Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/04/02
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Out of the scope Michel Bakni (talk) 09:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributor. --Wutsje 12:37, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Out of the scope Michel Bakni (talk) 09:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributor. --Wutsje 12:38, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
надто великий розмір файлу Ольга Гнатишин (talk) 01:44, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:41, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Uploaded wrong file/depicted person only wants the cropped version to be available Kristbaum (talk) 09:41, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
uploaded wrong file/depicted person only wants the cropped version to be available Kristbaum (talk) 09:42, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Geo Location accidentally included - please delete first version of the image.Thanks! Spritekollision (talk) 11:05, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: kept the file as such, deleted the first file version as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:37, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Sadeyedlady4u2 (talk) 13:17, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:32, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
I have to get a 92.61.202.175 13:22, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, nonsense request. --Rosenzweig τ 13:33, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Plecia gigantea♀︎Nicolas Théobald cotype éch. R914 p. 226 pl. VI diptères du Sannoisien de KleinKembs 1937.jpg
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Philippe rogez as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: image sur fond noir périmée, non utilisée et remplacée Philippe rogez (talk) 00:20, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 11:10, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
他使用了我朋友的照片,我朋友表示想將它刪除,因為並沒有經過他的同意,屬於惡意盜用 馬緯杰 (talk) 20:03, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 11:05, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Uploader request deletion. Redundant and not licensed file. Nightmoon55 (talk) 20:33, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 11:05, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Uploader request deletion. Redundant file. Nightmoon55 (talk) 20:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 11:04, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by TE(æ)A,ea. as Speedy (sdelete) and the most recent rationale was: so it can be updated: normal reupload tool broken}} It is in use. What's the issue with reuploading? Yann (talk) 21:14, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Yann: When I try to upload over this file, it times out after about half a minute, and kicks me back to Special:Upload. I tried the other thing (from the “Upload file” button), but it tells me to use the reupload tool, which, of course, does not work. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 21:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- This is not surprising, seeing the size of the book. Did you try Rillke's Chunked upload? Yann (talk) 22:02, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Yann: I haven’t set that up. Could you do that if I uploaded the file at a temporary name? TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 22:06, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- This is not surprising, seeing the size of the book. Did you try Rillke's Chunked upload? Yann (talk) 22:02, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Merged. --Yann (talk) 07:11, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded the file and thought about it now. The content is not appropriate for Wikimedia Commons and Wikpedia respectively. I wrote my user name on the woman's body using a lipstick. Therefore the picture is useless for any article. Tommy Prinz Nürnberg (talk) 22:18, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Gbawden. --Rosenzweig τ 11:04, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Hoax/fake & invalid source, see comments on File talk:Azov people with nazi flag.jpg. Also [1] and [2]. Regardless it having been forged or not, we have no author, no source, no license, no permission. Achim55 (talk) 17:17, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - hoax, fake (see hoaxeye). --Julo (talk) 14:01, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Withdraw No evidence that this image is in the public domain. The claim of meeting pma+100 for a colour photograph of a Roman building uncovered during construction in 1970 is dubious at best. Whpq (talk) 20:32, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
My mistake. That's a picture of an image panel on the house and not a portion of the house. -- Whpq (talk) 12:24, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 13:50, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 06:21, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Sory, this is a violant personal attack and should be deleted asap. -- Mdd (talk) 01:48, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted, speedily as content created for threat or attack. Taivo (talk) 08:25, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
{{Duplicate}} نعم البدل (talk) 23:17, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- @نعم البدل: What file is this a duplicate of? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:10, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Mdaniels5757: File:LL-Q58635 (pan)-نعم البدل-گھنٹا.wav. Basically I got the language code mixed up when I did the original recording, and was a bit impatient, so I recorded a new file and used that instead نعم البدل (talk) 04:09, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: F8. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:29, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Make renaming another file to this name possible WWBM (talk) 18:27, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- I'm sorry. I nominated this file to deletion by mistake. Pls cancel my file delete request, I just wanted to remove redirect WWBM (talk) 18:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Achim55 (talk) 17:57, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
The artist died in 1992. COM:FOP Netherlands explicity says that there is "no freedom of panorama [Not ok] for photographs, maps, applied art, industrial design, and models". This work is still copyrighted until 70 years after the artist's death had been passed, which will happen in 2063. 83.61.231.21 17:20, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Keep The source has a CC Zero license and declares that the mususeum got the painting on loan from the Rijksdienst voor het Cultureel Erfgoed. The latter authority is charged with conserving national heritage sites and other items of national importance. So it seems the Rijksdienst acquired the rights for the painting and we can use either {{Cc-0-heirs}} or just {{Cc-zero}}. De728631 (talk) 17:55, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- @De728631: Your reasoning, and those later added by both @Tm and @Vysotsky seems to be convincing. However, I think that it would be better to remove the PD tags and keep only the CC-zero one (or in alternative, {{Cc-0-heirs}}) for avoid future similar issues. For my part I see no reason to consider, with this evidence, that the file could be a possible copyright violation and, therefore, I withdraw my nomination. 83.61.231.21 11:53, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Keep Per De728631. Both dutch and english versions of the wesite [http://hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.5279 say in "Acquisition and rights" that "Credit line" is "On loan from the Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands, Amersfoort", the "Acquisition" was on "loan 1961" and it´s "Copyright" is "Public domain". Tm (talk) 18:31, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Keep The Rijksmuseum Amsterdam is meticilously correct in displaying actual licenses to images. Most likely option: the copyright of this ceremonial portrait (crowning of Dutch Queen Juliana), commissioned by the Dutch government, was transferred to the Dutch state. The painting was damaged while in the Dutch embassy in Jakarta. Vysotsky (talk) 22:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept, Nomination withdrawn by 83.61.231.21 11:53, 3 April 2023 (UTC) -- Mdd (talk) 13:56, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy © Council of Europe, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:26, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy Government of Bermuda, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:27, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy British Chambers of Commerce, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:27, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy Government of Bermuda, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:28, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy Government of Bermuda, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:28, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy Government of Bermuda, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:28, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy Government of Bermuda, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:28, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy The Council of the European Union, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy Government of Bermuda, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy NATO, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The image has VRT permission to be hosted on Commons. I doubt that would be the case if anything was questionable about the license. Otherwise the nominator should take it up with the Volunteer Response Team. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:56, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. "Note: This permission only extends to content provided by the FCDO and does not include third-party content.". —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy Belgian Presidency of the Council of the European Union, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:30, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The image has VRT permission to be hosted on Commons. I doubt that would be the case if anything was questionable about the license. Otherwise the nominator should take it up with the Volunteer Response Team. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:55, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy Bjarke Ørsted / eu2012.dk, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:31, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The image has VRT permission to be hosted on Commons. I doubt that would be the case if anything was questionable about the license. Otherwise the nominator should take it up with the Volunteer Response Team. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:56, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy Belgian Presidency of the Council of the European Union, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Foreign Secretary with Lene Espersen, Danish Minister for Foreign Affairs (5464485597).jpg
[edit]Picture courtesy The Council of the European Union, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:36, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy UN Photo/Mark Garten, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:36, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo courtesy United Nations/Jean-Marc Ferré, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:36, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The image has VRT permission to be hosted on Commons. I doubt that would be the case if anything was questionable about the license. Otherwise the nominator should take it up with the Volunteer Response Team. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:56, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy F. de la Mure / MAEE, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:37, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy Bjarke Ørsted / eu2012.dk, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:38, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy UN Photo/Mark Garten, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:38, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy Bjarke Ørsted/ eu2012.dk, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:38, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy UN Photo/JC McIlwaine, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy C. Bailleul / MAEE, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy UN Photo/Lou Rouse, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:40, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy pl2011.eu / Krzysztof Mystkowski / KFP, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:40, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy NATO, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:40, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy Gustavo Ferreira/ Ministério das Relações Exteriores, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:41, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy Gustavo Ferreira/ Ministério das Relações Exteriores, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:42, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The image has VRT permission to be hosted on Commons. I doubt that would be the case if anything was questionable about the license. Otherwise the nominator should take it up with the Volunteer Response Team. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:56, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Arrival at the Informal Meeting of Ministers of Foreign Affairs (Gymnich) in Pafos, Cyprus (7948985160).jpg
[edit]Picture courtesy Cyprus Presidency of the Council of the European Union, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:42, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Service of commemoration for the British Antarctic 'Terra Nova' Expedition (7027162387).jpg
[edit]Picture courtesy Julian Calder, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:43, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy Pete Bucktrout, British Antarctic Survey, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:44, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy NATO, not a work from the FCDO, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:44, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Picture courtesy of Murray Council, not a work from the Scottish Government, thus the CC license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:51, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete On top of that the EXIF information says the image is copyrighted by Ewen Weatherspoon. So the image is clearly COPYVIO. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:58, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Per warning: Post-1975 Italian image was copyrighted in USA A1Cafel (talk) 07:06, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per the nominator. There's zero evidence the image is released under a free license. Especially since the photographer died in 2017. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:00, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Image credit: AP Photo/Alastair Grant, not a work from the Number 10, thus the CC license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 08:28, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:27, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
No FOP Iran. MehdiTalk 08:44, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:27, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
No FOP Iran. MehdiTalk 08:45, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:27, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from the US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:05, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per the nominator. Not really much else to say about it besides what they have. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:05, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:05, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:07, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:07, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:07, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:08, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:09, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:09, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:12, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:12, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:14, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:14, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:14, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:14, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:14, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:14, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:15, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:15, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:16, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:16, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:16, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:16, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:16, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:16, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:17, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:17, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo by David Sachs / SEIU, not a work from US HUD, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:17, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:2015 Secretary's Awards
[edit]Images by Kaz Sasahara. All rights reserved, not a work from the U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, thus the PD license is invalid
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19695364344).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19695366224).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19695369644).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19695370554).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19695370934).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19695371734).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19695373134).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19695375794).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19695377184).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19695384114).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19695384734).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19695384894).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19695386424).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19697020153).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19697021433).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19697021663).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19697021943).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19697024733).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19697026373).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19697027763).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19697029783).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19697029983).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19697030603).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19697030773).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19697031243).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19697031633).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19697032553).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19697032683).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19697036183).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19697038793).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19697039573).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19697042743).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (19697043063).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20129978900).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20129980940).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20129981618).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20129982550).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20129983468).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20129984418).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20129985018).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20129985798).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20129989108).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20129989758).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20129990758).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20129992988).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20129993290).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20129993518).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20129993878).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20129997258).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20129997570).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20129998460).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20129998890).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20130000068).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20130005048).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20131381909).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20131382169).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20131382969).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20131383789).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20131385509).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20131385889).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20131386879).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20131387399).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20131388799).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20131389409).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20131390759).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20131393739).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20131396629).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20131399769).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20131401669).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20131401849).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20131403109).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20131403579).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20291764016).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20291764746).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20291765606).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20291766876).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20291768836).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20291773546).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20291776816).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20291777686).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20291778996).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20291779956).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20291780786).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20291781936).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20291782376).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20291782476).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20291783326).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20291785186).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20291787986).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20291788696).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20291789476).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20309595172).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20309596362).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20309596952).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20309599632).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20309599762).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20309600062).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20309603122).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20309606792).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20309610652).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20309611472).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20309613422).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20309616012).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20309620762).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20318010545).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20318014645).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20318021175).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20318023255).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20318024865).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20318025395).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20318026795).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20318028965).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20324020951).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20324022061).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20324023861).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20324026861).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20324028661).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20324031701).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20324033521).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20324034381).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20324035341).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20324035571).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20324036281).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20324038101).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20324040141).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20324040481).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20324042331).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20324043021).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20324043341).jpg
- File:2015 Secretary's Awards (20324046741).jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 09:18, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The images are clearly copyrighted by Kaz Sasahara per the EXIF information. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:06, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:30, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
No FOP Iran. MehdiTalk 18:10, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:35, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
No FOP Iran. MehdiTalk 18:12, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:35, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
"Photo by Quentin Kruger (Contractor)". A contractor is not a government employee. Abzeronow (talk) 18:33, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:35, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
No FOP Iran. MehdiTalk 18:38, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:33, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MexTDT as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10}}== {{int:filedesc DaB. (talk) 20:21, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Does not look like a selfie for me. As far as I see it is from a 4x400m sprint. --DaB. (talk) 20:22, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- The user is the sprinter. It might not be a selfie in the strict sense but it is a personal photo, used in the user’s page on eswiki and the user has admitted it was an self biography.[3] Therefore, it fits the F10 rationale.MexTDT (talk) 20:27, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The problem with this photo is that the author mentioned in the metadata is Sergio Mateo María - Europa Press, not the uploader. That is the only reason I support deletion, but it's a fundamental reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:54, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per IK. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:33, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
My name is Alexandru Maftei, this is a picture of me that was used by a friend without my consent. I don't want him to get in trouble, I only want this image to be removed from the internet as it is very unprofessionnal and it's one of the first results when you type my name on Google. 92.184.100.237 20:30, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete by courtesy, uploader seems to agree with deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 20:44, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:32, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
I made this map incorrectly, and as it portrays inaccurate information, I am hereby requesting that Wikipedia delete the file from Wikimedia Commons, so as to prevent misinformation. Alexcs114 (talk) 21:47, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:32, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Googlemaps Copyvio Enyavar (talk) 22:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:32, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Category:Profiles 186.173.79.57 23:00, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: F10 --Achim55 (talk) 07:46, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:31, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
out of com:PS Hanooz 00:34, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:46, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Per FBMD... in beginning of special instructions field of metadata, the photo is previously published in Facebook. All previously published files must have evidence of free license, for example VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:33, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:47, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Seems to be a screenshot of an aircraft simulator. Permission needed. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:47, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Seems to be a screenshot of an aircraft simulator. Permission needed. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:47, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Seems to be a screenshot of an aircraft simulator. Permission needed. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:47, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Newspapers are usually copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 12:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:47, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
No FOP Iran. MehdiTalk 13:48, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:47, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
1935 American photograph. Could be public domain. Richard Foss is the historian who apparently provided the photograph but didn't take the photograph. Would need more info on photo's provenance to keep. Abzeronow (talk) 16:50, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:48, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
2022 New Zealand photograph. Subject to Crown copyright, which has a copyright term of publication plus 100 years. Source also says "Copyright © 2023 Nelson City Council. All Rights Reserved " at the bottom of the page. Abzeronow (talk) 17:04, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:48, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
No FOP Iran. MehdiTalk 18:21, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:48, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
No FOP Iran. MehdiTalk 18:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:48, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
copyrighted logo, copyrighted layout Krd 07:07, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:58, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Incorrect depiction of a radical. Have File:Methyl-radical-2D-structure.svg as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:50, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 13:12, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is sdifferent from the author in the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:03, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:10, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:14, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:10, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Um, this is not how copyright works. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:20, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, unless evidence of permission can be established. Salavat (talk) 04:01, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Aaaarg, no... Nice catch! --MGA73 (talk) 07:15, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability https://www.youtube.com/@mrh-experiment8540 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:12, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Screenshot of a website CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:45, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:12, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:46, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete no freedom of panorama for graphic works in public spaces in the U.S. like signs with elaborate designs. Utah is also not one of the states that default to copyright-free licensing (unlike a few states like Florida and Massachusetts) as per COM:United States#US States. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:33, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE Ameisenigel (talk) 06:46, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Berrs1 (talk) 21:02, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:17, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
non-free logo Khinkali (talk) 22:15, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Gallery now redundant due to move into by-year galleries. Hullian111 (talk) 22:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Hullian111: For future reference, this could have been COM:CSD#U1. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
out of scope: fictional crystal ball speculation as of now Enyavar (talk) 22:38, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Fortaleza, Brazil - Brasil, Ceará (38956981552).jpg. Porto Neto (talk) 23:21, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:20, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Reason for the nomination: ICC Logos are not free use by default and there is no documentation to state so on the source page. Sputink (talk) 13:01, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. User's other uploads are copyvio. No demonstration that this is otherwise. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 15:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Clear copyvio. --Herby talk thyme 13:42, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Inferior to, and uploaded after, File:Twitter-logo.svg. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:09, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 17:27, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hilton Cleveland Downtown
[edit]No COM:FOP US for murals.
- File:Greetings from Cleveland (24195943364).jpg
- File:Greetings from Cleveland (24730683291).jpg
- File:Greetings from Cleveland (24797838756).jpg
- File:Greetings from Cleveland (24797867686).jpg
- File:Greetings from Cleveland (24824047075).jpg
- File:Greetings from Cleveland (24824147245).jpg
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 21:10, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kiaghaffarii (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Team photographs of some association football teams and players. Some photographs have annoying watermarks, which may suggest that the uploader is not the photographer.
- File:IMG-team.jpg
- File:Sorkhpoushan.jpg
- File:Ghaffari.jpg
- File:Sorkhpoushanteam.jpg
- File:Imageghaffari.jpg
- File:Amirghaffari7.jpg
- File:Amirghaffari2.jpg
- File:Amirghaffari3.jpg
- File:Amirghaffari1.jpg
Lymantria (talk) 14:53, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Aside from the nominator said all the images also appear to be lacking EXIF information which hints at license washing, or at least that the images weren't taken by the uploader. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:10, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 21:11, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lkkkssssskk (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:OOS
- File:Capture d’écran du 2021-12-30 12-09-47.png
- File:Capture d’écran du 2021-12-30 12-05-53.png
- File:Capture d’écran du 2021-12-30 11-57-51.png
- File:Capture d’écran du 2021-12-30 11-42-53.png
- File:Capture d’écran du 2021-12-30 10-57-12.png
- File:Capture d’écran du 2021-12-30 10-43-59.png
- File:Capture d’écran du 2021-12-30 10-35-43.png
- File:Capture d’écran du 2021-12-30 10-21-03.png
- File:Capture d’écran du 2021-12-30 10-12-45.png
- File:Capture d’écran du 2021-12-30 10-11-47.png
- File:Capture d’écran du 2021-12-30 10-07-29.png
A09090091 (talk) 17:15, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:49, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lkkkssssskk (talk · contribs)
[edit]These three images appear to contain CopyVios from a mapservice, and not own work - likely the composite satellite+bathymetry map of GoogleEarth. If they come from open source instead, the origin needs to be stated to keep the files.
- File:Tasmania satellite vue.png
- File:Capture d’écran du 2022-01-01 13-51-24.png
- File:Capture d’écran du 2021-12-31 19-12-09.png
Enyavar (talk) 19:00, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Also sources for both photos are missing for last two pictures, currently we don't know full copyright states of either of those. Speedy delete For last 2 files. A09 (talk) 19:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Looking at that, the uploads may all be suspicious, but I stick to content I know. Enyavar (talk) 06:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 21:13, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Is same picture as at IMDB ( https://m.imdb.com/title/tt15793462/ ) so that looks very suspicious; uploader is globally blocked so asking questions on the uploader's talk page won't help. Robotje (talk) 07:23, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:13, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Dubious ownership claim: [4] Gyrostat (talk) 13:16, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 04:10, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Already a file with the same content is there and over that the uploader claims it as own ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 13:42, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate of File:180515 TenAsia Bang Chan photoshoot.png. --✗plicit 04:08, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:04, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:23, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: used to be a stock picture according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:21, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:23, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
copyright promotional image - https://www.kpopmap.com/brazilian-to-moons-surprise-oneus-with-touching-projects-at-their-reach-for-us-concert/ Evaders99 (talk) 00:26, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability, unidentifiable person CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:33, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:23, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nisacha1234 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of com:PS
- File:پادکست جهان آرمانی.jpg
- File:لوگو جهان آرمانی.jpg
- File:کتاب تهمینه.pdf
- File:کتاب قضاوت خدا.pdf
- File:کتاب دمحمحیسم.pdf
- File:کتاب آلت پرستان.pdf
- File:امضا نیما شهسواری.jpg
- File:نیما شهسواری 4.jpg
- File:نیما شهسواری 3.jpg
- File:نیما شهسواری 2.jpg
- File:نیما شهسواری.jpg
- File:Nima Shahsavari.jpg
Hanooz 00:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Many of these are COM:INUSE on Wikidata. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:22, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Mdaniels5757 Done Wikidata item has been deleted. Hanooz 16:48, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:24, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Screenshot of an app CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:25, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a website CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:50, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: {{PD-textlogo}} but seems to be out of COM:SCOPE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:22, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:Mdaniels5757. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:25, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a website CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:51, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Hi! I confirm that this is my own work, I have authorization to use the logo and it was created specifically for this publication, that means that has not been published on any other site before. I would appreciate not canceling it, thanks!! Sofi.Vuotto (talk) 17:01, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a company CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:57, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: redundant to File:Windows logo - 2012 (dark blue).svg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:27, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Dubious ownership claim: [5] Gyrostat (talk) 01:38, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
some mistake in this fail. Binay babu (talk) 02:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, and above COM:TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Chsdrummajor07 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7. Too old for G7, converting. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:40, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Useful, and I don't understand the desire to delete it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused file (only uploaded a couple of weeks ago) - many alternatives in its category. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
صفحة الغلاف ليست في الملكية العامة Dew (talk) 04:28, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
unauthorized copy of https://eng2.lacity.org/newsletters/newsletter_vOpenFile.cfm?serverFilePath=e%3A%5Cboedata%5Cnewsletters%5C2011%5C03%2D09%2D11%20Newsletter%2Epdf Chuck Entz (talk) 04:42, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
erreur de téléversement Aboubacarkhoraa (talk) 05:18, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:34, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
no source no author no permission Hoyanova (talk) 05:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
no source no metadata no author no permission Hoyanova (talk) 05:36, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Better versions here 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 05:47, 2 April 2023 (UTC) I withdraw the deletion request. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 10:47, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep This is the png version, the other copies are jpg, we keep both. --RAN (talk) 05:00, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:36, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Qualité faible en plus de l'erreur de téléversement Aboubacarkhoraa (talk) 05:53, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. But is this really your own work? If not, don't upload again. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:37, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Original work by Zeekakboos on Reddit. Work uploaded without permission Zeekakboos (talk) 06:22, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:38, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Not suitable for commons in terms of copyright... Neriah (talk) 09:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:39, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
copyvio, foto of the page of recent book Nikolay Omonov (talk) 09:24, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:39, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
copyvio, image of the page of recent book (1991) Nikolay Omonov (talk) 09:26, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:39, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted Materials Michel Bakni (talk) 09:47, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:40, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted Materials Michel Bakni (talk) 09:48, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:40, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
wrong date, probably wrong author and source Xocolatl (talk) 09:59, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:40, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
The true author of this piece of art is Harry Carlson and is not 'Own work' by the uploader Harry Carlson was born in 1963 and is presumably still alive. His work is definitely not in the public domain (see here)
Geerestein3 (talk) 10:43, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:41, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
The true author of this piece of art is Harry Carlson and is not 'Own work' by the uploader Harry Carlson was born in 1963 and is presumably still alive. His work is definitely not in the public domain (see here) Geerestein3 (talk) 10:47, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:41, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
First, the uploader claims that the source is Unknown. That's absurd. They certainly know where they found it. Second, a 1975 image would have been PD in Mexico in 2005 under the old thirty year rule. That means it has a URAA copyright expiring around 2070. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:50, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- First, if it is so absurd that the source of the image is unknown, why do you not provide its origin? It is a photographic file that did not clarify its source data, and that was improved with the Remini application to increase its number of pixels. Second, according to 1996-2018 Art. 153: Anonymous works are considered in the public domain until the author or the owner of the rights are identified. Cementeɾo (talk) 23:06, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Just because the uploader doesn't know who the author is doesn't mean it is anonymous. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:45, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
First, the uploader claims that the source is Unknown. That's absurd. They certainly know where they found it. Second, it has a URAA copyright which will expire around 2070 . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:54, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- It is a photographic file that first appeared on the internet on April 19, 2020 by the TUDN television channel, and has been used by other media such as AS México or 90min.com. However, none of these media have clarified the origin of the photograph, therefore, according to 1996-2018 Art. 153: Anonymous works are considered in the public domain until the author or the owner of the rights are identified. Cementeɾo (talk) 23:27, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. "none of these media have clarified the origin of the photograph" - that is not the same as anonymous. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:44, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
The newspaper, Excélsior. certainly had a copyright on this image and knew who took it. It also has a URAA copyright which will expire in 2072 . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:44, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
This is a photo of a copyrighted map and the uploader does not have rights to the map. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Turkey Furius (talk) 11:15, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:44, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
file with low resolution / file size and no EXIF; very doubtful that this is an own work DCB (talk) 11:57, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- This is to 100 percent my own work. It was a video at the beginning and I just screenshoted it from my own video. This was recorded on my iphone 13 pro. Kareem Mouaz 020 (talk) 13:30, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:47, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Linkedin PP, dubious ownership claim. Gyrostat (talk) 12:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Hello Gyrostat, why do you request for this image to be deleted? What does "dubious ownerschip claim" mean? The use of this foto has been approved by both the photographer (credited bij name, "Bas Bogaerts") ànd its subject - Walter Rycquart. So what exactly is the problem here? Thanks for advizing - regards Filip020169 (talk) 13:26, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- The credit to the photographer is not mentionned anywhere, you claimed this is your own work. If the photographer agreed to this photo being published under licence CC-BY-SA 4.0, we need his permission. He can submit his permission through VRT. Gyrostat (talk) 13:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:47, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Sergi batiste and Stasi Sanlin
[edit]- File:Meli perea.jpg
- File:M00353--2.jpg
- File:Meliphoto.jpg
- File:Khor Khaffan 1.png
- File:Khor Khaffan 2.png
- File:Khor Khaffan 3.png
- File:Khor Khaffan 4.png
- File:Khor Khaffan 5.png
- File:Khor Khaffan 6.png
- File:Khor Khaffan 7.png
- File:Khor Khaffan 8.png
The uploader is not the author, as confirmed in this deletion request https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:M00353--2.jpg --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:47, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and per this edit. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:52, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Published on FB a few hours before Commons, same resolution and no metada ; dubious ownership claim. Gyrostat (talk) 12:53, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Muggensturm-Maria Koenigin der Engel-Kreuzweg-108-Jesus begegnet den weinenden Frauen-gje.jpg
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Gerd Eichmann as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: same subject as File:Muggensturm-Maria Koenigin der Engel-Kreuzweg-08-Jesus begegnet den weinenden Frauen-gje.jpg Too old for G7, converting to DR. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 12:58, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redundant. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:53, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Muggensturm-Maria Koenigin der Engel-Kreuzweg-109-Jesus faellt zum dritten Mal unter dem Kreuz-gje.jpg
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Gerd Eichmann as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: same subject as File:Muggensturm-Maria Koenigin der Engel-Kreuzweg-09-Jesus faellt zum dritten Mal unter dem Kreuz-gje.jpg Too old for G7, converting to DR. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 12:58, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redundant. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:53, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Muggensturm-Maria Koenigin der Engel-Kreuzweg-110-Jesus wird seiner Kleider beraubt-gje.jpg
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Gerd Eichmann as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: same subject as File:Muggensturm-Maria Koenigin der Engel-Kreuzweg-10-Jesus wird seiner Kleider beraubt-gje.jpg Too old for G7, converting to DR. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 12:58, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redundant. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:53, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Vujcic as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Don't even remember uploading this. Please delete. Too old for G7, converting to DR. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 12:58, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
As nominator, I will support deletion of this photo. Vujcic (talk) 15:18, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of graph without clear purpose. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:54, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Dubious ownership claim, seems to be copyrighted by Barley Damarod Gyrostat (talk) 13:09, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Sadeyedlady4u2 (talk) 13:27, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- You can calmly delete it. It is not an important photo certainly.
- Random photos 1989 (talk) 13:48, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- No, se debe conservar. Es una foto de arte. Ustedes no entienden... 191.126.60.228 21:34, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and uploader's agreement. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:00, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Poor quality image and is this even free? 2600:100C:A21A:B5A1:D970:B087:2B49:7045 13:44, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. I see no issues with the Flickr source. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:01, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Likely copied from another work given the label 'Figura 8' below the image. Mindmatrix 14:30, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:04, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Own work? 186.173.71.200 14:34, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:06, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Scope? Educational contribution? 186.173.71.200 14:36, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:07, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
There is scope, but ask for otrs. 186.173.71.200 14:37, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- And categorize her. 186.173.71.200 14:41, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:07, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Cover page without otrs 186.173.71.200 14:38, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:07, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
This appears to be copyrighted artwork from a website. No evidence of permission to upload here. Bri (talk) 14:43, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:09, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Is there an obligation to import from Flickr any woman you like? Download these pictures to your personal computer please. Commons Is not a spam box. 186.173.71.200 14:44, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:09, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MilkyDefer as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Current CC-BY-SA 3.0 license is clearly impossible for this file. It also seems clear to me that this file is above the threshold of originality. Converting to DR: very widely used. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Bonjour, j'ai créé cette image en utilisant une autre image comme calque donc elle ne respecte pas le seuil d'originalité.
- Hello, I create this image by myself using another image as layer so it not respect the threshold of originality.
- What is DR? --Jesmar (fr) discussion / (en) discuss 19:36, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- DR is deletion request, I would like to wait for others' opinions. MilkyDefer 03:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- So we can add Template:PD-textlogo and Template:Trademarked and keep the file? --Jesmar (fr) discussion / (en) discuss 16:00, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- If people agree that this file is really simple enough, then sure, tag it like that and the file is kept.
- The only problem is that we (or you) need to convince people that this file IS simple enough such that {{PD-textlogo}} actually holds. MilkyDefer 16:55, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Wait and see 1 2 --Jesmar (fr) discussion / (en) discuss 13:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Yes and I am also notifying enwiki and zhwiki fellows. This is really no easy decision. MilkyDefer 14:24, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- So we can add Template:PD-textlogo and Template:Trademarked and keep the file? --Jesmar (fr) discussion / (en) discuss 16:00, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- DR is deletion request, I would like to wait for others' opinions. MilkyDefer 03:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- The Zelda logo is well above the US's and Japan's threshold of originality (this is far more than a collection of simple shapes). A recreation of that logo is going to be a derivative work and must have the same copyright issues as the original. So this should be deleted. Masem (talk) 14:38, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- I don't see any valid reason for this logo to be used. It's very much within the copyright domain due to it being a copy of a copyrighted logo, but it's not being used to illustrate any articles i.e. The Legend of Zelda. I think it should be deleted. --ProtoDrake (talk) 14:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - falls above TOO in the US. – Pbrks (t • c) 15:10, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The original logo is above TOO. The creator admits this is a derivative of the original. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:DOTA-logo-wis.png. Either the original is below TOO (it's not), or any close copy (close enough to recognize and use) is a derivative of a copyrighted image. -- ferret (talk) 15:27, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Above the threshold for originality based on examples in Commons:Threshold of originality. czar 17:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Fails threshold of originality guidelines; should be fair use if used.Zxcvbnm (talk) 22:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:10, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
No realistic educational use. Unused. Headlock0225 (talk) 16:54, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- This is my OWN artwork, and I entered it in the Wiki Loves Folklore contest. Therefore, it very much should stay. I'm really tired of people trying to sabotage my entries. This is the second time. My pictures are here to STAY! Most Helpful (talk) 03:34, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- Please be assured that I am not attempting to sabotage your work. However Wikemedia Commons has strict
- Rules about the type of files that can be posted. Specifically files must fit within the Project Scope. You can read more about this here COM:PS. One of the requirements is that files "must be realistically useful for an educational purpose". Further down in COM:PS, it gives examples of files that are not in the Project Scope and includes "artwork without obvious educational use, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills".
- It is my opinion that your file does not fit into the Project Scope of Wikimedia Commons. It is not a slur on you or your artwork.
- My nomination for deletion Is open to review by all Users. A final decision will be made by an Administrator of Wikimedia Commons who have a lot more experience than me on what is is not acceptable. Headlock0225 (talk) 10:18, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- An artwork picture of the supposed Loch Ness Monster may well have educational value. I read a book of true stories stating that, long ago, people in MY HOME STATE found a giant water creature resembling the Loch Ness Monster! (I think that's awesome!) The book is called Tulsa's Haunted Memories, written by Teri French. If you do a Google search, you will find a description of the book that says, Tulsa's Haunted Memories explores the forgotten history and lost folklore of "America's Most Beautiful City." That's right... FOLKLORE! Exactly what Wiki loves. The book does not contain a picture of the creature. I simply did my own artwork of what I THINK the creature might have looked like. As for why it's in the toilet, well... that's just for fun! People HAVE found animals in their toilets, so I thought a picture depicting a supposed creature in a toilet would be fun and informative. Obviously, I couldn't take a REAL photo of the Loch Ness Monster (if I had, that picture would have won for sure!), so my only option was to do artwork of it. So again, I say this picture should stay. Thank you so much for your kind understanding, and I look forward to you seeing this beautiful photo here forever! Most Helpful (talk) 06:52, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:14, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Soskdjfjcjcjx (talk · contribs)
[edit]dubious sources, no evidence of free license
Avron (talk) 18:09, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:14, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:Redundant. This is the only upload by the user, which could also suggest his ignorance regarding the quality of vector images. — Baidax 💬 18:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:16, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
No information about the origial phohgraph that has been taken until 2000. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:32, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:15, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Self promotion - Selfie SurinameCentral (talk) 20:18, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:16, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
was replaced with a SVG Map with black Lines that is more Clearly visible. the light blue lines are not so easy on the eyes. replaced with https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Suriname_Resorts_Updated.svg SurinameCentral (talk) 20:05, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:17, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
was replaced with a SVG Map with black Lines that is more Clearly visible. the light blue lines are not so easy on the eyes. replaced with https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Suriname_Resorts_Updated.svg SurinameCentral (talk) 20:21, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:17, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Per The Christian Post, this photo is from the murdered subject's Facebook page. It is highly doubtful that the uploader bears the copyright privilege attached to this photo. Indy beetle (talk) 21:10, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:17, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The author is the model in the picture CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:36, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:18, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate Suaryaalhind (talk) 14:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: not duplicated and talk page don't get deleted. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate Suaryaalhind (talk) 14:54, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate Suaryaalhind (talk) 15:00, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate Suaryaalhind (talk) 15:03, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:3 Kalasha Thali.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:22, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo prise sur Google sans source Conquistador3 (talk) 19:31, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination, found all over the internet. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:35, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
photo perso que je souhaite retirer Conquistador3 (talk) 19:43, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:27, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
photo perso Conquistador3 (talk) 19:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused photo, alternatives available. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:28, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Contains a screenshot of a no longer available youtube video. The scene is originally from the Japanese TV show Mini-Moni which is not under a free license. Another video with the full scene for reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhy0tIbGs_0 Neriassel (talk) 20:09, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Do you think replacing the image with a free image and hiding the old version would work? I think it would be a waste to throw away the whole screenshot. Przemub (talk) 22:24, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Removing the video frame (and also the Pink Floyd album cover in the notification top left, I just noticed it) would solve the copyright related issues I think. The rest of the content on the image seems OK. Neriassel (talk) 23:58, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep as the current revision removes a copyrighted (non-libre) video, except the album cover is obviously de minimis, and delete the first revision. I'll prepare to rework it when replacing an existing one with "Fox nicking gooseberries". - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 01:03, 3 April 2023 (UTC); edited: 06:07, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: copyright violation has been removed. The "echoes" notification is currently COM:DM, but can be cropped out/removed if desired. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:34, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
At the request of the rights holder: User talk:Welkend#File:Bibliothek des Konservatismus Logo.svg Welkend (talk) 19:46, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Weak keep I think this could be below TOO. GPSLeo (talk) 10:40, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Weak keep per GPSLeo. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:53, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: This appears to be below TOO. Should the library insist, they can request a takedown or courtesy deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:57, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
You have the above Graphic uploaded to Wikipedia purporting to represent the Library of Conservatism logo. The graphic shown in this form is not our logo (purple on white is not part of our corporate design and was never made by us). Please delete this misleading graphic. 62.96.185.42 07:37, 19 June 2023 (UTC) Dr. Wolfgang Fenske, Director of Bibliothek des Konservatismus (Library of Conservatism) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.96.185.42 (talk) 07:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Indeed, the logo should be inverted (white text with purple background) and then kept. --PaterMcFly (talk) 11:17, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- The figurative mark is a graphic stylization of our house facade, which is also reminiscent of a bookshelf or a stack of books. It was created professionally by a graphic artist (golden ratio, etc.). The graphic artist is the sole owner of the copyright, the library is the sole owner of the usage rights. We therefore ask for the immediate deletion of this similar and any future original graphic. We expressly do not agree to publication on Wikipedia.
- Dr. Wolfgang Fenske, Director of Bibliothek des Konservatismus (Library of Conservatism) --62.96.185.42 14:49, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: send a formal takedown request to foundation:Legal:DMCA takedowns. --GPSLeo (talk) 07:05, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
These uploads do not appear to be the own work by the uploader as claimed but scans or photographs of older photographs. The original photographers remain unidentified and the copyright status unclear. To keep this, we need written permissions by the respective copyright holders or their heirs after they have been identified first through our support team.
- File:Paddy Sharkey demos fishing (Patrick Joseph Sharkey).jpg
- File:Paddy Sharkey (Patrick Joseph Sharkey).jpg
- File:Paddy sharkey Killybegs Memorial (Patrick Joseph Sharkey).png
- File:Paddy Sharkey and Peggy memorial card (Patrick Joseph Sharkey).jpg
- File:Paddy Sharkey and Derek Vial (Patrick Joseph Sharkey).jpg
- File:Paddy Sharkey and Taoiseach Sean Lemass (Patrick Joseph Sharkey).jpg
AFBorchert (talk) 13:08, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:55, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Not own works: screengrab images with FB or transmission code in EXIF data.
- File:Marine electrics Limited Paddy Sharkeys Company (Patrick Joseph Sharkey).jpg
- File:The field of stars By Paddy Sharkey (Patrick Joseph Sharkey).jpg
- File:Paddy Sharkey Grave in Killybegs.jpg
- File:Paddy Sharkey Grave (2) (Patrick Joseph Sharkey).jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:56, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:38, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
An IP user added this, claiming that the subject is only 15 years old and this was her first time of having sex. It was added just one week ago, and I don't know if this is a hoax or telling the truth. Of course it is a child pornography if it is the latter one. P.S. Although the legal age of Consent for sexual activity varies by country, majority of them requires to be at least 16, and it could be a criminal offence if the source country is setting the legal age to be at 16. A1Cafel (talk) 14:05, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- It's my picture. and she was 30 at the time of captured image Nowforever (talk) 02:46, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- OK, then now there is no concern of child porn. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:32, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep not child porn, that IP is a creep Dronebogus (talk) 05:24, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:47, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Own work? In scope? 186.173.71.200 14:32, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
No sign of own work, OTRS needed. 186.173.71.200 14:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no exif, PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 10:48, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Not own work as stated by the uploader
Avron (talk) 18:13, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:51, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Not suitable for commons in terms of copyright... Neriah (talk) 13:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:22, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Cover for the 1962 album "Album Seven by Rick" by Ricky Nelson and published by Imperial Records. The current licensing is incorrect but I thought it potentially could be PD-US-not renewed. A search on Copyright Catalog didn't return anything but I'm not entirely confident on my searching skills. Salavat (talk) 03:54, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:58, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Per EXIF Data, photo credit should read: Stefan Rousseau/PA, not a work from the UK Government, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 08:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:59, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Per EXIF Data, photo credit should read: Stefan Rousseau/PA, not a work from the UK Government, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 08:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:49, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Per EXIF Data, photo credit should read: Stefan Rousseau/PA, not a work from the UK Government, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 08:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:49, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Per EXIF Data, photo credit should read: Stefan Rousseau/PA, not a work from the UK Government, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 08:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per the nominator. Not really much else to say about it besides what they have. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:05, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:49, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Per EXIF Data, photo credit should read: Stefan Rousseau/PA, not a work from the UK Government, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 08:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:50, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
wrong person. No way to know who this actually is, and would probably be useless and a privacy problem if this person was not advertised as present at the event. File:Eric Barone-IMG 0177-rect.jpeg is also affected. Rama (talk) 11:53, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Issue reported on my talk page by Patrub01 Revision #746167447, a cursory image search suggests that this is indeed not the right person [6][7]. Rama (talk) 11:59, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:50, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Frodar as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.gesell.gob.ar/novedad/6875/villa-gesell-celebra-su-independencia.html. Source is smaller than here, but still unlikely own work. Converting for discussion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:10, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, yes, I couldn't find a image with the same size before the upload date, that's why I use the URL of a 2015 article, six years before this upload, to show that this file may have been on the web for years, and the uploader just grabbed this file from the internet. Very unlikely own work, should be deleted per COM:PCP. —Frodar (talk) 18:40, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:55, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Per warnings: Post-1975 Italian image was copyrighted in USA A1Cafel (talk) 07:07, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 10:58, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Per warnings: Post-1975 Italian image was copyrighted in USA A1Cafel (talk) 07:08, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 10:57, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:40, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Book of the uploader. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:12, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: The artwork is likely to be copyrighted. No evidence the uploader wrote the book - but can be undeleted with permission. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Questionable own work claim (no proper metadata, low resolution and size) HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: PCP, scan of a photo, can be undeleted with permission. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
You can see from its file history that it's obviously a scan from a newspaper. 87.196.72.233 20:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- It's actually this display from a public museum (National Museum of Mongolia). पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 05:44, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP mongolia. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This license is wrong. The Brooklyn Eagle renewed its copyrights starting from 1933.[8] Ping Diannaa who added the tag. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Diannaa: @Magog the Ogre: Could you be more particular about this supposed renewal? The linked page only says the first renewal was in 1933, which applies to earlier content, not stuff from 1941. Another related profile says "No issue copyright renewals were found for this serial." With the entire paper stopping publication in 1963, all of its work falls within the 1928 and 1963 public domain window, with no further renewals. (A paper from 1996 with the same name was a different entity, so no renewal from it can be inferred.) UpdateNerd (talk) 03:08, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- The paper applied its first renewal was in 1961 which applied to works from 1933. When the UPenn database says they started for that year, it means they applied in future years as well. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 11:12, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- I don't see where UPenn got that information from the records. A possible error? With the paper folding in 1963, it seems unlikely for it to have continued making renewals. UpdateNerd (talk) 04:18, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- The paper applied its first renewal was in 1961 which applied to works from 1933. When the UPenn database says they started for that year, it means they applied in future years as well. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 11:12, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment, I couldn't find anything in the copyright renewals from 1968 to 1970. The photo is however credited to "Kaufman", not sure if that changes anything. Salavat (talk) 04:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- I believe this would be a contribution rather than issue renewal. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 11:12, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I think it's unlikely that this particular photograph was renewed. Usually when contributions were renewed, it was stuff like comic strips or serialized fiction. Abzeronow (talk) 21:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: See above. --Yann (talk) 19:41, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Per EXIF Data, photo credit should read: Stefan Rousseau/PA, not a work from the UK Government, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 08:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel: could you double-check here?
- You seem to be refering to an elder version of the file, archived on Archive.org (see here), which refers to an elder version of the file on Flickr from 2012 which by then was copyrighted (see here).
- In the mean time that particular Flickr file has been update December 3, 2022 at 3:25:21 PM GMT+1, see "License History" here.
- Next, on 26 okt 2022 23:21 ThatRandomGuy1 uploaded a higher quality file from another source history.blog.gov.uk, which states "All content is available under the Open Government Licence v3.0, except where otherwise stated."
- It seems 100% clear you started this deletion request with a false/invalid/out-dated argument, and I would be nice if you could close this DR, and the related DR's yourself. -- Mdd (talk) 13:23, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 19:42, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Although the photo exists in video published by Indian government under free license, this is a selfie created by Australian prime minister and Indian government has no right to publish it. Taivo (talk) 16:14, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe Australian PM gave permission to Indian PM to use this image, that's why they used in the video. 𝕃𝐖 (talk) 07:52, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Unlikely. Evidence is needed for that. Taivo (talk) 07:18, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Probably a verbal permission. 𝕃𝐖 (talk) 06:16, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Unlikely. Evidence is needed for that. Taivo (talk) 07:18, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:40, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Lacking source info, questionable claims regarding authorship and copyright eligibility. Not found in User:0_Noctis_0's upload log here or on itwiki. Appears more likely to be a copied from elsewhere and slapped on with to Noctis's name (along with the Inkscape template) to give a veneer of legitimacy. Does not appear to be PD-simple either. Paul_012 (talk) 12:53, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Egregio collega User:Paul_012, le comunico che solo oggi mi sono ricollegato al mio profilo Wikipedia. L’immagine caricata non è di mia creazione e ritengo che il mio profili non sia stato compromesso. Le mie ultime interazioni su Wikipedia risalgono al 4 novembre 2021, Su Wikisource il 9 marzo 2022 e su Wikisource il 6 dicembre 2021 e tutto regolare. Pretendo che chi abbia caricato l’immagine ha utilizzando il mio nome senza permesso. Pretendo che venga cancellato immediatamente l’immagine se l’autore di questo abuso non si prenda la responsabilità. E credo che sia opera di “User: Patcha007” come mostra la pagina contributi di Caricamenti di Patcha007. 0 Noctis 0 (talk) 13:10, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:24, 13 September 2023 (UTC)