Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/08/24

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 24th, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://br.pinterest.com/pin/403987029043461201/ Pedroepaulo (talk) 00:47, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP: apparently a copvio. --Rosenzweig τ 07:00, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Duplicate}} Desta231206 (talk) 01:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of what? --Sreejith K (talk) 01:47, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I guess its the duplicate of File:YIA AirportLinelogo.png --Sreejith K (talk) 01:49, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Duplicated from YIA AirportLinelogo.png Desta231206 (talk) 01:50, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted (and redirected to duplicate file) by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 06:57, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Improper license Lilmath (talk) 15:50, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{db-g7}} Lilmath (talk) 15:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 16:27, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal file. please remove Uomobulges18241 (talk) 08:32, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:59, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsches bild Elex104 (talk) 11:15, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:58, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was under the false impression that this statue was Serbian when I moved this from enwiki to Commons due to the name of the user who uploaded this file. However, after a quick google lens search, I have found a webpage here that shows this statue was published in Bosnia and Herzegovinia, and Bosnia and Herzegovinia doesn't have FoP. The webpage indicates that the sculptor is c:Category:Ante Kostović, who died only in 1997, meaning this has a long way to go before it is PD. Matr1x-101 {user - talk? - useless contributions} 13:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:53, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken file. Replaced by File:De Standaard vol 063 no 19219 p 04 BINNENLAND.pdf. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 18:50, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:51, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ошибка в данных EverNever (talk) 18:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:51, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

плохое качество EverNever (talk) 18:57, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:51, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope

Out of project scope

Out of project scope

Out of project scope

Out of project scope

Out of project scope

Out of project scope

Out of project scope

Out of project scope

Out of project scope

Out of project scope

Out of project scope

Out of project scope

Out of project scope

Out of project scope

GeorgR (de) (talk) 20:02, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Merged into Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Filipeveiga The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:15, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This User Is Blocked by Odder Kirill Telegin (talk) 22:25, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Speedily kept (non-admin closure). We don't delete user pages just because they're blocked.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Omphalographer (talk • contribs) 00:49, 25 August 2023‎ (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This user is blocked by odder for reverting the previous flags Deni Spaho (talk) 01:02, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:45, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Filipeveiga (talk · contribs)

[edit]

definetly not own work, look at there: https://sqlbak.com/blog/backup-permissions/ , that place used a version of this image and it is from 2015.  Delete all.....

----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 16:29, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:08, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Filipeveiga (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Merging several individual nominations by @GeorgR (de): into one + including missed files.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:10, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:15, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Filipeveiga (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Not identical to the ones previously deleted at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Filipeveiga but very close (just color differences).

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:23, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. We already have tons of progress bar images at Category:Progress bars (and subcategories). These aren't substantially better than what we've already got, they're currently unused, and there's reasonable suspicion over their licensing. Omphalographer (talk) 21:58, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
per omphalographer,  Delete. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 02:22, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:49, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I created those files using canva and published this to use in some metrics. I know there is a ton of progress bar, but I wanted use mine if is possible. Not getting why this is being deleted every time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Filipeveiga (talk • contribs) 18:42, 27. Aug. 2023‎ (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Filipeveiga (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused background images (most with "GrupoFleury" and "YSSY" branding) and an unidentified logo with no clear educational use case.

Omphalographer (talk) 00:19, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD F10 and gave the uploader a {{Scope}} final warning. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:18, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata or any copyright notice/license from the author that enables any kind of redistribution of the media PhakkaponP (talk) 11:47, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Howcheng. --Rosenzweig τ 07:05, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviol https://www.corsedimoto.com/motomondiale/motoe-alessio-finello-riparte-da-basi-piu-solide-le-aspettative-cambiano/ Alfonso Galuba (talk) 18:14, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Howcheng. --Rosenzweig τ 07:04, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviol https://www.supermoto8.com/articles/8566 Alfonso Galuba (talk) 12:29, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Copyright © 2018 Supermoto8. --Túrelio (talk) 16:15, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Elena Ternovaja as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Upload mistake. The Brandenburg-Preußen Museum informed me that they do not have the rights to this picture and therefore cannot give permission for release. It belongs to a private collector.|source=URL that shows that the file is a copyright violation However, artwork dates to 1880. The original author is not given, but surely {{PD-old-assumed-expired}} would apply in that case, no? holly {chat} 23:49, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep PD-EU-no author disclosure . --RAN (talk) 18:20, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Please delete the picture! Elena was part of a Wikipedia group from Berlin (Germany) visiting this small museum in Brandenburg. We were all specifically asked to not take pictures of these artworks since they are not part of the museum's collection but belong to a private collector who did not give permission to spread images of them. It was an upload mistake, and Elena, the photographer of the artwork, specifically asked to take it down for this reason. We all will get in serious trouble if this stays on: the museum and our local wikipedia group who collaborated for an event with the museum on a very friendly basis. Grizma (talk) 06:52, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: @Grizma: OK, so I'll delete this as a G7 (uploader requested). Because she had tagged this as a copyright violation, that's why I had started this investigation. holly {chat} 02:54, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Howcheng: Thanks for understanding! It's my fault, I guess, it's always so hard to find out which template you should use. I recommended this one ... Grizma (talk) 19:43, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Elena Ternovaja as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Upload mistake. The Brandenburg-Preußen Museum informed me that they do not have the rights to this picture and therefore cannot give permission for release. It belongs to a private collector.|source=URL that shows that the file is a copyright violation All of the artworks shown in this photo appear to be old enough to be PD, and if any of them are not, then it seems like they would be de minimis. holly {chat} 23:54, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Yeah, but Elena Ternovaja's claim is that the photograph is not by the museum, whereas it is claimed on the file page to be by her. So the issue is that the photo is copyright violation, not the art depicted in it. Unless I misunderstood something. Elena, please look at any other photo you uploaded and make sure you've accurately identified who took the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:47, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Sorry for unprecise request. With "picture" the artwork is meant. Elena is the photographer, it's a copyright violation to the artwork as it belongs to a private collector who did not give permission to take a photograph. We were on a community event at a small museum und explicitly asked not to take pictures of these objects and upload them since they are not part of the museum's collection. Please take it down, it will be problematic for the museum we worked with if it remains in the commons. --Grizma (talk) 06:45, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted as a speedy G7, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kaiser Wilhelm II und Kaiserin Viktoria, Bilderbogen 1880.jpg. holly {chat} 05:52, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

True author is not known known, thus a copyright violation Culex (talk) 10:38, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:11, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from Facebook without permission. Please ask the author to send a permission to COM:VRT. Larryasou (talk) 05:40, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:37, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Chile says nothing about stamps and at least going by the discussion at Template talk:PD-Chile there's no consensus that works created by the Chilian government are in the public domain. Apparently currency isn't, which means it's probably unlikely stamps are. So this image should be delete as COPYVIO until at least 2,070. Or longer/shorter if someone can find out who the artist is and when or if they died. Adamant1 (talk) 07:30, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:59, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Chile says nothing about stamps and at least going by the discussion at Template talk:PD-Chile there's no consensus that works created by the Chilian government are in the public domain. Apparently currency isn't, which means it's probably unlikely stamps are. So this image should be delete as COPYVIO until at least 2,039. Adamant1 (talk) 07:39, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:13, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Chile says nothing about stamps and at least going by the discussion at Template talk:PD-Chile there's no consensus that works created by the Chilian government are in the public domain. Apparently currency isn't, which means it's probably unlikely stamps are. So this image should be delete as COPYVIO until at least 2,038. Or longer/shorter if someone can find out who the artist is and when or if they died. Adamant1 (talk) 07:42, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Delete Per above. The public domain situation in Chile regarding government works (especially given the CC-BY release in 2010/11) is tricky to say the least. It does not seem like the works of Correos de Chile, a State-owned business, are covered under the terms of the CC license, and so this has to be deleted. --Bedivere (talk) 17:32, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. See [1] for publication date. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:23, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Chile says nothing about stamps and at least going by the discussion at Template talk:PD-Chile there's no consensus that works created by the Chilian government are in the public domain. Apparently currency isn't, which means it's probably unlikely stamps are. So this image should be delete as COPYVIO until at least 2,033. Adamant1 (talk) 07:46, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:37, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist of this stamp died in 1961. So the image should be deleted as COPYVIO until at least 2,032 per the normal term of pma + 70 years. Adamant1 (talk) 12:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:22, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused disputed chemical diagrams II

[edit]

These images are simply not used on any page, are tagged with {{Disputed chem}}, and are superseded by better quality images without the errors on the images requested for deletion. – Alfa-ketosav (talk) 09:45, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 09:54, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background, colored atom labels and too much whitespace (margins). Replaced by File:3-Methyl-2-oxobutanoate-ion-2D-structure.svg as high-quality vector version drawn according to MOS. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 09:00, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:54, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality image in JPG format replaced by File:Logo of Westlake Vinnolit.svg. Especially the "Vinnolit" text suffers from bad quality due to pixelated borders. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 09:26, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:54, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 11:53, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:37, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1902. PD or DW? E4024 (talk) 19:10, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This should be {{PD-RusEmpire}}--Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no source. --JuTa 12:17, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP Russia. Author died in 1987 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Aleksandr_Pavlovich_Kibalnikov 213.134.175.94 09:36, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1959 monument in Russia. Per COM:FOP Russia. 213.134.175.94 09:40, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1959 monument in Russia. Per COM:FOP Russia. 213.134.175.94 09:41, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1959 monument in Russia. Per COM:FOP Russia. 213.134.175.94 09:41, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2022 monument in Russia. Per COM:FOP Russia. 213.134.175.94 09:42, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2022 monument in Russia. Per COM:FOP Russia. 213.134.175.94 09:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2000 monument in Russia. Per COM:FOP Russia. 213.134.175.94 09:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2000 monument in Russia. Per COM:FOP Russia. 213.134.175.94 09:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2009 monument in Russia. Per COM:FOP Russia. 213.134.175.94 09:45, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2003 monument in Russia. Per COM:FOP Russia. 213.134.175.94 09:45, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1958 monument in Russia. Per COM:FOP Russia. 213.134.175.94 09:51, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1958 monument in Russia. Per COM:FOP Russia. 213.134.175.94 09:51, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1978 monument in Russia. Per COM:FOP Russia. 213.134.175.94 09:52, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1988 monument in Russia. Per COM:FOP Russia. 213.134.175.94 09:54, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP Russia. Author died in 1964 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Juozas_Mik%C4%97nas 213.134.175.94 09:33, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality diagrams that seems to be of chromic acid, however, with hydrogen atoms instead of oxo groups, not used. Wostr (talk) 12:30, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Mongolia. The statue depicts a person who died in 1998. The author was sculptor B. Denzen. Still under author's copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:37, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:44, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP for buildings and 3D Art. Abzeronow (talk) 17:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Mongolia. The statue depicts a person who died in 1998. The author was sculptor B. Denzen. Still under author's copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:40, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:44, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted There is now FOP in Mongolia. Abzeronow (talk) 01:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo may be under a free license, but the sculpture is unfree and there is no freedom of panorama in the source country. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Monument to Georgy Zhukov, Ulan Bator, Mongolia.jpg for the artistic work's details. Cannot be de minimis as the sculpture is an essential element of the whole image. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:44, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP for 3D artworks. Abzeronow (talk) 17:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted statue, in a country where there is no freedom of panorama. The sculpture was given by Canada to Mongolia in 2006 and authored by Rick Taylor. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:56, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:44, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP for buildings and 3D artwork. Abzeronow (talk) 23:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The designer of this stamp, Otto Zeiller, died in 1988. So the image should be deleted until at least 2,059 per the normal term of pma +70 years. Adamant1 (talk) 12:58, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:45, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Mongolia. The sculpture is from 1985 and was authored by Russian sculptor L. K. Medyanov and designer B. Gombosuren. Unfree sculpture. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:08, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:45, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP for 3D artwork. Abzeronow (talk) 22:33, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Mongolia. The sculpture is from 1985 and was authored by Russian sculptor L. K. Medyanov and designer B. Gombosuren. Unfree sculpture. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:10, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:45, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP for 3D artwork. Abzeronow (talk) 22:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Assuming I got the right person the artist of the stamp on this cover, Alf von Chmielowski, died in 1967. So the stamp is copyrighted until at least 2,038 per the normal term of 70+ years of the artist for Austrian stamps. Although someone could maybe argue it's de minimis due to being attached to the cover, but from what I've seen so far that rational hasn't held water in DRs of stamps that are on postal covers. Who knows though. Adamant1 (talk) 13:11, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Yes, the author is Alfred von Chmielowski (1896-1967). --Materialscientist (talk) 02:48, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Mongolia. The statue was erected in 2010, authored by artist Sh. Tengisbold, and made by Mongol uran tsutguur LLC director D. Erdenebileg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:16, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:48, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP for 3D artworks. Abzeronow (talk) 22:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue honors the Mongolian head of state during 1984–90 and the depicted figure died in 1997 (source). The statue is likely to be under copyright and the image is unfree, and Mongolia has no freedom of panorama for free uses of images of copyrighted works in public like this. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:22, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:48, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP for 3D artworks. Abzeronow (talk) 22:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfree sculpture from Mongolia which has no freedom of panorama. It was erected in 2009 and its designers were R. Enkhtaivan and Khurtsgerel. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:26, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:48, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP for 3D art. Abzeronow (talk) 17:54, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was overlooked because it wasn't properly categorized. As before: There is no freedom of panorama in Mongolia. The statue was erected in 2006 and made by Korean sculptors. Still under sculptural copyright and the images are unfree.

Rosenzweig τ 13:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:09, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Mongolia. The statue was erected in 2011 and authored by architect B. Denzen.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:38, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:48, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: as per [2]. Yann (talk) 18:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Auteur décédé en 1960 Georges Réant. JuliusMassius (talk) 13:56, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Georges Émile Paul Gustave Réant (1898-1960) did not take this image in 1905 when he was 7 years old. I am not seeing how these are being attributed. No evidence is being presented and several, like this one, are patently false. The credit line on the card reads: "C.L. (Lille)", which is the publisher. --RAN (talk) 04:23, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per comment. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:50, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On the left side of the second chemical structure, there is a bend that implies a carbon atom at that should not be there (marked with notes on the file's page). Marbletan (talk) 14:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete. Not only does the bend imply a "non-existent" methylene, but there is no amide on the image that would be implied by the title. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 20:27, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete as unclear what this represents, especially given the page-name concern. The "bend" is an old way of drawing polysaccharides, that in this specific context would not mean a carbon. But it's ambiguous at best, and likely to be misinterpretted, and there are unambiguous ways of drawing it. Category:Polysaccharides and subcats thereof have tons of this style of images. And even in those cases, they do it in a way that is more self-consistent than this specific file. DMacks (talk) 16:06, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per nom & discussion above. Besides this, the file is of really low quality & most likely orphaned / unused for years now. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 15:28, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per comments. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:52, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These stamps clearly aren't the uploaders own work and Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Bermuda says nothing about stamps. So the image should be deleted as COPYVIO since normal term of 70+ years after the publication date hasn't passed yet. The same goes for File:Мисс мира Джина Свейнсон на почтовой марке Бермуд (1980).gif. Adamant1 (talk) 14:50, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:51, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In the lower left structure, the arrow from oxygen to the cyclohexene ring is coming from the wrong oxygen atom. The original uploader has already made the necessary correction, but uplaoded it with a different file name (File:OxydationAllyliquecorrigé.svg), so this incorrect version should be deleted. Marbletan (talk) 14:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per comments. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:51, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Bolivia#Stamps Bolivian stamps are copyrighted until at least 50 years after the artists death. I couldn't find any information on the artist of this stamp, but it's extremely doubtful (if not impossible) that they have been dead for more then 50 years since the stamp was published in 1975. The same goes for File:José-Maria-Linares-1857-1861 Stamp.jpg. Adamant1 (talk) 15:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:53, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Bolivia#Stamps Bolivian stamps are copyrighted until at least 50 years after the artists death. I couldn't find any information on the artist of these stamps, but it's extremely doubtful (if not impossible) that they have been dead for more then 50 years since the stamps was published in 1971. So the images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 15:15, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good find. You could be right. If so then the images can be undeleted next year, I guess. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:18, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:57, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reproduction of a copyrighted work per COM:MURAL. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 14:12, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:FOP US. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reproduction of a copyrighted work per COM:MURAL. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 14:12, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:FOP US. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reproduction of a copyrighted work per COM:MURAL. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 14:12, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:FOP US. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reproduction of a copyrighted work per COM:MURAL. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 14:13, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:FOP US. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrgiht violation Masti (talk) 14:25, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:02, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

by mistake uploaded other images as a new version. so better to delete this. PJeganathan 17:09, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 04:59, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

by mistake uploaded other images as a new version. so better to delete this. PJeganathan 17:10, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 04:59, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

by mistake uploaded other images as a new version. so better to delete this. PJeganathan 17:12, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 04:59, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

by mistake uploaded other images as a new version. so better to delete this. PJeganathan 17:13, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 04:59, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

by mistake uploaded other images as a new version. so better to delete this. PJeganathan 17:14, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 04:59, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

by mistake uploaded other images as a new version. so better to delete this. PJeganathan 17:14, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 04:59, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

by mistake uploaded other images as a new version. so better to delete this. PJeganathan 17:14, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 04:59, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

by mistake uploaded other images as a new version. so better to delete this. PJeganathan 17:15, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 04:59, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

by mistake uploaded other images as a new version. so better to delete this. PJeganathan 17:16, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 04:59, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mlvradm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

Regasterios (talk) 18:15, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all, out of scope, 1 image has no proper copyright information. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 20:23, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Materialscientist (talk) 04:57, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photograph has such a lack of lighting that the subject is barely visible. Abzeronow (talk) 18:18, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Materialscientist (talk) 04:58, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1985 published Chinese language journal. This is too recent for copyright to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:12, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to journals published between 1985-1988 by an American museum, there is a clear copyright notice in the front matter of the volume.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:00, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:17, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to 1985 publication, with a (C) notice in front matter. This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:02, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. The copyright notice is “© 1985”. As this lacks the name of the proprietor of the copyright, it is an invalid copyright license. In addition, there was no curative registration with the Copyright Office within five years. Thus, the work (and these images) are PD-US-1978-89. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 21:49, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per comment. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:23, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1985 Chinese language publication, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:19, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low quality chemical formula. Use File:4-tert-butylpyridine.svg instead. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 20:41, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Materialscientist (talk) 04:52, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low quality chemical structure (misplaced numbers). Use File:Iminium-Ion.svg instead. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 20:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Materialscientist (talk) 04:52, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low quality formula, use File:Structural formula of methyl formate.svg or File:Methyl formate.svg instead. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 20:50, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Materialscientist (talk) 04:54, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low quality formula. Use File:Tormentic acid.svg instead. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 20:52, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete. There are overlapping text and bonds that make the chemical structure potentially misleading/confusing. The alternative SVG, in addition to being graphically higher quality, is better in this regard. Marbletan (talk) 13:34, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Materialscientist (talk) 04:55, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low quality chemical structure. Use File:Imine general structure B.svg instead. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 20:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Materialscientist (talk) 04:55, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low quality image (subscript numbers). Use File:Alkene-2D-skeletal.svg instead. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 20:58, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Materialscientist (talk) 04:55, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely own work... Joschi71 (talk) 20:59, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. This colorization can be found on dozens of websites, with a much earlier upload date. --Materialscientist (talk) 04:57, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1985 thesis. No notice on document but this is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:47, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per comment. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:22, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Other speedy deletions

Originally tagged speedy by Silent Wind of Doom with the rationale: "Images of sports uniforms have been ruled fair use as per this discussion."

The images appear to be original works, but derivative of the actual uniforms worn by the players. Some of these uniform designs appear to consist solely of common property shapes (regular clothing and simple geometry), colors, and text. Others may have more complicated designs and should be considered for deletion.

Guanaco (talk) 09:08, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Huh. Deletion requests look so different on Commons than the main site.
I was notified about a discussion happening there about my uniform images. A recent (at the time) U.S. Supreme Court decision, namely on the case Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands, the design elements of a uniform are subject to copyright. As such, the designs of these uniforms are under copyright by their teams, their leagues, and the various manufacturers, whether it be Majestic, Reebok, or New Era.
The discussion came to the consensus of properly licensing uniform images as non-free sports uniforms with rationale and to remove them from Commons. As someone disrupted the ordered file names for the uniforms, and to be more precise, I reuploaded the files under new names, properly licensed them, and tagged the Commons images for deletion as per the discussion ruling them non-free. The ones that weren't moved have already been speedy deleted under request of creator. --Silent Wind of Doom (talk) 21:47, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Silent Wind of Doom: The decision about Commons images has to be made on Commons, as this wiki is autonomous. It may be more expedient to standardize and host local copies on English Wikipedia as fair use. However on Commons, we should follow the Supreme Court's ruling and apply the test to each image: "[A] feature incorporated into the design of a useful article is eligible for copyright protection only if the feature (1) can be perceived as a two- or three-dimensional work of art separate from the useful article and (2) would qualify as a protectable pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work—either on its own or fixed in some other tangible medium of expression—if it were imagined separately from the useful article into which it is incorporated." The court did not address whether they met the threshold of originality, so we can evaluate these in the manner of simple vs. complex logos. Guanaco (talk) 04:40, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • User:Silent Wind of Doom, you seem to misunderstand how copyright works. For a picture of a uniform, there are two copyrights:
    1. The copyright of the design of the uniform. However, per COM:TOO, some minimal originality is required, and if the design is too simple, then the design is not protected by copyright and so pictures of those designs can be posted to Commons and shouldn't be listed as unfree on English Wikipedia. The designs listed in this deletion request look very simple, although it could be debated that a few of them maybe are sufficiently complex.
    2. The copyright of the picture itself. The person who makes a drawing of a uniform needs to choose a free licence for his contribution to the image. This is the case even if the design of the uniform is copyrighted, and images which are uploaded to English Wikipedia without a free licence chosen by the artist get deleted per w:WP:FREER. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: none of the uniforms here strike me as above the COM:TOO. Just fancy text, plain colors and a stripe or two. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:52, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Other speedy deletions

Out of scope pictures.

Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:01, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:36, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Other speedy deletions

This file was initially tagged by BrunoBernardino as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: <G7> The limit has been way past 7 days, not eligible for speedy.

1989 (talk) 01:52, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 11:15, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Fake SVGs by Kontrollstelle Kundl

This file was initially tagged by Kontrollstellekundl as Speedy (sla) and the most recent rationale was: Outdated maps of districts of Styria, Fake SVGs by Kontrollstelle Kundl

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no consensus. --ƏXPLICIT 00:39, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files nominated for speedy deletion by Davey2010

These files were initially tagged by Davey2010 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: author req

Moved to DR as G7 doesn't apply to files older than a week.

CptViraj (talk) 16:59, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 21:37, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Kept 3 as requested. --Minoraxtalk 07:03, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files nominated as speedy delete by Sturm

This file was initially tagged by Sturm as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: No inside pictures are / were allowed. Per COM:FOP Brazil this should be fine, definitely no speedy deletion case.

GPSLeo (talk) 20:06, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I was personally in charge of this photowalk. Although we were allowed to photograph, we were asked, a posteriori, that the photos were not uploaded to Commons. Among all other participants, we agreed not to upload these pictures. Sturm (talk) 20:09, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete as above. I have uploaded most of the images and we have agreed to delete them at the request of church's maintainers. ━ ALBERTOLEONCIO Who, me? 00:15, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Aren't we past the courtesy takedown period, at this point we have to rely on copyright and FOP laws. I see nothing that would violate privacy, I see images of floor tiles and stairs, and walls. I think the church should file an official takedown notice and explain why these images should be hidden from view. That way we have the name of an official from the church, and not possibly some random parishioner complaining about privacy, that does not represent the view of church council. I would assume most churches would want a visual inventory of their interiors in case of theft, vandalism, or catastrophic destruction. --RAN (talk) 12:38, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I also attended to this event and I have heard about the conversation with the Father responsable for the church. He was emphatic about not publishing the photos of the interior of the church. Here is the thing: the Father contacted us with this request after the photowalk; in the meantime, some pictures were uploaded. Moreover, as much as I know about the scenario of cultural heritage in Brazil (I have studied the issue for more than 10 years now), most churches in rural areas do not disseminate their interiors and their collections because these buildings are settled in the middle of nowhere and have no security systems neither watchmen. The cases of robbery, fire and other vandalism are too many in Brazil. We must avoid wikis to be the reason for other losses... Sintegrity (talk) 01:13, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. We should not support a discourteous lie without a more compelling reason than just to host photos of a church interior. Being given a tour on the condition of not publishing the photos is something we should respect. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:18, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I understand all your arguments but if we start deleting these files in this case we would go away from the strict rule to only delete files for copyright or privacy reasons. This would open the gates for censorship of files. We even have files where we lost a court case Category:Images subject to Reiss Engelhorn Museum lawsuit. In this and other cases we just hide the original uploader but keep the files. --GPSLeo (talk) 07:25, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I'm shocked those images aren't being hidden, pending the results of an appeal. As for this, the analogy I'd give is that we often grant courtesy deletions to uploaders well beyond the official period when they are allowed to reconsider their uploads on Creative Commons licensing. Let's hide these photos as a courtesy deletion for the church. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:17, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:30, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Imagesdomainepublic

[edit]

Uploader request well after 7 days, all unused. To be clear, I am not the uploader, I just converted to DR after the uploader tagged for speedy deletion.

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:46, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Why would we want to delete beautiful PD flower pictures? Some of these images are quite good and potentially usable as thumbnails in articles. If you'd like to request the deletion of specific images you think are not useful, please do that, but I definitely oppose the wholesale deletion of all of these images. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:31, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as excluded educational content.

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Noting here that I converted these from speedy deletion nominations by Omphalographer as I felt that COM:CSD#G1 didn't apply to any of them, and no speedy criterion applied to most of them. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All of these files are Wikipedia pages printed to PDF, then uploaded to Commons. My take is that they're "redundant content [...] used for testing" (CSD G1) - they're redundant to the Wikipedia pages they were printed from, and they were most likely created as a result of the user messing around with the "download as PDF" and "upload file" sidebar links, rather than as a deliberate process. I can certainly send these to DR in the future if that'd be preferred. Omphalographer (talk) 02:40, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 07:18, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Converted from speedy deletion requests. These are all a few-month-old 20px by 20px images, requested for deletion by the author, and in use on template pages created by the author. These logos are so low-resolution to prevent their educational use, and are therefore out of COM:SCOPE, so they should be deleted.

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. These are all resized versions of images which are, in many cases, non-free, e.g. File:AGI-VN.png is a tiny version of vi:File:Logo tỉnh An Giang.svg which is used under a claim of fair use. Omphalographer (talk) 00:40, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Converted from User:Atcovi's speedy request. Too old for COM:CSD#G7, reason for deletion?

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm not familiar with Commons all too well, so I didn't realize there was a time limit to G7. I simply want these audio clips to be deleted because the "Mujawwad" recitations are in use and these audio clips are not avaliable on any page (therefore serving no purpose). -Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:50, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not being currently in use is not a deletion reason. Atcovi, I assume you uploaded these clips because the recitation is of high quality. Do you now think it is not of high quality? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:28, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    No, I just believed the Mujawwad recitations were better to use rather than the Murattal recitations due to the Tajweeed employed. But if not in use & my desire for these clips to be deleted is not a valid reason, then I have no problem revoking my request and leaving them to be. -Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 00:44, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 18:04, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nominated G7 by uploader, but ineligible due to age. These are high quality, hand drawn works and could be within scope, so kicking them to DR.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete all because those variants are unnecessary. - THV | | U | T - 10:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC); edited: 10:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: These are high quality works, I commend the uploader for their artistry, courtesy deletion is granted. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:04, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Mongolia. A photo caption on this site claims the equestrian statue was made possible through the financing of "Zinc Mineral LLC." in 2008. This makes it a recent statue still under sculptor's copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:31, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP. Abzeronow (talk) 02:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The entire category is a violation of Mongolian copyright law. There is no freedom of panorama in Mongolia; the monument was unveiled in 2008. Commercial license permission from author, artist B. Denzen, is required to keep these commercially-licensed photos.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:30, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: as per [3]. Yann (talk) 18:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bust of Danzan Ravjaa in Sainshand

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Mongolia. The bust was unveiled in 2003, as part of the 200th anniversary of Danzan Ravjaa's birth. It is unlikely the sculptor has been dead for more than 50 years.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:12, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:29, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP. Abzeronow (talk) 18:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Mongolia for free uses of copyrighted artworks and buildings in public spaces. This commercially-licensed photo lacks permission from the sculptor G. Enkhtur, who authored the statue in 2011. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:26, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:29, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted There is now FOP in Mongolia. Abzeronow (talk) 02:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted statue, in a country with no freedom of panorama. The artwork dates to 1999 and sculpted by B. Khiimori. Not yet in public domain. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:30, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:29, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Mongolia now as FOP for 3D artworks. Abzeronow (talk) 23:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Mongolia. The sculpture was installed in public in 2006. Too recent enough so that it is still under sculptor's copyright and is unfree work. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:35, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:29, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP. Abzeronow (talk) 02:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality diagram with many alternatives in Category:Capric acid, not used. Wostr (talk) 10:22, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:32, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Mongolia. The sculpture is recent enough to be still under sculptor's copyright, having been installed in public in 2005.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:26, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:32, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP. Abzeronow (talk) 01:02, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of panorama in Russia for sculpture.

Komarof (talk) 13:07, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a whole category Busts in Russia - Does that mean that all photos there are not allowed to be in Commons? Rakoon (talk) 13:12, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Rakoon It depends on whether the author is alive (or when they died) and the date of monument erection. See also Category:Russian FOP cases/deleted. --Komarof (talk) 13:22, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:32, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo of not an active contributor, self-promotion likely Ignatus (talk) 20:12, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1985 publication of an agency of the Canadian government, would have to have been published prior to 1973 for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:53, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:32, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1984 Journal of Canadian origin, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:14, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:35, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KikooTheBest (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: content from a reverted hoax on enwiki; see en:Special:Diff/1027198840 for details.

Omphalographer (talk) 23:04, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:51, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculpture by Argentine artist Troiano Troiani (1985-1963) located in La Plata. The sculpture was build in 1924 but installed in 1970. There is no freedom of panorama in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 23:20, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:53, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Meiko21 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author's request. Too old for COM:CSD#G7: please provide a reason. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:50, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. The image title and description both describe this as a fantasy logo ("phiên bản tưởng tượng" = "fantasy version"). Omphalographer (talk) 00:42, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. This image is just be used in a small template in the Vietnamese Wikipedia and actually didn't contribute much since there are currently only 2 users use the template in their home page. Meiko21 (talk) 16:09, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per comments. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:52, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Alfa-ketosav as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: unused expired disputed formula with superior version|Alfa-ketosav (talk) 20:38, 24 August 2023 (UTC) —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:51, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, marked with {{Disputed chem}}, bad GIF and unused. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 07:46, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: According to Category:Disputed chemical diagrams: "There is a consensus that unused files categorized as disputed chemical diagrams without any objection for more than one month meet criteria for speedy deletion." Apparently, this hasn't been expired yet, so it really was too early. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 07:28, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:53, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no license (No license since). This wasn't uploaded with a license claim, but isn't this just a {{PD-textlogo}}? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:46, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

COM:TOO UK is very low so unlikely to be {{PD-textlogo}}. w:File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg is above TOO in the UK. Jonteemil (talk) 12:59, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, discussion, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 07:07, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ann Lambton was British and died in 2008, I fail to see how this can be public domain as a British work published in 1960. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 06:30, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m sorry, I didn’t realize this. How long do I get before it is deleted? I would like to see if there is any way to check the copyright status on this file before it is removed. Lᴇᴇᴊᴏʀᴅᴀɴ9 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 22:48, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I looked up the copyright laws in Britain and it says 70 years after the author’s death. How does this work with Wikimedia? Isn’t it based in the US? Lᴇᴇᴊᴏʀᴅᴀɴ9 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 22:51, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
For it be suitable for Commons a work has to be under a free license, or out of copyright in the US AND it's origin country in this respect the UK. A work by a UK author who died in 2008 will not be out of copyright in the US either.
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:53, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, that makes sense. Thanks and sorry for the trouble! What will happen to the Wikisource page I started? I was going to transcribe into Wikisource and so it is connected. Will that also have to be removed? Lᴇᴇᴊᴏʀᴅᴀɴ9 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 16:11, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sadly yes, that will have to go as well. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks for warning me and also catching this error on my part! Lᴇᴇᴊᴏʀᴅᴀɴ9 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 20:27, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; Wikisource user is already notified. The file can be restored in 2079. --Rosenzweig τ 07:03, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brief description of a fictional character. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Even if this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 14:31, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:58, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text content. (Like previous uploads by this user: a list of English words and example usages, many of which are incorrect or unidiomatic.) Omphalographer (talk) 17:37, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:55, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: "flag of the fictional nation of Tankria". Omphalographer (talk) 17:49, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:51, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Under copyright by Editions Dupuis, their permission is required 90.16.68.16 19:34, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:49, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The updated image is File:Argentina - Partidos ganadores de elecciones provinciales 2023.svg Yilku1 (talk) 21:30, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: PNG copy of a May 15 version of the SVG file (which has many versions, as it is an updated election map). --Rosenzweig τ 06:46, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The updated image is File:Argentina - Partidos ganadores de elecciones provinciales 2023.svg Yilku1 (talk) 21:30, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: PNG copy of a May 15 version of the SVG file (which has many versions, as it is an updated election map). --Rosenzweig τ 06:46, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: alleged logo of a game which hasn't been announced; likely to be a hoax or fan content. Omphalographer (talk) 22:52, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: poorly drawn (hand colored?) flag of... something. No context in filename or description to identify this by. Omphalographer (talk) 22:53, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not seem like own work, likely copyrighted. Jonteemil (talk) 01:53, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, needs VTRS to keep, could be used as fair use on WP Gbawden (talk) 06:38, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The portrayed person is unlikely to be the photographer, hence no "own work" and a copyright issue. Lymantria (talk) 08:16, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:26, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional flag - out of scope for this project as it seems higly unlikely to be of use anywhere else Herby talk thyme 11:05, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:26, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low quality photo of nondescript rubble, no context, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:25, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:26, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the file has been uploaded to Flickr by a Pro user with the right license, it's a screenshot from the South Korean TV series "Dream Hight": there's the watermark of the channel, KBS2, on the top right corner. ChoHyeri (talk) 16:07, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:26, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover from http://www.booksiti.net.ru per metadata. Very low resolution, I suspect not an own work of the uploader. Abzeronow (talk) 18:07, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:26, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Benjamin Ier (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: personal flag.

Omphalographer (talk) 22:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 22:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused, unofficial redesign of a flag. Omphalographer (talk) 22:58, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:24, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unable to verify the existence of the "International Brazilian States of Latin America" (IBRSLA) allegedly represented by this flag. Omphalographer (talk) 23:00, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:24, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag of an island which doesn't appear to have an official flag (because it's uninhabited). Omphalographer (talk) 23:09, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:23, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. No such kingdom appears to have existed. (There was a tribe called the Curonians, but no kingdom.) Omphalographer (talk) 23:16, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:22, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PeckaA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: additional content related to a fictitious country (cf. en:Draft:Kingdom of Curonia (Fictional)).

Omphalographer (talk) 23:18, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:20, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PeckaA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

Trade (talk) 02:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:08, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PeckaA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

Trade (talk) 02:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PeckaA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

Trade (talk) 22:07, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 21:29, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PeckaA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible hoax

Trade (talk) 22:07, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Krd 11:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. ("Flag of Polandia, a micronation of mine") Omphalographer (talk) 23:28, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pythagoreio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: fictitious country content (cf. en:User:Pythagoreio/sandbox).

Omphalographer (talk) 23:30, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:26, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by LDM2003 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Duplicate file of File:Ascended Master Teachings.jpg. COM:REDUNDANT, so should be deleted after DR. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:50, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment In the case of both these files, I'd like to know whether all the contents are public domain except for anything added by User:Виктория5551. User:Виктория5551, please tell us where you got each source image from and what license was on the image. File:Ascended Master Teachings.jpg is very much COM:INUSE, but I suspect that there could be some copyright violation among the images. Unfortunately, he hasn't made any edits on Wikimedia since 2019, so what should we do if he doesn't give any input here? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:52, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 08:20, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FrenchCali

[edit]

Possible copyvio: A copyright appears in the metadata of each picture, F10 --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:19, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:51, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, taken from an advertisement Günther Frager (talk) 18:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused and illegible diagram. No educational use. Malcolma (talk) 19:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:31, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The correct file is this File:Elecciones para gobernador de Tierra del Fuego, Argentina, 1999 y 2003 (segunda vuelta).svg Yilku1 (talk) 22:10, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, quasi-duplicate by same uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 11:30, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Il y a un doublon. 2A02:A03F:C714:A300:5832:C606:A933:1202 22:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that the proposal means that File:Lobbes JPG05.jpg is a better version of the same photograph (better resolution and slightly better colors). Then, the image should be dealt with as if it had a {{Duplicate}} template.--Pere prlpz (talk) 17:50, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, bot-transferred inferior duplicate of File:Lobbes JPG05.jpg; deleted and redirected. --Rosenzweig τ 11:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source given says ARR no evidence of a free license - https://web.archive.org/web/20230321202824/https://www.sabrinainink.com/contact Category can also be deleted

Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 13:56, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Large empty margins need to be removed. The original uploader has already done so, but uploaded it with a different file name (File:Lubiprostone Conformer3D large (3).png), so this inferior superceded version should be deleted. Marbletan (talk) 19:08, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 13:52, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low quality chemical structure. Use File:Phenyl Nitrate.svg instead. Also nominated: File:Νιτρώδης Φαινυλεστέρας.jpg, instead of which use File:Phenyl nitrite.svg. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 20:45, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete both. Photos of hand written drawings are well below the minimal quality appropriate for Wikipedia. There are high quality alternatives that should be used instead. Marbletan (talk) 21:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 15:11, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused ssreenshot with no explanation of importance. No educational value Malcolma (talk) 19:54, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:03, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potentially a derivative work per COM:TOYS. Di (they-them) (talk) 04:26, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:39, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS. Di (they-them) (talk) 04:28, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:39, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS. Di (they-them) (talk) 04:28, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:39, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS. Di (they-them) (talk) 04:29, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:40, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS. Di (they-them) (talk) 04:29, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:40, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS. Di (they-them) (talk) 04:31, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:40, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS. Di (they-them) (talk) 04:32, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:40, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS. Di (they-them) (talk) 04:32, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS. Di (they-them) (talk) 04:33, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS. Di (they-them) (talk) 04:33, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS. Di (they-them) (talk) 04:34, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

used for x-wiki spam --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:52, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uba Michael is a prominent Urhobo Chief from the Niger Delta Deltan region of Nigeria, known by both political elites and business elites. Not a spam. This file should not be deleted. Jaardot (talk) 05:40, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this map from any source of international historians? Teamborannajar (talk) 06:23, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 18:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 07:08, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:42, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly unlikely to be own work due to lack of metadata + low quality and resolution, especially if we take into consideration the case of previous uploads by the same user. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 07:32, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:43, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 09:04, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:43, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 09:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:43, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation 151.28.148.113 10:16, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: logo of a non-notable company. --Kadı Message 18:44, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation from https://www.kenamobile.it/servizi/kena-green/ 151.28.148.113 10:16, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:44, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copvio (c) CHRISTOF ARNOLD M2k~dewiki (talk) 19:00, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The title of the file suggests it is a model from the Vincent case eyewares website CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:08, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope vanity selfie (admitted by uploader). Commons is not a personal photo album or social space. No EXIF or description showing the uploader is the author, or has rights to upload this image anyway. Acabashi (talk) 12:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 21:20, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused disputed chemical diagrams III

[edit]

Images are inaccurate in some way. If the phosphite ions aren't, your arguments are welcome. --Alfa-ketosav (talk) 20:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Marbletan (talk) 15:03, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per discussion, 2 deleted and 3 kept. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:35, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no license (No license since). Sure, but is this above or below the relevant thresholds of originality? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:47, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:26, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no license (No license since). Sure, but is this above or below the relevant thresholds of originality? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:48, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:26, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no license (No license since). Sure, but is this above or below the relevant thresholds of originality? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:48, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:26, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no license (No license since). Sure, but is this above or below the relevant thresholds of originality? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:48, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:26, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no license (No license since). Yes, this was uploaded without a license claim, but wouldn't this just be below COM:TOO Canada and therefore in the public domain? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:52, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Likely to be below TOO yes. Jonteemil (talk) 13:02, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-textlogo. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:27, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no license (No license since). Obviously below COM:TOO Brazil, so I can't action that speedy, but I think this is probably out-of-scope. As such, bringing to DR. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:53, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:28, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no license (No license since). Yes, this was uploaded without a license tag, but isn't this just a public domain file below COM:TOO Spain? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:56, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to be below TOO. Jonteemil (talk) 13:04, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-textlogo. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:28, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no license (No license since). Yes, this was uploaded without a license tag, but isn't this just public domain and below COM:TOO Spain? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:57, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:28, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no license (No license since). Yes, this was uploaded without a license tag, but isn't this just a public domain file that's below COM:TOO Spain? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:57, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:28, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no license (No license since). Yes, this was uploaded without a license tag, but wouldn't this just be below COM:TOO Spain and thereby rendered pubic domain? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:57, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:28, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR refferal as this seems to be conference proceedings, with contributions from Non-Federal contributors. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:09, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Copyright is claimed (in the booklet) by United States Department of Energy, which makes the complete booklet {{PD-USGov}}. Vysotsky (talk) 20:37, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-USGov, "United States copyright is not asserted". —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:30, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1989 publication with clear (C) notice in front material .

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:23, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:29, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. This picture was taken by Kathy from Hong Kong, owner of the dog Balltze. Cropping a background and putting three blue letters over the top doesn't make it your own work. Unknown Temptation (talk) 18:01, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 00:47, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1988 Chinese language publication, This is too recent for copyright to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:25, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These images depict a series of chemical reactions. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 10:22, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: lacks of EV. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:31, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not relevant 2405:201:5508:DBCF:7D68:B477:6CB9:FCE0 05:10, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:32, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks more like it's taken from the internet somewhere than own work. 80.62.117.232 06:07, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Already on the internet in 2015 according to TinEye. --P 1 9 9   16:31, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image sans les droits JuliusMassius (talk) 06:19, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. HIstorical image missing essential info. --P 1 9 9   16:31, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from the web - https://www.capetownetc.com/news/derek-watts-bids-farewell-to-carte-blanche-after-35-years/ - needs VTRS to keep. and Category:Derek Watts can be deleted as empty

Gbawden (talk) 06:36, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:34, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1989 publication of an agency of a Canadian provincial government, This would have had to have been published prior to 1973 for it to be out of copyright

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 06:57, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:35, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1989 Journal of American origins. This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:00, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:37, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1989 publication of an agency of a Canadian provincial government, for copyrights to have expired it would have had to have been published prior to 1973

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:15, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:37, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1988 journal of Hungarian origin. This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:31, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:37, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1988 Chinese language publication, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:39, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:38, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1988 publication of an agency of a Canadian provincial government, for copyrights to have expired it would have had to have been published prior to 1973.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:42, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:38, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1988 publication of an agency of a Canadian provincial government. It would have had to have been published prior to 1973 for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:38, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1988 British journal, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:45, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:38, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1989 British journal, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:47, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:38, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1988, Chinese language publication, this is too recent for copyrights too have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:50, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:38, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1987 publication of an agency of a Canadian provincial govenrment, it would have had to have been published prior to 1973 for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:00, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:39, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to items published 1987-89 by an agency of a Canadian provincial government. These would have had to have been published prior to 1973 for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:14, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:39, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Edwin.xavier.reyes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright. These show works by "Fleur B.", aka "Fleur Blume". [[User:Edwin.xavier.reyes}} claims they're his (not her) own work, but the copyright that matters (or matters more) is that of the 2D artwork depicted, not that of the subsequent photographer of the 2D artwork.

Hoary (talk) 08:39, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and likely not own work anyway. --P 1 9 9   16:43, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2089779147952132&id=1541529642777088&m_entstream_source=permalink Bodhisattwa (talk) 08:50, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:43, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jsem autorem tohoto souboru, přidal jsem ho na wikipedii a přeji si ho smazat. Adam Vácha (talk) 10:26, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Google-translation: "I am the author of this file, I added it to wikipedia and I wish to delete it." Adam Vácha, since you are beyond the period of automatic courtesy deletions, please give a reason why you'd like to delete this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:10, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9   16:47, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jsem autorem tohoto souboru, přidal jsem ho na wikipedii a přeji si ho smazat. Adam Vácha (talk) 10:27, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9   16:47, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jsem autorem tohoto souboru, přidal jsem ho na wikipedii a přeji si ho smazat. Adam Vácha (talk) 10:27, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: official logo and likely not own work, above TOO. --P 1 9 9   17:02, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work Trade (talk) 13:29, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agreed. The work depicted in this is definitely still under copyright and does not fall under fair use. The CC license does not supersede the copyright status of the posters. MonkeyBBGB (talk) 14:44, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:00, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Photograph was taken from Yahoo website, which mirrors in fact news website https://deadline.com/2023/01/jonas-dassler-flula-borg-more-set-for-thriller-gods-spy-1235220170/ . Photographer seems to have been correctly credited as Pascal Blancon by uploader, however, this is not sufficient. Henxter (talk) 13:49, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:00, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from this page: https://www.blogfoolk.com/2022/01/maria-moramarco-stella-ariente-visage.html Bradipo Lento (talk) 14:01, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:00, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1987 publication by an agency of a Provincial Canadian government. Would have had to have been published prior to 1973 to be out of copyright.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:31, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:48, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1987 journal of American origins with clear (C) notice in front matter.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:33, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:48, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roman Kubanskiy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Nonsense PD claim. Works must be free (PD) in US and country of origin per COM:L. Even if PD in the US, it would not be in Somalia (country of origin) which is, per COM:SOMALIA, pma + 30. Image is far too recent for this condition to be met.

Эlcobbola talk 19:09, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roman Kubanskiy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I understand that the user has taken photos from krd.ru - a government site that declares to publish its materials under a free license. But these photos were obviously taken by other people, not this government. It is highly probably that they are not PD yet as we don't have proper information about their publication.

So, I suggest we delete them

rubin16 (talk) 21:45, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By the way the site files krd.ru even earlier, they were distributed by CC-BY-3.0 (see here; 2013 blind version).
And this has been shown more than once. Let's recall the same archive of Putin and his photos of his parents. It's not clear who took the photos, it's not known when, but we must attribute for some reason kremlin.ru and call the author Vladimir Putin (it's like "personal archive"). File:Vladimir Spiridonovich Putin.jpg, File:Maria Ivanovna Shelomova.jpg, File:Spiridon Putin.jpg (check out this nomination - Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Vladimir Putin). Roman Kubanskiy, (talk) 09:10, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that you have some basis for assumptions but I still believe it is more likely that krd.ru just released photos without thorough review of their status (sometimes it happens, even with kremlin.ru or ria.ru and we individually delete such files despite being published on a cc-by website). People being related to Krasnodar just explains that they are posted on the website, but it is highly possible that they had no review of the original authorship/date of publication, otherwise they would post author's details somewhere around the photo. If the authors are unknown, it is another way of thinking about being in public domain due to age. But for Russian PD we need to be sure that photos were published (not made) 70+ years before and still we have no such evidence. rubin16 (talk) 08:13, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The grainy photos that are obviously scanned from books and newspapers should not be kept on Commons since the CC licence is for when the claimant is the owner and first publisher, not a republisher of a work.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:08, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and the precautionary principle. These are obviously just republished by that website, and we don't have enough information to determine their actual copyright status. --Rosenzweig τ 19:44, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roman Kubanskiy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative work of art project berlin.1969 by Russian photographer Krista Sudmalis --Trade (talk) 16:02, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep in my opinion this is below TOO. If you don’t know the meme it looks like a b&w photo of some random guy. Dronebogus (talk) 19:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what that's meant to prove. Of course if you aren't familiar with a source work, you won't recognize a derivative work - but that doesn't make it any less derivative. Omphalographer (talk) 22:03, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, I meant to say that “black and white photorealistic image of bearded muscular man” is not copyrightable. The only way to “rip off” Gigachad in this case would be to use the actual image or a functionally identical one. Dronebogus (talk) 12:49, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. Given the filenames and description, the author's intent was clearly to create a lookalike of the berlin.1969 photos. That makes these images a derivative work. Omphalographer (talk) 21:54, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, per @Omphalographer and @Trade. This AI-generated derivative work obviously used the specific copyrighted art linked by Trade.
Ooligan (talk) 03:07, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --P 1 9 9   16:58, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roman Kubanskiy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

AI-generated fakes. As well as being derivative work of presumably non-free content, these images are highly problematic as being represented as being images of real life people when they are in fact inventions of a computer program.

TommyG (talk) 12:52, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They are not presented as images of people, the source indicates Midjourney, and the license says that it is in the public domain, as it is generated by a neural network. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 12:54, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. Fictitious, potentially misleading pictures of identifiable living people. Omphalographer (talk) 00:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep – No valid deletion rationale has been provided so far. The images are high quality and show how images of real people can by generated by AI among other possible purposes. There are also other AI-generated images and even -videos of Putin which never were challenged with any (in this case invalid opinions-based) DRs. Moreover, agree with Kubanskiy and the images are well titled and categorized to prevent this from being mistaken as actual photographs. Prototyperspective (talk) 22:40, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What specific educational value do you see in these images? The fact that image generators can generate images of recognizable people is already thoroughly documented; we hardly need more proof of that. Omphalographer (talk) 22:55, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is not "proof" but a high-quality implementation of that. Just because we have very few images of that kind already does not mean more aren't allowed, especially since those few are mostly much lower in quality. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:10, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • It seems we need a general policy for this kind of things. Perhaps the question should be moved to Village Pump. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:44, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Or to Commons:AI-generated media.
    In any case, no valid rationale for deletion has been provided and as Kubanskiy noted these are clearly marked as AI made. There are other AI images of living people and even Putin in specific on WMC, it makes absolutely no sense and is against all WMC policies to delete these high-quality valuable, incl educationally valuable, images. @Roman Kubanskiy please add {{vk}} to your comment above. Prototyperspective (talk) 22:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Images can potentially be used starting from articles about neural networks (including for Midjourney) and even for the article "Deepfakes in relation to Vladimir Putin" as an example. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 18:34, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    We already have hundreds, possibly thousands, of examples of images generated by Midjourney alone, and even more from other image generation networks. Unless there is something which makes these images exceptionally good examples, I don't see the argument that they could be used as examples particularly compelling.
    With regard to that article: what article are you referring to? I don't see anything by that title. Even if it existed, File:Vladimir Putin warning Americans on election interference and increasing political divide.webm seems like a much more appropriate, and less potentially confusing, example which is already in use on many Wikipedias' articles on deepfakes. Omphalographer (talk) 18:45, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    They are higher quality than the other images. There are hundreds of images of Trump in Category:Caricatures of Donald Trump, thousands of the Eiffel tower, and terabytes of porn and over 600 porn images by "Exey Panteleev" where people continuously say the existence of some images is not a valid rationale for deletion. It's also not a valid rationale here. And in contrast to many of these examples, these images here are actually realistically educationally useful. Seems like admins don't care about WMC policy anymore. WHY would these images not be okay? They are very useful and deleting them is few-refuted-opinions-based policy-unacceptable censorship. Prototyperspective (talk) 19:34, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    The files are in use now and thus by definition to be kept IF Wikimedia policies are still of any value which may not be the case.
    @Fma12 @Skogshare @Lasemainecomtoise what do you think? It's always the same very few people that comment in these DRs. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:45, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
     Keep this is a DR based on subjective POV rather than any precautionary principle. I think that some people (as @Prototyperspective: stated, few of them) don't like AI images so they nominate or vote for deletion of them without other reasons than their personal opinions about the subjects.
    When they say "derivative works from copyrighted images" (derivative from WHAT images?) I dealt with such arguments on my own AI uploads and none of them could prove those images were really copyvios. Some of them were also images of high quality and artistic value and they were deleted anyway. There are thousands of low quality or poorly drawn pieces of "art" accepted on Commons, but when an AI image appears, it is automatically nominated under the statement of "no educational purpose" or "we already have real photographs of that image" so don't they understand that those depictions are OTHER FORM OF ART?
    To be clearer, File:Fender stratocaster a.i. image.jpg (among very others) was deleted in a massive DR that involved portraits of celebrities, sportsmen, or fictional characters, without taking into account that it was an artistic depiction of a Strat, not an image pretending to be a 'real' photograph. That's the point with AI images: they may have educational value as long as they can be used to illustrate (per example) articles where a free image can't be found, or specific AI or technology articles.
    Fma12 (talk) 14:46, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nominee @TommyG. -- Ooligan (talk) 18:07, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The nominee makes two points:
  • a) being derivative work of presumably non-free content – that is not the case as that is just training data and AI art is in the public domain
  • b) as being represented as being images of real life people when they are in fact inventions of a computer – completely disproven as they are clearly labeled and categorized
This rationale has been refuted. No valid deletion rationale has been provided. Prototyperspective (talk) 21:29, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Fma12 Sebbog13 (talk) 00:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep In use--Trade (talk) 19:23, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I'm just overly suspicious, but I'm a little concerned that some of the galleries in b:AI Art Application and Improvements Handbook are being used more as a vehicle to keep controversial images than to demonstrate those images' educational value. Omphalographer (talk) 20:45, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- no copyrights have been infringed, they are clearly marked as AI-generated, and several of them are in use. holly {chat} 23:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from here, no indication of a CC licensing. 2003:C0:8F1E:4700:2854:330:B8C8:FF3B 17:42, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:57, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Was published on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/p/Cs1_VviMU41/ CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:52, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:56, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1988 published work of an agency of a Canadian provincial government , Would have had to be published prior to 1973 for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:47, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:49, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1986 publication by an agency of a provincial Canadian government, would have had to be published prior to 1973 for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:50, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:49, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1986 publication, with a clear copyright notice in front matter.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:53, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:49, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1986 publciation of an egency of a Canadian provincial government, would have to have been published prior to 1973 to be out of copyright.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:58, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:49, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible F10, Possible ad CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:58, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Not an ad but a headshot. A web search shows that he's a working operatic tenor but not sufficiently notable for us to host his headshot. Moreover, singers' headshots are almost never selfies. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:00, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9   16:50, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1985 publication by an agency of a Canadian provincial government, would have had to have been published prior to 1973 for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:09, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:51, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1985 publication of an agency of a Canadian provincial Government, would have had to be published prior to 1973 for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:13, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:51, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1985 publication by an agency of the Canadian government, This would have had to have been published before 1973 for it to be out of copyright.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:15, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:51, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aex18 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Author ro:Ileana Ceaușu-Pandele died in 2011. There is no proof of permission.

Gikü (talk) 20:20, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:52, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source : https://www.utopiales.org/guest/fred-blanchard/ "droits réservés" - nécessité d'autorisation non pas de Blanchard mais du photographe Bédévore (talk) 21:36, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:53, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to 1985 publication of an agency of the Canadian government, would have to ave been published prior to 1973 for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:51, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:53, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hasanali4564562 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Considering that all of their other uploads were copyright violations, the own work claims here are extremely dubious.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, low-res/web-sized images, unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9   16:54, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to 1985 publication with a clear (C) notice in front matter. This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:11, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:54, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1984 journal which has a clear (C) notice in it's Front matter, This is too recent for the copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:16, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:55, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1984 Chinese language publication (translation?) , This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:18, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The first image is a map that I think is about population densities. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 07:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:55, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to 1984-86 publications by an agency of a Canadian provincial government, This would have had to be published prior to 1973 to be out of copyright.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:55, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no license (No license since). It was indeed uploaded without a licensing claim, but this is a fairly simple logo. Is it below COM:TOO Czech Republic? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:50, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, yes, this logo falls under the COM:TOO Czech Republic. Which template do I need to put in the page to state, that this really is my creation? Thank you! Annierys (talk) 12:03, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If this is actually your own creation, and you believe it to be in the public domain, then adding {{PD-self}} would be useful. If it's in the public domain for reasons of being too simple of a textlogo, then adding {{PD-textlogo}} would be even better. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 13:22, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 12:51, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no license (No license since). Indeed, this was uploaded without a license tag, but is this above or below COM:TOO Spain? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:58, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 12:54, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no license (No license since). Indeed, uploaded without a license tag, but is this below or above COM:TOO USA? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:59, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 12:59, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cómo puede ser el autor, alguien que está en un comité? 191.126.135.129 00:42, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I'm not really sure why that'd be a reason to delete this image. The description of the image says that this photo is of a state legislator, in the legislature, during a committee hearing. The image was just sent to me by the legislator via email, and is currently under review by VRT agents. And per Wikipedia's own guidelines (WP:POLITICIAN), state legislators are considered to be notable -- so it's not like I just uploaded an image of some random person. Y2hyaXM (talk) 00:50, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
El fotógrafo, quién es? 191.126.135.129 00:57, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Vogel said in his email to me that he was the sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work. He didn't say who specifically took the photo, but I'd have to assume it's someone in his office. Y2hyaXM (talk) 01:03, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bueno, yo no sé más que esto. A ver qué dicen los mandamases... 191.126.135.129 01:05, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 12:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly copyrighted statue, and Mongolia has no freedom of panorama. It is from 1966 and its author was sculptor L. Makhbal. Cannot immediately find the year the sculptor died, but it is probably still under copyright in Mongolia, and more so, in the United States courtesy of COM:URAA. U.S. copyright can be ignored if Mongolia had commercial freedom of panorama (to which the tag {{Not-free-US-FOP}} could have been applicable). But since U.S. copyright needs to be taken into consideration as there is no commercial FOP in Mongolia, these photos will not be restored even if the work falls in public domain in Mongolia; the photos can only be restored after the longer U.S. copyright term expires (since the statue was published before 1978): 95+1 years from 1966.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:45, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 23:41, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Mongolia now has commercial FOP. Abzeronow (talk) 16:51, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no license (No license since). Yes, this was uploaded without a license tag. However, my reading of COM:TOO India indicates that this is probably in the public domain there (and, consequently, in the United States due to the USA's similar TOO). Bringing here for discussion. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Below TOO in both India and the US. Jonteemil (talk) 13:05, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's the official company logo. I don't understand how there is a copyright issue regarding it. How is an organisation supposed to be identified on Wikipedia without its logo? It is completely attributed to the organisation and used everywhere on the web. And moneycontrol.com is a digital news property, not a newspaper/magazine that we can publish any other image such as its cover page, and it is owned by one of the largest media conglomerates in India. An image identifying the company's identity has to be placed in some way. If you are deleting it (though I don't see any reason to), please provide a replacement. BombaiyyaMag (talk) 19:09, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Per Jonteemil, India has nearly same TOO situation as US, anyone considered simple in US are generally considered simple in India, too. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:17, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 23:48, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Locke Cole as no license (No license since) Krd 06:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What's the problem if it was uploaded with the same tag {{PD-textlogo}}? I never claimed the creation of the image and i didn't change the original status --Zio27 15:46, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Deleted per G6 and imported from enwiki. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:30, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 00:05, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this map from any source of international historians? Teamborannajar (talk) 06:18, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It's from David K. Wyatt's "Thailand: A Short History" (Second Edition) pg. 142. I'll admit that it's not pretty but the borders are accurate. Yourlocallordandsavior (talk) 08:00, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 00:05, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeNumber as no source (No source since), Source has now been provided and iNat review passed. Loopy30 (talk) 11:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 00:08, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible derivative work of Yume Nikki Trade (talk) 15:04, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep “girl in a pink sweater with checkerboard pattern” is not, in my opinion, above TOO. If we can keep images of Marisa we can keep Madotsuki. Dronebogus (talk) 19:02, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This seems to fall within the guidelines at COM:Fan art. holly {chat} 00:13, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image shown is not of the company Equatorial Energia Goiás, but of another insurance company, which is not related to the topic. Therefore, I request the removal of the image, erroneously applied to the theme, and the removal of indexing in Google pages. 177.203.206.2 18:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep É simples, basta renomear o arquivo corretamente. Emerson Júnior GSF (talk) 18:48, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; @Emerson Júnior GSF: Please rename as necessary. holly {chat} 00:15, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Propuesta de eliminado del autor original. Germenfer (talk) 19:07, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: La próxima vez, puede usar {{speedydelete|G7}} porque es más rápido. holly {chat} 00:17, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In 中天新聞 website, it is stated that its material cannot be copied, distributed...without 中天新聞 approe. And there is lack of evidence showing 中天新聞 approve it. Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 21:42, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete copyright violations from source Lemonaka (talk) 05:04, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 00:19, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Free license is questionable. Where is the proof? Copied from an another web resource. Bilderling (talk) 07:35, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 17:49, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Auteur mort moins de 70 ans JuliusMassius (talk) 14:00, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Conservé, j'ai trouvé la personne qui à faite la photo (Arsène Jules Darras 1884-1941)
JuliusMassius (talk) 11:16, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 17:51, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Auteur inconnu et licence correcte, ne pas supprimer. JuliusMassius (talk) 00:07, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Achat de photo et auteur inconnu donc je retire ma demande de suppression. JuliusMassius (talk) 05:35, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. holly {chat} 18:23, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Auteur inconnu donc la photo ne doit plus être supprimé. JuliusMassius (talk) 00:07, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Achat de photo et auteur inconnu donc je retire ma demande de suppression. JuliusMassius (talk) 05:35, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. holly {chat} 18:23, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Chile says nothing about stamps and at least going by the discussion at Template talk:PD-Chile there's no consensus that works created by the Chilian government are in the public domain. Apparently currency isn't, which means it's probably unlikely stamps are. So this image should be delete as COPYVIO until at least 2,029. The same goes for File:StampAntarticaChilena1958scott310.jpg Adamant1 (talk) 08:17, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 18:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Auteur décédé en 1960. JuliusMassius (talk) 21:59, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 18:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: excluded educational content. Raw text. Better hosted elsewhere. Headlock0225 (talk) 14:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: COM:INUSE. holly {chat} 23:23, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Auteur encore vivant ou mort moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 00:14, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sent to me personally? Qué significa? Es Vogel un cartero y fotografo aparte de político? 191.126.135.129 00:45, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The image was just sent to me by Joe Vogel, a state legislator from Maryland, via email, and is currently under review by VRT agents. Y2hyaXM (talk) 00:53, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
El fotógrafo, quién es? 191.126.135.129 00:58, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Vogel said in his email to me that he was the sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work. He didn't say who specifically took the photo, but I'd have to assume it's someone in his office. Y2hyaXM (talk) 01:04, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done by User:Krd with rationale "No ticket permission since 24 August 2023". (non-admin closure) ClydeFranklin (talk) 05:04, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no license (No license since). True that this was uploaded without a license, but I think we may well be able to crop this to include only the actual written document and it would be a combo of {{PD-scan}} and {{PD-old}}. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:45, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per discussion. No need to crop imho, but feel free if thought needed. --Ellywa (talk) 19:47, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wutsje as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 F10 requres that the photograph be "Low-to-medium quality", but this is a relatively high quality photograph. Currently in use on IdWiki, so it would be within COM:SCOPE, but I have lingering doubts about its copyright status. As such, I'm bringing this here in light of COM:PRP for lacking evidence of permission from the copyright holder to distribute the file under a suitable free license. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:15, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This file was not in use when I tagged it, see id:Special:Diff/24058179. Wutsje 04:17, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not saying it was at the time of the tagging, I'm saying it currently is (as of the time of my comment above). — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:19, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Having seen the GL results I agree that a No permission tag would have been wiser. Wutsje 04:36, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Weak keep This is a high-res photo with EXIF, so it's definitely believable that the uploader claims own work. Google Lens was able to find this in multiple locations online, but all of them are smaller resolution than this. holly {chat} 00:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination. @Jpgbn: , please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder/photographer to publish the image or media file on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image or media file can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 19:54, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this map from any source of international historians? Teamborannajar (talk) 06:20, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, of no educational value, not in use on the projects, and therefore out of COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 19:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this map from any source of international historians? Teamborannajar (talk) 06:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 19:58, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not own work, and appears to be a single page extract from a larger journal. It is however in use, but no additional context is given in the file description. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 06:34, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. in addition, out of COM:SCOPE as it is text only, and also copyrighted probably. --Ellywa (talk) 20:04, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pas les droits pour publier. JuliusMassius (talk) 06:45, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The photo of Pierre Herman (1910 - 1990) is far more recent, I estimate 1960's, so that is not in PD yet (photo must be 120 years old we assume for anonymous photos). --Ellywa (talk) 20:08, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file below was previously deleted from Wikimedia Commons due to copyright violation, and it has been re-uploaded. It violates copyright law as it pertains to derivative works.

Saurabhsaha (talk) 07:00, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no copyright violation. This symbol belongs entirely to Azad Adhikar Sena and belongs entirely to this Party. Goodwikie (talk) 14:29, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination. @Genuinewikiuser and Goodwikie: , please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder/photographer to publish the image or media file on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image or media file can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:10, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source publication lists a copyright notice. This seems to be a translation of a Russian original.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:21, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination and per [{COM:PRP]]. --Ellywa (talk) 20:11, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Auteur mort moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 11:25, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Per community voting of Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/03#Cut-off_date_for_the_PD-old_template and {{PD-old-assumed}} a photo which is older than 120 years can be maintained. Therefore this photo must be deleted now but it can be undeleted 121 years after 1930 (when photo was made) - in 2051. . --Ellywa (talk) 20:13, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

left side of the image: photography of recognizable person w/o consent (Germany) / linke Seite des Bildes: Fotografie erkennbarer Person ohne Einverständnis (Deutschland) / https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Photographs_of_identifiable_people/de 80.187.64.11 11:48, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I blurred the face of the person and deleted the older version of the image. --Ellywa (talk) 20:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Auteur décédé moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 13:28, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Per community voting of Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/03#Cut-off_date_for_the_PD-old_template and {{PD-old-assumed}} a photo which is older than 120 years can be maintained. Therefore this photo must be deleted now but it can be undeleted 121 years after 1908 (when photo was made) - in 2029. . --Ellywa (talk) 20:21, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1987 work of the Canadian government, with clear (C) notice.

by A.C. Budd

by K.F. Best or Other

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:57, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Some of these illustrations may be allowable as {{PD-Art}}. This printing is from 1987, but Budd's illustrations were first published in at least 1957. Also, per the book's forward, Budd died Dec. 30, 1960, which would make {{PD-Canada}} valid. I'm not sure if {{PD-1996}} would apply for the U.S. side of the license though. This would only apply to the illustrations signed "A.C. Budd" (for example, File:Budd's flora of the Canadian Prairie Provinces (1987) (20420191675).jpg). Unsigned one or ones by K.F. Best are likely still under copyright. (I've regrouped the nominated files to mark which ones are by Budd.) —Tcr25 (talk) 14:08, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I concur that if these were published in 1957 as you say, then I would support PD-Canada. Do you know of an earlier edition in scan form?
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:05, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't. Google Books has snippit view versions, but I don't see a copy of Wild Plants of the Canadian Prairies (the 1957 predecessor) in HanthiTrust or Internet Archives... Still per {{PD-art}} these 1987 scans would still be acceptable, if an appropriate US license can be ID'd. —Tcr25 (talk) 15:42, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes but 1960+50 is 2010 and past URAA, which means they are not necessarily PD in the US, which is frustrating. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:16, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hurm, so that means they'd need to be set for undeletion in 2031, right? —Tcr25 (talk) 16:38, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, URAA applies. Undelete the Budd ones in 2053. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:48, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a a 1987-2000 published journal of an American museum. This is too recent for copyrights to have expired, but I can't see an obvious notice on the linked source, and a quick search in copyright records did not find the publication.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:09, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, deleted two. kept 2 per discussion. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:49, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Georges réant auteur décédé en 1960. JuliusMassius (talk) 14:14, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep @JuliusMassius: Can you show us where you are coming up with these names? Georges Émile Paul Gustave Réant (1898-1960) did not take a photo in 1905 at age 7 and have it published as a postcard. Can you link to where you have found your attribution? Either your dates are off or your attribution is off. Does the date come from the other side of the postcard? Can you scan both sides? Did you find the attribution at a website? --RAN (talk) 02:45, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Look here, the seller give Georges Émile Paul Gustave Réant : https://www.delcampe.net/fr/collections/cartes-postales/france/59-nord/autres--non-classes/59-wasquehal-le-canal-et-le-pont-du-triez-beau-plan-cycliste-416177435.html
The photo must be dated after 1905. JuliusMassius (talk) 13:49, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2031, no URAA issues. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:55, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1985 publication with clear (C) notice in front matter, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:04, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Internet Archive states "In copyright. Digitized with the permission of the rights holder.". holly {chat} 17:39, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

quotation right isn't valid in Commons, this score is still copyrighted 87.205.56.43 19:23, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Also deleted the derived File:YoureMyHeartPiano-2.svg. holly {chat} 17:42, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely violating the copyright of the text on this information panel (no FoP in COM:Jordan). The modern font indicates a recent print date, so it is unlikely to be an old public-domain text. Here is a more readable version for comparison. HyperGaruda (talk) 00:08, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This photograph is taken from information displayed at a Mausoleum and definitely a public place. As per me it is under public domain and COMːJordan also excludes material of public domain. This view may be taken care of deciding on the deletion request. Md iet (talk) 03:02, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; text being displayed in a public place does not make it "public domain". holly {chat} 17:43, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the real coat of arms of lebanon, and was simply created by some Wikipedian. It is not used in a de facto or de jure manner by the government, which simply utilizes the lebanese cedar alone for its passports, IDs, and embassies. Bill Williams (talk) 17:38, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[5] a simple google search shows that this fake coat of arms is rarely ever cited on the internet, only by a few random pages that are not official or reliable. It cannot remain on the Wiki in the form of misinformation towards readers of various articles, for example it is displayed on every article with the "politics of Lebanon" tag, when it is never used by the government of Lebanon, only the cedar tree by itself is. Bill Williams (talk) 17:41, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That the coat of arms is not used on the cover of the Lebanese passport, or that the government uses the cedar tree on the front of lecterns, is insufficient reasoning to call this fake. This design is incorporated into the presidential seal, which is sourced. Hubert Herald states that Lebanon has no official national emblem, but then confusingly follows with "When needed a shield is used of the colours and charge of the national flag." I would define that as a coat of arms. Whether official or quasi-official is up for debate. Fry1989 eh? 18:13, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fry1989 the Presidential Seal of Lebanon does not use this file, it has something quite different, and just because it is on the seal does not make it the official coat of arms. It is not official or used in many capacities besides maybe the seal, which may look similar to this file, but is not whatsoever the same. The shield and tree are both completely different on the seal compared to this file, with only the colors being the same. This file is still a made up, fake coat of arms created by a Wikipedian, and is misleading to readers across the Wiki. Bill Williams (talk) 23:43, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:INUSE - feel free to discuss on the appropriate talk page. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. This is my final decision on this nomination, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:37, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional coat of arms used wrongly on English wikipedia everywhere. Unsourced and isn't appearing anywhere. Only source on wikipedia:Coat of arms of Lebanon is this web page. Beshogur (talk) 19:41, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The Arabic Wikipedia notably cites an archived page from the Society for Creative Anachronism which includes several other national blazons, some of which are real, but some of which are historical or maybe even fictional, so I don't think it's a decent source, either. Per the last deletion request above, I would caution against suddenly deleting it when so many Wikipedias have articles specifically about this design which, if it is fictional, should probably be deleted first. Mnmazur (talk) 20:03, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This whole source is fictional. "Another wikipedia uses this" is not an argument. They use it wrongly. Beshogur (talk) 06:46, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: One thing I should like to note is that the announcement of the adoption of the Seal of the President of Lebanon, which is official and which includes this design, notes (in Arabic) that 'the arms were chosen because they historically represent the official symbol of the Lebanese Republic.' That's a pretty scant reference, but it does come from the Lebanese government itself, so it's worth taking note of it. Edit: The design was also præviously used on its own on the Presidency's website (it differs slightly, having a brown trunk, but the general blazon tracks, heraldically). Mnmazur (talk) 22:10, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: As stated in the last DR, this emblem appears to hold some sort of quasi-officiality. I cannot discern its status beyond that. How we should treat it is thus a complicated question, but deleting it outright seems the most extreme option and one we should think very carefully about. Fry1989 eh? 22:47, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If we don't delete, it will be used wrongly all over the wikipedia again. People's argument on wikipedia:Lebanon is "why does this file exist then" while there isn't single source of official Lebanese agencies or any reliable source showing how the actual coat of arms is, if there is one. Another argument is presidential seal containing a small coat of arms like this, while it's totally different in design. Also Lebanon uses the tree only in most cases, still this doesn't make this an official coat of arms / emblem. Beshogur (talk) 06:48, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also I saw your older comment above. How is this related to coat of arms of Lebanon. Presidential seals aren't coat of arms of the country, this would make wikipedia:Presidential Seal of Turkey official coat of arms of Turkey, which is definitely not. Beshogur (talk) 06:50, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You'll find my position has softened somewhat. I didn't say not to delete it, simply to think carefully before such a decision is made. To answer your question, the presidential seal is an official emblem, and it uses this symbol as part of its design. That doesn't make this coat of arms official by itself, but it does show that this coat of arms isn't a complete fantasy pulled out of thin air by some random nobody. Fry1989 eh? 16:05, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep:A similar Emblem can be found on the entrance of the embassy
  • and Also this one [6]
    Paolo Interdonato (talk) 16:36, 23 september 2023 (UTC)
I don't get how these are similar. These all seem custom emblems on those embassies. Do you even see that the trees aren't even matching? Beshogur (talk) 22:17, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is rather like this tree left, which isn't even used by Lebanon today. These photos seem old as well. And again, no indication being the coat of arms + the current file isn't even remotely similar to the ones presented. Beshogur (talk) 22:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:INUSE and discussion that shows real world usage. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:19, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Georges Réant auteur décédé en 1960. JuliusMassius (talk) 20:56, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 1908 postcard by a credited author, Undelete in 2029 as PD-old-assumed-expired. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:22, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

United States does not have freedom of panorama for sculptures (which would be tenuous at best in this case), making this is a derivative work. If you accept that this photo is just of the the statue itself, it is a fair use photo which is unacceptable on Commons. Bobak (talk) 08:44, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also see Commons:Deletion requests/File:2009-0620-WI011-GB-Lambeau.jpg, which was the exact same statue which was deleted under the same reasoning. Let's be consistent in our punishment. --Bobak (talk) 08:47, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:55, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original source of publication not provided, so impossible to state that no copyright notice was posted with its publication. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:35, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment the source had been already given, here it is updated via the wayback machine so it should not be a cause of deletion IMO. Fma12 (talk) 15:16, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The source given is ebay where the photo was for sale. It is not the original publication, so there is no evidence this image is in PD. Therefore the image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 19:03, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original source of publication not provided, so impossible to state that no copyright notice was posted with its publication. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:40, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear DR by @Gonzo fan2007: . The original source was clearly indicated (see also current revision via wayback machine) when I uploaded this file.
Moreover, I'm surprised after noticing that the nominator had made several edits to this file, such as uploading a new version and even updating the source so I don't know WHAT source he is claming for. Could he be clearer? – Fma12 (talk) 18:19, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fma12, the original source (i.e. where this was first published) was not on eBay. Without the original source (i.e. a newspaper, a team publication, a book etc), there's no way someone can claim that there was no copyright notice on it. My edits were from quite some time ago, before I had much of a grasp of copyright issues (maybe I still don't have a grasp, who knows?). Cheers, « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 23:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The source given is ebay where the photo was for sale. It is not the original publication, so there is no evidence this image is in PD. Therefore the image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 19:04, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Auteur décédé en 1960. JuliusMassius (talk) 21:50, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:05, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Auteur décédé en 1960. JuliusMassius (talk) 21:54, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Georges Émile Paul Gustave Réant (1898-1960) did not take this image in 1905 when he was 7 years old. I am not seeing how these are being attributed. No evidence is being presented and several, like this one, are patently false. --RAN (talk) 04:23, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:05, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]