Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/03/05
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
I uploaded it by mistake Sprts99 (talk) 01:10, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: was already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 03:55, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Incomplete/failed upload Juan Carlos Fonseca Mata (talk) 01:27, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. @Juan Carlos Fonseca Mata: You don't need to request deletion in such cases, just upload again as a second file version with the same name. --Rosenzweig τ 03:54, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
selfie Pushp0618 (talk) 04:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Obviously not a selfie, which is not a valid reason to delete a file anyway. Moumou82 (talk) 12:32, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Test or nonsense by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 12:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
no need this file Qnique (talk) 06:17, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
this file is not required and subject of this image no longer want to still had this image there. Qnique (talk) 06:22, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:00, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
It's a duplicate file, I uploaded two maps. The most recent version of the file has more updates on it. Sailoratlantis (talk) 08:42, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
I'm going to upload a new version of this file. Sailoratlantis (talk) 09:07, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:58, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Original 8ft x 4ft mirror designed and made by Flavia Brilli exhibited here at the Ministry of Sound club.jpg
[edit]incorrect information of location FLAVIA BRILLI (talk) 09:10, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:58, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Alive hitman (talk) 10:18, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:57, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
G7. Author or uploader request deletion Original author or uploader requests deletion of recently created (<7 days) unused content. Majvdl (talk) 10:57, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:56, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
La personne sur la photo ne veut pas que la photo soit présente sur Wikipédia. Cedrichbn (talk) 12:24, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:55, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Apparent copyvio: https://showbizpk.com/2022/12/29/rubya-chaudhry-wedding-pictures-with-her-husband-umair-dar/, dated December 29, 2022 Yngvadottir (talk) 10:00, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 15:15, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Apparent copyvio; photo used on album covers, see Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/3ByF9ZlyUOMuWfZ7lVklu4 Yngvadottir (talk) 10:08, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 15:15, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Apparent copyvio from Agence France-Presse: see photo credit here: https://tribune.com.pk/story/2402139/12-killed-in-kallar-kahar-bus-incident Yngvadottir (talk) 10:21, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 15:14, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Uuuyyhhhhhhh 2607:FB91:1984:783F:AC39:60F7:4E9E:6801 17:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination ;) Category:Sockpuppets of Bmmederos. --Achim55 (talk) 18:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Jjjjjhjjjhhh 2607:FB91:19AC:4E39:AC39:60F7:67D3:BF7D 18:30, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Keep No understandable justification is given The Quirky Kitty (talk) 07:26, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ??. --Kadı Message 20:12, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Hhhhhhhhhhh 2607:FB91:1984:783F:AC39:60F7:4E9E:6801 18:00, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination ;) uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 18:39, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Because it is Random photo from internet Jeffrey Berling (talk) 23:24, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - no basis for the claim of copyright infringement. Omphalographer (talk) 00:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep (français) : Bonjour. Je suis surpris et un peu désarçonné par la demande de suppression de mon fichier au motif "pris sur internet". Cela est faux et totalement abusif. Je l'ai réalisé moi-même hier soir en parallèle de la création de la page Monastère de Zamca sur la Wikipédia française. Le fichier a été réalisé via deux logiciels de DAO (dessin assisté par ordinateur) et je peux si besoin fournir des captures d'écrans du fichier source avec les différentes couches, etc. Par ailleurs, j'avais pris soin de mettre ma signature que vous retrouverez en bas à droite du fichier : "Combrian (Commons) 2023".
- (english). Hello. I'm not really able in English but I will try to answer. I'm a little bit shocked by this deletion request because this is my own file, made yesterday. I created this plan to illustrate the Zamca Monastery page on the French Wikipedia which I also made last night. I spent a lot of time on it with sofwares of digital drawings. If it's really necessary I can brought some screenchot of the original file with the layers. I also emphasize that I have affixed a very clear signature at the bottom right of the file : Combrian (Commons) 2023--Combrian (talk) 18:16, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept. No reason to doubt the good faith of the uploader. ----Benoît (d) 18:47, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Origin of image is untraceble at the moment. This is not the work of the uploader, so the given permission is not correct. Without the source a posible alternative form of permission cannot be considered Mdd (talk) 23:52, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Keep: nomination withdrawn. Found source after double checking, and adjusted permission. Mdd (talk) 00:06, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
I am the author of this photo and now I don't want to publish it on Wikipedia. Fandam007 (talk) 22:58, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: old photo used and potentily useful. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:05, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
I am the owner of this photo and I want it removed. This photo is not important on this website. (redacted) 18:33, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- I forgot to log in. I confirm that I wrote this request. The picture shows almost nothing and is therefore irrelevant to any content. Fandam007 (talk) 18:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep per Christian Ferrer, In Use --Lukas Beck (talk) 18:53, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- I removed the file from the site. Not in use at the moment. The picture captures everything from too far away in insufficient detail, moreover, almost nothing can be seen in the picture. Fandam007 (talk) 19:03, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- please stop kind of vandalism. This picture was usefull in the articels. I removed some of your changes. Lukas Beck (talk) 19:26, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- This is not vandalism. According to wiki rules, a file that is suggested for deletion needs to be removed from every page it is on. Whether an image is useful in articles or not is up to this discussion, not your decision. Fandam007 (talk) 00:34, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- please stop kind of vandalism. This picture was usefull in the articels. I removed some of your changes. Lukas Beck (talk) 19:26, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- I removed the file from the site. Not in use at the moment. The picture captures everything from too far away in insufficient detail, moreover, almost nothing can be seen in the picture. Fandam007 (talk) 19:03, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy kept. Unfortunately we cannot COM:COURTESY delete this file, as it seems that it had been in use for a long time. That means, there may be external usages which should be able to link to the original file. Otherwise I see no valid reason for deletion apart from courtesy. --A.Savin 01:07, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Wrong file uploaded Lasks (talk) 23:09, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:54, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
useless duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Freddy_2023_track.png FleurDeOdile (talk) 16:40, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose The track map uses the new colors and we can't just replace the old track map with the new colors without violating Commons:OVERWRITE. RandomInfinity17 (talk - contributions) 16:52, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- are you trying to do canvassing on this vote like on the others better color proposals? FleurDeOdile (talk) 17:17, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Maybe I shouldn't be the one to talk here since I'm not that involved in WPTC or the whole color scheme discussion, but it seems that they've already come to their decision and it'd be best to leave any objections in the primary discussion thread for the change, if it's still open, rather than attempting to delete the new tracks which seems a bit belligerent. Not to mention that your attitude in the Hypothetical Hurricanes Wiki Discord suggests that you are doing this just to stir drama between WPTC and HHW. Monsoonjr99 (talk) 18:32, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose deletion of this file, as well as similar nominations for Judy and Kevin. These files implement the new colors that were agreed upon. A bot request has been made on Commons to replace the older files with new colors, though this will take some time given the size of the task. Just as a general note, this nominator is aware of that color consensus, as he was informed of it on his talk page last night. These nominations are not in good faith. – wxtrackercody (talk) 20:55, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose It shouldn't be deleted, in my opinion, because they upload to prevent it. Commons:OVERWRITE. HurricaneEdgar 21:47, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Just because the track is in a different color doesn't mean it should be deleted. Layah50♪ ( 話して～! ) 23:06, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose I am all for neutrality, but consensus was reached to use these colors for track files/infoboxes on WPTC talk page, so......if you have any objections about this change on Wikipedia and WPTC, please discuss it on the project's talk page instead of marking all these files for deletion, it seems a bit immature. Cyclonetracker7586 (talk) 23:46, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- oh look at all that canvassing going on... FleurDeOdile (talk) 00:18, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Please don't accuse the canvassing going on because the users voted because of their opinions. HurricaneEdgar 00:30, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Please do not bring unsubstantiated claims of canvassing here. I am the only person that has commented here so far that offered some form of support in the color proposals, and I can assure you I haven't talked to any other person on this page. Again, you are not acting in good faith, knock it off. – wxtrackercody (talk) 00:34, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- oh look at all that canvassing going on... FleurDeOdile (talk) 00:18, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose I am all for neutrality, but consensus was reached to use these colors for track files/infoboxes on WPTC talk page, so......if you have any objections about this change on Wikipedia and WPTC, please discuss it on the project's talk page instead of marking all these files for deletion, it seems a bit immature. Cyclonetracker7586 (talk) 23:46, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose– The unfounded claims of canvassing speak to the intent of the nominator: disruption. It should be taken in good faith that commenters were alerted to this deletion discussion through an automated notice on Cyclone Freddy's talk page, which is how I ended up here. There was a prolonged debate on the track map colors spanning over a year with a consensus finally reached during an RfC last month. As mentioned by Cody, Fleur has been made aware of this and decided to go against consensus without ever taking part in the final RfC or the original discussion in November 2021. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 02:43, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Strong oppose - There is absolutely no reason to delete this file. The file exists as there has not yet been a conclusion on whether these colours should be used on the other wiki yet. Additionally, your attitude seems to suggest that you're just trying to be disruptive or aggressively try to get your own way. While I don't particularly like this colour scheme either, it is what was agreed on. SolarisPenguin (talk) 04:27, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree that this and other related nominations by FleurDeOdile have been in bad faith. @FleurDeOdile: These nominations are a waste of time for the community. Please withdraw them and find something more constructive to do.--Jasper Deng (talk|meta) 04:54, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Strong oppose - Creating a new image that's colored to the tropical cyclone scale colors isn't a reason why it should be deleted, especially when the weather community agreed to change the colors in these consensuses. Ignoring the consensus and deleting it because it looks similar to the other variant seems a bit "naive". Also considering the comments before this one was sent and your earlier contributions also show that this isn't the first time you were involved in controversy. – RedLambda (talk) 09:42, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Strong oppose - I don't see any solid justification for deletion of this image. As several other users have already mentioned, the motive for nomination in this case is transparent, and seems quite petty. AJC3fromS2K (talk) 11:17, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Kept. There is a clear consensus to against the deletion. (non-admin closure)--A1Cafel (talk) 10:38, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
useless duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Judy_2023_track.png FleurDeOdile (talk) 16:40, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose It shouldn't be deleted, in my opinion, because they upload to prevent this. Commons:OVERWRITE. HurricaneEdgar 21:49, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per my reasoning here. RandomInfinity17 (talk - contributions) 00:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose– bad faith nomination (further comments here) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 02:44, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per Cyclonebiskit.--Jasper Deng (talk|meta) 04:53, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Strongly oppose - per Cyclonebiskit RedLambda (talk) 16:08, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Kept. There is a clear consensus to against the deletion. (non-admin closure)--A1Cafel (talk) 10:39, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
useless duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kevin_2023_track.png FleurDeOdile (talk) 16:41, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose It shouldn't be deleted, in my opinion, because they upload to prevent this. Commons:OVERWRITE. HurricaneEdgar 21:47, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per my reasoning here RandomInfinity17 (talk - contributions) 00:52, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose– bad faith nomination (further comments here Cyclonebiskit (talk) 02:44, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per Cyclonebiskit.--Jasper Deng (talk|meta) 04:53, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Strongly oppose per Cyclonebiskit. RedLambda (talk) 16:11, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Kept. There is a clear consensus to against the deletion. (non-admin closure)--A1Cafel (talk) 10:40, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
I am in this photograph at the World naked bike ride : I did not consent to the photograph and it has been reposted to social media in the UK as well as commercial pornographic sites . . Some people object to the ride and comments on the reposts have been quite alarming (some people in the UK object to the ride) . It has also caused problems wiith my employer and famiy members hence I am asking fro it to be deleted please. Goodperson5678 (talk) 21:42, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- VRT comment: The VRT has received a courtesy-deletion request, and a follow up from WMF Trust and Safety, about this image and two others. The ticket can be read by VRT agents at ticket:2023030610015755. Pinging @Captain-tucker: , who courtesy-deleted a similar image in December 2022. The other two images are: File:She was even more shy than Cristina ;) (18869059645).jpg and File:WNBR Brighton 2014 (30398116524).jpg. ─ The Aafī (talk) 14:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:38, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
not likely a work owned by the uploader (given the watermark on the photo & the pixels of the photo, which indicate that the photo was possibly taken from a website) Miwako Sato (talk) 18:15, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Speedy delete A09 (talk) 06:43, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 00:06, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Delete Used in spam-like article. Yahya (talk) 09:45, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 05:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
out of the scope. Faisal talk 01:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
out of the scope. Faisal talk 01:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
out of the scope. Faisal talk 01:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:44, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
out of the scope. Faisal talk 01:37, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:44, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
out of the scope. Faisal talk 01:37, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:44, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 04:02, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:44, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 04:03, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:44, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Polytechnic mural
[edit]No FoP in Ukraine. Permission from the artist(s) is/are required
- File:Kiev 536 NTUU KPI Polytechnic mural.jpg
- File:Kiev 539 NTUU KPI Polytechnic mural.jpg
- File:Kiev 541 NTUU KPI Polytechnic mural.jpg
- File:Kiev 538 NTUU KPI Polytechnic mural.jpg
- File:Kiev 537 NTUU KPI Polytechnic mural.jpg
- File:Kiev 540 NTUU KPI Polytechnic mural.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 04:09, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:44, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:44, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:44, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:18, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:44, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Singapore A1Cafel (talk) 04:19, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:44, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Taichi for speedy deletion and the rationale was: Out of scope. Moving to DR as the rationale doesn't meet the speedy deletion criteria. CptViraj (talk) 05:40, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. File is unused and its educational purpose is not apparent. TilmannR (talk) 18:38, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sungodtemple as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: non-trivial logo. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. COM:TOO Russia: "Simple result (consisted of simple geometric shapes and / or text) of creative work (creative human activity) is copyrightable." and we don't have evidence of permission. TilmannR (talk) 18:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
The subject of the photo is a porn star, and the photo is apparently a mirror selfie taken with a cell phone. Since the uploader is probably not Mona Azar, the file should be deleted as a copyvio per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 13:16, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:40, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Falls out of COM:FOP Japan. The kannon statue was erected for the victims of a maritime incident occurred in 1965 (ja:マリアナ海域漁船集団遭難事件), thus not earlier than that year, meaning not in PD. Yasu (talk) 14:56, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:41, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 15:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP Slovenia: non-free modern architecture by Marko Mušič (b. 1941). Not suitable for Commons. TadejM (t/p) 15:53, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
The only upload, no metadata. Own work is doubtful, maybe real photographer's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:55, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:41, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Low quality, blurry and unused image, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 15:55, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Blurry and unused image, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 15:57, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:46, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 15:58, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:46, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 15:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:46, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:00, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:46, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 16:02, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:46, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Image was totally blurred, nothing can be seen clearly A1Cafel (talk) 16:05, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:46, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Blurry and unused image, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 16:05, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:46, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Low quality, blurry and unused image, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 16:07, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:46, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP Slovenia: non-free architecture. Not suitable for Commons. TadejM (t/p) 16:08, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:46, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 17:27, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:41, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
No source nor license given. Brunnaiz (talk) 17:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:46, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
too slow resolution for an own work, may be copied of any source Ezarateesteban 18:39, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:41, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 20:45, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:41, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope
Didym (talk) 20:58, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:46, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dragoonslair (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
- File:Foro Italo Turco - Platea.jpg
- File:Foro Italo Turco.jpg
- File:Festival di Catania - Mare Liberum.jpg
- File:Festival di Catania.jpg
- File:Edicola Eastwest Lungotevere dei Mellini - Roma - Rendering.jpg
Didym (talk) 21:04, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:47, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
From the surface pixelation, this appears to be a rephotograph of some other source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:00, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, looks promotional - relates to book release Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:02, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, needs proper source and age. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:04, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
No useful metadata, small size, low quality and JPG artefacts all around pillars and roof. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:06, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Because it is Random photo from internet Jeffrey Berling (talk) 23:25, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - no basis for the claim of copyright infringement. Uploader's name even appears in EXIF data. Omphalographer (talk) 00:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Comment It is my image, not previously published anywhere else. It depicts Liberecká street in Hodkovice nad Mohelkou, with the main focus being small early 20th century villa. It is not more random than most of the images in Category:Liberecká (Hodkovice nad Mohelkou). It is somewhat ironic, considering the previous post on my discussion page is an invite by @Richard Sekerak (WMCZ) to document more architecture. Best regards, --M.Rejha (talk) 14:27, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep This is a regular image that documents one of the streets in Czech Republic. I agree with Omphalographer - the name of the uploader is the same that appear in EXIF.
- @M.Rejha Pokud máte zájem tuto fotku přihlásit do Mikrosoutěže architektura, je potřeba vyplnit u ní category:Mikrosoutez architektura 2023. Fotografie je pěkná, jen pro jistotu připomínám, že to této soutěže lze přihlásit pouze fotografie pořízené od 15. února do 15. března 2023. Richard Sekerak (WMCZ) (talk) 20:25, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 13:05, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Because it is Logo Jeffrey Berling (talk) 23:27, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - I think the theme of this image is a facility with closed shutters and the logo is just a reflection.(Commons:De_minimis)--円周率３パーセント (talk) 02:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - what logo? The only thing I see in this photo which even remotely resembles a logo is the sign at the top of the photo, which is a simple wordmark well below the threshold of originality. Omphalographer (talk) 02:41, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 13:06, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Línea de tiempo-ELABORACION PROPIA PARA EL CURSO DE PROCESO CULTURAL ANDINO -DR .RUPIRE - GERARDO IGNACIO SORIA PERALTA 22020095-DERECHO-UNMSM-FDCP-EEGG 2022.png
[edit]tiene informacion muy sensible de mi persona como mi nombre completo Gerardo-Soria.P-22020095 (talk) 02:12, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hmm, but you have uploaded this file by yourself, 3 months ago. Anyway, what are the sources/authors of all the images used in this montage? --Túrelio (talk) 08:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative work, photographs not attributed, unlikely to be own work (or in the public domain) all of them, COM:PRP. --Strakhov (talk) 13:08, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Screenshot per Metadata, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 10:26, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Borrar, especialmente si es de un usuario común y corriente. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.126.28.30 (talk) 11:10, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Pero si pertenece a algún famosillo o bibliotecario eso es diferente... 191.126.28.30 12:11, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work, COM:PRP. --Strakhov (talk) 13:11, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Doctor confirmed it wasn't a Micropenis JeanMarie98 (talk) 13:26, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- Not sure of that but Delete for respect to the doc. 181.203.35.190 15:01, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G7. --Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Cette photo n'est pas à jour mais je ne sais comment télécharger une photo à jour ... merci de votre aide ! AbbayedeLongues (talk) 12:45, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. Good photograph. --Achim55 (talk) 13:28, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Il n'y a aucune raison valable de supprimer cette photo seulement parce que vous souhaitez en ajouter une autre. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:06, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Je ne vois pas pourquoi supprimer cette photo. La photo représente l'église abbatiale à une époque de sa vie. Elle a été utilisée avec mon autorisation par les propriétaires lors du concours du loto du patrimoine 2019 organisé par Stéphane Bern, avec lequel l'abbaye a été lauréate. Si vous avez une photo plus récente après travaux, vous pouvez l'ajouter dans Commons sans supprimer celle-ci. ChBougui (talk) 15:44, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 13:12, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Falsche Bildbezeichnung! Matthias-Tf (talk) 13:18, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Du kannst die Bildbeschreibung ändern, ohne das gesamte Bild zu löschen. Lukas Beck (talk) 19:09, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per comment above --Lukas Beck (talk) 19:10, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: early requested by uploader. --Strakhov (talk) 13:14, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
To me this photo looks similar to this photo on this website. The lights of the building in the center, the reflection of the sun on the building on the left, the sunlight on the trees, and the rainbow hanging from the top center to the left center look the same. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 15:17, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I confirmed what Mr. Syunsyunminmin pointed out. I agree to remove this file.--Krorokeroro (talk) 05:09, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 13:17, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
because i dont wanna my image here anymore Vitor101023 (talk) 21:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep all: You don't have the right to have all your photos deleted 3 years after the fact. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:40, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 13:19, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
OOS. Seems to be a personal files and not for educational purposes.
- File:Cao Thị Nga.jpg
- File:Vũ Đình Huy.jpg
- File:Hoàng Gia Trường.jpg
- File:Phạm Thị Mai.jpg
- File:Đỗ Công Đức.jpg
- File:Ninh Xuân Thắng.jpg
- File:Phượng Ớt.png
- File:Đỗ Công Quế.jpg
- File:Hà Cao.jpg
- File:BÙI ĐỨC THOAN.png
- File:Phạm Thị Ngư.png
- File:Phạm Văn Điền.jpg
- File:Tai nạn giao thông6.jpg
- File:Tai nạn giao thông1.jpg
- File:Tai nạn giao thông 5.jpg
- File:Tai nạn giao thông2.jpg
- File:Tai nạn giao thông4.jpg
- File:Tai nạn giao thông3.jpg
Tryvix1509 (talk) 12:33, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:54, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
It was a misspelled image that was properly renamed, and nothing links to this wrong file name, so it can be deleted without harm or any cleanup effort. Thank you.. {{u|WikiWikiWayne}} {Talk} 21:55, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: No need to keep this redirect, file was renamed 4 days after upload. --Achim55 (talk) 17:26, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 00:10, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Probably out of scope. Seems to be an unused personal logo of a non-contributor. If it's not "own work", then depending on the country of origin it might be above TOO and would require permission. TilmannR (talk) 00:15, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:36, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Travishowel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Missing permissions and might be considered advertisements.
- File:Water Jet Cutting Services Coimbatore - Best method to choose.jpg
- File:Laser cutting services - Laser cut job work.jpg
- File:Laser cutting services coimbatore.jpg
- File:Cuttingjpg.jpg
TilmannR (talk) 00:37, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:37, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
NoFoP-Japan. Derivative work of non-free illustration in Japan. 61.120.241.1 11:17, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:48, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
NoFoP-Japan. Derivative work of non-free illustration in Japan. 61.120.241.1 11:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:48, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
It is copyrighted photo see the source, so this file will be deleted. Uncitoyen (talk) 12:40, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:49, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
NoFoP-Japan. Derivative work of non-free image in Japan. 61.120.241.1 13:18, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:49, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
NoFoP-Japan. Derivative work of non-free illustration in Japan. 61.120.241.1 13:19, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Contributor wrote "Quoted from Information board". --61.120.241.1 13:23, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:49, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Profile picture, No proven notability https://www.youtube.com/@blessmon CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:19, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:49, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
hello you deleted the picture of blessmon, because of copyryght but he is my musical artist that's why I have permission to post the picture IronGargoyle — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blessmon365 (talk • contribs) 07:46, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- This was a personal picture, then, if you are the real Blessmon, and you do not have the required notability neither. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:15, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
NoFoP-Japan. Derivative work of non-free content. Explanation board's text and image have copyrighted in Japan. 61.120.241.1 13:38, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:19, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
NoFoP-Japan. Derivative work of non-free content. Explanation board's text have copyrighted in Japan. 61.120.241.1 13:39, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:19, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
NoFoP-Japan. Derivative work of non-free content. Explanation board's text have copyrighted in Japan. 61.120.241.1 13:40, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:18, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Too small, not readable, useless book cover -- ato (talk) 14:10, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:17, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 14:30, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:17, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
NoFoP-Japan. Derivative work of non-free illustration in Japan. 61.120.241.1 15:23, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:54, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
EXIF credits this image to Mike Lizzi, which contradicts the CC licence crediting it to the uploader, Jessica Vitale. Belbury (talk) 16:18, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:55, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
File:G4pFD1PSyzeJCEKuxELHXHtsvGKJB5i1O9v-SHTZeaVkvK7OoLD-f9G0 iJ0C--ONl8XiwqmdjA gwyMTx1WLKSu.jpg
[edit]Personal photo without educational use. Not a notable musician. Drakosh (talk) 16:24, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:55, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Not a relevant image, copyright violation. Mmcfly566 (talk) 19:39, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:59, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo Uhooep (talk) 20:37, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Thailand has a low threshold of originality. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:01, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 02:30, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Possibl copyvio: The watermark indicates another name than the one of the uploader CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:49, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:07, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
no-FoP in France. This work is Athanor by Anselm Kiefer still alive Tangopaso (talk) 22:51, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:08, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:53, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:09, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability, I find nothing on him on internet CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:58, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:04, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:00, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:03, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
If this were ever needed, it could be recreated in text as the image is so pixelated from repeat copies that it is not useful. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:02, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:03, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The name in the watermark is deifferent from the uplaoder's CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:03, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:03, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
No proben notability, Possible ad CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:05, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:02, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
NoFoP-Japan. Derivative work of non-free illustration in Japan. 61.120.241.1 13:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:20, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
NoFoP-Japan. Derivative work of non-free content. Explanation board's text and image have copyrighted in Japan. 61.120.241.1 13:37, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:19, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
NoFoP-Japan. Derivative work of non-free content. Explanation board's text have copyrighted in Japan. 61.120.241.1 13:38, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:19, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Non-free content - copyrighted photograph by Ana Mendieta (copyright owned by the artist's estate), image taken directly from SFMoMA's website. 19h00s (talk) 00:28, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:44, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
No evidence that the press kit was in public domain; see https://web.archive.org/web/20090801050618/http://www.brianswimme.org/media/press_kits.asp Ankry (talk) 01:08, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
The site license clearly stated that it is non-commercial: You are licensed by The Center to use materials on this site for non-commercial, educational and personal purposes only. You may copy these materials for personal and classroom use, so long as the copies contain all applicable copyright notices. This license is not exclusive to you, and you may not transfer it. Ankry (talk) 01:12, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The noncommercial restriction violates COM:LICENSING, so this should be deleted as a non-free file. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:16, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:44, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Image courtesy David Littleton from the Delaware Public Archives, not a work from the US Federal Government. Note that Delaware Public Archives is a state government agency and their publications are copyrighted unless otherwise stated A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:45, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Crop of photo at https://www.linkedin.com/posts/activity-6858726974819581952-KWtd?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios Adeletron 3030 (talk) 03:27, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:45, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
File:HK SW 上環 Sheung Wan 德輔道中 Des Voeux Road Central 永安百貨公司 Wing On Centre Department Store July 2021 SS2 11.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted food packages. Solomon203 (talk) 02:48, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Wouldn't this photo in particular fall under de minimis? TansoShoshen (talk) 03:47, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no it would not be de minimis. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted food packages. Solomon203 (talk) 02:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted food packages. Solomon203 (talk) 02:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted food packages. Solomon203 (talk) 02:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Logo sin permiso 191.126.28.30 11:03, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:31, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible Copyright Violation: the uplouder of this file is not the Copyrightholder of that web site Leonprimer (talk) 13:42, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Already years ago in an e-mail registered by the VRT the Copyrightholder has authorized Wikimedia users like me to upload his images under the applicable conditions and I have made use of this authorization for years. So why all of a sudden there seems to be a problem with this authorization is a mystery to me. --Piet.Wijker (talk) 14:07, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per VRT. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:33, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:GHS-pictogram-flamme.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:08, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Seal of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:09, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Kurdistan.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:18, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Blurry and unused COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 10:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:01, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Blurry and unused COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 10:21, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:01, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Although genital piercings are in scope, this image is in low quality and unused, and can be replaced by many alternatives in the category A1Cafel (talk) 10:22, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:01, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Blurry and unused COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 10:22, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:01, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Blurry and unused COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 10:23, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:01, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
This image has No Free "Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed)" under 'show more" at the web source. Leoboudv (talk) 22:28, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:02, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted Materials Michel Bakni (talk) 18:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:24, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted Materials Michel Bakni (talk) 18:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:24, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Earthquake Turkey 2023 map.jpg was deleted as a copyvio and needs to be removed or replaced in order to keep the image. Didym (talk) 20:43, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I created this file from the pictures in commons. I don't know when one of the source files was deleted. For this reason, you can delete it if it is necessary to delete it, thank you.
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused alternate history diagram Enyavar (talk) 21:13, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
because i dont wanna my image here anymore Vitor101023 (talk) 21:31, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Within-scope image well outside of courtesy deletion period. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:13, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
because i dont wanna my image here anymore Vitor101023 (talk) 21:32, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Within-scope image well outside of courtesy deletion period. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:14, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
because i dont wanna my image here anymore Vitor101023 (talk) 21:32, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Within-scope image well outside of courtesy deletion period. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:15, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
because i dont wanna my image here anymore Vitor101023 (talk) 21:33, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Within-scope image well outside of courtesy deletion period. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:14, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
because i dont wanna my image here anymore Vitor101023 (talk) 21:33, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Within-scope image well outside of courtesy deletion period. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:15, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
{{copyvio|1=YouTube uploader (mynavi news) withdrew CC BY license of the movie.}} 毒島みるく (talk) 07:41, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - The CC-BY license is irrevocable -- it cannot be withdrawn. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:33, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
This image has No Free "Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed)" under 'show more" at the web source. Leoboudv (talk) 22:15, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: If the Youtube source (mynavi news) withdrew the CC-BY license, can someone please review this image and close this DR as keep, please. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:25, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: LR passed from archive. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:27, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Requires COM:OTRS because at source it's credited "Image courtesy: Dr Sushruto Chakraborty" https://www.thebetterindia.com/198113/bengal-freedom-fighter-forgotten-hero-independence-struggle-history-india/ . As a previously published image, with the commons version being listed "own work" and three years after publication, OTRS is required. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:08, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:28, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
File:111111111Conjunto Arqueologico de Oquendo- Derechos e autor GERARDO IGNACIO SORIA PERALTA-22020095-DERECHO-FCP-UNMSM.jpg
[edit]atenta contra mi privacidad Gerardo-Soria.P-22020095 (talk) 02:04, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hmm, but you have uploaded this file by yourself, 3 months ago. --Túrelio (talk) 08:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:39, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Conjunto Arqueológico Huaca Palacio Inca De Oquendo GERARDO IGNACIO SORIA PERALTA 22020095 DERECHO P.webm
[edit]no respera mi privacidad Gerardo-Soria.P-22020095 (talk) 02:05, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
atenta contra mi privacidad Gerardo-Soria.P-22020095 (talk) 02:16, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hmm, but you have uploaded this by yourself. --Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused recent file. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:40, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
antenta contra mi privacidad Gerardo-Soria.P-22020095 (talk) 02:15, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hmm, but you have uploaded this by yourself. In addition, how can this image concern your privacy? --Túrelio (talk) 08:26, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, alternatives available. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:42, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Image from newspaper, most probably non-free. --FocalPoint (talk) 09:55, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:44, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo from newspaper, most probably non-free. --FocalPoint (talk) 09:53, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:44, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Bibliotecario Daniels? 191.126.28.30 10:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:45, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Content creator 191.126.28.30 11:00, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:45, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Debe tener un pituto entre los bíblios para tener su foto aquí... 191.126.28.30 11:01, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:47, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Commercial 191.126.28.30 11:02, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:43, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Trabajo propio, desde Bangladesh 191.126.28.30 11:04, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: photo of existing photo, missing all essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Trabajo propio desde Bangladesh 191.126.28.30 11:05, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:14, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Trabajo propio desde Bangladesh 191.126.28.30 11:06, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:15, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Call mama: Mi mami me llama? 191.126.28.30 11:07, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:17, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Tengo dos coches. 191.126.28.30 11:08, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:17, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Un famoso bar? 191.126.28.30 11:09, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:16, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Dice © 2023 191.126.28.30 12:24, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:19, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
clearly not own work. Book scans are derivative work 68.134.5.142 13:58, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:18, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
This file is a duplicate of another file. SeriousThinker (talk) 14:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate of File:Grand Duchy of Lithuania 1430.png. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused portrait of a person, who doesn't seem to be notable. It's the only upload of this user and they removed the authorship information for some reason. TilmannR (talk) 14:42, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:20, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Low quality, blurry and unused image, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 16:03, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep quality is no that bad. We do not have comparable images yet. --Lukas Beck (talk) 19:04, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Terrible quality. The file is suggested to show dogs "upsetting birds", but in reality you cannot see anything the like, nor is it possible to identify anything. --A.Savin 01:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. We don’t have too many photos of dogs mating while other dogs just hang around. Besides this file, nominated to deletion, I’ve only found this other. RodRabelo7 (talk) 05:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: agree with nom, unusable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:33, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Dianna Agron in 2013
[edit]The Flickr uploader is blacklisted for some reason. The video appears to have been taken by a woman and a man that looks like the Flickr uploader is seen in the video in a way that suggests that he was not the author of this.
- File:Dianna Agron 9-10-13 The Family premiere NYC.webm
- File:Dianna Agron NYC Premiere The Family September 2013.png
Abzeronow (talk) 17:39, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Strong keep Ridiculous nomination. The blacklist reasons can be seen - any film and TV screenshots from Flickr uploader are blacklisted. This obviously isn't one of those, so shouldn't be under suspicion. Of course, how the nominator thinks they have deduced that a woman took the video is strange since obviously that isn't in the video. I also just watched it all back and the only identifiable people are the subject and some security-looking men behind her, none of whom resemble the Flickr uploader by his user photo. Kingsif (talk) 23:44, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I found where the log was. I'll have to remember it's at COM:QFI for future reference as this is the first time I've encountered the blacklist while reviewing a file. I had some misgivings about the video when I heard what I thought was a voice behind the camera say "you're a great person" or something like that to Agron. Thinking about it more and knowing how tricky it can be to locate where a sound is coming from, it could have been in front of the camera but very close. I was going to let go of the misgivings since it was just a hunch to me when I saw the warning that the flickr user was blacklisted. I do have to think about whether that information had undue influence on how I analyzed the video trying to determine if Ownby was the author or not. I'll rewatch the video a few more times and I'll think about whether I want to withdraw my nomination or not. Abzeronow (talk) 15:36, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Upon further review, I have identified the person who spoke close to the camera, and I see them in the video in the first 30 seconds. Based on that and thinking about this further,
I withdraw my nomination and I sincerely apologize to Kingsif for my mistake. Abzeronow (talk) 19:57, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Upon further review, I have identified the person who spoke close to the camera, and I see them in the video in the first 30 seconds. Based on that and thinking about this further,
- Yes, I found where the log was. I'll have to remember it's at COM:QFI for future reference as this is the first time I've encountered the blacklist while reviewing a file. I had some misgivings about the video when I heard what I thought was a voice behind the camera say "you're a great person" or something like that to Agron. Thinking about it more and knowing how tricky it can be to locate where a sound is coming from, it could have been in front of the camera but very close. I was going to let go of the misgivings since it was just a hunch to me when I saw the warning that the flickr user was blacklisted. I do have to think about whether that information had undue influence on how I analyzed the video trying to determine if Ownby was the author or not. I'll rewatch the video a few more times and I'll think about whether I want to withdraw my nomination or not. Abzeronow (talk) 15:36, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:08, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
because i dont wanna my image here anymore Vitor101023 (talk) 21:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:10, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
because i dont wanna my image here anymore Vitor101023 (talk) 21:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:10, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Files on Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel
[edit]All of these images are works of Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel, a living German sculptor. The images infringe on Schadwinkel's copyrights and cannot be kept on Commons without free licenses from him.
- File:Atelier von Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel, Regal mit figürlichen Tonmodellen.jpg
- File:Atelier von Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel mit Holzskulpturen.jpg
- File:Atelier von Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel mit Holzskulpturen (Modelle).jpg
- File:Atelier von Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel mit Holzskulpturen (händende Hand).jpg
- File:Atelier von Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel mit Holzskulpturen aus Eiche.jpg
- File:Atelier von Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel mit Holzskulpturen und geschnitztem Stuhl.jpg
- File:Atelier von Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel mit einarmiger Holzskulpturen.jpg
- File:Atelier von Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel mit figürlichen Holzskulpturen.jpg
- File:Atelier von Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel mit hängender Holzskulptur.jpg
- File:Atelier von Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel mit mehreren Holzskulpturen.jpg
- File:Atelier von Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel mit stehenden Holzskulpturen.jpg
- File:Atelier von Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel mit verschiedenen Holzskulpturen.jpg
- File:Atelierraum von Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel mit Holzskulpturen.jpg
- File:Deckblatt Katalog, Schadwinkel.jpg
- File:Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel, Bleistiftzeichnungen, Höhe 200cm.jpg
- File:Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel, Bleistiftzeichnungen, Höhe um 200cm.jpg
- File:Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel, Bleistiftzeichnungen Höhe 240cm.jpg
- File:Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel, Figur aus Ton, 20cm.jpg
- File:Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel, Holzskulptur, Detail, Eichenholz, Länge 75cm.jpg
- File:Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel, Holzskulptur, Eichenholz, Höhe 200cm.jpg
- File:Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel, Holzskulptur, Eichenholz, Höhe 220cm.jpg
- File:Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel, Holzskulptur, Esche und Eiche, Höhe 195cm.jpg
- File:Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel, Holzskulptur, Lindenholz, Höhe 150cm.jpg
- File:Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel, Holzskulptur in der Marktkirche-Hannover, Esche und Eiche, Höhe 195cm.jpg
- File:Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel, Holzskulpturen, Eichenholz, Höhe 370cm.jpg
- File:Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel, Steinrelief, Obernkirchner Sandstein, ca. 200x200cm, Standort in Langenhagen.jpg
- File:Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel, Steinskulptur, Granit, Höhe 110cm.jpg
- File:Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel, Steinskulptur, Roter Sandstein, Höhe 126cm.jpg
- File:Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel, liegende Holzskulptur, Eichenholz, Länge 75cm.jpg
- File:Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel Holzskulptur, Eichenholz, Höhe 220cm.jpg
- File:Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel Holzskulptur, Eichenholz Höhe 164cm.jpg
- File:Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel Holzskulpturen, Eichenholz, Höhe 200; 204; 198cm.jpg
- File:Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel Kohlezeichnungen, Bleistiftzeichnung Höhe 200cm.jpg
- File:Portrait Schadwinkel.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, (Jameslwoodward). Thank you for your work. The uploader, Jürgen Friede (also User:Jürgen Friede) has not so much experience with Commons. But the copyright holder, and old man named User:Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel, had given to us, to me and Jürgen Friede, in German language the permission to upload his works with the licence CC BY-SA 4.0; please have a look here. I see Jürgen had made the same mistake with every upload, so I will (and unfornately have to) correct them all in the next hours. Please wait so long. Sincerely, Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 14:53, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hello James. I 've done that now. Could you give me your request, please? See you, Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 15:16, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- What you have done is not enough since we do not know who [:de:Benutzer:Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel|User:Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel]] actually is. We get many imposters here -- people who take the name of the artist in order to upload images without permission. The artist himself must either (a) write to VRT confirming that he is actually Hans-Tewes Schadwinkel, in which case the VRT volunteer will put a note saying that on the artist's talk pages, or (b) send free license for all the works above in a single email to VRT.
ADMINS -- please give this some extra time to allow the artist to respond. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Pinging @Bernd Schwabe in Hannover see above. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:32, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: permission received. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 18:34, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
NoFoP-Japan. Derivative work of non-free image in Japan. 61.120.241.1 13:30, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment. The subject died in 1960. There is a reasonable chance this is {{PD-Japan-oldphoto}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:22, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment. The subject person (ja:皆川マス) lived until 1960. May not be in the papublic domain if the individual holds the copyright. --61.120.241.1 03:52, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: the fact that the subject died in 1960 doesn't necessarily mean the photographer died shortly thereafter. --Yasu (talk) 15:22, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of non-free illustration in Japan. This artist is probably still alive. 61.120.241.1 13:33, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: the artist, Tetsuo Itoi, was alive in 2013 [1]; thus his works are not yet in PD. --Yasu (talk) 15:26, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted 191.125.0.70 15:12, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
{{not done}} IP vandalismLuckie Luke (talk) 17:38, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Info: EXIF reads "Copyright (C) A.S. Berg / Berg's Imagery. All Rights Reserved." --Achim55 (talk) 19:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)- This one https://www.facebook.com/ArmEmiratesEmbassy/photos/423978294389167/ seems to be the original one published by the embassy. --Achim55 (talk) 19:57, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:17, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Out of the scope Michel Bakni (talk) 18:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Out of the scope Michel Bakni (talk) 18:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Out of the scope Michel Bakni (talk) 18:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:54, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:19, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Images by Gerd Eichmann/Flaggen
[edit](Mostly) unused jpg versions of flags, svg alternatives available.
- File:Flagge Aegypten.jpg
- File:Flagge Afghanistan.jpg
- File:Flagge Allemagne.jpg
- File:Flagge Andorra.jpg
- File:Flagge Armenien.jpg
- File:Flagge Austria.jpg
- File:Flagge Belgien.jpg
- File:Flagge Bhutan.jpg
- File:Flagge BRD.jpg
- File:Flagge Bulgarien.jpg
- File:Flagge China.jpg
- File:Flagge Daenemark.jpg
- File:Flagge Deutschland.jpg
- File:Flagge England.jpg
- File:Flagge Finnland.jpg
- File:Flagge France.jpg
- File:Flagge Frankreich.jpg
- File:Flagge Georgien.jpg
- File:Flagge Germany.jpg
- File:Flagge Griechenland.jpg
- File:Flagge Grossbritannien.jpg
- File:Flagge Guatemala.jpg
- File:Flagge Honduras.jpg
- File:Flagge Indien.jpg
- File:Flagge Iran.jpg
- File:Flagge Irland.jpg
- File:Flagge Island.jpg
- File:Flagge Israel.jpg
- File:Flagge Italien.jpg
- File:Flagge Jordanien.jpg
- File:Flagge Jugoslawien.jpg
- File:Flagge Kambodscha.jpg
- File:Flagge Kanada.jpg
- File:Flagge Laos.jpg
- File:Flagge Liechtenstein.jpg
- File:Flagge Luxembourg.jpg
- File:Flagge Malaysia.jpg
- File:Flagge Malta.jpg
- File:Flagge Mexiko.jpg
- File:Flagge Myanmar.jpg
- File:Flagge Nepal.jpg
- File:Flagge Niederlande.jpg
- File:Flagge Norwegen.jpg
- File:Flagge Oesterreich.jpg
- File:Flagge Pakistan.jpg
- File:Flagge Palaestina.jpg
- File:Flagge Polen.jpg
- File:Flagge Portugal.jpg
- File:Flagge Rumaenien.jpg
- File:Flagge Russland.jpg
- File:Flagge San Marino.jpg
- File:Flagge Schottland.jpg
- File:Flagge Schweden.jpg
- File:Flagge Schweiz.jpg
- File:Flagge Singapur.jpg
- File:Flagge Slowakei.jpg
- File:Flagge Sowjetunion.jpg
- File:Flagge Spain.jpg
- File:Flagge Spanien.jpg
- File:Flagge Sri Lanka.jpg
- File:Flagge Thailand.jpg
- File:Flagge Tibet.jpg
- File:Flagge Tschechien.jpg
- File:Flagge Tuerkei.jpg
- File:Flagge Ukraine.jpg
- File:Flagge Ungarn.jpg
- File:Flagge USA.jpg
- File:Flagge Vatikan.jpg
Didym (talk) 21:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I don't see a need to delete one when we have the other, conversion to svg, can result in subtle changes to the color, only noticeable when you compare the two. --RAN (talk) 23:42, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- The svg versions predate those uncategorized jpg versions and probably even are the source images. --Didym (talk) 15:13, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I use these files for structuring and illustrating some of my personal categories. It helps me keep track of my more than 69,000 uploaded photos. If necessary I'm ready to categorize the files. - Gerd Eichmann (talk) 07:15, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --✗plicit 06:53, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
_II.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_portada.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_II.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_II.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_II.jpg){kind=link}
_II.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(18869059645).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Poor copy of File:Ambassador Gharibjanyan.JPG Kareyac (talk) 06:25, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- This is the original and highest resolution copy of the picture.it as approved to use by the owner and the photographer as well. 2001:8F8:1B6D:B7:4EB:C35A:603E:2782 07:05, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- No, it isn't. Achim55 (talk) 22:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- What about the copyright? 191.125.0.70 21:02, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- No, it isn't. Achim55 (talk) 22:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ambassador Gharibjanyan.JPG. --VIGNERON (talk) 16:59, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work Trade (talk) 14:25, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- This is a picture of the original award. I couldn't find a physical copy to scan, but I don't see how this could be derivative work. Ldisconzi (talk) 23:47, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd. Armbrust (talk) 20:15, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: no realistic educational value Headlock0225 (talk) 09:00, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:59, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. This has more educational value than all these anal fisting gifs on here. AI art is still art. Synotia (talk) 08:11, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete not good AI art. Illustrates nothing in particular. Out of scope. Also what anal fisting gifs? I only know of anal fisting static images. Dronebogus (talk) 20:44, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope. Vera (talk) 06:56, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:24, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
İbrahim Laleli is the author in the EXIF information of these files. In Demirören News Agency's news about Antalya Fashion Week in March 2020, it looks like the photojournalist is İbrahim Laleli. So these copyrighted photos by someone will be deleted.
- File:Ece Begum.jpg
- File:Barrus London - Özge Ulusoy - Antalya Fashion Week.jpg
- File:Antalya Fashion Week.jpg
Uncitoyen (talk) 11:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
_-_portada.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_portada.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Book author is Mariano Sáez y Romero (1868-1939), so the text of the book is in the public domain. This cover illustration is signed by "J. Unturbe" though, most likely Jesús Unturbe (painter and photographer from Segovia, b. 1895-d. 1983). So not in the public domain in Spain yet, Category:Undelete in 2064. Strakhov (talk) 13:43, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
_-_portada.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
_-_portada.jpg){kind=link}
Photo of non-free work. Asclepias (talk) 15:57, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Cette photo est le reflet d'une présentation publique dans un espace public, créé par une association. Cette association doit être ravie qu'on reprenne son travail pour le vulgariser.
- A garder. ChBougui (talk) 08:28, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - infringes on the copyrighted work shown. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:26, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo of not an active contributor. No notability found, commercial PR suspected Ignatus (talk) 22:07, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:27, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
some schoolchildrens' artwork, out of project scope Ignatus (talk) 22:14, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:27, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Adopted from a Chinese government website, 1, with no licenses. ときさき くるみ not because they are easy, but because they are hard 01:24, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 12:19, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo Uhooep (talk) 22:27, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: below COM:TOO US, also in scope. --Rosenzweig τ 07:36, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (photo by Matthias Schmidt) M2k~dewiki (talk) 01:03, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Guten Tag,
- danke für die Anfrage, ich ersuche das fragliche Foto auf der Wikipedia-Seite von Gabriele Petricek zu belassen und das Foto mit © Matthias Schmitdt zu bezeichnen.
- Mit freundlichen Grüßen
- Ariel Ariel Perutz (talk) 12:48, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Ariel Perutz: Bitte mal Commons:Licensing/de lesen (und auch verstehen). Einfach "© irgendwer" reinschreiben geht nicht, die Datei muss von ihrem Urheber (also hier dieser Matthias Schmidt, das bist anscheinend nicht du) explizit unter einer freien Lizenz freigegeben werden. Siehe COM:VRT/de. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 13:04, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: No VRT permission received. --Herby talk thyme 11:53, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Nutrition Stories - Collaborative Responsibility for Change Photo Exhibition - M R Hasan.jpg
[edit]
copyright? Xocolatl (talk) 11:40, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Images photographed are copyright. --Herby talk thyme 11:55, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Probably captured from non-free content. 61.120.241.1 15:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:55, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
doubtful source: no meta data, low resolution, was published on Panoramio t least one month earlier https://web.archive.org/web/20161015040045if_/http://static.panoramio.com/photos/large/32623150.jpg Albinfo (talk) 20:38, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
probably the sam ecase as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kalaja e Velçës.jpg Albinfo (talk) 20:40, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Alireza Vasighzadeh Ansari for Tasnim News Agency
[edit]- File:Beit al-Moqaddas 27 army exercise (27).jpg
- File:Beit al-Moqaddas 27 army exercise (28).jpg
- File:Beit al-Moqaddas 27 army exercise (29).jpg
- File:Beit al-Moqaddas 27 army exercise (30).jpg
- File:Beit al-Moqaddas 27 army exercise (31).jpg
- File:Beit al-Moqaddas 27 army exercise (32).jpg
- File:Beit al-Moqaddas 27 army exercise (33).jpg
- File:Beit al-Moqaddas 27 army exercise (34).jpg
- File:Beit al-Moqaddas 27 army exercise (35).jpg
- File:Beit al-Moqaddas 27 army exercise (36).jpg
- File:Beit al-Moqaddas 27 army exercise (37).jpg
- File:Beit al-Moqaddas 27 army exercise (38).jpg
- File:Beit al-Moqaddas 27 army exercise (39).jpg
- File:Beit al-Moqaddas 27 army exercise (40).jpg
- File:Beit al-Moqaddas 27 army exercise (41).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Per This deletion discussion, and releated rules: We can accept files from Tasnim News Agancy with Tasnim's watermark and by official photographers of the news agency around the world. This is stated in the footer of all their webpages at http://www.tasnimnews.com/. Photographs produced by the agency contain a watermark in the lower left corner, and on the bottom edge there is a black bar containing white text that attributes the name of the photographer, e.g. But the files listed above did not comply with this . I think Alireza Vasighzadeh Ansari is not official photographer of Tasnim and we can't accept this files. --MehdiTalk 07:45, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not all Tasnim works have that typical watermark, I have listed some examples here. And Vasighzadeh Ansari works for Tasnim's office in Isfahan as pointed here. I think this category should be merged with that too. Regards, HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:07, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- If Alireza Vasighzadeh Ansari and Alireza Vasigh Ansari are the same person, I withdraw my request.--MehdiTalk 16:26, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Seem to be the same, Vasigh(zadeh)+Ansari is a rare surname combination in Iran. Both people are based in the same city and it seems this is how Isfahan office of Tasnim publishes its entries. Examples for Vasigh: [2] [3] and Vasighzadeh [4] [5]. The personal preference seems to be Ali Vasigh (from portfolio website alivasigh.com). HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:40, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- KeepToday, I contacted the provincial photographers department of Tasnim News Agency and they confirmed that both people are the same. I withdrew my request. --MehdiTalk 10:02, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:40, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
There no any free license and book is not in public domain. Also there no any permissions from authors. So, it is copyright violation. Kharkivian (talk) 00:52, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- See page 4: (free distribution) https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:No_Panic!_(tutorial).pdf&page=4 2A02:2378:1091:6589:0:0:0:1 06:09, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- free distribution is not the same free license. It it the different. I don't paid for book, but I need permission for copying. Kharkivian (talk) 12:53, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Jim777: do you have more information to help determine the copyright status of this document? Also the {{PD-UA-exempt}} seems a bit strange, according to the book itself, the authors are Олександр Дєдик, Михайло Слободянюк, Олег Фешовець and Дзвенислава Подляшецька and not - as indicated on the file right now - "Ministry of Information Policy of Ukraine and Astrolabe Publishing" (the later, obivously being the publisher). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:43, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Per COM:PCP. UA-exempt covers "(c) official documents of a political, legislative or administrative nature (laws, decrees, resolutions, court awards, State standards, etc.) issued by government authorities within their powers, and official translations thereof" which this book seems not to be, Vigneron also brought up a valid question about authorship that wasn't answered. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:14, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
copyvio|source=https://www.rfi.fr/fr/emission/20180311-france-musee-branly-chirac-exposition-peintures-lointains TansoShoshen (talk) 02:00, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- To add, not only is this file a copyright violation. That isn't even a painting of Sisowath Monivong. That is a painting of Sisowath I. TansoShoshen (talk) 02:01, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- @TansoShoshen: who is the author of this painting? The source and the category seems to indicate Category:Mascré-Souville but there is no deathdate. Given the dates, it may well be in public domain (and if not, all five files should be deleted, not just this one). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:57, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP, we don't know when the artist died, this looks like a 20th Century painting, and we don't know when it was created let alone published. I have found a 1917 date for one of the paintings in the category mentioned (and I'll nominate that for deletion shortly). EDIT: 1927 to 1941 is the range of creation per https://www.frieze.com/article/fraught-future-ethnographic-museum Undelete in 2062 using 1941 as creation date.--Abzeronow (talk) 16:50, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
This letter was written in 1954 by Sofia Tatarcheva that is its author. Jingiby (talk) 06:15, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Question. Would a death announcement count as news and be ineligible for copyright per COM:NOP Bulgaria?
Deleted: Long and complex enough of a letter to be copyrightable. Doesn't appear to be as simple as "news". --Abzeronow (talk) 16:52, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Still copyrightable in the UK per COM:TOO UK. Also, per prior DR discussions, like this one, other Sky logos have been deleted from this project. There's already a local copy en:File:Sky One 2017.png (i.e. in PNG format). George Ho (talk) 09:19, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Almost forgot: this logo shows two halves of different shades. --George Ho (talk) 09:21, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Appears to be above the UK ToO. Local enwiki copy even says "Don't transfer to Commons". --Abzeronow (talk) 16:54, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Не правильная карта, станции Достык нет, Момышулы называется Sibom (talk) 10:54, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Factual errors are not a reason for deletion. A map with the correct station is derived from this. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:56, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk", laut Metadaten aber Fotograf Michael Schmid Lutheraner (talk) 12:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Das Bild wurde am 5. März offensichtlich von der Künstlerin selbst hochgeladen. Kurzer Hinweis zu Lizenzfrage auf ihrer Diskussionsseite einstellen? Gruß Remembergeorge (talk) 11:15, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader shares name of the subject, who is not the photographer. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:57, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
accidentally posted. For additional, there's only a author 28daniel (talk) 14:18, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused file, decided to grant courtesy deletion for uploader. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:00, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Per Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Product packaging it should be evaluated/discussed whether the label-content is copyrighted and requires permission, or not. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:21, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Similar problem with:
- File:Gin and Tonic.jpg
- File:2023 Alkohole.jpg
- File:2023 Rumy.jpg
- File:2023 Nalewki.jpg
- File:2023 Valbon Camembert klasyczny.jpg
- File:2023 Nifuroksazyd Hasco 100 mg.jpg
Deleted: per nomination all except File:2023 Nifuroksazyd Hasco 100 mg.jpg, which I think is likely not copyrightable. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:54, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation. João Justiceiro (talk) 18:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Brazil has a high threshold of originality, which this likely falls below (see COM:TOO Brazil). IronGargoyle (talk) 22:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Weak delete below COM:TOO Brazil, but still above COM:TOO US, I think. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:09, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- Two things: First of all, this is a very similar issue to that which led {{Not-free-US-FOP}} to be accepted. There is no reason why a similar principle wouldn't apply to threshold of originality for logos. As far as I've seen, it has been common practice to keep logos based on the country-of-origin TOO. This should be a much wider discussion at someplace like COM:VPC, not you trying to make the point in some random logo deletion requests. Second of all, although not as baffling as your interpretation of US threshold of originality here, This remains a logo which is still likely below COM:TOO US. It is text, simple shapes, and only a few colors. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:21, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. Above the ToO of Brazil. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:46, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Archivo derivado de otro 191.126.142.134 23:32, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP. Copyright status of the photograph used in this is unknown. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:48, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
No creo que sea trabajo de quien lo sube 191.126.142.134 23:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Very low resolution, no EXIF, duck for a netcopyvio. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:49, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
atenta contra mi privacidad Gerardo-Soria.P-22020095 (talk) 02:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hmm, but you have uploaded this file by yourself, 3 months ago. --Túrelio (talk) 08:32, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 17:12, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Mehdi as Dw no source since (dw no source since) HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:08, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The patches are PD-Iran (are in use for +30 years) and to the rest I think de minimis applies. If not, they can be blurred. HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:09, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- But we need to source and permission for personal photo on this image. Derivative work from other photo. --MehdiTalk 15:49, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Will blurring the image suffice for keeping the file? HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:42, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- I think u can use Commons:De minimis. --MehdiTalk 18:20, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Will blurring the image suffice for keeping the file? HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:42, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- But we need to source and permission for personal photo on this image. Derivative work from other photo. --MehdiTalk 15:49, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Without evidence of permission from the author, we can't keep it. —holly {chat} 17:15, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted by Nintendo. Removing the background and gradient might bring it below the treshold of originality. Dexxor (talk) 08:43, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I have removed the background and borders, I think this is already below the originality threshold. Sebano1999 13:45, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Sebano1999: Thanks, but the version you uploaded seems to be fan-made and deviates somewhat from the official logo. Dexxor (talk) 15:49, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, text only and below TOO. The fact that it is a derivative/fan work does not mean it has to be deleted from Commons. --Ellywa (talk) 21:54, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MexTDT as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:51, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Info
- We have various deleted Nickelodeon logos (e.g. Nickelodeon logos, Movers2008, Nick India.png, WPNICK ubox icon.svg). en:File:Nickelodeon logo.svg was considered non-free. I can't be sure whether any of the deleted files were similar to this one.
- NICK2023.png is nearly a duplicate and seems to be more accurate.
- Nick logo 2009.svg, Nick logo 2009.png, Animation disc Nick orange splat.svg and Animation disc Nicktoons Nick orange splat.svg also have a splat behind simple text.
- TilmannR (talk) 18:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Adding two more:
- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- One more:
- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:53, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- One more:
- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:21, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Comment If i used the TOO-UK rationale, which also include the unique font as part of Threshold of originality (TOO), Nick's 2009 custom font in the logo should be deleted unless they're standard font. However, this is not the case in the U.S. for Nick's splat logo. 36.68.195.77 13:36, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- I don't know why TOO-UK would be relevant here. As far as I know Nickelodeon has always been owned by American companies.
- en:File:NickelodeonLogo85-09.png is an older version of the logo and currently considered non-free.
- Delete Nickelodeon Splat Logo.jpg. Surely it's above the threshold of originality with all the lighting and textures.
- TilmannR (talk) 18:51, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- For comments on font: typefaces generally are not eligible for monopoly copyright protections. Only the specific digital font file holding code for the entire typeface is. --dsprc (talk) 15:27, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- For convenience, here's a list of all the 2023 versions of the logo:
- TilmannR (talk) 21:27, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- The issue is that the new Nickelodeon splat logo is not intended to live on a white background. The white text is rendered illegible with no background color behind it. Having the logo displayed this way is inconsistent with Nickelodeon's updated brand guidelines. Kutluj (talk) 16:37, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Brand guidelines are not relevant to this discussion. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:22, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- And another one: Nickelodeon_2023_logo_(outline).svg Wikiwerner (talk) 11:00, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- The issue is that the new Nickelodeon splat logo is not intended to live on a white background. The white text is rendered illegible with no background color behind it. Having the logo displayed this way is inconsistent with Nickelodeon's updated brand guidelines. Kutluj (talk) 16:37, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Delete Agree Copyvio in addition it appears most of the logo's are coming directly from Fandom pages, witch can't be used as a source. The sites used in the images need to come from Nickelodeon itself not a fandom wiki. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 20:19, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Fandom Wiki that logo used is mostly flat version. However, flat version of the logo is also acceptable as long as it had equivalent to the original 3D version. Nick itself occassionally use flat version of this logo. 114.125.236.122 01:27, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- The source is not relevant as long as the logos are legitimate and in the public domain. It needs to be specified, but you can take a public domain image from anywhere. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:24, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Keep any logos with a non-textured "splat" and delete the rest. I think that these fall below the threshold of originality in the United States. If you compare to the examples at COM:TOO US you will see that PD status is not restricted solely to fixed geometric shapes. The fact that these are single color, without shading, and have a relatively simple shape indicates that they are simple enough. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:21, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep File:NICK-2023.svg and File:NICK2023.png; Delete File:Nickelodeon logo 2023 by thortheskunk911 dfqnnzx-fullview.png and File:Nickelodeon Splat Logo.jpg. The first, second, and third files I listed are all below the threshold of originality in United States copyright law. They each consist of a single color, a single font, and a simple splat shape. Despite this, the third file should be deleted, as it is essentially a less-accurate version of the second and first files. The fourth file, on the other hand, is much more complex: I believe it does cross the threshold of originality, given the slimy shine of parts of the splat and the gradient of the purple background. It could only be rationalized under fair use, which is prohibited on Wikimedia Commons. — Mr. Starfleet Command (Talk • Contributions • Social Activity) 02:33, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep for flat versions of the 2023 logo only (both PNG and SVG, but SVG preferred). The fourth file in question (File:Nickelodeon Splat Logo.jpg) is the most likely candidate for deletion giving that the shape texture and much more shiny gradient background, that's above the threshold of originality that must be count. The third file (File:Nickelodeon logo 2023 by thortheskunk911 dfqnnzx-fullview.png) is essentially the least likely candidate to be deleted. The other two files are below TOO and should be tagged TOO-US when necessary to affirm this that cannot be deleted. 202.67.43.4 01:19, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep For all flat versions of the 2023 splat logo only. Per other arguments, these flat versions are all below threshold of originality in US copyright law (It may be above TOO in other countries (particularly UK/Australia) however, but it's not relevant), giving that they have single color, single font, and single splat. We should only Delete a image that have more complex than just splat shape in nature (File:Nickelodeon Splat Logo.jpg), it have the shiny parts of the splat and the gradient in the purple background. We want to go more strict about fair use usage of Wikipedia image. 180.254.163.46 05:37, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Don't delete it please — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.3.80.79 (talk) 21:09, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Nickelodeon logo 2023 by thortheskunk911 dfqnnzx-fullview.png, NICK2023.png, Nickelodeon Splat Logo.jpg, and NICK-2023.svg, so, basically, all of them (Nickelodeon Logo (2023–present).png has already been deleted). I really do not think the shapes are below the TOO; there's too much randomness in how the main splat shape is constructed, at least. The text is fine, the shading is not really an issue, and the lone circle is itself OK. The main splat shape, though? The off-center blob at the bottom, the blob at the top that has two "heads", so to speak, and the variance of curves and angles make this too complex to be kept here. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 18:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The wordmark alone represents the entity better and doesn't run into any COPYVIO concerns and is visible on everything but its exact orange shade. This is pretty much light-mode hostile and doesn't add anything outside an extra element that obscures and shrinks the wordmark and is too complex overall to render easily like a simple wordmark does. 'Change for the sake of change' logo fans should just follow the KISS principle and keep things simple. Nate • (chatter) 03:23, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all. If we use the guideline of TOO in the United Kingdom or its equivalent countries, all of these images should be deleted without question giving that it had unique font and splast shape. However, Nickelodeon was based in the U.S., we need to recommend deletion of more complex nature of the logo itself, that's splast shape and textured (In other words, non-textured ones should not deleted). I don't think any shapes of splast matters, as long as it didn't textured. 36.77.115.87 13:28, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all. Agree to many IP comments. No matter whether it is textured splash or not, this logo should be deleted NOW. 125.167.58.120 02:28, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep flat version only. I would guess that any shapes of splat are not eligible for the copyright, giving the fact that the new 2023 logo was not yet registered copyright by the copyright authority. Only 3d shapes that could removed due to these above the threshold of originality. 118.96.61.125 03:09, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- I think it might be worth noting that, as far as I can tell, Nickelodeon hasn't registered the logo with the United States Copyright Office, which seems to indicate that it could be below the threshold of originality in the US. Mr. Starfleet Command (talk • contributions) 02:52, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I don't have a Commons account, I am the user Howard Harold 129 I edit the Spanish Wikipedia, but the logo must remain, it must not be deleted, if the article is deleted it will be without a logo, unless it puts the previous logo, but the page would be outdated in the logo if I do that, just as they are in the articles of the Corazón and Cinema channels with their outdated logos in the Spanish Wikipedia, at least other Wikipedias like the English Wikipedia, have a space for local images, something that the Spanish Wikipedia does not have, that is why I say that the logo must remain, regards--190.236.202.77 09:19, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- It does not matter whether an article becomes without a logo. If it is a copyright violation, then we are obliged to delete it. Wikiwerner (talk) 16:04, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep all flat 2D logos with more reasonable reason. I don't see any incarnations of Nickelodeon's splat logo registered by US Copyright office, which make all of them below TOO. However, when we talking more specific, i see the 3D textured version of the logo (File:Nickelodeon Splat Logo.jpg) above TOO, so that file is only the likely deletion candidate if is deleted. Elsewhere, all other files (2D version of the logo) should be kept. Yayan550 (talk) 00:09, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Is the lack of registration indicative of being below the TOO, or are other factors at play (such as the paperwork to register taking a long time or no registration being sought to begin with)? -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 20:17, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per one of the nominations. Maanshen (talk) 13:47, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: all the 2D versions of the logo for being below the very generous COM:TOO US, but deleted the 3D one. —holly {chat} 18:03, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
