Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/05/13
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_(1).png){kind=link}
._Малюнак_1.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Because it is Blurry Negmatov Khabib666 (talk) 04:55, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- COM:INUSE. Must be kept unless there are copyright problems. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:47, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist when they saw the button. --Achim55 (talk) 11:48, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
파일을 잘못 올렸음 LeeGyujin (talk) 08:06, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 12:20, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
I want to delete this file. I am the author of this file. I feel there can be personal information leaked DashingX (talk) 08:48, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 12:39, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Photo was copied from https://edition.cnn.com/2012/04/05/europe/gallery/crown-jewels-new-exhibition/index.html (or specifically, https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/120330035052-crown-jewels-queen-alexandra-s-crown.jpg). User has a history of uploading copyrighted photos. Felida97 (talk) 12:08, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio - gone. --Herby talk thyme 13:09, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wiki678903 (talk · contribs)
[edit]all obvious copyright violations (file name always the same as the file on the website afaict)
- File:AlexandraCrown.png
- File:Hbz-prince-william-kate-middleton-wedding-1-gettyimages-113285848-1524755457.jpg
- File:Kate-middleton-sq-1c12bd4305044ab985c534cbc41c2a16.jpg
- File:GettyImages-157652191.webp
- File:Un8ghxhkg9ly.webp
- File:Steddiescrown.webp
- File:2021-0601-01-crown04.webp
- File:Coronation-of-King-Charles-III-30506-1424c319f54247b2951fa0fe173ca81a.webp
- File:K6qzq2gvolg81.webp
- File:Gettyimages-1175846060.webp
- File:Statediadem.jpg
- File:2021-0531-crown08.webp
- File:2022-1015-01-coronation10.webp
- File:120330035052-crown-jewels-queen-alexandra-s-crown.jpg
Felida97 (talk) 12:18, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Delete Obviously not own work. DrKay (talk) 12:25, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio - gone. --Herby talk thyme 13:09, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
fake porn. User should be indef blocked Tagishsimon (talk) 12:30, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; source also not clear. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:45, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of Foundation stone on St Albans School Hall, St Albans, May 2023.jpg No Swan So Fine (talk) 11:34, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:43, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of Abbey Gate, St Albans, May 2023 01.jpg No Swan So Fine (talk) 11:35, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:41, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of Building linking Abbey Gatehouse and St Albans School Hall, May 2023.jpg No Swan So Fine (talk) 11:35, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:41, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of Abbey Gate, St Albans, May 2023 03.jpg No Swan So Fine (talk) 11:36, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:41, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of Abbey Gate, St Albans, May 2023 02.jpg No Swan So Fine (talk) 11:36, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:41, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of North block of St Albans School, St Albans, May 2023.jpg No Swan So Fine (talk) 11:36, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:40, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of St Albans, May 2023 t 26.jpg No Swan So Fine (talk) 11:37, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:40, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of St Albans School Hall, May 2023.jpg No Swan So Fine (talk) 11:37, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:40, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of St Albans, May 2023 t 29.jpg No Swan So Fine (talk) 11:38, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:40, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of St Albans, May 2023 t 27.jpg No Swan So Fine (talk) 11:38, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:39, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
I have uploaded the photo again, this time with a better description Indossent (talk) 11:42, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. @Indossent: You can simply edit the file description. You do not need to upload the file again. --Rosenzweig τ 13:38, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
File:12.05.2023 - Cerimônia de Lançamento do Programa Escolas de Tempo Integral (52892695929).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unsure about what happened here. No photo is shown. RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:32, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: problem seems to have sorted itself out. --Rosenzweig τ 16:07, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Esta fotografía pertenece a la página https://www.pexels.com/es-ES/creative-commons-images/, la cual dice expresamente en su página All Photos on Pexels can be used for free. While most photos are released under the Pexels license, some photos are covered by the Creative Commons Zero (CC0) license. Both licenses are similar and allow you to do the following: >Puedes utilizar todas las fotos gratuitas con fines comerciales y no comerciales >No hace falta elogiar públicamente al fotógrafo o a Pexels, aunque es un lindo detalle >Puedes editar y adaptar las fotos como prefieras LéiFerAlcívarez (talk) 13:57, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploaded to https://www.pexels.com/es-es/foto/fotografia-aerea-de-edificios-de-gran-altura-1386444/ after July 2018. --Achim55 (talk) 15:31, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj 2601:58A:8E81:DBD0:AD24:78C0:734B:618D 15:33, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Category:Sockpuppets of Bmmederos. --Achim55 (talk) 16:07, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake ForzaJuve2019 (talk) 01:18, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Indeed you did, it was a copyright violation. --Wutsje 02:58, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake ForzaJuve2019 (talk) 02:58, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Yes, you did. Copyvio. --Wutsje 03:00, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake ForzaJuve2019 (talk) 03:12, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wutsje 03:20, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake ForzaJuve2019 (talk) 03:12, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. --Wutsje 03:19, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Uploader's request Basque mapping (talk) 13:42, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Mdaniels5757. --Rosenzweig τ 15:03, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Same user as Mandaji Narsimha Chary 369 LR0725 (talk) 16:01, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- My mistake. This is for speedy deletion. LR0725 (talk) 16:03, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Ymblanter. --Rosenzweig τ 15:02, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Esta fotografía pertenece a la página https://www.pexels.com/es-ES/creative-commons-images/, la cual dice expresamente en su página All Photos on Pexels can be used for free. While most photos are released under the Pexels license, some photos are covered by the Creative Commons Zero (CC0) license. Both licenses are similar and allow you to do the following: >Puedes utilizar todas las fotos gratuitas con fines comerciales y no comerciales >No hace falta elogiar públicamente al fotógrafo o a Pexels, aunque es un lindo detalle >Puedes editar y adaptar las fotos como prefieras LéiFerAlcívarez (talk) 13:59, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Pexels photo uploaded after 5 July 2018 license change, see Commons:Bad sources#Pexels.com for info. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:04, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Esta fotografía pertenece a la página https://www.pexels.com/es-ES/creative-commons-images/, la cual dice expresamente en su página All Photos on Pexels can be used for free. While most photos are released under the Pexels license, some photos are covered by the Creative Commons Zero (CC0) license. Both licenses are similar and allow you to do the following: >Puedes utilizar todas las fotos gratuitas con fines comerciales y no comerciales >No hace falta elogiar públicamente al fotógrafo o a Pexels, aunque es un lindo detalle >Puedes editar y adaptar las fotos como prefieras LéiFerAlcívarez (talk) 14:00, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Pexels photo uploaded after 5 July 2018 license change, see Commons:Bad sources#Pexels.com for info. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:04, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Esta fotografía pertenece a la página https://www.pexels.com/es-ES/creative-commons-images/, la cual dice expresamente en su página All Photos on Pexels can be used for free. While most photos are released under the Pexels license, some photos are covered by the Creative Commons Zero (CC0) license. Both licenses are similar and allow you to do the following: >Puedes utilizar todas las fotos gratuitas con fines comerciales y no comerciales >No hace falta elogiar públicamente al fotógrafo o a Pexels, aunque es un lindo detalle >Puedes editar y adaptar las fotos como prefieras LéiFerAlcívarez (talk) 14:00, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:05, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Esta fotografía pertenece a la página https://www.pexels.com/es-ES/creative-commons-images/, la cual dice expresamente en su página All Photos on Pexels can be used for free. While most photos are released under the Pexels license, some photos are covered by the Creative Commons Zero (CC0) license. Both licenses are similar and allow you to do the following: >Puedes utilizar todas las fotos gratuitas con fines comerciales y no comerciales >No hace falta elogiar públicamente al fotógrafo o a Pexels, aunque es un lindo detalle >Puedes editar y adaptar las fotos como prefieras LéiFerAlcívarez (talk) 14:01, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: speedily. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:05, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Esta fotografía pertenece a la página https://www.pexels.com/es-ES/creative-commons-images/, la cual dice expresamente en su página All Photos on Pexels can be used for free. While most photos are released under the Pexels license, some photos are covered by the Creative Commons Zero (CC0) license. Both licenses are similar and allow you to do the following: >Puedes utilizar todas las fotos gratuitas con fines comerciales y no comerciales >No hace falta elogiar públicamente al fotógrafo o a Pexels, aunque es un lindo detalle >Puedes editar y adaptar las fotos como prefieras LéiFerAlcívarez (talk) 14:01, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: speedily: Pexels photo uploaded after 5 July 2018 license change, see Commons:Bad sources#Pexels.com for info. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:05, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Esta fotografía pertenece a la página https://www.pexels.com/es-ES/creative-commons-images/, la cual dice expresamente en su página All Photos on Pexels can be used for free. While most photos are released under the Pexels license, some photos are covered by the Creative Commons Zero (CC0) license. Both licenses are similar and allow you to do the following: >Puedes utilizar todas las fotos gratuitas con fines comerciales y no comerciales >No hace falta elogiar públicamente al fotógrafo o a Pexels, aunque es un lindo detalle >Puedes editar y adaptar las fotos como prefieras LéiFerAlcívarez (talk) 14:02, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: speedily: Pexels photo uploaded after 5 July 2018 license change, see Commons:Bad sources#Pexels.com for info. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:05, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Esta fotografía pertenece a la página https://www.pexels.com/es-ES/creative-commons-images/, la cual dice expresamente en su página All Photos on Pexels can be used for free. While most photos are released under the Pexels license, some photos are covered by the Creative Commons Zero (CC0) license. Both licenses are similar and allow you to do the following: >Puedes utilizar todas las fotos gratuitas con fines comerciales y no comerciales >No hace falta elogiar públicamente al fotógrafo o a Pexels, aunque es un lindo detalle >Puedes editar y adaptar las fotos como prefieras LéiFerAlcívarez (talk) 14:02, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: speedily: Pexels photo uploaded after 5 July 2018 license change, see Commons:Bad sources#Pexels.com for info. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:06, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Esta fotografía pertenece a la página https://www.pexels.com/es-ES/creative-commons-images/, la cual dice expresamente en su página All Photos on Pexels can be used for free. While most photos are released under the Pexels license, some photos are covered by the Creative Commons Zero (CC0) license. Both licenses are similar and allow you to do the following: >Puedes utilizar todas las fotos gratuitas con fines comerciales y no comerciales >No hace falta elogiar públicamente al fotógrafo o a Pexels, aunque es un lindo detalle >Puedes editar y adaptar las fotos como prefieras LéiFerAlcívarez (talk) 14:02, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: speedily: Pexels photo uploaded after 5 July 2018 license change, see Commons:Bad sources#Pexels.com for info. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:06, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Esta fotografía pertenece a la página https://www.pexels.com/es-ES/creative-commons-images/, la cual dice expresamente en su página All Photos on Pexels can be used for free. While most photos are released under the Pexels license, some photos are covered by the Creative Commons Zero (CC0) license. Both licenses are similar and allow you to do the following: >Puedes utilizar todas las fotos gratuitas con fines comerciales y no comerciales >No hace falta elogiar públicamente al fotógrafo o a Pexels, aunque es un lindo detalle >Puedes editar y adaptar las fotos como prefieras LéiFerAlcívarez (talk) 14:03, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: speedily: Pexels photo uploaded after 5 July 2018 license change, see Commons:Bad sources#Pexels.com for info. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:06, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Esta fotografía pertenece a la página https://www.pexels.com/es-ES/creative-commons-images/, la cual dice expresamente en su página All Photos on Pexels can be used for free. While most photos are released under the Pexels license, some photos are covered by the Creative Commons Zero (CC0) license. Both licenses are similar and allow you to do the following: >Puedes utilizar todas las fotos gratuitas con fines comerciales y no comerciales >No hace falta elogiar públicamente al fotógrafo o a Pexels, aunque es un lindo detalle >Puedes editar y adaptar las fotos como prefieras LéiFerAlcívarez (talk) 13:58, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Pexels photo uploaded after 5 July 2018 license change, see Commons:Bad sources#Pexels.com. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:35, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per Mdaniels5757. --Strakhov (talk) 16:25, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Esta fotografía pertenece a la página https://www.pexels.com/es-ES/creative-commons-images/, la cual dice expresamente en su página All Photos on Pexels can be used for free. While most photos are released under the Pexels license, some photos are covered by the Creative Commons Zero (CC0) license. Both licenses are similar and allow you to do the following: >Puedes utilizar todas las fotos gratuitas con fines comerciales y no comerciales >No hace falta elogiar públicamente al fotógrafo o a Pexels, aunque es un lindo detalle >Puedes editar y adaptar las fotos como prefieras LéiFerAlcívarez (talk) 13:58, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Keep license fixed. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:47, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Mdaniels5757. --Strakhov (talk) 16:28, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Esta fotografía pertenece a la página https://www.pexels.com/es-ES/creative-commons-images/, la cual dice expresamente en su página All Photos on Pexels can be used for free. While most photos are released under the Pexels license, some photos are covered by the Creative Commons Zero (CC0) license. Both licenses are similar and allow you to do the following: >Puedes utilizar todas las fotos gratuitas con fines comerciales y no comerciales >No hace falta elogiar públicamente al fotógrafo o a Pexels, aunque es un lindo detalle >Puedes editar y adaptar las fotos como prefieras LéiFerAlcívarez (talk) 13:59, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep license fixed. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:45, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Mdaniels5757. --Strakhov (talk) 16:26, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Official portait from unknown origin, unlikely from uploader. Pierre cb (talk) 03:26, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Or quite possibly from the uploader, but not a portrait of any 'Prince Of Punial', given the lack of evidence that anyone having such a title exists. Over at en.wikipedia, we are currently looking into a possible hoax. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- This looks about as credible as that photo of Alan Macmasters. I agree that a hoax is likely. Hemiauchenia (talk) 02:51, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Found out with https://tineye.com/search/130307e2b979d87f690045b1347c1cdf97934ebe?sort=score&order=desc&page=1 that this image is from a photo of King George IV of UK with the head changed to a so called Prince of Punial. This is a clear hoax and copyvio. Pierre cb (talk) 03:38, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- This looks about as credible as that photo of Alan Macmasters. I agree that a hoax is likely. Hemiauchenia (talk) 02:51, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (speedy G3/x-wiki hoaxing). --DMacks (talk) 03:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Used before upload. VTR! 186.172.195.211 20:55, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- I object to the deletion request. Excuse me for not knowing: what kind of weird deletion request ist "Used before Upload. VTR!"? Can somebody explain? I know the photographer and we've been working together on the Berlinale project 2023. The pic was taken on the officiel press conference with Mina Kavani as anyone can see. There were probably 10 other photographers at her right and left side who took the same shot in the very same angle. The usage of the pics Elena has uploaded here has been and still is exclusively unter the commons license. Grizma (talk) 08:47, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- I didn`t use this picture another way. Elena Ternovaja (talk) 16:21, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no doupts on correct own work claim, no VRT needed. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:51, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 07:24, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete who is Brian and why do we care about his penis? Dronebogus (talk) 12:07, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 19:04, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
A compilation of images with unclear copyright status, see COM:DW. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:45, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:36, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Unused Wikipedia screenshot. No obvious use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:07, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:36, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Sorry this picture is not interesting for an encyclopedia Zamand Karim (talk) 23:05, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 09:25, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text document. Omphalographer (talk) 02:19, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:56, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Qué significa screenshot? 186.175.251.207 02:43, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Strakhov (talk) 09:28, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text content. Omphalographer (talk) 18:03, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:59, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text document. Omphalographer (talk) 18:04, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:00, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text document, possibly an attempt to create an encyclopedia article. Omphalographer (talk) 18:05, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:01, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text document, possibly an attempt to create an encyclopedia article. Omphalographer (talk) 18:05, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. It appears to be a copy of w:uz:Mogote tepaliklari. Copies of Wikipedia articles in PDF format on Commons are outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 15:03, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 12:01, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Explicit crush fetish, explicit cruelty to animals. Fushigi-kun (talk) 20:20, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 09:37, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
It is not in the public domain. The copyright date is wrong. The noted date is the the date of the establihment of the publishing house. Page 8 of this PDF is the copyright page and it's copyright is 1967. St. Andrews Drive (talk) 21:57, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2063. --Rosenzweig τ 12:04, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:18, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:27, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Screenshot from Reddit CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:27, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The picture is not from 2023, it is not from hs active years https://fr.besoccer.com/joueur/marco-ziem-773598 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:32, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:27, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
No realistic educational use Headlock0225 (talk) 15:02, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:28, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
No realistic educational use Headlock0225 (talk) 15:04, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:28, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
File was corrupted, I don't think it is useful A1Cafel (talk) 07:58, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:07, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 08:00, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:07, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation MJXVI (talk) 11:51, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:16, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Please remove the image as the copyright belongs to me. Elshad Imanverified 
13:55, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
-20230513135500-File:Rza_Talıbov_(şəxsi_foto).jpg){kind=link}
- Dear colleague Yann, please conclude.(reason: at the request of the author) -- Elshad Imanverified 13:56, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- There is no reason to delete this file. Once uploaded under a free license, a valid rationale is needed for deletion. Yann (talk) 16:31, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Dear @Yann, In fact, there is a reason, the person in the picture himself asked me to delete this picture of mine from the commons segment. For deletion What else could be a valid basic requirement? I request that the images be deleted according to the deletion criteria. G7. Author or uploader request deletion Elshad Imanverified 19:48, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Dear @Yann, In fact, there is a reason, the person in the picture himself asked me to delete this picture of mine from the commons segment. For deletion What else could be a valid basic requirement? I request that the images be deleted according to the deletion criteria. G7. Author or uploader request deletion Elshad Imanverified
- There is no reason to delete this file. Once uploaded under a free license, a valid rationale is needed for deletion. Yann (talk) 16:31, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Strong delete @Yann If you had given me your email address, I would have sent you the person's passport, a document proving that he wanted the photo deleted. Please delete under G7. Author or uploader request deletion and if you consider that the image is not used, that is, it is not associated with any article and category, then it is not used and there is a reason for its removal.-- Elshad Imanverified 09:51, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Dear Yann and Ankry, can you remove the image from commons considering these valid reasons?-- Elshad Imanverified 06:59, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- I do not see a valid reason here. Uploader request is a valid reason up to seven days since upload, not after five years. The photo presents a public person, so likely in scope. VRT permission received means that there is no copyright issue. Ankry (talk) 14:03, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Dear King of Hearts, the main valid reasons for the removal of the image are given. Maybe you can help to delete it, based on the above.-- Elshad Imanverified 09:23, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Comment @Elshad Iman (Elşad İman): Stop pinging admins. DRs are closed after one week. Yann (talk) 11:11, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- will it be deleted? Elshad Imanverified 11:31, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- will it be deleted? Elshad Imanverified
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 19:08, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:35, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:15, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The picture seems to have been taken from a TV stream CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:36, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- يرجى عدم حذف الملف
- .(محمد السياني.jpg)
- لا يوجد مبرر لحذف هذا الملف. لم يسبق وأن نشرت هذه الصورة في الشبكة العنكبوتية قبل نشرها في ويكيبيديا كومنز. مها علي القاسمي (talk) 17:11, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 07:10, 14 May 2023 (UTC)شكرا لك على الرد. من أين تأتي هذه الصورة؟
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:15, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
wrong date - copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 15:18, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- I agree, it seems to be a copyrigth violation. FocalPoint (talk) 20:14, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:15, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation, see source Xocolatl (talk) 15:20, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- I Agree. Clear copyright violation case. FocalPoint (talk) 20:10, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:15, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE Herzi Pinki (talk) 17:25, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:14, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Not a good light exposure. The Wikimedia Graphic Lab were asked for help, but made it too bright. As the author I request to delete this photo and supersede it with File:Vlietestraat DSC 5025.jpg 19:37, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Tomaatje12 (talk)
- Comment Both images are perfectly good and usable, so I don't understand this deletion request. I would tend to keep it, but it's to the discretion of the closing admin whether to give you a courtesy deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:27, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- It's nothing special. Tomaatje12 (talk) 13:27, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 19:14, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Low quality, as author I request to delete this file Tomaatje12 (talk) 20:08, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Not great, but certainly usable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:28, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion:May be useful. --Kadı Message 19:13, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:2018 JEBI
[edit]- File:2023.Kajiki.not.real.jpg
- File:2023.Podul.not.real.jpg
- File:2023.Bailu.not.real.jpg
- File:2023.Krosa.not.real.jpg
- File:2023.Lekima.not.real.jpg
- File:2023.Francisco.not.real.jpg
- File:2023.Wipha.not.real.jpg
- File:2023.Nari.not.real.jpg
- File:2023.Danas.not.real.jpg
- File:2023.Mun.not.real.jpg
- File:2023.Sepat.not.real.jpg
- File:2023.Wutip.not.real.jpg
- File:2023.Pabuk.not.real.jpg
- File:2023.Usagi.not.real.jpg
- File:2023.Manyi.not.real.jpg
- File:2023.Toraji.not.real.jpg
- File:2023.Yutu.not.real.jpg
- File:2023.Kongrey.not.real.jpg
- File:2023.Trami.not.real.jpg
- File:2023.Barijat.not.real.jpg
Fictional storm paths. All marked with "not.real". No educational value → out of scope. --Jahobr (talk) 20:09, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:11, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 20:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:10, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 20:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: also highly unlikely because it assumes the Democrats will gain most seats in states like Texas (which they won't). Thiscouldbeauser (talk) 13:51, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:10, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
"alternate History" fictional map. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 20:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:10, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
"alternate History" fictional map. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 20:23, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:11, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
"alternate History" fictional map. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 20:23, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:11, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
"alternate History" fictional map. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 20:24, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:11, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 20:24, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:11, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 20:24, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:11, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 20:24, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:11, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 20:27, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:12, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 20:27, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:12, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
"alternate History" fictional map. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 20:27, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:12, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
"alternate History" fictional map. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 20:27, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:12, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 20:27, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:12, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 20:28, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:12, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Fictional flag. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 20:34, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:12, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Afd: Articles for Deletion? 186.172.254.77 20:44, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 19:13, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Seems like a scan of a book, PD/authorship unknown, photo most likely still under copyright. A09 (talk) 21:08, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- keebne selirana iz njegove osike je skelS
- ika je skeniranal 89.142.42.96 07:17, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:12, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Unused Wikipedia screenshot. No obvious use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:07, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:43, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
Unused Wikipedia screenshot. No obvious use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:07, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:43, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
No evidence the author has released this into the public domain, see linked source. Indy beetle (talk) 06:47, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Yeah, I don't think User:Cork12 is John Deacon. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:47, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not Cork12 (talk) 15:20, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 16:55, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 09:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: https://lens.google.com/search?p=ATHekxfR35WoLgMUPzkpmyf3PtbLou5KBDtxFRv1JBsP6FNatq9TgvzemeH0nk96QZZrZoX8hpPtDsjtKgM2OWlGqi2MmHPvOuopiL2fQTJF0o9xvkkrB_7pDeLeI_GDlvBJHoEKd6Ne6rr9Us6lPs8SXBvlwOgWvpLG09VHW3r67TPSrkOMzQUZUKmTpPCox3pzYQcEZNyf39re35bxfRhk20xDEM0dHDMeRPaylNZlZNm99VQAt7wXFRu4gCKV3U5rVEatH2c_C6_3n5MZL6Ubb65gKR5mkz3Cy_yyRNPk#lns=W251bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsIkVrY0tKRFV5TkRFNU5XRXdMV1l3TlRZdE5EWXlZUzFpTURGakxURXlZV1V5TkdNeE1ETTNNUklmYnpSbFZVeG1TbUV0VVZGYVVVUjFWV2RKVkUxaWJEZEJRamxtZW1kNFp3PT0iLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLDEsbnVsbCxbbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsbnVsbCwxMixbXV0sbnVsbF0=. --Kadı Message 16:56, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:17, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 16:57, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
unusable quality Joschi71 (talk) 12:51, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 16:57, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure with opaque background & colored atoms. Replaced by File:Ethyl-acetate-2D-structure.svg as high-quality alternative. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:57, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 20:31, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
Qué significa own work? 186.175.251.207 02:05, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: false claims, false license, modified DW OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:58, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Qué significa submission declined? 186.175.251.207 02:45, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- It is the picture describing the person behind the article. If the article is not published, then I agree to delete the picture 185.56.227.6 11:44, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: OOS, only used on declined draft on en:w. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:59, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Abzeronow as no license (No license since 5 May 2023). There is a claimed license on the page, but the source page seems to be extremely vague, and I am unable to complete the license review for lack of a deep link. As a source is part of the essential information of a page, and we lack the required link to the web page on which the image or file is displayed, I am nominating this for deletion in light of COM:PRP. The lack of exif and the small size also contribute towards my doubt that this is genuinely freely licensed. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:48, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no evidence of actual free license status. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). While true, this is apparently related to an extant Indian organization's logo, and as such might be in-scope if that org would qualify for a Wikidata item. Is this under COM:TOO India? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:51, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, unsourced, undescribed. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:02, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Qué significa DW? 186.175.251.207 02:52, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:03, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Qué significa OOS? 186.175.251.207 02:54, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused personal photo, uploader's only contribution from Feb 2021. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:04, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Dubious claim of own work as image could be found at other websites (example: [1]) prior to the upload to Commons. Ixfd64 (talk) 04:30, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:05, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 04:52, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Seems to be in scope as a photo taken exclusively under black light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:45, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Ikan Kekek, no requirement to delete, no consensus to delete. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:06, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
out of scope: This map cannot be used in an educational context because the white background cannot be distinguished from the white parts of the Union Jack. Enyavar (talk) 09:02, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, useless (troll?). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:08, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Similar file found. Uploader has a history of uploading copyvios so this is a doubtful own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:12, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; online for 9 years before uploader's claimed date of photo. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:19, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation MJXVI (talk) 11:49, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, @MJXVI.
- I know why you nominated the image for deletion. You have obvious reasons; however, I suggest it not be removed as it is just a version uploaded from another image. We have to revert and delete the versions that have nothing to do with the original, because the last two modifications are different images.
- I await a prompt response.
- Thank you. 186.28.158.31 17:43, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, Checking the original photo is also necessary for further clarification. MJXVI (talk) 12:42, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Question If you make a version of a copyrighted photo, do you think that is somehow not copyrighted? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:53, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Reverted to previous version; inappropriate new uploads deleted. Do not upload different photo taken by someone else over existing sourced photo. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:16, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Derechos de autor. 191.125.18.4 15:35, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; claimed free license not seen at source page. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:30, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LosPajaros
[edit]- File:Tammy Baldwin on her support for the Respect for Marriage Act.ogg
- File:Mark Warner on the D.C. area Metro System.ogg
- File:Mike Lee on being told not to discuss matters of a briefing on Iran.ogg
- File:Ted Cruz on the Iran Nuclear Deal.ogg
- File:Jack Reed speaks on the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine.ogg
- File:Tina Smith on her support for the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022.ogg
- File:Gary Peters on his support for the Postal Service Reform Act of 2022.ogg
- File:Angus King speaks at the 50th Anniversary of the March on Washington.ogg
- File:Senator Mitch McConnell on working with President Obama.ogg
- File:Todd Young on his support for the Chips and Science Act.ogg
- File:John Boozman on increases in the step-up basis tax.ogg
- File:Mark Kelly on his support for the CHIPS and Science Act.ogg
- File:You Can't Make This Stuff Up Tommy Tuberville Slams Biden, Democrats For Unemployment Benefits.ogg
Unless otherwise stated, the only public-domain footage on C-SPAN is of activity in the House and Senate chambers. The C-SPAN files here are press conferences, Party agendas, committee hearings, and interviews of which the copyright belongs to C-SPAN or a non-governmental source. They can only be used non-commercially, which is not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. For the Angus King track, the video from King's Senate YouTube channel is pulled wholesale from a C-SPAN (non Senate floor) programme.
Aside from C-SPAN, these also, as far as I've checked, do not originate from a politician's personal office or have an equivalent source with the same audio on congressional committee websites. Thus, not public domain. SuperWIKI (talk) 03:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:38, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, Possible need of a request to the Volunteer Response Team CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:34, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Tentative delete pending opportunity for communication with VRT. ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:10, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- I spoke with the "author" himself and he gave me expressed permission to use it. Oroeh (talk) 15:16, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Oroeh: Tagged as missing permission. If the author has given specific permission to free license the photo, forward confirmation per COM:VRT. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:23, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 11:17, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Zamand Karim (talk) 23:07, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Why did you wait 8 months before requesting deletion? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:57, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, unused and alternatives available. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:46, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation. Image downloaded from his Facebook fanpage. CarlosEduardoPA (talk) 04:47, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:47, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Linha AV Évora-Elvas.jpg and all the uploads done by the same user
[edit]
The photos are relatively low resolution and have no Exif data. I strongly doubt that any of the uploads done who did this (Basileia55) are his/her "ownw work". The logos are obvious cases of COPYVIO an I am including them in this nomination instaead of tagging them with {{Copyvio}} them with only because they are so many. Stego (talk) 05:42, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I get if you believe the photos are likely to be copyvios because this user claimed several logos were also their "own work," but the logo files should be nominated separately, so we can try to reach a decision on whether they exceed COM:TOO Portugal. It's really hard to tell from the contents of that section just what level of complexity logos need to have to be copyrighted in Portugal, but the question has to be addressed and those files should not be summarily deleted merely on the basis that they are not "own work." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:52, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; all over the internet. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
The photos are relatively low resolution and have no Exif data. I strongly doubt that any of the uploads done who did this (Basileia55) are his/her "ownw work". Stego (talk) 05:45, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Linha AV Évora-Elvas.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 12:11, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; looks like screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
The photos are relatively low resolution and have no Exif data. I strongly doubt that any of the uploads done who did this (Basileia55) are his/her "ownw work". Stego (talk) 05:45, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Linha AV Évora-Elvas.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 12:14, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; looks like screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
The photos are relatively low resolution and have no Exif data. I strongly doubt that any of the uploads done who did this (Basileia55) are his/her "ownw work". Stego (talk) 05:47, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Linha AV Évora-Elvas.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 12:12, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; all over the internet. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:55, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
The photos are relatively low resolution and have no Exif data. I strongly doubt that any of the uploads done who did this (Basileia55) are his/her "ownw work". Stego (talk) 05:47, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Linha AV Évora-Elvas.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 12:12, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; all over the internet. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:50, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
The photos are relatively low resolution and have no Exif data. I strongly doubt that any of the uploads done who did this (Basileia55) are his/her "ownw work". Stego (talk) 05:51, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Linha AV Évora-Elvas.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 12:13, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:55, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
The photos are relatively low resolution and have no Exif data. I strongly doubt that any of the uploads done who did this (Basileia55) are his/her "ownw work". Stego (talk) 05:52, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Linha AV Évora-Elvas.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 12:12, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:55, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
The photos are relatively low resolution and have no Exif data. I strongly doubt that any of the uploads done who did this (Basileia55) are his/her "ownw work". Stego (talk) 05:53, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Linha AV Évora-Elvas.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 12:12, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:55, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Redundant file when we already have an SVG version, which has been in use for a long time. This file is also vague as it does not indicate the boundaries of the Hashemite Kingdoms of Iraq and Jordan. Wow (talk) 06:10, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
_(1).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1).png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Redundant crop. We already have another crop, File:Ks 1996 dole (cropped).jpg. Furthermore, PNG files suffer from a lack of sharpness on Wikipedia. Wow (talk) 06:30, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(1).png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
_(1).png){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted artwork A1Cafel (talk) 08:02, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
EXIF data indicate that the copyright owner is STUDIO PANOULIS CHRISTOS DIMAKEAS. Its permission is needed so as the photo is available with a compatible license. C messier (talk) 08:19, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:57, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gleb Leo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright of Jafim Taras (cover)
However the author Михась Зарецкий died in 1937, so this is probably in public domain (see Template:PD-Russia-1996). C messier (talk) 08:33, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- It is true, but illustration on the cover is drawed by Jafim Taras, he died in 1981. I will reupload this book without his drawing. Gleb Leo (talk) 08:40, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Gleb Leo (talk) 11:59, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
._%D0%9C%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8E%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BA_1.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%9C%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8E%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BA_1.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Gleb Leo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright of Jafim Taras. However the author Михась Зарецкий died in 1937, so this is probably in public domain (see Template:PD-Russia-1996). C messier (talk) 08:36, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
._Малюнак_1.png){kind=link}
- This illustration is drawed by Jafim Taras, he died in 1981. I will reupload Zarecki's book without this drawing. Gleb Leo (talk) 08:41, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- ΟΚ, then Delete. --C messier (talk) 13:46, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- ΟΚ, then
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
._Малюнак_1.png){kind=link}
No mention that the file is cc-0 on the allgeated source page 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:3960:DB74:C612:9797 09:33, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:57, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 09:33, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Likely not own works. Out of scope also due to bad quality and small size
- File:Hinode2sunrise2.jpg
- File:Zansetsupacksnow105cmx25cmx7cm.jpg
- File:Awafoam865mmx660mm.jpg
- File:Daen.jpg
- File:Shintouosmosis01.jpg
Юрий Д.К 09:55, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:59, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Un bibliotecario 191.125.18.4 10:53, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OoS. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:00, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Dos bibliotecarios 191.125.18.4 10:54, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OoS. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:00, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Image permission MJXVI (talk) 11:05, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; all over the internet. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:09, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
No indication of a free release MJXVI (talk) 11:18, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; all over the internet. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:10, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
No indication of a free release MJXVI (talk) 11:26, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:29, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:13, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope, no educational value Oursana (talk) 17:07, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:01, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hasenläufer as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: "Own work" seems not to be true. It looks like an old postcard with another copyright owner. Not a valid candidate for speedy since it looks old. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:27, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo missing all essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:35, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
No indication of a free release MJXVI (talk) 11:34, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:17, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
broken image and there is another, correct version of this file: File:Logo der Bundesstiftung Aufarbeitung - tr.gif Welkend (talk) 12:16, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:17, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Unfortunately no freedom of panorama in Mauritius. FunkMonk (talk) 12:24, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Question What in the photo is copyrighted? Can someone copyright a dead animal? Or is it the generic image of part of a tree that you think is subject to copyright? Is it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:55, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- It's a man-made sculpture[2], not a dead animal. FunkMonk (talk) 20:03, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- I see. Thanks for the explanation and the link. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:36, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- It's a man-made sculpture[2], not a dead animal. FunkMonk (talk) 20:03, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:18, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
This photo is a copyright violation. It was taken from – https://www.15min.lt/naujiena/aktualu/lietuva/vaizdas-kokio-lietuvoje-dar-nemateme-baigiamas-statyti-kauno-stadionas-is-paukscio-skrydzio-56-1695234 (the caption under the photo in the website says that it belongs to Kaunas City Municipality (Kauno miesto savivaldybė). – Sbaio (talk) 13:19, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:18, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Outdated, possibly confusing info. Also, this image isn't used anywhere. This one is more up to date: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:USB_2022_September_naming_scheme.svg GravityCore (talk) 14:01, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, superseded. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:19, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The picture was already used, without the detoured background, in 2022 https://franchisecompany.com.tr/guncel/tl-harcayip-doviz-kazandiriyoruz CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:15, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:20, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Trabajo propio 191.125.18.4 15:06, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:25, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Trabajo propio 191.125.18.4 15:06, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:25, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Trabajo propio 191.125.18.4 15:07, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:25, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Derechos de autor reservados. 191.125.18.4 15:32, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Deletion due to OR work which I uploaded to get a PNG version of, cannot be plausibly used on Wikipedia due to it being estimates by myself and thereforth Original Research Tweedle (talk) 16:06, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Original Research is not banned from commons, the file is clearly described as OR in the description field, I do not see a problem with it. Oxyman (talk) 16:34, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- No obviously, but it is not plausibly useable is more my point and I want all my files currently hosted on here to have some plausable usability. Does this deletion request not also fall under a OP requested one? Tweedle (talk) 11:52, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:27, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
COM:VRT permission needed from copyright owner. Most of these files are apparently works by the Spanish painter Antoni Rosell Altimira (1906-1995), according to the es.wikipedia sandbox where they are been used. So they are not "own work". Two of the paintings that are not attributed to Rosell Altimira nor used in the Wikipedia (File:1. Rosas.jpg and File:Rosas i Pressecs.jpg). They are probably painted by that painter (edit history by the uploader suggests so), though. If not, COM:VRT needed too. Undelete in 2066.
- File:JarronfloresArosell.jpg
- File:1. Rosas.jpg
- File:20. Paisaje 7 XXX Rierol.jpg
- File:Rosas i Pressecs.jpg
- File:Bailarina al espejo.jpg
- File:Chica leyendo.jpg
Strakhov (talk) 18:34, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:28, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No evidence to be own work. Taken from the internet Ориенталист (talk) 18:41, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No evidence to be own work. Taken from the internet Ориенталист (talk) 18:42, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No evidence to be own work. Taken from the internet Ориенталист (talk) 18:43, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Title card. I can't read Hindi so I cannot tell if the text is copyrightable, but this has Hindi Action Movies watermarks, and I'm not sure of the educational use of this. Abzeronow (talk) 18:49, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:30, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Raghunath daas as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: no sources, inaccurate —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and screengrab/copyvio. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:30, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Main subject of these two images are recent architectural works involved in two DRs at: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Philippine Sports Stadium and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Philippine Arena.
- File:Ciudad de Victoria Interchange Bypass Road Bocaue Santa Maria Bypass 02.jpg
- File:Ciudad de Victoria Interchange Bypass Road Bocaue Santa Maria Bypass 03.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:42, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- These 2 photos are just 2 of the 46 total of Category:Ciudad de Victoria Interchange ; I am not sure if they fail, but in my stand, since there are 46 photos already of the Interchange, these 2 photos may at the discretion of the Commons community be taken off, sincerely FBenjr123 (talk) 05:47, 13 January 2022 (UTC).
Violation of architect's copyright. As per [3], majority of recent buildings were variations of Architect Carlos A. Santos-Viola's designs on the Central Temple. According to the source also, "prominent architects, such as Juan Nakpil and Carlos Raúl Villanueva, had been involved in designing INC churches while the Engineering and Construction Department of INC, established in 1971, oversees the uniformity in design of church buildings. Without evidence to prove that this church building dates to pre-December 1972, {{PD-Philippines-FoP work}} cannot be invoked and images must be deleted unless a commercial license from INC's Engineering Department is secured.
- File:Barangays Parian Poblacion and San Antonio Mexico 35.jpg
- File:Barangays Parian Poblacion and San Antonio Mexico 31.jpg
- File:Barangays Parian Poblacion and San Antonio Mexico 30.jpg
- File:Barangays Parian Poblacion and San Antonio Mexico 29.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:58, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Personally (my stance may be a mistake ... I was told and lectured by learned INC Ministers at a McDonald's resto, when I asked them permission to take wedding or interiors of INC chapel not a big one; they sadly stated that even they themselves are advised not to take photos inside since it is sacrilegious, but exteriors, no problem (Vide: Category:Iglesia Ni Cristo Church (Pulilan, Bulacan) they are very near where you stay ... and lots of them all over Commons) ... very sincerely FBenjr123 (talk) 08:14, 1 March 2022 (UTC).
- @FBenjr123: permission from the church is irrelevant; what matters is commerci license permission from the entity who holds the architectural designs of the church. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:23, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Personally (my stance may be a mistake ... I was told and lectured by learned INC Ministers at a McDonald's resto, when I asked them permission to take wedding or interiors of INC chapel not a big one; they sadly stated that even they themselves are advised not to take photos inside since it is sacrilegious, but exteriors, no problem (Vide: Category:Iglesia Ni Cristo Church (Pulilan, Bulacan) they are very near where you stay ... and lots of them all over Commons) ... very sincerely FBenjr123 (talk) 08:14, 1 March 2022 (UTC).
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:48, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
COM:WEBHOSTing by a now-blocked uploader. There are already tons of images by a similar uploader (Judgefloro (talk · contribs)) in places like Category:Cycling men in the Philippines, Category:School children in Bulacan, and many more. FBenjr123 seems to treat Commons as a Facebook or Instagram site, where it is much more permissible to upload zillions of "redundant and near-duplicate images made to showcase the country to the world, without regard to their quality or usefulness."
- File:Standing cyclists giving thumbs up at Barasoain Church.jpg
- File:Standing Maloleños barefoot slippers abandoned street children eating food Paseo del Congreso.jpg
- File:Standing Maloleños barefoot slippers abandoned street children eating food Paseo del Congreso New Normal.jpg
- File:Standing Baliwageños ballons peddlers Sunday morning New Normal.jpg
- File:Poblacion Centero Baliuag 03.jpg
- File:Sleeping Bulaqueña senior citizen Sampaguita garland street vendor lying park bench Sunday.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:49, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Bridge is poorly-depicted in these two photos. Lots of better photos at Category:Old Plaridel-Pulilan Bridge. Still more COM:WEBHOST/Facebook/Instagram-type content by a sock of now-blocked Judgefloro (talk · contribs).
- File:Remnants Ruins of the Abandoned Balagtas-Cabanatuan line Old Plaridel-Pulilan railway bridge 10.jpg
- File:Remnants Ruins of the Abandoned Balagtas-Cabanatuan line Old Plaridel-Pulilan railway bridge 09.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:34, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:33, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Nudity, low quality, limited value, the only upload by user, probable vandalism. MtBotany (talk) 05:12, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:27, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Looks like a commercially available, copyrighted figure. FunkMonk (talk) 10:17, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation MJXVI (talk) 10:31, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
het bestand is afkomstig van https://www.parlement.com/id/vg09llpm1esz/h_h_hayo_apotheker waar onder de foto vermeld staat : bron: Ministerie van LNV , Verder lees ik hier: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overleg_help:Gebruik_van_openbare_bronnen#december_2003 onderaan: Gegevens mogen gebruikt worden, mits de bron wordt vermeld en er een link wordt gelegd naar www.parlement.com. Ten aanzien van foto's ligt het ingewikkelder. De meeste foto's zijn ter beschikking gesteld door Tweede en Eerste Kamer, en de rechten berusten bij hen. Kabinetsfoto's zijn afkomstig van de RVD (www.regering.nl). waaruit ik opmaak dat de foto's NIET gebruikt mogen worden Saschaporsche (talk) 20:30, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete de gebruiker die deze foto uploade is al geruime tijd niet meer actief, dus zal ook hier niet op reageren. Het lijkt me duidelijk dat deze foto verwijderd kan worden met de bovenstaande uitleg. Vera (talk) 15:35, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The illustration is not in public domain and not created by the uploader. It's clearly the work of famous Finnish cartoonist Kari Suomalainen who died in 1999. His works will enter public domain in Finland in 2070. --Risukarhi (talk) 18:54, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. 1984 work, file can be restored in 2080 (URAA). --Rosenzweig τ 13:07, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
There is no evidence the uploader is the copyright holder. This photo was originally posted by the singer and there's no proof she gave permission to use it. SubtleSylph (talk) 14:14, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence of permission from the copyright holder. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:17, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lalela Msvane
[edit]These images are marked {{PD-SAGov}}: "This image is in the public domain in South Africa and possibly other jurisdictions. This is because it is a work of the South African Government and was published more than 50 years ago. The copyright has therefore expired." which would be great if they weren't from 2021!!! So unless South Africa has discovered a time machine unknown to the rest of the world, I'm quite sure they were not actually published more than 50 years ago.
- File:Lalela Mswane crowned Miss South Africa 2021 (cropped).jpg
- File:Lalela Mswane crowned Miss South Africa 2021.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
GRuban (talk) 01:47, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:44, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lalela Msvane
[edit]Both these images were uploaded as "own work" by User:Maxernity. They are the user's only contributions, they're professional quality photos, and they were uploaded 13 November 2022. However, they also appear on https://savannanews.com/in-pictures-miss-supranational-lalela-mswane-dons-new-look-impressing-mzansi/ dated 27 July 2022 (and credited to Instagram/LalelaMswane). Unless User:Maxernity is claiming to be Lalela Mswane or her personal photographer, I don't think they actually made or own these images, so don't have the right to release them to us. Sorry.
GRuban (talk) 01:54, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:44, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
These arms do not exist as the current Prince of Wales has not been granted a Coat of Arms with the arms of Wales Ha2772a (talk) 19:49, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: Tag added to make clear that these are still proposed at this time. There are many proposed or theoretical coats of arms available on Commons, so keeping would be consistent with precedent. If need be a suggested change to the File name may be all that is required. Mangwanani (talk) 11:35, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:51, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Esta fotografía pertenece a la página https://www.pexels.com/es-ES/creative-commons-images/, la cual dice expresamente en su página All Photos on Pexels can be used for free. While most photos are released under the Pexels license, some photos are covered by the Creative Commons Zero (CC0) license. Both licenses are similar and allow you to do the following: >Puedes utilizar todas las fotos gratuitas con fines comerciales y no comerciales >No hace falta elogiar públicamente al fotógrafo o a Pexels, aunque es un lindo detalle >Puedes editar y adaptar las fotos como prefieras LéiFerAlcívarez (talk) 13:57, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment The license is fine. The only question is whether there's anything copyright-restrictive in the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:04, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- The license is not fine. If this photo were released under CC0, it would say "Free to use (CC0)" under it, like this one does: https://www.pexels.com/photo/construction-house-architecture-luxury-53610/. I've marked this photo for speedy deletion as a copyright violation. Omphalographer (talk) 04:12, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Uploaded on June 26th, 2018. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:33, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MrsSnoozyTurtle as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1|2=Image of copyright material uploaded as "own work"> I agree that it is unlikely that this is own work, but the cover looks to be well under COM:TOO USA. Is it also under COM:TOO Canada? If so, this could be cropped to bring about an image that is {{PD-ineligible}} in light of COM:COREL. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:31, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:14, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The uploader has misunderstood the definition of "own work" as he clearly didn't take the picture. A Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:17, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- No, but it's COM:INUSE. Might it be in the public domain? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:49, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- This seems to be one of a series of colourised photographs, others of which have previously been deleted here. Felix QW (talk) 20:29, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 16:03, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Alx 91 as Fair use (Non-free) and the most recent rationale was: logo. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:24, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- I would think not, considering what's at COM:TOO Brazil. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:50, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: This appears to be below TOO in both Brazil and the US. —holly {chat} 16:03, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Derechos de autor 191.125.18.4 17:10, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- please read this website carefully. SKBNK (talk) 17:12, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- The license is fine, as it allows commercial use. Is there another reason the photo should be deleted? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:53, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 16:04, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own works!
--Karim talk to me :)..! 18:28, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
أحبتنا هذه الصورة رفعها لنا أقارب الشيخ في موقع لتحميل القرآن الكريم وقالوا لنا انشروها مع المعلومات في صفحة ويكيبيديا الشيخ رحمه الله. أقارب الشيخ لا يعرفون شيئا عن الحقوق، لكن أرسلوها لنا لنضعها على ويكيبيديا. وشكرا. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Radhy365 (talk • contribs) 13:31, 14 May 2023 (UTC) القصد على هذه الصورة
الصورة الأخرى يرجى حذفها. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Radhy365 (talk • contribs) 13:33, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Google Translate: "The sheik's family do not know anything about the rights" → COM:PCP. —holly {chat} 16:08, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Юрий Д.К. as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Supersized Disk.tif|user=Юрий Д.К.. Different filetype, but COM:REDUNDANT to File:Supersized Disk.tif. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:46, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep It's useful to have this in png format. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:50, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Small size and poor quality compared to original Юрий Д.К 17:57, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment The two files are identical as thumbnails, which is how they would be used in online articles. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:01, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: It's not a problem for us to have the same image in different formats. I'll tag this one as {{Superseded}}. —holly {chat} 16:12, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
No evidence I could find that this is PD-USGov. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:29, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Applodion (talk) 10:01, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 16:13, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Множественные фактологические ошибки: 1) При начале проверки цифр согласно работе "Начальные училища ведомства Министерства Народного Просвещения в 1914 году" уже в Московской губернии выявлено несоответствие; 2) На 1916 год не существовало Санкт-Петербургской губернии, нет ее и в приводимой работе МНП; 3) В Полном собрании законов Российской Империи, т.33, с. 750 за указанную дату не идет речи о расходах, связанных с введением всеобщего образования, но о "нуждах начального образования и некоторых изменениях в условиях расходования кредитов на нужды начального образования"; 4) На основе двух законов (один из которых указан с ошибкой) экстраполируется список трат, что не соответствует данным, приведенным в официальных росписях доходов и расходов за приведенные года (дублированным также в "Новом энциклопедическом словаре Брокгауза и Ефрона"); GloomyPigeon (talk) 08:16, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: TinEye turns up a result from LiveJournal before upload to Commons. Uploader has a history of copyvio. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:39, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
And also
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. The building was built after 2000. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 19:58, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by User:Howcheng. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:41, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photographer is Fernando Sáenz Pérez, a Spanish computer science professor. The professor's link to the Flickr uploader which is an organization AUIC-Asociación de Usuarios de Informática Clásica is unclear, and since AUIC are not the photographer and they give an attribution line as "{c) Fernando Sáenz - Public Domain Work", VRT clarification from Fernando Sáenz Pérez may be necessary. Abzeronow (talk) 17:20, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:HP 8920A oscilloscope.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 16:57, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to suspect the correctness of the licensing on Flickr of this photo. According to https://www.auic.es/quienes-somos/ Fernando Sáenz is one of their members. Therefore decided to keep this image. --Ellywa (talk) 20:55, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I uploaded it by mistake Omarboulma1926 (talk) 21:36, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: not recent upload, in use. --Krd 07:52, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
