Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/01/27
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Creator, test file. Arflhn (talk) 01:03, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Creator, test file replaced by a pdf one see Category:Tram maps of Ghent Arflhn (talk) 01:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Creator, test file replaced by a pdf one see Category:Tram maps of Ghent Arflhn (talk) 01:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
long held file, unused, and person doesn't seem to have evident notability; single contribution upload — billinghurst sDrewth 03:00, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 03:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Mohammad-Jahangir-Alam-SEO-Expert-in-BD-Global-SEO-Agency-Digital-Marketing-Agency-in-Bangladesh.jpg
[edit]SEO upload. All the fields have been filled with keywords even the meta data Jeraxmoira (talk) 10:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Because it is Press photo WAKIDI-091 (talk) 10:31, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Test or nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 10:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Não quero ver FanSs.562 (talk) 12:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 13:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I wanted to delete the picture Akhinesh777 (talk) 12:54, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 13:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I wants to delete the picture Akhinesh777 (talk) 12:07, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:58, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
No Me Sirve OrlandoR503 (talk) 16:03, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep In use. Se ve bien, parece una foto útil. No veo ningún problema. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:54, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- BASURAAA OrlandoR503 (talk) 17:29, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE, frivolous deletion request without a deletion reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:23, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:43, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
no lo necesito OrlandoR503 (talk) 17:27, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:28, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Es Basura X3 OrlandoR503 (talk) 17:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Speedy Kept: kept repeatedly before; no valid reason for deletion; in use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
CACACACAC OrlandoR503 (talk) 18:31, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Speedy Kept: disruptive repeat deletion requests without reason; user blocked for 1 week. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
No parece trabajo propio de quien lo subio. Como dije, unico foto archivo del usuario y solo 141 KB. 186.172.21.85 21:39, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
No Me Gusta Borrenloooo OrlandoR503 (talk) 15:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Si la borramos no será porque no te gusta. 186.174.242.149 16:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Creo que Orlando necesita dos semanas. Una no le sirvió mucho. 186.174.242.149 16:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: On facebook 2 years before Commons upload [1]. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Uuuuuuiiii 2601:58A:8E7D:6260:A8B6:B722:79F3:40A4 23:16, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept (non-admin closure): incoherent nomination. Omphalographer (talk) 03:26, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Yyyyyyuuuu 91.209.212.6 16:59, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism by a kid from Florida. --Achim55 (talk) 18:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Njjjjjjjj 172.56.72.249 21:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: as usual. --Achim55 (talk) 21:33, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
screenshot. source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPGgnzc34tY Aya Nakamura - Djadja (Clip officiel) ZimskoSonce (talk) 01:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Bigg Boss (Tamil season 3) screenshot ZimskoSonce (talk) 01:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Image Crediits: Chirag Sharma https://dubeat.com/2014/11/07/personalities-visited-bits-pilani-oasis-2014/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 03:00, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:37, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
fake U.S. flag. original: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kissing_the_flag.jpg ZimskoSonce (talk) 03:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; fraudulently edited image. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Looks like it was taken as a picture from a TV channel/tape looking at the quality. Clear copyvio. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - useless contributions} 18:41, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:20, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vinolee Premarathne (talk · contribs)
[edit]All images look like they are either a) obvious copyvios from the internet or b) screenshots/screengrabs from movies (either digital or VHS tape presumably)
- File:Sri Lankan Actor Rangana Premarathne.jpg
- File:Best Actor in Sri Lanka.jpg
- File:Rangana Who is a Actor.jpg
- File:Rangana Premarathne Professional Actor.jpg
- File:Rangana Premarathne Famliy.jpg
- File:Rangana Premarathne One of the Best actor in Sri Lanka.jpg
- File:Rangana Vanshanath Premarathne.jpg
- File:Wehella Gamage Rangana Vanshanath Premarathne.jpg
- File:Rangana.jpg
- File:Rangana Premarathne One of the best Actor in Sri Lanka.jpg
- File:Rangana Premarathne Famous Actor in Sri Lanka.jpg
- File:Rangana Premarathne Who is an Actor.jpg
- File:Rangana Premarathne .A well-known Actor in Sri Lanka.jpg
- File:Rangana Premarathne Actor.jpg
- File:Rangana Premarathne Who is an Actor in Sri Lanka.jpg
- File:Rangana Premarathne Sri Lankan Actor.jpg
- File:Rangana Premarathne.jpg
- File:Rangana Premarathne with his wife Vinolee Premarathne.jpg
—Matrix(!) {user - talk? - useless contributions} 18:47, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate PD newspaper photos (talk) 18:33, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 09:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: From a videoclip from Carlos Torrico without indication of Creative Commons CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is different from the author, as per the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Photo by Carlos Torrico, as indicated on the article on the Spanish encyclopedia for D Loves The Sodomites, which also shows a copyright for an archive CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Files by Xavier987Ps
[edit]- File:Ejemplo de imagen hentai.jpg
- File:Ejemplo de imagen hentai 2.jpg
- File:Ejemplo de hentai yuri.jpg
AI-generated images with no educational value. Out of project scope. --Syrus257 (talk) 07:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:26, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Per EXIF, this image comes from Facebook. Better sourcing and permission are needed. Gikü (talk) 18:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:38, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
アップロードが上手くできなかった。 Ckara Hajimaru hito (talk) 08:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:02, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Piotr Bart as Logo (above threshold of originality) Yann (talk) 17:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Not eligible for speedy deletion. Yann (talk) 17:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This logo is probably not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. The lettering is fine, but the pattern or whatever that is on the letters is separable and probably is enough for a copyright, as it's not related to the shape of the letters. Carl Lindberg (talk) 23:26, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:12, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
No indication that these individuals are related to Lithuania. In addition, no source listed and looks like it was taken from someone's social media. – Sbaio (talk) 07:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, troll/pranker on en:w since blocked (I shall do likewise here). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:29, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Not own work. (https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1101832781228896&set=pb.100042065540805.-2207520000&type=3&locale=nl_BE) MarinaMann (talk) 13:50, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:48, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Not own work. (https://www.facebook.com/ParlaSenol/photos/pb.100066634803797.-2207520000/107139302670385/?type=3&locale=el_GR) MarinaMann (talk) 13:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:48, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Not own work. (https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1933151503364456&set=t.100044410690351) MarinaMann (talk) 13:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:48, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Please delete TUTRA PAHARI.jpg image this image in my private details show so please remove this image in wekimedia page Government814150 (talk) 07:39, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: nominator is not the original uploader account; no name seen in EXIF. (If there is a specific problem with EXIF, please have original uploader account email COM:VRT, EXIF can be edited or removed.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Sir yah page hmare dvara bnaya gya hai jisme mahoday sabhi image AEK hi image anek jagah prakasit ho gye Hain aur kuchh iss image me privacy hone ke karan in sabhi image aur es page ko delete yaa hatane ki kurpya karen mahoday,sir Government814150 (talk) 09:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment User:TUTRA PAHARI TEMPLE, the original uploader of this image has disruptively edited this deletion request (see history). The gist of the edit summaries seem to suggest that the uploader wants the image deleted as well. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:40, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per original section. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:05, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:53, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Johnathanholman98 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Random nude photo, nothing special, unlikely to be useful
- File:Male erection.jpg
- File:Male nude photography example recent.jpg
- File:Male nude photography example.jpg
- File:Male nude photography nature.jpg
- File:Male nude photography.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 02:36, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete nothing new Dronebogus (talk) 13:28, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: just another naked bloke. Thiscouldbeauser (talk) 03:18, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:40, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Johnathanholman98 (talk · contribs)
[edit]LevandeMänniska (talk), 11:37, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Not own work 186.174.32.165 14:42, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
The author of the photo is Marc Zirnheld (as seen in metadata), a professional photographer, working mainly for the press newspaper fr:La République des Pyrénées. All his works on the press are copyrighted. Given the small size and the cropping of the picture, it is highly likely that this picture is taken from one of his works published, and then cropped, without any permission for reuse. The uploader (Qsdf or Aurélien) does not appear to have any connection with Marc Zirnheld. - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 00:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - per above. D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 03:42, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Alextejthompson (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 12:36, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:33, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
metadata: (c) Ahmad Iskandar Photography ZimskoSonce (talk) 01:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:41, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 02:46, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, multiple promotional images uploaded by presumed company rep, no usage
Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:20, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright metadata differs SecretName101 (talk) 03:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
metadata differs SecretName101 (talk) 03:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:33, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
metadata indicates different copyright holder SecretName101 (talk) 03:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:33, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
different copyright holder indicated in metadata SecretName101 (talk) 03:33, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:33, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
different copyright holder indicated in metadata SecretName101 (talk) 03:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:33, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use and out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:33, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by seeming company rep, no usage and out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:33, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:33, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marketing HKE (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use
Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use
- File:AdQure Copywriting Services.png
- File:Blue Aqua Minimalist Sea Soothes the Soul Quote Instagram Post.png
- File:ACSThumbnail.png
Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:39, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Spam / advertising Lotje (talk) 04:40, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:40, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Spam / advertising Lotje (talk) 04:40, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
low quality personal photo of a child ZimskoSonce (talk) 04:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
© 2001-2024 Laerdal Medical. All Rights Reserved. ZimskoSonce (talk) 06:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Likely copyrighted artwork. Ooligan (talk) 06:54, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Is copyrighted an artwork on a public wall, whose creator does not live any more? Kostisl (talk) 17:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- In this case, yes, artist died last year, copyright is held by heirs. (Commonly in many countries rights are held by heirs until 70 years after artist's death - this one is far too recent to be out of copyright.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:51, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:51, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Hydrogen atoms in OH groups are missing, replaced by File:Pinitol biosynthesis.svg. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 06:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete, low quality structure due to H missing from OH and bad TIF. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 17:27, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company rep, no use and out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 09:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 09:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:42, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of paintings without permission GeorgHH • talk 14:43, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Likely copyright works Ooligan (talk) 08:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (two nominations). --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Foto:ALFREDO IGLESIAS. https://karatedavid.blogspot.com/2012/01/una-vida-dedicada-al-karate.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 00:42, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
images of items in gallery with no clarity that works are in or out of copyright — billinghurst sDrewth 01:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete; unless the COM:DW works seen can be shown to be PD, needs deleting as a violation of copyright. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Uploader claims to be the author but also states the copyright holder in the description. Could it be more obvious? KlausHeide (talk) 07:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:02, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:03, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyright protected artwork not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 10:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:05, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Artwork not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 10:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:04, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
an out of scope drawing of a sheep Nutshinou Talk! 22:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:16, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded for nonnotable youtube channel, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:16, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RandomWikiMate (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused video game screenshots, out of scope/copyvios
Nutshinou Talk! 22:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:15, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
the brain icon in logos is likely above COM:TOO
Nutshinou Talk! 23:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:15, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot from a TV program (see watermark in lower right). Abzeronow (talk) 23:57, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:14, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
© MOOKAS 2013. All rights reserved https://web.archive.org/web/20190127113430/http://www.taekwon.net/mks/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 03:54, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Busan Lotte mall and Tower
[edit]Significant presence of the mall building (from 2009) in these nominated images. As South Korea does not permit commercial Freedom of Panorama, architect's licensing permission is required.
- File:Busan Lotte town 2.jpg - interior architecture/design*
- File:Busan Lotte town 3.jpg - *ditto
- File:Busan Lotte town 4.jpg
- File:Busan Lotte Town.jpg
- File:Construction site of Busan Lotte Tower 1.jpg - the mall building here is not incidental (not de minimis)
- File:Lotte Mall Gwangbok 20200522 001.jpg
- File:Lotte Mall Gwangbok 20200522 002.jpg
- File:Lotte Mall Gwangbok 20200523 002.jpg
- File:Lotte Mall Gwangbok 20200523 004.jpg
- File:Lotte Mall Gwangbok 20200523 007.jpg
- File:Lotte Mall Gwangbok 20200523 008.jpg
- File:Lotte Mall Gwangbok 20200523 009.jpg
- File:Lotte Mall Gwangbok 20200523 011.jpg
- File:Lotte Mall Gwangbok 20200523 012.jpg
- File:Lotte Mall Gwangbok.JPG
- File:Lotte mall, Busan, October 2019 28.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:59, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
educational value? 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 08:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
bad quality 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 08:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in South Korea. Syrus257 (talk) 08:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in South Korea. Syrus257 (talk) 08:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
low quality selfie ZimskoSonce (talk) 10:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Same case as Commons:Deletion requests/File:대구역 전경.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:42, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The current station occupies the same building as the Daegu outlet of the Lotte Store. Same case as Commons:Deletion requests/File:대구역 전경.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:42, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Web resolution png by serial copyright violator. I didn't find the source of this one but doubt it's any better. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:20, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
no metadata and single edit contributor;unused; seems out of scope — billinghurst sDrewth 02:33, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
out of scope, a screenshot of a pile of heads in a video call — billinghurst sDrewth 02:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
autobiographical image and article in frWP; article nominated for deletion, and if succ3essful, this image falls under f10 — billinghurst sDrewth 02:41, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 02:46, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
appears out of scope; unused — billinghurst sDrewth 08:29, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Australia A1Cafel (talk) 09:43, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Educational value is not shown. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 12:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Probably not an own work by a new user unaware of copyright, but an official (copyrighted) photo found online. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Paul Foster-Bell Profile Publicity Photo.jpg. Schwede66 15:44, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
This logo is probably not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
This logo is probably not too simple for copyright in England. See COM:TOO UK. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
This logo is probably not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO Ireland. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
MPR Photo/Toni Randolph https://news.minnesota.publicradio.org/features/2005/02/08_randolpht_stpmayorrace/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:15, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
MPR Photo/Toni Randolph https://news.minnesota.publicradio.org/features/2005/02/08_randolpht_stpmayorrace/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
MPR Photo/Toni Randolph https://news.minnesota.publicradio.org/features/2005/02/08_randolpht_stpmayorrace/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
David & Bonnie (c) all rights reserved. source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/36338186@N05/47352727492 ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:19, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
© 2024 Libreriamo tutti i diritti riservati. ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:31, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:20, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
© 2018 Magic Flyer all rights reserved https://www.magicflyer.com/en/content/67-Professional-shop ZimskoSonce (talk) 06:52, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:19, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
I Am Malala book cover ZimskoSonce (talk) 10:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, you are. Delete. 186.174.32.165 14:20, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
bad art experiment, out of scope ZimskoSonce (talk) 10:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
i just want to delete this item PaleontoNicus (talk) 10:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Dont 186.174.32.165 14:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 20:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Unusable, meaningless title and content. Outside project scope Poliocretes (talk) 15:50, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:23, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Syrus257 (talk) 16:03, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Syrus257 (talk) 16:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Syrus257 (talk) 16:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused, out of scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:18, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot of a non-free app. Syrus257 (talk) 16:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:23, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Photograph of a billboard CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:46, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Screnshot or photograph of a screen from unidentified origin CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the auhtor, as per metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:53, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused photo, probably out of scope (certainly not usefull to illustrate an astronomy related subject). C messier (talk) 12:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
album cover; copy vio Wiki Farazi (talk) 12:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
low resolution photo, hardly readable watermark says something like "75street production / Photo Glenn Michel (?) ZimskoSonce (talk) 12:41, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Not own work. (https://twitter.com/ziya_polat/status/1749016144063721861) MarinaMann (talk) 13:46, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope drawing Nutshinou Talk! 13:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Piotr Bart as Logo (above threshold of originality) Yann (talk) 17:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- From UK, so it may not be OK, but not eligible for speedy deletion. Yann (talk) 17:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This logo is probably not too simple for copyright in England. See COM:TOO UK. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure in small resolution & not drawn according to MoS guidelines, but instead just copied from PubChem. Replaced by File:4-Phenyloctane-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality vector version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete, margins too large. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 08:01, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 17:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
low quality, no proper source Xocolatl (talk) 17:45, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:00, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
https://www.maiekhou.com/ - copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 17:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:00, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
probably copyright violation, low quality Xocolatl (talk) 17:49, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:00, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
watermark shows different photogrpaher named Kalyan Bodhisattwa (talk) 17:50, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation, source doesn't specify the license. Lolekek (talk) 01:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:50, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 19:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:44, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Oddly asymmetric geometry. File:Diazirines Structural Formula.V1.svg among others as higher quality alternatives. DMacks (talk) 19:59, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, {{BadJPG}}. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 13:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hasanrabiee (talk · contribs)
[edit]nonsense test images
- File:Hasan10.jpg
- File:Hasan8.jpg
- File:Hasan 9.jpg
- File:Hasan9.jpg
- File:Hasan7.jpg
- File:Hasan6.jpg
- File:Hasan5.jpg
- File:Hasan4.jpg
- File:Hasan3.jpg
- File:Hasan2.jpg
- File:Hasanrabiee.jpg
Nutshinou Talk! 22:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Low-res curves on surfaces; File:Urea 3D spacefill.png is higher quality. DMacks (talk) 23:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, those curves curve in the wrong direction (inward) and have vertices. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 11:45, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:47, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Pixelated, and uneven weighting; Category:TEMPO has a ton of alts. DMacks (talk) 23:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, unused, low-quality. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 10:17, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Unsuccessfully F10 nominated a few years ago, unsure why this was removed since this fits the criteria (only in use on long abandoned userpage - COM:INUSE specifies userpages are exempt) Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:15, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:30, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
paparazzi photo. https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/bad-taste-best-thing-happen-173225656.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 04:49, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:29, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=848987671&oldid=848899626. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:21, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright variation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=848987671&oldid=848899626. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=848987671&oldid=848899626. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=848987671&oldid=848899626. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:17, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=848987671&oldid=848899626. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:14, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=848987671&oldid=848899626. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:09, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=848987671&oldid=848899626. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:07, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=848987671&oldid=848899626. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:06, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=848987671&oldid=848899626. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:03, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright valuation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:15, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=848987671&oldid=848899626. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:01, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:53, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:20, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=848987671&oldid=848899626. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:53, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:54, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:20, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=848987671&oldid=848899626. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:51, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=848987671&oldid=848899626. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:50, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=848987671&oldid=848899626. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:49, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=848987671&oldid=848899626. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:47, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:57, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:23, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=848987671&oldid=848899626. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:44, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:24, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=848987671&oldid=848899626. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:42, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=848987671&oldid=848899626. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:03, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:47, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=848987671&oldid=848899626. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:38, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=848987671&oldid=848899626. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:33, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:27, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=848987671&oldid=848899626. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:32, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:16, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=848987671&oldid=848899626. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:59, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:49, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=848987671&oldid=848899626. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:58, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:50, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=848987671&oldid=848899626. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:51, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:18, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=848987671&oldid=848899626. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:55, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:52, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:18, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=848987671&oldid=848899626. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Posted on a forum in March 2020. --Yann (talk) 21:17, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:18, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Info Scaled-up photo, previouly published in 2014 via Blogspot. So, I don't view the metadata to be reliable. 0x0a (talk) 16:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:15, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure with colored atom labels & white background behind them; not drawn according to MoS guidelines. Replaced by File:Ethyl-acetate-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality vector replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Seemingly truncated left edge and generally unueven bond lines. File:Stilbene photoisomerization.svg is high quality. There are also several chemical mistakes in the summary-text, but no sense fixing them if the file itself is poor. DMacks (talk) 23:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, low quality. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 12:53, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused low quality Apple logo. No use Nutshinou Talk! 13:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused low quality Apple logo. No use Nutshinou Talk! 13:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused Apple logo. No use Nutshinou Talk! 13:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kalenberri (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused low quality Apple/Netflix logos. No use
- File:Ngaco.png
- File:Image processing20211110-9918-1iueugi.png
- File:Some people.png
- File:Edf6f691d463be51741b88f6699c9e05blocked.png
Nutshinou Talk! 13:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Scooder treni (talk · contribs)
[edit]nonsense/unused low quality versions of File:Flag of the Iraqi Turkmen Front.svg
- File:D38e3.png
- File:Kmc 20220923 973782.jpg
- File:Flag of Turkmen talking cats.png
- File:Türkmeneli konuşan kediler.png
- File:Kmc 20220913 134524.jpg
Nutshinou Talk! 15:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Scooder treni (talk · contribs)
[edit]random nonsense uploads by vandal tr:Vikipedi:Denetçi isteği/Dava/Bilgi şelale. remaining uploads probably also need checking
Nutshinou Talk! 17:42, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:45, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Coat of Arms of Australia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 16:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:31, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:33, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Info Flipped scaled-up photo, previouly published in 2019 at [2]. 0x0a (talk) 07:54, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per the evidence of 0x0a. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:33, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:45, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:39, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Info Flipped scaled-up photo, previouly published in 2014 at [3] (direct URL). 0x0a (talk) 08:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per the evidence of 0x0a. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:34, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:46, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MasterRus21thCentury as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Sergey Shoigu official events 47.jpg
diffentrly cropped. Pls discuss. Sanandros (talk) 16:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Sanandros Please remove the file from deletion, as I have re-recorded it in improved quality. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 06:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Master21thCentury. --Sanandros (talk) 08:22, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Tagged as Non-free on en.wp. See w:Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 January 19. Hand-drawn logos that probably are above Saudi Arabia's TOO. Uploading on commons is not a way to circumvent possible copyright issues.
- File:Sahab Logo.svg
- File:Sabrah Logo.svg
- File:Rijal Logo.svg
- File:Jareen Logo.svg
- File:Red Rock Logo.svg
- File:Tahlal Logo.svg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:26, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Bogus license. Unsure if this is below TOO
- File:Marafy Logo.svg
- File:Alarous Logo.svg
- File:Alfulwa Logo.svg
- File:Warefa Logo.svg
- File:Sedra Logo.svg
- File:Amaala Logo.svg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:30, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Incorrect license. CC-licensed files are not CC and PD-textlogo files are above TOO.
- File:Roshn Alfulwa Logo.svg
- File:Roshn Alarous Logo.svg
- File:Roshn Sedra Logo.svg
- File:Xaynor Logo.png
- File:Zardun Logo.png
- File:Norlana Logo.png
- File:Utamo Logo.png
- File:Siranna Logo.png
- File:Epicon Logo.png
- File:Leyja Logo.png
- File:Al Ula Seal.svg
--Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:48, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & similar by uploader. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:27, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Koushikpuppala (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM; self promotional logos by user blocked for spam on other wiki
Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. Photo: Peter Mauss Esto. https://www.e-flux.com/announcements/179454/candidates-selection-2018/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 07:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work. publ. 7 Oct 2014: https://www.balkan-handball.com/balkan/andrea-lekic-trebaju-nam-mladje-snage-u-reprezentaciji/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 07:57, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (can't find source). JW Anderson Oversized Crochet Embellished Sweater: https://www.pinterest.cl/pin/332070172521392261/, https://www.brownsfashion.com/si/shopping/jw-anderson-oversized-crochet-embellished-sweater-12371629 ZimskoSonce (talk) 08:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
internet video screenshot: https://hk.on.cc/hk/bkn/cnt/news/20190506/bkn-20190506192149982-0506_00822_001.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 08:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Claimed {{PD-Yemen}} but does not meet the requirements, probably not more than a decade old. MKFI (talk) 10:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah actually delete it please Abo Yemen (talk) 10:29, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
all rights reserved: Queda terminantemente prohibida la reproducción total o parcial de los contenidos ofrecidos a través de este medio, salvo autorización expresa de eldigitaldecanarias.net. Así mismo, queda prohibida toda reproducción a los efectos del artículo 32.1, párrafo segundo, Ley 23/2006 de la Propiedad intelectual ZimskoSonce (talk) 10:41, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
i want to delete this item PaleontoNicus (talk) 11:00, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- No! Very romantic 186.174.32.165 14:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion and file is in use. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
i want to delete this page PaleontoNicus (talk) 11:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, delete it. 186.174.32.165 14:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Request to delete own user page. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope personal vanity photo album snap, especially when the social media style description is read. Acabashi (talk) 13:15, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
No es una imagen original del usuario , es la foto de un monitor de ordenador reproduciendo esa imagen Geom (talk) 13:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
No es una imagen original del usuario , es la foto de un monitor de ordenador reproduciendo esa imagen Geom (talk) 13:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
No es una imagen original del usuario , es la foto de un monitor de ordenador reproduciendo esa imagen Geom (talk) 13:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
No es una imagen original del usuario , es la foto de un monitor de ordenador reproduciendo esa imagen Geom (talk) 13:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
No es una imagen original del usuario , es la foto de un monitor de ordenador reproduciendo esa imagen Geom (talk) 13:37, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:17, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
This is my image and it is low resolution, poor quality, outdated, and is no longer useful and has been replaced with a much higher quality image on the article it used to be on. It currently is unused. Please delete this obsolete, low-quality image. Thank you! Pastelitodepapa (talk) 23:38, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: We do not have a better alternative for this photo. --Kadı Message 06:07, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Better image here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BYU_Testing_Center_Interior_Fall_2019.jpg. This is my image and it is low resolution, poor quality, outdated, and is no longer useful and has been replaced with a much higher quality image on the article it used to be on (see link for the better image). It currently is unused. Please delete this obsolete, low-quality image. Thank you! Pastelitodepapa (talk) 01:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - No reason to delete. Still realistically useful, and just because it's not currently being used on a Wikipedia article doesn't mean it should be deleted. D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 03:40, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per D. Benjamin Miller. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
upload of a presentation on a stage with little context, and no explanation how it is educational — billinghurst sDrewth 02:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Plus
- File:CASTRO 2019.jpg and badly out of focus
- File:OSORNO 2018.jpg
— billinghurst sDrewth 02:37, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyright © 2017 EmBetGbR. Alle Rechte vorbehalten. http://www.embet.com/Werkstatt/Werkstatt.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 05:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyright © 2017 EmBetGbR. Alle Rechte vorbehalten. http://www.embet.com/Werkstatt/Werkstatt.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 05:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
© in-cultura.com GmbH ZimskoSonce (talk) 05:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Takes up too much of the screen to be COM:De Minimis. (Oinkers42) (talk) 05:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
screenshot of La Trappe advertisement. similar image: https://www.trappist.be/en/products/beers/la-trappe/# ZimskoSonce (talk) 05:49, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work. publ. 7 April 2011: https://masakanpadang-resep.blogspot.com/2011/04/lapek-koci.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 06:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Large Sculptural Artwork Marble Statue Shabani Lowland Gorilla by Dominic Hurley Front Side 18.6094-1 1024x1024.webp
[edit]unlikely to be own work. https://www.londonfine.co.uk/collections/antique-vintage-sculpture/products/large-sculptural-artwork-marble-statue-shabani-lowland-gorilla-by-dominic-hurley ZimskoSonce (talk) 06:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Possible Copyvio — filename "Made by Stefan Klüter.jpg" does not match uploader's name (who claims "own source"). KlausHeide (talk) 09:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible Copyvio — filename "Made by Stefan Klüter.jpg" does not match uploader's name (who claims "own source"). KlausHeide (talk) 09:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused low quality Google logo. No use Nutshinou Talk! 13:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:23, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
A photo of a photo. No indication that the author of the underlying 2D image gives permission for publishing. The description text shows that the image accompanies a piece of social media opinion... so using Commons as a social mediia site. Acabashi (talk) 13:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
not useful and misleading file title+description with deliberately false date; delete only after the problematic file-use has been removed Prototyperspective (talk) 14:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- The uploader is also problemático. See other additions 186.174.130.12 13:53, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Taken from a Facebook page with no proof of open license. Would need VRT permissions to keep, PascalHD (talk) 16:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
probably copyright violation, low quality Xocolatl (talk) 17:52, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
low quality, no proper source, probably copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 17:54, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Copy right infiltartion Dane-3051 (talk) 18:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence of permission. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:34, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of an association CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:32, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
This logo is probably not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The entire logo is text and a geometric shape. It is entirely within the scope of Template:PD-textlogo. Given a US court ruled the blue detailing found in File:Cyberpunk 2077 logo.svg did not bring it above the TOO, it would be extremely overzealous to assume the minor "detailing" on the main text character in the centre of this logo would bring it above TOO. CeltBrowne (talk) 18:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per CeltBrowne. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
The said source [4] did not release under compatible license, nor did the photographer [5]
-- DaxServer (talk) 19:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work. better quality: https://helloindonesia.id/en/pukul-manyapu-unique-tradition-from-central-maluku/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work without proof of provenance; this is a crop of an original photo from the 1970s: https://www.bridgemanimages.com/en-US/giorgio-lotti/ivan-illich-en-1977-sociologue-americain-d-origine-autrichienne-b-w-photo/photograph/asset/5468219 czar 03:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:54, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
it's my photo. i don;t have permission from the other people to publish it. DEMcGrady (talk) 04:53, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
it's my photo. i don;t have permission from the other people to publish it. DEMcGrady (talk) 04:54, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Photo is still on Flickr under free license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:43, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- I have deleted it from flickr. DEMcGrady (talk) 01:23, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Out of scope personal image unless I am missing something and one of these people is famous. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 16:05, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
it's my photo. i don't have permission from the other people to publish it. DEMcGrady (talk) 04:54, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Out of scope personal image unless I am missing something and one of these people is famous. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 16:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
low quality web photo. unlikely to be own work. in higher resolution: https://archiwum.allegro.pl/oferta/monety-czekoladowe-korony-czeskie-110szt-i10910007972.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 05:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 16:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation Dane-3051 (talk) 18:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What evidence is there that this is a copyright violation? The EXIF data on recent uploads by this user match. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:18, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:56, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation Dane-3051 (talk) 18:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What evidence is there that this is a copyright violation? The EXIF data on recent uploads by this user match. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:23, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:56, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation Dane-3051 (talk) 18:20, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What evidence is there that this is a copyright violation? The EXIF data on recent uploads by this user match. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:23, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation Dane-3051 (talk) 18:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What evidence is there that this is a copyright violation? The EXIF data on recent uploads by this user match. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:24, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation Dane-3051 (talk) 18:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What evidence is there that this is a copyright violation? The EXIF data on recent uploads by this user match. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:24, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What evidence is there that this is a copyright violation? The EXIF data on recent uploads by this user match. Facebook would have stripped out the EXIF data. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What evidence is there that this is a copyright violation? The EXIF data on recent uploads by this user match. Facebook would have stripped out the EXIF data. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What evidence is there that this is a copyright violation? The EXIF data on recent uploads by this user match. Facebook would have stripped out the EXIF data. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:27, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What evidence is there that this is a copyright violation? The EXIF data on recent uploads by this user match. Facebook would have stripped out the EXIF data. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:27, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What evidence is there that this is a copyright violation? The EXIF data on recent uploads by this user match. Facebook would have stripped out the EXIF data. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:29, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What evidence is there that this is a copyright violation? The EXIF data on recent uploads by this user match. Facebook would have stripped out the EXIF data. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:31, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What evidence is there that this is a copyright violation? The EXIF data on recent uploads by this user match. Facebook would have stripped out the EXIF data. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What evidence is there that this is a copyright violation? The EXIF data on recent uploads by this user match. Facebook would have stripped out the EXIF data. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:00, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:33, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What evidence is there that this is a copyright violation? The EXIF data on recent uploads by this user match. Facebook would have stripped out the EXIF data. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:00, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:33, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What evidence is there that this is a copyright violation? The EXIF data on recent uploads by this user match. Facebook would have stripped out the EXIF data. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:00, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What evidence is there that this is a copyright violation? The EXIF data on recent uploads by this user match. Facebook would have stripped out the EXIF data. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:00, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What evidence is there that this is a copyright violation? The EXIF data on recent uploads by this user match. Facebook would have stripped out the EXIF data. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per 0x0a. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Photo was published on facebook on Dec. 24, 2020 at 2:01 PM (UTC+6:30) before being uploaded here. 0x0a (talk) 18:29, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:37, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What evidence is there that this is a copyright violation? The EXIF data on recent uploads by this user match. Facebook would have stripped out the EXIF data. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per 0x0a. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:21, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Possibly taken from the post. User has a history of forging metadata (see COM:Deletion requests/File:MAS-2 Anti-materiel sniper rifle.jpg), and I don't think the metadata here is reliable. 0x0a (talk) 18:17, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:37, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete previously published on April 19, 2020 via Facebook, false metadata. 0x0a (talk) 17:43, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete presumably cropped from photo published on Oct. 16, 2020.
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:40, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:41, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:02, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:42, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:02, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:43, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:02, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Lack of proper permissions Dane-3051 (talk) 18:46, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:02, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:15, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:02, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:20, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright by Ahsan. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright valuation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Info Scaled-up photo, previously published on Facebook. 0x0a (talk) 16:37, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copy rate via Sean. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:24, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:20, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:31, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:19, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:05, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:05, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:37, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:05, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:05, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:40, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:41, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:42, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright via Loan. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:43, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:43, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep. What is the evidence that this is a copyright violation? All the EXIF from this set of uploads by the user match and if this had been taken from Facebook, the EXIF would have been stripped off. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Nominator appears to admit being sockmaster here and admirably seems to be attempting to clean up earlier copyright violations. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work, it looks like screenshot ZimskoSonce (talk) 10:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 20:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
i want to delete this item PaleontoNicus (talk) 11:00, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Please no, colorfull 186.174.32.165 14:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Useful image of Category:2022 floods in Indonesia. No other reason for deletion. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no recent upload, no reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 20:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
i want to delete this item PaleontoNicus (talk) 11:00, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Useful image of Category:2022 floods in Indonesia. No other reason for deletion. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no recent upload, no reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 20:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work. The crowd image is form Unsplash. The DJ Image is fromm where? Headlock0225 (talk) 11:20, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 20:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
This is a painted art work. The photo might be the uploaders, but the description doesn't show that the painter of the 2D art gives permission. Default assumptionː copyvio. Acabashi (talk) 13:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: missing permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 20:31, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Weird corrupted version of File:Wikipedia - Gold - PU1JFC.gif. No use/Unused Nutshinou Talk! 13:31, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Photo can be found on the City of Winnipeg website at https://web.archive.org/web/20220902074838/https://winnipeg.ca/interhom/mayor/default.asp - Likely a work of the City, which retains copyright on their works. Need VRT permissions to keep it. PascalHD (talk) 16:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Also visible https://web.archive.org/web/20200529230942/https://winnipeg.ca/interhom/mayor/default.asp in 2020, which pre-dates the file's upload to the Commons. PascalHD (talk) 16:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:37, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
series of images of a single woman that do not state a name, nor their educational context; all categorised "entrepreneurs" — billinghurst sDrewth 03:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Plus
- File:De extremo a extremo.jpg
- File:Radio Ares.jpg
- File:Radio Ares v2.jpg
- File:Mujeres al borde.jpg
- File:Blash weekend 14.jpg
- File:Evento DIOS.jpg
If they can be contenxtualised better; named better, and appropriately categorised then we probably can keep them if within scope. — billinghurst sDrewth 03:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:13, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Phùng Út Hà (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per COM:Vietnam, these Vietnamese logos / diplomas, as works of applied art, would be in the PD in Vietnam 75 years after first publication. I guess none of them are that old (the organisation using the shield-like logo was founded in 1955 apparently), and even if some are, they would be still protected in the US per the URAA. So it would only be possible to keep works that are shown to have been first published over 95 years ago, else the files should be deleted.
Rosenzweig τ 10:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- PS: If File:Emblem of Committee for solidarity of Vietnamese Catholics.png is originally from before 1960, it would probably in the PD in Vietnam because of a shorter 50 year term for works of applied art before the term was extended to 75 years in 2010. The URAA would still apply though. --Rosenzweig τ 10:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per nomination. Hide on Rosé (talk) 03:50, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: At very least, uploaded by LTA account with a false license. Per COM:PCP it is the uploader's responsibility to prove the license, which decidedly did not occur here. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:08, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". Indonesia 2006 (talk) 13:00, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Other micronations have their flags. See the vast majority of micronations here and here. Also here. Nominator seems to be a sock-puppet of banned user ThomasFan707 and WikiLoverFan1007. Admin, please ban.Terrorist96 (talk) 16:59, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:07, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Derivative of a logo with whos copyright likely lies with Liberland rather than the uploader, so not really "own work". The artwork in the crest, like the bird and tree, which are basically identical to the versions on the official logo is too detailed to be public domain under threshold of originality used for keeping logos on commons. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:39, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Simply remove the non-free coat of arms in the center until copyright expires, or delete this and locally transfer this to English Wikipedia. 170.235.203.18 16:32, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Already discussed no ? I see 10 versions of this flag, which one do you want to delete? Hyméros --}-≽ ♥ Yes ? 17:47, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- That's probably because I re-uploaded the version straight from the Liberland website on 12 March 2021, and forgot to update the metadata of the file. But seeing as it's in the public domain according to the Liberland website, this seems like merely an issue of updating the metadata of the file as appropriate. Getsnoopy (talk) 05:32, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept Liberland website provided in the discussion demonstrates that the image has been released into the public domain. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:16, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused low quality Google logo. No use Nutshinou Talk! 13:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:13, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Is it OK? 186.174.32.165 14:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope (misused by automated template). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:14, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -Emreculha (talk) 20:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC) There is no CC source
Kaynak bilgisi verilmemiştir Emreculha (talk) 15:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 20:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Incomplete Saqib ishfaq (talk) 16:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Satdeep Gill: please remove this video -Amrit Sufi (talk) 10:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Australia (converted).svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
its a selfie, uploaded as own work by the uploader, who is a different person Bodhisattwa (talk) 17:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:17, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation Dane-3051 (talk) 18:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, credit in EXIF data not matching the uploader. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:17, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
The redirect is not needed. Soap Boy 1 (talk) 18:15, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
scaled down and lossy-compressed version of File:Jeb Bush by Gage Skidmore 4.jpg. 0x0a (talk) 18:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:19, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
These appear to be screenshots of uncredited sources, used to illustrate concepts of traditional dress; two other uploads from this user, in the same batch, were taken from different Instagram accounts.
- File:لباس مردان سیستانی.jpg
- File:لباس زنان سیستانی.jpg
- File:پوشاک زنان سیستان.jpg
- File:پوشاک سیستانی.jpg
Belbury (talk) 18:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- The image is a personal work and has been published on Instagram pages with my permission Aliwxz (talk) 18:49, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- For context the other uploads from this user I'd tagged as copyvios were:
- File:لباس زنانه سیستانی.jpg which appears at https://www.instagram.com/p/CGwFoBYFMWw/
- File:پوشاک زنانه سیستانی.jpg which appears (at a higher resolution) at https://www.instagram.com/mehrazinsistan/p/CLoypcNF7XU/
- The uploader has removed the copyvio template from both files, so consider them added to this discussion.
- Why are you choosing to upload in some cases smaller versions of these images with black bars across the top and bottom? Belbury (talk) 19:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- For context the other uploads from this user I'd tagged as copyvios were:
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Can't find the exact source, but probably plucked from the internet similar to File:নগদ সাধারণ.jpg. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - useless contributions} 18:29, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:21, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused file, only user edit, unclear image (are there stars?), bad image name and description. 2806:10A6:19:98C8:F4BB:4DC:A636:E0C3 20:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Small size, not sharp as there are some trails, unused. IMHO too low quality to be realistically usefull, especially since the region it depicts has many much better images available. C messier (talk) 22:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Unused file superseded by SVG version Alhadis (talk) 22:47, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Falsches Bild Nadar13a (talk) 22:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused and out-of-scope personal "artwork". --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:23, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
The current station occupies the same building as the Daegu outlet of the Lotte Store. Same case as Commons:Deletion requests/File:대구역 전경.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 12:43, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation, the author is Aleksandr Less (1909–1972) https://electro.nekrasovka.ru/books/6163885/pages/2 Andreykor (talk) 04:53, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Taichi as Logo — billinghurst sDrewth 05:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as {{PD-textlogo}}. Nothing but simple text (the triangles seem to be deltas). IronGargoyle (talk) 19:57, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per above: PD-textlogo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:21, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
The image includes part of Virgin Media's logo in the bottom right-hand corner. Khiikiat (talk) 09:45, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Not sure the logo is a strong enough reason to delete. This is a screen shot from a Youtube video, as long as an admin conducts the youtubereview on the file and passes the CC license review I believe you can keep. Diddykong1130 (talk) 05:09, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- I agree. This is a very likely "Keep". -- WikiPedant (talk) 23:59, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
You can always crop that symbol out."Keep" -- James Kevin McMahon (talk) 02:27, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: come on! The logo is just a snippet. DM. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:29, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
The image includes part of Virgin Media's logo in the bottom right-hand corner. Khiikiat (talk) 09:46, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Not sure the logo is a strong enough reason to delete. This is a screen shot from a Youtube video, as long as an admin conducts the youtubereview on the file and passes the CC license review I believe you can keep. Diddykong1130 (talk) 05:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: come on! The logo is just a snippet. DM. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
This looks like a painted art work. The photo might be the uploaders, but the description doesn't state that the author of the 2D art gives permission. Default assumptionː copyvio. Blurred and poor quality so anyway hardly of any value, educational or otherwise. Acabashi (talk) 13:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
This is a painted art work. The photo might be the uploaders, but the description doesn't show that the painter of the 2D art gives permission. Default assumptionː copyvio. Poor qualirty and of not much worth anyway. Acabashi (talk) 13:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:33, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of an open license granted to this photograph. VRT permissions needed to keep. PascalHD (talk) 16:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:35, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Emperors of the Han dynasty
[edit]The paintings are erroneously claimed as PD-old. Based on the photos of the original paintings published on [8], they're signed and dated: "painted by Zhang Xinhua, A.D. 198x" ("华□张新华绘 公元一九八□年") . Moreover, the artist, Zhang Xinhua was borned in 1943 according to an articleChinese on Baidu Encyclepedia. His works are most likely under copyright. Note: '□' is a placeholder for an illegible character. --0x0a (talk) 19:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:00, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Self Fisting.jpg CommandGenius1 (talk) 16:50, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Duplicate? It’s a modified version of it. But I don’t oppose deletion. Zenomonoz (talk) 23:33, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 12:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
has failed notability at enWP; and single contribution by user; not within scope — billinghurst sDrewth 02:47, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep. She and her foundation have been featured as the main topic in a number of articles for major British tabloids. While these cannot be used as evidence for notability on English Wikipedia, they still convey a degree of noteworthiness. Not every project is bound by en:WP:DAILYMAIL. The file is also in project-space use across two different projects. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: has potential educational value thus within scope. --Royalbroil 16:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Photo is watermarked and has no metadata, unlikely to be own work. 0x0a (talk) 06:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, please revisit the page. It has been edited to show the original owner. A letter of consent will be send sortly once this page is reinstate for permission. GoldenOrangeSky (talk) 04:48, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ticket:2024012910006858 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 14:02, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted (No ticket permission since 29 January 2024). --Royalbroil 16:09, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Photograph of an American engineer who died in 1990. No context given for when or where this photo of him was taken, or who took it. It had already appeared online (https://www.i-programmer.info/history/people/669-a-l-samuel-ai-and-games-pioneer.html) at the time of upload. Belbury (talk) 19:52, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, source predates upload and source license is All Rights Reserved. --Royalbroil 17:07, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:SIG UK A1Cafel (talk) 16:15, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Royalbroil 01:37, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Work of the County of Essex. No sign of an open license. Local governments in Canada reatin copyright by default. PascalHD (talk) 16:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Royalbroil 01:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:FOP Russia can't apply to monuments, do we have ideas whether there's free licenses available from its author? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Uploader here. A pretty generic Soviet monument, there are tens or hundreds of such monuments throughout Russia which are having more-less similar model (pedestal + stele in the shape of a truncated pyramid with a plate).
I would not be surprised if the architect was some architecture school student who is probably do not even remember this work. The real author of the model is likely the author of a university textbook, but since I have a different education I hardly imagine which kinds of textbook we should look for.
Anyway, I admit I was sure that all of the objects in Russia can be shot freely, unfortunately it's not true as I see it now. I am not going to protest against deletion (just wondering if there is a chance ...) --Wolverène (talk) 09:08, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:43, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:FOP Russia can't apply to monuments, do we have ideas whether there's free licenses available from its author? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:39, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep — COM:TO. Simple text on rectangular plates — trivial. Avsolov (talk) 05:12, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Avsolov Given COM:TOO Russia and some Russian-related TOO cases, I really doubt this can't be copyrightable. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 16:02, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- The uploader here. I have to admit that the photo is of poor quality, and most probably not helpful for informational/educational purposes even in theory, as such plates are not at all unique. So I won't have complaints if it would be deleted. --Wolverène (talk) 05:28, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:43, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Same or similar problem as here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Parrot_standard.png {{Wrong license}} Z80Spectrum (talk) 17:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: I'm the uploader of the file. I have found out that I'm uncertain about the copyright status of the source image (images4.imagebam. com/ab/0d/90/MERD6DK_o.png ). Another editor (@4throck) has provided me with the link to the source image, and I didn't verify it. @4throck seems to be not willing to upload the source image to Wikimedia Commons.
Z80Spectrum (talk) 17:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Parrot portion of image is PD, [9]. Spectrum portion isn't copyrightable per COM:THRESHOLD. VQuakr (talk) 00:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Parrot image is PD, gradient is too simple for copyrights. —holly {chat} 20:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Not in use, not educationally useful -- Adds nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, outstandingly poor quality Webfil (talk) 17:29, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. The "collection of images"? We have only one other image of this actress. While the other image is better quality, this image is more than adequate. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- @IronGargoyle At least another picture, since then deleted, populated the category when the request was opened — otherwise I'd have used other words.
- While I believe in the added value of having more than one image representing a subject, I do not think quantity has to prevail over quality. In this case, the image has serious quality issues; it has high loss due to JPEG compression, high amount of noise, distracting background lights and unbalanced composition, with the face of the radio host seemingly protruding from the subject's face.
- This image does not comply with all of the conditions to fit Commons scope. Yes, it's a free image depicting the subject, but is it realistically useful for an educational purpose? Its depleted quality disqualifies it for any realistic use. It has been replaced on the projects by the non-perfect yet way less blurry one. This is a textbook example, cited on COM:EDUSE : "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality". I would add that the subject is not rare nor hard-to-find; she is a living person, nay a B-list celebrity in Canada. There are and will be photograph opportunities.
- Could you please elaborate regarding your appreciation of the quality or sufficiency of the image? Webfil (talk) 03:55, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- I went back and looked at the other one and I changed my mind. It's honestly not much better. They are both adequate images that work best at web resolution, and that's perfectly fine. When we have this few images of a notable subject, I don't think we should have to justify wanting to keep more than one. Unless the image is in some way demeaning to the subject, violating the privacy of the subject, or of such low quality to truly be unusable, the more the better. I will add that the association with La soirée est encore jeune means that this image shows the subject at work in a way that the other image doesn't. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Are we paparazzi now, grabbing poorly framed blurry snapshots whenever we spot a minor 'sleb? Andy Dingley (talk) 12:44, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- That is an absolutely ridiculous characterization of this photograph. Paparazzi implies some invasion of privacy. She is sitting in front of a microphone in public working on a show. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:25, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- @IronGargoyle Consent, in Québec (Canada) must be obtained in order for a photograph to publish the picture (see also this legal advice). On La soirée est encore jeune, the host referred to Bull-Doser as Ti-Monsieur Louche ("Creepy Lil' Guy") a couple of times (they even had their own jingle!), because the person was nabbed multiple times taking surreptitious pictures of guests from outside the venue, making the guests uncomfortable. That is, to say the least, not a mark of explicit consent. Webfil (talk) 15:48, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- This does not apply for persons of public interest, however. D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 07:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- @IronGargoyle Consent, in Québec (Canada) must be obtained in order for a photograph to publish the picture (see also this legal advice). On La soirée est encore jeune, the host referred to Bull-Doser as Ti-Monsieur Louche ("Creepy Lil' Guy") a couple of times (they even had their own jingle!), because the person was nabbed multiple times taking surreptitious pictures of guests from outside the venue, making the guests uncomfortable. That is, to say the least, not a mark of explicit consent. Webfil (talk) 15:48, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- That is an absolutely ridiculous characterization of this photograph. Paparazzi implies some invasion of privacy. She is sitting in front of a microphone in public working on a show. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:25, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Ti-Monsieur Louche ("Creepy Lil' Guy") is not the mark that we want to be associated with.--Prosfilaes (talk) 20:50, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Notable actress--Trade (talk) 15:18, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep - Very poor photo, but an in-scope subject that we have barely any photos of. The two other photos we have of this person were taken six years later. — Rhododendrites talk | 15:46, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 20:55, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Same or similar problem as here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Parrot_standard.png Note: I'm the uploader of the file. I have found out that I'm uncertain about the copyright status of the source image (images4.imagebam. com/ab/0d/90/MERD6DK_o.png ). Another editor (@4throck) has provided me with the link to the source image, and I didn't verify it. @4throck seems to be not willing to upload the source image to Wikimedia Commons. {{Wrong license}} Z80Spectrum (talk) 17:42, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Parrot image is PD and the gradient is too simple for a copyright. —holly {chat} 20:56, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Bangladesh Navy patrol frigate BNS Somudra Avijan (F 29) approaches the Independence-variant littoral combat ship USS Tulsa (LCS 16) for a replenishment-at-sea exercise during Cooperation Afloat Readiness and Training (CARAT) 2021.jpg
[edit]Copyright violation Dane-3051 (talk) 18:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. How is this a copyright violation? It has clear US Navy EXIF. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:04, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 20:59, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
This logo is probably not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO Japan. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep This entire logo is categorically geometric or text with the only exception being the inclusion of a very abstract and flat 2D representation of a crown at the centre. I think unless we know for a fact that the crown design would take this over the TOO in Japan, it would be over zealous to delete this logo. CeltBrowne (talk) 18:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as TOO in Japan is fairly low. —holly {chat} 21:00, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Bangladesh (Sept. 21, 2012) U.S. Navy and Bangladesh Navy Sailors assigned to Riverine Squadron 2 (RIVRON TWO) and the Bangladesh Navy Special Warfare Diving and Salvage Command (SWDS) practice patrolling in formation on the Padma River.jpg
[edit]Copyright violation Dane-3051 (talk) 18:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Image has US Navy EXIF. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 21:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
This image is copyrighted due to the fact Jamaica's government still retains the copyright — Preceding unsigned comment added by CtasACT (talk • contribs) 19:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Only letters? Keep. 186.175.61.88 15:36, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- Letters plus a crown icon. There's no COM:TOO Jamaica page, so how do we know whether it's copyrighted or not? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:09, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:56, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Harimauhobbes (talk · contribs)
[edit]Oregon Legislative Policy and Research Office is not part of the U.S. Federal Government, thus the license is invalid
- File:Map of Oregon's 60th House District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 59th House District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 58th House District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 57th House District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 56th House District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 55th House District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 54th House District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 50th House District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 53rd House District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 52nd House District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 51st House District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 49th House District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 47th House District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 48th House District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 44th House District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 46th House District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 45th House District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 41st House District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 43rd House District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 42nd House District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 40th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 38th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 39th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 37th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 36th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 35th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 34th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 31st House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 32nd House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 33rd House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 30th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 29th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 28th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 27th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 26th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 25th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 24th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 23rd House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 22nd House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 21st House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 20th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 19th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 17th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 18th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 16th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 15th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 14th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 11th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 12th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 13th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 9th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 10th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 8th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 1st House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 6th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 5th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 4th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 2nd House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 3rd House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
- File:Map of Oregon's 7th House District as of September 7, 2021.pdf
A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- These files are taken directly from the Oregon Legislature's website and are produced by the state government and therefore in the common domain. Harimauhobbes (talk) 03:53, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Source: [10]
- The Public Records Law applies to any public body in this state. A “public body” is broadly defined to include 'every state officer, agency, department, division, bureau, board and commission; every county and city governing body, school district, special district, municipal corporation, and any board, department, commission, council, or agency thereof; and any other public agency of this state.'"
- "Generally, legislative records are public records subject to inspection." Harimauhobbes (talk) 03:57, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Please see the note of the template. Individual U.S. state has its own copyright and {{PD-USGov}} cannot be applied here. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:08, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Source: [11]
- ORS 171.206 does not give the state government permission to copyright documents created for the state legislative assembly. This statute also defines that all such documents are public documents. By statute, all documents created by the Legislative Policy and Research Office are for usage by the legislative assembly and are therefore public documents. Harimauhobbes (talk) 04:14, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. A public document does not mean public domain copyright status. The state government of Oregon is not the US Federal Government. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Harimauhobbes (talk · contribs)
[edit]Oregon Legislative Policy and Research Office is not part of the U.S. Federal Government, thus the license is invalid, also not old enough to be in PD in USA
- File:Oregon's 30th Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 29th Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 28th Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 27th Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 24th Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 26th Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 25th Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 23rd Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 21st Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 22nd Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 19th Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 17th Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 16th Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 18th Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 15th Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 13th Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 14th Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 12th Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 20th Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 11th Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 7th Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 10th Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 9th Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 8th Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 6th Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 5th Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 4th Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 1st Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 2nd Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
- File:Oregon's 3rd Senate District as of September 27, 2021.pdf
A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- The copyrightable part comes from Open Street Map, the question becomes is outlining a senate district on an OSM creative enough to be copyrightable? --RAN (talk) 22:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. I would say that an outline of a legislatively defined senate district is not sufficiently creative to attract copyright above and beyond the already free Open Street Map. The previous DR for house districts (see above) should also be re-examined under this argument. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:52, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: The outlining of a district, in my opinion, is not copyrightable. Other elements are from OSM so they are freely licensed. --Bedivere (talk) 04:23, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Occasion of Hanuman Jayanti at Thakurdwara Shri Sankat Mochan Hanuman Mandir at Aurangabad in Yamuna Nagar.jpg
[edit]Fraud Image Gupta Ynr (talk) 06:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- I am not able to understand that the nominator (who is the uploader) himself is calling the images as fraudlent, but since not used anywhere + uploader's nomination, its a Delete. Contributers2020Talk to me here! 11:23, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Photo uploaded by nominator in 2022. What is the fraud? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. However, the uploader may request deletion as author request. --Bedivere (talk) 04:24, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Priests performing priestly activities at thakurdwara Shri hanuman mandir Aurangabad, Yamuna Nagar.jpg
[edit]Fraud Image Gupta Ynr (talk) 06:33, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nominated by uploader. What is the fraud? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:46, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- I am not able to understand that the nominator (who is the uploader) himself is calling the images as fraudlent, but since not used anywhere + uploader's nomination, its a Delete. Contributers2020Talk to me here! 11:24, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: The nominator did not provide a clear or valid reason for deletion, and it’s been almost two years since the initial upload. In absence of additional comments by the nominator, there’s little reason to delete the file. — gabldotink [ talk | contribs | global account ] 02:38, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Uploader may request deletion per author request. --Bedivere (talk) 04:24, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Mahant Sugan Das ji founder of Thakurdwara Shri sankat Mochan Hanuman Mandir at Aurangabad, Yamuna Nagar.jpg
[edit]Fraud image Gupta Ynr (talk) 06:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- I am not able to understand that the nominator (who is the uploader) himself is calling the images as fraudlent, but since not used anywhere + uploader's nomination, its a Delete. Contributers2020Talk to me here! 11:24, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. However, the uploader may request deletion as author request. --Bedivere (talk) 04:24, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Shri Hanumant lalji Maharaj at Thakurdwara Shri Sankat Mochan Hanuman Mandir Aurangabad, Yamuna Nagar.jpg
[edit]Fraud image Gupta Ynr (talk) 06:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- I am not able to understand that the nominator (who is the uploader) himself is calling the images as fraudlent, but since not used anywhere + uploader's nomination, its a Delete. Contributers2020Talk to me here! 11:24, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. However, the uploader may request deletion as author request. --Bedivere (talk) 04:25, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Clearly not own work, because it was taken from this page. – Sbaio (talk) 07:45, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- What if I upload it again, except this time be sure to say that the work is someone else's and provide the link? Yes, I respectfully admit that the image was not mine, and you may delete it. If I upload it again, I'll be sure to say it is not mine. UnknownIndividual3662 (talk) 11:53, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to reupload it, except this time I will add that it is not mine. UnknownIndividual3662 (talk) 12:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- See COM:L. --Achim55 (talk) 13:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Question. Is it possible this might qualify as {{PD-LT-exempt}}? IronGargoyle (talk) 13:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. May be restored if the file is an official symbol as per PD-LT-exempt. --Bedivere (talk) 04:25, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 09:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 04:26, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 09:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Sahaib: Why do you doubt the uploader's claim of own work? All Google Lens and TinEye hits are from pages created after the upload here. —holly {chat} 20:48, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Holly Cheng: because of the metadata and the fact that this is the only image they have uploaded. Though I don't know if that is enough for this to be deleted. Sahaib (talk) 21:39, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- I agree it's suspicious, but drive-by uploads do happen occasionally, so without actionable evidence I don't really have a reason to delete it. —holly {chat} 22:46, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Holly Cheng: because of the metadata and the fact that this is the only image they have uploaded. Though I don't know if that is enough for this to be deleted. Sahaib (talk) 21:39, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 04:26, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Not own work 186.174.32.165 14:54, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 04:26, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Work not simple enough for PD-Shape and not old enough for PD-Old or PD-Cuba (with the organization made in 1961) CubanoBoi (talk) 15:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Same for other works uploaded by the same user: File:Unión de Jóvenes Comunistas.jpg, File:Logo PCC.png, File:Logo de la Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de Camagüey.png, and File:Universidad de Camagüey.png. And this map likely not being own work, also uploaded by the user File:Relieve de Nuevitas.jpg. CubanoBoi (talk) 15:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted all per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 04:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by M0tty as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Collin - Trente poésies russes, 1894.djvu47.png
One is a bette scan than the other. Anyway discuss it first. Sanandros (talk) 16:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 04:28, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by M0tty as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Collin - Trente poésies russes, 1894.djvu9.png
One is a better scan than the other. Pls discuss it first. Sanandros (talk) 16:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 04:28, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
This logo is probably not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep This logo consists only of text and geometric shapes and falls under the scope of Template:PD-textlogo. In my view, there is not sufficient complexity in any element that would cause it to breach the threshold of originality in the USA. CeltBrowne (talk) 18:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 04:28, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo from a show, From Facebook CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 04:28, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
This logo is probably not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep This logo is entirely text based, featuring the white text "Wrestling Society" over a stylised red "X". The "detailing" found in the red X is minimal and certainly not more complex than the blue detailing found in File:Cyberpunk 2077 logo.svg, which a US court ruled NOT to be above TOO. I do not believe there is a strong case to be made that this file exceeds the parameters of Template:PD-textlogo. CeltBrowne (talk) 18:43, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 04:28, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
File:U.S. Navy and Bangladesh Navy Sailors assigned to Riverine Squadron 2 (RIVRON TWO) and the Bangladesh Navy Special Warfare Diving and Salvage Command (SWDS) practice patrolling in formation on the Padma River.jpg
[edit]Copyright violation Dane-3051 (talk) 18:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. How is this a copyright violation? It has clear US Navy EXIF. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:15, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 04:28, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
File:U.S. Navy and Bangladesh Navy Sailors assigned to Riverine Squadron 2 (RIVRON TWO) and the Bangladesh Navy Special Warfare Diving and Salvage Command (SWDS).jpg
[edit]Copyright violation Dane-3051 (talk) 18:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. How is this a copyright violation? It has clear US Navy EXIF. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:16, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 04:28, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
This logo is probably not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO Japan. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I don't get the impression, all at, from COM:TOO Japan that this logo would be above TOO in Japan. If the text of File:Asahi logo.svg is fine, and geometric shapes such as File:Olympic flag.svg is fine, then this logo consisting only of text and a simple geometric shape should not be over the TOO. It would be overzealous to delete a file this simple. CeltBrowne (talk) 18:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 04:29, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
This logo is probably not too simple for copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
This "insignia" consists of several elements, however, each element is either a simple geometric shape or text. The insignia consists of:
- A five-pointed star, which is a geometric shape
- A Sunburst in a geometric style
- A flag/banner in a simple shape
- A simplified version of a pike
- The text C Y M and another 5-pointed star
- In the negative space of the top star, a hammer and sickle in a simplified style
The only contentious parts of this insignia are the simplified shapes of the hammer and pike. The sickle is actually also geometric in shape. Can anyone demonstrate that these are above Irish TOO? The line between the hammer and pike being geometric or not seems to be pretty thin. CeltBrowne (talk) 12:22, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP. --Bedivere (talk) 04:29, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
This logo is probably not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Although I can appreciate to some users this logo will appear at first to be contentious, I believe this logo falls under the bounds of Template:PD-textlogo as it consists of text and geometric shapes. The "metal grate" beneath the text is clearly arranged in a geometric pattern. A US court ruled that the blue detailing found in File:Cyberpunk 2077 logo.svg (please view at full size) did NOT bring it above American TOO; if the blue detailing found inside the text of File:Cyberpunk 2077 logo.svg did not bring it above America TOO, what grounds do we have to believe the "texture" found inside the text "Collision" brings this logo above American TOO? CeltBrowne (talk) 18:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Multiple complex and creative shading patterns in multiple colors, fine decorative lines. While I can see the case for this given the Discover Card example at COM:TOO US, this is notably more complex. It pushes this into COM:PRP territory in my opinion. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and Iron. --Bedivere (talk) 04:30, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Game Changer Wrestling Logo
[edit]This logo is probably not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO US.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Given a US court has ruled that the blue detailing found in File:Cyberpunk 2077 logo.svg (please view at full size, and consider the blue detailing found in the letter "C" in particular) was NOT above TOO, I do not believe the detailing found in these logo brings them above American TOO either. CeltBrowne (talk) 18:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 04:30, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
I have concerns about the shape above the text. I'm not sure it would qualify as a "simple geometric shape", but would like to hear what the community thinks. ✗plicit 01:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. I think this probably falls below the threshold of originality in Canada, which trends towards the US in its threshold of originality. The shapes are a single color. A page on the history of the Rivière-du-Loup flag stated that this iteration is several rectangles and a wave. I think these would qualify as relatively simple shapes. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 04:33, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Uncropped versions of this image exist elsewhere online (https://web.archive.org/web/20080728000922/http://grdurand.com/blogger/uploaded_images/wife_carrying-749944.jpg), the Flickr source appears to be someone who (to this day) sometimes uses his Flickr account to blog about interesting news stories by posting photos or screenshots taken from them and posted as CC-attribution. Belbury (talk) 14:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 04:33, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Kaynak bilgisi verilmemiştir Emreculha (talk) 15:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 04:33, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
This logo is probably not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep This logo consists only of text and geometric shapes and falls under the scope of Template:PD-textlogo. I would ask those considering this deletion to compare and contrast the "paint detailings" of this logo with the blue detailings found on the letters "C", "b" and "e" found in File:Cyberpunk 2077 logo.svg (please view at full size), which a US court ruled NOT to be above American TOO. CeltBrowne (talk) 18:59, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 04:32, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Not only are neither Medium nor Charles Joseph Berkey III reliable sources for attributing this photo, there's no blanket assumption that military photos (especially training photos) are US military productions (for examples, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jack Teixeira (JPEG version).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Travis King.webp, and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Monica Elfriede Witt in uniform.jpg). Fourthords | =Λ= | 18:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- In the cases where we deleted we had evidence of an active copyright claim by a third party contractor. I do not see any evidence presented here, we have almost 100 images in various categories of official military portraits, where there is no evidence of a third party contractor involved. --RAN (talk) 21:53, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Actually, in the examples above, there're also no active copyright claims by third party contractors; they just cite broader evidence that the US military does sometimes contract out its portrait photography, and that those contractors do retain their copyrights. At the third discussion listed above, Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk · contribs) agreed with deletion, saying, "enough evidence has been presented that the DOD has lapsed in contractually obliging an outside vendor to turn over the copyright to official DOD images." (None of this is to mention the sourcing of this particular image.) Fourthords | =Λ= | 02:17, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, I used the Medium photo because it was the highest quality version I could find (I would note that it is considered "generally unreliable" but is not "deprecated" on the Wikipedia Reliable sources/Perennial sources list), however, it is also found in other sources as well (which I address below). I am not as familiar with Wikimedia Commons guidelines as I am with the Wikipedia guidelines, but I was not under the assumption that content from Wikimedia must be sourced from a "reliable source." Much of the media on Commons involves "own work", which is not a reliable source on Wikipedia and would be removable under guidelines such as "original research". While I cannot find any source for the photo that is listed on the perineal reliable sources list on Wikipedia, there are several other sources that use and support the claim that this is a photo of Shawn Nelson. Including [12], [13], and another "generally unreliable", but not "deprecated" source, Find-A-Grave[14]. I would also note that the current picture used in the article (which you added in 2023) is based on a cropped high school yearbook, without establishing the listed source, "Martha Clark & Diana Garner," as reliable sources, nor is there a reliable source that identifies the Shawn Nelson listed in the photo as the Shawn Nelson associated with the 1995 San Diego tank rampage.On the issue of copyright, the assumption that a contractor has unlimited copyright over the images they produce under a US government contract is not a forgone conclusion. Works produced by contractors for the federal government, including DOD, have caveats. For example, as of 2016, "The Department of Defense (DoD) is guided by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Subpart 227.71 and Part 211 and Part 252 provisions that affect the ownership of copyright for works created under contract. DFARS Subpart 227.72 provides the copyright guidance for DoD (FAR 27.400). The DFARS recognizes that the contractor owns the copyright for works created under contract (DFARS 227.7103-9, DFARS 252.227-7013-4). If a special clause is inserted into a contract (DFARS 252.227-7020), the contractor must assign the copyright to the Government." [15]Assuming for the sake of argument that this type of photograph contracted by DOD can be copyrighted, it appears all of the following must be true for this image (which was taken sometime between 1978 and 1980, the years Nelson served) to be currently protected under copyright: there would have had to be a contractor taking these types of photos between 1978 and 1980, said contractor must have taken this photo, the contract language and regulations at the time allowed for copyrighting of the photo, and said contractor must have filed a copyright on said photo within 5 years. None of the above has been established for the photo in question. If you would like to change the copyright template to Template:PD-US-1978-89, I would not object.Finally, if we are going to claim that photos like this one are copyrighted based on the reasoning presented, then it would allow for a mass removal of many of the images in the Category:Official portrait photographs of the United States Army, Category:Official portrait photographs of the United States Marine Corps, Category:Official portrait photographs of the United States Navy, and Category:Official portrait photographs of the United States Air Force. Wikipedialuva (talk) 11:42, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- I wasn't suggesting that there's a codified prohibition against Medium's blogs or Mr. Berkey as Commons-acceptable sources, but just that they're not generically-reliable, and that they don't even attribute the photo to the US military at all (nor do the equally-impeachable Mankine, Adrian, and J S Larrison). If we can satisfactorily establish provenance, then yeah, 78–89 licensing would be a great boon, provided we can prove that the photo was originally published within those years (and not circa 1995, when the subject made headlines). Fourthords | =Λ= | 16:04, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- I feel, given the totality of the circumstances, that the photo is clearly a photo of Shawn Nelson. When one takes into account that numerous sources have claimed that it is him (even if they are not considered reliable per the Wikipedia perennial sources board), but also the plain appearance compared to other reliable sources, even to the source photo you provided, it demonstrates an overwhelming strong likelihood that the photo is indeed Shawn Nelson.
- I feel as if you are moving the goal posts a bit on the topic of copyright. Originally, you implied the photo was a "military photo (... training photo)" and that it was possibly taken by a contractor, but now you seem to call that into question by stating the sources "don't even attribute the photo to the US military at all." Assuming, for the sake of argument, that it was not taken by a service member, DOD employee, or DOD-approved contractor, then who would have taken the photo and why was it taken? It would be extremely unlikely that Shawn Nelson hired a photographer to photograph himself for the photo in question (what appears to be a military photo), and even assuming he did, depending on how he negotiated those rights to the photo, I think it would likely still be considered published between 1978 and 1989, and there is no evidence he ever applied for copyright protection for the photo (unless you claim that he commissioned a military-style photo of himself in uniform over nine years after leaving the military). By far the most likely conclusion is that it is, in fact, a military photo taken from 1978–1980. Per the previously cited deletion discussions, assuming that it was in fact a contractor who took the picture instead of a service-member or DOD employee (and that is a big assumption), it was almost certainly being distributed and/or sold, or at a minimum, being offered for distribution and/or sale. Even if the picture was never actually sold or distributed, it would appear that a mere offer would likely be enough to constitute publication. The Air Force representative you cited in File:Monica Elfriede Witt in uniform.jpg discussion even used the term "distributed": "These photographs sometimes are filed in the records of the unit but oftentimes they are just distributed to the individual members with no permanent copy kept."
- According to the US Copyright Office, "publication" occurs when "the distribution of copies or phonorecords of a work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending", "offering to distribute copies or phonorecords to a group of persons for purposes of further distribution, public performance, or public display, constitutes publication", or "when an offer to distribute copies or phonorecords to a group of persons for further distribution, public performance, or public display is made by or with the authority of the copyright owner." [16] Wikipedialuva (talk) 12:23, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not making any assumptions. We're lacking all evidence for any claims (provenance, source, licensing, and publication). As such, "where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted." Fourthords | =Λ= | 00:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- I wasn't suggesting that there's a codified prohibition against Medium's blogs or Mr. Berkey as Commons-acceptable sources, but just that they're not generically-reliable, and that they don't even attribute the photo to the US military at all (nor do the equally-impeachable Mankine, Adrian, and J S Larrison). If we can satisfactorily establish provenance, then yeah, 78–89 licensing would be a great boon, provided we can prove that the photo was originally published within those years (and not circa 1995, when the subject made headlines). Fourthords | =Λ= | 16:04, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 04:34, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 19:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no hits on Google and the only similar image is from another angle. Costumes are de minimis IMO. --Bedivere (talk) 04:31, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 19:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Xocolatl hello. I will ask HKYAF to sign the permission form to hopefully allow this to be used. It is their photo. BJCHK (talk) 03:39, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep as this the original image and is not used on any other websites (this seems to be the cropped image and there shouldn't be privacy of the image problem because it seems to be setup outside for the public to see. However I am not sure about the copyright rules that would be applied on those images. The author BJCHK also has not filled the COM:VRT for a month now. Contributers2020Talk to me here! 11:21, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 04:34, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
لانها غير موثوق بها وقام احد الاشخاص نشر الصورة بدون اذن Mostafaibrahim25yy (talk) 19:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Info The translation for this response is:-
Because it is not reliable and someone published the image without permission
. Contributers2020Talk to me here! 11:13, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
محتوى احتيالي ونصاب ارجو الحذف بأسرع وقت Mostafaibrahim25yy (talk) 23:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Info The translation for this response is:-
Fraudulent and fraudulent content, please delete it as soon as possible.
- Sources for the translation of response 1 and response 2. Contributers2020Talk to me here! 11:16, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --Bedivere (talk) 04:32, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
This is essentially the same logo as File:WEAU 13 logo.png on the English Wikipedia, except omitting the NBC peacock. The other/earlier version is asserted to be non-free; are there any other factors here that would send this overall logo above TOO? (It is not CC0-licensed in any event.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:TOO. Every part of the logo is either a simple geometric shape (ovals / rectangles) or letters. Royalbroil 17:00, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 04:32, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
no textlogo Krd 06:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [17]. Yann (talk) 13:56, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
This definitely seems like a personal file that'd fall under F10 -- no global contributions, no usage -- but I can't read the language and it's not text so I'm not sure. Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 04:32, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
per COM:PS Riad Salih (talk) 21:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 04:32, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
This image has been uploaded to Commons in the past (sorry, I don't know the original name). Everybodywiki often mirrors Wikipedia content, so the origin of the image, copyright holder, and licensing is unclear. MarioGom (talk) 18:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, upload of obvious sock of JavadNazari, indeffed as such (by me) on en.wp. Please note also the username of the claimed author. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- See also Deletion requests/File:Nazari Javad.jpg, more of the same, though from a different sock. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 13:21, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation Dane-3051 (talk) 18:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Nominated by uploader, reporting their own action as a copyright violation (See Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 110#Weird Myanmar military-related swath of deletion requests). A TinEye search shows a copy of this image was on a Flickr mirror site in 2016 (mirror site no longer appears to be an active domain). It is unclear whether the mirror site had access to the high resolution version we have here. However, given the earlier publication of the image (in any resolution) we probably need VRT evidence, which the uploader is unlikely to offer given their nomination. From Hill To Shore (talk) 15:46, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. [24Cr][talk] 22:52, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Syrus257 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Protected by copyright as stated in in website. Yann (talk) 09:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- I'm unable to read Korean, but this is strange. The website has both an "all rights reserved" and the "open government license" tag at the bottom of the page. Which one is valid now? PaterMcFly (talk) 21:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Here is translation of copyright policy (you can see original korean article in popup by click "저작권 정책", <a id="footer_cpyrht_policy"> link in bottom ) section on www.assembly.go.kr:
- Copyright and other intellectual property rights for works created and written by the National Assembly belong to the National Assembly Secretariat.
- In accordance with Article 24(2) of the Copyright Act (Free Use of Public Works), the materials provided on the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea's website for which the National Assembly Secretariat holds all intellectual property rights can be used freely without separate permission.
- However, the materials that can be freely used are marked with the "Korea Open Government License (KOGL) Type 1", so please check whether the work is marked with the KOGL before using it freely. In the case of free use, users must specifically indicate the source of the work.
- If you wish to use materials that are not labeled as KOGL, please consult with the person in charge before using them. For more information, please contact webmaster@assembly.go.kr or call 02-6788-3055. Hashflu (talk) 01:20, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- So the question is then: Does the KOGL apply to this image? PaterMcFly (talk) 13:34, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Under the circumstances it is not reasonable to assume a KOGL license applies, and the ROK has no PD-USGov-like copyright exceptions. --Xover (talk) 16:42, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: significant doubt as to whether a KOGL license applies. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:11, 16 March 2024 (UTC)