Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/09/26

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 26th, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Privacy breach. 27.58.142.72 09:38, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Privacy breach. 171.79.114.201 06:06, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Privacy breach. Sanjayti (talk) 06:18, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, speedily per Ikan Kekek. Taivo (talk) 08:28, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is wrong pronounced Ainhoa Grobas (talk) 15:28, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 15:36, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

siuf0oj+ypnhºñº~hgin´ 2001:8A0:FA0B:E200:6DDF:E930:255A:364E 20:13, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: nonsense request. --Rosenzweig τ 20:16, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake YeadHosen (talk) 02:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Reasonably prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake YeadHosen (talk) 02:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per uploader nomination; unused personal photo. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:04, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 03:42, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:05, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presumably a copyvio, can't see how this can be "own work". Jmabel ! talk 04:56, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; false claims; from social media. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:11, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pornography. innapropriate. 197.232.110.211 09:27, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:09, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pornographie explicite 82.120.229.176 13:47, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep Not a valid reason--Trade (talk) 14:42, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No new reason for deletion offered since kept last month. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:42, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of Aaronson Andrew, not 'own work'. 2607:F140:8801:0:0:0:1:25 15:32, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am Aaronson Andrew. This is my own work. NudistPhotographer (talk) 05:18, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:29, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is unashamed pornography. Undoubtedly the previous requests are overlooked due to lack of detail and argumentation, despite how frankly obvious. This clip serves no educational purpose beyond the article. The videos length is unnecessary as the act is made clear after a few seconds. It is obvious these videos are shared for pleasure and not education. I do not see how any argumentation could be provided for the need of a video of this length and nature to be absolutely necessary to provide education. It is the responsibility of the contents producer to sensitively distribute such material within consenting circles and not the educational tool Wikipedia. There is plenty of pornography elsewhere. It is needless and irresponsible to propagate this material for one’s own pleasure. Children knowingly and unknowingly use this site as it is largely educational. AJ1001 (talk) 21:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy Kept: no valid, or even novel, reason for deletion Dronebogus (talk) 23:25, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama for statues in Kazakhstan. Also looks really grainy which is a sign that the photo was stolen too KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 20:07, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Heatrave (talk) 19:15, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:17, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal selfies uploaded for an event or something. Really, I'm not exactly sure what they were uploaded up for, but they should be deleted as OOS regardless.

Adamant1 (talk) 10:24, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:49, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Drmermaid1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The photo is not own work as stated, the diagram is DW. Both need permission via COM:VRT.

P 1 9 9   02:47, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For the diagram, we have received a permission email per Ticket:2023092610003746, which is currently being processed. --Mussklprozz (talk) 07:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep for both files. For the photo, we now obtained VRT permission from the photographer. For the diagram, we had already the permission from the creator. The open question there was only the said photo which was used therein. --Mussklprozz (talk) 18:48, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn (resolved). --P 1 9 9   18:56, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Skulljujos (talk) 14:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, really low quality. Taivo (talk) 07:09, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Skulljujos (talk) 14:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, really low quality. Taivo (talk) 07:21, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality Skulljujos (talk) 14:04, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, really low quality. Taivo (talk) 07:58, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Skulljujos (talk) 14:25, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, as copyright violation. Circa 1953 photo, copyrighted 70 years after photographer's death. No evidence of anonymous work, no publication data, no exact date, vague source. Taivo (talk) 08:09, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Skulljujos (talk) 14:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, really low quality. Taivo (talk) 08:00, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Skulljujos (talk) 14:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, really low quality. Taivo (talk) 08:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Skulljujos (talk) 14:28, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, really low quality. Taivo (talk) 08:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Skulljujos (talk) 14:31, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, really low quality. Taivo (talk) 08:03, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mistake low quality Skulljujos (talk) 14:32, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, really low quality. Taivo (talk) 07:55, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Skulljujos (talk) 14:32, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, really low quality. Taivo (talk) 07:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Skulljujos (talk) 14:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, really low quality. Taivo (talk) 07:48, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Skulljujos (talk) 14:34, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, really low quality. Taivo (talk) 07:49, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Skulljujos (talk) 14:34, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, really low quality. Taivo (talk) 07:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Skulljujos (talk) 14:34, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, really low quality. Taivo (talk) 07:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Skulljujos (talk) 14:35, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, really low quality. Taivo (talk) 07:53, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany stamps of this country are copyrighted until at least 70 years after the death of the artist. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2,082 since the artist, Dietrich Dorfstecher, died in 2011. If not longer due to it's copyright status being renewed by the URAA. Although I'll leave it up to the closing administrator to decide which term should apply.

Die Briefmarke zeigt ein Gemälde aus dem 19. Jahrhundert ({{PD-old-100-expired}}), der Rest dürfte {{PD-ineligible}} sein.  Keep. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 08:09, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adamant1 (talk) 22:32, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The Heinrich Heine stamp is not a reproduction of d:Q112294976, but apparently a recreation by Dorfstecher and IMO sufficiently original for its own copyright. The files can be restored in various years, I've added notes and categories. --Rosenzweig τ 10:12, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the designer's death. In this case the designer, Dietrich Dorfstecher, died in 2011. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO until at least 2,082.

Adamant1 (talk) 07:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 12:17, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the designer's death. In this case the designer, Bernadette Baltis, seems to still be alive. So the image should be deleted as COPYVIO until an undetermined date. Adamant1 (talk) 06:30, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 14:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the designers death. In this case the designers, Lorli and Ernst Jünger, seem to still be alive or at least haven't been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO until an undetermined date.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:42, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ernst Jünger and Lorli Jünger are both in their 80s, but still alive; the files can be restored 70 years pma of their deaths, with the following exceptions.

Per [1], the Elser photo is a passport photo from 1938; they also say he never was in Düsseldorf, so a Düsseldorf Gestapo officer could not have photographed him there. Since the photo is dated 1938, we can restore that stamp in 2059 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. Josef Albers was a US citizen (since 1939) and worked in the US, so we should apply US copyright here. Homage to the Square is a whole series of works, and this particular one seems to be from 1966, see [2]. With US copyright, there's always the possibility that something is in the public domain because there was no notice etc., but I'd assume works of a high profile artist like Albers are not in the PD, so the two files showing his art can be restored in 2062 (95 + 1 years from 1966). --Rosenzweig τ 14:38, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the designer's death. In this case the designer, Fritz Zerritsch, died in 1985. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO until at least 2,056. Adamant1 (talk) 07:19, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2056. --Rosenzweig τ 15:06, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the designers death. In this case the designer, Erna de Vries, seem to still be alive or at least haven't been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO until an undetermined date.

Adamant1 (talk) 07:29, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Erna de Vries, born 1937, indeed seems to be alive. The files can be restored 70 years pma. --Rosenzweig τ 15:08, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist of this lithograph, André van der Vossen, died in 1963. So the image is copyrighted until at least 2034 per the normal term in the Netherlands of 70+ years after the artists death. Adamant1 (talk) 07:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, although this is a Dutch work, not German. w:nl:André van der Vossen is named at the bottom of the image and died in 1963. Not public domain until 2034, see COM:Netherlands. Verbcatcher (talk) 12:53, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good call. My bad. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. 1922 work, so it's in the PD in the US already, and the file can be restored in 2034. --Rosenzweig τ 15:40, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the designer's death. In this case the designer, André van der Vossen, died in 1963. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO until at least 2,033.

Adamant1 (talk) 07:37, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. André van der Vossen is named on these 1958 stamps, so they are protected for 70 years pma in Germany. In the US, they are protected until the end of 2053, so the files can be restored in 2054. --Rosenzweig τ 15:38, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the designer's death. In this case the designer, Horst Naumann, died in 1985. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO until at least 2,081.

Adamant1 (talk) 07:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: most, per nomination, kept the two with Käthe Kollwitz works. Naumann is named on the pre-1966 stamps, so these are protected for 70 years pma in Germany like the rest. Horst Naumann actually died in 1990, so the stamps are protected until the end of 2060 in Germany. The stamps up to (and including) 1977 are protected in the US for 95 (+ 1) years, so they can be restored after that period, but not before 2061 (I'll add notes). The 1979 and 1983 stamps are protected in the US for 70 years pma as well and can be restored in 2061. --Rosenzweig τ 15:21, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text content. If you are trying to create a Wikipedia article, please refer to w:Help:Your first article. Omphalographer (talk) 02:32, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:03, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text content. Omphalographer (talk) 02:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:03, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text content. Omphalographer (talk) 02:35, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:03, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal CV. Omphalographer (talk) 02:40, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text content; religious polemic. Omphalographer (talk) 02:43, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text content. Omphalographer (talk) 02:45, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text content. Omphalographer (talk) 02:46, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text content, another old attempted article in PDF form. Omphalographer (talk) 02:48, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text content. Omphalographer (talk) 02:49, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:00, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the designer's death. In this case the designer, Reiner Zieger, seems to still be alive. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO until an undetermined date.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:28, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 15:58, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the designer's death. In this case the designer, Leif Frimann Anisdahl, seems to still be alive. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO until an undetermined date.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:59, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 15:56, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Yugoslavia says nothing about stamps and the artist of these ones, Leif Frimann Anisdahl, seems to still be alive. So the images should be deleted as COPYVIO until an undetermined date unless someone can provide evidence to contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 20:50, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

According to the laws of the former Yugoslavia, state signs (including postage signs) are exempt from copyright. The same applies to the legislation of Serbia and Montenegro. Andrey Korzun (talk) 10:04, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Where do the laws of the former Yugoslavia say that state signs are exempt from copyright or even that stamps are including in that? If you look at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Yugoslavia it says nothing about stamps. Let alone does it say that they or state signs are PD. Even Template:PD-YugoslaviaGov just says "certain official state documents such as law texts" and stamps aren't law text. That's not even to say anything about Serbia and Montenegro, which have essentially the same rules as Yugoslavia. So what exactly are you basing your comment on? --Adamant1 (talk) 12:18, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It seems difficult to find the original of the Yugoslav Copyright Law (1978). But we have a Serbian copyright law (1998), which largely replicated the law of the former Yugoslavia. It contains Article 6, paragraph 2. “The following shall not be considered works of authorship: 1) Laws, decrees and other regulations; 2) Official materials of government agencies and agencies discharging public functions.” Postage stamps are official materials of the state postal department. Link to the law https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text/498378 Andrey Korzun (talk) 10:15, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Most people and countries don't usually consider postage stamps to be de facto PD under any kind of clause saying "official materials" the state are. In this case if "official materials" just meant "everything created by the state" as your trying to treat it then there'd be zero reason for the first point of the regulation saying laws, decrees, and other regulations are public domain. Since all of those are obviously "Official materials of government agencies and agencies discharging public functions." So there's clearly still things created the government that aren't PD regardless and I assume one of those thing are postage stamps. Since again, most countries that have similar clauses don't include postage stamps in them and there's zero evidence that Yugoslavia did. Or for that matter even Serbian to begin with, but even if stamps of Serbia are de facto PD based on that rational it doesn't automatically conclude that the same would go for Yugoslavia and personally I don't think it does for the reasons I've given. Mainly that there's no reason the law would specifically state laws, decrees, and other regulations are PD and then go on to say "Official materials" also are if "Official materials" meant everything created by the state regardless. For instance I assume buildings, statues, bridges, and the like aren't covered in that. Really, there's no reason stamps would be for reasons I have zero urge to get into. Suffice to say, it's way more likely they aren't PD then the opposite. --Adamant1 (talk) 14:41, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD per the map at Commons:Stamps. holly {chat} 17:21, 24 January 2024 (UTC) Deleted: I misread the map. holly {chat} 17:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 06:04, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:49, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, needs permission from the artist Désiré Froc-Robert A1Cafel (talk) 06:06, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:49, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Jean-Pierre Lartisien is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 06:11, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:49, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Alphonse Saladin died in 1956 A1Cafel (talk) 06:13, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:49, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Alphonse Saladin died in 1956 A1Cafel (talk) 06:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Jean-Marc de Pas is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 06:18, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Jean-Marc de Pas is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 06:19, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Jean-Marc de Pas is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 06:21, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the designer's death. In this case the designer, Dieter Ziegenfeuter, seems to still be alive. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO until an undetermined date unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. It's possible a few are based on earlier works that are PD but I couldn't find copies of the originals if they exist to confirm that being the case.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:24, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I added the last couple of images after I created the initial deletion request because I did using the Visual File Change tool and they were in a different directory. I don't think that makes them or the nomination in general "invalid." In fact I've done it that way plenty of times in the past and no one ever had a problem with it. Although I guess the deletion request template could be added to the files, but that's a separate issue and has nothing to do with the DR in general. But I have nominated images for deletion before even if they didn't contain the template and the images were still deleted. So really, it just seems like a super pedantic procedural non-issue. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:31, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most, per nomination, kept the one showing the 19th century painting. As for three files not having the deletion template added: That is generally not good, please do that in the future, Adamant1. In this particular case, I've looked at it, and all 4 uploaders received, on the very same day, notifications that there were deletion requests for stamp files they had uploaded, bot none did respond. So my conclusion is they all were notified enough. --Rosenzweig τ 15:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Christian Champagne is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 06:25, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Christian Champagne is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 06:25, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Christian Champagne is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 06:25, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Christian Champagne is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 06:25, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Christian Champagne is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 06:25, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Christian Champagne is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 06:25, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Christian Champagne is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 06:25, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Christian Champagne is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 06:25, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Christian Champagne is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 06:25, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Christian Champagne is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 06:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Christian Champagne is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 06:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Christian Champagne is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 06:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Alphonse Camille Terroir died in 1955 A1Cafel (talk) 06:29, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Félix Schivo died in 2006 A1Cafel (talk) 06:48, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Félix Schivo died in 2006 A1Cafel (talk) 06:48, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Jean-Marc de Pas is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 06:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, needs permission from the artist Annick Leroy A1Cafel (talk) 06:51, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 06:51, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly photoshopped/edited - with no exif. Unlikely to be own work this is a DW Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

High quality professional image with no exif, unlikely to be own work. PCP Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the designers death. In this case the designer, Paul Reißmüller, seem to still be alive or at least haven't been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO until an undetermined date.

Adamant1 (talk) 07:57, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:06, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 10:18, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 10:20, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was uploaded once and copyright was claimed to belong to Ministry of Commerce, Cambodia, and now, it's an own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:42, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:38, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: low-res/web-size image with FB code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9   15:04, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional quality, posed photograph, user's only upload, no EXIF. I can't find the original earlier version on the Web, but I think it's highly likely to be a copyright violation per Commons:Precautionary principle. If I'm wrong and User:Jscu is actually a professional photographer and donating just this one image to us, I'd be only too happy if they were to write Commons:Volunteer Response Team and explain as much. But my suspicious nature says otherwise. GRuban (talk) 15:18, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:53, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work is taken from this source. According to the bibliography on the PDF, the author of this work is Surrey Satellite Technology Limited. So this file will be deleted. Uncitoyen (talk) 15:54, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:53, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Estonia, artist Tauno Kangro is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 15:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:53, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Estonia, artist Tauno Kangro is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 15:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:53, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Estonia, artist Tauno Kangro is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 15:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:53, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Estonia, artist Tauno Kangro is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 15:57, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:53, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Norway, artist Stinius Fredriksen died in 1977 A1Cafel (talk) 15:58, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:53, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Norway, artist Stinius Fredriksen died in 1977 A1Cafel (talk) 15:59, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:53, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in North Macedonia A1Cafel (talk) 16:42, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:53, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found on IMDB. Possibly might be free as {{PD-US-no notice}} as many publicity photos were, but we would need evidence. It's certainly not "own work" as claimed. holly {chat} 17:06, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly unlikely to be "own work" as claimed. Appears to be a publicity photograph, so it may be {{PD-US-no notice}} like so many others, but we would need better provenance to make that determination. holly {chat} 17:18, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1997 license plate from Manitoba that has elements that would place it above the ToO in Canada. Not public domain in Canada yet. Abzeronow (talk) 17:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See EXIF: Author Apinya Rittipo/BGPU ≠ uploader Obbdeewajin Эlcobbola talk 18:02, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is obviously derived from this photography, which does not seem to be freely licensed. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:16, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the designers death. In this case the designers, Sibylle and Fritz Haase, seem to still be alive or at least haven't been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO until an undetermined date.

Adamant1 (talk) 08:17, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Fritz Haase and Sibylle Haase-Knels are in their 80s and alive. The files can be restored 70 years pma of their deaths. --Rosenzweig τ 16:32, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the designers death. In this case the designer, Gerhard Stauf, died in 1996. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO until at least 2,067.

Adamant1 (talk) 09:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. The 1974 stamps are protected in the US until the end of 2069 and can be restored in 2070; the rest of the stamps are protected for 70 years pma in the US as well and can be restored in 2067. --Rosenzweig τ 16:47, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google Maps copyright infringement — Koreller (talk) 16:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:53, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google Maps copyright infringement — Koreller (talk) 17:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:53, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google Maps copyright infringement — Koreller (talk) 17:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:53, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have a permission for the translation, but the original work is still under a copyright in France (until 2044) and in USA (until 2038). Yann (talk) 17:30, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I ignored the copyright in USA longer than 70 years after death of the writer. --Lucyin (talk) 11:23, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Lucyin: The US copyright is counted from the date of publication, not from the author's death. Yann (talk) 11:37, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for explanation, but the book "was first published in English and French in the United States by Reynal & Hitchcock in April 1943". So it is 70 years old, isn't it ? Or has that work a 95-years-old copyright (even without the drawings) ?
Other idea: The book is out of copyright in any country but France or USA. The German publisher Titenfass has published a lot of translations of it (the work is said to have been translated in 400 languages and dialects). If Wikipedia would have a server outside USA (and France), it can be stored there legally.
I see in English Wiki that the cover of the book seems to be hosted in another country than USA (Great-Britain ?). If the Walloon Wikipedia is hosted in Belgium, might the file be transferred over there ?
--Lucyin (talk) 17:24, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Lucyin: Bonjour, Pour ce livre publié en 1943, les droits d'auteur aux États-Unis sont de 95 ans après la publication. Il n'y a pas de truc pour contourner cette exigence. S'il y en avait un, quelqu'un l'aurait probablement déjà utilisé. Les traductions n'annulent pas les droits d'auteur sur l'original. Tous les sites de Wikimedia doivent être conformes au droit des États-Unis. L'image sur la Wikipedia de langue anglaise utilise une exception très particulière pour cette image de la couverture dans un article de cette Wikipédia. -- Asclepias (talk) 20:45, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:56, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Honvib (talk) 20:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, courtesy deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 16:57, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong date (he is dead!!!), tiny - probably copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 20:21, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no proper author, source, or date; not enough information to determine the copyright status. --Rosenzweig τ 16:59, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DUYSTARS56MX (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: one selfie and eleven random PDF documents (and I do mean random - everything from invoices for professional services to printouts of RFCs).

Omphalographer (talk) 22:15, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 17:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Acharyak184 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: plain text content (a student project).

Omphalographer (talk) 22:17, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 17:03, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Retriever 69 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res/web-size screengrab images with disparate quality and styles, missing EXIF data or credit to someone else.

P 1 9 9   02:52, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 20:21, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Retriever 69 (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

Same as before. Likely not own works: low-res/web-size screengrab images with disparate quality and styles, missing EXIF data or credit to someone else (File:Oxyzone City Park.jpg says "Author Doby" in EXIF data).

P 1 9 9   15:12, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, uploader lost assumption of good faith with multiple copyright violations. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality photo, we had better ones to illustrate street-scenes A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete can't imagine this being useful. - Jmabel ! talk 03:44, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 20:21, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:51, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:51, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Half open banana is not valid reason for copyright. Keep it. 200.111.227.230 15:22, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:51, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:54, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Indo British Wikipedian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

fantasy diagrams are out of project scope

Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:49, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Indo British Wikipedian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

data do not match with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1946_Bengal_Legislative_Assembly_election fake data, misleading diagram

Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:43, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:10, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author of the book is not the artist. Steven Spurrier died in 1961, so his copyright lasts until 2031. (UK) -- Verbarson  talkedits 17:44, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:42, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:21, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:44, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is not original, no author permission found. Likely a Flickrwashing account. Đại Việt quốc (talk) 21:15, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:45, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark: (C) Dan Carr Holapaco77 (talk) 23:17, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:46, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This cannot be self image. Date is probably not 2022, and this old image is not self image probably. LR0725 [ Talk | Contribs ] 23:44, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:46, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Alphonse Camille Terroir died in 1955

A1Cafel (talk) 06:37, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. 1930 work, the files can be restored in 2026. --Rosenzweig τ 00:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Alphonse Camille Terroir died in 1955

A1Cafel (talk) 06:39, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. 1925 work, the files can be restored in 2026. --Rosenzweig τ 00:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay - text document outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 14:46, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 20:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brief biography of non-notable individual. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 14:51, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 20:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brief personal essay on the pros and cons of gardening in the shade. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 14:53, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 20:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 03:53, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 15:18, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 15:18, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from the source + COM:OOS (personal photo) A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 15:18, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

замена на новое фото Andrey45mt9 (talk) 10:51, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedydelete|F8}} Andrey45mt9 (talk) 07:45, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE at multiple projects. --Rosenzweig τ 21:17, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{speedydelete|F8}} Andrey45mt9 (talk) 07:34, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Still COM:INUSE at multiple projects. If by F8 you mean it's an exact or scaled down-duplicate, please name the file it is supposedly a duplicate of. Or even better use the {{Duplicate}} template. --Rosenzweig τ 10:49, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:34, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{speedydelete|F8}} Andrey45mt9 (talk) 09:35, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as before, still COM:INUSE, no valid reason for deletion shown. --Rosenzweig τ 17:09, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See EXIF: "DFP" photo, variants elsewhere before upload (e.g., [6][7]), etc. Эlcobbola talk 17:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete Clearly a copyviol: photo by DFP Photo Agency, cf. metadata — danyele 00:34, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above. --Эlcobbola talk 17:12, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, needs permission from the artist René André Duparc A1Cafel (talk) 06:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The life span of René André Duparcq is 1897–1966, see here. The statue was erected in 1950, see here. Francis I of France founded Le Havre and its port in 1517, hence the significance of the statue. This artwork will be in the public domain according to French law in 2037 (70 years after the death) and {{PD-US-expired}} can be assumed to apply in 2046 (95 years after the erection of the statue). --AFBorchert (talk) 07:53, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:53, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Doclys as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: unlikely to be original work based on the summary, plus the file also carries no EXIF. Converting to DR, not a valid reason for speedy. King of ♥ 06:58, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Agreed, not appropriate for speedy deletion. However, the argument is valid, and 224 × 321 pixels was tiny even in 2011. Plus, the uploader says "pls go ahead with deletion" on their user talk page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:46, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:54, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

At least the portrait of Habash and the b/w-photography in the upper right corner are above COM:TOO. Unfortunately, Lebanon has no freedom-of-panorama exception. Therefore, this image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Genuinely asking; how you know the picture is posted in Lebanon? It could be located in Jordan or Palestine? Faraz Sualeh (talk) 19:15, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Concluded from the marker on the map on https://www.flickr.com/photos/sebastian-baryli/3230637113/. Jordan also has no FoP. --Túrelio (talk) 19:21, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, you're correct...😬
My bad🤦🏻‍♂️ Faraz Sualeh (talk) 19:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:54, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama for statues in Kazakhstan. Need information about artist Zh. Maldybayev KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 20:06, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:55, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama for statues in Kazakhstan. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 20:07, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:55, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama for statues in Kazakhstan. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 20:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:55, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama for statues in Kazakhstan. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 20:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:55, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama for statues in Kazakhstan. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 20:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:55, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama for statues in Kazakhstan. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 20:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:55, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama for statues in Kazakhstan. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 20:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:55, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama for statues in Kazakhstan. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 20:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:56, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation of the sculpture. This is a memorial to to Vladimir Vysotsky who died in 1980, so it is unlikely to be older than that. No freedom of panorama in Montenegro, see COM:FOP Montenegro. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Podgorica, statua di vladimir visockij.JPG, for another photo of the same memorial. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:02, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:56, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality image of com:PENIS Pippobuono (talk) 07:11, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:48, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, no educational value A1Cafel (talk) 15:59, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:55, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 00:23, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I don’t see what’s so great here Dronebogus (talk) 14:28, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:41, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not like this. FLLLGL (talk) 03:25, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 00:36, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 00:23, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete not bad is nor good enough Dronebogus (talk) 14:25, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:41, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SuerteZodiacal298 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These look like screenshots from a movie. They were uploaded by a globally blocked account for block evasion.

The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 01:06, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adding this one as well to the deletion nomination because it's a crop.

  •  Delete. Delete all. Based on the image quality and the history of the multiple accounts involved, it is clear that these images do not qualify as "own work". They would require permission from the actual copyright holders in order for them to be hosted on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 12:18, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:41, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nominated for deletion before due to copyvio. Joaquinazo (talk) 01:10, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:43, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the uploader's original work; it can be found in the same or even higher resolutions on plenty of other websites, including Facebook and Instagram. Similar shots have been posted to Ms. Maigue's Instagram [8] [9] which she credits to the photographer Andrei Suleik. Doclys👨‍⚕️👩‍⚕️ 🩺💉 02:19, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural close - already deleted. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:42, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant poor-quality crop of File:This artist’s impression shows the strange object AR Scorpii.jpg, unused. Юрий Д.К 02:30, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:43, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logotype is far beyond simple text and shapes, as it includes shadows, non-standart typeset, pseudo-3d effect. Masur (talk) 05:35, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:43, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One credited to insta, another has no info and found here https://www.songkick.com/images/39289876 and here https://www.facebook.com/lucas.cervetti/photos/pb.100046981006961.-2207520000/2419975891387883/?type=3 - PCP - unlikely to be own work

Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:44, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this logo is an old version that is not in use anymore. I am planning to upload the latest version of the logo Mayiani10 (talk) 08:29, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete - simply upload the new logo as a separate file. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:45, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file contains an image of a rose in someone's hand, but it appears to be gibberish or doesn't convey any meaningful information in context. Saurabhsaha (talk) 10:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:46, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file contains an image of a town, but it appears to be gibberish or doesn't convey any meaningful information in context Saurabhsaha (talk) 10:05, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid reason for deletion. In scope and geolocated. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:48, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file contains an image of a place, but it appears to be gibberish or doesn't convey any meaningful information in context. Saurabhsaha (talk) 10:15, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The image could be a good one for illustrating how a fisheye lens distorts a space when used in photography, but the large © watermark on the image is in conflict with the uploader's release of the image under {{CC-by-sa-4.0}}. If it's reuploaded without the watermark, it would be acceptable. —Tcr25 (talk) 16:28, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:49, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non rispecchia il tema del concorso Mario2912 (talk) 10:59, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep For the purposes of Deletion requests, I don't care what rules of a competition this photo may have violated; all I care about is whether it's a potentially useful image that seems to have a proper license. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:56, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:49, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete. Not "own" work. The image is almost certainly dowloaded from internet. See this for example, although that doesn't seem to be the original source, as the "missing" caption suggests. But on the other hand it couldn't have been taken from Commons, because the article is dated "Sept. 13, 2023", 13 days earlier than this file was uploded here. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 11:21, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:50, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Requesting deletion of this gallery as it is 6 years out of date and not particularly useful. I am the only contributor to this gallery, and I am not interested in updating or maintaining it. I think for something as long-running and multi-faceted as a professional sports team, visitors would be better off browsing a well-organized category than seeing a limited gallery. IagoQnsi (talk) 01:50, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment It's not important to maintain a gallery as long as there is an equivalent category for these images. So no objection to deleting the gallery, as long as neither the category nor any images are deleted at the same time. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:58, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: procedural close - already deleted. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:50, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As far as I can tell, this appears to be a photograph of singer en:Marilyn Manson projected on a screen during an en:Avril Lavigne concert (Context: Manson provided vocals on the studio recording of Lavigne's song "Bad Girl"). Origin and copyright status of the original photograph is unclear. El Grafo (talk) 11:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:50, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res holiday snap obviously for advertising purposes. 62.216.206.127 12:19, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:50, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private hoiliday snap. Person COM:SCOPE Qualitätssicherung (talk) 12:22, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:51, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res image with watermark imposed obviously for advertising purposes. Qualitätssicherung (talk) 12:23, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:51, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain advertising. Qualitätssicherung (talk) 12:24, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:51, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, uploader obviously not the photographer Alabasterstein (talk) 12:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:51, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, wrong date, wrong description, probably not own work as claimed. A b/w version of this picture is on page 140 of "Mechelen aan de Tigris" (2001), credited to Hollerweger, 1990, placing the picture in Hassana, Iraq. Wimmel (talk) 12:56, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:52, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have uploaded this image for illustrating the article about Nikolay Varlamovich Sollogub in the Russian Wikipedia (the image in the source was reported of being his portrait), but afterwards I have found out that it is a picture of Vladimir Alexandrovich Sollogub, and that another version of the pictture is already on the Commons: Sollogub VA.jpg Leokand (talk) 13:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete G7 courtesy delete of recent upload based upon uploader's request. —Tcr25 (talk) 16:57, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:52, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by حركه النجباء (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, one has visible watermark

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:56, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:52, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by جاوید بشیری (talk · contribs)

[edit]

False own work claims. One seems like a screenshot and others are logos

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:57, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:53, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:License laundering, the user uploading the video does not own rights to this music video. The link provided by YouTube under the video says "℗ OUD Productioon" HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:53, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no author no permission out of project scope - used on nl-wiki for person promotional article Hoyanova (talk) 14:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:54, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cristianradunema (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Book covers with a design simple enough to go under {{PD-ineligible}}, but unfortunately there is no info on the source and permission of the accompanying photo.

Gikü (talk) 12:31, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:40, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cristianradunema (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Letterboxing and an original transmission code on the larger image suggest it isn't own work. There's no camera data on this image either.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:51, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP, 2 already deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 07:48, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cristianradunema (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These paintings are of a living (as of August 9) artist Mihai Bandac (b. 1939). No proof of permission.

Gikü (talk) 18:31, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:54, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cristianradunema (talk · contribs) 4

[edit]

Likely not own work: subject is same as uploader (3 different cameras, 1 missing EXIF data).

P 1 9 9   15:10, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:54, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyvio. Low resolution, no EXIF, that very suspicious black border, user's only contribution ... most important, https://es-us.vida-estilo.yahoo.com/blogs/lo-que-te-perdiste/en-nicaragua-no-aceptan-nastassja-bol%C3%ADvar-como-su-053548228.html was published March 27, 2013, with this image, while our upload here is from 10 August 2013. GRuban (talk) 15:12, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:54, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SarayPons (talk · contribs)

[edit]

LCW website had a clearly visible copyright notice (https://web.archive.org/web/20180426094224/http://www.lcw-cfl.org/). The copyright status of the photograph and the newspaper is unclear.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:32, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:55, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source does not release under a free license: "Copyright : ICRC" HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:55, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hassan.khalifeh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own works. One has visible watermark.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:55, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AusGenius (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Based on the uploader's edits on Wikipedia, the uploader is the subject of these photos. Since he is not the photographer, the licensing and the claims of own work are not appropriate. Instead, permission from the photographers/copyright holders of each of these photos is needed in order for them to be hosted on Commons.

Marbletan (talk) 17:04, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:55, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JackintheBox (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Created for use in a third-party trivia quiz website in 2020. Rhode Island was deleted this June as unused/out of scope, the rest should probably follow too. None are currently in use. I'd add that Wikimedia is not your personal free web host.

Patrick Neil, oѺ/Talk 17:32, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The Washington State seal was kept (by me) in 2022 per Commons:Deletion requests/File:State seal of Washington with text removed.png. --Rosenzweig τ 18:41, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:56, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, superseded by an .svg file, and low resolution. Worldlydev (talk) 18:44, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:57, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph of a logo and as such is a derivative work of the original logo. Whpq (talk) 18:49, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why delete a historical artifact like this, when it appears to be one of the only images of it available online? A more appropriate action would be to nominate a higher quality image to replace it. If someone has such an image, by all means do so please. But do not simply delete it! Thank you Peter54321 (talk) 19:16, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Because the photo is a derivative work of a copyrighted logo. See Commons:Licensing#Derivative works. -- Whpq (talk) 19:32, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:56, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Supposed to be "own work" according to the uploader (only upload...). Very dubious. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:38, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:57, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal (and self-referential) work. Non-notable person. - Fma12 (talk) 21:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:57, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Beyond scope, just a random excerpt from a book. Jan Kameníček (talk) 21:53, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Applies also to File:Gavara.jpg3.jpg and File:Gavara.jpg. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 21:58, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:57, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reverse image search reveals that this photo is not the property of the uploader, but is instead, that of the cruise line. Tunestoons (talk) 23:02, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:57, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:24, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted drawing A1Cafel (talk) 06:59, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:30, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 07:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:33, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scaled-down of File:President Biden met with President Lula da Silva at the 78th UNGA.jpg A1Cafel (talk) 07:05, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. This file has a very detailed Metadata, including the name of the Photographer. The other file- the file you uploaded- has NO Metadata. The detailed metadata plus the photo together makes this file more valuable to the Commons Project and its users, despite a slightly smaller size photo. --Ooligan (talk) 20:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:33, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Minorax as no permission (No permission since). Low-res with EXIF from a consumer DSLR, uploaded in 2013. There are no older or larger hits online. Uploader has no other uploads or global contribs. Can we COM:AGF here? King of ♥ 07:21, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:34, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Free image, but contains the site logo, which is protected by copyright. Venzz (talk) 07:25, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Now uploaded version without unfree label, from other source. --Kaganer (talk) 02:36, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: problem seems resolved. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:34, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Free image, but contains the site logo, which is protected by copyright Venzz (talk) 07:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, now re-uploaded free version without unfree watermark (from other source). --Kaganer (talk) 02:17, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: issue apparently resolved. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:35, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is a mirrored version of what it's supposed to show - that's easy to spot when you look at the last word written in elder futhark: it's supposed to say faihido but the runes are mirrored and even when you ignore the fact that some of them aren't the same when mirrored it would say odihiaf. I.e. nothing is really bad about this picture but it is wrong to portray the mirrored version as correct 2001:16B8:3110:5B00:FDF4:5783:5B32:AB3E 12:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Early runic inscriptions were sometimes written from right to left with mirrored glyphs. Looking at this image of an interpretive plaque at the Einang stone site, the runes are shown as being written in the direction and form that is seen in this picture. The way the translation is given in the image description here makes it seem the image is mirrored, but it isn't. —Tcr25 (talk) 17:12, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion, in use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:36, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 06:53, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


De minimis, её там и не видно почти (it's almost invisible there). Lesless (talk) 09:04, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think so. The sculpture is in the center and it is an unavoidable part of the photo. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:42, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:31, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 07:02, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:31, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission - copyvio from www.welikeart.nl Hoyanova (talk) 14:24, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mail received per VRT. Please keep for a few weeks to come. Ellywa (talk) 19:47, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:32, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Skulljujos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Freedom of Panorama does not apply to cropped images that focus on works of art that appear in backgrounds of larger photographs.

Ytoyoda (talk) 15:23, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All these images except File:Jose cordero (cropped).jpg and File:Jose cordero.jpg are supported by

Ecuador

Decision 351 of the Andean Community of Nations provides for FOP as follows:
  • "Article 22.- Without prejudice to that put forth in the Chapter 5 and in the previous article, it will be legal to realize, without authorization from the author and without the payment of any remuneration, the following acts:...h) Realizing the reproduction, emitting by radio diffusion or public transmission by cable, of the image of an architectural work, of a work of fine arts, of a photographic work or of a work of applied art, that is found situated in permanent form in a place open to the public".
See COM:CRT/Ecuador#Freedom of panorama for more information.

English | español | +/−

, as all of them sit at the Legislative Palace of Ecuador permanently, which is a public space open to the public.--Skulljujos (talk) 02:30, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: most of them after verifying with the official WIPO translation it does appear that these meet the FoP exemption for Ecuador (Chapter VII, Section 22, Subsection (h)). Deleted: the two that do not qualify. --Majora (talk) 21:55, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Skulljujos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Blatant license laundering. The YouTube videos are merely displaying pre-existing images to which the YouTube channel does not have copyrights. For example, File:Jose arroyo alcalde de pujili.png (and thus its crop) is this image and File:Omar menendez alcalde de puerto lopez.png (and thus its crop) is this image, etc.

Эlcobbola talk 19:10, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:33, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Certainly not own work, but does it meet COM:TOO? The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:20, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: below COM:TOO Peru. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:09, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:11, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The current rationale is File 10: Personal photos by non-contributors, requesting speedy deletion of the page with this reason. The uploader has only 316 edits across Wikimedia projects. Saurabhsaha (talk) 16:40, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose The uploader has valuable contribution in As wp as well as Commons. So, this image doesn't come under F10 criteria.Chiring chandan (talk) 17:22, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose Pranamikaadhikary (talk) 17:25, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose DC Assam (talk)
 Keep photo of a modest but valuable contributor, also COM:INUSE. Günther Frager (talk) 21:47, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Such continuous efforts to delete valuable images from Assamese Wikipedia should be considered as an act of vandilism.I, personally, condemn such act and request the administrator to take seriuos measures to discourage such attempts.the uploader has contributed towards Wikipedia and his contribution cannot be disregarded.Thanks. Ishanjyotibora (talk) 09:47, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very bad quality, very low resolution, wrong color, better file File:Pourbus, Franz (II) - María de' Medici, reina de Francia - Prado.jpg Oursana (talk) 23:25, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, because this may be a photo of the painting before restoration, the yellow tint may be caused by an old varnish that has since been removed. This effect is shown in w:en:Conservation and restoration of cultural property#Example of the restoration of an oil painting. If this photo is of the painting before restoration then it is useful. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:34, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Weak keep, I agree in principal with Verbcatcher's point and lean keep for that reason, but it would be good to know if/when the painting was restored and that information included within the file description. (I'm not finding those details in a quick search.) —Tcr25 (talk) 13:16, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:21, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And also:

unlike own works as per "FBMD" in metadata. 0x0a (talk) 10:40, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:08, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per original uploader's request. Suppressed by File:u3224d.svg with unified Unicode naming. David Xuang (talk) 12:21, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:08, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per original uploader's request. Suppressed by File:u32199.svg with unified Unicode naming. David Xuang (talk) 12:23, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:08, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per original uploader's request. Suppressed by File:u31b90.svg with unified Unicode naming. David Xuang (talk) 12:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:08, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per original uploader's request. Suppressed by File:u31b76.svg with unified Unicode naming. David Xuang (talk) 12:31, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:08, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per original uploader's request. Suppressed by File:u31b75.svg with unified Unicode naming. David Xuang (talk) 12:31, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:08, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per original uploader's request. Suppressed by File:u31b91.svg with unified Unicode naming. David Xuang (talk) 12:31, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:08, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suppressed by unified File:u31fee.svg in Unicode. David Xuang (talk) 12:48, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:08, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Free image, but contains the site logo, which is protected by copyright Venzz (talk) 07:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep and crop, the logo is not de minimis, however a crop wouldn't significantly detract from the image. I've made a request at Commons:Overwriting existing files/requests. Queen of Hearts ❤️ (she/they/ella/elle) 02:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Logo has been cropped out and original version hidden. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:21, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

w:File:Flag of Hezbollah.svg

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:10, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say File:Hizbollah flag.jpg falls under Commons:de minimis. FunkMonk (talk) 07:57, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@FunkMonk: "De minimis" basically requires that if the copyrighted part is blurred or blanked, the image is still useful. Will that image still be useful if I blur the logo? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:19, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"i stood in the middle of the street forever waiting for the damn wind to blow the flag so i could get a good photo of the fully-extended flag."
Oh, dear Flickr user upyernoz, you shouldn't have. Seriously. You shouldn't have. Like, you should not have waited. Could have probably kept this otherwise. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:24, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
On the other hand, could you make any kind of useful image by cropping so it only shows the logo itself? Seems not. FunkMonk (talk) 13:40, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:39, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logos of Lebanese group Hezbollah

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:58, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:29, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo in Lebanon HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:15, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:28, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is highly unlikely that Wisnia519 is the original author of this picture. The face picture of Bartłomiej Sitek has been circulating the internet before it has been uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. MemicznyJanusz (talk) 16:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:28, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:License laundering. This is evidently not a work by khamenei.ir, watermark "الإعلام العربي" is visible. HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:29, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also affected: File:Israeli vehicle (D9T).jpg. HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:30, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:27, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file, taken from a 2014 Italian web site and said to show en:Stamata Revithi, is claimed to be from ca. 1896, but without any evidence to support this, it's just assumed because Revithi supposedly ran a marathon in that year.

The drawing could easily have been created much later than 1896. The web site does not give any source, date or author for the image, there is no caption at all, not even one saying that the image shows Revithi.

So there is not enough information to determine the copyright status of this image, and the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle unless convincingly shown to be actually under a free license, be in the public domain in both its source country and the US or actually be old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}}. Rosenzweig τ 15:25, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:35, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, not an own work PizzaKing13 (talk) 05:48, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per request of uploader File_talk:Scale_1201.webp. Obviously is not taken in 1910. Venzz (talk) 08:11, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:48, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From instagram personal account, not suitable with CC-BY license Urang Kamang (talk) 08:18, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:47, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


It appears that the names on the map are incorrect, such as "Bhoutan" instead of "Bhutan" and "Chine" instead of "China." Due to these errors, it may be advisable to consider deleting the file. Saurabhsaha (talk) 09:22, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

такое фото уже есть. Andrey45mt9 (talk) 10:54, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedydelete|F8}} Andrey45mt9 (talk) 07:38, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by Well-Informed Optimist. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by SahinBasaran (talk · contribs)

All self-made original images. None are actually official flags or representative of data. Hoax/fancruft

EvergreenFir (talk) 01:57, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:32, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by SahinBasaran (talk · contribs)

Iraqi government watermark visible, files lack proper quality and EXIF

HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:06, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:53, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by SahinBasaran (talk · contribs)

Source: "2023 © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır". No indication of being released under CC

HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:53, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by SahinBasaran (talk · contribs)

Not own work. [11] Copyright status unknown.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:11, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Photo appears to be from a 1990 demonstration/declaration of the Gagauz Republic. I can find multiple instances of it online, but nothing that provides any credits or proper dating. —Tcr25 (talk) 19:38, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:53, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by SahinBasaran (talk · contribs)

Copyright holder mentioned in EXIF: "Jane Sweeney". No permission

HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:12, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:12, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by SahinBasaran (talk · contribs)

Copyright holder mentioned in EXIF: "SUKRU AKCAN". No permission.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:17, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:12, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SahinBasaran (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photograph from a photograph. Copyright status of the original photograph is unknown.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:18, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment looks to be a colorized version of File:Gökçeada-Town-1967.jpg, which doesn't have the most solid sourcing info on it either since it was originally uploaded to en-wiki in 2007 (and the original uploader hasn't been active since 2008). —Tcr25 (talk) 17:30, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:40, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SahinBasaran (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos are usually copyrighted. Unclear if they are free.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:20, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:38, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by SahinBasaran (talk · contribs)

Not 'own work'. Found on the internet as early as 2016, before upload here [12]

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:20, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:14, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by SahinBasaran (talk · contribs)

Not 'own work' [13]

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:38, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:19, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SahinBasaran (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work [14]

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:41, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:19, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, not an own work PizzaKing13 (talk) 00:10, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No evidence provided, per Infrogmation. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, not an own work PizzaKing13 (talk) 05:49, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no evidence provided, per Infrogmation. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Publicity still bears logo of the record label 4AD, which is based in the United Kingdom and thus invalid as public domain Diplomat's Son (talk) 09:15, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Based on current evidence, the logo is very much de minimis, it is small enough in the original. The tiny logo is not the subject of the photo, its the artists. The photograph itself (which has been cropped) has no copyright markings on it which would make it PD in the US (if it follows {{PD-US-1978-89}} template accordingly as uploader has claimed).
PascalHD (talk) 16:42, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Revisiting this DR - My previous comment was rushed. Anyway, I did some research on this photo, there is no evidence it was ever published as a publicity photo in a U.S. issued press kit. This is a UK published publicity photo taken by Steve Pyke. The current tag in use is invalid and rights belong to the photographer or UK based label 4AD. Disregard my last comment from October. PascalHD (talk) 01:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kept: per IronGargoyle. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original author wthdrew Commons Licence Skulljujos (talk) 13:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No evidence that the YouTube uploader owns the rights to the film screenshotted. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original author wthdrew Commons Licence Skulljujos (talk) 13:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No evidence that the YouTube uploader owns the rights to the film screenshotted. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original author wthdrew Commons Licence Skulljujos (talk) 13:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No evidence that the YouTube uploader owns the rights to the film screenshotted. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original author wthdrew Commons Licence Skulljujos (talk) 13:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No evidence that the YouTube uploader owns the rights to the film screenshotted. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Autor retiro licencia commons Skulljujos (talk) 17:43, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:32, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original author wthdrew Commons Licence Skulljujos (talk) 13:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No evidence that the YouTube uploader owns the rights to the film screenshotted. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original author wthdrew Commons Licence Skulljujos (talk) 13:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No evidence that the YouTube uploader owns the rights to the film screenshotted. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original author wthdrew Commons Licence Skulljujos (talk) 13:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No evidence that the YouTube uploader owns the rights to the film screenshotted. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Autor retiro licencia commons Skulljujos (talk) 17:43, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:32, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original author wthdrew Commons Licence Skulljujos (talk) 13:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No evidence that the YouTube uploader owns the rights to the film screenshotted. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original author wthdrew Commons Licence Skulljujos (talk) 13:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No evidence that the YouTube uploader owns the rights to the film screenshotted. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This individual posted without permission and has no business adding to this wiki 96.92.196.202 21:17, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

please delete this page - the person who did this has no connection to these individuals and is random/weird to add 96.92.196.202 21:18, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:30, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused b/w crop of the oil painting seen in File:Pieter Hendrik Schoute, 1911.jpg. I see no reason to keep it. Watchduck (quack) 21:31, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very bad quality very low resolution, better file File:Joachim von Sandrart - Maximilian I, Elector of Bavaria.jpg Oursana (talk) 22:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is not original, no author permission found. Likely a Flickrwashing account. Đại Việt quốc (talk) 21:15, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It seems there are about 30 images from this Flickr account uploaded to Commons. If we decide to delete this file, the same should also be done with the other files and 21066078@N02 added to Commons:Questionable Flickr images/Users --Didym (talk) 23:39, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is not original, no author permission found. Likely a Flickrwashing account. Đại Việt quốc (talk) 21:15, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by RoBri as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.schwarzwaelder-bote.de/inhalt.donaueschingen-mitgepraegt-ehrenbuerger-hansjuergen-buehler-feiert-85-geburtstag.70a85c67-a300-46b1-a92d-0d144410e89e.html Alabasterstein (talk) 11:53, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Die image on the website of schwarzwaelder-bote.de ist obviously smaller then the upload in Commons. The photographer ist mentioned as Dirk Hetzer that is corresponding to User:Dhetzer which made it plausible that this is the photographer itself. Alabasterstein (talk) 11:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: AGF here. holly {chat} 17:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Excluir porque tem outra imagem igual (fotos), duas vezes e, esta preto e branco pode escluir. 2804:D51:7AAB:8900:9935:DDA9:F71D:A1F 13:45, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason we can't have both. holly {chat} 17:41, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License updated in good faith, but it applies only to the price list, The magazine/brochure appears to be of Dutch origin (albiet an English language publication.) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:11, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Printed in the Netherlands does not necessarily mean published there. holly {chat} 17:47, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License updated in good faith, but only applies to price list, Magazine/Brochure seems to be of Dutch origin( albiet English language publication.) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:13, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Printed in the Netherlands does not necessarily mean published there. holly {chat} 17:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Magazine brochure is of Dutch origins (and thus to recent for copyright to have expired), Not a work of US Gov. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:16, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, on page 4 of the PDF it says "Published by: The Netherlands Flower-bulb Institute - The Associated Bulb Growers of Holland / Hillegom The Netherlands". Moreover, the metadata and page 3 indicate "The Wyatt-Quarles Seed Company", which is unlikely to be branch of the US federal government. Verbcatcher (talk)

And I will note here that the ENTIRE contents of Category:FEDLINK - Henry G. Gilbert Nursery and Seed Trade Catalog Collection and Category:Henry G. Gilbert Nursery and Seed Trade Catalog Collection should be checked for copyright status. NONE of the seed catalogs is a work of US Gov, and the wrong license seems to have been applied as part of a mass upload. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:08, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. While it was printed in the Netherlands, it was clearly distributed (and therefore legally published) in the United States. I do agree, however, that PD-USGov is inappropriate; PD-US-no notice is the correct licence. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 03:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But on page 4 it says that it was published in the Netherlands. My interpretation is that pages with coloured illustrations originated from an organization that promoted Dutch exports, and that an American retailer inserted their price list in them. This edition was clearly intended for the US and Canada, but the Dutch organization would most likely have produced versions for their other export markets. The photographs would probably have been reused in each of these versions. Verbcatcher (talk) 05:20, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Verbcatcher: The photographs were clearly used here, and this work is a U.S. work (and in the public domain there). I don’t even think that such separate publication would matter. In any case, “would most likely” and “would probably” are not evidence. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 22:54, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Its is not clear to me that this is a US work. Separate publication of the photographs would be significant if they predated this publication, the place of first publication normally indicates the home country of a work. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:41, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note that Commons:Licensing includes "Wikimedia Commons only accepts media / that are explicitly freely licensed, or / that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work." Verbcatcher (talk) 23:45, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Verbcatcher: I agree as to prior publication. However, the only thing I can see is this publication, and absent any evidence (in any form) to the contrary, you only offer abject speculation as to the existence of prior publication, and more is needed to engage in your point. I don’t mean to be dismissive, I just don’t think that a hypothetical prior publication is enough. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 00:17, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:PCP doesn't apply here because we have no reason to doubt the Internet Archive's analysis. holly {chat} 17:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Shaan Sengupta as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not an own work. Logo of Delhi government organisation. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 18:07, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 17:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Troquei outra nova a mesma Giuliano Robert 2021 Ludovica80 (talk) 19:02, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 17:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pode apagar essa imagem, pois troquei outra imagem de Giuliano Robert 2021 Ludovica80 (talk) 19:02, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: As this is not your upload, there is no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 17:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Audio is believed to be copyrighted in its source country, Finland, based on the year of death of its author, John Grandell. The author died in 1960, so the audio has copyright protection in Finland until 2031. See COM:FINLAND. This was originally an MP3 and then converted to OGG.

Copyright in a musical work with lyrics, when the lyrics and music have been specifically created for the work, subsists until 70 years have elapsed from the death of the last surviving lyricist or composer, whether or not they have been appointed as the authors of the musical work with lyrics.[404/1961–2015 Sec.43(2)] Eyesnore (talk) 19:15, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 17:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - picture of text The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:42, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a picture of the corresponding artwork somewhere? The very least we could do is add that text to the image description. (I also photograph such labels, but I don't upload them, just transcribe the plaques into the uploads desc's.)
 Neutral on the question whether or not this is in scope, but remember that even blank papers can be in scope. --Enyavar (talk) 18:17, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Flickr uploader is also blacklisted. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the work of Soccer Digital, not actually public domain.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:32, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As imagens estão presentes no perfil de Soccer Digital no Flickr e estão marcadas como domínio público. O perfil disponibiliza várias imagens sobre jogadores e todas com a mesma marcação de domínio público. Qual seria a objeção? MajorPrince (talk) 23:46, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@MajorPrince The issue is that they are not the work of Soccer Digital. The photographs belong to Getty Images and the public domain tag isn’t that meaningful. It’s fine if Soccer Digital releases their photos to the public domain. But they cannot re-license works of other organizations. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 01:34, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I understand. But are they really the same day (or the same photographer)? Because this Digital Soccer image shows an earring in Rodrygo's ear that is slightly different from the earring Rodrygo wears in the Getty Images photos (the Digital Soccer one is a small earring). The hair color appears more blonde in the Getty photos, as well as the messy hair. It may be a subtle difference, but there really is something MajorPrince (talk) 03:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@MajorPrince You're right about the subtle but noticeable differences between the Soccer Digital photos and the Getty Images photos. I'm still not sure, but now I have more doubts and I'm fine keeping these images unless there's stronger evidence. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Imho the portraits are different from the Getty Images (the few I checked) so imho can be kept on Commons, as concluded in the discussion as well. --Ellywa (talk) 23:14, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]