Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/04/23
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Mauvaise licence, violation de droits d'auteurs possible 2A01:CB19:8E94:3F00:B26A:8CD0:1B70:75E9 07:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 08:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
الصورة مسيئة للنبي والاكيد انه سنهاجمكم ان لم تمحونها ونطالب محو الصفحة بالكامل والا سوف تسببب في قتل الكثير من الناس Ziadayman2019 (talk) 08:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 09:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
الصورة مسيئة للنبي والاكيد انه سنهاجمكم ان لم تمحونها ونطالب محو الصفحة بالكامل والا سوف تسببب في قتل الكثير من الناس Ziadayman2019 (talk) 09:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, Commons is not censored. --Achim55 (talk) 09:22, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
الصورة مسيئة للنبي والاكيد انه سنهاجمكم ان لم تمحونها ونطالب محو الصفحة بالكامل والا سوف تسببب في قتل الكثير من الناس Ziadayman2019 (talk) 09:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
الصورة مسيئة للنبي والاكيد انه سنهاجمكم ان لم تمحونها ونطالب محو الصفحة بالكامل والا سوف تسببب في قتل الكثير من الناس Ziadayman2019 (talk) 09:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 09:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
الصورة مسيئة للنبي والاكيد انه سنهاجمكم ان لم تمحونها ونطالب محو الصفحة بالكامل والا سوف تسببب في قتل الكثير من الناس Ziadayman2019 (talk) 09:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 09:34, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
الصورة مسيئة للنبي والاكيد انه سنهاجمكم ان لم تمحونها ونطالب محو الصفحة بالكامل والا سوف تسببب في قتل الكثير من الناس Ziadayman2019 (talk) 09:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 09:38, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
File:The Kara-Khanid ruler Ilig Khan on horse submitting to Mahmud of Ghazni riding an elephant, Persian painting, 1306-14.jpg
[edit]الصورة مسيئة للنبي والاكيد انه سنهاجمكم ان لم تمحونها ونطالب محو الصفحة بالكامل والا سوف تسببب في قتل الكثير من الناس Ziadayman2019 (talk) 09:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 09:39, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
الصورة مسيئة للنبي والاكيد انه سنهاجمكم ان لم تمحونها ونطالب محو الصفحة بالكامل والا سوف تسببب في قتل الكثير من الناس Ziadayman2019 (talk) 09:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 09:39, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
الصورة مسيئة للنبي والاكيد انه سنهاجمكم ان لم تمحونها ونطالب محو الصفحة بالكامل والا سوف تسببب في قتل الكثير من الناس Ziadayman2019 (talk) 09:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 09:40, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
الصورة مسيئة للنبي والاكيد انه سنهاجمكم ان لم تمحونها ونطالب محو الصفحة بالكامل والا سوف تسببب في قتل الكثير من الناس Ziadayman2019 (talk) 09:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 09:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
الصورة مسيئة للنبي والاكيد انه سنهاجمكم ان لم تمحونها ونطالب محو الصفحة بالكامل والا سوف تسببب في قتل الكثير من الناس Ziadayman2019 (talk) 09:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 09:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
удаление этой фотографии. и добавление другой Илья Шиян (talk) 11:59, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 12:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
خطا در ویرایش Mohammad75M5 (talk) 07:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Owner requested removal JikgokuResident (talk) 14:18, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 17:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Vandalism 95.70.138.199 14:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- This is not vandalism. It is an educational image. See Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Blocks_and_protections#ip_user_making_bad_faith_deletion_requests_and_vandalizing_categories the user is a vandal themselves. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 16:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm both a vandal, and also not a vandal, at the same time. 95.70.138.199 16:38, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- You son a bitch! 95.70.138.199 16:39, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
User is developing their own arms, and using Commons as hosting, Not educational or otherwise within scope.
— Pseudomonas (talk) 05:21, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment commons:project scope#File in use on Commons only says "by custom the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed". Arlo James Barnes 12:57, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Has been used outside of Commons and uploader is a very active user so I am going to keep for now. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: The lion inside is the logo of Peugeot, a French car brand. It's copyright infringement. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 95.70.138.199 (talk) 14:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. The lion inside is the logo of the car brand Peugeot. 95.70.138.199 14:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- No it is not copyright infringement, it comes from File:Armoiries Suède ancien 2.svg unrelated to w:Peugeot. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 16:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry. I realized that it was the Peugeot lion. Oops, you bastard. 95.70.138.199 16:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
The image is so ugly that I feel like I'm gonna be run over by a nice truck and die. 95.70.138.199 14:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- See Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Blocks_and_protections#ip_user_making_bad_faith_deletion_requests_and_vandalizing_categories the user is a vandal acting in bad faith. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 16:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not a vandal, you stupid son of a bitch!!!
- I hate that ugly ass face! 95.70.138.199 16:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MHComputer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own works, no evidence of a free license.
- File:الهام-اخوان-سریال-دودکش2.jpg
- File:الهام-اخوان-فیلم-باخانمان.jpg
- File:الهام-اخوان-فیلم-دوزیست.jpg
Yann (talk) 19:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by نعيم قربوسي (talk · contribs)
[edit]F10: personal photos.
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 31.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 30.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 28.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 29.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 26.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 27.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 25.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 24.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 23.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 22.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 20.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 21.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 19.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 18.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 17.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 16.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 15.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 14.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 13.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 12.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 11.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 10.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 09.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 08.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 07.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 06.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 05.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 04.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 02.jpg
- File:ويكي بعد المدرسة Wikipedia after school 03.jpg
All the best -- Chuck Talk 22:34, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Some of them are SD:F10 for sure and are deleted. However, some other pictures are in scope representing the views of Tunisia and so on, those are kept. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
A vida nos entulhos - Demais para contar.jpg Samuelamaro (talk) 21:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Uploader's request, revoked on file page. --Achim55 (talk) 06:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 07:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Because it's a personal photo. PhilippeAthos (talk) 11:23, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Image of a person with a Wikipedia article. "This is a personal photo" is not a sufficient rationale. Miniwark (talk) 14:57, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:28, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
{{Delete}} reason=This file is verified source. PhilippeAthos (talk) 06:17, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I don't understand the deletion reason. PhilippeAthos, if you're saying it's stolen from somewhere, please provide a link. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:45, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by sock. --Эlcobbola talk 11:54, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Not appropriate and suitable to use into Infobox or anywhere. Pretty Baxon (talk) 13:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep File is in use, so this reasoning is obviously wrong. PaterMcFly (talk) 14:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no new arguments. --GPSLeo (talk) 14:21, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Not appropriate for infobox Pretty Baxon (talk) 09:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept as before. Probably sock nomination. (Non-admin closure) 186.174.134.132 12:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Possible license laundering, site of source listed cannot be opened, and there isn't archive page of source EleniXDD (talk) 12:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- and also this
- EleniXDD (talk) 12:51, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Keep This one was clearly taken by an employee of the U.S. Navy, as can be seen in the image's EXIF data. No reason to doubt that. This image is in the PD and thus it would be a wrong to delete it. --Msb (talk) 15:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Got it, so the first one gets a label/code in its data, which determines its in public domain. How about the second one, source cannot be opened, and there isn't an archive. EleniXDD (talk) 16:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- So, for the first, you should withdraw your DR with the first image completely. For the second one, there is an archive entry of it. We consider {{PolishPresidentCopyright}} to apply for this one as well. As such, withdraw your DR request for this one as well. Regards, Msb (talk) 17:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination EleniXDD (talk) 23:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- So, for the first, you should withdraw your DR with the first image completely. For the second one, there is an archive entry of it. We consider {{PolishPresidentCopyright}} to apply for this one as well. As such, withdraw your DR request for this one as well. Regards, Msb (talk) 17:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 08:46, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
delete Manuel-Ambrogioni (talk) 16:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Procedural close-Duplicate nomination Seawolf35 (talk) 21:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Voglio cancellare la foto Manuel-Ambrogioni (talk) 20:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Clear G7. WhoAteMyButter (talk) 01:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 08:44, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the svg has some minor shape errors that I noticed after uploading it. Fixing them would take some time, so I think it would be best to delete this first to avoid confusion. Xhulianoo (talk) 19:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:43, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope - low quality image with no apparent use The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:12, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
2017 sculpture Hahn/Cock installed in Minneapolis; no FoP in the US for public artworks. Another file depicting this artwork was deleted here. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 03:40, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope; unclear what the intended purpose of this image is IagoQnsi (talk) 04:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 04:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope, and possibly copyright violation as a derivative work of the Minecraft logo IagoQnsi (talk) 05:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Taken from Big South website. Although each conference's logo by itself is below COM:TOO, I think the overall image with the background design likely exceeds TOO. IagoQnsi (talk) 05:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 06:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:42, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Not own work. Proper source, date, permission, and license must be provided. Yann (talk) 07:26, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:42, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Medals are sculptural works and need VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 13:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:42, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
A bunch of different uploads from a Flickr Uploader that has no followers and EXIF data for some that names other authors. Looks like license laundering to me. Abzeronow (talk) 19:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
This is a low quality random image uploaded by a banned sockpuppet user. It appears to be out of scope. Leoboudv (talk) 19:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Source of this photograph is Facebook per metadata. Abzeronow (talk) 22:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Low quality, unclear content. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Low quality, unclear contents. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Appears to be an out of scope personal image. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused fictitious fantasy flag. --Achim55 (talk) 06:40, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:15, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
CopyVio of Karen Wynn Fonstad's work Hinnerk11 (talk) 00:12, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Per nomination. Copyvio. -- Asclepias (talk) 12:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:16, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope personal fantasy art The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- It might be useful for certain things. (I don't know) Draheinsunvale (talk) 00:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nomination. "Commons is not a personal free web host." -- Asclepias (talk) 12:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per nomination Palemeditation (talk) 18:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:16, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
No FOP in Ukraine Altenmann (talk) 04:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
no FOP for 3D art in Russia Altenmann (talk) 04:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
no FOP for 3D art in Russia Altenmann (talk) 04:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:19, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: nonsense AI-generated infographic full of gibberish text. Omphalographer (talk) 06:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as nonsense, seems to be part of a school project where students are (hopefully only on their own initiative) using AI to generate text and infographics. Belbury (talk) 09:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Would vote for deletion but it's currently in use. Even when it wasn't in use I would only be for deletion because of the gibberish text, it could be reuploaded with that text or removed and it could also be uploaded as a new version. Uploader, pls remove or replace the gibberish text.
- Prototyperspective (talk) 15:57, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:21, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: another AI-generated gibberish infographic. Omphalographer (talk) 06:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as useless, seems to be part of a class project where at least one other student is also (I assume without being instructed to) using AI to get a draft finished before a deadline. Belbury (talk) 09:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom Prototyperspective (talk) 15:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:21, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: another gibberish AI-generated infographic. Omphalographer (talk) 06:51, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as useless, seems to be an ill-advised school project. Belbury (talk) 09:51, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Gibberish text everywhere.
- Prototyperspective (talk) 15:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:22, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
copyrighted COM:PACKAGING. Permission is needed
Estopedist1 (talk) 07:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:22, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AnneMyllykorpi (talk · contribs)
[edit]uploadings by new user. File:Reino AARIKKA2.jpg is small image, unlike that own work. File:Kuvakirja Reino Aarikasta.jpg is book cover. Permission from the artist is needed
Estopedist1 (talk) 07:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:23, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 07:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:23, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
This is not the user's own work, but probably a copyright violation. No evidence that this is PD. Published on Twitter in 2016: https://twitter.com/StasiArchiv/status/745919469139169280 Kusma (talk) 08:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:40, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Confermòo Sslazio19001995 (talk) 17:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:37, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The source indicaes a copyright, From Facebook CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 21:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:47, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. If you are trying to create a Wikipedia article, you cannot do so by uploading a PDF file; please read en:Help:Your first article. Omphalographer (talk) 23:39, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 23:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
All of these files are apparently copyvios, grabbed from Instagram, Facebook or various web sites.
- File:Peugeot Expert de la Police Nationale.jpg
- File:Polaris SSV Ranger de la Police Nationale.jpg
- File:Lamborghini Aventador de la Police Nationale.jpg
- File:Citroën Ami de la Police Nationale.jpg
- File:Renault Master de la Police Nationale.jpg
- File:Peugeot Rifter de la Police Nationale.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 08:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 13:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: No realistic educational value. A low resolution image of man. Plenty of better quality pictures of similar subject on Commons. Headlock0225 (talk) 15:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:00, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: No realistic educational value. A low resolution image of a baby. Plenty of better quality pictures of similar subject on Commons. Headlock0225 (talk) 15:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:00, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: No realistic educational value. A low resolution image of 2 men. Plenty of better quality pictures of similar subject on Commons. Headlock0225 (talk) 15:47, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:00, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work, Already on the internet in 2009 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:00, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The pictures are from different sources, sometimes websites, sometimes Facebook
- File:AmandaTheVoice2023.jpg
- File:LeandroAmanda.png
- File:Festival de Jazz de Sorocaba 1.png
- File:Amanda Maria.jpg
- File:Em 2019 na peça Palavra de Mulher com Virgínia Rosa, Tania Alves e Lucinha Lins.jpg
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:59, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio © Niklas Berg M2k~dewiki (talk) 16:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:59, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio ©Niklas Berg M2k~dewiki (talk) 16:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:59, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Several picture from different source, Flyer or billboard, Picture with a watermark
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Screenshot of a software CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:51, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:57, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Self-promotion. Melquíades (talk) 17:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:57, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused AI-generated infographic. No gibberish words in this one, but the graphic is abstract nonsense. Omphalographer (talk) 18:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, completely incoherent. Belbury (talk) 09:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Low quality.
- Prototyperspective (talk) 15:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:53, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Switzerland has no FoP for interior spaces. One of the churches architects was Karl Zöllig died in 1970. Switzerland has a standard of life + 70 years.
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:53, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Switzerland has no FoP for interior spaces. Its architect was Fritz Metzger who dies in 1973. Switzerland knows a standard of life + 70 years. I suggest to undelete in 2044.
- File:St. Theresia Zürich Blick zur Orgel und zur Theresienkapelle.JPG
- File:St. Theresia Zürich innen.jpg
- File:St. Theresia Zürich Innenansicht.JPG
- File:Theresia Zürich Werktagskapelle 1933-1978.jpg
- File:Theresia Zürich Werktagskapelle 1979.tif
- File:Theresia Zürich-Friesenberg historisch innen.jpg
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Switzerland has no FoP for interior spaces. Its architect was Fritz Metzger who died in 1973. Switzerland knows a standard of life + 70 years. I suggest to undelete in 2044.
- File:Felix und Regula Zürich Hard Innen.JPG
- File:Hard - Katholische Kirche Felix & Regula - Innenansicht 2011-08-16 16-04-42 ShiftN.jpg
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:46, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:44, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Interior architecture, authored by w:de:Walter Maria Förderer. Swiss freedom of panorama does not extend to interior artworks and architecture. But take note the sculptural and graphical pieces inside the church may be in public domain because according to w:fr:Église Saint-Nicolas (Hérémence) many of the fixtures and furnitures were reused from the old church (therefore photos of such fixtures need individual review).
- File:Hérémence, église Saint-Nicolas 14.jpg
- File:Hérémence, église Saint-Nicolas 8.jpg
- File:Hérémence-église-intérieur-03.jpg
- File:Hérémence-église-intérieur-04.jpg
- File:Hérémence-église-intérieur-05.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:03, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Förderer's architecture is very expressive and interesting, I'm quite fascinated by it and therefore think it's quite sad that we have to delete these photos, but I can only agree with JWilz12345's reasoning - as Förderer died in 2006, this is protected until the end of 2076 (if we by then still have the same copyright term...). --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Switzerland has no FoP for interior spaces. Its architect was Walter Förderer who died in 2006. Switzerland knows a standard of life + 70 years. I suggest to undelete in 2077.
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:59, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:44, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Possible COM:DW of non-free content Seawolf35 (talk) 19:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:44, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Олександр Бабанин (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Switzerland has no FoP for interior spaces. Its architect was Walter Förderer who died in 2006. Switzerland knows a standard of life + 70 years. I suggest to undelete in 2077.
- File:Katholisch Lichtensteig innen quer.jpg
- File:Katholisch Lichtensteig innen.jpg
- File:Toggenburg Lichtensteig Katholische Kirche StGallus altar.jpg
- File:Toggenburg Lichtensteig Katholische Kirche StGallus inside view1.jpg
- File:Toggenburg Lichtensteig Katholische Kirche StGallus inside view2.jpg
- File:Toggenburg Lichtensteig Katholische Kirche StGallus organs.jpg
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 19:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:42, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:St. Johannes (Luzern)
[edit]Switzerland has no FoP for interior spaces. Its architect was Walter Förderer who died in 2006. Switzerland knows a standard of life + 70 years. I suggest to undelete in 2077.
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 19:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Germany has no FoP for interior views. Its architect was Walter Förderer who died in 2006. Germany knows a standard of life + 70 years. I suggest to undelete in 2077.
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment, Paradise Chronicle! However, the owner of the building (Ev. Kirchengemeinde Monheim) published a paper which shows views of the interior and is accessible by the internet (https://api2.churchdesk.com/files/b319a5e9-8cce-40aa-a3ef-c4dc219b07ee/view). If you need the permission for use of this source from Ev. Kirchengemeinde Monheim, please let me know. Dmertin (talk) 21:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- The church has of course the right to publicize their events. But it does not own the copyright, for which we need the permission from Walter Förderer. People sometimes transfer the copyright to an institution such as for example the architect Jean Prouvé did. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 06:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mayloveheal (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:NOTWEBHOST and COM:SCOPE. Bunch of not in use files that are personal in nature, being personally written books and low quality pictures for personal projects.
- File:Ascende animation 34.png
- File:Ascende animation 33.png
- File:Ascende animation 32.png
- File:Ascende animation 31.png
- File:Ascende animation 30.png
- File:Ascende animation 29.png
- File:Ascende animation 28.png
- File:Ascende animation 27.png
- File:Ascende animation 26.png
- File:Ascende animation 25.png
- File:Ascende animation 24.png
- File:Ascende animation 23.png
- File:Ascende animation 22.png
- File:Ascende animation 21.png
- File:Ascende animation 20.png
- File:Ascende animation 19.png
- File:Ascende animation 18.png
- File:Ascende animation 17.png
- File:Ascende animation 16.png
- File:Ascende animation 14.png
- File:Ascende animation 15.png
- File:Ascende animation 13.png
- File:Ascende animation 12.png
- File:Ascende animation 11.png
- File:Ascende animation 10.png
- File:Ascende animation 09.png
- File:Ascende animation 08.png
- File:Ascende animation 07.png
- File:Ascende animation 04.png
- File:Ascende animation 06.png
- File:Ascende animation 05.png
- File:Ascende animation 01.png
- File:Ascende animation 02.png
- File:Ascende animation 03.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 28.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 27.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 26.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 25.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 24.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 23.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 22.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 21.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 20.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 19.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 18.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 17.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 16.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 15.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 14.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 13.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 12.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 11.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 10.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 09.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 08.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 07.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 06.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 05.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 04.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 01.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 03.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen screenshot of a movie 02.png
- File:Seentroughwater in laupen ( screenshot of a movie ).png
- File:Seentroughwater.pdf
- File:Soundsofgrowth-270.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-266.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-267.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-265.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-262.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-264.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-261.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-260.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-259.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-258.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-058.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-059.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-056.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-054.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-052.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-050.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-046.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-048.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-036.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-044.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-042.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-040.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-038.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-035.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-034.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-032.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-030.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-028.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-026.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-024.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-022.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-019.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-020.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-018.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-016.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-014.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-012.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-006.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-010.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-008.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-003.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-005.jpg
- File:Soundsofgrowth-001.jpg
- File:Pg34edited.tif
- File:Pg33edited.tif
- File:Pg32edited.tif
- File:Pg32 inheart.tif
- File:Pg31edited.tif
- File:Pg30edited.tif
- File:Pg31 inheart.tif
- File:Pg30context.tif
- File:Pg29edited.tif
- File:Pg29context.tif
- File:Pg29c edited.tif
- File:Pg29a inheart.tif
- File:Pg29a edited.tif
- File:Pg27edited.tif
- File:Pg27context.tif
- File:Pg26edited.tif
- File:Pg26context.tif
- File:Pg25edited.tif
- File:Pg25context.tif
- File:Pg24edited.tif
- File:Pg24context.tif
- File:Pg23edited.tif
- File:Pg22edited.tif
- File:Pg23context.tif
- File:Pg22context.tif
- File:Pg21context.tif
- File:Pg21edited.tif
- File:Pg20edited.tif
- File:Pg20context.tif
- File:Pg20 0 edited.tif
- File:Pg19edited.tif
- File:Pg19context.tif
- File:Pg19 0 edited.tif
- File:Pg18edited.tif
- File:Pg18 0 edited.tif
- File:Pg18context.tif
- File:Pg17edited.tif
- File:Pg17context.tif
- File:Pg17 0 edited.tif
- File:Pg16edited.tif
- File:Pg16context.tif
- File:Pg16 0 edited.tif
- File:Pg15edited.tif
- File:Pg15context.tif
- File:Pg15 0 edited.tif
- File:Pg15 0 1 edited.tif
- File:Pg14 0 edited.tif
- File:Pg14edited.tif
- File:Pg14context.tif
- File:Pg13edited.tif
- File:Pg13 0 1 edited.tif
- File:Pg13 0 edited.tif
- File:Pg13 0 2 edited.tif
- File:Pg12edited.tif
- File:Pg12 0 edited.tif
- File:Pg11edited.tif
- File:Pg11context.tif
- File:Pg11 0 edited.tif
- File:Pg10edited.tif
- File:Pg10context.tif
- File:Pg10 5 edited.tif
- File:Pg10 3 edited.tif
- File:Pg10 2 1 edited.tif
- File:Pg10 2 edited.tif
- File:Pg10 1 edited.tif
- File:Pg10 0 edited.tif
- File:Pg9c edited.tif
- File:Pg9b edited.tif
- File:Pg9b 0 edited.tif
- File:Pg9a edited.tif
- File:Pg9a 0 edited.tif
- File:Pg8edited.tif
- File:Pg8 0 edited.tif
- File:Pg7edited.tif
- File:Pg7c edited.tif
- File:Pg7b edited.tif
- File:Pg7 0 edited.tif
- File:Pg7 0 c edited.tif
- File:Pg6edited.tif
- File:Pg7 0 b edited.tif
- File:Pg6 0 edited.tif
- File:Pg5 0 edited.tif
- File:Pg5edited.tif
- File:Pg4edited.tif
- File:Pg3edited.tif
- File:Pg4 0 edited.tif
- File:Pg3 0 edited.tif
- File:Pg2context.tif
- File:Pg2 edited.tif
- File:Pg2 0 edited.tif
- File:Pg1context.tif
- File:Pg1 edited.tif
- File:Pg prelude edit.tif
- File:Pg1 0 edited.tif
- File:Pg prelude 0 edit.tif
- File:Pg24 inheart.png
- File:Pg24 inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg22 inheart.png
- File:Pg23 inheart.png
- File:Pg23 inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg21 inheart.png
- File:Pg22 inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg21 inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg20 inheart.png
- File:Pg20 inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg19 a inheart.png
- File:Pg19 a inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg19 0 inheart.png
- File:Pg19 0 inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg18 inheart.png
- File:Pg18 inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg17 inheart.png
- File:Pg17 inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg16 inheart.png
- File:Pg16 inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg15 inheart.png
- File:Pg14 a inheart.png
- File:Pg15 inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg14 a inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg14 0 inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg14 0 inheart.png
- File:Pg13 inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg13 inheart.png
- File:Pg12 inheart.png
- File:Pg12 inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg11 inheart.png
- File:Pg11 inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg10 a inheart.png
- File:Pg10 a inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg10 0 inheart.png
- File:Pg10 0 inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg9a inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg8 inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg7c inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg7b inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg7a inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg6 inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg5 inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg4 inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg3 inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg2a inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg2 inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg1a inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg1 inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg09b inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg prelude inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg09c inheart.png
- File:Pg9c inheart thumb.jpg
- File:Pg09b inheart.png
- File:Pg09a inheart.png
- File:Pg08 inheart.png
- File:Pg07c inheart.png
- File:Pg07b inheart.png
- File:Pg07a inheart.png
- File:Pg06 inheart.png
- File:Pg05 inheart.png
- File:Pg04 inheart.png
- File:Pg03 inheart.png
- File:Pg02a inheart.png
- File:Pg02 inheart.png
- File:Pg01a inheart.png
- File:Pg01 inheart.png
- File:Pg00 prelude inheart.png
Seawolf35 (talk) 21:47, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. This is all personal artwork; none of it has any obvious educational value. Omphalographer (talk) 23:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- i do believe that my artwork has an educational value therefore i do oppose the deletion of them as i understand it of importance that artwork what has philosophical depth is acessible to anyone free of cost and most of all shared into the public domain for everyone to perform upon freely Mayloveheal (talk) 05:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- on a further observation i do think that while of course all artwork is personal as in there is a human person who comes from its own life and shares its own observations trough written or painted or photographed artwork
- the act of sharing ones personal artwork into the public domain and uploading it to a website what aims to provide a free of cost free of copyright universal education repository
- does in fact speak for the value what artwork shared into the commons have
- also i would like to respond to the argument of low quality ... seen from my point of view, any judgement of quality in art is highly subjective Mayloveheal (talk) 06:07, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- i do believe that my artwork has an educational value therefore i do oppose the deletion of them as i understand it of importance that artwork what has philosophical depth is acessible to anyone free of cost and most of all shared into the public domain for everyone to perform upon freely Mayloveheal (talk) 05:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
grabbed from the web >> https://www.syri.net/amp/index.php?id=468974 // http://www.panorama.com.al/sabri-godo-le-sanatoriumin-dhe-shuhet-ne-shtepi-sot-dite-zie/ –– license bogus Albinfo (talk) 22:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
license bogus: kmsh.al isn't CC licensed > copyright note on the website © Të gjithë të Drejtat e Rezervuara 2024 Komuniteti Mysliman i Shqipërisë Albinfo (talk) 22:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
license bogus: kmsh.al isn't CC licensed > copyright note on the website © Të gjithë të Drejtat e Rezervuara 2024 Komuniteti Mysliman i Shqipërisë Albinfo (talk) 22:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
license bogus: kmsh.al isn't CC licensed > copyright note on the website © Të gjithë të Drejtat e Rezervuara 2024 Komuniteti Mysliman i Shqipërisë Albinfo (talk) 22:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
image might be free of copyright because of age, but this is a license bogus: kmsh.al isn't CC licensed > copyright note on the website © Të gjithë të Drejtat e Rezervuara 2024 Komuniteti Mysliman i Shqipërisë Albinfo (talk) 22:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:30, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
grabbed from the web & license bogus: kmsh.al isn't CC licensed > copyright note on the website © Të gjithë të Drejtat e Rezervuara 2024 Komuniteti Mysliman i Shqipërisë Albinfo (talk) 22:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:30, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
grabbed from the web: https://pashtriku.org/mira-meksi-leter-per-letersine-e-moikomit/ Albinfo (talk) 22:12, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:30, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Likely copyrighted image used by Bully Tools here: https://bullytools.com/ Ooligan (talk) 23:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:30, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted image. You can see it here: https://www.home-light.eu/lng/en//tea-coffee-service-jencks.html--Neoclassicism Enthusiast (talk) 14:22, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:30, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
unclear permission, alleged of copyright violation Exagren (talk) 02:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:21, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation from https://www.orami.co.id/magazine/rumah-adat-sulawesi-tenggara Exagren (talk) 02:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:20, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 07:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 07:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 22:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 17:48, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:48, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 07:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 07:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Descriptions, Exif data with various cameras (one by Hasselblad) and the watermark in one image suggest that contrary to claims these photos are not the uploader's "own work". See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lokschuppen Bielefeld.jpg for another file by this uploader where the author was obviously someone else.
- File:Lokschuppen Bielefeld, 1950.jpg
- File:Lokschuppen Bielefeld Innenansicht.jpg
- File:Lokschuppen Bielefeld 2019.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 08:33, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:17, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Not sure what the original source is, but this is a photo that appears a lot online with different faces edited in (https://www.instagram.com/p/CymXSO3tyLs, https://www.pinterest.de/pin/488922103313046882/). Perhaps a default image in some kind of face swap app. Belbury (talk) 09:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and not useful
- Prototyperspective (talk) 15:54, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:16, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
new user, single uploading. Small file, no EXIF-data. Unlike that own work Estopedist1 (talk) 10:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:15, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
unused personal file. Out of scope Estopedist1 (talk) 10:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:14, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
likely copyvio Alexeyevitch (talk) 12:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:14, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
logo only for promotional purposes — Draceane talkcontrib. 14:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation - Photo of an artwork of a living artist taken inside a Museum Kritzolina (talk) 14:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, If you think it is a copyright violation (although nothing stated it in the museum), delete it, no matters for me. Regards. GF38storic (talk) 15:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Artworks by living artist are always protected by copyright. As long as the artist did not publish them under a free licence we cannot host images of such artworks on Commons. Kritzolina (talk) 15:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Matria is not a country, the only party corresponding to UKD is in Uttarakhand, India, the SDL is a defunct communist party of Slovakia... Not an actual election result Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:23, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Fantasy userspace content; see en:User:Igec133/sandbox/SK. Omphalographer (talk) 17:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Author unclear. May have been uploaded with false licensing Imamanik05 (talk) 14:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:09, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
unused and useless test files, Tateng does not exist
Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:09, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Albert13377 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Problematic user. File:Quixote Village.jpg is from Internet. File:Väikemaja .jpg is not own work per EXIF-data. I suspect that other files are also not own works
Estopedist1 (talk) 14:34, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 14:47, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 14:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 14:51, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
unused and temporary file Estopedist1 (talk) 14:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jurginas18 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Old photo(s). Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
Estopedist1 (talk) 14:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
copyrighted COM:PACKAGING. Permission is needed Estopedist1 (talk) 15:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:04, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Old photo(s). Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. Estopedist1 (talk) 15:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:04, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Unused file. Seems that someone's personal art. Out of scope Estopedist1 (talk) 15:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
unused file, unidentified man. Likely some self-promo Estopedist1 (talk) 15:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 15:23, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Possible Flickr washing from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Olivier-Uwishema Trade (talk) 15:34, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:01, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
This is an AI generated image that is not a work of the artist Otto Dix, nor does it have anything to do with him, or his subject matters in art. Its art style resembles that of any generic AI image. 2620:9:6000:5800:D076:1ED2:F3DA:597C 20:40, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- If you think it is not in his style you might change the category, but it is simply the output that was generated by the stated prompted. You might change the category though. I can’t see any argument why this image should be deleted!? A11w1ss3nd (talk) 21:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep IDONTLIKEIT isn't a valid reason for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- They didn't say they didn't like it. -- Asclepias (talk) 11:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- They didn't say anything that is a valid reason either. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- They didn't say they didn't like it. -- Asclepias (talk) 11:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. "Commons is not a personal free web host." -- Asclepias (talk) 11:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Of course, DELETE this nonsense. Why keep, because someone likes it? 186.173.161.234 02:35, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per Asclepias. There's nothing educational about the image. --Adamant1 (talk) 14:24, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:37, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Cropped version of File:Asphalt 8 Airborne logo.png, unclear what use this would serve IagoQnsi (talk) 02:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- This logo was used from the game's release date in 2013 until 2022. The game's logo was then changed to be more modern, dynamic and lively. The added image has not been placed on the page to violate copyright in any way. Alicanbykkse (talk) 11:34, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Dubious own-work claim. It's unclear if this seal is old enough to qualify for PD status. ✗plicit 05:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- I do actually find this conceivable as an amateur rendering of the seal. The one on the town council facebook page for instance does look quite different in its rendering. Felix QW (talk) 07:27, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:39, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
This photo is a reproduction of a modern plaque containing text that is most likely covered by copyright, and of which the author is unknown. I'm not proposing it for speedy deletion only because, surprisingly, it's considered a 'quality image'. teatroge (dm) 05:33, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- The plaque contains a routine description by the city/muncipality of Genoa. This appears to be OK for FOP-Italy under "objects that are not creative or artistic enough to be copyright-protected". Tagooty (talk) 05:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- The plaque does not cointain a "routine description", it's a brief but detailed historical summary. Furthermore:
- There is no Freedom of Panorma in Italy (see also here).
- Freedom of Panorama has nothing to do with texts.
- This photo is a reproduction of a bidimensional work (not an "object"), which includes text. It's like taking a flyer (or a book) freely published by the City of London, photographing it, and claiming that you're reproducing it under the freedom of panorama. All texts are copyrighted until proven otherwise. This one could have been written by a historian and then simply sponsored by the Comune di Genova and the Municipio I Centro Est. Just because it is publicly displayed, does not mean it is not copyrighted. --teatroge (dm) 06:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- The plaque does not cointain a "routine description", it's a brief but detailed historical summary. Furthermore:
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:39, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Logo Yann (talk) 08:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Uploaded in 2015, proper DR is better. Yann (talk) 08:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- It's not simple geometry, it's a depiction of a rabbit's head. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 15:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:42, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Logo Yann (talk) 08:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Uploaded in 2013, proper DR is better. Yann (talk) 08:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- The human Silhouette is above TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 15:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- France has a low TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 15:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- The human Silhouette is above TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 15:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:42, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Logo Yann (talk) 08:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Uploaded in 2020, in use, proper DR is better. Yann (talk) 08:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- The complexity of the letter adornings push this above TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 15:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:44, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Low quality duplicate of File:Circle of Animals Zodiac Heads (49687077127).jpg Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - turned into redir. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Own request: bad shot Riad Salih (talk) 15:26, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The picture is from a vinyl from 1984, thus it is 40 years. According to the banner on the page, it is not in public domain CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - tagged for undeletion in 2034. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:56, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
author requested deletion on cswiki Jan Myšák (talk) 17:51, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - F10 applies. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:59, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Numidia-FLAG-Kingdom.jpg Djaafar TAKI (talk) 17:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Fake Flag Djaafar TAKI (talk) 17:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Fake Flag Djaafar TAKI (talk) 17:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Fake Flag Djaafar TAKI (talk) 17:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Fake Flag map Djaafar TAKI (talk) 17:58, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:59, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Fake Flag Djaafar TAKI (talk) 17:59, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:59, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 18:40, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:00, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
This is fake Fuzeen (talk) 19:07, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G7 applies. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
out of focus Steinninn ♨ 20:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
out of focus image Steinninn ♨ 20:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- It's ok with me to remove the picture and also the others from 2002.16:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC) Hornstrandir1 (talk) 16:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Cause I don't this image to been show online anymore. Alexbouvinkurtti (talk) 21:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
I don't want this to be on wiki anymore Alexbouvinkurtti (talk) 21:34, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
I don't want this to be on wiki anymore Alexbouvinkurtti (talk) 21:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
I don't want this to be on wiki anymore Alexbouvinkurtti (talk) 21:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:04, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
I don't want this to be on wiki anymore Alexbouvinkurtti (talk) 21:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
I don't want this to be on wiki anymore Alexbouvinkurtti (talk) 21:33, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:04, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
No traceable source - Clear and traceable data sources are a must for content that is so highly contentious. Refael Ackermann (talk) 22:12, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- I cited my source. Infobox:Template Israel Hamas war infobox, double checked. The source editors use is Barron’s, and I use that. Personisinsterest (talk) 07:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- the source link gives a 404 error, says this "content doesn't seem to exist" Naren Sirigere (talk) 10:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- It is the base link, it updates every day with the date and number killed. I'm not going to add its new page to the description every five days. Personisinsterest (talk) 00:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- the source link gives a 404 error, says this "content doesn't seem to exist" Naren Sirigere (talk) 10:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:04, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Flickr account looks like a license laundering account, no followers, no camera EXIF. Abzeronow (talk) 19:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe? Though I have come across plenty of cases where journalists, Internet celebrity types, etc. who throw together these quick Flickr accounts with a copyright-released headshot or two.
- What if we leave a message asking for justification and see if the user responds in kind? I'm having trouble navigating the Commons' policy documentation for this sort of thing, so any insight would be appreciated. QRep2020 (talk) 23:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Judging from the proximity of the upload dates to Commons and to flickr, and from another upload by the uploader that had a similar situation, the flickr account does look like a license laundering account. The photo itself is apparenly a selfie by the subject and it would be fine if it can be obtained from a legitimate source and if the person accepts to offer it with a free license. If you can contact Linette Lopez (not the flickr account!) in a reliable way, for example at her work email or her twitter account, you can ask her if she would offer a free-licensed photo. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:35, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, I think I can find her work email. To confirm, doing all this wouldn't break any of Commons' rules, especially since the picture currently appears on the subject's Wikipedia article? QRep2020 (talk) 01:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- It doesn't break rules to request a photo and a free license from the copyright owner. If the license comes from the subject, the photo must be a photo on which she owns the copyright. A self-portrait is fine. If it's not a self-portrait, the license must come from the person who owns the copyright, probably the photographer. If you have not made such requests before, please see Commons:VRT about what to request and how the person can confirm the license. -- Asclepias (talk) 02:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, I think I can find her work email. To confirm, doing all this wouldn't break any of Commons' rules, especially since the picture currently appears on the subject's Wikipedia article? QRep2020 (talk) 01:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Judging from the proximity of the upload dates to Commons and to flickr, and from another upload by the uploader that had a similar situation, the flickr account does look like a license laundering account. The photo itself is apparenly a selfie by the subject and it would be fine if it can be obtained from a legitimate source and if the person accepts to offer it with a free license. If you can contact Linette Lopez (not the flickr account!) in a reliable way, for example at her work email or her twitter account, you can ask her if she would offer a free-licensed photo. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:35, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Ticket:2024043010012824 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 21:01, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Linette Lopez.jpg” under ticket:2024043010012824. --Ww2censor (talk) 18:10, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Looks like this can be closed as keep then. Abzeronow (talk) 18:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! QRep2020 (talk) 04:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Looks like this can be closed as keep then. Abzeronow (talk) 18:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept — Preceding unsigned comment added by QRep2020 (talk • contribs) 05:20, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE Unused personal picture Seawolf35 (talk) 18:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Why will you delete this pics?
- This picture is an Iranian actor " Abolfazl Heidari ".
- Help me add this pics on Wikimedia. 2A01:5EC0:E008:8C4F:1:0:F6FF:1C4F 05:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedied per F10. I also create-protected it. ─ Aafī (talk) 06:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Personality rights–problematic image. Hard to tell if the woman ever consented to be photographed for obvious reasons. See also COM:PCP. RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:39, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - especially as import on flickr, we don't even have the chance to talk to the photographer. --Kritzolina (talk) 06:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Recht am eigenen Bild. Ich selbst bin auf dem Bild zu sehen (Leona Rudolph). Die Ersteller der ursprünglichen Seite haben keinen Zugriff mehr auf die Bearbeitung, da es sich um eine aufgelöste Partei handelt (siehe JED https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jugend-_und_Entwicklungspartei_Deutschlands). Somit bin ich selbst schon lange nicht mehr Teil dieser Partei und möchte nicht in Zusammenhang damit gebracht werden. Der Wikipedia Eintrag erscheint bei der Suche meines Names an einer der ersten Stellen. Aufgrund meiner Arbeit als neutrale Psychologin ist eine Löschung des Bildes wichtig, da es meinen Internet Auftritt stark beeinflusst. 2003:CA:BF39:1068:4D4D:849E:1E1E:D613 06:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination / image of a non notable person, originally used for promotional reasons. --Kritzolina (talk) 06:47, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
新居浜市立西中学校の公式ホームページに使用されている画像の無断転載であるため。 まりさめきりさ (talk) 18:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:18, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
own work? similr https://www.deviantart.com/lobux/art/International-crew-934382683. eien20 (talk) 20:23, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:20, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
The distressed letter U makes this a borderline TOO case. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 01:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Actually it is a very clear case, the "U" has two diagonal lines and some random white dust, thats far below the high TOO in the US (not sufficiently original enough). Keep. TheImaCow (talk) 13:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
fictional combination of two historic kingdoms, also exaggerated.
Apparently motivated by nationalism/irredentism Enyavar (talk) 11:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:28, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Most if not all of the Artwork is from Alberto Giacometti who died in 1966. The art was exhibited in a room in Venice, Italy which counts with a standard of life + 70 years. There is no FoP in Italy. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 11:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Bonjour,
- Autant que je sache il n'y a aucune raison de supprimer ledit fichier, qui sert actuellement à un article, il me semble que l'on peut donc conserver le fichier.
- Cordialement Monsieur Guerin (talk) 17:16, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Works seems de minimis because there are many and the major subject is the person; furthermore, the info on the photo by Paolo Monti (like the original scan on the BEIC digital catalog) shows that it was commissioned ("Occasione: Documentazione della Biennale di Venezia del 1962 [...]") so the artist and the gallery gave permission" --Spinoziano (BEIC) (talk) 06:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sure the artist and the gallery gave permission to take the photograph from a professional. But commons is not a storage for only professional photographs and they can also be used for other purposes which do not reflect the interests of the original authors. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 09:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Works seems de minimis because there are many and the major subject is the person; furthermore, the info on the photo by Paolo Monti (like the original scan on the BEIC digital catalog) shows that it was commissioned ("Occasione: Documentazione della Biennale di Venezia del 1962 [...]") so the artist and the gallery gave permission" --Spinoziano (BEIC) (talk) 06:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:29, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The photographs are of a series of photographs from Emmy Andriesse of the workshop of Alberto Giacometti., But the artwork depicted is not yet in the PD. Alberto Giacometti only died in 1966. His workshop was in Paris, France and France has a standard or life and 70 years. There is no FoP in France.
- File:Interieur atelier van Giacometti PK-F-A.06811.jpg
- File:Zonder titel PK-F-EAA.6810-1.jpg
- File:Zonder titel PK-F-EAA.6810-2.jpg
- File:Zonder titel PK-F-EAA.6810-3.jpg
- File:Zonder titel PK-F-EAA.6812-1.jpg
- File:Zonder titel PK-F-EAA.6812-2.jpg
- File:Zonder titel PK-F-EAA.6814-1.jpg
- File:Zonder titel PK-F-EAA.6814-2.jpg
- File:Zonder titel PK-F-EAA.6815.jpg
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 12:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:29, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The YouTube channel of the Philippine TV program w:en:Rated Korina is indeed valid and licenses their episodes on YouTube under suitable free licenses. However, the cited YouTube video where this screenshot is obtained is from Korina Interviews. Although both "Rated Korina" and "Korina Interviews" are hosted by the same person, the production companies of both shows are different, and it is not sure if the CC license given by Rated Korina on the cited video extends to the episodes of Korina Interviews, produced by w:en:Brightlight Productions. Rated Korina is currently produced by ABS-CBN. Deletion request made to allow further discussion. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Mixing content from the other production company would be a concern, unless Korina gives a go to let both production companies to release content under CC BY. Not all CC BY videos on YouTube are free of fair use content. Ahri.boy (talk) 14:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Map is based on ephemeral status of countries' position on BRICS, and isn't concrete enough to be warranted a map, no longer updating it Peter Njeim (talk) 08:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Claim that this is the uploader's "own work" is dubious. Hoary (talk) 09:18, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hey guys this one is my own work and i got permission to take the original logo so i could later change it Mistakefinder77 (talk) 09:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Unidentified logo out of scope and probabl copyvio. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Description mentions a picture of Rajput sardar but title is given gurjar sardar. Neither any page number of the book or link is given to reverify. The book has many volumes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hiensrt (talk • contribs) 13:01, 20 December 2021 (UTC) (per special:diff/615315277 and special:diff/615316316) — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Hiensrt: Would a change of title via {{Rename}} fix the problem? If so, what should the title be, Rajput Sirdars of Rajpootana.jpg? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author; F10 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Reformierte Kirche Turgi
[edit]Switzerland does not know a FoP for interior views. And that FoP is not valid for the interiors of churches is specifically mentioned. Switzerland has a standard of life + 70 years, its architects are Dubach & Gloor and the church was built in 1960 and it's not in the public domain for some years to come.
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 16:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. There is nothing substantively creative shown in terms of architecture. It is a plain white wall with a simple cross. The cloth work in the background might be de minimis or could be cropped out/blurred. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - the cloth wall hanging is clearly copyrighted. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
no own work Dirk Lenke (talk) 17:17, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi,
- This file belongs to a gallery of photographs which is licensed CC BY-SA.
- You can find the gallery of images and the CC tag here: https://zacheta.art.pl/pl/mediateka-i-publikacje/anemona-crisan-instalacja-do-wnetrza. This is image 7 out of 9 in this gallery.
- There is an option to search for all CC-BY-SA galleries of images on the Zacheta Gallery website here and the image can also be found there in the set of photos described above.
- Let me know if this settles the issue. Marta Malina Moraczewska (talk) 06:29, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Switzerland has no FoP for interior views. The church's architect was Ernst Gisel who died in 2021. Switzerland knows a standard of life + 70 years.
- File:Effretikon - Reformierte Kirche Effretikon, Rebbuckstrasse - Innenansicht 2011-09-07 18-18-42 ShiftN.jpg
- File:Effretikon - Reformierte Kirche Effretikon, Rebbuckstrasse - Innenansicht 2011-09-07 18-18-48 ShiftN.jpg
- File:Effretikon - Reformierte Kirche Effretikon, Rebbuckstrasse - Innenansicht 2011-09-07 18-19-18 ShiftN.jpg
- File:Effretikon - Reformierte Kirche Effretikon, Rebbuckstrasse - Innenansicht 2011-09-07 18-19-24 ShiftN.jpg
- File:Effretikon - Reformierte Kirche Effretikon, Rebbuckstrasse - Innenansicht 2011-09-07 18-19-42.jpg
- File:Effretikon - Reformierte Kirche Effretikon, Rebbuckstrasse - Innenansicht 2011-09-07 18-20-12 ShiftN.jpg
- File:Effretikon - Reformierte Kirche Effretikon, Rebbuckstrasse - Innenansicht 2011-09-07 18-20-24.jpg
- File:Effretikon - Reformierte Kirche Effretikon, Rebbuckstrasse - Innenansicht 2011-09-07 18-20-54.jpg
- File:Effretikon - Reformierte Kirche Effretikon, Rebbuckstrasse - Innenansicht 2011-09-07 18-21-00.jpg
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:18, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep File:Effretikon - Reformierte Kirche Effretikon, Rebbuckstrasse - Innenansicht 2011-09-07 18-19-42.jpg and File:Effretikon - Reformierte Kirche Effretikon, Rebbuckstrasse - Innenansicht 2011-09-07 18-21-00.jpg, as nothing is substantively pictured but the pipe organ, which is a utilitarian object. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:57, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination kept 2. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Per Commons:Monuments and copyright in the US, historic monuments and plaques are likely copyrighted and not suitable for Commons. Per Packers Heritage Trail, the plaques are owned by the property owners (this one being Titletown Brewing). Note that each photo on the each plaque is provided curtesy of some other organization, such as the Green Bay Press-Gazette for this one, which holds the copyright for the photos. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:06, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author, F10
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:59, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING DanielPenfield (talk) 18:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- The packaging restriction doesn't cover this photo because each package takes a tiny part of the image and because the details of the packaging can't be made out at standard viewing sizes. Collectively this means the packages are so insignificant as to be incidental. Further, the purpose of this photo isn't to show the packaging, it is to show how the eclipse was being used to advertise products for party planning. The actual products being advertised aren't really important, just that it was a large, prominent display. Lorax (talk) 00:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment "the purpose of this photo isn't to show the packaging" is an intriguing theory given that the subject of the photograph is a retail display full of packaging which occupies what looks like 60% of the area of the photograph and is positioned in the center of the photograph. The other elements depicted are part of a wall, some tiled floor, and part of a potted plant sitting on some wooden crates, but those seem to be included due to poor subject isolation.
- Question So you claim that "the details of the packaging can't be made out at standard viewing sizes", yet when I view the 3,072 × 4,080 pixel original at 100% zoom (1 image pixel per screen pixel), I can clearly make out details of each package. What is your definition of "standard viewing size" and why is "standard viewing size" the threshold to meet instead of the 3,072 × 4,080 pixel original photograph? -- DanielPenfield (talk) 08:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- "when I view the 3,072 × 4,080 pixel original at 100% zoom..." The guidelines don't say that at every possible resolution it must be impossible to make out the details, instead they say 'Note: de minimis consideration applies to a specific image composition. Significant cropping to focus on the copyrighted work can very easily turn a "probably OK" into a "probably not OK".' Zooming in so you can't see the whole picture is significant cropping. Look at the video game console photo that is given as an example of de minimus, the four icons are a small portion of the photo and hard (but not impossible) to make out, however if you load the image at full resolution and look at the icons they are clear. Cropping the photo to be just those icons would probably fail the de minimus test.
- Lorax (talk) 01:05, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Your claim My response The guidelines don't say that at every possible resolution it must be impossible to make out the details The guidelines don't say "every possible resolution" because a reasonable person would (or should) understand that only the original image as it was uploaded (in other words, at full resolution) needs examining. It goes (or should have gone) without saying. Zooming in so you can't see the whole picture is significant cropping. So you made the claim that "the details of the packaging can't be made out at standard viewing sizes". Your claim is destroyed by the facts that: - Anyone can see the details of each of the dozens of individual packages in the original image at 100% zoom (in other words 0% enlargement, 0% reduction, 1 image pixel per screen pixel)
- You can't (or won't) state what you think the definition of "standard viewing sizes" is
Look at the video game console photo that is given as an example of de minimus, the four icons are a small portion of the photo and hard (but not impossible) to make out, however if you load the image at full resolution and look at the icons they are clear. You're confused: the icons collectively constitute about 1% of the area of File:Commodore TV Game 2000K.jpg--that's what makes them de minimis. The packaging in File:Wegmans eclipse party planning Rochester NY 2024-04-07 11-08-30 1.jpg a) collectively constitutes about 60% of the area of the image, b) is centered in that image, and c) if removed, the only objects remaining in the image are part of a wall, some floor tiling, and some shelving, which makes your de minimis claim preposterous. Cropping the photo to be just those icons would probably fail the de minimus test. And the icons would take up 100% of the area of the resulting image, whereas they take up 1% of the area in the original File:Commodore TV Game 2000K.jpg. In contrast, the packaging in File:Wegmans eclipse party planning Rochester NY 2024-04-07 11-08-30 1.jpg takes up 60% of that image by area. (Your refusal to provide your definition of "standard viewing sizes") In the absence of your definition of "standard viewing sizes", I am going to assume that you clicked on File:Wegmans eclipse party planning Rochester NY 2024-04-07 11-08-30 1.jpg which clearly states "Size of this preview: 451 × 599 pixels" and this became your "standard viewing size". That single size then became plural when you realized that the preview of File:Wegmans eclipse party planning Rochester NY 2024-04-07 11-08-30 1.jpg in your upload log is 180 × 239 pixels. No reduced (or enlarged for that matter) preview should be used to assess whether the details of the packaging can be discerned--the sole standard should be the original image as viewed using the link provided in the text "Original file (3,072 × 4,080 pixels, file size: 3.73 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg); (request rotation); ZoomViewer".
- Keep de minimis applies here. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Did you read COM:De minimis#Guidelines Guideline #7? In other words, if you erase all of the image that depicts packaging (plus the advertising sign plus the pricing signs), do you still have a useful image or a completely useless image?--see the following derived image, for example: . -- DanielPenfield (talk) 08:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- The de minimis guidelines are phrased awkwardly in that meeting the guidelines means that it is not de minimis and not meeting them is de minimis. Lets go through each of the guidelines in turn to see if this photo meets them (bad) or doesn't meet them (good).
- the file is in use to illustrate X: No, this file is not being used to illustrate any product
- the file is categorised in relation to X: No, categorization does not relate to any product
- X is referenced in the filename: No, the file name references no product
- X is referenced in the description: No, no product is referenced in the description (only general categories of products)
- X cannot be removed from the file without making the file useless: No, any individual copyrighted element could be removed, hoever, collectively they are part of the larger work and their inclusion is unavoidable. The guidelines are for any specific X, not every possible X at once.
- from other contextual clues (e.g., by comparison with a series of uploads by the same uploader) X is the reason for the creation of the file.: No, I've given my reson for the creation of the file. "to show how the eclipse was being used to advertise products for party planning", and I didn't upload any photos that focused on specific products.
- This image did not meet any of the criteria, so the de minimis guideline applies. Lorax (talk) 01:10, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- The de minimis guidelines are phrased awkwardly in that meeting the guidelines means that it is not de minimis and not meeting them is de minimis. Lets go through each of the guidelines in turn to see if this photo meets them (bad) or doesn't meet them (good).
- Comment Did you read COM:De minimis#Guidelines Guideline #7? In other words, if you erase all of the image that depicts packaging (plus the advertising sign plus the pricing signs), do you still have a useful image or a completely useless image?--see the following derived image, for example: . -- DanielPenfield (talk) 08:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Your claim My response The de minimis guidelines are phrased awkwardly... Let me get this straight: You didn't like COM:De minimis#Guidelines, so you wrote your own version here? And you didn't provide a courtesy link back to COM:De minimis#Guidelines so that others can verify that your rewrite is a faithful and complete version of the original? ...in that meeting the guidelines means that it is not de minimis and not meeting them is de minimis. Your characterization is oversimplified--others can click on COM:De minimis#Guidelines and verify that each guideline consists of a complex combination of considerations (in the "Description" column) which leads to exactly one of the following conclusions (in the "Case can be considered de minimis" column): "OK Yes, definitely", "OK Very likely", "Maybe", "Very unlikely", "Definitely not". Lets go through each of the guidelines in turn to see if this photo meets them (bad) or doesn't meet them (good). Why would you go through each one by one when Guideline #7 clearly states "Copyrighted work X is the central part of the subject (e.g. it is the reason for taking the photo). Removing it would make the derivative work useless." alongside a " Definitely not" de minimis? All you need to consider is Guideline #7 when viewing alongside . X cannot be removed from the file without making the file useless: No, any individual copyrighted element could be removed, hoever, collectively they are part of the larger work and their inclusion is unavoidable. The guidelines are for any specific X, not every possible X at once. Your logic literally follows the fallacy of composition. Furthermore Commons talk:De minimis#Photos of media merchandise on store shelves undermines your argument.
Deleted: per nomination - The test for de minimis is whether most observers would notice at a glance if the item were deleted from the image. That iobviously can't apply here. Also, even ignoring the packaging, the sign that is the center of the image has a copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Grammar Nazi icons
[edit]With the rise of antisemitism and Islamophobia fueled by neo-Nazism, I don't think having these kind of images is conducive at all to Wikimedia Commons. The term "grammar Nazi" is already offensive in of itself, to make images derived from racist and bigoted media and use them in a non-academic way is a bit too much. I only see this file BTW being used in userboxes, etc. as well as a small handful of articles where the image is not at all conducive.
- File:Grammar Nazi Coat of Arms Text.svg
- File:Grammar Nazi Coat of Arms.svg
- File:Grammar Nazi Icon Text Bcg.svg
- File:Grammar Nazi Icon Text.svg
- File:Grammar Nazi icon.jpg
- File:Grammar Nazi Icon.svg
- File:Grammar Nazi.svg
Aasim (talk) 19:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Not a valid reason for in use images. --RAN (talk) 01:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- keep these images not valid reason to delete Daisytheduck (talk) 02:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- They are discriminatory. Per COM:SCOPE Commons primarily includes images used to foster education. Modifying hate symbols to use them in a noneducational manner is not in scope. Aasim (talk) 06:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- (Jameslwoodward), these files was used in several articles, at least in ruwiki (example). Now I need to ask Commons admins to restore files to reupload them to ruwiki locally, and it should be done in every wiki that uses these files. "Hate symbol" is not a reason to delete, Commons contains and should contain megatons of files containing hate symbols, from Nazi propaganda to Russian military "Z" symbol, for educational reasons. Such deletions due to "political correctness" should not spoil article namespace of wikipedias. Please, review your decision and restore files, at least that was used in articles. MBH 05:58, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: +1, per Commons talk:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Grammar Nazi icons. — Draceane talkcontrib. 06:50, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- And this closure is clearly a SUPERVOTE. — Draceane talkcontrib. 07:25, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by StomboyCarGeek as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: 3D, metallic logo. Fair Use are not allowed on Commons. Not blatant for me, should be discussed if it might be below COM:TOO US which is very high. The fair use concerns don't matter then. Jonteemil (talk) 19:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Metallic fonts like File:Call of Duty2 Logo.jpg, File:Call of Duty 3.jpg and File:Logo Franchise CoD.png which look similar to File:Logo CoD.jpg were deleted without any discussion in the past. I already uploaded a non-textured version at File:StarCraft logo.svg as a replacement. Matt (talk) 19:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - pure text -- even in very fancy fonts -- does not have a copyright unless it is long enough to be literature. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:51, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Trip from Búðir to Stykkishólmur , Iceland - August 2010 - Patrick Nouhailler © (5338609154).jpg
[edit]Duplicate of File:Helgafellssveit - panoramio (9).jpg Steinninn ♨ 19:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete because it is a duplicate. GeoWriter (talk) 19:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:50, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
incorrect name Mateusmatsuda (talk) 21:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Mateusmatsuda: what do you want the name to be? —Matrix(!) {user - talk? -
uselesscontributions} 16:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)- I'm not sure if it's the model 3 or y, so the name of the file can be "Model 3 or Y". Thanks Mateusmatsuda (talk) 13:39, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Also if you could remove the deletion warning from my page, I'd be very thankful.
- https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Mateusmatsuda Mateusmatsuda (talk) 13:52, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- It's a Model Y, so you can just request the name to be changed to that. Somegreenguy (talk) 22:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if it's the model 3 or y, so the name of the file can be "Model 3 or Y". Thanks Mateusmatsuda (talk) 13:39, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - name changed. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Billinghurst as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: unlikely to be own work. 2022 so would be under copyright and has a level of artistic merit PD-textlogo, but not used, may be out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:12, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:02, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tesla_Model_3_in_Curitiba-PR.jpg Mateusmatsuda (talk) 20:58, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Closing malformed nomination, all listed targets already deleted or moved. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Wrong coat of arms Mbetit (talk) 18:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:00, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep COM:INUSE - even if incorrect, Wikipedias are finding it educationally useful. Consigned (talk) 22:31, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Niet own work 191.125.7.26 11:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete A cropped version of the same file can be found on the internet prior to upload here: [1]. If the uploader is the photographer or copyright holder, please provide permission to COM:VRT. Consigned (talk) 22:36, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:22, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
the image has been replaced by another of better quality PancoPinco (talk) 13:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Though lower resolution, File:Giuseppe Patania - Ritratto di Antonio Lucchesi-Palli (1781-1856).7º principe di Campofranco, luogotenente generale del Regno delle Due Sicilie.jpg has much better colour/contrast. File not in use. Consigned (talk) 22:34, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:22, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung: Als Urheber wird MODERN ART FILM ARCHIV angegeben - ein Urheber kann aber nur eine natürliche Person sein, nicht aber ein archiv Lutheraner (talk) 16:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Professional photo, permission from the photographer needed via COM:VRT. Consigned (talk) 22:38, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:22, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mentxuwiki as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyright violation: See image
Noting that this is a 2011 image, so there is no certainty that it was taken from the referenced site which would typically have changed its image in 13 years. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:58, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- The image was part of the website in November 2019.[2] That's shortly after the domain was registered.[3] I see no indication that the website existed before August 2019, and as far as I can tell, they took the image from Wikimedia Commons (which was their right because it's been published as PD). Renerpho (talk) 07:26, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- The image on Commons is 560 × 274 px, and doesn't have any EXIF data. The image on their website is 4847 x 2071, and contains EXIF data, including the date the image was taken (2 November 2009). I don't know the domain they may have used before switching in 2019(?), but the image on their website cannot come from Wikimedia. I'm conflicted on this, because the uploader Guyletsbuild has dozens of similar images taken in Spain that look like they were genuinely theirs (most of them uploaded as a batch on the same day), and there is no reason why they couldn't have taken this image. Some look like they were taken with the same camera.
- I'd also like to note that, while the images can be brought to perfect congruency if the image on commons is upscaled by a factor of 8, there are parts of the Wikimedia image that are not covered by the image on their website (note that 2192>2071), and vice versa (4480<4847). The images are clearly "descended" from the same photo, which may have been originally published who knows where (maybe by Guyletsbuild themselves), but neither appears to be the original. If Guyletsbuild published it as PD before uploading to Commons, the museum had every right to use it without attribution, and there was no reason why Guyletsbuild would have had to disclose this.
- I see no clear indication of a copyvio, and would vote Keep. Renerpho (talk) 08:05, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:11, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation, not Liang Qichao's calligraphy works as described. Kcx36 (talk) 12:58, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Whose calligraphy is this then if not Liang Qichao's? Abzeronow (talk) 17:53, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Unable to judge, as there is no signature. The calligraphy content comes from a famous article by Liang Qichao that too many calligraphers have written. Kcx36 (talk) 22:04, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, OK. Do you have an estimate when this particular calligraphy was published? Abzeronow (talk) 22:13, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Most likely within twenty years. Kcx36 (talk) 08:44, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, OK. Do you have an estimate when this particular calligraphy was published? Abzeronow (talk) 22:13, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Unable to judge, as there is no signature. The calligraphy content comes from a famous article by Liang Qichao that too many calligraphers have written. Kcx36 (talk) 22:04, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 23:37, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sebastian Wallroth as Logo (history) Yann (talk) 08:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Uploaded in 2021, in use, proper DR is better. Yann (talk) 08:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Per COM:TOO Germany. To be protected by copyright it is sufficient that the applied art image “attains a level of creativity that allows a public open to art and relatively familiar with views on art to justifiably speak of 'artistic' creations." To determine whether a design is below TOO is always a bit subjective. Imho this image is not showing such a high level of creativity, to speak of an 'artistic' creation. The portrait of Liebniz has been reproduced many times, probably based on this. Therefore the image can be kept on Commons. --Ellywa (talk) 15:39, 4 August 2024 (UTC)