Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/12/28
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![133 File:"Let's help and work together".jpg](#File:"Let's_help_and_work_together".jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![175 File:"Szene aus dem Gefecht bei Vendôme, Januar 1871" von Louis Kolitz (5. April 1845 - 24. Juli 1914).png](#File:"Szene_aus_dem_Gefecht_bei_Vendôme,_Januar_1871"_von_Louis_Kolitz_(5._April_1845_-_24._Juli_1914).png){kind=link}
_am_Rathenauplatz_mit_Schillerdenkmal.jpg){kind=link}
_der_Anker-Versicherung_an_der_Ecke_Goethestraße_und_Großer_Bockenheimer_Gasse_in_Frankfurt_am_Main_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_der_Anker-Versicherung_am_Goetheplatz_in_Frankfurt_am_Main_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![185 File:Poster for the 1929 film "Come Across".jpg](#File:Poster_for_the_1929_film_"Come_Across".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_in_Frankfurt_am_Main_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_in_Frankfurt_am_Main_(1).png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_in_Frankfurt_am_Main_(3).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_und_50_(rechts)_in_Neuss,_1911.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![260 File:Plate 11 from "Bar from clear day"..jpg](#File:Plate_11_from_"Bar_from_clear_day"..jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Not free picture 77.95.57.63 13:02, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:45, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
This colored image is definitely not a photo made before 1937, but the artwork of unnamed painter (see image structure), scanned from the book, issued in 1995. It's very likely that the author is still living and no evidence to the contrary has been presented. Moreover, when comparing this image with others, it is likely to conclude that this is a fantasy image creatively made by the artist on the basis of the subject's later photographs.188.123.231.16 07:52, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete Source is a screen grab from the location noted. However, there is no indication at the source that the video is available under the stipulated cc-by-sa-4.0 license nor any other license compatible with Commons. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 14:13, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:21, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:33, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Kuva on ladattu Wikimediaan ilman omistajan lupaa. Kuvan omistaa Dextor Sales Oy ja sitä on lupa käyttää vain omistajan luvalla. Kuvan alkuperä: https://www.erareppu.fi/tuotteet.html?id=47892/384495
Kuvan käyttöön ja jakoon ei ole annettu lupaa.
Image uploaded to Wikimedia without the owner's permission. This image is owned by Dextor Sales Oy and may be used only with the permission of the owner. Origin of the image: https://www.erareppu.fi/tuotteet.html?id=47892/384495
No permission has been granted for the use and distribution of the image. 2001:14BB:1AA:BDF6:ADCA:6A00:28DF:6073 09:07, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 19:47, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Abadonna (talk) 17:45, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- own work, please delete ASAP, thanx--Abadonna (talk) 17:46, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Closed the nominated page Commons:Forum will not be deleted. The file [[:]] refered to in this request deleted per Commons:Courtesy deletions, uploader requested deletion short after upload. --Martin H. (talk) 18:03, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Yamaha XSR Wikisympathisant (talk) 16:53, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: non-sense request. --JuTa 17:06, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Stadtzentrum Weinfelden Lukas 91 (talk) 15:33, 27 September 2020 (UTC) Die Datei Stadtzentrum Weinfelden bitte löschen diese ist mein eigenes Werk
- Kept. We cannot delete Commons:Forum. We will discuss the other issue accordingly. Danke. E4024 (talk) 15:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Altstadt von Weinfelden Lukas 91 (talk) 15:35, 27 September 2020 (UTC) Altstadt von Weinfelden bitte löschen dies ist ein fremdes Werk
- Kept. We cannot delete Commons:Forum. We will discuss the other issue accordingly. Danke. E4024 (talk) 15:56, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Helmut Tribus Goldhähnchen (talk) 15:03, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Kept. DR on the wrong page. XenonX3 (talk) 15:21, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Bright_Diamond.jpg Arielle Diamond (talk) 17:15, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept - obviously erroneous nomination.
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
misclicked, should have been overwrite. Flix11 (talk) 05:49, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: As requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 21:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
book published for the first time in 1943, uploaded by mistake on Commons Cunegonde1 (talk) 09:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 21:39, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake মোঃ সাকিবুল হাসান (talk) 15:37, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: As requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 21:26, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Series114-85 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivatives of copyrighted photographs, no FoP in Russia for these.
- File:Могила Чин-Мо-Цая Владимира Ивановича на новом Бадалыкском кладбище..jpg
- File:Могила Чин-Мо-Цая Владимира Ивановича на Бадалыкском кладбище..jpg
- File:Могила Ершова Василия Васильевича на Бадалыкском кладбище..jpg
Komarof (talk) 04:52, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete everything. Series114-85 (talk) 11:57, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:20, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused, personal picture. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 19:32, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 19:47, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of project scope.
- File:Incar T618 charger.jpg
- File:Letter c.jpg
- File:Logo 6.png
- File:Ironplex laptop.jpg
- File:2 mouses in row.jpg
- File:Car driver.jpg
- File:Tip Tap Toe.png
- File:Ironplex books.jpg
- File:Ironplex+ logo.png
- File:Remote to control the car.jpg
- File:Sketch1703205796856.png
- File:Google Slides Logo 512px.png
- File:Sketch 20231216 205840.png
- File:Google speaker.jpg
- File:HighCober.jpg
- File:New look.png
- File:Box tablet.jpg
- File:My things.jpg
- File:IowaDaaa989872918+2019.jpg
- File:Sketch1702160762637.png
- File:17016507149g.jpg
- File:Screenshot 2023120emay.png
- File:Sketch1701540342114.png
- File:Screenshotk248.png
- File:Sketch 20231201 200902.png
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:38, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Personal images with no educational use. Omphalographer (talk) 06:20, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Comment: File:Car driver.jpg was already deleted twice under COM:CSDs F10 and F7. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:59, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Account indef. for vandalism and harassment. --Yann (talk) 21:03, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: low resolution screenshot of unclear significance. Omphalographer (talk) 06:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 21:05, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
This is an ad in a newspaper. There is no reason to assume that this is freely licensed. Counterfeit Purses (talk) 20:09, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, your right. Doesn't live up to de minimis. Just delete it Marginataen (talk) 20:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:37, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
This Zapruder film is not public domain, and is copyrighted. Although I believe it should be preserved as much as anyone, legally it should not be available here. Yamasztuka (talk) 14:44, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- If its deleted, where else can it be found online easily? Not youtube. Orastor (talk) 15:51, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Can we try to fix the copyright info and use it for historical purpose? Orastor (talk) 22:53, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- If you want to get sued for huge damages, post it on your own website. Commons will not host it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:14, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Can we try to fix the copyright info and use it for historical purpose? Orastor (talk) 22:53, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination--copyvio is copyvio, regardless of how useful you might think it is. --DMacks (talk) 23:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 07:04, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:47, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 00:16, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Peace Palace, Phnom Penh
[edit]There is no complete freedom of panorama in Cambodia. Works of art, including architecture, cannot be freely depicted and dsitributed in images unless these are de minimis or not the main subjects of the images. None of the images nominated here show th building in de minimis manner. The building itself was completed in 2010 according to enwiki, so still under architects' copyright.
- File:Cambodian Peace Palace.JPG
- File:Cambodian Peace Palace.jpg
- File:Peace Buidling - Front.JPG
- File:Peace Building - side angle.JPG
- File:Peace Building.JPG
- File:Peace Palace, Phnom Penh.jpg
- File:Vimean Santepheap.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:48, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:27, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:22, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Flickr washing.
- File:SURESH GUPTA IN MEETING.jpg
- File:Suresh Shyamlal Gupta.jpg
- File:Suresh Gupta.jpg
- File:Suresh Shyamlal.jpg
- File:SURESH SHYAMLAL GUPTA.jpg
- File:Suresh Shyamlal Gupta protest.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:26, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:22, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sara.pedrosa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logo(s). No obvious use. No need to have 9 of the same logo of different sizes as well.
- File:O sonho deve ser sonhado e vivido.jpg
- File:DockFlix (10).png
- File:DockFlix (9).png
- File:DockFlix (8).png
- File:DockFlix (7).png
- File:DockFlix (6).png
- File:Dockf.png
- File:DockFlix (5).png
- File:DockFlix (1).png
- File:DockFlix.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:32, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:22, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 14:45, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 14:45, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 14:47, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
out of scope --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:48, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 14:49, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 14:56, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 14:56, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 14:56, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 14:56, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
out of scope --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
out of scope --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:02, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
out of scope --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:02, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot of a webpage. Which is most probably protected by copyright. Source link isn't working. So there is no way to find out more info about the webpage. Syrus257 (talk) 15:13, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
out of scope --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:13, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
out of scope --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:14, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
out of scope --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:14, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
out of scope --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:15, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 15:57, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted character A1Cafel (talk) 15:59, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted character A1Cafel (talk) 15:59, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted character A1Cafel (talk) 15:59, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. PDF printout of various enwiki articles from mid-2010, e.g. w:Special:Permalink/368398306. Omphalographer (talk) 06:42, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 09:30, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
schlechtes Bild. Ruediger Be (talk) 09:08, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Kein Löschgrundǃ Ein weiterer dieser absurden Löschanträge von Ruediger Be. --Rufus46 (talk) 13:12, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Keep No reason for deletion! -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 19:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 09:33, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
schlechtes bild. Ruediger Be (talk) 09:12, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Speedy keep COM:INUSE. It looks like all your deletion requests should be kept. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:17, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 09:33, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
schlecht und überflüssig, es gibt ein besseres. Ruediger Be (talk) 09:13, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Kein Löschgrundǃ Ein weiterer dieser absurden Löschanträge von Ruediger Be. --Rufus46 (talk) 13:12, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion! -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 19:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 09:32, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
nicht mehr aktuell, die Hecke ist weg. Ruediger Be (talk) 09:14, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Kein Löschgrund. Wir behalten hier alle Fotos, auch wenn sie nicht (mehr) den aktuellen Zustand des Objekts abbilden; im Gegenteilː Wir wollen hier gerade auch Veränderungen im Laufe der Zeit dokumentieren. Ich hätte dem Antragsteller geraten, sich über die Ziele, Regeln und die Arbeitsweise von Commons zu informieren, bevor er so absurde Löschanträge stellt. --Rufus46 (talk) 12:31, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Danke für die freundliche Antwort. 2003:CE:8F17:993A:5D00:8C3A:EA85:EDEE 15:44, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Wer dankt? Ruediger Be? Ironisch gemeint oder ernsthaft? --Rufus46 (talk) 16:22, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Danke für die freundliche Antwort. 2003:CE:8F17:993A:5D00:8C3A:EA85:EDEE 15:44, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not up do date anymore – No reason for deletion! -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 19:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 09:32, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
nicht mehr aktuell, die Hecke ist weg. Ruediger Be (talk) 09:15, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Kein Löschgrund. Wir behalten hier alle Fotos, auch wenn sie nicht (mehr) den aktuellen Zustand des Objekts abbilden; im Gegenteilː Wir wollen hier gerade auch Veränderungen im Laufe der Zeit dokumentieren. Ich hätte dem Antragsteller geraten, sich über die Ziele, Regeln und die Arbeitsweise von Commons zu informieren, bevor er so absurde Löschanträge stellt. --Rufus46 (talk) 13:08, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not up do date anymore – No reason for deletion! -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 19:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 09:34, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
nicht mehr aktuell, der Vorplatz ist neu gestaltet Ruediger Be (talk) 09:16, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Kein Löschgrund. Wir behalten hier alle Fotos, auch wenn sie nicht (mehr) den aktuellen Zustand des Objekts abbilden; im Gegenteilː Wir wollen hier gerade auch Veränderungen im Laufe der Zeit dokumentieren. Ich hätte dem Antragsteller geraten, sich über die Ziele, Regeln und die Arbeitsweise von Commons zu informieren, bevor er so absurde Löschanträge stellt. --Rufus46 (talk) 12:32, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not up do date anymor – No reason for deletion! -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 19:39, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 09:34, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
probably not made by the uploader; a prior image of the same name was deleted; nonsensical info; low resolution and likely from somewhere else Prototyperspective (talk) 09:53, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Strakhov (talk) 09:34, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unusable screenshot of a freely licensed video. Abzeronow (talk) 17:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 09:36, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
questionable claim of authorship. model picture can be found by reverse image searching.
- File:Sukienka z wykonana z płynnego lateksu.jpg
- File:Sukienka wynonana z płynnego lateksu- Annomalia.jpg
RZuo (talk) 20:06, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Strakhov (talk) 09:39, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Personal file uploaded by non-notable user with no constructive global contributions, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:46, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 09:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kacamata as no permission (No permission since). This is a clearly posed cell phone camera portrait with full metadata, so I'm sending this to DR rather than deleting this as a speedy. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:50, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, @Red-tailed hawk. In the picture's description is written that the picture was taken by Mirian Leite to be published in a magazine called "Roadie Crew". This is why I tagged it as missing permission. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 01:37, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Fair enough. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since). Appears to be some sort of signature, which would raise possible issues with COM:TOO and {{PD-signature}}. However, it's unclear to me if this signature would be in-scope; I can't figure out if the signer is notable, and if they aren't then I really don't see an educational reason to keep the signature on Commons. As such, since I I can't action the speedy due to the TOO question, I'm sending to DR with a weak preference towards deletion. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:15, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:26, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
appears to be a photograph of a newspaper article, which wouldn't be the uploader's "own work" GoingBatty (talk) 03:10, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:43, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Apparently copied from the university's website: https://nyuad.nyu.edu/content/nyuad/en/home/about/careers/_jcr_content/pagetop/columncontol_1706253881/columnpar4_1/image/image.img.jpg Bremps... 03:38, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:54, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Low-quality photo with no clear educational purpose Logan Talk Contributions 04:33, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:06, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
No verifiable source provided for the map, no evidence this is US DoD work, except the uploader's statement. Komarof (talk) 08:32, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep – the Uploader has stated exactly: it's US Department of Defense T[actical] P[ilotage] Chart B-1A. A clear bibliographic reference IS a piece of evidence. And so it is – take a look at the index and the chart in question. Did you check this before posting a deletion request? Upior polnocy (talk) 01:11, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per Upior polnocy – PD as a work of the American government, annotations by a respected scientist (sadly now dead, so not able to confirm the truthful claims made in the upload). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:36, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per all, which is the same reason I declined this nominator's speedy-copyvio tag for this image. DMacks (talk) 10:16, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:56, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
clearly a scanned book, likely copyvio Jan Myšák (talk) 08:44, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:57, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Cadre from amateur web series. Is it in project scope? Ignatus (talk) 09:25, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:58, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 14:50, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep This is a plain reproduction of a public domain work. The artist died in 1923! Did you even take a closer look to the category? Herbert Ortner (talk) 21:39, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Reproduction of public domain work. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 14:51, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:19, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Es kann nicht sein, dass man etwas scannt und dessen Entstehungsjahr weiß, aber nicht weiß, was man da in der Hand hat und wo es herkommt. Quelle und Urheber "unknown" ist Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 16:33, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Public domain images should not be deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:07, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The license is valid, most postcards are taken by anonymous photographers. --RAN (talk) 19:34, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion, 1900 image. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:18, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Reaction equation in wrong file format (PDF). Replaced by File:Benzpyrene Metabolism.svg by the same user. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:35, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Delete, the file format is wrong, and the background is opaque. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 10:52, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:12, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Low-quality 3D model with opaque (white) background & poor resolution. Replaced by many alternatives in Category:Methyl acetate. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:38, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:11, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Downsized duplicate of File:Rara Avis - Rare Birds by Diddo Velema.jpg MPF (talk) 21:00, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:15, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Ot of scope: Personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 21:25, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:14, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Uploaded by mistake and do not have rights to the image Blogbamba (talk) 21:48, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:14, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:01, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:13, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:01, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:13, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:PORN GnocchiFan (talk) 23:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:10, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
DMCA - Model not approved DMCATakeDown (talk) 19:00, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:10, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:PORN GnocchiFan (talk) 23:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:10, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
DMCA - Model not approved DMCATakeDown (talk) 19:00, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:10, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Obviously not own work, very likely taken from elsewhere in the internet. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 23:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:08, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
This isn't "own work', it's a shot taken from a video posted by Al-Qassam Brigades. Amr F.Nagy (talk) 23:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:07, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
This isn't "own work', it's a shot taken from a video posted by Al-Qassam Brigades. Amr F.Nagy (talk) 23:24, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:07, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
This isn't "own work', it's a shot taken from a video posted by Al-Qassam Brigades. Amr F.Nagy (talk) 23:24, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:08, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
This isn't "own work', it's a shot taken from a video posted by Al-Qassam Brigades. Amr F.Nagy (talk) 23:25, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:06, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:29, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:06, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:29, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:05, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:29, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:05, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:35, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:05, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:35, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:05, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Personal file uploaded by non-notable user with no constructive global contributions, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:46, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:04, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Above threshold of originality Trade (talk) 23:55, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:04, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Above threshold of originality Trade (talk) 23:55, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:04, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Above threshold of originality Trade (talk) 23:56, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:04, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since). Quality of upload is consistent with a cell phone photograph, and the uploader reasonably could have taken this photograph. As such, I'm sending to DR rather than actioning the speedy. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:00, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per Red-tailed hawk. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:27, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:24, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
appears to be a photograph of a newspaper article, which wouldn't be the uploader's "own work" GoingBatty (talk) 03:10, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:18, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:50, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:14, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Herbythyme as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:51, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:13, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:13, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:13, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:13, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:13, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:13, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:13, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Racerslater (talk · contribs)
[edit]DW - look like screenshots from a YT series
- File:Episode 4 the Zombie goes wide body.png
- File:Episode 3 The Anarchystang goes on the dyno.png
- File:Episode 2 The Anachy Garage.png
- File:The Anarchy Garage.png
- File:Episode 1 Anarchystang.png
Gbawden (talk) 07:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:PENIS, please also refer to a earlier discussion Mys 721tx (talk) 01:30, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep In use. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 03:55, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, image is within scope and is a freely-licensed picture. -- Cirt (talk) 20:12, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Blurry and unused COM:PENIS photo, can be replaced by alternatives A1Cafel (talk) 07:30, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete No longer in use and there are much better alternatives now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:19, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete come a ways since 2013, kept by the probably the least respected user ever no less Dronebogus (talk) 01:36, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:09, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
unused self-advertising image Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:27, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:11, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
not educationally useful Kelly The Angel (talk) 10:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:10, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
not educationally useful Kelly The Angel (talk) 10:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:10, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not educationally useful Kelly The Angel (talk) 10:41, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:10, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
not educationally useful Kelly The Angel (talk) 10:45, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:10, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
not educationally useful Kelly The Angel (talk) 10:45, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:10, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Bright_Diamond.jpg Arielle Diamond (talk) 17:15, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: malformed but speedy F10 eligible. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:08, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Non-used, low-resolution photography, out of focus and/or out of scope.
- File:-i---i- (1043922386).jpg
- File:-i---i- (1043922436).jpg
- File:-i---i- (2058068481).jpg
- File:-i---i- (2058854086).jpg
- File:-i---i- (2074080099).jpg
- File:-i---i- (2081567953).jpg
- File:-i---i- (2081568653).jpg
- File:-i---i- (2081568967).jpg
- File:-i---i- (2082352836).jpg
- File:-i---i- (2082353320).jpg
- File:-i---i- (2082353500).jpg
- File:-i---i- (2082354344).jpg
- File:-i---i- (2139284426).jpg
- File:-i---i- (38522306746).jpg
- File:-i---i- (524842204).jpg
- File:-i---i- (539062673).jpg
- File:-i---i- (6328790063).jpg
- File:-i---i- (8176418604).jpg
- File:Abstraction (35728813284).jpg
- File:Abstraction (35754497863).jpg
- File:Abstraction (36166881680).jpg
- File:Acidental blur - Miami (505167457).jpg
- File:Acrobat (15597138587).jpg
- File:Air bubbles (30312884103).jpg
- File:Alimentando os peixes (3430677445).jpg
- File:Arab monster (30976403462).jpg
- File:Arabesques of chance (33219962402).jpg
- File:Arco (2310867557).jpg
- File:Arm scaned (16826115927).jpg
- File:At Termas de Cauquenes (467070140).jpg
- File:At the store (5649944407).jpg
- File:Autorretrato (10478659046).jpg
- File:Autorretrato (8403136438).jpg
- File:Autorretrato (9067853941).jpg
- File:Autorretrato (9363672073).jpg
- File:Bar at noon (4994127661).jpg
- File:Barra funda. (539052516).jpg
- File:Before the rain (41499173384).jpg
- File:Biblioteca púbica Mário de Andrade (26935795064).jpg
- File:Bola? Que bola? (3157509565).jpg
- File:Bosque da Barra 09.jpg
- File:Bosque da Barra 20.jpg
- File:Bosque da Barra 21.jpg
- File:Bosque da Barra 22.jpg
- File:Bosque da Barra 25.jpg
- File:Boxing (4833761317).jpg
- File:BSB 4x4 ação (4724210073).jpg
- File:BSB 4x4 camadas (4724208221).jpg
- File:BSB 4x4 espírito (4724205313).jpg
- File:BSB 4x4 forma (4724213545).jpg
- File:BSB 4x4 luz (4724211475).jpg
- File:Bubbles in water (32499716188).jpg
- File:Bubles (31934622375).jpg
- File:Cacau. (1353387352).jpg
- File:Capoeira na Barra (8403139186).jpg
- File:Carlinhos Brown with my glasses (6394000159).jpg
- File:Carlos the doorman (42745601492).jpg
- File:Coincidence (504810216).jpg
- File:Condensation (36166881460).jpg
- File:Condensation (41841876712).jpg
- File:Ela e eu (6261823797).jpg
- File:Gotinha. (977520982).jpg
- File:Grafismo natural (8379470285).jpg
- File:Grafismo sacro I (8380541128).jpg
- File:Grafismo sacro II (8380539008).jpg
- File:Grafismo sacro III (8380538858).jpg
- File:História 4x4 (13950947029).jpg
- File:História 4x4 (14134292111).jpg
- File:História 4x4 (14137625305).jpg
- File:Náusea sinuosa (6261824175).jpg
- File:O sol não se pÔs por inteiro (6261822861).jpg
- File:Olha o trem! (13950930767).jpg
- File:Olha o trem! (13950977530).jpg
- File:Olha o trem! (13950988868).jpg
- File:Olha o trem! (14114429366).jpg
- File:Olha o trem! (14137857834).jpg
- File:Olha o trem! (14157682103).jpg
- File:Olha o trem! (14157682173).jpg
- File:Pedro Lys and Manu new year (15717988944).jpg
- File:Pedro snd Manu new year (16338662051).jpg
- File:Pillow talk (12133659646).jpg
- File:Plasma (18741869374).jpg
- File:Plasma (19176773280).jpg
- File:Plastic pool (6912883202).jpg
- File:Plastic sky (5302561609).jpg
- File:Plastics (26592957338).jpg
- File:Quadrinho de Metal (2859089649).jpg
- File:Quadrinho de Metal (2859089657).jpg
- File:Quadro Verso Bíblico (2859872058).jpg
- File:Quando a realidade parece mais perturbadora que qualquer roteiro de Stranger Things. Artigo sobre projeto dos anos 70 sobre comunicação com golfinhos (!). (30051342260).jpg
- File:Reading the news (2992264018).jpg
- File:Red juice (44689999210).jpg
- File:Red room (31897790316).jpg
- File:Self portrait entangled (38355400352).jpg
- File:Serra do mar (4740111975).jpg
- File:Serra do Mar - PR (4740114493).jpg
- File:Shadow of a cat (3642844544).jpg
- File:Snow White (18053788473).jpg
- File:Sol entre as árvores (6921838703).jpg
- File:Sumaré (1305798718).jpg
- File:Tom Zé on TV (497002345).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._(30051342260).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Sturm (talk) 17:37, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:06, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
useless image SecretName101 (talk) 20:08, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files found with Special:Search/German Men92 orbs
[edit]Flags orbs obsolete, and not used in any article. There are already better sets of flag orbs in SVG.
Goldsztern ✶ 00:30, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete JackPotte (talk) 18:16, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Question What does "obsolete" mean in this context, and why isn't it a reason to keep these as historical? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:28, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unusably low quality. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:34, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Not own work, not properly sourced. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 23:44, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- The source for this image looks like to be this one. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 03:24, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Brazil and USA. --RAN (talk) 19:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:36, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Not own work, date and time taken are unknown. Needs permission to keep Gbawden (talk) 06:37, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
flickr washing --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:50, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- see Commons:Deletion requests/File:All indian cine workers association.png --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:51, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
out of com:PS Hanooz 13:06, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
out of scope --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:51, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Multiple hits on TinEye prior to Commons upload: https://tineye.com/search/cb8d8dff69ef72f56205c4ee8f36e68a1e17411a?sort=size&order=desc&page=1 Abzeronow (talk) 19:33, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Most likely previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification of the true copyright holder (the photographer) via email correspondence is required for images previously published on social media so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. For email template, see COM:VRTS#Email message template for release of rights to a file. Better still, have the original overwrite this FB-derived image, if the image is truly self-photographed work of the uploader. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 20:52, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
![20:52, 28 December 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/12/28#c-JWilz12345-20231228205200-File:"Let's_help_and_work_together".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
![11:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/12/28#c-Krd-20240106113100-File:"Let's_help_and_work_together".jpg){kind=link}
Personal art Kelly The Angel (talk) 11:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: OOS. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:43, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Air crash images uploaded by Agile5468
[edit]- File:TU204 Red poster.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yu_XCEFCQM&ab_channel=NYCAviationTV)
- File:FmnSj XXEBIJerV.png (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nmy8TLJtwZo&ab_channel=ABC7Chicago)
- File:US-cargo-plane-crash-012.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sUWC2jfjqI&ab_channel=AEROpressBG)
Clearly not own work. User uploaded photos of 3 air crashes, all in different countries, and all have been previously published (see link above). If these turn out to be own work I honestly want to ask how unlucky this person is to have experienced 3 air crashes right in from of them. --S5A-0043Talk 14:47, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 16:56, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
CSD-F8. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 00:51, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: F8 doesn't apply but it's unused and unlikely to be used becasue of the higher quality SVG version. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:51, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since). This is a relatively low resolution photograph of a lamp post that has been up on Commons since 2016. TinEye returns no evidence of prior publication, and the user's uploads appear to be consistent with them having actually been the one that took this photo. I'm not sure there's significant doubt here, so I'm sending this to DR. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:53, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Red-tailed hawk. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:51, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kharkivian as no permission (No permission since). TOO? File is in-use at w:en:Darnytsia (company). — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:56, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: changed to {{Pd-textlogo}}. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:10, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Jaouad888 (talk) 01:55, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Two years ago. Still Delete because this is apparently not the logo of something notable. --Rosenzweig τ 21:42, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per Rosenzweig. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:53, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:50, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PER COM:CHINA, China has a relatively low threshold of originality standard. This appears to be fine. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Found here in 2016 - https://bathnovelaward.co.uk/2016/12/20/50-writing-tips-from-novelist-gillian-mcallister/ - we need permission to keep Gbawden (talk) 07:01, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Better version at File:TSC logo.svg Rogers Sports & Media (talk) 08:20, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:56, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Rogers Sports & Media as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: reason=Better version at File:TSC logo.svg|subpage=File:TSC TV channel logo.png|year=2023|month=December|day=28 Yann (talk) 15:52, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate listing, already deleted. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:56, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
The file is an image cropped from a publication from the Brazilian National Cancer Institute. Originally the publication stated "É permitida a reprodução total ou parcial desta obra, desde que citada a fonte." (Total or partial reproduction of this work is permitted, provided the source is cited).
However, the source page later stated that all works are instead licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0. As the previous copyrighted free use is revocable, it is understood that the file's license is made unfree (with the author has no intention to dual license it). The file is therefore unfree for Commons purpose, and should be deleted. 廣九直通車 (talk) 09:26, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. This was indeed released previously under less restrictive (and to my mind Commons-permissible) terms. Items released under more permissive terms cannot have those terms be rolled back to be more restrictive. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:06, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. I changed the license to {{Attribution}}. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
not educationally useful Kelly The Angel (talk) 10:48, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:59, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
personal art Kelly The Angel (talk) 10:59, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:59, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
personal art Kelly The Angel (talk) 11:04, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:59, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
personal art Kelly The Angel (talk) 11:06, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:09, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
personal art Kelly The Angel (talk) 11:06, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:59, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
personal art Kelly The Angel (talk) 11:07, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:59, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate מקף־עברי (talk) 11:50, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (File:גבעת יונה, דצמבר 2023 02.jpg). --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:00, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Relatively complex fan art of the Pokémon character Pikachu, and Canada (where it states the photo was taken) does not have freedom of panorama for 2D works (it is the main focus of the image as well). Xeroctic (talk) 12:02, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:01, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Based on the grainy resolution it looks like a screenshot from a copyrighted video. The user has uploaded similar copyrighted images before. Since no real proof is given as to where this photo is taken, my assumption is that the user is not the copyright holder. Kigsz (talk) 13:00, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination / COM:PCP - We have lots of other photos of them that we know are fine and don't have video compression artifcats. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:02, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Blurry and unused image, also probably out of scope A1Cafel (talk) 15:48, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete low quality crap photo passed off as “artistic” Dronebogus (talk) 02:15, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Poor quality, Blurry and unused image. --Javidd (talk) 17:50, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:04, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Blurry and unused image, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 16:24, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Accidentally uploaded so no contest. Remove it. Someone Not Awful (talk) 15:50, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Poor quality, Blurry and unused image. --Javidd (talk) 17:59, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:04, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Fake flag, created as a joke by superimposing the coat of arms of Manzanares over the French flag. FlyingAce (talk) 16:28, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:06, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by .caiify3623. (talk · contribs)
[edit]User globally blocked for maintaining a crosswiki campaign to control content on microstates, created a large number of useless maps (instead of updating an existing map, created new "versions" (v) of the same, generating a lot of extra maps). The maps have no sources and are suspected to be based solely on the knowledge of the blocked user.
There are also some unofficial or proposed flags, so they could not be in the public domain.
- File:BlankMap World small states explained.png
- File:BlankMap World small states attempt.png
- File:BlankMap world small states and dependecies.png
- File:BlankMap-World v6 small states fixed.png
- File:Blank-Map World v7 small states extended.png
- File:BlankMap-World-v7 small states extendedv2.png
- File:BlankMap World v8 small states.png
- File:BlankMap World v9 small states.png
- File:BlankMap world v10 small states.png
- File:BlankMap-World v11 small states.png
- File:Blank Map-World v12 small states.png
- File:BlankMap-World v13 small states.png
- File:BlankMap-World v14 small states.png
- File:BlankMap-World v15 small states.png
- File:Blank-Map World v16 small states.png
- File:Explanation of the Pacific ocean Microstates.png
- File:Asian microstates map.png
- File:Oceanian microstates map.png
- File:BlankMap-World Hispanicness.png
- File:Hispanophone World Map.png
- File:Detailed SVG map of the Hispanophone V2.png
- File:BlankMap-World Romance Languages.png
- File:BlankMap-World Official or Secondary Romance Languages.png
- File:Flag of Serranilla Bank (unofficial).jpg
- File:Flag of Bajo Nuevo Bank (unofficial).jpg
- File:Flag of Socotra.jpg
- File:Flag of Andaman and Nicobar Islands (proposal).png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Taichi (talk) 23:34, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all. The flags all appear to be proposals by the uploader; there's no evidence that these flags are authorized or used in any capacity by anyone. Omphalographer (talk) 21:27, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Replaced with File:Crayfish logo.png. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:10, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:11, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
File:HK ALC 鴨脷洲 Ap Lei Chau 利東邨 Lei Tung Estate 商場 Commercial Centre shop January 2021 SS2 御名苑 Restaurant 08.jpg
[edit]
This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as no permission (No permission since). Clearly self-photographed, converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:33, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:12, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
falsche Bildbeschreibung bzw. falsches Bild als Quelle verlinkt. Wo kommt das Bild in Wirklichkeit her? Xocolatl (talk) 20:38, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 15:02, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Logo. Yes, this is a logo, but is it under COM:TOO USA? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:22, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- FWIW, there was a previous conversation with Yann here who helped me put the {{PD-textlogo}} template no it. Red-tailed hawk, Could you please explain what COM:TOO USA implies? If you're asking whether the company is based in the US, then yes, it is. Please check [1]. I can see where this began, User:NebulaSynthetics uploaded content that I tagged for copyright violation, so I believe they tried doing the same. Jeraxmoira (talk) 05:29, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- The threshold of originality in the United States is more or less explained as the level of originality that is required for a work to be copyrightable. Very simple and unoriginal objects are not subject to copyright protection in the United States, but also some non-trivial works are denied copyright registration by the U.S. copyright office (for example, the logo of Cyberpunk 2077 and the Nikon logo) because of the particular quirks of how originality is determined. Our understanding of what is sufficiently original to warrant copyright protection is very dependent upon previous cases; where originality is borderline, it's better to handle the deletion as a formal deletion request, since speedy deletion is reserved for the most obvious cases. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 21:49, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Incorporating "EF" into the ice cream cone is above COM:TOO US. The USPTO does not register trademarks that are not unique. No free license at source website. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:31, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD-textlogo. This is just stylized letters. Yann (talk) 11:32, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Obviously under COM:TOO US and COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:25, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo, below US threshold of originality. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:47, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Because it is an unnecessary image . 福地 良介 (talk) 02:24, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep necessary. the image explain Japanese plain office inside. --eien20 (talk) 18:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Within scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:49, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
schlechtes Bild, es gibt besere dort. Ruediger Be (talk) 09:06, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep No reason for deletion! -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 19:42, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:50, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
schlechtes bild. Ruediger Be (talk) 09:09, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Nicht nachvollziehbar. Die Bildqualität ist allemal ausreichend. PaterMcFly (talk) 13:55, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:51, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal art Kelly The Angel (talk) 11:06, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment Would be better if you made one DR for the furry files by User:Dad-wikimasters. They're all very similar. Prototyperspective (talk) 13:34, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep imo it’s just as in scope as any of the existing human-made yiff images Dronebogus (talk) 01:46, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete We don't host personal artwork unless there is some compelling use for it. We have no shortage of yiff images on Commons and it's trivial to generate 100 more in a few minutes. Plus the watermark/advertising doesn't help. Nosferattus (talk) 02:28, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per Nosferattus. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:26, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
personal art Kelly The Angel (talk) 11:06, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep illustrates “scaly” erotica, which I don’t think we have much of Dronebogus (talk) 01:44, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Due to both the copyright and ethical concerns, I am always in favor of deleting AI art, especially when we have any non-AI generated images that don't have those concerns. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:18, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:33, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
personal art Kelly The Angel (talk) 11:06, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep imo it’s just as in scope as any of the existing human-made yiff images Dronebogus (talk) 01:47, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Due to both the copyright and ethical concerns, I am always in favor of deleting AI art, especially when we have any non-AI generated images that don't have those concerns. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:44, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- You shouldn’t indiscriminately target something just because of how it was made. There’s no “copyright and ethical concerns” with this image of a generic furry character so unless you have a specific reason for deleting this particular image your argument is objectively invalid Dronebogus (talk) 08:32, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Dronebogus: AI art tools work by scraping tens of thousands of pieces of copyrighted art without attribution or permission, so they can regurgitate simulacrums of that work, often incredibly close simulacrums, without compensating or crediting the original artists. This is core to their design. Commons is founded on respect for copyright and attribution. I'm genuinely shocked that anyone that believes in Commons' mission can support AI art. They're incompatible. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- You can neither copyright an art style nor claim plagiarism from works you can’t even point to. If I, say, drew a completely character in the style of classic anime, collecting bits and pieces of the styles from Neon Genesis Evangelion, Ghost in the Shell, Hayao Miyazaki etc. for inspiration, with no particular scene or concept undeniably reused, would that somehow be a copyright violation or plagiarism? Dronebogus (talk) 08:01, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Dronebogus: AI art tools work by scraping tens of thousands of pieces of copyrighted art without attribution or permission, so they can regurgitate simulacrums of that work, often incredibly close simulacrums, without compensating or crediting the original artists. This is core to their design. Commons is founded on respect for copyright and attribution. I'm genuinely shocked that anyone that believes in Commons' mission can support AI art. They're incompatible. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- You shouldn’t indiscriminately target something just because of how it was made. There’s no “copyright and ethical concerns” with this image of a generic furry character so unless you have a specific reason for deleting this particular image your argument is objectively invalid Dronebogus (talk) 08:32, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:33, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 13:06, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 13:06, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: Picture from the official website https://www.erjonhajnaj.com/about CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:47, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Picture on the official website of the artist https://www.erjonhajnaj.com/collections/116975 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:48, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Uploads from different authors for every pictures, The sources indicate copyright
- File:ALHENA 2023 JCH.jpg
- File:ALHENA 2023.jpg
- File:ALHENA 2022 current.jpg
- File:ALHENA 2022 1600.jpg
- File:Zespół Alhena podczas koncertu w MCK.jpg
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:41, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- The copyright of all photos is regulated with their authors, so they can be legally published under a free license.
- Quantor (talk) 10:39, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Quantor: : Could you please open a OTSR request with the VRT Team to clarify the situation, as explained here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team ? it is to be sure that you have the right to upload the photos. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:56, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- I also commented the matter here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Quantor?markasread=70046456&markasreadwiki=commonswiki#c-CoffeeEngineer-20231228174100-Notification_about_possible_deletion
- However OK, I will open a request (but in the afternoon).
- Quantor (talk) 11:13, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Quantor: I see what you did with the tags. I would suggest to let it like that, as it is not free of copyright by the law, but the Creative Commons allows the use of the photographs. No need to apologize, I thank you for clarifying the situation. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:08, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Can be undeleted with evidence of CC. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Non-used, low-resolution photography, out of focus and/or out of scope.
- File:A penas um pasto.jpg
- File:Agua (7090105585).jpg
- File:Agua e areia (6767102797).jpg
- File:Aguardem (5406232404).jpg
- File:Amazonia - Mundo das aguas. (6083441240).jpg
- File:Amazonia - Mundo das aguas. (6083442862).jpg
- File:Amazonia - Mundo das aguas. (6083443308).jpg
- File:Amazoniaaed.jpg
- File:AO ABRIR.jpg
- File:ATARDESER DESDE EL MORRO - panoramio.jpg
- File:Azul da cor do mar (6767111803).jpg
- File:Brazil (13727749195).jpg
- File:Brazil (13727773273).jpg
- File:Brazil (13728143674).jpg
- File:Brazil (13728155834).jpg
- File:Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil (51381033662).jpg
- File:Cat (51263938393).jpg
- File:Cebolinha (6765848577).jpg
- File:Chegando no restaurante (6326188496).jpg
- File:Chuva e Luz (7084941661).jpg
- File:Collage photos in the countryside of Brazil 2012.jpg
- File:Depositado, enfim! -mestrado (34140483235).jpg
- File:DSC08935 (10043010596).jpg
- File:DSC08946 (10043004155).jpg
- File:Edifício beira-mar (7521952).jpg
- File:Ensolarado (51945127889).jpg
- File:Janelas velhas e meu amor por elas (10681016946).jpg
- File:Jantar (13205296265).jpg
- File:Mew (51263861738).jpg
- File:Mew (51264376609).jpg
- File:Módulo - corte longitudinal (4195988505).png
- File:Nanquim sobre caderno (7518626).jpg
- File:Nina (51262830997).jpg
- File:Nina cat (51263151908).jpg
- File:Nina Cat (51282913448).jpg
- File:Nuvens (51422576202).png
- File:Nuvens (51422576217).png
- File:Nuvens de HDR (51430891718).jpg
- File:O grupo almoçando na Vila de São Tomé (7450469082).jpg
- File:O grupo dentro da lancha (7450412146).jpg
- File:O grupo fotografando na Praia da Ponta Negra (5984194687).jpg
- File:O grupo se reunindo para a foto (6432286793).jpg
- File:O grupo seguindo a trilha (6329093576).jpg
- File:Pano de pratos (6765849051).jpg
- File:Por do sol (6939179988).jpg
- File:Por do sol (6939180242).jpg
- File:Por do sol (6939180486).jpg
- File:Praia de Pajuçara - Maceió a noite. (6791542895).jpg
- File:PROCURANDO PAZ - panoramio.jpg
- File:Risco (4175756348).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Sturm (talk) 17:42, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all. A lot of these are typical tourist group photos (focused on the tourists, not the destination) and are useless. A couple of the others could conceivably be useful as photos of specific locations or landmarks if they were tagged properly - but they're all unidentified, and it's unlikely to be worth the effort to ID them. Omphalographer (talk) 19:46, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Omphalographer, please take a time to reevaluate your opinion regarding the file mentioned by JWilz12345. Thanks, RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:23, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, that one's fine now that it's been identified. On the other hand, it's a badly overexposed photo of a building we have many better photos of; deleting it wouldn't have been a great loss. Omphalographer (talk) 07:37, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Omphalographer, please take a time to reevaluate your opinion regarding the file mentioned by JWilz12345. Thanks, RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:23, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep File:Brazil (13727773273).jpg, found to be Candelaria Church in Rio de Janeiro (confirmed via this). Black-and-white photos are still in scope here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:57, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed ( keep). And to be fair all cariocas know that. User Sturm should be a little more careful when nominating lots of files to deletion, though most of them should be indeed deleted. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:21, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed (
Deleted: per nomination, kept 1. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by OsascanianoPouPou (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:PaísesCaléria2.png
- File:CalériaGlobe.png
- File:PaísesCaléria.png
- File:MapaCaléria2.png
- File:MapaFederações2.png
- File:MapaCaléria.png
- File:Cannabis FC.jpg
- File:Atletico Verdasso.png
- File:UniãoDasNaçõesDaCaléria.png
Files are fictional and out of scope, evident with the incoherent descriptions of most files --N Panama 84534 20:37, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Adsci8 (talk) 15:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
File:"Szene aus dem Gefecht bei Vendôme, Januar 1871" von Louis Kolitz (5. April 1845 - 24. Juli 1914).png
[edit].png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Quellenlos, und laut https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/from-the-battle-for-metz-1870-sketch-louis-kolitz/eQGH87Pj-z-JpQ ist das eine Darstellung aus einer Szene aus den Kämpfen um Metz 1870. Xocolatl (talk) 20:56, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by A. Savin. --Gbawden (talk) 08:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Geschäftshaus Biebergasse 14, Ecke Börsenstraße 2–4 (auch Siegmund Strauss-Haus) am Rathenauplatz mit Schillerdenkmal.jpg
[edit]_am_Rathenauplatz_mit_Schillerdenkmal.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_am_Rathenauplatz_mit_Schillerdenkmal.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
See Diskussionsseite. Photograph is taken between 1938 and 1944 and has not suitable Copyright license. Flibbertigibbet (talk) 11:51, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
_am_Rathenauplatz_mit_Schillerdenkmal.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 23:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Turmbau (1896, Neogotik) der Anker-Versicherung an der Ecke Goethestraße und Großer Bockenheimer Gasse in Frankfurt am Main (2).jpg
[edit]_der_Anker-Versicherung_an_der_Ecke_Goethestra%C3%9Fe_und_Gro%C3%9Fer_Bockenheimer_Gasse_in_Frankfurt_am_Main_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_der_Anker-Versicherung_an_der_Ecke_Goethestra%C3%9Fe_und_Gro%C3%9Fer_Bockenheimer_Gasse_in_Frankfurt_am_Main_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
garantiert kein "eigenes Werk". Upload einer Messina-Sockenpuppe. Xocolatl (talk) 15:50, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 00:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Am Fünffingerplätzchen in Frankfurt am Main, das Pesthaus mit Bemalung von Heinrich Holz u. Inschrift von Rudolf Kilb an der Goldhutgasse 14.jpg
[edit]
Hier könnte man am Entstehungsjahr 1900 zweifeln. Ohnehin aber, da User:Messina global gebannt ist, zu löschen. Xocolatl (talk) 15:52, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 00:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Die Quelle (und eigentlich auch der Urheber) kann nicht unbekannt sein, sonst hätte User:Messina das ja nicht scannen können. Xocolatl (talk) 15:53, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Frankfurt am Main 1886-1910 : ein Führer durch seine Bauten : den Teilnehmern an der Wanderversammlung des Verbandes Deutscher Architekten- und Ingenieur-Vereine gewidmet vom Frankfurter Architekten- und Ingenieur-Verein 1910. Frankfurt am Main 1910, S. 132f
https://archive.org/details/frankfurtammain100verb/page/132/mode/2up — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.207.241.180 (talk) 07:57, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not a valid rationale. The nomination roughly says: "The source (and actually the author) cannot be unknown, otherwise User:Messina would not have been able to scan it." we have over 100,000 images that are anonymous, yet somehow were scanned. --RAN (talk) 19:05, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 00:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Turmbau (1896, Neogotik) der Anker-Versicherung am Goetheplatz in Frankfurt am Main (2).jpg
[edit]_der_Anker-Versicherung_am_Goetheplatz_in_Frankfurt_am_Main_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_der_Anker-Versicherung_am_Goetheplatz_in_Frankfurt_am_Main_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Die Quelle kann nicht unbekannt sein. Reine Faulheit der Messina-Sockenpuppe. Xocolatl (talk) 15:54, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 00:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Am Fünffingerplätzchen in Frankfurt am Main, Pesthaus mit Bemalung von Heinrich Holz u. Inschrift von Rudolf Kilb an der Goldhutgasse 14.jpg
[edit]
Die Quelle kann nicht unbekannt sein. User:Messina war nur zu unorganisiert... Xocolatl (talk) 15:55, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 00:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Frankfurt am Main, Eckhaus am Opernplatz und an der Ecke Große Bockenheimer Straße und Goethestraße 34 (6).png
[edit].png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Beide Quellenangaben beziehen sich auf das neuere Bild, und eine solche Collage ist ohnehin wenig brauchbar. Außerdem Upload einer Sockenpuppe des global gebannten Benutzers Messina. Xocolatl (talk) 15:57, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 00:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Frankfurt am Main, Eckhaus am Opernplatz und an der Ecke Große Bockenheimer Straße und Goethestraße 34 (4).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Quelle unbekannt? Quatsch. Xocolatl (talk) 15:57, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 00:02, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Frankfurt am Main, Eckhaus am Opernplatz und an der Ecke Große Bockenheimer Straße und Goethestraße 34 (5).png
[edit].png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Beide Quellenangaben beziehen sich auf das neuere Bild, Collage ohnehin wenig brauchbar, Upload des global gebannten Benutzers Messina. Xocolatl (talk) 15:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-EU-no author disclosure" for the original postcard and CC license for the matching modern shot. --RAN (talk) 19:42, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 00:02, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Poster from a 1929 film. Clearly not own work, likely still copyrighted? For COM:United States, "Anything published before January 1, 1928 is in the public domain", but it's a 1929 film 94rain Talk 01:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
![01:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/12/28#c-94rain-20231228014000-File:Poster_for_the_1929_film_"Come_Across".jpg){kind=link}
- Oh actually I didn't notice the date in the description is 31 December 1927. If that can be verified then I'll withdraw my request. 94rain Talk 01:42, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Apparently printed in Australia by Morrison & Bailey, Sydney, so to determine the copyright status some research might be needed about the source country of this work (US or Australia?). --Rosenzweig τ 21:46, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment. This seems to have been made for the Australian market. There is a signature at lower right. It is distinctive but unfortunately just initials. If anyone knows of a good source for information on signatures like this, it might be solvable. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:41, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Source country appears to be Australia - but lacking info to determine copyright status. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
![19:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/12/28#c-Infrogmation-20240119192900-File:Poster_for_the_1929_film_"Come_Across".jpg){kind=link}
Photo too glossy and too professional to be created by and belong to uploader. Subject posed and directly faced the camera, directed by photographer. Unlikely the author and the uploader are the same person. George Ho (talk) 02:45, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; tineye search shows images was online in 2014. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Photo too professional and unlikely to have been created by the uploader. George Ho (talk) 02:52, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: While not found in reverse image search, the other photo uploaded by this user File:Photo May 26, 12 30 00 PM.jpg as own work is on CandaceSmith website [2]; clearly taken at same photo session. If the uploader is the actual photographer who took photos for Candace Smith's website and retains licensing rights, they may submit proof via COM:VRT and images can be undeleted. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
![[2]](https://www.candacesmith.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/about-comedia.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Komarof as Dw no source since (dw no source since). I've conducted a reverse image search, and the photo is listed on the leadership for the Devcom Analysis Center. The uploader account is "DAC Comms", and the file is claimed as "own work" as source, which seems accurate if the account was actually run by the DAC. It seems likely that this is a {{PD-USGov}} of some sort, so I'm sending to DR rather than actioning the speedy. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:11, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: source and license changed per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:44, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Guliolopez as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:47, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: false license claim; TOO Ireland uncertain. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is one of series shot, imported to panoramio. For simple categorise, delete this, and keep the best one of series: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Moscow_bus_12118_2013-08_1377787449_Volokolamskoe_highway_LiAZ-6213.JPG Svetlov Artem (talk) 08:04, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Nothing wrong with having more than one photo of topic; no need to choose only one as "best", reusers can chose for themselves, and alternative shots may have additional information detail. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
schlechtes Bild, es gibt besere dort Ruediger Be (talk) 09:06, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep. Perfectly fine image of church pews and organ. Within scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:54, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per IronGargoyle. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
schlechtes Bild. Ruediger Be (talk) 09:07, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep. Perfectly fine image of a pipe organ. Within scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:54, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
schlechtes bild. Ruediger Be (talk) 09:10, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep. Perfectly fine image of a pipe organ. Within scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:53, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
schlechtes bild Ruediger Be (talk) 09:11, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep. Perfectly fine image, image is also in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:52, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
not educationally useful Kelly The Angel (talk) 11:13, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, as the image depicts the meme. Otherwise it would be hard to understand the reason why the category El pero stretchy was created, since it is an obscure, 4chanesque meme. RodRabelo7 (talk) 14:34, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. The fact that RodRabelo7 (the uploader) created a category for this image doesn't make it a notable meme. Omphalographer (talk) 19:55, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
It perfectly follows the 4th Category inclusion criterion, that is, “The category is part of a diffusion scheme, and at least one of its sibling categories meets any of the other criteria above.” Otherwise it would have to be on the generic category Internet memes or Unidentified internet memes and users would not necessarily be able to identify the meme. RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:39, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with Omphalographer that it is not notable. And I'd add that it is likely a copyright violation since we don't know the origin of the dog image. SDudley (talk) 01:01, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Copyright violation? The original image was LITERALLY uploaded here on Commons more than a decade ago. Furthermore the source is stated on the file information; this just shows you didn’t even take your time to correctly evaluate your opinion. RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:31, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Properly sourced derivative of free licensed image. No consensus ffor OOS deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:24, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
I am the creator and uploader of this file and I request that this file be deleted. Iretn 847362 (talk) 12:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request; unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Own work? This is a cropped version of this photo. Google give many hits for example a higher resolution here. Wouter (talk) 13:33, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
上传失败11111 AbinaTang (talk) 14:00, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Recently uploaded, no apparent use. Redundant to File:X mark.svg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:56, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Watermark suggests it's copyrighted Syrus257 (talk) 15:28, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD-author-FlickrPDM licensed: https://web.archive.org/web/20190120135051/https://www.flickr.com/photos/124590788@N08/30011996158/ Solomon203 (talk) 01:34, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:41, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Unidentified female models
[edit]Out of scope. These are all photos of unidentified female models, and we have more than enough photos of female models with a name. Personal photos, perhaps for advertising purposes, which is out of scope. Not in use. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. See Commons:Categories for discussion/2021/11/Category:Unidentified female models for more information.
- File:@sarahfarris (48228048031).jpg
- File:@summer kayyyyy (46969638345).jpg
- File:After Cryo Therapy at CryoFuel NYC.jpg
- File:AG9A7893.jpg
- File:AGUS.jpg
- File:Akanksha Singh .jpg
- File:Amy Winehouse inspired Emma.jpg
- File:Andrea V.jpg
- File:Aneliese.jpg
- File:Anivia Cruz.jpg
- File:Apache girl (8954418606).jpg
- File:Asian model bending backwards with pole.jpg
- File:Asian model in skirt 2.jpg
- File:Black opaque tights and short pleated check skirt.jpg
- File:BlackScale Snap (12126958784).jpg
- File:Blonde girl posing for a photo.jpg
- File:Body Painting to Live Mannequin, Omotesando, Tokyo.jpg
- File:Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8L II USM.jpg
- File:Celebrate213.JPG
- File:Chopper Girl at Convention 118.jpg
- File:Cute Women Models posing at Renault Sport F1 promotion.jpg
- File:Diana (8369163184).jpg Delete as per request. ~Moheen (keep talking) 17:50, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- File:Equine Boutique Location (2915020011).jpg
- File:Fapa.jpg
- File:First6.jpg
- File:Foto de ensaio.jpg
- File:GMC girls.jpg
- File:HannGel.jpg
- File:Holly Cagle.jpg
- File:Iris-top.jpg
- File:Kaila Elizabeth's lingerie photoshoot from May, 2018.jpg
- File:Kaila Elizabeth.jpg
- File:Karina (64956529).jpeg
- File:Khalesi.jpg
- File:Khrystyna Tyminska.jpg
- File:Ksenia Flusova.png
- File:L4000189.jpg
- File:Lady Louise (19800622595).jpg
- File:Lan Vy586.jpg
- File:LauraG-Ins.png
- File:Lenkajosefiova.JPG
- File:Leticia Ledger.jpg
- File:Lillie-Jo0BFA8005-36B5-4CFA-9114-963D8EB6764A.jpg
- File:Live Mannequin, Omotesando, Tokyo.jpg
- File:LuissaBurtonmodel.jpg
- File:Mandie Pistol 1.jpg
- File:Mandie Pistol.jpg
- File:MandiePistol2.jpg
- File:Maryameil5 n.jpg
- File:Melissa by MH 2.jpg
- File:Melissa by MH.jpg
- File:Michelle-Mylrea-2013.jpg
- File:Modelo de intermodels.jpg
- File:Modeloailenbechara.jpg
- File:Motiv3 kb 189.tif
- File:Nappy girl.jpg
- File:Neil Kendall .jpg
- File:Nina papunashvili.jpg
- File:Paige Jordae Photoshoot.jpg
- File:Paige Jordae.jpg
- File:Photoshoot in Rome with an Italian model.jpg
- File:Plus Size Model.jpg
- File:Pretty young woman in 'naughty nurse' uniform and sandals 01.jpg
- File:Primeros planos actriz Colombiana Martha Lucia Pereira.jpg
- File:Rhina.jpg
- File:Rigmor 1984 15 yrs old.jpg
- File:Rigmor 1984.jpg
- File:ROCK DREAMER.jpg
- File:Rojo (6261861013).jpg
- File:Rosariocuenca.jpg
- File:Sample Work.jpg
- File:Shikshamatabadul1.jpg
- File:Shola StyleCity Hollywood Glamour (2945791126).jpg
- File:Shola StyleCity Hollywood Glamour (2945791360).jpg
- File:SholaRokii (2944914167).jpg
- File:SholaRokii (2945777994).jpg
- File:SholaRokii (2947292233).jpg
- File:SholaRokii (2947292309).jpg
- File:SholaRokii (2947292441).jpg
- File:SholaRokii (2947292619).jpg
- File:SholaRokii (2947292921).jpg
- File:SholaRokii (2947293057).jpg
- File:SholaRokii (2947293127).jpg
- File:SholaRokii (2947293957).jpg
- File:SholaRokii (2947294095).jpg
- File:SholaRokii (2948147390).jpg
- File:SholaRokii (2948147796).jpg
- File:SholaRokii (2948148680).jpg
- File:SholaRokii (2948148820).jpg
- File:SholaRokii (2948148982).jpg
- File:SholaRokii (2948149124).jpg
- File:SOLINE.jpg
- File:Stefy01.jpg
- File:StudioSix for Style & The City Vintage Jean Muir (3535902798).jpg
- File:StudioSix for Style & The City Vintage Jean Muir (3535903256).jpg
- File:Sur pige.jpg
- File:Tanziibear.jpg
- File:The Colour of my Dreams (15405354340).jpg
- File:The Equestrian Session (2828508601).jpg
- File:The Equestrian Session (2828510891).jpg
- File:The Equestrian Session (2828511615).jpg
- File:The Equestrian Session (2828513679).jpg
- File:The Equestrian Session (2829346666).jpg
- File:The Equestrian Session (2829348828).jpg
- File:The Equestrian Session (2829351654).jpg
- File:The Equestrian Session (2829352070).jpg
- File:TrooshFOTO.jpg
- File:Utthara Unni Modelling.png - Keep Sorry, is not an unidentified model, should not have been nominated for deletion --JopkeB (talk) 16:32, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- File:Vida matinal III (4558840475).jpg
- File:Vitange.JPG
- File:VivianaVa.jpg
- File:VivianaVasconcelos.jpg
- File:Zara (10074472815).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
JopkeB (talk) 16:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- This: File:Body Painting to Live Mannequin, Omotesando, Tokyo.jpg is a shop window in Japan, and shouldn't be there. I don't think these mass nominations of loosely related files are helpful, and actually recommend cancelling the whole thing and nominate separately as applicable. Darwin Ahoy! 16:37, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- But I do agree that most of those seem to be out of our scope. Darwin Ahoy! 16:41, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Some are out of scope, yes, but we cannot put them all in the same bag. Of those that I uploaded, the vast majority are in a professional degree. "We have a lot of photos of women" was not always a good argument, but it is always better, of course, this depends on the quality and focus of the composition. In short, it is a subjective assessment. --Wilfredor (talk) 19:41, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep all, per DarwIn and Wilfredor. Resubmit as separate DRs with discrete rationales. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:11, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Many of these photos seem to be of high quality. I suggest nominating photos with FBMD in their EXIFs or watermarks separately. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:10, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Delete, except for the exceptions: I put a lot of time and effort to sort out the original category, see the Notes at the bottom of Commons:Categories for discussion/2021/11/Category:Unidentified female models. So I think the photos that were originally in this category and are in scope, are not nominated for deletion here. And all the ones that are here nominated for deletion are out of scope and should be deleted, except for the ones that have a request not to (with a reason). And no, when so many photos are out of scope for the same reason, I do not think there should be deletion requests for all of them seperately, that is a lot of extra, useless work, for the nominator as well as for the administrator; both of us can make better use of our time.
- When you think a photo mentioned here should still stay, put you comment next to the file with the reason why it should stay. The rest of the photos can be deleted.
- Since when is "are in a professional degree" and "high quality" the same as "in scope"? I do not know any better than it is the other way around: A photo should be in scope; professionality and high quality are a bonus but not necessary.
--JopkeB (talk) 14:49, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep all images. Files are clearly in scope as per other comments. This is another shotgun approach that are, as the others, a waste of time of users, administrators, etc. Only looking at File:VivianaVa.jpg and File:VivianaVasconcelos.jpg is seen that uploader does not speek enough languages (spanish and\or portuguese) to understand that the deletion requester does not know that the depicted model is from Venezuela. Also deletion requester does not need to vote a second time and try to put conditions as to how others vote.
- All other users could make better use of our time. Tm (talk) 01:19, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- File:Zara (10074472815).jpg (uploaded by me) is a good example of a boudoir type photograpy (and a very high resolution at 4 912 × 7 360 or 36.15MP). Also taken by a professional photographer (and one that presently works to Getty Images) and images of this photographer have survived a category deletion request like this, after a long undeletion request with deveral participants]. Scope of this images has been established pure and simple along time ago. Tm (talk) 01:46, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- And categories of unidentified concepts, objects, persons, etc like Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Unidentified female models are collectors to images that for several reasons have something in it that was not still identified, not collectors to deletion requests. Tm (talk) 01:52, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- The deletion and undeletion requests you refer to, were about licences, not about scope. This deletion request is about scope. JopkeB (talk) 03:17, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- That is the problem: These files are not in scope, other comments did not say how they are in scope, how they are educational media, for which purposes they can be reused. So please give valid reasons, reasons that match the Commons:Project scope. JopkeB (talk) 03:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- No. You are the one that has to show why they are out of scope thing that you did not do until now.
- 1 - Your arguments that you "put a lot of time and effort to sort out the original category" and "Personal photos, perhaps for advertising purposes, which is out of scope." do not had up when you nominated, in this deletion request, photos that were previosly nominated to deletion with arguments like "Unused personal photo. Out of project scope" and were kept as there was "no valid reason for deletion". Case in point File:Diana (8369163184).jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Diana (8369163184).jpg
- 2 - "we have more than enough photos of female models with a name" is not a valid argument to delete photos as there is not a maximum threshold or set number of files\photos for any category or subject where if there is any number above a threshold some are deleted. See Commons:Scope
- 3 - "Not in use". Not in use is not and never was a valid argument to delete images. Again see Commons:Scope.
- 4 - "Not realistically useful for an educational purpose.". Just as some examples, a set of 8 photo studio images of a professional model wearing Category:Equestrian sports equipment and all named "The Equestrian Session (Flickrid).jpg" is realistically useful for an educational purpose, not speaking of images of boudoir, images of studio photo sessions from the 1980´s (
- File:Rigmor 1984 15 yrs old.jpg and File:Rigmor 1984.jpg as if there were a lot with free licenses)
- 5 - The images that i saw all have other valid categories, so one more argument against these being out of scope.
- 6 - And the "other comments" did say how they are in scope, how they are educational media, for which purposes they can be reused, etc, so please stop trying to circle the drain as all other users could make better use of our time to listen to valid concerns of scope, thing that you until now did not do. Tm (talk) 03:41, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- File:Zara (10074472815).jpg (uploaded by me) is a good example of a boudoir type photograpy (and a very high resolution at 4 912 × 7 360 or 36.15MP). Also taken by a professional photographer (and one that presently works to Getty Images) and images of this photographer have survived a category deletion request like this, after a long undeletion request with deveral participants]. Scope of this images has been established pure and simple along time ago. Tm (talk) 01:46, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Jopke, are you voting twice? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:09, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- No, that was not my intention. I removed. it. --JopkeB (talk) 04:19, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Blanket mass deletion not supported; over broad. No prejudging of relisting individual image or smaller related subsets of images. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:45, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Work by Agnes Martin (1912-2004) is subject to copyright 77.63.75.135 16:28, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Annals of the South African Museum = Annale van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum (IA annalsofsoutha7011976sout).pdf
[edit]1976 is too recent for South African copyrights to have expired. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:28, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- What is the projected date for undeletion? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:08, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- South Africa has 50 years pma. The principal author is named as H. E. Böhme from the South African Museum in Cape Town. A quick search didn't find any further details, but definitely still protected there until at least the end of 2026, most likely longer unless H. E. Böhme died right in 1976. Protected in the US until the end of 2071, so the earliest undeletion date would be 2072. --Rosenzweig τ 21:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:42, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope. Amateur porn, no educational use. Adsci8 (talk) 17:45, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- One of the only videos we have of crossdressing Keep --Trade (talk) 18:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I agree. "Porn" is not a valid deletion rationale. PaterMcFly (talk) 18:47, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Let's be fair, I said more than just "porn."
- Anybody else think this video is overly gratuitous for a depiction of crossdressing? Adsci8 (talk) 15:38, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: categories show potential usefulness; no consensus to delete. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:43, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
This is a low-quality scan from a Pearson textbook (probably Chemistry: The central Science, by Brown, LeMay, et al.) It is not original work. Achem (talk) 19:41, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:44, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Dennis Hastert was first elected in 1986. This photo was taken when he was employed as a school coach. Also, he is not the photographer. Ooligan (talk) 20:01, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep If the congressional license does not apply, then the PD US no notice license would apply as there is no copyright notice and the image was produced between 1928 and 1977 . RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 20:28, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Agree with RUG. PD US no notice should be fine. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- | class="wikitable"
- |1929 through 1977
- |Published without a copyright notice
- |None. In the public domain due to failure to comply with required formalities
- |{{PD-US-no notice}}
- |
- This private photo (purported to be 1976) was apparently first "published" in the year 2000, on Dennis Hastert's House.gov website. So, PD-US-no notice would not apply in this situation. (@A1Cafel/@RandomUserGuy1738), Where was it "published" in 1976, or any other time before September 2000? -- Ooligan (talk) 00:08, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion; problems seem resolved. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Relisting, I seemed to have closed this too soon. As @Ooligan: notes, if this image was not published until 2000, the tag {{PD-US-no notice}} would not apply. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:03, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation- Thanks for the relisting.
- Here is the first provable "publication" of this photograph in the year 2000. [3] -- Ooligan (talk) 19:43, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- I believe that in 1976 (under the old U.S. copyright law) simple distribution to the people in the photo would have constituted publication. @User:Clindberg, is that correct? - Jmabel ! talk 20:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- If copies of the photo were handed out, that should be general publication. If Dennis Hastert was not the photographer, how did he get a copy without it being published? While different circuit courts may have different tests, the Copyright Compendium section 1905.1 states: Generally, a limited publication is the distribution of copies of a work to a definitely selected group with a limited purpose and without the right of diffusion, reproduction, distribution, or sale. A limited publication is not considered a distribution to the public and, therefore, is not publication. See White v. Kimmell, 193 F.2d 744, 746-47 (9th Cir. 1952) (explaining that a publication is limited if it “communicates the contents of a [work] to a definitely selected group and for a limited purpose, and without the right of diffusion, reproduction, distribution or sale ... [and is] restricted both as to persons and purpose.”). One of the examples they give there says Giving away copies of a photograph without further restriction constitutes publication of that work. Carl Lindberg (talk) 20:36, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- I believe that in 1976 (under the old U.S. copyright law) simple distribution to the people in the photo would have constituted publication. @User:Clindberg, is that correct? - Jmabel ! talk 20:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- When you go to the website [4], it shows the image was produced in 1976 as the description is Denny's State Champion Wrestling Team (1976). Just because it was posted to his Congressional website in 2000, it does not mean it was published or produced that same year. Furthermore, given that this picture was produced during Dennis Hastert's time as a teacher at Yorkville High School, there is a good chance this image might have been published in the 1976 yearbook. If that is confirmed, then that would be further reasoning for the PD US no notice to stand. RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 01:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Per Clindberg, US case law has sided with an image being "made public" when a "perceivable copy" leaves the custody of the creator. In photography, the print from the original negative is a "perceivable copy". --RAN (talk) 19:14, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Carl, appears to have been distributed in 1976 meeting pre-1978 definition of publication. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:35, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- File:Как создать папку? 4.png
- File:Как создать папку? 3.png
- File:Как создать папку? 2.png
- File:Как создать папку?.png
derivative work of non-free content (I also advise to check the contribution of this user for violations of the rules) --Khidistavi (talk) 15:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:35, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Someone who's wrong on the internet as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10 Yann (talk) 16:10, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete G10 Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 17:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- This can be educational. I don't think G10 is a valid reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 19:06, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- What about the watermark that says Alif Media Productions? I think we have reason to doubt that this is the uploader's own work, especially given the copyright issue with his other upload. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 20:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- This can be educational. I don't think G10 is a valid reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 19:06, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Probable copyvio, watermark. --Yann (talk) 21:33, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Uploader ist eine Sockenpuppe des global gebannten Messina. Lauthttps://www.ansichtskarten-design-kunst.de/de/ansichtskarte-ak-frankfurt-main-1931-domrestaurant-interieur-fachwerk-architektur-ortsansicht-hessen.html stammt die Ansichtskarte nicht aus dem Jahr 1900, sondern von 1931 (wozu auch das Design eher passt) und womöglich ließe sich auch der Verlag und Urheber herausfinden. Xocolatl (talk) 12:55, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination:deleted by A.Savin. --Kadı Message 10:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
kolorierte Version von https://www.stadtbild-deutschland.org/forum/index.php?thread/1037-frankfurt-am-main-galerie/&pageNo=9. Zu Behaupten, Quelle und Autor seien unbekannt, ist eine Frechheit. Upload einer Messina-Sockenpuppe. Xocolatl (talk) 12:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination:deleted by A.Savin. --Kadı Message 10:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Gebäude der „Providentia“ - Feuerversicherungsgesellschaft an der Taunusanlage 20 in Frankfurt am Main (Portal).png
[edit].png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no author, no source, but date??? See Messina Xocolatl (talk) 13:00, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: deleted by A.Savin. --Kadı Message 10:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Upload des global gebannten Messina. Quelle und Autor unbekannt, aber Datum 1900 bekannt kann ja schlicht nicht sein. Xocolatl (talk) 13:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Ist eine alte Postkarte, Datum geschätzt um 1900 kann stimmen. Herbert Ortner (talk) 19:45, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. It certainly appears to be 1900, and would be PD-EU-no author disclosure even if a bit more recent. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:25, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination:deleted by A.Savin. --Kadı Message 10:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Hohenzollernhaus - Kaiserkeller an der Kaiserstraße 29 (Theaterplatz) in Frankfurt am Main (2).jpg
[edit]_in_Frankfurt_am_Main_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_Frankfurt_am_Main_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
"eigenes Werk" von 1900? Quatsch. Upload einer Messina-Sockenpuppe. Xocolatl (talk) 13:06, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD-EU-no author disclosure. --RAN (talk) 19:31, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination:deleted by A.Savin. --Kadı Message 10:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Quelle und Urheber unbekannt, aber dass das Bild von 1900 stammt, soll man dann wissen? Faul und frech. Upload einer Sockenpuppe von Messina Xocolatl (talk) 13:07, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination:deleted by A.Savin. --Kadı Message 10:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
noch ein Upload einer Messina-Sockenpuppe. Wenn Autor und Quelle angeblich unbekannt sind, woher kommt dann das Datum? Xocolatl (talk) 13:08, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination:deleted by A.Savin. --Kadı Message 10:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Upload einer Messina-Sockenpuppe. Datum angeblich bekannt, Quelle und Urheber aber nicht? Quatsch. Xocolatl (talk) 13:10, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination:deleted by A.Savin. --Kadı Message 10:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Upload einer Sockenpuppe von Messina. Dass Quelle und Urheber unbekannt sind, man aber das Datum kennt, ist ein Märchen. Xocolatl (talk) 13:11, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination:deleted by A.Savin. --Kadı Message 10:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Hohenzollernhaus - Kaiserkeller an der Kaiserstraße 29 (Theaterplatz) in Frankfurt am Main (1).png
[edit]_in_Frankfurt_am_Main_(1).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_Frankfurt_am_Main_(1).png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
"Ursprung unbekannt" kann schlicht nicht sein. Vor allem nicht in Kombination mit der Datumsangabe. Upload einer Messina-Sockenpuppe. Xocolatl (talk) 13:12, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep A postcard from 1909 is "PD-EU-no author disclosure". --RAN (talk) 19:32, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination:deleted by A.Savin. --Kadı Message 10:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Upload einer Messina-Sockenpuppe. Ursprung und Autor unbekannt, Datum aber bekannt? Quatsch. Xocolatl (talk) 13:13, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination:deleted by A.Savin. --Kadı Message 10:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Hohenzollernhaus - Kaiserkeller an der Kaiserstraße 29 (Theaterplatz) in Frankfurt am Main (3).jpg
[edit]_in_Frankfurt_am_Main_(3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_Frankfurt_am_Main_(3).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Upload einer Sockenpuppe des global gebannten Messina. Quelle und Urheber unbekannt, aber Datum bekannt? Das ist Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 13:14, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-EU-no author disclosure" for a postcard from 1907. --RAN (talk) 19:39, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- So the photographer is dead since 70 years already? Citation? Kind regards, Grueslayer (talk) 06:54, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination:deleted by A.Savin. --Kadı Message 10:55, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amirsobhanhosseini (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
- File:Majidhosseini-asrejadid.jpg
- File:Majidhosseini-tvplus.jpg
- File:Majidhosseini-katkani.jpg
- File:Majidhosseini-hokm2.jpg
- File:Majidhosseini-khatabbe-mahmoodrazavi.webp
- File:Majidhosseini-rambodjavan.webp
- File:Majidhosseini-hokm.jpg
- File:Majidhosseini-mohadese.jpg
- File:Majidhosseini&parviztanavoli.jpg
- File:Majidhosseinifinal.jpg
- File:Majidhosseinipic.jpg
Didym (talk) 16:35, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom, and at least most of these appear to be out of scope. Adsci8 (talk) 15:28, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:55, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sieht deutlich nach Kriegsruine aus. Wieso sollte das Bild von 1900 sein? Wahrscheinlich ganz falsche Quellenangabe. Upload einer Sockenpuppe des global gebannten User:Messina. Xocolatl (talk) 16:37, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination:deleted by A.Savin. --Kadı Message 10:55, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Grundriss der Gemäldegalerie in Kassel, um 1870 von Heinrich von Dehn-Rotfelser (1825 - 1885).png
[edit].png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
eigenes Werk von 1880? Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 20:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Obviously not, but presumably public domain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:01, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, but upload without source, wrong author and by a sockpuppet of User:Messina. --Xocolatl (talk) 15:40, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- PD images should not be deleted for extraneous reasons like that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:42, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination:deleted by A.Savin. --Kadı Message 10:56, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Replaced with File:EDITPRESS.png. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- ok, we put a png file Marketing Editpress (talk) 10:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:48, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
_und_50_(rechts)_in_Neuss,_1911.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_und_50_(rechts)_in_Neuss,_1911.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
In der angegebenen Quelle ist dieses Bild nicht zu finden. Außerdem wird hier das Entstehungsjahr 1900 angegeben, im Artikel aber 1911. Wieso? Vermutlich ein Sockenpuppenupload des global gesperrten Messina. Xocolatl (talk) 16:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
_und_50_(rechts)_in_Neuss,_1911.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: already deleted by A.Savin. --Rosenzweig τ 17:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
_und_50_(rechts)_in_Neuss,_1911.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Dass Quelle und Urheber unbekannt, das Entstehungsjahr aber bekannt sein soll, ist Unfug. Xocolatl (talk) 16:30, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: already deleted by A.Savin. --Rosenzweig τ 17:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Komarof as Dw no source since (dw no source since). I've conducted a reverse image search, and the photo is listed on the leadership for the Devcom Analysis Center. The uploader account is "DAC Comms", and the file is claimed as "own work" as source, which seems accurate if the account was actually run by the DAC. It seems likely that this is a {{PD-USGov}} of some sort, so I'm sending to DR rather than actioning the speedy. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:11, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion and source found PD-USGov-Military-Army. --Royalbroil 00:43, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Komarof as Dw no source since (dw no source since). I've conducted a reverse image search, and the photo is listed on the leadership for the Devcom Analysis Center. The uploader account is "DAC Comms", and the file is claimed as "own work" as source, which seems accurate if the account was actually run by the DAC. It seems likely that this is a {{PD-USGov}} of some sort, so I'm sending to DR rather than actioning the speedy. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:11, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: closing as keep per discussion and source found. --Royalbroil 00:45, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Komarof as Dw no source since (dw no source since). I've conducted a reverse image search, and the photo is listed on the leadership for the Devcom Analysis Center. The uploader account is "DAC Comms", and the file is claimed as "own work" as source, which seems accurate if the account was actually run by the DAC. It seems likely that this is a {{PD-USGov}} of some sort, so I'm sending to DR rather than actioning the speedy. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:12, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: keep per discussion and source found. --Royalbroil 00:47, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Komarof as Dw no source since (dw no source since). I've conducted a reverse image search, and the photo is listed on the leadership for the Devcom Analysis Center. The uploader account is "DAC Comms", and the file is claimed as "own work" as source, which seems accurate if the account was actually run by the DAC. It seems likely that this is a {{PD-USGov}} of some sort, so I'm sending to DR rather than actioning the speedy. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:12, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: closed as keep per discussion and source found. --Royalbroil 00:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Komarof as Dw no source since (dw no source since). I've conducted a reverse image search, and the photo is listed on the leadership for the Devcom Analysis Center. The uploader account is "DAC Comms", and the file is claimed as "own work" as source, which seems accurate if the account was actually run by the DAC. It seems likely that this is a {{PD-USGov}} of some sort, so I'm sending to DR rather than actioning the speedy. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:12, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: closed as keep per discussion and source found. --Royalbroil 00:52, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Komarof as Dw no source since (dw no source since). I've conducted a reverse image search, and the photo is listed on the leadership for the Devcom Analysis Center. The uploader account is "DAC Comms", and the file is claimed as "own work" as source, which seems accurate if the account was actually run by the DAC. It seems likely that this is a {{PD-USGov}} of some sort, so I'm sending to DR rather than actioning the speedy. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:13, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: close as keep per discussion and source found. --Royalbroil 00:53, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:50, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. It's a US logo and should probably fall below COM:TOO US. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion - below Threshold of Originality. --Royalbroil 00:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 2001:448A:3010:263:7BC5:63E5:B6C:337 as no permission (No permission since) Krd 09:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no evidence of source or permission on derivative. --Royalbroil 00:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ananyagokhale2001 (talk · contribs)
[edit]2 are from Qualman's website - the other was probably taken from https://www.austintexas.org/listings/mclendon-photography/8252/ - no exif, unlikely to be own work. PCP
Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:34, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Likely not own work:. See LinkedIn profile of featured person: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jiann-wen-woody-ju-ab1539202/. Looking at the edit history of the contributor it seems like the only edits they have are for a draft on the featured person so I don't think they would have been the photographer too. I would've given the editor the benefit of the doubt here if they're a longstanding editor but that's not the case here. S5A-0043Talk 08:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- In response to the deletion nomination of "Woody Ju.png" on Wikimedia Commons:
- I created the article on the behave of Professor Ju and the image in question is copyrighted by Professor Ju. As such, it is original work and rightfully uploaded with his permission.
- Regarding the comparison with the LinkedIn profile, the image is indeed the same. However, as Professor Ju hold the rights to this image, its usage here is entirely appropriate and legal. The similarity is due to it being a professional representation of Professor Ju, commonly used across various professional platforms.
- I trust this addresses the concerns raised in the deletion nomination, demonstrating the legitimacy and appropriateness of the image for the article on Professor Jiann-Wen Woody Ju. Zhuwenli (talk) 10:04, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Zhuwenli Please ask Prof. Ju to send an email to the Commons ticket system using COM:VRTS so that we can verify that he indeed allowed the image to be uploaded here. You also need to edit the "source" and "author" section of the file description to reflect the actual source if you are not the one who created the image. S5A-0043Talk 00:21, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment tagged as permission pending since 6 January. Has a VRT email been received? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: 00:23, February 6, 2024, by Krd (No ticket permission since 6 January 2024). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:35, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Claire Mouradian, depicted on the picture, does not wish for this picture to be on Commons. She feels her "droit à l'image" (personnality rights) is being infringed upon. As the photographer of this picture, I want to respect her wishes and remove it. RSVartanian (talk) 10:34, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:35, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I am the author and uploader of this file and I request that this file be deleted. this file data is weakly based on its sources. sources do not provide population and diviosn based data. another version of ethnic map is available and this file is useless and data shown is not being confiormed by sources. Iretn 847362 (talk) 12:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused map with unreliable info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:40, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
I am the author and uploader of this file and I request that this file be deleted. this file data is weakly based on its sources. sources do not provide population and diviosn based data. another version of ethnic map is available and this file is useless and data shown is not being confiormed by sources. Iretn 847362 (talk) 12:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused map with unreliable info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:40, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
I am the author and uploader of this file and I request that this file be deleted. this file data is weakly based on its sources. sources do not provide population and diviosn based data. another version of ethnic map is available and this file is useless and data shown is not being confiormed by sources. Iretn 847362 (talk) 12:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused map with unreliable info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:40, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
I am the author and uploader of this file and I request that this file be deleted. this file data is weakly based on its sources. sources do not provide population and diviosn based data. another version of ethnic map is available and this file is useless and data shown is not being confiormed by sources. Iretn 847362 (talk) 12:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused map with unreliable info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:40, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
I am the author and uploader of this file and I request that this file be deleted. this file data is weakly based on its sources. sources do not provide population and diviosn based data. another version of ethnic map is available and this file is useless and data shown is not being confiormed by sources. Iretn 847362 (talk) 12:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused map with unreliable info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:40, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
I am the author and uploader of this file and I request that this file be deleted. this file data is weakly based on its sources. sources do not provide population and diviosn based data. another version of ethnic map is available and this file is useless and data shown is not being confiormed by sources. Iretn 847362 (talk) 12:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused map with unreliable info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:40, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
I am the author and uploader of this file and I request that this file be deleted. this file data is weakly based on its sources. sources do not provide population and diviosn based data. another version of ethnic map is available and this file is useless and data shown is not being confiormed by sources. Iretn 847362 (talk) 12:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused map with unreliable info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:40, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
I am the author and uploader of this file and I request that this file be deleted. this file data is weakly based on its sources. sources do not provide population and diviosn based data. another version of ethnic map is available and this file is useless and data shown is not being confiormed by sources. Iretn 847362 (talk) 12:24, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused map with unreliable info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:40, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
I am the author and uploader of this file and I request that this file be deleted. this file data is weakly based on its sources. sources do not provide population and diviosn based data. another version of ethnic map is available and this file is useless and data shown is not being confiormed by sources. Iretn 847362 (talk) 12:24, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused map with unreliable info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:40, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
I am the author and uploader of this file and I request that this file be deleted. this file data is weakly based on its sources. sources do not provide population and diviosn based data. another version of ethnic map is available and this file is useless and data shown is not being confiormed by sources. Iretn 847362 (talk) 12:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Yes,the map is completely wrong,this map was drawn in favor of the Azari people EHSAN.USEF (talk) 18:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:11, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
I am the author and uploader of this file and I request that this file be deleted. this file data is weakly based on its sources. sources do not provide population and diviosn based data. another version of ethnic map is available and this file is useless and data shown is not being confiormed by sources. Iretn 847362 (talk) 12:24, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:11, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
No copy right issue — Preceding unsigned comment added by डॉक्टर रघुवीर सिंह (talk • contribs) 03:47, 29. Dez. 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:11, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Is this own work? The metadata give author: "Aliza Schlabach Photography". Copyright? Wouter (talk) 13:38, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:12, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Missing camera EXIF, low resolution. 'Copyright 2016. All right reserved' in metadata. Uploaded by user with two edits, the other one was blatant copyvio. Komarof (talk) 13:50, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:13, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" - Urheberin und abgebildete Person sollen identisch sein - es handelt sich aber offensichtlich nicht um ein Selfie Lutheraner (talk) 13:51, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:14, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Watermark suggests it's a copyrighted image Syrus257 (talk) 15:21, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- PD-author-FlickrPDM licensed. Solomon203 (talk) 01:33, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: image no longer available on Flickr and license was not yet confirmed, fails COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:16, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Replaced with File:EcostagePledgeGreen.png. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:57, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:16, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Replaced with File:EHEDG transparent logo.png. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:01, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Improper copyright claim. This is clearly a screen cap of a tv broadcast, as seen by the virtual ads paced on the field which are not actually there. Look at the foot of the player standing on the Air New Zealand ad and it's clear. oknazevad (talk) 21:55, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. From what I can tell, these are actual painted advertisements on the field. They are painted to look 3D or be easily readable from the camera perspective. The foot of the player you mention doesn't provide any convincing evidence to me. Sometimes TV broadcasts do what you are saying. What is telling here is that you can see the texture of the grass through the paint. When they project the ads onto the field digitally, you can't see that. The camera EXIF data, high resolution and lack of digital artifacts also supports the case for legitimacy. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient evidence for deletion, as per User:IronGargoyle. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:29, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The most recent Finder logo is fair use on English Wikipedia, therefore this image is a derivative of them. Some of the other Finder images might be fair use as well depending on how complex they are. Xeroctic (talk) 11:53, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Royalbroil 23:59, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Uncredited screenshot of Reuters news footage, not yet public domain in the US: https://www.britishpathe.com/asset/227418/ Belbury (talk) 11:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: not public domain in United States. --Royalbroil 00:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Work by Agnes Martin (1912-2004) is subject to copyright 77.63.75.135 16:27, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
![16:27, 28 December 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/12/28#c-77.63.75.135-20231228162700-File:Plate_11_from_"Bar_from_clear_day"..jpg){kind=link}
- Comment A rectangular grid of regularly spaced lines can carry a copyright? Wondering, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:TOO United States paintings (almost all not okay). --Royalbroil 00:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
![00:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/12/28#c-Royalbroil-20240211004000-File:Plate_11_from_"Bar_from_clear_day"..jpg){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama for buildings in South Korea. ✗plicit 13:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Keep건축가 Min Gyu-am이 서울중앙지법(Seoul Central District Court)에 소송을 제기한 사건은 원고 Min Gyu-am의 승소가 아니고 화해이다. 제(hyolee2/H.L.LEE (talk))가 서울중앙지법(Seoul Central District Court)에 어느 언론사가 제가 촬영한 어느 경찰서의 사진을 사용한 건은 원고(hyolee2/H.L.LEE (talk))에 사진의 저작권이 있다고 인정되어 승소했다.--hyolee2/H.L.LEE (talk) 20:22, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. @Hyolee2: , South Korean law still does not recognize commercial freedom of panorama. The case ended in settlement, but the settlement is favorable to the architect, so we do not treat this thing lightly. We can only accept newer Korean monuments and architecture like this if the fourth condition at the Korean FoP provision is removed, so that copies can now be exploited commercially, that is mandated by commercial Creative Commons licenses. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:54, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Keep 이 정도로 단순한 학교 건물에까지 파노라마의 자유에 대한 소송을 제기한 사례는 대한민국에 없고, 없을 것입니다. 한국과 관련된 사진 자료에 대해 과도하게 엄격한 규정을 적용한다면 위키미디어 운동에 참여할 한국인은 남아나지 않을 것이 불보듯 뻔합니다.--Trainholic (talk) 17:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Trainholic address your rants to the Korean legislature instead of Wikimedia Commons admins/nominators, on why the Korean law's Article 35(2) is not made to conform to Internet and free culture age. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:32, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Atlantis The Royal, Dubai
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 50 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in United Arab Emirates.
- File:Atlantis The Royal, Dubai 3.jpg
- File:Atlantis The Royal, Dubai 5.jpg
- File:Atlantis The Royal, Dubai.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 14:54, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:33, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Ich habe eine neue Datei mit demselben Inhalt hochgeladen -> siehe S-Bahn Stuttgart.svg Jonnykwe (talk) 21:52, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 05:30, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Habe eine neue Datei mit demselben Inhalt hochgeladen (siehe Liniennetz S-Bahn Stuttgart 2024.svg). Außerdem beinhaltet diese Datei mehrere Fehler und ich habe an allen Stellen, an denen sie benutzt wird, diese durch die neue Datei ersetzt Jonnykwe (talk) 19:25, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:37, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Derivative image of an original cited source image (which has copyright status: © 2003 Académie des sciences/Éditions scientifiques et médicales Elsevier SAS. Tous droits réservés). The image in Wikimedia Commons seems very similar to the source image except for a vertical flip and a horizontall flip, with colouring of the data points and colouring of some text. Are these changes enough to classify this as an original image? Or should it be deleted because the source image does not allow derivatives? GeoWriter (talk) 20:31, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- It took me 10 hours of work yesterday to create this new image.
- It is not forbidden to use a diagram type that someone else has also used when it comes to visualising temporal coincidences. It can also be represented along a vertical axis with the lettering left and right, but then the diagram becomes very broad because at some points so many magmatic provinces have to be enumerated that were formed at the same time.
- I think we have the same problem here as in medicine with anatomical drawings. If you draw them differently, they become wrong. Is that why you can't draw organ systems? Because the same organ systems can already be seen in anatomy books? I haven't used anything from the original, it's not an edited original but a completely new drawing of the same thing in the same form of representation. Sciencia58 (talk) 07:39, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- In geology, there is a convention that you draw the old at the bottom and the young at the top, just as the layers normally are.
- I find the diagram in the publication confusing because the course of time starts at the top right and ends at the bottom left with a zero, so you think you must start reading at the bottom left, where diagrams usually begin. It is difficult to understand for an inexperienced reader and the scales on the sides are sloppy, the distances between the lines are different. I have precisely drawn time scales on the sides. I sometimes wonder what kind of inaccurate work people get paid for. I make more precise and visually appealing graphics and get nothing. Sciencia58 (talk) 12:18, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Please compare with the confusing image in the publication Sciencia58 (talk) 09:36, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- If I had only doubled the size of the original image and not redrawn every line myself and not rewritten every word myself, the lines and the lettering would look like this: https://puu.sh/JXPCZ/8d4cf03683.png Sciencia58 (talk) 09:36, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment - An alternative is to just plot the data from Table 1 in the source (which is factual and not copyrightable) in a way that is sufficiently different to the original. The particular cross-plot used by the authors is a little unusual, which might be an issue as that's the original part of the diagram. You could, however, plot the same data above and below a horizontal timeline as time ranges to allow the same comparison. I personally find the cross plot used somewhat confusing as it isn't actually plotting one variable against another, which that sort of plot generally implies. Having said all that, my (possibly uninformed) opinion is that your version is probably sufficiently different, but if there's another simple way to plot the same data, why not do that. Mikenorton (talk) 18:00, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- In the diagram, one variable is plotted against another. Sometimes a geological event does not coincide exactly with a specified time period or the end of a time period, but happened slightly before or after. Then the orange dot is not exactly on the line. The fact that so many points lie exactly on the line enabled Courtillot and Rennes to show that there are temporal coincidences that strongly indicate causal relationships. They could thus also prove that the anoxic events in the oceans with the mass extinctions of the marine fauna were caused by the volcanic events, which are arranged chronologically on the right-hand side of the diagram.
- Scotese continued to work on this topic.
- Someone is welcome to create another diagram from the data. I've done my job, if that's not welcome, too bad for Wikipedia, because without a clear chronological overview of the events, nobody who hasn't already studied the subject will be able to make sense of our articles. My diagram is different enough that no one could accuse us of copyright infringement. The only reason to delete it would be that someone might get jealous because I did it so well. Sciencia58 (talk) 08:13, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Sciencia58, your contributions are welcome but they must not violate international copyright laws and Wikimedia Commons copyright rules. If an image does not meet the copyright requirements of Wikimedia Commons, the image cannot be included in Wikipedia Commons. If a new image looks too similar to the original image, then the number of hours of effort spent to create the new image is not relevant to its copyright status. The copyright status of the image that you uploaded will be decided by the administrators of Wikimedia Commons, not by me. I am only giving my opinion. In my opinion, the image you uploaded is too similar to the original image and I think it is a derivative of the original image (not merely using the factual data points), which would be a copyright violation because the original image does not allow derivatives. Please see Commons:Derivative works for some information about derivatives. Also, why have you uploaded twelve more recent versions of this image, with only the explanatory comment of "so", after this image was tagged for discussion? GeoWriter (talk) 23:01, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- I have made several small improvements. I had uploaded the picture too early. The arrows were initially still from the original image. I then drew my own arrows. By the way, arrows are extremely labour-intensive if they have to be fitted into existing images. It took me a whole day to draw the arrows on the File:Cycle of rocks 1.png, because the overall picture has to show harmonious circles. I work in Paint. I can only use whole circles or make curved lines manually.
- There is one aspect of copyright: a drawing must have a certain level of creativity in order to be able to claim copyright protection. There are many simple drawings that do not have this level of creativity. A diagram with a square frame has no level of creativity. Neither does a diagonal line from one corner to the other. Even the small circles are abstract symbols without creative level. My small circles also look different. The technical terms for the time periods and the volcanic events are commonly used. They are not subject to copyright. That would be the end of all science. I have now changed the order within the lines when naming the volcanic events. Any other diagram created from this data would look exactly the same. Copyright law does not require that you can only create a single diagram from published data that belongs to the first publisher. There is also the option of writing to the publisher and asking whether diagrams with the same content may be drawn. Of course, that would only be a rhetorical question. Sciencia58 (talk) 07:20, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- I am in the process of making an updated diagram of the global paleoclimate, taken from Scotese's PDF page 5, because the diagram we use in the articles on climate change etc. is out of date. Scotese has revised his diagram himself with new data. I will write to him and ask him personally if I can use his new temperature curve. He will laugh and say: of course. But I will ask him to send an OTRS release. If these were all declared copyright infringements, we could stop our work here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Paleoclimate_over_time
- I will contact him anyways, I have been in contact with him before, he is a very nice person. Sciencia58 (talk) 07:24, 3 January 2024 (UTC) I wrote an email to him. It can take some time, until he answers. Sciencia58 (talk) 19:51, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Wow I am so happy, Christopher Scotese has answered already this morning: Climate image. Sciencia58 (talk) 09:34, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
keep does not meet the threshold of originality and is therefore in the public domain. Copyright protects only the presentation, not the content. The presentation here is the simple most possible: a 45 degree line correlating two scales. Nothing protected in that. --h-stt !? 20:17, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: The chart's underlying data is not copyrightable, so anyone can make a new chart based on the same data. —holly {chat} 19:42, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Per the consensus formed in this discussion, "We cannot use material from any VOA site dated after June 2013." According to the source, the file is published on April 28, 2015. Mhhossein talk 11:37, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
I'd like to add the following to the list:
- File:103rd Street in Johannesburg has been nicknamed "Mogadishio" for its large Somali community. (VOA S. Honorine).jpg
- File:10th death anniversary of Zhao Ziyang 04.jpg
- File:2014 cumhurbaşkanlığı seçimi için oy veren vatandaş.jpg
- File:2014 Hong Kong June 4th Candlelight Vigil (10).jpg
- File:2014 Hong Kong June 4th Candlelight Vigil (13).jpg
- File:2014 Hong Kong June 4th Candlelight Vigil (12).jpg
- File:2014 Hong Kong June 4th Candlelight Vigil (11).jpg
- File:2015 03 10 Hillary Clinton by Voice of America (cropped to collar).jpg
- File:2015 03 10 Hillary Clinton by Voice of America.jpg
- File:2015 03 10 Hillary Clinton by Voice of America (cropped to face).jpg
- File:2015 Bangkok bombing VOA 6.jpg
- File:2015 Bangkok bombing VOA 9.jpg
- File:2015 Hallowenn dog costume party 10.jpg
- File:2015 Hallowenn dog costume party 2.jpg
- File:2015 Hallowenn dog costume party 3.jpg
- File:2015 Bangkok bombing VOA 5.jpg --Mhhossein talk 11:46, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Withdrew the nomination, thanks to User:Taivo's reminding. --Mhhossein talk 06:24, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --Jcb (talk) 17:03, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Source video „Messages from the Land of Epic Battles #8“ by al-Furqān Media. https://jihadology.net/2013/09/26/al-furqan-media-presents-a-new-video-message-from-the-islamic-state-of-iraq-and-al-sham-messages-from-the-land-of-epic-battles-6/ Viii23dawari (talk) 10:22, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Viii23dawari, if the video was shot by a kidnappee or journalist, it's probably unfree. If the video was shot by a terrorist, it should be considered that the terrorists do not recognize their government, its copyright laws or the Berne Convention. This essentially boils down to {{PD-self}}. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; it doesn't matter if a terrorist refuses to recognize the legitimacy of their own government, as they are still under its jurisdiction (see also: sovereign citizen), and as such, they are still afforded copyright protection unless they specifically waive it. —holly {chat} 19:56, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo is very obviously not uploader's own work, as it a) was taken no later than 1960 and b) can plausibly be considered evidence of the photographer's participation in war crimes Yann (talk) 16:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Malaysia. Yann (talk) 16:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Malaysia says, copyright for unknown creators lasts fifty years after publication. Uploader cites Asoka Guikon's A People’s History of Malaya: The New Emergency from 1980. Was it published anywhere before that? (Probably, it looks like it was taken from a newspaper. But when was that newspaper published?) DS (talk) 18:16, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Even assuming a 1960 publication date, 50 years protection means it became PD in 2011 at the earliest, which is after the URAA restoration date. —holly {chat} 19:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Retirement Anouncement for Bobbie R. Allen, Director of the Bureau of Aviation Safety, NTSB.pdf
[edit]Out of scope: counterfeit document? This was obviously not created in 1968; it's a modern document created in Microsoft Word with an older-looking header pasted onto it. Omphalographer (talk) 16:44, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Sir.
- My name is William Allen, and I am constructing a Wikipedia page to document the career of my father, Bobbie R. Allen who was the Director of the Bureau of Aviation Safety at the National Transportation Safety Board until 1968.
- I appreciate the value of oversight to ensure the integrity of Wikipedia data. I can assure you however, that all documents uploaded to Wiki for the Bobbie R. Allen Wikipedia project, which I manage, are in fact, valid and true representations of the original documents which are in the possession of Bobbie R. Allen's family.
- I will be happy to provide additional proof of authenticity should you need such.
- William D. Allen Wdallen49 (talk) 23:28, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- The metadata attached to this file (not to mention the level of detail) indicates unambiguously that it was created and printed in Microsoft Word by someone named Bill Allen on July 30, 2023. Omphalographer (talk) 00:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- The uploaded image was generated by scanning the original document using a digital scanner. That image was then uploaded into Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro Extended to enable Text Recognition. Once the text was identified it was duplicated into Microsoft Word in order to allow text to be found when searching. Although there is obviously metadata attached, we believe the final image of the document is representative of the original. Wdallen49 (talk) 01:29, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- The metadata attached to this file (not to mention the level of detail) indicates unambiguously that it was created and printed in Microsoft Word by someone named Bill Allen on July 30, 2023. Omphalographer (talk) 00:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment @Wdallen49: Would it be possible to upload a straight unmodified scan of the original document (eg in png or other image format)? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:37, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- I have discovered an original document and will upload it as soon as possible. Wdallen49 (talk) 10:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Wdallen49: I see that you have uploaded File:Bobbie R. Allen, Retirement Notice, NTSB, 1968.pdf. Can you edit the page so that you put in the exact URL where you got the file from? Right now it just says "Google search". Thanks. —holly {chat} 19:35, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- I have discovered an original document and will upload it as soon as possible. Wdallen49 (talk) 10:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: replaced by File:Bobbie R. Allen, Retirement Notice, NTSB, 1968.pdf. —holly {chat} 20:51, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Diese Datei stammt noch von meinen alten Bestrebungen, alle Zustände der S-Bahn Stuttgart zu visualisieren, das verfolge ich derzeit nicht Jonnykwe (talk) 21:55, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Diese Datei beinhaltet Fehler und ich werde bald eine neue Version dieser Datei hochladen, sowie auch von allen anderen Jahren. Siehe auch Liniennetz S-Bahn Stuttgart 2024.svg. Dies ist die neue Version vom jetzingen Zustand. Jonnykwe (talk) 19:20, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Jonnykwe: Did you make a new version yet? If yes, what is the file name? —holly {chat} 19:36, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Jonnykwe: bump. —holly {chat} 23:14, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Krd 14:01, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Vermutlich kein eigenes Werk. Die Verbindung dürfte noch jung sein (vermutlich erst nach der Wende gegründet), daher greift noch das Urheberrecht. GerritR (talk) 19:39, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:03, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Gower as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FERRERO ROCHER is a trademark of FERRERO S.P.A..
I wonder if it does't meet de minimis rule. Simple plastic box, chocolates in plain gold papers and text are below COM:TOO. The only copyrighted items are those graphics depicting piles of chocolates but they are very small and the photo does not focus on them. If someone cropps the photo to show them as a main subject such deriviative photo would be of very low resolution. ~Cybularny Speak? 19:48, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment Trademarks are not policed by Commons, but why wouldn't the logo be above COM:TOO? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:03, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Cybularny, Italy has a high ToO in addition. --Abzeronow (talk) 23:47, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}