Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/07/14
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
_oyuncu_ve_senaristtir.jpg){kind=link}
_oyuncu_ve_senaristtir._Küçük_yaşlarda_tiyatro_yapmış_ve_yazmaya_8_yaşında_annesine_hitaben_yazdığı_bir_şiir_ile_başlamıştır.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
6.jpg){kind=link}
경기도_남양주소방서_508의무소방대(2007년)12.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
1941Michel6.jpg){kind=link}
_Indians_during_the_18th_century.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![334 File:Pages in "Bag-ong Kasuyatan ag Henesis - Exodo" (The New Testament and Henesis - Exodus) Bible translated by Wycliffe Bible Translators.jpg](#File:Pages_in_"Bag-ong_Kasuyatan_ag_Henesis_-_Exodo"_(The_New_Testament_and_Henesis_-_Exodus)_Bible_translated_by_Wycliffe_Bible_Translators.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation Kelly The Angel (talk) 09:45, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted. Obviously copyrighted movie poster. Needs to be uploaded locally to English Wikipedia under fair use. --GMGtalk 10:59, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Self-promoting article page, out of project scope. No other contributions to wm projects. Commons is neither your personal free web host nor a vehicle to promote your business. Achim55 (talk) 05:39, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:23, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Clear deep fake/photoshopped vandal/attack/harassment image and used to spam deep fake images for the infobox at w:en:Stephan Trojansky. Creator blocked at enwiki for socking. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | enwiki 10:10, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:29, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
obvious deep-fake/photoshopped vandal/attack/harassment image – the subject actually looks more like this. Yann (talk) 11:42, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:42, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo, above COM:TOO A1Cafel (talk) 13:24, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Yann (talk) 18:31, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Delete per COM:TOO UK. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:02, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:41, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
This amateur image has no significance and is not used in any articles Kj1595 (talk) 16:50, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:51, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Yann (talk) 18:32, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per a Google-translation of the Albanian-language article that uses this logo, this is a British company, so quite obviously over COM:TOO UK. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:01, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:41, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
wrong photo Boldlayers (talk) 10:59, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:32, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Looks like some kind of bug. I wanted to upload a new version of existing file, not a new file with name as on my PC. Thank you. IKhitron (talk) 11:11, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:31, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello Wikimedia, I wanted to edit wikipedia.org for Lindon Emerllahu, but I don't know how to use well it, I'm sorry for this photo of him, because it is not made by me but I found in his facebook profile. I hope you delete it because I wouldn't like to be mentioned like a person who not uses copyright standard. Bye! Adriatikgashii7 (talk) 13:26, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload, also an obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 09:30, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Duplikat VSchagow (talk) 17:47, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:28, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Duplicated Version, I uploaded the picture by mistake (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rebbah_Lakhdar.jpg) Riad Salih (talk) 22:10, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:19, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation, see source Xocolatl (talk) 23:30, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 10:55, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
File:10th Biennial Symposium on Minorities, the Medically Underserved and Cancer (IA 10thbiennialsymp00unse).pdf
[edit]2006 Publication by Intercultural Cancer Council which is not part of the federal government. Abzeronow (talk) 18:44, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Jmabel. --Rosenzweig τ 07:59, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
child pornographty Lool187 (talk) 19:31, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
child pornographty Lool187 (talk) 19:32, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Nudity != pornography. However this could be a bit of a borderline case. And since you're the uploader yourself, I'd say Delete PaterMcFly (talk) 20:17, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Very poor quality because of posterization. --Achim55 (talk) 20:30, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 07:59, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
child pornographty Lool187 (talk) 19:32, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 07:58, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
child pornographty Lool187 (talk) 19:32, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 07:58, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
child pornographty Lool187 (talk) 19:32, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 07:58, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
child pornographty Lool187 (talk) 19:32, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 07:58, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation Kelly The Angel (talk) 11:11, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Hello again, may I please get a reason why this poster is being deleted, and what I can correct to not get it on the deletion list? Sk3rd11 (talk) 21:47, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 01:48, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:YAZAR OYUNCU VE KİŞİSEL GELİŞİM UZMANI CANAN KESER Canan Keser (yazar) oyuncu ve senaristtir.jpg
[edit]_oyuncu_ve_senaristtir.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_oyuncu_ve_senaristtir.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Brief biography of non-notable person that falls outside of COM:SCOPE Lotje (talk) 05:18, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Speedy delete per nom, COM:CSD#F10, and COM:CSD#G10. Also, the filename, which translates as "AUTHOR ACTOR AND PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT EXPERT CANAN KESER Canan Keser (writer) is an actress and screenwriter" in English, is inappropriate. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 18:53, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 03:55, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Brief biography of non-notable person that falls outside of COM:SCOPE Lotje (talk) 05:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as a copyvio of https://kitappad.com/image/img_thump/1/canan-sezer-sevin-sevaptir-bence-153.jpg as stretched by https://kitappad.com/canankeser1/sevin-sevaptir-bence-248/ and per nom as violating COM:CSD#F10 and COM:CSD#G10. Also, the filename, which translates as "It exhibits an exemplary attitude with its life story and struggle to hold on to life" in English, is inappropriate. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 17:09, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 03:57, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Kişisel gelişim ve psikoloji ile ilgili birçok kurs ve seminere katılmış, belgeler almış, ayrıca birçok dernek ve konseylerde seminer vermiştir.jpg
[edit]
Brief biography of non-notable person that falls outside of COM:SCOPE Lotje (talk) 05:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as a copyvio of https://media.licdn.com/dms/image/C4D03AQGbDaJ3i2RyHA/profile-displayphoto-shrink_100_100/0/1640930185577?e=1695254400&v=beta&t=kKhzTnEmClyK-B2ZW6KkE_9vqlGQeejSYlUQfejxyQ4 as encircled by https://www.linkedin.com/in/canan-keser-153b14206/ and per nom, COM:CSD#F10, and COM:CSD#G10. Also, the filename, which translates as "He attended many courses and seminars on personal development and psychology, received documents, and gave seminars in many associations and councils" in English, is inappropriate. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 18:33, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 03:58, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Canan Keser (yazar) oyuncu ve senaristtir. Küçük yaşlarda tiyatro yapmış ve yazmaya 8 yaşında annesine hitaben yazdığı bir şiir ile başlamıştır.jpg
[edit]_oyuncu_ve_senaristtir._K%C3%BC%C3%A7%C3%BCk_ya%C5%9Flarda_tiyatro_yapm%C4%B1%C5%9F_ve_yazmaya_8_ya%C5%9F%C4%B1nda_annesine_hitaben_yazd%C4%B1%C4%9F%C4%B1_bir_%C5%9Fiir_ile_ba%C5%9Flam%C4%B1%C5%9Ft%C4%B1r.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_oyuncu_ve_senaristtir._K%C3%BC%C3%A7%C3%BCk_ya%C5%9Flarda_tiyatro_yapm%C4%B1%C5%9F_ve_yazmaya_8_ya%C5%9F%C4%B1nda_annesine_hitaben_yazd%C4%B1%C4%9F%C4%B1_bir_%C5%9Fiir_ile_ba%C5%9Flam%C4%B1%C5%9Ft%C4%B1r.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Brief biography of non-notable person that falls outside of COM:SCOPE Lotje (talk) 05:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as a copyvio of https://kitappad.com/image/img/1/canansezer-1507-1657199295.jpg as encircled by https://kitappad.com/canankeser1 and other pages and per nom, COM:CSD#F10, and COM:CSD#G10. Also, the filename, which translates as "Canan Keser (writer) is an actress and screenwriter. He did theater at a young age and started writing at the age of 8 with a poem he wrote to his mother." in English, is inappropriate. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 19:28, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 03:56, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Brief biography of non-notable person that falls outside of COM:SCOPE Lotje (talk) 05:20, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom, COM:CSD#F10, and COM:CSD#G10. Also, the filename, which translates as "AUTHOR AND PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST CANAN KESER" in English, is inappropriate. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 19:22, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 03:54, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sassette Smuftling (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work but copyvios, derivative work at best.
- File:Снимок экрана (2657).png
- File:Снимок экрана (2658).png
- File:Снимок экрана (2656).png
- File:Снимок экрана (2659).png
- File:Снимок экрана (2654).png
- File:Снимок экрана (2655).png
- File:Снимок экрана (2653).png
- File:Снимок экрана (2652).png
- File:Снимок экрана (2651).png
- File:Снимок экрана (2650).png
- File:Снимок экрана (2649).png
- File:Снимок экрана (2648).png
- File:Снимок экрана (2647).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Achim55 (talk) 16:54, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I agree. According to the Russian file names, these appear to be screenshots. The depicted characters appear to be from some video (or possibly book) about Gargamel and the smurfs. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 14:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Screenshot of non-free content (F3). --Эlcobbola talk 07:14, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Not 2023 work by the uploader. Might or might not be PD, but would need factual source information to determine. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:48, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:46, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:46, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:11, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:46, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Denmark A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:46, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Denmark A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Denmark A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Denmark A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Claimed by a user to not be own work, but the photo is not as devoid of metadata as could be, so I think this may be better handled at DR than with a speedy tag. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:49, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
No license given, and no license at source. Over COM:TOO Brazil, but it's possibly {{PD-BrazilGov}} if it was published in 1979 (the flag contains a number matching that year), so I'm sending to DR rather than actioning a speedy. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:58, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Brazilian municipal flag that's over COM:TOO Brazil and COM:TOO USA. No license given, nor at source. I'm noting that the year "1980" is on the flag, which makes me not want to action a speedy, lest this be {{PD-BrazilGov}} due to its age. In any case, DR is best suited to handle this sort of case, so I'm sending this here. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:00, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Seems below COM:TOO USA, but is it in scope? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:04, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Brazilian municipal logo. Contains "20-06" and "1980". It's above COM:TOO Brazil and COM:TOO USA, and there isn't a valid free license at source (nor claimed on Commons) so the only way that this is free is if it's {{PD-BrazilGov}}. Do either of those numeric strings represent the year of this logo's first publication? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:12, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged as no license (No license since). There is no license on the page nor at source, though upon second review it's plausible that this is {{PD-BrazilGov}} (the year on the crest is 1955, and works of the Brazilian government are free if from before 1983). — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged as no license (No license since). There is no license claimed (nor at source), but it's a bit more complicated than an easy speedy would be. Upon further review, the year on this image is "1953". It's unclear to me if that's the year of founding, or if that's the first year that this crest was published, but if it were published in 1953 it would be {{PD-BrazilGov}}. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:17, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially taggedas no license (No license since). Upon further review, there's a year in the logo of "1979", which may be either the year of the founding of the municipality or the year that the seal was first published. It would be {{PD-BrazilGov}} if first published before 1983, but I can't confirm that to be the case. Absent information for a free license at source (or even so much as claimed on Commons), Ihis is going here in line with COM:PRP. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:23, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged as no license (No license since). Upon further review, there's a year in the logo of "1980", which may be either the year of the founding of the municipality or the year that the seal was first published. It would be {{PD-BrazilGov}} if first published before 1983, but I can't confirm that to be the case. Absent information for a free license at source (or even so much as claimed on Commons), Ihis is going here in line with COM:PRP. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:23, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 06:24, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hubert H. Humphrey Memorial
[edit]Modern memorial, erected in 2012, no freedom of panorama in the United States for non-architectural works
- File:Hubert H. Humphrey Memorial, facing MN Capitol.jpg
- File:Hubert H. Humphrey Memorial-plaza.jpg
- File:Hubert H. Humphrey Memorial-relief.jpg
- File:Hubert H. Humphrey Memorial-wall.jpg
- File:Hubert H. Humphrey Memorial-wall02.jpg
- File:Hubert H. Humphrey statue-Minnesota State Capitol.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 06:29, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:55, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jesse Chisholm statue
[edit]Modern statue, erected in 2007, no freedom of panorama in the United States for non-architectural works
- File:Chisholm Statue in Kingfisher.jpg
- File:Jesse Chisholm Statue.jpg
- File:Kingfisher, OK USA - Statue of Jesse Chisholm - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Kingfisher, OK USA - Statue of Jesse Chisholm - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 06:30, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:56, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thepublicschoolmusician (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos of photos / old photos, not 2023 own work
Gbawden (talk) 06:33, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hello,
- I have permission to use the Rogers family photos. The original owner has passed away. They are in the public domain.
- Admittedly, the Jules Ah See photo is a screenshot. How can one include photos of long dead people and still meet Wikipedia requirements? Thepublicschoolmusician (talk) 16:38, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- Please see: COM:VRT Krd 06:56, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:56, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Po'pay by Cliff Fragua
[edit]The statue was installed in 2005 by Cliff Fragua (1955–). There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for non-architectural works, permission from the artist is required.
- File:Cliff Fragua and his statue of Popé.jpg
- File:Pope-SR-03.jpg
- File:Sculptor Cliff Fragua and Po'pay statue.jpeg
A1Cafel (talk) 06:33, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
The statue was installed in 2005 by Cliff Fragua (1955–). There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for non-architectural works, permission from the artist is required. A1Cafel (talk) 06:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
The statue was installed in 2005 by Cliff Fragua (1955–). There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for non-architectural works, permission from the artist is required. A1Cafel (talk) 06:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 06:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
File:The "Sweet Inspiration" statue outside the Dublin Bottling Works and W.P. Kloster Museum in Dublin, Texas LCCN2015630959.tif
[edit]No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 06:38, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope text PDF. Rosenzweig τ 06:53, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sandiganbayan
[edit]https://lakansining.wordpress.com/2017/05/26/quezon-city-batasan-hills/02-1999-sandiganbayan-centennial-building/ & https://m.facebook.com/321728413632/photos/321749308632/321750878632/ - 1999 bldg by ARCHITECT FELIPE M. MENDOZA. No freedom of panorama in the philippines
- File:0062jfHoly Spirit (C.O.A.) Commonwealth Avenue Sandiganbayan Quezon Cityfvf 01.jpg
- File:0062jfHoly Spirit (C.O.A.) Commonwealth Avenue Sandiganbayan Quezon Cityfvf 02.jpg
- File:0062jfHoly Spirit (C.O.A.) Commonwealth Avenue Sandiganbayan Quezon Cityfvf 03.jpg
- File:0062jfHoly Spirit (C.O.A.) Commonwealth Avenue Sandiganbayan Quezon Cityfvf 04.jpg
- File:09620jfCommonwealth Avenue Central Barangays Quezon Cityfvf 03.jpg
- File:09620jfCommonwealth Avenue Central Barangays Quezon Cityfvf 04.jpg
- File:09620jfCommonwealth Avenue Central Barangays Quezon Cityfvf 05.jpg
- File:09620jfCommonwealth Avenue Central Barangays Quezon Cityfvf 07.jpg
- File:09620jfCommonwealth Avenue Central Barangays Quezon Cityfvf 08.jpg
- File:09620jfCommonwealth Avenue Central Barangays Quezon Cityfvf 09.jpg
_Commonwealth_Avenue_Sandiganbayan_Quezon_Cityfvf_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Commonwealth_Avenue_Sandiganbayan_Quezon_Cityfvf_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Commonwealth_Avenue_Sandiganbayan_Quezon_Cityfvf_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Commonwealth_Avenue_Sandiganbayan_Quezon_Cityfvf_04.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 15:41, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Patrickroque01: This is another important government building that is commonly in news media. Many other pictures of this bulding posted on commercial sources may be copyrighted by respective publishers or authors, and they can't be used without permission, proper license or payment; so these Wiki contributions by Judge Floro are among useful free-to-use altertnatives. I remind Mcrl Lxmna to please refrain from sending any more petitions to wipe out sceneries of Manila and the Philippines just because of the claim that there is no freedom of panorama in the country, or else many content creators, photographers, tourists, vloggers, students and other people will be legally chilled. It's also questionable if this DR by Mcrl Lxmna was acknowledged by the architect firm and the Sandiganbayan, the court that manages the Centennial Building. Patrickroque01 (talk) 15:06, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. Per COM:FOP Philippines only buildings completed prior to December 15, 1972 can be published with a free license. Photos of more recent buildings cannot be published because there is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. The building on this photo is built after mentioned date and therefore the image must be deleted. @Mrcl lxmna: thanks for your tremendous effort to clean up Copyright violations. This is important work to protect re-users of the files on Commons from problems with the material we have here. --Ellywa (talk) 18:01, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sandiganbayan
[edit]Copyvio uploads, no freedom of panorama in the architectural work's source country and these photos under commercial Creative Commons licenses are violations of building architect's copyright. Contributed by SJasminum (talk · contribs), an abusive sockpuppet of Judgefloro (talk · contribs) who is also blocked on English Wikipedia.
- File:Buildings and Roads in Quezon City Commonwealth Area SJasminum 07.jpg
- File:Buildings and Roads in Quezon City Commonwealth Area SJasminum 09.jpg
- File:Buildings and Roads in Quezon City Commonwealth Area SJasminum 11.jpg
- File:Buildings and Roads in Quezon City Commonwealth Area SJasminum 12.jpg
- File:Buildings and Roads in Quezon City Commonwealth Area SJasminum 13.jpg
- File:Buildings and Roads in Quezon City Commonwealth Area SJasminum 14.jpg
- File:Buildings and Roads in Quezon City Commonwealth Area SJasminum 15.jpg
- File:Buildings and Roads in Quezon City Commonwealth Area SJasminum 16.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:53, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in USA, needs permission from artist Linda Sioux Henley A1Cafel (talk) 06:53, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 06:54, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 06:54, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The statue was installed in 1997 by Armand Lamontagne (1939–). There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for non-architectural works, permission from the artist is required A1Cafel (talk) 06:57, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
The statue was installed in 1997 by Armand Lamontagne (1939–). There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for non-architectural works, permission from the artist is required A1Cafel (talk) 06:57, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:49, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The statue was installed in 1997 by Michael Martino (1946–). There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for non-architectural works, permission from the artist is required A1Cafel (talk) 06:58, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:49, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The statue was installed in 1997 by Michael Martino (1946–). There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for non-architectural works, permission from the artist is required A1Cafel (talk) 06:59, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:49, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 07:06, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:49, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to Scanderbeg (Rome)
[edit]No FoP in Italy. Artist Romano Romanelli died in 1969
- File:2013-04-25 Roma statua Scanderbeg particolare.jpg
- File:2013-04-25 statua Scanderbeg piazza Albania Roma.jpg
- File:Monumental of Scanderbeg in 2018.01.jpg
- File:Monumental of Scanderbeg in 2018.02.jpg
- File:Monumental of Scanderbeg in 2018.03.jpg
- File:Monumental of Scanderbeg in 2018.04.jpg
- File:Monumental of Scanderbeg in 2018.05.jpg
- File:Monumental of Scanderbeg in 2018.06.jpg
- File:Monumental of Scanderbeg in 2018.07.jpg
- File:Monumental of Scanderbeg in 2018.08.jpg
- File:Monumental of Scanderbeg in 2018.09.jpg
- File:Monumental of Scanderbeg in 2018.10.jpg
- File:Monumental of Scanderbeg in 2018.11.jpg
- File:Monumental of Scanderbeg in 2018.12.jpg
- File:Monumental of Scanderbeg in 2018.13.jpg
- File:Monumental of Scanderbeg in 2018.14.jpg
- File:Monumental of Scanderbeg in 2018.15.jpg
- File:Monumental of Scanderbeg in 2018.16.jpg
- File:Monumental of Scanderbeg in 2018.17.jpg
- File:Monumental of Scanderbeg in 2018.18.jpg
- File:Monumental of Scanderbeg in 2018.19.jpg
- File:Monumento equestre a Giorgio Castriota Scanderbeg, piazza Albania, Roma.jpg
- File:Piazza Albania.JPG
- File:Skanderbeg Rom.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 07:12, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 15:18, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope. I don't think there is a "Zuv Language", let alone an official logo for it. Rosenzweig τ 07:22, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:49, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope "seal"/coat of arms of some fictitious nation. Rosenzweig τ 07:24, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:49, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Prateekjojawara (talk · contribs)
[edit]These files all have Facebook metadata in the Exif data, suggesting that unlike claimed they're not the uploader's own work and probably copyvios. The files should be deleted per the precautionary principle.
Rosenzweig τ 07:32, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lyly Bovaryste (talk · contribs)
[edit]User has a record of uploading work of others from Insta. None of these have exif, besides the copyvio I am not sure if these are in scope
- File:Mohamed Nazim Bennoukh.jpg
- File:Zoubida Dahou.jpg
- File:Fayçal Bennedjar.jpg
- File:Mohamed ElAmine Ould Mamar.jpg
- File:Nour El Houda Derdour.jpg
- File:Belkacem Mohammed Mourad Abdel Khalek.jpg
- File:Douae Camélia Benamour.jpg
- File:Hennouni Mohamed El-Amine.jpg
- File:Lahcene Nouha.jpg
- File:Djaouad Moussa.jpg
- File:Belkacem Taki Eddine Akram.jpg
- File:Kaid Lylia.jpg
- File:Beldjilali Feriel.jpg
- File:Mohamed Benkoibich Ismail.jpg
- File:Abderrahmane DJELLOUL DAOUADJI.jpg
- File:DJELLOUL DAOUADJI Abderrahmane.jpg
- File:BENHAMADI Hadj BouabdAllah.jpg
- File:Ghizlene Rabia KABARDJI.jpg
- File:KAOUDER Ilyes.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:00, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lyly Bovaryste (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal artwork credited to Insta - likely out of scope
- File:Portrait d'une femme africaine.jpg
- File:Portrait d'une femme aux yeux d'un caméléon.jpg
- File:A modifier5555.jpg
- File:A modifier4.jpg
- File:ElGrandeToto.jpg
- File:A modifier 45.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:46, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- The user is active on other wikis and is able to upload a limited number of personal files, and this is a relatively limited number of files. That being said, not all of them appear to be claimed as own work, and I can't verify licensing for those that are not. As such, Delete delete File:A modifier 45.jpg, File:ElGrandeToto.jpg, File:A modifier4.jpg, File:A modifier5555.jpg, and
Keep the rest as permissible. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:58, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, except 2. See above. --Yann (talk) 21:58, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Professional photo, no meaningful exif. Needs a source or proof its own work as claimed Gbawden (talk) 11:25, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:49, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hatchling25 (talk · contribs)
[edit]None of these are own work as claimed. One has author info in exif, PCP
- File:Windrush, man looking into camera.jpg
- File:TTA.5.6 copy.png
- File:Joes-Bar-2.4.jpg
- File:Joes Bar 2.6.tif
- File:Joes Bar 2.4.tif
- File:Joes Bar 2.2.tif
- File:Joes Bar 2.1.tif
- File:Alfgrey.joesbar.HiDef.tif
Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:00, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Flickrwashing, account has 0 followers etc and only pics of Wright Gbawden (talk) 12:47, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:49, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Showbizz Entertainment (talk · contribs)
[edit]Watermarks with multiple photographers' names indicates that the uploader's claims of "own work" cannot be true. In addition, these files were uploaded only for use on a now-deleted highly promotional page on English Wikipedia (and the uploader is blocked there because of it) and they are therefore outside of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Showbizz campus Tour Photographs 1.jpg
- File:Showbizz campus Tour Photographs 2.jpg
- File:Showbizz campus Tour Photographs 3.jpg
- File:Showbizz Campus Tour Event.jpg
Marbletan (talk) 12:49, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:00, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 13:12, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:49, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Monaco A1Cafel (talk) 13:15, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:49, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 13:17, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Likely not own works: most look like screengrabs, and credit in EXIF data of File:Tennis(2008).jpg doesn't match uploader.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:30, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
creators will 최광모 (talk) 07:17, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:56, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:30, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
creators will 최광모 (talk) 07:17, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:56, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:30, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
creators will 최광모 (talk) 05:44, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:26, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:31, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
creators will 최광모 (talk) 05:46, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:26, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:32, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
creators will 최광모 (talk) 05:46, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:26, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:32, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
creators will 최광모 (talk) 09:47, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:32, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:32, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:32, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
creators will 최광모 (talk) 09:46, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:32, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
creators will 최광모 (talk) 09:46, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:32, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
creators will 최광모 (talk) 09:46, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:32, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
creators will 최광모 (talk) 09:46, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:32, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
creators will 최광모 (talk) 09:46, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:32, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:33, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:33, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:33, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:33, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:33, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:33, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo.\ 최광모 (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:36, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:36, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:36, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:36, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:36, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:36, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:36, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:36, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:36, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:06, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:38, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:06, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:38, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:06, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:38, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:06, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:38, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:06, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:38, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:06, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
6.jpg){kind=link}
6.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:38, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
6.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:06, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
6.jpg){kind=link}
%EA%B2%BD%EA%B8%B0%EB%8F%84_%EB%82%A8%EC%96%91%EC%A3%BC%EC%86%8C%EB%B0%A9%EC%84%9C_508%EC%9D%98%EB%AC%B4%EC%86%8C%EB%B0%A9%EB%8C%80(2007%EB%85%84)12.jpg){kind=link}
%EA%B2%BD%EA%B8%B0%EB%8F%84_%EB%82%A8%EC%96%91%EC%A3%BC%EC%86%8C%EB%B0%A9%EC%84%9C_508%EC%9D%98%EB%AC%B4%EC%86%8C%EB%B0%A9%EB%8C%80(2007%EB%85%84)12.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 15:39, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
경기도_남양주소방서_508의무소방대(2007년)12.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:06, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
경기도_남양주소방서_508의무소방대(2007년)12.jpg){kind=link}
This particular image is not the official state emblem of Assam or affiliated with any government entity. It appears to have been created by the user themselves. Therefore, I kindly request that it be removed as it is spreading misinformation and potentially misleading others. অজয় দাস (talk) 16:21, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete False information. দিব্য দত্ত (talk) 16:53, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete -Kuldhar Rabha (talk) 05:14, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: This image does not bear the stature of the official emblem of Assam or possess any connection with a recognized government entity. It appears to have materialized from the realm of the author's imagination, existing as a fictional construct. Saurabhsaha (talk) 07:08, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:06, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Likely a copyright violation based on this user's other (deleted) uploads. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:24, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Schematic is wrong. Inputs should be inverted, proper version already exists: 
. See: en:Flip-flop_(electronics)#SR_NAND_latch Ololuki (talk) 17:53, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:06, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused photograph that the uploader wishes to delete. There is a "Love Football Hate Business" sticker that seems copyrightable but it could be de minimis. I'm inclined towards a courtesy deletion here. Abzeronow (talk) 17:56, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused photo of nondescript cat, unusable composition, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:15, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
1943 German photograph. Source is a dead link. Photograph would appear to have been restored by URAA. Abzeronow (talk) 18:33, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused very poor quality and blurry images of unidentified locations (coordinates are wrong), unusable, out of scope.
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0490 (953225934).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0492 (953228114).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0493 (952374943).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0494 (952376973).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0495 (952379797).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0731 (953642711).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0733 (953647683).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0737 (954511312).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:47, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:06, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:2005 Tourist photos of Thunder Bay 2
[edit]Same as before: more blurry, unusable, and unidentifiable images with wrong coordinates.
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0517 (952541193).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0638 (953987192).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0648 (954003128).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0650 (953150547).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0661 (953159413).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0665 (954022754).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0673 (953182303).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0681 (953189649).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0691 (954069712).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0694 (953224147).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0695 (954081242).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0696 (954084608).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0697 (954087184).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0712 (953284906).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0715 (953293740).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0716 (953296390).jpg
- File:Thunder Bay trip IMG 0524 (952556629).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:29, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Delete Source is incorrect. Actual source appears to be here, which does not show the image available under any license compatible with Commons. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 18:53, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Privacy violation. My photo of my bedroom. Markus13666 (talk) 15:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:49, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Private image, image not in use Markus13666 (talk) 22:13, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep Just kept on June 30, and nothing has changed. This is a good photo, and another photo of this bed is in use. You voluntarily licensed the photo. Your best bet is to stop calling attention to these photos by continually nominating them for deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:35, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:07, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Schlafzimmer_14_3.jpg Markus13666 (talk) 09:11, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Not a dupe, and stop requesting deletion over and over. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:26, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:09, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Not educationally useful Markus13666 (talk) 22:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Comment It contains several elements that could be usable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:33, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:07, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
COM:PERSONAL Markus13666 (talk) 15:35, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- What elements are unique and useful for the project for educational purposes? 88.67.61.156 07:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- The mat is probably unique, but that's an irrelevant question. Elements don't have to be unique to be usable, and the burden is on the nominator to demonstrate that it couldn't possibly have a use. It was already kept, and the nominator was trying to get out of their irrevocable agreement to give their photos a Creative Commons license. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:15, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- This is a random private photo without focusing on anything. «Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality.» Commons:Project scope#Examples Markus13666 (talk) 19:55, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- And you'll make the same claim next year after this is kept again. No-one forced you to upload it, and if you think there are no usable elements in this photo, that's fine, I guess, but doesn't determine how others might use it. And I won't engage further in this IMO useless discussion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:19, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
- The mat is probably unique, but that's an irrelevant question. Elements don't have to be unique to be usable, and the burden is on the nominator to demonstrate that it couldn't possibly have a use. It was already kept, and the nominator was trying to get out of their irrevocable agreement to give their photos a Creative Commons license. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:15, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- Copyright violation. Source https://www.instagram.com/novndrr/ Viii23dawari (talk) 08:18, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Viii23dawari, can you give a direct link to the photo? I'm not seeing it there. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:58, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- https://www.instagram.com/s/aGlnaGxpZ2h0OjE4MjA4MTg1NjgyMjc4MTU3?story_media_id=2988775161683673476&igshid=MzRlODBiNWFlZA== Viii23dawari (talk) 08:31, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- I guess there's no way to view the image without logging into instagram? OK, then someone else will look at it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:59, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- https://www.instagram.com/s/aGlnaGxpZ2h0OjE4MjA4MTg1NjgyMjc4MTU3?story_media_id=2988775161683673476&igshid=MzRlODBiNWFlZA== Viii23dawari (talk) 08:31, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Viii23dawari, can you give a direct link to the photo? I'm not seeing it there. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:58, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: The Instagram user appears to have deleted all their photos, but I'll trust that it was there and that it was posted before its upload to Commons. —holly {chat} 19:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Fictional, out of scope N Panama 84534 00:00, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 07:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Fictional and out of scope. Not used for educational purposes N Panama 84534 21:41, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:FOP Japan. the momument was established in 1994. [2] eien20 (talk) 01:57, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:52, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete low quality exhibitionism Dronebogus (talk) 19:10, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:52, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statue of Lenin in Cēsis
[edit]The sculpture was installed in 1959 by Kārlis Jansons (1896–1986). There is no freedom of panorama in Latvia. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2057.
- File:It's serious - panoramio.jpg
- File:Lenin in box - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Lenin in box - panoramio.jpg
- File:LeninCesis.jpg
- File:LeninInBox.jpg
- File:LeninLettland.jpg
- File:The blank eyes - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 07:21, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment possible COM:URAA issue too, so that the photos cannot be undeleted even if the work becomes public domain in Latvia, due to U.S. copyright. U.S. copyright can be ignored if Latvia had commercial FOP. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:54, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: If this statue is from 1959, US copyright will last until the end of 2054, and copyright in Latvia will last longer than that. --Rosenzweig τ 10:55, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig in any case, the statue remains unfree, so Delete until it becomes free in Latvia. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:11, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig in any case, the statue remains unfree, so
- @JWilz12345: If this statue is from 1959, US copyright will last until the end of 2054, and copyright in Latvia will last longer than that. --Rosenzweig τ 10:55, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
It's an old and outdated version of the companies logo. See www.kickbase.com - a new brand identity has been launched. Kazakhattack (talk) 09:58, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. We also keep historic images/logos. --PaterMcFly (talk) 10:50, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 07:42, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
It's and old outdated version of the companies logo. See www.kickbase.com for an updated version of the brand identity. We already provided the new version. Kazakhattack (talk) 09:59, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. We also keep historic images/logos. --PaterMcFly (talk) 10:50, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Is there a legit way to update it? As the rights holder of the old and the new logo, it would be great to refresh it so there is no confusion with our partners and fans. 93.199.4.165 10:23, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- You can upload a new one under a new name. Maybe add the year to the file name so it can be more easily identified. Then replace the usages. You can also add a comment to the description that indicates that this logo is old. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:44, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- Is there a legit way to update it? As the rights holder of the old and the new logo, it would be great to refresh it so there is no confusion with our partners and fans. 93.199.4.165 10:23, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 07:42, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Collection of personal writing (book reviews, etc.). Outside of COM:SCOPE.
- File:The Mardons and the Pandemic-converted.pdf
- File:Lice Study.pdf
- File:Screwballs.pdf
- File:Lethbridge Politicians Federal Provincial and Civil.pdf
- File:Education During Covid-19.pdf
- File:Curveballs by Catherine Mardon.pdf
Marbletan (talk) 14:48, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:40, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Copy of an old version of w:en:Marie Van Brittan Brown. It serves no purpose as a PDF on Commons; outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 15:00, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by OscarDanby52 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files uploaded for use on a English Wikipedia hoax/fiction page on English Wikipedia (for which the uploader is indefinitely blocked). Outside of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Overthehills.png
- File:Eat well.png
- File:Bad Bedtime Story.png
- File:Warszawa.png
- File:Sketch-1658565939288.png
- File:Sketch-1658528994756.png
- File:Bigmanbarry.png
- File:Randomalbumcover.png
- File:The glass mountain.png
- File:The Glass Mountain.png
- File:Overthehillsandfaraway.png
- File:Assassinationnation.png
- File:Over the hills.png
- File:Revolter 2 art.png
- File:Revolter art.png
- File:Random artwork.png
Marbletan (talk) 15:06, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:38, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Essay/class assignment; ouside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 15:10, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:36, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Essay/class assignment; ouside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 15:11, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:36, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: short-lived K-pop meme, not a real flag (cf. https://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20181017000514). Omphalographer (talk) 19:45, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:33, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag (es:Usuario:Catagarciav/Taller). Omphalographer (talk) 19:47, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 19:51, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:31, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: unofficial, unused, blurry flag. Omphalographer (talk) 19:52, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 19:55, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE Veverve (talk) 03:22, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:53, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Author is Douglas Coulter per Metadata, not uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:53, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:53, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 04:52, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:53, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sitis (statue)
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France.
- File:Guingamp - Place de la République - Sitis 01.jpg
- File:Guingamp - Place de la République - Sitis 02.jpg
- File:Guingamp - Place de la République - Sitis 03.jpg
- File:Guingamp - Place de la République - Sitis 04.jpg
- File:Guingamp - Place de la République - Sitis 05.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 07:01, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- C'est vraiment dommage. Ça limite très rapidement au niveau encyclopédique. Kev22 (talk) 08:47, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- That is true. But that's a political issue. Some years ago, France even attempted to convince the European Parlament to pass a law to remove FOP all over Europe. Luckily, that failed (not least because we protested). So do write some letters to your representatives. --PaterMcFly (talk) 13:32, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:54, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Micha Star Liberty (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal and looking like self promotional images. These are outside the scope of this project. User page has been deleted 3 times now.
Herby talk thyme 11:24, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:54, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ByDinaGifts (talk · contribs)
[edit]Blatant advertising; not in COM:SCOPE, very much COM:SPAM
Gikü (talk) 15:54, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:55, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Adolf Wirthmiller sen. died 1959, Adolf Wirthmiller jun. died 1960... copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 23:27, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:56, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Description says this was taken in 2023, but this is a false date since the man pictured here, Jean Snella, died in 1979. When was this photography really taken? Who's the real photographer (I strongly doubt the "own work" claim)? No proof this is a free picture. Titlutin (talk) 23:50, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:56, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Chiyako92 as Copyvio (copyviol) and the most recent rationale was: COM:SCREENSHOT. Challenged on talk page. @Fiorentino1988: please send permission to COM:VRT. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:18, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Autorizzazione inviata dalla società produttrice @Mdaniels5757 Fiorentino1988 (talk) 09:22, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- Permission received and pending. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:53, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:Frame del film Una Sconosciuta.jpg” under ticket:2023071710003892. Ruthven (msg) 12:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per VRT. Ruthven (msg) 12:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
"FBMD" in Metadata indicated that the file was first published on Facebook, also find a larger resolution at here A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Low resolution image missing EXIF, also the user's only uploads, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused file. The file is not in use since 2016. Per COM:NOTUSED. Estopedist1 (talk) 08:38, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by A.Podolian (talk · contribs)
[edit]professional images. Thumbnails. Unlike that own work. No EXIF-data. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed.
Estopedist1 (talk) 08:41, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:23, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 13:24, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Uselessly low resolution, we have much better images in Category:People playing blackjack --PaterMcFly (talk) 13:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Two images of Category:Sitagliptin in strange representation (even if we assume color means an element, it's missing some of the actual atomic sites--mixing up the idea of an atom and the bond to an atom). Lower diagram has poor geometry and the whole image also has a weird gray bar at the top and large other margins. The cat has better alts. DMacks (talk) 18:56, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
And also:
the presumed original from which the first file is cropped. Here instead the whole image also has a large distracting border. DMacks (talk) 18:58, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete both, per DMacks. Marbletan (talk) 20:39, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete both files per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:11, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Missing nitrogen in the fused 6-membered ring. Category:Sitagliptin has correct diagrams, which also are in higher quality than this small jpg. DMacks (talk) 19:01, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete. The chemical structure is incorrect and there is a correct high quality alternative. Marbletan (talk) 20:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Replaced by File:Sitagliptin.svg. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:14, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not an own work, is it? 181.43.0.4 19:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Only upload of user, so presumably also out of scope. PaterMcFly (talk) 20:11, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Obviously a professional promo photo, uploader ≠ copyright holder, no permission by photographer. 2003:C0:8F21:E100:EC08:4587:98D0:C555 22:54, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non notable fictional map Dronebogus (talk) 23:29, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by TimWu007 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.ditiezu.com/thread-551000-2-1.html (http://img.ditiezu.net/forum/201801/23/203540owvpoueexmw11o41.jpg). I cannot see the link. PQ77wd, did you take this photo yourself? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:50, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Mdaniels5757 That forum has banned access from outside mainland China, but the image link can still be accessed ([3]). The screenshot of that thread: [4].Tim Wu (talk) 00:54, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Mdaniels5757 You can found the watermark of origin author has been removed by PQ77wd. PQ77wd is an "experienced" copyvio uploader: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by PQ77wd, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by WKDx417. Meanwhile the photograph taken by PQ77wd him/herself (e.g. File:Exit C, Xinnan Station, Guangzhou Metro.jpg has rich EXIF information and blurry picture quality). Tim Wu (talk) 01:10, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- OK, I'm in favor of deletion now. I note for the closing admin that PQ77wd is autopatrolled; that should likely be revoked. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per Tim Wu. --Sanandros (talk) 21:53, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Belbury as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:SCREENSHOT. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:55, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: Scratch content is CC BY-SA 2.0, see https://scratch.mit.edu/terms_of_use sec. 4, plus same username as the scratch uploader. And COM:INUSE, so in scope. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:56, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per mdaniels. --Sanandros (talk) 22:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
irrelevant picture that should not be on the wikimedia 2406:3003:2001:223D:F9A6:5606:5F35:F9C 05:47, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a deletion reason, but is it own work? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:22, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 22:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyright: While the uploader may indeed be the photographer, what's depicted is said to be by Steph Gorkii, whose estate presumably owns the copyright to it. Incidentally, the three other uploads by the contributor of this image each show Gorkii but are curiously miscellaneous; I wonder if all three really are the uploader's "own work". Hoary (talk) 07:01, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 22:08, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
The image metadata states the picture is made by a different user Dajasj (talk) 07:42, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- @MarcoSwart, is this your picture? Dajasj (talk) 07:42, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- No, Marco de Swart must be someone else. MarcoSwart (talk) 07:55, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 22:10, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
no permission from author - see metadata "Credit/Leverancier Marco De Swart" Hoyanova (talk) 14:33, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 05:05, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
no permission from author - see metadata "Author Marco De Swart" Hoyanova (talk) 14:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 05:06, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo by non-Wikipedian: out of scope; no indication of notability. --Karim talk to me :)..! 08:03, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (artist: Johanna Flammer, Foto: Dirk Rose) M2k~dewiki (talk) 11:39, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (Photography: Kai Werner Schmidt) M2k~dewiki (talk) 11:40, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (Photography: Kai Werner Schmidt) M2k~dewiki (talk) 11:40, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
"Penley" painting needs permission. Ooligan (talk) 11:41, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:52, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio. No evidence at the source provided (BBC article) that the image has been released under a free license (cc-by-sa-4.0). ed g2s • talk 13:28, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:57, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Crecer pensando que somos tontas sin saber que nacimos con una condición es de las peores cosas que podemos vivir, es un derecho humano saber que nacimos con una variante genética parte de los trastornos del neurodesarrollo.jpg
[edit]
out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 13:50, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 11:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
no permission from author - see metadata "Author Marco De Swart" Hoyanova (talk) 14:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
not used. Self-promo. Probably some marginal award. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 14:41, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:50, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused file. The file is not in use since 2016. Per COM:NOTUSED. Estopedist1 (talk) 14:41, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Informations insuffisantes. Complexité des instructions de téléversement. PPD (talk) 15:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 11:50, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
out of scope M2k~dewiki (talk) 15:49, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:50, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
promo. Not used. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:10, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:50, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Privacy violation. My photo of my bedroom. Markus13666 (talk) 15:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:48, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
A violation of the privacy policy. File not in use Markus13666 (talk) 22:10, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Kept on June 30. It's your fault if you violated your own privacy and thought better of it months later. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:36, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Not really useful. Duplicate of this photo https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Schlafzimmer_14_3.jpg Markus13666 (talk) 09:09, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep all. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:31, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:09, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Edofinternet (talk · contribs)
[edit]I doubt this uploader understands the license they agreed to or that they have the rights to them. Especially the PNG file makes it look like they were downloaded somewhere else. Would ask for VRT verification but they probably won't read this
- File:Max Mauff Wir sind die Flut.jpg
- File:Dreharbeiten zu Wir sind die Flut.png
- File:Dreharbeiten zu "Wir sind die Flut" in Erkelenz..jpg
Vera (talk) 22:11, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
CC-BY-NC-SA license on Flickr, the VRT ticket is just a verification for those images marked with CC-BY-SA A1Cafel (talk) 13:22, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- VRT agent (verify): This is a nine year old ticket when things were not much complex as they are now. I can find a link to Category:Files from Korea.net Flickr stream but is not sure if everything in that category is by default CC-BY-SA. There's a certain correspondence between the uploader (back then) and Korea.net guys requesting license-changes on Flickr of files that were uploaded then. This file is very recent and if it is not CC-BY-SA by-default, I see no point using the ticket to help this file be kept here. I would say this ticket be used for files that were uploaded by Scoopfinder who appears to have "vanished" and only those prior to 30/10/2015, the date when a note was added for the last time on this ticket. Please let me know if you have any doubts. ─ The Aafī (talk) 14:45, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oh sorry, Scoopfinder is here: NoFWDaddress, but they have not edited since 9 October 2022. Otherwise, I believe they could tell us better about all of the Korea.net situation. FWIW, we do not accept proxy/forwarded permission and I would deem the ticket as invalid in our current standard. VRT needs a clear release from the original owner/copyrights holder that they release the media under a compatible free license that allows re-use. All of this is missing here. ─ The Aafī (talk) 14:54, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Ticket doesn't make this CC-BY-SA. --Gbawden (talk) 15:07, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
CC-BY-NC-SA license on Flickr, the VRT ticket is just a verification for those images marked with CC-BY-SA A1Cafel (talk) 13:22, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Ticket doesn't make this CC-BY-SA. --Gbawden (talk) 15:08, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
CC-BY-NC-SA license on Flickr, the VRT ticket is just a verification for those images marked with CC-BY-SA A1Cafel (talk) 13:22, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Ticket doesn't make this CC-BY-SA. --Gbawden (talk) 15:08, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
CC-BY-NC-SA license on Flickr, the VRT ticket is just a verification for those images marked with CC-BY-SA A1Cafel (talk) 13:22, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Ticket doesn't make this CC-BY-SA. --Gbawden (talk) 15:09, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Simple logo, but is it in-scope? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:47, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:TOO UK, making the scope question moot, though I agree that its notability is unclear. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:44, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:28, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Photo d’Indira Ampiot , Miss France 2023 lors d’un déplacement à Basse-Terre (Guadeloupe).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Lomita as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.instagram.com/p/Cn4NjbPO3ht/
Per talk page, France-Pt9301 has sent an email containing permission from the photographer. @France-Pt9301: please send the permission to permissions-commons
wikimedia.org if you haven't already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:07, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 09:52, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
This picture is a non-free content. https://www.instagram.com/p/CukRXYHNQe3/?img_index=4 Nt (talk) 16:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 09:52, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Meaningless and likely fictitious political diagrams – see previous mass DRs of this user's files. Enyavar (talk) 08:02, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:51, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Likely not produced by uploader. Potential copyvio. XtraJovial (talk) 04:47, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept, withdrawn. XtraJovial (talk) 13:50, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A09 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:SCREENSHOT. COM:TOO US? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:01, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Just technical icons here, nothing copyrightable. --PaterMcFly (talk) 07:27, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Threads.ing.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Threads screenshot.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:05, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Low resolution image missing EXIF, also the user's only uploads, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:06, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Found it on here 4 years before uploaded to Commons, but with a slightly lower resolution A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:07, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Tarashnaa has several kind of wooden handmade product that made your vision clear about wooden creativity. once you visit must familiar with marketing trend.jpg
[edit]
Copyright violation. Photo is also on https://tarashnaa.com/. I do not see a VRT ticket. JopkeB (talk) 04:44, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete; this is clearly intended as an advertisement. Omphalographer (talk) 04:48, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:08, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unnecessary Bobertrobert0709 (talk) 05:56, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:08, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
False license MRTFR55 (talk) 06:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Invalid license MRTFR55 (talk) 19:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Redeleted; same image by same uploader as previous deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:56, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Unused file. The file is not in use since 2016. Per COM:NOTUSED. Estopedist1 (talk) 06:46, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Per TinEye search, not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:03, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Can u provide a link?--Sanandros (talk) 22:09, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- I guess any administrator should known TinEye search option. Anyway https://web.archive.org/web/20130627074834/https://www.tunstall.co.uk/solutions/lifeline-vi Estopedist1 (talk) 06:03, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- I forgot pinging to @Sanandros Estopedist1 (talk) 06:03, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry but I couldn't find out the resolution of the pic in the link. What resolution it has?--Sanandros (talk) 14:30, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Sanandros: why the resolution is important for this deletion request? Anyway, it is 294x193 Estopedist1 (talk) 18:13, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Because that's not the original file where the uploader copied it. Ours is 583 × 430 and thats a higher resolution. Then it's possible that the uploade is indeed the author.--Sanandros (talk) 20:52, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Sanandros: it is so easy to manipulate with image's resolution. I guess we should apply here Commons:precautionary principle Estopedist1 (talk) 06:03, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- Because that's not the original file where the uploader copied it. Ours is 583 × 430 and thats a higher resolution. Then it's possible that the uploade is indeed the author.--Sanandros (talk) 20:52, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Sanandros: why the resolution is important for this deletion request? Anyway, it is 294x193 Estopedist1 (talk) 18:13, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry but I couldn't find out the resolution of the pic in the link. What resolution it has?--Sanandros (talk) 14:30, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- I forgot pinging to @Sanandros Estopedist1 (talk) 06:03, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- I guess any administrator should known TinEye search option. Anyway https://web.archive.org/web/20130627074834/https://www.tunstall.co.uk/solutions/lifeline-vi Estopedist1 (talk) 06:03, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Already published in 2014, so would need VRT anyway if indeed own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:11, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Unused file. The file is not in use since 2016. Per COM:NOTUSED. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:04, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:11, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Not the uploader's own work from 2020 as claimed, but most likely taken from [5] and the PDF brochure there which was created in 2001. So a copyvio that should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 07:20, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, clearly screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:14, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Clearly not own work Dajasj (talk) 07:43, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Although this user might be working for WFFR, but I believe this should require more explicit consent. Dajasj (talk) 07:44, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:15, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Photograph of a potentially copyrighted map. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 07:53, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Sbb1413. This work has been accomplished by me. There is no issue of copyright as such. Thanks.2405:201:1C:B8C7:84F7:6635:658:6E45 11:29, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not talking about the copyright of the photograph, I'm talking about the copyright of the photographed map. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 11:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:15, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
no permission from author see metadata "Author Victor Krijt Copyright holder Victor Krijt Horizontal resolution 240 dpi Vertical resolution 240 dpi Copyright status Copyrighted Unique ID of original document 138B4316B350905CE5126182F126A243 Date metadata was last modified 23:46, 2 January 2015 Contact information vckrijt@me.com www.actionphotoshoot.com Zevenaar, , Netherlands +316261305" Hoyanova (talk) 08:32, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:16, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Low quality, small size. Almost impossible to distinguish details. Qualitätssicherung (talk) 08:45, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unusable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:16, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Tsitas SHMERA.jpg, per watermark, not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Other two images are old. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
File:Evangelos Gerakakis.jpg#OK, to be kept- File:Tsitas SHMERA.jpg
- File:Tsitas 01f.jpg
Estopedist1 (talk) 08:49, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Evangelos Gerakakis = PD-EU-no author disclosure --RAN (talk) 01:52, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:17, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation Kelly The Angel (talk) 11:10, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:18, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation Kelly The Angel (talk) 11:11, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:17, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Unused file. The file is not in use since 2016. Per COM:NOTUSED. Estopedist1 (talk) 14:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:18, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
no permission from author - see metadata "Author Marco De Swart" Hoyanova (talk) 14:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:19, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
no permission from author - see metadata "Author Marco De Swart" Hoyanova (talk) 14:36, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:19, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
out of scope M2k~dewiki (talk) 15:49, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:21, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
out of scope, unused, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 16:01, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Unused file. The file is not in use since 2016. Per COM:NOTUSED. Promotional, photoshopped image, original image from Internet, not own work Estopedist1 (talk) 16:06, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
some of them are not own work. I suspect that none of them are own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed.
- File:SONAR LAUGHING.jpg
- File:KEVIN LAUGHING.jpg
- File:SONAR BEERD.png
- File:FRENCH STUDIO HOURGLASS.png
- File:FRENCH AND BURGESS AT TEMPERANCE.jpg
- File:FRENCH AT ARGUS.jpg
Estopedist1 (talk) 16:09, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, FB and transmission code in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:24, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by SpiderMum as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: commercial radio logo. COM:TOO Poland? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:10, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:24, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Per TinEye search, not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: TinEye gave 2 results, both are later and smaller versions. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Saurabhsaha as Speedy (Db) and the most recent rationale was: -g11 Yann (talk) 18:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep No external link, this could be useful. Yann (talk) 18:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per Yann and COM:TOO India. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:46, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
too big size, can't use Akschyn (talk) 21:33, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment That's not a Commons deletion reason. Do you mean that this is a violation of COM:TOO Azerbaijan, which we have no page for? If it's over the threshold of originality for Azerbaijan, we can't host it at any size. However, you should examine the fair use policies of various Wikipedias. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:42, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:31, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no relevant visual, specific, information in this picture. No meaning-giving comment was added. This could be anywhere, whenever ... Paulbe (talk) 21:55, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Keep Chamberlain Street is 3 blocks long. That's quite specific enough. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:39, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Ikan. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:31, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Likely to be a screenshot of a social media call, not certain if photos like this are allowed on articles. Iggy the Swan (talk) 22:07, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
probably copyright violation, see source and "author" Xocolatl (talk) 23:17, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
1941Michel6.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
1941Michel6.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
See this, made by this stamp designer who died in 1972. If Estonian copyright rules apply, 70 pma (+1) means this enters PD in 2043. If German copyright rules apply, then {{PD-Germany-§134-KUG}} applies, but URAA means this enters PD in 2037. Matr1x-101 {user - talk? - useless contributions} 21:12, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
1941Michel6.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:36, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
1941Michel6.jpg){kind=link}
The file is claimed to be 1877, but there's no licensing tag on the page and there's no direct source provided; I can't verify the publication date. As such, I'm nominating in light of COM:PRP. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:41, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment There's a date on the file itself, but it's very small. Can anyone see that date clearly? It looks more like 1817 to me, but I would believe 1877 and seriously doubt there's really a good reason to delete the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:41, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Considering that the world's first permanent photograph was taken in the 1820s, I think that a date of "1817" would probably refer to the year of the building's construction, rather than the year of the photograph being taken. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 13:45, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- If that were so, it would put the year the photo was taken in more doubt. But that is not remotely so. Try 817. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:23, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- I suppose that makes sense.
I withdraw my nomination; this appears to be {{PD-old-assumed}} if that "1877" date is right. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 20:46, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- I suppose that makes sense.
- If that were so, it would put the year the photo was taken in more doubt. But that is not remotely so. Try 817. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:23, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD-old. Ruthven (msg) 07:29, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Very simple logo uploaded withoujt a license tag (probably can be {{PD-textlogo}}), but is it in-COM:SCOPE? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:31, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Yes. See w:ChargePoint. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:39, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Ruthven. --Rosenzweig τ 11:41, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tidjani Saleh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Licensing tag says that works published by the government "may be freely used for non-profit purposes, subject to respect for the integrity of the work and indication of the source", but that seems to fail the requirements of COM:L, which requires that general commercial use and remixing of the work be allowed. This seems equivalent to an -NC-ND restriction in its current form, so we can't exactly host these here.
- File:Official ministerial portrait of Mohamed Melainine Ould Eyih (cropped).jpg
- File:Official ministerial portrait of Mohamed Melainine Ould Eyih.jpg
- File:Official presidential portrait of Mohamed Ould Ghazouani.jpg
- File:Logo of the National Independent Election Commission (2023).png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:09, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- I nominated the license tag for deletion back in May: Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Attribution-MauritaniaGov. That discussion hasn't seen any action yet. As you point out, the tag conflicts with COM:L. It was created by a new editor, who then used it to upload these images you've nominated for deletion. 25stargeneral (talk) 02:46, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:27, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Copyright holder is Adam Davila Photography, not uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 03:42, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:25, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). It's got a bungled license tag, but an attempt to add one. I'm just not sure what the source of this photo is based off of a look at the page, so I don't think I can simply remove the speedy tag without sending this here. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:46, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: no license, no source, no description of what this actually is. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:26, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). There's no proper license tag, and the author claims that they have "rights to publish" this photo, but I don't think that's sufficient under COM:L because it doesn't expressly enable reuse and remixing by anyone, anytime, for any purpose. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:52, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:26, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
No license since July 3, but this may well be under COM:TOO Brazil and COM:TOO USA. Thoughts? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:56, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:33, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: now has pd-shape license. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:26, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Book is less than 70 years old, so creator cannot be dead for at least 70 years. No VRT ticket. JopkeB (talk) 04:11, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:27, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). The uploader basically is claiming this as {{PD-textlogo}} without applying the actual license tag, but this is a UK logo, and the UK has a very low TOO, so I'm bringing this here for further discussion. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:27, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:27, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
The image is a Copyrighted logo LGGO 74 (talk) 04:28, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Question Is it over COM:TOO Spain? I can't tell, because no examples of files are given at that link. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: pd-textlogo applied. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:28, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
The image is a Copyrighted logo LGGO 74 (talk) 04:28, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Presumably PD-Textlogo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:38, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: pd-textlogo applied. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:29, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). Uploader purports to have "the rights to publish" this photograph, but it's not clear to me that this grants a COM:L-compliant free license to re-use and re-mix this work anywhere, for any time, and for any purpose. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: improper license + out of scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:29, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (artist: Johanna Flammer, Foto: Ivo Faber) M2k~dewiki (talk) 11:38, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:30, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Vietnam's FOP was revoked since 2023, image uploaded afterwards are not allowed on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 13:27, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Blackened the foreground recent building, in the spirit of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WMSE_m%C3%B6ter_WMFI,_AC_07.jpg, I hope it's OK now. Syced (talk) 14:44, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Syced is it still in scope? The censored photo you cited was part of the protest campaign in Finland during the European Parliament events in summer 2015. I don't see any indication that Vietnamese Wikipedians would lobby for restoration of unrestricted FOP in Vietnam. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:51, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, has become out of scope. No practical purpose because there is no movement in Vietnam similar to EU Wikimedians' protests during 2015 in which there were instances of uses of censored photos. This can be kept if there are actual movements like demonstrations and protests that Vietnamese Wikimedians might conduct to protest the removal of freedom of panorama. In short, the censored photo is out of project COM:SCOPE. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:49, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:31, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by HeminKurdistan as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted logo, also out of scope. Seems relatively simple (it may well be below COM:TOO USA), but I agree that this is probably out-of-scope. I can't speedy delete a file for that, though, so I'm bringing this to DR. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 14:02, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Also affected: File:Tanvpn.jpg. HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:03, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:31, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
this is not "own work" Saschaporsche (talk) 15:24, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:32, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Photo is copyrighted (see here) also no permission has been given. NikosLikomitros (talk) 15:54, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- The name of the photographer is listed: Marilena Stafylidou. PetitHans (talk) 16:24, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- @PetitHans If the name is listed, this doesn't means that a copyvio will survive a deletion proposal. NikosLikomitros (talk) 12:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:33, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Extent of territory controlled by the Mosquito (Miskito) Indians during the 18th century.jpg
[edit]_Indians_during_the_18th_century.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Indians_during_the_18th_century.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The user uploaded a map made by the author, but there are doubts that the license is the right one, possibly it still has copyright. Taichi (talk) 16:02, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:33, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Image is by Nintendo, not by the uploader. Easily found many places online. Trey Maturin (talk) 16:12, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as obvious copyright violation. (Oinkers42) (talk) 22:21, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:33, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
This picture is a non-free content. https://lens.google.com/search?ep=gsbubb&hl=ko&re=df&p=Acn1BYeLFP9pegsjUx0Reb0CEvPF0Lh4sywsSU9DsPEm_LV9i2oALGKE6uqq7FmOynH87KmtH_TITlRudtQxqCxiZ00Iob7k6uFIrVsLZjjKVKlsfgVf8XCJD__lcrkwo_q7QRFYgadcgWw3TJTbZxGJroekIy6FQ_XDeh-gC-N1e2QKVTGSjWuoOvrcZ4VfdNcN9IFTzPhwsqxSmIMKMTVx2gtCmITSaOcW8eNqAb_pBGKLEyg6jzmZ1y9ZUYWMzmne3CnbhaVIK1zwtv38KU_SjZiDV5fjsZ2r9DUvg8Der9wi2ZnfZ0h0Xmws0bTAdlM%3D#lns=W251bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsIkVrY0tKR1V6TTJRNFpqTXhMV1V4TlRjdE5EYzFaUzFoTnpjM0xUUTBZV1pqT1RNM01XSmlOaElmZHpjNU9GWXlORTUyZDFGUk9FZHRjM3A0VFdaRGJITnVkR0pzVTJ4U1p3PT0iXQ== Nt (talk) 16:12, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ovruni as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This image is identical to this other one that does not indicate such license https://grupodetrabajohistoriasiglo20.blogspot.com/2018/08/los-cuatro-historiadores-peruanos_28.html. Possibly PD due to age, discuss. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- The given link attributes this photo to this posting by the Raúl Porras Barrenechea Institute of the National University of San Marcos. Unfortunately they do not provide any credits or any information about its origins. In summary, we do not know neither the author of this photo nor its first publication. We have also no indication when this photograph was taken, we just know that Raúl Porras Barreneche died in 1960. Unfortunately {{PD-Peru-photo}} works only for creations before 1953. --AFBorchert (talk) 12:12, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by HeminKurdistan as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted logo. COM:TOO? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:31, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wiki Farazi as Fair use (Fair use). COM:TOO Malaysia? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:46, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, because the logo not his (Afiq999) original work. The organization Akademi Super was established in 2014. The work is no more than 50 years, and should be delete because copright (based Copyright Act 1987). Wiki Farazi (talk) 00:02, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- You've cited copyright rules, not COM:TOO rules. And if File:Petronas Logo.svg was kept, this is definitely simpler and a textlogo, and by that logic should be kept. However, if you know how Malaysian law defines the threshold of originality, you should cite specific legal (and/or, better yet, case law) language and add it to COM:TOO Malaysia. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:07, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:35, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Not own work, and copyright will belong to the football club. Do much detail to be pd-logo. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:08, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:35, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Clip accidentally cut off before finished full word عُثمان (talk) 17:30, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:35, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
file not .svg FrenchFryInAFryer387 (talk) 18:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not a reason to delete. PaterMcFly (talk) 20:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by FlorianH76 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Obviously not own work of the uploader, taken from not free source. I agree, but the individual depicted died in the 1960s. Is anybody able to come up with a legitimate source on the history of this photo? It's possible that it's PD, but if we can't find such a source within a week, it's liable to deletion under COM:PRP and COM:F5. It would be a shame, because it's in-use on several wikis, but we can't host copyright-violating content. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:00, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Posters depict photos which have no license proof QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 19:42, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
The doll's package box contains a copyright notice on the side saying "© Harvey Rosenberg Inc. 1977". ebay listing proves it. Also, copyright renewal is not required for ones copyrighted in 1977 as one of the Copyright Acts (more likely 1992 one) ended requirement for those copyrighted in 1964 and thereafter. Fails COM:TOYS. George Ho (talk) 21:17, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:38, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Not educationally useful Markus13666 (talk) 22:00, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Usable photo of a lawnmower, though the crop on the left is regrettable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:37, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- Better photo of this lawn mower https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rasenmäher_7.jpg Markus13666 (talk) 09:13, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- This is a deletion request, not COM:VIC. We don't delete photos just because there's one that's better, only when they're not usable. Or at least that's how I understand things. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:11, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- These are photos of the same lawnmower, uploaded by different users. 777mxx (talk) 16:32, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
- «Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality.» Commons:Project scope#Examples 777mxx (talk) 16:44, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:38, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Asembleo as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: รศ.ดร.ดวงฤทธิ์ เบ็ญจาธิกุล ชัยรุ่งเรือง.jpg
One is PNG so not exact duplicate as JPG, so cannot be speedied. Recommend that as PNG that it an be deleted — billinghurst sDrewth 23:55, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:38, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Dantsig died in 2017 - need OTRS for the paintings
- File:Field workers painting by Mai Dantsig.jpg
- File:Minsk - Hero-city painting by Mai Dantsig.jpg
- File:'About the Great Patriotic War' painting by Mai Dantsig.jpg
- File:Worker painting by Mai Dantsig.jpg
- File:Holiday painting by Mai Dantsig.jpg
- File:Dream painting by Mai Dantsig.jpg
- File:In the field painting by Mai Dantsig.jpg
- File:Paints painting by Mai Dantsig.jpg
- File:Ruined city painting by Mai Dantsig.jpg
- File:Youth painting by Mai Dantsig.jpg
- File:'Etudes on the nature' painting by Mai Dantsig.jpg
- File:Wedding painting by Mai Dantsig.jpg
- File:New life painting by Mai Dantsig.jpg
- File:'My city, ancient, modern' painting by Mai Dantsig.jpg
- File:Solihorsk painting by Mai Dantsig.jpg
- File:Minsk painting by Mai Dantsig.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 09:33, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:22, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Getty images photos, not TechCrunch's to license.
- File:509306957DH00066 TechCrunch.jpg
- File:509306957DH00071 TechCrunch.jpg
- File:509306957DH00068 TechCrunch.jpg
- File:509306957DH00064 TechCrunch.jpg
- File:George Hotz speaks onstage during TechCrunch Disrupt SF 2016 01.jpg
- File:George Hotz speaks onstage during TechCrunch Disrupt SF 2016 02.jpg
- File:577181505RR106 TechCrunch D.jpg
- File:DeenaShakirTechCrunch2022.jpg
- File:Andrew Ng at TechCrunch Disrupt SF 2017.jpg
—Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:28, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- All the photos are from the official TechCrunch flickr account, where all are marked with suitable licence, and with "Photo by Steve Jennings/Getty Images for TechCrunch" (just one example). Doesn't "for TechCrunch" mean that they own the photos and so photos are free to use? Artem.G (talk) 05:42, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- and just for the record - I didn't upload these two files - File:577181505RR106 TechCrunch D.jpg, File:DeenaShakirTechCrunch2022.jpg Artem.G (talk) 14:54, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep TechCrunch is a well respected company, existing since 2005. They publish information, and also organize interesting events (at least from 2010 to 2022). For these events they hired good photographers, and published their photos on the TechCrunch Flickr stream (now totaling 81,386 photographs). As far as I can see, they always mention the name of the photographers, and all photos are given a CC-BY license. Commons holds at least 5,586 photographs from these events, and the photographs are used very frequently across all Wikis. The TechCrunch Flickr stream is also viewed heavily (19.7M views), so the photographers know about this usage and license. TechCrunch doesn't "own" the photos, but have arranged contracts with the photographers including a suitable copyright license. Commons holds these photographs according to their license. Vysotsky (talk) 22:08, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: properly licensed and attributed files. --Polarlys (talk) 08:07, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
non free license Sand Kastle 17 (talk) 03:09, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 08:08, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
" Tim von DailyVerses.net (per Email)" is not an OTRS. Veverve (talk) 03:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Isn't this the same as if the uploader claimed "own work"? The uploader (OTRS member) certainly verified that the Mail was credible. The only strange thing is that no ticket is mentioned. --PaterMcFly (talk) 07:38, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Those need an OTRS with a ticket number, the procedure is legally important. Veverve (talk) 13:36, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission according to our guidelines (file of limited encyclopedic value btw.). --Polarlys (talk) 08:09, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Image lacks COM:EVIDENCE of being in public domain. Photograph is credited to Edmund Hillary/Royal Geographical Society.[6] Muzilon (talk) 04:41, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Muzilon, Could "PD-Nepal" apply for this photo taken in Nepal over 70 years ago? -- Ooligan (talk) 05:12, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Ooligan: But was the photo first published in Nepal? If the first official publication was (for example) the journal of the Royal Geographical Society in 1953, then it would likely remain copyrighted in the USA for 95 years after publication, and therefore ineligible for Commons until 2048. Muzilon (talk) 07:05, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: No comprehensible justification for licensing. --Polarlys (talk) 08:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused photo of non-notable event and people, no context, unusable, out of scope. Also added for same reason:
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:08, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment Category:Brasa (Hilton Niagara Falls) added (which has more photos like this one). --Rosenzweig τ 09:26, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks Rosenzweig for adding the category. These 2 are too personal, but the rest are better alternatives. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:30, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 08:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Kacamata as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image taken from the internet. See source.
COM:TOO US? (and therefore COM:TOO Brazil?). —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:53, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Mdaniels5757 COM:TOO always confuse me, but in this case as the name of the website is in the logo ("Bahia Notícias") I thought it would be original enough to be copyrighted. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 01:01, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Looks below COM:TOO for both countries. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:20, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Ikan Kekek; license changed to PD-logo. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:36, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Megitsune-chan as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1. COM:TOO US? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:57, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment This is the logo of a store in Tashkent, to COM:TOO Uzbekistan is most relevant, but there is no such page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:23, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Dubious license claim, relevant TOO uncertain, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:36, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Freedom4U as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photograph of a poster with no indication that it is in the public domain/properly licensed ErickAgain 14:09, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep North Korea has FoP that also applies to 2D works of art. As photograph is taken in a publicly accessible museum FoP applies.--ErickAgain 14:11, 14 July 2023 (UTC).
- Delete I seriously don't understand the idea that a museum, simply because it is accessible by some members of the public, is a public space. Freedom4U (talk) 04:06, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - per ErickAgain, - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 13:42, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:38, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Freedom4U as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photograph of a poster with no indication that it is in the public domain/properly licensed ErickAgain 14:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep see discussion on Commons:Deletion requests/File:DPRK Museum painting 2.jpg
- Is there a way to merge these two deletion requests? That would make sense since its the same premise for both. Anyways, see my comment listed as above at the link. Freedom4U (talk) 04:08, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:38, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by SpiderMum as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: commercial tv logo. COM:TOO Poland? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:11, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: false license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Freedom4U as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photograph of a poster with no indication that it is in the public domain/properly licensed —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:48, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep: {{FoP-North Korea}}. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:48, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Mdaniels5757 Why would a poster inside of a primary be a public space? Freedom4U (talk) 17:01, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: for same reason as Mdaniels, above. North Korea tour of a school makes it public, such as in government buildings. Raquel Baranow (talk) 22:56, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: A primary school is a public space, thus the poster is usable by the rationales above. ~ ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki·†·⚓⊙☳☶⚡ 00:57, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Kalki That is an assertion not backed up by scholarly research into North Korean copyright law. See Liu 2018 p.12, which states Further, where a work situated in public places is copied, there is no infringement. That would include sculpture or building situated in public places, or murals in public places. In addition, if the definition of "public space" were to be stretched that much, that would suggest that all books stored in North Korean libraries would also be exempt from copyright. Freedom4U (talk) 08:44, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, without further information on the parameters of a "public place" in the North Korean FOP, perhaps COM:PCP applies. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:30, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per majority of discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 07:03, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- If I understand well, according to you I should not have displayed a picture of St Kerien statue in Vallee des Saints, as I am not the sculptor of this statue ?
- If you are right, Wikimedia can suppress all my pictures : I am not a sculpor, but just the person who took the pictures, as other persons did for the first statues installed on this site (see for instance : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vall%C3%A9e_des_Saints#/media/Fichier:Saint_Tugdual_-_Vall%C3%A9e_des_Saints.jpg)
- I hope this will be solved quickly, one way or the other... I never intended to do wrong. Scrapdemonik (talk) 08:52, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Yes you can't upload photographs of statues who are not in the public domain yet (or do not have a free licence). In fact all of the close up images of the statues of the Vallée des Saints would need to also be deleted, unless the artists give an agreement. Miniwark (talk) 12:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your answer.. As it is the same for all the pictures I took in Vallee des Saints, I am sending mails to the sculptors to get their opinion.
- If they prefer the pictures to be deleted, I'll request their suppression. Scrapdemonik (talk) 12:14, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Pour les non-anglophones, cette discussion concerne la validité de la publication de photos d'oeuvres n'appartenant pas encore au domaine public.
- En résumé (si j'ai bien tout compris), la photo elle-même n'est pas incriminée, mais sa publication sur Wikimédia implique une licence autorisant son usage commercial. Cette photo pourrait donc être utilisée à des fins commerciales, sans l'accord du sculpteur.
- Parmi les liens communiqués par ailleurs, celui-ci me semble le plus simple à comprendre :
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/France#Freedom_of_panorama
- Après ces nombreux échanges, j'ai décidé de solliciter l'avis des sculpteurs des différentes photos de la Vallée des Saints que j'ai publiées ici.
- Je reste attristée par le fait qu'en raison de cette loi, aucune photo d'un monument ou d'une sculpture dont le créateur n'est pas décédé depuis 70 ans ne peut être publiée sur Wikimédia. Ce n'est pas le cas dans tous les pays, mais c'est la loi française. Son application sur ce site implique que, sur Wikimédia, la France apparaîtra comme un vieux musée entouré de beaux paysages... Scrapdemonik (talk) 15:23, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Yes you can't upload photographs of statues who are not in the public domain yet (or do not have a free licence). In fact all of the close up images of the statues of the Vallée des Saints would need to also be deleted, unless the artists give an agreement. Miniwark (talk) 12:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete and all the statues photograph in the same category. Miniwark (talk) 12:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think it would be a good idea to suppress all the statues in the same category : the head manager and some of the sculptors gave me their consent for the publication of their statue, it may be the same for pictures taken by other people. Scrapdemonik (talk) 08:55, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Yes, probably most pictures from that site should be deleted, unless we get a permission from the copyright holder. --Yann (talk) 20:19, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 07:03, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- If I understand well, according to you I should not have displayed a picture of St Kerien statue in Vallee des Saints, as I am not the sculptor of this statue ?
- If you are right, Wikimedia can suppress all my pictures : I am not a sculpor, but just the person who took the pictures, as other persons did for the first statues installed on this site (see for instance : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vall%C3%A9e_des_Saints#/media/Fichier:Saint_Tugdual_-_Vall%C3%A9e_des_Saints.jpg)
- I hope this will be solved quickly, one way or the other... I never intended to do wrong. Scrapdemonik (talk) 08:57, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- If you take photos of old enough statues, they are no longer under copyright. I believe the sculptor must have died at least 70 years ago for a sculpture to be out of copyright in France. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:16, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your answer, I do understand your position.. If you are right, it seems to me that all the pictures taken in "Vallee des Saints" should be suppressed ??? (as well as many pictures of monuments ????) Scrapdemonik (talk) 09:20, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- That, unfortunately, is French law, not my preference. France does not have a form of COM:Freedom of panorama that permits Commons to host such photos. That's regrettable, but why is it so hard to understand? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:58, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- I respect the copyright. I am not sure of how it applies to photographies taken in open places.
- If Wiki decides to suppress all the pictures of statues or monuments created by artists who are not died for more than 70 years, mine should be suppressed too, and I won't see any inconvenience.
- Does it apply to statues displayed in France, and created by french and foreigner sculptors ? Or does it apply to statues created by french sculptors and displayed anywhere in the world ? Scrapdemonik (talk) 16:23, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- I don't want to be mean with other photographers ... I suggest you to have a look at these 124 categories of pictures taken in Carnoet village
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Vall%C3%A9e_des_Saints?uselang=fr
- Do some of these may remain published ? Or should they all be suppressed ???
- Do we need an authorisation from "the Vallee des Saints" administration to publish these pictures ? ...
- I recently visited a museum, which clearly indicates by a symbol near the paintings if a photography
- can be taken or not
- in case a picture can be taken : wether it can be used only for personal use (family photo album), or published on a media..
- Pictures are authorised in "Vallée des Saints", and I read no information concerning an interdiction to published these pictures...
- Once again, if you are right, I have no opposition to see my pictures suppressed, with the others Scrapdemonik (talk) 16:42, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- I just sent a message to "contact@lavalleedessaints.bzh" including a link for this discussion and the pictures concerned ..
- Their opinion should be the most important, don't you think so ??? Scrapdemonik (talk) 19:11, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- No. The copyright belongs to the sculptor. Please read COM:FOP France, and then if you still have questions, let us know. Note that Commons unfortunately requires that images hosted on its servers be usable commercially. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:26, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- ............
- And what about all the other pictures shown on Wikimedia about Vallée des Saints and other places like this ???
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Vall%C3%A9e_des_Saints?uselang=fr
- and what about Wikipedia
- https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vall%C3%A9e_des_Saints
- and what about all the pictures concerning "sculpture moderne" on Wikimédia
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=sculpture+moderne&title=Special:MediaSearch&go=Lire&type=image
- Scrapdemonik (talk) 09:00, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Did you read the link I gave you? As for Wikipedias, they have different policies on fair use. There is no fair use on Commons. I am not going to look through other photos right now, but if you've found some that are in violation of copyright laws, you can request deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- I did read the link, in short it says that according to french law, pictures of buildings and sculptures located in public space can be shown by private persons, but are not authorized for commercial utilisation ...
- The problem is not "my" picture, but the fact that - according to Creative Commons License 3 - this picture can be re-used for commercial use - and this would be unlawful. This would not be the case if the picture was shown with a "Creative Commons NonCommercial license" - I believe I can not change anything for this
- I will not request any deletion of other pictures taken in the same circumstances ... but if only upsmines are deleted I will surely be upset ! Scrapdemonik (talk) 12:07, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Prepare to be upset, then. Non-commercial licenses are not allowed on Commons. Read COM:Licensing. I feel like you are trying to bargain with me. That won't work because I don't set policy on this site. If it were up to me, Commons would allow non-commercial licenses. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:13, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- no worry, there are much more important reasons to be upset, so I will let Wikimedia takes its decision... If it were a more important matter to me, I may have taken other decisions ... but as it is today, I believe I will just let it go !
- Yesterday, I found a link on some of your requests of suppressions. Can't find it today. I wish you "bon courage" for sending all the necessary "request for suppression"
- I sure would not like to take your job, even if I understand it's a necesssary one....
- Could it be a good idea to change the "warning message", I mean change " I am the author of this photography ...." by " I took this picture of a statue made XX years ago" ???
- Scrapdemonik (talk) 19:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- I don't have a job here, even a voluntary one, and when I make deletion requests, they're usually really obvious, though I have made some mistakes. You are the author of your photos, but not of the artwork you photograph. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:41, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- ..........
- Have a good day Ikan, for my part I'll stop this discussion and let Wikimedia take a decision...
- If it leads to delete my picture, I just hope that it will be the same for all pictures taken in Vallee des Saints (either Carnoet, either other places), as well as pictures of Pyramid du Louvre (illustrating what is forbidden according to french laws) ..
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/France#Freedom_of_panorama
- It is the law, I do not contest your point anymore.. I'm just very sad for what "France" will look like on Wikimedia after this operation : an old museum in nice countryland ? Scrapdemonik (talk) 07:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- for Pyramid du Louvre :
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=pyramide+du+louvre&title=Special:MediaSearch&go=Lire&type=image
- (some of them seem to respect the law as the pyramid is just a detail on the picture, most of them focus on the pyramid)...
- and these are just some instances of "risky pictures" Scrapdemonik (talk) 08:01, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- I understand that the author of the scultures is the sculptor himself, so the following information does not change the law .. but I just received a note from the General Manager of Vallee des Saints, saying :
- "Je vous remercie de m'avoir prévenu. Côté de l'Association La Vallée des Saints, nous n'y voyons pas d'inconvénient car nous considérons que cette page contribue à la promotion du site. Nous sommes donc favorables à la publication des images." (on our side, we consider that this page (my picture), contributes to promote our site ; therefore, we welcome the publication of pictures) Scrapdemonik (talk) 16:26, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- Non-de minimis photos of the Louvre Pyramid are routinely deleted on this site. Also, I'm glad that the general manager there has a positive attitude, but COM:Licensing requires permission from the copyright-holder for commercial use. You are correct that Commons policies cause very large-scale deletions on this site. Are you aware that it is possible to upload fair use photos (sometimes in smaller versions) locally to some Wikipedias that allow fair use? I would suggest for you to read the fair use policies of relevant Wikipedias and devote your energy to making local uploads where warranted, rather than on arguing policy in a deletion request thread or pointing out that x-number of images that should be deleted have not been deleted yet. You could argue policy at Commons talk:Licensing or any of several other policy talk pages, but sadly, you won't get anywhere that way, either. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:42, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
- I must admit that you made me think over this, and I am sending messages to the sculptors, for all the pictures I registered about Vallee des Saints (and not only the two you quoted), to get their opinion
- If they prefer the pictures being removed, I will ask myself for their suppression (unless I can do it myself ?)
- so, thank you for your message.
- Pour les non-anglophones, cette discussion concerne la validité de la publication de photos d'oeuvres n'appartenant pas encore au domaine public.
- En résumé (si j'ai bien tout compris), la photo elle-même n'est pas incriminée, mais sa publication sur Wikimédia implique une licence autorisant son usage commercial. Cette photo pourrait donc être utilisée à des fins commerciales, sans l'accord du sculpteur.
- Parmi les liens communiqués ci-dessus, celui-ci me semble le plus simple à comprendre :
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/France#Freedom_of_panorama
- Après ces nombreux échanges, j'ai décidé de solliciter l'avis des sculpteurs des différentes photos de la Vallée des Saints que j'ai publiées ici.
- Je reste attristée par le fait qu'en raison de cette loi, aucune photo d'un monument ou d'une sculpture dont le créateur n'est pas décédé depuis 70 ans ne peut être publiée sur Wikimédia. Ce n'est pas le cas dans tous les pays, mais c'est la loi française. Son application sur ce site implique que, sur Wikimédia, la France apparaîtra comme un vieux musée entouré de beaux paysages... Scrapdemonik (talk) 11:18, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Non-de minimis photos of the Louvre Pyramid are routinely deleted on this site. Also, I'm glad that the general manager there has a positive attitude, but COM:Licensing requires permission from the copyright-holder for commercial use. You are correct that Commons policies cause very large-scale deletions on this site. Are you aware that it is possible to upload fair use photos (sometimes in smaller versions) locally to some Wikipedias that allow fair use? I would suggest for you to read the fair use policies of relevant Wikipedias and devote your energy to making local uploads where warranted, rather than on arguing policy in a deletion request thread or pointing out that x-number of images that should be deleted have not been deleted yet. You could argue policy at Commons talk:Licensing or any of several other policy talk pages, but sadly, you won't get anywhere that way, either. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:42, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
- I don't have a job here, even a voluntary one, and when I make deletion requests, they're usually really obvious, though I have made some mistakes. You are the author of your photos, but not of the artwork you photograph. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:41, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Prepare to be upset, then. Non-commercial licenses are not allowed on Commons. Read COM:Licensing. I feel like you are trying to bargain with me. That won't work because I don't set policy on this site. If it were up to me, Commons would allow non-commercial licenses. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:13, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Did you read the link I gave you? As for Wikipedias, they have different policies on fair use. There is no fair use on Commons. I am not going to look through other photos right now, but if you've found some that are in violation of copyright laws, you can request deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- No. The copyright belongs to the sculptor. Please read COM:FOP France, and then if you still have questions, let us know. Note that Commons unfortunately requires that images hosted on its servers be usable commercially. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:26, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- That, unfortunately, is French law, not my preference. France does not have a form of COM:Freedom of panorama that permits Commons to host such photos. That's regrettable, but why is it so hard to understand? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:58, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your answer, I do understand your position.. If you are right, it seems to me that all the pictures taken in "Vallee des Saints" should be suppressed ??? (as well as many pictures of monuments ????) Scrapdemonik (talk) 09:20, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- If you take photos of old enough statues, they are no longer under copyright. I believe the sculptor must have died at least 70 years ago for a sculpture to be out of copyright in France. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:16, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Yes, probably most pictures from that site should be deleted, unless we get a permission from the copyright holder. --Yann (talk) 20:13, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
such works are exempt from copyright only when are kept in the original way - as a banknote, stamp, etc. Otherwise they become copyrighted rubin16 (talk) 08:38, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. I don't see where that theory comes from. --Yann (talk) 20:14, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). Artwork is public domain in France but not the US. The uploader claims to be the grandson of the painter, so uploader should contact VRT/fr if they inherited the copyright. Abzeronow (talk) 15:52, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Still no permission. --Yann (talk) 20:09, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Robertsky as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1. Media is a 2D graphical work taken in the public, thus is likely to be copyrighted as there's no exemption for paintings, drawings, engravings, and photographs in Singapore's copyright laws taken in the public. Yann (talk) 18:28, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Yann on what grounds are you challenging the copyvio tag? Robertsky (talk) 09:29, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- I don't challenge your claim, but FoP issues should get a regular DR. Yann (talk) 12:32, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- I see. However, such FoP issues should be clear cut. there have been similar photos of other murals being deleted via DR, i.e. Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Little India, Singapore. (I do file DR or ask for second opinion if it is more ambiguous.) Robertsky (talk) 13:56, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- I don't challenge your claim, but FoP issues should get a regular DR. Yann (talk) 12:32, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:07, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Looks like a photo of Andrii Yarmoshevych made in a studio, unlikely to have been made by him himself Base (talk) 10:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: The caption in his user page read "a photo from the filming of the interview" (via Google Translate), so copyright does not belong to him; if the videographer transferred the copyright to him, we would need proof of it in VRT. —holly {chat} 19:05, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Circa 1928 German photograph. I don't see a basis for the CC0 license. This would be in copyright in the US until next year. Abzeronow (talk) 15:40, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- It is the same case as the photo by Perscheid, which is in the public domain. The publisher that issued cards of singers and actors in the 1920s-1940s no longer exists and the photographer is unknown. I have given an estimated date based on a recording from 1928. The photo may of course have been taken earlier. It would also be possible to date it between 1925 and 1928 (similar to Perscheid). Bärbel Pelker (talk) 13:51, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- Given the backlog of DRs, (which I am trying to do my part to reduce) this may be moot if this closes around New Years. It sounds like this would be in the clear in less than six months. Abzeronow (talk) 16:09, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Going to be PD in 6 weeks, so no point in deleting it now. —holly {chat} 18:59, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by SpiderMum as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: commercial tv logo. COM:TOO Poland? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:11, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Polish copyright law has quite a long tradition of setting the threshold rather low. —holly {chat} 19:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
False claims, dubious license. Person shown died in 1985, so this is certainly not a 1985 photo by the uploader. Crop of photo from cover of 1977 LP "New Horn in Town" (eg [7]). Seems clear enough case that I would speedy delete, but this has been on Commons since 2012 and is currently in use in multiple projects. Only upload by user. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:16, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- PS: to preempt someone saying it might be PD-US no notice, there is a clearcopyright notice on the back of the LP [8] -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:56, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Pages in "Bag-ong Kasuyatan ag Henesis - Exodo" (The New Testament and Henesis - Exodus) Bible translated by Wycliffe Bible Translators.jpg
[edit]_Bible_translated_by_Wycliffe_Bible_Translators.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Bible_translated_by_Wycliffe_Bible_Translators.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The translation is probably copyrighted. Veverve (talk) 02:52, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Unsure. It's quite a bit of text, but quotation rights for the bible are normally very broad. I would assume that the copyright for a bible translation only kicks in if you really reproduce significant parts of it. --PaterMcFly (talk) 07:31, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP, the text would be complex enough to have its own copyright. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:53, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:ColumbiaU Wordmarklogo.JPG, Columbia's minimalist crown appears to have been created too recently to be in the public domain, and there isn't evidence that Columbia has placed it under a free license. Each of these contain such a crown in a greater-than-de minimis fashion, so they need to be deleted as non-free in line with COM:L and COM:PRP.
- File:Columbia University Coat of Arms.png
- File:Columbia University Official Shield.png
- File:Columbia University shield.svg
- File:ColumbiaNYUCoat.JPG
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:57, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, these appear to have been published around 2006 and these are above the ToO in the US. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:55, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:ColumbiaU Wordmarklogo.JPG, Columbia's minimalist crown (used in the SEAS logo, on the right) appears to have been created too recently to be in the public domain, and there isn't evidence that Columbia has placed it under a free license. The crown is used in a greater-than-de minimis fashion, so this needs to be deleted as non-free in line with COM:L and COM:PRP. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:58, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:56, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
