Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/05/05
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![95 File:La Bruja Salguero presentando "Grito interior"..jpg](#File:La_Bruja_Salguero_presentando_"Grito_interior"..jpg){kind=link}
![113 File:A "Dinosaurs Attack" card.jpg](#File:A_"Dinosaurs_Attack"_card.jpg){kind=link}
YANN_ORHAN.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Este archivo podría no ser muy util en la wiki Luis XD csc (talk) 00:05, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:18, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
เป็นไฟล์เก่า Mr.Korapoj Teacharat (talk) 01:43, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Keep Google Translate: "is an old file." All the more reason to keep it! Not that it might not be deletable on copyright grounds, but that's not the reason that was offered for deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:44, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:17, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
I didn't upload the right photo Ron de Harte is a city council person FYE31 (talk) 07:06, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:16, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Unvalid license. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:02, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 12:37, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
This picture has no purpose for why I uploaded it. Abedin Shanto (talk) 14:03, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 15:33, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Request of the author Bireyseldanisman (talk) 19:59, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Request of the author Bireyseldanisman (talk) 16:14, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 20:08, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Delete most unlikely the work of the uploader as this image is attributed to Daniele Venturelli/Getty Images on this newspaper webpage: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-10031175/Naomi-Campbell-rules-runway-glittering-pink-gown-Versace-special-event.html Ww2censor (talk) 13:42, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 20:48, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Tipazo ! 186.173.47.240 13:52, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 21:58, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
blatant advertising Veracious (talk) 15:16, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Mdaniels5757. --Rosenzweig τ 21:58, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
blatant advertising Veracious (talk) 15:17, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Mdaniels5757. --Rosenzweig τ 21:58, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
blatant advertising Veracious (talk) 15:17, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Mdaniels5757. --Rosenzweig τ 21:58, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
blatant advertising Veracious (talk) 15:18, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Mdaniels5757. --Rosenzweig τ 21:58, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Not own work. Source: https://www.instagram.com/p/CGDNQShl1Dh/ Brunnaiz (talk) 20:05, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:29, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not an own work, to be honest. N61l16fwts (talk) 20:05, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
It's same and taken from the web. Flag Creator (talk) 11:54, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Delete Navassa Island does not have a flag (other than that of the United States). This design is not "unofficial" or "local" or anything else. It was made up by a random person unrelated to Navassa Island, it has never been flown on Navassa Island, and it has never been used or recognized in any capacity that would give it legitimacy. I can't just make up flags for places that don't have any and pretend it's the "unofficial" or "local" flag of that place. This is purely fictional, has no educational purpose, and should not be used on any Wikipedia project.
- Reywas92 (talk) 01:42, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
I agree. Nerdqwertyoof (talk) 20:52, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Since I created this work, I would rather delete it. Im very sorry for uploading a file from the web. Flag Creator (talk) 15:31, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:35, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Low-quality chemical structure with colored atom labels & opaque background. Have various other representations, even with stereochemistry, in Category:Lactate ion. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:17, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Dubious copyright claim: No EXIF, listed author is "Photographers there". Uploader has a record of uploading copyvios (see here) Wcam (talk) 13:00, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted toy. FunkMonk (talk) 20:49, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Yann is a violator of copyrights. 186.174.1.147 02:47, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: © World Policy Conference 2023 | All rights reserved. --Kadı Message 11:06, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Low quality COM:NUDE photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete COM:PORN Dronebogus (talk) 21:30, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 11:09, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
This yanngster could become an admin some day. 186.174.1.147 03:13, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 11:05, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Low quality COM:NUDE photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- De dónde salen estos psicópatas? Delete. 186.175.250.120 19:58, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete COM:PORN Dronebogus (talk) 21:24, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 11:08, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope HeminKurdistan (talk) 06:26, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 11:08, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 07:34, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:47, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Possible ad: Flyer CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:34, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 11:10, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Possible ad: Flyer CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:34, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 11:10, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
This is my photo and I didn't upload it please delete. 49.228.245.10 09:42, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- From Facebook, speedy. 181.43.3.228 18:53, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 10:48, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a band CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:07, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 11:12, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a band CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:12, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 11:11, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:12, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 11:12, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: logo of a band CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:03, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:49, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a band CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:03, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:49, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Selfie posted by someone else than the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:04, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 10:49, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Person died in 2021 can not be own work of 2023. Original author? Date? Copyright status? Drakosh (talk) 11:30, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:58, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Image from The Guardian, not freely licensed. Canley (talk) 12:22, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:58, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Not own work, found at https://www.idf.il/%D7%90%D7%AA%D7%A8%D7%99-%D7%99%D7%97%D7%99%D7%93%D7%95%D7%AA/%D7%97%D7%99%D7%9C-%D7%94%D7%94%D7%A0%D7%93%D7%A1%D7%94-%D7%94%D7%A7%D7%A8%D7%91%D7%99%D7%AA/%D7%9B%D7%9C-%D7%94%D7%9B%D7%AA%D7%91%D7%95%D7%AA/2023/%D7%92%D7%93%D7%95%D7%93-614-%D7%94%D7%99%D7%95%D7%91%D7%9C-%D7%97%D7%99%D7%9C-%D7%94%D7%A0%D7%93%D7%A1%D7%94-%D7%A7%D7%A8%D7%91%D7%99%D7%AA-%D7%9C%D7%95%D7%97%D7%9E%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%94%D7%9B%D7%A9%D7%A8%D7%94-%D7%94%D7%93%D7%A8%D7%9B%D7%94/, unsure about copyright Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:10, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:57, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unfortunately, main focus is a COM:BOOK cover Nutshinou Talk! 14:42, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unfortunately, main focus is a COM:BOOK cover Nutshinou Talk! 14:42, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The picture is on the internet since 2013 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:20, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:56, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Advertsing for a concert CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:25, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:51, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Archivo con © 186.173.107.100 15:28, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:51, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Chandrasekharmusic (talk) 16:07, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 10:52, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused pie chart with no explanation. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 16:15, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:56, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:20, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 10:53, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused and unexplained table. No meaningful title. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 16:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:55, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Same file as File:Flag of France.svg SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 17:53, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no need to delete. The colors of the flag of france have changed during time, while this appears constant. --Ellywa (talk) 20:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
This is the same file as File:Flag of France.svg. Flag263 (talk) 23:46, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per previous. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:57, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
This is the flag of France. And it's same as w:File:Flag of France.svg Nerdqwertyoof (talk) 18:35, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:42, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 10:53, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CriminalResearcherFinland (talk · contribs)
[edit]Fake images created with some software, out of scope.
kyykaarme (talk) 18:57, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:54, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Porqué miente que es own work? 186.173.138.216 19:21, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Spam and unsourced DW. --Achim55 (talk) 19:50, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:54, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
no metadata, not in use, possible not notable ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 21:42, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 10:55, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 08:05, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:45, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Looks like a selfie from some social media website, and the image can also be found online from a few years ago, so I doubt it's "own work" by the uploader as claimed. kyykaarme (talk) 18:55, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:45, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted Material: CAD image Michel Bakni (talk) 21:16, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:45, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted Materials Michel Bakni (talk) 21:18, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:45, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Random nude photo, nothing special, unlikely to be useful, may be use as exhibitionism A1Cafel (talk) 08:50, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete COM:PORN Dronebogus (talk) 21:30, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:19, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Radioultimitomix
[edit]- File:Eduardo Franco cantando (400).png
- File:Flyer Del Programa PURO MEDARDO (400).png
- File:Flyer Del Programa Infantíles Del Ayer.png
- File:Flyer Del Programa Eduardo Franco.png
- File:Flyer Del Programa De Camilo Sesto.jpg
- File:Flyer Del Programa De Disco Music Fever.png
- File:Flyer Del Programa De Tarde Sabrosona.png
- File:Flyer Del Programa De Disco Music Fever.png
- File:Flyer Del Programa De Camilo Sesto.jpg
- File:Flyer Del Programa De Románticamente Contigo.png
- File:Flyer Del Programa De Radio Ultimito Mix Musical.png
- File:Flyer Del Programa De Julio Jaramillo.png
- File:Flyer del programa "Camilo Sesto".jpg
- File:Flyer Del Programa "Puro Medardo".jpg
- File:Flyer Programa de "Eduardo Franco".jpg
- File:Flyer Del programa "Radio Ultimito Mix Musical".jpg
- File:Flyer Del programa "Julio Jaramillo".jpg
- File:Flyer Del programa "Tarde Sabrosona".jpg
- File:Flyer Del programa "Románticamente Contigo".jpg
- File:Logo (400x400).png
- File:Logo actualizado de Radio Ultimito Mix.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ad for a radio and certain copyvio on the pictures used on the flyers.--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:44, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:20, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Creature Craft rescue boat descending down Sunset Falls on the South Fork Skykomish River, Washington, USA 2.webm
[edit]Accidentally imported a video that is not marked as CC-licensed, from a series of videos that otherwise are CC-licensed. Dhx1 (talk) 14:55, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: by Krd. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:20, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Not needed; sef-made Lingzhi.Renascence (talk) 15:01, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:20, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
file with low resolution / file size and no EXIF; very doubtful that this is an own work DCB (talk) 18:38, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
file with low resolution / file size and no EXIF; very doubtful that this is an own work DCB (talk) 18:38, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
file with low resolution / file size and no EXIF; very doubtful that this is an own work DCB (talk) 18:38, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
file with low resolution / file size and no EXIF; very doubtful that this is an own work DCB (talk) 18:39, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
file with low resolution / file size and no EXIF; very doubtful that this is an own work DCB (talk) 18:39, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
see EXIF: stilbezirk GmbH & Co.KG / Johannes Heuckeroth – no permission for release under a free license DCB (talk) 18:40, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE Ameisenigel (talk) 18:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Kantor Kuwu 186.173.138.216 19:19, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Spam and unsourced DW. --Achim55 (talk) 19:51, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:21, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Self promotion —Ismael Olea (talk) 19:20, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:21, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Tan fea la foto que no se usa en ninguna parte. 186.173.138.216 19:34, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete low quality nudity Dronebogus (talk) 05:04, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:21, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
The file may contain sensititve information on an individual which may be of harmt to him and his family 1066Olsen (talk) 19:49, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Also a text, and Commons normally doesn't host text files. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:38, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:21, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eggman1123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, poor quality and many better alternatives exist
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Юрий Д.К 22:20, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:21, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (photo by Mareike Keiper) M2k~dewiki (talk) 10:21, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, please let me know why this should be removed? Jadwig40 (talk) 14:29, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Mareike Keiper is the copyright holder but I have her permission to use the photo. Jadwig40 (talk) 14:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Jadwig40 Please have her send permission to COM:VRT using the instructions there. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- too complicated. Please delete the photo. Thank you! Jadwig40 (talk) 21:29, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Jadwig40 Please have her send permission to COM:VRT using the instructions there. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 08:49, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 07:37, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:09, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 07:37, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:09, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused text diagram, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:58, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep If we delete every unused image, we would have to delete about 75% of all images. Commons is not for the exclusive use of Wikis, we offer our images to all end-users, so long as they follow the terms of the license. --RAN (talk) 02:21, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- "Unused" is not the deletion reason. It is a text-only diagram, which is out of scope if unused. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:07, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. See COM:SCOPE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:11, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Perfectnews (talk) 11:55, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per fairly prompt uploader request; unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:24, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
This is the picture of the Broz family string trio that is marked as taken from their website in 2011. In 2011 (as well as now) this website was not licensed under free license, see https://web.archive.org/web/20110208205604/http://www.triobroz.com/ Also one of the trio's musicians, Barbara Broz, is named as an author and uploader but at the same time she is one of the persons pictured. I would delete it as probable copyright violation. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:29, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:38, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
File has been stolen from multiple porn websites 49.185.82.214 22:26, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Is the anonymous nomination supported by evidence? All the reverse image search results (TinEye and Google) are lower resolution than this file. Brianjd (talk) 13:49, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:36, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Creo que se necesita permiso para subir este archivo. 186.173.138.216 22:30, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; COM:CV. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:27, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation; artist died in 2008; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Reformierte Kirche Churwalden Abendmahlstisch.JPG
- File:Reformierte Kirche Churwalden Kanzel mit Evangelistensymbolen.JPG
Martin Sg. (talk) 22:58, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:26, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Sources stated that it was from the Government of South Papua but there were no sources that stated it was directly from the Government of South Papua, only limited to claims. Oloyobuen (talk) 07:29, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep wrong claim, multiple sources said that this is a newly released logo from the government itself
- * https://papua.tribunnews.com/2023/04/28/sah-begini-logo-provinsi-papua-selatan-dan-maknanya-yang-akan-dipajang-di-kemendagri
- * https://sorongnews.com/lambang-provinsi-papua-selatan-sarat-makna/
- * https://www.instagram.com/p/Crr6IuKPbL0/?hl=en (a photograph during the anniversary of regional autonomy)
- This logo is public domain (sourced from the Indonesian government), so there is no reason to delete it. Afif Brika1 (talk) 09:02, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Keep The official website of South Papua Province also used the logo. Jauhsekali (talk) 22:32, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Per Afif and Jauhsekali. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:48, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Most likely previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification of the true copyright holder (the photographer) via email correspondence is required for images previously published on social media so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of these images and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. For email template, see COM:VRTS#Email message template for release of rights to a file. Better still, have the originals overwrite these FB-derived images, if the images are truly self-photographed works of the uploader.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:56, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Made-up flag created by user blocked for vandalism. No source and should not be used on any wiki. Reywas92 (talk) 03:59, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:59, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 06:49, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- I am a friend of Jim he approves this picture asked me to make some corrections as he could not figure out how to log into Wikipedia on his own. 2604:7A40:322:2070:8210:25:6DEC:75BA 13:14, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:59, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
this is incomplete information Aniket95 (talk) 08:19, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Uploader request. While this image is pretty dope, it’s of me and I uploaded it for my WP user page. I’ve since edited it out of that page, don’t plan to re-use it for anything else, and I doubt it has much value for any other user. VibrantThumpcake (talk) 10:01, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
File:08 - No. 19 Iris Road, Summit - the approximate location of Timothy Day's Tavern (taken from Streetview).png
[edit].png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Archaelogical work has found that the location of this image is no longer correct. Please delete to avoid further confusion. Thank you. Anne Ammundsen (talk) 12:06, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and copyvio if taken from Google Streetview. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
No proof of copyright free has been given or can be found online Dajasj (talk) 12:07, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Map showing locations of Colonel Elias Dayton's house and Timothy Day's Tavern as they were in 1782. OpenStreetMap.jpg
[edit]
Archaelogical work has found that the locations marked on this image are no longer correct. Please delete to avoid further confusion. Thank you. Anne Ammundsen (talk) 12:15, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Certainly not own work. Cropped from web image. Most probably: https://gerb-epp.info/meps/асим-адемов/ Сале (talk) 12:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- The image provided there (gerb-epp.info) and in asim-ademov.eu is also provided by me. Osislyamov (talk) 12:49, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Osislyamov, "own work" is only applicable if you are the photographer who took the original photo, which is not evident in this case. An original photo with full EXIF information can help. According to gerb-epp.info, the content is copyrighted, which is against the (CC BY-SA) license you specified for File:Asim-Ademov-bio-image.png. Сале (talk) 15:38, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The picture is credited to Dave Stapleton, who is not the uploader CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:52, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:06, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The name of the author is different from the one in the watermark of the picture CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:06, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
![13:06, 5 May 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/05/05#c-CoffeeEngineer-20230505130600-File:La_Bruja_Salguero_presentando_"Grito_interior"..jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
![19:31, 30 May 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/05/05#c-P199-20230530193100-File:La_Bruja_Salguero_presentando_"Grito_interior"..jpg){kind=link}
Per COM:TOY, this figure (Nendoroid no. 136) is likely to be copyrighted. Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 13:15, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom, clearly a copyrighted toy. Di (they-them) (talk) 22:39, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Questionable own work claim, no metadata and low quality HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:17, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Questionable own work claim, no metadata and low quality HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:17, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. Not a meaningful contributor. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:55, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:18, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: A studio is mentionned in the watermark on the picture CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:22, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Y si no, qué? El archivo es de Feysbuk y el tipo es un desconocido. Borrar hoy. 186.173.107.100 15:59, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Taken from FB per EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The author is not the uploader CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:33, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope (advertising): the logotype of unsignificant seed company. Radmir Far (talk) 15:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Blurry and extremely low resolution image. Project has a plethora of much better images of the same subject matter. Headlock0225 (talk) 17:26, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and likely copyvio, screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:38, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Cavetown - Green.webm (noticed during upload but too slow to abort the upload) Dhx1 (talk) 17:29, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:49, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
wrong date, wrong author and source Xocolatl (talk) 17:50, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 17:52, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, credit in EXIF data not matching the uploader. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:50, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
not own work https://www.moroccoworldnews.com/2018/06/248733/king-mohammed-vi-and-abu-azaitar-meet-again NAADAAN (talk) 17:52, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:51, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
probably wrong date, wrong author, wrong source Xocolatl (talk) 17:56, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Cuatro ojos 186.173.138.216 19:17, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Caricatura 186.173.138.216 19:18, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio: screenshot. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:46, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Person on the photo is not the author as claimed. Copyvio Masti (talk) 19:23, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- I'm author. Dariusz Andrzej Kwiecień (talk) 20:39, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- If it's a selfie, there is no copyright issue. What's your claim to fame, Dariusz? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:40, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. Not a meaningful contributor. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Otro huevón. 186.173.138.216 20:33, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:45, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted trading card. FunkMonk (talk) 20:50, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
![20:50, 5 May 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/05/05#c-FunkMonk-20230505205000-File:A_"Dinosaurs_Attack"_card.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
![19:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/05/05#c-P199-20230530194000-File:A_"Dinosaurs_Attack"_card.jpg){kind=link}
Own work and in scope? 181.43.3.228 20:59, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- also advertise in description. just remove it. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 21:36, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- I can't. (I'm still on disguised patrol of Commons Admins. :) 181.43.3.228 15:10, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- P199 can do it. 181.43.3.228 18:52, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
- I can't. (I'm still on disguised patrol of Commons Admins. :) 181.43.3.228 15:10, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:41, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
I highly doubt „csilber2017“ (seems to be Chris Silber himself) being the photographer. In other words: possible copyvio. KlausHeide (talk) 21:35, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Taken from FB per EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:42, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LondonDiez (talk · contribs)
[edit]clear copyvio, low res, no metadata, could be speedydeleted.
----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 21:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:41, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo. The flag pattern itself is well below the threshold of originality basically everywhere, and even if it weren't then the flag would be in the public domain in Italy 20 years after creation (see COM:GVT Italy). The only part of this image that might be above the threshold of originality is the ornate flag staff, but that is reasonably claimed as own work by the uploader and I can't find that image online anywhere that dates to prior to its upload here. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:43, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Reverted to original version without the additon of decorative pole. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:49, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Hay un error involuntario en los colores del escudo Hans Habsburg (talk) 02:36, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused, questionanable accuracy, questionable license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:50, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). Fairly simple design that may well be under COM:TOO USA. Is this a {{PD-textlogo}}? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:39, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Yeah, I believe so. And it's in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:44, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: license changed per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:51, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Unvalid license. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:04, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:52, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
This work is property of the Chinook Indian Nation and may not be used without the written permission. The original art was created by Tribal member Tony A. Johnson https://chinooknation.org/tribal-logo-3/ 80.148.22.102 08:29, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:53, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted photo A1Cafel (talk) 10:48, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- The license of the photo is CC-BY, it is compatible with our project. --Luisalvaz (talk) 19:08, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Flickr user describes photo as "Fotografía: desconocido" - unknown author, Flickr user does not have authority to license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:55, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Si, tu trabajo propio, es Messi? 186.173.107.100 15:53, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- User's other upload was from https://www.facebook.com/sakhnin.fc/photos. I can't find the particular image but it looks like it's from the same place. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:54, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:57, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
NOFoP Japan. This stela description describes events in 2015, so it is unlikely that it is an old text in the public domain. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 09:50, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:06, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Richard Djerf
[edit]These photos by the Phoenix Police Department were not made by the federal US government, so the license tag used here is not valid. There is no PD license tag for Arizona in Category:PD-USGov license tags (non-federal).
- File:Crime Scene Photo of the Luna Family's Kitchen.jpg
- File:Richard Djerf, arrested for murdering the Luna family in Phoenix - shown with wound.jpg
- File:Richard Djerf, arrested for murdering the Luna family in Phoenix.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 11:05, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Arthur F Collins murdered in front of his wife and child on New York City subway October 1965.jpg
[edit]
This is a 1965 US newspaper article and probably still copyrighted. Without a proper source we cannot determine its copyright status, so the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 11:09, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- The copyright holder is the Associated Press, but 1964 is the cutoff for renewals, so this is still copyrighted. --RAN (talk) 12:39, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Methin Intaraprasit (talk · contribs)
[edit] Delete Thailand stamps are copyright for 50 years per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Thailand#Stamps and all these appear to fall with that time period. The uploaded cannot licence these on behalf of the Thailand Post.
- File:พระราชวรวงศ์เธอ กรมหมื่นพิทยาลงกรณ์.jpg
- File:หม่อมเจ้าสิทธิพร กฤดากร.jpg
- File:พระเจ้าบรมวงศ์เธอ กรมหลวงวงศาธิราชสนิท.jpg
- File:พระเจ้าบรมวงศ์เธอ กรมพระกำแพงเพชรอัครโยธิน.jpg
- File:พระเจ้าบรมวงศ์เธอ กรมพระนเรศรวรฤทธิ์.jpg
- File:สมเด็จเจ้าพระยาบรมมหาศรีสุริยวงศ์ (ช่วง บุนนาค).jpg
- File:สมเด็จพระเจ้าบรมวงศ์เธอ เจ้าฟ้าศิริราชกกุธภัณฑ์.jpg
- File:สมเด็จพระมหิตลาธิเบศร อดุลยเดชวิกรม พระบรมราชชนก.jpg
- File:พระเจ้าบรมวงศ์เธอ กรมหลวงชุมพรเขตอุดมศักดิ์.jpg
- File:สมเด็จพระเจ้าบรมวงศ์เธอ กรมพระยาชัยนาทนเรนทร.jpg
- File:สมเด็จพระราชปิตุจฉา เจ้าฟ้าวไลยอลงกรณ์ กรมหลวงเพชรบุรีราชสิรินธร.jpg
- File:สมเด็จพระเชษฐาธิราช เจ้าฟ้าจักรพงษ์ภูวนาถ กรมหลวงพิษณุโลกประชานาถ.jpg
- File:พระบาทสมเด็จพระวชิรเกล้าเจ้าอยู่หัว.jpg
- File:พระบาทสมเด็จพระวชิรเกล้าเจ้าอยู่หัวและพระบรมวงศานุวงศ์.jpg
- File:พระบรมราชานุสาวรีย์สามกษัตริย์.jpg
- File:พญามังราย.jpg
- File:พระเจ้ากรุงธนบุรี.jpg
- File:แสตมป์พระนางเจ้าสว่างวัฒนา ชุดที่ 3.jpg
- File:แสตมป์พระนางเจ้าสว่างวัฒนา ชุดที่ 2.jpg
- File:แสตมป์พระนางเจ้าสว่างวัฒนา ชุดที่ 1.jpg
- File:แสตมป์เจ้าฟ้าภาณุรังสีสว่างวงศ์.jpg
- File:แสตมป์สมเด็จพระศรีพัชรินทราบรมราชินีนาถ พระบรมราชชนนีพันปีหลวง.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ww2censor (talk) 21:09, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per the nominator since the stamps are clearly copyrighted. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:39, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:22, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). Fairly simple logo; is it below COM:TOO in the relevant countries? If so, we could tag as {{PD-textlogo}} and keep. Otherwise, this needs to be deleted. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:33, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:TOO Germany. Compare this textlogo to this one, linked from COM:TOO Germany, that was denied copyright protection by a German court. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:42, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Can be kept as a text logo. Gnom (talk) 07:05, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Ich schließe mich an. Es kann aber auch eine Freigabe durch die Firma erfolgen, falls verlangt. Gisbert K (talk) 16:13, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Can be kept as a text logo. Gnom (talk) 07:05, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 18:49, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Unvalid license. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:04, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Jameslwoodward. --Rosenzweig τ 10:44, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
YANN_ORHAN.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
YANN_ORHAN.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio? 186.174.1.147 03:32, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
YANN_ORHAN.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: no evidence of permission by photographer Yann Orhan, relation to uploader Melanieprx unclear. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:54, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
YANN_ORHAN.jpg){kind=link}
Text to speech synthetic voices may be copyrighted by the companies that make them. This is a six second recording, and the text itself does not appear to be copyrightable. This would definitely fall under "fair use" but since Commons doesn't allow that, opened a DR for discussion on this. Abzeronow (talk) 16:14, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete From a copyright standpoint, this is probably fine - just as the copyright on a font does not attach to every document created using that font, neither does the copyright on a text-to-speech voice attach to every recording of that voice. HOWEVER, I don't see any educational value in this recording. The file description suggests that the uploader may have uploaded it for personal use. Omphalographer (talk) 04:01, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per Omphalographer. Ruthven (msg) 07:51, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
1971 published South Korean photograph. Would still be under copyright in South Korea since it's from after 1963. Abzeronow (talk) 16:41, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:50, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:LICENSING, files hosted on Commons need to be either available under a free license or in the public domain in both the United States and its country of origin. However, this file is tagged as not being free in the United States. The work was published in 1937 abroad, and the work was copyrighted in the U.K. on the URAA date (the creator of the file died in 1950). As such, per COM:HIRTLE, this is copyrighted in the U.S. of A. until 95 years after its publication date, which means that this is copyrighted in America until 1932. Until then, it should be deleted from Commons. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:14, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep As I understand it files are not deleted if URAA is the only reason to delete. Unless copyright holder request a deletion. --MGA73 (talk) 16:10, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
- That flies in the face of the precautionary principle, and the Licensing policy. Per that policy, while URAA-related deletion requests should be evaluated with care, [i]f the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under US or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle. The analysis above demonstrates that the file is copyrighted in the United States, or at least that there is significant doubt as to its freedom under U.S. law. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:49, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:19, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
While the text of this work was created by w:en:Henrietta Elizabeth Marshall, who died in 1941, she was not the illustrator. Rather, the illustrations for the book from which this was taken were created by Arthur Cadwgan Michael, who died in 1965. This illustration itself was a U.K. work, and copyright in the U.K. subsists for 70 years after death for artistic works (see COM:UK). As such, while this is certainly in the public domain in the United States, this appears to be copyrighted in the U.K. and if so should be deleted in line with COM:L. My only hold up is about whether this is a commissioned work or not. If so, that may affect the final analysis, as the commissioner would own the copyright, but it's unclear to me what the specific financial arrangement was in the creation of this book, so I'm bringing it here for discussion. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:02, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- VRT agents: please note Ticket:2023050410010303. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:09, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete UK work, illustrations not PD in source country, undelete 2036 Hekerui (talk) 09:19, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 08:58, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation; stained glass windows from 1960; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 23:03, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Imho this is a photo of the choir, not of the stained glass. The stained glass is barely visible. --Freigut (talk) 10:18, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- I also only see the windows as part of the picture. Thanks and regards Schofför (talk) 17:09, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Looks like a general view of section of church; whatever design is in the windows is seen only incidentally/minimally. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:25, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Materialscientist (talk) 08:59, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio from his Youtube series, certainly not an "own work" Deacon Vorbis (talk) 07:11, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted photo A1Cafel (talk) 10:48, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- The licence of the photo on Flickr (the source) is CC-by. It is compatible with Commons. The user of the photo (Proyecto pioneras) has the permission of the person to free those pictures of women of interest in Panama. Luisalvaz (talk) 14:34, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, flickrwashing. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted photo A1Cafel (talk) 10:48, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, flickrwashing. --Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted photo A1Cafel (talk) 10:48, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/"Reynolds Thomas"
[edit]These are said to be 1966/1967 paintings by US artist (Harry) Reynolds Thomas, who lived from 1927 to 1991. Without more details we cannot tell if they are copyrighted, so the files should be deleted per the precautionary principle. They can be restored 95 years after creation (assuming they were also published then), so in 2062 and 2063. If they were unpublished before 2003, their copyrights would expire 70 years pma (at the end of 2061), so that fits.
- File:Reynolds Thomas - L'Interruption du Boule (The Ball Interruption), 1967.jpg
- File:Reynolds Thomas - The Jugglers.jpg
- File:Reynolds Thomas - L'Interruption du Boule (The Ball Interruption) 1967.jpg
,_1967.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1967.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Rosenzweig τ 11:23, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
No PD license found on the source A1Cafel (talk) 17:16, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Aaron Penis? 186.173.138.216 20:35, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- what? it says LaPedis MaraG1994 (talk) 20:50, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Ow. Perdón! 186.173.138.216 21:15, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- He seems rather notable, per a web search. But is this really your own work, MaraG1994? If it is, can you add EXIF information to the file page? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:37, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, DR nomination based on a non-relevant issue. -- Ooligan (talk) 05:40, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: PCP. no exif. Can be undeleted with permission. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Americana22ount (talk · contribs)
[edit]Architectural copyright violation. Buildings unlikely to be authored by architects who died more than 50 years ago. As there is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines, commercial license clearances from the architects/building designers or their heirs are required.
- File:National Museum of the Philippines - Western Visayas.jpg
- File:Stronghold Insurance Tower - Iloilo.jpg
- File:Qualimed Hospital Iloilo.jpg
- File:Roblee Science Hall Central Philippine University.jpg
- File:Eugenio Lopez Memorial Hall, Central Philippine University.jpg
- File:Roblee Science Hall of Central Philippine University.jpg
- File:Franklin Hall of Central Philippine University.jpg
- File:Engineering Building (CPU College of Engineering).jpg
- File:Loreto D. Tupaz Hall.jpg
- File:Rose Memorial Auditorium.jpg
- File:Festive Walk Parade (Phase 2).jpg
- File:Jaro Cathedral - Chapel of Lights.jpg
- File:Jaro Evangelical Church.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:02, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 03:32, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Americana22ount (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]COM:DW, photos of existing photos, missing original author, source, date, and permission.
- File:Lily V. Biton.jpg
- File:Leo Tito Ausan Jr.jpg
- File:Ramona Palabrica-Go.jpg
- File:Elvegia Ruiz-Mendoza.jpg
- File:Calixto Zaldivar.jpg
- File:Alexander Pama.jpg
- File:Alfonso A. Uy.jpg
- File:Alexis Belonio.jpg
- File:Ramon Muzones.jpg
- File:Jose V. Aguilar.jpg
- File:Felipe Landa Jocano.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). There is a (non-machine-readable) license, so this isn't a speedy. However, that license only applies to the U.S. copyright; this is a Japanese work, and COM:Japan does not list a similar provision waiving copyright on advertisements as was the case in the USA. Since, per COM:Licensing, the work needs to be freely licensed/in the public domain in both its country of origin and the USA, and it is not so in Japan, this appears like it should be deleted in light of COM:PRP. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:30, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: "The copyright of a work in the name of an organization expires 70 years after publication" so that means 2057 in Japan. —holly {chat} 20:43, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyvio from his Youtube series, cerrtainly not an "own work" Deacon Vorbis (talk) 07:12, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:45, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Per [1], this image was created sometime after 1982, so PD-US-no-notice does not apply. White completely painted over the now-public-domain photo, making creative choices as to what colors to use, so this is above the threshold of originality. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 10:06, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment A de minimis keep could be argued for this - the choice of colors in this case is not creativity, but rather an attempt to faithfully reproduce the historic colors of the time. Anyway, the image is actually unsourced, merely referring to the black-and-white original as source is not enough. Brandmeister (talk) 16:24, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose This is kind of ridiculous. The bush was made green, the white wall was made white, the police uniform was made blue, and the skin of a likely white man was made white. I see nothing original about these color interpretations. HAL333 (talk) 17:57, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- The color selections, and the choices of where to place those colors, are original because they represent White's guess as to what this particular tiny blurry black-and-white photo segment depicts. There is clear creative effort involved in that decisionmaking. I could take the same photo and overpaint it to depict a bird perched on a cat's back resting under a tree. Even given the same prompt of what this should depict, if you asked 100 painters to color the black-and-white photo in they would do so 100 different ways. Is his left arm raised, or does it continue downward out of frame? Is the B&W white area on either side of his neck the same color on both sides? Is his body facing the camera or leftward? Is the white splotch on his left shoulder significant or just a photographic artifact? What to make of the B&W black area behind the left shoulder? These are all creative decisions, and White's answers are not always intuitive, e.g. making that black area tan in the color version or making the white bit behind the neck light blue. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 21:13, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Comment It could still be public domain per {{PD-US-1978-89}}. The problem is that newspapers at that time tend to be printed in B&W, so publication in newspapers wouldn't count. It would have to be a magazine or something, which would most likely have a copyright notice. FunnyMath (talk) 23:54, 5 May 2023 (UTC)- Oppose Seems like a reasonable and not particularly original interpretation of what the colors would be, and is valuable to include in the article as some may have trouble interpreting the B&W photo. People who puport that the photo shows the "badge man" would likely colorize it in a very similar way --Sophlake (talk) 10:20, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: I'm going to sidestep the question of whether colorization engenders a new copyright and delete the image for having no source. It's obviously not File:Badgeman.jpg because the file sizes don't match, and the one at [2] has a different color palette, so where did this come from? TinEye was not able to find an instance of this image online before its upload here, and a Google search for "jack white badge man" didn't really turn up many results. Once we have a valid source and can verify that this is indeed Jack White's colorization and not the uploader's, then we can move on to the next question of whether this derivative work passes the threshold of originality. —holly {chat} 21:17, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
This is said to be a painting by US artist en:Hudson Mindell Kitchell. Without a proper source and date (year) we cannot tell if it is copyrighted, so the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. The artist died in 1944, so any copyright should have expired 95 years after that, and the file can be restored in 2040. Rosenzweig τ 11:12, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- At lower right of the painting, the artist signed his name (HM Kitchell), and dated it 1920. Pmc80 (talk) 01:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD-US-expired; the en-WP article states he had exhibits in the 1920s, so I think we can assume that this counts for publication purposes. —holly {chat} 21:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The author (the copyright holder, see https://www.facebook.com/hggtalk) is alive, the licenses are not valid (the photo published later than 1975; the photo was not in public domain on the URAA date in Taiwan; about the URAA date in Taiwan please refer to https://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ38a.pdf), the file uploaded without written consent from the author showing at the file description page. --Lokseng01 (talk) 12:33, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 21:37, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The page of source does not exist and we have no proof that this is a VOA work. VOA does not have staff in Iran and cannot create a photograph from an orchestra in Iran, and we also know VOA publishes photos from AP, AFP, etc. sometimes without credit. HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:30, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; could not find the page in Internet Archive and there was no license review. —holly {chat} 21:55, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Unused text-only image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:56, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Edenaviv5. —holly {chat} 21:55, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Unused text diagram, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:01, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- I needed it as an image for use elsewhere, especially as one cannot type in this text. Edenaviv5 (talk) 15:00, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 21:58, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Unused text diagrams, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope.
- File:Sino-Tibetan language family groups.jpg
- File:Uralic Languages.png
- File:Celtic languages.png
- File:Altaic Language tree.jpg
- File:Germanic language tree.jpg
- File:Triangle of Violence (English).png
- File:Romance Language tree with language status.jpg
- File:Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis.jpg
- File:The four vedas flowchart.jpg
.png){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:07, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- I made all of these myself. I have them in my Google Doodles. Edenaviv5 (talk) 14:57, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Also re: the claim that these could be text is not accurate. The shape and relation of these matters, hence their use as images. Edenaviv5 (talk) 15:03, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep 75% of all images are unused, and we supply images to all third parties, not just wikis. --RAN (talk) 04:19, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- "Unused" is not the deletion reason. They are text-only diagrams, which are out of scope if unused. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:09, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- If you immediately delete it because it's not used (to your knowledge), how is anyone meant to find and use it? I created this because I needed a public domain image file of the Germanic language tree, so I produced it and published it in the public domain. Edenaviv5 (talk) 00:52, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
- Also, again, the reason they are diagrams is because the visual relationship of material matters. They could not be done through text alone. Edenaviv5 (talk) 00:53, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
- "Unused" is not the deletion reason. They are text-only diagrams, which are out of scope if unused. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:09, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 21:58, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
This is a derived work of the text and pictures in the display board, and hence a copyright violation. Freedom of panorama in the UK doesn't extend to graphic or literary works, and the information board is the main subject of the picture and hence not de minimis. bjh21 (talk) 15:41, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 21:58, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
It seems Kosovo law applies to this photograph, and per source it was taken some 50 years ago. So it would be still protected. HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:13, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 22:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Questionable own work claim, no metadata, low quality HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:25, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan
- It's a photo posted to the public.SinaM2 (talk) 16:40, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- @SinaM2 Have you taken this photo? HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:44, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan
- Hello, yes, I took the photo myself SinaM2 (talk) 18:09, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- @SinaM2 Please upload the original version of the photograph you took so that we can see the metadata. Also for File:Sarbaz (Sistan and Baluchistan).jpg. HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:28, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan
- Hello, I thought you know more than me, the internet in Iran is terrible. I can hardly upload a picture. Now how can I access information from several years ago. Bandan is our village. I can prove that I took the picture years ago with a different phone. I change my phone every few months, the previous file cannot be found, but I can prove that I am a Sarbaz.
- I just got a video of the soldier. This is the village of Bandan[3].
- I just took the picture of the Sarbaz (Sistan and Baluchistan) see[4]. SinaM2 (talk) 21:21, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan
- Just know that I do not intend to copy. Thankful SinaM2 (talk) 21:24, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan
- I put the full version of YouTube 7 days.
- An original unedited version of Bandana SinaM2 (talk) 21:49, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- @SinaM2 Tineye shows that this picture was available on the internet on Sep 24, 2017, you uploaded this file in May 2021. The only way for you to prove that you took it is to upload the original file with metadata. HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:05, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan
- I told you, I took this photo several years ago. I shared the photo on Instagram, only my friends share it on Instagram, I have no reason to copy someone else's photo. Because I can take the photo again, but this photo is the best photo I could take years ago. Please don't let it be deleted. The consequences of someone saying it is a copy are with me. Please don't let it be deleted.SinaM2 (talk) 19:02, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan
- As you can see, I am filming and taking photos in my village. I request you to make a correct decision. The internet and antenna are weak here.SinaM2 (talk) 22:33, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan [Bandan,Sarbaz]
- See the date of the photos shared for the first time on my father's Instagram page.SinaM2 (talk) 20:24, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- @SinaM2 Tineye shows that this picture was available on the internet on Sep 24, 2017, you uploaded this file in May 2021. The only way for you to prove that you took it is to upload the original file with metadata. HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:05, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- @SinaM2 Please upload the original version of the photograph you took so that we can see the metadata. Also for File:Sarbaz (Sistan and Baluchistan).jpg. HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:28, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- @SinaM2 Have you taken this photo? HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:44, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
![[4]](https://s9.uupload.ir/files/sinam2/IMG_20230505_233912_550.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: I accept the uploader's explanation. —holly {chat} 22:19, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Questionable own work claim, no metadata, low quality HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:25, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @HeminKurdistan
- This is our city how can I not add a photo I have no reason to copy the photo
- SinaM2 (talk) 16:58, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- @SinaM2 Have you taken this photo? HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan
- Hello, yes, I took the photo myselfSinaM2 (talk) 18:08, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- @SinaM2 Have you taken this photo? HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: I accept the uploader's explanation. —holly {chat} 22:19, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope: Excluded educational content. Better hosted elsewhere. Headlock0225 (talk) 17:07, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- I've been reading thru the excluded content in COM:SCOPE. These files are scientific journals coming from Royal Society Open Science. Almost all of the files in Category:Journals from Royal Society Open Science are embedded with graphs, images and tables. These media serve important role and help in projecting a complete picture of the content in the article. Thus, I believe they're in scope. See also, my explanation for the same question in the bot approval Commons:Bots/Requests/DaxBot -- DaxServer (talk) 16:58, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: As the bot's purpose was approved, these files should be considered within scope. —holly {chat} 22:21, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
This is the full song from the Game Boy version of Tetris, which is copyrighted by Nintendo. LucianoTheWindowsFan (talk) 21:05, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete and move to enwiki. There it can be cropped and used on the article about Tetris, qualifying as fair use. Thiscouldbeauser (talk) 13:40, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 22:21, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Это какой-то детский рисунок в paint. -Туча (talk) 21:48, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: It's not any worse than File:Roche.gif. —holly {chat} 22:23, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
May be a copyright: KMSP/Paris 2024 has free license this photo? VRT ticket may be needed Ezarateesteban 22:55, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: See also File:Tony Estanguet à la Philharmonie de Paris.jpg. -- Asclepias (talk) 11:17, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: both per nomination and ordered universal replacements. —holly {chat} 22:29, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bedivere as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Although it is the work of an unknown author possibly from 1960 (no evidence this is correct) there has been no effort made to find the actual date or author of this work and so it cannot be kept Chile is 70 PMA so a 1960 work would not have entered the public domain especially one that appears to have been published in 1960. Converting to DR for discussion. Abzeronow (talk) 15:50, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- It could have expired if copyright expired before 1993 (IIRC) when the copyright law was amended to expand the protection from 30 to 50 years (and then again to 70 years in the 2000s). Law is not retroactive though Bedivere (talk) 15:53, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Ah, OK. COM:Chile does not have this information. Abzeronow (talk) 15:56, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- So we know the arrest date was 1960-09-19, so we know the date of the photo, and this being a big news story, we can assume it was published shortly afterward. The question becomes, do we know who the photographer was? It's going to be either a member of the police or the press. The source page credits the Gendarmería de Chile for the photo, but I could not connect to [5] to search the archives. If it turns out the photographer name is not recorded, then {{PD-Chile}} looks like it would apply. Maybe some other people could try to get to that website? —holly {chat} 22:13, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per remark of Bedivere. --Ellywa (talk) 21:56, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
