Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/10/26

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 26th, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete this file due to this file is in copyright. I'm sorry for mistaken to uploading this. Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 11:17, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request & standard yt license. --Achim55 (talk) 11:20, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to rename this file. Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 11:25, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mickey Đại Phát, click >here<. --Achim55 (talk) 11:28, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How can I do? I cannot remove it. Achim55, can you please delete it for me? Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 11:30, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 11:54, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random and poor-quality personal photo with off-color description. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:39, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedied. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:53, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by sock of Aliawalsh22 - see w:en:User talk:Aliawalsh2. Paid editing most definitely suspected. Both accounts indeffed on en WP. Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. Uploaded while evading a block 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 14:09, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, (C) Equus Media SL. --Túrelio (talk) 15:54, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 09:09, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete Impersonation of celebrity and/or trolling 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:08, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment please see Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections#Sockpuppetry and Impersonation 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 17:05, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicates [[:File:Sumedh Mudgalkar SM.jpg[edit]]] Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 09:11, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SD F10. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is, or appears to be, a picture of the uploader, but there is no evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Evidence of any transfer of licencing must be sent via COM:VRT Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 09:13, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; SD F10. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PhilipRomanoPhoto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looking at these files, it all seem the files are professional photographs taken by this namesake Philip Romano.

The account uploader is PhilipRomanoPhoto says it is free, but who knows if it is real until the person submits confirmation to the VRT.

Curlyrnd (talk) 19:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is me; I've just sent an email to the VRT. PhilipRomanoPhoto (talk) 20:28, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per ticket:2022102610416577. Philip Romano confirmed. — Tulsi 24x7 06:47, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Fotograf wurde von der abgebildeten Person gebeten, dieses Foto zu löschen. Anderes Foto der Person ist vorhanden, keine Einbindung dieses Fotos im WP-ANR. P170 (talk) 21:48, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 06:55, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded accidentally 129.67.119.219 22:40, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you FuzzyMagma? Brianjd (talk) 05:05, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: No author, no source, no license, no permission. --Achim55 (talk) 08:12, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Brianjd as stated above, it was Uploaded accidentally. I was trying to update another image with high quality image. Please (if you can) delete it immediately FuzzyMagma (talk) 10:55, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Brianjd assume good faith 😕 FuzzyMagma (talk) 10:56, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:26, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

flag of algiers 94.140.246.27 16:56, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 07:52, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

muss Rechte nochmals abklären Riboa111 (talk) 09:52, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

muss Rechte nochmals abklären Riboa111 (talk) 13:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:34, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sexy half asian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparent COM:NETCOPYVIOs - File:Beautiful Asian Teen From South Burnaby Secondary Grad of 2002.jpg is here, for example, and has many other copyvios in the file history.

Эlcobbola talk 14:22, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 08:21, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is a fictional medal that has never been used in macedonia and is therefore out of scope -desperatehousehusband (talk) 11:20, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: In use. Requester is not familiar with our use of "barnstars". --Achim55 (talk) 11:23, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep per above. Brianjd (talk) 14:48, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 11:41, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

veraltetes Firmenlogo Tgoedde (talk) 13:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 11:42, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 13:43, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:43, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PNG raster, there is a vectorial version available. Kun Kipcsak (talk) 14:52, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: we don't delete raster images just because there is now also a vector version available. --Rosenzweig τ 11:44, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. Just the text "Bitcoin Haberleri kointimes.net". Marbletan (talk) 15:08, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:45, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An inappropriate map at the moment, uploaded only to provoke conflicts. 95.52.98.244 08:23, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. --Achim55 (talk) 08:38, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Obviously. It’s a terrible map anyway, regardless of accuracy. Brianjd (talk) 14:38, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:18, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Parts of the depicted poster/banner are copyrightable. As this banner is likely installed only temporarily, it is hardly covered by Hungary's freedom-of-panorama exception. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:27, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with: File:Pék Zoltán (cropped).jpg


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:20, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark suggests that this image is not own work by uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:51, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:18, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of non-notable person: 852 followers on Instagram and 17 subscribers on YouTube. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:20, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:22, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of non-notable person: 852 followers on Instagram and 17 subscribers on YouTube. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:20, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:22, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of non-notable person: 852 followers on Instagram and 17 subscribers on YouTube. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:21, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:22, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of non-notable person: 852 followers on Instagram and 17 subscribers on YouTube. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:21, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:23, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of an artist who does not have a page in the encyclopedia and without the face showing. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal photo by non-contributor/F10. --Wdwd (talk) 13:09, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Elise240SX (talk) 13:33, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:54, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Elise240SX (talk) 13:35, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:54, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohamed Youssef Kamel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors). And the first one (Cddcds) also is promotion/advertising, see description.

JopkeB (talk) 15:28, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:52, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Drclafuente (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional images. The large logos and brand name text added to them makes them essentially unusable on Wikimedia projects, therefore outside of COM:SCOPE.

Marbletan (talk) 15:44, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:47, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Elise240SX (talk) 17:13, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:55, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Elise240SX (talk) 17:27, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Usable as a thumbnail. Elise240SX, do you look at the photos on the file page before requesting deletion, or do you open them all up to full size and characterize them as "poor quality" such that they should be deleted based on that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:12, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I uploaded this photo lol, It's incredibly poor quality and I actually took good photos of the same make, model, year, and colour of car in better condition like a week ago. Elise240SX (talk) 23:20, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:55, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Azim20221401 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res/web-size images with disparate quality and styles, missing EXIF data, and scanned image. Unreliable uploader with previous DR's.

P 1 9 9   18:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:41, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in the US for works by living artists. This sculpture is by David Deming. http://demingart.com/gallery/figurative/ Eureka Lott 18:20, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:40, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thedesimedia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.

🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:30, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:39, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F3|2=Copyrighted album cover Ixfd64 (talk) 22:08, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep: It seems the nominator did not even bother to read the licensing information. The background image is the public domain painting The Accolade by Edmund Leighton. The modifications made to the image are merely the addition of text and obviously do not meet the threshold of originality. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:12, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Accolade by Edmund Leighton.
@Ixfd64 I think that the identity of the painting should be added to the file description, to make it easier to verify the public domain claim. Otherwise, what you said seems correct regarding the background image and text. I don’t know about the typeface. Brianjd (talk) 05:05, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Good idea. I've updated the description. Ixfd64 (talk) 06:33, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:38, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is asserted to be copyright ineligible due to not meeting the threshold of originality. Although most of this logo is text, it does include an image of a toadstool which is neither text, nor a simple shape. The toadstool reaches the threshold for originality, Whpq (talk) 00:01, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - surpasses COM:TOO US. (Oinkers42) (talk) 17:10, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:37, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, taken from a news website MB (talk) 03:52, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Yann at 20:07, 2 November 2022 UTC: as per COM:SPEEDY. --Krdbot 02:19, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used in the rejected en:Draft:Fujairah fine arts academy, also created by the uploader. Nominated due to copyright concerns (which was also the reason the draft was rejected) and undisclosed COI concerns. Brianjd (talk) 14:19, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment I don't think COIs matter if the file is useful: this is not Wikipedia and not an article. And as a matter of fact, we can all benefit from businesses releasing useful copyrighted content (notably including pictures of packaging) that couldn't be hosted here, otherwise. That said, I think there are two questions that need to be settled: (1) Would we keep a file of a logo just because the logo is beautiful and an example of what a logo can be at its most florid? I think we should in exceptional cases, but I believe the answer will be "No." But if the answer is "Yes" or "Maybe," there is a second issue: (2) Does the uploader control the copyright for the logo, such that they can assure us they have the right to enable its use under an acceptable license? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:08, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ikan Kekek It turns out that that Commons is one of the few Wikimedia projects that does not require disclosure of paid editing. So I guess that’s one issue settled. Brianjd (talk) 15:18, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   03:00, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 02:30, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work of Tasnim News Agency and probably a work of IRGC Navy. Same pictures published by farsnews.ir with another watermark and credited to "NEDSA" (IRGC Navy) (please see gallery here).

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:24, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:34, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work of Tasnim. Same pictures published by ISNA with its own watermark (see gallery here).

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work of Tasnim. See the second image published by Fars News (credit: Recieved) image gallery and by Moj News Agency without credit image gallery. Probably a work of Iranian navy.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:51, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work of Tasnim. Same igames published by IRNA without credit (see gallery) Image from a secret underground base is highly likely to be taken by the Iranian armed forces. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CaesarIran that includes same pictures.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a Work by Mehr News, but 'Received'. CC does not apply.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:03, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a Tasnim work. Same image with alterations published by Mehr (Credit: Received) [1] gallery

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:22, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a Tasnim work. Same image used by Fars News (link) and Mizan (link) which is not obtained from Tasnim (margins different, bigger picture).

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a Tasnim work. Sane images published by ISNA gallery and IRNA gallery (credit 'Recieved'). Janes credits one to Iranian Ministry of Defence and Armed Forces Logistics.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

The source says it has received the photographs and does not name any photographer. Probably a work of Iranian defense ministry and certainly not a work by Mehr News.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:48, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nominator. We lack author information, which is required under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license, so we cannot host these files. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:40, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Mohammad Agah.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Mohammad Agah

HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a Work by Tasnim (Iranian defense ministry is the likely source.) because:

  1. No photographer is credited
  2. The same images are published by yjc.ir here with its own watermark, clearly not obtained from Tasnim.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

General comment

Who the original author is do not matter. What is important is to know who the copyright holder is. There could be more than one copyright holder as the original author might have given the rights to more than one person. Therefore, about the images published by Tasnim or Mehr news agencies in the photo section of their site:

  •  Keep if Tasnim / Mehr is credited (even if also published elswhere with another watermark)
  •  Keep if the photographer is credited (even if also published elswhere with another watermark)
  •  Delete if another agency is credited
  • undelete images that didn't need to be deleted

For images credit "received", I am not sure about who is the right holder. Maybe we can keep the ones only published by one agency and delete those that were also published by non-free agencies.

--Hosortyr (talk) 19:37, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Published by (and watermarked by!) official Iranian news agencies, such as Tasnim. "All Content by Tasnim News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License." See also this related discussion. Vysotsky (talk) 12:31, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The comment above ("2. The same images are published by yjc.ir here with its own watermark, clearly not obtained from Tasnim.") only strengthens my argument. At the footer of the mentioned yjc.ir website it says: کلیه حقوق این سایت متعلق به باشگاه خبرنگاران جوان بوده و استفاده از مطالب آن با ذکر منبع بلامانع است., (English: "All the rights of this site belong to the Young Journalists Club, and the use of its contents is unrestricted as long as the source is mentioned.") It seems clear that the Iranian Armed Forces supply photos with a free license to several press agencies, to use as however they see fit. Vysotsky (talk) 09:33, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment See this related (successful) undeletion request. --- Vysotsky (talk) 23:18, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Files are not a work of Tasnim, they are obtained from leader.ir which does not release with a free license.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:05, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:37, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:00, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

No photograph is credited and the files are recieved, not a work by Mehr/Tasnim News Agency.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:16, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. Photos marked as received are clearly created by someone else. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Photographs are recieved, not a work by Mehr News so cc does not apply

HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:13, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Files are recieved, not a work by Mehr News.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:19, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Photograph is 'received', not a work by Mehr News

HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Clearly not a work by Fars News

HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:48, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree with the "received" images above, I disagree with these six. I see no mention of "received" images. Vysotsky (talk) 22:03, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
These photographs are not from Iran (France, Gabon, etc) and are from different times. If you check the link, this one even has a watermark and Fars News has not removed it. HeminKurdistan (talk) 22:13, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Didn't see that. Thanks for making that clear. Vysotsky (talk) 22:17, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Does not appear to be the original work of an Iranian press agency. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:35, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Files are recieved, not a work by Mehr News

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:41, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Files are 'recieved', not a work by Tasnim

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:28, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per {{Tasnim}}. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:43, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work by Tasnim

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:42, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:46, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work by Tasnim

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:48, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Images are recieved

HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:44, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Received. Not a work by Tasnim.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:02, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:51, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

The rights of these photos belong to Iranian defense ministry, as previously discussed (Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Mohammad Agah).

HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:46, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Files referred to here (link) were previously discussed and kept. Propose to keep per same argumentation. Vysotsky (talk) 12:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Images are received, not a work by Tasnim

HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom and comment. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:08, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

No indication that this is a Tasnim work. No photographer credited.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 05:38, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted already —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Unlike khamenei.ir, files from Leader.ir are not freely licensed

HeminKurdistan (talk) 09:20, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted above per nomination and discussion. Ellywa (talk) 21:35, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work by Tasnim, files from Leader.ir are not freely-licensed.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 09:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:23, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work by Tasnim

HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:56, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not by Tasnim, but "Received", acc. to sources. Copyright not with Tasnim News Agency. Vysotsky (talk) 21:11, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nom. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:40, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Works are 'Received', CC license does not apply as they are taken by the source from somewhere else.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:28, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Materialscientist (talk) 01:40, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photographs from leader.ir are not freely-licensed. I don't know how many times should we warn this user and then again waste our time by nominating uploads from leader.ir for deletion.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:55, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:FOP Iran

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:55, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:43, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are no Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine and no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:07, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:43, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused Google Chrome screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:44, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 15:14, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:44, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very low resolution, uploader didn't identify the building or location so it's impossible to know whether this image would be useful for the project ···日本穣 Talk to Nihonjoe 16:31, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:44, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a screen with an audiovisual work being broadcasted. The television is the intended subject here. Equivalent to COM:SCREENSHOT violation. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:44, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


delete it. PaulGorduiz106 (talk) 10:21, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:15, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brks22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COPYVIO (https://imgur.com/a/AwgCc0x , https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFlashing/comments/mtu30j/take_her_out_to_the_ball_game_take_her_out_to_the/ )

EvergreenFir (talk) 19:22, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:38, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brks22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

probably COPYVIO, small resolution, no exif, photos as PNG, 4 of 11 uploads already deleted. edits at en.wp mostly reverted.

C.Suthorn (talk) 21:42, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brks22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Remaining uploads of this user, not already nominated for deletion. As much as I would like to keep these, the mostly low resolutions and lack of metadata suggest copyright violations. Also, the three files already nominated for deletion were all nominated as copyright violations as well.

Brianjd (talk) 09:03, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And now I see that they had two previous mass DRs, also for copyright violations. But the uploads nominated here are all more recent. It seems like this user is not learning. Brianjd (talk) 09:05, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:16, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

has no scientific or cultural use; most probably example of exhibitionism -desperatehousehusband (talk) 10:11, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:16, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

has no scientific or cultural use; most probably example of exhibitionism -desperatehousehusband (talk) 10:14, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:16, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

has no scientific or cultural use; most probably example of exhibitionism -desperatehousehusband (talk) 10:14, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:16, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

has no scientific or cultural use; most probably example of exhibitionism -desperatehousehusband (talk) 10:14, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:16, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

has no scientific or cultural use; most probably example of exhibitionism -desperatehousehusband (talk) 10:14, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:16, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

has no scientific or cultural use; most probably example of exhibitionism -desperatehousehusband (talk) 10:14, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:16, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this image not only contains the maker's face but also doesn't offer any educational value, making it most likely a case of exhibitionism -desperatehousehusband (talk) 10:23, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:16, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image not high quality enough to be useful; no educational value; exhibitionism -desperatehousehusband (talk) 10:26, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per COM:PENIS. SHB2000 (talk) 11:29, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:16, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SmellyShinyMole (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per OOS and COM:PENIS. Collection of personal images, not in use.

Smooth O (talk) 10:33, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:17, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vishal Ladva (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

JopkeB (talk) 12:27, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 21:26, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Belhasan12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

JopkeB (talk) 12:30, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 21:26, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Habibur Rahman - Rahman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is neither your personal free web host nor a vehicle to promote your career. No contribs to wm projects.

Achim55 (talk) 12:53, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 21:27, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fuzzy photo, appears to be a personal photo, out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 13:37, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 21:28, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, appears to be a play crown on his head, personal photo Oaktree b (talk) 14:07, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 21:28, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I suspect that this is a screenshot, albeit a good one. Almost identical to https://newyork.consulfrance.org/Pascal-Cagni-in-New-York-why-investors-and-companies-should-Choose-France but just flipped. PCP Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:31, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope - Not Educationally Useful / Redundant Bakertaylor28 (talk) 05:45, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


(non-admin closure) Kept due to the vandalistic nature of the nominations in bulk.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:23, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image has no eduactional value and is of poor quality -desperatehousehusband (talk) 10:31, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@-desperatehousehusband  Speedy keep In use at bs:Frenulum peniskog prepucija. Brianjd (talk) 14:47, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: in use. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:31, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PORN -desperatehousehusband (talk) 11:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@-desperatehousehusband  Keep We do not have that many images of nude kneeling women, and no others posed this way: bare feet together under her butt, torso horizontal and viewed from behind and slightly above. Brianjd (talk) 14:58, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:31, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleMaps CopyVio (according to Source-Link) Enyavar (talk) 20:27, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:33, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

German stamps were found not to be official works by courts, so they are not automatically in the public domain; see COM:Germany#Stamps. These stamps are the work of de:Manfred Gottschall, who died in 2015. So they are still protected by copyright and should be deleted. The files can be restored in 2086.

Rosenzweig τ 06:22, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:16, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Rémyjh ne détient pas les droits de cette image Sété40 (talk) 02:31, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, screengrab. --P 1 9 9   02:38, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Rémyjh ne détient pas les droits de cette image Sété40 (talk) 02:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, screengrab. --P 1 9 9   02:38, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a display problem on the Chinese wiki, always display old version photo in dimension of new version photo, but after I uploaded File:張俊生 (2022.03.13).jpg, solved the problem. 寒吉 (talk) 02:58, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: redundant to File:張俊生 (2022.03.13).jpg. --P 1 9 9   02:40, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Procedural nomination. This file was initially tagged by ObadaJx as Speedy (Db-author) and the most recent rationale was: author. Too old for COM:CSD#G7, though. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 04:21, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per consensus above to grant courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   02:41, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Literally zero information about the license, I'm not sure if the Auyl allows you to use your photos like this Kazman322 (talk) 04:53, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:41, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 05:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:41, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license, tagged as "copyright @ derechos reservados" (all reserved rights). Taichi (talk) 05:13, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and DW, missing all essential info. --P 1 9 9   02:42, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent copyright violation per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Presidential Inaguration.jpg. Brianjd (talk) 08:06, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely not own work, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   02:43, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have already uploaded a better version of this image Surojit mondal memes (talk) 09:00, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 12:48, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   02:48, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This page adds nothing more than the relevant commons category page provides. I suggest it be deleted. —  Junglenut | talk  09:05, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:49, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope? Image is a closeup of an unidentified green surface. Filename translates as ‘image’. Description is ‘green’. No categories. Not used. Uploader’s only other contribution also nominated for deletion as out of scope. Brianjd (talk) 09:08, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:49, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable figure, probably. No information about copyright. GoEThe (talk) 09:24, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and User:IronGargoyle. --P 1 9 9   02:50, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused map of one-time user, to specifically show two locations within Spain. The map inserts are from an unidentified online map service and are (especially unsourced) a CopyVio. Enyavar (talk) 09:40, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:50, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of apparently non-notable man. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:45, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:51, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of apparently non-notable man. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:45, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:51, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified teams: doesn't seem useful. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:09, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:51, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a screenshot/photo of a photo. No exif, PCP Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:54, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The video has no audio, it has been successfully re-uploaded to another file Demonocrazy (talk) 10:58, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. Superseded by File:Ikusgela – Axular eta XVII. mendeko literatura.webm. --P 1 9 9   02:56, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. This image is from https://bemtc.business.site/. I do not see a VRT ticket. Anyone can make an account with this name. JopkeB (talk) 12:35, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and advertising. --P 1 9 9   02:58, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. This image is from https://bemtc.business.site/. I do not see a VRT ticket. Anyone can make an account with this name. JopkeB (talk) 12:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and advertising. --P 1 9 9   02:58, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. Plus probably copyright violation. I do not see a VRT ticket. Anyone can make an account with this name. JopkeB (talk) 12:38, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:57, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Surojit mondal memes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.

🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 12:47, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:58, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo / out of scope LevandeMänniska (talk), 12:51, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:00, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo / identifiable person(s) LevandeMänniska (talk), 12:54, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:00, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo / out of scope LevandeMänniska (talk), 12:55, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:00, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo / identifiable person(s) LevandeMänniska (talk), 12:55, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:00, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo / identifiable person(s) LevandeMänniska (talk), 12:56, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:00, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo / identifiable person(s) LevandeMänniska (talk), 12:56, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:00, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo / identifiable person(s) LevandeMänniska (talk), 12:57, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:00, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo / identifiable person(s) LevandeMänniska (talk), 12:58, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:00, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo / identifiable person(s) LevandeMänniska (talk), 12:58, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:00, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo / identifiable person(s) LevandeMänniska (talk), 12:59, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:00, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This painter is alive, so his painting can't be on commons gpesenti (talk) 13:00, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gpesenti Every DR is a teaching opportunity, so let’s get it right: This painter is alive, so his painting is not yet out of copyright, and therefore cannot be on Commons without permission. Brianjd (talk) 15:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:00, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo / identifiable person(s) LevandeMänniska (talk), 13:00, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:03, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo / identifiable person(s) LevandeMänniska (talk), 13:00, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:03, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo / identifiable person(s) LevandeMänniska (talk), 13:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:03, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality Elise240SX (talk) 13:05, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. Plenty of alternatives in its category. --P 1 9 9   03:04, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo / identifiable person(s) LevandeMänniska (talk), 13:05, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:03, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor lighting, low quality Elise240SX (talk) 13:05, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. Plenty of alternatives in its category. --P 1 9 9   03:04, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor lighting, low quality Elise240SX (talk) 13:05, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. Plenty of alternatives in its category. --P 1 9 9   03:04, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo / identifiable person(s) LevandeMänniska (talk), 13:06, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:03, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo / identifiable person(s) LevandeMänniska (talk), 13:06, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:03, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo / identifiable person(s) LevandeMänniska (talk), 13:06, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:03, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo / out of scope LevandeMänniska (talk), 13:07, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:03, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo / identifiable person(s) LevandeMänniska (talk), 13:08, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:03, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo / identifiable person(s) LevandeMänniska (talk), 13:08, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:02, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo / identifiable person(s) LevandeMänniska (talk), 13:09, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:02, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo / identifiable person(s) LevandeMänniska (talk), 13:11, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:02, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo / identifiable person(s) LevandeMänniska (talk), 13:11, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: useful as interior view, in scope. --P 1 9 9   03:05, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo / identifiable person(s) LevandeMänniska (talk), 13:12, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:02, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 13:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:02, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 13:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:02, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EmuLover (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: NationStates maps

Enyavar (talk) 13:55, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:02, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-notable individual, Gsearch brings up no listings. small photo Oaktree b (talk) 14:09, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:02, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of a video game screenshot Oaktree b (talk) 14:10, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:05, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poorer quality smaller copy of File:FMIB 37131 Croiseur-Cuirasse Pothuau.jpeg. Pibwl (talk) 15:05, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:09, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jordano ice (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

JopkeB (talk) 15:43, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. And not own works: uploader is also the subject in the photos. --P 1 9 9   03:10, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res image of unnamed person, description "testtesttesttesttesttest". Belbury (talk) 15:45, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   03:12, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. If I understand Commons:Copyright rules by territory/China well, then there is copyright on newspapers that last for 50 years in China (and so in Hong Kong). And I do not see a VRT ticket from the owners of the newspaper. JopkeB (talk) 15:49, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"fair dealing for research" ... "for use of works in library and school are permitted." ?
https://www.ipd.gov.hk/eng/pub_press/publications/hk.htm Volunteertoday (talk) 02:31, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Volunteertoday Commons’ licensing policy requires all files to be free to use for all purposes, including commercial purposes. Brianjd (talk) 03:43, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@JopkeB As stated at the top of that page, Hong Kong has its own rules. But Hong Kong’s standard copyright term is also life + 50 years, and I don’t see any special rules for newspapers, so I guess the rest of the nomination is still valid. Brianjd (talk) 03:46, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! And so I learn here on Commons something new every day. --JopkeB (talk) 01:30, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:13, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a copyrighted image of ABS-CBN Entertainment. It also lacks evidence that it was released under the current license, nor did the user who uploaded it is the one who created the image. Besides, fair use is not allowed in Commons. See Commons:Fair use. 114.108.219.155 17:12, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:15, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not own work, you can even see a watermark on it. BilletsMauves (talk) 18:13, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:15, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Less than 1 day. Self-request. Bennylin (yes?) 19:13, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   03:16, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I made a mistake migrating this from wikipedia when a better version of this file already exists under a different name: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Permalloy_cable.svg Vinyasi (talk) 19:15, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:17, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tk170 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: Alternate history fantasy maps

Enyavar (talk) 20:17, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:17, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says "copyrighted"/"all rights managed", and the Flickr source is not the original image source. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 20:20, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:17, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 20:37, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:20, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WWII 1939-1945 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: fictional content.

Enyavar (talk) 20:42, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:20, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per description, this is a still of a multimedia presentation. As the presentation would presumably be under copyright, this is a derivative of a copyrighted work. We can only keep this on Commons if it can be proven that the underlying multimedia presentation is not subject to copyright. Hog Farm (talk) 21:31, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:20, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is not the author of the photo as explained by himself (photo sent by artist) Culex (talk) 22:40, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MalerFrank (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyvio, contemporary artworks, (no freedom of panorama).

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:03, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:22, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MalerFrank (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Works by living artist: missing permission.

P 1 9 9   03:24, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:38, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IMO, the depicted mural needs to be considered a copyrightable work of art. Unfortunately, France has no freedom-of-panorama exception for public works. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:07, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per COM:GRAFFITI Oxyman (talk) 16:08, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I am unconvinced that the rationale of COM:GRAFFITI applies here; the mural is even signed and dated by the artist. And even in the case of unquestionably illegal graffiti, our own template is very cautious. Felix QW (talk) 17:44, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Léna (talk) 17:23, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image has literally no possible use and is of poor quality -desperatehousehusband (talk) 10:28, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep Can you cite a better quality image? There’s not many images to choose from in the category Ball of foot, where the primary image is not even of a human. Brianjd (talk) 14:44, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @-desperatehousehusband. Brianjd (talk) 14:44, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep Per Brianjd. Frivolous request. Guido den Broeder (talk) 23:07, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In scope. --Léna (talk) 17:24, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: CSD F10 (personal photos of or by non-contributors)and CSD G10 (files created as advertisements). I think this is still within COM:SCOPE, though. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:19, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. This is an unused photo of the uploader's own oos art pieces. The uploader is not notable. We need permission from photographer Amendolagine & Barracchia, Milan per this edit.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:29, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Those images are part of the project Wiki Women design of Wikimedia Belgium. They were uploaded by the original creator, as part of her participation to the activity. The images are not commercial, but are only meant to document (work of) Belgian women designers. Geert Van Pamel (talk) 11:52, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Incomplete license. Photo of 3D object not own work of uploader but rather work of Amendolagine & Barracchia, Milan. Needs release from photographer. Glrx (talk) 06:34, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Uploader requests deletion because photographers will not permit an NC license. Pascale De Backer diff states,

    All the photographers of my designs would be more than glad to accord me the license to publish their photos on Wikimedia, as they already did on any other media, but none of them agrees with the terms of the Creative-Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0. All my photographers can only accept a Non-commercial (NC) license. Since Wikimedia Commons does not offer a NC license, which I regret, I need the 7 images to be removed, please.

    Glrx (talk) 19:40, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted by User:Ciell. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:19, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: CSD F10 (personal photos of or by non-contributors)and CSD G10 (files created as advertisements). I think this is still within COM:SCOPE, though. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:19, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. This is an unused photo of the uploader's own oos art pieces. The uploader is not notable. We need permission from photographer Milos Sitarica per this edit.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:30, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Those images are part of the project Wiki Women design of Wikimedia Belgium. They were uploaded by the original creator, as part of her participation to the activity. The images are not commercial, but are only meant to document (work of) Belgian women designers. Geert Van Pamel (talk) 11:51, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. But I still like it. Interesting object. Taivo (talk) 08:28, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Incomplete license. Photo of 3D object not own work of uploader but rather work of Milos Sitarica. Needs release from photographer. Glrx (talk) 06:36, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Uploader requests deletion because photographers will not permit an NC license. Pascale De Backer diff states,

    All the photographers of my designs would be more than glad to accord me the license to publish their photos on Wikimedia, as they already did on any other media, but none of them agrees with the terms of the Creative-Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0. All my photographers can only accept a Non-commercial (NC) license. Since Wikimedia Commons does not offer a NC license, which I regret, I need the 7 images to be removed, please.

    Glrx (talk) 19:39, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted by User:Ciell. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:20, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: CSD F10 (personal photos of or by non-contributors)and CSD G10 (files created as advertisements). I think this is still within COM:SCOPE, though. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:20, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. This is an unused photo of the uploader's own oos art piece. The uploader is not notable. We need permission from photographer Rickdeckard per this edit.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:31, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Those images are part of the project Wiki Women design of Wikimedia Belgium. They were uploaded by the original creator, as part of her participation to the activity. The images are not commercial, but are only meant to document (work of) Belgian women designers. Geert Van Pamel (talk) 11:52, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. Interesting object, in my opinion educationally valuable. Taivo (talk) 11:12, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Incomplete license. Photo of 3D object not own work of uploader but rather work of Rickdeckard. Needs release from photographer. Glrx (talk) 06:39, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Uploader requests deletion because photographers will not permit an NC license. Pascale De Backer diff states,

    All the photographers of my designs would be more than glad to accord me the license to publish their photos on Wikimedia, as they already did on any other media, but none of them agrees with the terms of the Creative-Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0. All my photographers can only accept a Non-commercial (NC) license. Since Wikimedia Commons does not offer a NC license, which I regret, I need the 7 images to be removed, please.

    Glrx (talk) 19:39, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted by User:Ciell. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:20, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: CSD F10 (personal photos of or by non-contributors)and CSD G10 (files created as advertisements). I think this is still within COM:SCOPE, though. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:20, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. This is an unused photo of the uploader's own oos art piece. The uploader is not notable. We need permission from photographer Milos Sitarica per this edit.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:31, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Those images are part of the project Wiki Women design of Wikimedia Belgium. They were uploaded by the original creator, as part of her participation to the activity. The images are not commercial, but are only meant to document (work of) Belgian women designers. Geert Van Pamel (talk) 11:51, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I like the object. Taivo (talk) 11:16, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Incomplete license. Photo of 3D object not own work of uploader but rather work of Milos Sitarica. Needs release from photographer. Glrx (talk) 06:40, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Uploader requests deletion because photographers will not permit an NC license. Pascale De Backer diff states,

    All the photographers of my designs would be more than glad to accord me the license to publish their photos on Wikimedia, as they already did on any other media, but none of them agrees with the terms of the Creative-Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0. All my photographers can only accept a Non-commercial (NC) license. Since Wikimedia Commons does not offer a NC license, which I regret, I need the 7 images to be removed, please.

    Glrx (talk) 19:39, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted by User:Ciell. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:20, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: CSD F10 (personal photos of or by non-contributors)and CSD G10 (files created as advertisements). I think this is still within COM:SCOPE, though. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:20, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. This is an unused photo of the uploader's own oos art piece. The uploader is not notable. We need permission from photographer Milos Sitarica per this edit.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Those images are part of the project Wiki Women design of Wikimedia Belgium. They were uploaded by the original creator, as part of her participation to the activity. The images are not commercial, but are only meant to document (work of) Belgian women designers. Geert Van Pamel (talk) 11:52, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I like the object. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Incomplete license. Photo of 3D object not own work of uploader but rather work of Milos Sitarica. Needs release from photographer. Glrx (talk) 06:41, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Uploader requests deletion because photographers will not permit an NC license. Pascale De Backer diff states,

    All the photographers of my designs would be more than glad to accord me the license to publish their photos on Wikimedia, as they already did on any other media, but none of them agrees with the terms of the Creative-Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0. All my photographers can only accept a Non-commercial (NC) license. Since Wikimedia Commons does not offer a NC license, which I regret, I need the 7 images to be removed, please.

    Glrx (talk) 19:38, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted by User:Ciell. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:21, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: CSD F10 (personal photos of or by non-contributors)and CSD G10 (files created as advertisements). I think this is still within COM:SCOPE, though. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:20, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. This is an unused photo of the uploader's own oos art piece. The uploader is not notable. We need permission from photographer Alberto Riccardo Messaggi: RickDeckard per this edit.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Jeff G,
This is not "marketing".  This are all my designs and my pictures (and I payed the production and took pictures by myself), everything belongs to me in person (Pascale De Backer = the designer) and I have all the copyright of all my designs : Light Book, Silent Tulip Vase, Tabletto, Pilli Luck, Pilli Love, Beach Cocoon, Empty Thoughts.
Please let me know asap what is the problem (info@pascalina.be) and if there is a problem for your Wikimedia organisation, then please let me know exactly "what is the exact problem" and if it is a problem then please delete all my account completely with Wikimedia.
Wikimedia Belgium (EU) asked me a while ago as a Belgian designer to be part of Wikimedia and Wikimedia asked me pictures and texts of my own designs, so "if" this is a problem for Wikimedia then please delete my account or tell me what I can do because I don't want to have problems.
Thank you for understanding,
Kind Regards,
Pascale De Backer (info@pascalina.be)(www.pascalina.be) 2A02:1810:2E3B:9300:5069:BD40:7E23:98F1 09:32, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please participate in the rest of the discussions linked on User talk:Pascale81.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:46, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Those images are part of the project Wiki Women design of Wikimedia Belgium. They were uploaded by the original creator, as part of her participation to the activity. The images are not commercial, but are only meant to document (work of) Belgian women designers. Geert Van Pamel (talk) 11:51, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Incomplete license. Photo of 3D object not own work of uploader but rather work of Alberto Riccardo Messaggi: RickDeckard. Needs release from photographer. Glrx (talk) 06:42, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Uploader requests deletion because photographers will not permit an NC license. Pascale De Backer diff states,

    All the photographers of my designs would be more than glad to accord me the license to publish their photos on Wikimedia, as they already did on any other media, but none of them agrees with the terms of the Creative-Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0. All my photographers can only accept a Non-commercial (NC) license. Since Wikimedia Commons does not offer a NC license, which I regret, I need the 7 images to be removed, please.

    Glrx (talk) 19:38, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted by User:Ciell. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:21, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: CSD F10 (personal photos of or by non-contributors)and CSD G10 (files created as advertisements). I think this is still within COM:SCOPE, though. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:20, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment A photo of a sofa in the shape of a tablet is definitely in scope, but are there design copyright problems with hosting it? I have the same question for all the other deletion requests in this series, and I think that unless we have clarification from the creator(s), the answer is "yes" and the photos will have to be hidden. However, if the uploader is indeed the creator, we should welcome the contributions, edit the descriptions if and as necessary, and keep everything. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:02, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. This is an unused photo of the uploader's own oos art piece. The uploader is not notable. We need permission from photographer Milos Sitarica per this edit.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:33, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Those images are part of the project Wiki Women design of Wikimedia Belgium. They were uploaded by the original creator, as part of her participation to the activity. The images are not commercial, but are only meant to document (work of) Belgian women designers. Geert Van Pamel (talk) 11:52, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Incomplete license. Photo of 3D object not own work of uploader but rather work of Milos Sitarica. Needs release from photographer. Glrx (talk) 06:44, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Uploader requests deletion because photographers will not permit an NC license. Pascale De Backer diff states,

    All the photographers of my designs would be more than glad to accord me the license to publish their photos on Wikimedia, as they already did on any other media, but none of them agrees with the terms of the Creative-Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0. All my photographers can only accept a Non-commercial (NC) license. Since Wikimedia Commons does not offer a NC license, which I regret, I need the 7 images to be removed, please.

    Glrx (talk) 19:36, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted by User:Ciell. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:21, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong date, probably wrong source and author Xocolatl (talk) 17:59, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: if it's from 1970 as claimed, it's still protected in the US because of the URAA. The file can be restored in 2066. --Rosenzweig τ 17:10, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see now that 1970 is another randomly made up year by RAN ( I should have known). From how the guy looks on the photo, he could have been 47, but also 60, and then the year would have been 1983. I'll bump the undeletion year to 2079 accordingly. --Rosenzweig τ 17:19, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm genuinely unsure not the copyright status of this newspaper (etc) snippet. I suggest COM:VRT be used by the uploader to verify dates and copyright status. COM:PCP applies 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:22, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

According to the linked enWiki draft, Michael Emerson hosted Face to Face from 1979 to the early 1980s. There is a good chance therefore that the advert appeared without a copyright notice or subsequent registration and would therefore be in the scope of PD-US-1978-89. Could the uploader perhaps provide the whole newspaper page, so that this can be verified? Felix QW (talk) 19:23, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: we'd need this in the context of its original publication to determine if it is perhaps PD-US-no-notice. Since we don't have that, deleted per the precautionary principle. --Rosenzweig τ 17:22, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 185.172.241.184 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as the underlying movie, en:Storm over Asia (1928 film), seems to be in the PD (File:Потомок Чингисхана. (1928).webm). -- Túrelio (talk) 06:44, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am the uploader, thanks, Túrelio, for pinning me at my talk page. I think it's very simple: movie is in PD (if you are interested in Soviet propaganda, or a fan Vsevod Pudovkin, we have the whole movie available at en.Wikipedia). I think Túrelio might have subconsciously be drawn to delete because we do have a copy at Wikipedia, under fair use. I don't know why the op of that file chose that path, but it doesn't change the fact this movie is in PD and screenshots of it are not copyrighted either, so this still frame should be allowed on Commons. Giray Altay (talk) 08:50, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Giray Altay You seem to misunderstand: @Túrelio actually agrees that the file is PD. They only created the DR in order to challenge a speedy deletion nomination. Brianjd (talk) 14:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Brianjd Allright. So I vote for keeping the file, what about you and @Túrelio?--Giray Altay (talk) 14:42, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio, if you agree to keep this public domain file, and the other user at least does not disagree, can we restore it? I need it for a Wiki article I was editing and I am afraid if I don't finish it now I will forget about it and leave it unfinished.--Giray Altay (talk) 16:57, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Looks good to me. I also note that the original version of the English Wikipedia copy was at a higher resolution (462 × 576). It was shrunk by a bot; the current versions on the English Wikipedia and Commons are identical, at a resolution of 283 × 353. Brianjd (talk) 12:49, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am not familiar with relevant procedures at Wikipedia; I have requested a fix at their Help Desk. Brianjd (talk) 12:56, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. howcheng {chat} 17:37, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:N999UA_photo.jpg Suspected copyvio - the author claims he took this photo, and that must have been some 40 years (1982-1986) ago, but does not provide any details. Just want someone with more experience to look into the matter. Also note the preivous name of the file by the uploader.Thanks. 78.45.5.249 12:14, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 17:38, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Leader.ir is unlike khamenei.ir not a free website HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:58, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 17:41, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sabinegeraudie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright violation. These sculptures are probably in France (at least La chaise de SAB is in Nice). There is no FOP in France. I do not see a VRT ticket. Anyone can make an account that looks like the name of the artist. So Commons needs a VRT ticket from the artist (preferably with the same e-mail as is on https://www.sab-nice.fr/contact.php) for the photos of these sculptures, otherwise they will be deleted.

File:Sab-et-la-chaise.jpg also needs the name of the real photographer, because if the artist herself is on the photo, she cannot have taken the photo herself. And then we need a VRT ticket from the photographer as well.

JopkeB (talk) 16:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, but @JopkeB: did you try to contact the artist via her website to see if she is also the uploader? Also, a self-portrait can easily be taken with a tripod and setting the camera's timer. howcheng {chat} 17:44, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo / identifiable person(s) LevandeMänniska (talk), 16:33, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Not bad, but appears to be a non-notable person and not in use. The fact that a person is identifiable in a photo of them, though, is obvious and not a problem most of the time. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ikan Kekek Given that the file was uploaded about a day ago and is used on the uploader’s frwiki user page, we might consider offering a grace period. Of course, there is the usual concern that the uploader appears to be the subject, but the photo does not appear to be a selfie, so it might be a copyright violation.
    Also, among the photos I checked from this batch, it’s not clear that any were taken in public. So the fact that people are identifiable might be a problem. Brianjd (talk) 03:52, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. howcheng {chat} 17:46, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These flags are unsourced.

Alexphangia Talk 16:52, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Very likely fake flags, likely created as a hoax. Flagvisioner (talk) (contribs) 02:22, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 17:47, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is not simple Артём 13327 (talk) 18:46, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As always, I am confused as to what is ‘simple’ (below the threshold of originality) and what is not. Someone might need to check the whole category Google.com logos. Brianjd (talk) 03:59, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I think where the shadows and the effect of volume are usually not simple. Артём 13327 (talk) 12:23, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
See, for example, Google 1998 logo.png and Google Beta Logo.gif (neither of which is nominated for deletion). Brianjd (talk) 12:47, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. howcheng {chat} 17:49, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jazzertyy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

As of now: Fictional map; Belarus was not yet annexed by Putin.

Enyavar (talk) 20:25, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The map concerns the Union State of Russia and Belarus, and therefore territory claimed by Russia is also claimed by the Union State. As it is de jure a confederation of the two states, Belarus does warrant being colored fully in green, just as it was on the prior version of this image before representing Eastern Ukraine as claimed. Jazzertyy (talk) 20:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Enyavar The SVG file is used on cs:Svaz Ruska a Běloruska, en:Union State and fi:Venäjän ja Valko-Venäjän valtioliitto. The enwiki article looks legitimate, and a web search seems to support that the Union State (of Russia and Belarus) is a real thing. So at least this aspect of the map seems legitimate. Brianjd (talk) 04:57, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. howcheng {chat} 17:49, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Fotograf wurde von der abgebildeten Person gebeten, dieses Foto zu löschen (vgl. File talk:Harald-Schmitt-Berlin 12-2009.JPG). Anderes Foto der Person ist vorhanden, keine Einbindung dieses Fotos im WP-ANR. P170 (talk) 21:50, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 17:50, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CaesarIran (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photo from a secret underground military site, not a work by Tasnim. Same images published by other Iranian outlets without credit (example IRNA) Likely a work of Iranian armed forces.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:38, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong source/ author Xocolatl (talk) 17:47, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This photo was the property of
Nusinov family. Nusinov Vladimir Isaakovich, who lives in the city of Maalot, Israel, provided me with the photo with the right to own and to distribute. The photo was taken in the early 1930s. Since Nusinov was a statesman, an employee of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Belarus and an open opponent of Stalin, the photo can be considered as a public domain. In addition, the photo is unique. There are practically no photos of I. Nusinov in the Internet. Gragpak1 (talk) 14:22, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
P. S. Nusinov was an employee of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of USSR Gragpak1 (talk) 14:26, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per COM:PRP. There is insufficient evidence of place and time of first publication, and for authorship and subsequent transfer of title. At a minimum the process at COM:VRT should be followed if the claim is explicit release by the author's successors in interest. If the claim is a copyright exemption or expiration, the relevant facts (author, date, place) should be provided along with citations to the relevant copyright law provisions under which the claim is made. --Xover (talk) 10:20, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:30, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation de droit d'auteur. Copie de cette photo. Le site de la mairie précise : "Sauf mention contraire, les photos sont la propriété de la commune de Châtillon-en-Vendelais" ([2]) Pymouss Let’s talk - 14:39, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour je suis Yohann Chantrel conseiller municipale de la commune justement je suis en charge de la communication et de la gestion du facebook de la mairie en parrallèle. Cette photo a été validée par la mairie car c'était l'ancienne mairie qui était en photo.C'est une mise à jour car nous avons des années de retard... Chanchan35210 (talk) 10:39, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour comment cela se passe donc?Pour que Google se mette à jour (car google reprend la photo wikipédia) il faut que ce soit validé?
Merci Chanchan35210 (talk) 11:04, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per nom. But note that Chanchan35210 above is claiming to be a representative of the copyright holder, and their comment can be interpreted (it is unclear) as saying the owner is authorising compatible licensing. If that us the case, the process at COM:VRT should be followed to verify the claim. --Xover (talk) 09:52, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Also note that I have posted a message on Chanchan35210's user talk page requesting clarification of their position in this discussion. Xover (talk) 10:13, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. @Chanchan35210: On attend un courriel à COM:VRT, pour récupérer éventuellement la photo. Ruthven (msg) 15:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 15:14, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel Shows the red lines (blood vessels?), which I have not seen in other penis photos (except for the other one by the uploader that you recently nominated). Brianjd (talk) 05:19, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep and rename to something less crude. It’s actually a great photo of the blood vessels on the foreskin. Dronebogus (talk) 10:09, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If this is kept, consider undeleting the other one too. Brianjd (talk) 15:24, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep, per above. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:50, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ivan Dancha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This is, or appears to be, a picture of the uploader, but there is no evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Evidence of any transfer of licencing must be sent via COM:VRT
Admins, please check the other files uploaded by this uploader. I can't check the names because I am unable to work with the alphabet

🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 21:56, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]