Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/10/19
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
secretary document Rithiporn (talk) 10:57, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 11:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
{{SD|F1}} Alectricity (talk) 03:37, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:57, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Uhooep as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Clearly not taken in 2023, one of the subjects died in 1993 Yann (talk) 09:24, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Keep PD-UK-unknown --RAN (talk) 12:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: OK now. --Yann (talk) 12:41, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Uhooep as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Clearly not taken in 2023, one of the subjects died in 1960 Yann (talk) 09:25, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Jamaica. --RAN (talk) 11:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: OK now. --Yann (talk) 13:11, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Uhooep as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Clearly not taken in 2023, subject died in 1946 Yann (talk) 09:25, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Jamaica --RAN (talk) 11:57, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: OK now. --Yann (talk) 13:06, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Uuuuuuuu 2607:FB91:19FC:CDC5:AC39:BE31:E281:2E81 13:36, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism by known LTA from Florida. --Achim55 (talk) 13:56, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Uuuuuuuu 2607:FB91:19FC:CDC5:AC39:BE31:E281:2E81 14:49, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: LTA uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 19:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Uuuuuuuu 2607:FB91:19FC:CDC5:AC39:BE31:E281:2E81 14:50, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: LTA uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 19:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Uuuuuuuu 2607:FB91:19FC:CDC5:AC39:BE31:E281:2E81 14:50, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: LTA uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 19:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
hujijhhjhh 50.250.122.200 16:19, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 16:22, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Uuuuuuuu 2607:FB91:19FC:CDC5:AC39:BE31:E281:2E81 17:50, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism by known LTA from Florida. --Achim55 (talk) 19:31, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/File:Regions of the Floridian State.png
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj 2607:FB91:1937:8B3C:AC39:60F1:6826:5C01 01:16, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wutsje 03:43, 6 May 2023 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj 2607:FB91:1928:4B05:AC39:60F1:50A9:1ECE 14:17, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Uploader's request, vandalism by a known LTA from Florida. --Achim55 (talk) 14:59, 27 May 2023 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Ggggggggggfttttftttttttfttt Bastianmalata (talk) 23:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Uploader's request, vandalism by a known LTA from Florida. --Achim55 (talk) 13:25, 5 June 2023 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj 2607:FB91:197D:89A0:AC39:60F1:FDC0:6E30 15:38, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Uploader's request, vandalism by a known LTA from Florida. --Achim55 (talk) 15:40, 27 June 2023 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj 2607:FB91:C1B:1777:AC39:60F1:FACB:8DE4 15:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: as usual. --Achim55 (talk) 17:33, 3 July 2023 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Jkkkkkkkkkjj 2601:58A:8E81:DBD0:4128:A298:5A21:E65 18:41, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: as usual. --Achim55 (talk) 19:31, 8 September 2023 (UTC) |
Uuuuuuuu 2607:FB91:19FC:CDC5:AC39:BE31:E281:2E81 17:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism by known LTA from Florida. --Achim55 (talk) 19:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Hhhhhhhhhhhhhya 172.56.78.206 17:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism by known LTA from Florida. --Achim55 (talk) 20:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Gksyy (talk) 13:45, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:26, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
dios pls la cage Pablito77779 (talk) 22:27, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 07:24, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Blatant COM:NOTWEBHOST violation, uploaded to replace the same image after a speedy deletion. Sumanuil (talk) 06:53, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Please don't delete files
- I requesting
- Ajit kumar 19w files any don't delete Ajitkumarsahu19world (talk) 16:54, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Begging is unseemly. Facebook will happily host your profile photo, but it doesn't belong here.Sumanuil (talk) 20:14, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Delete If you contribute a few hundred constructive posts that are not of or about you and your YouTube channel, you will be allowed to upload a few profile pics. That's the deal here. Read COM:SCOPE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:58, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- And while you're at it, quit breaking the discussion notification templates. It won't make the discussion go away. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 03:26, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Günther Frager (talk) 11:55, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:43, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Blatant COM:NOTWEBHOST violation. Sumanuil (talk) 07:03, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Please don't delete I requesting ajit kumar files do not delete Ajitkumarsahu19world (talk) 16:58, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Commons is not social media. Put your profile pic on Facebook, not here.Sumanuil (talk) 19:34, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Günther Frager (talk) 11:56, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:42, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
https://www.gettyimages.ch/detail/nachrichtenfoto/thierry-huguenin-is-the-sole-survivor-of-the-ordre-du-nachrichtenfoto/607394372 NAADAAN (talk) 17:53, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, clear CV, false claims. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:31, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/File:Erect penis.jpg
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Bad quality, no realistic educational value, Commons has more than enough of these Wutsje (talk) 14:54, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: Out of project scope: another low resoluted image of the male genitalia which can be replaced ba many other better images we already have This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Author requests 2001:44B8:256:500:585F:1673:D152:6CE1 06:23, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Unused , low quality image of explicit subject - COM:NOPENIS Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:07, 22 September 2015 (UTC) Deleted: Alan (talk) 21:50, 18 October 2015 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:56, 8 September 2023 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:31, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, poorly photographed low quality image of very common object. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:34, 20 October 2023 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Yet another penis selfie Dronebogus (talk) 14:44, 25 October 2023 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:49, 1 November 2023 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 07:06, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 03:56, 18 November 2023 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Com:Penis 186.174.90.17 20:07, 4 June 2024 (UTC) Deleted: previously deleted under another name. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:27, 5 June 2024 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Hi. These are mine. A friend of mine uploaded these without my knowledge. Please delete this photo and all the other photos uploaded from this account.and Hello worldsd (talk) 07:57, 18 August 2024 (UTC) Deleted: all your cocks and banned your account. Taylor 49 (talk) 22:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC) Deleted: already deleted by Achim55. --Rosenzweig τ 22:25, 18 August 2024 (UTC) |
This image is not intended for public use and needs to be removed Optout123 (talk) 02:42, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: Insufficient rationale. Uploaded 15 years ago, ticket:2008021010002433, in use on 13 projects. --Achim55 (talk) 07:56, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep Yes, and CC licenses are irrevocable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:16, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Strange apparently nonsensical request by new user. Image has been on Commons since 2008, has had Wikimedia VRTS ticket since 2020, and is in use in multiple projects. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:37, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Uhooep as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Clearly not taken in 2023, one of the subjects died in 1962 Yann (talk) 09:25, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Jamaica and PD-1996. --RAN (talk) 17:32, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: OK now. --Yann (talk) 21:16, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
G10: Files and pages created as advertisements DanielPenfield (talk) 06:42, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 09:27, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
G10: Files and pages created as advertisements DanielPenfield (talk) 06:43, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 09:27, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:37, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:34, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:37, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:20, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:37, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company w/ SEO keyword cats, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:21, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:37, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promotional pictures uploaded by company, no non-vanity page use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:38, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by likely company ref, no use outside failed AfC spam draft Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:30, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:38, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:30, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:38, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by likely company rep, no use outside failed AfC spam draft Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:30, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:38, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, ad promo image uploaded by company among a batch of them, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:31, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:39, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:39, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM; promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:53, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:39, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:39, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by now banned company account, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:13, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:39, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by likely company rep, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:15, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:40, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by likely company rep, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:15, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:40, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:26, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:40, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Own work and COM:SCOPE concern, and the title "terrorist" is inappropriate as well A1Cafel (talk) 04:25, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete In scope if real, and titles and descriptions can be changed, but highly unlikely own work. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:08, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G3. Content intended as vandalism, threat, or attack. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, uploaded by company for promo purposes ("seo" in username), no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:26, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by likely company rep, no non-wikidata usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:34, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by likely company rep, no non-wikidata usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:35, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:37, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep ("incu" username), no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:39, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, dubious license, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:40, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, previous deletion request closed as out of scope but this image escaped somehow Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:41, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo picture uploaded by company, dubious license, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:42, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:45, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo/ad images uploaded by likely brand rep, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:53, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:42, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:55, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. Files and pages created as advertisements. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:42, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
This photo, or more precisely, this dinosaur is not in Styrassic Park. 5.206.203.18 13:31, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: You know what Styrassic Park looked like 33 years (watermark bottom right) ago? --Achim55 (talk) 13:53, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- The construction of the Styrassic Park was with 1998. 5.206.203.18 10:39, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep It looks like this image is from the now closed Saurierpark Traismauer (See this pic.) The file name (and maybe other details) need to be corrected, but the image shouldn't be deleted because of that. —Tcr25 (talk) 18:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- This photo has nothing to do with Styrassic Park. We as operators of the Styrassic Park are not happy with it. If the page describes the Styrassic Park, then not some 'symbolic photo' should be shown.
- Therefore we ask for deletion of this photo. 5.206.203.18 10:35, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- There's not a copyright reason for deletion. However, the file information and name should be corrected. If it's used on a page related to Styrassic Park, then it should be removed from that page. —Tcr25 (talk) 14:06, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- I've removed it from the de-wiki page for Styrassic Park and from the Commons category. I've also added at {{Fact disputed}} tag to the image, which can be renamed if it's kept after deletion review. —Tcr25 (talk) 14:14, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- There's not a copyright reason for deletion. However, the file information and name should be corrected. If it's used on a page related to Styrassic Park, then it should be removed from that page. —Tcr25 (talk) 14:06, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: and renamed to File:Saurierpark Traismauer 1990 (50978947447).jpg. --Achim55 (talk) 15:43, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
WP: COI Parbon (talk) 20:14, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Conflict of interest is not a Commons policy. Would you like to try another deletion reason? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:08, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete It is a copyvio. The image is widely available on the web. For example here: https://nettv4u.com/celebrity/bengali/director/simit-ray-antor. Günther Frager (talk) 20:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:16, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use outside wikidata Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
It cannot be proven that it is the uploader's own work. Based on the cutting situation, it is suspected to be a stolen video screenshot. Kmchang28 (talk) 01:05, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
It cannot be proven that it is the uploader's own work. Based on the cutting situation, it is suspected to be a stolen video screenshot. Kmchang28 (talk) 01:06, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Duquedemexico (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused, likely fictitious coats of arms and monograms.
- File:ESCUDO CASA DE LOS REMEDIOS (2).jpg
- File:Ducado del reino de Mexico.png
- File:Monograma en gerardo de los remedios en paint.png
- File:Señorio de la Villa Alpina.png
- File:Condado de castillo de animas.png
Omphalographer (talk) 01:34, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:16, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused low-quality (JPEG) arrow symbol. Omphalographer (talk) 01:35, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:36, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: low quality, unused diagram. (This looks like it's been through a couple too many format conversions.) Omphalographer (talk) 01:44, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:36, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Banners are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:36, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:36, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 02:48, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:36, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 02:49, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:36, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 02:49, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:36, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bulgaria A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:36, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:37, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:37, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:37, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Concattedrale Gran Madre di Dio
[edit]Unfortunately there's FOP in Italy and the architect of this church, Gio Ponti, died in 1979. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2050.
- File:Concattedrale 1.jpg
- File:Concattedrale di Taranto (Italy), a forma di vela, realizzata dall'Architetto GIO' PONTI.jpg
- File:Concattedrale di Taranto vista aerea.jpg
- File:Concattedrale Gran Madre di Dio (Taranto).jpg
- File:Concattedrale Gran Madre di Dio.jpg
- File:Concattedrale gran madre di dio.jpg
- File:Cripta Concattedrale Gran Madre di Dio.jpg
- File:GranMadreDiDio-TA.jpg
- File:PANORAMICA- Concattedrale Gran Madre di Dio.jpg
- File:Taranto - Concattedrale Gran Madre di Dio - 2023-09-08 16-09-50 001.jpg
- File:Taranto - Concattedrale Gran Madre di Dio - 2023-09-08 16-10-58 001.jpg
- File:Wideangle..jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 03:14, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:16, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Blatant copyright violation. Literally Teddy's NHL team headshot for the 23-24 season. DannyMusicEditor (talk) 04:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:39, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:56, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:56, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, no non-wikidata usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, no non-wikidata usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image by company, SEO keyword cats, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:09, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image upload by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:12, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo image uploads in batch by company, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:13, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo image uploads in batch by company, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:14, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo image uploads in batch by company, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:14, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo image uploads in batch by company, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:14, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo upload by company, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:18, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo upload by company, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:20, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images by company rep, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:21, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images by company rep, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:21, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images by company rep, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:21, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images by company rep, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:21, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
This violates copyright. There is no indication the editor got permission for this image. NHL.com has copyright ownership HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 05:37, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:38, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
This violates copyright. There is no indication the editor got permission for this image. NHL has copyright ownership HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 05:38, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:38, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of Troll face Trade (talk) 05:40, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Unlikely COM:EDUSE. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 05:50, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of Commons scope. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:40, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:09, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, clearly promotional image/desc uploaded by company, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:12, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM - promo image uploaded by company, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:43, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM - promo image uploaded by company, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:43, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo spam images uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:46, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:48, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted art work of Sergio Franzoi
[edit]- File:Paesaggio di Marghera di Sergio Franzoi.jpg
- File:Amanti Sergio Franzoi.jpg
- File:I sopravvissuti Sergio Franzoi.jpg
- File:Il clown Sergio Franzoi.jpg
- File:Dopo la catastrofe Sergio Franzoi.jpg
- File:Composizione di Sergio Franzoi.jpg
- File:Composizione 2 di Sergio Franzoi.jpg
- File:Composizione 3 di Sergio Franzoi.jpg
- File:Composizione 4 di Sergio Franzoi.jpg
- File:Astratto finale di sergio franzoi.jpg
- File:Astratto con Freccia bozzetto di Sergio Franzoi.jpg
- File:Mosaico, padiglione rosso, Ospedale al Mare.png
Sergio Franzoi is an Italian painter and died on 2022. His art works are copyrighted. No evidence of copyleft notice on the source: RAAM Project. This procedure follows this one: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CorrectIT90 on the same topic. --Harlock81 (talk) 08:38, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:47, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
unused formula that can easily be replaced by TeX; no educational value due to missing description Jochen Burghardt (talk) 08:44, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:47, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kendry c.c (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Casanavegun.jpg
- File:Mgp-79.jpg
- File:Sc and fnfal.jpg
- File:Sc-2005d.jpg
- File:San isidro lima.jpg
- File:Fad gu.jpg
- File:Lima skyline.jpg
- File:Barranco skyline.jpg
- File:Lima smart.jpg
- File:Lince city.jpg
- File:San miguel city.jpg
- File:La molina city.png
- File:Campo de marte lima.jpg
- File:San borja lima.jpg
- File:Lima pueblo libre.jpg
- File:Jesus maria modern.jpg
- File:Magdalena night.jpg
- File:Malecon barranco.jpg
- File:Barranco malecon.jpg
- File:Surco city.jpg
- File:Miraflores city.jpg
- File:Skyline san isidro.jpg
- File:Build lima.jpg
- File:Towerdt.jpg
- File:Musea de lima.jpg
- File:Musea.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Archivo: solicitudes de eliminación / archivos cargados por Kendry c.c
[edit]Hola EugeneZelenko,
he leído su mensaje. Le agradezco que haya notado algo malo sobre las fotos subidas, las fotos fueron creadas mi sin ninguna copia alguna, la razón por la cual no tienen buenas resoluciones y que carece de EXIF es para proteger las fotos de los piratas ciberneticos que deambulan clonando fotos como las mias es por esa misma razón es que carecen de las sigientes reglas, las fotos las comparti con algunas paginas nacionales e internacionales con mi permiso sin abusar de ellas, muchisimas gracias por su atención.
gracias
Kendry c.c
--Kendry c.c (talk) 16:51, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:02, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kendry c.c (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work, small sizes withput EXIFs, uploader already uploded copyvios
Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:25, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kendry c.c (talk · contribs)
[edit]User with a bad history, very unlikely to be own works.
- File:Suat pnp.jpg
- File:Suat logo.png
- File:FN FAL 97.jpg
- File:SC-2010 Carabina.jpg
- File:FAD versión 2.jpg
- File:Rieles.jpg
- File:SC-2010 peruvian gun.jpg
- File:SC-2010 Grenade Launcher 2019.jpg
- File:FAD 2018 rifle de asalto.jpg
Yann (talk) 08:47, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:48, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
unused formula that now has been be replaced by TeX at https://en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?title=Transportation_Deployment_Casebook/xxxxxxx&stable=0#The_S-Curve_Model Jochen Burghardt (talk) 08:53, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:48, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
unused formula that now has been be replaced by TeX at https://en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?title=Transportation_Deployment_Casebook/xxxxxxx&stable=0#The_S-Curve_Model Jochen Burghardt (talk) 08:53, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:49, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
unused formula; has been replaced by TeX at its sole occurrence at pt:Metapopulação Jochen Burghardt (talk) 08:59, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:59, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:49, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
unused formula that can easily be replaced by TeX Jochen Burghardt (talk) 08:59, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
unused formula that can easily be replaced by TeX Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
unused formula that can easily be replaced by TeX Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Replaced in sq:Qarqet trefazore with TeX equivalent:
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
(3).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg){kind=link}
_03.jpg){kind=link}
![275 File:Andreas Paolo Perger, "Cover of the album Relief".jpg](#File:Andreas_Paolo_Perger,_"Cover_of_the_album_Relief".jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_cropped.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_a_forma_di_vela,_realizzata_dall%27Architetto_GIO%27_PONTI.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 20:56, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Image can be used outside our projects if Tex is not available. --Elly (talk) 14:42, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
unused formula that can easily be replaced by TeX; no educational value due to missing description Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. We shouldn't feel the need to retain images of text (or out-of-scope images in general, really) just on the faint off-chance that someone on a non-Wikimedia site has hotlinked them. Omphalographer (talk) 17:50, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
unused formula that can easily be replaced by TeX; no educational value due to missing description Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:03, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
unused formula that can easily be replaced by TeX; no educational value due to missing description Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:03, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
unused formula that can easily be replaced by TeX; cf. en:Rendleman–Bartter model Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
has been replaced by Tex at its sole use en:Airbag launching Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:09, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
(3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
(3).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
has been replaced by Tex at its sole use en:Airbag launching Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:09, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
(3).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
(3).jpg){kind=link}
unused equation that can easily be replaced by TeX; poorly rasterized font Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:14, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:50, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Spam of a drug vendor. Pure 100% conflict of interest. Not in use now.
- File:Scale завод Производство ЭСКОМ.webp
- File:Производство ЭСКОМ05.webp
- File:0306 zataljevanje ampul2hd-1-scaled.webp
- File:Производство ЭСКОМ04.webp
- File:Производство ЭСКОМ02.webp
- File:Производство ЭСКОМ 01.webp
- File:Производство ЭСКОМ.webp
- File:Производсво эском.webp
- File:Эском лого на сайт.svg
Bilderling (talk) 09:36, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal promo picture, unused Enyavar (talk) 09:50, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Might be in scope, but clearly not a selfie, so lacking permission from the photographer. juancarlosguerrerobeltran@gmail.com can contact COM:VRT if he chooses to grant permission for this photo to have the appropriate license that allows commercial use of the image. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:47, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:51, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Unlike a own work: missing medata, seems captured from a video. 0x0a (talk) 10:20, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:50, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
File:HK TWD Tsuen Wan Plaza 荃灣廣場 mall 百老匯院線 Broadway Cinema current films July 2021 SS2 02.jpg
[edit]
Copyrighted screenshot in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 11:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:25, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
File:HK TWD Tsuen Wan Plaza 荃灣廣場 mall 百老匯院線 Broadway Cinema current films July 2021 SS2 03.jpg
[edit]
Copyrighted screenshot in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 11:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:25, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
File:HK TWD Tsuen Wan Plaza 荃灣廣場 mall 百老匯院線 Broadway Cinema current films July 2021 SS2 06.jpg
[edit]
Copyrighted screenshot in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 11:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:25, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted screenshot in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 11:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 11:05, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
File:HK SKD TKO 將軍澳 Tseung Kwan O 日出康城 Lohas Park 商場 the Lohas mall shop 陶源中菜 Sportful Garden Restaurant July 2021 SS2 14.jpg
[edit]
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 11:06, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
File:HK SKD TKO 將軍澳 Tseung Kwan O 日出康城 Lohas Park 商場 the Lohas mall shop 陶源中菜 Sportful Garden Restaurant July 2021 SS2 13.jpg
[edit]
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 11:06, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
File:HK SKD TKO 將軍澳 Tseung Kwan O 日出康城 Lohas Park 商場 the Lohas mall shop 陶源中菜 Sportful Garden Restaurant July 2021 SS2 12.jpg
[edit]
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 11:06, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 11:08, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 11:08, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 11:09, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:27, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 11:12, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:27, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 11:13, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:27, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 11:13, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:27, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 11:13, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:27, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Guledza Dominik
[edit]Self-promotion only, not-notable individual.
- File:Dömötör Csaba és Guledza Dominik a Magyar Országgyűlésben.jpg
- File:Guledza Dominik a magyar Országgyűlésben.jpg
- File:Guledza Dominik az Európai Parlamentben, Brüsszelben.jpg
- File:Guledza Dominik MCC.jpg
- File:MCC kampány.jpg
- File:Németh Szilárd, Guledza Dominik.jpg
- File:Orbán Viktor és Guledza Dominik a Magyar Országgyűlésben.jpg
- File:Poitikai beszéd az MCC Központban.jpg
- File:Sebastian Kurz és Guledza Dominik MCC Feszt.jpg
- File:Évértékelő 2023- Vitályos Eszter, Guledza Dominik, Hoppál Péter.jpg
Bencemac (talk) 12:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:27, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by apparent company rep w/ slogan (admitted in title), no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:08, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:53, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No commercial freedom of panorama in Kyrgyzstan QazyQazyQazaqstan (talk) 17:23, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company for use in since-deleted spam enwiki article, no other use Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:28, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, dubious license, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:28, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:25, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:25, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:25, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no usage outside now deleted vanity userpage Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:26, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company founder (identifies as such in his photo), no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:28, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company founder (identifies as such in his photo), no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:28, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, dubious license, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:30, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:33, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:33, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:34, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
File:Львівський національний академічний театр опери та балету імені Соломії Крушельницької 2022 року, грудень.jpg
[edit]
Повтор: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lviv_Theatre_of_Opera_and_Ballet_Grybyuk.jpg Hrybiuk (talk) 18:34, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:34, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, private photo from friend, no usage -- ato (talk) 18:49, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:47, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:48, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:49, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no proof that the cover of the music album is available under a free license. GAndy (talk) 18:49, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:49, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:50, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company (similar promo image by user already deleted as out of scope), no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:53, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:53, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:54, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:32, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Linked source says the license is Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. Non-commercial licenses are incompatible with Commons. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:58, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:32, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep ("Apple Gee" => APG), no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:32, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:32, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:32, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused image of the words "Tú y tu linda costumbre // De encantarme tanto". Omphalographer (talk) 19:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use outside company draft Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:03, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:32, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:32, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused image of the words "La Sonrisa en mi cara no significa que mi vida es perfecta. // Solo aprecio lo que tengo // Y lo que Dios me ha bendecido..." Omphalographer (talk) 19:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:32, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:05, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:32, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:06, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:33, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, dubious license ("the rights belong entirely to us" =/= CC), no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:06, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:33, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company for spam purposes ("Contact IAM"), no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:33, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Het overzicht is verouderd Verloren16 (talk) 19:09, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Not a deletion reason, but text files not in use are out of COM:SCOPE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:25, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:33, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:09, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:14, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope / copyvio: plain text, tons of uncredited/unlicensed images. Omphalographer (talk) 19:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, dubious license, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:14, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: image of text (a brief inspirational quote). Omphalographer (talk) 19:11, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 19:11, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, dubious license, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:12, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of many such images uploaded by likely company rep (see contribs), no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:13, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: image of inspirational text that's far too small to read. Omphalographer (talk) 19:20, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: image of text. Omphalographer (talk) 19:25, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: more images of text. Omphalographer (talk) 19:25, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:NOTHOST - unused image of non-notable person. Uploader's contribs also suggest COM:ADVERT issue (paid promotion/spam). Эlcobbola talk 19:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:14, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 19:53, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
_01.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:14, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
_01.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 19:54, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
_02.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:14, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
_02.jpg){kind=link}
_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_03.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 19:54, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
_03.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:14, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
_03.jpg){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 19:54, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:14, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 19:55, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:14, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 19:56, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Currently, the painting or image displayed does not exist; the photograph that is intended to be deleted commemorates an event that took place years ago. This photograph is part of a collection with historical significance.-- ElGuruCesar (talk) 20:14, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:14, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 19:56, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:14, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 19:56, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 19:57, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 19:57, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 19:57, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:12, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 19:57, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:12, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 19:58, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:12, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:59, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:12, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:12, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:12, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, dubious license, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:12, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company rep who admits on talkpage pics are for marketing purposes, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:09, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:13, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, out of scope image uploaded by company rep for marketing purposes, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:13, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:16, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Unidentifiable person CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:16, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:16, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, description written with likely SEO intent ("[business] in [location] is a very common SEO phrase especially when shoehorned in), no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:18, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by likely company rep, dubious license, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image that user outright admits marketing gave them to upload, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:21, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:23, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by likely rep, no use (last deletion discussion said "could be usable" but so far no use has emerged) Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:25, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by likely rep, no use (last deletion discussion said "could be usable" but so far no use has emerged) Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:25, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:40, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:41, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:47, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:49, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company rep ("marketing"), no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:50, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by banned company account, title betrays spam purpose, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:52, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company, dubious license, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:52, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company, dubious license, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:52, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:56, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- This is Picture is Shartra Technology Logo that has been copyright protected. How would reported as spam. 183.83.52.82 07:48, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple image uploaded by company rep ("Faceafrika" in username), no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:57, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple image uploaded by company rep ("Faceafrika" in username), no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:57, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:58, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, no use but title suggests it was an attempt to spam enwiki Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:58, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use but edit summary suggests it was a failed enwiki spam attempt Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:03, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use outside presumably deleted enwiki spam attempt Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:03, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by company, apparent spam attempt according to last deletion request that agreed it was out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:05, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by company, apparent spam attempt according to last deletion request that agreed it was out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:06, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by company, apparent spam attempt according to last deletion request that agreed it was out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:06, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by company, apparent spam attempt according to last deletion request that agreed it was out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:06, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by company, apparent spam attempt according to last deletion request that agreed it was out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:06, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use but seems to be created for failed nlwiki spam attempt Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:06, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by apparent company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:08, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:11, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep ("Pagearticle" - article marketing?), dubious license, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:12, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:12, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:13, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:18, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by apparent company rep, spammy language, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:21, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by apparent company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by apparent company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by apparent company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:23, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:07, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, part of a batch of several promo images uploaded by apparent company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:24, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:07, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, text too small to read but may be promo copy, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:25, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:07, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:07, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:52, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:07, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:55, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:06, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:56, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:06, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:57, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:06, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Only used for vandalism ro:Special:Diff/15891134. Gikü (talk) 22:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Delete: only used for vandalism and out of SCOPE (Note: uploaded by a confirmed vandal editor).Accipiter Gentilis Q. (talk) 06:03, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:06, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE personal pic. Gikü (talk) 22:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Delete: out of SCOPE (Note: uploaded by a confirmed vandal editor).Accipiter Gentilis Q. (talk) 06:02, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:06, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:15, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:06, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:16, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
![22:16, 19 October 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/10/19#c-CoffeeEngineer-20231019221600-File:Andreas_Paolo_Perger,_"Cover_of_the_album_Relief".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:06, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
![00:06, 26 October 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/10/19#c-Materialscientist-20231026000600-File:Andreas_Paolo_Perger,_"Cover_of_the_album_Relief".jpg){kind=link}
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:16, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:06, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:17, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple images uploaded by company for promo purposes, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:18, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:18, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple images uploaded by company for promo purposes, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:18, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:20, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:21, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:21, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:23, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:24, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:24, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:25, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:25, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:26, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:27, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, no use (dupe is in use) Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:27, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:28, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:28, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, no use outside abandoned AfC draft that seems spammy Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, desc sounds like keyword stuffing, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:34, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:34, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:35, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company rep ("our company") no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:36, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused logo of a non-notable YouTube channel (25 subscribers, 11 videos). Omphalographer (talk) 22:47, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:54, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by likely PR rep (other is spam for PR company), no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:56, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:58, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:58, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company rep (see userpage) , no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:05, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:09, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:11, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:14, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:15, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:15, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by banned company user, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:25, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by banned company user, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:25, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:26, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:31, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:33, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple images uploaded by likely company PR, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:34, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:38, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see how this could fail to be a copyright violation as a derivative work of the plaque. Jmabel ! talk 00:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:06, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
The Lula image appears to be copyrighted, per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lula - foto oficial05012007 edit.jpg Adeletron 3030 (talk) 01:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:07, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Threbirah as no permission (No permission since) Krd 02:08, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:07, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:12 rue Cassini, Paris
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and the architect of this building, Charles Abella, died in 1961. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2032.
- File:12 rue Cassini (38686247120).jpg
- File:12 rue Cassini Paris.jpg
- File:Paris 14e - Rue Cassini 12 Immeuble Abella MH.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 02:31, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and the architect of this monument, Charles Abella, died in 1961. So this image is copyrighted until at least 2032. Adamant1 (talk) 02:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Banners are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 02:39, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- We already had that for a different image of the same banner. This banner is permanet and it is also still there. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Banner Liqui-Moly-Stadion.jpg. Please cancel this dr. Ping to Marcus Cyron-- Chaddy (talk) 02:49, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Banners are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 02:41, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and the architect of this building complex, Émile Aillaud, died in 1988. So this image is copyrighted until at least 2059. Adamant1 (talk) 02:42, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and the architect of this staircase, Émile Aillaud, died in 1988. So this image is copyrighted until at least 2059. Adamant1 (talk) 02:43, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Montedoria building
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architect of this building, Gio Ponti, died in 1979. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2050.
- File:Milano - edificio Montedoria - facciata viale Doria.JPG
- File:Milano - edificio Montedoria - vista da est 01.JPG
- File:Milano - edificio Montedoria - vista da est 02.JPG
- File:Milano - edificio Montedoria - vista da est 03.JPG
Adamant1 (talk) 03:21, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Hardly usable file. Uncredited music. Out of scope. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 13:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:28, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Not in-use picture of an unknown teenager. The Commons is not an online photo album and cannot be a repository for just anything. Ldorfman (talk) 13:30, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:29, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Plain text document outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 13:36, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:29, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gnomingstuff as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10 Wdwd (talk) 13:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Clear spam: "MerrJep.al, the largest trading site in Albania. Here you can sell the items you don’t need, and buy the ones you do: Houses, Vehicles, Jobs, Cameras, Mobile Phones, and much more!" No use outside a failed AfC from 2019 that was also spam. Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:06, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:29, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Uploaded as own work, but this is self-evidently not the case,as it is a photo of an artist's painting. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:03, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:29, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation; artist of tapestry died in 2005 (pd in 2075), no freedom of panorama.
- File:Schaffhausen - Kloster Allerheiligen IMG 9818 ShiftN.jpg
- File:Schaffhausen - Kloster Allerheiligen IMG 9822 ShiftN.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 16:27, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: deleted 9818, cropped the tapestry out of 9822 and hid the old version. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation; no freedom of panorama due to fact of non-permanence. Martin Sg. (talk) 16:42, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:36, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Trollface
[edit]Copyrighted character
- File:Ganry-face.jpg
- File:Ganry-face2.jpg
- File:I Am A.jpg
- File:Internet-Meme auf einem Straßenschild.JPG
- File:This is Moe 3.JPG
—SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 02:28, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
- Like it was explained before at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:This_is_Moe_3.JPG, the use on my t-shirt on a former picture I took is de minimis. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 02:54, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
- That being said: if there is no need for the category then so be it, but that doesn't change the fact it is de minimis. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 02:58, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Moe Epsilon: This is definitely an edge case. The reason I nominated the photo for deletion is the Trollface takes up nearly a third of the photo, while in the De minimis guidelines, all the examples given are about a sixth.—SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 17:29, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
- And with that about a third of the copyrighted image in question was also cut out the bottom half of the picture. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 19:43, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
- I think a portion of the bottom of this image could be cropped away to make it even 'even more' de minimis. Would that make sense? Either way, I don't think it needs to be deleted. ~Mable (chat) 08:42, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
- There is no such thing as 'even more' de minimis, that's nonsense. De minimis requirements once met do not change unless you can show me in the last couple years where it had to be "even more" per some law recently passed. I've already cropped it once before, with the previous version of the image being deleted, per the previous deletion request. You could make a case if the entire logo was present still, but there is no way for someone to profit off of an already cropped, partial image, nor use it in a way copyrighted images are for profit, if the whole logo isn't there. It's getting to a point of near absurdity to crop entire parts of my body out of image of me, because a logo appears on a shirt. It's not the subject of the image and wouldn't be any different if it was a half of any other copyrighted logo. More to the point, the owner of the copyright, Carlos Ramirez, has actually been quoted as saying:
- "People message me: 'Hey, look, your trollface was used here! You oughta sue these guys' I just say 'Okay, I’ll look at it.' And I look at it. If it’s a really minor thing, I can’t be bothered with it. It’ll take too much time, and let people have their fun. If they’re not making any significant money on it, it’s like, eh, not a big deal."
- He doesn't even care if money is made on it unless it's a "significant" amount, much less for my use of a selfie I've uploaded to Commons. So again, I don't feel like having to, once again, crop it, so that my torso isn't even in the picture anymore. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 17:37, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- There is no such thing as 'even more' de minimis, that's nonsense. De minimis requirements once met do not change unless you can show me in the last couple years where it had to be "even more" per some law recently passed. I've already cropped it once before, with the previous version of the image being deleted, per the previous deletion request. You could make a case if the entire logo was present still, but there is no way for someone to profit off of an already cropped, partial image, nor use it in a way copyrighted images are for profit, if the whole logo isn't there. It's getting to a point of near absurdity to crop entire parts of my body out of image of me, because a logo appears on a shirt. It's not the subject of the image and wouldn't be any different if it was a half of any other copyrighted logo. More to the point, the owner of the copyright, Carlos Ramirez, has actually been quoted as saying:
- I think a portion of the bottom of this image could be cropped away to make it even 'even more' de minimis. Would that make sense? Either way, I don't think it needs to be deleted. ~Mable (chat) 08:42, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
- And with that about a third of the copyrighted image in question was also cut out the bottom half of the picture. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 19:43, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Moe Epsilon: This is definitely an edge case. The reason I nominated the photo for deletion is the Trollface takes up nearly a third of the photo, while in the De minimis guidelines, all the examples given are about a sixth.—SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 17:29, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
The Ganry face grafiti images and "I Am A" should certainly be deleted. The German street sign art is a transformative work, but fair use isn't allowed on Commons and the Trollface visual has a central presence on this piece of art, so I am afraid that it should also be deleted from Commons. ~Mable (chat) 08:42, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 22:46, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Trollface
[edit]Derivative work of copyrighted character created by Carlos Ramirez
- File:2016-07-07 12-53-43 ILCE-6300 DSC02408 (27666237034).jpg
- File:2016-07-07 12-53-45 ILCE-6300 DSC02409 (27666620223).jpg
- File:4chan, anti ACTA le 25 février 2012.jpg
- File:Delightful cityscape.jpg
- File:No acta (6971028671).jpg
- File:No ACTA, Paris March 2012 N2.jpg
- File:Otakon 2012 224.JPG
- File:SDCC 2011 - Trollface (5973604012).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Trade (talk) 18:26, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep the one with masks, per COM:COSPLAY. (Otakon for example is cosplay). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 02:08, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- So as long as you print out a copyrighed image and use it as a paper mask, it doesn't count as a derivative work? Trade (talk) 12:28, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- Yes because it’s now clothing Dronebogus (talk) 14:42, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- So as long as you print out a copyrighed image and use it as a paper mask, it doesn't count as a derivative work? Trade (talk) 12:28, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep mask images; we’re working on the assumption that masks are costumes, and costumes are clothing, which can’t be copyrighted under US law. Dronebogus (talk) 14:42, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: all of them are deleted except for the 3D masks. Dronebogus, your assessment is explicitly incorrect. The original 2d image is copyrighted regardless of if someone prints it out and wears it or puts it anywhere else. However the 3d masks are... well... it'd be difficult to tell they even came from the 2d image unless you were told that, so they're not derivitive works of the 2d image, merely inspired by it. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
I've done both a Tineye and Google Lens search of this image and cannot find any evidence this image was published without a notice prior to 1989. In order for an image like this to stay on the Commons you have to provide proof, which the source link has zero information on the original publication date or author, and is just a web article using the photo. If this was actually a press kit/promo photo from the 80s, a copy/scan of that should be found, where it shows the lack of notice... otherwise this image needs to be deleted under COM:PCP. PascalHD (talk) 19:03, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- this & the RunDMC one I uploaded should be deleted. In my quest to improve the images in articles I misread the press kit thing and missed the “published with out prior notice of copyright” part. Apparently a lot of press kit photos are explicitly copyrighted.Ringerfan23 (talk) 19:54, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- That's alright, I appreciate your honesty. Copyright can be a confusing area and I understand not everyone is an expert on the subject. It has taken me a while to get a hang of licensing. I encourage to learn more about how the Commons and copyright works, I lead you to COM:SCOPE. PascalHD (talk) 00:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:18, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: incomprehensible acrostic "unification equation". Omphalographer (talk) 19:15, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:17, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
The image is not hosted on a site with appropriate license:https://www.pjenl.gob.mx/PoderJudicial/TSJ/Salas/ubicacion.aspx WikiDasher (talk) 19:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:17, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
I don't see how this can help being a copyright violation (the placard is presumably copyrighted). Jmabel ! talk 19:26, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:17, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
The image contains an sculpture by Nushi Muntaabski, an Argentine artist that is still alive. There is not freedom of panorama for 3D artworks in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 19:27, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:16, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
The image contains an sculpture by Nushi Muntaabski, an Argentine artist that is still alive. There is not freedom of panorama for 3D artworks in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 19:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Creo que no queda claro el "freedom of panorama", si no esta tipificado en leyes argentina, hay un vacío legal en este tema. Es triste que muchas de estas fotografías se consideren borrar un algo que no está del todo claro.-- ElGuruCesar (talk) 19:38, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- Las obras de arte como pinturas, dibujos y esculturas están protegidas en Argentina. Algunos países tienen una salvedad cuando las obras de artes están permanentemente ubicadas que permite fotografiarlas sin violar la propiedad intelectual. La Argentina no posee dicha cláusula. En el enlace puedes ver las políticas de Commons y algunas discusiones si te quieres interiorizarte. Creo que a todos nos gustaría que este tipo de fotografías estén en Commons, pero la política de licenciamiento es bastante clara. Günther Frager (talk) 22:30, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:16, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Mural installed the La Casa del Tango in Rosario. The work is quite recent as the museum opened in 2009. There is no freedom of panorama for mural in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 19:34, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- ¿Cuál es exactamente el problema con la fotografía? A que te refieres con que el museo fue abierto en 2009. El edificio tienen más de 100 años, perteneció a Ferrocarriles Argentinos y luego fue cedido a la municipalidad de Rosario.-- ElGuruCesar (talk) 19:30, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:16, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 19:41, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:16, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 19:41, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:16, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 19:43, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Similar a otras fotografías que haz etiquetado para borrar, muchas de las imágenes ¿se borraran porque hay arte implícito? En esta ocasión se documenta la existencia de un edificio "skate park" en la ciudad de Rosario, Argentina. -- ElGuruCesar (talk) 19:45, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:16, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 19:44, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Humahuaca in Argentina is a highly picturesque locality, characterized by the unique architecture of its buildings. I do not believe this image should be removed, as there is limited visual content available for this locality. The 'freedom of panorama' in Argentina is not clearly defined, and its limits are unspecified.
- "Se ha admitido pacificamente que los edificios puedan ser reproducidos mediante pinturas o fotografías, sin estimarse que esta reproducción lesione los derechos de autor". - Dr. Emery, Miguel Angel (professor of Intellectual property law in Argentina)
- -- ElGuruCesar (talk) 20:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:16, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 19:44, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Humahuaca in Argentina is a highly picturesque locality, characterized by the unique architecture of its buildings. I do not believe this image should be removed, as there is limited visual content available for this locality. The 'freedom of panorama' in Argentina is not clearly defined, and its limits are unspecified.
- "Se ha admitido pacificamente que los edificios puedan ser reproducidos mediante pinturas o fotografías, sin estimarse que esta reproducción lesione los derechos de autor". - Dr. Emery, Miguel Angel (professor of Intellectual property law in Argentina)
- -- ElGuruCesar (talk) 20:04, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:16, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 19:44, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: logo of a non-notable esports team. (Article on ruwiki was speedily deleted in 2021; I was unable to find any other mention of them online.) Omphalographer (talk) 19:44, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 19:45, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 19:45, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: a photograph of someone's face edited to have disturbingly large eyes. Text in description appears unrelated to image. Omphalographer (talk) 19:45, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:14, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused low-quality diagram. Omphalographer (talk) 19:50, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Monument of Fontanarrosa by Carmita Batlle installed in Rosario, Argentina in 2017. There is no freedom of panorama in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 19:50, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for free uses of images of public art. Per this article, the sculpture Walt, The Lock West Monster dates to 2011 and authored by "then Syracuse Public Artist in Residence Brendan Rose and the students of one of the design classes he was teaching at SU." A commercial license permission from Rose is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:53, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple images uploaded by company owner, wrong license, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:05, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- owner of the logo and of the company is the same person, StefanDurina, and he uploaded the logo and is in daily use. Correct license StefanDurina (talk) 22:54, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Weak Keep. Not notable in a Wikipedia sense, but their "sustainable smartphone" marketing that turns up in a web search seems like it has some potential to be important as a trend-setter. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:22, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - it can be undeleted if an article sticks. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:14, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for free distribution and sharing of images of copyrighted public art. This article tells us that The Hand dates to 2008 and was authored by Brendan Rose. Commercial CC licensing permission from Rose is needed. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 21:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:14, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Cover design is almost certainly not old enough to be out of copyright, the question is whether it is *copyrightable* (in which case it can be assumed to be a likely derivative copyvio in the absence of evidence otherwise) or whether it's below the threshold of originality. Ubcule (talk) 21:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:13, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
The contents of the book itself (i.e. Balzac's novel) will be long out of copyright, but the cover art on this edition might not be. It's unclear whether this is a reproduction of an old image or a modern drawing somewhat in that style. (My guess is the latter). Ubcule (talk) 21:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:13, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
The book itself is, of course, long out of copyright, but the status of the cover art this reproduces is less clear. Although the text style is obviously modern, that's irrelevant, the only copyrightable aspect is the image. Is this out of copyright or not? Ubcule (talk) 21:05, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The image is in the public domain. See here. Victor Hugo himself apparently made the drawing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:19, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:13, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
This is based on an engraving by Pierre-Gustave Staal who died in 1882, so the original is long out of copyright. Can it be assumed that- while the colourisation is likely modern- this (and hence the entire cover) is still out of copyright or not? Ubcule (talk) 21:11, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:13, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Not a real firearm, KWA/KSC airsoft gas blowback replica. FrozenSeas (talk) 21:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: it is COM:INUSE. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:12, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious logo, inaccurate information in description. (Rockstar Games hasn't made any substantial announcements about GTA6 yet, beyond that it may be under development.) Omphalographer (talk) 21:49, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:12, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Screenshot, logo likely above COM:TOO P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:16, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for free distribution and sharing of images of copyrighted public art. This article tells us that Immersive Cloud was authored by Daekwon Park. Commercial CC licensing permission from Park is needed. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 20:13, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
no freedom of panorama in italy 151.65.212.172 23:55, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 16:49, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architect of this building, Gio Ponti, died in 1979. So this image is copyrighted until at least 2050. Adamant1 (talk) 03:58, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:38, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
OOS selfie of a non-notable person. Adamant1 (talk) 04:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom but also probably not a selfie and likely copyright violation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:10, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:38, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 08:56, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Question Remind me: Does Chinese law recognize a concept of de minimis? If it does, might it apply to this kind of overview? I'm guessing not, but I don't know. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:51, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:38, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 08:58, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Beautiful piece. Pity, would have required permission from the maker. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:53, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:38, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Uploader request; superseded by more recent versions on en.wv -- Jtneill - Talk 08:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Text file not in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:38, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:39, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Extremely low-quality chemical structure in poor resolution, pixelated bonds and in-image text. Replaced by File:4-Methylheptan-3-ol-2D-skeletal.svg drawn according to MoS guidelines. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 13:46, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 18:19, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wcam as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.instagram.com/p/Co7QZ7RBriw/?hl=en&img_index=1
Converted to regular DR to allow for evaluation of the later added CC license on Instagram. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:55, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- 已在上傳過此照片的貼文中加入聲明「此照片以「創用CC 姓名標示－相同方式分享 4.0 國際通用版（CC BY-SA 4.0）」開放授權釋出」，應該符合版權規定 A0910094524 (talk) 10:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep appears to be a valid license. Wcam (talk) 13:12, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep CC-BY-SA 4.0 as stated within the IG post. S5A-0043Talk 14:18, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: See above. --Yann (talk) 17:05, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
File:Animaker Logo.png Кингзјевонњикимен (talk) 17:41, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. --Yann (talk) 16:37, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Flickr source doesn't provide camera EXIF, and Flickr account which says it's the subject has no followers. The description seems to tell us this is a selfie, but is it? Abzeronow (talk) 17:18, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Not sure what number of Flickr followers has to do with anything. Uncropped image not found anywhere else on the web, so I would assume it to be original. --Uhooep (talk) 00:44, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, flickrwashing. --Gbawden (talk) 06:15, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- File:“Ikedarennsrecentohitoin2020.jpeg”.jpg
- File:PhotoinGhanaAmbassador.jpg
- File:Tokyounigraduationceremony.jpg
Portraits of a non-notable academic. Out of scope/not educationally useful. The subject's biography article was deleted from the Japanese Wikipedia following discussion at ja:Wikipedia:削除依頼/池田廉 (社会科学者). First Comet (talk) 01:47, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:07, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cité Pablo Picasso (Nanterre)
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and the architect of this building complex, Émile Aillaud, died in 1988. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2059.
- File:Cité pablo picasso nanterre.jpg
- File:Crane of the BasalteBuilding at LaDefenseParis and ToursAillaud on BackgroundRight.jpg
- File:Le Wonder Zénith Anto.jpg
- File:Tours Aillaud, de la prefecture des Hauts de Seine.JPG
- File:Tours Aillaud - Cité Pablo Picasso @ La Défense @ Paris (35146254576).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 02:41, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- What exactly is the copyright infringement in File:Crane of the BasalteBuilding at LaDefenseParis and ToursAillaud on BackgroundRight.jpg? Nemo 18:22, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- Uuhh, the 3 or 4 blue buildings that are clearly visible in the background and part of the complex built by Émile Aillaud? --Adamant1 (talk) 19:15, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- Could we move these pictures in the fr.wikipedia.org like the following picture? https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Tours_Aillaud_Juillet_2022.jpeg Oliver H (talk) 15:44, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Kept per de minimis the photos of the park or of the neighborhood. Ruthven (msg) 16:10, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Vittoriano Viganò
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the creator of the works in these images, Vittoriano Viganò, died in 1996. So they are copyrighted until at least 2066.
- File:Paolo Monti - Servizio fotografico (Milano, 1956) - BEIC 6355792.jpg
- File:Paolo Monti - Servizio fotografico (Milano, 1956) - BEIC 6365434.jpg
- File:Paolo Monti - Servizio fotografico (Milano, 1956) - BEIC 6365436.jpg
- File:Paolo Monti - Servizio fotografico (Milano, 1958) - BEIC 6355793.jpg
- File:Paolo Monti - Servizio fotografico (Milano, 1979) - BEIC 6355789.jpg
- File:Paolo Monti - Servizio fotografico - BEIC 6355788.jpg
_-_BEIC_6355792.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_BEIC_6365434.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_BEIC_6365436.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_BEIC_6355793.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_BEIC_6355789.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 03:03, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- What's the copyrightable work in the first three photos and how did you reach the conclusion the photos are a derivative work? According to the best information available, Paolo Monti had permission from the copyright holders for downstream licensing, see Commons:BEIC. Nemo 05:47, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- The art instillation or whatever it is, which I assume was created by Vittoriano Viganò. As to the rights, according to the page that you linked to "This statement is consistent with the story of the photos as we know of it: the artists commissioned the photos for inclusion in future publications authored by Paolo Monti." I'm sure you'd agree that Commons and the whole "image that anyone can use for any purpose" thing doesn't include "publications authored by Paolo Monti." Although them specifically saying it's just "the story as they know it" doesn't exactly sound like a guarantee everything is totally above board anyway. But even if it was, "publications authored by Paolo Monti" clearly doesn't allow for indiscriminate re-use regardless. Same goes for point 3 and 4 on that list BTW. In fact point 3 just nonsensical handwaving, at least as far as Commons is concerned if not more generally. Whereas point 4 is just patently false on it's face. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- The "future publications" bit is meant to include things such as the Paolo Monti collection online, which is under CC BY-SA. Commons can host copies of CC BY-SA publications. I'm not sure what you mean by saying that point 4 is false, can you clarify? Further legal analysis about the general case is available, which distinguishes between 1:1 copy and original work from the photographer. You said the photos are a derivative work so you don't seem to challenge the original component, so you seem to agree we fall in the second case (of which derivative works are one possibility). Nemo 06:17, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- It specifically says "future publications authored by Paolo Monti", Not just "future publications" and Paolo Monti obviously didn't create the website. Regardless though, anyone can release a photograph under a CC BY-SA license. That has nothing to do with if it's COPYVIO because what's being depicted in the image is copyrighted. Although the article still clearly says future publications authored by Paolo Monti, not anything created by anyone years after their death. As to why point four is patently false, the whole thing seems to be insinuating that there's no FOP for 3D objects in countries that follow the Berne convention or that photographs of 3D objects aren't considered derivative works in general. Both of which are clearly wrong. Otherwise there would have been zero reason for Paolo Monti to get permission to take the photographs to begin with. Although there's plenty of countries that follow the Berne convention while still not allowing for FOP. Italy being one of them. There's zero evidence that it's fine to take pictures of otherwise copyrighted 3D objects in Italy just because they follow the Berne convention. Or again there'd be zero reason for all these permissions to begin with. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- The "future publications" bit is meant to include things such as the Paolo Monti collection online, which is under CC BY-SA. Commons can host copies of CC BY-SA publications. I'm not sure what you mean by saying that point 4 is false, can you clarify? Further legal analysis about the general case is available, which distinguishes between 1:1 copy and original work from the photographer. You said the photos are a derivative work so you don't seem to challenge the original component, so you seem to agree we fall in the second case (of which derivative works are one possibility). Nemo 06:17, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- The art instillation or whatever it is, which I assume was created by Vittoriano Viganò. As to the rights, according to the page that you linked to "This statement is consistent with the story of the photos as we know of it: the artists commissioned the photos for inclusion in future publications authored by Paolo Monti." I'm sure you'd agree that Commons and the whole "image that anyone can use for any purpose" thing doesn't include "publications authored by Paolo Monti." Although them specifically saying it's just "the story as they know it" doesn't exactly sound like a guarantee everything is totally above board anyway. But even if it was, "publications authored by Paolo Monti" clearly doesn't allow for indiscriminate re-use regardless. Same goes for point 3 and 4 on that list BTW. In fact point 3 just nonsensical handwaving, at least as far as Commons is concerned if not more generally. Whereas point 4 is just patently false on it's face. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: Monti's Foundation hasn't the rights from Viganò heirs (unless this is forwarded to COM:VRT. Kept File:Paolo Monti - Servizio fotografico - BEIC 6355788.jpg per, at least, de minimis. Ruthven (msg) 16:14, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Palazzo e Torre Rasini
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architects of this building, Gio Ponti and Emilio Lancia, died in 1979 and 1973 respectively. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2050.
- File:Facciata principale della Torre Rasini, Milano (1933-1934).jpg
- File:Milano Palazzo e Torre Rasini.JPG
- File:Milano Torre Rasini.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 03:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:15, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Teatro Nuovo (Milan)
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architect of this theatre, Emilio Lancia, died in 1973. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2044.
- File:Milano, teatro nuovo, foyer 01.JPG
- File:Milano, teatro nuovo, foyer 02.JPG
- File:Milano, teatro nuovo, foyer 03 fontana.JPG
- File:Milano, teatro nuovo, foyer 04 lucernario.JPG
- File:Milano, teatro nuovo, ristorante 01.JPG
- File:Milano, teatro nuovo, sala 01.JPG
- File:Milano, teatro nuovo, sala 02.JPG
Adamant1 (talk) 03:37, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- I am not sure how many of these pictures are really copryghtable by the architect. For instance lucernario will fall under Commons:UA, as utilitaria object, and probably also fontana. Ristorante does not show any designed part, it is just a room with (non original) chairs and tables, so I don't think it is copyrightable. --Sailko (talk) 14:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- A few things, while I'd agree that the lamp might fall under Commons:UA if it were just a generic lamp shade, it's clearly part of the buildings original, art deco design. So I think it would qualify as being copyrighted as a sculptural part of the overall, original work. Just like say a stained glass window in a church would even though windows in general serve a utilitarian purpose otherwise. The same goes for the fountain. There's zero reason it wouldn't be copyrighted just because it's part of the building. And I have to disagree about the last image you bring up. I didn't nominate the image for deletion just because of the chairs and tables, obviously. But because It clearly shows unique aspects of the building's design, like the cutout for the window and backset holes in the wall for the photographs. Both of which are actually pretty unique architectural elements. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:11, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, but kept the lamp and views of corridors that are below ToO. Ruthven (msg) 16:17, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architect of this building, Emilio Lancia, died in 1973. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2044.
- File:Fale - Milano - 52.jpg
- File:Fale - Milano - 53.jpg
- File:Fale - Milano - 54.jpg
- File:Milano - edificio corso Matteotti 5-9.jpg
- File:Milano - panoramio (26).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 03:39, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, which theatre are you talking about? If this is about it:Teatro Nuovo (Milano) it is on the other side of the road... Friniate (talk) 12:11, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Building then. Like it matters. I'd appreciate it if you stopped concern trolling me with things that aren't issues. I'm perfectly capable of noticing and correcting my own mistakes, or the closing administrator can just ignore them, but The less needless comments in the meantime the better. Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- I thought that you confused the bulding with the theatre... What is the name of this building? I'm sorry, but if you propose DRs you have also to provide details, otherwise of course people will make questions... Friniate (talk) 12:24, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, I notice now that it's written in the category that the architect was Lancia. Sorry, but same architect, almost same place, you just opened a DR about the theatre, then you write "theatre" here... A qui pro quo wouldn't have been so impossible. Friniate (talk) 12:31, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Almost a week later and I'm still at lose as to what exactly your insinuating or how it relates to if the images are copyrighted. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:49, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, I notice now that it's written in the category that the architect was Lancia. Sorry, but same architect, almost same place, you just opened a DR about the theatre, then you write "theatre" here... A qui pro quo wouldn't have been so impossible. Friniate (talk) 12:31, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- I thought that you confused the bulding with the theatre... What is the name of this building? I'm sorry, but if you propose DRs you have also to provide details, otherwise of course people will make questions... Friniate (talk) 12:24, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Building then. Like it matters. I'd appreciate it if you stopped concern trolling me with things that aren't issues. I'm perfectly capable of noticing and correcting my own mistakes, or the closing administrator can just ignore them, but The less needless comments in the meantime the better. Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: work by Emilio Lancia (Milano, 20 luglio 1890 – Besozzo, 1973); no photo is de minimis. Ruthven (msg) 16:07, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Via della Posta 8–10 (Milan)
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architect of this theatre, Emilio Lancia, died in 1973. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2044.
- File:Palazzo Lancia piazza Affari (Milano).jpg
- File:Palazzo Lancia, sculture di Giuseppe Maretto in piazza degli Affari (Milano).jpg
- File:Palazzo Lancia, sculture di Giuseppe Maretto particolare.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 03:41, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:18, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Palazzo del Toro
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architect of this theatre, Emilio Lancia, died in 1973. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2044.
- File:Milano - panoramio (29).jpg
- File:Milano palazzo del Toro facciata.JPG
- File:Milano palazzo del Toro vista.JPG
- File:Milano, piazza San Babila 04.jpg
- File:Palazzo del Toro di notte.jpg
- File:Palazzo del Toro in piazza San babila, Milano, veduta di tre quarti 01.jpg
- File:Palazzo del Toro in piazza San babila, Milano, veduta di tre quarti 02.jpg
- File:Paolo Monti - Servizio fotografico (Milano, 1982) - BEIC 6330935.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_BEIC_6330935.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 03:42, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Monti's photo was commissioned as part of a book for Einaudi, according to the description, so the copyright aspects must have been handled. According to the best information available, Paolo Monti had permission from the copyright holders for downstream licensing, see Commons:BEIC. Nemo 05:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- As I've already stated in another comment here what the BEIC article says is nonsensical at best if not outright patently false at worst. Although I'm not going to repeat the reasons why. Except to say that point 2 of the section on "rights" clearly says "This statement is consistent with the story of the photos as we know of it: the artists commissioned the photos for inclusion in future publications authored by Paolo Monti, so they provided the necessary authorisations and transfer of rights." None of which is compatible with Commons or it's usage policy. As people re-using the images clearly aren't "publications authored by Paolo Monti" and them saying it's the story as far as they know it isn't at all a guarantee that everything was done properly. Although even if it was, the re-use would still only be confined to "publications authored by Paolo Monti" anyway. So there's no grounds what-so-ever to keep the images. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:08, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- (I've answered there.) Nemo 06:18, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- As I've already stated in another comment here what the BEIC article says is nonsensical at best if not outright patently false at worst. Although I'm not going to repeat the reasons why. Except to say that point 2 of the section on "rights" clearly says "This statement is consistent with the story of the photos as we know of it: the artists commissioned the photos for inclusion in future publications authored by Paolo Monti, so they provided the necessary authorisations and transfer of rights." None of which is compatible with Commons or it's usage policy. As people re-using the images clearly aren't "publications authored by Paolo Monti" and them saying it's the story as far as they know it isn't at all a guarantee that everything was done properly. Although even if it was, the re-use would still only be confined to "publications authored by Paolo Monti" anyway. So there's no grounds what-so-ever to keep the images. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:08, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ifthere is a permission from Lancia to Monti or to Einaudi, please forward it to COM:VRT. Ruthven (msg) 16:20, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
imagevio from [1], the image is available in higher resolution on that page; uploader cannot attribute "unknown author" — Draceane talkcontrib. 06:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:21, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
L'auteur est mort en 1965, il y a 58 ans. Ce n'est pas une création personnelle WεFt (talk) 06:45, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:22, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Sculpture by living artist Nina Sundby (born 1944). No freedom of panorama for sculptures in Norway. 4ing (talk) 07:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:26, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Шалов Михаил (talk · contribs)
[edit]Very unlikely to be own works, one is obviously taken from a printed material, the other is very small without EXIFs
Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:28, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
No evidence of PD, the same reason as Commons:Deletion requests/Pocket Atlas of the USSR, 11th ed., 1940 (renomination) - previous edition of the same atlas, the same authors. Komarof (talk) 04:45, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: {{PD-Russia-1996}} seems OK. --Yann (talk) 14:41, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Premchander8 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: low quality photographs of a child holding a sign; limited educational value. The text of the sign is troubling as well - whether it was intended to or not, it reads disturbingly like a call for additional violence.
Omphalographer (talk) 05:43, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Comment The image makes its own point, it's below COM:TOO India, and Commons is not censored. I'm inclined to keep it. The file description can be edited if anyone wants to do so, the red-linked category should probably be removed and appropriate categories added, and personality rights templates should be added. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:05, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- My greatest concern here is, in short, that it's unclear whether this child was responsible for, or even aware of, the political message they were being used to convey in the photo. Given the tense political/religious conflict that this photo was taken in relation to, I'm not terribly comfortable keeping a photo which could potentially come back to harm the child shown in it, especially given the possibility that the photographer may have been effectively using the child as a prop, and given that the photo is not (and, as far as I'm aware, has never been) in use on any Wikimedia project. Omphalographer (talk) 05:41, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Omphalographer has a point. The paper is exactly the same for both children, so I too doubt the secerity of the message, from the child point of view. --Yann (talk) 14:44, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
I don't see any proof this is free. It just says "Source: Website". WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 05:54, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:45, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
While the whole image might have a VRT ticket for the photograph, I am not sure if the sculpture is in the PD since the photo was taken in Italy, and the sculptor died in 1966. No FoP in Italy and Italy has a standard of life plus 70 years Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Italy Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:44, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per the nominator. I find it hard to believe that a crop of something like a statue would be PD just because the image it was cropped from is. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:09, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:47, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
unused formula that can be replaced by TeX; no educational value due to missing description Jochen Burghardt (talk) 08:44, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. If a graphic is needed, it should be SVG anyway. --Yann (talk) 14:48, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyvio, original at: https://www.disruptionlab.org/photos#darkhavens no permission visible Alabasterstein (talk) 08:54, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- permission found at the bottom of the side, DR closed. Alabasterstein (talk) 09:12, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: License reviewed. --Yann (talk) 14:50, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Brandon Bryant speaking at the Disruption Network Lab 2022-03-26 (CC Maria Silvano) cropped.jpg
[edit]_cropped.jpg){kind=link}
_cropped.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyvio, see: disruptionlab.org/photos#the-kill-cloud no permission visible Alabasterstein (talk) 09:09, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- permission found at the bottom of the side, DR closed. Alabasterstein (talk) 09:12, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: License reviewed. --Yann (talk) 14:51, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
now unused; use File:Var mass system.svg instead Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:52, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10 Yann (talk) 10:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I think the reason is not valid. A picture of a building, regardless of the building's function, is in scope. My only question would be whether this is really Kartikguide's own work. However, they contributed to Commons only on 13 February and 2 July of this year, so I doubt we'll hear from them, and unless someone finds a source for this image, its merely being small and lacking EXIF are expressly not sufficient reasons to delete per COM:Deletion requests. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:43, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 14:52, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a non-free map. See [2] about the ticket. Yann (talk) 12:38, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted. --Yann (talk) 14:53, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
This file is outdated and has been replaced by this file: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_Software#/media/File:Greenhouse_Software_wordmark.png Greenhouse-software (talk) 15:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Not a deletion reason, and files uploaded locally to en.wikipedia don't replace files on Commons. Either the company is notable, which makes its history notable, or there should be no logos for the company on any Wikimedia site. Which one is it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:32, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you for the input!
Kept: different versions of the logo can be present Greenhouse-software (talk) 22:28, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Incorrect author, year and license. — Redboston 17:05, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: License fixed. --Yann (talk) 15:02, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyright infrigement: https://banskidvor.org/promocija-knjige-drzava-apsurda-prof-dr-branka-dokica/branko-dokic-1/ Ђидо (talk) 17:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:03, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:00, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:San Luca Evangelista (Milan)
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architect of this building, Gio Ponti, died in 1979. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2050.
- File:Milano chiesa San Luca Evangelista facciata scorcio.JPG
- File:Milano chiesa San Luca Evangelista facciata.JPG
- File:Milano chiesa San Luca Evangelista interno.JPG
Adamant1 (talk) 03:54, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 21:39, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Low resolution, missing EXIF, uploaded without license and author's name among other blatant copyright violations, see uploader's talk page. License added later by unknown unregistered user. Evidence of own work is required in such a case. Komarof (talk) 09:11, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PCP. --Ezarateesteban 21:40, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Omphalographer as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 We have about 100 times less self-portraits of women than men, so a few good ones may be OK. How this is not a selfie, so permission from the photographer is needed. Yann (talk) 09:34, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 21:41, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Omphalographer as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 We have about 100 times less self-portraits of women than men, so a few good ones may be OK. How this is not a selfie, so permission from the photographer is needed. Yann (talk) 09:35, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 21:42, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 0x0a as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10 Yann (talk) 11:38, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, no educational purpose possible. --Ezarateesteban 21:43, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Omphalographer as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 We have about 100 times less self-portraits of women than men, so a few good ones may be OK. How this is not a selfie, so permission from the photographer is needed. Yann (talk) 09:35, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:58, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
the uploader likely mixed up the names as Peter Fischli and David Weiss are two well known artists and published a book under the same title. Peter Fischli is still alive. The art ws exhibited in a museum in Switzerland and there exists a standard of life plus 70 years, no FoP for interior spaces in Switzerland. Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Switzerland Paradise Chronicle (talk) 10:17, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- The request is convincing to me as uploader. In fact, I just thought at the photographer Andres Furger, who published his photography under a Creative Commons license on his website, but didn't consider the legal situation of the depicted piece of art. Real beginner's mistake, sorry for that! Best regards, DerMaxdorfer (talk) 10:21, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:58, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS. Although the photograph is properly licensed, it shows a 3D work that is licensed and copyrighted. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- This is a limited edition collectible that was at her speaking event and is referenced in the article. I took this photo at the speaking event for Sister Jean ZachMcDowell (talk) 12:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for replying. I'm not questioning whether you took the photograph yourself (as I said above, the photograph itself is properly sourced/licensed). Please take a look at Commons:Derivative works to see why the copyright of this image belongs to the creator of the bobblehead, and there's no evidence that the creator/distributor has not released the intellectual property rights. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:57, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bsharafiev (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal pictures used for self-adv. Wiki is not a hosting. Is it OK to publish such personal stuff?
Bilderling (talk) 13:52, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:56, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Uploaded as own work, but per this admission that isn't the case. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, as the work of (and presumably copyright by) somebody not yet identified. -- Hoary (talk) 22:12, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:56, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
This was uploaded by a 1-upload user from Russia who has 4 total edits including the upload across commons. Has no metadata, marked as same date as upload; just seems very implausible some photographer made an account as "Deadpool0992" and showed up to upload this one promotional-type photo of him. DemonDays64 (talk•contribs•uploads) 18:30, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:54, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 12:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:41, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Det finns ett bättre original. Den här bilden är en usel delförstoring och har inget syfte i Commons. FFswe (talk) 20:48, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Filen används av olika wikis (minst en i huvudnamnrymd), därför inom projektets syfte/scope. (COM:INUSE). --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:42, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No commercial freedom of panorama in Uzbekistan QazyQazyQazaqstan (talk) 12:59, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Clearly not uploader's work -- on trading card here and EXIF credit is "Copyright holder SNS Group 0141 221 3602." Эlcobbola talk 14:24, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Judging by the uploader's name, Dwinnie (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) , I'm guessing that they are the same person as DavidPWinnie (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) , DPWinnie (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) , and w:David Winnie, the footballer seen in the photograph. And based on their edits, they seem to be under the belief that they own the rights to the image since they're in the photograph. If all these accounts do belong to David, then a few things:
- Copyright belongs to the photographer/agency, not the person photograph. If you want an action shot of yourself on your Wikipedia article, please ask a photographer to release the rights and contact COM:VRT to verify that they have done so.
- Please pick one account and stick to it. I don't think you're necessarily abusing multiple accounts, but jumping from user name to user name makes it difficult for other users to communicate with you.
- You've received several notices about image deletions and you don't seem to have responded on a talk page or discussion page. If you're not sure why your uploads keep deleting, please ask a reviewer or a nominator. If you do understand, please stop.
- Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:55, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gnomingstuff as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10 Yann (talk) 14:37, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: I don't see any advertising. Image is useful. --Gbawden (talk) 06:00, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Неверный источник - в Атласе СССР не было Африки. Не ясно, на каком основании данный файл находится в общественном достоянии. — Redboston 14:04, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- : Keep. Это Карманный атлас мира 1940 г., уже перешел в общественное достояние. \\ PD-old. It is a scan of pocket world atlas, published in USSR in 1940 by government. I fixed this mistake. Scans of this atlas you may in http://www.atlas1940.narod.ru/index.htm --Bestalex (talk) 12:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- На каком основании он перешёл в общественное достояние?— Redboston 21:17, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Commons:Deletion requests/Pocket Atlas of the USSR, 11th ed., 1940. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:55, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
The file was kept according to this discussion. The decision was based on another discussion. However, that decision has been reversed. — Redboston 15:23, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/Pocket Atlas of the USSR, 11th ed., 1940 (renomination). --Gbawden (talk) 06:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation Theroadislong (talk) 15:53, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I don't see any evidence, but this seems indeed a bit doubtful. Yann (talk) 15:00, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 06:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Sreten Stojanovic died in 1960 and Serbia has a standard of life and 70 years. So I believe before 2031 it shouldn't be on commons. Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Serbia Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:55, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by YOintment as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: [3]This music was performed by its copyright holders, the National Symphony Orchestra of Taiwan and the National Taiwan Choir, who have granted permission for it to be downloaded and used for non-profit purposes only.（[4]本樂曲係由著作權人國立中正文化中心附設國家交響樂團及國立實驗合唱團所演奏及演唱，經同意授權僅供非營利下載使用。） Yann (talk) 09:24, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:55, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10 Yann (talk) 11:33, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Seems to be out of scope. —holly {chat} 19:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architect of this building, Vittoriano Viganò, died in 1996. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2067.
- File:Paolo Monti - Servizio fotografico - BEIC 6355791.jpg
- File:Paolo Monti - Servizio fotografico - BEIC 6365435.jpg
- File:Paolo Monti - Servizio fotografico - BEIC 6365437.jpg
- File:Paolo Monti - Servizio fotografico - BEIC 6365539.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 03:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Except perhaps the last photo, these are just showing limited functional details which are not copyrightable in the first place. According to the best information available, Paolo Monti had permission from the copyright holders for downstream licensing, see Commons:BEIC. Nemo 05:47, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- As I've already stated in another comment here what the BEIC article says is nonsensical at best if not outright patently false at worst. Although I'm not going to repeat the reasons why. Except to say that point 2 of the section on "rights" clearly says "This statement is consistent with the story of the photos as we know of it: the artists commissioned the photos for inclusion in future publications authored by Paolo Monti, so they provided the necessary authorisations and transfer of rights." None of which is compatible with Commons or it's usage policy. As people re-using the images clearly aren't "publications authored by Paolo Monti" and them saying it's the story as far as they know it isn't at all a guarantee that everything was done properly. Although even if it was, the re-use would still only be confined to "publications authored by Paolo Monti" anyway. So there's no grounds what-so-ever to keep the images. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:22, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- (I've answered there.) Nemo 06:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- As I've already stated in another comment here what the BEIC article says is nonsensical at best if not outright patently false at worst. Although I'm not going to repeat the reasons why. Except to say that point 2 of the section on "rights" clearly says "This statement is consistent with the story of the photos as we know of it: the artists commissioned the photos for inclusion in future publications authored by Paolo Monti, so they provided the necessary authorisations and transfer of rights." None of which is compatible with Commons or it's usage policy. As people re-using the images clearly aren't "publications authored by Paolo Monti" and them saying it's the story as far as they know it isn't at all a guarantee that everything was done properly. Although even if it was, the re-use would still only be confined to "publications authored by Paolo Monti" anyway. So there's no grounds what-so-ever to keep the images. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:22, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:44, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
schlechtere Kopie von dieser Datei: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:KAS-Mairose,_Ralf-Bild-1699-1.jpg Berlinschneid (talk) 11:46, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Berlinschneid: Das ist ein und dieselbe Datei. Du meinst wohl File:KAS-Mairose, Ralf-Bild-1638-1.jpg? --Rosenzweig τ 07:29, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ja, genau. Die Bilder sehen identisch aus, nur die eine Datei hat Streifen. --Berlinschneid (talk) 12:51, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:47, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per commons:TOY Tomer T (talk) 12:28, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:47, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:SM Center Dagupan
[edit]No freedom of panorama in the Philippines, and per w:SM Center Dagupan the mall opened in 2019.
- File:7878Dagupan City DownTown District 19.jpg
- File:7878Dagupan City DownTown District 20.jpg
- File:7878Dagupan City DownTown District 21.jpg
- File:7878Dagupan City DownTown District 28.jpg
- File:By Jdcedit - SM Center Dagupan.jpg
Matr1x-101 {user - talk? - useless contributions} 14:34, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:47, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
fichier répétitif par rapport à un fichier existant (Ajoutons leurs voix ! [Aidez-nous à traduire !] Menu principal Accueil Portails thématiques Article au hasard Contact Basculer vers l’ancien habillage Contribuer Débuter sur Wikipédia Aide Communauté Modifications récentes Faire un don Fichier:Flag of the French Walloon movement.svg) Sthubertliege (talk) 18:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tipperary Hill
[edit]There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for free distribution and sharing of images of copyrighted public art. The English Wikipedia article tells us that the statue is no earlier than 1995. Authored by Dexter Benedict, a commercial CC licensing permission from him is needed.
- File:Tipperary Hill - Stonethrowers statue.jpg
- File:Tipperary Hill - stonethrowers Syracuse, New York.jpg
- File:Tipperary Hill - Syracuse, New York.jpg
- File:Tipperary Hill Stonethrower family.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 20:27, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
This is the same image as the deleted File:Marcelo Pont Vergés.jpg, which uploader acknowledged is not their work ("the picture of myself (Marcelo Pont) was taken by a friend") Copyright initially vests in the author (photographer), not the mere subject, and does not care about camera ownership. COM:VRT from the actual author is needed, including due to publication prior to Commons upload. Эlcobbola talk 20:47, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment We also have to take into account that the Oscar statuette is copyrighted and we may have to blur it in case COM:VRT is successful. Günther Frager (talk) 21:58, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep This is one of those cases where being rules lawyers makes no sense. COM:PCP directs us to delete when there is significant doubt of the freedom of the file. Is it really reasonable to think that Marcelo's Pont friend, using Marcelo Pont's camera and taking the photo on request of Marcelo Pont, is not OK with transferring the copyright to Marcelo Pont? Let's be realistic here. —holly {chat} 21:07, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- As an admin, it is your obligation both to know and to follow rules:
- Copyright can only be transferred through formal written conveyance or operation of law (17 U.S.C. § 201); desire is meaningless ("Is it really reasonable to think that Marcelo's Pont friend [...] is not OK with transferring the copyright to Marcelo Pont") Ownership of a device, further, has nothing whatsoever to do with copyright, and we routinely have uploader's claiming "my friend gave permission" that is later found to be limited to Wikipedia or otherwise insufficiently free;
- COM:EVID requires "In all cases the uploader must provide appropriate evidence." (underline added) COM:PCP is thus not the threshold at which we require evidence, which seems to be your misapprehension, but the threshold at which we disregard provided evidence. No evidence has been provided; to the contrary, the uploader acknowledged lying about authorship.
- The foregoing is precisely why COM:VRT is available and required--verily, per COM:VRT: "if any of the following statements is one you could make, then you must send an email to the VRTS system: [...] I have received permission from the original author (not me) to upload the file to Commons [or] my file has been previously published without a free license on a medium I can't alter" (underline added, bold in in original).
- Because the above is so obvious, I omitted reference to the additional issue of being a non-de minimis derviative work of the copyrighted Oscar statuette. (Did you even look at the image?)
- Let's be realistic here, indeed. Эlcobbola talk 22:14, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- As an admin, it is your obligation both to know and to follow rules:
I'm going to delete this for being a derivative work of the Oscar statuette. However, I'm going to nitpick a bit about the other stuff.
- US law regarding copyright transfer doesn't apply to this Argentinian photo.
- As I said, it's a reasonable assumption that the friend is fine with this. We're not talking about a case where the friend is a professional photographer and used their own setup to make a portrait photo. This is a candid snap and not even a very good one.
- Copyright does not automatically belong to the person who pushed the button. It all depends on who makes the creative choices, and if the button-pusher is just a human remote control, then the subject of the photo could easily own the copyright. None of that even matters until there's a dispute, anyway.
- Bureaucracy is all fine when it comes to covering our asses, but there's also room for not biting the newbies and assuming good faith, especially with the explanation the uploader gave. Could he be lying? Sure, but so could anyone who emails into VRT, so at some point you have to take people at their word.
So looking at this in context, here we have a not-very-good photo of a person, uploaded by the subject so that his Wikipedia article can have a photo that he approves of. He's not familiar with the intricacies of intellectual property law, so he naturally and mistakenly assumes that because it was his camera and he asked a friend to do it for him, he owns the copyright. I get that you want to follow policies and procedures, but you didn't even bother to explain the VRT process to the uploader when he asked how he could "provide the necessary evidence" and went straight to nominating his upload for deletion. And when I enter the picture three months later to say hey, maybe cut the guy a little slack, you decide to jump all over me as well. —holly {chat} 00:14, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
The file was kept according to this discussion. The decision was based on another discussion. However, that decision has been reversed. — Redboston 14:27, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Gbawden. --Rosenzweig τ 08:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/81/Офис_«АБС_Электро»_в_Чебоксарах.jpg АБС Электро (talk) 19:55, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/81/Офис_«АБС_Электро»_в_Чебоксарах.jpg 81.88.222.127 09:02, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
- No valid reason for deletion given. That being said, the uploader's name does not match the photographer's, so this is a possible copyvio. On the other hand, this is a full-resolution photo with EXIF, so it's certainly possible that the uploader and the photographer are both employees of the same company or something like that. —holly {chat} 20:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting as PCP until license is concrete. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:16, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no source (No source since). It's sourced from http://www.zupulu.com/zupu.php?act=viewcatpic&z=16863&cid=1413, third image in the second row, http://www.zupulu.com/upload_pic/smallpic_2011/201107/1309927393.jpg. I'm not certain whether there may be some other issue here (including a possible licensing issue, I don't read Chinese) but I don't think there is a lack of source. Jmabel ! talk 18:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- This is obviously not own work, so the license is wrong. Yann (talk) 00:25, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- This was tagged as lacking a source, not lacking a valid license. {{Self}} is obviously wrong, but I have no idea whether the image may be PD-old or if there may even be a license stated in Chinese on the source page. - Jmabel ! talk 06:05, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- I changed the license, and it's over 100 years old. [[User:Flag Creator|Flag Creator]] (talk) 08:09, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- How do you know it is that old and not a recent creation in an old style? Is the work kept in a museum (if so, where?) or is it from an old book (if so, which?)? --Lambiam 11:40, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
- Check User:HuangdiOfSongChina's uploads. He has the same type like this one, emperor Huan, but it was nominated for deletion, but kept because it was pd-old. [[User:Flag Creator|Flag Creator]] (talk) 16:44, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Flag Creator: Dude has a ton of uploads. Can you just link us directly to the correct file so I don't have to crawl through pages and pages of his uploads? —holly {chat} 20:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Check User:HuangdiOfSongChina's uploads. He has the same type like this one, emperor Huan, but it was nominated for deletion, but kept because it was pd-old. [[User:Flag Creator|Flag Creator]] (talk) 16:44, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- How do you know it is that old and not a recent creation in an old style? Is the work kept in a museum (if so, where?) or is it from an old book (if so, which?)? --Lambiam 11:40, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
- TinEye recorded a version, not cropped and without watermark, on April 16, 2008.[5] There the trail seems to end. --Lambiam 11:50, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
- There is actually a small reddish mark of some kind around (h,v) = (200,350). --Lambiam 12:04, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
- I changed the license, and it's over 100 years old. [[User:Flag Creator|Flag Creator]] (talk) 08:09, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- This was tagged as lacking a source, not lacking a valid license. {{Self}} is obviously wrong, but I have no idea whether the image may be PD-old or if there may even be a license stated in Chinese on the source page. - Jmabel ! talk 06:05, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. No reliable source showing the age of this image such as an old book or museum website. Therefore the image might be modern and has to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:05, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
