Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/05/10
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Hoax or attack 186.174.134.132 04:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted by Achim55. 186.174.134.132 11:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Created solely to vandalize enwiki, where the creator is blocked as a vandalism-only account. Air on White (talk) 01:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --Achim55 (talk) 20:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Delete it again, Sam. 186.174.199.87 01:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Aafi. --Rosenzweig τ 19:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
ausversehen hochgeladen HeavY913 (talk) 10:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Delete requested by owner shortly after uploading the file. Günther Frager (talk) 20:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 20:54, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
If this is uploader's own creation, then it is totally out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:30, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Speedy, derechos de autor 186.174.69.38 19:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- This image represents me and I own the rights to the image Denizemszi (talk) 19:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Es Vd Sr Zoltan? Es rapero y fotografo a la vez? 186.174.69.38 19:54, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Zoltan? No. My name is Rizner Dénes nickname Deniz, and I'm artist no photogarpher Denizemszi (talk) 08:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- The metadata for this image state: (C) POCZIK ZOLTAN . So, POCZIK ZOLTAN needs to confirm the choosen free license for this image to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). --Túrelio (talk) 10:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- He's shoot the photo, but copyrights are mine Denizemszi (talk) 10:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- The metadata for this image state: (C) POCZIK ZOLTAN . So, POCZIK ZOLTAN needs to confirm the choosen free license for this image to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). --Túrelio (talk) 10:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Zoltan? No. My name is Rizner Dénes nickname Deniz, and I'm artist no photogarpher Denizemszi (talk) 08:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Es Vd Sr Zoltan? Es rapero y fotografo a la vez? 186.174.69.38 19:54, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by EugeneZelenko. --Rosenzweig τ 19:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Victor Mena 186.174.69.38 20:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Aafi. --Rosenzweig τ 19:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
In summary, per the official guideline, it should be deleted because "it does not help Commons build a higher quality database that adheres more closely to its educational aims."
Senator2029║talk 10:34, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Morning Sunshine (talk) 09:21, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 06:38, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete terrible lighting Dronebogus (talk) 07:29, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 09:07, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:42, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:37, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: poorly focused random penis snapshot (note: different image from previously deleted of same name). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:50, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Incorrect background Neil4242 (talk) 20:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:02, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Random nude photo, act as exhibionism, not educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete i want to add al his uploads to the nomination all of his uploads is just exhibitionism
- it's not in use by extension is out of Scope COM:NOTUSED COM:CENSOR COM:PENIS
- please take a look on the Username it look like this User account made specifically to publish Nudes which not the intention of commons at all
- there is a lot of similar themed photos from another user on wiki commons
- i suggest deleting all his uploads. wiki is not for exhibitionism photos and issuing a warning to this User if you agree with my reasoning 197.54.65.78 04:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Redundant request: covered by Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Nudistwood. Taylor 49 (talk) 02:21, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Incorrect background Neil4242 (talk) 20:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:02, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Blatant copyvio Ecrusized (talk) 22:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already speedy deleted as copyvio. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
I made a mistake Aurilis (talk) 22:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:01, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
I made a mistake Aurilis (talk) 22:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:01, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
I am willing to upload a better version Argosykoji (talk) 09:54, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Poorer quality duplicate that I uploaded by accident, coloring is worse. Joseph1891 (talk) 12:02, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
{{copyvio|1=Image from google maps}} AjayDas (talk) 13:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 19:09, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
{{copyvio|1=Image from Instagram}} AjayDas (talk) 13:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, source given as Instagram. --Rosenzweig τ 19:12, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
copyvio|1=Images from google maps AjayDas (talk) 13:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, image source given as GoogleMaps. --Rosenzweig τ 19:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
copyvio|1=image from google maps AjayDas (talk) 13:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Achim55. --Rosenzweig τ 19:09, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
I'm the one who created this but i did mistakes in licensing which is inaccurate. It must be deleted. Ramsoni322 (talk) 18:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Thumbnail of a video [1],with no copyright information. Ratnahastin (talk) 11:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
"AI enhanced" version of this picture [2] taken from here [3] and erroneously tagged as own work. Ratnahastin (talk) 13:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
copyvio|1=Cover page of a book AjayDas (talk) 13:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Blurry unidentified person Krok6kola (talk) 00:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
This looks like a made up AI generated image of the mobster [Mike Coppola], who apparently died in 1966 at the age of 66. It also has multiple generation issues. So the image should be deleted as OOS. Adamant1 (talk) 04:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Iphotosfun (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused and unusable AI-generated slop, almost all consisting primarily of unreadable gibberish.
- File:Good Morning Message for friends and Family love and.png
- File:Good Morning Message for friends and Family beautiful.png
- File:Good Morning Message friends and love.png
- File:Good Morning Message quotes.png
- File:Good Morning Message for friends world.png
- File:Good Morning Message for friends and Family loves.png
- File:Good Morning Message for friends and loves.png
- File:Good Morning Message for friends and Family goutes.png
- File:Good Morning Message for friends and Family quotas.png
- File:Good Morning Message Family.png
- File:Good Morning Message for friends and Family quota.png
- File:Good Morning Message friends and Family.png
- File:Good Morning Message for friends and Family worlds.png
- File:Good Morning Message for friends lovely.png
- File:Good Morning Message for friend.png
- File:Good Morning Message for friends love.png
- File:Good Morning Message.png
- File:Good Morning Message for boyfriend.png
- File:Good Morning Message for friend and Family.png
- File:Good Morning Message for friends and love.png
- File:Good Morning Message for friends.png
- File:Good Morning Message for love.png
- File:Good Morning Message for friends and Family love.png
- File:Good Morning Message for friends and Family.png
Omphalographer (talk) 06:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per the nominator. Clearly OOS. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Nonsense; outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 13:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Some may be useful without the gibberish text. There are AI tools to remove text which the uploader could have used. Prototyperspective (talk) 15:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
COM:Derivative work of a book. Certainly copyrighted by the diocese. Roman missal dated 2012, but the image shows the cover pages showing the coat of arms which is likely copyrighted. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Might be COM:PACKAGING issue? Another problematic upload of Valenzuela400 (talk · contribs). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Fuzzy photo ComputerHotline (talk) 11:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:08263jfSan Isidro Labrador Parish Fiesta Pulilan Bulacan Carabao Kneeling Festival 2017fvf 12.jpg
[edit]
Copyrighted 2D graphic art, not permanently-situated (was only used for the occasion of the 2017 Pulilan Carabao Festival / Feast Day of the town patron saint St. Isidore the Laborer). There is no Freedom of Panorama. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio per file name. Phương Linh (talk) 14:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged and re-tagged by Мункач Варош as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Flag of Uzhgorod.svg. COM:DUPE explicitly excludes files with different types. These have to go to DR. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Watemarked image that doesn't coincide with source. We need the real source to check it indeed has a CC0 license. Günther Frager (talk) 15:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
The source doesn't indicate a CC0 license. Notice that the oldest archived version is from 2001, one year before CC licenses were released. Günther Frager (talk) 15:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
User was clearly not the photographer and the source doesn't indicate a CC-BY-SA 4.0 license. In fact it is impossible as the archived version is from 2011 and CC-BY-SA 4.0 was published in 2013. Günther Frager (talk) 16:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Too blurry to be useful for any educational purposes (other than demonstrating blur) Jarekt (talk) 16:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
artist died in 2009 so the artwork is still copyrighted Jarekt (talk) 16:53, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own image Jarekt (talk) 17:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
1906 German photograph, likely public domain but a few years too young for PD-old-assumed Abzeronow (talk) 19:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
1908 French postcard. There are some areas with text that are obscured by the stamp or not legible at resolution that might have an author credit. Possibly public domain, slightly too young for PD-old-assumed. Abzeronow (talk) 19:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Insufficient or doubtful author and license. It's a derivative work of a photograph by an unknown author from a family archive. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Per description and categorizing, this is screenshot of documentary film. Probably copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 20:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Same case as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Taide - panoramio.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Does not look to be a 2020 photograph as claimed; looks to be old publication photo with text on it. (Might be PD or free licensed for some reason, but actual source information needed.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
This compound is not ionic wih all the anions clustered, but instead has a definite octahedral-center framework (doi:10.1006/jssc.2001.9192). The typography of the minus-signs masking part of one of the three bonds in each is also distracting). DMacks (talk) 11:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, also delete File:Ytterbium(III) cyanide.png for the same typographic reason. Perhaps File:Prussian-blue-simplified-motif-from-xtal-xray-3D-bs-17.png can be the replacement for Al(CN)3, as they both have a similar structure. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 14:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Agree with both comments. User:Mfernflower disagrees about use of the prussian-blue image in the infobox. DMacks (talk) 05:51, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
_cyanide.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 13:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Golden Fire Dog
[edit]Copyvios, taken from website with "all rights reserved"; moreover, hoax or personal ranks, out of scope.
- File:Commander uniform.jpg
- File:Commander, Royal Order of the Golden Fire Dog.jpg
- File:GCOLLAR COA.jpg
- File:GCROSSCOA.jpg
- File:GO COA.jpg
- File:Grand collar uniform.jpg
- File:Grand Collar, Royal Order of the Golden Fire Dog.png
- File:Grand cross uniform.jpg
- File:Grand Cross, Royal Order of the Golden Fire Dog.png
- File:Grand officer uniform.jpg
- File:Grand Officer, Royal Order of the Golden Fire Dog.jpg
- File:GrandCollarOrderGoldenFireDog.jpg
- File:Knight uniform.jpg
- File:Knight's medal Royal House of Sefwi Obeng-Mim.jpg
- File:Knight, Royal Order of the Golden Fire Dog.jpg
- File:KnightCOA.jpg
- File:Member COA.jpg
- File:Member uniform.jpg
- File:Miniature medal Royal House of Sefwi Obeng-Mim.jpg
- File:Rang II Royal House of Sefwi Obeng-Mim.jpg
- File:Rang of ROYAL ORDER OF THE GOLDEN FIRE DOG.jpg
- File:Ribon Royal House of Sefwi Obeng-Mim.jpg
- File:Royal Order of the Golden Fire Dog.jpg
- File:Sash with badge Royal House of Sefwi Obeng-Mim.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miss teen universe corp (talk · contribs)
[edit]Spam files depicting common and generic subjects
- File:MISS TEEN UNIVERSE MALAYSIA 2019.jpg
- File:MISS TEEN UNIVERSE Alondra miss teen.jpg
- File:MISS TEEN UNIVERSE.jpg
- File:Miss teen universe show final opening candidatas.jpg
- File:Fantasia filipinas (2).jpg
- File:Miss teen universe teotihucan mexico.jpg
- File:Miss teen universe cuba y venezuela MTU Paseo-19.jpg
- File:Chicas miss teen.jpg
- File:Miss teen universe CORONA.jpg
- File:MISS TEEN UNIVERSE 2019 MISS TEEN.jpg
- File:MEDINA VERENZUELA.jpg
- File:Brayhan.jpg
- File:Freddy medina.jpg
- File:Brayhan guerrero.jpg
- File:Mexico (6).jpg
- File:Ganadora del miss teen.jpg
- File:Colombia (4).jpg
- File:Candidatas miss teen universe.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Dronebogus (talk) 03:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Germany.svg. Fry1989 eh? 14:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Italy.svg. Fry1989 eh? 14:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yamira Xiomara (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Feliijotapege (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used.
- File:Joaco.jpg
- File:Dan drums.jpg
- File:Banda caved.jpg
- File:Presentacion de caved.jpg
- File:Caved show.jpg
- File:Niminal.jpg
- File:Caved.jpg
- File:Ilustracion de caved.jpg
- File:Los de caved ahora 2022.jpg
- File:Logo de caved 2022.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logos.
- File:Dandylogo.png
- File:Snowlight.png
- File:Cayutanyflag.png
- File:CayutaNY.jpg
- File:Walmartnewlogo.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Billy Mok.2014 (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
- File:TCM 12X.jpg
- File:氹仔中央公園.jpg
- File:史劉蓮德博士眺望台.jpg
- File:氹仔市政花園.jpg
- File:九澳水庫郊野公園.jpg
- File:黑沙公園.jpg
- File:恩尼斯花園.jpg
- File:Social de Ilha Verde 3.jpg
- File:Social de Ilha Verde 2.jpg
- File:Social de Ilha Verde 1.jpg
- File:Fai Fu Building.png
- File:GSASC Chart 3.PNG
- File:GSASC Chart 2.PNG
- File:GSASC Chart.png
- File:GSS Chart.png
- File:GSEF Chart 2.PNG
- File:GSEF Chart.PNG
- File:GSAL Chart.png
- File:CB Architecture.gif
- File:CPSP Architecture.png
- File:EPM Architecture.GIF
- File:PJ Architecture.png
- File:海關架構.jpg
- File:ESFSM Architecture.png
- File:SPU Architecture.gif
- File:IPIM Architecture.jpg
- File:GASPF Architecture.jpg
- File:DSAL Architecture.gif
- File:DSEC Architecture.jpg
- File:DSF Architecture.jpg
- File:DSE Architecture.gif
- File:SAFP Architecture.jpg
- File:FP Architecture.jpg
- File:DSAJ Architecture.jpg
- File:Macau DSI Architecture.jpg
- File:TCM Announcer System.jpg
- File:Transportes Announcer System.jpg
- File:TCM FDG6920G.jpg
- File:NewEra Announcer System.JPG
- File:NewEra Priority seats.JPG
- File:MOME TV.jpg
- File:IACMArchitecture.PNG
- File:D.S.A.T. Architecture.jpg
- File:CTSM.jpg
- File:SAFP.png
- File:Praia de Hac Sá.jpg
- File:Centro de Aprendizagem e Exames de Condução.jpg
- File:Parque Industrial Transfronteiriço.jpg
- File:ISTMO F. AMARAL.jpg
- File:NAPE Coimbra St.Terminal.jpg
- File:P.SerenidadeTerminal -1.jpg
- File:Canal Das Hortas Terminal.jpg
- File:Rua de Lei Pou Chôn.jpg
- File:Ilha Verde Terminal.jpg
- File:Torre De Macau.jpg
- File:Camoes Garden Terminal.jpg
- File:Pacoação Ká Hó.jpg
Didym (talk) 05:00, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Billy Mok.2014 (talk · contribs)
[edit]This group of images are claimed to be copied from a website, however the website has no drawings or illustrations on it only text. This uploader has been blocked for uploading copyrighted images. This series of poor quality black and white logos look like they were photocopied and faxed two or three times prior to upload. Even if these are the logos of these various outfits, surely better quality ones could be provided than this group of tiny, blurry, poor quality images.
- File:澳門社會工作司.PNG
- File:水警稽查隊.PNG
- File:澳門體育總署.PNG
- File:澳門政府印刷署.PNG
- File:澳門房屋司.PNG
- File:地圖繪製暨地籍司.PNG
- File:社會保障基金 (澳葡政府).PNG
- File:勞工暨就業司.PNG
- File:經濟司.PNG
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:56, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept, so this is not a question of copyright, but a question of scope. As all those files are used, they are apparently in scope. Taivo (talk) 08:34, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Billy Mok.2014 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams and logos.
- File:IAM Organization.jpg
- File:CB Organization.jpg
- File:DSEC Organization.jpg
- File:DST Organization.jpg
- File:DSFSM Organization.jpg
- File:DSI Organization.jpg
- File:DSAJ Organization.jpg
- File:IFTM Organization.jpg
- File:ESFSM Organization Chart.jpg
- File:澳巴報站顯示範例2019B.jpg
- File:澳巴報站顯示範例2019A.jpg
- File:Organization Chart of IPM.jpg
- File:Organization Chart of UM.jpg
- File:Macau Land, Public Works and Transport Bureau organization as of 2022-03-31.jpg
- File:新時代舊小中大巴顯示範例 (歡迎辭).png
- File:新時代舊小中大巴顯示範例 (下一終點站).png
- File:新時代舊小中大巴顯示範例 (下一站).png
- File:澳巴小大巴顯示範例 (下一站).png
- File:澳巴歐五中巴顯示範例 (到站).png
- File:澳巴新時代新小中大巴顯示範例 (下一站).png
- File:澳巴新時代新小中大巴顯示範例 (到站).png
- File:澳巴小巴顯示範例 (到站).png
- File:澳巴新大巴中巴顯示範例 (到站).png
- File:新福利小巴報站顯示範例 (到達終點站 - 英文).png
- File:新福利小巴報站顯示範例 (到達終點站 - 中文).png
- File:新福利小巴報站顯示範例 (下一站 - 葡文).png
- File:新福利小巴報站顯示範例 (歡迎辭 - 英文).png
- File:新福利小巴報站顯示範例 (歡迎辭 - 中文).png
- File:新福利小巴報站顯示範例 (下一站 - 中文).png
- File:新福利報站新範例 (報站).png
- File:新福利報站新範例.png
- File:新福利報站範例 (到達終點站 - 英文).png
- File:新福利報站範例 (到達終點站 - 中文2).png
- File:新福利報站範例 (到達終點站 - 中文1).png
- File:新福利報站範例 (下一站 - 葡文).png
- File:新福利報站範例 (下一站 - 中文A).png
- File:新福利報站範例 (下一站 - 中文B).png
- File:新福利報站範例 (歡迎辭 - 英文1).png
- File:新福利報站範例 (歡迎辭 - 英文2).png
- File:新福利大巴報站顯示範例 (歡迎辭 - 中文).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:30, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Bing Maps screenshot Einsamer Schütze (talk) 00:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:20, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Bing Maps screenshot Einsamer Schütze (talk) 00:04, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:20, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Bing Maps screenshot Einsamer Schütze (talk) 00:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:21, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
This is an old logo for MCAS Iwakuni. Iwakunicommstrat (talk) 01:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep That is not a valid reason to delete. Old logos is a part of the history. --MGA73 (talk) 06:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:21, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". ThomasFan707 (talk) 04:32, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Just like almost every other fantasy flag deletion, this claim comes without merit. The project scope does not exclude depictions of fantasy, and the nominator has not clearly articulated a reason why this file falls out of the project scope (citing several policies is not a reason). This flag, in fact, is not just the random creation of some user but an image asset from ARMA 3, a notable video game, and therefore has potential illustrative value for articles about that game. Mysterymanblue 07:36, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, per "COM:INUSE", the Wikimedia Commons is not an arbiter of truth and this user registered 6 (six) days ago, their user page reads "Hello There, Thomas the Tank Engine is the Best." And almost all of their edits include proposing the deletion of flags with the same summary. A careless admin would delete this and unfortunately we have too many careless admins "helping out" with DR's, so I propose closing this request as invalid and possible vandalism. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:50, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
This image was nominated for deletion a while ago since it's fictious. Although it was kept. Presumably because it was in use at the time. That doesn't seem to be the case now though. So the image should be deleted as OOS since it clearly lacks any kind of educational value. Adamant1 (talk) 04:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete SVG available. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 04:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by user banned for spamming; no use and out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
claim as own work, photo is from university's website (Direct link) Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 09:54, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
wrong author, copyright violation, see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 13:06, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
out of scope, possible promotional content CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. F10. --Kadı Message 15:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 18:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:25, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 18:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Krd. --Kadı Message 15:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 18:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:25, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 18:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:25, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 18:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:25, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 18:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:25, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 18:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:26, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 18:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:26, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 18:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:26, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 18:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:26, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope / copyvio: plain text, possibly copied from a copyrighted book Omphalographer (talk) 18:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:26, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Visucreativ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
- File:Kirukkal prefinal.pdf
- File:Open arultharum amaavaasai valipaadu.pdf
- File:Open palantharum parikarangal.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:22, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Visucreativ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-published ebooks, likely not in COM:SCOPE.
- File:வெளிச்சத்திற்கு வாங்க 3 final 02.pdf
- File:வெளிச்சத்திற்கு வாங்க 3 final 03.pdf
- File:வெளிச்சத்திற்கு வாங்க 3 final 01.pdf
- File:ஒதுக்கப்பட்ட உயிரினம்.pdf
- File:Croped வான் மழையே வா.pdf
- File:போற்றி.. போற்றி.. final.pdf
- File:0VARUMAI NEENGI.pdf
- File:Kirukkal-Part 1 final-cropped.pdf
- File:Kirukkal part 2-cropped.pdf
Günther Frager (talk) 20:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak delete. Applying Google Translate to the file descriptions suggests that these are indeed out of scope, but it'd be nice if someone who knows Tamil could take a look at the contents and confirm that. Omphalographer (talk) 20:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 23:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Personal fantasy Enyavar (talk) 23:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
suspected YandexMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 23:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, and there is no evidence that this is a free photo. Tineye is displaying results from w:The Exterminating Angel which is still copyrighted. FlyingAce (talk) 23:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Valenzuela400 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Some post-1972 works of architectures in the Philippines, not eligible for {{PD-Philippines-FoP work}}. Furthermore, the uploader seems to exhibit Judgefloro (talk · contribs)-like uploading habit.
- File:McDonald's restaurants Quezon City1.jpg
- File:Café Mary Grace1.jpg
- File:Tawiran Obando Bulacan1.jpg
- File:Bulacan State University Student Lounge8.jpg
- File:Student Lounge Bulacan State University2.jpg
- File:Bulacan State University4.jpg
- File:Rancho Home of Original1.jpg
- File:Consumer Service Office2.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:56, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Valenzuela400 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Costumes of copyrighted characters, these do not benefit from the lax interpretation of COM:COSTUME.
- File:Volkswagen Beetle Walter MartC.jpg
- File:Volkswagen Beetle Walter MartB.jpg
- File:Volkswagen Beetle Walter MartA.jpg
- File:Jollibee characters12.jpg
- File:Jollibee charactersC.jpg
- File:Jollibee charactersB.jpg
- File:Jollibee charactersA.jpg
- File:Jollibee charactersE.jpg
✗plicit 23:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Good afternoon Explicit; can you give me a day or 2 to study the matter; FYI I am only interested in the VW Beetle which is a treasure a 1971 vintage now $ 20,000 at private auction, but restored and repainted but all the interiors and machines are still 98% ok. I talked to the driver and asked them to take off the mascot since it is dirty, rugged and unwashed; but they told me it will dance an hour later 7pm at Singkaban Festival. It was getting dark and I could'nt wait. So I paid the desk employee of the shared computer to edit and crop it by paint etc. But when I came back she was absent so I uploaded the entire photo. Now she gave me the cropped image without the mascot. I am studying if I can upload in Wikipedia the cropped image without the mascot. Btw, I can put the template speedy deletion since I will not argue here, but treat this as a query, I am new here, thank you and very sincerely yours Valenzuela400 (talk) 07:41, 14 September 2024 (UTC).
- Delete - after a careful study of the Commons rule on the issue of mascots, I found that - Costumes and cosplay, quote If the costume is not the central focus of the image but only an incidental feature, or one among many costumes, it is likely to be considered de minimis. I opine however that my photos may not fall in this exception, since the mascot may be the central focus and the Beetle is just an incident. I am not yet familiar on speedy deletion, but I will try to place the template since it remains my option to delete my own photo. Regarding my said question, pending your reply, I will crop my photos taking off the mascot if possible. However, I was promised that the VW Beetle will be available for photography soon and they will inform me on its whereabouts. For all the above, please delete. Best wishes and very sincerely yours Valenzuela400 (talk) 09:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC).
- Additional reply: I already added the tags speedy deletion, especially with Jollibee characters which might not be OK with mascots, thank youValenzuela400 (talk) 10:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC).
- Delete - after a careful study of the Commons rule on the issue of mascots, I found that - Costumes and cosplay, quote If the costume is not the central focus of the image but only an incidental feature, or one among many costumes, it is likely to be considered de minimis. I opine however that my photos may not fall in this exception, since the mascot may be the central focus and the Beetle is just an incident. I am not yet familiar on speedy deletion, but I will try to place the template since it remains my option to delete my own photo. Regarding my said question, pending your reply, I will crop my photos taking off the mascot if possible. However, I was promised that the VW Beetle will be available for photography soon and they will inform me on its whereabouts. For all the above, please delete. Best wishes and very sincerely yours Valenzuela400 (talk) 09:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC).
Deleted: all files were already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 10:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:KaZantip, 2008
[edit]Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.
- File:20080823-IMG 1295 Nights @ Kazantip (4196358198).jpg
- File:20080823-IMG 1299 Nights @ Kazantip (4195602847).jpg
- File:20080823-IMG 1304 Nights @ Kazantip (4195603557).jpg
- File:20080823-IMG 1308 Nights @ Kazantip (4196359710).jpg
- File:20080823-IMG 1339-Edit Nights @ Kazantip (4196361080).jpg
- File:20080823-IMG 1348 Nights @ Kazantip (4195605975).jpg
- File:20080823-IMG 1352 Nights @ Kazantip (4196361786).jpg
- File:20080823-IMG 1362 Nights @ Kazantip (4195606663).jpg
- File:20080823-IMG 1395 Nights @ Kazantip (4195608395).jpg
- File:20080824-IMG 1441 Nights @ Kazantip (4195610889).jpg
- File:20080824-IMG 1468 Nights @ Kazantip (4195611847).jpg
- File:20080824-IMG 1476 Nights @ Kazantip (4195612623).jpg
- File:20080824-IMG 1484 Nights @ Kazantip (4196368512).jpg
- File:20080824-IMG 1488 Nights @ Kazantip (4196369128).jpg
- File:20080824-IMG 1497 Nights @ Kazantip (4196369484).jpg
- File:20080824-IMG 1517 Nights @ Kazantip (4195615935).jpg
- File:20080824-IMG 1522 Nights @ Kazantip (4195616299).jpg
- File:20080824-IMG 1529 Nights @ Kazantip (4196372330).jpg
- File:20080826-IMG 2001-Edit Nights @ Kazantip (4195619519).jpg
- File:20080826-IMG 2213 Nights @ Kazantip (4195619969).jpg
- File:20080826-IMG 2222 Nights @ Kazantip (4195620315).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Mitte27 (talk) 13:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Delete No freedom of panorama in the U.S. for 3D works of art. No indication the rights of the image are available under a license compatible with Commons. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 14:07, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation - the creator of this photograph (Pip - bypip.co.uk) has not given permission for the use of this photograph. Photograph was taken from an article by The Times. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/richard-gadd-i-was-stalked-for-four-years-8r2vdpd9r TheGoodEndedHappily (talk) 20:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Support Per the nominator. Mondo (talk) 20:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Olive34830 (talk · contribs)
[edit]There is no freedom of panorama in France.
- File:Montferrier rond-point Agropolis street art 2019 n°8.jpg
- File:Montferrier rond-point Agropolis street art 2019 n°7.jpg
- File:Montferrier rond-point Agropolis street art 2019 n°5.jpg
- File:Montferrier rond-point Agropolis street art 2019 n°6.jpg
- File:Montferrier rond-point Agropolis street art 2019 n°4.jpg
- File:Montferrier rond-point Agropolis street art 2019 n°2.jpg
- File:Montferrier rond-point Agropolis street art 2019 n°1.jpg
- File:Montferrier rond-point Agropolis street art 2019 n°3.jpg
- File:Rond-point Agropolis station eaux̠ usées n°2. Street-Art 2019.jpg
- File:Rond-point Agropolis station eaux usées n°6. Street-Art 2019.jpg
- File:Rond-point Agropolis station eaux̠ usées n°6 zoom. Street-Art 2019.jpg
- File:Rond-point Agropolis station eaux̠ usées n°6. Street-Art 2019.jpg
- File:Rond-point Agropolis station eaux̠ usées n°5. Street-Art 2019.jpg
- File:Rond-point Agropolis station eaux̠ usées n°4. Street-Art 2019.jpg
- File:Rond-point Agropolis station eaux̠ usées n°1. Street-Art 2019.jpg
- File:Rond-point Agropolis station eaux̠ usées n°3. Street-Art 2019.jpg
- File:Agropolis,ancien musée,street-art,19.11.2019-22.jpg
- File:Agropolis,ancien musée,street-art,19.11.2019-19.jpg
- File:Agropolis,ancien musée,street-art,19.11.2019-18.jpg
- File:Agropolis,ancien musée,street-art,19.11.2019-16.jpg
- File:Agropolis,ancien musée,street-art,19.11.2019-17.jpg
- File:Agropolis,ancien musée,street-art,19.11.2019-15.jpg
- File:Agropolis,ancien musée,street-art,19.11.2019-14.jpg
- File:Agropolis,ancien musée,street-art,19.11.2019-13.jpg
- File:Agropolis,ancien musée,street-art,19.11.2019-12.jpg
- File:Agropolis,ancien musée,street-art,19.11.2019-11.jpg
- File:Agropolis,ancien musée,street-art,19.11.2019-10.jpg
- File:Agropolis,ancien musée,street-art,19.11.2019-7.jpg
- File:Agropolis,ancien musée,street-art,19.11.2019-9.jpg
- File:Agropolis,ancien musée,street-art,19.11.2019-8.jpg
- File:Agropolis,ancien musée,street-art,19.11.2019-4.jpg
- File:Agropolis,ancien musée,street-art,19.11.2019-6.jpg
- File:Agropolis,ancien musée,street-art,19.11.2019-5.jpg
- File:Agropolis,ancien musée,street-art,19.11.2019-3.jpg
- File:Agropolis,ancien musée,street-art,19.11.2019-1.jpg
- File:Agropolis,ancien musée,street-art,19.11.2019-2.jpg
Günther Frager (talk) 21:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unidentified apparent work of art Krok6kola (talk) 00:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 18:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not PD yet, creator Hermann Junker (1877-1962) died less than 70 years ago Einsamer Schütze (talk) 00:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 18:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
blurry photo of unidentified people Krok6kola (talk) 00:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 18:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
not in PD, not published under CC Einsamer Schütze (talk) 00:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 18:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
gov.kz does not publish its images with CC0 1.0. Malik Nursultan B (talk) 00:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 18:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Seems like it is a copyvio of https://www.freepik.com/free-photo/top-view-delicious-noodles-concept_11381863.htm Bawolff (talk) 02:07, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 18:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Sorry this picture is not interesting for an encyclopedia Perfectodefecto (talk) 03:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Quite interesting for me though. Keep. 186.174.37.27 19:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 18:23, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Upload por un violador de derechos de autor 186.174.69.38 19:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- This image represents me and I own the rights to the image Denizemszi (talk) 19:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Como lo va a demostrar? 186.174.69.38 19:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- My name is Rizner Dénes nickname: Deniz. This is my facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/deniz.official and my website: https://deniz.hu Denizemszi (talk) 09:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Como lo va a demostrar? 186.174.69.38 19:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission (different web sources, eg: http://audmax.hu/img/upload/hirek/2023-deniz---a-zene-es-a-szoveg-szolgalataban/at2.jpg). --Wdwd (talk) 08:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
copy of linkedin https://fr.linkedin.com/posts/albert-moghomaye-b028115_%C3%A9nergie-assurance-opportunit%C3%A9-activity-6997851459765555200-3O-R?trk=public_profile_like_view Habertix (talk) 19:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 08:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted artworks. RodRabelo7 (talk) 20:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 08:02, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Suspected CopyVio: Uploader declared unsourced satellite images as "own work" - Sources (like Landsat) need to be stated, and if it's just GoogleMaps, it needs to get deleted.
- File:Satelital Conciliación.jpg
- File:Colón Satelital.jpg
- File:Lezica Satelital.jpg
- File:Paso de las Duranas Satelital.jpg
- File:Prado Satelital.jpg
- File:Bella Vista Satelital.jpg
- File:Aires Puros Satelital.jpg
- File:Capurro Satelital.jpg
- File:Belvedere Satelital.jpg
- File:Nuevo París Satelital.jpg
- File:La Tablada o Sayago Rural Satelital.jpg
- File:Peñarol Satelital.jpg
- File:La Teja Satelital.jpg
- File:Aguada Satelital.jpg
- File:Sayago Norte Satelital.jpg
- File:Sayago Complete Satelital.jpg
- File:Sayago Satelital.jpg
Enyavar (talk) 14:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unknown source (COM:DW). --Wdwd (talk) 12:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by WalterKlaus3 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Flickrwashing. The source flickr account was created on March 2023 and the about on flickr shows it is "walterklaus315", a similar user name a the uploader. March 2023 is also when this editor created an article on Danny Lauter on the English Wikipedia. The photostream has images with varying EXIF information crediting different copyright holders, none of which are the uploader. Also has a history of copyright violations.
Whpq (talk) 15:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 12:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Still copyrighted. Painter Wacław Palessa died in 1976. Botev (talk) 16:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- This painting is state owned (The Szczecin National Museum) and it is in public domain. Oleo (talk) 05:10, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- The fact that the painting itself is state-owned doesn't mean that it is in public domain. Do we have any evidence that it was somehow released to the public domain by its author? --Botev (talk) 08:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Probably, you`re right. But using royal we? That makes me laugh. Oleo (talk) 10:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- On the contrary, that was pluralis modestiae. --Botev (talk) 19:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Chyba jest Pan fajnym gościem i raczej Pana polubię. Pozdrawiam. Oleo (talk) 05:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- On the contrary, that was pluralis modestiae. --Botev (talk) 19:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Probably, you`re right. But using royal we? That makes me laugh. Oleo (talk) 10:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- The fact that the painting itself is state-owned doesn't mean that it is in public domain. Do we have any evidence that it was somehow released to the public domain by its author? --Botev (talk) 08:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Still copyrighted. Painter Wacław Palessa died in 1976. Botev (talk) 16:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- This state published postcard comprises the state owned painting/image (The Warsaw Museum) which is in public domain. Oleo (talk) 05:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- The fact that the state published it as a postcard doesn't mean it's not copyrighted. Although photographs published prior to 1994 may qualify as {{PD-Polish}}, this is not a photograph but a painting. So no - still no evidence of copyright-free status. --Botev (talk) 08:50, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- So delete it. I don`t care. Oleo (talk) 11:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- The fact that the state published it as a postcard doesn't mean it's not copyrighted. Although photographs published prior to 1994 may qualify as {{PD-Polish}}, this is not a photograph but a painting. So no - still no evidence of copyright-free status. --Botev (talk) 08:50, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Ahri.boy as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Out of scope, just some text: Not a valid SD criterion, file is currently in use. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 16:54, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- The draft article in enwiki is already deleted as it is unambiguous advertising. I tagged the photo as Out of scope.
Speedy delete as it contains only some text that is considered an advertisement Ahri.boy (talk) 21:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Günther Frager as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo by Oren Peled - © All rights reserved Yann (talk) 18:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Hello
- My name is Oren Peled and I am the owner of the rights to the photo you wish to delete. I am the one who uploaded the photo to Wikipedia (it is a page that provides information about an English-speaking Israeli film I made - you can get more details about it on SAVINGMANGO.COM). I am aware of the importance of copyright and respect it, and it is important for me to emphasize that I am the owner of the rights to this image.
- I will be more then happy to prove it in any way that needed.
- Thank you
- Oren ORENPELED (talk) 20:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission - @ORENPELED: Please follow Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team#Licensing_images:_when_do_I_contact_VRT?. --Wdwd (talk) 09:25, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
out of scope: Commons is not the platform for "who has seen my pet" searches Enyavar (talk) 12:53, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- I apologise for making it seem like I was looking for tuxedo and needed help finding him on Wikipedia XD. As it turns out, I uploaded it for my user page. I named the file that way because I was missing my boy. But, hes been lost for months now and we have concluded his death. So, it was not meant to be a search for a lost pet, and now we have given up. It was meant to be used on my user page. Jayson (talk) 13:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- recategorized as user page image,
I withdraw my nomination --Enyavar (talk) 14:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- recategorized as user page image,
Kept: DR withdrawn. --Wdwd (talk) 13:00, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
potential copyvio and entirely unusable due to multiple unnecessary watermarks Psubhashish (talk) 13:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Marjing
[edit]These are historically inaccurate AI generated images of the mythological god Marjing. So the files should be deleted as OOS due to serving no educational purpose what-so-ever.
- File:Ancient Meitei God Marjing — Primordial deity of polo (Sagol Kangjei), hockey (Khong Kangjei), horse (Sagol) & wars (Laan) — Rider of Samaton Ayangpa, a winged flying horse — Wielder of a divine polostick (or a hockey stick).jpg
- File:Ancient Meitei God Marjing — Primordial deity of polo (Sagol Kangjei), hockey (Khong Kangjei), horse (Sagol) and wars (Laan) — Rider of Samaton Ayangpa, a winged flying horse — Wielder of a divine polostick (or a hockey stick).jpg
- File:Primordial Meitei Deity Marjing — Ancient God of polo (Sagol Kangjei), hockey (Khong Kangjei), horse (Sagol) & wars (Laan) — Rider of Samaton Ayangpa, a winged flying horse — Wielder of a divine polostick (or a hockey stick).jpg
,_hockey_(Khong_Kangjei),_horse_(Sagol)_%26_wars_(Laan)_%E2%80%94_Rider_of_Samaton_Ayangpa,_a_winged_flying_horse_%E2%80%94_Wielder_of_a_divine_polostick_(or_a_hockey_stick).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_hockey_(Khong_Kangjei),_horse_(Sagol)_and_wars_(Laan)_%E2%80%94_Rider_of_Samaton_Ayangpa,_a_winged_flying_horse_%E2%80%94_Wielder_of_a_divine_polostick_(or_a_hockey_stick).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_hockey_(Khong_Kangjei),_horse_(Sagol)_%26_wars_(Laan)_%E2%80%94_Rider_of_Samaton_Ayangpa,_a_winged_flying_horse_%E2%80%94_Wielder_of_a_divine_polostick_(or_a_hockey_stick).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 05:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The artworks were created using numerous explanations in the prompts, for which considerable amount of research in the topic has been done. Merely saying historically inaccurate in a deletionist perspective without understanding anything about the topic, just because it's AI, is really shocking. Regarding scope too, the files are used in numerous projects. Haoreima (talk) 19:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Korouhanba
[edit]These are historically inaccurate AI generated images of the mythological god Marjing. So the files should be deleted as OOS due to serving no educational purpose what-so-ever.
- File:Numit (AKA Korou Hanba, Korouhanba, Kolou Hanpa, Kolouhanpa, Koilou Hanpa, Koilouhanpa, Taohuireng, Taohuileng, Taodanba, Taotanpa, Ngantureng, Ngantuleng, among His 1000 Names) — Sun God — Classical Meitei mythology & religion.jpg
- File:Numit (aka Korou Hanba, Korouhanba, Kolou Hanpa, Kolouhanpa, Koilou Hanpa, Koilouhanpa, Taohuireng, Taohuileng, Taodanba, Taotanpa, Ngantureng, Ngantuleng, among His 1000 Names) — Sun God — Classical Meitei mythology & religion.jpg
- File:Numit (alias Korou Hanba, Korouhanba, Kolou Hanpa, Kolouhanpa, Koilou Hanpa, Koilouhanpa, Taohuireng, Taohuileng, Taodanba, Taotanpa, Ngantureng, Ngantuleng, among His 1000 Names) — Solar God — Classical Meitei mythology & religion.jpg
- File:Numit (alias Korou Hanba, Korouhanba, Kolou Hanpa, Kolouhanpa, Koilou Hanpa, Koilouhanpa, Taohuireng, Taohuileng, Taodanba, Taotanpa, Ngantureng, Ngantuleng, among His 1000 Names) — Sun God — Classical Meitei mythology & religion.jpg
- File:Numit (or Korou Hanba, Korouhanba, Kolou Hanpa, Kolouhanpa, Koilou Hanpa, Koilouhanpa, Taohuireng, Taohuileng, Taodanba, Taotanpa, Ngantureng, Ngantuleng, among His 1000 Names) — Sun God — Classical Meitei mythology & religion.jpg
_%E2%80%94_Sun_God_%E2%80%94_Classical_Meitei_mythology_%26_religion.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E2%80%94_Sun_God_%E2%80%94_Classical_Meitei_mythology_%26_religion.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E2%80%94_Solar_God_%E2%80%94_Classical_Meitei_mythology_%26_religion.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E2%80%94_Sun_God_%E2%80%94_Classical_Meitei_mythology_%26_religion.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E2%80%94_Sun_God_%E2%80%94_Classical_Meitei_mythology_%26_religion.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 05:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Shame there's no prompt specified. In what way are they inaccurate? Belbury (talk) 10:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- I assume the file names were the prompts. In what way do these images look like the mythological god
Korouhanba? Because there's a few images of him out there and he looks nothing what-so-ever like this guy. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Numerous descriptions of the deities are mentioned in sacred scriptures, which exist in varying degrees. These descriptions are not always available in the internet. And we do not promote uploading pictures looking similar to ones already present in internet because those already present ones might be copyrighted. And also, please be respectful while commenting regarding religious topics.
- Delete fanciful reimagining of mythological figure seemingly made without any historical material, not that an AI can even be trusted to faithfully render such material. Dronebogus (talk) 10:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The artworks were created using numerous explanations in the prompts, for which considerable amount of research in the topic has been done. Merely saying historically inaccurate in a deletionist perspective without understanding anything about the topic, just because it's AI, is really shocking. Regarding scope too, the files are used in numerous projects. Haoreima (talk) 19:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:02, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Very low resolution and the fact that a nearly identically named image uploaded by the same user was speedied as a copyvio suggest this probably isn’t own work Dronebogus (talk) 10:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:12, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Bing maps screenshot Einsamer Schütze (talk) 01:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 08:54, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 08:56, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 08:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 福田 Futian 孖嶺站 Maling Metro Station map sign n B C D E exit signs May 2024 R12S.jpg
[edit]
Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 08:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 龍崗 Longgang 吉華路 Jihua Road 坂田北站 Bantian North Station floor plan sign May 2024 R12S 08.jpg
[edit]
Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 08:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 龍崗 Longgang 吉華路 Jihua Road 坂田北站 Bantian North Station map sign May 2024 R12S 09.jpg
[edit]
Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 08:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 龍崗 Longgang 星河 Galaxy Coco Park mall 客戶服務處 service counter intro sign May 2024 R12S.jpg
[edit]
Copyrighted poster in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 08:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 08:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 08:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 08:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 龍崗 Longgang 雅寶站 Yabao Metro Station Smartphone ads Harmony OS May 2024 R12S 01.jpg
[edit]
Copyrighted poster of Huawei. Solomon203 (talk) 10:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 08:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 龍崗 Longgang Metro 光雅園站 GuangYaYuan Station floor plan sign May 2024 R12S 02.jpg
[edit]
Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 08:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 08:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Not in the public domain Daehan (talk) 08:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: no free license at source. --GPSLeo (talk) 08:55, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krashaon19 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Poorer quality duplicate, will not be used on Wikipedia, and will likely never be used on any related Bath City F.C. article. Yann (talk) 12:55, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Properly licensed and we are past courtesy deletion period. The other version is a different file type. We keep both, pngs make poorer thumbnails but use less compression. --RAN (talk) 19:11, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
This a redundant and low quality image that bloats commons, it will likely never be used in any Bath City related articles. Bathwelshman19 (talk) 13:42, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per previous listing. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:37, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Poor quality image that I uploaded. Stupidly, I heavily altered and even drew some parts of the image in editing software's. Should be deleted. Joseph1891 (talk) 10:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --GPSLeo (talk) 08:59, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 龍崗 Longgang Metro 光雅園站 GuangYaYuan Station map sign Wuhe Blvd May 2024 R12S 01.jpg
[edit]
Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 08:59, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 龍崗 Longgang Metro map sign Wuhe Blvd Bantian North Station n Wuhe Station May 2024 R12S.jpg
[edit]
Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 09:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
File:BJ 北京首都國際機場 Beijing Capital International Airport BCIA location map directory sign Floorplan Aug-2010 You Are Here.JPG
[edit]
Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 09:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳市 Shenzhen 福田區 Futian District 上梅林站 Metro Shangmeilin Station map sign May 2024 R12S 08.jpg
[edit]
Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 09:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳市 Shenzhen 福田區 Futian District 上梅林站 Metro Shangmeilin Station map sign May 2024 R12S 09.jpg
[edit]
Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 09:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Dervative work of Finnish sculptor Matti Mönkäre. Sculpture Ahjo ("Furnace") unveiled in 1981. No Freedom of panorama in Finland for sculptures, not in PD. Htm (talk) 11:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 09:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
wrong date, wrong author, wrong source... Xocolatl (talk) 13:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Now fixed, you can fix too. --RAN (talk) 02:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --GPSLeo (talk) 09:01, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation and duplicate Alienautic (talk) 13:04, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 09:02, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
I, as an uploader and had no experience at that time, found that this picture is not for uploading as my own work. I apologize for my mistake. I have found out a long time ago but not remember that I still have some pictures to get them removed. Pakorn Wongaroon (talk) 13:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 09:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No educational use, fictional coat of arms Zoupan (talk) 22:37, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- It definitely should not be used in a Wikipedia article, but it's pretty harmless (similar to a number of other such files). AnonMoos (talk) 11:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In dubio pro reo as the file is used in it wp Sanandros (talk) 22:39, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
This is supposedly a fictional cart of arms for a so called "new Yugoslavia", whatever that is. So the image should be deleted as OOS since it doesn't serve any educational purpose. Adamant1 (talk) 00:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:38, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE fantasy flag; COM:NOTHOST. GPinkerton (talk) 13:15, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, per nomination. Veverve (talk) 09:58, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep INUSE, and (yet another) highly pejorative nomination from this editor who stretches "invention" (this does appear to be a flag which has been invented, perhaps by this uploader) into dismissive terms like "fantasy" and citing NOTHOST. It is hardly breaching use of Commons as a personal web host when this image in INUSE across Wikipedia.
- There is no WP:OR rule here at Commons. The creation of a flag like this, with Rhodes as a charge upon an existing national flag, has a long vexillogical tradition to represent regions. It's being used for that purpose at Wikipedia; this is legitimate and we should support it. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:39, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Andy Dingley: no-one is citing WP:OR. Your allusions to it are a strawman argument. You have not presented any plausible reasons as to why you believe Commons policies should be ignored in this case, and instead you make misplaced references to irrelevant rules on other Wikis. This is not a reasonable course of argument to attempt. GPinkerton (talk) 12:04, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: is in use and I don't see it as a fake, it is a compilation of real images that could have value in illustrating. --rubin16 (talk) 07:18, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
This is a fictional flag that's only being used on a couple of random user galleries. And I don't think it's inherently has any educational value just because it's a combination of elements from real flags either. So the image should be deleted as COPYVIO as OOS unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 01:00, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete original keep arguments are absurd, amounting to “Andy Dingley uses the Chewbacca defense and rubin16 agrees”. This is clearly OOS and the value of decorating some userpages is outweighed by the bad precedent set by this egregious case of admin supervoting. Dronebogus (talk) 11:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep For exactly the same reasons as last time. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Your argument was nonsense back then and it remains nonsense almost three years later. Dronebogus (talk) 08:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. WikiCommons is not your free webhost for your original artistic creations (COM:SCOPE, COM:HOST). Veverve (talk) 10:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:38, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
This flag never existed, and it being used in a semi-official manner , that's not appropriate. Fry1989 (talk) 19:59, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
- It's used on en-wiki, right? Shouldn't it be discussed there, not here? If they insist on using the pic, it stays. NVO (talk) 20:22, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
- I have checked the Stub it's in on Wikipedia-EN, it was just added earlier today, without any discussion anywhere regarding it. I have since undone that insert, as this is completely inappropriate. It should be deleted. Fry1989 (talk) 22:04, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
- What makes it inappropriate? It's the Canadian flag with two colors instead of one. The first one proposed in 1966 had two blue bars representing the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.--Harfang (talk) 20:23, 28 March ::2011 (UTC)
- I do like what you did with the history stub, but it doesn't explain why having this two coloured flag on file is wrong!--Harfang (talk) 20:27, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- What makes it inappropriate? It's the Canadian flag with two colors instead of one. The first one proposed in 1966 had two blue bars representing the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.--Harfang (talk) 20:23, 28 March ::2011 (UTC)
- This is the flag proposed in 1964, and it's quite different from this file. It was never adopted, or even used unofficially. It's not appropriate for those reasons. Fry1989 (talk) 01:09, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Question Are we quite sure this was not one of the choices in the design process? -- Given that it is halfway between the Pearson flag and the final choice, that seems at least possible. If that is true, then we should keep it to illustrate the process. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:55, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- I have checked the Stub it's in on Wikipedia-EN, it was just added earlier today, without any discussion anywhere regarding it. I have since undone that insert, as this is completely inappropriate. It should be deleted. Fry1989 (talk) 22:04, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Kept: in use Jcb (talk) 14:44, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
The file was previously nominated for deletion since the flag is fictional but it was kept due to being in use on Wikipedia at the time. That doesn't seem to be the case anymore though. So the image should be deleted as OOS unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 01:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - as noted above, not fictional, but a candidate in the process and ended up with this flag without the blue. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Activist art. No context within any article. Not used with exception of a few user pages. DevinCook (talk) 06:37, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
- Images primarily or only used on user pages are allowed -- consult {{User page image}}. This is a "Special or fictional flag". Commons has many hundreds of them, and they usually aren't deleted just for being "Special or fictional" -- only if they're maliciously hoaxing or hatemongering.... AnonMoos (talk) 14:20, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
- In the case of this image, I would favor the "maliciously hoaxing or hatemongering" argument. -DevinCook (talk) 21:18, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
- Really? en:User:Kelapstick/UBX/CommieCali says "This User doesn't think California is the First Communist State of America, he just likes this flag." -- AnonMoos (talk) 22:11, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
- In the case of this image, I would favor the "maliciously hoaxing or hatemongering" argument. -DevinCook (talk) 21:18, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Hopefully communist witch hunt is past. Yann (talk) 09:20, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 20:16, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per previous discussion on this topic. The file is in use on a user page. Mysterymanblue 22:26, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Mysterymanblue: COM:INUSE states: "If an image is in use on another project (aside from use on talk pages or user pages), that is enough for it to be within scope." (emphasis added) Being in use on a talk page or user page does not mean it is within COM:SCOPE. COM:SPAM suggests "Artwork without obvious educational use, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills" … "are not realistically useful for an educational purpose" and "An otherwise non-educational file does not acquire educational purpose solely because it is in use on a gallery page or in a category on Commons, nor solely because it is in use on a user page". If a file – such as this one – is out of scope; it should be deleted. GPinkerton (talk) 01:24, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. "The uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of Commons or another project is allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project.". —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:53, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
This is a fake flag for "Communist California." The only usage outside of file logs seems to be on a user talk page along with the caption "This User previously lived in the Shit-Hole State of California, and believes it to be the First Communist State of America." So at least IMO it doesn't follow the "good faith" part of the guideline about a file being kept if it's in use. There's no educational value to it outside of that either. So the image should be deleted as OOS, if not also due to the clearly malicious nature of it. Adamant1 (talk) 03:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete trolling is OOS Dronebogus (talk) 01:17, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:41, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: meaningless AI-generated "infographic" full of gibberish ("comminnication", "inforginmon", "soccial work", "glod almoctimg", etc). Omphalographer (talk) 06:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
This image was nominated for deletion back in 2021 since it's a fictional flag but was kept due to being in use at the time. Although it's not being used anywhere now. So the image should be deleted as OOS. Adamant1 (talk) 06:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
This seems to be a user created fictional flag for heterosexuals. So it should be deleted as OOS due to having absolutely no educational value what-so-ever. Commons isn't a personal file host. Adamant1 (talk) 06:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as personal, promotional content per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Hetero Flag.png. Omphalographer (talk) 06:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- What product is being advertised here, exactly? Trade (talk) 13:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Heterosexuality™️ Dronebogus (talk) 11:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- What product is being advertised here, exactly? Trade (talk) 13:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete OOS as non-notable Dronebogus (talk) 11:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep This flag may have influenced the heart-shaped straight flag [4] [5] [6] [7] also used as a cisgender flag. Web-julio (talk) 04:07, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:43, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Image metadata states the copyright holder is "Peter Polyak". On the site https://www.polyakart.com/ referenced no CC license is mentioned, under which user:Polygo13 has uploaded this painding. 92.117.128.26 06:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Orphan image, article where the image was used, was deleted recently: (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trés Hanley). Delete per COM:NOTUSED (file used in Commons only) and COM:SPAM (self-promotion). Mika1h (talk) 09:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Added a similar file to the nomination, same subject, same uploader. --Mika1h (talk) 08:17, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Not public domain — this is a page from a 1986 issue of Consumer Reports. Trivialist (talk) 10:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Not PD in the US Dronebogus (talk) 10:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Why? The work was created around 1926, and in the US no works seems not to be copyrighted that were created before 1929.
- Commons:URAA-restored copyrights#Preliminary tests Paradise Chronicle (talk) 13:04, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- Artist died 1935, so PD in Germany. Pre 1929, so PD USA. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Arguably out of scope. Low quality photo of two unidentified people, according to description attending a sf convention in Poland - but nothing related to the event can be identified in the background. This photo has next to no educational or encyclopedic value, it is pretty much a selfie of two random people. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 12:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
wrong date, no source link Xocolatl (talk) 13:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
probably wrong author, date, source Xocolatl (talk) 13:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Obviously in the public domain, no reason to delete, please just slap on a {{Wrong license}} in the file description for now Nutshinou Talk! 18:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:57, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Superseded by .PNG: File:1_Spesmilo.png. All .jpg instances changed to .png, no longer used on Wikis. I am the copyright holder and consent with the deletion of the file. Fouky (talk) 13:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:57, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Superseded by .PNG: File:1_Stelo.png. All .jpg instances changed to .png, no longer used on Wikis. I am the copyright holder and consent with the deletion of the file. Fouky (talk) 13:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:57, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Superseded by .PNG: File:5_Steloj.png. All .jpg instances changed to .png, no longer used on Wikis. I am the copyright holder and consent with the deletion of the file. Fouky (talk) 13:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:57, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Superseded by .PNG: File:10_Steloj.png. All .jpg instances changed to .png, no longer used on Wikis. I am the copyright holder and consent with the deletion of the file. Fouky (talk) 13:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:57, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Superseded by .PNG: File:25_Steloj_Ag.png. All .jpg instances changed to .png, no longer used on Wikis. I am the copyright holder and consent with the deletion of the file. Fouky (talk) 13:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:57, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Superseded by .PNG: File:25_Steloj_Cu-Ni.png. All .jpg instances changed to .png, no longer used on Wikis. I am the copyright holder and consent with the deletion of the file. Fouky (talk) 13:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:57, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Superseded by .PNG: File:25_Steloj_Au.png. All .jpg instances changed to .png, no longer used on Wikis. I am the copyright holder and consent with the deletion of the file. Fouky (talk) 13:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:57, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Exif and file size imply it's not own work but taken from somewhere else. 186.174.134.132 14:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:58, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Wonka (film)
[edit]These photos show miniature versions of movie posters, therefore these are derived works. And we need permission of all production companies, which we most likely will never get
- File:HK KTD KW 觀塘 Kwun Tong Apm shopping mall 戲院 Palace APM Cinemas December 2023 R12S 01.jpg
- File:HK 啟德商場 AirSide Kai Tak Mall 電影院 MCL Cinemas on films January 2024 R12S 03.jpg
Mbch331 (talk) 15:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:58, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
URAA-case. Derivative work of Finnish sculptor Gabriel Engberg (Wikidata:Q5711671). Engberg died in 1953. Memorial to Battle of Nokia was unveiled in 1933. It was copyright protected in Finland at Uraa-date (1996-01-01). Because of URAA restored copyright this memorial is copyright protected in United States until 2029-01-01. There is no freedom of panorama for sculptures in Finland. Htm (talk) 16:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete since Finland has no valid FoP for monuments, URAA needs to be taken into account. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image is too out of focus to be of use for Commons Leoboudv (talk) 09:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The original on Flickr is actually a video, should that be imported instead or would it still be too low quality? Somegreenguy (talk) 23:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Comment: I suppose it would be better to import this as a video instead. Somegreenguy Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Low quality version of File:Couple standing in shallow water by Terasaki Kogyo.jpg Dronebogus (talk) 10:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE, processed as dup. --Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Likely not own work, small crop of unknown source with transmission code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:04, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Jan-Joosten-van Lodensteyn-and-William-Adams-with-Ship-Liefde-first-encounter-in-Kyushu-Japan-1600.png
[edit]
This seems like a modern painting of historical event. Likely no in PD Jarekt (talk) 16:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Hmm, you're right. If it's modern art then it should be deleted. Update: I did research and the author is Nobuyuki Tamada and it was made in April 2000 so it should be deleted. -18:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC) Artanisen (talk) 18:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Uncertain why uploader would have rights to license. Author and copyright holder "Moritz Bernoully" per EXIF. Reverse image search shows multiple versions on line more than 2 years before Commons upload. Note: Currently in use, but we have multiple good alterative images of this building. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
suspected CopyVio: satellite image claimed as own source Enyavar (talk) 18:06, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:26, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. It's a derivative work of a photograph by an unknown author from a family archive. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Figure19 as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: 040 Томск Императорский томский университет (cropped).jpg. Not an exact COM:DUPE, but requested by uploader. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Now I have doubts upon which image is primary, so I'm withdrawing my request. Keep --Figure19 (talk) 17:40, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 08:23, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Probably not PD Einsamer Schütze (talk) 00:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Faithful reproduction of obviously PD 2-dimensional art, so {{PD-art}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Reliefs do not count as 2-dimensional, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-Art_tag#Photograph_of_an_old_coin_found_on_the_Internet Einsamer Schütze (talk) 10:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- You have to consider that guidance in the context of the width-to-relief ratio. Many paintings, for example, are not truly flat. They have textural brushstrokes which lead to a painting surface which is not a smooth surface. Coins have a relatively small width, and so their relief can lead to creative choices when photographing in a necessarily close-up manner. A very wide chapel wall has a relief ratio that makes the changes in depth much less significant than a coin. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 22:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Probably not PD Einsamer Schütze (talk) 00:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Faithful reproduction of obviously PD 2-dimensional art, so {{PD-art}}. Right edge can be cropped if need be. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Reliefs do not count as 2-dimensional, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-Art_tag#Photograph_of_an_old_coin_found_on_the_Internet Einsamer Schütze (talk) 10:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 22:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Probably not PD Einsamer Schütze (talk) 00:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Faithful reproduction of obviously PD 2-dimensional art, so {{PD-art}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Reliefs do not count as 2-dimensional, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-Art_tag#Photograph_of_an_old_coin_found_on_the_Internet Einsamer Schütze (talk) 10:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 22:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Probably not PD Einsamer Schütze (talk) 00:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Faithful reproduction of obviously PD 2-dimensional art, so {{PD-art}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Reliefs do not count as 2-dimensional, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-Art_tag#Photograph_of_an_old_coin_found_on_the_Internet Einsamer Schütze (talk) 10:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 22:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 龍崗 Longgang 吉華路 Jihua Road 坂田北站 Bantian North Station drink vending machine May 2024 R12S.jpg
[edit]
COM:PACKAGING, also Copyrighted Vita Smiley World. see: Commons:Deletion requests/File:维他柠檬茶Smiley World瓶装.jpg メイド理世 (talk) 02:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 22:12, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Khoriphaba
[edit]These are historically inaccurate AI generated images of the mythological god Khoriphaba. So the files should be deleted as OOS due to serving no educational purpose what-so-ever.
- File:Divine Wrestling between Gods — Khoiriphaba vs Loiyalakpa — Classical Meitei mythology & religion (Sanamahism AKA Lainingthouism) of ancient Kangleipak civilization.jpg
- File:Grappling between Gods — Khoiriphaba vs Loiyalakpa — Classical Meitei mythology & religion (Sanamahism AKA Lainingthouism) of ancient Kangleipak civilisation.jpg
- File:Grappling between Gods — Khoiriphaba vs Loiyalakpa — Classical Meitei mythology & religion (Sanamahism AKA Lainingthouism) of ancient Kangleipak civilization.jpg
- File:Khoiriphaba (Khoriphaba) — Son of King Salailen (Soraren) & Queen Konthoujam Tampha of Heavenly Kingdom — Crying for his separation from mother — Gods gifted him golden horse, peacock, tortoise, etc. to pacify his cry but in vain.jpg
- File:Khoiriphaba vs Loiyalakpa — Gods of wrestling — Classical Meitei mythology & religion (Sanamahism AKA Lainingthouism) of ancient Kangleipak civilisation.jpg
- File:Khoiriphaba vs Loiyalakpa — Gods of wrestling — Classical Meitei mythology & religion (Sanamahism AKA Lainingthouism) of ancient Kangleipak civilization.jpg
- File:Lai Khoiriphaba (Khoriphaba), blindfolded & allowed by God Koupalu, to choose a bride of His choice using His divine mallet (polo stick) — Lai Nupi Thiba — Classical Meitei mythology & religion (Sanamahism) of ancient Kangleipak.jpg
- File:Lai Khoiriphaba (Khoriphaba), blindfolded & allowed by God Koupalu, to choose a bride of His choice using His divine polostick (mallet) — Lai Nupi Thiba — Classical Meitei mythology & religion (Sanamahism) of ancient Kangleipak.jpg
- File:Lainingthou Khoiriphaba (Khoriphaba), blindfolded & allowed by Koupalu, to choose a bride of His choice using His divine polostick (mallet) — Lai Nupi Thiba — Classical Meitei mythology & religion (Sanamahism) of ancient Kangleipak.jpg
- File:Two wrestler gods — Khoiliphapa (AKA Kholiphapa or Khoiriphaba or Khoriphaba) & Loiyalakpa (AKA Loyalakpa or Loiyarakpa or Loyarakpa) — Classical Meitei mythology & religion (Sanamahism AKA Lainingthouism) of Kangleipak civilization.jpg
- File:Wrestling between Gods — Khoiriphaba vs Loiyalakpa — Classical Meitei mythology & religion (Sanamahism AKA Lainingthouism) of ancient Kangleipak civilisation.jpg
- File:Wrestling between Gods — Khoiriphaba vs Loiyalakpa — Classical Meitei mythology & religion (Sanamahism AKA Lainingthouism) of ancient Kangleipak civilization.jpg
_of_ancient_Kangleipak_civilization.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_of_ancient_Kangleipak_civilisation.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_of_ancient_Kangleipak_civilization.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E2%80%94_Son_of_King_Salailen_(Soraren)_%26_Queen_Konthoujam_Tampha_of_Heavenly_Kingdom_%E2%80%94_Crying_for_his_separation_from_mother_%E2%80%94_Gods_gifted_him_golden_horse,_peacock,_tortoise,_etc._to_pacify_his_cry_but_in_vain.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_of_ancient_Kangleipak_civilisation.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_of_ancient_Kangleipak_civilization.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_blindfolded_%26_allowed_by_God_Koupalu,_to_choose_a_bride_of_His_choice_using_His_divine_mallet_(polo_stick)_%E2%80%94_Lai_Nupi_Thiba_%E2%80%94_Classical_Meitei_mythology_%26_religion_(Sanamahism)_of_ancient_Kangleipak.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_blindfolded_%26_allowed_by_God_Koupalu,_to_choose_a_bride_of_His_choice_using_His_divine_polostick_(mallet)_%E2%80%94_Lai_Nupi_Thiba_%E2%80%94_Classical_Meitei_mythology_%26_religion_(Sanamahism)_of_ancient_Kangleipak.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_blindfolded_%26_allowed_by_Koupalu,_to_choose_a_bride_of_His_choice_using_His_divine_polostick_(mallet)_%E2%80%94_Lai_Nupi_Thiba_%E2%80%94_Classical_Meitei_mythology_%26_religion_(Sanamahism)_of_ancient_Kangleipak.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%26_Loiyalakpa_(AKA_Loyalakpa_or_Loiyarakpa_or_Loyarakpa)_%E2%80%94_Classical_Meitei_mythology_%26_religion_(Sanamahism_AKA_Lainingthouism)_of_Kangleipak_civilization.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_of_ancient_Kangleipak_civilisation.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_of_ancient_Kangleipak_civilization.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 05:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete implausible interpretations of ancient mythology Dronebogus (talk) 11:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The artworks were created using numerous explanations in the prompts, for which considerable amount of research in the topic has been done. Merely saying historically inaccurate in a deletionist perspective without understanding anything about the topic, just because it's AI, is really shocking. Regarding scope too, the files are used in numerous projects. Haoreima (talk) 19:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Haoreima: The images should at least be slightly plausible and realistic if your going to claim this is all about me an ignorant, AI hating deletionist or whatever. The "numerous explanations" aside, you'd have to at least agree that Khoriphaba clearly wasn't a white Aryan who looks like a modern anime character like he's being portrayed in some of these images. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 22:12, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Koupalu
[edit]These are historically inaccurate AI generated images of the mythological god Koupalu. So the files should be deleted as OOS due to serving no educational purpose what-so-ever.
- File:Birth, Discovery & Adoption of Thoudu Nungthen Leima by God Koupalu & Goddess Kounu — Lady laid on a riverbed stone slab — Classical Meitei mythology & religion (Sanamahism AKA Lainingthouism) of early Kangleipak civilisation.jpg
- File:Birth, Discovery & Adoption of Thoudu Nungthen Leima by God Koupalu & Goddess Kounu — Lady laid on a riverbed stone slab — Classical Meitei mythology & religion (Sanamahism AKA Lainingthouism) of early Kangleipak civilization.jpg
- File:Koupalu (AKA Koubaru or Koubru) — Guardian of the Northwest — Personification of Mount Koubru — Receiver of puppies as offerings — Classical Meitei mythology & religion (Sanamahism AKA Lainingthouism) of Kangleipak civilisation.jpg
- File:Koupalu (AKA Koubaru or Koubru) — Guardian of the Northwest — Personification of Mount Koubru — Receiver of puppies as offerings — Classical Meitei mythology & religion (Sanamahism AKA Lainingthouism) of Kangleipak civilization.jpg
_of_early_Kangleipak_civilisation.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_of_early_Kangleipak_civilization.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E2%80%94_Guardian_of_the_Northwest_%E2%80%94_Personification_of_Mount_Koubru_%E2%80%94_Receiver_of_puppies_as_offerings_%E2%80%94_Classical_Meitei_mythology_%26_religion_(Sanamahism_AKA_Lainingthouism)_of_Kangleipak_civilisation.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E2%80%94_Guardian_of_the_Northwest_%E2%80%94_Personification_of_Mount_Koubru_%E2%80%94_Receiver_of_puppies_as_offerings_%E2%80%94_Classical_Meitei_mythology_%26_religion_(Sanamahism_AKA_Lainingthouism)_of_Kangleipak_civilization.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 05:06, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The artworks were created using numerous explanations in the prompts, for which considerable amount of research in the topic has been done. Merely saying historically inaccurate in a deletionist perspective without understanding anything about the topic, just because it's AI, is really shocking. Regarding scope too, the files are used in numerous projects. Haoreima (talk) 19:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Numerous explanations aside, if we're going to host AI generated images of mythological gods they should at least be plausible and Koubru clearly wasn't an Aryan white guy who looked like a modern western cartoon character. It's an insult to Asian folklore to act like these images are at all representative of how Koubru probably looked in traditional depictions of him. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:40, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please understand what is meant by Aryan look and white people's look first of all. By the way, I am not here for a debate or an argument. I have done considerable research in the very topic about their descriptions reading sacred scriptures. You are free to express your comments but in a calm way. Btw, my comment isn't the final. Haoreima (talk) 19:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm actually pretty calm about this. So lets make this about me or your perceptions of my emotions. The fact is that Koubru didn't look like a white Aryan cartoon character. Just because you've done considerable research doesn't mean it will be or is reflected in the AI generated images of him. Although if you have evidence of him looking like that in traditional texts be my guest and present it. I'm more then willing to retract this if the images are in fact historically accurate representations. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Great! I can provide you the books, if you are interested. However, those are written in Indian languages, not in English. Haoreima (talk) 20:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- I was hopping more for actual images of him from traditional texts. Basing it purely on textual descriptions doesn't work because we don't generally host fantasy amateur artwork. I'd probably be fine with these types of images if they were reflective of actual artwork from reliable Tibetan sources though. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Great! I can provide you the books, if you are interested. However, those are written in Indian languages, not in English. Haoreima (talk) 20:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm actually pretty calm about this. So lets make this about me or your perceptions of my emotions. The fact is that Koubru didn't look like a white Aryan cartoon character. Just because you've done considerable research doesn't mean it will be or is reflected in the AI generated images of him. Although if you have evidence of him looking like that in traditional texts be my guest and present it. I'm more then willing to retract this if the images are in fact historically accurate representations. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please understand what is meant by Aryan look and white people's look first of all. By the way, I am not here for a debate or an argument. I have done considerable research in the very topic about their descriptions reading sacred scriptures. You are free to express your comments but in a calm way. Btw, my comment isn't the final. Haoreima (talk) 19:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Numerous explanations aside, if we're going to host AI generated images of mythological gods they should at least be plausible and Koubru clearly wasn't an Aryan white guy who looked like a modern western cartoon character. It's an insult to Asian folklore to act like these images are at all representative of how Koubru probably looked in traditional depictions of him. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:40, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 22:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
This image is probably copyrighted due to being taken from Google. So it should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 06:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please see "How to use and cite Trends data" at Google Trends support. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 07:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep data and facts, not copyrightable. Dronebogus (talk) 07:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure the interface of their website and styling of data can both be copyrighted. Even if said data is ultimately just some factual numbers. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Interface is clearly beneath US TOO. Dronebogus (talk) 10:33, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Dronebogus: I don't necessarily disagree and I probably wouldn't have nominated the image for deletion if it were just of the interface. I think it's above US TOO taken as a whole though and that's usually how it works with images of software. You can't just say a screenshot of a document opened in Microsoft Word is below US TOO because the X in the top corner is to simple to be copyrighted. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don’t see a single thing here that passes TOO since it’s all mundane and purely utilitarian. I assume this was auto-generated so even if there’s somehow a “sweat of the brow” clause for producing charts and data visualizations there is no human author to credit. Dronebogus (talk) 08:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Dronebogus: I don't necessarily disagree and I probably wouldn't have nominated the image for deletion if it were just of the interface. I think it's above US TOO taken as a whole though and that's usually how it works with images of software. You can't just say a screenshot of a document opened in Microsoft Word is below US TOO because the X in the top corner is to simple to be copyrighted. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Interface is clearly beneath US TOO. Dronebogus (talk) 10:33, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure the interface of their website and styling of data can both be copyrighted. Even if said data is ultimately just some factual numbers. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, as per Dronebogus. RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 22:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Dr. Daniela Sommer, SPD Fraktion im Hessischen Landtag © Christof Mattes CC BY-SA 4.0.jpg
[edit]
Das Foto wurde fälschlicherweise als freigegeben eingestuft. Die abgebildete Person bittet um eine Rücknahme der Veröffentlichung. Daraufhin wurde das Foto wurde von der Ursprungswebsite www.spd-fraktion-hessen.de gelöscht. SPD-Fraktion im Hessischen Landtag (talk) 06:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 22:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
From https://m.famousfix.com/list/indian-psychiatrists with no indication that the image is free to use, therefore for us defaults to copyvio. Also uploader has given no information as to authorship, other than "I made this myself". So if not copyvio, it's an out of scope personal vanity shot of no use to the project. Acabashi (talk) 08:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Shot is useful for Wikipedia as it has been used in an article on English Wikipedia “Jaswant Singh Neki”. I have just imported file on commons from English Wikipedia which you rightly say that loader has mentioned made myself. It could also be possible that famousfix itself has used this photo and not the original copyright holder. No doubt subject is a noted psychiatrist doctor and Sikh scholar and material is useful should not be deleted. Guglani (talk) 08:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 22:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Files by Wikivoyage user Luchs
[edit]No evidence of permission: all links to uploader and sourcefile are dead
- File:Agvatnet.jpg
- File:Buneset.jpg
- File:Burchardikirche.jpg
- File:Burg altena 02.jpg
- File:Die Stadt Dinant.jpg
- File:Dinant Gericht.jpg
- File:Dinant Rathaus.jpg
- File:Fontane-Geburtshaus.jpg
- File:Gletschertopf in der Nähe von Nesland auf den Lofoten.jpg
- File:Gustav Kühn Denkmal.jpg
- File:Halberstadt01.jpg
- File:Halberstadt02.jpg
- File:Halberstadt03.jpg
- File:Halberstadt04.jpg
- File:Hogskrova Aussicht.jpg
- File:Kirchplatz Neuruppin.jpg
- File:Klimadiagramm Bsp 01.jpg
- File:Stadt altena.jpg
- File:Stamsund 2009.jpg
- File:Stamsund Aussicht.jpg
- File:Å i Lofoten 2009.jpg
A.Savin 11:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep There is just as much evidence here as there is if you or anyone upload a file to Commons and write "own work". When Wikivoyage was introduced as a member of the Wikimedia community thousands of old files were transferred from the old website to Commons. It was transferred with a bot and it copied all the information from that website to Commons. Just like if it was copied from Wikipedia to Commons. --MGA73 (talk) 13:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ping User:Multichill and User:Magog the Ogre. Magog helped clean up files from Wikivoyage after the transfer. Multichill untroduced me to the Pywikipedia bot that could move files to Commons. Both have transferred files to Commons with a bot. --MGA73 (talk) 13:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep absolutely no reason to doubt the orginal upload logs. Multichill (talk) 15:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep these images were on Wikivoyage which was its own project before merging into Wikimedia. The project was shut down after all images were transferred to Commons. MGA73 and I personally went and reviewed each of them. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 22:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope and unsourced: Maps used to promote revisionist history based on dubious sources. The land in the crudely redlined areas is not "gone" or "missing" (the maps even show it as land), it was just determined by historians (on whose research the original maps are based on) to have not been under direct rule of the Tang dynasty back in the day.
- File:There is a problem with this map, what about the land within the blue line?.png
- File:There is a problem with this map (land within the red line is missing).jpg
- File:Land is missing within the red line.png
- File:The red part of the land is gone.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Enyavar (talk) 13:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 22:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Suspected CopyVio: Satellite images are generally implausible as "own work"; so this is at best a screenshot of an undisclosed free satellite image which needs to be named. Otherwise, CopyVio.
Enyavar (talk) 13:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: by Krd. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
I, as an uploader and had no experience at that time, found that this picture is not for uploading as my own work. I apologize for my mistake. I have found out a long time ago but not remember that I still have some pictures to get them removed. (เดืมทีสับสนระหว่างเนื้อหาเสรี และเนื้อหาไม่เสรี จึงอัปโหลดไฟล์ของผู้อื่นลง wikimedia commons ซึ่งส่วนมาก ผมจะอ้างอิงตลอด แต่ใช้วิกิมานานแล้วพบว่ามันไม่ได้ทำแบบนั้น แล้วเพิ่งนึกออกว่ายังมีไฟล์ที่ยังไม่ลบ) Pakorn Wongaroon (talk) 13:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: unused. --Bedivere (talk) 22:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
I, as an uploader and had no experience at that time, found that this picture is not for uploading as my own work. I apologize for my mistake. I have found out a long time ago but not remember that I still have some pictures to get them removed. (ไม่ใช่ผลงานตัวเอง เกิดความสับสนระหว่างเนื้อหาเสรีกับเนื้อหาไม่เสรี เมื่อตอนเข้าวิกิใหม่ ๆ) Pakorn Wongaroon (talk) 13:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 22:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Screenshots of mw:Extension:FCKeditor (by Mafs) which has been abandoned for over a decade. Out of scope, and also derivative works of the drawing in the center, of which we have no idea of the license.
* Pppery * it has begun... 16:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I have no problem with anyone wanting to push these back on the MediaWiki wiki where they came from. —Uzume (talk) 16:57, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- They should be nowhere IMO - they're out of both wikis' scope, in addition the licensing issue. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: these are historical images of that MediaWiki extension, and while they are not used now, they are in scope in my opinion as they have the potential to be used, especially in the MediaWiki.org wiki. As for the drawing pictured, we have nothing against believing it is the actual own work of the uploader--Bedivere (talk) 22:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Derivative of 3 videos (the latter one is of 1970s), sources are missing, copyright status is unclear. Quick1984 (talk) 17:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 22:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Derivative of 3 videos (the latter one is of 1970s), sources are missing, copyright status is unclear. Quick1984 (talk) 17:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 22:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Derivative of the video of 1970s, source is missing, copyright status is unclear. Quick1984 (talk) 17:06, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 22:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Derivative of 3 videos (the latter one is of 1970s), sources are missing, copyright status is unclear. Quick1984 (talk) 17:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 22:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Probably not PD Einsamer Schütze (talk) 00:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep if cropped to focus on the center panel. Faithful reproduction of obviously PD 2-dimensional art, so {{PD-art}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Reliefs do not count as 2-dimensional, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-Art_tag#Photograph_of_an_old_coin_found_on_the_Internet Einsamer Schütze (talk) 10:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Not PD yet, creator Hermann Junker (1877-1962) died less than 70 years ago Einsamer Schütze (talk) 00:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Faithful reproduction of obviously PD 2-dimensional art, so {{PD-art}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Reliefs do not count as 2-dimensional, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-Art_tag#Photograph_of_an_old_coin_found_on_the_Internet Einsamer Schütze (talk) 10:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
This file has been superseded by c:File:KY-16-senate-districts accurate vs.svg, which contains corrected information. Mad Mismagius (talk) 02:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:18, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Not in use - vector version available HLFan (talk) 08:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Not in use - vector version available HLFan (talk) 08:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Not in use - vector version available HLFan (talk) 08:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Not in use - vector version available HLFan (talk) 08:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Superstraight
[edit]All of these images are for a fictional flag having to do with a fake, transphobic sexual orientation that never went anywhere outside of a single online message board. There's no reason we need to host images of fictional flags for every random meme or online message board posting out there. In fact we don't as the upwards of three hundred deletion requests for fictional flags that were deleted in Category:Fictitious symbol related deletion requests/deleted shows. The clear consensus is against hosting these types of images on Commons. So they should be deleted as OOS since they clearly serve absolutely no educational value what-so-ever.
- File:Alternative Super Straight Flagge.png
- File:Super Straight Flag.png
- File:Super Straight Flagge.png
- File:Superstraight Flag (Flagicon).png
- File:Superstraight Flag Flagicon.jpg
- File:Superstraight Flag.png
- File:SuperStraightFlag.jpg
- File:SuperStraightFlag.png
- File:SuperStraightFlag.svg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 09:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep to start with, at least one is COM:INUSE. Next, if by “a single message board” you mean /pol/, a very notable board on the very notable website 4chan, then that is enough to both make it marginally notable and notable enough for commons’ extremely low standards. Finally, there is a difference between a made-up thing that originated outside WM and a thing made up one day. This is the former. Dronebogus (talk) 10:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- The only in use file I saw was being used in a 2 old draft article that clearly isn't going to be put in mainspace anytime soon, if ever. So I don't think the usage is a valid reason to keep the image. As far as the where this orginated from, your correct that 4chan is notable. That obviously doesn't mean every single random thing that gets posted there is notable, eductional, or otherwise worth hosting on Commons though. Files don't get a free pass from Commons:Project scope just because someone might have posted them to 4chan once. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- File:Super Straight Flag.svg is in extensive use (and if you game the system by going to every single wiki it’s on and removing it you will be reported). You should actually check these things before indiscriminately nominating everything in a category. And I don’t get why you seem to think this is just some random thing that never received any media attention— it’s discussed on the w:/pol/ article of enwiki— I quote, “ Colors associated with ‘super straight’, often used in the form of flags, were black and orange.” (Emphasis mine) It’s also discussed extensively at w:Straight flag, where one of these files is in use. Dronebogus (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, I must have missed checking that one. I don't plan on removing it from anywhere and I'd appreciate it if you laid off the needlessly confrontational, accusatory tone about this. Its really not helpful. I explained why I don't think its a thing in the other DR. Plenty of random, benial facts are mentioned in Wikimedia articles. That doesn't make them "things" though, whatever that means. Do you have any evidence of these flags actually beinf IRL or refered to outside of the transphobic angle? If not then at least IMO these images clearly aren't worth keeping. Although their eductional usefulness would still be questionable regardless. But actual usage of the flags IRL would at least be better then your claim that they should be kept simply "because 4chan." --Adamant1 (talk) 11:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- You are living in some kind of alternate universe where a pride flag must be used in real life by some kind of legitimate sexual or gender minority to be in-scope. I have literally presented extensive evidence that these are non-trivially COM:INUSE and you just keep repeating the same arguments over and over when they have nothing to do with what I just said. Dronebogus (talk) 11:06, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Are you really going to argue this is at all comparable to the pride flag? Come on. You know they aren't at all comparable to each other. Regardless, just because one image is in use doesn't automatically mean the other 9 images I nominated for deletion should be kept. You clearly have no actual arguement for keeping the imaged outside of making bad faithed, personal accusations though. I hear what your saying perfectly fine. I just think your wrong. Get over it and spare me the defense bad attitude about this. There's really no need for it. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- “If superstraight isn’t a pride flag then you must delete” isn’t a coherent argument. I really don’t care what happens to the unused ones as long as the ones that are actually being legitimately used are kept. That’s literally all I’m vouching for here. Dronebogus (talk) 11:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Good thing none of the reasons I said the images should be deleted have anything to do with the pride flag then. Your the one who brought it up to begin with. The only noncoherent argument here is you bringing up the pride flag and then treating me like it has anything to do with why I think the images should be deleted. "the Chewbacca defense is a legal strategy in which a criminal defense lawyer tries to confuse the jury rather than refute the case of the prosecutor. It is an intentional distraction or obfuscation." That's literally all you've been doing. I guess there's nothing more to say about it if you don't care about the unused files being deleted though. Although I think the one that's in use should be deleted to, but I'm more then willing to leave it up to whomever closes this. Maybe drop it on your end going forward in the meantime. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- I’m still completely baffled about why you think your reasons to delete make any sense whatsoever, but I’m more baffled by your resistance to acknowledging COM:INUSE applies to File:Super Straight Flag.svg and multiple others. Dronebogus (talk) 11:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Since your apparently incapable of dropping this for some reason how exaxtly is me saying I just missed that the one file was being used in a Wikipedia article not an acknowlegement of COM:INUSE? With the other file, I could be wrong but I thought COM:INUSE didn't apply in cases were the image is being used on a draft article that has essentially no chance of ever being put into mainspace. The standard here isn't just "use" after all. There's also "realistic utility" and that's kind of negated by it being used in a draft article that's been stalled out for multiple years. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you want to convince me that you actually understand what INUSE is, just remove File:Super Straight Flag.svg, please. Dronebogus (talk) 11:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'll remove it if you promise not to come in so hot about things next time ;) --Adamant1 (talk) 12:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you want to convince me that you actually understand what INUSE is, just remove File:Super Straight Flag.svg, please. Dronebogus (talk) 11:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Since your apparently incapable of dropping this for some reason how exaxtly is me saying I just missed that the one file was being used in a Wikipedia article not an acknowlegement of COM:INUSE? With the other file, I could be wrong but I thought COM:INUSE didn't apply in cases were the image is being used on a draft article that has essentially no chance of ever being put into mainspace. The standard here isn't just "use" after all. There's also "realistic utility" and that's kind of negated by it being used in a draft article that's been stalled out for multiple years. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- I’m still completely baffled about why you think your reasons to delete make any sense whatsoever, but I’m more baffled by your resistance to acknowledging COM:INUSE applies to File:Super Straight Flag.svg and multiple others. Dronebogus (talk) 11:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Good thing none of the reasons I said the images should be deleted have anything to do with the pride flag then. Your the one who brought it up to begin with. The only noncoherent argument here is you bringing up the pride flag and then treating me like it has anything to do with why I think the images should be deleted. "the Chewbacca defense is a legal strategy in which a criminal defense lawyer tries to confuse the jury rather than refute the case of the prosecutor. It is an intentional distraction or obfuscation." That's literally all you've been doing. I guess there's nothing more to say about it if you don't care about the unused files being deleted though. Although I think the one that's in use should be deleted to, but I'm more then willing to leave it up to whomever closes this. Maybe drop it on your end going forward in the meantime. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- “If superstraight isn’t a pride flag then you must delete” isn’t a coherent argument. I really don’t care what happens to the unused ones as long as the ones that are actually being legitimately used are kept. That’s literally all I’m vouching for here. Dronebogus (talk) 11:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Are you really going to argue this is at all comparable to the pride flag? Come on. You know they aren't at all comparable to each other. Regardless, just because one image is in use doesn't automatically mean the other 9 images I nominated for deletion should be kept. You clearly have no actual arguement for keeping the imaged outside of making bad faithed, personal accusations though. I hear what your saying perfectly fine. I just think your wrong. Get over it and spare me the defense bad attitude about this. There's really no need for it. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- You are living in some kind of alternate universe where a pride flag must be used in real life by some kind of legitimate sexual or gender minority to be in-scope. I have literally presented extensive evidence that these are non-trivially COM:INUSE and you just keep repeating the same arguments over and over when they have nothing to do with what I just said. Dronebogus (talk) 11:06, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, I must have missed checking that one. I don't plan on removing it from anywhere and I'd appreciate it if you laid off the needlessly confrontational, accusatory tone about this. Its really not helpful. I explained why I don't think its a thing in the other DR. Plenty of random, benial facts are mentioned in Wikimedia articles. That doesn't make them "things" though, whatever that means. Do you have any evidence of these flags actually beinf IRL or refered to outside of the transphobic angle? If not then at least IMO these images clearly aren't worth keeping. Although their eductional usefulness would still be questionable regardless. But actual usage of the flags IRL would at least be better then your claim that they should be kept simply "because 4chan." --Adamant1 (talk) 11:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- File:Super Straight Flag.svg is in extensive use (and if you game the system by going to every single wiki it’s on and removing it you will be reported). You should actually check these things before indiscriminately nominating everything in a category. And I don’t get why you seem to think this is just some random thing that never received any media attention— it’s discussed on the w:/pol/ article of enwiki— I quote, “ Colors associated with ‘super straight’, often used in the form of flags, were black and orange.” (Emphasis mine) It’s also discussed extensively at w:Straight flag, where one of these files is in use. Dronebogus (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- The only in use file I saw was being used in a 2 old draft article that clearly isn't going to be put in mainspace anytime soon, if ever. So I don't think the usage is a valid reason to keep the image. As far as the where this orginated from, your correct that 4chan is notable. That obviously doesn't mean every single random thing that gets posted there is notable, eductional, or otherwise worth hosting on Commons though. Files don't get a free pass from Commons:Project scope just because someone might have posted them to 4chan once. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Speedy keep. In use in at least 13 pages across all projects, including Catalan-, Persian-, Italian-, and English-language Wikipedias, besides of course Wikidata. RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:53, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Most of them being the mainspace, just noting. RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:54, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- I just looked and most of them aren't being used. One file File:Super Straight Flag.png is being used in a draft that's been there for 2 years and I'm pretty sure we delete images in that case since it doesn't have "realistic utility" at that point. Then there's a couple of random uses with other files in bot galleries, which again, doesn't meet the whole ""realistic utility" thing. That's all the usage I can find though. So can you point out which file is used in at least 13 pages across all projects since I'm not seeing it on my end for some reason? --Adamant1 (talk) 22:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep File:SuperStraightFlag.svg as a notable internet meme. Delete the rest as not useful--Trade (talk) 19:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep all, even if some of them aren't currently being used, there's no reason not to keep them for future use. JoePhin (talk) 02:54, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Before Adamant1 tries to argue that “most of them aren’t in use”, again, I’ll point out that since most of them are functionally identical to ones in use they’re kind of inherently in-scope. The only legitimate reasons to delete them are redundancy (which isn’t a particularly strong argument anyway) and being in undesirable formats for simple geometry like PNG/JPG over SVG (again also a weak argument). Dronebogus (talk) 11:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- I wasn't going to argue that, actually. Thanks for assuming though. Honestly, I don't expect anything even slightly related to sex or gender issues to be deleted, or at least for anyone to vote that way, but it what it is. I still think the images should be deleted regardless. Maybe at least leave the mind reading at the door next time though. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep some are identical and kinda useless, but others are not. MikutoH (talk) 00:52, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Superstraight
[edit]Unused close variants of File:Super Straight Flag.png or File:SuperStraightFlag.png.
- File:Alternative Super Straight Flagge.png
- File:Super Straight Flagge.png
- File:Superstraight Flag (Flagicon).png
- File:Superstraight Flag Flagicon.jpg
- File:Superstraight Flag.png
- File:SuperStraightFlag.jpg
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, also both PNGs have even higher-quality SVGs, which are more than sufficient. ~TheImaCow (talk) 20:51, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:08, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Turkiskauppiaat
[edit]These Panoramio imports depict Turkiskauppiaat (authored by sculptor Ossi Somma[8] who died in 2020[9]) in a non-incidental or intentional manner (that is, the sculpture is the important element in these Panoramio images). As there is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Finland for public art, these Panoramio imports infringe the late sculptor's posthumous copyright.
- File:"Turkiskauppiaat" illan suussa - panoramio.jpg
- File:Pirkkalaitorin "turkiskauppiaat"(Somma) - panoramio.jpg
- File:Turkiskauppiaat Ossi Somma's art - panoramio.jpg
- File:Turkiskauppiaat (Ossi Somma) joulua odotellessa...Christmas waiting - panoramio.jpg
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_joulua_odotellessa...Christmas_waiting_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:01, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
I feel like these standee photo-spots would violate c:COM:FOP US.
- File:Disney World 2008 100 3087 (2514467925).jpg
- File:Disney World 2008 100 3088 (2515294446).jpg
- File:Disney World 2008 100 3089 (2515295406).jpg
- File:Disney World 2008 100 3090 (2515296482).jpg
- File:Disney World 2008 100 3091 (2514471987).jpg
- File:Disney World 2008 100 3092 (2514472857).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
(Oinkers42) (talk) 23:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:01, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Harri Hedman Ossi
[edit]These Panoramio imports from a Panoramio photographer all depict various artistic works made by Ossi Somma (died 2020). The Panoramio photographer claims on his website that there was a permission from the sculptor (the images date to 2012); however, it is just a blanket statement that cannot be ascertained – if the permission is only confined to photography or if it extends to publication on Panoramio under commercial CC licensing. Finland has no commercial Freedom of Panorama for public art.
- File:Veistoksia, Ossi Somman, Taidepihalta, Vanha Penttilänkoulu 2 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Penttiläkoulun taidepihalta, (Ossi Somma) - panoramio.jpg
- File:Ossi Somma, Taidepialla ...art outdoors - panoramio.jpg
- File:Ossi Somman taidetta ,Pirkkalaistorilla, Nokialla - panoramio.jpg
- File:Veistoksia, Ossi Somman, Taidepihalta, Vanha Penttilänkoulu - panoramio.jpg
- File:Tie Ossi Somman, Taidepihalta, Vanha Penttilänkoulu - panoramio.jpg
- File:Tie Ossi Somman, Taidepihalle, Vanha Penttilänkoulu - panoramio.jpg
- File:Ossi Somma, Taidepihalla, Vanha Penttilänkoulu 4 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Ossi Somma, Taidepihalla, Vanha Penttilänkoulu ,art outdoors - panoramio.jpg
- File:Ossi Somma, Taidepihalla, Vanha Penttilänkoulu 2...Art outdoors - panoramio.jpg
- File:Sculpture Art, Pihamaalla (art outdoors) - panoramio.jpg
- File:Scrap cars outside in the garden - No, This is an art - panoramio.jpg
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:02, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted material Einsamer Schütze (talk) 01:02, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: no compatible license. --Ezarateesteban 17:18, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Alabasterstein as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no permission visible, see: https://jqadams.art/werke/marizza-liechtenstein-1923 Yann (talk) 18:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep According to https://jqadams.art/werke/marizza-liechtenstein-1923 it is the work by an Austrian painter, en:John Quincy Adams (painter) (1873-1933). The information should be corrected - source is not {{Own}} but {{PD-Art}} or PD-old, date, 1923.--miya (talk) 06:27, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Done. --Yann (talk) 09:19, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Trabajo propio? 186.174.69.38 18:54, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes I own the rights to the work and took the photo. 82.7.63.119 20:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- It’s perfectly fine for it to be on Wikipedia and has been considered “in the public domain” for such purposes by me 82.7.63.119 20:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, name of uploader is different from mentioned author. We would need permission from the author to maintain the image on Commons. --Ellywa (talk) 16:41, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Poor quality image that I should't have uploaded, heavily edited and messed around with it Joseph1891 (talk) 10:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep there is another similar picture of the subject? we don't delete images because low quality Ezarateesteban 17:20, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 11:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Really bad quality image that I uploaded, For some reason when I uploaded it I photoshoped it heavily and changed some parts of the image to make it appear clearer and smoother but its just looks bad. Should be deleted. Joseph1891 (talk) 10:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep we don't delete images because low quality unless there is another best Ezarateesteban 17:22, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 11:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
As per description, Recorded in 2011 during a rehearsal with the ballet orchestra. Performers' copyright status is unclear. Quick1984 (talk) 17:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 11:23, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
As per description, Recorded in 2010 during a rehearsal with the ballet orchestra. Performers' copyright status is unclear. Quick1984 (talk) 17:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 11:23, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
The perfomer, Yevgeny Aleksandrovich Mravinsky, died in 1988. Quick1984 (talk) 17:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyrighted recording. --Ellywa (talk) 11:23, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
The performer, Leonid Veniaminovich Yakobson, died in 1975. Quick1984 (talk) 17:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyrighted recording. --Ellywa (talk) 11:23, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Complex logo, surpasses threshold of originality. The blue part is text-only, but the green leaf is complex. 66.65.58.236 18:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 11:24, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Logo no simple 186.174.69.38 18:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, in addition not in use, possibly out of scope. --Ellywa (talk) 11:25, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
1910 French postcard, author appears to be "M. B, edit. a Vitry-le-Francois". Not an anonymous work, but too young for PD-old-assumed. Abzeronow (talk) 19:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment M.B. is likely to be the publisher (assuming that "édit." on the postcard is short for éditeur = publisher), so it could still be an anonymous work. Gestumblindi (talk) 18:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: kept, imho this is a "pseudanonmous work" per COM:FRANCE and protected for 70 years after publication. --Ellywa (talk) 13:46, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Insufficient or doubtful author and license. It's a derivative work of a photograph by an unknown author from a family archive. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Here on the website of the museum: https://mrkm.ru/novosti/k-90-letiyu-anatoliya-ivanovicha-berezina/?sphrase_id=8151. It says that all materials of the website are covered by
- Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. FlorianH76 (talk) 18:02, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. I beleive @FlorianH76: toook the image in good faith from the museum website, wich indeed states CCBYSA. However, I cannot imagine the museum owns the copyright of all photo's, like this from 1976. Can you please, FlorianH76, contact the museum to get the permission performed? Please forward the result to VRT. If succesful, the image can be undeleted. Thanks so much. Ellywa (talk) 13:55, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Günther Frager as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The source link states: © Copyright 2022-2024 Εθνικό Τυπογραφείο - Δ/νση Ζ Πληροφορικής . All Rights Reserved. Converted to DR to allow discussions. Günther Frager (talk) 21:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 13:59, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
No evidence this nontrivial logo is available under the claimed license - the license of the code of an extension does not necessarily apply to its logo * Pppery * it has begun... 16:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I have no problem with anyone wanting to push this back on the MediaWiki wiki where it came from. —Uzume (talk) 16:57, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- That doesn't help if there's a licensing problem. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Pppery and Uzume: 2 remarks:
- this logo is a simple remix of File:20101031 SemanticMediaWiki Logo.svg and File:Apache Solr logo.svg (both clearly under free license).
- did anyone tried to contact SBachenberg? that is the easy to have more clarity.
- Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 11:53, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- @VIGNERON: Well Pppery made this token gesture but Special:CentralAuth/SBachenberg made the most edits between January 2010 and February 2014 at mw:Special:Contributions/SBachenberg (the same site where this image was migrated from). However SBachenberg seems to have never responded to anything posted on mw:User talk:SBachenberg. Besides your observations about the images origins, perhaps the best evidence of the license is the SMW SolrStore at SourceForge. —Uzume (talk) 17:12, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, self made logo, of no educational use. Only used on a wikidata item today. Ellywa (talk) 11:21, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: The image is derivative of two images with different licenses. The license on this image does not conform to the CC license on the consituent. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
