Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/03/19
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
ДфлрдАужбакбаббжажбжаАааакбм 176.99.214.34 09:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —RP88 (talk) 10:09, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Uploaded by sockpuppet. Fry1989 eh? 14:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Uploaded by sockpuppet. Fry1989 eh? 14:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded dozens of photos from the Hocken Library the other day that were CC-BY-4.0 and did not notice that amongst them was this one that didn't have a free license. I'll also nominate the crop that I've produced. Schwede66 18:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Same rationale as File:David Murdoch 509.jpg; sorry for that! Schwede66 18:29, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded dozens of photos from the Hocken Library the other day that were CC-BY-4.0 and did not notice that amongst them was this one that didn't have a free license. I'll also nominate the crop that I've produced. Schwede66 18:30, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
As per File:Kahutoi Te Kanawa 448.jpg; sorry for that. Schwede66 18:31, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Please delete. Rogi (talk) 10:36, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 19:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Incorrectly uploaded a non-free file, so I think a speedy delete is needed. Nature Moon (talk) 19:29, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:31, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
not "own work", see https://www.imdb.com/name/nm3505501/?ref_=nm_mv_desc H7 (talk) 08:31, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 12:06, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: not own work PD-US-no notice? Yann (talk) 22:36, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Keep Yes, the photo was published in 1965 without copyright notice. See [1]. 0x0a (talk) 13:07, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 13:14, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Error with the fucntio AravindEditor (talk) 12:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Speedy delete Looks very far from anything freely-licensed. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Delete, apparent copyright violation, published on X before upload to Commons.[2]- Also delete the duplicate File:Wrestlemania XL.jpg, from the same uploader. Verbcatcher (talk) 14:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - contributions} 19:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Fake picture, can be anyone KvaraWolves88 (talk) 19:34, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- agree, please also delete the same photo by same uploader:
- Ellywa (talk) 09:50, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Blatant vandalism. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
I don't think this is de minimis. There is no acceptable freedom of panorama in Ukraine; for details on the author of the iconic but copyrighted Derzhprom building see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Derzhprom. The copyrighted architectural work here still has "independent economic significance" even if it may pass de minimis of EU standards as an "overview photo of the square." One can still use this image in commercial souvenir items about the building, unreasonably harming the posthumous economic rights held by heirs of the late architects Серафімов Сергій Савич, Кравець Самуїл Миронович, and Фельгер, Марк Давидович. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:10, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:05, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
There is not freedom of panorama in Ukraine. The same image is present on en.wiki: en:File:Kharkov Freedom Square.jpg, where this information is clearly stated. The picture was taken in 2003, so the license is clearly wrong. Harlock81 (talk) 19:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#G4. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:02, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
This file contains sensitive location information in its EXIF. I re-uploaded it to File:SonyFE24105F4GOSS.jpg and fixed all pages linking to it. HellcatSRT (talk) 18:12, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Note: I requested speedy deletion (G7) instead. HellcatSRT (talk) 02:26, 20 March 2024 (UTC)- SD G7 doesn't apply here because it requires me to do it within 7 days of uploading. In my case, it has been more than 7 days. Therefore, I created the below (non-speedy) deletion request again. HellcatSRT (talk) 23:43, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
EXIT contains sensitive coordinates. I removed that and reuploaded the file as a separate file File:SonyFE24105F4GOSS.jpg (also fixed pages linking to it). This (old) file is no longer needed.
P.S. In the original deletion request, I crossed out the reason and (wrongly) switched to speedy deletion because I didn't notice that SD G7 only allows me to delete my own file within 7 days of uploading. Therefore, I made this new request. HellcatSRT (talk) 23:42, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:27, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: altready deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 07:00, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete all images by this user as F10/G3. Justarandomamerican (talk) 02:45, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: altready deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 07:00, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
This file contains sensitive location information in its EXIF. I re-uploaded it to File:Bunit.jpg and fixed all pages linking to it. HellcatSRT (talk) 18:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: I requested speedy deletion (G7) instead. HellcatSRT (talk) 02:25, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 06:59, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Já existe outro arquivo semelhante na Wikimedia com o mesmo nome Vini1980 (talk) 06:04, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:53, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Translation: "There is no other similar file on Wikimedia with the same name" --RAN (talk) 13:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason. --RAN (talk) 13:22, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- How can you translate a language about which you have no idea?! The sentence says just the opposite. Por Dios! 186.175.91.65 18:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
"There exists another similar file on Wikimedia with the same name": File:Retrato de Maria Perpétua.png. --Achim55 (talk) 18:40, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Bravo! 👏 The real problem here is one person is uploading many pictures of the same witch, under several user names, and then asking deletion, under several other user names, all in red (like blood). It is either the witch herself or a child... 186.175.91.65 19:05, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Esse ficheiro já existe em outra página da Wikimédia Vini1980 (talk) 14:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Ficheiro já existente em outra página da Wikimédia Commons Vini1980 (talk) 17:03, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: This one looks significantly better than File:Retrato em miniatura de Maria Perpétua Calafate de Souza.jpg. --Achim55 (talk) 18:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 22:10, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
JA existe um arquivo semelhante Vini1980 (talk) 04:18, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept. No new arguments here. I blocked the nominator for edit warring after warnings. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Foi eu quem carregou esse ficheiro , e já existe um semelhante. Estou tendo problemas com os direitos autorais e por isso preciso que ele seja eliminado por favor 170.238.199.31 03:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. An 1815 image is out of copyright. --Achim55 (talk) 18:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted per ticket:2024041010011792. --Krd 14:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Nonsense image that's supposedly a coat of arms The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:58, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
So blurry, it's not possible to understand the location. Lack of educational value. Nanahuatl (talk) 00:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Useless Andy Dingley (talk) 00:52, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:58, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Risk of copyright violation, the file name suggests that this is artwork from the online shopping service AliExpress. This is the only upload from this uploader. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm pretty sure this is an advertisement. Google translates the text at the top as "discount on basket products". Omphalographer (talk) 02:48, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:00, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
no educational purpose, out of scope — billinghurst sDrewth 05:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
I am fine with this photo being nominated for deletion. --Excel23 (talk) 22:31, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:01, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Could be exceed COM:TOO UK as the threshold in UK is really low A1Cafel (talk) 08:36, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:02, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
File:TW 台灣 Taiwan 台北 Taipei Metro 捷運 北門站 Beimen Station platform floor plan sign March 2024 R12S 01.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted maps in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 10:34, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:02, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted map in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 10:36, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:02, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted map in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 10:37, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:02, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Better version: File:TW 台灣 Taiwan 台北 Taipei Metro 捷運 北門站 Beimen Station ticket machine March 2024 R12S 09.jpg Solomon203 (talk) 11:17, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
File:TW 台灣 Taiwan 台北 Taipei Metro 捷運 北門站 Beimen Station traffic card balance display March 2024 R12S 01.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted screenshot in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 11:17, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
File:TW 台灣 Taiwan 台北 Taipei Metro 捷運 北門站 Beimen Station traffic card balance display March 2024 R12S 02.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted screenshot in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 11:18, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
File:TW 台灣 Taiwan 台北 Taipei Metro 捷運 北門站 Beimen Station traffic card balance display March 2024 R12S 06.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted screenshot in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 11:18, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 13:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
A mediocre image of an overwrought motif on the internet of a sailing ship at sea under moonlight. The moon in the image is obviously misshapen, AI readily produces images of far better quality. And given the abundance of quality art images of ships in all settings on Wikimedia it seems like a poor quality addition. J. M. Pearson (talk) 16:11, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom Prototyperspective (talk) 16:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: movie-poster
1930 movie poster from Germany. Won't be public domain in the U. S. until 2026. Would be public domain in Germany if the artist died before 1954. Abzeronow (talk) 16:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Work of artist Alfred Herrmann (1884–1962). Can be restored in 2033. --Rosenzweig τ 19:36, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 18:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:22, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
per COM:SCOPE Riad Salih (talk) 21:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:NOTWEBHOST and COM:SCOPE Seawolf35 (talk) 22:02, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
This is a movie produced in 1981, China News Service（中国新闻社） is not its copyright holder shizhao (talk) 02:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
This image is not at the flickr source. Leoboudv (talk) 04:02, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Arnab Banerjee, managing attorney at Banner Law in Los Angeles (June 2019) photographed by Ithaka Darin Pappas.jpg
[edit]no evident educational purpose for this image; seems more promotional — billinghurst sDrewth 05:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 10:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 10:51, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 10:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused image uploaded by a banned user. Leoboudv (talk) 11:00, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 11:02, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 11:02, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 11:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 11:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 11:10, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 11:10, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
File:HK WCN 灣仔北 Wan Chai North 香港會展 HKCEC 佳士得 Christie's 拍賣前 Auction 預展 preview exhibition November 2021 SS2 338.jpg
[edit]Photo of painting by Georgette Chen (1907-1992), whose works are copyrighted in Singapore. See https://www.christies.com/lot/lot-6348867 . 0x0a (talk) 12:57, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
File:HK WCN 灣仔北 Wan Chai North 香港會展 HKCEC 佳士得 Christie's 拍賣前 Auction 預展 preview exhibition November 2021 SS2 073.jpg
[edit]Photo of painting by Liu Haisu (1896-1994), whose works are copyrighted in China. See https://www.christies.com/lot/lot-6346463/ . 0x0a (talk) 13:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
This statement says that this flickr account is a flickrwashing account. This should a speedy delete case in my view...and perhaps theis flickr account should be added to the bad flickr authors list. Leoboudv (talk) 18:57, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:35, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Image of a copyrighted magazine catalogue. Derivative image. Leoboudv (talk) 18:58, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:35, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
This may be a copyrighted poster by cannabisenergydrink.com Leoboudv (talk) 19:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:35, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Promotional picture, likely copyright violation due to no/little EXIF, also uploaded by LTA (Papa2004) A09 (talk) 19:02, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:35, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused selfie of a Wikimedia user. User has blanked the page. Abzeronow (talk) 20:58, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:36, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Uncertain what educational value is this image. It may simply need more context as at the moment it has no clear use — billinghurst sDrewth 21:36, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:36, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Croatian military patch, possibly still in copyright. Abzeronow (talk) 22:11, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:36, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Croatian military patch, possibly still in copyright Abzeronow (talk) 22:14, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:36, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Tagged as PD-textlogo, but it seems above TOO to me. DMacks (talk) 22:47, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:36, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Looking at all the other flags in the category (Category:White ensigns of Germany), this one appears to have the wrong line thickness for the main cross. Unused and unlikely to be used. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:12, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:36, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, as original uploader, I would like to ask for deletion of this file. I did not notify person standing in doors and I do not want to upload images of person without consent. Thank you! --Adam Hauner (talk) 00:01, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, relatively recent upload, unused, possible COM:IDENT issues. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:20, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Small JPG; have File:Oxidation of alcohol by PDC in DMF.svg that also is a more-standard color. DMacks (talk) 22:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Low-quality chemical reaction equation with opaque (white) background & in quite small resolution. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:28, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 00:00, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background and fully pixelated. Also delete its unused redirect File:Screen Shot 15.png. Replaced by File:Benzoic acid 200.svg as high-quality vector version. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 12:57, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 18:02, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
CopyVio (see Watermark lower left). Also: Muscovitian propaganda. Enyavar (talk) 17:09, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Music album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Le sujet ne souhaite plus être visible Tbausier (talk) 19:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The subject is apparently non-notable, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:54, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 10:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Do you believe that the web site of the president of Azerbaijan violences the law of Azerbaijan (see here)? Leokand (talk) 11:14, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Commons is not a gallery for displaying personal art works. Out of the project scope.
- File:The Baltics!.png
- File:Natzi & Sweden!.png
- File:Palestine will be free!.png
- File:North Atlantic Treaty Organizations.png
- File:Kawaiii?!.png
- File:Japan and palau ice cream.png
- File:Anti nazi movement.png
- File:Netherlands & Slovakia.png
- File:Slovakia oh lol lol.png
- File:Poland and Reichtangle.png
- File:THIS IS POLAND.png
Estopedist1 (talk) 20:22, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal doodles, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Japan yayyy.png
- File:My fav country!.png
- File:Japan !.png
- File:Bear !.png
- File:Red star.png
- File:The best korea.png
- File:My persona.png
- File:Meet the artist.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope, the actual (historical) Batangas flag has a wider white field. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 10:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:14, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. --Wdwd (talk) 12:17, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
The rationale was ignored. The file depicts a ahistorical version of the flag. The horizontal bars of the Batangas flag are not equal in size similar to the Flag of Crimea. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 00:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Still COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- The problem is the instance above while close to a historical flag is wrong and not just of "poor quality". File:Ph Flag of Batangas.svg is the proper version Hariboneagle927 (talk) 07:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- For disclosure I have now phased out any instance of the file's usage of throughout all Wikiproject pages. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 07:48, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- The problem is the instance above while close to a historical flag is wrong and not just of "poor quality". File:Ph Flag of Batangas.svg is the proper version Hariboneagle927 (talk) 07:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- I guess there's a time lag that explains why it's still listed as being in use in the Tagalog Wikipedia article about Miss Universe Philippines 2023? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Nope, still in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:47, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Already phased out that one last instance. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 14:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Not when I posted. Next time, take care of that before requesting deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:51, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Nope, still in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:47, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion; no longer in use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
file is on my phone camera roll but I'm not sure I'm the author, need to check before uploading Ukulele (talk) 00:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Do you see these animals everyday? 186.174.137.159 17:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per very prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:43, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
clearly out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Lower resolution copy of an existing file. See Commons:Deletion policy#Redundant/bad quality. Celia Homeford (talk) 08:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Lower resolution copy of a deleted file. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Charles III official portrait.jpg. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:29, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Charles III official portrait.jpg, also resulting in deletion, of which this file is a duplicate from the same source. DankJae 01:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:48, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Social network (X/Twitter) profile photo, no proof of Creative-Commons license Celinea33 (talk) 01:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no evidence of claimed free license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magnolia677 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=233872249792894&set=pb.100095103609302.-2207520000&type=3 Wilfredor (talk) 01:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - Appears to be a copyright-protected photo on Facebook. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- The poster was published on Quebec reunifiés Website on feb 14th under CC-BY-SA 4.0 license :
- https://www.quebecreunifie.ca/2024/02/14/14-fevrier-2024-affiche-st-valentin/
- The image is public domain Jsgervais (talk) 04:55, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Its not public domain but its a Compatible license with Wikimedia Commons, that is, the image should not be deleted. The main difference between CC-BY-SA 4.0 and CC0 (public domain) is it requires attribution, that is If someone decides to use the image, the origin and the author must always be shown where the work is used outside the Quebec Reunifie page, also if any changes are made to the original work this must be cited, in the public domain this does not it is necessary. In any case, both licenses are compatible with Wikimedia Commons --Wilfredor (talk) 13:14, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep No, You can check the poster license here in the official website --Wilfredor (talk) 12:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Risk of copyright violation. The clip-art image without these words is widely available on the Internet. TinEye reports examples that predate the upload to Commons. We need evidence of a free license. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:29, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Risk of copyright violation, unlikely that the uploader is the author of all the included photographs. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, collage of unsourced images. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Photo grabbed from Facebook, see FBMD Solomon203 (talk) 10:43, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Photo grabbed from Facebook, see FBMD Solomon203 (talk) 10:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Photo grabbed from Facebook, see FBMD Solomon203 (talk) 10:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Photo grabbed from Facebook, see FBMD Solomon203 (talk) 10:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 11:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
copyright; there was an honest mistake on the part of the uploader (Beaky15). Apologies! Beaky15 (talk) 15:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The license is now "PD-EU-no author disclosure". --RAN (talk) 16:51, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: problem seems resolved. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Appears to be a screenshot, due to its small size and lack of Metadata A1Cafel (talk) 16:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, as the uploader of the image, I can clarify that it is not a screenshot. It has been uploaded since long and is original. Would appreciate suggestions to improve. Thanks! Pharaoh496 (talk) 18:47, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- You were in the room to shoot the photo? What kind of camera did you use? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- With due respect, I cant reveal my camera details. I can however take suggestions from improvement. I am a novice here Pharaoh496 (talk) 14:54, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- With due respect, you've been very cryptic in this thread, which does not instill confidence that you shot the photo. Are you a professional photo journalist? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:31, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- No need for the underconfidence. It was an internship-project, however I am not permitted to reveal further details. Rest assured, this is not a copy of anyone else's work. Pharaoh496 (talk) 08:25, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- You should reveal the details privately to COM:VRT, so that they can certify that your assertions are true. I can't imagine why you need to be so secret. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:20, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- No need for the underconfidence. It was an internship-project, however I am not permitted to reveal further details. Rest assured, this is not a copy of anyone else's work. Pharaoh496 (talk) 08:25, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- With due respect, you've been very cryptic in this thread, which does not instill confidence that you shot the photo. Are you a professional photo journalist? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:31, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- With due respect, I cant reveal my camera details. I can however take suggestions from improvement. I am a novice here Pharaoh496 (talk) 14:54, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- You were in the room to shoot the photo? What kind of camera did you use? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Unless the original picture with EXIF data is provided. Where are internships allowed to attend to the Prime Minister's meetings? Yann (talk) 10:36, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The file is not providing any source information, I can find the image on the google searchs too MAL MALDIVE (talk) 15:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:24, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Porn images by Hboli
[edit]- File:Womens bra.jpg
- File:Women lingerie.jpg
- File:Nipple lick.jpg
- File:Asian dildo.jpg
- File:Asian female breast.jpg
- File:Asian women vulva.jpg
- File:Asian sexual intercourse.jpg
- File:Asian facial cumshoot.jpg
- File:Asian creampie.jpg
- File:Asian sex intercourse.jpg
- File:Asian female creampie.jpg
Unuseful porn images (see COM:NUDE ) taken in a private location without evidence of consent (see COM:IDENT). --Jaqen (talk) 18:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see why these should not be useful, also the quality is acceptable. The girl is obviously aware of the camera, so I think we can assume consent here. Given the subject, it's obvious the images where taken in a private location. PaterMcFly (talk) 14:20, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Lighting is bad, they are amateurish. More importantly, while we can assume she was aware she was being photographed, we cannot assume she consents to the photos being put online. The uploader, a new user, did not assert consent. The face of the author of the photos is not visible in any of them. I believe that in order to keep pornographic photos of identifiable people we should be confident that there is consent, in order to avoid the risk of keeping revenge porn on Commons. Jaqen (talk) 19:12, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- You didn't tell the uploader your thoughts, so I informed him for you. See: [3]--125.230.88.21 15:59, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Lighting is bad, they are amateurish. More importantly, while we can assume she was aware she was being photographed, we cannot assume she consents to the photos being put online. The uploader, a new user, did not assert consent. The face of the author of the photos is not visible in any of them. I believe that in order to keep pornographic photos of identifiable people we should be confident that there is consent, in order to avoid the risk of keeping revenge porn on Commons. Jaqen (talk) 19:12, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- How do we determine consent? I am looking at others in the category and do not see any way to determine that someone gave consent. We do not require a form "18 U.S.C. 2257 Records Keeping For Models", maybe you should lobby that we require one. We also respond immediately to takedown notices for nude images. --RAN (talk) 01:29, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Comment None of these files have metadata, and while I don't expect real name, I think that this is a situation where we can be more stringent as a step to some authenticity. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:20, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Seven of these files (2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11) were copyright violations (tip: use Yandex Reverse Image Search), so I deleted those. I think we can safely assume the other ones are not own work too. Wutsje 04:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion; several proven copyvios, uploader has forfieted assumption of good faith. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Josephjoseph1111 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: images with disparate quality and styles, missing or inconsistent EXIF data or credit to someone else (3 images credited to Author JULIEN JUNET). And subject is same as uploader.
- File:Joseph Kiluba Mpalila pendant la finale de la ligue Lac Saint-Louis avec le groupe U21 AA du CS Montréal Centre en 2023.jpg
- File:Joseph Kiluba Mpalila et ses coéquipiers en Final de la saison 2023-2024 pour le trophée Lac Saint-Louis avec le CS Montréal Centre U21 AA.jpg
- File:Joseph Kiluba Mpalila en Final de la saison 2023-2024 pour le trophée Lac Saint-Louis avec le CS Montréal Centre U21 AA.jpg
- File:Joseph Kiluba Mpalila avec le trophée Lac Saint-Louis U21 AA Édition 2023-2024 remporté avec le CS Montréal Centre.jpg
- File:CS Montréal Centre victoire face à Saint Laurent 4-2 le 31 août 2023..jpg
- File:Josephkilubaetvictorwanyama.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:49, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bwiseman49 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvio: photo from different sources according to the metadata, From Facebook, Possible F10
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:50, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
copyright infringement Scann (talk) 23:02, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:50, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Dubious claims of own work. At least some of these are posters from a university, and there's a variety (and lack) of metadata, sizes, etc.
- File:PUSL-Metamorphoses-COV C1.jpg
- File:PUSL AreWeEurope-COV-C1.jpg
- File:Capture d’écran 2024-03-12 à 13-1.16.37 0.png
- File:BXL SL2.png
- File:BXL SL.png
- File:Prog th.jpg
- File:Pro ESPR.jpg
- File:Campus USLB.jpg
- File:Logo campus USLB.jpg
- File:Isa H..png
- File:Capture d’écran 2024-03-17 à 15.28.35.jpg
- File:Capture d’écran 2024-03-18 à 12.49.06.png
- File:Projet KUL.jpg
- File:Hommage van camp.jpg
- File:Cours au 1.jpg
- File:Rentrée.png
- File:Ommegang 10.jpg
- File:Recteurs.jpg
- File:Capture d’écran 2024-03-17 à 16.31.38.png
- File:Clocheton et passerelle.png
- File:Angle botanique-marais.png
- File:Bâtiment de l'Ommegang.jpg
- File:Campus St Louis.jpg
- File:Logo FUSL.jpg
- File:Logo USLB.jpg
- File:Portrait de Jean Ladrière.webp
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:49, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
The central eagle is heavily pixelated. File:Kaiserliche marine.png exists and is much higher quality. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:12, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:49, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in USA, needs permission from the artist Gregory Jackson A1Cafel (talk) 10:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- got it. add this one too. SDudley (talk) 17:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - contributions} 13:19, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
This is an unused file, and I request to delete it because it violates the paid contributing without disclosure 호로조 (talk) 18:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 04:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
This is an unused file, and I request to delete it because it violates the paid contributing without disclosure 호로조 (talk) 18:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 04:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal file Seawolf35 (talk) 22:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 04:23, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_photographed_by_Ithaka_Darin_Pappas.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_map_20240112.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Clayton-Jackson-McGhie-memorial-Duluth-Minnesota_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_photographed_by_Ithaka_Darin_Pappas.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_photographed_by_Ithaka_Darin_Pappas.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
arquivo já existente na wikimédia Laneoliveira1997 (talk) 01:02, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete A higher resolution was added but not overwriting the original. --RAN (talk) 06:18, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Sería mejor prohibir las imágenes de esta bruja en Commons. Temo que va a hacer una brujería y algunos bibliotecarios gueis se van a convertir a derechos... 186.174.137.159 17:51, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: File:Retrato em miniatura de Maria Perpétua Calafate de Souza.jpg is of lower quality and resolution. Laneoliveira1997, if you continue persistently creating new accounts we will take some action. --Achim55 (talk) 18:17, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- eliminar, jã existe outro aquivo com o mesmo nome Laneoliveira1997 (talk) 15:54, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Já existe na Wikimedia um semelhante Laneoliveira1997 (talk) 15:58, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Arquivo ja existente em outros sites Laneoliveira1997 (talk) 15:58, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ankry (talk) 13:46, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Seodaemun Independence Park
[edit]Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama for sculptures in South Korea. This statue was created by Kim Chong-yung (김종영; 1915–1982). It is protected by copyright until 2053.
- File:Sculpture at the Seodaemun Independence Park.jpg
- File:Statue at Seodaemun Independence Park with Inwangsan Mountain.jpg
- File:The Seodaemun Independence Park in Seoul.jpg
✗plicit 03:31, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:01, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
no evident educational purpose; no record in wikidata — billinghurst sDrewth 05:18, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Pasha es un apellido, como Rey, Reyes, Reymundo, etc que usan los gitanos en este país... :) 186.174.137.159 17:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:07, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
copyvio see metadata which read "Copyright holder Mine Dalemans" also used for advertising on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 08:00, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:15, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
The artist does a gesture with his hand that can be misinterpreted and would like this picture of him to be deleted Andy Lany (talk) 08:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep no evidence of above statement, anything can be misinterpreted. Uploader should have considered that CC are irrevocable. Applicant is different from creator, most likely troll. Quality image at that. Keep strongly. --Zenwort (talk) 01:47, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster. Solomon203 (talk) 11:00, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- The poster is about a cultural project by a student, and it's placed on a public place (see COM:FOP Mexico). Luisalvaz (talk) 06:31, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- agree. Clearly FOP:MEX. Fix licence and keep. --Zenwort (talk) 01:59, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Allowable according to Mexican freedom of panorama. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:19, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Loafiewa as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1
Converted to regular DR as no rationale or evidence was provived. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:57, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
This photo shows a replica Mark 4 tank created by an enthusiast and put on display for a photo shoot. Your removal request is an insult.ジョンドウ (talk) 16:07, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- FOP:Japan to be added and keep. --Zenwort (talk) 02:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no evidence of copyvio. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:25, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
derivative work. Permission from artist is needed Estopedist1 (talk) 12:48, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:25, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D/3D works in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 13:51, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:26, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
The subject of the picture asked me to delete it does not reflect her personality. Micky.rodeh (talk) 14:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- picture obviously taken with consent. After so many years too late for courtesy deletion, even if she's ugly in that one. CC is irrevocable. Keep. --Zenwort (talk) 02:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
_map_20240112.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_map_20240112.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted map in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 14:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
_map_20240112.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
_map_20240112.jpg){kind=link}
. Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:32, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
The image file adds "nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject." J. M. Pearson (talk) 15:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Not bad. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC
- Keep. --Zenwort (talk) 02:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Might be useful Wizardofwords25 (talk) 01:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
This is not in use. 170.235.203.17 16:57, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Phantasy flag. Delete. --Zenwort (talk) 02:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:46, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
This is an unused file, and I request to delete it because it violates the paid contributing without disclosure 호로조 (talk) 18:37, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- I recall from previous discussions that Commons does not prohibit paid contributions, so if my memory is correct, that shouldn't be a deletion reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:49, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Paid contributions in themselves are not a reason for deletion, but maybe a reason to check for conflicts of interest. But that is not an issue with such an image. IMHO the image could be deleted because it's useless without knowing who the subject is. --PaterMcFly (talk) 14:22, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think conflicts of interest are considered an issue on Commons, though if you could cite a policy or guideline showing that they are, that would be appreciated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:34, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Of course, I know better than to assume that an admin won't "delete per nom" for an incorrect reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:57, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Conflict of interest is rarely an issue on commons, but images do get deleted if they're clearly showing some fake information (e.g. fake maps). There's clearly no such issue with this image, though. PaterMcFly (talk) 08:54, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Of course, I know better than to assume that an admin won't "delete per nom" for an incorrect reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:57, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think conflicts of interest are considered an issue on Commons, though if you could cite a policy or guideline showing that they are, that would be appreciated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:34, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Paid contributions in themselves are not a reason for deletion, but maybe a reason to check for conflicts of interest. But that is not an issue with such an image. IMHO the image could be deleted because it's useless without knowing who the subject is. --PaterMcFly (talk) 14:22, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Commons does not have a paid editing disclosure mandate, file is in use. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:50, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
This is an unused file, and I request to delete it because it violates the paid contributing without disclosure 호로조 (talk) 18:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Doesn't matter, this is anyway {{PD-Ineligible}} --PaterMcFly (talk) 14:23, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:53, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
highly informative description; please upload again... Just not with a CopyVio. Merci. Enyavar (talk) 13:02, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Edit after our talk in German: Delete - BingMaps CopyVio, now replaced with File:Traces in The Empty Quarter.jpg made with OSM/OpenTopo --Enyavar (talk) 15:34, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Enyavar, thanks for this message. What do you mean. How should I upload without using Satellite Images? I see a lot of satellite images in WP. What is the detailes problem? Thanks for your help? Thomas Brandl-Ruttner (talk) 11:03, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Thomas Brandl-Ruttner: , pardon, hier kommen ein paar Sachen zusammen.
- a) GoogleMaps ist durch Copyright geschützt, und wenn du entsprechende Kompositkarten (Satellitenbild + Beschriftungen/Linien) auf Google-Basis findest, sind sie wahrscheinlich zu löschen. Über Hinweise, wo Satellitenbild-Kompositkarten in WP genutzt werden, freue ich mich, und kann sie entsprechend prüfen.
- b) Ein zweiter Blick hat mir jetzt gezeigt, dass GoogleMaps mir (erstmal?) ein anderes Satellitenbild anzeigt. Insofern Entwarnung: Es ist keine Google-CopyVio... sondern stattdessen eine CopyVio von einem anderen Kartendienst. Vielleicht Yandex oder Bing Maps (unfrei -> ebenfalls CopyVio). OSM wäre dagegen in Ordnung.
- "Eigenes Werk" ("own work") bedeutet, dass du selbst alle Bestandteile desBildes erstellt hast: vom Flug ins All für das Foto über die Grenzen/Beschriftungen bis hin zum Overlay deiner Route. Deine Karte kann behalten werden, wenn du unter "Source/Quelle" genau nennst, welches der (freie) Kartendienst im Hintergrund ist, idealerweise per Link auf diesen Dienst. Ich gehe hier nämlich nicht davon aus, dass du z.B. mit QGis selbst einen Satellitenausschnitt hinterlegt und mit OSM verschnitten hast. Wenn der Kartenhintergrund nicht Public-Domain (frei) ist, dann müsstest du wie bereits geschrieben die Route nochmal auf einer anderen Hintergrundkarte neu hochladen. LG, --Enyavar (talk) 17:48, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Guten Morgen, Super. Herzlichen Dank. Ja es war Bing. Alles klar, dann erstelle ich eine OSM basierte Karte und lade es nochmal hoch. BEsten Dank Thomas Brandl-Ruttner (talk) 05:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ich habe eine neue Version auf OSM Basis hochgeladen - diese Version kann gerne gelöscht werden - Danke! Thomas Brandl-Ruttner (talk) 15:13, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Guten Morgen, Super. Herzlichen Dank. Ja es war Bing. Alles klar, dann erstelle ich eine OSM basierte Karte und lade es nochmal hoch. BEsten Dank Thomas Brandl-Ruttner (talk) 05:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Picture under copyright law (https://www.theatre-contemporain.net/biographies/Annick-Lefebvre/) gpesenti (talk) 15:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment j'ai demandé à l'utilisatrice-téléverseuse de déposer une autorisation de republication sous licence libre dans VTRS. Webfil (talk) 15:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:31, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Author field autotranslates as This work is based on an old version that has been widely circulated and the original owner of this photo is unknown. Rebuilt with artificial intelligence. This appears to be an extremely heavily AI upscaled version of en:File:Makhfi_Badakhshi.jpg, a photograph that enwiki considers to still be in copyright. This Commons:Derivative work of it cannot be released as public domain. Belbury (talk) 15:37, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
work by P. Picasso (Pablo Picasso) 178.37.205.142 22:26, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. (Comment: Some early works by Picasso might be out of copyright if first published in countries which regulate copyright by publication date, but this does not seem one of those. Apparently published in Poland, per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Poland will be out of copyright 70 years after Picasso's death.) --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Ubcule as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative copyvio Yann (talk) 22:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: DW artwork on label. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: not own work PD-US-no notice? Yann (talk) 22:36, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete unless the original source is identified in order to demonstrate that it meets licensing requirements (VRT also a possible solution). DMacks (talk) 13:49, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: edits by RAN look correct. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Doubt on the own claim work, the date is not correct, The photo is already on the internet in 2014 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:11, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
If this file really served anything it would be in use somewhere. 186.173.117.57 23:49, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- As an author, I'd delete it. Rhodesian05 (talk) 07:08, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader concurs with deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:10, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I didn't intend to bring more Bull-Doser images to deletion but I came across this during my editing at friwki. In my opinion this is a violation of Commons:NOCREEPSHOTS. I do not read this image as a subject giving her consent. I do not believe this is an appropriate encyclopedic image of the subject, per the "Moral issues" section of Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. Shawn à Montréal (talk) 22:25, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nomination. Regarding COM:NOCREECPSHOTS : "In the same way as quality newspapers may apply a "public interest" test to doubtful images, the degree to which an image meets our educational project scope may also be considered. When in doubt, there is no requirement for Commons to host any image of a person." Man, does that applies to many of the uploader's pictures Webfil (talk) 16:37, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment
Neutral- if we had other free licensed images of the author I would agree this should be deleted, but since we don't I'm conflicted. I hope we can find some; I just checked Flickr without success. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:34, 28 April 2024 (UTC)- per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Varda Étienne (SDLM '16).jpg another author at the same event appears to be stating that Bull-Doser photographed them without permission. Situation seems clear. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Thuong Thuong Soul (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files with vague claims of own work. User is a sockpuppet, see contributions to Wikipedia.
- File:Ca sỹ, nhạc sỹ Thanh Bùi.jpg
- File:Thanh Bùi trong chương trình Samsung Hope Relay Anthem.jpg
- File:Thanhbuilen10.png
Spinixster (talk) 10:07, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused, poor quality. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
File:TW 台灣 Taiwan 台北 Taipei Metro 遊車河 tour to 松山站 SongShan Station train interior March 2024 R12S 01.jpg
[edit]
Personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 11:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. I am not seeing how this is a personal image. The person in frame does not appear to be the main subject. This seems to be a fine image of a metro train interior in Taiwan. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle; mundane but in scope. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
מדובר בקצינה בחירה במשטרת ישראל שמבקשת להסיר את התמונה הזו שהועלתה בעבר לרשת ללא אישורה עמיר שמחיוף (talk) 12:24, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- No entiendo nada... 186.174.137.159 17:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Question Google translation: "This is an election officer in the Israel Police who requests the removal of this photo that was previously uploaded to the web without her permission". עמיר שמחיוף or anyone else who knows: What do relevant Israeli laws state? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Any evidence of her request? Picture obviously taken with her consent. Alas the given source https://www.flickr.com/photos/il_police/ gives all rights reserved. --Zenwort (talk) 02:13, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep The licence is part of the general permit given in Template:IsraeliPoliceLicense and the image was uploaded by a verified user account belonging to Israel Police (User:ניו מדיה - משטרת ישראל). The only reason given to remove is an unproven claim that the subject doesn't currently want it online here and I am not sure Commons:Photographs_of_identifiable_people#The_right_of_privacy applies here. DGtal (talk) 12:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Do not blank image description pages of open deletion discussions. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:42, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation, source https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/340905/overview says all rights reserved 331dot (talk) 12:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Les logos des communes françaises doivent être chargées sur Wikipédia francophone. Henry (Babel talk !) (Francophone ?) 12:50, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept: no deletion reason. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:21, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Ce logo est obsolète et a été remplacé par la Ville de Pessac depuis 2020. Il ne doit plus être utilisé Cela génère des confusions. Ville de Pessac (talk) 13:18, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Speedy keep Ce n'est aucune raison de supprimer. Logos <<obsolètes>> sont historiques. Veuillez de ne pas demander des suppressions pour cette raison fausse. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: in use; Commons is for historic as well as current media. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:45, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused low quality photos (out of focus).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. One of the two files is in use at de:Wasselonne. These are both usable at web resolution and represent a historic tannery building. Note that while these are essentially the same image at a different level of brightness, I think the unused darker image is actually a bit better. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:16, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Because there is a duplicate of the file. Tandreasen0421 (talk) 00:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
There is a new version of this file already. Can you delete this please? Tandreasen0421 (talk) 01:06, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Comment. It would be helpful if you could link the new version of the map, but we do not delete historical versions of maps as a general rule. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:51, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:16, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Not quite sure what this is, but out of scope Seawolf35 (talk) 18:48, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 21:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
There's a better version in SVG: Los bandidos de Río Frío - Letra capital h.svg JaimeDes (talk) 00:36, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Risk of copyright violation, may not be the uploader's own work. This appears to be a still from Ben-Hur (2016 film).[4] Published in websites with dates that predate the upload here.[5][6] TinEye reports multiple pre-dated matches. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: IMDb reports a Toni Salabasev in the Camera and Electrical Department for the 2010 miniseries of Ben-Hur,[7] so the uploader may have taken this photograph. However, it is unclear whether a member of a film or TV crew would able to be legally licence stills, and we would also need licence validation through VRT. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:53, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:40, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Own work claim and different author. Used on https://www.blackachievementmonth.nl/event/lezing-glenn-helberg-ubuntu/ Agora (talk) 01:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- It is a cropped version indeed of a file that is found on blackachievementmonth.nl; therefore I mentioned the source in the filename. The photo was taken on behalf of that organization. The person depicted is regarded a role model. I do not know him personally. Niksbij26 (talk) 09:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing essential info and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:41, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation, software screen capture from w:en:Mega (service). Too complex to be under the threshold of originality. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:52, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Also delete: File:Meganzrus.jpg and File:Meganzrus (1).jpg, from the same website and the same uploader. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, and out-of-scope advertising. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:43, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
File:TW 台灣 Taiwan 台北 Taipei Metro 捷運 北門站 Beimen Station raingo public umbrella March 2024 R12S.jpg
[edit]
Too blurry photo. Better version: File:Raingo shared umbrellas at Beimen Station 20240323.jpg Solomon203 (talk) 10:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
The file image adds "nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject," and is of poor quality. J. M. Pearson (talk) 15:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Quality looks fine to me. Omphalographer (talk) 17:22, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- It was my contribution, I just felt that Wikimedia deserved better. But perhaps I'm wrong. J. M. Pearson (talk) 18:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Mallards are commonly photographed, so I understand your motivation. I'd be fine with this image to be deleted by request. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- The photo adds nothing to the category, there's so much mediocre material on wiki already it doesn't need mine too. I'd just bought a new camera and was anxious to use it, overly enthusiastic about contributing. It doesn't matter to me, it's not going to ruin my day whether it's a "keep" or "delete." Thanks. 2601:444:47D:DC60:9553:A3B:251D:7EDD 23:35, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Mallards are commonly photographed, so I understand your motivation. I'd be fine with this image to be deleted by request. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- It was my contribution, I just felt that Wikimedia deserved better. But perhaps I'm wrong. J. M. Pearson (talk) 18:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: more than acceptable image. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Logo belongs to [8] © Copyright Ramco Cements™. Not User:Deepa vasudevan's own work. No re-use mentioned on the official website and PD Text logo does not apply here Jeraxmoira (talk) 15:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
EXIF identifies the author as Cassiano Ferraz and says Any use of this image depending express authorization by author, no such permission is given here. Belbury (talk) 15:31, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Not the work of the University of Oregon - work of the University of Washington: https://www.teenvogue.com/story/decolonize-conservation-jessica-hernandez Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:12, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio. It says: "Work of Prestofelippo" (a famous youtuber) 2800:810:446:8A6B:2C99:92DA:C85E:3C22 16:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, screenshot. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:18, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
copyvio from given site no permission - https://oor.nl/albums/noodzakelijk-verdriet/ Hoyanova (talk) 07:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
The diagram is completely incorrect as the 2018 Jerusalem council had 32 members DGtal (talk) 10:26, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: corrected according to the calid source. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:08, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Несоответствие указанной лицензии Трифонов Андрей (talk) 15:43, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- что не так? я указал источник. Свод памятников истории, архитектуры и культуры крымских татар. — Симферополь. – Белгород: «КОНСТАНТА», 2018. — Т. III. — С. 234. — 392 с. https://crimeanreview.ru/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/svod-pamyatnikov-krmtat-3tom.pdf Вы можете изучить книгу и сами правильно укажите, но не удаляйте и не портьте мою работу. Abdulhak Zerdevi (talk) 15:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Указана Вами при загрузке Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. Автор изображения неизвестен. В книге стоит Копирайт Института истории им. Ш. Марджани АН РТ Крымский научный центр, 2018. Как совместить эти факты? Вы нарушитель авторского права, надеюсь что по незнанию. Трифонов Андрей (talk) 16:12, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Следует, например, перенести фото в Рувики по КДИ, поскольку персона умерла.--Трифонов Андрей (talk) 15:57, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- я не знаю как это сделать.
- 1. Персона умерла.
- 2. автор фото неизвестен.
- 3. персона мой прадед и все вышеуказанные фото есть у меня дома и являются моей собственностью а точнее уже общественной. Копирайт Марджана касается книги а не фото. Эту книгу как источник указал для того что бы другим было удобно взаимодействовать, особенно исследоавателям. Abdulhak Zerdevi (talk) 22:02, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
1. Сделать это легко. В русской википедии слева есть кнопка Загрузить файл. Нажимаете. Выбираете Несвободный. Заполняете поля. Используете 1 несвободное изображение для статьи о предке. 2 нельзя. Для других статей нельзя. Изучите КДИ в рувики. Успеха User:Abdulhak Zerdevi.--Трифонов Андрей (talk) 22:57, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- 2. Не пишите в обсуждениях ничего, что не соответствует действительности. Википедисты дотошные. Вы три раза загружая несвободный файл считали что это пройдёт незаметно? Вам в феврале 2023 расставили шаблоны источник, что бы Вы семейные предания подтвердили публикациями. Прошел год, текст без источников может быть удалён. Трифонов Андрей (talk) 23:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Для справки администраторов
15:19, 19 февраля 2023 Magog the Ogre обсуждение вклад удалил страницу File:1931 adji-umerov a d.jpg-nggid042442-ngg0dyn-0x300x100-00f0w011c010r110f110r010t010.jpg (Recreation of content deleted per community consensus (G4)) (поблагодарить) (global usage; delinker log)
04:53, 15 февраля 2023 Krd обсуждение вклад удалил страницу File:1931 adji-umerov a d.jpg-nggid042442-ngg0dyn-0x300x100-00f0w011c010r110f110r010t010.jpg (No permission since 7 February 2023) (поблагодарить) (global usage; delinker log) --Трифонов Андрей (talk) 16:27, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: a fragment of the photograph that was published anonymously in 1936 in what was then a part of Russian Federation, so it is in PD. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Несоответствие указанной лицензии Трифонов Андрей (talk) 15:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- что не так? я указал источник. Свод памятников истории, архитектуры и культуры крымских татар. — Симферополь. – Белгород: «КОНСТАНТА», 2018. — Т. III. — С. 234. — 392 с. https://crimeanreview.ru/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/svod-pamyatnikov-krmtat-3tom.pdf Вы можете изучить книгу и сами правильно укажите, но не удаляйте и не портьте мою работу. Abdulhak Zerdevi (talk) 16:00, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Указана Вами при загрузке Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. Автор изображения неизвестен. В книге стоит Копирайт Института истории им. Ш. Марджани АН РТ Крымский научный центр, 2018. Как совместить эти факты? Трифонов Андрей (talk) 16:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- 1. Помогите мне поставить правильную настройку что фото сохранилось на статье. Это мой прадед, все фото принадлежат по закону мне. Но я не знаю детали настроек википедии, потому выложил как смог. Буду благодарен за помощь. Abdulhak Zerdevi (talk) 21:48, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Как Вам могут принадлежать авторские права на групповой снимок выпускников? Они принадлежать наследникам фотографа, если такие есть, а Вам принадлежит ваш физический экземпляр фото. Поясняю образно: у Вас может законно быть пластинка, но у Вас нет прав на песню. Трифонов Андрей (talk) 23:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- 1. Помогите мне поставить правильную настройку что фото сохранилось на статье. Это мой прадед, все фото принадлежат по закону мне. Но я не знаю детали настроек википедии, потому выложил как смог. Буду благодарен за помощь. Abdulhak Zerdevi (talk) 21:48, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Указана Вами при загрузке Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. Автор изображения неизвестен. В книге стоит Копирайт Института истории им. Ш. Марджани АН РТ Крымский научный центр, 2018. Как совместить эти факты? Трифонов Андрей (talk) 16:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
04:05, 17 февраля 2023 Krd обсуждение вклад удалил страницу File:Svod-pamyatnikov-krmtat-3tom виньетка 1а.jpg (No permission since 9 February 2023) (поблагодарить) (global usage; delinker log)
Kept: this group photograph was published anonymously in 1936 in what was then a part of Russian Federation, so it is in PD. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
как минимум, подложная дата. и ранее было опубликовано, как минимум, тут: https://www.facebook.com/283830052568065/photos/a.357403998544003/792478755036523/?type=3 Jim Hokins (talk) 17:09, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
An architectural work photographed from a public space in Vietnam after January 1, 2023. I wasn't aware of the new copyright law when I uploaded the photo. I checked for copyright protection, and since the monument was completed in 1984, it may be quite some time before the copyright protection expires. Ltn12345 (talk) 15:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 09:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: not own work PD-US-no notice? Yann (talk) 22:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Now fixed. --RAN (talk) 00:20, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It is unsafe to assume the photo is fall under {{PD-US-no notice}} -- we don't know if there was a copyright notice on the back. See previous discussion here. 0x0a (talk) 11:56, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Subject: Urgent Appeal for Collaboration and Reconsideration of Recent Actions on Cheryl Miller's Page
- Dear Wikipedia Community and Yann,
- I hope this message finds you in good health and spirits. I am reaching out to address two pressing concerns that have significantly impacted the Wikipedia page dedicated to Cheryl Miller, a figure whose contributions to the entertainment industry and cultural heritage warrant respect and accurate representation.
- Firstly, the recent deletion of historically significant images from Cheryl Miller's page has not only diminished the richness of her portrayal but also overlooked the legal and rightful permissions granted for their use. As representatives managing Cheryl Miller's estate, we hold explicit rights to these images, many of which have been shared in good faith and under appropriate licenses for over a decade. These images, selected for their historical value and personal significance, are crucial in illustrating Cheryl Miller's profound impact and legacy.
- Secondly, it has come to our attention that Cheryl Miller's page has been subjected to vandalism and unauthorized edits. These actions not only distort the factual accuracy of her contributions but also disrespect her legacy and those who seek to preserve it. The vandalism extends beyond simple factual inaccuracies, reflecting a broader pattern of targeted disruption and possibly malicious intent.
- In light of these challenges, we appeal to the Wikipedia community for support and understanding. Our objectives are twofold:
- To seek collaborative solutions for the restoration and protection of Cheryl Miller's page. We believe in Wikipedia's mission to disseminate accurate and verifiable information, and we are committed to contributing constructively towards this goal.
- To request a reconsideration of the decision to delete the images in question, backed by a willingness to provide any additional documentation or clarification required to meet Wikipedia's standards and policies.
- We understand the importance of Wikipedia's guidelines and the community's role in upholding the integrity of its content. It is in this spirit of collaboration and mutual respect that we request your assistance in addressing these concerns. We are ready to engage in dialogue, provide necessary documentation, and work together to ensure that Cheryl Miller's legacy is represented accurately and respectfully on Wikipedia.
- We look forward to your constructive feedback and hope to find a path forward that honors the spirit of Wikipedia while safeguarding the legacy of Cheryl Miller.
- Thank you for your time and consideration.
- Warm regards,
- Representative of Cheryl Miller's Estate Blacklisablack (talk) 05:14, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Blacklisablack Please provide the back of the photo so that we can infer its copyright status based on the information on it. 0x0a (talk) 04:50, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann and Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): Good news! The back of photo was found on ebay, and there was no copyright notice on it. 0x0a (talk) 10:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: See above. I will upload the back for future reference. --Yann (talk) 10:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Unused photoshopped image, unusable, pointless DW of File:Crveni Krst concentration camp, Niš, Serbia.jpg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:24, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:57, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
copyvio, the stated source/author (ProCyclingStats) does not hold the copyright of this (pixelated) file. This file is not in the public domain. Yannick1 (talk) 20:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:59, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded this image before I understood there is no freedom of panorama. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Clayton-Jackson-McGhie-memorial-Duluth-Minnesota.jpg for another example. WFinch (talk) 21:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:59, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image was cropped from an image I uploaded before being aware there is not freedom of panorama. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Clayton-Jackson-McGhie-memorial-Duluth-Minnesota.jpg WFinch (talk) 21:47, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:59, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Clayton-Jackson-McGhie-memorial-Duluth-Minnesota_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Clayton-Jackson-McGhie-memorial-Duluth-Minnesota_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image is cropped from an image I uploaded before I understood there is no freedom of panorama for this sculpture. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Clayton-Jackson-McGhie-memorial-Duluth-Minnesota.jpg WFinch (talk) 21:48, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:59, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for this 2003 sculpture. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Clayton-Jackson-McGhie-memorial-Duluth-Minnesota.jpg for another version that has been deleted. WFinch (talk) 21:53, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:59, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Ceci n'est pas un autoportrait - attribution au photographe erroné Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 10:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Bonjour @Droit de retrait 03, @Nattes à chat est l'autrice de cette photo et m'a donné l'autorisation lors de l'éditathon pour la publier sur Commons. Le Commissaire (talk) 14:09, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Bonjour. Vos métadonnées sont donc erronées : vous avez mentionné
- Source Travail personnel
- Auteur Le Commissaire
- confondant le sujet de la photo (vous) et l'auteur de la photo (Nattes à chat). Il vous faut donc changer les métadonnées, puis demander à "Nattes à chat" d'envoyer une autorisation, et la photographie de vous par "Nattes à chat" sera conservée.
- La confusion entre "photo dont ego est le sujet" et "photo prise par ego" est une erreur classique, qu'il convient d'éviter. (et de maîtriser pour l'expliquer aux participant·es aux projets wikiPMédia.
- Bien à vous
- Droit de retrait 03 alias Éliane Daphy, retraitée, ancienne ingénieure Cnrs responsable des publications en archives ouvertes d'une importante Unité mixte de recherche ("labo") CNRS/EHESS 2006-1018).
ːːː I gave my authors rights to Le Commissaire for this photo and allowed him to publish it on commons on my behalf. Do we really need to go thru all the painful burocracy ? Nattes à chat (talk) ːːːː J'ai envoyé le ticket OTRS. @Le Commissaire: la procédure est décrite ici https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aide:Republication/Courriel_Image Nattes à chat (talk)
Ticket:2024041110000202 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 01:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:Le Commissaire lors de l'éditathon à Majorque en 2022.jpg” under ticket:2024041110000202. --Mussklprozz (talk) 11:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: VRT ticket received. (non-admin closure) — doclys (❀) 15:32, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
We already have a svg file of this map with a better file name. 2600:1009:B01E:D586:C5F4:8BCE:5036:5405 01:34, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- The new file has better quality borders and is different than the old file. ZackCarns (talk) 01:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- You’ve been told before to stop uploading new files of the maps and it’s better to just overwrite the old files and the old files have a better and categorized harmonizing names like Montana Presidential Election Results 1932 is a better file name. 2600:1009:B01E:D586:C5F4:8BCE:5036:5405 02:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as duplicate. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Risk of copyright violation, may not be the uploader's work. The logo at the bottom is of the Association of Scouts of Azerbaijan, and we need evidence of permission from this association. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:00, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Clarification: the logo may be a copyright violation in itself (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Azərbaycan Skautları Logo.png), but the presence of the logo suggests that this document may have been published by the association whose logo this is. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:12, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Risk of copyright violation. No evidence of permission from the Association of Scouts of Azerbaijan, whose logo this is. This is too complex to come below the threshold of originality in most or all jurisdictions. COM:AZERBAIJAN does not give specific guidance. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:PCP, from an account that has uploaded multiple copyrighted photographs Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, a user's history of uploading copyright violations is insufficient, although the speedy deletion tagging of some of their other uploads appears to be justified. Their only contributions on English Wikipedia are for w:en:Arctic Trucks, so they may be connected with this organisation. I cannot see any free licenses in https://arctictrucks.com/ or https://antarcticachallenge.com/, so we should require license validation through VRT. Verbcatcher (talk) 16:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Regardless uploaders history, no evidence that not own work. Keep. --Zenwort (talk) 02:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:38, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Monteith Hall, 218 East Ave. in Elyria, Ohio, Col. Nahum Ball Gates, son-in-law of Rev. John Monteith, c. 1940.png
[edit]
This file was initially tagged by EurekaLott as no license (No license since)
circa 1940 American photograph. If published before 1978, is probably public domain due to formalities. If unpublished until after 1978, it would still be in copyright. Abzeronow (talk) 16:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- HI @Abzeronow, well as I said on my talk page, this file is the same as another one that another user also targeted as problematic, I was wrong in my logic about the dates, so I think too that it should be deleted, as it should have been 2024-120 years = before 1904, rather than 2024-70= 1954, as I thought that as it was an anonymous work, we could used its creation date as the first year of the death of the anonymous author + 70 years. So no problem, we should delete it. Academia45 (talk) 21:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:38, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
This is an unused file, and I request to delete it because it violates the paid contributing without disclosure 호로조 (talk) 18:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Unlike most Wikimedia projects, Commons does not require disclosure for paid editing, so that is not a valid grounds for deletion. There might be copyright or scope issues, but someone would need to spell those out. - Jmabel ! talk 00:28, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- What I'm sure is that this file is a logo. However, I'm not sure that it is a Public Domain (e.g. PD-logo file) file. 린눈라단 (talk) 08:37, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I don't think this is below the threshold of originality in the US. We would need COM:VRT permission from the company. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:38, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Татьяна Кайманова (talk · contribs)
[edit]No FoP in Russia / Ukraine for sculpture.
- File:Кайманпилот м 02.jpg
- File:Кайманпилот бел 22.jpg
- File:Кайманпилот бел 21.jpg
- File:Кайманпилот бел 20.jpg
- File:Кайманпилот бел 19.jpg
- File:Кайманпилот бел 18.jpg
- File:Кайманпилот бел 06.jpg
- File:Кайманпилот пенз 07.jpg
- File:Кайманпилот купр 24.jpg
- File:Модель памятника Куприну. Автор В.Б. Курочкин.jpg
- File:Модель памятника Куприну. Автор В. Б. Курочкин.jpg
- File:Модель памятника Куприну. Скульптор В. Б. Курочкин.jpg
- File:Бюст Куприна. Модель. Автор В. Б. Курочкин.jpg
- File:Модель памятника Куприну. Севастополь. 2009.jpg
- File:Памятник А. И. Куприну. Гатчина. 2023.jpg
- File:Бюст Куприна. Гатчина. Библиотека имени Куприна.jpg
- File:Памятник Куприну. Балаклава. Набережная.jpg
- File:Памятный знак. Балаклава.jpg
- File:Памятник Куприну.jpg
- File:Памятник Куприну1.jpg
- File:Первый памятник Куприну.jpg
- File:Памятник Куприну. Рельеф1.jpg
- File:Памятник Куприну. Село Наровчат.jpg
- File:Памятник Куприну. 2015.jpg
- File:Памятник Куприну. Наровчат.jpg
Quick1984 (talk) 20:22, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Очень признательна за указанные ошибки при загрузке файлов. Исправляю и впредь буду внимательнее. Благодарю за помощь Татьяна Кайманова (talk) 14:11, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
This file contains video and images which were almost certainly not produced Second Kamerad RAR, thus this file cannot be attributed under a CC Attribution 3.0 Unported license. PizzaKing13 (talk) 02:09, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 00:51, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ZioNicco as no source (No source since) Krd 05:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Delete stated Italian TV show screenshot, copyvio --Zenwort (talk) 01:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete copyvio Julie13666 (talk) 11:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Film frames are protected for 20 years after creation according to {{PD-Italy}} and this is from 1968. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:05, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Abzeronow (talk) 00:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by ZioNicco as no source (No source since) Krd 05:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Though source is missing, it seems to be dated 1971 and meets {{PD-Italia}}+{{PD-1996}}. Consigned (talk) 19:14, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: License is correct, Italian film stocks from a 1971 Italian TV program. --Abzeronow (talk) 00:55, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Modern Sciences as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: this is not own work of Uploader
Converted to regular DR as no evidence was provided. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- no evidence for deletion claim. Keep. --Zenwort (talk) 01:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comments No earlier versions nor versions with competing copyright claims found in reverse image searches. Currently in use in multiple projects. Uploader has since been indef blocked, and uploaded multiple copyvios with false "own work claims. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:38, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak delete per COM:PRP, user has uploaded many copyright violations, and their current active uploads have a mix of exif suggesting they are not the photographer. Consigned (talk) 19:27, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader and author are different, issues of uploader's contributions; per nomination and Com:PCP. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
L'affichage est flou Département Finistère (talk) 13:10, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - fuzzy, COM:REDUNDANT with the better quality File:Logo du Département du Finistère.jpg Consigned (talk) 21:11, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, use File:Logo du Département du Finistère.jpg. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:45, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Image uploaded by a user named Roine Stolt, showing Roine Stolt. Even if we believe that the user is the actual artist, then it is not own work. If the user is not the artist, then it seems to be a small crop of an unknown source, likely taken from the JET guitar website (but this image is not present on the website version of April 6, 2012, at archive.org). Missing original author, source, and permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:46, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Porque quero alterar o tipo copyright Yussukin (talk) 16:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader request, unused in content ns. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:47, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Porque carece de autorización de la persona que figura en la imagen: María Rei Vilas Xuncal (talk) 17:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Picture obviously taken with her consent. After 4 years too late for courtesy request. CC irrevocable. Keep. --Zenwort (talk) 02:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:47, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
licence incorrecte, cf https://theconversation.com/fr/republishing-guidelines WikipSQ (talk) 17:31, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Reading the French the licence should be CC: attributio nd-sa. --Zenwort (talk) 02:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; noting Commons:Deletion requests/File:Geological map of Paris.jpg. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:48, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for artworks and sculptures in the United States which likely makes this a copyvio. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:5E4:48BE:836F:9F61 18:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Spam warning ⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️ from Wikipedia unknown account.. removing Manciniart photos — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.171.64.1 (talk) 21:29, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Spam warning ⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️ from Wikipedia unknown account.. removing Manciniart photos — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 5.179.161.135 (talk) 22:22, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; copyvio, no FOP. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:49, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Estevoaei as Speedy (Speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Irrelevant: Used on user page, see COM:INUSE. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - contributions} 18:34, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; in use, resolve at wiki first. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:51, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
This is an unused file, and I request to delete it because it violates the paid contributing without disclosure 호로조 (talk) 18:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: personal photo; per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:55, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright violation; artist died in 2019; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Copyrighted artworks. Consigned (talk) 21:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Fue subida para crear articulo en wikipedia que fue considerado de autopromoción. Por tanto y dado que no cumple con la finalidad por la que fue subida se solicita su eliminación para preservar anonimato de las personas que aparecen Tabonal (talk) 22:02, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader request, unused, 2024 image. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Fue subida para crear artículo en wikipedia que fue considerado de autopromoción. Por tanto y dado que no cumple con la finalidad por la que fue ascenso se solicita su eliminación para preservar el anonimato de las personas que aparecen Tabonal (talk) 22:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader request, unused, 2024 image. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Fue subida para crear artículo en wikipedia que fue considerado de autopromoción. Por tanto y dado que no cumple con la finalidad por la que fue ascenso se solicita su eliminación para preservar el anonimato de las personas que aparecen Tabonal (talk) 22:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader request, unused, 2024 image. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Fue subida para crear artículo en wikipedia que fue considerado de autopromoción. Por tanto y dado que no cumple con la finalidad por la que fue ascenso se solicita su eliminación para preservar el anonimato de las personas que aparecen Tabonal (talk) 22:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader request, unused, 2024 image. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Fue subida para crear artículo en wikipedia que fue considerado de autopromoción. Por tanto y dado que no cumple con la finalidad por la que fue ascenso se solicita su eliminación para preservar el anonimato de las personas que aparecen Tabonal (talk) 22:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader request, unused, 2024 image. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:12, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Fue subida para crear artículo en wikipedia que fue considerado de autopromoción. Por tanto y dado que no cumple con la finalidad por la que fue ascenso se solicita su eliminación para preservar el anonimato de las personas que aparecen Tabonal (talk) 22:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader request, unused, 2024 image. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:12, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Fue subida para crear artículo en wikipedia que fue considerado de autopromoción. Por tanto y dado que no cumple con la finalidad por la que fue ascenso se solicita su eliminación para preservar el anonimato de las personas que aparecen Tabonal (talk) 22:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader request, unused, 2024 image. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:12, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Fue subida para crear artículo en wikipedia que fue considerado de autopromoción. Por tanto y dado que no cumple con la finalidad por la que fue ascenso se solicita su eliminación para preservar el anonimato de las personas que aparecen Tabonal (talk) 22:07, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader request, unused, 2024 image. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:12, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Fue subida para crear artículo en wikipedia que fue considerado de autopromoción. Por tanto y dado que no cumple con la finalidad por la que fue ascenso se solicita su eliminación para preservar el anonimato de las personas que aparecen Tabonal (talk) 22:07, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader request, unused, 2024 image. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:12, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Fue subida para crear artículo en wikipedia que fue considerado de autopromoción. Por tanto y dado que no cumple con la finalidad por la que fue ascenso se solicita su eliminación para preservar el anonimato de las personas que aparecen Tabonal (talk) 22:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- La finalidad no sólo es escribir un artículo. La imagen puede servir otros fines también. 186.173.117.57 01:13, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader request, unused, 2024 image. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:13, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Caulfield as no source (No source since) Krd 05:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
As the one above. --Zenwort (talk) 01:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Though source is missing, dated 1964 it meets {{PD-Italia}}+{{PD-1996}}. Consigned (talk) 19:15, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: license is correct. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Doublette mit 2024 UEC Track Elite European Championships 070.jpg Nicola (talk) 10:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Uploader request, duplicate of File:2024 UEC Track Elite European Championships 070.jpg. Consigned (talk) 19:18, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:25, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Logo jest nieaktualne i nie połączone z żadnym wpisem. Pojawia się w wyszukiwarce po wpisaniu nazwy pracowni i jest aktualnie mylące dla Klientów. 80.238.115.88 10:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Only used on a personal page, non-notable corporate logo. Consigned (talk) 19:17, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D/3D works in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 10:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Even if one considers the toy cooyrightable and not COM:UA as it would be in Nationalist China, clearly de minimis. --Zenwort (talk) 01:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the sculpture (for lack of a better word for the ship and its passengers) is clearly the focus of the photograph. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:14, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely to be uploader's own work (image is claimed to be from 1965 while the uploader claims to be "at school", i.e., of school age as of 2024). Also, it's a scan from a newspaper or other low-quality print which is very likely copyrighted. See also related discussion about another image by the same uploader[9]. — kashmīrī TALK 10:43, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
![[9]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Aagam_Manthan_and_Translation_Research_under_Ganadhipati_Gurudev_Shree_Tulsi_,_Acharya_Shree_Mahapragya_,_Acharya_Shree_Mahashraman_and_Sadhvi_Pramukha_Shree_Kanakprabha_Ji.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom, unlikely the uploader's own work. Consigned (talk) 19:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2061. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:16, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
problème de conditions d'utilisation, cette oeuvre ne peut pas être adaptée Département Finistère (talk) 13:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- This would need VRT since we'd need to verify the uploader represents the Department to keep. Abzeronow (talk) 18:19, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. @Département Finistère: please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you are the copyright holder and this user in order to publish the image or media file on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image or media file can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:53, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Something like Bindingsteuer doesn't exist, see deleting discussion in German Wikipedia w:de:Wikipedia:Löschkandidaten/19. März 2024#Bindingsteuer (BNR)
Killarnee (talk) 15:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Regardless of the opinion of the user "killarnee" with regards to the existence or not "Bindingsteuer", the changes to "§ 20 Abs. 6" in December 2019 and Deember 2020 are history.
- The article "Bindingsteuer" has Number 1: not been deleted but moved. Number 2: the discussion was about "political inclination" and "relevance of the term Bindingsteuer" and not its existence.
- Changes in 2019: https://www.buzer.de/gesetz/4499/al82883-0.htm
- Changes in 2020: https://www.buzer.de/gesetz/4499/al119027-0.htm
- User "killarnee" is invited to check how the law changed in 2019 and 2020 and the changes match what it's depicted in the two png file.
- Best regards P0su0h (talk) 16:12, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Regardless of the lengthy German debate: Wrong licence in any case. Obviously screenshot from software, text may be free as German law. Doubtful if educational. Delete precautionary principle. --Zenwort (talk) 02:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 185.172.241.184 as Logo. I believe this file is simple enough to be allowed under COM:TOO US. Seawolf35 (talk) 19:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think this is above threshold, thus very likely copyvio. --Zenwort (talk) 02:51, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Font seems simple, though has an element of proportionality thrown through to wrap around a simple image though again with an element of design. The declaration of the license is fictional. I tend ever so slightly to agree with Zenwort, though it probably needs to be compared with other deletions focused on to TOO or not to TOO. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:59, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, imho the U is not a standard font and its colors make it above threshold as well. --Ellywa (talk) 20:56, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Orgel St. Matthäus Hochzoll.jpg
- File:St. Matthäus Hochzoll Altarraum.jpg
- File:St. Matthäus Hochzoll Wandbehang.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:56, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:St. Petrus (Augsburg)
[edit]copyright violation; artist of stained glass windows (E. Schickling) died in 2012; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Augsburg, St. Petrus (2).jpg
- File:Augsburg, St. Petrus (3).jpg
- File:Augsburg, St. Petrus (4).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:41, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Stained glass is either de minimis or easily cropped out to feature the pipe organ. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Church was inaugurated in 1962, and its architect Willem Wichtendahl died in 1992. In Germany there exists a standard of life + 70. In Germany FoP is only for exterior views and this files are from the interior of the church. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 06:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 20:57, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:St. Petrus (Augsburg)
[edit]copyright violation; contemporary artworks (crucifixus, for example; artist of stained glass windows (E. Schickling) died in 2012); no freedom of panorama.
- File:Ev. Petruskirche Augsburg 2.jpg
- File:St. Petrus Augsburg-Lechhausen 2.jpg
- File:St. Petrus Augsburg-Lechhausen.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Church was inaugurated in 1962, and its architect Willem Wichtendahl died in 1992. In Germany there exists a standard of life + 70. In Germany FoP is only for exterior views and this files are from the interior of the church. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 06:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:57, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation; stained glass windows by Domke (see https://www.evangelisch-in-waiblingen.de/fileadmin/mediapool/gemeinden/KG_waiblingenneu/Adressen_und_Ansprechpartner/Gebaeude/Miki.pdf) who died in 2005; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Michaelskirche Waiblingen 03.JPG
- File:Michaelskirche Waiblingen 04.JPG
- File:Michaelskirche Waiblingen 06.JPG
- File:Michaelskirche Waiblingen 07.JPG
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:57, 19 March 2024 (UTC
- 03 is de minimis, keep that. --Zenwort (talk) 02:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, deleted three, kept 03 based on comment of Zenwort. --Ellywa (talk) 20:58, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation; stained glass windows by Domke who died in 2005; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Düsseldorf-Unterbilk, Friedenskirche Innen.JPG
- File:Friedenskirche (Düsseldorf) (2).jpg
- File:Friedenskirche (Düsseldorf) (3).jpg
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- I uploaded new pixelized versions. --Chris06 (talk) 17:53, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Which made the already blurry pics rather unusable. Scope? --Zenwort (talk) 02:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Behalten, es geht um Innenfotos des Kirchraum, nicht um die Fenster. --Chris06 (talk) 06:13, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Ja ich verstehe, die Kirche ist in der Public Domain, aber die Fenster sind noch unter copyright und eher prominent im Bild, also da kann man meiner Meinung nach kein de minimis draus machen. Files der Innenräume ohne die Fenster sind ja auch nicht zur Löschung vorgeschlagen worden. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:01, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Die Fotos sind für die Dokumentation des Innenraums geeignet und Bilder wurden hier schon oft nicht gelöscht, wenn das Fensterglas verpixelt ist. --Chris06 (talk) 15:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Comment I have stricken my delete vote since its not anymore the same files we are voting on and I can follow the rationales of both Chris06 but also the one of Zenwort.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 06:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per Zenwort. The pixalated windows makes the images of no educational use imho. --Ellywa (talk) 21:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation; stained glass windows by Domke who died in 2005; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 20:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
copyvio, 1 artwork by Rosa Studer-Koch (pd. 2061), no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 20:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Delete no FoP for interiors of a church in Switzerland Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:00, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Keep de minimis. --Zenwort (talk) 02:58, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, I do not agree the artwork is De Minims. If it cropped, only rows of chairs remain. --Ellywa (talk) 21:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jnkssns as Speedy (Löschen) and the most recent rationale was: Logo ist falsch! Es hat im oberen Drittel rechts über dem "n" in Holthausen eine Macke. Ein neues Logo wurde bereits hochgeladen und im Artikel geändert --Jnkssns (talk) 13:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC) Yann (talk) 22:11, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Überholte Datei, wird nicht mehr benötigt. Da sie von mir durch bessere Datei [10] ersetzt wurde. Foxxy199 (Foxy5) (talk) 22:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
![[10]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lageplan_Schweinfurt_Hauptbahnhof.png){kind=link}
- We can have two versions of the same file. Some may prefer it without the labelling. — billinghurst sDrewth 03:13, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Billinghurst. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Überholte Version Foxy5 (talk) 22:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- ("Überholte Version" → "Overhauled version") Do you mean Karte Schweinfurter Becken 2.png with 'overhauled version'? WikiMichi (talk) 21:57, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- @WikiMichi: No. Karte Schweinfurter Becken 2.png is the better version. I mean this File:Karte Schweinfurter Becken.png with Overhauled version. Foxxy199 (Foxy5) (talk) 11:13, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: I don't think that "Schweinfurt Becken 2" is an outdated version. For me, this map has a different context. The first version IMHO represents more the topography, lacking the urban area. In my opinion, this is too distracting in a more topographical context. In an encyclopedic context, on the other hand, the urban area fits in better, simply as a reference to the "real world", to make it easier to imagine the dimensions.
- So it is a keep for me. There are many, many "unused" files on Commons, which are not used in Wikimedian projects like Wikipedia. However, one never knows when another editor is going to need a different map, let alone non-editors just downloading (or using the file via API). It's not like the storage space is sacre. ;-) --WikiMichi (talk) 21:32, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- @WikiMichi: No. Karte Schweinfurter Becken 2.png is the better version. I mean this File:Karte Schweinfurter Becken.png with Overhauled version. Foxxy199 (Foxy5) (talk) 11:13, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Comment Having multiple versions of files is perfectly reasonable, they just need to be suitably described/commented/explained what the file may be, and how it differs from other versions. I wouldn't suggest that we delete something unless it is problematic — billinghurst sDrewth 03:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Still useful. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:01, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Datei wird nicht mehr benötigt, da sie von mir durch bessere Datei [11] ersetzt wurde. Foxxy199 (Foxy5) (talk) 22:49, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
![[11]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Unterer_Sennfelder_See_und_Dorfsee.png){kind=link}
- I think that we can have both versions. Remembering that it is not solely internal use that is the consideration. I don't see that two versions is problematic. Good {{Information}} templates is the requirement. — billinghurst sDrewth 03:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Billinghurst. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:02, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Derivative work of copyrighted Peter Griffin character.
Converting to DR for discussion since the photograph appears to be free. Germany has FOP, and this appears to be permanently displayed. Abzeronow (talk) 20:36, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete, per this. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 20:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and discussion, derivative work of copyrighted original, painted presumably without permission, so we cannot host the image with FOP in Germany as a reason. --Ellywa (talk) 19:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Derivative work of copyrighted Peter Griffin character.
Photograph appears to be free, so converting to DR as this doesn't fit criteria for speedy deletion. Germany has FOP and this may be covered by that. Abzeronow (talk) 20:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Graffiti can be removed, so FOP doesn't apply. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 20:49, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: @Gnom: for their perspectives on German law. Abzeronow (talk) 21:27, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- I guess this is covered by German fop, because it is both public (if this is a public street or path, which it seems to be) and permanent (per de:Panoramafreiheit#Kriterium „bleibend“, which explicitly mentions that many legal commentaries consider graffiti to be permanent). I'm not so sure if this is lawful though (in both Germany and the US) because it's a copyrighted character. We do have several other photographs like this though (File:Hilden, Dorotheen Park Lucky Luke.JPG is one I could find after a quick search). --Rosenzweig τ 21:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, per COM:PCP. Peter takes up too much space on the photo to be COM:De Minimis. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 02:54, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- It is my understanding that FOP requires that the artwork in question was originally placed with the rightsholder's authorisation, which is not the case here. Pinging @Gestumblindi. Gnom (talk) 07:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- I guess this is covered by German fop, because it is both public (if this is a public street or path, which it seems to be) and permanent (per de:Panoramafreiheit#Kriterium „bleibend“, which explicitly mentions that many legal commentaries consider graffiti to be permanent). I'm not so sure if this is lawful though (in both Germany and the US) because it's a copyrighted character. We do have several other photographs like this though (File:Hilden, Dorotheen Park Lucky Luke.JPG is one I could find after a quick search). --Rosenzweig τ 21:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Weak delete As I was pinged by Gnom: I share Gnom's understanding. I think that original graffiti in Germany should be considered permanent and therefore fine, per Rosenzweig, but graffiti depiciting pre-existing copyrighted artwork or characters are a different matter. If these would fall under FoP, we could "liberate" any artwork, any copyrighted character, just by painting them - without the copyright owner's permission - on a wall and then claiming FoP. This can't be the law's intention. I would differentiate, though. For example, File:Tintin-Wandgemaelde in Bruessel.jpg is a meticulously painted mural in a prominent location in Brussels, Belgium, showing a scene from a Tintin comic. It is part of the official en:Brussels' Comic Book Route and therefore we can assume that it was made with the right owner's permission (and Belgium has now FoP, too). Such murals should be fine. On the other hand, we also can almost certainly assume that the graffito in question here was not made with the right owner's knowledge and permission. Why do I then only vote "weak delete"? Because, as also pointed out by Rosenzweig, we seem to have a quite liberal practice when it comes to this question. There will be borderline cases where a permission by the rights holder would seem possible, but not certain. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:49, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Freedom of panorama rests on the notion that certain artwork types may have allowable 2-D derivative works made if they are in a public place. It protects the photographer from infringement when capturing a panorama of these public artworks. It shouldn't matter if the creator of the public work has infringed themselves on an earlier work. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- @IronGargoyle: Your assumption basically destroys copyright - if it were true, as I wrote above, I just could paint the copyrighted artwork of my choice on a wall in public space and suddenly it's free for anyone to photograph and reproduce. That surely can't be right? Gestumblindi (talk) 11:06, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- It does not destroy copyright. That is a silly and hyperbolic statement. The original graffiti artist is still committing a copyright violation. FoP laws where photographers are able to reproduce 2D graphical art in public are relatively rare (and probably problematic for the reasons you give), but that does not make the laws less valid, nor their attempt to protect photographers in a more extreme manner. The derivative work is a derivative work no matter the source. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:12, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Per de:Panoramafreiheit#Rechtfertigung, the official rationale for freedom of panorama in Germany says something like that erecting a work of art at public places expresses the intent to dedicate that work to the general public. And Germany's highest court, the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Court of Justice), added that authors consenting to such a placement of their works also agree to dedicating their work to the general public, at least to a certain degree. Some legal commentators argue that some works of art may be placed in public solely at the initiative of the owner without the consent of the author, and therefore fop should be based on the interests of the general public. They all though seem to base their arguments mainly on legitimately produced statues etc. which exist in single copies, so those arguments probably don't quite fit for graffiti. --Rosenzweig τ
- Delete - even if FOP, it's a depiction of a copyright violation. The copyright holder did not consent to displaying the character in public. Consigned (talk) 21:15, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and discussion, derivative work of copyrighted original, painted presumably without permission, so we cannot host the image with FOP in Germany as a reason. --Ellywa (talk) 19:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
This is an unused file, and I request to delete it because it violates the paid contributing without disclosure 호로조 (talk) 18:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- In use at koWP, though in user ns and potentially out of scope. Have requested deletion at koWP and let us see how that community responds. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyvio. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:36, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
