Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/10/02
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
![57 File:"Scrolls" by David Phillips, 2017, in front of Jordan Hall, New England Conservatory of Music, Boston, MA.jpg](#File:"Scrolls"_by_David_Phillips,_2017,_in_front_of_Jordan_Hall,_New_England_Conservatory_of_Music,_Boston,_MA.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(7).JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
self promo on enwp and commons --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:41, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedied. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 12:28, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Herby pointed out that this file is infringing copyright at 07:59, 2 October 2022 (UTC). Fruits Monster (talk) 08:28, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:06, 2 October 2022 UTC: Copyright violation: All rights reserved at source. Copyright© 2020 WOOSONG UNIVERSITY. All Rights Reserved. --Krdbot 13:33, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- File:20180803 161551 - Fiori di Como by Dale Chihuly at the Bellagio Hotel & Casino.jpg
- File:Bellagio Ceiling (3274420588).jpg
- File:Bellagio Entrance (348745946).jpg
- File:Bellagio hotel Las Vegas 02.JPG
- File:Bellagio hotel Las Vegas 11.jpg
- File:Bellagio Las Vegas December 2007.jpg
- File:Bellagio lobby - panoramio.jpg
- File:Bellagio's Lobby, Las Vegas-6958798344.jpg
- File:Bellagio, Bellagio Hotel and Casino, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (5438824861).jpg
- File:Bellagio, Las Vegas, Nevada - panoramio.jpg
- File:Detail of Fiori di Como by Dale Chihuly at Bellagio Hotel & Casino in Las Vegas, Nevada.jpg
- File:Fiori di Como (8226785457).jpg
- File:Fiori di Como at the Bellagio (Las Vegas)-2683149679.jpg
- File:Fiori di Como at the Bellagio (Las Vegas)-4437123033.jpg
- File:Fiori di Como by Dale Chihuly at the Bellagio Hotel & Casino. in Las Vegas 2012.jpg
- File:Fiori di Como by Dale Chihuly at the Bellagio Hotel & Casino. in Las Vegas 2016.jpg
- File:Glass Flower Ceiling at the Bellagio Hotel (3661281639).jpg
- File:Glass flowers in the lobby of the Bellagio, Las Vegas-37375886.jpg
- File:Las Vegas ceiling.jpg
- File:Las Vegas, 2016 Dale Chihuly Sculpture en verre du Bellagio (2).jpg
- File:Las Vegas, 2016 Dale Chihuly Sculpture en verre du Bellagio (3).jpg
- File:Las Vegas, Dale Chihuly Sculpture en verre du Bellagio.jpg
- File:Las Vegas, Nevada - Fiori di Como by Dale Chihuly at the Bellagio Hotel & Casino.jpg
- File:Las Vegas, September 2018 - 30901122748.jpg
- File:Las Vegas, September 2018 - 43862571585.jpg
- File:Las Vegas, September 2018 - 44053036724.jpg
- File:Starr 071225-0736 Tropaeolum majus.jpg
- File:Starr 071225-0738 Tropaeolum majus.jpg
- File:Starr 071225-0739 Tropaeolum majus.jpg
- File:The Wonderous Garden of Bellagio (3822451476).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-2683149679.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-4437123033.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Reason:
Copyrighted © Dale Chihuly.
This is a glass sculpture installed on the ceiling of the Bellagio Hotel & Casino in Las Vegas, by a famous American artist.
FoP in the USA#Artworks and sculptures states: "For artworks, even if permanently installed in public places, the U.S. copyright law has no similar exception, and any publication of an image of a copyrighted artwork thus is subject to the approval of the copyright holder of the artwork." No approval is specified here, for none of these photographs.
The Village Pump was consulted prior to this request, and there seems to be a consensus for deletion. User:JWilz12345 suggested me to nominate the whole category. User:Clindberg noticed "There is a copyright registration (VA0001644783) for "Fiori di Como" by Dale Chihuly, from October 2007".
2D and 3D artworks are not okay according to the FoP summary table. -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:14, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- I was afraid of that, but it cannot be helped. --Judithcomm (talk) 07:42, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Gah! This should have been done ages ago. Even I am guilty here. Thanks for nominating this. Deleted per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 15:29, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Samuel Pinku (talk · contribs)
[edit]self promo on enwp
- File:Pinku3.jpg
- File:Pro Sound Studio Dubai.jpg
- File:SIH Studios Sharjah.jpg
- File:At Sachal Studios LHR.jpg
- File:At Abbey Road Studios London.jpg
- File:Mixing time.jpg
- File:Samuel and Jagjit Singh.jpg
- File:Samuel Suleman.jpg
- File:Pinku jee.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:53, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:18, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
unused files. Random excerpts from some court stuff/documents. Watermarked, abusive EXIF-data. I guess that out of project scope.
- File:CC3504JAF1.jpg
- File:CC3503JAF-e1447523829935.jpg
- File:Court transcript - john alite.jpg
- File:JAGAliteCross2042JAF-e1447523297758-1024x680.jpg
Estopedist1 (talk) 17:09, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:16, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
unused. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 17:10, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:16, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Useless redirect Shenzhiming88 (talk) 08:49, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:19, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
False license claim. It's from another websites. Yogwi21 (talk) 01:45, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Polarlys at 20:23, 2 October 2022 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 01:30, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
self promo on enwp --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:50, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:03, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:23, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:21, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AzureSprites (talk · contribs)
[edit]used for spam on enwp
- File:08267623a2a1e3cd13ecf254f35e1be4.500x500x1.png
- File:Untitled design (46).png
- File:Untitled design (11).png
- File:Untitled design (14).png
- File:Untitled design (35).png
- File:Untitled design (26).png
- File:Untitled design (45).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:59, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:23, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Heiddy Martinez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional. Out of the project scope.
Edslov (talk) 17:20, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:25, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Nehemia G as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1|Avichai Socher is NOT an IDF Spokesperson's Unit photographer, and told me OTRS made without his approval and asked to help with speedy delete of this infringement. You can see on IAF website his description as "Aviation Photographer and Aerospace Engineer", vs. Sgt. Amit Agronov who is an IAF Magazine Photographer - https://www.iaf.org.il/9204-53248-en/IAF.aspx -- Geagea (talk) 23:09, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Will check that info with the IDF Spokesperson's Unit. Just to understand correctly. Nehemia G, Avichai Socher told you that he own's the copyright? -- Geagea (talk) 23:19, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Yes. Socher said he own the rights to the image. Nehemia G (talk) 05:40, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: O.k. I'm deleting the file as there is some doubt regarding to the copyright ownership. Thanks for notification. -- Geagea (talk) 07:26, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Obsolete 98.110.124.126 19:57, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: Why would that be? There doesn't seem to be any other version of the photograph here on Commons which could render this version obsolete, so the deletion request appears to be malformed. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:09, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Extremely strong keep There is absolutely no policy reason for deleting this image. Being "obsolete" is not a policy reason. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:33, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Keep In use, and a completely absurd argument. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:46, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. --Achim55 (talk) 15:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Source is subject's Facebook page, with no evidence that uploader is authorized to upload the image here under a Commons-compatible license. Kinu (talk) 00:56, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:55, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
No evidence of permission. Repeatedly uploaded by User:Wagiis Wagone, who was previously blocked for copyright issues, with the same inappropriate claim of permission, and it is highly likely that User:Young Bloke is a new account attempting to evade scrutiny for the same behavior. Sanctions recommended. Kinu (talk) 14:28, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:33, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Yet another copyvio by this user. Per this edit summary at enwiki, "referenced from Flickr" and absolutely no evidence of permission. This user has been warned enough for copyright violations. Please block. Kinu (talk) 15:13, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Pinging Yann, who has previously blocked the uploader for persistent copyright issues. --Kinu (talk) 17:54, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:02, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
There is better version: Yugoslavia-Army-OF-3 (1951–1982).svg Ђидо (talk) 00:22, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:47, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
There is a better version: Yugoslavia-Army-OF-4 (1951–1982).svg Ђидо (talk) 00:23, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:46, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
There is a better version: Yugoslavia-Army-OF-5 (1951–1982).svg Ђидо (talk) 00:23, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:46, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
There is a better version: Yugoslavia-Army-OF-2b (1982–2006).svg Ђидо (talk) 00:24, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:46, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Madame Tussauds Berlin
[edit]Derivative work of copyrighted wax sculpture in a museum. Not allowed by freedom of panorama in Germany.
- File:Angelina Jolie & Brad Pitt figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30977364502).jpg
- File:Jack Sparrow wax figure Madame Tussauds Berlin 001.jpg
- File:Katy Perry figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31082938426).jpg
- File:Lady Gaga figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30298542244).jpg
- File:Lady Gaga figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31082952836).jpg
- File:Madame Tussaud, Berlin - panoramio.jpg
- File:Miley Cyrus at Madame Tussauds Berlin - Full figure.jpg
- File:Miley Cyrus at Madame Tussauds Berlin.jpg
- File:Nicole Kidman figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30977366342).jpg
- File:Rihanna figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30751907550).jpg
- File:Rihanna figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31082951116).jpg
- File:Taylor Swift figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30298516114).jpg
- File:Taylor Swift figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31119121265).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:25, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- But how do we know they're not real people!!
Delete unfortunately. At least they fooled @EEIM: "Johnny Depp en un evento en Berlín" ("Johnny Depp at an event in Berlin") - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:21, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:15, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Madame Tussauds Berlin 2
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted wax sculptures in a museum. No FoP in Germany. Please see Com:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Madame Tussauds Berlin.
- File:(Old) Justin Bieber figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30751899780).jpg
- File:Albert Einstein figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31080929336).jpg
- File:Alice Schwarzer figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31081279226).jpg
- File:Angela Merkel figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30310285613).jpg
- File:Angela Merkel figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30749496960).jpg
- File:Angela Merkel figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31003063871).jpg
- File:Angela Merkel figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31116787095).jpg
- File:Anne Frank figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (28649803901).jpg
- File:Anne Frank figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (28649804911).jpg
- File:Ayrton Senna figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30297758494).jpg
- File:Barack Obama figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31080712586).jpg
- File:Barbara Schöneberger figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30976044372).jpg
- File:Barbara Schöneberger figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30976045642).jpg
- File:Berlin - Madame Tussaud - geo.hlipp.de - 31280.jpg
- File:Bertolt Brecht figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31080927256).jpg
- File:Beyoncé figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (28621469282).jpg
- File:Boris Becker and Steffi Graf figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30975608312).jpg
- File:Boris Becker figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31082235066).jpg
- File:Calvin Harris wax figure at Madame Tussauds, Berlin (July 24th, 2016) 01.jpg
- File:Calvin Harris wax figure at Madame Tussauds, Berlin (July 24th, 2016) 02.jpg
- File:Calvin Harris wax figure at Madame Tussauds, Berlin (July 24th, 2016) 03.jpg
- File:Conchita Wurst figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30298551994).jpg
- File:Conchita Wurst figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31005266991).jpg
- File:Conchita Wurst figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31005347141).jpg
- File:Conchita Wurst figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31005348971).jpg
- File:Cristiano Ronaldo figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31118369955).jpg
- File:David Garrett figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30298533784).jpg
- File:Dirk Nowitzki figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30975604532).jpg
- File:Dirk Nowitzki figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31082234176).jpg
- File:E.T. figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (28621471562).jpg
- File:E.T. figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (28621566182).jpg
- File:Elyas M. Barek figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30298169214).jpg
- File:Elyas M. Barek figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30298170644).jpg
- File:Franz Beckenbauer figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31004508551).jpg
- File:Gerhard Schröder figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30974148432).jpg
- File:Günter Grass figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30750160270).jpg
- File:Günter Grass figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30750160930).jpg
- File:Hape Kerkeling figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30298176424).jpg
- File:Hape Kerkeling figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31118742875).jpg
- File:Harry Styles figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31005345761).jpg
- File:Helene Fischer figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31005331391).jpg
- File:Helene Fischer figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31082946506).jpg
- File:Helmut Kohl figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31080306706).jpg
- File:Hildegard Knef figure at Madame Tussauds (30310973433).jpg
- File:Hildegard Knef figure at Madame Tussauds (30310974613).jpg
- File:Jennifer Lopez figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30299431254).jpg
- File:Joachim Gauck figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30310417663).jpg
- File:Joachim Gauck figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31003159111).jpg
- File:Joachim Gauck figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31080711656).jpg
- File:Johann Sebastian Bach figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30310688083).jpg
- File:Johann Sebastian Bach figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31080933406).jpg
- File:John F. Kennedy figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30748971510).jpg
- File:Johnny Depp figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30752891540).jpg
- File:Julia Roberts figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31083991626).jpg
- File:Karl Marx figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (28442937280).jpg
- File:Katy Perry figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31082940456).jpg
- File:Katy Perry figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31119125355).jpg
- File:Katy Perry figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31119129845).jpg
- File:Katy Perry figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31119133965).jpg
- File:Klaus Wowereit figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31002771361).jpg
- File:Konrad Adenauer, John F. Kennedy & Willy Brandt figures at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31002526141).jpg
- File:Konrad Adenauer, John F. Kennedy & Willy Brandt figures at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31116300595).jpg
- File:Lady Gaga figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30298539894).jpg
- File:Lady Gaga figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30751911980).jpg
- File:Lady Gaga figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31082953826).jpg
- File:Lady Gaga figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31082954336).jpg
- File:Lady Gaga figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31082954886).jpg
- File:Liam Payne figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30298541414).jpg
- File:Lionel Messi figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31082229396).jpg
- File:Lionel Messi figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31082230266).jpg
- File:Liza Minnelli figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (28442938920).jpg
- File:Liza Minnelli figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (28649807241).jpg
- File:Louis Tomlinson figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31005345051).jpg
- File:Ludwig van Beethoven figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31003407861).jpg
- File:Madonna figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31005265111).jpg
- File:Manuel Neuer figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30297765434).jpg
- File:Manuel Neuer figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30750975290).jpg
- File:Manuel Neuer figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30975612822).jpg
- File:Marie Tussaud Madame Tussaud figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (28649811271).jpg
- File:Marilyn Monroe figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30974767932).jpg
- File:Marilyn Monroe figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30974768662).jpg
- File:Marlene Dietrich figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31003696681).jpg
- File:Matthias Schweighöfer figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30298173054).jpg
- File:Matthias Schweighöfer figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30976048762).jpg
- File:MdmTussauds AnneFrank .JPG
- File:Mesut Özil figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30975611372).jpg
- File:Mesut Özil figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31118367385).jpg
- File:Michael "Bully" Herbig figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31004923351).jpg
- File:Michail Gorbatschow figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30310012323).jpg
- File:Michail Gorbatschow figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31002775881).jpg
- File:Miley Cyrus figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31082942596).jpg
- File:Miley Cyrus figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31082946226).jpg
- File:Miley Cyrus figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31119138575).jpg
- File:Muhammad Ali figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30975606142).jpg
- File:Niall Horan figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30298544624).jpg
- File:Nicole Kidman figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin.jpg
- File:Oliver Kahn figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30975576842).jpg
- File:One Direction figures at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30298549284).jpg
- File:Otto von Bismarck figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (28694626546).jpg
- File:Paula Patton as "Garona" (Warcraft The Beginning) figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30975393532).jpg
- File:Paula Patton as "Garona" (Warcraft The Beginning) figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30975395852).jpg
- File:Pope John Paul II figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30974142922).jpg
- File:Rihanna figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31082948326).jpg
- File:Robert Pattinson figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30752893210).jpg
- File:Romy Schneider as "Sisi" figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30974746032).jpg
- File:Romy Schneider as "Sisi" figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31003698501).jpg
- File:Ronald Reagan figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30310009383).jpg
- File:Ronald Reagan figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31002774021).jpg
- File:Sebastian Vettel figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30975607302).jpg
- File:Sebastian Vettel figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31118366055).jpg
- File:Sigmund Freud figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30310684773).jpg
- File:Sonja Zietlow figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31004904961).jpg
- File:Sonja Zietlow figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31082602456).jpg
- File:Sonja Zietlow Madame Tussauds Berlin.jpg
- File:Sophie Scholl & Anne Frank figures at Madame Tussauds Berlin (28649800041).jpg
- File:Sophie Scholl figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (28109567924).jpg
- File:Sophie Scholl figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (28727066835).jpg
- File:SophieScholl MdmTussaudsBerlin.JPG
- File:SPIDER-MAN figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30310976573).jpg
- File:Stefan Raab figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30298176944).jpg
- File:Stefan Raab figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30751461620).jpg
- File:Taylor Swift figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31005313661).jpg
- File:Taylor Swift figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31082936136).jpg
- File:Thomas Gottschalk figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31082603346).jpg
- File:Travis Fimmel as "Lothar" (Warcraft The Beginning") figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30311597953).jpg
- File:Travis Fimmel as "Lothar" (Warcraft The Beginning") figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30311604473).jpg
- File:Travis Fimmel as "Lothar" and Paula Patton as "Garona" (Warcraft The Beginning) figures at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30311601153).jpg
- File:Travis Fimmel as "Lothar" and Paula Patton as "Garona" (Warcraft The Beginning) figures at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30750830760).jpg
- File:Travis Fimmel as "Lothar" and Paula Patton as "Garona" (Warcraft The Beginning) figures at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31118125685).jpg
- File:Udo Lindenberg figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (28649683201).jpg
- File:Udo Lindenberg figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (28726955175).jpg
- File:Ulrich Honecker figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31080311126).jpg
- File:Walter Ulbricht figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30295972444).jpg
- File:Walter Ulbricht figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30310019063).jpg
- File:Will Smith figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30752877170).jpg
- File:William Shakespeare figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31080924796).jpg
- File:William Shakespeare figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31080926176).jpg
- File:Willy Brandt figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31002523621).jpg
- File:Winston Churchill figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30748972990).jpg
- File:Yoda figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin.jpg
- File:Zayn Malik figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (30298543354).jpg
_Justin_Bieber_figure_at_Madame_Tussauds_Berlin_(30751899780).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_figure_at_Madame_Tussauds_Berlin_(30975393532).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_figure_at_Madame_Tussauds_Berlin_(30975395852).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_figure_at_Madame_Tussauds_Berlin_(30311597953).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_figure_at_Madame_Tussauds_Berlin_(30311604473).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_figures_at_Madame_Tussauds_Berlin_(30311601153).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_figures_at_Madame_Tussauds_Berlin_(30750830760).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_figures_at_Madame_Tussauds_Berlin_(31118125685).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:13, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Madame Tussauds Berlin 3
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted wax sculptures in a museum. No FoP in Germany.
- File:Alice Schwarzer figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin (31003701091).jpg
- File:Taylor Lautner figure at Madame Tussauds Berlin.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:18, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Germany has FOP. The problem is that it only apply to outdoor photos. --MGA73 (talk) 20:59, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Madame Tussauds Berlin 4
[edit]Copyrighted wax figures in the museum. No FoP in Germany for interior works
- File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 1.jpg
- File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 10.jpg
- File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 11.jpg
- File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 12.jpg
- File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 13.jpg
- File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 14.jpg
- File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 15.jpg
- File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 16.jpg
- File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 2.jpg
- File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 3.jpg
- File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 4.jpg
- File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 5.jpg
- File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 6.jpg
- File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 7.jpg
- File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 8.jpg
- File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 9.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:15, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:27, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SanJoSugbu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Most likely previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification of the true copyright holder (the photographer) via email correspondence is required for images previously published on social media so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of these images and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. For email template, see COM:VRTS#Email message template for release of rights to a file. Better still, have the originals overwrite these FB-derived images, if the images are truly self-photographed works of the uploader.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:22, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:27, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:21, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:27, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion is keep. --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 14:46, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
This logo is outdated. We want to change it to other one. 92.119.221.137 09:29, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
This logo doesn't correspond to real one. I would ask to substitute it with the relevant one. 2A0B:A080:1:131:D994:F232:1081:EF93 10:17, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion just upload the new one as separate file and write this information in the description. --GPSLeo (talk) 10:29, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
old logo — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 45.89.88.219 (talk) 06:25, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per previous result above. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:49, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:28, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Faa.story
[edit]Own request
- File:Arca Museum Sonobudoyo - 1.png
- File:Arca Museum Sonobudoyo - 2.png
- File:Bangunan Sonobudoyo - 1.jpg
- File:Bangunan Sonobudoyo - 3.jpg
- File:Bangunan Sonobudoyo - 5.jpg
- File:Diorama History of Java Museum - 1.jpg
- File:Diorama History of Java Museum - 2.jpg
- File:Diorama Mataraman History of Java Museum.jpg
- File:Diorama Mataraman at History of Java Museum (1).jpg
- File:Diorama Mataraman at History of Java Museum (2).jpg
- File:Gedung Museum Affandi - 2.jpg
- File:Gedung Museum Affandi - 3.jpg
- File:Keraton Paviliun at History of Java Museum.jpg
- File:Koleksi Museum Affandi - 1.jpg
- File:Koleksi Museum Affandi - 10.jpg
- File:Koleksi Museum Affandi - 11.jpg
- File:Koleksi Museum Affandi - 12.jpg
- File:Koleksi Museum Affandi - 13.jpg
- File:Koleksi Museum Affandi - 14.jpg
- File:Koleksi Museum Affandi - 15.jpg
- File:Koleksi Museum Affandi - 16.jpg
- File:Koleksi Museum Affandi - 17.jpg
- File:Koleksi Museum Affandi - 18.jpg
- File:Koleksi Museum Affandi - 19.jpg
- File:Koleksi Museum Affandi - 1a.jpg
- File:Koleksi Museum Affandi - 1b.jpg
- File:Koleksi Museum Affandi - 2.jpg
- File:Koleksi Museum Affandi - 3.jpg
- File:Koleksi Museum Affandi - 4.jpg
- File:Koleksi Museum Affandi - 5.jpg
- File:Koleksi Museum Affandi - 6.jpg
- File:Koleksi Museum Affandi - 7.jpg
- File:Koleksi Museum Affandi - 8.jpg
- File:Koleksi Museum Affandi - 9.jpg
- File:Koleksi Museum MACAN - 1.png
- File:Koleksi Museum MACAN - 10.png
- File:Koleksi Museum MACAN - 11.png
- File:Koleksi Museum MACAN - 12.png
- File:Koleksi Museum MACAN - 13.png
- File:Koleksi Museum MACAN - 14.png
- File:Koleksi Museum MACAN - 15.png
- File:Koleksi Museum MACAN - 16.png
- File:Koleksi Museum MACAN - 17.png
- File:Koleksi Museum MACAN - 18.png
- File:Koleksi Museum MACAN - 2.png
- File:Koleksi Museum MACAN - 3.png
- File:Koleksi Museum MACAN - 4.png
- File:Koleksi Museum MACAN - 5.png
- File:Koleksi Museum MACAN - 6.png
- File:Koleksi Museum MACAN - 7.png
- File:Koleksi Museum MACAN - 8.png
- File:Koleksi Museum MACAN - 9.png
- File:Museum Benteng Vredeburg - 13.jpg
- File:Museum Benteng Vredeburg - 15.jpg
- File:Museum Benteng Vredeburg - 16.jpg
- File:Museum Benteng Vredeburg - 20.jpg
- File:Museum Benteng Vredeburg - 24.jpg
- File:Museum Benteng Vredeburg - 5.jpg
- File:Pintu ruangan di Museum Sonobudoyo - 4.png
- File:Revitalisasi Museum Taman Tino Sidin - 2.jpg
- File:Revitalisasi Museum Taman Tino Sidin.jpg
- File:Ruang Gallery Museum Affandi - 1.png
- File:Ruang Gallery Museum Affandi - 10.png
- File:Ruang Gallery Museum Affandi - 11.png
- File:Ruang Gallery Museum Affandi - 12.png
- File:Ruang Gallery Museum Affandi - 13.png
- File:Ruang Gallery Museum Affandi - 14.png
- File:Ruang Gallery Museum Affandi - 15.png
- File:Ruang Gallery Museum Affandi - 16.png
- File:Ruang Gallery Museum Affandi - 17.png
- File:Ruang Gallery Museum Affandi - 18.png
- File:Ruang Gallery Museum Affandi - 2.png
- File:Ruang Gallery Museum Affandi - 3.png
- File:Ruang Gallery Museum Affandi - 4.png
- File:Ruang Gallery Museum Affandi - 5.png
- File:Ruang Gallery Museum Affandi - 6.png
- File:Ruang Gallery Museum Affandi - 7.png
- File:Ruang Gallery Museum Affandi - 8.png
- File:Ruang Gallery Museum Affandi - 9.png
- File:Ruang Koleksi Wayang Golek History of Java Museum.jpg
- File:Ruang koleksi History of Java Museum.jpg
- File:Tourist History of Java Museum.jpg
- File:Wayang di Museum Sonobudoyo - 10.png
- File:Wayang di Museum Sonobudoyo - 4.png
- File:Wayang di Museum Sonobudoyo - 5.png
- File:Wayang di Museum Sonobudoyo - 6.png
- File:Wayang di Museum Sonobudoyo - 9.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Faa.story (talk • contribs) 05:40, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:CSD#G7. — Tulsi 24x7 03:20, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Seems to be a (badly designed) hoax. Please provide a reliable source. Old Polish had a special 'O' but not a 'Q'. Achim55 (talk) 20:46, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:29, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
no meaningful description, not in use, out of scope Ezarateesteban 21:50, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:28, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
not in use nor meaningful description, so no educational purpose is possible Ezarateesteban 21:58, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:28, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SalkovVasil (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:31, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:29, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:PENIS, New files of low resolution or poor quality which provide little descriptive information of a subject we already have files of may be nominated for deletion citing appropriate rationale(s). Such files are of limited value as media for categories related to human anatomy and stages of development. These are newly uploaded low-resolution and poor quality images of circumcised penises and are unused and should be deleted per COM:PORN.
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:44, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Comment Deleted the first image as it was blurry. I'll let someone else judge the remaining one. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:37, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. low quality. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
crosswiki spam from Wikidata (Wikidata:User:Baldo MWAMBA). Non-contributor. Personal photo Estopedist1 (talk) 11:30, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 19:36, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
This file has been superseded. Niketto sr. (talk) 20:07, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Superseded, but it's the one from the full set of Category:Images from wpi.art by Jean Béraud of [1] Maltaper --Maltaper (talk) 03:26, 3 October 2022 (UTC)- Oppose we stopped deleting "superseded" images a long time ago. Just tag them with {{Superseded}} and leave them be. This one is part of a larger set. Multichill (talk) 11:25, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:37, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted photos A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Masur (talk) 05:46, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:1,3-Dimethoxy-2-propanol-2D-structure.svg as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:13, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (also uneven bond-line cap-style). --DMacks (talk) 05:49, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 14:12, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Low res, not used, out of scope Nv8200p (talk) 01:56, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 14:08, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
the material published in 1955. copyrighted COM:URAA. eien20 (talk) 02:42, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: DW, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 14:13, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose, lol this is not applicable to this case simply because it's for public advertisement. We are basically advertising the same thing but for free. What a joke. Please take down this request. It's not serious. Alexander Davronov (talk) 19:07, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Question Public advertisement is not protected by copyright? --A1Cafel (talk) 03:04, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; @Alexander Davronov: please take a look at Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Posters. --Wdwd (talk) 14:17, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:23, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be from https://www.flickr.com/photos/tavruday/5958554242/ Adeletron 3030 (talk) 03:30, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:31, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:31, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be the self-photographed photo by Pinay06 (talk · contribs). There is a yellowing / whitish margin at the bottom-right, and the photo appears to be a photo of a photo on a book or a publication of some sort. COM:Derivative work violation. No sufficient info on who was the photographer of the underlying photo and when it was first published. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:37, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 15:30, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
It meets the criteria to be deleted Adeshina Abdulsamad Olajide (talk) 05:50, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete F10. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:28, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 15:35, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bradford as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: google search
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as no evidence was provided and Google-Images search did not yield any pre-publication. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:55, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per Túrelio. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:44, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep High-resolution with EXIF data, also no pre-publication on the Internet, no room for copyright violation. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:44, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Elizabeth, Queen Consort (2).jpg and derivative
[edit].jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
The photographer (Dorothy Wilding) died in 1976. This file is still under copyright in the country of origin until 70 years from Wilding's death had been passed. Her works would be out of copyright on January 1, 2047. Also applies to the derivative version from this file. 83.61.243.178 12:33, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:46, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Person in the photo wants it removed. 74.76.41.118 14:10, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo by non-contributor. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:48, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
crosswiki spam from Wikidata. Not notable. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 15:22, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Tineye showed the earliest results in 2011, possible COM:NETCOPYVIO A1Cafel (talk) 16:22, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama for 2d images (billboard in this case) in Canada Headlock0225 (talk) 20:54, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; DW; name, description and categorization makes clear purpose of image is the billboard; rest is incidental. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:59, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Delete Image is clearly marked as being from RockXposure (https://www.rockxposure.com/). This is a professional photographer who has a vested interest in selling their works. It's highly unlikely this is the work of the uploader, nor that the uploader has been given rights to release this image. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 22:58, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:00, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
File:"Scrolls" by David Phillips, 2017, in front of Jordan Hall, New England Conservatory of Music, Boston, MA.jpg
[edit]
No FoP for 3D works in USA. Artist David Phillips is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
- As can be read on New England Conservatory of Music website page (reference #16 on David Phillips page): "A piece of public art on NEC's campus—"Scrolls" by David Phillips, which evokes the scroll at the end of a string instrument [...]"
- https://necmusic.edu/news/whats-new-november
- This means the work is considered public art and does not require to involve the artist for use of the picture posted on Wikimedia Commons for Wikipedia non-commercial usage. Crescendo102 (talk) 21:40, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as freedom of panorama in the US does not cover three-dimensional art. Even if it were free to use for non-commercial purposes, this would be insufficient for Wikimedia Commons. Felix QW (talk) 20:21, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- In order to resolve this issue, should I obtain authorization from the artist? Crescendo102 (talk) 20:58, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, that would be very helpful! You would need to obtain permission to release your photo of the sculpture under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license, and then follow the procedure outlined at Commons:Volunteer Response Team#Declaration of consent for all enquiries. Thank you very much! Felix QW (talk) 14:10, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- Finally I agree to delete this picture. Thank you for your comments. Crescendo102 (talk) 21:23, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, that would be very helpful! You would need to obtain permission to release your photo of the sculpture under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license, and then follow the procedure outlined at Commons:Volunteer Response Team#Declaration of consent for all enquiries. Thank you very much! Felix QW (talk) 14:10, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- In order to resolve this issue, should I obtain authorization from the artist? Crescendo102 (talk) 20:58, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as freedom of panorama in the US does not cover three-dimensional art. Even if it were free to use for non-commercial purposes, this would be insufficient for Wikimedia Commons. Felix QW (talk) 20:21, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:59, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 08:35, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- I took the picture myself, but if the banner is copyrighted, feel free to delete the picture.-- Ideophagous (talk) 08:37, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 05:58, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Unknown license. Source does not state such license. Bedivere (talk) 05:20, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:01, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Uploader stated it was taken from AsianWiki, which uploads non-free images without permission. Lullabying (talk) 19:04, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:53, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
The file name and description make it clear that the only purpose of this image is to show the copyrighted Obama poster. It cannot be argued that the poster is de minimis because if it were removed there would be no reason to keep the image on Commons. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:13, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I don't really agree, because this is a good composition of part of a house, showing a particular style of shutters, window, lamp and door and two bushes. Depending on how important the title is under the law, it might be possible to make a de minimis argument and change the filename, though I expect this photo to be deleted based on your argument. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:49, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- In order to be useful as a photo of architecture there should be a wider view here. The photo is clearly focussed on the copyrighted logo sign, so the logo cannot be considered de minimus here. Ankry (talk) 15:20, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as per the nominator. Ankry (talk) 15:16, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, The sign itself is too simple to be eligible for copyright per COM:TOO United States. The capture of the copyrighted logo on the sign is unintended and unavoidable de minimis usage. The purpose of the photograph is to capture the display of the sign, not the copyrighted logo. Same principal as photographs of the Skyy Vodka bottle in Ets-Hokin v Skyy Spirits. PK-WIKI (talk) 19:58, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment it is not below ToO (see en:File:Obama Biden logo.svg), and regarding de minimis I quote from our policy Commons:De minimis: "If the existence of the poster makes the image more attractive, more usable, (...), then a de minimis defence to a copyright-infringement action will probably fail. (...) it will be difficult to argue de minimis if the photograph is described as illustrating "an advertising poster". It is clear from the title and from where the image is currently used (e.g. en:Barack Obama 2008 presidential campaign) that its purpuse is to show the sign. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:02, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and my comment above. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:03, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
only text and tables, out of scope Ezarateesteban 21:47, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:48, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Anonymous user, professional shooting, wrong date -> dubious "own work" 178.9.212.245 22:21, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:48, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Lacks a license for its home country (Germany; printed in UK) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:38, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Explain why this is not public domain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:50, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - no indication of the copyright status in Germany. We need the date of death of the author to confirm its status. Parsecboy (talk) 12:11, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, lacking info needed to determine copyright status in source country. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:35, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Probable copyvio, given the uploader's track history, oos without specific identification of the subject. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:10, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: This might be OK to keep if it's VRT verified. All of the other uploads by Saimum11 were logo files which most likely are copyvios; this file, however, is photo with EXIF data that could've been taken by the uploader. This file is currently not being used anywhere, but it's file name seems to indicate it's a photo of a high school. Perhaps, it's this high school. So, maybe it's not a copyvio per se, but it's problem per COM:SCOPE since it's not being used anywhere. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:15, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no VRT, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:33, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from advertisement.
- File:Fuji-Q City Bus E2163.jpeg
- File:Fuji-Q City Bus E3882-azulclaro-A.jpeg
- File:Fuji-Q City Bus E3882-azulclaro-B.jpeg
- File:Fuji-Q Bus F3859-TsubakiFactory.jpeg
- File:VIPliner1820 Mariyachan KarutaGO.Rear.jpeg
- File:TobuBusC-5198 ADATARA.jpeg
- File:Fuji-Q Bus F3802 QUARTETTO-B.jpeg
- File:Fuji-Q Bus F1306 Matterhorn-A.jpeg
- File:Fuji-Q Bus F1306 Matterhorn-B.jpeg
- File:Fuji-Q Bus F1302 Fujiyoshida Rear.jpeg
- File:Fuji-Q Bus F3802 QUARTETTO-A.jpeg
- File:Fujiexpress T1700 KABA3-B.jpeg
- File:Fuji-Q City Bus E3408 lovelive Rear.jpeg
- File:JRBusKanto H657-18407 Achimura-B.jpeg
- File:JRBusKanto H657-18407 Achimura-A.jpeg
- File:Fuji-Q Bus F3802 BanGDream2022-B.jpeg
- File:IBAKO1210 Umematsuri-B.jpeg
- File:IBAKO1210 Umematsuri-A.jpeg
- File:Fuji-Q Bus F1301 NARUTO&BORUTO-B.jpeg
- File:TokaiBus1549 lovelive-Rear.jpeg
- File:KeiseiBus8163 Syobu.jpeg
- File:JRBusKanto H657-16409 Zenkoji-B.jpeg
- File:JRBusKanto H657-16409 Zenkoji-A.jpeg
- File:IBAKO1197 MitoHollyHock-B.jpeg
- File:IBAKO1197 MitoHollyHock-A.jpeg
- File:Fuji-Q Bus F1604 PaddingtonTown.jpeg
- File:Fuji-Q Bus F1303 Shinbi-A.jpeg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose：いずれも日本国内を一般的に走行している路線バスの写真でありご指摘のような写真ではない。--江戸前鰻 (talk) 02:53, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- 追記：いずれも広告目的のバスではなく、特定の路線を走る限定デザインのバスであったり、そのバスのデザイン自体が日本のその年の優れた工業デザインとして表彰されたものだったりと特筆性はあるものです。--江戸前鰻 (talk) 03:18, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- 追記：更に言わせて貰うと、これらの画像は私が日本語版にアップロードした画像で間違いありませんが、COMMONSに画像をアップロードした事は一度もありません。これらの画像は特段COMMONSで共有すべきものとも思いません。ですが、日本語版ユーザーの中に他人の上げた画像を片っ端からCOMMONSにアップロードし直した上で日本語版から削除しているユーザーがおります。私にCOMMONSのruleを良く読めと言われても、私は日本語版にしか関与しておりません故悪しからずご了承下さい。Sorry,I can't speak English.--江戸前鰻 (talk) 03:38, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: except File:TobuBusC-5198 ADATARA.jpeg. 広告も著作物であるため、それがメインの被写体となっている場合はコモンズで受け入れできません。詳しくは二次的著作物をお読みください. --Yasu (talk) 15:42, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- どこに広告が写っているのかご説明下さい江戸前鰻 (talk) 02:49, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
COM:FOP Netherlands stated that the exception does not apply in the locations specifically excluded by the lawmakers: schools, operas, entrance halls of businesses, and museums A1Cafel (talk) 03:04, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:12, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:06, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:12, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted photo of Kelly Chan A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:12, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Artwork on the Fourth Plinth of Trafalgar Square is temporarily, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:12, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Artwork on the Fourth Plinth of Trafalgar Square is temporarily, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:13, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Artwork on the Fourth Plinth of Trafalgar Square is temporarily, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:13, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:13, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
self promo on enwp --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:49, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Uploaded only for use on a deleted page deemed inappropriate for Wikipedia. Marbletan (talk) 17:41, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:37, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible COM:PACKAGING violation? Although the can isn't the primary subject, de minmis certainly does not apply here. SHB2000 (talk) 11:39, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per COM:PACKAGING. I agree that de minimis does not apply. Felix QW (talk) 20:09, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Delete, or crop right half if anyone thinks the glass of beverage without the image of the commercial can is useful. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:03, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:33, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
a cropped version withouy watermark is available R8cocin8 (talk) 13:26, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 10:34, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2004. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor Володимир Довбенюк. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:34, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:34, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Advertisement of a non-notable Belgian SME Neanderen (talk) 14:06, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:34, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Founder of the same non-notable Belgian SME Neanderen (talk) 14:08, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:34, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Herby pointed out that this file is infringing copyright at 07:59, 2 October 2022 (UTC). Fruits Monster (talk) 08:28, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep According to this page, it should be public domain in both the USA and South Korea. Felix QW (talk) 19:59, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Felix. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:07, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
This file 100% is not "own work" CubanoBoi (talk) 13:45, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:49, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Image has a watermark from another website which Is 2001:A61:1045:ED01:2D00:7CA4:5E93:1AF2 14:33, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no evidence of permission. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:51, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
File:2015-08-22 Dr Les Sachs - Leszek Sachs (Lešek Sachs - Лэшэк Сакс - Leslie Raymond Sachs).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A tourist photo of a non-notable person. Neanderen (talk) 15:38, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:54, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No clear license. Photo not taken by Jacobs but rather collected by Jacobs. Follow the hyperlink and reach https://opc.mfo.de/ which states "The Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach gGmbH (MFO) owns the copyright to many of the images used on this website. Those images can be used in low resolution (as displayed on this website) on the terms of the Creative Commons License Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Germany. IMPORTANT: The Creative Commons License is not applicable for images to which the MFO does not own the copyright. If the copyright is owned by a third party, you must obtain a separate permission to use it, regardless if it is low resolution or high resolution. To be sure, please inform yourself beforehand on the copyright situation by asking at photos@mfo.de." There are only 5 or 6 pictures of Ramanujan, and the good ones have copyright claims. See discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Srinivasa_Ramanujan/Archive_1#Lede_Image Furthermore, this image may have been previously deleted: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ramanujan.jpg Glrx (talk) 17:18, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- According to [2] it is his passport photo. Given that Ramanujan died in 1920, this appears to be public domain under {{PD-India}} or maybe {{PD-UK-Unknown}}. David Eppstein (talk) 19:04, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- @David Eppstein: This image is not the passport photo. This image is a derivative work of the passport photo, and that derivative work has significant improvements so it would have its own copyright. See https://twitter.com/stevenstrogatz/status/1556630568422481921 . The derivative work would have been done after the passport photo was obtained in 1937 by Chandrasekhar. The image on Commons is also not the same that the Royal Society used. Glrx (talk) 17:04, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- Image restoration is de minimis for copyright purposes. David Eppstein (talk) 17:21, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- @David Eppstein: This image is not the passport photo. This image is a derivative work of the passport photo, and that derivative work has significant improvements so it would have its own copyright. See https://twitter.com/stevenstrogatz/status/1556630568422481921 . The derivative work would have been done after the passport photo was obtained in 1937 by Chandrasekhar. The image on Commons is also not the same that the Royal Society used. Glrx (talk) 17:04, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep as per David Eppstein. Yann (talk) 08:43, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per Eppstein's rationale. The image is guaranteed to be dated prior to Ramanujan's death in 1920, at any rate. --NoonIcarus (talk) 12:50, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per David Eppstein. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:56, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Contains wallpapers from Xiaomi Артём 13327 (talk) 06:15, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:08, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
what's this used for? also lack of proper permission and sourcing info.
RZuo (talk) 08:55, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:07, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be the uploader's creation. — Racconish 💬 10:16, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:07, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be the uploader's creation — Racconish 💬 10:16, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:07, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
“Why does the chicken cross the road” Low quality image of a nondescript scene. SCOPE Also applies to the rest of this series File:Poule FMSF 02.jpg, File:Poule FMSF 03.jpg, File:Poule FMSF 04.jpg 62.216.208.193 13:27, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- 62.216.208.193: These images were depicted as a proof that there are stray chickens similarly as stray cats and stray dogs in Sfax. --Csisc (talk) 14:35, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- If so, the image should be kept. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:54, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Reasonable depiction of urban fauna. Within scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:05, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Possible authorship hoax. The similar summer shot File:Gorodomlya summer.png also date by February 2017 and taken from Yandex Maps. Alex Spade (talk) 14:30, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:03, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Srinivasa Ramanujan - OPC - 2 (cleaned).jpg Glrx (talk) 17:20, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: per David Eppstein (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Srinivasa Ramanujan - OPC - 2 (cleaned).jpg). --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:58, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:33, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- The picture has a frame that has not bee cropped out. That implies that it is a picture of a picture. Use of COM:VRT to provide correct attribution is compatible with your request to retain this picture for now because undulation is part of that process.The uploader's other upload is a definite copyvio, so track record suggests that this picture is as well. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 06:30, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- OK, I follow your reasoning. I've crossed out my keep vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:10, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PCP. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:59, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution version of this painting; a much better one of the same painting is at File:August Malmström - Dancing Fairies - Google Art Project.jpg Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:59, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per COM:INUSE, still widely in use. If replaced everywhere, a new deletion request can be opened. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:29, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Помилкове завантаження Сарапулов (talk) 17:15, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Assuming the translation is right, there was an error loading? If the file was corrupt, that would be a reason for deletion, but I'm not seeing that problem on my end. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:02, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle - don't see any errors. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:32, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
oryginalny plik zawiera na stronie 5 niewolną grafikę, której autorką jest Maria Hiszpańska-Neumann 1917-1980 Piotr433 (talk) 20:57, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close: already deleted by Krd. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:33, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marketing M Lhuillier (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible COM:SPAM, as the uploader seems to be an organization connected to the building that these photos show. Possible self-advertising and promotion.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:25, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep if there is no FoP problem, because regardless of the uploader's motivations, pictures of this building are in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:15, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: sorry but the uploader hasn't contributed other photos. And mind you, it is not a single individual but an organization. If you don't know yet, M'Lhuillier is a major
financial and pawnshopmoney transfer firm here. The name of the uploader implies they are part of a marketing team. The intention is clear; they are here to promote their establishment only. It violates COM:ADVERT. Two of the file names are promotional in nature. To add also, as it seems the uploader is an organization, it is likely that the uploader is not the photographer. See also a failed undeletion request at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2021-11#File:FSUU Swimming Pool inside (Original Work).jpg. - With regards to FOP, then it is a third problem but no longer relevant since the images are promotional in nature (and compounded by upload made by an uploader who is an organization and not the photographer). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:36, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: sorry but the uploader hasn't contributed other photos. And mind you, it is not a single individual but an organization. If you don't know yet, M'Lhuillier is a major
.jpg){kind=link}
- Please see Commons talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#Limits to G10: advertising and this edit summary, and feel free to participate, but it is destructive to Wikimedia to penalize users by eliminating useful images just because the motivation of the uploader was promotional. We have to have flexibility to retain images that are of educational value - in this case, pictures of a building - regardless of the motives of the uploader. I see the question of whether the uploader was an individual or an organization as irrelevant. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:40, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: the discussion you mentioned has no bearing over this deletion request done by me. This is not a speedy deletion but rather a constructive deletion request. Your claim that deletion requests are destructive to Commons is baseless. Deletion requests provide opportunity for other users to give their inputs, such as what we are doing now, not speedy deletions in which files may be speedily deleted at most within a week.
- Again, I see the self-promotion intention on the part of the uploader (who is not even an individual). The uploader hasn't made other uploads except this building. The file names are clearly promotionary. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:53, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Is there another talk page I need to start a discussion about non-speedy deletion rationales on? What's destructive to Commons is to delete photos that have educational use, just because the uploader was motivated by a desire to promote a product or business. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:27, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Also note that filenames can be changed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:30, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: the fact that the uploader has used Commons to promote their branch of one of our notable money transfer firms already violates COM:ADVERT. Besides the files have three problems: the problem I raised, the doubtful authorship since the uploader name is an organization and the person who uploaded this may not be the actual photographer, and of course architectural copyright (as the building is too recent to dismiss the architect as being dead for more than 50 years). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:36, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Then request deletion for the FoP issue and questionable authorship. But the principle I laid out is important for future deletion requests. We should not be throwing away educationally useful images just because the intent of the uploader was promotional. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:47, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note the following language at COM:ADVERT: "As dictated by our scope, content which constitutes advertising or self-promotion may be deleted from Wikimedia Commons. For the policy, see COM:PS (Project scope: Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose)." So this policy already states that content which constitutes advertising or self-promotion may (not must, and therefore presumably does not always have to be) deleted from Wikimedia Commons, and it is at least strongly suggested that this is limited by exceptions for images that are realistically useful for an educational purpose. Do I need to start a new thread on Commons talk:What Commons is not to get further clarification, or do you accept what seems to me to be a pretty unimpeachable reading of the existing policy? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:52, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- I've posted a new comment to an existing thread, Commons talk:What Commons is not#Advertising. I invite your comments and the comments of anyone else reading this thread there. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:03, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Also note that filenames can be changed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:30, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Please see Commons talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#Limits to G10: advertising and this edit summary, and feel free to participate, but it is destructive to Wikimedia to penalize users by eliminating useful images just because the motivation of the uploader was promotional. We have to have flexibility to retain images that are of educational value - in this case, pictures of a building - regardless of the motives of the uploader. I see the question of whether the uploader was an individual or an organization as irrelevant. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:40, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep We certainly don't have anywhere near as comprehensive a policy against advertising and self-promotion as (for example) en-wiki. If the description were largely promotional about their business, we could edit it; there is nothing inappropriate about a picture of a building. - Jmabel ! talk 21:31, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: note that authorship and architectural copyright issues still need to be taken into account. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:20, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- Of course. That's why files uploaded as advertisements might be the only way to get photos of certain buildings. If the photos themselves are in scope, the intension of the uploader does not change that. If the uploader is part of a marketing team, as we believe, the team is responsible of securing the necessary rights. We might of course want to seize the opportunity to ask for VRT confirmation. –LPfi (talk) 10:38, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: note that authorship and architectural copyright issues still need to be taken into account. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:20, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: I see no problem on the spam/scope side of things for images of interesting buildings -- promotional or not. However, the Philippines do not have any FoP and the building is clearly still under copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Claimed as nom's own work but this is clearly untrue unless nom is at least 130 years old 77.103.145.96 06:16, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- We would need more information on the image to determine its copyright status per UK term lengths. @Baldwintwentytwo: Could you shed some light on how you came across this picture? Felix QW (talk) 19:56, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Obviously not own work as claimed and also obviously a halftone. Eligible for
|
The copyright situation of this work is theoretically uncertain, because in the country of origin copyright lasts 70 years after the death of the author, and the date of the author's death is unknown. However, the date of creation of the work was over 120 years ago, and it is thus a reasonable assumption that the copyright has expired (see here for the community discussion). Do not use this template if the date of death of the author is known.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1929.  |
| This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. | |
Professional promo photo, no indication that uploader = copyright holder. CC licensing seems unlikely. 217.239.15.7 12:01, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- The photo was taken by photographer Alexander Paul Englert from Frankfurt. He has assigned all rights to the BSW & EWH foundation family. The photo can be used freely and his name does not have to be mentioned. Adrienne Hinze (talk) 13:35, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. That confirms that this is a copyvio. There is one right that is non-transferable by German law, and that is the Urheberrecht (inadequately translated with "copyright") which includes the right to decide on the license the picture is published by.
- So what you need is Mr Englert's assent into publishing this under a Creative Commons license. This is not something your foundation can do with the set of rights he sold you. --217.239.15.7 21:05, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:35, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Made this image 10 years ago. Time to come down from the internet. OPBLP (talk) 22:57, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Assuming you and Ollybennett2 (talk · contribs) are the same person, then wanting to remove your own image isn't a valid reason for deletion. However, I'm not liking the quality as it is a mishmash of multiple images. Delete if a better image is found; otherwise Keep as long as the image is in use. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:54, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:43, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
the photo at the bottom in the middle is made by Gerald Zugmann and taken from the official homepage of the architects (https://coop-himmelblau.at/projects/falkestrasse/). Unlikely that he allowed that. Carl Ha (talk) 12:05, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:35, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Resolution too small to idenfity anything meaningful. Braveheart (talk) 14:44, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Used in a project-space discussion in German Wikipedia. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:53, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:38, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation? This photo is from https://www.alanba.com.kw and I do not see a VRT ticket. I cannot read arabic, so I could not see whether it is allowed to have photos from this website on Commons. JopkeB (talk) 14:57, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. The website this is copied from is marked "جميع حقوق النشر محفوظة - جريدة الأنباء © 2022" which Google translates as "All rights reserved - Al-Anbaa Newspaper". Marbletan (talk) 17:45, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:38, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
This photo is from a dissertation of 2016 published in Brazil (Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Brazil), so the author and photographer cannot be dead for at least 70 years. Dissertation: Priante, Wagner Penedo. A cerâmica dos Tapajó e o desejo de formas: estudo de peças cerâmicas arqueológicas mirando potências criativas. Dissertação (Mestrado em Artes) – Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Instituto de Artes. - São Paulo, 2016, 264 p. JopkeB (talk) 15:05, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:38, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Place de Magdebourg - Demi-Finale de CAN 2019
[edit]- File:Place de Magdebourg - Demi-Finale de CAN 2019 01.jpg
- File:Place de Magdebourg - Demi-Finale de CAN 2019 03.jpg
- File:Place de Magdebourg - Demi-Finale de CAN 2019 05.jpg
- File:Place de Magdebourg - Demi-Finale de CAN 2019 06.jpg
- File:Place de Magdebourg - Demi-Finale de CAN 2019 07.jpg
- File:Place de Magdebourg - Demi-Finale de CAN 2019 08.jpg
- File:Place de Magdebourg - Demi-Finale de CAN 2019 09.jpg
- File:Place de Magdebourg - Demi-Finale de CAN 2019 10.jpg
- File:Place de Magdebourg - Demi-Finale de CAN 2019 11.jpg
- File:Place de Magdebourg - Demi-Finale de CAN 2019 12.jpg
- File:Place de Magdebourg - Demi-Finale de CAN 2019 13.jpg
- File:Place de Magdebourg - Demi-Finale de CAN 2019 14.jpg
- File:Place de Magdebourg - Demi-Finale de CAN 2019 15.jpg
- File:Place de Magdebourg - Demi-Finale de CAN 2019 16.jpg
Reasons for deletion request Series of very grainy, night time pictures dominated by glare. Absolutely no details can be recognised. --62.216.208.193 13:40, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- 62.216.208.193: There are the only images depicting this place in Sfax, Tunisia. This is the main square of the city. Some of the images are not blurry. We can keep some of them for coverage purposes. I think that File:Place de Magdebourg - Demi-Finale de CAN 2019 06.jpg, File:Place_de_Magdebourg_-_Demi-Finale_de_CAN_2019_13.jpg, File:Place_de_Magdebourg_-_Demi-Finale_de_CAN_2019_14.jpg, and File:Place de Magdebourg - Demi-Finale de CAN 2019 16.jpg can be kept. --Csisc (talk) 14:33, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - kept the best one of these more or less identical images. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:42, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
|
This media file may not fall within the project scope of Wikimedia Commons. All content on Wikimedia Commons must be realistically usable for an educational purpose, such as to be able to be used to illustrate the subject of an article on a Wikimedia project. For example, personal photos, unless they could possibly be used to illustrate a Wikipedia article for instance, may be considered to be out of scope.
Any content which falls outside the project scope might be nominated for deletion. |
- File:Darshan actor.jpg is on https://vshops.tk/ProductDetail.aspx?iid=271547743&pr=87.88
- File:Kusu banavara.jpg
- File:Filmtoday.jpg is on https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/nenapirali-prem
- File:Sadhu-Kokila.jpg is on https://starsunfolded.com/sadhu-kokila/
- File:Reeshma-Nanaiah.jpg is on https://southindianactress.in/actress-reeshma-nanaiah-photos/reeshma-nanaiah-17/
- File:Darshan Banavara.jpg
- File:-sonu-actress-indian-model.jpg is on https://www.filmytoday.com/celebs/37769/films-list/
- File:Chethan.jpg
- File:Anisha-Ambrose-photoshoot.jpg is on https://wallpapercave.com/anisha-ambrose-wallpapers
- File:All in.jpg is on https://www.imdb.com/name/nm9884007/
JopkeB (talk) 15:24, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Change of reason for DR
I am sorry, I should have paid more attention beforehand, File:Darshan actor.jpg, File:Filmtoday.jpg, File:Sadhu-Kokila.jpg, File:Reeshma-Nanaiah.jpg, File:-sonu-actress-indian-model.jpg, File:Anisha-Ambrose-photoshoot.jpg and File:All in.jpg are in use, so these files should not be deleted for being out of scope. But these photos are not made by the uploader, but from other websites (as is mentioned in the files), and I see no VRT tickets. See links next to the photos. So I change the reason for this DR to:
- Copyright violation for the files with a link mentioned above
- Out of scope, personal photos, for the others.
--JopkeB (talk) 15:53, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- What about the other photos? What's your current deletion reason for them, JopkeB? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:51, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- The others mentioned here are out of scope, personal photos, Commons is not a family album. --JopkeB (talk) 05:22, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- OK, yeah, that looks right to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:27, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:42, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by FMSky as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZisPIbh1AcQyVh_1dJzVTbaI9oveGAThRvuevnAQSU2VZuW3SF1iQPbY0Pr4Hqx4a15NVlQwjPd641Bbclx-PpfGx0aP5R3ugE6FFgHdyVsDWW4cjVxeUBBkdI-Yd4tUS-xBOlCCCRoFhnCTopBhBB0QA08xKTRz8VpF_1790Hxt44lm-npaUrjvcdmn6einb2lCS_1zvtmkVhJ3bgbLz7mUgJ9rwC4KQBBg0x3cFn0vXZRCnMHB7ABLKL1lX5Dkf7O8sVGje8F7BOltXOpnnZFIQyM-3DDPwFjY8nS5M8M6y2RPLiJbMmKDV0eJRZuTQnzgUbOUanVTRHIcICH1RVOhopwGR011A
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as Google-Images-search did not yield any prepublication. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:50, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The link did not show any prepublications therefore the file should not be deleted. Khonarh (talk) 19:07, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - very small image, no EXIF, appears in several places without a free license. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:44, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Es ist hier weder ersichtlich, dass der Hochlader, noch dass der genannte Urheber über das Urheberrecht verfügt. Urheber kann nur eine natürlich Person sein, vielleicht verfügt das genannte Unternehmen über irgendwelche Rechte, aber das Urheberrecht ist nicht dargestellt geschweige denn nachgewiesen. Irgendwelche Rechte des Hochladers, das Foto unter eine CC-Lizenz zu stellen sind nun gar nicht ersichtlich. Lutheraner (talk) 17:53, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Vermutlich ist es das Übliche, dass das Unternehmen die Nutzungsrechte an dem Foto erworben hat und nun meint, es könne damit machen, was es will. --217.239.15.7 22:26, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - © 2022 · FINANCE ist eine Marke der F.A.Z. BUSINESS MEDIA GmbH. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:48, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
The source has not released the picture with CC license HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:56, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:48, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio. The object illustrated is this Greek drinking cup, which is PD, but the photograph is taken from a book published in 1997 and still under copyright. The license wrongly describes it as a faithful copy of a two-dimensional work of art. Greek vases are not two-dimensional (this one is shaped like this and PD-Art does not apply to three-dimensional objects. Choliamb (talk) 22:50, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- You are wrong. This is a kylix tondo, yes. But there are different kind of tondos. This here is one of those. This is a flat image. 2 dimensional. Marcus Cyron (talk) 22:58, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, Marcus. I have a lot of respect for the work you have done here at the Commons over the last two decades with images of Greek and Roman art, but you're mistaken about this: I've seen this vase in person, and as the profile photo I linked above shows, the bottom is not flat, it is concave. Very shallow, yes, but not entirely flat. And the restrictions on PD-Art are clear: it does not apply to three-dimensional objects. But even if it did, the photo also fails PD-Art because it is not an exact copy: it has been altered by cropping around the circle and replacing the black glazed background outside the tondo with white. So what is described in the license as "a faithful copy of a two-dimensional work of art" is neither faithful nor two-dimensional. I understand that you may be reluctant to give it up because it is in use on a number of pages, but symposium scenes are very common on Attic red-figure pottery and there are any number of other similar but non-copyvio examples that can be used to replace it wherever it is used, including the following:
- File:Brygos Painter ARV 371 24 symposion (02).jpg
- File:Banquet scene Louvre G135 full.jpg
- File:Vatican Mus 16582 Brygos Painter kylix symposium.jpg
- File:Banqueters Met 1979.11.8.jpg
- File:Terracotta bell-krater (bowl for mixing wine and water) MET DP319827.jpg
- File:Peleus Painter ARV 1039 8 symposion - three draped youths (03).jpg
- Or if something more sexually explicit is wanted, there are plenty in Category:Sexual intercourses with hetaeras in ancient Greek pottery. Choliamb (talk) 00:14, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- I'm adding a link to a photo of the interior of a cup of similar date that shows the kind of gradual curvature I'm talking about. Whether that is enough to describe the inner surface of the cup as three-dimensional rather than two-dimensional for the purposes of PD-Art is a different matter, of course. I admit that the curvature is not obvious, especially when the tondo is viewed from head on. The larger question, I think, is whether PD-Art applies to small areas of two-dimensional decoration on larger three-dimensional objects. I have assumed that it does not, and that 3-D objects are non-starters for the Bridgeman vs. Corel defense. But perhaps that is too rigid a view. Cheers, Choliamb (talk) 13:38, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- That last image looks like the bottom of the dish (where the image is) is pretty much flat 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 08:21, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, Marcus. I have a lot of respect for the work you have done here at the Commons over the last two decades with images of Greek and Roman art, but you're mistaken about this: I've seen this vase in person, and as the profile photo I linked above shows, the bottom is not flat, it is concave. Very shallow, yes, but not entirely flat. And the restrictions on PD-Art are clear: it does not apply to three-dimensional objects. But even if it did, the photo also fails PD-Art because it is not an exact copy: it has been altered by cropping around the circle and replacing the black glazed background outside the tondo with white. So what is described in the license as "a faithful copy of a two-dimensional work of art" is neither faithful nor two-dimensional. I understand that you may be reluctant to give it up because it is in use on a number of pages, but symposium scenes are very common on Attic red-figure pottery and there are any number of other similar but non-copyvio examples that can be used to replace it wherever it is used, including the following:
.jpg){kind=link}
_MET_DP319827.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination - We strictly interpret Bridgeman -- for example, coins are not considered eligible. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:51, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
its a copyvio, look at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arms of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.svg CubanoBoi (talk) 13:47, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, per implausibility of "Source Own work Author Government of Afghanistan" and even greater implausibility of them releasing it under CC BY SA license Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 22:23, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:19, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image source is dot-com that provides no attribution. Uploader has long history of problematic uploads and appears to be incommunicative. See my post on talkpage. Eric talk 07:57, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep The image is low quality, but widely used and certainly out of copyright. A Google reverse image search reveals a complete digitalisat of the page from which this is taken, but I am seemingly too daft too find it on the webpage. Felix QW (talk) 19:53, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for running that search; I did not know about that reverse search service. I just tried in vain to find a higher-resolution version of the full page from which this image seems to have been cropped. Do we know who the third figure is on there, the one kneeling below her? That might help with a search. Eric talk 14:04, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
- Unfortunately I could only guess. I have asked at the wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities, they are usually very good at this sort of thing. Felix QW (talk) 09:56, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
- And they did it! See w:Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Humanities#Sourcing a drawing of Sybilla of Anjou. Felix QW (talk) 20:09, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Wow, they went deep! So do you think we can now be more confident that this is a reliable image of Sibylla, maybe copied from a source dating to her lifetime? Eric talk 22:43, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- I am pretty sure this is a phantasy image, actually, but so are most of the images we have for medieval figures. Another decent two-dimensional picture claiming to depict her is on this altarpiece, so one could try cropping from there for an alternative. Felix QW (talk) 10:45, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- Looks like an excuse for another trip to Bruges. Eric talk 22:33, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- I am pretty sure this is a phantasy image, actually, but so are most of the images we have for medieval figures. Another decent two-dimensional picture claiming to depict her is on this altarpiece, so one could try cropping from there for an alternative. Felix QW (talk) 10:45, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- Wow, they went deep! So do you think we can now be more confident that this is a reliable image of Sibylla, maybe copied from a source dating to her lifetime? Eric talk 22:43, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- And they did it! See w:Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Humanities#Sourcing a drawing of Sybilla of Anjou. Felix QW (talk) 20:09, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Unfortunately I could only guess. I have asked at the wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities, they are usually very good at this sort of thing. Felix QW (talk) 09:56, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for running that search; I did not know about that reverse search service. I just tried in vain to find a higher-resolution version of the full page from which this image seems to have been cropped. Do we know who the third figure is on there, the one kneeling below her? That might help with a search. Eric talk 14:04, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The image is obviously old enough to we out of copyright, and has educational value 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 08:08, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion, in public domain due to age. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:17, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(7).JPG){kind=link}
_(7).JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Almost the same as File:Kolbrandstad stavkirke (klokkebygget) (6).jpg (both uploaded by me) Ezzex (talk) 11:08, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
_(7).JPG){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Indeedous (talk) 22:42, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
_(7).JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Almost the same as File:Kolbrandstad stavkirke (3).JPG (both pictures opploaded by me) Ezzex (talk) 11:14, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Indeedous (talk) 22:43, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Turaids as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Lithuanian soldiers of XVI century.PNG
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as per Commons:Deletion policy#Duplicates (JPEG -> PNG). -- Túrelio (talk) 19:32, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Indeedous (talk) 22:44, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
A photograph created in France in the 1960-ies. No source or authorship provided. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 10:24, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Здравствуйте! Источник - Киреев Ф. С., Невская Т. А., Ратушняк В. Н., Великая Н. Н., Голованова С. А., Колесникова М. Е., Охонько Н. А., Покотилова Т. Е., Федосов П. С. Казачество в истории Северной Осетии / г. Ростов-на-Дону, Изд. «Медиаграф», 2019 г. - 525 с - ISBN 978-5-7534-1562-2. Страница 387. Этот источник указан в литературе. Вот ссылка на оригинальную фотографию https://ibb.co/TWzBnpq 2balex (talk) 11:07, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Это ничем нам не помогает. Авторы российской книги 2019 года не обладают авторским правом на сделанное во Франции фото 1960-х годов. А без выяснения вопроса о том, кто этим авторским правом обладает, загрузить фото на Викисклад нельзя. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 15:47, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Понимаю. Нужно будет найти и указать первоисточник фотографии (откуда она попала в книгу)? 2balex (talk) 05:19, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Это ничем нам не помогает. Авторы российской книги 2019 года не обладают авторским правом на сделанное во Франции фото 1960-х годов. А без выяснения вопроса о том, кто этим авторским правом обладает, загрузить фото на Викисклад нельзя. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 15:47, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:53, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
And also other sculptural variants:
- File:Значок октябрёнка (2)..jpg
- File:Oct star.jpg
- File:Little Octobrist Badge.jpg
- File:Badge. Latvia. Oktobreni — Ļeņina mazberni.jpg
- File:- Oktobreni — Ļeņina mazberni - Nozīme. Padomju Latvija.png
..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Copyrighted until 2059. Not {{PD-RU-exempt}} or {{PD-LV-exempt}}. Author is ru:Томский, Николай Васильевич (1900-1984) Alex Spade (talk) 10:27, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Comment: Not to be confused with cheap plastic variant (like File:Октябрятский значок.JPG) which used pictorial reproduction of {{PD-old-70-expired}} paint File:Lenin V I at age of 3.jpg by ru:Пархоменко, Иван Кириллович (1870-1940). Alex Spade (talk) 10:34, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:55, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Not PD-BY-exempt. "Белорусская республиканская пионерская организация" (brpo.by) is social organization, not state authority Alex Spade (talk) 10:46, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:56, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Помилкове завантаження Низька якість Сарапулов (talk) 20:14, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Юрий Д.К. as duplicate (dupe) and the most recent rationale was: IGR J16283-4838 01.tif
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as per Commons:Deletion policy#Duplicates (JPEG -> TIFF) and as to-be-deleted version is markedly cropped vs. TIFF image. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:41, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete New image has much better quality than the old one. Юрий Д.К. (talk) 15:31, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Keep first upload a cropped jpg version. --Nachcommonsverschieber (talk) 13:58, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Done - File:IGR J16283-4838.jpg - better version. Юрий Д.К. (talk) 16:07, 29 October 2022 (UTC)- Comment When we have a better quality image, the low-quality duplicate doesn't serve any purpose. Юрий Д.К., Could you please tell me why did you upload a better image as "new one"? I am in support of preserving history of any given file and feel the file should have been uploaded on this very file as a "new version". There is history since 2011 on this file. ─ The Aafī (talk) 06:16, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + replaced by IGR_J16283-4838.jpg. Ruthven (msg) 11:18, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
not own work, VRT-permission is needed Estopedist1 (talk) 09:58, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
I am to maintain this file, it was moved to Commons from itwiki--Air fans (talk) 21:06, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- In use. Evidence that's it's not own work? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:59, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- This is not my work but this file it is transferred from itwiki with File Importer Air fans (talk) 11:24, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- It's not stated to be your own work but the work of Matteo Pilia. What's the evidence that it's not a photo by Matteo Pilia? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:25, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- This is not my work but this file it is transferred from itwiki with File Importer Air fans (talk) 11:24, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
I am pinging also user:ZioNicco as an importer--Estopedist1 (talk) 11:25, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- This file was uploaded on itwiki in 2009 by Matteo Pilia. Air fans (talk) 21:00, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. File has been uploaded on it.wiki in 2009 by User:Daniele2000. But no permission from the author has been provided. Ruthven (msg) 11:21, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
DSS is copyrightː https://archive.stsci.edu/dss/copyright.html Lithopsian (talk) 14:48, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Changed credit. SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer (talk) 15:35, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: fixed. Ruthven (msg) 11:23, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
DSS is copyrightː https://archive.stsci.edu/dss/acknowledging.html Lithopsian (talk) 15:47, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- It has credit and it does not say that it is any user's own work. SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer (talk) 16:34, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- I changed the licensing SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer (talk) 17:06, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Unless otherwise specifically stated, no claim to copyright is being asserted by STScI and material on this site may be freely used as in the public domain in accordance with NASA's contract. [3]. Ruthven (msg) 11:26, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
DSS images are copyrightː https://archive.stsci.edu/dss/copyright.html Despite the claim this is an ESO image, there is no link, I can't find any trace of it at their website, and the page today and in the past claims that the image weas created using Aladin lite Lithopsian (talk) 20:34, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- Third time lucky. To be perfectly frank, I don't believe the claim that this is an image originating at ESO. There is no link given here, I can't find any trace of it at eso.org, the image was initially uploaded with the claim that it was an Aladin Lite image and it still makes that claim today. If the creator removes the nomination tag again, I will consider this evidence of bad faith and escalate it for administrator action. Nomination discussions are closed by an administrator, occasionally another third party, once arguments have been presented. Lithopsian (talk) 20:39, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: see above. Ruthven (msg) 11:27, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
The given permissions link does not apply to this image. DSS is copyrightː https://archive.stsci.edu/dss/copyright.html Lithopsian (talk) 20:12, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: see above. No further information given which would justify a deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:39, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Funeral Procession for One of the Victims of the Kanjuruhan Stadium Stampede in Nglegok, Blitar, East Java.jpg
[edit]
"This file is in the public domain in Indonesia, because it is published and distributed by the Government of Republic of Indonesia, according to Article 43 of Law 28 of 2014 on copyrights" does not apply Polarlys (talk) 20:24, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info, if it applies, so it will be the same for all Indonesian police HQ images here Fikri RA (talk) 00:52, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: The image that your mentioned are more likely to be licensed under CC-BY-SA-3.0 instead of PD-IDGov. 125.167.57.167 03:25, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, that license? I'll check it later, because the source are from external (police) Fikri RA (talk) 03:40, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: © 2021 All Right Reserved Tribratanews Polres Blitar Kota. Ruthven (msg) 11:29, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
{{SD|G10|all this file shows is products for sale; these aren't standardised or well-known shakuhachi varieties}} Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 12:25, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Chris (Coline) Apparently you do not read English correctly, this photograph and its text, respond to an innovative design proposal that shows the progress of this instrument in its mouthpiece. It does not correspond at all to the marketing of a product. This article and photo are original and try to illustrate a historical process in the evolution of the shakuhachi. The photographs are authentic and have the master's permission to publish. Koumori1 (talk) 15:16, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- You mean they do not read Spanish well. I'd like to keep this photo, but it will be necessary to contact the COM:VRT and demonstrate that there is indeed permission to share this photo under a Creative Commons license. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:57, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- i meant spanish. yes!. The article talk about the evolution design of shakuhachi mouthpiece, this is about the art state. And yes, I have the permission to use this photo. it is my picture. Koumori1 (talk) 18:43, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- Contact COM:VRT. Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
- i meant spanish. yes!. The article talk about the evolution design of shakuhachi mouthpiece, this is about the art state. And yes, I have the permission to use this photo. it is my picture. Koumori1 (talk) 18:43, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- You mean they do not read Spanish well. I'd like to keep this photo, but it will be necessary to contact the COM:VRT and demonstrate that there is indeed permission to share this photo under a Creative Commons license. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:57, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Koumori1: – there's no Spanish on the image, so I'm not sure what you're talking about. In fact, there's no text indicating that these are historical shakuhachi varieties at all – only the text "JIARI SERIES" with what appears to be product names or numbers underneath. If these aren't products for sale, then I apologise, but "BX3", "HB2" and "SBB" are not descriptive of the type of flute shown – they sound like items in a product range.
- However, I don't think I'm wrong here. A quick search shows that these are items in a product range. I'm assuming that you're the owner of Zapata Signature Shakuhachi, based on this edit where you identify yourself as such. A quick search for "zapata signature shakuhachi" throws up this – the Jiari range of shakuhachi for sale on your website. It even states that the BX3 Koumori is a product for sale.
- "It does not correspond at all to the marketing of a product" is patently false. The flutes shown are the products in the top left-hand corner, which are varieties of shakuhachi designed by yourself. It's not that they're wrong, fake or inauthentic – they're non-notable, and non-notable advertising is not encyclopedic. They may be new, modern takes on historical varieties – that's fine, I've nothing against that. Innovation is necessary in all fields, and your website shows that you clearly know your stuff.
- But this is an advertising image, unlike File:Tipos de boquilla.jpg you uploaded, which genuinely shows the historical progression of shakuhachi mouthpieces. You were told on your Talk page in January that your additions to the article "List of shakuchachi players" were not notable, and I have had to spend time cleaning up your additions – some of which are great, but some of which were pure advertising.
- This file doesn't add to Wikipedia, nor can it be used in the article on shakuhachi. Not everything, everyone, or every innovation is notable, and this is not notable. Even if it's been licensed for use here, it isn't something we can use.Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 11:42, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- Photos that promote new products can be useful, though, as long as they are not misrepresented. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:39, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: surely they have to be notable?Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 11:17, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Potentially useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:23, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: surely they have to be notable?Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 11:17, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Photos that promote new products can be useful, though, as long as they are not misrepresented. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:39, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The file is in scope on Commons, because it is in use today on Spanish Wikipedia. However the logo and possibly the design of the flutes might be copyrighted. Therefore the image must be deleted for now per COM:PRP. @Koumori1: , please follow the procedure described on VRT to show you own the copyright of the photo. If succesfull, the image can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:39, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
