
Se la licenza CC-BY non verrà aggiunta nel video di origine, il file dovrà essere cancellato. --Horcrux (talk) 11:56, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ciao @Horcrux, hai ragione
Provvedo a trasmettere le comunicazioni per il copyright il prima possibile, mentre ho capito cosa intendi per il video; la licenza non è citata in descrizione quindi non è possibile utilizzare quell'immagine diversamente da quella di boban pesov giusto?
se non dovessi riuscire a risolvere chiaramente cancellerò l'immagine GiovanniPen (talk) 08:35, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
News? --Horcrux (talk) 10:48, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ciao, mi sa che essendo il video di comedy central non c'è scampo; cancello l'immagine (?) GiovanniPen (talk) 11:52, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Devi pingare l'altro utente, in questo modo: @Horcrux: . Altrimenti difficilmente ti risponderà. --Phyrexian ɸ 07:02, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ciao Giovanni, ho proposto il video per la cancellazione. Grazie per la collaborazione! --Horcrux (talk) 10:11, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Phyrexian grazie pensavo di averlo fatto
@Horcrux se vuoi cancello io direttamente e bypasso procedure --GiovanniPen (talk) 15:11, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Solo gli amministratori possono cancellare pagine e file. --Horcrux (talk) 15:37, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

[edit]
2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:BarbascuraX-teatro.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ruthven (msg) 14:45, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Abzeronow (talk) 16:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Foto doppie

[edit]

Ciao, avendo visto la tua ultima richiesta di cancellazione sono qui a informarti che esiste il {{Duplicate}} che fa esattamente quel lavoro. :-) Threecharlie (talk) 05:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Threecharlie: ciao Roberto, grazie. Lo metto nel motivo della proposta di cancellazione? oppure non c'è bisogno e basta che inserisco il template in pagina? GioviPen GP msg 08:22, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
L'ho già aggiunto io :-) Threecharlie (talk) 09:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Threecharlie ma per il futuro? il modo giusto per farlo qual è? così non sbaglio più, grazie hahaha GioviPen GP msg 09:22, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ho visto che Turelio ha revertato il mio avviso, affermando che ci sono 6 versioni con differenti risoluzioni quindi la cosa è più complessa (sono immagini caricate con il bot (doppio senso) e il bot non è così intelligente da capirlo). Quindi questo non è un "caso tipo" ma se trovi una foto inequivocabilmente doppia, ad esempio evidente stessa inquadratura (lo vedi dai particolari come forma delle nubi, o le ombre) ma risoluzione e dimensioni più basse, o anche stesse dimensioni e risoluzione ma diverso nomefile e/o uploader, usa quel template. Caricherà l'immagine in una categoria di servizio e poi gli admin provvederanno. :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 11:18, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Categorie

[edit]

Ciao, perché questo? Centro abitato e comune non sono la stessa cosa. Syrio posso aiutare? 21:07, 23 September 2024 (UTC) ps stesso discorso per Avio.[reply]

ciao. è come dire che esiste un ala frazione di ala. imho non ha senso; sarebbe un'overcategorizzazione superflua...
il centro abitato non necessita di una sottocategoria apposita (differentemente da quanto invece serve generalmente per le frazioni o le località nettamente separate). non è come province e città (provincia di Como, comune di Como)
tolto questo ne ho approfittato anche per disambiguare le categorie più generiche ed evitare ridondanze sui vari livelli... GioviPen GP msg 13:36, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nulla da dire sulla disambiguazione, ma il resto scusa non ha senso; a parte che nessuno ha mai parlato di frazioni, ma che il comune e il centro abitato siano due cose distinte è una cosa oggettiva (tanto è vero che c'è sia questo sia, sei chilometri dopo, questo; addirittura ci sono pure cartelli del genere, a dire letteralmente che "comune" e "capoluogo" sono due realtà distinte). Il punto è: nel comune di Ala ci sono cose che sono dentro il centro abitato di Ala, e ci sono cose che sono fuori dal centro abitato di Ala, quindi distinguerle ha senso. -- Syrio posso aiutare? 00:23, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Syrio a seguito del nostro incontro a Padova per la itWikiCon 2024 (e visti i messaggi su Hisgot_sa_Gumagamit:Qu0404) mi permetto di aggiungere:
per commons ha senso ma per le wiki credo di no... tipo su CEB io eviterei (anche perché poi compaiono elementi wikidata che vanno sistemati etc, come troppo spesso è successo e succede a causa delle traduzioni automatiche), difatti su itwiki non ci sono voci separate per il comune e il centro abitato omonimo mentre per le altre località o frazioni del comune sì. GioviPen GP msg 10:19, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah ok, ma di ceb.wiki a me interessa poco in realtà; lì avevano deciso che questa cosa la volevano fare, per questo gliel'ho segnalato, ma si regolino come meglio credono (infatti gli ho scritto should/can). Ovviamente è una cosa che ha senso più a livello di database che non di enciclopedia (anche se devo dire che pure a livello di enciclopedia non sarebbe concettualmente sbagliata, soltanto assai poco pratica). -- Syrio posso aiutare? 10:38, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for categorizing images for DJ equipment and Turntablism

[edit]

Hi! I see you've added a lot of images into Category:DJ equipment, Category:DJ setups, Category:Turntablism and Category:Turntables as DJ equipment. Thank you very much! Alexey Vazhnov (talk) 21:36, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexey Vazhnov I'm doing the maintenance needed for the main category DJs. almost 1k media in it GioviPen GP msg 21:38, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for doing this, but I was wondering if File:All-City Coffee Pioneer Square 03.jpg really should be just in Category:Laptop DJs. I see at least one turntable, and if I remember correctly (17 years later!) there were actually two. - Jmabel ! talk 07:28, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmabel just the needed maintenance. imho the fact that is a laptop. DJ does not exclude the use of CDJ; in the picture you can clearly see a computer linked with the setup so that’s why. We of course can add any more for example Category:Turntablism or the one for CDJ’s (but those are not clearly depicted) GioviPen GP msg 12:20, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not familiar at all with the categories in that area, but it seems to me the term "Laptop DJ" suggests someone who doesn't use turntables. Maybe a subcat or something else for those who are using both? People who use turntables usually see themselves as doing something different from "DJ Press Play" and would probably be insulted to be placed in that category just because a computer was part of their rig. - Jmabel ! talk 16:52, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel: technically it doesn't work like that but, the categoyy laptop djs (it means that the dj also use the pc, not that is a press play dj and stop) does not exclude the use of every other items/hardware for the setup and neither the possibility to add more categories. imho we dont actually need another subcat more specific or combining GioviPen GP msg 16:58, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yisroel Newman (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:08, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quadro Carlo Pisacane (Catania).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:47, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.


Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto di Catania 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:19, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome, Dear Filemover!

[edit]

العربيَّة  Deutsch  español  English  français  português  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  кыргызча  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(台灣)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hi GiovanniPen, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Abzeronow (talk) 18:06, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 20:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Padova - Casa Canonicale del Petrarca P1766.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Krd 19:14, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palco inaugurazione fermata metro Monte Po.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Krd 19:14, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stazione Fontana metropolitana Catania.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Krd 19:14, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Krd 19:19, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Targa onorificenza Don Peppe Diana.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Krd 19:20, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tela Don Peppe Diana.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Krd 19:20, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]