Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/11/29

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 29th, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marked "own work" but see, for example, here: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/breaking-news-live-updates-oct-10/liveblog/94754019.cms Larry Hockett (talk) 03:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedied already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:20, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=687362409435028&set=a.220226696148604 ZioNicco (talk) 09:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao ho visto che hai proposto la cancellazione della foto. Sai indicarmi la procedura esatta per caricare quella foto ? Perchè ne sono in possesso con i diritti ma wikipedia non me la carica. Caricando la stessa foto da fb invece il caricamento è andato a buon fine. Sofia Melella (talk) 15:01, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedied 16:11, November 29, 2022 by EugeneZelenko. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 21:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 23:01, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE ordinary person (not used anywhere) Mateus2019 (talk) 21:36, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 07:14, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 21:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work as image could be found at another website prior to the upload to Commons. Uploader's other images were previously deleted for copyright reasons. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:17, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of TOC-2 seen from TOC Gotanda.jpg. I uploaded it by mistake Syced (talk) 00:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:34, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File uploaded for use of vandalism only Nightmare Rarity (talk) 11:18, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete personal photo for non-wikipedian out of scope. --Karim talk to me :)..! 13:21, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment and also File:Naked little boy age 12.jpg. --Karim talk to me :)..! 13:23, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Karim185.3 That file is missing a DR tag. Brianjd (talk) 12:09, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Nightmare Rarity and Karim185.3: I reported these files as suspected child pornography. I do like to say that mere nudity is not pornography, but the framing here (from the neck to the legs), combined with the nudity, the obscured background and the lack of meaningful descriptions, is suspicious.
Convenience links:
Brianjd (talk) 12:09, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Convenience link for uploader: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth?target=Matrokbam2022 Brianjd (talk) 12:11, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. --Mhhossein talk 12:27, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

German stamps were found not to be official works by courts, so they are not automatically in the public domain. These stamps are the work of de:Jochen Bertholdt, who died in 2020. So they are still protected by copyright and should be deleted. The files can be restored in 2091.

Rosenzweig τ 13:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 13:43, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany stamps of Germany are copyrighted until at least 70 years after the artist's death. In this case the artist, Jochen Bertholdt, died in 2020. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2091.

Adamant1 (talk) 07:57, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Malverna as Logo. Below COM:TOO? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is above threshold of originality and eligible for copyright protection from unknown source. Malverna 00:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:01, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is taken off her Facebook with no indication of releasing it to the public domain. AngusWOOF (talk) 00:57, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:03, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails COM:SCOPE. Nw520 (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Seems out of scope. Overlaid text looks like social media; possibly copyvio also. Brianjd (talk) 11:48, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:03, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is mostly a duplicate of the prior file which I nominated for deletion with the addition of two bunny statues. I don't think this is any less self promotional with the bunny statues that it is without them. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:40, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Robert Elwes Author (talk · contribs)

[edit]

One of the things Commons is not, is a private photo album. Unused personal photos are out of COM:SCOPE.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all these and this and this one too, shameless (attempted) self-promotion both here (1, 2) and on en.wp (where he is now indefinitely blocked with talk-page access removed for blowing his own trumpet and just refusing to listen to anyone else). Apart from the promotion, they seem to be fully out of scope, per nom. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:56, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not seeing how this is useful to this project either. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:58, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:40, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Mention of All Rights Reserved in the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:52, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:37, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

At this file size/quality and with this being a portrait of a public figure, I doubt it's own work of the uploader and suggest it was taken from a prior source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:35, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work, small, low quality, over the desk portrait of politician or ruler. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:58, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:30, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused table. Could be reproduced in text if ever needed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:59, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:23, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata indicates the image came from Facebook. The uploader has had multiple other files deleted for copyright issues, this appears to be another case where they are claiming as "own work" an image they found online. Ravensfire (talk) 20:00, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:23, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work due to small size and lack of metadata. Uploader has history of uploads with unclear copyright status. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:03, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:23, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure what this image is for. Seems out of scope. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:22, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-educational Bfuster (talk) 21:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD G7. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:20, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-educational Bfuster (talk) 21:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD G7. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:21, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-educational Bfuster (talk) 21:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD G7. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:21, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-educational Bfuster (talk) 21:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD G7. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:21, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-educational Bfuster (talk) 21:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD G7. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:21, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of a screenshot Oaktree b (talk) 22:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:16, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of focus photo of an unidentified person, out of scope, unused in all wiki projects Oaktree b (talk) 22:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:16, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of Family Guy TV program Oaktree b (talk) 22:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 22:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 22:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 22:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 22:57, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:14, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The book cover is above the threshold of originality in the United States and appears to be copyrighted. As such, this should be deleted as a presumptive lack of a valid free license for this book cover. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 06:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:12, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:10, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appears to be an advertising poster for extant media, not the uploader's original work. Ilzolende (talk) 07:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:10, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong image uploaded Bioarts (talk) 08:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD G7. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:10, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I post the wrong image. Melaniegore1 (talk) 10:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: spam. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:08, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:Scope: unused personal image. MKFI (talk) 10:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:07, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Derivative work: photograph-of-photograph on computer screen, original unknown. MKFI (talk) 10:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:07, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A photo shot in 1967 can hardly be free, if it has not been freely released by the photographer himself. Even if he/she had died the same year, the image would still be in his/her copyright til end of 2037. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:06, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio, see history. 91.193.179.246 11:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:05, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

extremely low quality, looks like a photo of a photo, unlikely to be own work as claimed Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:04, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE. This is basically an advertisement; it ends "Enrol in our Data Analytics course right away" Marbletan (talk) 15:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:03, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work. See exif data Skivsamlare (talk) 15:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:03, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GF1903 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and:

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo from unknown origin. Pierre cb (talk) 16:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:01, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:57, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too small to have any educational value; unclear copyright status — Draceane talkcontrib. 16:59, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:57, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giorgia De88 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

probably not own work, permission would be required

— Draceane talkcontrib. 17:02, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:56, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 17:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:55, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 17:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:55, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 17:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:55, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 17:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:55, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 17:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:54, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 17:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:54, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 17:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:54, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 17:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:53, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 17:29, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:53, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo, unidientified singer. Clearly indicated it was uploaded as promotion in description. Oaktree b (talk) 18:18, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:49, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyvio appears copy of a commercial work Oaktree b (talk) 18:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:48, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-notable individual, unused in any wiki Oaktree b (talk) 18:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:47, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above ToO in China. See also [1]. Yann (talk) 19:02, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:47, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Generated with unspecified avatar software, many variations of this exist online (eg. https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1457983932863942657/vXH4FgMP_400x400.jpg) Belbury (talk) 19:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:46, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unknown individual, no indication of notability, photo unused in all wiki projects Oaktree b (talk) 19:29, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:46, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused photo of an unidentified individual Oaktree b (talk) 19:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:45, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously a copy, see the marks at the top of the letterboxing to see how this was a screenshot before being here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:38, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete obivous copyright violation by an user who has more than two dozen cases of confirmed copyright infringements on WCommons. Veverve (talk) 19:54, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:45, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ploreky (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Usuallly I avoid mass nominations. This is an exception because all the photos have the same problem. Many have FBMD in metadata, others have transmission data showing these were all copied from the internet and are not own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Save you can't just nominate it all to deletion just because you also found the photo elsewhere. I also have my own photos, and just because someone else ay also have it, doesn't mean it should be deleted. You can debate with me otherwise..... Ploreky (talk) 10:13, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Please don't just assume. Please.
Ploreky (talk) 10:18, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
1) all the photos have the same problem. Many have FBMD in metadata, others have transmission data showing these were all copied from the internet and are not own work. You have not responded to this.
2) Already, two dozen images of yours are confirmed copyright infringements.
How, then, are we not to assume that all those images are copyright violations? Also, COM:PCP. Veverve (talk) 15:31, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely I can nominate if we found the photo elsewhere. If it was previously published, we need COM:OTRS. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:45, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work on the photo on the screen Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Adeletron 3030 as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Chinchilla in captivity.jpg. Redundant and lower-quality than the cited file, but different file type, so not eligible for speedy (COM:DUPE). —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Webp conversion of File:Chinchilla in captivity.jpg. The quality is lower and takes longer to load on Wikipedia. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 03:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:23, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: OOS. Does not qualify for speedy as far as I can tell, but I agree re scope. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:22, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from https://ipc-paris.fr/michel-boyance/ without permission Ske (talk) 02:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:22, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Taichi (talk) 03:14, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:19, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:16, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:16, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post-1989 murals, no FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:16, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Artsakh A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:16, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly a screenshot of an RSBN newscast; unless Editor Alex 2021 can prove they're a representative of RSBN, its clearly violating copyright. GRuban (talk) 04:01, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:14, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 04:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:13, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo courtesy of Lucas Barth, not a work from the US Federal Government A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:41, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo courtesy of Lucas Barth, not a work from the US Federal Government A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo courtesy of Chuck Graham (a freelance photographer), not a works from the US Federal Government A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo courtesy of Chuck Graham (a freelance photographer), not a works from the US Federal Government A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 05:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 05:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 05:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Qatar. The image focus too much on the modern buildings, not a general skyline view A1Cafel (talk) 05:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 05:29, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Qatar. The Aspire Tower is the subject of this photo, if the tower was removed, the image is unlikely to be useful anymore (fails de minimis) A1Cafel (talk) 05:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyvio per the talk page.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 06:38, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 17:17, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 17:18, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 17:19, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 17:19, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 17:19, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 17:19, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 17:19, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 17:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 17:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bogus license. Uploader is also subject of the photo, so they should obtain permission from original photographer. Needs COM:VRT. P 1 9 9   18:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

reverse of image at https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/392452-REG/Korg_AW1_AW_1_Clip_On_Instrument.html Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

reverse of image at https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/392452-REG/Korg_AW1_AW_1_Clip_On_Instrument.html Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

At this size/quality and that this was a politician, I think the date is wrong and I think it's not own work. Needs accurate source. Might be old enough to keep. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And all the images related to Miklós Hegedűs, his art, workplace, and others, by the same uploader, from the same source.

Translation of the request of the uploader (on my talk page):

Dear Grin! Please, since I don't speak English and you mentioned this possibility in your e-mail, I ask you now to start deleting the pictures of Miklós Hegedűs, the painter, with the following reason:

The rights holders have not consented to the publication of the images, partly because they have the right to publish them in pictorial form (the image of the paintings), and partly because the caption and content contain data that violate personal rights and which they do not wish to publish (place of burial and anthroposophical connection).

The pictures of Miklós Hegedűs are from Ibolya Beluk, not from his heirs, and since the painter died in 2022, permission would have to be obtained from his descendants, which they refused to grant on 12 November. Unfortunately, I am not familiar with the process of deletion here, and after User:Mdaniels5757 put a template on the images on 13 November 2022 that reads "If no valid permission is received within 30 days of the first response from the VRT agent, this file will be deleted. Please do not submit a further request for deletion for authorization reasons." I thought that by 13 December at the latest, these files would be deleted.

Now I see that you have given permission numbers to three of them, or that you have written that an extra separate request for deletion is needed.

You know the options here, please help me to get these files I uploaded on 11 November removed from Wikimedia Commons.

Thank you very much! Sorry to bother you, but as I said, I am not familiar with the methods here. Sincerely, Commission (talk) 20:01, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

[...] Here's what they are:

    File:Miklós Hegedűs, 2022.jpg According to his legal heirs (Mihály Hegedűs), as a portrait photograph it does not reflect the painter's personality. They do not contribute.
    File:Invitation to the event of the Anthroposophical Pedagogical Workshop, 2022-06-11.jpg Invasion of privacy (They do not intend to publish his anthroposophical affiliation). They do not consent.
    File:Notification of the funeral of Miklós Hegedűs painter, 2022.jpg Data violating privacy rights (grave location). They do not consent.
    File:Miklós Hegedűs at the Anthroposophical Pedagogical Workshop's Common Image session 01.jpg Data violating privacy rights (anthroposophy) No consent given.
    File:Pictures of Miklós Hegedűs at the Common Image session of the Anthroposophical Pedagogical Workshop 02.jpg Data violating privacy rights (anthroposophy). They do not consent.
    File:Miklós Hegedűs' painting Október (2018) at the Anthroposophical Pedagogical Workshop.jpg neither to the publication of the painting's photo nor to the publication of the painter's anthroposophical affiliation. They do not consent.
    File:Pictures of Miklós Hegedűs Nekrológ, 2022-09-25.jpg They do not consent to the publication of the portrait on the montage by Ibolya Beluk and the painter's works.
    File:Miklós Hegedűs painter's studio, Solymár.jpg No consent is given to the publication of the studio.
    File:Hegedűs Miklós painter's studio 01, Solymár 2020-02-20.jpg They do not consent to the publication of the recording of the studio.

Thank you very much, if you can do something about it, for deletion. Sincerely, --Bizottmány (talk) 22:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

--- grin 22:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:44, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VIGNESHWARAN PONNUSAMY (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The camera in these photos is (per the metadata) the same camera as that used to take this image, where the listed source is "INTERNET" and author is "INTERNET". As such, this does not appear to be the uploader's own work and, as should be deleted per COM:PRP.

Red-tailed hawk (nest) 06:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:20, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VIGNESHWARAN PONNUSAMY (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files contain metadata that indicates that the same camera took them as these two, where the listed source is "INTERNET" and author is "INTERNET". As such, these images do not appear to be the uploader's own work and, as such, should be deleted per COM:PRP.

Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:59, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:01, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Cebu von oben.jpg Nw520 (talk) 00:04, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Krd 13:41, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Ci En Shenyang.jpg Nw520 (talk) 00:05, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm retracting this deletion request. --Nw520 (talk) 14:43, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:41, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-res duplicate of File:Tai Qing Gong Shenyang.jpg. The watermark is placed slightly differently. Nw520 (talk) 00:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm retracting this deletion request. --Nw520 (talk) 14:42, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked duplicate of File:Taihui.jpg Nw520 (talk) 00:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Nw520  Speedy keep In use at ceb:Wutai Xian, es:Wutai, fr:Xian de Wutai, ko:우타이현, ru:Утай (Синьчжоу) and wikidata:Q1197006. Brianjd (talk) 11:29, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked duplicate of File:TaiShan, China.jpg Nw520 (talk) 00:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked duplicate of File:Tian Hua Shan Tour-1.jpg Nw520 (talk) 00:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep In use. Brianjd (talk) 11:30, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-res duplicate of File:Wohnhaus in Gensan.jpg Nw520 (talk) 00:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm retracting this deletion request. --Nw520 (talk) 14:42, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked duplicate of File:Yougutemple.jpg Nw520 (talk) 00:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked duplicate of File:Shenyang Zentrum.jpg Nw520 (talk) 00:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm retracting this deletion request. --Nw520 (talk) 14:42, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-res duplicate of File:Shenyang She Li Ta.jpg. The watermarked is placed slightly differently. Nw520 (talk) 00:14, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm retracting this deletion request. --Nw520 (talk) 14:43, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Creative1222 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Previously published on Reddit.

~Cybularny Speak? 00:17, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Only photos no. 5-9 were previously posted on Reddit. I can't edit the original post to add a licence, so please delete them. No reason for deletion of no. 1-4. Creative1222 (talk) 08:02, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Creative1222: Sending a permission to VRT is an option. ~Cybularny Speak? 08:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Cybularny: Done. Creative1222 (talk) 08:38, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I just missed it. Tag added. Polimerek (talk) 10:16, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 13:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked duplicate of File:Tian Hua Shan-area.jpg Nw520 (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Grill - BBQ in General Santos City.jpg, which has been retouched and de-watermarked. Nw520 (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm retracting this deletion request. --Nw520 (talk) 14:42, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:44, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked duplicate of File:TianHuaShan-Tour-2.jpg Nw520 (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:44, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is not licensed under CC-BY-SA as the text on fandom. see NON-TEXT FILES column Larryasou (talk) 02:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:45, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free picture http://compagniedesguidesdechamonix.over-blog.com/article-chamonix-ceremonix-en-memoire-d-etienne-livacic-49795110.html Ske (talk) 02:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:45, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The use of this background requires authorization. see[2] Larryasou (talk) 02:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:45, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted. Not own work. SnowPanda88 (talk) 03:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:45, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Title of original file is incorrect Nomesiec (talk) 03:19, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:45, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect file title. This is YABUN not NAIDOC week Nomesiec (talk) 03:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:46, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect file title. this is YABUN not NAIDOC Week Nomesiec (talk) 03:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:46, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect file title. this is YABUN not NAIDOC Week Nomesiec (talk) 03:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:46, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect file title. this is YABUN not NAIDOC Week Nomesiec (talk) 03:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:46, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect file title. this is YABUN not NAIDOC Week Nomesiec (talk) 03:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:46, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect file title. this is YABUN not NAIDOC Week Nomesiec (talk) 03:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:46, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect file title. this is YABUN not NAIDOC Week Nomesiec (talk) 03:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:46, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 17:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The foto is of the bike :-) Mario1952 (talk) 13:24, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:47, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image 2600:100C:A210:2BB2:9DCF:2D8C:B67F:3616 17:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:47, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I see we have OTRS on these two book covers, but I don't see any educational purpose. Files are not in use. There is no wiki page to go with any of it. It just looks like advertising or self-promotion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:48, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright--cartoon signed Pascal Kirchmair, not userːJacquelinekato إيان (talk) 05:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. I made a mistake. User's page clarifies discrepancy. ̴̴ إيان (talk) 07:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Clear keep, as admitted by the person proposing the deletion. Vysotsky (talk) 23:17, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nomination withdrawn. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:14, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Natu2806 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No source, missing permission and some pictures are from Google Maps.

Edslov (talk) 03:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: Except the first one, all of them deleted. --Kadı Message 20:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free photo without permission Venzz (talk) 17:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

the author is supposed to send the permission, i hope it will come through soon (with the outages internet is also not really working) --アンタナナ 22:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 20:07, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nourtheflagmaster (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Fictional flags, not in use, out of scope, some may be used for attack.

Xunks (talk) 17:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:18, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nourtheflagmaster (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These appear to be fictional flags that are unused and of no educational value and should thusly be deleted along the lines of COM:SCOPE.

Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:17, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Out of scope, fictional flags. Flagvisioner (talk) 21:26, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:50, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny image, not used, superseded, out of scope. Yann (talk) 19:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File appears to be in meaningful use at fa:کاربر:Shervinafshar/طرح‌های کاری مدیریتی. Brianjd (talk) 13:17, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The other images in this series (0000.png, 1000.png and 1110.png1100.png is missing for some reason) could be kept on the same basis, except that they all have SVG equivalents, so they should be deleted. Brianjd (talk) 13:21, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per meaningful use, as I looked at the context. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:33, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Use can be replaced by File:1111.svg. Yann (talk) 11:55, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann Isn’t that up to the user who owns that page? Brianjd (talk) 12:11, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Brianjd: Nobody owns anything here. This page can be edited by anyone. This file was added there in 2006, while File:1111.svg was created on 2008. Yann (talk) 12:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann You are aware that the page where this file is used is in userspace, right? I don’t know how things work at fawiki, but seemed clear at the projects where I was involved that you don’t edit another user’s userspace unless there are exceptional circumstances like blocks or copyright issues. Brianjd (talk) 12:18, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I see that. I don't even need to edit that page directly. If I use universal replace, AFAIK the image will be replaced in all namespaces in all projects. Yann (talk) 12:25, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann I was under the impression that the ‘don’t mess with another user’s userspace’ rule applies to all forms of editing, including CommonsDelinker. Brianjd (talk) 12:28, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, actually there is no choice. There is no way to specify that an image should be replaced only on certain namespaces. Yann (talk) 12:32, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @Ikan Kekek (which should have been done earlier). Brianjd (talk) 12:35, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Great news! Shervinafshar is en-4. They can speak for themselves here! Brianjd (talk) 12:19, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion: In use. --Kadı Message 20:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i dont use it anymore 𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐨. (talk) 20:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: fictitious coat of arms. --Kadı Message 20:12, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of another photograph; source not indicated. Boylarva99 (talk) 21:58, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:20, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:Methylmalonate-2D-structure.svg as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 06:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 11:20, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The ticket doesn't contain permission for this file (and some other uploaded by Tatiana Matlina; listed above) Анастасия Львоваru/en 12:00, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And yes, I checked some other letters from this author. Some of them contains dead links on radikal.ru (image hosting), so there is a little chance that the permission was given and Tatiana uploaded them with a wrong description, but now it's unverifyed. Анастасия Львоваru/en 12:18, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Натюрморт с фруктами. х.м.40х40.2012.jpg (another author). Анастасия Львоваru/en 12:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:37, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and:

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:39, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Karetsuji (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos far above TOO. Illogical to assume that school logos are works of an officer or employee of the Government of the Philippines, PD-PhilippinesGov doesn't apply.

P 1 9 9   18:57, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I may have placed the wrong licensing tags as I assumed that the specialized school namely PSHS-CMC under PSHSS in turn under DOST a Government Department of the Philippines is under PD-PhilippinesGov, Does PD-Logo suffice? Karetsuji (talk) 05:18, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, PD-Logo certainly doesn't apply. That is only for very simple logos but these logos are far too complex. --P 1 9 9   16:02, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:40, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a TV interview (from a private TV channel) can't be a personal work Shkuru Afshar (talk) 11:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t know why this image nominated for deletion since it has neither offended nor copyright content — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:3032:C:FBD6:5D09:1E24:868E:E8AC (talk) 11:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:06, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Change the image to one PurpleViss (talk) 07:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request. --plicit 03:32, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Change the image to one PurpleViss (talk) 07:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request. --plicit 03:32, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Change the image to one PurpleViss (talk) 07:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request. --plicit 03:31, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Change the image to one PurpleViss (talk) 07:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request. --plicit 03:31, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:Scope: personal image. MKFI (talk) 10:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 17:17, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked duplicate of File:Guanghuatempele.jpg Nw520 (talk) 00:06, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Nw520 This is the third nomination like this, and all those files are in use. Please check before nominating files for deletion! Brianjd (talk) 11:27, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep per above. Brianjd (talk) 11:27, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the heads-up, Brianjd. Don't worry, I will refrain from doing deletion requests for the time being. PS: Would be nice if someone mentioned on Commons:Deletion requests that files being in-use automatically contradicts a deletion. Similarly, COM:Redundant could use some clarification. --Nw520 (talk) 14:37, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Nw520 files being in-use automatically contradicts a deletion That’s always true for quality issues, but never true for copyright issues, and privacy issues are much more nuanced.
Commons:Deletion requests does link to relevant policies, including Commons:Deletion policy, which includes Commons:Deletion policy#Redundant/bad quality (COM:Redundant). The question remains: What would you like clarified in COM:Redundant? Brianjd (talk) 14:45, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Brianjd: Wenn auf Commons:Löschanträge entschieden wurde, musst du alle Vorkommen, die du durch GlobalUsage finden kannst, durch die bessere Datei ersetzen. (Commons:Deletion policy/de#Redundant) → As soon as a decision has been made on Commons:Deletion requests, all usages […] have to be replaced. --Nw520 (talk) 14:51, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Nw520 I raised this issue at Commons talk:Deletion policy#‘Redundant/bad quality’ section. Brianjd (talk) 14:59, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Though, originally I meant that COM:Redundant should state that being older and thus “serv[ing] as proof that uploader released it under a free license” is a reason for a keeping. --Nw520 (talk) 14:54, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I asked at Commons:Deletion requests/Files created by User:Farawayman whether that really is a reason for keeping. If it is, then yes, it should be documented somewhere. Brianjd (talk) 15:00, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Assuming I haven't missed anything, all my open deletion requests (that no one else has contributed to) have been withdrawn in order to not waste anyadmin's time any more. --Nw520 (talk) 20:04, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. This watermarked version cannot prove anything about the better version (without watermark) as far as both versions were transferred from another Wikiproject independently. As for being in use, of course in this kind of cases it is necessary first of all to replace the version that is to be deleted with the better version. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:27, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked duplicate of File:Simatai.jpg Nw520 (talk) 00:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not in use, unlike the other nominations in this series. Brianjd (talk) 11:28, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:19, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Concas1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

small size, strange names, I doubt the uploader is the author

Avron (talk) 01:58, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all three images are found at different websites, definitely not an own work. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:44, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate File:Павел Карпов 7.jpg Gzen92 (talk) 08:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:46, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a hoax Masti (talk) 19:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: simple text, out of scope. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 14:48, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image not found at source provided. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:54, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: there is no problem with the source but it cannot be licensed as PD-Russia as far as it was created in France. Should be uploaded to the local wiki as fair-use. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 14:55, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not think the image uploaded here is original. It looks very pixelated and seems to be copied multiple times before being here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:58, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 15:18, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Acrylictouch (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-uploads by non-notable artist. Out of scope.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:22, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo from unknown origin. Pierre cb (talk) 16:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I’ve kept this file because it does not address the reason for the deletion, or it is inadequate for other reasons. According to my talk page, deleting files without my permission is prohibited. Please make sure your deletion reason meets the following:

  1. It should be consistent. Terms like “per nomination” and “.” are inconsistent for a deletion reason.
  2. Make sure your reason is clearly with my permission.
  3. Wikipedia is not Bee Swarm. Bee Swarm is generally vandalism and hoaxes as defined in Wikipedia’s CSD G3.
  4. If this file is protected, do not nominate it.
  5. Color Control System logo should not be deleted if it is protected by the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF).
  6. Important: Do not delete my files without permission from me. Deleting without the editor’s permission is unacceptable, and may lead to a block.

Thanks. BeeSpeed1989 (talk) 23:04, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

deleting files without my permission is prohibited is the best joke of the year, ROFL. --Achim55 (talk) 23:04, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: non-free logo above COM:TOO. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced, unattributed image uploaded by a blocked sock puppeteer. Unlikely this is Benjamin Harrison IV. As far as I can tell there is no extant portrait of Benjamin Harrison IV. Gamaliel (talk) 01:59, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced, unattributed image uploaded by a blocked sock puppeteer. Unlikely this is Benjamin Harrison IV. As far as I can tell there is no extant portrait of Benjamin Harrison IV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gamaliel (talk • contribs)


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:49, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Gestumblindi. --Rosenzweig τ 12:44, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo is asserted to not meet the threshold of originality consisting of only simple shapes and text, but the logo features a portion of a baseball with its stitching. Whpq (talk) 18:19, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep the stitching details are minimum, IMO. Fma12 (talk) 18:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Originally uploaded at en:File:ODU Baseball Alt Logo.jpg with a non-free use rationale; marked as {{PD-textlogo}} and copied to Commons by Fma12. Brianjd (talk) 13:12, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Brianjd: There are lot of simple-text files uploaded at the en.wiki as NFCC that have been moved to Commons (in fact, I copied many of them here). Regarding the ODU logo, I uploaded it with the convincement it was not copyrightable but maybe I was wrong. Anything can happen. Fma12 (talk) 11:09, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Fma12 I’m not suggesting you did something wrong (indeed, moving PD files to Commons is obviously a good thing). I’m simply documenting the file’s history in case that is useful to other users. Brianjd (talk) 13:13, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, pal. Fma12 (talk) 23:29, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. plicit 00:32, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny image, not used, superseded, out of scope. Yann (talk) 19:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:1111.png. Brianjd (talk) 13:21, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 05:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny image, not used, superseded, out of scope. Yann (talk) 19:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:1111.png. Brianjd (talk) 13:21, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 05:31, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It will affect my professional life. Thank you very much for your help. Gtam95 (talk) 19:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Courtesy deletion of personal photo. --Mhhossein talk 05:34, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The first original-founded (maybe there is a older version, but I didn't find) photo was uploaded on 20 February 2018 in a website. However this file was uploaded 9 February 2021 on Commons. So this copyrighted file will be deleted. Uncitoyen (talk) 09:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:41, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have fixed the issue. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: has a license tag now. --Rosenzweig τ 12:42, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be copied from Bollywood Hungama. Although some images are released under CC by the publication, this does not have the watermark which is normally connected with the CC files, and does not seem to match the conditions that they place on other images (eg set, party or event) Bilby (talk) 09:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am the owner of this image, in-fact Bollywoddhungama copied this image.Orbit578 (talk) 05:40, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Uploader’s only global contribution (outside of a sandbox). Resolution 1,005 × 847; no EXIF data.
@Orbit578 If this really is your image, please contact VRT. Brianjd (talk) 13:06, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: for lack of permission. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:42, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in UAE. The Burj Al Arab is the subject of this photo. If the building was removed, the photo is unlikely to be useful anymore A1Cafel (talk) 17:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, cropped. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:26, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, dull image of swimmers and likely out of COM:SCOPE. The tower is the only integral element that made this image interesting. Plus the swimmers look small here, reducing utility and purpose. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:32, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I’m convinced.  Delete. RodRabelo7 (talk) 13:42, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:43, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abyssal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal fractal images with weird or misleading names, and without useful description or categories, abuse of COM:WEBHOST. We don't host personal art by non notable artists.

List of files

Yann (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann There are 1016 files. I collapsed the list. Brianjd (talk) 11:41, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]
 Keep. These images can serve as educational examples of the use of fractals in art, so they fall under the umbrella of the Commons scope. Abyssal (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yann, is it not the case that we have featured some user-created fractal images at COM:FPC? Would it have been better to have deleted those? What standard should we use to decide which work of fractal art is not worthy of being seen? This seems like a difficult question to me, because I agree that it's a reasonable proposition that Commons shouldn't host every work of fractal art. But neither should we delete all of it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:58, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
To have some educational value, we need more information for each file: how the file was created (software, data entry, etc.), meaningful categories, and meaningful names. Nothing like this was done. So there are around 1000 files to fix. Yann (talk) 12:15, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
These were all made with Fractal Explorer. Abyssal (talk) 14:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Abyssal: Start fixing some files with a proper description (software and data entry, etc.), a meaningful name and categories, then some may be kept. Yann (talk) 19:16, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What's wrong with the category they're already in? Abyssal (talk) 20:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's a personal category, and it doesn't count. Yann (talk) 22:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Per your recommendations, the images have been categorized by the software used to produce them and Category:Fractal wallpapers by User:Abyssal has been upmerged into the impersonal Category:Fractal wallpapers and awaits deletion. Abyssal (talk) 23:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, good start. What would be very useful is what data you provided for each one. Could you also propose a meaningful name for each (using the {{Rename}} template)? Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:59, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Full HD (1,920 × 1,200) is the standard now, so anything smaller than that is useless as a wallpaper. Yann (talk) 11:55, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The vast majority of these should meet that standard. I'll work on correcting the file names in the medium-term future. Abyssal (talk) 01:43, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
speedy  Keep. Per Abyssal and obviously in scope (as fractals and wallpapers). Юрий Д.К. (talk) 21:33, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete the unused ones with bad names and descriptions (i.e. just "Fractal wallpaper.") for being out of scope. I don't believe that fractal wallpapers are inherently educational. Especially when there's no information about which part of which fractal is being depicted and there are more than a thousand of them. Obviously contributors are allowed to have a few personal files, but this is too much. Additionally some of these aren't wallpaper-sized (e.g. [1], [2]), some are duplicates (e.g. [3a]/[3b], [4a]/[4b]), some are near-duplicates (e.g. [5a]/[5b], [6a]/[6b]), and some aren't even fractals (e.g. [7], [8]). TilmannR (talk) 20:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:03, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sceenshot of an error on Wikipedia in 2008. Do we need this now? Yann (talk) 00:18, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann If this was anything other than software, we’d ridicule the nominator and ask why they were so determined to erase history. It looks just as much in scope as anything else in the category Software errors. Brianjd (talk) 11:37, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @Ikan Kekek, who often comments on historical images nominated for deletion. Brianjd (talk) 11:39, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Winpdb-1.3.6.png is in use. Pictures of software errors are certainly in scope anyway. For others, I don't have a clear opinion. Yann (talk) 11:58, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It seems like this should be archived somewhere, but the other side of the argument is that while it's a matter of Wiki-history, is it notable? And for that, since I don't really have the full context, I don't have an answer. I guess what that amounts to is at least a weak  Keep from me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:45, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 14:56, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Rave as Fair use (fairuse). Converting to DR because age of the subject makes this possibly in the public domain. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:02, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep PD-Russian Empire --RAN (talk) 17:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I recommend to the uploader and those who wish to save the file try to contact the administration of the Museum of his majesty’s lifeguards Cossack regiment (Courbevoie, Paris suburb, France) in order to obtain additional information about the portrait in question: double-check that its author is unknown or anonymous; clarify the date when the portrait was first presented to the public. As a result, we may get confirmation that the portrait is in the public domain.--Yellow Horror (talk) 16:08, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I tried sending questions about the authorship and circumstances of the first public presentation of the portrait in question to associated with the museum email address which I found online. Got a short answer like "Unfortunately we can't help you" signed by «Объединение Лейб-Казаков» (Association of Lifeguard Cossacks).--Yellow Horror (talk) 12:22, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Yellow Horror Not the sort of answer I would expect from a museum. Brianjd (talk) 13:03, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. PD-RusEmpire, before 1913. See: https://viewer.rsl.ru/ru/rsl01004017473?page=73 (Хрещатицкий Б.Р. История Лейб-гвардии казачьего его величества полка. 1775-1813-1875-1913. Ч. 1-. - СПб.: Т-во Р. Голике и А. Вильборг, 1913).--Ctac (talk) 18:10, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ok, then keep the current version, but delete the first version of the file. I do not see any significant differences between the paintings from the book and the museum, except for some difference in proportions, but following the precautionary principle and available sources, I prefer to consider them different works of art with different publication histories.--Yellow Horror (talk) 07:28, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 14:57, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hellodasan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Certificates are not own work, and the photo is facebook sized. I don't think any of this is own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:53, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hellodasan.pdf
It my File .
File:Mano thangaraj with gitex participents.jpg
Personally i took this image.
File:Uae codes certificate.pdf
This is also my file.
Really offended with your comments and advise how to remove this delete request. Hellodasan (talk) 06:52, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Hellodasan: It's unlikely you are "UAE Codes" whose watermark is on the certificates. Taking a photograph of someone else's certificate does not make it your own work on the certificates. The photograph has no metadata, but it's size and quality ((960 × 789 pixels, file size: 139 KB, )) clearly show it's been compressed by a system such as Facebook or Instagram. We need COM:OTRS to retain. Please read COM:L and understand this is not a situation of "offense." Commons has clearly described the type of images to which it offers free webhosting and like any host retains the ability and process to edit the collection to fit the Scope and Licenses of the project. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:16, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tannim101 as Speedy (db-author) and the most recent rationale was: author. Too old for G7; used in user talk archive on enwiki; converting to DR. Reason? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Old" is no reason for deleting anything. If the data were considered correct in the past, this is historical now. I think we can allow User:Doc James to keep it in his archive. Edit the file description if anything has been superseded by new research. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:54, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. howcheng {chat} 17:54, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tannim101 as Speedy (db-author) and the most recent rationale was: author. Too old and in use for G7; converting to DR. Reason? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Flagged as potentially inappropriate due to nature of the resource in question to identify its vehicle. Could pose a risk to safety and resilience in the highlands. Tannim101 (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Question Tannim101, a picture of an ambulance is dangerous? Can you explain why? That doesn't sound like a deletion reason, but you should explain further if you'd like an admin to consider a plea for a courtesy deletion on such a basis. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi, local employee asked for it to be removed. Unsure their specific reasons, but they mentioned resilience/security etc. Agree seems a bit odd, but I guess they have their reasons Tannim101 (talk) 15:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • OBJECT / KEEP I can see no reason whatsoever why this image is in any way compromising. It is a car, the registration number is obscured, and it is in public not private ownership. Paramedic cars are not owned by the intelligence services or law enforcement so it's not like any major state secrets are being revealed. It should be kept.
10mmsocket (talk) 16:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Tannim101 Some people seem to think that anyone who photographs something must be out to attack it. Obviously, that is a ridiculous idea, so:  Speedy keep Brianjd (talk) 11:45, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Tannim101 If you are still in contact with them, perhaps you could ask them to comment here? Brianjd (talk) 11:45, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. howcheng {chat} 17:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo. COM:TOO? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: If this refers to the Himyarite Kingdom (disestablished 525 CE), this would surely be out of copyright, but the file is not used in the article, so it's unknown what entity, if any, actually uses or used it. howcheng {chat} 17:59, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A clear COM:DERIV. Certainly not a De minimis. Mhhossein talk 06:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mhhossein Which work is copyrighted and not DM here? Brianjd (talk) 12:01, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The picture located at the center. --Mhhossein talk 12:23, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; whether or not it's de minimis, it's not being used anyway. howcheng {chat} 18:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A clear COM:DERIV of protected works. Mhhossein talk 06:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please identify the protected work? Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 17:37, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, the banners. --Mhhossein talk 05:13, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The uploader makes FOP DRs all the time; they should know better. Are we sure that neither COM:FOP Australia nor COM:DM applies? Brianjd (talk) 11:54, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @Mhhossein, Ooligan. Brianjd (talk) 11:55, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It’s not clear from the FOP page, but {{FoP-Australia}} makes it clear that it applies only to permanent works. Brianjd (talk) 11:59, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And who talked about FOP? It is irrelevant here. There are dozens of protected posters in this photo. --Mhhossein talk 12:32, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Perhaps a marginal de minimis case. Let the closing admin decides. --A1Cafel (talk) 12:28, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's far beyond de minimis. A large portion of the photo is covered by the protected works. The level of violation is neither trivial nor minimal.--Mhhossein talk 05:10, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; the little flyers are de minimis, the giant poster is not. howcheng {chat} 18:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The files are images of Peruvian police automobiles, in which they both come from mynewsdesk.com, a blacklisted source that is listed on COM:BAD#Mynewsdesk.com back in May 2016, and the deprecation consensus was made much earlier than the license reviewer's review (on 2016-09-17). Given by the description on COM:BAD and a lack of EXIF documentation about the copyright holder, I believe further permissions from the copyright holder is needed.

廣九直通車 (talk) 09:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Thuresson: Notifying license reviewer.廣九直通車 (talk) 09:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 18:04, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bei den anderen Neuen Bild hat er die lizenz eingetragen, nur hier vergessen, hatte dies nachgetragen ....--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 15:04, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Woelle ffm: Die Lizenz muss vom Urheber selbst kommen und kann nicht einfach von anderen "nachgetragen" werden. --Rosenzweig τ 12:24, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Rosenzweig: ja du hast recht, aber der neue User braucht Hilfe--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 12:57, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; user was notified that the file is unlicensed and chose not to do anything about it. Deleted without prejudice; uploader is free to re-upload with the correct license. howcheng {chat} 18:08, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly a COM:CV. It's the logo of the London Irish Amateur rugby club and I believe the licence for it is incorrect (claims its a CC-0 when no evidence has been provided the club has waived all claims to copyright of it) The C of E (talk) 16:15, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

the logo is not under copy write. if you look at the london irish professional logo the sword is black and a black surround, this is copywrite (UK00003473958). London Irish Amateur use the original logo from 1898 Tommythenodd (talk) 16:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have evidence this was the exact same one created in 1898 and used then? The C of E (talk) 18:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination as it's unused. @Tommythenodd: Please feel free to re-upload with the proper documentation if you plan to use it in the future. howcheng {chat} 18:10, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gleb Leo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No evidence that artists, whose works are on these book covers, died 70 or more years ago. For example, the author of File:Пекла (1929).pdf - Boris Malkin died in 1972.

Xunks (talk) 18:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of artists are uknown and there is no information. For example: File:У капцюрох ГПУ.pdf, File:Płač Biełaruskaj Staronki Matki pa dzietkach svajich renehatach.pdf, File:Зорным шляхам (1932).pdf. Also you should remember that a lot of these books wherepublished in Minsk and belarusian term of copyright is 50 years. Gleb Leo (talk) 18:29, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
50 or 70, the evidence is still needed. ‘Unknown’ is not ‘anonymous’. --Xunks (talk) 19:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
But if artist is not indicated in the book and there is no bibliographical information about him (so, artist is unknown), this publication is anonymous and term of copyright is counted from publication. Should I separately show that artist is anonymous (uknown) in template? Gleb Leo (talk) 19:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Again, ‘unknown’ is not ‘anonymous’. ‘Anonymous’ means the author intentionally chose not to disclose his name. In turn, if you simply don’t know the name, this doesn’t mean it cannot became known after further investigation. --Xunks (talk) 19:58, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It can be known after, but today is unknown. Belarusian law (art. 20, google translate):
2. The exclusive right to a work is valid during the life of the author and fifty years after his death, except for the cases provided for by this article.
3. The exclusive right to an anonymous work or a work used under a pseudonym shall be valid for fifty years from the moment of the first legal publication of such a work or fifty years from the moment of its creation, if within fifty years from the moment of its creation it was not lawfully published with the consent of author.
When determining the period of validity of the exclusive right to an anonymous work or a work used under a pseudonym, in respect of which, within the period provided for by part one of this paragraph, the author has disclosed his true name or his name has ceased to leave doubts, paragraph 2 of this article shall apply.
50 years have gone and we have not found artists. So, it is PD in Belarus, where a lot of these books were published. Lithuanian law (art. 35, google translate):
1. The property rights of authors to a work created on the basis of co-authorship are valid throughout the life of the co-authors and 70 years after the death of the last of the co-authors.
2. The property rights of authors to a work in which the author's name is not indicated or a pseudonym is indicated are valid for 70 years from the moment the work was legally made public. In the event that the identity of the author of such a work is not in doubt or the real name of the author becomes known within the specified period, the author's property rights to such a work are valid throughout the life of the author and 70 years after the death of the author.
So, in Lithuania also it is PD, if author is not known for 70 years. Gleb Leo (talk) 20:29, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, if I know the artist, how I can separately show his copyright? Gleb Leo (talk) 18:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You can use {{Copyright information}} or at least |Author: Ivan Ivanov (1880-1940; text)<br> Petr Petrov (1870-1930; drawings). --Xunks (talk) 19:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep "Unknown" is not exactly "anonymous", and is not exactly "pseudonymous" but looking through these, most do not name the cover image creator. If we find one that absolutely has a credited image creator where we have a death death beyond the 50 or 70 years rule (depending on which country first published) we can always block that image from display. Google does the same thing at Google Books, where the publisher has given permission for the text, but not the images for contractual/copyright reasons. Responding to having a named author but no life dates: For instance LCCN has over 10,000 author entries for public domain books where there is no birth or death date for the author. For those authors, having a name, is still equal to being anonymous/pseudonymous, despite 95 years of research and the budget of the Library of Congress. I have also not come across any Bulgaria/Russian case law contraindicating this. Where in the US we have details from Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc. and Authors Guild, Inc. v. HathiTrust giving guidance on the court's thinking on US copyright law on images in books, and on the copyright status of abandoned/orphaned works. See also where illustrators sued Google Books over the same issue we are discussing of text vs images. --RAN (talk) 05:38, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep According to Belarusian and Lithuanian law, most of the books listed are in the public domain. And the book File:Пекла (1929).pdf will be in the public domain in a month, in 2023. Unfortunately, I must admit that I did not notice that the artist was listed there, also there was no information about him in the National Library, where I took it. So specifically this book we can delete, but in a month it will be there like PD in Belarus. Gleb Leo (talk) 15:44, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Today is already 2023, so File:Пекла (1929).pdf is in the public domain now. Also Happy New Year! Gleb Leo (talk) 19:43, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Gleb Leo: Can you type out the name of the illustrator for File:Пекла (1929).pdf, and I will do a little bit of research on him. --RAN (talk) 19:02, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, of course. The illustrator is Barys Malkin (by: Барыс Малкін; ru: Борис Малкин). Gleb Leo (talk) 19:07, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I added a creator template for both the author and the cover art illustrator. --RAN (talk) 04:49, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I am convinced by the research done by Gleb Leo. howcheng {chat} 18:17, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es un archivo erróneo Davidavgi19 (talk) 18:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 18:17, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

should have been deleted in 2007, but by some mistake it was kept (Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Waika man.jpg, no clear permission — Draceane talkcontrib. 20:16, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from the image pages:
Somehow it seems my misunderstanding that hr:Slika:Waika man.jpg and hr:Slika:ShabanoYanomami.jpg are the works of hr:Suradnik:Zeljko. I agree to delete image:Waika man.jpg and image:ShabanoYanomami.jpg.Penpen 12:55, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
{{no source since/en|month=September|day=29|year=2007}}
It is under investigation what occurred in the original file. Please wait for a while.
Hm, a while = 15 years?! — Draceane talkcontrib. 20:17, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; ordered a global replacement with File:環形草屋結構圖.png. howcheng {chat} 18:21, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The work contains a protected work and should be deleted per COM:DERIV. Not a De minimis. Mhhossein talk 06:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mhhossein I assume the protected work is the photo of Mahsa Amini Maryam Rajavi? Brianjd (talk) 11:57, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I see no picture of Mahsa Amini here, rather people are holding Rajavi's photo which is protected by copyrighted. --Mhhossein talk 12:22, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Mhhossein: I misread a comment about the photo. Brianjd (talk) 12:57, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, image is showing a copyrighted photo on a prominent position. --Ellywa (talk) 21:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Dialogue of epochs. Interpretations - Exhibition in Gomel 13.03.2015 Oleg Kostiuchenko.JPG

There is no permission on this painting in the ticket. Анастасия Львоваru/en 12:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

the same situation as here, was given the permission for some files, the uploader also used another paintings. Анастасия Львоваru/en 12:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Я не поняла, зачем выставлен на удаление файл, на который получено разрешение от художника?
В Викимедиа поступило электронное письмо, подтверждающее, что владелец авторских прав на это произведение подтвердил публикацию на указанных здесь условиях. Эта переписка была проверена добровольцами службы VRT и помещена в архив разрешений. Доверенные участники, имеющие учётную запись в VRTS, могут получить доступ к переписке по номеру #2015011610013711.
Может, мне уже удалить свой аккаунт отсюда, чтобы больше не читать подобных посланий?
Потратила часть жизни, чтоб добыть эти разрешения, чтоб загрузить всё, а теперь выясняется, что впустую тратила время. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tatiana Matlina (talk • contribs)
Татьяна, я думаю, что Вы проделали большую работу, и большая часть загруженных Вами изображений оформлена верно; но не все. Я благодарна Вам, но мне сложно заниматься поддержкой, пока я проверяю Ваш вклад. Те работы, что оформлены неверно, попадают сюда как раз потому, что разрешения от художника в письме на них нет. Анастасия Львоваru/en 13:01, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:20, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is given a permission for really small copies, not for a big size. Анастасия Львоваru/en 12:53, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The author attached to the ticket several collages (564x777px with 7 photos on it, for example) and said ...являюсь автором и единственным обладателем исключительных авторских прав на фотографии и произведения станковой и монументальной живописи из приложенных файлов, и даю разрешение на публикацию этих фотографий (I am the author and owner of exclusive copyright for photographs and works of easel and monumental painting from the attached files, and I give permission to publish the photographs). I do not think that the meaning of this text can be extended to full-size works. Анастасия Львоваru/en 12:57, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the ccbysa licence does not state the license is only valid for a low resolution. If high resolution is published, it can imho be used on Commons, unless it is unlawfully obtained. In that case, the author should contact VRT themselfves or the Foundation. --Ellywa (talk) 19:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Craicmerchant

[edit]

In the licensing section, the uploader claims to be the copyright owner, but in the file titles, gives credit to three different photographers: Sean Walsh, Katherin Baumbach, and Glen Bollard. It would therefore appear that the uploader is the author of none of these pictures. Therefore, they are copyright violations. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:53, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The last two files are also nearly identical with only small differences in brightness/contrast. TornadoLGS (talk) 21:00, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The photos have been used widely for promotional purposes in various forms of media - print and online since the 1990's. Some are also available to download from the band's website as part of their press kit, with photographer credits. They are free to use. Craicmerchant (talk) 23:03, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Craicmerchant: Just because you can download a photo off a website does not mean it is free to use. If the pictures are on a commercial website, such as for a band, then they probably are copyrighted unless the site indicates otherwise. You certainly may not claim the photos to be your own work. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:24, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
For admins: There is more discussion at User talk:Craicmerchant#Notification about possible deletion indicating that there is permission to use photos of The Stunning, but proper attribution is still required. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:49, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, the photos are the band's own publicity photos. Some are available to download from the Press kit on their website for promotional use and the website says "feel free to use". The one of Steve Wall in Co. Clare in 2021 was taken by me as I was in attendance at a recording session. And the one of Steve as Chet Baker was also taken by me on the set of the film. The photo by Glen Bollard is used by the band online for promotional purposes and the copyright is owned by the band - but free to use as their website states. https://thestunning.net/press-kit I understand if you need delete the photos that appear to violate any copyright terms, though I know the band would have no problem with them as they own the copyright to their own photos. In the meantime I will try to find some that are covered under creative commons. Thanks. Craicmerchant (talk) 14:05, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have struck through the three files claimed to own work. @Craicmerchant: Have you tried contacting the band to see if they can add a CC-BY declaration on the press kit page? Or maybe have them go through the COM:VRT process for the remaining files. Thanks. howcheng {chat} 18:30, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, deleted photos without permission, kept 3 photos claimed to be own work. --Ellywa (talk) 20:00, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]