This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Speedy keep This is a representative of the Government of Indonesia, and just because you don't know who someone is, doesn't make a valid reason to nominate the file for deletion. I don't know who most of the people are on here, but someone else will! I suggest for the admins to close this nomination as invalid. Commons would be empty if everyone did this! DaneGeld (talk) 04:29, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Felicitaciones por empezar a tratar de agregar categorias al archivo! Le voy a volver a felicitar cuando encuentre las categorias correctas. Me siento bien de haberle promovido las ganas de categorizar... 186.173.30.11307:55, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's not what a deletion request is for though. Just because you don't know who is in the image, doesn't mean it should be deleted. It was already marked as needing categories, and that would have been picked up by any one of the numerous editors who patrol those things. DaneGeld (talk) 08:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
@Jonteemil: It should be. This logo entered the public domain in Canada in the 1980s because the copyright term for anonymous works was only 50 years at the time. That was before the URAA restoration date, which would make it PD in the US as well. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:08, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These are AI generated images of a otherwise copyrighted comic strip. Just because AI artwork is freely licensed in general that mean depictions of otherwise copyrighted characters would be.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I've found the file description here. The artwork itself is undoubtedly in the public domain. The photographer, however, is unidentified. The photographer must release their photo with a suitable licence for this to be on Commons; that's missing. There's nothing on the target website about copyright. Hence, this image must go. Schwede6606:10, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I uploaded the same file now to a different filename. Which was not possible for me before since I was lacking autopatrol right. Now this version is not needed anymore. Dirk Hünniger (talk) 08:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
In a kkwiki article, it is said that this image was taken from Facebook, which does not mean that the user is the author and therefore the license here is not real Malik Nursultan B (talk) 16:50, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Are stickers really covered by FOP? They seem not to be permanently placed. Also, are we certain that the sticker was created by the copyright holder? Jonteemil (talk) 19:49, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Je fais une demande séparée pour l'affiche du festival de 1978, que j'ai conçue, mais qui contient un dessin d'Alain Trebern, dont j'ai acheté les droits d'utilisation à l'époque (1978).
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This is supposedly an AI-generated image of Rékey-Tőkésy Ármin. It's clearly not accurate though due to the nature of the thing. Along with the multiple rendering errors. So the image should be deleted as OOS. Adamant1 (talk) 03:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These are all AI-generated images of lemur editing Wikipedia. They serve zero educational purpose as such. Since, obviously, lemurs don't use computers IRL. Let alone do they edit Wikipedia articles. So the images should be deleted as OOS.
Keep all. I made the images to serve as my avatar on Wikipedia; they are all used on w:user:Sdkb (through a random seed changed every time the page is purged). We have traditionally granted some latitude in COM:SCOPE to established contributors to create avatars for themselves, as they help users maintain distinct identities and thus serve the project by helping facilitate collaboration. I submit that these images fall under that realm. They are small files (totalling less than even a tiny video clip) with minimal maintenance burden. Best, Sdkbtalk03:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sdkb: I checked the files before nominating them for deletion and none of them seemed to be in use. Is there a reason you can't just pick one to use as an avatar instead of expecting us to host files that aren't actually "in use" for most of the time? As it seems like your really stretching the purpose of something being in scope if it's "in use" at that point beyond what the guidelines allow for. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:58, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I thought it'd be fun to have the lemurs "editing Wikipedia" in different ways (e.g. 03 is mid-leap, 04 is using an antiquated computer, etc.) to introduce some variety, thus the rotating gallery (which the software may have trouble detecting being in use). I made perhaps 50 generations and chose my 10 favorites to use. Best, Sdkbtalk04:36, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh OK. That makes sense, I guess. It still seems like a grey area, but one I'm more then willing to leave it up to whomever closes this to decided where the line on it should or shouldn't be. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:31, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete: the design on the sign is flat, so it definitely isn't covered by FoP. I think the {{FoP-UK}} template added by Varied Surf Igloo is a mistake. The only use is an example of the Starbucks logo on articles about a wireless ISP. --bjh21 (talk) 08:40, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment US logo. We have multiple other versions of such signs in various places, possibly need to be looked at - original early 1970s Starbucks logo might be PD (I haven't checked) but unlikely that recent versions of it are since it's a major corporation. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file is an image depicting the words "User:Obahn" which is not in use on any project. It was created for use on my user page, before the account was renamed. Obhf(talk) 4.17am, Monday 1 July 2024 (UTC) 04:17, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file is an image depicting the words "User:Obahn" which is not in use on any project. It was created for use on my user page, before the account was renamed. Obhf(talk) 4.19am, Monday 1 July 2024 (UTC) 04:19, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file is an image depicting the word "Obahn" which is not in use on any project. It was created for use on my user page, before the account was renamed. Obhf(talk) 4.21am, Monday 1 July 2024 (UTC) 04:21, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file is an image depicting the words "User:Obahn" which is not in use on any project. It was created for use on my user page, before the account was renamed. Obhf(talk) 4.22am, Monday 1 July 2024 (UTC) 04:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No freedom of panorama for sculpture in the U.S., and I don't see any relevant permission for the peacock sculpture. Am I missing something? Jmabel ! talk05:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Paintings by Portuguese painter João Califórnia (1929-2001). They are still copyrighted in his country of origin (70 years pma). We can undelete these files in 2072.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These are AI-generated images of nude women, and are de facto lacking in educational value as such. Although at the first one seems to be in use on another project to depicted "Body-Horror" but the already the articles where it's being used on are already being illustrated with more factually relevant contemporary sources. And there is no special pass in the guidelines for questionably educational or useful images that are being used elsewhere.
@JPxG: If you don't mind me asking what part of COM:SCOPE and COM:AI am I incorrect about? Because you've made the same accusation several times now in other discussions but I have yet to hear an example of what I'm getting wrong. At least not one that doesn't just involve you misciting things and taking what I said out of context. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:36, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, here is what COM:AI says:
Per the Commons project scope, only media that are realistically useful for an educational purpose should be hosted on Commons. Just because an AI image is interesting, pretty, or looks like a work of art, that doesn't mean that it is necessarily within the scope of Commons. While some AI-generated media fall within our scope, media that lack a realistic educational use may be nominated for deletion.
Here is what COM:SCOPE says:
The expression "educational" is to be understood according to its broad meaning of "providing knowledge; instructional or informative".
A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose, as is a file in use for some operational reason such as within a template or the like. Such a file is not liable to deletion simply because it may be of poor quality: if it is in use, that is enough.
The meaning of these policies seems extremely clear to me. The term "educational" is given a specific, clearly explained definition. Not only does this definition fail to make an exception for low-quality images, it explicitly says that there is not such an exception. The claim that "there is no special pass in the guidelines for questionably educational or useful images that are being used elsewhere" is false. JPxG (talk) 10:54, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not only does this definition fail to make an exception for low-quality images, it explicitly says that there is not such an exception. I've explained to you multiple times now that this has nothing to do with the quality of the images. What are you finding so hard to understand about that? Your quote would matter if I had nominated the images for deletion because of them being low quality, but that has nothing to do with this or any other DR where you've falsely claimed it's why I nominated the images for deletion.
The claim that......is false. I've already cited it several times now but COM:SCOPE clearly states "any use that is not made in good faith does not count" and that "file not legitimately in use include ones that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose." So again, what are you having such a hard time understanding about either one of those exceptions? --Adamant1 (talk) 11:07, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are entitled to your opinion, and you can certainly go there and propose they change their policies, but this is obscene. If the Vietnamese Wikipedia thinks this image has enough educational value to use it in their article, why on Earth would you presume to know better than them? Do you speak Vietnamese, Bengali and German? You have never made any edits on any projects in any of those languages. What makes you think you are allowed to dictate to them which freely-licensed images they can use? JPxG (talk) 11:53, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What changes would I be proposing? I literally cited the guideline. Your the one who disagrees with the exceptions and keeps acting like they don't exist. I 100% agree that in use files aren't "liable to deletion simply because it may be they of poor quality." That's why I've never nominated an in use image for deletion "simply because it's of poor quality." So I don't really know what your talking about. Again, your the one acting like that's what I'm doing while ignoring the part of the guideline that I'm actually basing this on. It's totally your issue and your problem to resolve though. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Adamant1, do not misquote policy. You claim above that COM:SCOPE clearly states "any use that is not made in good faith does not count" and that "file not legitimately in use include ones that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose." However, anyone can verify that your second quote in fact does not occur in the linked policy. Instead, Commons:Project_scope#File_not_legitimately_in_use reads as follows:
File not legitimately in use A media file which is neither: • realistically useful for an educational purpose, nor • legitimately in use as discussed above falls outside the scope of Wikimedia Commons.
In other words, the tampered quote in your comment misleadingly omits the reference to COM:INUSE (legitimately in use as discussed above).
Speedy keep first image. The OP is effectively trying to override COM:INUSE as part of a campaign to purge commons of as many AI generated images as possible, based on some vague-wave claim it’s not educationally useful in their opinion (which is apparently better than the opinions of entire other projects). This is a gross violation of policy and I’m half thinking of reporting them if it continues apace. Weak keep the rest because they haven’t really made a convincing case to delete them either. Dronebogus (talk) 15:26, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - all. Or we will simply have ten million AIs uploading ten billion AI images and posting them to minor language entries and the Commons will be but a memory. Is there perhaps a policy discussion brewing about this somewhere? mr.choppers (talk)-en-02:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It will lose all usefulness as we are drowned in meaningless images. It's already happening to various stock photo vendors; AI images are creeping in and some searches mostly return AI results. As with free speech, which can be obscured by meaningless noise in great profusion.
We volunteers cannot be expected to keep up with an onslaught of AI images, which can be churned out at a much higher rate than we can look at them, not to mention our ability to debate their merits and whether or not to erase them. See this conversation - someone had these images made in a few clicks of buttons and several of us volunteers have wasted hours and days on discussing them. I am aware this is not the place to debate this, but I think all AI images should be removed unless there is a strong reason to include them. mr.choppers (talk)-en-12:49, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The one in use is quite bad and low quality. But it's in use. It must be kept for now due to COM:INUSE which you recently supported to keep some AI images after arguing to have unexpected porn show up in sexuality-unrelated search results earlier. The problem can and needs to be addressed on the Wikipedias where the file is in use. Prototyperspective (talk) 15:02, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why are we suddenly taking Adamant1’s side here, that “AI bad, nuke-em-all-god-knows-his-own, INUSE be damned”? Need I remind you that Adamant1 is currently blocked for 2 weeks for, among other things, this exact behavior? Dronebogus (talk) 17:36, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ten million AIs uploading ten billion AI images / an onslaught of AI images, which can be churned out at a much higher rate than we can look at them - this argument seems rather speculative to me, not to say an apocalyptic "The sky is falling!" claim.
DALL-E was first announced three and a half years ago already, and has been publicly available for about two years. The novelty of text-to-images models has worn off for many by now, and on a quick glance at the 500 newest files I can't spot a single AI-generated artwork. (Instead lots of low-quality road photos, probably a substantial amount of copyvios, and many other non-AI items that could use cleanup - as it has always been). Regards, HaeB (talk) 04:34, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The “logic” here seems to be that since AI images are easy to generate, they require literally no effort whatsoever to generate well, therefore they have no value and will flood commons, therefore they’re intrinsically bad, therefore we should delete as many as possible to increase the quality of Wikimedia Commons. Or something. Dronebogus (talk) 05:01, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These are AI generated images of a pallas's cat. We already have plenty of non-AI generated images of the animal though and don't usually host amateur artwork to begin with. So these images should be deleted as OOS.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
All of these files are AI-generated images of gibberish that have various rendering issues and inaccuracies. As well as the gibberish text. Plus we don't usually amateur, user created artwork anyway. So these images should be deleted as OOS.
This mass deletion request seems not to be very constructive. For File:Serendipity 2.png there is a DR running since 12.6. with clear discussion and waits for decision by Admin. I need this file for „educational purposes“ according to our criteria, as described in first deletion request discussion.--Wortulo (talk) 09:56, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't care about the rest of the images, but Keep for File:Leon de milei motosierra vs ratas.jpg, which was posted by President of Argentina Javier Milei in his personal account. Milei usually uploads AI generated images where he depicts himself as a lion (and in this case, he refers to his opponents as "rats"). Those kind of mages also are graphic representations of his political points of view and government proposals so the "non-educational" or "trivial" would not apply in this case, according to the relevance of the subject. (in fact, there is a specific category for Milei's AI images). Fma12 (talk) 10:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep on all of the images in this nomination that are in use at other projects, which is a considerable number of them; Adamant1 seems to be in the habit of indiscriminately mass-nominating AI images, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:AI-generated toys (another mass-nomination from yesterday, including the literal header image for AI image model DALL-E on thirteen Wikipedias). They consistently misrepresent Commons scope policy in their arguments; in reality, it explicitly considers being in-use on other projects to put images within scope. JPxG (talk) 10:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@JPxG: Your being disingenuous and making things personal again when I've asked you at least a couple times to stop with it already. Are you that incapable of listening? The guideline doesn't explicitly consider being in-use on other projects to put images within scope. There's multiple exceptions to it that your choosing to ignore, which your free to do. But I'd appreciate if you didn't keep acting like it's my problem when I didn't write the guideline and I've repeatedly explained to you what it says. As I said on my talk page, be my guest and get anything in the guideline that you disagree with having to do with this or anything clarified. I could really care less, but it's not my issue and your just cry bullying at this point. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:17, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what you mean by "making things personal", is that a reference to this? At any rate: being in use on other projects making an image be in-scope seems to have pretty solid consensus everywhere but your posts. JPxG (talk) 22:53, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In german WP this would be vandalism - such mass DR without looking, if there are DR running (in my case) or decisions to keep exist already. --Wortulo (talk) 10:21, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good thing this isn't German Wikipedia then. Where did I say I didn't look before I nominated the images for deletion though? --Adamant1 (talk) 10:25, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To have 2 DR at the same file at the same time should also not be a rule here and increases only the work for admins (much is waiting for decision). When there a discussion is running, you can discuss there. --Wortulo (talk) 10:31, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, which is why I removed the file from the deletion request. I just didn't understand what you were talking about originally. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:33, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed that that is notable as a quasi-hoax, and should be kept as such (with warnings all over the file page!). - Jmabel ! talk17:51, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Setting up something that might make it easier to keep track of this large number of images that may each raise different issues; I've ordered this roughly in order of my sense of likelihood of being kept:
Probably notable as a quasi-hoax, see above
Posted by President of Argentina Javier Milei, probably notable on that basis, see above
Used in vi:Sự đoan trang ("Modesty"); caption "Đồ họa của AI về một bạn nữ trẻ gốc Á trong bối cảnh đương đại, phụ nữ Á Đông vốn có tiếng về sự dung dị" which Google translates as "AI graphic of a young Asian female in a contemporary context, Asian women are famous for their simplicity"
Speedy keep another example of Adamant1 trying to indiscriminately purge as many AI files as possible. Not taking this request seriously. Dronebogus (talk) 18:14, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Some of these probably deserve deletion, and I've done my best to sort it out above (@Dronebogus: please do have a look at the last 10 or 15 in the gallery and see if there is anything you believe should be kept but @Adamant1, this nomination covered a lot of files with very different issues, at least two of which look to me to be noteworthy absolutely clear keeps. Please, do more research yourself before making DR nominations: I've just spent an hour or so sorting through this, and it really isn't fair to make someone else do that work if you want to nominate for deletion. - Jmabel ! talk18:49, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think the burden of proof is on Adamant1 here. I have no opinion on whether the last 10-15 are individually notable but I’m not going through them individually to say “keep toss keep keep toss x3” because Adamant1 clearly couldn’t be bothered themself. Dronebogus (talk) 18:55, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I actually did look through them before hand. That said, I'm just a volunteer and get things wrong sometimes like everyone else. You as much as anyone should its easy to miss things or be wrong sometimes. Its not like there isn't plenty of DRs where's absolutely wrong calls. The difference is I'm not out there treating like your its intentional
negligence because you just hate nudity or whatever.
So you should really stop trying to make these things personal and assume good faith. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:03, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that image was deliberately used in The Signpost to demonstrate the weirdness of AI generated material. The image is illustrating a serious article about AI text. Bri (talk) 17:04, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep those published by Javier Milei. Delete all others without use, except those mentioned above by fellow commenters. Bedivere (talk) 20:45, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t think those last 2 are necessarily bad; one references the Wikimedia project and the other demonstrates the concept of AI gibberish in a self-referential way. Dronebogus (talk) 15:55, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Split decision: A large number of these are in scope as in use - either on other projects or, in one case, as part of a collage on this project. A decent number of the remainder are out of scope and have been deleted for that reason, and one was deleted per the uploader's request. It's also worth noting that the nominator was blocked for this indiscriminate nomination and others like it. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:09, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These are all AI-generated images of "steampunk." Although they have various inaccuracies, it's not even clear if they accurately represent the genre, and we don't usually host user generated amateur artwork anyway. Commons isn't a personal file host. So these images should be deleted as OOS.
I agree that any INUSE files should be kept, but I think we should keep the "no user generated amateur artwork" unless they are significant contributors and is used as one of the small number of allowed personal files. We are a curated media repository, not DeviartArt or social media. Abzeronow (talk) 19:03, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And we have policies about that. But Adamant1 doesn’t seem to understand what they actually mean. If a file is in scope, it doesn’t matter if the artist is an amateur. Dronebogus (talk) 19:12, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, AI should not be treated any differently from a work created by a human, and any notable AI works (such as those that get independent press coverage) are also in scope. Abzeronow (talk) 19:15, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the first three and the last one; don't care either way about the rest (these are of low/outdated quality). The last one is COM:INUSE and is more or less the only image in several categories and very useful even if it wasn't in use (albeit the concept could have also been implemented in better or additional ways). Prototyperspective (talk) 10:27, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
a file that is in use is always in scope I don't really feel like getting into an argument about it, but that's patently false. Plenty of files that are "in use" get deleted pretty routinely on a daily basis. Including ones like these. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:04, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, it's not. Of course plenty of files that are "in use" get deleted pretty routinely on a daily basis, but the reason for that are in most cases copyright concerns. COM:INUSE is only about the scope issue. If a file is in use in a Wikimedia project, it is in scope and can not be deleted as "out of scope". INUSE is pretty clear and unambiguous there - it explicitly says "if it is in use, that is enough", can't get much clearer, right?. However, if turns out that there is a copyright issue or other non-scope-related issues (e.g. privacy), deletion for these other reasons is still possible, of course - even if the file is in use. If a file that is in use and where there are no other concerns is deleted, that is simply a mistake that should be corrected - mistakes happen. Gestumblindi (talk) 09:54, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Gestumblindi: I provided some examples of "in use" files that were deleted for other reasons outside of copyright concerns in the ANU complaint. I'm sure you can plenty of other examples. It only took me a few minutes to find those and others certainly exist. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:14, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As the ANU discussion is closed, I'm going to reply here: I'm aware of cases of the kind mentioned by Rhododendrites, that is, users who actively try to ensure that their otherwise out-of-scope pictures (whether AI generated or some other personal artwork and the like) are kept by adding them to various Wikipedia language versions and/or Wikidata, unilaterally, and not as the result of any kind of community consensus there. Things like "one person adding their own made-up representation of a mythological figure", as Rhododendrites wrote. In such cases I agree that they're not validly INUSE. On the other hand, if editors in Wikipedia language versions independently decide that they wish to use a specific picture, INUSE applies, as well as COM:NPOV (that is, Commons doesn't overrule local project decisions). Gestumblindi (talk) 18:24, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keepany that are COM:INUSE, as they are within COM:SCOPE, regardless of any other argument raised in the nomination. The nomination is based on subjective conjecture, whereas COM:SCOPE is policy. No opinion from me regarding the other images, feel free to delete them as necessary. --benlisquareTalk•Contribs14:07, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Badly drawn Hitler memes. Possibly taken from other websites without credit (like the user's other four uploads were), seems out of COM:SCOPE even if original.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
1) No FOP for the statues in the US 2) We need permission from the artist for the paintings/drawings 3) the photo of the artist is unlikely to be own work
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Not educationally useful: made up by uploader who is a vandal on en,Wikipedia. Possible copyright violation (image of Loke) Sjö (talk) 14:17, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I uploaded the same file now to a different filename. Which was not possible for me before since I was lacking autopatrol right. Now this version is not needed anymore. Dirk Hünniger (talk) 08:39, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete: This image is attributed to JB Lacroix/WireImage but there is no evidence of permission in the metadata. Photo agencies seldom releases such images freely so we can use them. Ww2censor (talk) 09:04, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination for first three files (missing permission); kept last File Antonio Ecarri Barrio.jpg - seems to be own work. --Wdwd (talk) 11:30, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep Whatever the nominator is trying to say here, it does not appear to be a reason for deletion. Please be more specific. --Rosenzweigτ11:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Deepl translate: The photo is a fake. It is in Caminito comune. Not Caminito - La Boca. Description and categogry are not correct. This can be changed easily. No reason for deletion. Herbert Ortner (talk) 08:38, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These are all AI generated images of animals that contain various inaccuracies or rendering issues. Regardless, we don't generally host noneducational amateur artwork on Commons anyway. So these images should be deleted as OOS.
Delete those not in use. Some poor images without clear usefulness. That it's AI nominated by Adamant1 is no more a reason to automatically keep than it is to automatically delete. I see some categorized as "Realistic animals by Midjourney" when they are not "realistic" in as much as they show obvious false anatomy. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:57, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I thought I had left out "Vladimir Putin with monkey." I must have miss cliked. I removed it from the DR though. Thanks for mentioning it. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:01, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In addition to the above keep votes I also suggest to keep mine File:Crow and moon on the road.png image and the one to the right Nagarjun a spotted owlet peers through its hole. The claim that they aren't educative is a bit unsubstantiated. Some images are evident on how manipulative imaging software can be. --Alexander Davronov (talk) 20:53, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: most, no consensus for bulk deletion. Deleted a few of the worst that were not in use and had no specific keep votes (eg badly rendered shark with extra mouths in an underwater field of daisys!). No prejudging renomination of individual files or small related sets of files for specific reasons. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:07, 19 July 2024 (UTC). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:07, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Based on the comment "I know this work is based on other people，you can soon delete it", this is not the uploader's own work. Missing permission on the underlying images. Consigned (talk) 23:40, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
@Kasia.gauza: Is the retouching fully automatic or clearly engineering work (and non-copyrightable) or creative (and copyrightable)? In the latter case you should explicitly license your work. Per my knowledge, some people claim copyright on their retouching/restoration of old works. Ankry (talk) 11:33, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Is there really such a thing as a "high quality" image of the tooth fairy? Since she exists only in the minds of young children, I would argue her depiction by a young child is not without value. Anyways I felt this drawing to be a step-up from the Tooth Fairy article's sole current picture, which is that of teeth sans fairy. --Xiaphias (talk) 00:26, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I noticed this when it was uploaded. My thinking was that it's a perfectly nice example of a child's artwork and could stay. No worries here. – JBarta (talk) 22:50, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
As an IP address which mostly lurks, rarely edits, I'm sure no one will care about my vote to keep, but good lord, what kind of killjoy deletes pictures of the tooth fairy for being insufficiently detailed? -75.187.58.134
I don't think the rationale for keeping is "it's cute and my kid did it", but rather it's an excellent example of child's artwork. Viewed in that light, I think it should be perfectly welcome here, and we even have a category for it: Category:Drawings by children – JBarta (talk) 06:16, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, in all fairness, I don't see a bag of money or a bag of teeth... both of which you'd think the tooth fairy would be carrying around ;-) Actually, if you look closely, she's wearing bright colors, has disheveled hair, lots of messy lipstick, a wild stare in her eyes and is holding what appears to be a straight razor... – JBarta (talk) 03:10, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep unless there's a reason to doubt the information about the artist and her relationship to the photographer provided at the source. The source is from the parents of the minor child that drew the image and they would be able to legally release the image, both the original and the derivative, as CC BY 2.0 (hopefully with the child's agreement). — Tcr25 (talk) 18:36, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Comment. The file is in use, so there are no scope issues. The question is whether this implementation of the sea-lion heraldic device is sufficiently original. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:36, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
All of these files are AI-generated images created by the same user as part of a personal school project. Although some of them are being used on user pages, but the usage seems to be from one off accounts that were created purely as part of the afformed school assignment. Which at least IMO doesn't mesh with Commons:Project scope. Especially since we don't generally host user created amateur artwork to begin with. So these images should be deleted as OOS.
Keep the majority as COM:INUSE.Although some of them are being used on user pages, but the usage seems to be from one off accounts that were created purely as part of the afformed school assignment seems incorrect, File:Cubism 2022 Machine Learning Trio.png is the only file which is only in use on a user page, all the others are in use on mainspace articles or drafts. Where are you getting the idea that there was a school project to create and use these images?
I stand corrected. File:Dragon Tree 6 by David S. Soriano.png is being used on Wikitionery. It's not really clear to me what purpose it serves or how it's educational though, but whatever. From what I can tell the other files are being used on user pages and a couple of random galleries about people on Wikiquote. Again though, I seriously question how that qualifies them as "reasonably educational." Like if you look at File:Pop Art 2022 Loved You Too.png it's being used here as part of a qoute. But it looks nothing like the guy who wrote it and doesn't even have anything to do with the quote itself. So it appears to be in use for absolutely no reason what-so-ever. I'd say the same goes for the other images. Although I'm not going to list them but, but I don't think keeping an image like that simply because someone added it to a random page completely out of context on another project that it is in the spirit of COM:SCOPE. Usage isn't a free pass. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:03, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, if your wondering what I was talking about when I said the usage is part of a school project, see this user page. There's a few others with the comment. Although admittedly they could have all just stumbled on the same images for no reason, but it's more likely that they are associated with David S. Soriano. It doesn't really matter either way though, because they are still one off accounts that were only using the images as part of a school project regardless. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:08, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not our place to decide on usage, COM:INUSE says A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose. [...] If an image is in use on another project (aside from use on talk pages or user pages), that is enough for it to be within scope. There are clear mainspace usages, the first file on your list appears in mainspace on four languages of Wikipedia.
I assume Soriano's artwork has ended up on random wikiquote entries and user pages because it has simple filenames about cubism and pop art, so is easily found by users who don't really know what they're looking for. I've never seen a school project that's asked students to put their teacher's artwork on their user page. Belbury (talk) 10:37, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, I don't care either way, but I think your misconstruing what the guideline says and the intent behind it. And 100% it is our place to decide on usage, We do it multiple times a day for COPYVIO and the gives other examples where the "in use" clause doesn't apply. Ones your free to disagree, but there's no bright line there and it's not my issue if you think the guideline shouldn't have exceptions. Personally, I could really care less about any given image on here. Waves come in, waves go out. Some files are deleted even if they are in use, some are kept. That's life. I trust whomever closes this will make a correct call that's respectful of the guidelines. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:42, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
COM:INUSE is policy and gives a very clear bright line. There's no exception for random galleries about people on Wikiquote, just talk pages and user pages.
I think File:Cubism 2022 Machine Learning Trio.png is the only file you've flagged here which is in use but only on a user page, is that right? It's a little unusual for not being that user's own upload, just a picture they apparently found and liked. I'd rename it since it doesn't actually seem to be an example of cubism, but don't see a strong reason to delete. Belbury (talk) 11:18, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Admittedly they contradict each other to a degree, but COM:NOTUSED says "A media file which is neither realistically useful for an educational purpose, legitimately in use as discussed above falls outside the scope of Wikimedia Commons." I'd argue a file being used on a random page that it has absolutely no relation what-so-ever to isn't "realistically useful for an educational purpose" as far as Commons:Project scope. I'd love to see that part of the guideline clarified at some point, but it is what it is in the meantime and it's clearly not serving a "realistic educational purpose" by being on a random page that has no relation to the image what-so-ever. The same goes for a lot, if not all, of the other images. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:27, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not seeing any contradiction there, COM:INUSE tells us that if an image is being used outside of user/talk pages on any Wikimedia projects - even a "random page" of Wikiquote, Wikitionary or Wikibooks - it's considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose, so would pass the first bullet of COM:NOTUSED. --Belbury (talk) 11:37, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, it can pass the fist bullet point. Nowhere does it insinuate that's it absolute though. It's clearly saying "in use files are considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose. Except in cases where a media file is neither: realistically useful for an educational purpose, nor legitimately in use as discussed above." That's literally what the guideline says. Otherwise that whole thing would just be one four word sentence instead of multiple lines and as many paragraphs. Your just choosing to ignore the parts of it that you disagree with. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:46, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's clearly saying "in use files are considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose. Except in cases where a media file is neither: realistically useful for an educational purpose, nor legitimately in use as discussed above." That's literally what the guideline says.
Contrary to Adamant1's claim, this is not the wording in the guideline, and Adamant1's misquote changes its meaning in an important way.
A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose, as is a file in use for some operational reason such as within a template or the like.
We can already see here how the words at the beginning of the allegedly verbatim wording provided in Adamant1's comment were changed. But so far the meaning remains largely intact.
However, anyone can verify that the second sentence in Adamant1's "quote" ("[...] Except in cases where a media file is neither: [...]") does not occur in the policy (not even in a reworded but equivalent form). Instead, Commons:Project_scope#File_not_legitimately_in_use begins as follows:
File not legitimately in use A media file which is neither: • realistically useful for an educational purpose, nor • legitimately in use as discussed above falls outside the scope of Wikimedia Commons.
Here, "legitimately in use as discussed above" refers to the preceding COM:INUSE section of the policy.
In other words, under the policy, either of the two conditions (educational / in use) suffices to make an image in scope, contrary to Adamant1's claims that the second one does not suffice under the policy.
And for context: Beyond this DR here, Adamant1 has outright misquoted this policy in other cases too - see the notes here about another DR comment where Adamant1 claimed I literally cited the guideline but COM:SCOPE did not contain the allegedly quoted text. (That was one of the various problems brought up this thread on the "User problems" noticeboard that lead to the current two-week block of Adamant1. Hopefully Adamant1 won't resume this kind of disruptive behavior once the block expires, but this pattern is worth documenting here for the purposes of this DR and in case it occurs again.)
Changing my verdict to Keepall as COM:INUSE per JPxG's observation on use within the Indonesian Wikipedia, my mistake for taking the batch count at face value. --Belbury (talk) 06:34, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keepall I personally don’t think these are very good, but I also respect INUSE. I’m also not taking the time to review every single file; please be more discriminating in the future. Dronebogus (talk) 18:10, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep All of these seem to be in use somewhere. File:The Tin Men.png, File:The Cubism Perspective.png and File:Fraternal Twins Cubism.png show up with no uses on the tool for some reason, but all three are in use at at the Indonesian Wikipedia. It is, extremely emphatically, not our business as Commons editors to decide what images other projects are allowed to use, and what their image use policies should be; Indonesian Wikipedia editors are grown adults and can make their own content decisions. The circumstances in which we should be overriding them are extremely limited. Basically, if they are violating copyright or breaking the law, COM:SCOPE permits us to override local projects' consensus, and neither of these things is remotely the case here -- "this image SUX!" is not a legal issue and Commons policy explicitly says so. JPxG (talk) 01:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"this image SUX!" And that right there is exactly what I was talking about the ANU complaint. Where exactly did I say "this image SUX!" or anything else along those lines? --Adamant1 (talk) 01:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've explained this about a dozen times, and each time you've ignored the entire explanation and responded with vague insults, so I don't think I can explain this to you. Definitionally, if you refuse to provide a reason for why something should be done, the only reason you're giving is that you want it to be done.JPxG (talk) 01:51, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I gave reasons in my original messages. It's not me if you want to stick your fingers in your ears and go off about how I'm doing this because "this image SUX!" or whatever. I never said the image "SUX" in this or any other DR and it's rather insulting to repeatedly treat me like that's my position. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:55, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. The fact that some are randomly used means nothing; like File:Science Fiction Art Robot Narcissist.png which can be seen at the Arabic entry for Narcissism in the workplace - it serves no purpose there. As for the ones in "use" in Indonesian-language WP, they are all posted in something called a wikistory (whatever that is); I would argue that using AI-generated images to illustrate an article about an art movement (or nearly anything else) is inappropriate. I don't have the time or energy to look at all of them; they can be churned out by the millions every minute and serve no purpose whatsoever. mr.choppers (talk)-en-02:27, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Uh, no, being in use definitely does not mean “nothing”, “randomly” or not. It’s not our job to judge what other projects think of images unless we also contribute to those projects. Or has Commons decided to start engaging in Wiki-imperialism now? Dronebogus (talk) 17:41, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all the others, per COM:INUSE. I went through each of these and am quite confident that the editors on other projects who had added them to pages of various kinds on many different projects did so in good faith in the sense of COM:EV, and the nominator has provided no evidence otherwise anyway. Regards, HaeB (talk) 02:31, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Nominating five images in this personal artwork category which are currently not COM:INUSE on any other projects, per past discussions. (If some were used on the Indonesian Wikipedia in July, they aren't any more.)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by CubanoBoi as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: unknown copyright info May be old enough. Yann (talk) 13:32, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These images appear to be unused amateur sketches of people that were uploaded by the artist. So they should be deleted as OOS since we don't generally host amateur artwork.
Probably because en:wp:Jacques Hitier doesn't exit. Regardless, that's not usually how this works and it doesn't even look like him to begin with if it was. I have no problem with using sketches in articles in theory, but they should at least be accurate representations of the subject. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:23, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
With regards, this image was taken with a camera and published in the Internet archive, and then due to the lack of access to the work in the device's memory, it was downloaded from there and published. Thank you. دکتر سمیعی (talk) 07:40, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File usage are part of deletion requests at Wikipedias. Suggest that there is nothing in this photograph that clearly meets realistic educational scope. Also noting commenter has had account locked. — billinghurstsDrewth07:20, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Escolop as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The image dimension is too small.Yann (talk) 13:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Possible copyvio: This is obviouly a professional promo photo. The date is certainly wrong; this was not taken in 2024 (he left Myanmar in 2021). Who is the photographer / copyright holder? Is this really "own work"? 2003:C0:8F1E:DB00:19E0:802F:415:977E21:29, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Likely copyright violation; picture was uploaded on enWiki at the same time the contributor was uploading text they copied from imbd. User's other contributions have all been copyright violations claimed as "own work". I highly doubt this picture was taken yesterday GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 22:42, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Flickr user Paul Lammens says in the comments on Flickr[9], "not my own picture but scanned slide from my collection. OK to use!" Since they are not the original photographer, we don't know the correct license. Did they buy the slide and someone else owns the rights to the image? Dual Freq (talk) 23:08, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Ww2censor as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This file looks like a private work of this guy and not official US military work. If this is US official work we need the full original url to verify that.Yann (talk) 17:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Taichi as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: The photo is tagged in Flickr as Creative Commons NC-ND 2.0 license, not compatible here. — billinghurstsDrewth22:23, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Billinghuest, this picture was taken from the Flickr account of the U.S. Embassy in Panama. All pictures taken by a U.S. official are property of the U.S. government, which means that is public domain. That’s the reason why I tagged like that. Whatever says on Flickr is not the correct rights. It’s a U.S. government owned picture, so its public domain Enmanuel (talk) 22:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The photo gallery is not hosted on a US government owned site, there must be a reason why the US embassy account adopted CC nc-nd as its license, we can't assume it's a mistake, because equally In the future someone may still encounter the license incompatibility error. That is something for the US embassy to clarify, not for us to guess. Taichi (talk) 00:09, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: Our usual experience with governmental Flickr accounts is that they're not run by copyright lawyers, but comms staff, and there's no reason to expect differently here. --James F.(talk)12:18, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete Agreed as uploader. Undelete date could be brought down if dates of publication could be determined; I couldn't quickly find them. – BMacZero (🗩) 02:30, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Doubts about this file to be PD-textlogo as calligraphic part can show an artistic intent (artworks have a lower TOO in France, the country of origin for this logo) - Luchoxtrab (talk) 14:55, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Kept, this is French logo. After consulting COM:TOO France I decide, that this is simple logo by French rules. France demands imprint of originality. Although the line below the logo is not made of simple geometrical figures, I do not consider this enough original, because many logos have such underline. The rest is pure text. Taivo (talk) 11:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Both the files are different. I can't find any similar instances of the file prior to its publication here, and given the EXIF/metadata and good quality, I don't have any doubts. I am inclined to Keep'ing this file. Regards, Aafi (talk)18:02, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The film posters are presumably copyrighted works. Since the picture was taken inside a building and such film posters are usually not permanently attached, freedom of panorama unfortunately does not apply. Lukas Beck (talk) 09:14, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Die mit abgebildeten Poster sind nicht eigentlicher Inhalt des Fotos. Sie erscheinen zwangsläufig nebenbei bei dem Foto einer besonderen Fensterputzarbeit, die ohne den Hintergrund nicht dargestellt werden kann. -- Kürschner (talk) 09:25, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ich widerspreche. Die beiden Plakate machen einen Großteil des Bildhintergrundes aus und sinn deutlich und scharf erkennbar. Hier noch von Nebensächlichkeiten, von deminimi zu sprechen, halte ich für falsch. Lukas Beck (talk) 11:20, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Parce que ce blason est basé sur un blasonnement erroné (voir débat dans la discussion sur la page de la famille Olphe-Galliard). Un nouveau blason est en réalisation. Très cordialement. Montcorin (talk) 11:41, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These files were both nominated for deletion individually by Ранко Николић. The rationale was the same for both files: No permission, taken from https://sd-crvenazvezda.net/klubovi/ , 2016 @ СД Црвена звезда, Designed by MojaCrvenaZvezda.Net & SCART-Design Ранко Николић (talk) 18:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC). I think it ought be better if they both appear in a mass request since they are so similar.[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep, both are very simple text-based logos. Are you somehow bored, Jonteemil? There's plenty of other work here... Xgeorg (talk) 10:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Xgeorg Firstly, please remain civil in all discussions, even if you think they are dumb or unnecessary. Secondly, the fact that there are more complex logos here doesn't make these two okay. I looked at your past participations in deletion requests and you have consistantly voted for keep with a similar rationale text-logo, very simple, yet the files have been deleted every time. So it strikes me that you don't have a good grasp on thresholds of originality and Commons's rules regarding it. Files on Commons need to be free in both the country of origin AND the US and if there is significant doubt, then we delete per COM:PCP. File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg and w:File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg are both much less complex than File:Los Angeles Football Club.svg, yet the first two have copyright whereas the last doesn't. It's all got to to with the country of origin and its TOO laws. Regarding these logos I totally disagree that they are very simple text-based logos. The ICE in the middle of the logo is stylized with gradients to get that "icy" impression and also the line above and the text HOCKEY LEAGUE is stylized with the same gradients. For a TOO that is described as low which COM:TOO Austria is, I'd be very doubtful if this logo would be clearly below it. Jonteemil (talk) 11:54, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your input. I appreciate the reminder to keep discussions civil and respectful, and I will keep that in mind. I understand that more complex logos don't automatically justify the use of simpler ones.
I wonder that you have time to study my voting behavior...
Regarding my votings in deletion requests, I want to emphasize that I always strive to understand and apply Commons's rules and guidelines to the best of my ability, but in general I don not agree to the strict rules regarding logos this projects has given itself. On the other hand, I have nominated already hundreds of files for deletion, if clear CR violations - see Commons:Deletion requests/Files by User:Sv3n19341997Xgeorg (talk) 13:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Comment Not quite clear whether this map reaches the threshold of originality. In addition, it is licensed at the source under the GFDL; however, since it has been licensed there in 2023, it may not pass Commons' GFDL restrictions if found to be above the threshold of originality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Felix QW (talk • contribs) 21:25, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: This one was uploaded before the one at your site by less than an hour, so its unlikely this one came from there. I suspect the same user uploaded it to both sites and decided only recently they didn't want it on Commons. --Bastique☎ appelez-moi!20:12, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
COM:Oman doesn't state if 2008 royal decree was retroactive or not since this would have been PD in 1999 as a photograph since those had a 25 year copyright term pre-2008 and this appears to have been published pre-1960s. @Mohammed Qays: @Dyolf77: @علاء: to see if they have more info on Omani copyright law. Abzeronow (talk) 20:34, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Abzeronow, after a long search, I see that the person does not meet the notability criteria, and even the copyright or source of this image is unknown. Therefore, I prefer to delete it. Mohammed Qays 🗣13:58, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I actually don't question the authorship of the images. I have taken images that are the same quality as have a number of other amateur photographers on Commons. Looking at their behavior on nlwiki, this seems to be some kind of publicist or agent and is probably this person: Christel Loggers | LinkedIn and she worked for an event service during the time of the uploads of these pictures, so she probably did take the pictures and has the rights.
The Renaldo Ishaak article was deleted as soon as they created it, so he would fail notability. Remy Gieling (from the 2022 Event picture) hasn't yet been deemed worthy of a Wikipedia article.
Although the Ewout Genemans picture isn't very good, it's reasonable to assume that she has the rights to took that one as well.
All the hits on File:KLUUN-DvdL-1019909 (1).jpg I was able to find were sourced from this picture, however. We have the meta data from the image. And the image is in use on Kluun's article on nlwiki.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Photo of a plaque published by the Government of Canada. Government works are usually Crown Copyright, which is copyrighted for 50 years after publishing (see {{PD-Canada}}; per the description this plaque seems to have been released in 2010. Though technically 3 dimensional, per COM:FOP Canada I think this qualifies as a 2d work (and not a work of artistic craftsmanship) thus not eligible for FOP. Consigned (talk) 21:27, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
@Steffen Dietrich das Foto muss im Prinzip nicht gelöscht. Es ist zwar nicht denkmalgeschützt, es darf aber trotzdem hochgeladen werden. wenn du möchtest kann ich das foto auf einen anderen Dateinamen verschieben. Viele Grüße Zthomas11:32, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Thomas, ist Okay. Das Gebäude gehört zum großflächigen Bereich des Diakonissenmutterhaus Bad Harzburg e.V. im Krodotal und es ist ein Pfarrhaus. Wohnhaus mit Carport befinden sich nicht in der Kleine Krodostr. 6 sondern gehört zum Areal "Obere Krodostr. 30". Text- und Bildänderungen werde ich erst bei Wiki vornehmen, wenn das "Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Denkmalpflege" (NLD) in Hannover mir ihr Okay für diese Korrektur gegeben haben und das kann wegen der Urlaubszeit dauern. Gruß Steffen Steffen Dietrich (talk) 13:22, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Das Bild zeigt "Kleine Krodostr. 6". Die ist auch im Niedersächsischen Denkmalaltas verzeichnet. Denkmalatlas
Aber eigentlich ist die "Kleine Krodostr. 6" kein Baudenkmal sondern die "Obere Krodostr. 30". und die ist nicht im Denkmalatlas verzeichnet und das möchtest du beim Denkmalamt ändern lassen? Zthomas05:42, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Thomas, falsch sind im "Niedersächsischen Denkmalatlas", das ausgewiesene Gebäude vom Baudenkmal (ehem. Krodohaus Siemens, ID:37704226) und der dazugehörige Straßenname. Die Kleine Krodostr. 6 muss Obere Krodostr. 30 heißen, die Hausnummer 6 in der Kleine Krodostr. gibt es überhaupt nicht. Siehe auch [14], das Gebäude (L-förmig) oberhalb der Bugenhagenkapelle ist der richtige Standort für das Baudenkmal. Eine historische Postkarte von mir aus dem Jahr 1922 brachte den Fehler ans Licht.
Weitere Baustelle ist der Objekttyp (Wohnhaus, Schlosserei, Pfarrhaus, Wohn-/ Geschäftshaus, Schule etc.), die werden mal aufgeführt und mal nicht. Die Zuweisung der versch. Objekttypen stammt aus der Zeit, als es ein Baudenkmal wurde, die Nutzung heute kann eine völlig andere sein. Wünsche dir ein schönes Wochenende. Steffen Steffen Dietrich (talk) 11:03, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Thomas, ich nerve mal wieder. Habe zwei Baudenkmale mit dem Denkmalstatus "Ehemaliges Denkmal" gefunden, sie werden im Denkmalatlas nicht mehr aufgeführt. Sollte ich diese auch in der "Liste der Baudenkmale in Bad Harzburg" löschen und wie umgehen mit dem Bildmaterial? Gruß Steffen Steffen Dietrich (talk) 16:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Steffen Dietrich du nervst überhaupt nicht, deine Fragen sind gut!
ich hab dir auf deiner disk in der wikipedia geantwortet.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The architect of the church was Karl Band who died in 1995. In Germany there is no FoP for interior views and exists a standard of life + 70 years Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:45, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete Unused, fuzzy, agree with the uploader that it isn't educationally useful. Users could very easily create their own better quality image. Consigned (talk) 15:14, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Taichi as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: The photo is tagged in Flickr as Creative Commons NC-ND 2.0 license, not compatible here. — billinghurstsDrewth22:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey. This picture was taken from the Flickr account of the U.S. Embassy in Panama. All pictures taken by a U.S. official are property of the U.S. government, which means that is public domain. That’s the reason why I tagged like that. Whatever says on Flickr is not the correct rights. It’s a U.S. government owned picture, so it's public domain. https://www.state.gov/copyright-information/#copyrightEnmanuel (talk) 22:33, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The photo gallery is not hosted on a US government owned site, there must be a reason why the US embassy account adopted CC nc-nd as its license, we can't assume it's a mistake, because in the future someone may still encounter the license incompatibility error. That is something for the US embassy to clarify, not for us to guess. Taichi (talk) 00:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Photo seems to be uploaded by Marc Lavoie, the subject of the photo, but not the photographer. Permission needed from the photographer. Consigned (talk) 21:24, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Since we don't have camera EXIF, difficult to tell if this was done with a camera on a timer or if this is a "bystander selfie." Abzeronow (talk) 21:25, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I can't find any copyright registration for this set of cards. --RAN (talk) 17:39, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Speedy keep This is a representative of the Government of Indonesia, and just because you don't know who someone is, doesn't make a valid reason to nominate the file for deletion. I don't know who most of the people are on here, but someone else will! I suggest for the admins to close this nomination as invalid. Commons would be empty if everyone did this! DaneGeld (talk) 04:29, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Ticket:2024070210008771 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 15:00, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Delete deceptive AI image Dronebogus (talk) 10:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment US logo. We have multiple other versions of such signs in various places, possibly need to be looked at - original early 1970s Starbucks logo might be PD (I haven't checked) but unlikely that recent versions of it are since it's a major corporation. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Info Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stable Diffusion - In space - 4.jpg was already discussed separately in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stable Diffusion - In space - 4.jpg and kept by Holly Cheng. I think that one was discussed enough, no really new arguments have been brought forward here, and we should respect the original decision, so 
Probably notable as a quasi-hoax, see above
Posted by President of Argentina Javier Milei, probably notable on that basis, see above
Derivative work File:Major topics of pathology informatics.png is used extensively
Used in fi:Stable Diffusion as an example of Stable Diffusion's output
used in en:2020s as an illustration of DALL-E's output
Used in cs:Adobe Firefly as an illustration of Firefly's output
Used in en:DALL-E to illustrate DALL-E's failure to generate meaningful text![Used two places in AI Art Generation Handbook on Wikibooks: [1], [2]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5b/DALL%C2%B7E_-_Dollar_note_showing_Javan_rhinoceros_wearing_a_business_suit_screaming_aloud_with_hands_on_the_cheek_while_seeing_the_stock_price_crash.png/120px-DALL%C2%B7E_-_Dollar_note_showing_Javan_rhinoceros_wearing_a_business_suit_screaming_aloud_with_hands_on_the_cheek_while_seeing_the_stock_price_crash.png)
![Used in AI Art Generation Handbook on Wikibooks: [3]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a9/DALL%C2%B7E_Billboard_ads_showing_Javan_rhinoceros_wearing_a_business_suit_screaming_aloud_with_hands_on_the_cheek_while_seeing_the_stock_price_crash.png/120px-DALL%C2%B7E_Billboard_ads_showing_Javan_rhinoceros_wearing_a_business_suit_screaming_aloud_with_hands_on_the_cheek_while_seeing_the_stock_price_crash.png)
Used in AI Art Generation Handbook on Wikibooks: [3]![Used in AI Art Generation Handbook on Wikibooks: [4]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/ae/DALL%C2%B7E_Magazine_ads_showing_Javan_rhinoceros_wearing_a_business_suit_screaming_aloud_with_hands_on_the_cheek_while_seeing_the_stock_price_crash.png/120px-DALL%C2%B7E_Magazine_ads_showing_Javan_rhinoceros_wearing_a_business_suit_screaming_aloud_with_hands_on_the_cheek_while_seeing_the_stock_price_crash.png)
Used in AI Art Generation Handbook on Wikibooks: [4]![Used in Dutch-language Wikibook Leerparadijs/Onderwijs [5] to illustrate training for an exam](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/26/Leerparadijs_Deelcertificaat.png/120px-Leerparadijs_Deelcertificaat.png)
Used in Dutch-language Wikibook Leerparadijs/Onderwijs [5] to illustrate training for an exam![Used in Dutch-language Wikibooks "Onderwijstaal" [6]; relevance there is unclear, seems just decorative](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b9/Onderwijstaal.webp/120px-Onderwijstaal.webp.png)
Used in Dutch-language Wikibooks "Onderwijstaal" [6]; relevance there is unclear, seems just decorative
Used at de:Wikipedia:Stuttgart/Archiv/Juni_2024_-_Editierworkshop. Not necessarily a good illustration there, but already archived; filename suggests it was created for this precise purpose.
Used in vi:Sự đoan trang ("Modesty"); caption "Đồ họa của AI về một bạn nữ trẻ gốc Á trong bối cảnh đương đại, phụ nữ Á Đông vốn có tiếng về sự dung dị" which Google translates as "AI graphic of a young Asian female in a contemporary context, Asian women are famous for their simplicity"
![Used two places in AI Art Generation Handbook on Wikibooks: [1], [2]](/wiki/File:DALL%C2%B7E_-_Dollar_note_showing_Javan_rhinoceros_wearing_a_business_suit_screaming_aloud_with_hands_on_the_cheek_while_seeing_the_stock_price_crash.png)
![Used in AI Art Generation Handbook on Wikibooks: [3]](/wiki/File:DALL%C2%B7E_Billboard_ads_showing_Javan_rhinoceros_wearing_a_business_suit_screaming_aloud_with_hands_on_the_cheek_while_seeing_the_stock_price_crash.png)
![Used in AI Art Generation Handbook on Wikibooks: [4]](/wiki/File:DALL%C2%B7E_Magazine_ads_showing_Javan_rhinoceros_wearing_a_business_suit_screaming_aloud_with_hands_on_the_cheek_while_seeing_the_stock_price_crash.png)
![Used in Dutch-language Wikibook Leerparadijs/Onderwijs [5] to illustrate training for an exam](/wiki/File:Leerparadijs_Deelcertificaat.png)
![Used in Dutch-language Wikibooks "Onderwijstaal" [6]; relevance there is unclear, seems just decorative](/wiki/File:Onderwijstaal.webp)
.png)
Neutral about these five which do not seem to be in use currently (no opinion about those): File:Dragon Tree 6 by David S. Soriano.png, File:Fraternal Twins Cubism.png, File:The Cubism Perspective.png, File:The Tin Men.png, File:Woman at Door with Angel.png.
for 2D works. // sikander { talk } 🦖 15:10, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_0702_007_(17215313465).jpg){kind=link}
_0702_006_(17214753011).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(10).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(11).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(12).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(13).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(21).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(4).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(5).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(7).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(8).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(9).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(4).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(5).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(7).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(8).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(9).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(9).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(7).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_0702_007_(17215313465).jpg){kind=link}
_0702_007_(17215313465).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_0702_007_(17215313465).jpg){kind=link}
_0702_007_(17215313465).jpg){kind=link}
_0702_007_(17215313465).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
_0702_007_(17215313465).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
_0702_006_(17214753011).jpg){kind=link}
_0702_006_(17214753011).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_0702_006_(17214753011).jpg){kind=link}
_0702_006_(17214753011).jpg){kind=link}
_0702_006_(17214753011).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
_0702_006_(17214753011).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_-_Midjourney_AI_bertsioa.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_Soriano.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(066e84d0-155d-451f-67c8-6dbae012da3f).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_I._U._Otuo_IX_JP.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![[12]](https://dynamic-media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-o/08/2b/19/6c/cinar-lokantasi.jpg?w=800&h=-1&s=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}