Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/11/29
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
Marked "own work" but see, for example, here: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/breaking-news-live-updates-oct-10/liveblog/94754019.cms Larry Hockett (talk) 03:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:20, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=687362409435028&set=a.220226696148604 ZioNicco (talk) 09:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Ciao ho visto che hai proposto la cancellazione della foto. Sai indicarmi la procedura esatta per caricare quella foto ? Perchè ne sono in possesso con i diritti ma wikipedia non me la carica. Caricando la stessa foto da fb invece il caricamento è andato a buon fine. Sofia Melella (talk) 15:01, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedied 16:11, November 29, 2022 by EugeneZelenko. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 21:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 23:01, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE ordinary person (not used anywhere) Mateus2019 (talk) 21:36, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 07:14, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 21:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work as image could be found at another website prior to the upload to Commons. Uploader's other images were previously deleted for copyright reasons. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:17, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate of TOC-2 seen from TOC Gotanda.jpg. I uploaded it by mistake Syced (talk) 00:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:34, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
File uploaded for use of vandalism only Nightmare Rarity (talk) 11:18, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete personal photo for non-wikipedian out of scope. --Karim talk to me :)..! 13:21, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment and also File:Naked little boy age 12.jpg. --Karim talk to me :)..! 13:23, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Karim185.3 That file is missing a DR tag. Brianjd (talk) 12:09, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Nightmare Rarity and Karim185.3: I reported these files as suspected child pornography. I do like to say that mere nudity is not pornography, but the framing here (from the neck to the legs), combined with the nudity, the obscured background and the lack of meaningful descriptions, is suspicious.
- Convenience links:
- Brianjd (talk) 12:09, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Convenience link for uploader: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth?target=Matrokbam2022 Brianjd (talk) 12:11, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --Mhhossein talk 12:27, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps by Jochen Bertholdt
[edit]German stamps were found not to be official works by courts, so they are not automatically in the public domain. These stamps are the work of de:Jochen Bertholdt, who died in 2020. So they are still protected by copyright and should be deleted. The files can be restored in 2091.
- File:DBP 1991 1522-1525-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1991 1522-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1991 1523-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1991 1524-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1991 1525-R.JPG
- File:Ddrschiffbau1971IwanFranko.jpg
- File:Ddrschiffbau1971typ17.jpg
- File:Ddrschiffbau1971typ451.jpg
- File:DPAG 2005 100 Jahre Mittellandkanal.jpg
- File:DPAG 2009 Eisenbahnfährverkehr Sassnitz-Trelleborg.jpg
- File:FDC 1976 GDR-MiNr21232124 pm B002.jpg
- File:FDC 1983 GDR ThuringianGlass pm B002.jpg
- File:GDR 1985 SouvBfIUPACJena pm B002.jpg
- File:GDR 1987 MiNrWZd0726 SD B002.jpg
- File:PSC 1990 GDR Greifswald pm B002b.jpg
- File:PSC 1990 GDR MSArkona mt B002.jpg
- File:PSE 1986 GDR LeipMesse mt B002.jpg
- File:Se-tenant 1986 GDR MiNrWZd692 pm B003.jpg
- File:Sonderbriefmarke 2000 Jahre Koblenz 1992.jpg
- File:SouvBf 1984 GDR Kamenz pm B002.jpg
- File:SouvCard 1984 GDR LHGotha pm B002.jpg
- File:SouvCard 1988 GDR TramCottbus pm B002a.jpg
- File:Stamp 1984 GDR MiNr2888 pm B002a.jpg
- File:Stamp 1984 GDR MiNr2889 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1984 GDR MiNrBl77 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1984 GDR-WorkersFestvalGera MiNr28802881ZD pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1986 GDR MiNr3003 pm B002a.jpg
- File:Stamp 1986 GDR MiNr3004 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1987 GDR MiNr3080 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1987 GDR MiNr3081 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1988 GDR MiNi3198 pm B002a.jpg
- File:Stamp 1988 GDR MiNi3199 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1988 GDR MiNi3200 pm B002a.jpg
- File:Stamp 1988 GDR MiNi3201 pm B002a.jpg
- File:Stamp 1988 GDR MiNr3203 pm B002a.jpg
- File:Stamp 1988 GDR MiNr3204 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1988 GDR MiNr3205 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1988 GDR MiNr3206 pm B002b.jpg
- File:Stamp 1988 GDR MiNr3207 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp DDR 1986 MiNr 3015 Dresdner Pferdebahn 1886.png
- File:Stamp DDR 1986 MiNr 3016 Leipziger Strassenbahn 1896.png
- File:Stamp DDR 1986 MiNr 3017 Berliner Strassenbahn 1910.png
- File:Stamp DDR 1986 MiNr 3018 Hallesche Strassenbahn 1928.png
- File:Stamp Germany 1995 MiNr1829 Hilfsorganisation CARE.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1996 Briefmarke Domplatz Halberstadt.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1969, MiNr 1515.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1969, MiNr 1516.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1969, MiNr 1519.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1969, MiNr 1520.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1970, MiNr 1575.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1970, MiNr 1576.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1970, MiNr 1584.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1970, MiNr 1585.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1970, MiNr 1586.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1970, MiNr 1587.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1970, MiNr 1588.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1970, MiNr 1589.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1970, MiNr 1590.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1970, MiNr Zusammendruck 1575, 1576.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1971, MiNr 1693.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1971, MiNr 1694.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1971, MiNr 1695.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1971, MiNr 1696.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1971, MiNr 1697.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1971, MiNr 1698.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1975, MiNr 2023.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1975, MiNr 2024.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1975, MiNr 2069.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1975, MiNr 2076.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1975, MiNr 2077.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1976, MiNr 2161.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1976, MiNr 2162.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1977, MiNr 2208.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1977, MiNr 2209.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1977, MiNr 2223.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1977, MiNr 2276.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1977, MiNr 2277.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1977, MiNr 2278.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1977, MiNr 2279.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1977, MiNr 2280.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr 2310.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr 2311.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr 2312.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr 2313.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr 2316.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr 2317.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr 2353.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr 2354.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr 2355.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr 2359.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr 2360.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr 2362.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr 2363.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr Block 052.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr Block 053.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1979, MiNr 2405.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1979, MiNr 2452.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1979, MiNr 2453.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1980, MiNr 2514.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1980, MiNr 2515.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1981, MiNr 2657.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1981, MiNr 2658.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1981, MiNr 2659.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1981, MiNr 2660.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1982, MiNr 2706.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1982, MiNr 2707.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1982, MiNr 2709.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1982, MiNr 2710.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1982, MiNr 2711.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1982, MiNr 2712.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1982, MiNr 2713.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1982, MiNr 2714.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2835.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2836.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2837.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2838.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr 2848.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr 2880.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr 2881.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr 2888.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr 2889.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr Block 077.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr Zusammendruck 2880, 2881.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 3017.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr 3081.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr 3118.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr 3119.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr Zusammendruck 3118, 3119.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3161.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3162.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3163.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3164.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3165.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3166.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3198.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3199.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3200.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3201.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3203.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3204.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3205.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3206.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3207.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1990, MiNr 3302.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1990, MiNr 3303.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1990, MiNr 3304.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1990, MiNr 3305.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1990, MiNr 3306.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1990, MiNr 3307.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1990, MiNr 3308.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1990, MiNr 3309.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1990, MiNr Zusammendruck 3306-3309.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 13:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:43, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps by Jochen Bertholdt
[edit]Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany stamps of Germany are copyrighted until at least 70 years after the artist's death. In this case the artist, Jochen Bertholdt, died in 2020. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2091.
- File:Ersttagsbrief Technische Denkmale DDR - Rothenfurth.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1970, MiNr 1575-1576.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1975, MiNr 2083.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1975, MiNr 2084.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1975, MiNr 2085.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1976, MiNr 2122.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 3003.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 3004.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 3015.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 3016.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 3018.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 3052.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 3053.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr Zusammendruck 3052-3053.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr 3080.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr 3105.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 07:57, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Malverna as Logo. Below COM:TOO? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- It is above threshold of originality and eligible for copyright protection from unknown source. Malverna 00:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:01, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
This is taken off her Facebook with no indication of releasing it to the public domain. AngusWOOF (talk) 00:57, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:03, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Fails COM:SCOPE. Nw520 (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as no educational value. Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 13:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Seems out of scope. Overlaid text looks like social media; possibly copyvio also. Brianjd (talk) 11:48, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:03, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
This is mostly a duplicate of the prior file which I nominated for deletion with the addition of two bunny statues. I don't think this is any less self promotional with the bunny statues that it is without them. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:40, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Robert Elwes Author (talk · contribs)
[edit]One of the things Commons is not, is a private photo album. Unused personal photos are out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Graf von Schworstadt Fullsizeoutput 8645.jpg
- File:Robert and Marina Elwes.jpg
- File:Robert Elwes Dog Fullsizeoutput 8c92.jpg
- File:Robert Elwes Author DSCN7971.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all these and this and this one too, shameless (attempted) self-promotion both here (1, 2) and on en.wp (where he is now indefinitely blocked with talk-page access removed for blowing his own trumpet and just refusing to listen to anyone else). Apart from the promotion, they seem to be fully out of scope, per nom. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:56, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- Not seeing how this is useful to this project either. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:58, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:40, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Mention of All Rights Reserved in the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:52, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:37, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
At this file size/quality and with this being a portrait of a public figure, I doubt it's own work of the uploader and suggest it was taken from a prior source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:35, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, small, low quality, over the desk portrait of politician or ruler. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:58, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:30, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Unused table. Could be reproduced in text if ever needed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:59, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:23, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Metadata indicates the image came from Facebook. The uploader has had multiple other files deleted for copyright issues, this appears to be another case where they are claiming as "own work" an image they found online. Ravensfire (talk) 20:00, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:23, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work due to small size and lack of metadata. Uploader has history of uploads with unclear copyright status. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:03, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:23, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Not sure what this image is for. Seems out of scope. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:22, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
non-educational Bfuster (talk) 21:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G7. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:20, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
non-educational Bfuster (talk) 21:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G7. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:21, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
non-educational Bfuster (talk) 21:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G7. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:21, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
non-educational Bfuster (talk) 21:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G7. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:21, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
non-educational Bfuster (talk) 21:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G7. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:21, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
copyvio of a screenshot Oaktree b (talk) 22:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:16, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
out of focus photo of an unidentified person, out of scope, unused in all wiki projects Oaktree b (talk) 22:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:16, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
copyvio of Family Guy TV program Oaktree b (talk) 22:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 22:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 22:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 22:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 22:57, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:14, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
The book cover is above the threshold of originality in the United States and appears to be copyrighted. As such, this should be deleted as a presumptive lack of a valid free license for this book cover. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 06:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:12, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:10, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Image appears to be an advertising poster for extant media, not the uploader's original work. Ilzolende (talk) 07:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:10, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
wrong image uploaded Bioarts (talk) 08:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G7. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:10, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
I post the wrong image. Melaniegore1 (talk) 10:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: spam. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:08, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:Scope: unused personal image. MKFI (talk) 10:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:07, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
COM:Derivative work: photograph-of-photograph on computer screen, original unknown. MKFI (talk) 10:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:07, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
A photo shot in 1967 can hardly be free, if it has not been freely released by the photographer himself. Even if he/she had died the same year, the image would still be in his/her copyright til end of 2037. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:06, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio, see history. 91.193.179.246 11:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:05, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
extremely low quality, looks like a photo of a photo, unlikely to be own work as claimed Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 13:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:04, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE. This is basically an advertisement; it ends "Enrol in our Data Analytics course right away" Marbletan (talk) 15:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as out of scope, advertising. Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 10:25, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:03, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Probably not own work. See exif data Skivsamlare (talk) 15:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:03, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
and:
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Logo from unknown origin. Pierre cb (talk) 16:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:01, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
File:2014 Holiday Bazaar with Santa - Camp Humphreys, South Korea - 21~23 November 2014 (15901339186).jpg
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:57, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
too small to have any educational value; unclear copyright status — Draceane talkcontrib. 16:59, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:57, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Giorgia De88 (talk · contribs)
[edit]probably not own work, permission would be required
- File:Calendario 1993.jpg
- File:Calendario2005-b.jpg
- File:Copertine calendario2016.jpg
- File:Calendario2005.jpg
- File:Copertine calendario2017.jpg
- File:Salute tavolo.jpg
- File:Salute compatto.jpg
- File:Calendario salute.jpg
- File:Celendari salute 2021.jpg
— Draceane talkcontrib. 17:02, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:56, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 17:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:55, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 17:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:55, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 17:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:55, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 17:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:55, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 17:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:54, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 17:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:54, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 17:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:54, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
File:Sanjay Mitra, Managing Director and CEO, Unico Technologies Limited. Ph.D Indian institute of Technology.jpg
[edit]out of scope Trade (talk) 17:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:53, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 17:29, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:53, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Promo, unidientified singer. Clearly indicated it was uploaded as promotion in description. Oaktree b (talk) 18:18, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:49, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
likely copyvio appears copy of a commercial work Oaktree b (talk) 18:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:48, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
non-notable individual, unused in any wiki Oaktree b (talk) 18:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:47, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Above ToO in China. See also [1]. Yann (talk) 19:02, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Above TOO in China and US. Did not find a license. https://olympics.com/en/olympic-games/beijing-2008/logo-design describes the emblem and poster. Glrx (talk) 19:19, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:47, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Generated with unspecified avatar software, many variations of this exist online (eg. https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1457983932863942657/vXH4FgMP_400x400.jpg) Belbury (talk) 19:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:46, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
unknown individual, no indication of notability, photo unused in all wiki projects Oaktree b (talk) 19:29, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:46, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
unused photo of an unidentified individual Oaktree b (talk) 19:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:45, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Obviously a copy, see the marks at the top of the letterboxing to see how this was a screenshot before being here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:38, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete obivous copyright violation by an user who has more than two dozen cases of confirmed copyright infringements on WCommons. Veverve (talk) 19:54, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:45, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Usuallly I avoid mass nominations. This is an exception because all the photos have the same problem. Many have FBMD in metadata, others have transmission data showing these were all copied from the internet and are not own work.
- File:Papangwithimelda.jpg
- File:Bataanhermosa.jpg
- File:Papangwithfr.jpg
- File:Papangedsa.jpg
- File:Papanginhermosa.jpg
- File:Papangwithnomer.jpg
- File:Pilaracc.jpg
- File:NCCPpilar.jpg
- File:Papangalmario2.jpg
- File:Weekofprayer.jpg
- File:Parishofourladyofpillaracc.jpg
- File:Batangasecumenicalcouncil.jpg
- File:Bishop John Florentine.jpg
- File:Nsipb.jpg
- File:Cathedral of The Most Holy Trinity.jpg
- File:Naturesbasilica4.jpg
- File:Naturesbasilica3.jpg
- File:Station of the Cross.jpg
- File:Marcos with papang.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete the user has shown on their talk page that they have but a poor grasp on copyright rules. Moreover, the user has more than two dozen cases of confirmed copyright infringements on WCommons. Veverve (talk) 19:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Save you can't just nominate it all to deletion just because you also found the photo elsewhere. I also have my own photos, and just because someone else ay also have it, doesn't mean it should be deleted. You can debate with me otherwise..... Ploreky (talk) 10:13, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Please don't just assume. Please.
- Ploreky (talk) 10:18, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- 1) all the photos have the same problem. Many have FBMD in metadata, others have transmission data showing these were all copied from the internet and are not own work. You have not responded to this.
- 2) Already, two dozen images of yours are confirmed copyright infringements.
- How, then, are we not to assume that all those images are copyright violations? Also, COM:PCP. Veverve (talk) 15:31, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Absolutely I can nominate if we found the photo elsewhere. If it was previously published, we need COM:OTRS. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:45, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely own work on the photo on the screen Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Adeletron 3030 as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Chinchilla in captivity.jpg. Redundant and lower-quality than the cited file, but different file type, so not eligible for speedy (COM:DUPE). —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Delete Webp conversion of File:Chinchilla in captivity.jpg. The quality is lower and takes longer to load on Wikipedia. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 03:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:23, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: OOS. Does not qualify for speedy as far as I can tell, but I agree re scope. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:22, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
copied from https://ipc-paris.fr/michel-boyance/ without permission Ske (talk) 02:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:22, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope. Taichi (talk) 03:14, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as appears to definitely be out of scope. Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 13:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:19, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:16, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:16, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Post-1989 murals, no FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:16, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Artsakh A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:16, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Clearly a screenshot of an RSBN newscast; unless Editor Alex 2021 can prove they're a representative of RSBN, its clearly violating copyright. GRuban (talk) 04:01, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:14, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 04:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:13, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Photo courtesy of Lucas Barth, not a work from the US Federal Government A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:41, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Photo courtesy of Lucas Barth, not a work from the US Federal Government A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Photo courtesy of Chuck Graham (a freelance photographer), not a works from the US Federal Government A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Photo courtesy of Chuck Graham (a freelance photographer), not a works from the US Federal Government A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 05:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 05:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 05:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
No FoP in Qatar. The image focus too much on the modern buildings, not a general skyline view A1Cafel (talk) 05:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 05:29, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
No FoP in Qatar. The Aspire Tower is the subject of this photo, if the tower was removed, the image is unlikely to be useful anymore (fails de minimis) A1Cafel (talk) 05:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Probable copyvio per the talk page. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 06:38, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 17:17, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 17:18, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 17:19, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 17:19, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 17:19, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 17:19, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 17:19, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 17:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
File:Dubai - United Arab Bank -Concord Towers - أبراج مئوية.-توافق البنك العربي المتحد - panoramio.jpg
[edit]No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 17:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Bogus license. Uploader is also subject of the photo, so they should obtain permission from original photographer. Needs COM:VRT. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
reverse of image at https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/392452-REG/Korg_AW1_AW_1_Clip_On_Instrument.html Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
reverse of image at https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/392452-REG/Korg_AW1_AW_1_Clip_On_Instrument.html Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
At this size/quality and that this was a politician, I think the date is wrong and I think it's not own work. Needs accurate source. Might be old enough to keep. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
And all the images related to Miklós Hegedűs, his art, workplace, and others, by the same uploader, from the same source.
Translation of the request of the uploader (on my talk page):
Dear Grin! Please, since I don't speak English and you mentioned this possibility in your e-mail, I ask you now to start deleting the pictures of Miklós Hegedűs, the painter, with the following reason:
The rights holders have not consented to the publication of the images, partly because they have the right to publish them in pictorial form (the image of the paintings), and partly because the caption and content contain data that violate personal rights and which they do not wish to publish (place of burial and anthroposophical connection).
The pictures of Miklós Hegedűs are from Ibolya Beluk, not from his heirs, and since the painter died in 2022, permission would have to be obtained from his descendants, which they refused to grant on 12 November. Unfortunately, I am not familiar with the process of deletion here, and after User:Mdaniels5757 put a template on the images on 13 November 2022 that reads "If no valid permission is received within 30 days of the first response from the VRT agent, this file will be deleted. Please do not submit a further request for deletion for authorization reasons." I thought that by 13 December at the latest, these files would be deleted.
Now I see that you have given permission numbers to three of them, or that you have written that an extra separate request for deletion is needed.
You know the options here, please help me to get these files I uploaded on 11 November removed from Wikimedia Commons.
Thank you very much! Sorry to bother you, but as I said, I am not familiar with the methods here. Sincerely, Commission (talk) 20:01, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
[...] Here's what they are:
File:Miklós Hegedűs, 2022.jpg According to his legal heirs (Mihály Hegedűs), as a portrait photograph it does not reflect the painter's personality. They do not contribute. File:Invitation to the event of the Anthroposophical Pedagogical Workshop, 2022-06-11.jpg Invasion of privacy (They do not intend to publish his anthroposophical affiliation). They do not consent. File:Notification of the funeral of Miklós Hegedűs painter, 2022.jpg Data violating privacy rights (grave location). They do not consent. File:Miklós Hegedűs at the Anthroposophical Pedagogical Workshop's Common Image session 01.jpg Data violating privacy rights (anthroposophy) No consent given. File:Pictures of Miklós Hegedűs at the Common Image session of the Anthroposophical Pedagogical Workshop 02.jpg Data violating privacy rights (anthroposophy). They do not consent. File:Miklós Hegedűs' painting Október (2018) at the Anthroposophical Pedagogical Workshop.jpg neither to the publication of the painting's photo nor to the publication of the painter's anthroposophical affiliation. They do not consent. File:Pictures of Miklós Hegedűs Nekrológ, 2022-09-25.jpg They do not consent to the publication of the portrait on the montage by Ibolya Beluk and the painter's works. File:Miklós Hegedűs painter's studio, Solymár.jpg No consent is given to the publication of the studio. File:Hegedűs Miklós painter's studio 01, Solymár 2020-02-20.jpg They do not consent to the publication of the recording of the studio.Thank you very much, if you can do something about it, for deletion. Sincerely, --Bizottmány (talk) 22:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
--- grin ✎ 22:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:44, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by VIGNESHWARAN PONNUSAMY (talk · contribs)
[edit]The camera in these photos is (per the metadata) the same camera as that used to take this image, where the listed source is "INTERNET" and author is "INTERNET". As such, this does not appear to be the uploader's own work and, as should be deleted per COM:PRP.
- File:WDG-3A IN TAKES BOAT MAIL EXPRESS.jpg
- File:WDP-3A SETHU SUPER FAST EXPRESS.jpg
- File:SETHU SUPER FAST EXPRESS.jpg
- File:PALLAVAN EXPRESS.jpg
- File:VAIGAI SF EXP.jpg
- File:Rock Fort Express With WAP-7.jpg
- File:ROCK FORT EXPRESS WITH WAP-4.jpg
- File:PANDIAN SUPER FAST EXPRESS.jpg
- File:UZHAVAN EXPRESS.jpg
- File:ANANTHAPURI EXPRESS.jpg
- File:ANANTHAPURI MAIL.jpg
- File:ANANTHAPURI EXPRESS SMALL NAME BOARD.jpg
- File:NELLAI EXPRESS.jpg
- File:POTHIGAI EXPRESS.jpg
- File:POTHIGAI SF EXPRESS.jpg
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 06:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:20, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by VIGNESHWARAN PONNUSAMY (talk · contribs)
[edit]These files contain metadata that indicates that the same camera took them as these two, where the listed source is "INTERNET" and author is "INTERNET". As such, these images do not appear to be the uploader's own work and, as such, should be deleted per COM:PRP.
- File:WAP-4 CHARGED BOAT MAIL EXPRESS.jpg
- File:WDG-3A HEADING SETHU EXPRESS.jpg
- File:WDG 3A WITH SETHU SUPER FAST EXPRESS.jpg
- File:SETHU EXPRESS LARGE BOARD.jpg
- File:SETHU SF EXPRESS.jpg
- File:SETHU EXPRESS WITH P7.jpg
- File:SETHU EXPRESS WITH P4.jpg
- File:SETHU EXPRESS SMALL NAME BOARD.jpg
- File:SETHU EXPRESS AT TPJ.jpg
- File:RPM P7 WITH SETHU EXPRESS.jpg
- File:AJJ WAP-4 SETHU EXPRESS.jpg
- File:P7 WITH SETHU EXPRESS.jpg
- File:PALLAVAN EXPRESS WITH P7.jpg
- File:PALLAVAN EXPRESS NAME BOARD.jpg
- File:CHOLAN EXPRESS WITH WAP-7.jpg
- File:MANNAI EXPRESS 2.jpg
- File:TNP WITH TIRUCHENDUR EXPRESS.jpg
- File:CHENDUR EXPRESS IA AT TIRUCHCHIRAPPALLI.jpg
- File:TIRUCHENDUR EXPRESS IS AT TRICHY JN.jpg
- File:CHENDUR EXPRESS WITH WAP-4.jpg
- File:PANDIAN EXPRESS EOG.jpg
- File:PANDIAN SF EXPRESS.jpg
- File:MYSORE EXPRESS.jpg
- File:TIRUCHIRAPPALLI EXPRESS.jpg
- File:TRICHY EXPRESS.jpg
- File:UZHAVAN EXPRESS WITH WDP-4B.jpg
- File:WAP7 CHARGES ANANTHAPURI EXPRESS.jpg
- File:ANANTHAPURI EXPRESS IS AT MADRAS.jpg
- File:NELLAI SUPER FAST EXPRESS.jpg
- File:NELLAI SF EXPRESS.jpg
- File:39004 RPM WAP-7 NELLAI SF EXPRESS.jpg
- File:POTHIGAI SUPER FAST EXP.jpg
- File:KANYAKUMARI EXPRESS WITH 30578 RPM WAP-7.jpg
- File:KANYAKUMARI EXPRESS WITH 30479 RPM WAP-7.jpg
- File:KANNIYAKUMARI EXPRESS WITH RPM WAP-7.jpg
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:59, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:01, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Cebu von oben.jpg Nw520 (talk) 00:04, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 11:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 13:41, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Ci En Shenyang.jpg Nw520 (talk) 00:05, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- I'm retracting this deletion request. --Nw520 (talk) 14:43, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:41, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Low-res duplicate of File:Tai Qing Gong Shenyang.jpg. The watermark is placed slightly differently. Nw520 (talk) 00:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- I'm retracting this deletion request. --Nw520 (talk) 14:42, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Watermarked duplicate of File:Taihui.jpg Nw520 (talk) 00:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Correct but this version is older so it serves as proof that uploader released it under a free license. --MGA73 (talk) 08:42, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Nw520 Speedy keep In use at ceb:Wutai Xian, es:Wutai, fr:Xian de Wutai, ko:우타이현, ru:Утай (Синьчжоу) and wikidata:Q1197006. Brianjd (talk) 11:29, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Watermarked duplicate of File:TaiShan, China.jpg Nw520 (talk) 00:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Correct but this version is older so it serves as proof that uploader released it under a free license. --MGA73 (talk) 08:43, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Watermarked duplicate of File:Tian Hua Shan Tour-1.jpg Nw520 (talk) 00:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Correct but this version is older so it serves as proof that uploader released it under a free license. --MGA73 (talk) 08:44, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep In use. Brianjd (talk) 11:30, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Low-res duplicate of File:Wohnhaus in Gensan.jpg Nw520 (talk) 00:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- I'm retracting this deletion request. --Nw520 (talk) 14:42, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Watermarked duplicate of File:Yougutemple.jpg Nw520 (talk) 00:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Correct but this version is older so it serves as proof that uploader released it under a free license. --MGA73 (talk) 08:46, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Watermarked duplicate of File:Shenyang Zentrum.jpg Nw520 (talk) 00:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- I'm retracting this deletion request. --Nw520 (talk) 14:42, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Low-res duplicate of File:Shenyang She Li Ta.jpg. The watermarked is placed slightly differently. Nw520 (talk) 00:14, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- I'm retracting this deletion request. --Nw520 (talk) 14:43, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Creative1222 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Previously published on Reddit.
- File:Panorama-wnętrze-9.jpg
- File:Panorama-wnętrze-8.jpg
- File:Panorama-wnętrze-7.jpg
- File:Panorama-wnętrze-4.jpg
- File:Panorama-wnętrze-5.jpg
- File:Panorama-wnętrze-6.jpg
- File:Panorama-wnętrze-3.jpg
- File:Panorama-wnętrze-2.jpg
- File:Panorama-wnętrze-1.jpg
~Cybularny Speak? 00:17, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Only photos no. 5-9 were previously posted on Reddit. I can't edit the original post to add a licence, so please delete them. No reason for deletion of no. 1-4. Creative1222 (talk) 08:02, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Creative1222: Sending a permission to VRT is an option. ~Cybularny Speak? 08:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for all those files under ticket:2022112910005469. --Polimerek (talk) 13:59, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Polimerek There's no tag on File:Panorama-wnętrze-1.jpg, was that on purpose? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:22, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, I just missed it. Tag added. Polimerek (talk) 10:16, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 13:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Watermarked duplicate of File:Tian Hua Shan-area.jpg Nw520 (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Correct but this version is older so it serves as proof that uploader released it under a free license. --MGA73 (talk) 08:48, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Grill - BBQ in General Santos City.jpg, which has been retouched and de-watermarked. Nw520 (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- I'm retracting this deletion request. --Nw520 (talk) 14:42, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:44, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Watermarked duplicate of File:TianHuaShan-Tour-2.jpg Nw520 (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Correct but this version is older so it serves as proof that uploader released it under a free license. --MGA73 (talk) 08:50, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:44, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Image is not licensed under CC-BY-SA as the text on fandom. see NON-TEXT FILES column Larryasou (talk) 02:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:45, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
non free picture http://compagniedesguidesdechamonix.over-blog.com/article-chamonix-ceremonix-en-memoire-d-etienne-livacic-49795110.html Ske (talk) 02:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:45, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
The use of this background requires authorization. see[2] Larryasou (talk) 02:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:45, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted. Not own work. SnowPanda88 (talk) 03:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:45, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Title of original file is incorrect Nomesiec (talk) 03:19, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:45, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Incorrect file title. This is YABUN not NAIDOC week Nomesiec (talk) 03:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:46, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Incorrect file title. this is YABUN not NAIDOC Week Nomesiec (talk) 03:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:46, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Incorrect file title. this is YABUN not NAIDOC Week Nomesiec (talk) 03:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:46, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Incorrect file title. this is YABUN not NAIDOC Week Nomesiec (talk) 03:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment In each case, if the only problem is the filename, just request a filename change. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:46, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Incorrect file title. this is YABUN not NAIDOC Week Nomesiec (talk) 03:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:46, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Incorrect file title. this is YABUN not NAIDOC Week Nomesiec (talk) 03:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:46, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Incorrect file title. this is YABUN not NAIDOC Week Nomesiec (talk) 03:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:46, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 17:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- The foto is of the bike :-) Mario1952 (talk) 13:24, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:47, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Poor quality image 2600:100C:A210:2BB2:9DCF:2D8C:B67F:3616 17:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. In use on multiple projects. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:52, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:47, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
I see we have OTRS on these two book covers, but I don't see any educational purpose. Files are not in use. There is no wiki page to go with any of it. It just looks like advertising or self-promotion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- It does appear that way. Delete this and his other uploads, nominated below.-- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:48, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
copyright--cartoon signed Pascal Kirchmair, not userːJacquelinekato إيان (talk) 05:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Never mind. I made a mistake. User's page clarifies discrepancy. ̴̴ إيان (talk) 07:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Clear keep, as admitted by the person proposing the deletion. Vysotsky (talk) 23:17, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Nomination withdrawn. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:14, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
No source, missing permission and some pictures are from Google Maps.
- File:Humedal entre rocas sector "Piedras Mágicas".jpg
- File:Humedal urbano "Piedras Mágicas".jpg
- File:Humedal urbano "La Proto".jpg
- File:Mapa humedales "Cajón del Río Claro".jpg
Edslov (talk) 03:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: Except the first one, all of them deleted. --Kadı Message 20:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Not free photo without permission Venzz (talk) 17:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- the author is supposed to send the permission, i hope it will come through soon (with the outages internet is also not really working) --アンタナナ 22:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Ticket:2022120110003734 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 17:01, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Вакуленко Володимир Володимирович.jpg” under ticket:2022120110003734. --Andriy.v (talk) 18:11, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 20:07, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nourtheflagmaster (talk · contribs)
[edit]Fictional flags, not in use, out of scope, some may be used for attack.
- File:Flag Of Iiquapha.jpg
- File:Flag of the Alft Islands.jpg
- File:Flag of the Russianese Kingdom.jpg
- File:Greenbluewhiteredcrossflag.jpg
- File:Flag of Attay.jpg
- File:Flag of Abadar.jpg
- File:Flag of Vanuatu proposed.jpg
- File:A proposed flag of Tonga.jpg
- File:Flag of Wynn.jpg
- File:Flag of Americans in Australia.jpg
- File:Proposed Flag of the Comoro Islands.jpg
- File:Flag of Minamitorishima.jpg
- File:Flag of the Lesser Sunda Islands.jpg
- File:Flag of Novaya Zemlya.jpg
- File:Flag of the Senyavin Islands.jpg
- File:Flag of Manu'a (Variant).jpg
- File:Flag of Manu'a.jpg
- File:Flag of the Samoan Islands (PROPOSAL).jpg
- File:FLAG OF THE MOALA ISLANDS.jpg
- File:Flag of Viti Levu Group.jpg
- File:Flag of the Oregon Trail.jpg
- File:Flag of the Pitcairn Island-Chain.jpg
- File:Flag of the Outer Islands.jpg
- File:Flag of Eleuthera.jpg
- File:Flag of the Cayman Island-Chain.pt.jpg
- File:Flag of Xet.jpg
- File:Flag of Antiqua.jpg
- File:Flag of Furneaux Group.jpg
- File:Flag of the Caroline Islands.jpg
Xunks (talk) 17:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:18, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nourtheflagmaster (talk · contribs)
[edit]These appear to be fictional flags that are unused and of no educational value and should thusly be deleted along the lines of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Flag of the Hoara Islets.jpg
- File:Flag of Ā.jpg
- File:Flag of the Islamic Unity of Indonesia-Malaysia-Brunei.jpg
- File:Flag of the Buyavara Islands.jpg
- File:Flag Of Iiquapha.jpg
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:17, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope, fictional flags. Flagvisioner (talk) 21:26, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:50, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Tiny image, not used, superseded, out of scope. Yann (talk) 19:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - Image was uploaded in 2005 so imho should be kept, The world was a much different place in 2005 and this may of had it's use somewhere in the near 20 years of being here. –Davey2010Talk 20:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Too small to be usable.-- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep File appears to be in meaningful use at fa:کاربر:Shervinafshar/طرحهای کاری مدیریتی. Brianjd (talk) 13:17, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- The other images in this series (0000.png, 1000.png and 1110.png – 1100.png is missing for some reason) could be kept on the same basis, except that they all have SVG equivalents, so they should be deleted. Brianjd (talk) 13:21, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per meaningful use, as I looked at the context. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:33, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Use can be replaced by File:1111.svg. Yann (talk) 11:55, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Yann Isn’t that up to the user who owns that page? Brianjd (talk) 12:11, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: Nobody owns anything here. This page can be edited by anyone. This file was added there in 2006, while File:1111.svg was created on 2008. Yann (talk) 12:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Yann You are aware that the page where this file is used is in userspace, right? I don’t know how things work at fawiki, but seemed clear at the projects where I was involved that you don’t edit another user’s userspace unless there are exceptional circumstances like blocks or copyright issues. Brianjd (talk) 12:18, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, I see that. I don't even need to edit that page directly. If I use universal replace, AFAIK the image will be replaced in all namespaces in all projects. Yann (talk) 12:25, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Yann I was under the impression that the ‘don’t mess with another user’s userspace’ rule applies to all forms of editing, including CommonsDelinker. Brianjd (talk) 12:28, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Well, actually there is no choice. There is no way to specify that an image should be replaced only on certain namespaces. Yann (talk) 12:32, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Pinging @Ikan Kekek (which should have been done earlier). Brianjd (talk) 12:35, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Well, actually there is no choice. There is no way to specify that an image should be replaced only on certain namespaces. Yann (talk) 12:32, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Yann I was under the impression that the ‘don’t mess with another user’s userspace’ rule applies to all forms of editing, including CommonsDelinker. Brianjd (talk) 12:28, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, I see that. I don't even need to edit that page directly. If I use universal replace, AFAIK the image will be replaced in all namespaces in all projects. Yann (talk) 12:25, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Yann You are aware that the page where this file is used is in userspace, right? I don’t know how things work at fawiki, but seemed clear at the projects where I was involved that you don’t edit another user’s userspace unless there are exceptional circumstances like blocks or copyright issues. Brianjd (talk) 12:18, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: Nobody owns anything here. This page can be edited by anyone. This file was added there in 2006, while File:1111.svg was created on 2008. Yann (talk) 12:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Yann Isn’t that up to the user who owns that page? Brianjd (talk) 12:11, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Use can be replaced by File:1111.svg. Yann (talk) 11:55, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per meaningful use, as I looked at the context. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:33, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- The other images in this series (0000.png, 1000.png and 1110.png – 1100.png is missing for some reason) could be kept on the same basis, except that they all have SVG equivalents, so they should be deleted. Brianjd (talk) 13:21, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Great news! Shervinafshar is en-4. They can speak for themselves here! Brianjd (talk) 12:19, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: In use. --Kadı Message 20:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
i dont use it anymore 𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐨. (talk) 20:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: fictitious coat of arms. --Kadı Message 20:12, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Photograph of another photograph; source not indicated. Boylarva99 (talk) 21:58, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:20, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:Methylmalonate-2D-structure.svg as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 06:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 11:20, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- File:Area around Mir Castle Complex by Eugeny Kolchev 02.jpg
- File:Area around Mir Castle Complex by Eugeny Kolchev 01.jpg
- File:Bastion of Mir Castle Complex by Eugeny Kolchev.jpg
- File:Larisa Finkelshtein Photo by Eugeny Kolchev.jpg
- File:Boris Penchuk memorial plaque by Eugeny Kolchev on Volodarski street Minsk.jpg
- File:Boris Penchuk - creation process of memorial plaque by Eugeny Kolchev.jpg
- File:Violinist by Evgeny Kolchev 2008 National Art Museum of Belarus.jpg
- File:Borzois by Eugeny Kolchev 2003.jpg
- File:Run by Eugeny Kolchev 2004.jpg
- File:Kiss by Eugeny Kolchev 2005.jpg
- File:Adam and Eva by Eugeny Kolchev.jpg
- File:Offense Sculpture by Eugeny Kolchev.jpg
- File:Pegas Relief by Eugeny Kolchev.jpg
- File:Relief by Eugeny Kolchev.jpg
- File:Hockey Sculpture by Eugeny Kolchev.jpg
- File:Gennady Muromtsev by Eugeny Kolchev 02.jpg
- File:Gennady Muromtsev by Eugeny Kolchev 03.jpg
- File:Valery Slauk.jpg
- File:Gennady Muromtsev by Eugeny Kolchev 01.jpg
The ticket doesn't contain permission for this file (and some other uploaded by Tatiana Matlina; listed above) Анастасия Львоваru/en 12:00, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- And yes, I checked some other letters from this author. Some of them contains dead links on radikal.ru (image hosting), so there is a little chance that the permission was given and Tatiana uploaded them with a wrong description, but now it's unverifyed. Анастасия Львоваru/en 12:18, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Натюрморт с фруктами. х.м.40х40.2012.jpg (another author). Анастасия Львоваru/en 12:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:37, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
and:
- File:2014 02 27 Abel 008 (12853799035).jpg
- File:2017 05 03 Marina di Pietrasanta 2 DSC 0610 (50729318482).jpg
- File:2017 05 03 Marina di Pietrasanta 2 DSC 0588 (50729223511).jpg
- File:2017 05 03 Carrara DSC 0234 (50605587746).jpg
- File:2017 05 03 Carrara DSC 0233 (50604844103).jpg
- File:2017 05 06 Lucca 0249 (50690614841).jpg
- File:2017 10 07 Portofino 0253 (46521732054).jpg
- File:2017 10 07 Portofino 0429 (47244842562).jpg
- File:2017 10 07 Portofino 0434 (47244841802).jpg
- File:2017 10 07 Portofino 0435 (47297102981).jpg
- File:2017 10 07 Portofino 0436 (47297102851).jpg
- File:2017 10 07 Portofino 0440 (32355410017).jpg
- File:2017 10 07 Santa Margherita Ligure 0136 (32365629097).jpg
- File:2017 10 07 Santa Margherita Ligure 0138 (32365628927).jpg
- File:2017 10 07 Santa Margherita Ligure 0140 (32365628687).jpg
- File:2017 10 07 Santa Margherita Ligure 0140 (32365628687).jpg
- File:2017 10 07 Santa Margherita Ligure 0707 (46421152645).jpg
- File:2017 10 07 Santa Margherita Ligure 0740 (46612689494).jpg
- File:2018 03 22 Marrakech 65DSC 0758 (42581917644).jpg
- File:2018 03 24 Anima 83DSC 0313 (29837211798).jpg
- File:2018 03 24 Anima 83DSC 0314 (29837211168).jpg
- File:2018 03 24 Anima 83DSC 0315 (41899183580).jpg
- File:2018 03 24 Anima 83DSC 0316 (42991572784).jpg
- File:2018 03 24 Anima 83DSC 0388a (28817627497).jpg
- File:2018 06 06 Rüdesheim 12DSC 0174 (45604037921).jpg
- File:2018 06 06 Rüdesheim 12DSC 0177 (43786402270).jpg
- File:2018 06 06 Rüdesheim 12DSC 0179 (43786400250).jpg
- File:2018 06 07 Hatzenport 51bDSC 0067 (45442651515).jpg
- File:2018 06 07 Senheim 60DSC 0354 (46287361652).jpg
- File:2018 06 08 Koblenz 31DSC 0107 (46319733222).jpg
- File:2018 06 08 Koblenz 31DSC 0108 (45458077215).jpg
- File:2018 06 08 Koblenz 31DSC 0109 (46319733022).jpg
- File:2018 06 08 Koblenz 31DSC 0113 (46319731842).jpg
- File:2018 06 08 Koblenz 31DSC 0114 (46319731422).jpg
- File:2018 06 08 Koblenz 31IMG 091626 (45647432184).jpg
- File:2018 06 08 Rüdesheim 33DSC 0348 (45482880045).jpg
- File:2018 06 08 Rüdesheim 33DSC 0349 (45482879855).jpg
- File:2018 06 08 Rüdesheim 33DSC 0362 (32523369808).jpg
- File:2018 06 08 Rüdesheim 33DSC 0363 (32523369558).jpg
- File:2018 06 08 Rüdesheim 33DSC 0429 (32523355628).jpg
- File:2018 06 10 Kamp - Bornhofen 34IMG 062527 Hotel (45685268914).jpg
- File:2018 10 24 Siena 46DSC 0324 (40618661033).jpg
- File:2018 10 24 Siena 46DSC 0370 (46860765694).jpg
- File:2018 10 24 Siena 46DSC 0371 (46860765504).jpg
- File:2018 10 24 Siena 46DSC 0410 (40634859493).jpg
- File:2018 10 24 Siena 46DSC 0457 (33724026058).jpg
- File:2018 10 21 Hotel Fortuna 12IMG 20181021 194038 (40467649583).jpg
- File:2018 10 21 Hotel Fortuna 21DSC 0019 (46518548415).jpg
- File:2018 10 24 Siena 46DSC 0241 (47580157161).jpg
- File:2018 10 24 Siena 46DSC 0259 (40614059343).jpg
- File:2018 12 24 WA0000 (40168760023).jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination for the second picture. The first picture is good for me. It shows a statue and could therefor be relevant for commons. --Lukas Beck (talk) 17:54, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- If statue is notable, may be there are other photos that fit Commons:Project scope better? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:48, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- I don't have any idea. I do not know abpout that statue honestly and there is no good discription. Lukas Beck (talk) 17:28, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- If you don't know this, then first search and don't make next deletion request. Matlin (talk) 17:07, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- The request for deletion is already justified in this form. I also ask you to think about what use such private photos should have here. And here I am not referring to a specific image but to a large number of images, which are also included here in the deletion request. And by the way, a good description is really helpful sometimes. Lukas Beck (talk) 18:25, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- If statue is notable, may be there are other photos that fit Commons:Project scope better? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:48, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:39, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Logos far above TOO. Illogical to assume that school logos are works of an officer or employee of the Government of the Philippines, PD-PhilippinesGov doesn't apply.
- File:PSHS - CMC ELITE(2012)jpg.jpg
- File:PSHS - CMC Ad Libitum(2012).jpg
- File:PSHS - CMC GLOBE(2012).png
- File:PSHS - CMC SIPA(2012).jpg
- File:PSHS - CMC PASTEL(2012).jpg
- File:PSHS-CMC SMART LOGO(2012).jpg
- File:(PSHS-CMC) SCS LOGO(2012).jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:57, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Apologies, I may have placed the wrong licensing tags as I assumed that the specialized school namely PSHS-CMC under PSHSS in turn under DOST a Government Department of the Philippines is under PD-PhilippinesGov, Does PD-Logo suffice? Karetsuji (talk) 05:18, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- No, PD-Logo certainly doesn't apply. That is only for very simple logos but these logos are far too complex. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:02, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:40, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot of a TV interview (from a private TV channel) can't be a personal work Shkuru Afshar (talk) 11:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- I don’t know why this image nominated for deletion since it has neither offended nor copyright content — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:3032:C:FBD6:5D09:1E24:868E:E8AC (talk) 11:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:06, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Change the image to one PurpleViss (talk) 07:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. --✗plicit 03:32, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Change the image to one PurpleViss (talk) 07:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. --✗plicit 03:32, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Change the image to one PurpleViss (talk) 07:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. --✗plicit 03:31, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Change the image to one PurpleViss (talk) 07:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. --✗plicit 03:31, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:Scope: personal image. MKFI (talk) 10:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 17:17, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Watermarked duplicate of File:Guanghuatempele.jpg Nw520 (talk) 00:06, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Correct but this version is older so it serves as proof that uploader released it under a free license. --MGA73 (talk) 08:39, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Nw520 This is the third nomination like this, and all those files are in use. Please check before nominating files for deletion! Brianjd (talk) 11:27, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per above. Brianjd (talk) 11:27, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads-up, Brianjd. Don't worry, I will refrain from doing deletion requests for the time being. PS: Would be nice if someone mentioned on Commons:Deletion requests that files being in-use automatically contradicts a deletion. Similarly, COM:Redundant could use some clarification. --Nw520 (talk) 14:37, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Nw520 files being in-use automatically contradicts a deletion That’s always true for quality issues, but never true for copyright issues, and privacy issues are much more nuanced.
- Commons:Deletion requests does link to relevant policies, including Commons:Deletion policy, which includes Commons:Deletion policy#Redundant/bad quality (COM:Redundant). The question remains: What would you like clarified in COM:Redundant? Brianjd (talk) 14:45, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: Wenn auf Commons:Löschanträge entschieden wurde, musst du alle Vorkommen, die du durch GlobalUsage finden kannst, durch die bessere Datei ersetzen. (Commons:Deletion policy/de#Redundant) → As soon as a decision has been made on Commons:Deletion requests, all usages […] have to be replaced. --Nw520 (talk) 14:51, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Nw520 I raised this issue at Commons talk:Deletion policy#‘Redundant/bad quality’ section. Brianjd (talk) 14:59, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Though, originally I meant that COM:Redundant should state that being older and thus “serv[ing] as proof that uploader released it under a free license” is a reason for a keeping. --Nw520 (talk) 14:54, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- I asked at Commons:Deletion requests/Files created by User:Farawayman whether that really is a reason for keeping. If it is, then yes, it should be documented somewhere. Brianjd (talk) 15:00, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: Wenn auf Commons:Löschanträge entschieden wurde, musst du alle Vorkommen, die du durch GlobalUsage finden kannst, durch die bessere Datei ersetzen. (Commons:Deletion policy/de#Redundant) → As soon as a decision has been made on Commons:Deletion requests, all usages […] have to be replaced. --Nw520 (talk) 14:51, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Assuming I haven't missed anything, all my open deletion requests (that no one else has contributed to) have been withdrawn in order to not waste anyadmin's time any more. --Nw520 (talk) 20:04, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads-up, Brianjd. Don't worry, I will refrain from doing deletion requests for the time being. PS: Would be nice if someone mentioned on Commons:Deletion requests that files being in-use automatically contradicts a deletion. Similarly, COM:Redundant could use some clarification. --Nw520 (talk) 14:37, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. This watermarked version cannot prove anything about the better version (without watermark) as far as both versions were transferred from another Wikiproject independently. As for being in use, of course in this kind of cases it is necessary first of all to replace the version that is to be deleted with the better version. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:27, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Watermarked duplicate of File:Simatai.jpg Nw520 (talk) 00:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Not in use, unlike the other nominations in this series. Brianjd (talk) 11:28, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:19, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
small size, strange names, I doubt the uploader is the author
Avron (talk) 01:58, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: all three images are found at different websites, definitely not an own work. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:44, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
duplicate File:Павел Карпов 7.jpg Gzen92 (talk) 08:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:46, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
This file is a hoax Masti (talk) 19:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: simple text, out of scope. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 14:48, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Image not found at source provided. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:54, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep We experience link rot every day. The question is whether it was made public in 1926 and is PD-Russia. --RAN (talk) 05:18, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: there is no problem with the source but it cannot be licensed as PD-Russia as far as it was created in France. Should be uploaded to the local wiki as fair-use. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 14:55, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
I do not think the image uploaded here is original. It looks very pixelated and seems to be copied multiple times before being here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:58, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per {{PD-Saudi Arabia}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:28, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- I was thinking the image was not useful as it's highly pixelated and not in use. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:33, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 15:18, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Acrylictouch (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-uploads by non-notable artist. Out of scope.
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:22, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Logo from unknown origin. Pierre cb (talk) 16:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Keep I’ve kept this file because it does not address the reason for the deletion, or it is inadequate for other reasons. According to my talk page, deleting files without my permission is prohibited. Please make sure your deletion reason meets the following:
- It should be consistent. Terms like “per nomination” and “.” are inconsistent for a deletion reason.
- Make sure your reason is clearly with my permission.
- Wikipedia is not Bee Swarm. Bee Swarm is generally vandalism and hoaxes as defined in Wikipedia’s CSD G3.
- If this file is protected, do not nominate it.
- Color Control System logo should not be deleted if it is protected by the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF).
- Important: Do not delete my files without permission from me. Deleting without the editor’s permission is unacceptable, and may lead to a block.
Thanks. BeeSpeed1989 (talk) 23:04, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
- deleting files without my permission is prohibited is the best joke of the year, ROFL. --Achim55 (talk) 23:04, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: non-free logo above COM:TOO. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Unsourced, unattributed image uploaded by a blocked sock puppeteer. Unlikely this is Benjamin Harrison IV. As far as I can tell there is no extant portrait of Benjamin Harrison IV. Gamaliel (talk) 01:59, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Unsourced, unattributed image uploaded by a blocked sock puppeteer. Unlikely this is Benjamin Harrison IV. As far as I can tell there is no extant portrait of Benjamin Harrison IV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gamaliel (talk • contribs)
- It is possible, of course, that this is a hoax. But it is not invented by the uploader: here (page 24) we can see the same image, and that slideshow was created 4 years earlier. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:39, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:49, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Gestumblindi. --Rosenzweig τ 12:44, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
This logo is asserted to not meet the threshold of originality consisting of only simple shapes and text, but the logo features a portion of a baseball with its stitching. Whpq (talk) 18:19, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep the stitching details are minimum, IMO. Fma12 (talk) 18:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Originally uploaded at en:File:ODU Baseball Alt Logo.jpg with a non-free use rationale; marked as {{PD-textlogo}} and copied to Commons by Fma12. Brianjd (talk) 13:12, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: There are lot of simple-text files uploaded at the en.wiki as NFCC that have been moved to Commons (in fact, I copied many of them here). Regarding the ODU logo, I uploaded it with the convincement it was not copyrightable but maybe I was wrong. Anything can happen. Fma12 (talk) 11:09, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Fma12 I’m not suggesting you did something wrong (indeed, moving PD files to Commons is obviously a good thing). I’m simply documenting the file’s history in case that is useful to other users. Brianjd (talk) 13:13, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- No problem, pal. Fma12 (talk) 23:29, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Fma12 I’m not suggesting you did something wrong (indeed, moving PD files to Commons is obviously a good thing). I’m simply documenting the file’s history in case that is useful to other users. Brianjd (talk) 13:13, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: There are lot of simple-text files uploaded at the en.wiki as NFCC that have been moved to Commons (in fact, I copied many of them here). Regarding the ODU logo, I uploaded it with the convincement it was not copyrightable but maybe I was wrong. Anything can happen. Fma12 (talk) 11:09, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Comment - Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minnesota Twins Logo.svg is a similar deletion request where the logo contained a baseball image. That was closed as delete by User:Krd. -- Whpq (talk) 01:47, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Fma12: Is this really "simple"? The below "artistic dash" (I guess) looks like so 3D-ize, lead me to rather believe its artistic feature, some probably likely designed logos for Internet Explorer 9 were deleted just half months ago per this DR, where contributors concerned that such pseudo-3D designs are able to exceed TOO US. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:43, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: Yes, it's "simple" for me. What's the problem? I'm giving an opinion, not a whole truth. Fma12 (talk) 12:56, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- Well if this is true, then the IE9 logos shall be restored, right? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:07, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: Yes, it's "simple" for me. What's the problem? I'm giving an opinion, not a whole truth. Fma12 (talk) 12:56, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. I think the stitching in the middle in between two different fonts is too much. It can go back to English as a non-free logo. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Still, concerns about IE9 also apply here. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 16:02, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. ✗plicit 00:32, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Tiny image, not used, superseded, out of scope. Yann (talk) 19:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 05:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Tiny image, not used, superseded, out of scope. Yann (talk) 19:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 05:31, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
It will affect my professional life. Thank you very much for your help. Gtam95 (talk) 19:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Courtesy deletion of personal image of user who is apparently not (or at least not yet) notable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek Keep The user might not be notable, but this photo seems to be notable for being the only one taken using a iPod touch’s front camera. Courtesy deletion of a file from more than 10 years ago requires a good reason. Brianjd (talk) 13:40, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Brianjd, you mean the only photo on Commons to be identified in a category of having been taken with that camera? Is that so notable? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:31, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek No, I meant what I said.
- I moved the file from Taken with iPod touch to the newly-created Taken with iPod touch front camera. I also scanned the former category for other images of the type normally taken with a front camera, but didn’t find any. It’s possible that I missed one, but it is clear that Commons does not have many of them. Brianjd (talk) 10:11, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, the image is not the first picture taken by iPod touch among worldwide. Personal photo... Kadı Message 20:06, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- I tend to agree, because it's not a very good photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:27, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Kadı and Ikan Kekek: But is it representative of photos taken with front cameras circa 2012? And if so, does Commons have other photos taken with front cameras from that era? Brianjd (talk) 00:17, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- I have no idea, and you may be right that it's of historical value. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:52, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- I tend to agree, because it's not a very good photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:27, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Brianjd, you mean the only photo on Commons to be identified in a category of having been taken with that camera? Is that so notable? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:31, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Apart from extremely rare cases from early photography, a photograph is not noteworthy because of the type of camera it was taken with. An iPod touch front camera is not an innovative or historically important camera. This is out of project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:26, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- KeepAgreeing with Ikan. This is the only of this kind of photo. --Trade (talk) 23:45, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion of personal photo. --Mhhossein talk 05:34, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
The first original-founded (maybe there is a older version, but I didn't find) photo was uploaded on 20 February 2018 in a website. However this file was uploaded 9 February 2021 on Commons. So this copyrighted file will be deleted. Uncitoyen (talk) 09:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:41, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
I have fixed the issue. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: has a license tag now. --Rosenzweig τ 12:42, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Ravi Gaikwad, Chairman, Shant Bharat Surakshit Bharat signing documents RSWS at Wankhede Stadium Mumbai.jpg
[edit]Appears to be copied from Bollywood Hungama. Although some images are released under CC by the publication, this does not have the watermark which is normally connected with the CC files, and does not seem to match the conditions that they place on other images (eg set, party or event) Bilby (talk) 09:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- I am the owner of this image, in-fact Bollywoddhungama copied this image.Orbit578 (talk) 05:40, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Uploader’s only global contribution (outside of a sandbox). Resolution 1,005 × 847; no EXIF data.
- @Orbit578 If this really is your image, please contact VRT. Brianjd (talk) 13:06, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- There is an VRTS email received for “File:Ravi Gaikwad, Chairman, Shant Bharat Surakshit Bharat signing documents RSWS at Wankhede Stadium Mumbai.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2023010410007351. ─ The Aafī (talk) 18:15, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: for lack of permission. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:42, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in UAE. The Burj Al Arab is the subject of this photo. If the building was removed, the photo is unlikely to be useful anymore A1Cafel (talk) 17:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Keep, cropped. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:26, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, dull image of swimmers and likely out of COM:SCOPE. The tower is the only integral element that made this image interesting. Plus the swimmers look small here, reducing utility and purpose. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:32, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- Alright, I’m convinced. Delete. RodRabelo7 (talk) 13:42, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:43, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal fractal images with weird or misleading names, and without useful description or categories, abuse of COM:WEBHOST. We don't host personal art by non notable artists.
List of files
|
---|
|
Yann (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Yann There are 1016 files. I collapsed the list. Brianjd (talk) 11:41, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]- Keep. These images can serve as educational examples of the use of fractals in art, so they fall under the umbrella of the Commons scope. Abyssal (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Yann, is it not the case that we have featured some user-created fractal images at COM:FPC? Would it have been better to have deleted those? What standard should we use to decide which work of fractal art is not worthy of being seen? This seems like a difficult question to me, because I agree that it's a reasonable proposition that Commons shouldn't host every work of fractal art. But neither should we delete all of it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:58, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- To have some educational value, we need more information for each file: how the file was created (software, data entry, etc.), meaningful categories, and meaningful names. Nothing like this was done. So there are around 1000 files to fix. Yann (talk) 12:15, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- These were all made with Fractal Explorer. Abyssal (talk) 14:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Abyssal: Start fixing some files with a proper description (software and data entry, etc.), a meaningful name and categories, then some may be kept. Yann (talk) 19:16, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- What's wrong with the category they're already in? Abyssal (talk) 20:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- It's a personal category, and it doesn't count. Yann (talk) 22:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Per your recommendations, the images have been categorized by the software used to produce them and Category:Fractal wallpapers by User:Abyssal has been upmerged into the impersonal Category:Fractal wallpapers and awaits deletion. Abyssal (talk) 23:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- OK, good start. What would be very useful is what data you provided for each one. Could you also propose a meaningful name for each (using the {{Rename}} template)? Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:59, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Full HD (1,920 × 1,200) is the standard now, so anything smaller than that is useless as a wallpaper. Yann (talk) 11:55, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- The vast majority of these should meet that standard. I'll work on correcting the file names in the medium-term future. Abyssal (talk) 01:43, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Per your recommendations, the images have been categorized by the software used to produce them and Category:Fractal wallpapers by User:Abyssal has been upmerged into the impersonal Category:Fractal wallpapers and awaits deletion. Abyssal (talk) 23:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- It's a personal category, and it doesn't count. Yann (talk) 22:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- What's wrong with the category they're already in? Abyssal (talk) 20:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Abyssal: Start fixing some files with a proper description (software and data entry, etc.), a meaningful name and categories, then some may be kept. Yann (talk) 19:16, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- These were all made with Fractal Explorer. Abyssal (talk) 14:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- To have some educational value, we need more information for each file: how the file was created (software, data entry, etc.), meaningful categories, and meaningful names. Nothing like this was done. So there are around 1000 files to fix. Yann (talk) 12:15, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Yann, is it not the case that we have featured some user-created fractal images at COM:FPC? Would it have been better to have deleted those? What standard should we use to decide which work of fractal art is not worthy of being seen? This seems like a difficult question to me, because I agree that it's a reasonable proposition that Commons shouldn't host every work of fractal art. But neither should we delete all of it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:58, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- speedy Keep. Per Abyssal and obviously in scope (as fractals and wallpapers). Юрий Д.К. (talk) 21:33, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete the unused ones with bad names and descriptions (i.e. just "Fractal wallpaper.") for being out of scope. I don't believe that fractal wallpapers are inherently educational. Especially when there's no information about which part of which fractal is being depicted and there are more than a thousand of them. Obviously contributors are allowed to have a few personal files, but this is too much. Additionally some of these aren't wallpaper-sized (e.g. [1], [2]), some are duplicates (e.g. [3a]/[3b], [4a]/[4b]), some are near-duplicates (e.g. [5a]/[5b], [6a]/[6b]), and some aren't even fractals (e.g. [7], [8]). TilmannR (talk) 20:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:03, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Sceenshot of an error on Wikipedia in 2008. Do we need this now? Yann (talk) 00:18, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Yann If this was anything other than software, we’d
ridicule the nominator andask why they were so determined to erase history. It looks just as much in scope as anything else in the category Software errors. Brianjd (talk) 11:37, 3 December 2022 (UTC) - Pinging @Ikan Kekek, who often comments on historical images nominated for deletion. Brianjd (talk) 11:39, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- File:Winpdb-1.3.6.png is in use. Pictures of software errors are certainly in scope anyway. For others, I don't have a clear opinion. Yann (talk) 11:58, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- It seems like this should be archived somewhere, but the other side of the argument is that while it's a matter of Wiki-history, is it notable? And for that, since I don't really have the full context, I don't have an answer. I guess what that amounts to is at least a weak Keep from me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:45, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- File:Winpdb-1.3.6.png is in use. Pictures of software errors are certainly in scope anyway. For others, I don't have a clear opinion. Yann (talk) 11:58, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 14:56, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Rave as Fair use (fairuse). Converting to DR because age of the subject makes this possibly in the public domain. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:02, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Russian Empire --RAN (talk) 17:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Please note that the image in question is not the group portrait actually created in the 19th century, but a partial artistic reproduction of it, created "in the middle of the 20th century", as stated in the source. Without more precise information about the date of publication, this reproduction cannot be considered in the public domain, despite the fact that its author is unknown.--Yellow Horror (talk) 01:59, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- I recommend to the uploader and those who wish to save the file try to contact the administration of the Museum of his majesty’s lifeguards Cossack regiment (Courbevoie, Paris suburb, France) in order to obtain additional information about the portrait in question: double-check that its author is unknown or anonymous; clarify the date when the portrait was first presented to the public. As a result, we may get confirmation that the portrait is in the public domain.--Yellow Horror (talk) 16:08, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- I tried sending questions about the authorship and circumstances of the first public presentation of the portrait in question to associated with the museum email address which I found online. Got a short answer like "Unfortunately we can't help you" signed by «Объединение Лейб-Казаков» (Association of Lifeguard Cossacks).--Yellow Horror (talk) 12:22, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Yellow Horror Not the sort of answer I would expect from a museum. Brianjd (talk) 13:03, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. PD-RusEmpire, before 1913. See: https://viewer.rsl.ru/ru/rsl01004017473?page=73 (Хрещатицкий Б.Р. История Лейб-гвардии казачьего его величества полка. 1775-1813-1875-1913. Ч. 1-. - СПб.: Т-во Р. Голике и А. Вильборг, 1913).--Ctac (talk) 18:10, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Ok, then keep the current version, but delete the first version of the file. I do not see any significant differences between the paintings from the book and the museum, except for some difference in proportions, but following the precautionary principle and available sources, I prefer to consider them different works of art with different publication histories.--Yellow Horror (talk) 07:28, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 14:57, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hellodasan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Certificates are not own work, and the photo is facebook sized. I don't think any of this is own work.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:53, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- File:Hellodasan.pdf
- It my File .
- File:Mano thangaraj with gitex participents.jpg
- Personally i took this image.
- File:Uae codes certificate.pdf
- This is also my file.
- Really offended with your comments and advise how to remove this delete request. Hellodasan (talk) 06:52, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Hellodasan: It's unlikely you are "UAE Codes" whose watermark is on the certificates. Taking a photograph of someone else's certificate does not make it your own work on the certificates. The photograph has no metadata, but it's size and quality ((960 × 789 pixels, file size: 139 KB, )) clearly show it's been compressed by a system such as Facebook or Instagram. We need COM:OTRS to retain. Please read COM:L and understand this is not a situation of "offense." Commons has clearly described the type of images to which it offers free webhosting and like any host retains the ability and process to edit the collection to fit the Scope and Licenses of the project. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:16, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tannim101 as Speedy (db-author) and the most recent rationale was: author. Too old for G7; used in user talk archive on enwiki; converting to DR. Reason? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- old diagram. Not used. Now incorrect data Tannim101 (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- "Old" is no reason for deleting anything. If the data were considered correct in the past, this is historical now. I think we can allow User:Doc James to keep it in his archive. Edit the file description if anything has been superseded by new research. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:54, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- thanks I’ll edit the description Tannim101 (talk) 15:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —howcheng {chat} 17:54, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tannim101 as Speedy (db-author) and the most recent rationale was: author. Too old and in use for G7; converting to DR. Reason? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Flagged as potentially inappropriate due to nature of the resource in question to identify its vehicle. Could pose a risk to safety and resilience in the highlands. Tannim101 (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Question Tannim101, a picture of an ambulance is dangerous? Can you explain why? That doesn't sound like a deletion reason, but you should explain further if you'd like an admin to consider a plea for a courtesy deletion on such a basis. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, local employee asked for it to be removed. Unsure their specific reasons, but they mentioned resilience/security etc. Agree seems a bit odd, but I guess they have their reasons Tannim101 (talk) 15:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- OBJECT / KEEP I can see no reason whatsoever why this image is in any way compromising. It is a car, the registration number is obscured, and it is in public not private ownership. Paramedic cars are not owned by the intelligence services or law enforcement so it's not like any major state secrets are being revealed. It should be kept.
- 10mmsocket (talk) 16:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Tannim101 Some people seem to think that anyone who photographs something must be out to attack it. Obviously, that is a ridiculous idea, so: Speedy keep Brianjd (talk) 11:45, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Tannim101 If you are still in contact with them, perhaps you could ask them to comment here? Brianjd (talk) 11:45, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —howcheng {chat} 17:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo. COM:TOO? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: If this refers to the Himyarite Kingdom (disestablished 525 CE), this would surely be out of copyright, but the file is not used in the article, so it's unknown what entity, if any, actually uses or used it. —howcheng {chat} 17:59, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
A clear COM:DERIV. Certainly not a De minimis. Mhhossein talk 06:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Mhhossein Which work is copyrighted and not DM here? Brianjd (talk) 12:01, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- The picture located at the center. --Mhhossein talk 12:23, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; whether or not it's de minimis, it's not being used anyway. —howcheng {chat} 18:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
A clear COM:DERIV of protected works. Mhhossein talk 06:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Could you please identify the protected work? Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 17:37, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- Sure, the banners. --Mhhossein talk 05:13, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- The uploader makes FOP DRs all the time; they should know better. Are we sure that neither
COM:FOP Australianor COM:DM applies? Brianjd (talk) 11:54, 3 December 2022 (UTC)- Pinging @Mhhossein, Ooligan. Brianjd (talk) 11:55, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- It’s not clear from the FOP page, but {{FoP-Australia}} makes it clear that it applies only to permanent works. Brianjd (talk) 11:59, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- And who talked about FOP? It is irrelevant here. There are dozens of protected posters in this photo. --Mhhossein talk 12:32, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Perhaps a marginal de minimis case. Let the closing admin decides. --A1Cafel (talk) 12:28, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- It's far beyond de minimis. A large portion of the photo is covered by the protected works. The level of violation is neither trivial nor minimal.--Mhhossein talk 05:10, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; the little flyers are de minimis, the giant poster is not. —howcheng {chat} 18:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Police automobiles in Peru
[edit]The files are images of Peruvian police automobiles, in which they both come from mynewsdesk.com, a blacklisted source that is listed on COM:BAD#Mynewsdesk.com back in May 2016, and the deprecation consensus was made much earlier than the license reviewer's review (on 2016-09-17). Given by the description on COM:BAD and a lack of EXIF documentation about the copyright holder, I believe further permissions from the copyright holder is needed.
- File:Hyundai Santa Fe Policía Nacional del Perú 001.jpg
- File:Hyundai Santa Fe Policía Nacional del Perú 002.jpg
廣九直通車 (talk) 09:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Thuresson: Notifying license reviewer.廣九直通車 (talk) 09:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 18:04, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Bei den anderen Neuen Bild hat er die lizenz eingetragen, nur hier vergessen, hatte dies nachgetragen ....--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 15:04, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Woelle ffm: Die Lizenz muss vom Urheber selbst kommen und kann nicht einfach von anderen "nachgetragen" werden. --Rosenzweig τ 12:24, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: ja du hast recht, aber der neue User braucht Hilfe--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 12:57, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; user was notified that the file is unlicensed and chose not to do anything about it. Deleted without prejudice; uploader is free to re-upload with the correct license. —howcheng {chat} 18:08, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Possibly a COM:CV. It's the logo of the London Irish Amateur rugby club and I believe the licence for it is incorrect (claims its a CC-0 when no evidence has been provided the club has waived all claims to copyright of it) The C of E (talk) 16:15, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- the logo is not under copy write. if you look at the london irish professional logo the sword is black and a black surround, this is copywrite (UK00003473958). London Irish Amateur use the original logo from 1898 Tommythenodd (talk) 16:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Do you have evidence this was the exact same one created in 1898 and used then? The C of E (talk) 18:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination as it's unused. @Tommythenodd: Please feel free to re-upload with the proper documentation if you plan to use it in the future. —howcheng {chat} 18:10, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
No evidence that artists, whose works are on these book covers, died 70 or more years ago. For example, the author of File:Пекла (1929).pdf - Boris Malkin died in 1972.
- File:Хлопчык з-пад Гродна (1940).pdf
- File:Хлопчык з-пад Гродна (1949).pdf
- File:Салавей (1932).pdf
- File:Салавей (1928).pdf
- File:Пекла (1929).pdf
- File:Сын вады (1932).pdf
- File:Сын вады (1928).pdf
- File:У краіне райскае птушкі (1932).pdf
- File:У краіне райскае птушкі (1927).pdf
- File:Янка Купала. Збор твораў (1925–1932). Том 6.pdf
- File:Над ракою Арэсай (1933).pdf
- File:Урачыстасьць (1925).pdf
- File:Насцечка (1941).pdf
- File:Як дзядзька Тамаш напалохаў ваўкоў (1941).pdf
- File:Буры (1930).pdf
- File:Хвоі гавораць (1926).pdf
- File:Цемра (1928).pdf
- File:Хвоі гавораць (1928).pdf
- File:Vita (1926).pdf
- File:Лягатып Дзяржаўнага Выдавецтва Беларусі (1).png
- File:Шчаслівая дарога (1935).pdf
- File:Угрунь (1927).pdf
- File:Па беларускім бруку (1925).pdf
- File:Сутарэньне (1925).pdf
- File:Марына (1926).pdf
- File:Выбраныя апавяданьні (Чарот, 1926).pdf
- File:Выбраныя вершы (Чарот, 1925).pdf
- File:Вершы (Трус, 1925).pdf
- File:Matka (1928).pdf
- File:Romeo i Julja na Białorusi (1929).pdf
- File:Права на зброю (1933).pdf
- File:Пялёсткі (1926).pdf
- File:Камсамольскія вершы (1930).pdf
- File:Шанхайскі шоўк (1926).pdf
- File:Марсэльеза (1927).pdf
- File:Суседзі (1932).pdf
- File:Табе (1927).pdf
- File:Два (1925).pdf
- File:Два (1928).pdf
- File:Паэмы (Бядуля, 1927).pdf
- File:Пачуцьці (1926).pdf
- File:Сьцежкі-дарожкі (1928).pdf
- File:На чыгунцы (1928).pdf
- File:Пад сонцам (1925).pdf
- File:Бацькаў сын (1932).pdf
- File:У віры жыцьця (1925).pdf
- File:Магіла льва (1927).pdf
- File:Досьвіткі (1926).pdf
- File:Зорным шляхам (1932).pdf
- File:Веснапесьні (1929).pdf
- File:У капцюрох ГПУ. Фрагмэнт Салавецкага Крамля (1937).jpg
- File:У капцюрох ГПУ.pdf
- File:Сьцежкі-дарожкі (1929).pdf
- File:Płač Biełaruskaj Staronki Matki pa dzietkach svajich renehatach.pdf
- File:Цьвікевіч. Парады цяжарным.pdf
- File:Лемантар (1925).pdf
- File:Лемантар (1927).pdf
- File:Ірляндзкія Народныя Казкі (1923).pdf
Xunks (talk) 18:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- A lot of artists are uknown and there is no information. For example: File:У капцюрох ГПУ.pdf, File:Płač Biełaruskaj Staronki Matki pa dzietkach svajich renehatach.pdf, File:Зорным шляхам (1932).pdf. Also you should remember that a lot of these books wherepublished in Minsk and belarusian term of copyright is 50 years. Gleb Leo (talk) 18:29, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- 50 or 70, the evidence is still needed. ‘Unknown’ is not ‘anonymous’. --Xunks (talk) 19:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- But if artist is not indicated in the book and there is no bibliographical information about him (so, artist is unknown), this publication is anonymous and term of copyright is counted from publication. Should I separately show that artist is anonymous (uknown) in template? Gleb Leo (talk) 19:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Again, ‘unknown’ is not ‘anonymous’. ‘Anonymous’ means the author intentionally chose not to disclose his name. In turn, if you simply don’t know the name, this doesn’t mean it cannot became known after further investigation. --Xunks (talk) 19:58, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- It can be known after, but today is unknown. Belarusian law (art. 20, google translate):
- 2. The exclusive right to a work is valid during the life of the author and fifty years after his death, except for the cases provided for by this article.
- 3. The exclusive right to an anonymous work or a work used under a pseudonym shall be valid for fifty years from the moment of the first legal publication of such a work or fifty years from the moment of its creation, if within fifty years from the moment of its creation it was not lawfully published with the consent of author.
- When determining the period of validity of the exclusive right to an anonymous work or a work used under a pseudonym, in respect of which, within the period provided for by part one of this paragraph, the author has disclosed his true name or his name has ceased to leave doubts, paragraph 2 of this article shall apply.
- 50 years have gone and we have not found artists. So, it is PD in Belarus, where a lot of these books were published. Lithuanian law (art. 35, google translate):
- 1. The property rights of authors to a work created on the basis of co-authorship are valid throughout the life of the co-authors and 70 years after the death of the last of the co-authors.
- 2. The property rights of authors to a work in which the author's name is not indicated or a pseudonym is indicated are valid for 70 years from the moment the work was legally made public. In the event that the identity of the author of such a work is not in doubt or the real name of the author becomes known within the specified period, the author's property rights to such a work are valid throughout the life of the author and 70 years after the death of the author.
- So, in Lithuania also it is PD, if author is not known for 70 years. Gleb Leo (talk) 20:29, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Again, ‘unknown’ is not ‘anonymous’. ‘Anonymous’ means the author intentionally chose not to disclose his name. In turn, if you simply don’t know the name, this doesn’t mean it cannot became known after further investigation. --Xunks (talk) 19:58, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- But if artist is not indicated in the book and there is no bibliographical information about him (so, artist is unknown), this publication is anonymous and term of copyright is counted from publication. Should I separately show that artist is anonymous (uknown) in template? Gleb Leo (talk) 19:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- 50 or 70, the evidence is still needed. ‘Unknown’ is not ‘anonymous’. --Xunks (talk) 19:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Also, if I know the artist, how I can separately show his copyright? Gleb Leo (talk) 18:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- You can use {{Copyright information}} or at least
|Author: Ivan Ivanov (1880-1940; text)<br> Petr Petrov (1870-1930; drawings)
. --Xunks (talk) 19:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- You can use {{Copyright information}} or at least
- Keep "Unknown" is not exactly "anonymous", and is not exactly "pseudonymous" but looking through these, most do not name the cover image creator. If we find one that absolutely has a credited image creator where we have a death death beyond the 50 or 70 years rule (depending on which country first published) we can always block that image from display. Google does the same thing at Google Books, where the publisher has given permission for the text, but not the images for contractual/copyright reasons. Responding to having a named author but no life dates: For instance LCCN has over 10,000 author entries for public domain books where there is no birth or death date for the author. For those authors, having a name, is still equal to being anonymous/pseudonymous, despite 95 years of research and the budget of the Library of Congress. I have also not come across any Bulgaria/Russian case law contraindicating this. Where in the US we have details from Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc. and Authors Guild, Inc. v. HathiTrust giving guidance on the court's thinking on US copyright law on images in books, and on the copyright status of abandoned/orphaned works. See also where illustrators sued Google Books over the same issue we are discussing of text vs images. --RAN (talk) 05:38, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep According to Belarusian and Lithuanian law, most of the books listed are in the public domain. And the book File:Пекла (1929).pdf will be in the public domain in a month, in 2023. Unfortunately, I must admit that I did not notice that the artist was listed there, also there was no information about him in the National Library, where I took it. So specifically this book we can delete, but in a month it will be there like PD in Belarus. Gleb Leo (talk) 15:44, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Today is already 2023, so File:Пекла (1929).pdf is in the public domain now. Also Happy New Year! Gleb Leo (talk) 19:43, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Gleb Leo: Can you type out the name of the illustrator for File:Пекла (1929).pdf, and I will do a little bit of research on him. --RAN (talk) 19:02, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, of course. The illustrator is Barys Malkin (by: Барыс Малкін; ru: Борис Малкин). Gleb Leo (talk) 19:07, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
- I added a creator template for both the author and the cover art illustrator. --RAN (talk) 04:49, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: I am convinced by the research done by Gleb Leo. —howcheng {chat} 18:17, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Es un archivo erróneo Davidavgi19 (talk) 18:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 18:17, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
should have been deleted in 2007, but by some mistake it was kept (Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Waika man.jpg, no clear permission — Draceane talkcontrib. 20:16, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comments from the image pages:
- Somehow it seems my misunderstanding that hr:Slika:Waika man.jpg and hr:Slika:ShabanoYanomami.jpg are the works of hr:Suradnik:Zeljko. I agree to delete image:Waika man.jpg and image:ShabanoYanomami.jpg.Penpen 12:55, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- {{no source since/en|month=September|day=29|year=2007}}
- It is under investigation what occurred in the original file. Please wait for a while.
- Hm, a while = 15 years?! — Draceane talkcontrib. 20:17, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; ordered a global replacement with File:環形草屋結構圖.png. —howcheng {chat} 18:21, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
The work contains a protected work and should be deleted per COM:DERIV. Not a De minimis. Mhhossein talk 06:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Mhhossein I assume the protected work is the photo of
Mahsa AminiMaryam Rajavi? Brianjd (talk) 11:57, 3 December 2022 (UTC)- I see no picture of Mahsa Amini here, rather people are holding Rajavi's photo which is protected by copyrighted. --Mhhossein talk 12:22, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Mhhossein: I misread a comment about the photo. Brianjd (talk) 12:57, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- I see no picture of Mahsa Amini here, rather people are holding Rajavi's photo which is protected by copyrighted. --Mhhossein talk 12:22, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, image is showing a copyrighted photo on a prominent position. --Ellywa (talk) 21:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
There is no permission on this painting in the ticket. Анастасия Львоваru/en 12:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- the same situation as here, was given the permission for some files, the uploader also used another paintings. Анастасия Львоваru/en 12:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Я не поняла, зачем выставлен на удаление файл, на который получено разрешение от художника?
- В Викимедиа поступило электронное письмо, подтверждающее, что владелец авторских прав на это произведение подтвердил публикацию на указанных здесь условиях. Эта переписка была проверена добровольцами службы VRT и помещена в архив разрешений. Доверенные участники, имеющие учётную запись в VRTS, могут получить доступ к переписке по номеру #2015011610013711.
- Может, мне уже удалить свой аккаунт отсюда, чтобы больше не читать подобных посланий?
- Потратила часть жизни, чтоб добыть эти разрешения, чтоб загрузить всё, а теперь выясняется, что впустую тратила время. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tatiana Matlina (talk • contribs)
- Татьяна, я думаю, что Вы проделали большую работу, и большая часть загруженных Вами изображений оформлена верно; но не все. Я благодарна Вам, но мне сложно заниматься поддержкой, пока я проверяю Ваш вклад. Те работы, что оформлены неверно, попадают сюда как раз потому, что разрешения от художника в письме на них нет. Анастасия Львоваru/en 13:01, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:20, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- File:Uladzimir Kachan Christmas with the Infanta 2010.jpg
- File:Dialogue of epochs. Interpretations - Exhibition in Gomel 13.03.2015 22.JPG
- File:Uladzimir Kachan Museum of History of the fire service in Grodno.JPG
There is given a permission for really small copies, not for a big size. Анастасия Львоваru/en 12:53, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
The author attached to the ticket several collages (564x777px with 7 photos on it, for example) and said ...являюсь автором и единственным обладателем исключительных авторских прав на фотографии и произведения станковой и монументальной живописи из приложенных файлов, и даю разрешение на публикацию этих фотографий (I am the author and owner of exclusive copyright for photographs and works of easel and monumental painting from the attached files, and I give permission to publish the photographs). I do not think that the meaning of this text can be extended to full-size works. Анастасия Львоваru/en 12:57, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: the ccbysa licence does not state the license is only valid for a low resolution. If high resolution is published, it can imho be used on Commons, unless it is unlawfully obtained. In that case, the author should contact VRT themselfves or the Foundation. --Ellywa (talk) 19:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Craicmerchant
[edit]- File:Steve Wall Olympia Theatre Dublin, photo by Glen Bollard.jpg
- File:The Stunning-Photo credit-Richie Smyth 0796 CC 2000px B&W.jpg
File:Steve Wall as Chet Baker on the set of my Foolish Heart..jpg- File:The Stunning circa 1990.jpg
- File:The Stunning-on fire by Kathrin Baumbach 0872-Edit.jpg
File:Steve Wall - photo credit - Sean Walsh.jpgFile:Steve Wall - photo credit - SeanWalsh.jpg
In the licensing section, the uploader claims to be the copyright owner, but in the file titles, gives credit to three different photographers: Sean Walsh, Katherin Baumbach, and Glen Bollard. It would therefore appear that the uploader is the author of none of these pictures. Therefore, they are copyright violations. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:53, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- The last two files are also nearly identical with only small differences in brightness/contrast. TornadoLGS (talk) 21:00, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- The photos have been used widely for promotional purposes in various forms of media - print and online since the 1990's. Some are also available to download from the band's website as part of their press kit, with photographer credits. They are free to use. Craicmerchant (talk) 23:03, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Craicmerchant: Just because you can download a photo off a website does not mean it is free to use. If the pictures are on a commercial website, such as for a band, then they probably are copyrighted unless the site indicates otherwise. You certainly may not claim the photos to be your own work. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:24, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- For admins: There is more discussion at User talk:Craicmerchant#Notification about possible deletion indicating that there is permission to use photos of The Stunning, but proper attribution is still required. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:49, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hi there, the photos are the band's own publicity photos. Some are available to download from the Press kit on their website for promotional use and the website says "feel free to use". The one of Steve Wall in Co. Clare in 2021 was taken by me as I was in attendance at a recording session. And the one of Steve as Chet Baker was also taken by me on the set of the film. The photo by Glen Bollard is used by the band online for promotional purposes and the copyright is owned by the band - but free to use as their website states. https://thestunning.net/press-kit I understand if you need delete the photos that appear to violate any copyright terms, though I know the band would have no problem with them as they own the copyright to their own photos. In the meantime I will try to find some that are covered under creative commons. Thanks. Craicmerchant (talk) 14:05, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
I have struck through the three files claimed to own work. @Craicmerchant: Have you tried contacting the band to see if they can add a CC-BY declaration on the press kit page? Or maybe have them go through the COM:VRT process for the remaining files. Thanks. —howcheng {chat} 18:30, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, deleted photos without permission, kept 3 photos claimed to be own work. --Ellywa (talk) 20:00, 22 April 2023 (UTC)