Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/07/18
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
03.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_avec_photogrammes_-_btv1b64024472_(1_of_3).jpg){kind=link}
,_Permanent_Representative_of_El_Salvador_to_the_United_Nations,_presents_her_credentials_to_Secretary-General_António_Guterres.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_portrait.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_member_of_the_French_Resistance,_c._1940_(Remini_enhanced).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 反对校园霸凌 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: <G7> Yann (talk) 16:33, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:33, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Nonsense used only on user space. 186.173.216.231 01:53, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Probably it also is a deletion error. 186.173.216.231 01:58, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:36, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
No educational purpose. unused on user page for a long timr. Redtigerxyz (talk) 07:53, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
To Upload high resolution photos Radhikakarthik (talk) 07:42, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:50, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Dw no source since (dw no source since). The uploader attempted to have it deleted after 14 days without a reason. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:07, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Screenshot, the uploader and nominator are most probably the same. --Yann (talk) 12:32, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
MJF attacked Daniel Garcia on a bloody mess on AEw Dynamite Beach Break Anogen29 (talk) 09:11, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted. Uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:00, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope, also mistagged. Unsyndicated Truth (talk) 06:49, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: LTA nomination; file also COM:INUSE and thus not eligible for scope deletion ceteris paribus. --Эlcobbola talk 14:23, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Karin Schaupp is a German-Australian Guitarist and Sophie Hutchings is a Australian Pianist and Composer. Anogen29 (talk) 10:19, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, G7-speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 14:28, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:04, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:44, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:14, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:44, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Uploader is part of a ToU violating sock farm on en, these own work claims are not plausible. Another upload is a straight up copyvio altho claimed as own work, so please delete.
- File:AmericanCollegeBrisbaneWoollongabba.png
- File:His Excellency the Prime Minister of Australia.jpg
- File:King's International University Niumeitolu Road, Haveluloto, Nukuʻalofa, Tonga's Logo.png
- File:Jagvinder.jpeg
- File:Scott fisk.jpeg
—SpacemanSpiff 13:04, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:25, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
- File:AuxesisGroupMumbaiMaharashtraIndiaKumarGauravAkashGaurav.png
- File:Cashaawikipediawebsitework.png
- File:Cashaa'sOfficialLogoNew.jpeg
Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:14, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:45, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yeasir Ali (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside spammy declined sandbox draft, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:57, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:17, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:17, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nasimobeid (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:19, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:18, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake OsascanianoPouPou (talk) 21:40, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: g7; per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:45, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Yes yes yes Moosebag12 (talk) 21:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G7; per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:31, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Cover copyright 186.174.114.142 22:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, earlier online elsewhere per reverse image search. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:08, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:53, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:17, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:58, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:17, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Goo Not This is a Crang 118.174.170.175 05:57, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nonsense nomination but CSD G2. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:18, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by nonnotable youtuber; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:22, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:18, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:55, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:18, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tamburello (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:55, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:56, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:27, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:56, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:27, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:57, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:18, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:57, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:18, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manzartypesetting (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope
- File:Manzar Typesetting Tool Screenshots.jpg
- File:Manzar Typesetting Tool Logo.png
- File:Manzar Typesetting Tool Arabic Logo.png
Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:58, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:19, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DavidTurnbu11 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside sandbox, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:59, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:19, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:00, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:19, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside sandbox, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:00, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:20, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Spc-international (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:01, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:20, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:02, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:20, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:20, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:21, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:06, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:21, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:21, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:21, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:21, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:09, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:21, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage besides sandbox, out of scope
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:10, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:21, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage besides user talkpage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:11, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:22, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:11, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:22, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:22, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maartenvanvulpen (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside sandbox, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:13, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:23, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Photo of unidentified person. Out of scope. 0x0a (talk) 07:23, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. AI-generated garbage. Omphalographer (talk) 07:30, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G3 (see enwiki). --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:24, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:37, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:27, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LAAREYA CLOTHING (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:37, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:28, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:38, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:28, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:38, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:28, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wedding bazaar (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope
- File:Wb final Logo.jpg
- File:Logo launched in 2017 under WB & CO by Sandeep Dhaliwal and Preeti Ludu.jpg
Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:38, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:28, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:39, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:28, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:39, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:28, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KanthariaM (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:39, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:28, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:39, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:29, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:40, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:29, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside sandbox, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:40, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:29, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:40, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:29, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Machot Matur Makuer (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:42, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:29, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:42, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:29, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:42, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:29, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:42, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:30, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:43, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:30, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:44, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:30, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TheSweetShooter (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:45, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:30, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dècorous Official (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:45, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep ("cc" in username); no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:45, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COPYVIO chaine YouTube Vilbrequin Factory (talk) 07:46, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:46, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside promotional tone sandbox, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:47, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:49, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:49, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:53, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:32, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:53, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:32, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:53, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:32, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:54, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep (see talk page); no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:54, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:54, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:56, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ali Jraisheh (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:57, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:58, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Millennialstm (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 08:00, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 08:00, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:34, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of a household appliance; better images exist in e.g. Category:Heated towel rails. Omphalographer (talk) 19:02, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:39, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of a green bag (with nonsense text on it) surrounded by leafy vegetables - apparently a AI's interpretation of "environmentally (f)riendly"? No likely educational use. Omphalographer (talk) 19:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:39, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Childish drawing 186.174.114.142 00:00, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:35, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Il contient les données GPS de la phots et je souhaite garder ça privé. Margaux Fritschy (talk) 14:33, 18 July 2024 (UTC) Margaux Fritschy (talk) 18:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; recent upload, unused. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:34, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:DW of non-free flag UTATraxRide (talk) — Preceding undated comment was added at 17:04, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Speedy keep. Per file source and https://www.cityofdowagiac.com/news_detail_T11_R90.php, design is open-source and free to use. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 18:20, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Duplicate request also located at Commons:Deletion requests/File: Flag of Dowagiac, Michigan.svg. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 18:23, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: This file is below COM:TOO US and hence can't be considered non-free even if the file of which this file is a derivative work, itself, might be non-free. (non-admin closure) Jonteemil (talk) 21:55, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
copyright wrong upload Kocerdinc (talk) 11:56, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G7. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:53, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
PARCEQUE JE VEUX Philippeson Juste (talk) 06:44, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: User talk pages are not deleted, see Commons:Deletion requests/User talk:Eudorasolutions for another example. (non-admin closure) Jonteemil (talk) 15:44, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
No benefits to wikimedia Kevenswodolkski (talk) 18:21, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: User talk pages are not deleted, see Commons:Deletion requests/User talk:Eudorasolutions for another example. (non-admin closure) Jonteemil (talk) 15:47, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
性的なもので、個人的であるため。 HST39 (talk) 06:45, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:27, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
requested by own user; uploaded by mistake Estevoaei (talk) 06:55, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Rastrojo. --Rosenzweig τ 08:26, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
requested by own user; uploaded by mistake Estevoaei (talk) 06:55, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Rastrojo. --Rosenzweig τ 08:26, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
requested by own user; uploaded by mistake Estevoaei (talk) 06:55, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Rastrojo. --Rosenzweig τ 08:26, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
requested by own user; uploaded by mistake Estevoaei (talk) 06:55, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Rastrojo. --Rosenzweig τ 08:26, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not used; besides, there are better pictures of the sun Bremps... 01:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Yes, like the base image. Unused crops are generally innecessary. Delete. 186.173.192.149 02:08, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 03:01, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by LittleFigure14 (talk · contribs)
[edit]personal youtube channel images, no potential usage and out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:57, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 03:01, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
dupe of twitch logo already on site Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:30, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 03:10, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Amini Aisyah (talk) 05:13, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; not INUSE. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 04:39, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
1935 German bank note, possibly PD in Germany but not the US. Abzeronow (talk) 00:38, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:46, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
low-res image with low quality, missing EXIF data, appears to be a screenshot from TV news at [1]. 0x0a (talk) 04:17, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:46, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Missing permission for shown photo on the display, no COM:DM Wdwd (talk) 07:52, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:46, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
The description from the website says "Фото: Павел Бедняков, РИА «Новости»", would need a permission from RIA Novosti. 0x0a (talk) 08:14, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:46, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Lithuania, architect Bronius Elsbergas died in 1998 A1Cafel (talk) 09:14, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:46, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Lithuania, architect Kārlis Reisons died in 1981 A1Cafel (talk) 09:20, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Lithuania, architect Kārlis Reisons died in 1981 A1Cafel (talk) 09:21, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Lithuania, architect Kārlis Reisons died in 1981 A1Cafel (talk) 09:22, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Iceland, artist Bjarni Þór Bjarnason is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 09:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in France, architect Jean Willerval died in 1996 and Marcel Spender died in 1999 A1Cafel (talk) 09:37, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in France, architect Jean Willerval died in 1996 and Marcel Spender died in 1999 A1Cafel (talk) 09:39, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in France, architect Jean Willerval died in 1996 and Marcel Spender died in 1999 A1Cafel (talk) 09:39, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Estonia, artist Edgar Viies died in 2006 A1Cafel (talk) 09:47, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ghana A1Cafel (talk) 09:48, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 09:48, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 13:46, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Commons:Derivative works from paintings. Should be cropped/blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by سيف نور الدين (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope
--Alaa :)..! 16:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AHMADSAADABDELMOATY (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope
--Alaa :)..! 16:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope
--Alaa :)..! 16:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Unused promotional image/advertising, out of scope, and redundant to individual images already on Commons. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:22, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO Slovenia A09 (talk) 19:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:49, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO Slovenia A09 (talk) 19:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:49, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Unused photo; description and author credit removed by uploader possible uploader attempt at deletion; questionable scope Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:36, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:49, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
DW of modern artwork, no FOP in US Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:02, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:49, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal image Nv8200p (talk) 21:22, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:49, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unacceptable derivative work of a puppet design. ✗plicit 23:50, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:49, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Parcours BD (Tintin)
[edit]The artist of the characters on this mural, Hergé, died in 1983 and there's zero evidence that he created the mural or that whomever did retain the copyright for the characters since it was created in 2005. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.
- File:A street in Brussels de minimis.jpg
- File:A wall paint in Brussels, featuring Tintin.jpg
- File:Brussels - Christmas 2009 (4257534497).jpg
- File:Brussels 22 33 15 268000.jpeg
- File:Brussels comic book route- Tintin on rue de l'Etuve (Belgium, DSCF4461).jpg
- File:Cartoon auf einer Hausfassade in Brüssel (Belgien) 5.jpg
- File:Comic Mural Tintin, Hergé, Brussels (cropped).jpg
- File:Comic Mural Tintin, Hergé, Brussels.jpg
- File:Comic Mural Tintin, Hergé, Bruxelles.jpg
- File:Graffiti in Brussels.001 - Brussel.jpg
- File:Kuifje en Haddock.jpg
- File:Mur peint Bruxelle crop.jpg
- File:Mur peint Bruxelle.jpg
- File:Mur peint Bruxelles 2.jpg
- File:Street Art In Brussels - Photographed Christmas 2009 (4257533393).jpg
- File:Tin Tin - panoramio.jpg
- File:Tintin - panoramio.jpg
- File:Tintin Bruxelles rue de l'Etuve.jpg
- File:Tintin-Wandgemaelde in Bruessel.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_5.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 00:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Es ist Teil des Parcours BD der Stadt Brüssel. Zu diesem Zweck wurde ein Herge-Motiv aus dem Band L’affaire Tournesol auf eine große Wand übertragen. Diese Arbeit wurde von Art Mural ausgeführt. Diese letzte Aussage kann natürlich noch ergänzt werden. Aber es wäre, gelinde gesagt, seltsam, wenn so etwas ohne Rücksprache mit den Rechteinhabern gemacht worden wäre. Was die Fotos betrifft: In Belgien herrscht Panoramafreiheit. Lewenstein (talk) 01:52, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
It would be strange, to say the least, if something like this had been done without consulting the rights holders.
Why would it be strange if the mural was created without consulting the rights holders? People create murals of copyrighted characters without getting the proper permission all the time, to the point that it's actually pretty routine. Do you have a link to somewhere that discusses the copyright status of the mural or are you just speculating? Because we obviously can't host the images if there's no actual evidence and/or it's otherwise just your personal opinion. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:08, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
These murals are in the city center of Brussels. They are not the work of some random street graffiti artist, they are here because they were commissioned to be and the city is well aware of their existence (and so are millions of people, tourists and residents alike).
Belgium has freedom of panorama and if there was a copyright issue with these murals then it would be up to the city of Brussels to do something about it, not some Commons users.
If you suspect that the city of Brussels is guilty of improperly permitting, hosting and promoting copyrighted material then you are free to contact them and ask for clarifications, but wasting the time and energy of everyone involved with these pictures without even doing your due diligence is inappropriate imo. --Trougnouf (talk) 06:37, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Keep First, Belgium has now appropriate freedom of panorama. Second, although I have in the past argued for deleting obviously unauthorized graffiti of copyrighted characters, such as in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Peter Griffin in Hannover 2015.jpg, this is a completely different case. Actually, I have brought up these Tintin murals in that deletion request as an example of cases that aren't an issue. The Peter Griffin graffito was exactly that, roughly sprayed in an underpass amoungst other graffiti, so any kind of authorization or knowledge of the copyright owner was highly unlikely. The Tintin murals on the other hand are - as I wrote there - part of the official en:Brussels' Comic Book Route and therefore we can assume that they were made with the right owner's permission.In this case, it's highly unlikely that such an official art route by the city of Brussels would be executed without the Hergé Foundation's permission which is well known for protecting Hergé's rights rigorously. Gestumblindi (talk) 09:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed.. It's even more unlikely that the Foundation's website would feature this mural if they had not approved it: [2]. That took a couple of minutes to find, in the most obvious place to look. So much for "zero evidence". - Davidships (talk) 11:39, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Davidships: Maybe you can point it out but I don't see anything anywhere about the copyright status of the murals. In fact at least a few of the murals in the photographs on that website have a copyright on them and say "copyrighted Hergé." Regardless, just because someone associated with the Tintin museum takes a picture of someone else's work and puts it on their website that doesn't really mean anything about the copyright status of said work. "Oh hey, some random employee of a museum associated with Tintin took a picture of this mural while they were out for a walk. So it must be PD" clearly wouldn't hold up in court. And I don't even see an image of this particular mural on their website to begin with anyway. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:58, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Try the seventh image in the link already provided. It beggars belief that the copyright owner would actively encourage the public to visit the mural if they considered it is a copyvio. That is not proof, but "evidence" it is. I am not expressing a view on whether the images should be kept or not as that seems to depend much more on the application of Belgian FOP, about which I am ignorant. - Davidships (talk) 12:24, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure specifically how Tintin.com works, but their their licensing page says "Tintinimaginatio S.A. is entrusted on an exclusive basis by La Croix de l'Aigle S.A with the exploitation of the rights relating to Hergé's work and in particular the rights of reproduction, communication, adaptation and derivative rights of Hergé's work." So there's zero evidence that Hergé's characters are licensed more generally and/or outside of their exclusive agreement with whomever owns the copyright to them at this point. Now if we had evidence that the artist of the mural was or is an employee of Tintin.com and created it on their behalf with the licensing terms granted to them by the copyright holder, cool, but I don't see any evidence of that and them reposting an image of something on their website doesn't prove anything about it either way. It's pretty clear that they are the only one's who have exclusive rights to reproduce the characters though. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:58, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Try the seventh image in the link already provided. It beggars belief that the copyright owner would actively encourage the public to visit the mural if they considered it is a copyvio. That is not proof, but "evidence" it is. I am not expressing a view on whether the images should be kept or not as that seems to depend much more on the application of Belgian FOP, about which I am ignorant. - Davidships (talk) 12:24, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Davidships: Maybe you can point it out but I don't see anything anywhere about the copyright status of the murals. In fact at least a few of the murals in the photographs on that website have a copyright on them and say "copyrighted Hergé." Regardless, just because someone associated with the Tintin museum takes a picture of someone else's work and puts it on their website that doesn't really mean anything about the copyright status of said work. "Oh hey, some random employee of a museum associated with Tintin took a picture of this mural while they were out for a walk. So it must be PD" clearly wouldn't hold up in court. And I don't even see an image of this particular mural on their website to begin with anyway. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:58, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I second Gestumblindi here, and would even go further, as it seems to be at least disputed whether FOP requires that the original artwork was displayed with consent of the copyright holder. I am arguing that this isn't even necessary. Even if we only assume that the image must have been attached legaly to that wall (which clearly seems to be the case), that is sufficient for FOP to apply.
- In particular, we do not need to know under what conditions (aka. license) the painting was made. FOP also applies if the image was intended to be displayed "for non-commercial use only". It's the very core of FOP, that whoever takes a picture of a work permanently in the public does not need to check for any kind of permission from the owner or copyright holder. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:41, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- @PaterMcFly: Both of you seem to be misunderstanding why I nominated the images for deletion. This has nothing to do with FOP or FOP laws in Belgium. It has to do with the fact that Tintin is a copyrighted work and there's no evidence that the artist of this mural retained the rights from Hergé or his family members to reproduce it publicly or otherwise. Just like say there can generally be FOP in Belgium, but that doesn't mean I (or anyone else) can create a mural of characters from Star Wars without obtaining permission from Disney first and then upload an image of said mural to Commons as PD "because FOP." That's not how it works with derivatives. See Commons:Derivative works "if the underlying work is still copyright protected, the original copyright holder must also license the underlying work for reuse." --Adamant1 (talk) 11:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, you will find here in French, or here in English compelling evidences that all those comics mural painting are an official command of the City of Brussels, as indicated on their own website: The City of Brussels pays special attention to the comic book. Since the early 90s, it pays tribute to characters and authors of the Franco-Belgian comics on the walls in the Pentagon (city center) and Laeken. These murals are part of a larger project called Comic Strip Trail, organized by the City itself in coordination with right-holders. Now, please stop wasting everybody's time and let's move on. Greetings. M0tty (talk) 14:00, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- I still disagree that it's a clear statement that everything is above with the mural, but I'm fine leaving it up to the closing admin to decide. That said, even if if correct none of that information was provided in the file descriptions. So the only waste of time here, if there is any, is on the people who decided to upload the images without proper attribution. It's not on me, or anyone else on here, if someone uploads an image of something they didn't create as their own work and without providing a link to the proper license. So spare me the snide comments and it take up the uploaders next time if you really care that much about it. It's not my job to parse through a bunch of random websites to figure out how something is licensed. --Adamant1 (talk) 14:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed it's not your job. It's not ours either. See my comment above for an uploader's take on your request. --Trougnouf (talk) 14:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- It is actually the uploader's job to provide the proper licensing information. Sure, you gave your opinion about it here after the fact, but none of that was provided in the descriptions of the files you uploaded. Let alone did provide any factual information about it outside of speculation anywhere either. And 100% should have. Especially if you going to treat me like this whole was a waste of time on my end. People tend to nominate files for deletion if or when the uploader wrongly licenses something as their own work and then doesn't clarify it anywhere. That's just how this works. Sorry, but aren't here to do research or document how something is licensed on behalf of uploaders just because they can't be bothered to for whatever reason. It's your responsibility to make sure the files you upload are properly documented, sourced, attributed, and licensed. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:03, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- I put the cc-by-4.0 template and that's sufficient. I could have added Template:FoP-Belgium (as some people simply add to my pictures when they feel a clarification is preferred, feel free to do so, it would not bother anyone) but I didn't and I don't think that is required. Freedom of panorama applies to the public space and almost anything permanent requires approval (a permit) from the local administration, so it is safe to assume that the work is officially permitted (aka "lawfully published") and we don't need to assume guilty until proven otherwise and start our own inquisition on everything that freedom of panorama stands for. --Trougnouf (talk) 15:10, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- I've been doing this for at least a couple of years, have a pretty deep understanding of the laws and policies around these things, and I'm telling you just slapping a cc-by-4.0 on the thing and calling good there isn't sufficient in this case. We'll have to disagree though. But your claim that there's no issue here because almost anything permanent requires approval (a permit) from the local administration or that this has anything to do with an inquisition of FOP just goes to show you clearly don't understand the unique issue with durative works and the reasons why I nominated these specific images for deletion. Either that or your just intentionally choosing to ignore them. Regardless, I said I'm fine leaving it to whomever closes this. So I'd appreciate it if we just left it there. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:26, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- You don't seem to understand that the local administration which issues the permits for this type of permanent artwork is the law that determines whether it was "lawfully published" or not. I'm also glad to leave this behind and I hope that you will follow the consensus and take any further FoP issues you may have up to the local authorities, so that volunteer photographers like myself can continue volunteering the time and energy they devote to Wikimedia Commons to more useful and fulfilling tasks like documenting FoP artwork. --Trougnouf (talk) 15:45, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
volunteer photographers like myself can continue volunteering the time and energy they devote to Wikimedia Commons to more useful and fulfilling tasks like documenting FoP artwork.
I wish you would. This wouldn't have been a thing to begin with if you had of documented the artwork instead of just slapping a generic cc-by-4.0 on it and calling things good there. Be my guest and actually "document" things properly next time so there won't be a reason to nominated your images for deletion to begin with though. Otherwise don't be surprised if you end up in a similar situation in the future. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:57, 18 July 2024 (UTC)- I could have added the FoP template but that would not have helped me, you tagged every picture of this artwork regardless. What you are asking me to do is to start an investigation into how this (and any) public artwork got approved; ask the commune for the proof they got when they approved the permit... (Or I may likely endure this again from you for any FoP work I upload.) It is entirely ridiculous and I'm starting to think that you are acting in bad faith. --Trougnouf (talk) 16:02, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
What you are asking me to do is to start an investigation into how this (and any) public artwork got approved
No I'm not. I asked you to properly document the artwork you upload images of. That's it. Nowhere have I said you should investigate "any" public artwork or even any images of public artwork uploaded by other people. So don't put words in my mouth or try to make this about something it isn't. Just properly document and license your uploads. I could really care less about other public art that we aren't discussing or have nothing to do with this deletion request. Again, just properly document and license your uploads. It's literally the bare minimum for files to be hosted on Commons and that's all I'm asking for here. Otherwise don't be surprised if your files get nominated for deletion. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:11, 18 July 2024 (UTC)- My uploads are properly documented. I've mentioned what it is and where it is and categorized it appropriately. You made a blanket deletion request on every file in this category, I don't know what you are now calling "the basics" or "properly documenting" and you sure are pretty vague about it now but I'm pretty sure that all files in this category are not lacking proper documentation. Please do as you said by letting the admins close this discussion and leave me alone. --Trougnouf (talk) 16:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- I could have added the FoP template but that would not have helped me, you tagged every picture of this artwork regardless. What you are asking me to do is to start an investigation into how this (and any) public artwork got approved; ask the commune for the proof they got when they approved the permit... (Or I may likely endure this again from you for any FoP work I upload.) It is entirely ridiculous and I'm starting to think that you are acting in bad faith. --Trougnouf (talk) 16:02, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- You are the only one seeking for problems here, everybody but you agreed on the fact that these paintings have been legally painted, by city order, in coordination with right-holders (Casterman, Dargaux, Dupuis and other big belgian comics editors included). Therefore there is no legal issues for these pictures as the right-holders have agreed for those painting to be painted and so they fall under the FOP. M0tty (talk) 15:48, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- That's fine. I said I was fine leaving it up to whomever closes this. Your the ones trying to turn this into a debate and treating me like I'm just an inquisition against FOP or whatever. It's not a problem to nominate badly or wrongly licensed files for deletion. The problem comes in when people decide to turn into a debate and make it into a personal thing against the nominator like you and Trougnouf have been doing instead of just making your case and moving on. I'm not here to debate this, but I have no problem responding if someone is going to be snide about it and/or treat me like I'm just on an inquisition against FOP in Belgium or whatever.
- You don't seem to understand that the local administration which issues the permits for this type of permanent artwork is the law that determines whether it was "lawfully published" or not. I'm also glad to leave this behind and I hope that you will follow the consensus and take any further FoP issues you may have up to the local authorities, so that volunteer photographers like myself can continue volunteering the time and energy they devote to Wikimedia Commons to more useful and fulfilling tasks like documenting FoP artwork. --Trougnouf (talk) 15:45, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- I've been doing this for at least a couple of years, have a pretty deep understanding of the laws and policies around these things, and I'm telling you just slapping a cc-by-4.0 on the thing and calling good there isn't sufficient in this case. We'll have to disagree though. But your claim that there's no issue here because almost anything permanent requires approval (a permit) from the local administration or that this has anything to do with an inquisition of FOP just goes to show you clearly don't understand the unique issue with durative works and the reasons why I nominated these specific images for deletion. Either that or your just intentionally choosing to ignore them. Regardless, I said I'm fine leaving it to whomever closes this. So I'd appreciate it if we just left it there. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:26, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- I put the cc-by-4.0 template and that's sufficient. I could have added Template:FoP-Belgium (as some people simply add to my pictures when they feel a clarification is preferred, feel free to do so, it would not bother anyone) but I didn't and I don't think that is required. Freedom of panorama applies to the public space and almost anything permanent requires approval (a permit) from the local administration, so it is safe to assume that the work is officially permitted (aka "lawfully published") and we don't need to assume guilty until proven otherwise and start our own inquisition on everything that freedom of panorama stands for. --Trougnouf (talk) 15:10, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- It is actually the uploader's job to provide the proper licensing information. Sure, you gave your opinion about it here after the fact, but none of that was provided in the descriptions of the files you uploaded. Let alone did provide any factual information about it outside of speculation anywhere either. And 100% should have. Especially if you going to treat me like this whole was a waste of time on my end. People tend to nominate files for deletion if or when the uploader wrongly licenses something as their own work and then doesn't clarify it anywhere. That's just how this works. Sorry, but aren't here to do research or document how something is licensed on behalf of uploaders just because they can't be bothered to for whatever reason. It's your responsibility to make sure the files you upload are properly documented, sourced, attributed, and licensed. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:03, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed it's not your job. It's not ours either. See my comment above for an uploader's take on your request. --Trougnouf (talk) 14:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- I still disagree that it's a clear statement that everything is above with the mural, but I'm fine leaving it up to the closing admin to decide. That said, even if if correct none of that information was provided in the file descriptions. So the only waste of time here, if there is any, is on the people who decided to upload the images without proper attribution. It's not on me, or anyone else on here, if someone uploads an image of something they didn't create as their own work and without providing a link to the proper license. So spare me the snide comments and it take up the uploaders next time if you really care that much about it. It's not my job to parse through a bunch of random websites to figure out how something is licensed. --Adamant1 (talk) 14:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, you will find here in French, or here in English compelling evidences that all those comics mural painting are an official command of the City of Brussels, as indicated on their own website: The City of Brussels pays special attention to the comic book. Since the early 90s, it pays tribute to characters and authors of the Franco-Belgian comics on the walls in the Pentagon (city center) and Laeken. These murals are part of a larger project called Comic Strip Trail, organized by the City itself in coordination with right-holders. Now, please stop wasting everybody's time and let's move on. Greetings. M0tty (talk) 14:00, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- @PaterMcFly: Both of you seem to be misunderstanding why I nominated the images for deletion. This has nothing to do with FOP or FOP laws in Belgium. It has to do with the fact that Tintin is a copyrighted work and there's no evidence that the artist of this mural retained the rights from Hergé or his family members to reproduce it publicly or otherwise. Just like say there can generally be FOP in Belgium, but that doesn't mean I (or anyone else) can create a mural of characters from Star Wars without obtaining permission from Disney first and then upload an image of said mural to Commons as PD "because FOP." That's not how it works with derivatives. See Commons:Derivative works "if the underlying work is still copyright protected, the original copyright holder must also license the underlying work for reuse." --Adamant1 (talk) 11:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- It's obvious neither one of you think it's on uploaders to do the basics, that's fine. But this is just going to be the result of your compliancy and unwillingness to do things properly. Either do things the correct way from the start, or just make your case and move on next time. Otherwise just don't upload images to Commons. It's not that difficult to properly license and document a work though. Your the only ones turning this into a problem by not just doing it to begin with. Now can we please end it there and stop beating the dead horse? --Adamant1 (talk) 15:57, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- With your understanding, we would need to completely revisit the way commons handles FOP. We currently assume that when something is publicly displayed, we can take a picture and reuse it for whatever purposes. We do not, and that is the point, need to check under what conditions the object was placed in public, we do not even need to know its author/painter/artist. If I buy a sculpture of a contemporary artist, I own that sculpture but not it's copyright, but I can still place it in my frontyard, for others to see and take pictures of. If you want to challenge that view of how FOP works, I think this is the wrong place to do it, as this would need a larger community consensus and a statement from the wikimedia board. PaterMcFly (talk) 16:19, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- That's how it works with normal sculptures. We're talking about a derivative mural of otherwise copyrighted cartoon characters that wasn't created by the original artist and that we don't know the copyright status of here though. I can't just display an otherwise copyrighted movie poster in my front yard and let other people take photographs of it that they base reproductions of the original poster on without permission from the original artist. That's not how FOP works. "Well, my neighbor scanned the Star Wars poster in my front yard and FOP. So whatever! It should be fine." It's a different thing when we are talking about a derivative of a derivative of something that's copyrighted where we don't even know the chain of permission outside of the uploader claiming it's their own mural that they created when it obviously isn't. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:26, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- That's how it works with normal sculptures. We're talking about a derivative mural of otherwise copyrighted cartoon characters that wasn't created by the original artist and that we don't know the copyright status of here though. I can't just display an otherwise copyrighted movie poster in my front yard and let other people take photographs of it that they base reproductions of the original poster on without permission from the original artist. That's not how FOP works. "Well, my neighbor scanned the Star Wars poster in my front yard and FOP. So whatever! It should be fine." It's a different thing when we are talking about a derivative of a derivative of something that's copyrighted where we don't even know the chain of permission outside of the uploader claiming it's their own mural that they created when it obviously isn't. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:26, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
| Misc request for deletion by IP |
|---|
| You may delete this single file File:Cartoon auf einer Hausfassade in Brüssel (Belgien) 5.jpg - best regards, --2003:ED:D708:759F:41B3:4A6D:AEDE:CC60 18:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC) |
I've posted Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Adamant1 since I find their behavior problematic and there have been previous issues specifically with regards to FoP content in Belgium (Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems/Archive_112#Adamant1). These issues should have stopped then and yet here we are and they threatened to do it again. --Trougnouf (talk) 23:14, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Adamant, these are clearly allowed by FOP in Belgium, the photographs are taken in the environment, and the mural is not separated from its surroundings. As mentioned above, evidence suggests this mural was created with the consent of the copyright holder. Abzeronow (talk) 23:21, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Abzeronow: What evidence? The copyright is still held by Herges estate and no one in this DR has provided any evidence that the artist has the rights to re-create the characters. The only thing we do have is a photograph of the mural on some website. There's nothing on that website saying they created the mural or that the artist did it as an employee of theirs and with the proper license though. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:25, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm not going to close this because I'm not expert enough on Belgian copyright law, but if I understand correctly these should be fine if they are shown in context and not OK if they are cropped to just Hergé's copyrighted work. I do want to remark on one point: it seems highly probable that Hergé's estate authorized these works. Looking at https://www.tintin.com/en/news/5731/walking-around-brussels-with-tintin, it's pretty difficult to imagine his estate having ignored or tolerated a copyright violation on this scale. Some of the works even include his signature and or an explicit copyright notice worked into the piece, although admittedly this one doesn't. But I think if the rationale to delete these is based on the possibility that the mural might be an unauthorized derivative work, there is so much circumstantial evidence to the contrary that (contrary to the usual case) there would need at least some evidence of that being the case, not just the fact that it is imaginable. (And, please, if you've already said something above, no need to reiterate it in response to me. Yes, I know not everyone is in agreement.) - Jmabel ! talk 05:26, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: Just to ask a question if you'll allow me, but where does your idea that TinTin.com is or has anything to do with Herges estate come from? Because from what I read it sounds like they have the exclusive rights to republish his works but the copyright is still owned by his family or whomever handles it on their behelf. I assume that wouldn't be TinTin.com though. Since republishing rights and actually owning the original copyright are two seperate things. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:35, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't say that at all. It simply documents that there is an enormous amount of Hergé's copyrighted work in public spaces in Brussels and, as I said, it's pretty difficult to imagine his estate having ignored or tolerated a copyright violation on this scale. Is it imaginable that one particular work was unauthorized? Yes. Is it likely? In my opinion, no. - Jmabel ! talk 05:41, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- You make a fair point and it's one I don't necessarily disagree with. It's unfortunate our coworkers above decided to make it personal and beat a dead horse about it instead of just making a similar one. Otherwise I probably would have just retracted this about 10 messages ago. Oh well. Better just to throw around insults and report the nominator to ANU then make actual points I guess. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:54, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't say that at all. It simply documents that there is an enormous amount of Hergé's copyrighted work in public spaces in Brussels and, as I said, it's pretty difficult to imagine his estate having ignored or tolerated a copyright violation on this scale. Is it imaginable that one particular work was unauthorized? Yes. Is it likely? In my opinion, no. - Jmabel ! talk 05:41, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: Just to ask a question if you'll allow me, but where does your idea that TinTin.com is or has anything to do with Herges estate come from? Because from what I read it sounds like they have the exclusive rights to republish his works but the copyright is still owned by his family or whomever handles it on their behelf. I assume that wouldn't be TinTin.com though. Since republishing rights and actually owning the original copyright are two seperate things. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:35, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
| Misc request for deletion by IP |
|---|
|
- Leaning keep. It seems to be a reasonable assumption that the government had the copyright owners' permission to reproduce the work in public as a mural (COM:MURAL), similar to when they place a statue or another permanent piece of art. Thus, FOP is allowed. BTW it seems like Tintin copyrights are taken copyright seriously by Tintinimaginatio based in Brussels, and I imagine if the murals were egregious copyright violations they would be investigated and removed. Consigned (talk) 17:27, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: the overwhelming consensus below is that this work was done by consulting the copyright holder and is therefore not a copyright violation. There is no "significant doubt" per COM:PCP. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 05:24, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unsyndicated Truth (talk) 06:49, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 08:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, self promotional image; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 08:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 08:58, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete unrecognizable as a penis Dronebogus (talk) 06:16, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by nonnotable youtuber; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:58, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:00, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:14, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:00, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
personal bio, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:01, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:02, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PHANTOMLOCKED (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside wikidata, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:17, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No references found for this company. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:21, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:17, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:19, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Self-nomination. Amateur translation from Romanian, untrustworthy diagram. Gikü (talk) 16:19, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:23, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:24, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:24, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Captaain cool (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:25, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:26, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, self promotional image; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by nonnotable youtuber; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:32, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:31, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yahya eddahbi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope
- File:صوؤة شخصية.jpg
- File:GcamIndo 20240611 210521 8.4.300.PORTRAIT.jpg
- File:GcamIndo 20240710 163838 8.4.300.PORTRAIT.jpg
--Alaa :)..! 16:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:31, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by nonnotable youtuber; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:35, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:32, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:37, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:32, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused image/text; looks like a confused attempt to add an infobox to a kowiki draft. Omphalographer (talk) 17:25, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:25, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Unused promotional image/advertising, out of scope, and redundant to the original File:2-Eganville-Cephalopod-Fossil.jpg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:17, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:33, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Low resolution JPG ({{BadJPG}}); the difference between single bonds and double bonds is not even discernable. There are high quality alternatives in Category:Thiamine that should be used instead. Marbletan (talk) 18:50, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as definitely undecipherable. Also the bond from the central CH2 headed down and to the right is not going to the correct site on that lower-right ring. DMacks (talk) 13:19, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Double Pee (talk · contribs)
[edit]Non-notable, uploaded for promotional purposes: en:User_talk:Double_Pee
- File:Double pee15.jpg
- File:Double pee14.jpg
- File:Doublepee 10.JPG
- File:Double pee 13.jpg
- File:Double pee 12.jpg
- File:Double pee11.jpg
- File:Double pee 9.JPG
- File:Double pee 8.JPG
- File:Double pee 7.JPG
- File:Double pee 6.JPG
- File:Dp2.jpg
- File:Double pee4.JPG
- File:Double pee 5.JPG
- File:Doublepee3.jpg
- File:Double pee2.jpg
- File:Double pee1.jpg
Nutshinou Talk! 19:33, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:35, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep used in user page--90.165.115.131 21:23, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: In use Lymantria (talk) 15:15, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal selfie for non-contributor Nutshinou Talk! 19:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- More than a selfie I see a collage, an OOS collage. DELETE anyways. 186.174.114.142 21:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
very bad quality, very low resolution, better file Painted crucifix by Master Guglielmo (Sarzana) Oursana (talk) 20:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Ok, superseeded by this file --Sailko (talk) 13:29, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Morocco.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:26, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Ugly COM:PENIS 186.174.114.142 21:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Another ugly COM:PENIS 186.174.114.142 21:08, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 00:47, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:39, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
unused logo, possibly promo. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 21:43, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thinkbigtechberry (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:36, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:41, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BenjamínNp (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, self promotional images; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:41, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:41, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Is it alright? 186.174.114.142 23:22, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation. Movie screenshot. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Is this OK? 186.174.114.142 23:23, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation. Movie screenshot. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Das Logo ist nicht mehr aktuell Schluetersche (talk) 10:37, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, we keep historic logos. If necessary, upload the new logo as a separate file. --Rosenzweig τ 08:46, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
I previously requested the removal of an upload due to personal information concerns. However, the deletion/editing process has resulted in more pages on the site containing my name. Therefore, I kindly ask if you could either delete the file along with any associated sub-pages containing my name, or remove my name from all pages, URLs, filenames, etc. My information is still discoverable through search engines, which I would like it not to be Thank you 217.76.14.147 17:48, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Procedural close. Active DR for this image already at (redacted name). --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:05, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
I previously requested the removal of this upload due to personal information concerns. However, the deletion/editing process has resulted in more pages on the site containing my name. Therefore, I kindly ask if you could either delete the file along with any associated sub-pages containing my name, or remove my name from all pages, URLs, filenames, etc. My information is still discoverable through search engines, which I would like to avoid. Thank you for your assistance. 217.76.14.147 08:04, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
I previously requested the removal of an upload due to personal information concerns. However, the deletion/editing process has resulted in more pages on the site containing my name. Therefore, I kindly ask if you could either delete the file along with any associated sub-pages containing my name, or remove my name from all pages, URLs, filenames, etc. My information is still discoverable through search engines, which I would like it not to be Thank you 141.196.56.203 15:18, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Procedural Kept. The only issue is apparently the former user name; previous deletion request discussion with that visible has been deleted. (If any other pages on Wikimedia with the name visible still exist, please contact an admin or COM:VRT so it can be deleted or hidden.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:56, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
someone uploaded this image using a bot and the image seems to have little educational value — billinghurst sDrewth 02:47, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Magnus Manske's bot is fine - it used to be part of the Commons:Flickr2Commons upload workflow - but this photo is an unremarkable, poorly lit photo of someone's computer desk. I can't imagine any use for it. Omphalographer (talk) 04:26, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:42, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
because the name used does not suit me. Philippeson Juste (talk) 06:46, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete no use to anyone but themself. Jonteemil (talk) 15:23, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know how this works, I really need help to delete this file. If you can help me, I would be grateful. 152.207.111.65 16:14, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Speedy delete, and I kindly ask uploader Philippeson Juste to think twice before uploading useless selfies ever again. RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:19, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:Pi.1415926535. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:43, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 06:40, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
This flag is low quality. ErrrrrWhat (talk) 05:03, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. This is indeed an awful autotraced SVG, but it's the image we have. A higher quality alternative would be appreciated. Omphalographer (talk) 07:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Low quality is a reason to improve, not delete, especially when an alternate image is not available. —Tcr25 (talk) 20:09, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:59, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Letter was written after DJT was out of office, therefore I believe it falls outside of PD-US, even if he uses presidential title and insignia Packer1028 (talk) 06:22, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:00, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and this statue was created in 2022. So the image should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 12:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:01, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Copyright Gettyimages? Wouter (talk) 13:55, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:02, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP US. This photo was taken in the United States and the subject is based on the copyrighted Japanese character Hello Kitty. IDCM (talk) 15:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:04, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope - COM:PORN Mazbel (Talk) 01:53, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. 186.173.192.149 02:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- This person is using an IP address from Chile, which is the same country of @Mazbel If true, this is a sock-puppet. Please let Wikimedia users give their input instead of faking it. Thanks. Miguel Angel Omaña Rojas (talk) 02:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- No sea mal educado. En Chile, ahora, con las invasiones inmigratorias viven casi 20 millones de personas. Yo soy una de ellas y no soy Mazbel. Cuando siente ganas de insultar, use su teléfono móvil, la cámara en modo reverso le servirá como espejo. Regards. 186.173.192.149 02:57, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- No insult was made. Please read again my comment. Miguel Angel Omaña Rojas (talk) 04:28, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- No sea mal educado. En Chile, ahora, con las invasiones inmigratorias viven casi 20 millones de personas. Yo soy una de ellas y no soy Mazbel. Cuando siente ganas de insultar, use su teléfono móvil, la cámara en modo reverso le servirá como espejo. Regards. 186.173.192.149 02:57, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- This person is using an IP address from Chile, which is the same country of @Mazbel If true, this is a sock-puppet. Please let Wikimedia users give their input instead of faking it. Thanks. Miguel Angel Omaña Rojas (talk) 02:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Like I’ve said in my other images that portray sex education —- which have been attampted to be unsuccessfully deleted, btw —- if this depiction does not suit Wikimedia Commons, then all sex education images should be deleted. And yet @Mazbel is not doing so.
- The latter brings me to the typical bias in Wikimedia (by many but certainly not all users) where certain images are kept while others are deleted. This image, with consent, as a photographer and artist, shows interracial oral intercourse. I’ve expressed, over and over, about the importance of depicting ethnic and national diversity in Wikimedia and Wikipages. This is explained in the description, but probably @Mazbel didn’t read it, since the deletion request was tagged by this user almost a couple of seconds after I uploaded it. (Really, you can check the records).
- So, this isn’t my first rodeo, I tend to get delete requests when it comes to my sex education contributions or my indigenous images. But also, Wikimedia users know my work and how I treat contributions with a respectful and encyclopedic tone. And if not, you can check my contributions to the Wikimedia project.Miguel Angel Omaña Rojas (talk) 02:10, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment @Miguel Angel Omaña Rojas: First of all, making comments/accusations of that kind (Special:PermanentLink/900225256) I think it is not appropriate and even less if you lack evidence. If you believe that the above edition of the IP, corresponds to an edition of my account, feel free to file a request here COM:RFCU .- As a second point, you mention that you have authorization/consent to upload the image, could you please provide that? Also, you mention being the photographer, where is the EXIF data delivered by the camera? As a source, you mention that it is your own creation, so I would think you would have no objection to share more information. Best regards.--Mazbel (Talk) 02:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- I will. It is strange that you've not mentioned the topic I brought, which was that all sex education images should be deleted according to your swift out-of-scope deletion reasoning. Your reasoning was COM:PORN and hence my replied was not addressed. Which is the topic of this deletion thread. Miguel Angel Omaña Rojas (talk) 04:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 00:47, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. LevandeMänniska (talk), 16:56, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete probably stolen; there is evidence that the user is a sockpuppeteer so I wouldn’t be surprised if they’re engaging in other unethical behaviors. Dronebogus (talk) 20:12, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Side Note
[edit]
Is the title of the file in Danish? Migüelito, cuantas idiomas habla Vd?! (Si no habla danes, podemos suponer que el archivo es originario de Dinamarca? ;) 186.172.83.68 09:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:24, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
大学バレーボールのパンフレットだと思われますが、「写真提供 月間バレーボール」とあるため、パンフレット制作者並びに月間バレーボールの著作権を侵害しているものと考えられます 2400:4151:4A0:2500:C9CA:9396:249C:A9C2 00:09, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The uploader appears to be the subject. The subject does not inherently own copyright. Agree with nom that this appears to be a corporate work, not theirs. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 07:00, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
The image is not showing RegionVisitor90 (talk) 12:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:36, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
The image is missing RegionVisitor90 (talk) 12:08, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Uhm, it's displaying fine for me. —Tcr25 (talk) 14:55, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:36, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Goulven Jaouen
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and the creator of these sculptures, Goulven Jaouen, is either still alive or hasn't been dead for more then 70 years since they were all created in the 2010s. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.
- File:Carnoët - Vallée des Saints - Saint Aubert - Sant Aoperzh.jpg
- File:Carnoët - Vallée des Saints - Sainte Erell.jpg
- File:Jacut ou Yagu.jpg
- File:Jorand ou Yorand.jpg
- File:Nonne - plan général.jpg
- File:Nonne.jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582275196).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582305471).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582313326).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582616071).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582623616).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582700546).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582726201).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582733536).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582751671).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582804777).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582845307).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582851607).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582877207).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582881001).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582896147).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582962862).jpg
_Brittany_(48582275196).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582305471).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582313326).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582616071).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582623616).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582700546).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582726201).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582733536).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582751671).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582804777).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582845307).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582851607).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582877207).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582881001).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582896147).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582962862).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 12:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:36, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Reverse conditioning (talk · contribs)
[edit]probably not own work, there are so many quite different tracks in these long-duration files; e.g. 11:11 of File:Sessio3.wav; the two images seem to only be ads
- File:Sessio3.wav
- File:Sessio2.wav
- File:Upload kid 512px.png
- File:Upload kid.png
- File:Sample session.wav
- File:Sessio random.wav
- File:23 sessio.wav
- File:17-sessio.wav
- File:17sessio.wav
- File:20 sessio.wav
- File:17 sessio.wav
- File:13 sessio.wav
- File:Sessio 12.wav
- File:6 sessio.wav
- File:Sessio6.wav
- File:Sessio5.wav
- File:Sessio1.wav
- File:Sessio 1.wav
- File:Sessio 15.wav
- File:Sessio18.wav
- File:Sessio19.wav
- File:Sessio21.wav
- File:Sessio22.wav
- File:Sessio23.wav
- File:Sessio 13.wav
- File:Sessio 30.wav
- File:Sessio 28.wav
- File:Sessio 29.wav
- File:Sessio 6.wav
- File:Sessio 5.wav
- File:Sessions 14.wav
- File:Sessio 10.wav
- File:Sessio 8.wav
- File:Sessio 9.wav
- File:Sessio 4.wav
- File:Sessio 7.wav
- File:Sessio 3.wav
- File:Sessio 2.wav
- File:Sessio 14.wav
- File:Sessio 24.wav
- File:Sessio 25.wav
- File:Sesio 1.wav
- File:Sessio 23.wav
- File:Sessio 22.wav
- File:Sessio 21.wav
- File:Sessio 20.wav
- File:Sessio 19.wav
- File:Sessio 18.wav
- File:Sessio 17.wav
- File:Sessio 16.wav
- File:Sessio 1 v.1.2.wav
Prototyperspective (talk) 12:47, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:35, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Reverse conditioning (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely copyvio: additional extremely long music recordings with no meaningful descriptions, almost certainly not all own work.
- File:Sessio 11.wav
- File:Sessio7.wav
- File:Session7.wav
- File:Session 6.wav
- File:Session6.wav
- File:Session5.wav
- File:Session4.wav
- File:Sessio4.wav
Omphalographer (talk) 01:56, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Prototyperspective (talk) 20:28, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 03:01, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Files in Category:Patrice Le Guen
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and the artist of these sculptures, Patrice Le Guen, is either still alive or hasn't been dead for more then 70 years since they were created in the 2010s. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO.
- File:083 Carnoët.jpg
- File:2048 IMG 4143nBW.jpg
- File:Azenor.jpg
- File:Henri de Lacaze-Duthiers - Statue à Roscoff.jpg
- File:Idy (1).jpg
- File:La Vallée des Saints - statues Carnoët 01.JPG
- File:La Vallée des Saints - statues Carnoët 02.JPG
- File:La Vallée des Saints - statues Carnoët 24.JPG
- File:Pêcheuse kerhorre.jpg
- File:Saint malo statue vallee des saints.jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582387831).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582437837).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582440322).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582445786).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582502571).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582531302).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582596922).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582605011).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582605927).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582609822).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582614097).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582660322).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582741386).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582762186).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582835931).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582849106).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582884787).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48583036192).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582387831).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582437837).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582440322).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582445786).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582502571).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582531302).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582596922).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582605011).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582605927).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582609822).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582614097).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582660322).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582741386).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582762186).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582835931).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582849106).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582884787).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48583036192).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 13:20, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- La photo File/083 Carnoët.jpg a pour thème principal le tumulus, les statues n'y sont qu'accessoires.̴̴̴̴̴̴
- ̴ Henri MOREAU 03:15, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:37, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Asturhispano (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:NETCOPYVIO Cropped from https://www.dendecaguelu.com/2017/02/iglesia-de-san-pedro-apostol-en.html
- File:Parroquia de San Pedro Apóstol (Valencia de Don Juan)-8.jpg
- File:Parroquia de San Pedro Apóstol (Valencia de Don Juan)-7.jpg
- File:Parroquia de San Pedro Apóstol (Valencia de Don Juan)-6.jpg
- File:Parroquia de San Pedro Apóstol (Valencia de Don Juan)-4.jpg
- File:Parroquia de San Pedro Apóstol (Valencia de Don Juan)-5.jpg
- File:Parroquia de San Pedro Apóstol (Valencia de Don Juan)-2.jpg
- File:Parroquia de San Pedro Apóstol (Valencia de Don Juan)-3.jpg
- File:Parroquia de San Pedro Apóstol (Valencia de Don Juan)-1.jpg
-8.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-7.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-6.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
LMLM (talk) 07:28, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:22, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Asturhispano (talk · contribs)
[edit]User with bad history, small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Nuestro Padre Jesús Nazareno (Oviedo).jpg
- File:Nuestro Padre Jesús de la Sentencia (Oviedo).jpg
- File:Santa Vera Cruz (Valencia de Don Juan).jpg
- File:Bendito Cristo de Santa Marina-2.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 13:23, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:37, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and the creator of this sculpture, René-Albert Baucour, died in 1969. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2039.
- File:Parc Montsouris @ Paris (29527382854).jpg
- File:Parc Montsouris statue 6.JPG
- File:Parc Montsouris statue 8.JPG
- File:Paris 2012 - Un premier frisson by René Baucour (10).jpg
- File:Paris 2012 - Un premier frisson by René Baucour (11).jpg
- File:Paris 2012 - Un premier frisson by René Baucour (2).jpg
- File:Paris 2012 - Un premier frisson by René Baucour (3).jpg
- File:Paris 2012 - Un premier frisson by René Baucour (4).jpg
- File:Paris 2012 - Un premier frisson by René Baucour (5).jpg
- File:Paris 2012 - Un premier frisson by René Baucour (6).jpg
- File:Paris 2012 - Un premier frisson by René Baucour (7).jpg
- File:Paris 2012 - Un premier frisson by René Baucour (8).jpg
- File:Paris 2012 - Un premier frisson by René Baucour (9).jpg
- File:Paris 2012 - Un premier frisson by René Baucour.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 13:46, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:38, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Le Buisson ardent (Böhmer)
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and the artist of this sculpture, Geneviève Böhmer, died in 2016. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2087.
- File:Lyon 3e - January 2016 (19).JPG
- File:Lyon 3e - Place Eugène Varlin - Le Buisson ardent, côté sud.jpg
- File:Rue Moncey (Lyon) - fontaine (buisson).jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_fontaine_(buisson).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 13:58, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:38, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Seenu Shanmugam
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and the artist of these sculptures, Seenu Shanmugam, isn't dead or at least hasn't been dead for more then 70 years since these were all created in the 2010s. So the images should be deleted as COPYVIO.
- File:Carnoët - Vallée des Saints - Ivy (1).jpg
- File:Carnoët - Vallée des Saints - Saint Kireg (1).jpg
- File:Carnoët - Vallée des Saints - Saint Maeog.jpg
- File:Carnoët - Vallée des Saints - Saint Winoc.jpg
- File:Sant Briac.jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582433546).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582454506).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582470691).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582473701).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582476431).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582494787).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582506216).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582518517).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582527272).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582568216).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582596301).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582656867).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582675826).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582679111).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582682826).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582721662).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582765232).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582814142).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582817287).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582833137).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582836392).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582866417).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (51269540283).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582433546).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582454506).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582470691).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582473701).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582476431).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582494787).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582506216).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582518517).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582527272).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582568216).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582596301).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582656867).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582675826).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582679111).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582682826).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582721662).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582765232).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582814142).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582817287).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582833137).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582836392).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582866417).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(51269540283).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 14:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:38, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, self promotional image; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:30, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:38, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Completely unsharp image. August (talk) 16:38, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:38, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
03.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and this stained glass window was created in the 1960s. So it's clearly copyrighted. Adamant1 (talk) 16:50, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
03.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:38, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
03.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Job Guével
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and the artist of these stained glass windows, Job Guével, died in 2000. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2071.
- File:Église de Sulniac (Vitraux)02.jpg
- File:Église de Sulniac (Vitraux)03.jpg
- File:Église de Sulniac (Vitraux)04.jpg
- File:Église de Sulniac (Vitraux)11.jpg
- File:Église Saint-Gorgon de Plovan (12).jpg
- File:Église Saint-Gorgon de Plovan (14).jpg
- File:Église Saint-Gorgon de Plovan (15).jpg
- File:Église Saint-Gorgon de Plovan (16).jpg
02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
04.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
11.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 04:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:38, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sandoval 12 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own works: small size, missing metadata or containing FBMD in metadata, user has a history of uploading copyvios.
- File:Complejo de El Alto.jpg
- File:Estadio Municipal de Laja.jpg
- File:Estadio Fabián Tintilay.jpg
- File:Dr. Aldo Bravo Monasterio Stadium 2.jpg
- File:Dr. Aldo Bravo Monasterio Stadium.jpg
- File:Enrique Giese Stadium 2.jpg
- File:Enrique Giese Stadium.jpg
- File:Hugo Zabala Stadium 2.jpg
- File:Hugo Zabala Stadium.jpg
- File:ESTADIO FABIÁN-TINTILAY 2.jpg
- File:ESTADIO FABIÁN-TINTILAY.jpg
- File:Estadio Los Andes Cosmos 79 1.jpg
- File:Estadio Municipal Carlos Villegas.jpg
- File:Estadio Los Andes Cosmos 79.jpg
- File:Estadio Hugo Zabala.jpg
- File:Estadio de Achacachi 1.jpg
- File:Complejo satelite El Alto.jpg
- File:Estadio de Achacachi.jpg
- File:Estadio Serafín Ferreira.jpg
- File:Estadio Departamental Víctor Agustín Ugarte.jpg
- File:Complejo Deportivo “Evo Morales Ayma”.jpg
- File:Luis Lastra.jpg
- File:Estadio Sucre de Surapata.jpg
- File:Municipal La Bombonera.jpg
- File:Municipal Bicentenario de Aiquile.jpg
- File:Manuel Flores estadio.jpg
- File:Municipal Distrito 6 "Virgen de Luján".jpg
- File:Municipal Villa 1.º de Mayo.jpg
- File:Samuel Vaca Jiménez.jpg
- File:Capitán José Angulo.jpg
- File:Lourdes de Yotala.jpg
- File:Edgar Peña.jpg
- File:Estadio municipal quillacollo.jpg
- File:Municipal de Shinahota.jpg
- File:Hernando Siles.jpg
- File:Evo Morales Ayma I.jpg
- File:Evo Morales Ayma II (Villa Pagador).jpg
- File:Municipal de El Alto (Villa Ingenio).jpg
- File:Municipal de San Julián.jpg
- File:IV Centenario.jpg
- File:Integración Bolivia.jpg
- File:Orlando Quiroga.jpg
- File:Irineo Pimentel Rojas.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
0x0a (talk) 17:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per the nominator. Clearly COPYVIO. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:26, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:39, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused AI-generated artwork (translated description: "a labyrinth of mirrors"). Omphalographer (talk) 19:01, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:39, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of two astronauts surrounded by bubbles of water and nonsense equipment. No educational use. Omphalographer (talk) 19:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:00, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:41, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of a hiker in a tropical forest. Probably uploaded as a spam vector (see description). Omphalographer (talk) 19:09, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete G10 as spam. Belbury (talk) 12:24, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:41, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded this image as part of a batch-upload from Flickr. This is out of scope and was not intended to be uploaded at the same time, also see ticket:2024071810011049. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:40, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as out of scope. Ankry (talk) 21:49, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:41, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Bruno Guyader
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and the artist of these sculptures, Bruno Guyader, seems to still be alive. So these images are copyrighted.
- File:Carnoët - Vallée des Saints - Saint Houardon (2).jpg
- File:Carnoët - Vallée des Saints - Saint Houardon.jpg
- File:Saint Pereg (Vallée des Saints).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582269746).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582410747).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582413462).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582582966).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582586216).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582709652).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582727167).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582797456).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582804516).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582948482).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582953912).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582956467).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582965802).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582269746).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582410747).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582413462).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582582966).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582586216).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582709652).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582727167).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582797456).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582804516).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582948482).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582953912).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582956467).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582965802).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 21:06, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:42, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Someone who should use Facebook 186.174.114.142 21:14, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. out of scope. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:42, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Vastseliina_rahvamaja.jpg is not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed.
I suspect the other two files are also not own works. Deletion per COM:PCP
- File:Vastseliina rahvamaja kollektiivid.jpg
- File:Ago Ruusi näituse avamine.jpg
- File:Vastseliina rahvamaja.jpg
Estopedist1 (talk) 21:17, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:46, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Olivier Lévêque
[edit]Unfortunately there's FOP in France and the artist of these statues, Olivier Lévêque, seems to still be alive. So these images are copyrighted.
- File:Carnoët - Vallée des Saints - Saint Eneour.jpg
- File:Carnoët - Vallée des Saints - Saint Thegonnec.jpg
- File:Carnoët - Vallée des Saints - Santig du (2).jpg
- File:Saint Tugdual (Vallée des Saints).jpg
- File:Saint Tugdual - Vallée des Saints.jpg
- File:Santig du statues-vallee des saints.JPG
- File:Symphorien.jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582337831).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582429807).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582521487).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582524427).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582556096).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582559741).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582593191).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582645086).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582649401).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582707216).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582746682).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582755157).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582801052).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582830016).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582859042).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582863172).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582870587).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582882406).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582937802).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582940842).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48583024522).jpg
- File:Trifin.jpeg
- File:Vallée des Saints 21.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582337831).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582429807).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582521487).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582524427).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582556096).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582559741).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582593191).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582645086).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582649401).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582707216).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582746682).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582755157).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582801052).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582830016).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582859042).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582863172).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582870587).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582882406).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582937802).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582940842).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48583024522).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 21:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:42, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
different sources. Not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed.
- File:Alexander Prior Portrait in Winspear.jpg
- File:Prior conducting Shostakovich.jpg
- File:Alex conducting the Estonian Radio Symphony Orchestra.jpg
- File:Alex with the Estonian Radio Symphony Orchestra.jpg
- File:Alex Conducting Mowgli.jpg
- File:ESO-Alex Prior-Charles Richard-Hamelin-20161029- ESK9630 2.jpg
- File:QSO Power and Glory Large-159.jpg
Estopedist1 (talk) 21:24, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:43, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed.
Estopedist1 (talk) 21:31, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:43, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Vivien Gamba
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and the artist of these sculptures, Vivien Gamba, seems to still be alive. So these images are copyrighted.
- File:Carnoët - Vallée des Saints - Saint Alain.jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582260566).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582271321).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582449832).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582691847).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582746186).jpg
_Brittany_(48582260566).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582271321).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582449832).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582691847).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582746186).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 21:39, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:42, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Unused file. Single (remaining) uploading by the user. No EXIF-data (or no satisfactory EXIF-data). Unlike that own work. Deletion per COM:PCP Estopedist1 (talk) 21:41, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:42, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:David Puech
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and the artist of these sculptures, David Puech, seems to still be alive. So these images are copyrighted.
- File:Hommage aux Carriers 1.jpg
- File:Hommage aux Carriers 2.jpg
- File:Saint Paul Aurélien.jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582517621).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582539081).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582691641).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582754656).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582759262).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582905032).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48583008277).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48583015517).jpg
_Brittany_(48582517621).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582539081).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582691641).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582754656).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582759262).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582905032).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48583008277).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48583015517).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 21:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:42, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
File:LUCASPROPHETES.jpeg and alikes
[edit]
- File:IMGLucasProphetes.jpeg
- File:IMG LucasProphetes2.jpeg
- File:Lucas Prophetes.jpeg
- File:Sobre o Lucas Prophetes.jpeg
- File:Photo LucasProphetes.jpeg
- File:IMG LucasProphetes.jpeg
Non notable person trying to use Wikipedia to promote himself. Stegop (talk) 21:58, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:46, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cyril Pouliquen
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and the artist of these sculptures, Cyril Pouliquen, seems to still be alive. So these images are copyrighted.
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582358776).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582362621).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582571686).jpg
- File:The Valley of the Saints La Vallée des Saints (Carnoët) Brittany (48582922752).jpg
_Brittany_(48582358776).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582362621).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582571686).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brittany_(48582922752).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 22:13, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:44, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Fictional and out of scope. No candidate by the name of "Bases" was the GOP nominee in the 1992 U.S. presidential election N Panama 84534 20:40, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:14, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and this stained glass window was created in 2004. So it's clearly copyrighted. Adamant1 (talk) 00:26, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment at the bottom of the glass itself we can read "Atelier André 2004" (deathdate unknown but can't be public domain before 2075). For reference, a similar picture can be found here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/8118630@N08/14325210598. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 13:09, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 13:03, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 10:21, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and perhaps a screenshot based on history of uploader. --Gbawden (talk) 13:56, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
It already exists in good quality (File:TV3 Baltics (2019).svg) and is used in several languages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dejelnieks (talk • contribs) 00:28, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:09, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
File:La Ruse de Miss Plumcake - scénario (résumé conforme à la vue) avec photogrammes - btv1b64024472 (1 of 3).jpg
[edit]_avec_photogrammes_-_btv1b64024472_(1_of_3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_avec_photogrammes_-_btv1b64024472_(1_of_3).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
- File:La Ruse de Miss Plumcake - scénario (résumé conforme à la vue) avec photogrammes - btv1b64024472 (1 of 3).jpg
- File:La Ruse de Miss Plumcake - scénario (résumé conforme à la vue) avec photogrammes - btv1b64024472 (2 of 3).jpg
- File:La Ruse de Miss Plumcake - scénario (résumé conforme à la vue) avec photogrammes - btv1b64024472 (3 of 3).jpg
_avec_photogrammes_-_btv1b64024472_(2_of_3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_avec_photogrammes_-_btv1b64024472_(3_of_3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
This is a French script by René Chavance (1879–1961), so it will not be in the public domain there until 2032. hinnk (talk) 01:36, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:10, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Not own work, copied from https://www.freiheit.org/sub-saharan-africa/hon-robert-kyagulanyi-ssentamu-bobi-wine-accepts-freedom-award-nomination Bremps... 02:40, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:15, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
per https://web.archive.org/web/20230729101459/https://www.flickr.com/people/simpleinsomnia/ , this flickr account specialized in "vintage found photographs" , so they're not uploader's own work, and provenance is likely "some unlabeled photo album that I got for $15 on ebay" or similar. DS (talk) 04:59, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Also File:Mt._Rushmore_under_construction_-_Flickr_-_simpleinsomnia.jpg and File:Fisherman eating "Pork and Beans" in a burned out forest - Flickr - simpleinsomnia.jpg and File:Two young men in costumes embracing.jpg and File:Man grabbing his chest.jpg and File:Family having a picnic in the woods (12596527935).jpg and File:View of Collins Street.jpg and File:Portrait of a Navajo woman (10490432575).jpg and File:Grumpy little boy sitting in a bucket (14213979376).jpg and File:African American woman in a fur coat walking down the sidewalk (16900511727).jpg, and others but it's late. DS (talk) 05:04, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- and File:Creepy bed frames sit in an empty room (16677234910).jpg and File:Cute baby with a hat (13591840163).jpg and File:Baby in a bassinet with a huge smile (10021525336).jpg and File:Performers in costume cabinet card 1 (13511755984).jpg and File:Ill woman recovers surrounded by flowers (13629817404).jpg and File:African American children pose in front of a barn wall (16822098645).jpg and File:Japanese soldier posing in front of a flag (12557312775).jpg and File:Man welding (12730284643).jpg and File:Blurry little boy stands on a chair (13894119989).jpg. DS (talk) 14:06, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:18, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unsyndicated Truth (talk) 06:49, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I have assessed these last three images as in scope in my DRs from 24 November 2011. They show young Dutch people during a video filming, IMHO in scope. --Ras67 (talk) 10:59, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- It's just only a promotional image, bad quality, no educational purpose. 14.102.58.186 01:34, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and likely not own work but screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:20, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unsyndicated Truth (talk) 06:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I have assessed these last three images as in scope in my DRs from 24 November 2011. They show young Dutch people during a video filming, IMHO in scope. --Ras67 (talk) 10:58, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- It's just only a promotional image, bad quality, no educational purpose. 14.102.58.186 01:35, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and likely not own work but screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:20, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unsyndicated Truth (talk) 06:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I have assessed these last three images as in scope in my DRs from 24 November 2011. They show young Dutch people during a video filming, IMHO in scope. --Ras67 (talk) 10:57, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- It's just only a promotional image, bad quality, no educational purpose. 14.102.58.186 01:35, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and likely not own work but screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:20, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
requested by own user; uploaded by mistake Estevoaei (talk) 06:55, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
requested by own user; uploaded by mistake Estevoaei (talk) 06:55, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:19, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 09:42, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- 先前已移除FOP模板，仍不适合？ Hualin~希望の星は青霄に昇る Talk 13:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- 而且不适合的DW走F3较快？ Hualin~希望の星は青霄に昇る Talk 13:11, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- @HualinXMN This poster cannot use a {{FoP-China}}, Genshin, HSR and ZZZ characters is copyright-protected, If so de minimis, can use a {{De minimis}} templates. メイド理世 (talk) 16:30, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Deployed,can check Pls.Hualin~希望の星は青霄に昇る Talk 16:44, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- 请参考COM:De minimis，相关角色在图片中的比例可能并不是微不足道的，相反可能是该图片的主要部分或是说主题。 Teetrition (talk) 03:28, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Deployed,can check Pls.Hualin~希望の星は青霄に昇る Talk 16:44, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- @HualinXMN This poster cannot use a {{FoP-China}}, Genshin, HSR and ZZZ characters is copyright-protected, If so de minimis, can use a {{De minimis}} templates. メイド理世 (talk) 16:30, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- 而且不适合的DW走F3较快？ Hualin~希望の星は青霄に昇る Talk 13:11, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The poster is the subject of the photo, so it can't be de minimis. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:22, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 09:43, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The characters are very evident, not de minimis, unless China has an unusual standard. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:08, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Egriselda López (left), Permanent Representative of El Salvador to the United Nations, presents her credentials to Secretary-General António Guterres.jpg
[edit],_Permanent_Representative_of_El_Salvador_to_the_United_Nations,_presents_her_credentials_to_Secretary-General_Ant%C3%B3nio_Guterres.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Permanent_Representative_of_El_Salvador_to_the_United_Nations,_presents_her_credentials_to_Secretary-General_Ant%C3%B3nio_Guterres.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
UN Photo, not uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 10:25, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
it was just an example and is no longer used! Politikundwirtschaft (talk) 10:42, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
The source shows this is a 1978 photo by Johnny Bitang for the Philippine newspaper Bulletin Today. There is no evidence for the stated CC0 license anywhere, and the photo could not be public domain in the Philippines, and probably not the U.S. We would need evidence that the photographer or copyright owner licensed the image. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:40, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
No evidence at source for stated license. Source is a listing for selling a copy of a postcard -- https://aucview.aucfan.com/yahoo/c1100968817/ -- so they would have no rights to license it anyways. It appears to be a 1966 Japanese postcard, which may qualify for {{PD-Japan}}. However, it would have been under copyright on the URAA date, so unless this was simultaneously published (within 30 days) in the U.S., it would be under U.S. copyright until 2062. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:48, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:33, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The source is http://www.wakanatsu.com/photo/ferryakebono.html . The uploader is claiming they took the photo ("own work"); this seems unlikely. However even if true, it was published on the internet before the upload here, so we would need to follow the COM:VRT procedure to get emailed confirmation of the license from the copyright holder. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:54, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:33, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Worse quality duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WarwickLogo.png (as Warwick_logo actually has a non-transparent background). domdomegg (talk) 15:45, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mazbel as Copyvio (db-copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: help=off can't find evidence of copyvio but looks to be not COM:INUSE and out of COM:SCOPE. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 15:49, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:26, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Imgbin-mutawakkilite-kingdom-of-yemen-nordjemen-yemen-arab-republic-imams-of-yemen-emblem-of-yemen-others-ydbuu8ML2xFP6uPEqbEvAieGi.jpg
[edit]
A lower quality version of File:Coat of arms of Yemen 1962.svg uploaded after the original photo was posted, seemingly taken off Imgbin, and with a fake transparent background. The file is useless. Wheatley2 (talk) 19:39, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Already published on this artist's Facebook page with a way better quality. It is doubtful uploader is the real photographer. Probably not free: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=545552904242833&set=a.283042893827170 Titlutin (talk) 20:31, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Image is sourced from Natalie; no sign of image license listed on the website 2601:645:E85:1FE0:8143:F67B:63D9:549D 20:43, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:28, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
From IMDB 186.174.114.142 22:13, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:28, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely own work. Jean-Jacques Jelot-Blanc appears on the photo, so he didn't take the picture (photographers are the default copyright holders). Also it was uploaded in 2016 (the sole contribution from the user), but it was already available on the web in 2013, 2014 and 2015. We need a COM:VRT ticket to keep this image. Günther Frager (talk) 22:50, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:29, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by أحمد أبو عباس as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10; in use though subject to speedy deletion at wiki; poking it away for review through DR — billinghurst sDrewth 23:40, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, no longer in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:31, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
This is an no known flag UTATraxRide (talk) 13:19, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: In use and properly sourced. --Achim55 (talk) 16:13, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: It is no longer in use - I've removed it - and the source clearly indicates that this isn't an officially adopted flag. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:10, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- It's still in use at Flags of counties and municipalities in Wisconsin. Jonteemil (talk) 20:20, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no longer in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:31, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Palais du Peuple (Kinshasa). The building is the only interesting subject here, hence not de minimis. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Regards, Aafi (talk) 08:57, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and this stained glass windows were created in 2007. So their clearly copyrighted.
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 00:28, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 12:31, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and these stained glass windows were created in 1991. So they are clearly copyrighted.
- File:Survilliers Saint-Martin 340.JPG
- File:Survilliers Saint-Martin 341.JPG
- File:Survilliers Saint-Martin 343.JPG
- File:Survilliers Saint-Martin Chor 355.JPG
Adamant1 (talk) 00:31, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment the author is apparently Florent Chaboissier (born in 1948 and still alive in 2024). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 12:36, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 12:34, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Vitraux de l'église de Locmaria
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and these stained glass windows were created in the 1980s. So their clearly copyrighted.
- File:Vitrail de l'église de Locmaria - les chapelles de Locmaria.JPG
- File:Vitrail de l'église de Locmaria - Marie et l'enfant.JPG
- File:Vitrail de l'église de Locmaria - Marie.JPG
- File:Vitrail de l'église de Locmaria Sainte Anne.JPG
Adamant1 (talk) 00:38, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment the glass are signed "F. Le Nezet", apparently this is Francis Le Nezet (born 30/11/1942 in Marseille and died 18/03/1993 in Bono). If true, the undeletion date would be 2064. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 12:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 12:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
1934 German bank note, possibly PD in Germany but would be subject to URAA. Abzeronow (talk) 21:56, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Similar to Commons:Deletion requests/File:1 marco1948.jpg, I doubt this would be protected in Germany (PD-ineligible). The text ist just formulaic legalese without any creativity, and the graphic elements are either just ornamental or in the PD for other reasons (the eagle from the German coa). I could see the ornaments being below COM:TOO US as well. --Rosenzweig τ 06:42, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I kept several similar files in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files with no license using PD-GermanGov-currency. --Rosenzweig τ 21:17, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Kept: as per Rosenzweig. --Yann (talk) 16:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/insource:"Giovanni Coruzzi"
[edit]Photos by Giovanni Coruzzi sourced from Bridgeman Images. The files have {{PD-Italy}}, but it is incorrect. Although the photographer name is Italian, the country of origin is France. These photos where taken between 1967 and 1976 in Paris (see description or source link). Several articles from the French newspaper Le Figaro credits him under the French image agencies AGIP/Rue des Archives [3] [4] and Leemage [5] [6]. Notice that Bridge Image acquired both porfolios [7][8]. The copyright protection in France is 70 years pma and therefore they are still protected in its country of origin.
- File:Yves Montand 1967.jpg
- File:Danielle et Georges Cravenne, 1969.jpg
- File:Philippe Bouvard, Michel Audiard, Marie-Paule Belle, Françoise Mallet-Joris, 1973.webp
- File:Alice Sapritch, Jacques Demy, Catherine Deneuve, 1973.jpg
- File:Alice Sapritch, 1973.jpg
- File:Philippe Bouvard 1973.jpg
- File:Jean Barthet, 1974.jpg
- File:Gilbert Bécaud, Charles Aznavour, Georges Garvarentz, Serge Lama, 1976.jpg
- File:Georges Garvarentz, 1976 (cropped).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Günther Frager (talk) 22:23, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Italy concerns all Italian photographers. Groupir ! (talk) 22:46, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter, COM:L requires works to be in the public domain in the country of origin, and that is not determined by the nationality of the author. Also, people with Italian names are not necessarily Italian. Chiara Mastroianni is the perfect example of a French national with an Italian name. Günther Frager (talk) 23:42, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Country of origin is both France and Italy and the rule of the shorter term placed these photos under public domain in the 90s. - Groupir ! (talk) 04:02, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- If you claim Italy is the country of origin, please provide the evidence these photos where first published in Italy. It would be also good you to read a bit of history before assigning nationality based on names, especially when referring to the extensive Italian diaspora. Günther Frager (talk) 06:57, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Born in Parma in 1928... Groupir ! (talk) 11:08, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- If you claim Italy is the country of origin, please provide the evidence these photos where first published in Italy. It would be also good you to read a bit of history before assigning nationality based on names, especially when referring to the extensive Italian diaspora. Günther Frager (talk) 06:57, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Country of origin is both France and Italy and the rule of the shorter term placed these photos under public domain in the 90s. - Groupir ! (talk) 04:02, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter, COM:L requires works to be in the public domain in the country of origin, and that is not determined by the nationality of the author. Also, people with Italian names are not necessarily Italian. Chiara Mastroianni is the perfect example of a French national with an Italian name. Günther Frager (talk) 23:42, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion, COM:PCP. No evidence at all provided that the country of origin for these photos is Italy and not France. Even if the photographer is Italian, that does not automatically the country of origin is Italy. --Rosenzweig τ 09:29, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and this stained glass window was created in 2001. So it's clearly copyrighted. Adamant1 (talk) 00:24, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment most likely Delete but
Wait for an answer from the uploader on User talk:Natureln just to be sure. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 12:29, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:56, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and these stained glass windows were created in 1991. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.
- File:Saint-Cado à Belz.jpg
- File:Vitrail de la chapelle de l'ile de st cado - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Vitrail de la chapelle de l'ile de st cado - panoramio.jpg
- File:Vitrail de la Chapelle de Saint-Cado (Belz) - 02.jpg
- File:W1015-Belz StCado StKado VitrailMerStCado 74187.JPG
- File:W1017-Belz StCado StKado VitrailTerreStGildas 74195.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 00:35, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:56, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hanbury Street, London
[edit]All of these images are of murals (not street art) that were created by known living artists and/or contain otherwise copyrighted characters and there's no FOP in the United Kingdom for 2D graphic works. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.
- File:"Follow the leader" By Fanakapan - Street Art. 2018. (38876439004).jpg
- File:"The New World Order is the Enemy of Humanity" artwork on Hanbury Street.jpg
- File:2015 Graffiti Des X.jpg
- File:2015 Graffiti Elvis.jpg
- File:2015 Graffiti IMG 3243.jpg
- File:2015 Graffiti IMG 3244.jpg
- File:2015 Graffiti IMG 3252.jpg
- File:2015-08-07 Hanbury1.jpg
- File:2015-08-07 Hanbury3.jpg
- File:2015-08-07 Hanbury4.jpg
- File:2015-08-07 Hanbury6.jpg
- File:2015-08-07 Hanbury7.jpg
- File:2015-08-07 Hanbury8.jpg
- File:Alex Face on Hanbury Street.jpg
- File:Alex Face, Hanbury Street 2013-11-02.jpg
- File:Alex Face, Hanbury Street.jpg
- File:Alex Senna in Shoreditch - 33660536292.jpg
- File:Alex Senna in Shoreditch.jpg
- File:Amara Por Dios, Shoreditch - 27401166987.jpg
- File:Amara Por Dios, Shoreditch - 28398834828.jpg
- File:Amara Por Dios, Shoreditch - 42225279882.jpg
- File:Amara Por Dios, Shoreditch.jpg
- File:Ant Carver Hanbury Street.jpg
- File:Beavis And Butt-Head Of Shorditch.jpg
- File:Blam (5841315395).jpg
- File:Caught in the Act, Hanbury Street.jpg
- File:Conor Harrington (4387827306).jpg
- File:Crane by Peter Roa on Hanbury Street (15233940302).jpg
- File:Deshfortex.jpg
- File:Dicing With Death.jpg
- File:Eelus - An Angel for Ruby (15211287436).jpg
- File:Face - 17123533201.jpg
- File:Face - 17123550101.jpg
- File:Fintan Magee - Fighting over the moon (15234308935).jpg
- File:Graffiti April 2014 IMG 0177.jpg
- File:Graffiti in Shoreditch, London - Bird eating Crane by Bon (11154114933).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Shoreditch, London - Churchill by Paul Don Smith (11154356593).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Shoreditch, London - Crane by Roa (9422244129).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Shoreditch, London - Elephant by Alexis Diaz (9422258885).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Shoreditch, London - Enio? and Milo Tchais (9425026194).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Shoreditch, London - Fighting Tigers by DALeast (9422229035).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Shoreditch, London - Firestuss by Paul Don Smith (9422227379).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Shoreditch, London - Flying Devils in Black by Unknown (9529859780).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Shoreditch, London - Hatred by Ben Slow (9422248989).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Shoreditch, London - Horse Power by Jonesy (11153903746).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Shoreditch, London - Jimi Hendrix by Paul Don Smith (9422260091).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Shoreditch, London - Johnny Cash by Paul Don Smith (9422227861).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Shoreditch, London - Nando Mambo Batman piece (9424994882).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Shoreditch, London - Poor Self Trait by Edwin and Jeavons (9424995868).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Shoreditch, London - Queen's Guard Handstand by Martin Ron (11153968585).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Shoreditch, London - Unknown on Hanbury Street (11154151914).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Shoreditch, London - Victorious Churchill by Paul Don Smith (11154302434).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Shoreditch, London - Warrior Woman by Kid Acne (9425025670).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Shoreditch, London - Words by Guy Denning (11154053746).jpg
- File:Graffiti, Hanbury Street - East London.jpg
- File:Guardian Angel Hanbury Street.jpg
- File:Guy Denning, Josh and Tempo33, Hanbury Street.jpg
- File:Hanbury Street - 21598800408.jpg
- File:Hanbury Street Graffiti.jpg
- File:Hanbury Street sign.jpg
- File:Hanbury Street street art.jpg
- File:Hanbury Street, London 2011-03-15.jpg
- File:Hanbury Street, London 2012-08-11.jpg
- File:Hanbury Street, London 29 April 2014.jpg
- File:Hanbury Street, London September 21, 2014.jpg
- File:Hanbury Street, Shoreditch.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 00:53, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:56, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Luxembourg, architect Christian Scholl died in 1957 A1Cafel (talk) 09:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah that is correct. Unless we are told otherwise at wmf:Resolution_talk:Licensing_policy we should do something about the files that are reported as poblematic. --MGA73 (talk) 14:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:56, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Venclauskis House
[edit]No FoP in Lithuania, architect Kārlis Reisons died in 1981
- File:Venclauskiai house in Šiauliai - panoramio.jpg
- File:Venclauskiu namai - panoramio.jpg
- File:Venclauskiu rumai.jpg
- File:Šiauliai, Lithuania - panoramio (1).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 09:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:55, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
This Catholic church was only completed in 2005 but Lithuania has no FOP sadly for modern buildings Leoboudv (talk) 19:39, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 23:43, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
No FoP in Lithuania, architect Kārlis Reisons died in 1981 A1Cafel (talk) 09:17, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:55, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Lithuania, architect Kārlis Reisons died in 1981 A1Cafel (talk) 09:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Overall 2/3 of the photo features not the Kaunas Carillon building, but other things (e.g. path, sky, clouds, trees, etc.), so possibly it can be kept even though there is no FoP in Lithuania because the carillon is just located in the centre of the photo, but it do not occupy more than 50% of the photo resolution (I think it is 25-30%). In Commons we keep photos of buildings even of countries where there is no FoP if the copyrighted buildings do not occupy the majority of the photos' content. -- Pofka (talk) 21:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete It's the subject of the photo. No chance for de minimis. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek, A1Cafel, and Martin Urbanec: Yes you are(?! :-( unfortunately) right. But wikipedians/commonsians concerned on Lithuania (together with other people of Lithuania) does not got such support as got those concerned on FoP in Belgium @ other West democracies (remember please blackout of Wikipedias before permitting FoPs in several countries!). Unfortunately, Lithuania didn't succeed do this in their parliament or elsewhere. This is not fair. Now all activism of those times is forgotten, in politics are other problems, who can help now resolve this problem for Lithuania?! No one. This is very, very unfair. --Kusurija (talk) 13:44, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:55, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Swedbank Head Office
[edit]No FoP in Lithuania, architect Audrius Ambrasas is still alive
- File:Limmeuble de la Swedbank (Vilnius) (7703028210).jpg
- File:Swedbank building in Vilnius (8602456677).jpg
- File:Swedbank Headquarters Vilnius.png
- File:Swedbank in Vilnius, Lithuania.jpg
- File:Swedbank ir laptai.JPG
- File:Пр.Конституции - panoramio.jpg
- File:Центральный офис"Swedbank" - panoramio.jpg
_(7703028210).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 09:26, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:55, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Maman (Beaufort02)
[edit]FOP in Belgium doesn't cover temporary works and the creator of this sculpture, Louise Bourgeois, died in 2010. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2081.
- File:Ensor's grave.JPG
- File:Duinenkerkje08.jpg
- File:Duinenkerkje09.jpg
- File:Spin - Beaufort 2006.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 14:27, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, per w:en:Maman (sculpture)#Temporary locations, this was temporarily exhibited in Oostende, Belgium, in 2006. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:24, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, temporary exhibit. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:55, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:55, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Sculpture by Georgian artist Zourab Tsereteli (b. 1934) installed in France where there is no freedom of panorama.
- File:Robert-Schuman Monument Scy-Chazelles (1).jpg
- File:Robert-Schuman Monument Scy-Chazelles (2).jpg
- File:Robert-Schuman Monument Scy-Chazelles.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Günther Frager (talk) 17:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:55, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tear Drop Memorial
[edit]Monument by Georgian artists Zurab Tsereteli (b. 1934) installed in New Jersey in 2006. Notice that the is no freedom of panorama for 3D works in the US.
Günther Frager (talk) 18:54, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:54, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Chronicle of Georgia
[edit]Monument by Zurab Tsereteli (b. 1934) installed in Tbilisi in 1985. Notice that there is no freedom of panorama in Georgia.
- File:2023-12-26 The Chronicle of Georgia 1.jpg
- File:2023-12-26 The Chronicle of Georgia 2.jpg
- File:2023-12-26 The Chronicle of Georgia 3.jpg
- File:2023-12-26 The Chronicle of Georgia 4.jpg
- File:2023-12-26 The Chronicle of Georgia 5.jpg
- File:2024-06-16 Chronicle of Georgia.jpg
- File:Tbilisi Stonehenge.JPG
- File:The Chronicle of Georgia front view.jpg
- File:The Chronicle of Georgia full.jpg
- File:The Chronicle of Georgia to the top 2.jpg
- File:The Chronicle of Georgia to the top.jpg
- File:The Chronicle of Georgia with man height 185cm.jpg
Günther Frager (talk) 19:01, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:54, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
COM:DW of non-free flag The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:06, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:14, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
(Assuming this is real), COM:DW of non-free flag The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:06, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:14, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
COM:DW of non-free flag The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:14, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and there's no reason these characters (temporary statues masks?) wouldn't be copyrighted. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.
- File:Carnaval de Chalon-sur-Saône de 1966 01.jpg
- File:Carnaval de Chalon-sur-Saône de 1966 02.jpg
- File:Carnaval de Chalon-sur-Saône de 1966 03.jpg
- File:Carnaval de Chalon-sur-Saône de 1966 04.jpg
- File:Carnaval de Chalon-sur-Saône de 1966 05.jpg
- File:Carnaval de Chalon-sur-Saône de 1966 06.jpg
- File:Carnaval de Chalon-sur-Saône de 1966 09.jpg
- File:Carnaval de Chalon-sur-Saône de 1966 10.jpg
- File:Carnaval de Chalon-sur-Saône de 1966 11.jpg
- File:Carnaval de Chalon-sur-Saône de 1966 12.jpg
- File:Carnaval de Chalon-sur-Saône de 1966 13.jpg
- File:Carnaval de Chalon-sur-Saône de 1966 14.jpg
- File:Carnaval de Chalon-sur-Saône de 1966 15.jpg
- File:Carnaval de Chalon-sur-Saône de 1966 16.jpg
- File:Carnaval de Chalon-sur-Saône de 1966 17.jpg
- File:Carnaval de Chalon-sur-Saône de 1966 18.jpg
- File:Carnaval de Chalon-sur-Saône de 1966 19.jpg
- File:Carnaval de Chalon-sur-Saône de 1966 20.jpg
- File:Carnaval de Chalon-sur-Saône de 1966 22.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 12:06, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Il me semble évident qu il n'y a pas de droits d'auteurs sur un carnaval de 1966. Patrice78500 (talk) 13:16, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:14, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Constru-centro (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:51, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Constru-centro (talk · contribs)
[edit]Constru-centro previously nominated these files for deletion here, here, here, here, and here, resulting in them all being kept based on the assumption that CC licenses are irrevocable. But I don't think they wanted to revoke their licenses; rather, they wanted to say that they didn't own the copyright of the files in the first place.
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:Jackson live in Lisbon.jpg
- File:The ‘Rocket Man’ — Kinnie Gibson.jpg
- File:«Thriller» performance in 1992 (2).jpg
- File:«Thriller» performance in 1992.jpg
- File:Michael Jackson Dangerous World Tour 1993.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Prospectprospekt (talk) 03:48, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Interesting, there are zero reverse search results for all photos on TinEye or Google Lens prior to the Commons upload dates, so I would be curious where the photos originated if they are not actually 'Own work'. It is very possible these are copyvios, I just cannot find any evidence to suggest so. Also possible the uploader regrets choosing a CC license and wants to have the photos taken down as established. They are of good quality, so either is possible. PascalHD (talk) 22:21, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- These are obviously professional photos (in particular the one from the 1993 Dangerous Tour and the one of Kinnie Gibson, taken from the stage!), probably the works of Michael Jackson's then official photographer, Mr. Sam Emerson.[9]http://www.redboxphoto.biz/albums/music/
- Martin 31.190.47.45 16:15, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- If there's no evidence these photos were stolen, they should be kept. The uploader did not say they were not their own work, so I don't think we should be trying to read tea leaves. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:01, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- The evidence is that Sam Emerson was Michael Jackson's official photographer at the time and the only one who could get so close to the singer. It was impossible for a 1993 fan-camera to take such high quality photos. I wrote an email to Mr. Sam Emerson and am waiting for a response. I have included the link to this thread.
- P.S. the uploader wrote in other threads that he lied about the license. What else is needed to remove these images? MJJ-777 (talk) 18:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- In that case, nothing. Delete. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Agree. Delete MJJ-777 (talk) 16:10, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Agree.
- Did he respond yet? Wcamp9 (talk) 03:05, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- In that case, nothing.
Deleted: per discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 04:09, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Letter likely not licensed under listed terms. Packer1028 (talk) 06:28, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: I don't know how copyrightable simple correspondence is, but I'm not at all certain this is within scope. It seems to have been uploaded to make a point. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 15:14, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 09:41, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Plus, the image is part of a large collection of personal snapshots that are not educationally useful: Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful. Eric talk 12:55, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per IronGargoyle. Whatever else is part of the collection is irrelevant to this DR. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:05, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Eat Delete per nom. Queen of Hearts (talk) 02:22, 27 July 2024 (UTC)- Keep. The drawing of Colonel Sanders is the only thing which is copyrightable here (everything else is de minimis). The drawing is from 1954 and registered with the copyright office that year by Harland Sanders. It was not, however, renewed. This puts the image in the public domain per {{PD-US-not renewed}}. I also think that a well-photographed meal of one of the largest restaurant chains in the world would be in scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:49, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- However, a number of KFC logo involving Colonel Sanders' face was deleted--A1Cafel (talk) 09:04, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. Those images all seem to be different illustrations of Sanders which were not first produced in the 1950s. IronGargoyle (talk) 11:11, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- However, a number of KFC logo involving Colonel Sanders' face was deleted--A1Cafel (talk) 09:04, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 15:12, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
I am the author and I do not want this image to be linked to my nickname or name anymore. Furthermore, I do not want to share this image as an open source anymore. And the image is not being used anywhere in wikipedia. Araneus (talk) 12:20, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Useful historical artifact. I think it would be fine to revdel to eliminate evidence of authorship, but none of the reasons given above are actual deletion reasons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:11, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. If someone else wants to reupload citing anonymous release in the original licenses, feel free, but we should honor the author's request. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 15:23, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
COM:DW: Unknown source of the potrait of Aleksandar Vučić A1Cafel (talk) 13:30, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel found the source below. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 15:31, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
The character of Aleksandar Vučić was drawn, without a copy of someone else's photo or portrait. --Smiroje (talk) 16:36, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- This is clearly derived from this photograph from Getty Images Bastique ☎ let's talk! 15:30, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Smiroje: Files derived from a copyrighted material doesn't mean that you have earned the ownership of the file. It is still copyrighted. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:35, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Made from copyrighted photograph. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 15:35, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
The file is an inessential duplicate of File:Assassination attempt of Donald Trump diagram.svg, except Crooks is repositioned to be on the left side of the building. Aerial footage of the building shows that Crooks was on right side of the building (see File talk:Assassination attempt of Donald Trump diagram.svg#Shooter location is wrong apparently) Bambobee (talk) 14:08, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Dubious position of shooter puts the image out of scope as lacking educational value. In addition, image does not credit its source (claims own work but clearly derived from File:Assassination attempt of Donald Trump diagram.svg); Open Street Maps holds a CC-BY-SA-2.0 license to its map data, and BmboB should get at least moral rights for map details beyond OSM. Image is redundant given small variation from File:Assassination attempt of Donald Trump diagram.svg. Image is only used on talk page of File:Assassination attempt of Donald Trump diagram.svg for the purpose of proposing a change to that file. If a change in location is warranted, then it should be made to the original images. Glrx (talk) 19:25, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:03, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- Use of inaccurate diagram on es.Wiki replaced with the accurate version. File only in use on talk page of the accurate diagram. Glrx (talk) 14:35, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete No longer in use, hence concerns above take precedent. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 15:25, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Domdomegg as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: I don't think this logo is CC-BY-SA: see https://warwick.ac.uk/about/brand/brand-guidelines/logos/ domdomegg (talk) 15:46, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
I think this should probably be moved to Wikipedia instead, given its use as a logo there: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Upload/Uploadtext/en-nonfree-logo domdomegg (talk) 15:47, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Obviously above COM:TOO UK. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:12, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, meets COM:TOO UK. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 15:37, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
appears (and claimed) to be from vice news; linked article's image claims reuters credit on lead image, maybe this, but the image itself is no longer hosted there so cannot confirm. dubious copyright status https://tineye.com/search/523fcfc5a59f9586ac5977ddc97af3911acb3e90?sort=crawl_date&order=asc&page=1 Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:39, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 15:42, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
_portrait.png){kind=link}
_portrait.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not stated in the source that this (AI upscaled?) image of a person who died in 1974 and wasn't identified until 2022 was "published in the United States between 1929 and 1963". Certainly appears to have been taken before 1963, but it may not have been published publicly until 2022. en:File:RuthMarieTerry.webp considers the image to be copyrighted with 31 October 2022 as the date of publication. Belbury (talk) 18:27, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
_portrait.png){kind=link}
- Keep United States case law has ruled that an image is "made public", published in USCO legal terms, when it leaves the custody of the photographer. It does not mean solely reproduced in a newspaper or magazine, even though that is one way an image can be made public. See: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minerva Kohlhepp Teichert 1908.jpg for a discussion of the relevant case law. It is also not AI upscaled, it is just a larger image, with no increase in apparent resolution or smoothing of grain. --RAN (talk) 18:53, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- The Teichert discussion seems to say that if a photo was taken by a family member, it wouldn't be considered published. Do we know the provenance of this photo? Are we assuming from the aesthetic that she was sitting for a professional photographer with the possible view that its sale "probably constituted general publication"? The source web page only says
Courtesy of the FBI
. - I wondered if the {{PD-algorithm}} template meant that you'd used AI to upscale it from the first, smaller file version. Belbury (talk) 09:01, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- The Teichert discussion seems to say that if a photo was taken by a family member, it wouldn't be considered published. Do we know the provenance of this photo? Are we assuming from the aesthetic that she was sitting for a professional photographer with the possible view that its sale "probably constituted general publication"? The source web page only says
- I removed algorithm, I must have clicked the new tick box by accident when clicking creator=unknown. Stylistically it appears to be a commercial photograph circa 1955 to 1960 when this style was popular. The style was where the shoulders fade away. --RAN (talk) 18:04, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Clearly a commercial photograph, kept per discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 15:51, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
_portrait.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non-informative image, for me. MBH 19:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- These ar the high-quality welds in one of the pylons of the cableway. The esthetics of the pylons is only possible by the welds that hold them together (form follows function). I think, that you might understand that these are quite unusual, because if they were more commmon, we would see more cableways of this type all over the world. Not everybody can make welds of this type, although anyone can request that photos should be deleted. Please keep. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 20:47, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- OK, but it will be good if all of these be explained on image description and an image will be in a suitable categories (Welds etc.) Now I just don't understand what's on image. MBH 21:40, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, done. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 22:44, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per discussion above. MBH, are you satisfied, and would you like to withdraw the deletion request? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:15, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek Yes, you could keep the file. MBH 02:25, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- You can use the {{withdraw}} template. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek Yes, you could keep the file. MBH 02:25, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, done. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 22:44, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- OK, but it will be good if all of these be explained on image description and an image will be in a suitable categories (Welds etc.) Now I just don't understand what's on image. MBH 21:40, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Kept per discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 15:52, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Earliest archive that I could find on the Wayback Machine ([10]) shows that the file is under CC BY-ND 4.0 (Template:Noderivatives). SergioFLS (talk) 04:36, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- It looks like the uploader is the original person who licensed it. People are permitted to license their images with different licenses (for instance, Flickr doesn't allow anything past CC 2.0 but people can upload here with a 4.0 license), but we should probably make sure the uploader is, in fact the original person who created the image, and that should probably go through COM:VRT. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 15:09, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per Bastique, needs VRT. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:24, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Yvonne Chollet (1897-1945), member of the French Resistance, c. 1940 (Remini enhanced).jpg
[edit],_member_of_the_French_Resistance,_c._1940_(Remini_enhanced).jpg){kind=link}
,_member_of_the_French_Resistance,_c._1940_(Remini_enhanced).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
AI-upscaled image where the source image at File:Yvonne Chollet (1897-1945), member of the French Resistance, c. 1940.jpg was deleted in April 2023 for lacking a valid licence. No other source is specified. Belbury (talk) 11:19, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
,_member_of_the_French_Resistance,_c._1940.jpg){kind=link}
- Hello, @Belbury: , Perhaps restore and license the original photograph {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}. Since it's an identity photograph taken in 1940, whose author remains unknown. Yvonne Chollet died in 1945, so the question of image rights does not arise. Best regards, --Madelgarius (talk) 11:25, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Added the source to Undeletion requests for discussion (diff). Bastique ☎ let's talk! 16:18, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
,_member_of_the_French_Resistance,_c._1940.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: URAA applies, Undelete in 2036. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:26, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [11]. Yann (talk) 19:33, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
![[11]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=946635679#File%3AYvonne_Chollet_%281897-1945%29%2C_member_of_the_French_Resistance%2C_c._1940.jpg){kind=link}
Not own works, no source, and no evidence of a free license.
- File:Frankiebrohm.jpg
- File:Hnikaidoh.jpg
- File:Gramirez.jpg
- File:Chjackson12.jpg
- File:Vgbaker7.jpg
- File:Bcecil2004.jpg
- File:Bscott7yo.jpg
- File:Dgrundmandesert.jpg
- File:Mmyersphoto.jpg
- File:Wertheiminpain.jpg
- File:Gjonesbygate.jpg
- File:Jstanforduniv.jpg
- File:Tayloripn1872.jpg
- File:Echolandrobert1968.jpg
- File:CstagemyerYouth.jpg
- File:Mebjinnewspaper1937.jpg
- File:Jcarlton1914.jpg
- File:Jchandlesandblades.jpg
- File:Rpakington1536.jpg
- File:Payne-gallwey.jpg
Yann (talk) 13:27, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
I add also these:
- File:Astonleg.jpg
- File:Crstphrsn963.jpg
- File:Mcgaritynwsppr.jpg
- File:Emdavisonderby.jpg
- File:Jstrange lastphoto.jpg
ZandDev (talk) 19:36, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Six of them can likely be properly sourced and licensed with a little more work:
- File:Jstanforduniv.jpg cropped from 1897 photo. see here File information updated.
- File:Tayloripn1872.jpg cropped from an 1872 illustration from Illustrated Police News. see here File information updated.
The full illustration has been added as File:Killed by a Coffin at Kensal Green Cemetery (1872).png - File:Jcarlton1914.jpg is from a 1914 U.S. newspaper report. see here
- File:Jchandlesandblades.jpg is from an 1823 medical journal. see here File information updated.
File:Rpakington1536.jpg is cropped from a 1794 engraving of Sir John Pakington, making it a misidentification. see here Delete this one due to poor quality; full image is at File:Sir John Pakington.jpg, if a crop is needed, it can be made from that file.- File:Payne-gallwey.jpg appears to be cropped from this image. Payne-Gallwey died in
18811916, so the image predates that.
- Delete The rest Tcr25 (talk) 15:26, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Comment: File:Payne-gallwey.jpg depicts Ralph Payne-Gallwey, who died in 1916, not Sir William Payne-Gallwey, 2nd Baronet. Rori1911 misidentified the subject. Gildir (talk) 17:06, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think that one is on me for scanning the newspaper article too quickly... —Tcr25 (talk) 18:57, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- File information has been updated for all of them except File:Payne-gallwey.jpg. The Northern Echo image might be acceptable for the source since we know he died in 1916, making the photo's creation at least that long ago, but I'm not finding other indications of pre-1916 publication to say for sure. —Tcr25 (talk) 19:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: File:Payne-gallwey.jpg depicts Ralph Payne-Gallwey, who died in 1916, not Sir William Payne-Gallwey, 2nd Baronet. Rori1911 misidentified the subject. Gildir (talk) 17:06, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- File:Emdavisonderby.jpg is a cropped version of a Daily Mirror photograph that ran on page 1 on their June 5, 1913 issue. Version on Mirrorpix credits the image to Daily Mirror staff. Given date of first publication and no photographer is named, {{PD-UK-unknown}} should apply. —Tcr25 (talk) 13:11, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Most since they're either too recent or not properly sourced so they can be checked if PD. Kept some that were PD. Deleted Payne-gallwey because it's a circa 1910s photograph, and it could still be copyrighted. Undelete that in 2037. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:43, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
No indication that the OGL applies on the Twitter account of the First Minister of Scotland A1Cafel (talk) 15:56, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:40, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No indication that the OGL applies on the Twitter account of the First Minister of Scotland A1Cafel (talk) 15:56, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:40, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Ymnes (talk) 14:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- I made this photo myself today but forgot to tag it. But I did now. These artworks fit in a greater environment and do not have copyright in this way on a photo. Ymnes (talk) 14:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Ymnes Museums are not considered public spaces for the purposes of Freedom of Panorama in the Netherlands, according to that page. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 15:41, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Isn't there this exception of artwork that are in a setting? This is why I think copyright is not at stake. Ymnes (talk) 15:48, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Ymnes Museums are not considered public spaces for the purposes of Freedom of Panorama in the Netherlands, according to that page. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 15:41, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, an exposition in a museum does not fall in the Freedom of panorama, so this photo cannot maintained. I am not aware from such exception. --Ellywa (talk) 18:01, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Ymnes (talk) 14:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- I made this photo myself today but forgot to tag it. But I did now. These artworks fit in a greater environment and do not have copyright in this way on a photo. Ymnes (talk) 14:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Ymnes Museums are not considered public spaces for the purposes of Freedom of Panorama in the Netherlands, according to that page. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 15:41, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Isn't there this exception of artwork that are in a setting? This is why I think copyright is not at stake. Ymnes (talk) 15:48, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Ymnes Museums are not considered public spaces for the purposes of Freedom of Panorama in the Netherlands, according to that page. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 15:41, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, an exposition in a museum does not fall in the Freedom of panorama, so this photo cannot maintained. I am not aware from such exception. --Ellywa (talk) 18:02, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
