Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/02/12
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_74_(50566049202).jpg){kind=link}
_-_73_(50566049537).jpg){kind=link}
_-_75_(50566048912).jpg){kind=link}
![89 File:"don james kiriella image.jpg".jpg](#File:"don_james_kiriella_image.jpg".jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_20230911.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Quién es Lara, tu novia? 186.174.118.19 00:14, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted F10 by Pi.1415926535. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:47, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
smallpenis Sochulove (talk) 16:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Really small, impossible to see it in the scope. 186.175.245.89 16:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
File name error 薔薇騎士団 (talk) 03:53, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Keep (obviously). What should the filename be? It can be renamed easily, there is no need for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 04:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Or have you already uploaded a duplicate at File:Mianguan Yinan.jpg ? (Which you should have been warned about). In which case, delete - but that could be a speedy delete as user request. Andy Dingley (talk) 04:02, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate of File:Mianguan Yinan.jpg. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
image appears to be copyrighted (https://www.itsaliving.nyc/ABOUT). also would like to delete some of the metadata attached to this photo. Camardavids (talk) 04:08, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
garbage image uploaded by now-globally-locked LTA to illustrate fake entries which have since been deleted from wikidata DS (talk) 04:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Same issue with this one. DS (talk) 04:27, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
erros de informação Romulo Portugal (talk) 13:23, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Exact dupe of File:Miniatura de Maria Perpétua Calafate de Souza.png. --Achim55 (talk) 17:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Wrong image uploaded Spw2444 (talk) 15:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 16:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Child porn, please delete and block uploader Dronebogus (talk) 15:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Het meisje 2A02:A449:AFA:1:D8AB:7E26:CC93:5CF0 17:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 17:33, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
AI upscaling of a "KCNA via REUTERS" news photo which does not appear to be freely licenced (https://www.infobae.com/america/mundo/2021/10/06/el-regimen-de-kim-jong-un-moviliza-a-los-maestros-para-cosechar-papas-y-tratar-de-evitar-la-hambruna-en-corea-del-norte/). The malformed hands are not present in the lower resolution original and there's a significant difference in background where the watermark has been removed in the bottom right. Belbury (talk) 17:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Same with File:Kim Jong-un and Kim Tok-hun inspecting typhoon affected regions in Anbyon County.png which is taken from https://www.rfa.org/english/news/korea/nk-rural-committee-01292024224216.html ("KCNA via Reuters"). --Belbury (talk) 17:13, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:18, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
2024 music album cover ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:02, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Howdy. I was given information from the record label that I could use this photo but it appears to be outside the bounds of what is acceptable on Wikipedia. Please delete. I am working on a copyright free image presently.
- Thanks! Inputoutputer (talk) 15:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
movie screenshot https://elcinema.com/en/person/1090510/gallery/123481988/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:14, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
movie poster https://antiquefacebook.blogspot.com/2020/02/15.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:35, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:08, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
unliely to be own work. https://www.facebook.com/Economic.Faculty/photos/a.564460386897416/2379507932059310/?type=3 ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:36, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:14, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
old magazine scan https://www.facebook.com/zakyzezo19/photos/a.319752878140586/4127485317367304/?type=3 ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:53, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:14, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Arquivo errado , foi por engano Romulo Portugal (talk) 12:03, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Go home. 186.174.198.224 00:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Mudança de imagem Romulo Portugal (talk) 22:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Go home. 186.174.198.224 01:16, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
ajuste de imagem Romulo Portugal (talk) 22:57, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Go home. 186.174.198.224 01:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
carregamento errado Romulo Portugal (talk) 23:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Go home. 186.174.198.224 01:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
imagem errada História do Porto (talk) 23:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Go home. 186.174.198.224 01:16, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
erro de informação Romulo Portugal (talk) 13:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Stop socking please. 186.175.194.215 15:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Note to closing admin: See Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/História do Porto. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:53, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Delete While I don't condone the page blanking or suspected sockpuppetry, without a source or author, there's no way to validate the alleged date (and thus that it's in the public domain) or that it is the person it purports to depict. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:00, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I cannot see that the picture is any different to any of the others published in that section, it is not a copyright infringement as the picture is of myself, I would be grateful if would repost my picture. Thank you. Xyz666xyz (talk) 07:09, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete seriously, we don’t need any more penises! Dronebogus (talk) 15:51, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Delete: Poor quality, enough better images in stock. --Achim55 (talk) 07:45, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- poor quality? i don't believe the quality is any worse than all the pictures already in this section, i only want to add to the variety available to viewers of this section, i have also posted one picture in the the flaccid penis page, maybe you should check that for quality too and let me know what you mean by poor quality so in future i can take better pictures. Xyz666xyz (talk) 13:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I join the delete opinions. If you need to see or upload more of this stuff sure there is some dick.com or cock.com whatsoever in internet. 191.126.164.86 15:38, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:24, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation DirkVE (talk) 10:23, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:53, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by TheImaCow as Speedy (db-noimage) Yann (talk) 10:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Broken scan, no useful information here. TheImaCow (talk) 13:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Not a broken scan at all. It's what is on the second page of a source document. We will keep scan of blank pages if that is what is there in a scanned book, for example. The numbers mean something to somebody. Some of it looks like lat/long coordinates. No reason for deletion, as per previous keep. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Then i'll call it "useless scan". If this caption is important, it should be added to the file description of "page 1". Keeping a seperate file only for a couple numbers is unnessescary. A file which provides merely a caption to another file is not realistically useful for any educational purpose, and especially not if we don't know what the numbers which are not coordinates even refer to. TheImaCow (talk) 20:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- And I'll disagree with that. Part of Commons is supporting Wikisource, which wants scans of raw source documents, including if there are blank pages in a series. Not sure this one in particular is used there, but it was useful enough for the National Archives to scan on their side, so there 's probably a reason for us. And not knowing what the numbers are right now is actually a reason to keep -- somebody knows, so that can be discovered in the future. Deleting stuff that a particular user (or several users) doesn't understand isn't the right approach. We do often upload the backs of postcards as well, even if blank (proves there was no author credited which can be help in proving anonymous publication which can affect the copyright term). Sometimes those get uploaded in the a file, then overwritten with the front, so there is no separate file. But, uploading separately is fine for those as well. Deleting files does not save any disk space, so that's not a reason for deletion -- it just hides the files so only admins can see them. Just because something isn't useful to you, doesn't mean it's not useful to somebody else. This was uploaded as part of a NARA cooperation project and I see no reason to delete it. If you want to bury it deep in a categorization tree fine, but it's not useless. It was part of the source record being scanned. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:08, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see how keeping those numbers in a seperate file is better than just adding them to the description of "page 1". This is not some useful source text for wikisource etc, this is simple metadata about a image, which belongs to the image it belongs to, not a seperate file. Deleting files saves no space, of course, but they still need to be categorized & maintained. TheImaCow (talk) 08:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- There is no other reference for the values -- if this is Wikisource, they would want the raw scan. Secondly, the background is actually a sliver of photo. But primarily, this is the source document. Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see how keeping those numbers in a seperate file is better than just adding them to the description of "page 1". This is not some useful source text for wikisource etc, this is simple metadata about a image, which belongs to the image it belongs to, not a seperate file. Deleting files saves no space, of course, but they still need to be categorized & maintained. TheImaCow (talk) 08:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- And I'll disagree with that. Part of Commons is supporting Wikisource, which wants scans of raw source documents, including if there are blank pages in a series. Not sure this one in particular is used there, but it was useful enough for the National Archives to scan on their side, so there 's probably a reason for us. And not knowing what the numbers are right now is actually a reason to keep -- somebody knows, so that can be discovered in the future. Deleting stuff that a particular user (or several users) doesn't understand isn't the right approach. We do often upload the backs of postcards as well, even if blank (proves there was no author credited which can be help in proving anonymous publication which can affect the copyright term). Sometimes those get uploaded in the a file, then overwritten with the front, so there is no separate file. But, uploading separately is fine for those as well. Deleting files does not save any disk space, so that's not a reason for deletion -- it just hides the files so only admins can see them. Just because something isn't useful to you, doesn't mean it's not useful to somebody else. This was uploaded as part of a NARA cooperation project and I see no reason to delete it. If you want to bury it deep in a categorization tree fine, but it's not useless. It was part of the source record being scanned. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:08, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it's the upper part of the photo. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Clindberg. - Jmabel ! talk 00:14, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. It's useful to have the full photo. Deleting it is a losss of information. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: kept by Yann. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:59, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
https://www.etsy.com/de/listing/947361284/3-stuck-manner-afrikanischen - copyright? Xocolatl (talk) 17:26, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Please, let the File:Dr Kayode Fayemi.jpg be listed at Commons Wikimedia. I would appreciate it. Thank you. Adeola Ready (talk) 12:42, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Please do not delete the File:Dr Kayode Fayemi.jpg let it be kept and listed on Wikimedia Commons. I would appreciate it if my request is granted. Thank you. Adeola Ready O (talk) 13:01, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Gold Wynn Mural, Colonial Apartments, Delaware Avenue, Allentown, Buffalo, NY - 52640143012.jpg
[edit]
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
If the author is unknown, it can't be under Creative Commons license. Yann (talk) 09:01, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the user's only upload. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
File:This was a place wear village people used to go jogging it is located in telangana, allinagar.jpg
[edit]
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Neither Sivkishen JI nor Kishen SSR is mentioned in en.wiki. In my opinion the photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in India for 2D works and the photo violates banner author's copyright. In addition, the banner is not permanently situated. Taivo (talk) 12:35, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 13:30, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 13:32, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 13:32, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 13:38, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 13:47, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Maybe it is free, but I am unable to find the declared CC-BY-SA 3.0 license on the source page. Ankry (talk) 17:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:41, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per usual Dronebogus (talk) 22:26, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. There are enough small penises and erections on Commons. 191.126.164.86 15:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:08, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:14, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:14, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage and out of scope
- File:Thai Le.jpg
- File:Techvify-software.jpg
- File:Techvify Logo Blue.png
- File:Logo-Techvify.jpg
- File:Techvify-vietnam-icon.png
Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:09, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Low resolution out of focus image, much better images exist in Category:Lucky Bay Calistemon (talk) 08:41, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:09, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
_-_74_(50566049202).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_74_(50566049202).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private holiday snap COM:SCOPE Qualitätssicherung (talk) 09:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
_-_74_(50566049202).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
_-_74_(50566049202).jpg){kind=link}
_-_73_(50566049537).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_73_(50566049537).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private holiday snap COM:SCOPE Qualitätssicherung (talk) 09:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
_-_73_(50566049537).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
_-_73_(50566049537).jpg){kind=link}
_-_75_(50566048912).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_75_(50566048912).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private holiday snap COM:SCOPE Qualitätssicherung (talk) 09:57, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
_-_75_(50566048912).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
_-_75_(50566048912).jpg){kind=link}
Files found with Special:Search/Sheikh Zayed Mosque EditQ
[edit]No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates. The mosque was completed in 2007 by Yusef Abdelki, permission from the architect is required.
- File:Inside the Main Prayer Hall, Sheikh Zayed Mosque 3.jpg
- File:Tourists Center, Sheikh Zayed Mosque 1.jpg
- File:Tourists Center, Sheikh Zayed Mosque 2.jpg
- File:Main Prayer Hall, Sheikh Zayed Mosque 2.jpg
- File:Main Prayer Hall, Sheikh Zayed Mosque 1.jpg
- File:Main Prayer Hall, Sheikh Zayed Mosque 5.jpg
- File:Main Prayer Hall, Sheikh Zayed Mosque 3.jpg
- File:Main Prayer Hall, Sheikh Zayed Mosque 6.jpg
- File:Inside the Main Prayer Hall, Sheikh Zayed Mosque 4.jpg
- File:Inside the Main Prayer Hall, Sheikh Zayed Mosque 1.jpg
- File:Inside the Main Prayer Hall, Sheikh Zayed Mosque 2.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 10:30, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:14, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
AI generated face with fake name. He is not Jackson Dormio. Delete or rename, please. ZimskoSonce (talk) 11:27, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:12, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
spam, out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 11:53, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- created by an account which has been blocked in multiple wikis for vandalism. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 06:10, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused out of focus photo of dog with unverified claim to fame.Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 12:31, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:14, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
AI-enhanced versions of publicity photos published at least a couple of years ago at https://stonecupid.com/new-photos, where the closest thing to a copyright notice is Current Photos by Magnus Diehl-pls credit - no assertion that they are specifically public domain.
Belbury (talk) 12:31, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Julie Christensen.jpg. For Julie Christian 2.jpg, please point me to how to get proper attribution so that I can keep on the relevant Wikipedia page. Thanks. -Jan Janopus (talk) 12:53, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Commons:Volunteer Response Team#Licensing images: when do I contact VRT? should cover the possible situations here. If you are Diehl and wish to release some of your previously published client work into the public domain, it either needs an email from you confirming that, or Christensen updating her website to include an explicit licencing notice. Belbury (talk) 13:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- This photo does not appear on Julie Christensen's professional website, so I presume that option is out.
- I can secure email to confirm release of photo to public domain, but photo was also modified by me. I presume also that that does not matter. Thanks again. -Jan Janopus (talk) 13:28, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Is https://stonecupid.com/new-photos not Christensen's professional website?
- If you're not the photographer but can secure email permission, please do so. And no, your modification doesn't change the copyright status, we must get Diehl's permission to use his work, even if we have altered it slightly. Belbury (talk) 18:04, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Commons:Volunteer Response Team#Licensing images: when do I contact VRT? should cover the possible situations here. If you are Diehl and wish to release some of your previously published client work into the public domain, it either needs an email from you confirming that, or Christensen updating her website to include an explicit licencing notice. Belbury (talk) 13:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Cotemporary image not by the uploader, and not available under a free license. --RAN (talk) 17:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Modifying someone else's copyrighted work with AI elements in Photoshop does not make it Public Domain. PascalHD (talk) 01:41, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:16, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 12:42, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:14, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jenny Taraji (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos of seemingly not notable person.
- File:Baddie Roma 14.jpg
- File:Baddie Roma 13.jpg
- File:Baddie Roma 12.jpg
- File:Baddie Roma 11.jpg
- File:Baddie Roma 9.jpg
- File:Baddie Roma 10.jpg
- File:Baddie Roma 8.jpg
- File:Baddie Roma 7.jpg
- File:Baddie Roma 6.jpg
- File:Baddie Roma 5.jpg
- File:Baddie Roma 4.jpg
- File:Baddie Roma 3.jpg
- File:Baddie Roma 2.jpg
- File:Baddie Roma 1.jpg
- File:Captivating Shot of Baddie Roma Grace the Poster for the Short Film Scarlet 2.jpg
- File:Captivating Shot of Baddie Roma Grace the Poster for the Short Film Scarlet.jpg
Spinixster (talk) 13:31, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
unused personal photo by non contributor ZimskoSonce (talk) 13:45, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Masturbation
[edit]Low quality garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 16:14, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:19, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
TF 1 TV channel screenshot with Messi's face ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:23, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/gravediggingaditch/6859517862 (c) All rights reserved ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
wrong licence Carl Ha (talk) 23:12, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete 1930s work by Austrian artist Ernst Demar (1893–1975). The file can be restored in 2046. --Rosenzweig τ 08:02, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
It might display an underage teen girl 213.94.19.138 23:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I agree, we should delete this unless we know how old the girl is. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:41, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
self promotion —Ismael Olea (talk) 17:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:26, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BluesyMammal417 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused symbols of fiction state of questionable notability.
- File:Skillandian Anthem Instrumental.ogg
- File:Skillandian Anthem Instrumental 1992.ogg
- File:Garrison National Flag.svg
- File:Skillson Country Flag.svg
- File:Skilland Country Flag.svg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:38, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BluesyMammal417 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Cartoon screenshots and audio samples. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Phineas Flynn at 1995 victory ceremony.png
- File:Phineas Flynn addresses to the nation.png
- File:Phineas Flynn Sings "A Wing and a Prayer".jpg
- File:Ellingtonian Anthem in NewFoundLand.jpg
- File:Sequester Address 1997.png
- File:A Wing and a Prayer 2001.wav
- File:William Sequester in 1998.png
- File:George Hanson.png
- File:Ellingtonian Anthem.wav
- File:The Adventures of Phineas Flynn (1995).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BluesyMammal417 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused maps and trivial symbols of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
- File:Flag Of Pshueth.png
- File:United States Election Results 2020.png
- File:President 49th signature.jpg
- File:Election 1996.png
- File:Election 2016.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BluesyMammal417 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01847/japan-fire_1847194a.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:25, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BluesyMammal417 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: fictitious flag and CoA.
Omphalographer (talk) 18:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:27, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag (cf. w:User:SuperCfj/sandbox). Omphalographer (talk) 18:01, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:28, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: various fantasy flags and emblems.
Omphalographer (talk) 18:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:28, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: fantasy flag. Omphalographer (talk) 18:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Не актуален, удалите пожалуйста Zero (talk) 18:30, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Не актуален, удалите пожалуйста. Zero (talk) 18:30, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope --George Chernilevsky talk 06:32, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Image entered PD in Taiwan, but not in USA because of URAA 218.103.254.52 02:29, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: There has been no discussion about this image, therefore I do not see sufficient arguments for deleting it. The Wikimedia Foundation – through the statement of the Legal department - does not see a reason to delete content simply because of general concern about the URAA. The guideline of Commons at COM:URAA states “A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion. If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under U.S. or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle.” Nobody took the effort to participate in this discussion, therefore I decided to keep the image, because it has a correct licence for the country where it originated. In addition, the file page is showing a warning sign that a licence tag is missing to show the image is possibly not in public domain in the USA which will prevent users from USA to use it freely without additional research. If you do not agree with this decision, you are kindly requested to nominate the image again for deletion in order to have a broader discussion about it. --Ellywa (talk) 15:29, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 10:42, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per previous DR. Ruthven (msg) 10:15, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
No proof the photo is in the Public Domain. Tag used is for pre-1929 works. This photo is from 1978. PascalHD (talk) 03:01, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Not yet old enough to be PD in source country, regardless of dubious US license claim. (and the name of a web search engine is not a "source") --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
I posted it as a picture of myself and 331dot instructed me to remove it. AfroUpdates (talk) 12:31, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per very prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:38, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
metadata: 2023 Brenda Garnett, all rights reserved. ZimskoSonce (talk) 12:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
unliely to be own work. source: https://www.facebook.com/escritorandrediniz/photos/a.496757867094025/3977081525728291/?type=3 ZimskoSonce (talk) 13:13, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work. https://jugmedia.rs/osnovci-u-bojnickoj-opstini-dobijaju-nove-klupe-posle-pola-veka/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 13:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. metadata: Philippe Ramakers / Intuitive Fotografie ZimskoSonce (talk) 13:26, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
The author of this photograph is not "unknown" as claimed, and it's also not from 1940. Per the alt text in the HTML source of the MOMA source page, and also per [1], this is a 1925 self portrait of August Sander, who died in 1964. So the photo is still protected by copyright in Germany, and the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2035. Rosenzweig τ 00:16, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
File:On formulas for factorials and values of factorials of negative integers arising from them.pdf
[edit]Out of scope: plain text. Uploader may want to read w:Gamma function; this is not a new result. Omphalographer (talk) 00:37, 12 February 2024 (UTC) This is not the same thing as the Gamma function. Charles Ewan Milner
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Delete. False claims of self authorship and an incorrect date, for a photo that's obviously of WWII era.
No objection if anyone wants to make a keep argument that this is clearly PD now, owing to age and the implicit and inevitable status of Soviet images of this vintage (I'm no expert on the Soviet rules then). Andy Dingley (talk) 01:04, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Previously published at https://www.mlive.com/broncos/2014/08/in_his_web_former_wmu_basketba.html, please verify license by emailing the address shown at COM:VRT.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 04:27, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:28, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gnomingstuff as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10. However, the person is well enough described in the desctription of the photo, to assume that he will become relevant. Please keep. NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
![07:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/02/12#c-NearEMPTiness-20240212071100-File:"don_james_kiriella_image.jpg".jpg){kind=link}
- Delete: Image is uploaded by author for explicitly promotional purposes, so COM:SPAM and arguably CSD:G10 would apply. Books are self-published and non-notable. Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:36, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
![02:36, 23 February 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/02/12#c-Infrogmation-20240223023600-File:"don_james_kiriella_image.jpg".jpg){kind=link}
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 福田 Futian 華強北 Huaqiang North 紅荔路 Hongli Road basement 正佳國際影城 Genecia Cinemas February 2024 R12S 05.jpg
[edit]
Copyrighted Film Poster. メイド理世 (talk) 10:02, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:38, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 福田 Futian 華強北 Huaqiang North 紅荔路 Hongli Road basement 正佳國際影城 Genecia Cinemas February 2024 R12S 04.jpg
[edit]
Copyrighted Film Poster. メイド理世 (talk) 10:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:38, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 福田 Futian 華強北 Huaqiang North 紅荔路 Hongli Road basement 正佳國際影城 Genecia Cinemas February 2024 R12S 03.jpg
[edit]
Copyrighted Film Poster. メイド理世 (talk) 10:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:38, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TheChineseGroundnut (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely COM:FLICKRWASHING. Commercial logos and low res photos of celebrities in different styles uploaded to a new Flickr account with no history other than these uploads [2]. File:French singer Yamê performing on ColorsxStudios.jpg appears to be a screenshot from this copyrighted video. File:Tone Stith in 2023.jpg looks like it was originally from Instagram [3].
- File:The Herald (Nigeria) Logo.png
- File:French singer Yamê performing on ColorsxStudios.jpg
- File:Punky Punk.png
- File:The Next Star plaque.jpg
- File:Tone Stith in 2023.jpg
- File:Flo Milli in 2023.jpg
- File:Prentice Powell in 2015.jpg
- File:Julia Church Image.jpg
_Logo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Spicy (talk) 10:38, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete and blacklist FLickr account. File:Prentice Powell in 2015.jpg was published as early as 2014 and File:Julia Church Image.jpg is from the artist's Instagram account. There's a couple of AI images with iffy copyright status, but I don't know that they're adding much encyclopedic content. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Flickr user added to bad list. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:38, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
low resolution photo. unlikely to be own work. i can't find original photo using google and yandex image search. ZimskoSonce (talk) 11:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader has uploaded multiple other copyright violations. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:47, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work. https://www.skynewsarabia.com/middle-east/1660046-%D8%B5%D9%88%D8%B1-%D8%B4%D8%B1%D8%B7%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%95%D8%B3%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%8A%D9%94%D9%8A%D9%84-%D8%AA%D9%83%D8%B4%D9%81-%D8%A7%D9%94%D8%B3%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%A1-%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D9%82%D8%AA%D9%84%D9%88%D8%A7-%D8%A8%D9%87%D8%AC%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B3 ZimskoSonce (talk) 11:59, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:48, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:Derivative work: This image appears to be a scan from a book or newspaper. Original photographer unknown. MKFI (talk) 12:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:49, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: claimed own work but file EXIF shows "Author WAYNNE WILLIAMS Copyright holder PORT HILLS PRODUCTIONS". VRT permission from Port Hills Productions needed. MKFI (talk) 12:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:49, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 12:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:49, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: claimed own work, but file EXIF shows "Author JIM HUANG". VRT permission from Jim Huang needed. MKFI (talk) 12:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:49, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
© SIPRI 2023 - not released under CC license ZimskoSonce (talk) 12:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:49, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work. https://www.moma.org/collection/works/257 ZimskoSonce (talk) 12:24, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:50, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Image Courtesy: @MovsarUFC via X/Twitter https://www.sportskeeda.com/mma/news-end-genocide-now-undefeated-ufc-star-calls-end-israel-s-war-palestine-following-heartbreaking-death-infant ZimskoSonce (talk) 12:26, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:50, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
These are all building plans, pictures and architecture models about architect en:Draft:Wolf Schijns. Based on username Mschijns might be the architect, or possible relative, but the copyright for these images might belong to the architect company. In any case VRT permission is needed to verify copyright.
- File:Wolf Schijns pricture.jpg
- File:Architectural drawing of 'De kleine schans' 02.jpg
- File:Architectural drawing of 'De kleine schans' 01.jpg
- File:Exhibition 'Architectuur en wonen' 01.jpg
- File:Exhibition 'Architectuur en wonen' 02.jpg
- File:Scale model installation in artist studio 'De Zaak' 01.jpg
- File:Scale model installation in artist studio 'De Zaak' 02.jpg
- File:Scale model of Stadsvilla.jpg
- File:Scale model installation in artist studio 02.jpg
- File:Scale model installation in artist studio 01.jpg
- File:Villa for Casanova in Lego 02.jpg
- File:Villa for Casanova in Lego 03.jpg
- File:Villa for Casanova in Lego 01.jpg
- File:Architectuur van de Dogon 01.jpg
- File:Architectuur van de Dogon 02.jpg
- File:Exhibition Grieks Schetsboek 01.jpg
- File:Exhibition Grieks Schetsboek 02.jpg
- File:Repurposing old time kilns, industrial monument.jpg
- File:Urban ideas sketch for the center of the Hoge Vucht 01.jpg
- File:Urban ideas sketch for the center of the Hoge Vucht 02.jpg
- File:Retirement Homes Loenen aan de Vecht 02.jpg
- File:Retirement Homes Loenen aan de Vecht 01.jpg
- File:Dorpshuis in Vlist 02.jpg
- File:Dorpshuis in Vlist 01.jpg
- File:HEMA department store 01.jpg
- File:HEMA department store 02.jpg
- File:Church and community center 01.jpg
- File:Church and community center 03.jpg
- File:Church and community center 02.jpg
- File:Urban plan with housing ‘De Kleine Schans’ 04.jpg
- File:Urban plan with housing ‘De Kleine Schans’ 03.jpg
- File:Urban plan with housing ‘De Kleine Schans’ 02.jpg
- File:Urban plan with housing ‘De Kleine Schans’ 01.jpg
- File:Urban plan for the ‘Houtmarkt’ 04.jpg
- File:Urban plan for the ‘Houtmarkt’ 01.jpg
- File:Urban plan for the ‘Houtmarkt’ 03.jpg
- File:Urban plan for the ‘Houtmarkt’ 02.jpg
- File:Designresearch for the center Hoge Vucht 02.jpg
- File:Designresearch for the center Hoge Vucht 03.jpg
- File:Designresearch for the center Hoge Vucht 01.jpg
- File:Redesign of the ‘Boschpoort’ 02.jpg
- File:Redesign of the ‘Boschpoort’ 01.jpg
- File:Redesigns of the ‘Tolhuis’ 03.jpg
- File:Redesigns of the ‘Tolhuis’ 01.jpg
- File:Redesigns of the ‘Tolhuis’ 02.jpg
- File:Housing plan in Ginneken 02.jpg
- File:Housing plan in Ginneken 03.jpg
- File:Housing plan in Ginneken 01.jpg
- File:Architectural design Vest pocket theater 02.jpg
- File:Architectural design Vest pocket theater 01.jpg
- File:Architectural design Youth center 02.jpg
- File:Architectural design Youth center 01.jpg
- File:Interior retirement center Voorburg 02.jpg
- File:Interior retirement center Voorburg 01.jpg
- File:Renovation House Breda 01.jpg
- File:Renovation House Breda 03.jpg
- File:Renovation House Breda 02.jpg
- File:Restauration project Quasr 5.jpg
- File:Restauration project Quasr 4.jpg
- File:Restauration project Quasr 3.jpg
- File:Restauration project Quasr 2.jpg
- File:Restauration project Quasr 1.jpg
- File:Seniorhouses and paramedic practices 04.jpg
- File:Seniorhouses and paramedic practices 02.jpg
- File:Seniorhouses and paramedic practices 01.jpg
- File:Seniorhouses and paramedic practices 03.jpg
- File:Archeological training and conservation centre 1.jpg
- File:Archeological training and conservation centre 2.jpg
- File:Archeological training and conservation centre 3.jpg
- File:Carwash centre ‘Christ’ 1.jpg
- File:Carwash centre ‘Christ’ 2.jpg
- File:Carwash centre ‘Christ’ 3.jpg
- File:Apartmentbuilding Overkroeten 3.jpg
- File:Apartmentbuilding Overkroeten 1.jpg
- File:Apartmentbuilding Overkroeten 2.jpg
- File:Brinkplan Overkroeten 4.jpg
- File:Brinkplan Overkroeten 1.jpg
- File:Brinkplan Overkroeten 2.jpg
- File:Brinkplan Overkroeten 3.jpg
- File:Houses plan ‘t Holle 2.jpg
- File:Houses plan ‘t Holle 1.jpg
- File:Compilation Dogon village in the Afrika Museum 1.jpg
- File:Compilation Dogon village in the Afrika Museum 2.jpg
- File:Compilation Dogon village in the Afrika Museum 3.jpg
- File:Compilation Student housing 4.jpg
- File:Compilation Student housing 5.jpg
- File:Compilation Student housing 2.jpg
- File:Compilation Student housing 3.jpg
- File:Compilation Student housing 1.jpg
- File:Compilation Djenne hospital 4.jpg
- File:Compilation Djenne hospital 2.jpg
- File:Compilation Djenne hospital 1.jpg
- File:Compilation Djenne hospital 3.jpg
- File:Compilation Law firm with home 2.jpg
- File:Compilation Law firm with home 1.jpg
- File:Compilation Law firm with home 3.jpg
- File:Compilatie foto's project De Driehoek 7.jpg
- File:Compilatie foto's project De Driehoek 6.jpg
- File:Compilatie foto's project De Driehoek 4.jpg
- File:Compilatie foto's project De Driehoek 3.jpg
- File:Compilatie foto's project De Driehoek 5.jpg
- File:Compilatie foto's project De Driehoek 2.jpg
- File:Compilatie foto's project De Driehoek 1.jpg
MKFI (talk) 12:29, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no progress. (If proper permission per VRT recieved, may be undeleted.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:51, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author given as "Not Sure", no reference for that CC BY-SA. It could be in PD since its simple shape, but definitely not sure. Sciking (talk) 12:41, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, no suport for claimed license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:53, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
2021 movie poster ZimskoSonce (talk) 13:38, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hello,
- not so sure what I have done wrong with the picture. this is the official poster of the movie found on their website credited with the right author and copyrights.
- Let me know if I should so something different.
- thanks a lot in advance Superjuju360 (talk) 14:13, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Movie posters are copyrighted. There's nothing you can do that makes it legal to copy them. Period. PaterMcFly (talk) 15:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hoanghung150814 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files with vague claims of own work, some of which are definitely copyrighted.
- File:Vua Thiệu Trị.jpg
- File:Chợ Tân Phước.jpg
- File:Chùa Sơn Thành.jpg
- File:Bản đồ Việt Nam.png
- File:Quảng Trị- Phát động Chương trình “Tháng Ba biên giới”.png
- File:Một số thành viên đoàn công tác số 10 chụp ảnh lưu niệm tại cột mốc chủ quyền trên đảo Nam Yết..png
- File:Cột mốc chủ quyền trên đảo Sơn Ca..png
- File:Chiến sỹ hải quân Việt Nam canh gác bên mốc chủ quyền trên đảo Đá Tây A..png
- File:Cột mốc chủ quyền trên đảo Sinh Tồn Đông..png
- File:Cột mốc chủ quyền trên đảo Sinh Tồn.png
- File:Nhóm cựu chiến binh hải quân bên cột mốc chủ quyền đảo Trường Sa Đông..png
- File:Cột mốc chủ quyền trên đảo Song Tử Tây..png
- File:Chiến sỹ hải quân Việt Nam canh gác bên cột mốc chủ quyền trên đảo Trường Sa Lớn.png
- File:Hoàng Sa, Trường Sa là của Việt Nam.png
Spinixster (talk) 13:39, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
All of these images are likely under copyright to the Dean 2024 campaign. The current tag in use is {{PD-shapes}} which does not accurately apply to these works. These photos are certainly above the threshold of originality, and contain other photos which are not released under any open license.
- File:Dean24-Choice.jpg
- File:Dean24-COL.jpg
- File:Dean24-Competition.jpg
- File:Dean24-Courage-1.jpg
- File:Dean24-Courage-2.jpg
- File:Dean24-Democracy.jpg
- File:Dean24-FinancialStress.jpg
- File:Dean24-Healthcare.jpg
- File:Dean24-Invited.jpg
- File:Dean24-Leadership-1.jpg
- File:Dean24-NHPoll.jpg
- File:Dean24-NHPoll2.jpg
- File:Dean24-Optimism.jpg
- File:Dean24-Power.jpg
- File:Dean24-Reimagine.jpg
- File:Dean24-System.jpg
- File:Dean24QuoteGraphic1.jpg
- File:Dean24QuoteGraphic2.jpg
- File:Dean24QuoteGraphic3.jpg
- File:Get to Know Dean Phillips Graphic.jpg
PascalHD (talk) 22:58, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- As campaign materials, I am not quite if it would qualify as {{PD-US-Gov}} PascalHD (talk) 23:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- It probably depends on who made them. Campaign materials by Dean Philipps could be PD because he's payed as a member of the parliament. I'm not 100% sure whether works by a member of parliament also qualify as work of the government, though. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:39, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Campaign materials are not PD-gov because they are not created as part of offical duties. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
This file should be deleted, since it is not officially fixed in any documents, and is someone's invention, which was then uploaded by another participant. They decided for the Mishar Tatars what they should have. You can look at the Russian Wikipedia and make sure that it is not used there, although in other language Wikipedia, where the Tatar Tatars usually do not enter, this flag is there. Diniyar Khasanov (talk) 19:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hubert Hartmann
[edit]copyvio; pd in 2076; no fop.
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:57, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
source: https://sindhulisaugat.com/2023/12/21/126995/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
(c) 2024 All Rights Reserved Peter Rubardt, Conductor http://www.peterrubardt.com/peter-rubardt/conductor-gallery.asp ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:07, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
metadata: Paavo Lehtonen ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:09, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright. On this page is mentioned "© AFP or licensors". Googlegives many hits. Wouter (talk) 20:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyright. This is not own work but a screenshot from TV or this. Wouter (talk) 20:23, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 20:36, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
seems to be a test upload, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Commons is not an amateur porn site Dronebogus (talk) 22:27, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Human sexuality is within project scope, but we have better quality properly lit alternatives. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:43, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
This seems to be an image that is not based on any reliable information. Violates "all media must be realistically useful for an educational purpose", this flag invented by the author at best can sow confusion. Викидим (talk) 16:24, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- Hello, Siberian Tatars have no official institutions, because they are not too much, it is little nation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siberian_Tatars), so they discuss their problems online. In one siberian tatar group they discussed flag of siberian tatar people, they chose this flag by online poll (https://vk.com/topic-9968898_24852226) and this flag (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_Siberian_Tatars.svg) won with 65%
Do not deprive small people of the right to their own flag, the Internet is the only place where they can declare themselves. Sebirkhan (talk) 18:21, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per COM:INUSE, as it is in use in some Wikipedia language versions and in Occitan Wiktionary, see also COM:NPOV (Commons serves the other Wikimedia projects; if files are deemed useful in these and in use, they are automatically in scope). --Gestumblindi (talk) 16:01, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
To begin with, the Siberian Tatars are not a separate ethnic group. They are part of the Tatar people. accordingly, they cannot have their own flag. Russian Russian Wikipedia, where the most complete information about the Siberian Tatars is available, since they speak Tatar and Russian, does not have this flag. Next, I want to say about the attempt to remove this flag early. The argument in favor of leaving this flag was that 65% of 116 people voted for it. Out of 116 people on the social network! How could such a small group of people decide which flag to have for a group of Tatars, whose number, according to maximum estimates, is about 500 thousand people? Diniyar Khasanov (talk) 19:43, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, you can consider the Siberian Tatars to be part of the Kazan Tatars. This is your ideological right, although it is not true. The Siberian Tatar language is considered a separate language and is in danger of extinction, this is not my opinion, you can read about this in UNESCO materials [4]https://en.wal.unesco.org/languages/siberian-tatar also you can read the List of endangered languages in Russia wiki article.
- As for the flag. Every nation has the right to its own flag, but the Siberian Tatars do not have official institutions to choose their flag, so the current flag was chosen through oral voting, word of mouth, and also through the Internet (including thanks to the Sybyrlar organization). Therefore, it is incorrect to say that the flag of the Siberian Tatars was adopted by the Internet community.
- Not only the Sybyrlar organization uses this flag, but also other Siberian Tatar organizations: LOCAL PUBLIC ORGANIZATION "NATIONAL CULTURAL AUTONOMY OF SIBERIAN TATAR CITY OF TYUMEN"
- as well as the organization TYUMEN REGIONAL PUBLIC ORGANIZATION "NATIONAL-CULTURAL AUTONOMY OF SIBERIAN TATARS".
- In addition, the World Congress of Tatar also used this symbolism in its materials in the design of the news about the Siberian Tatars.[5]https://tatar-congress.org/ru/blog/yazyk-sibirskih-tatar-poluchil-mezhdunarodnoe-priznanie/ Sebirkhan (talk) 08:18, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- The fact that the Siberian Tatars are part of the Tatar people is not my "ideological right", they are recognized by historians as part of the Tatar people. The Siberian Tatars themselves do not distinguish themselves as a separate people in the population censuses, but are simply recorded as Tatars. Only a small part of the Siberian Tatars called themselves "Siberian", namely 6,779 people, but the scribes still counted them as part of the Tatar people.
- Also, the Great Russian Encyclopedia does not single out the Siberian Tatars as a separate people. The Russian Geographical Society does not single them out as a separate people. The list is long, since no one singles them out as a separate people. The flag was adopted by the Internet community. They do not have official recognition, and they do not, because, as I argued above, no one distinguishes them as a separate people. But let's consider for the sake of interest how objective this vote was in this online community.
- According to the 2010 census, as I wrote above, 6,779 people called themselves Siberian Tatars, while there are only 3,612 people in this online community, which already shows that not even all "Siberian Tatars" know about this community. And in the survey, as I wrote above, only 116 people participated! And I'm not talking about the fact that on such platforms it is possible to add voices using robots or various sites. Other public organizations also do not inspire confidence, since there are much fewer participants in these groups, 229 in one and 188 in the other. Again, if we compare this with the number of Tatars who called themselves Siberian, it will be less than 4%. What kind of objectivity do you expect with such indicators?
- The World Congress of Tatars has published a photo that is only partially similar to the flag that is now being put up for removal, so this is also not an argument.
- And the fact that you pointed to the link in Wikipedia to the List of endangered languages in Russia is fundamentally wrong, since
- 1)Wikipedia itself says that it is not an authoritative source
- 2) In the article, in addition to the "Siberian Tatar" language, there is also the Baraba Tatar language, which most researchers call a dialect of the Tatar language (sometimes the Siberian Tatar language), but it is not a separate language. The same situation is with the Yurt Tatar language, which is a sub-dialect of the middle dialect of the Tatar language, and is not separate. So it's not surprising.
- I translate through a translator, so I ask the admins to clarify some information about the text with me, if necessary. Diniyar Khasanov (talk) 19:26, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: As with the last nomination, this file is still COM:INUSE. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in South Korea, considered copyrighted Adeletron 3030 (talk) 02:23, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Please explain how this could possibly be copyright. It's a photo of a municipal building taken from a public-access right of way. Jpbarrass (talk) 04:09, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Jpbarrass Sure. Architecture is considered 3D art and intellectual property rights of building designs belong to the architects. And there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea, which means even though the arena is visible to the public, 2D reproductions of them, i.e. photographs, cannot be used commercially. All photographs uploaded to Commons must allow commercial use b Adeletron 3030 (talk) 04:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. That's interesting, but does that then mean that every photo featuring a building in Korea has to be deleted? Jpbarrass (talk) 04:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Jpbarrass It depends. Designs of unique buildings - stadiums, museums, skyscrapers, train stations, theaters, airports, etc - could be considered copyrighted. But more generic architecture (houses, normal office buildings) are probably fine, and same for historic buildings where the copyright has expired. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 20:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I looked for other examples, and Lotte World Tower is an obvious example. I see that's uploaded, too, but at Wikipedia, not Commons.
- File:Lotte World Tower 2019.jpg
- Would it be OK to upload it to English Wikipedia instead of here? Jpbarrass (talk) 03:39, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- (I mean perhaps that way we can upload things without licensing them for commercial purposes.) Jpbarrass (talk) 03:40, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Jpbarrass You can upload it at Wikipedia and you should be fine, though I’m not sure if it needs to be a non-free image with a fair use rationale or simply add a “do not export to Commons” tag. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:38, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. That sounds like a plan. Let's approve the deletion here, though I've no idea how to do that! Jpbarrass (talk) 05:34, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Jpbarrass It depends. Designs of unique buildings - stadiums, museums, skyscrapers, train stations, theaters, airports, etc - could be considered copyrighted. But more generic architecture (houses, normal office buildings) are probably fine, and same for historic buildings where the copyright has expired. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 20:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. That's interesting, but does that then mean that every photo featuring a building in Korea has to be deleted? Jpbarrass (talk) 04:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Jpbarrass Sure. Architecture is considered 3D art and intellectual property rights of building designs belong to the architects. And there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea, which means even though the arena is visible to the public, 2D reproductions of them, i.e. photographs, cannot be used commercially. All photographs uploaded to Commons must allow commercial use b Adeletron 3030 (talk) 04:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 12:47, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
This should be either moved or deleted, as it is not an image of Dimitrios Loundras (1896 Olympic gymnast). Rather, it is of the 1900 Dutch rowing team, which included a young coxswain whose name is unknown. See the same image at File:Rowing coxed pair 1900.jpg. Also note that this was uploaded by a globally locked LTA user. BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, please see COM:MOVE. --Wdwd (talk) 12:42, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Norway, except for buildings. Artist is no:Per Ung. Can be restored in 2084. 4ing (talk) 21:16, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Too bad. I didn't know when I snapped the pic. in 2014. Toxophilus (talk) 06:53, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:35, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Norway, except for buildings. Can be restored in 2055. 4ing (talk) 21:18, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:38, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Norway, except for buildings. Can be restored in 2054. 4ing (talk) 21:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:38, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Norway, except for buildings. Can be restored in 2054. 4ing (talk) 21:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:40, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Не актуально, удалите пожалуйста! Zero (talk) 21:27, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 12:30, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Уже не актуально! Удалите пожалуйста! Zero (talk) 21:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 12:28, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Person in photo isn't Alexander Stubb, its prime minister Orpo Minttu99 (talk) 22:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- What? Where has anyone claimed that this picture is of Alexander Stubb? The file name and description clearly state that it is Petteri Orpo. Ur Nan123 (talk) 23:51, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 12:25, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Do you see this picture at the source? I don't. 186.175.219.84 22:53, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 12:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Ist das Bild Frei? Warum? 186.175.219.84 22:58, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 12:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
_20230911.jpg){kind=link}
_20230911.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
質量差的图像，非常小，模糊 颐园居 (talk) 01:57, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
_20230911.jpg){kind=link}
- Poor quality image, very small, blurry
- You have submitted the file for deletion here based on the same reasons again and again, even the fact that the reason has failed as an accepted reason to delete. I'm respectful of your right to submit the files for deletion, but I'm sorry that, I'll have to choose to report you and your acts to the Administrators' noticeboard for processing if you choose to continue your mischief like these. 隐世高人 (talk) 03:18 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- 你已基于同样理由一次又一次地在此提交文件删除，即使事实上该理由未能成为可被接受的删除理由。我尊重你提交文件删除的权利，但我很抱歉的是如果你选择继续你类似这样的闹剧，那我也不得不选择提报你和你的行为到管理员布告板来处理。(为避免有人以看不懂英文为由表示自己未得知有收到我的警告，特此另发中文的同样内容，绝无他意！) 隐世高人 (talk) 03:33 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Not reasons for deletion, and we don't have a surplus of alternatives. Andy Dingley (talk) 02:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
_20220525.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: per discussion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:42, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
_20230911.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted newspaper A1Cafel (talk) 13:28, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:46, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unlikely to be won work. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm4407924/mediaviewer/rm2348386817/?ref_=nm_ov_ph ZimskoSonce (talk) 14:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:47, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. (c) YG Entertainment https://www.instagram.com/reel/CztipMGocSr/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 14:16, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:48, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
(c) Universal pictures https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmAJtj6PEvY Interview with Elsie Fisher for Despicable Me ZimskoSonce (talk) 14:18, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete very obvious violation SDudley (talk) 21:19, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:46, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Google Maps - copyvio Psubhashish (talk) 15:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:49, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
1994 bulgarian newspaper article photo ZimskoSonce (talk) 15:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:48, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
צילום: אלון שפרנסקי https://www.mako.co.il/tv-the_cops/season2-classified/Article-2795f203b75b981027.htm ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:01, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 19:17, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
(c) YG Entertainment. https://www.allkpop.com/video/2023/11/ruka-makes-a-great-first-impression-in-babymonsters-new-visual-film-and-teaser-photos ZimskoSonce (talk) 14:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:17, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5zzQQpdv94&lc=Ugg7NOnfrgs-9XgCoAEC ZimskoSonce (talk) 14:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:17, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
source: https://www.facebook.com/GastroMiastoWr ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ~Cybularny Speak? 17:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
source: https://www.facebook.com/GastroMiastoWr ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ~Cybularny Speak? 17:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
source: https://www.facebook.com/GastroMiastoWr ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:26, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ~Cybularny Speak? 17:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
metadata: Andres Poveda ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:33, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:44, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
metadata: Photographer: Anna Kostetskaya ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:43, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 14:44, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyright violation; contemporary artworks (see Stiftskirche (Stuttgart)#Glasfenster); no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:01, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:43, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
2022 movie poster ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:02, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:39, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=220322371761287&set=p.220322371761287 ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:39, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work. https://www.facebook.com/uaesm32/photos/a.1357081784330362/1812149738823562/?type=3 ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:38, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
bad fan art, out of scope. original image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:231124_Song_Kang.jpg ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:35, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 13:40, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Penis
[edit]
Dronebogus (talk) 14:34, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:39, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Penis
[edit]Unremarkable WP:PENIS pics
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Dronebogus (talk) 15:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by User:Gbawden. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:43, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Penis
[edit]Low quality penis images
File:Enlarge 2425408393.png- File:Erect circumcised penis.jpg
- File:Male anus, perineum, scrotum and penis II.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 15:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I do not understand the benchmark for "low quality". It demonstrates exactly what it stated. I believe in regards to both empirical characteristics (resolution, clarity, etc) and usefulness, it surpasses many other images left under this category. Rafe101 (talk) 17:14, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I just realized the first one is not low quality and in use; removing Dronebogus (talk) 22:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- The world makes a little more sense. Thanks Rafe101 (talk) 22:22, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete the rest. 186.175.219.84 22:27, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I just realized the first one is not low quality and in use; removing Dronebogus (talk) 22:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 06:26, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Penis
[edit]SERIOUSLY WE DO NOT NEED MORE DICK PICS
- File:Human Male Ejaculation (1).gif
- File:Human Male Ejaculation (2).gif
- File:Human Penis (1).jpg
- File:Human Penis (10).jpg
- File:Human Penis (11).jpg
- File:Human Penis (4).jpg
- File:Human Penis (5).jpg
- File:Human Penis (6).jpg
- File:Human Penis (7).jpg
- File:Human Penis (8).jpg
- File:Human Penis (9).jpg
- File:Human Penis+.jpg
- File:Human Penis-.png
- File:Low and tight circumcision.jpg
- File:Male penis flaccid to erect.jpg
- File:My dick.jpg
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Dronebogus (talk) 11:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:26, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Penis
[edit]- File:Erectpenis.jpg
- File:Erectpenis14.jpg
- File:Fully erect male with a cock ring on the testicles.gif
- File:Malepubichair.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 11:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10 - also CSD U3 of their userpage and a block. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
low resolution web photo, unlikely to be own work. https://www.playmakerstats.com/player/amin-torkashvand/309332 ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:38, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 06:26, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Fails (b) inventions, legal, administrative and judicial acts, as well as other official creations and their collections, presented in order to inform the public, seems only applies to documents, not photographs, see this A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
2014 book cover ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:13, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:56, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Benno Klandt M2k~dewiki (talk) 18:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:56, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Benno Klandt M2k~dewiki (talk) 18:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:56, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Benno Klandt M2k~dewiki (talk) 18:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:56, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Benno Klandt M2k~dewiki (talk) 18:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:56, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Sven Rauhe M2k~dewiki (talk) 18:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:56, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Image entered PD in Taiwan, but not in USA because of URAA 218.103.254.52 02:30, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: There has been no discussion about this image, therefore I do not see sufficient arguments for deleting it. The Wikimedia Foundation – through the statement of the Legal department - does not see a reason to delete content simply because of general concern about the URAA. The guideline of Commons at COM:URAA states “A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion. If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under U.S. or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle.” Nobody took the effort to participate in this discussion, therefore I decided to keep the image, because it has a correct licence for the country where it originated. In addition, the file page is showing a warning sign that a licence tag is missing to show the image is possibly not in public domain in the USA which will prevent users from USA to use it freely without additional research. If you do not agree with this decision, you are kindly requested to nominate the image again for deletion in order to have a broader discussion about it. --Ellywa (talk) 15:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 10:40, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:08, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Random date of creation (given the age of depicted person, it's around 1965), missing date of first publication, no attempt to clarify who the author is. 188.123.231.64 08:18, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
original artwork not in public domain, under copyright in source country until 2051, first exhibited in 1929 (per Wikipedia) so not in the public domain in the U.S. Hekerui (talk) 09:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:28, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Image entered PD in Taiwan, but not in USA because of URAA 218.103.254.52 02:29, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: There has been no discussion about this image, therefore I do not see sufficient arguments for deleting it. The Wikimedia Foundation – through the statement of the Legal department - does not see a reason to delete content simply because of general concern about the URAA. The guideline of Commons at COM:URAA states “A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion. If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under U.S. or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle.” Nobody took the effort to participate in this discussion, therefore I decided to keep the image, because it has a correct licence for the country where it originated. In addition, the file page is showing a warning sign that a licence tag is missing to show the image is possibly not in public domain in the USA which will prevent users from USA to use it freely without additional research. If you do not agree with this decision, you are kindly requested to nominate the image again for deletion in order to have a broader discussion about it. --Ellywa (talk) 15:28, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 10:39, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep We should just ignore that. PaterMcFly (talk) 15:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:29, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Image entered PD in Taiwan, but not in USA because of URAA 218.103.254.52 02:30, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: There has been no discussion about this image, therefore I do not see sufficient arguments for deleting it. The Wikimedia Foundation – through the statement of the Legal department - does not see a reason to delete content simply because of general concern about the URAA. The guideline of Commons at COM:URAA states “A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion. If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under U.S. or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle.” Nobody took the effort to participate in this discussion, therefore I decided to keep the image, because it has a correct licence for the country where it originated. In addition, the file page is showing a warning sign that a licence tag is missing to show the image is possibly not in public domain in the USA which will prevent users from USA to use it freely without additional research. If you do not agree with this decision, you are kindly requested to nominate the image again for deletion in order to have a broader discussion about it. --Ellywa (talk) 15:29, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 10:40, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:29, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. This is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 11:01, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Should be okay for Switzerland. --Leyo 21:28, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- COM:TOO Switzerland first sentence says: "literary and artistic intellectual creations with individual character, irrespective of their value or purpose". In my opinion the logo is copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
The flag was launched in 1983 and is a work of the Canadian government. It is protected by Crown copyright (Canada) and does not expire until 2034. Please put this file in Category:Undelete in 2034. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 11:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- The English Wikipedia article Flag of Calgary says that it was designed by Gwynneth Llewellyn and Yvonne Fritz, with no suggestion that it is protected by Crown copyright. Is there some other information you have to support that?
- That being said, even if not protected by Crown copyright, it would presumably be protected by the Llewellyn & Fritz ordinary copyright, and as such should not be hosted on Commons. It could be re-uploaded to the various Wikipedia that use it, though, and used under fair use. TJRC (talk) 20:27, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
This image is obviously not the uploader's own work (the depicted person died in 1940). As such the CC license is not correct. Another suitable license is not (yet) given. Mosbatho (talk) 13:51, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
This image is obviously not the uploader's own work (the depicted person died in 1940). As such the CC license is not correct. Another suitable license is not (yet) given. Mosbatho (talk) 13:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Too unhealthy Integergraphy (talk) 16:26, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Speedy keep Nonsense reason. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:08, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Also the nominator seems keen to have their own photos (one already deleted, one now at DR as unlicensed) of this subject used instead. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:12, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ✗plicit 05:13, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright © 1994-2024 The University of British Columbia. All rights reserved. https://food.ok.ubc.ca/places/tim-hortons-library/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 14:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Picture of a deceased newborn - the basic human rights are clearly violated. 109.42.114.23 15:23, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you mean. The image is of an exhibit from a Grand Jury Report, posted by both state and federal government in Pennsylvania and the United States. Wikipedia is NOT censored, and the image is of a victim of illegal late-term abortion. DocZach (talk) 22:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- The image is to give context into the horrific crimes of Kermit Gosnell. The human rights were violated by Gosnell, and I'm not sure how this image is violating any "rights" when it simply provides the reality and horrendous nature of Gosnell's crimes.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_censored DocZach (talk) 22:24, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Unable to determine from the court documents if this is a photograph made by the FBI or Pennsylvania law enforcement. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:58, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- The investigation into Gosnell involved federal and state employees. The document the image is sourced from is on the Supreme Court website, a federal government website. The images are in the public domain as part of a federal and state ruling. Pennsylvania also has public domain for released rulings or reports such as those. DocZach (talk) 13:00, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Things do not become public domain just because they are placed on a US federal government website. They are public domain because a federal employee created the images as part of their duties. We do not know who created this image. As you say, the investigation involved both federal and state employees. If this was taken by a state employee (or a material witness who worked at the clinic) it would not be public domain. There is a very good chance this is true. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:26, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Once again, both the FBI and DEA were involved in leading this investigation. Second of all, the images are properly sourced to a government court document. In regards to Pennsylvania law enforcement, Pennsylvania law sorts court documents and their contents into the public domain. DocZach (talk) 01:46, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- First of all, the photo is contained within a court document, but the photo is not a court document in and of itself. It is a work by the photographer who took it. Second, there is no evidence for the notion that Pennsylvania releases their government documents into the public domain; note the footer at https://www.pacourts.us/ which says "© 2024 The Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania". IronGargoyle (talk) 03:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Page 2: "In view of these findings, the Court hereby accepts the Report and refers it to the Clerk of Court for tiling as a public record." The elements within the document are all public domain. It is a Grand Jury Report with photos taken by federal and state officials, admitted as crime scene exhibits. It is also listed under the Supreme Court website, and is registered as a judicial ruling and opinion, and is therefore a federal government document. DocZach (talk) 10:47, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Also, the original proposal for deletion of this file was not for a copyright concern...? It was because he said "human rights were violated." Yes, human rights were violated when Gosnell killed people. Providing evidence to show people the reality of his crimes is not a "human rights violation." DocZach (talk) 10:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. I'd like to add a few points:
- 1. The mugshot of Kermit Gosnell is literally sourced from the same party, the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office. I've looked around, and have found numerous articles that use the same photos, and they cite the Grand Jury Report as well. Under United States and Pennsylvania copyright law, the use of these images would be permissible under fair use. So, even if you don't think this file is protected as a photo part of the public domain, it would still be available for use under fair use laws. Aside from it being in the public domain, I also believe it meets the exemption that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Non-free_content provides, meeting all 10 torts.
- Here are examples of other articles that use some of the same images, sourcing them from the Grand Jury Report:
- https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/kermit-gosnell-dr-abortion-clinic-story-b2346073.html
- https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna41211777
- The particular focus on this photo seems to be an attempt to censor the image due to its graphic and upsetting nature, rather than a genuine concern of copyright. The original proposal was for the purpose of it being unsettling, not for being a concern of copyright. DocZach (talk) 21:40, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- So, if you'd like to re-classify the license as "fair use", then that's fine. But I still believe it is under public domain for the reasons I've already stated. DocZach (talk) 21:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Also, the original proposal for deletion of this file was not for a copyright concern...? It was because he said "human rights were violated." Yes, human rights were violated when Gosnell killed people. Providing evidence to show people the reality of his crimes is not a "human rights violation." DocZach (talk) 10:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Page 2: "In view of these findings, the Court hereby accepts the Report and refers it to the Clerk of Court for tiling as a public record." The elements within the document are all public domain. It is a Grand Jury Report with photos taken by federal and state officials, admitted as crime scene exhibits. It is also listed under the Supreme Court website, and is registered as a judicial ruling and opinion, and is therefore a federal government document. DocZach (talk) 10:47, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- First of all, the photo is contained within a court document, but the photo is not a court document in and of itself. It is a work by the photographer who took it. Second, there is no evidence for the notion that Pennsylvania releases their government documents into the public domain; note the footer at https://www.pacourts.us/ which says "© 2024 The Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania". IronGargoyle (talk) 03:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Once again, both the FBI and DEA were involved in leading this investigation. Second of all, the images are properly sourced to a government court document. In regards to Pennsylvania law enforcement, Pennsylvania law sorts court documents and their contents into the public domain. DocZach (talk) 01:46, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Things do not become public domain just because they are placed on a US federal government website. They are public domain because a federal employee created the images as part of their duties. We do not know who created this image. As you say, the investigation involved both federal and state employees. If this was taken by a state employee (or a material witness who worked at the clinic) it would not be public domain. There is a very good chance this is true. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:26, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Fair use is not possible on Commons. The assertion that somehow Pennsylvania law overrides Federal copyright law is incorrect. The copyright belongs to the unknown photographer. It might be PD if it were an FBI image, but that seems unlikely. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
TV interview screenshot ZimskoSonce (talk) 15:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Logo is no longer in use. New logo appears on Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg page. 70.35.170.4 19:39, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept PD. No reason for deletion. History as well as current are equally within Commons scope. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:45, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Logo is old and should no longer be available Dwpvmarketing (talk) 16:36, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, no valid reason for deletion. Obsolete logos remain in scope as they illustrate the history of the firm's brand identity. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 16:38, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keeping this logo up is misleading and does not conform with the brand's current identity. We would like to replace it with the new one to avoid this confusion. Dwpvmarketing (talk) 19:31, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work. https://twitter.com/hw_floyd/status/1725546313645760981 ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:38, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I am Harrison Floyd and this is my picture. I own it and have trademarked my image / likeness. Stop taking down pictures I put up. Thanks. Fluzzylumpkins (talk) 05:58, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Unclear, we assume that the copyright of a photograph belongs to the photographer and this is clearly not a selfie. However, if we accept that Harrison Floyd owns the copyright then we should confirm the uploader's identity through the Commons:Volunteer Response Team system. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:16, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, the uploader has now said "I am not Harrison Floyd",[6] so the claim to authorship is clearly unreliable. The uploader has claimed ownership of another photo which is claimed by the New York Times, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Floydinrichmond.jpg, which casts further doubt on this file. Verbcatcher (talk) 20:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Unclear, we assume that the copyright of a photograph belongs to the photographer and this is clearly not a selfie. However, if we accept that Harrison Floyd owns the copyright then we should confirm the uploader's identity through the Commons:Volunteer Response Team system. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:16, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
![[6]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3ADeletion_requests%2FFile%3AFloydinrichmond.jpg&diff=858754749&oldid=858726708){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Photo: Courtesy of Harrison Floyd https://www.theuprising.info/p/harrison-ford-weird-election-incident/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I am Harrison Floyd. I own this picture and I have ownership /copyright privileges of all the pictures I have used on this page. Please put them back. Thanks. Fluzzylumpkins (talk) 05:55, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- I am Harrison Floyd and this is my picture. I own it and have trademarked my image / likeness. Stop trying to prevent me from correcting this page by getting me flagged for false copyright violations. Fluzzylumpkins (talk) 06:03, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Unclear, we assume that the copyright of a photograph belongs to the photographer and this is clearly not a selfie. However, if we accept that Harrison Floyd owns the copyright then we should confirm the uploader's identity through the Commons:Volunteer Response Team system. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:12, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Speedy delete, the uploader has now said "I am not Harrison Floyd",[7] so the claim to authorship is clearly unreliable. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:50, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Unclear, we assume that the copyright of a photograph belongs to the photographer and this is clearly not a selfie. However, if we accept that Harrison Floyd owns the copyright then we should confirm the uploader's identity through the Commons:Volunteer Response Team system. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:12, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
former version of LUSINI logo that is not in use anymore, to avoid false use of it PR Lusini (talk) 17:27, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - we keep historic logos. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
There is no proof of the CC 4.0 license alleged by the uploader. Denniscabrams (talk) 17:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Vandalism. It's this photo https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Arctic_Monkeys_@_Sir_Stewart_Bovell_Park_(7_1_12)_(6693049021).jpg with a bow drawn on it. JeffUK (talk) 18:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
_(6693049021).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:47, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
there is no such thing as the Cascadian Self-Defense Forces and I can find no evidence that this proposal exists outside of the imagination of the uploader 170.213.22.187 19:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, as well as File:Cascadian Army - Rank Insignia 01.jpg. "Cascadia" is a loosely defined region, not a nation, and doesn't have an army. Omphalographer (talk) 03:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
copyvio, works by Rudolf Yelin der Jüngere (d. 1991), no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:18, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
All three card backs are copyrighted and above COM:TOO. They are not COM:De minimis. (Oinkers42) (talk) 19:32, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
-20240212193200-File:Gradation_de_cartes_de_collections.jpg){kind=link}
- I ask to C.H.E.N for the right they are ok and are very happy of this article.
- If you need they can sign a document
- thank you
- Nicolas MDN 2A01:E0A:4C7:E080:397D:B7EB:31DE:48F7 21:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- The problem is that you would need permission from the card manufacturers. (Oinkers42) (talk) 02:38, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
copyvio, pd in 2084; no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- ja, was soll ich mit diesen Buchstabenkombinationen anfangen? Warum sollte das gelöscht werden?--Steffen 962 (talk) 21:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Steffen 962: Das ist eine Urheberrechtsverletzung (copyvio), denn die Panoramafreiheit gilt in Deutschland nicht in Innenräumen (no fop); der Künstler starb 2013, deshalb sind seine Werke noch urheberrechtlich geschützt und werden erst 2084 gemeinfrei (pd in 2084). --Rosenzweig τ 08:18, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Mir ging es eigentlich nur um den Inneneindruck des Altarbereichs. So gibt es halt neue Fenster. Das ist ja noch eine Einfachverglasung. Eine Dreifachverglasung wäre auch möglich. ;-) Steffen 962 (talk) 00:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Steffen 962: Ich befürchte, da sieht man noch zu viel von der Kunst, als dass das als unwesentliches Beiwerk durchgehen könnte. Klarglas wäre besser. Zu den Kriterien (aus einem Urteil des Bundesgerichtshofs von 2014) siehe Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany/de#Unwesentliches Beiwerk. --Rosenzweig τ 07:42, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Ja, Klarglas hatte ich schon probiert, ist aber nicht der Lokalität angemessen und langweilig. Ich versuche es einmal mit zufallsverteilten bunten Kacheln. Dann liegen die Urheberrechte bei mir und ich bin noch nicht tot. Steffen 962 (talk) 22:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Du kannst natürlich auch versuchen, die Fenster von Aussen zu fotografieren, zum Beispiel abends, wenn drinnen Licht brennt. Dann müsste FOP eigentlich anwendbar sein. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:36, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Ja, Klarglas hatte ich schon probiert, ist aber nicht der Lokalität angemessen und langweilig. Ich versuche es einmal mit zufallsverteilten bunten Kacheln. Dann liegen die Urheberrechte bei mir und ich bin noch nicht tot. Steffen 962 (talk) 22:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Steffen 962: Ich befürchte, da sieht man noch zu viel von der Kunst, als dass das als unwesentliches Beiwerk durchgehen könnte. Klarglas wäre besser. Zu den Kriterien (aus einem Urteil des Bundesgerichtshofs von 2014) siehe Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany/de#Unwesentliches Beiwerk. --Rosenzweig τ 07:42, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Mir ging es eigentlich nur um den Inneneindruck des Altarbereichs. So gibt es halt neue Fenster. Das ist ja noch eine Einfachverglasung. Eine Dreifachverglasung wäre auch möglich. ;-) Steffen 962 (talk) 00:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Steffen 962: Das ist eine Urheberrechtsverletzung (copyvio), denn die Panoramafreiheit gilt in Deutschland nicht in Innenräumen (no fop); der Künstler starb 2013, deshalb sind seine Werke noch urheberrechtlich geschützt und werden erst 2084 gemeinfrei (pd in 2084). --Rosenzweig τ 08:18, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Unusable due to glare. Blurry. Zenwort (talk) 19:59, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
No evidence that uploader composed the song; IMDb lists somebody else ㆀ (talk) 21:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Hemos desincorporativo este modelo de diploma Ceaprost (talk) 16:27, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 06:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Este modelo de diploma actualmente no está en eso Ceaprost (talk) 16:29, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 06:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Este modelo de diploma actualmente no está en uso fue desincorporado Ceaprost (talk) 16:31, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 06:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The watermark says Courtesy Joe Wong, so this is not a work by the US federal government. Ben.MQ (talk) 09:14, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -Pete F (talk) 16:05, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:35, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 07:32, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep A badly-labelled crop from File:Parts & Labor press photo 2011.jpg. Deletion isn't needed, just fix the tagging. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:48, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 07:32, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: fixed source, author. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:54, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
unliely to be own work. https://www.daljir.com/eng-abshir-muuse-oo-ka-mid-ahaa-aasaasayaashii-puntland-oo-london-ku-geeriyooday/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:36, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
unliely to be own work. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=352751344074971&set=pb.100080203253870.-2207520000&type=3 ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:39, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
source: https://www.instagram.com/wty1127/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
derivative work. Photo Credit: WWE https://wrestlingheadlines.com/wwe-hall-of-famer-jim-duggan-completes-cancer-treatment/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:24, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. photoshopped photo with fake head. --Ellywa (talk) 20:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
derivative work. credit: David J. Phillip https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2022/feb/24/world-record-holder-ryan-crouser-one-of-several-ol/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:26, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, photoshopped foto with fake head. --Ellywa (talk) 20:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. credit: Seoul Broadcasting System (Universe Ticket - realiy show competition) ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:32, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:10, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation, couldn't find the source of the logo and it's corresponding license 2001:D08:C5:574E:195B:4819:421B:9625 19:39, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:10, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
metadata: bas bogaerts ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:40, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, we would need permission from bas bogaerts. --Ellywa (talk) 20:09, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
low resolution of File:ClaraMariaPommernLucasKilian1621.jpg Carl Ha (talk) 22:02, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, of no educational use and therefore out of COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 20:09, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 07:32, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- hello, I don't really care for that file : I only cropped the original black frame - but it seems this pic was first cropped by Prisoner of Zenda from File:Fowk.jpg published under GNU
- so, either the first file is legit, and then the cropped one is also - either both should be removed... --Hsarrazin (talk) 08:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi, according to Fowk.jpg, the image was made by User:Nou Uiserr at Scots Wikipedia so I added that user's name as "permission" to Gordon Wilson.jpg to solve the problem and so both can stay. You can now call off the deletion request please. --93.107.219.204 20:30, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Attribution fixed. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:11, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 07:32, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Attribution and sourcing have been fixed. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. J Lou for Maje Paris SS24 campaign https://www.instagram.com/p/C1mBVBjJQ7L/?img_index=1 ZimskoSonce (talk) 11:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 61.80.40.2 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Yann (talk) 12:01, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:42, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Taken from a blog without permission. Huñvreüs (talk) 13:28, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:45, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Taken from a blog without permission. Huñvreüs (talk) 13:29, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Taken from a blog without permission. Huñvreüs (talk) 13:29, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work. https://toldot.com/life/cemetery/graves_38412.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 13:46, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Correct. This is public domain. For demonstration purposes and with full attribution, this is under the fair use doctrine. Rechtman (talk) 17:16, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not the uploader's photo. We don't allow fair use on Commons. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
The author doesn't own the featured VTuber.
- File:Asano Ruri - 【豪華12人】Vtuber酒飲み音頭.png
- File:JK組.png
- File:Mondo,奈羅花.png
- File:Takehana 【豪華12人】Vtuber酒飲み音頭.png
- File:WEATHEROID TypeA Airi.jpg
- File:Yuika Shiina 2021-08-18.png
- File:にじさんじの叶.png
- File:アンジュ・カトリーナ.png
- File:ゲーム部 (cropped).png
- File:ジョー・力一.png
- File:ドーラ様.png
- File:ハニーストラップ.png
- File:リゼ・ヘルエスタ.png
- File:八朔ゆず.png
- File:奈羅花 (cropped).png
- File:日ノ隈らん.png
- File:星川サラ.png
- File:織田信姫とゲーム部.png
- File:鷹宮リオン.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 13:08, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep As for "File:Yuika Shiina 2021-08-18.png" it is a video featuring Vtuber Yuika Shiina herself, and she is aware of and allows this video to be published as a Creative Commons by the contributor of this video. Therefore, we believe that the deletion is unjustified and does not constitute copyright infringement.
- If a third party publishes a video on Youtube as Creative Commons without the permission of the Vtuber himself, the screenshot should be removed, but the file published with the permission of the Vtuber himself should not be removed. 七厩拓 (talk) 14:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- For the same reason, we oppose the removal of all files currently requested for removal, including Files in Category:Screenshots of Virtual YouTubers. 七厩拓 (talk) 03:46, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- [Yuika Shiina] is aware of and allows [...]: Proof? Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 07:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- KeepSo as File:不知火フレア.png,ile:湊あくあ.png. Those screenshots are made from the original youtube movie published under CC-BY license. As long as following the CC rules,those screenshots are totally OK in the eyes of copy right.I wonder what is the problem here.Please define the problem more precisely. Wamaduma (talk) 15:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Are these characters the property of the VTubers themselves? Or do these persons have the right to grant permission to use this copyrighted work? Usually these persons are under contract with the company and use the character, so they do not have the right to grant permission to use the character. Even if the video is licensed as YouTube CC-BY on the character's channel, it is not clear whether the permission was granted by the office or by the voice actor. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 11:36, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- That's not the case here. In these cases, the screenshot isn't from the featured VTuber's channel. Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 13:59, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Certainly not the character's own channel. It appears that the owner of the channel is not the person who can grant copyright permission for these characters. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 15:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- KeepPlease check the license of the source. --Joansedana (talk) 18:33, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- That's not the case here. In these cases, the screenshot isn't from the featured VTuber's channel. Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 13:59, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. These images are taken from CCBYSA licensed youtube films, but there is no evidence - indeed severe doubt - these licenses where lawfully added with permission of the original news sites, games sites etc. So the images have to be deleted, regrettably. --Ellywa (talk) 21:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
The author doesn't own the featured VTuber, though they're under the same agency.
- File:Aki Rosenthal.png
- File:Himemori Luna2.png
- File:Oozora Subaru.png
- File:Roboco-san.png
- File:おしぃりぃ.png
- File:不知火フレア.png
- File:湊あくあ.png
- File:魔界ノりりむ (cropped).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 13:09, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep For both groups you nominated here, see reason at {{PD-algorithm}}. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:15, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know how these have anything to do with AI. Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 13:35, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- These VTuber models are drawn by humans and rigged by humans. Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 13:43, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Cookai1205 Human drawing can let pictures have no burrs? Don't tell me, that there are burrs trained in someone's fork of ChatGPT source codes. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- These are screenshots of YouTube videos. The latest ones are from 2019.
- One of the characters is a 3DCG model, others are Live2D-like models, which require digital art for layered parts, then be rigged. Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 10:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Cookai1205 3DCG, Live2D, as well as layered image parts, are also AI-generatable (through trainning, so far and however not suitable for free-licensing), just see Gochiusa as example. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Again, it's from or before 2019, and you have no evidence it's AI-generated. I'm not sure what do you mean by "no burrs", but I don't think you can tell that from a screenshot. Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 13:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Did you check the source? Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 13:09, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Cookai1205 Just one word: Yes! Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Cookai1205 3DCG, Live2D, as well as layered image parts, are also AI-generatable (through trainning, so far and however not suitable for free-licensing), just see Gochiusa as example. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Cookai1205 Human drawing can let pictures have no burrs? Don't tell me, that there are burrs trained in someone's fork of ChatGPT source codes. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- KeepPlease check the license of the source. --Joansedana (talk) 18:35, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. These images are taken from CCBYSA licensed youtube films, but there is no evidence - indeed severe doubt - these licenses where lawfully added with permission of the original news sites, games sites etc. So the images have to be deleted, regrettably. --Ellywa (talk) 21:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Same as above, the screenshot isn't from the VTuber's channel. Therefore, no evidence of promison.
Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 07:04, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep As said, {{PD-algorithm}}, @Joansedana: You may consider nominating restoration of those which mis-deleted. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Again, no evidence it's AI-generated, you have no idea what you're acusing. Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 07:38, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- @七厩拓: Agree with this clause? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:22, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226 I agree with @Cookai1205; there is no evidence that the content is AI-generated, so I don't think it falls under {{PD-algorithm}}. 七厩拓 (talk) 18:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Okay feel free to Delete. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Okay feel free to
- @Liuxinyu970226 I agree with @Cookai1205; there is no evidence that the content is AI-generated, so I don't think it falls under {{PD-algorithm}}. 七厩拓 (talk) 18:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- @七厩拓: Agree with this clause? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:22, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Again, no evidence it's AI-generated, you have no idea what you're acusing. Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 07:38, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:21, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. metadata: Arun_Anna_Shiva ZimskoSonce (talk) 13:46, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. @Kranthi03n: , please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder/photographer to publish the image or media file on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image or media file can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
metadata: Ken Cedeno 2018 ZimskoSonce (talk) 13:59, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Ken Cedeno is a professional photographer (see https://www.kencedeno.com/about) and there is no evidence of a free licence. False claim of own work by the uploader. From Hill To Shore (talk) 22:53, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. @Gabrielleeconomos: , please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder/photographer to publish the image or media file on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image or media file can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work. https://www.instagram.com/p/CI7ZBvqsOEI/?img_index=1 ZimskoSonce (talk) 14:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP. Uploader – who was notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. Therefore – due to insufficient of information like source, author, publication status and creation date – this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
metadata: photo by Zack Massey ZimskoSonce (talk) 14:43, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. @RAASUSA: , please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder/photographer to publish the image or media file on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image or media file can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
metadata: photo by Zack Massey ZimskoSonce (talk) 14:43, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. @RAASUSA: , please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder/photographer to publish the image or media file on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image or media file can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
video screenshot. source: https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/video/literature-kazandirdigi-bocege-babasinin-ismini-verdi-40690366 (0:11) ZimskoSonce (talk) 14:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
metadata: PAVEL SERKOV ZimskoSonce (talk) 14:59, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- PAVEL SERKOV it`s me Fox89 (talk) 19:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. @Vos89: , please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have the same identity as the photographer mmentioned. If successful, the image can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
No es mi trabajo propio. 186.175.136.74 15:09, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP. Uploader – who was notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. Therefore – due to insufficient of information like source, author, publication status and creation date – this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Es mi trabajo propio? 186.175.136.74 15:09, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason to think this is not an own photo. Not found on the internet. --Ellywa (talk) 21:32, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
metadata: Valérie Leroy ZimskoSonce (talk) 15:51, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. @Diouma daniel: , please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder/photographer to publish the image or media file on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image or media file can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:33, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Low quality image of some cum Dronebogus (talk) 15:57, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of COM:SCOPE as it is not educational useful and not in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 21:33, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Photo by Dylan Perlot https://www.imdb.com/name/nm6093901/mediaviewer/rm449711873/?ref_=nm_ov_ph ZimskoSonce (talk) 15:57, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. @WikiWarrior24: , please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder/photographer to publish the image or media file on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image or media file can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:34, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot: YouTube/Radio Azattyk https://cpj.org/2024/02/kyrgyzstan-upholds-detention-of-11-journalists-cpj-calls-for-release/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 15:59, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Source mentioned is CCBYNC, but states "Images and other media are not covered by the Creative Commons license. For more information about permissions, see our FAQs.". --Ellywa (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
metadata: Foto: GERALDO BUBNIAK/AGB ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 09:39, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
metadata: katsuo meikyo ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:18, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. @Eayerswikieditor: , please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder/photographer to publish the image or media file on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image or media file can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 09:40, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
metadata: Luca Carlino/Nur Photo ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. @Tas Tas Tas Tas: , please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder/photographer to publish the image or media file on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image or media file can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 09:40, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
© 2021 Résonances Avocats https://resonances-avocats.com/avocats/#eric-bourdot ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 09:41, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
https://resonances-avocats.com/avocats/#leila-haddad-randon © 2021 Résonances Avocats ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 09:41, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
duplicate Marcello.migliavacca (talk) 16:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader request, not in use, per COM:COURTESY. --Ellywa (talk) 09:43, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
photo by Sigrid Kuusk https://www.filminrevolt.org/interview-with-marta-pulk-a-year-full-of-drama/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. @Marta Pulk: , please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder/photographer to publish the image or media file on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image or media file can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 09:44, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
metadata: MICHAEL LUNA ?MLP STUDIOS?SCOTTSDALE AZ?(480) 399-2487 ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:22, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. @Bidj J0if: , please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder/photographer to publish the image or media file on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image or media file can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 09:46, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
wrong date, probably wrong author and source. copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 17:23, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Attribution and date fixed. --RAN (talk) 17:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- If the image is circa 1965, does the PD tag, which requires the image to be before January 1 1964 be correct? The uploader really needs to be more upfront about where this image came from. The EXIF data is either from this being a picture of a picture, or deceptive. It calls into question similar works they uploaded. Ravensfire (talk) 14:33, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no source for publication date of the image. --Ellywa (talk) 09:49, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
low quality human penis video, out of scope ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:43, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- this video was put into the necessary format for wikimedia commons, therefore the quality is what it is. And the typical "ring" of the phemosis is clearly visible, it adds up to other typical sources which more or less look the same, but a phemosis has many looks and this video widens the range. Sommerwind888 (talk) 12:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Sommerwind888, there is no phimosis there. Commons doesn’t necessarily need your COM:PENIS. RodRabelo7 (talk) 10:04, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom. RodRabelo7 (talk) 10:05, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- The phimosis ring is clearly visible. Without knowledge about what a phimosis means and what it can look like you should not even request deletions, this is hilarious, sorry. Sommerwind888 (talk) 10:10, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. per COM:PENIS. imho we have enough photos in Category:Phimosis. --Ellywa (talk) 09:51, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
"source: facebook" ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:57, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 09:52, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
low resolution web photo. in better quality: https://www.instagram.com/sravana_tn/p/CijuP0jhj04/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyrighted photo. --Ellywa (talk) 09:53, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
source: Minecraft: 25 Things You Didn't Know About Foxes (thumbnai photo) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kgt3VjJmHWw ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:09, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyrighted image taken from youtube film. --Ellywa (talk) 09:54, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by M.casanova as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Chancel was the author, not Galantara|source=https://www.bridgemanimages.com/it/chancel/cartoon-of-benito-mussolini-sitting-on-the-coffin-of-giacomo-matteotti-1924-drawing/drawing/asset/54711355
Converting to DR for discussion and easier undeletion. Chancel died in 1977, Undelete in 2048. Abzeronow (talk) 18:30, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and Abzeronow remarks. --Ellywa (talk) 09:56, 29 April 2024 (UTC)