Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/09/25
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![27 File:Gautampant.JPG".jpg](#File:Gautampant.JPG".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_4x3_(rectangle).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_edit.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Wellcome_M0000116.jpg){kind=link}
_Wellcome_V0027138.jpg){kind=link}
Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 00:12, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:21, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 00:13, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Used for self promo on wikidata.
- File:Amirhosseinpour3.jpg
- File:Amirhosseinpour4.jpg
- File:Amirhosseinpour2.jpg
- File:Amirhosseinpour.jpg
- File:Amirhosseinpour1.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:58, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:53, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope, the file name seems to be a "rent these speakers". Taichi (talk) 06:21, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:56, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope. For promotional issues. Taichi (talk) 06:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:57, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Finesse Ring Girls (talk · contribs)
[edit]Clearly not own work. Permission/source needed.
- File:Quest ring girl.jpg
- File:Usa ring girls.jpg
- File:Orla ring girl.jpg
- File:Presenter ring girl.jpg
- File:Carla Jade Beach.jpg
- File:Round card girl.jpg
- File:Carla jade.jpg
- File:Coco lodge.jpg
- File:Finesse Ring Girls Tay.jpg
- File:Ring Girls 1.jpg
- File:Ring Girl.jpg
- File:Ring Girls.jpg
- File:Ring girls.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:11, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Promo photos. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Fausse manoeuvre, aurait dû être téléchegé sur FRwiki au lieu de Commons - Wrong action, should have been uploaded on FRwiki instead of Commons - non-free logo Cortomaltais (talk) 15:24, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Changed to speedy delete --Cortomaltais (talk) 15:33, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 17:57, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Bastiangeno (talk) 15:08, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Vandalism G3, user blocked indef. --Achim55 (talk) 18:40, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
low resolution file Basavaraj M (talk) 08:41, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Keep Nice overview, useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:09, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Nice overview, useful, unfortunately for Commons deletion requested by uploader within minutes of original upload. (Why are you uploading good photos, then requesting them be deleted?). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:44, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
low resolution file Basavaraj M (talk) 08:42, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Valuable photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:09, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Good valuable photo, but unfortunately for Commons, nominated for deletion by uploader within minutes of original upload. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:42, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
low resolution file Basavaraj M (talk) 08:42, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Good, usable photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:08, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Good, usable photo, but unfortunately for Commons, nominated for deletion by uploader within minutes of initial upload. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:41, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
low resolution file Basavaraj M (talk) 08:43, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Perfectly usable photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:07, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per request by uploader minutes after upload. (Nice photo. I hope you'll share more.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:40, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright? Kazman322 (talk) 12:30, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Comment Ridiculous "Source" and "Author" texts, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:01, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per above; given "Source" and "Author" are not just ridiculous, but insulting to Wikimedia Commons. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:38, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright 2601:246:C280:9000:DC8:9220:5625:F3CF 15:17, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:35, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Stolen porn, trolling Dronebogus (talk) 18:11, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Godawful penis pic, vandalism Dronebogus (talk) 18:12, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Vandalism, clearly from some copyrighted game Dronebogus (talk) 18:13, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Probably a retouched screenshot from the movie Jurassic World Goji1895 (talk) 18:38, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Mistake with way of upload, need to delete it after I was granted an approval for using the image by Naftali himself Meitar95 (talk) 18:42, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:11, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The original file was already deleted for being a possible copyvio Ur Nan123 (talk) 20:45, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (derivative of image deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pääministeri Marin Strasbourgissa 12.-13.9.2022 - 52354798269.jpg). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
scanned brochure, published 2004 in Germany, bogus PD-textlogo license FASTILY 21:04, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; DW, false license claims. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:08, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Poor quality image 2600:100C:A203:FD7F:A127:A320:59CD:4CFC 21:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Speedy keep COM:INUSE and not a valid reason for deletion. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:24, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per SHB2000 (an example of "banner" photos used in some projects). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:06, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
non-creative images taken in Italy are in the public domain if prior to 1976. this image was taken in Italy in 1987. Andr€a (talk) 10:28, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Own file by Indeciso42 correctly released. Blackcat 
01:38, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Non-creative images taken in Italy are in the public domain if prior to 1976. This image was taken in Italy in 1988. Andr€a (talk) 18:20, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Own work released by the author. Blackcat 01:34, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Non-free licenses Plostvaler (talk) 13:14, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 10:09, 29 September 2022 UTC: as per COM:SPEEDY. --Krdbot 13:26, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Because it is Blurry Padhiyar.official (talk) 22:23, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Dubious listing. One of series of photos from the International Space Station. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:14, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per Infrogmation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:10, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 17:13, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
i dont want it GAUTAM PANT (talk) 14:48, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
![14:48, 25 September 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/09/25#c-GAUTAM_PANT-20220925144800-File:Gautampant.JPG".jpg){kind=link}
Delete by courtesy & F10 --Achim55 (talk) 18:37, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Unused user photo, uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:36, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 17:16, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
![17:16, 1 October 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/09/25#c-Strakhov-20221001171600-File:Gautampant.JPG".jpg){kind=link}
Blurry / black photo with no sensible description or categories. Thuresson (talk) 22:55, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; OOS useless. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:05, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, useless. --Strakhov (talk) 17:19, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
bad quality image which is not in use. we already have a good picture showing this pair of 1857 watercolours Zello (talk) 23:02, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment What is the superior version? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:04, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- This:
- This:
Kept: IMHO a different version of the same original art work. Both files can coexist in Commons. Everyone feel free to use the one they deem better. --Strakhov (talk) 17:23, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- You're right. In this case I made a mistake. This image should be deleted. -- Ies (talk) 15:34, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:37, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Because is not him. Just not him. Why is on wikipedia? Is popular or famous? JustMusicLoft (talk) 14:32, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Right now, the file is in use. Let's reconsider when the article it's used in is deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:58, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment No longer in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:38, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Crosswiki vandalism and sabotage. Involved users: MusicandFun494 (talk · contributions · Statistics), MusicEDMLive (talk · contributions · Statistics), JustMusicLoft (talk · contributions · Statistics), MusicLovers007 (talk · contributions · Statistics). MexTDT (talk) 01:25, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- All users have made contributions related to Darius Dominte and were created within less than 36 hours.
- MusicEDMLive created the article on the Japanese and French Wikipedia.
- MusicandFun494 created the article on the Spanish Wikipedia and a draft on the Polish Wikipedia.
- MusicLovers007 edited the Spanish article and uploaded this image file.
- JustMusicLoft started to vandalize several pages in Commons, Japanese Wikipedia and Spanish Wikipedia translating the same tagline: "Delete Because is not him. Just not him. Why is on wikipedia? Is popular or famous?"
- MexTDT (talk) 01:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:38, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by copyvio sockfarm
[edit]- File:NDPHook.jpg
- File:Yeo'sTruckSGP.jpg
- File:MrBeanDishes.jpg
- File:MrBeanSGPancakes.jpg
- File:MrBeanNovena.jpg
- File:MrBeanSGShibuya.jpg
- File:Wetfloorsignsgp.jpg
- File:OttersSGP.jpg
- File:SPGroupSGP.jpg
- File:HawParVillaSG2.jpg
- File:HawParVillaSG.jpg
- File:HawParVillaStation.jpg
- File:Map of the Sentosa Express.png
- File:KillineyKopitiamSG.png
- File:Kayatoastkopikillineykopitiamsg.jpg
- File:Kayatoastkopikillineykopitiamsg1.jpg
- File:Sgchangiairportlogo.png
- File:MuseumOfIceCreamSGP2.jpg
- File:MuseumOfIceCreamSGP3.jpg
- File:MuseumOfIceCreamSGP.jpg
- File:IceKacangSG.jpg
- File:IceKacangSG2.jpg
- File:Singaporeconstructionsigns.jpg
- File:SingaporebusADE3.jpg
- File:Ham chim peng singapore.jpg
- File:DBS Marina Bay HQ.jpg
- File:DBS Marina Bay HQ (2).jpg
- File:DBS Marina Bay HQ (3).jpg
- File:National Gallery Singapore SGP.jpg
- File:Parliament and Skyline of Singapore.jpg
- File:PokkaILTCSGP.jpg
- File:Pokka24ILTCSGP.png
- File:PadangSingapore4.jpg
- File:PadangSingapore3.jpg
- File:PadangSingapore2.jpg
- File:PadangSingapore5.jpg
- File:Greateasternsingapore.jpg
- File:NOGSG4.jpg
- File:NOGSG6.jpg
- File:NOGSG2.jpg
- File:NOGSG13.jpg
- File:SingaporeSciencePark.png
- File:SingaporeSEAgames1993.png
- File:TatsumaYoshida.jpg
- File:Singaporefootballteam2017.jpg
- File:TatsumaYoshida2.jpg
- File:SingaporeNationalStadiumLogo.png
- File:SingaporeLaksaPrimaTaste.png
- File:OldChangKeeSG.jpg
- File:OldChangKeeSG2.jpg
- File:OldChangKeeSG1.jpg
- File:OldChangKeeSG3.jpg
- File:OldChangKeeSG4.jpg
- File:Oldchangkeesglogo.png
- File:OldChangKeeSG5.jpg
- File:Singaporeport.jpg
- File:Haw Par Corporation.png
- File:Haw Par Tiger Balm.jpg
- File:Ya Kun Logo.png
- File:Nationalstadiumexterior.png
- File:SSHLogo.png
- File:Sportshubexteriorview.png
- File:Sgnationalstadium.png
- File:Glorysgkaya.jpg
- File:Kayagreensg.jpg
- File:Singaporekayabrownandgreen.jpg
- File:Toastboxkaya.jpg
- File:Singaporekayagreenandbrown.jpg
- File:Chua Chu Kang Stadium.jpg
- File:Bishan Stadium 2.jpg
- File:Hougang Stadium.jpg
- File:Jalan Besar Stadium 2.jpg
- File:Jalan Besar Stadium 3.jpg
- File:Jurong East Stadium 2.jpg
- File:Jalan Besar Stadium 5.jpg
- File:Jalan Besar Stadium 4.jpg
- File:Jurong West Stadium 2.jpg
- File:PokkaSGLogo.png
- File:PokkaJPLogo.png
- File:Straits Settlements.png
- File:SGNational&IndoorStadiumPostcard.jpg
- File:SGNDP1980s2.jpg
- File:SGNDP1980s.jpg
- File:SGYouthFestival1988.jpg
- File:SingaporeNationalStadium1980s.jpg
- File:SingaporeNationalStadiumEntrance1980s.jpg
- File:HDBPlayground.jpg
- File:HDBFitnessCentre.png
- File:SkyVilleDawson1.jpg
- File:SkyVilleDawson2.jpg
- File:StrathmoreGreen.jpg
- File:JayChouInSingapore.jpg
- File:BTSInSingapore.jpg
- File:SingaporeAirportMap.png
- File:BreadTalk.jpg
- File:BreadTalkSGP.jpg
- File:BreakTalkBreads.jpg
- File:Chickenricesgptoastbox.jpg
- File:ToastBox.jpg
- File:Toastboxkayatoast.jpg
- File:Toastboxkayatoasthalfboiledegg.jpg
- File:ToastBoxSGP.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Cleanup for this sockfarm which serially uploads copyvios has been a bit piecemeal (starting here). Most of the files deleted so far have been taken from social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. (An example which was claimed by someone is here.) Generally the exif is scrubbed, and they include logos, scans and postcards, professional shots, and obvious marketing images, among the more blatant copyvios. In the interest of cleaning up these serial copyvios (especially considering the precautionary principle) while reducing admin load I thought it best to put together this list of remaining files. There are undoubtedly more out there, but may as well clean up what can be cleaned up. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 16:42, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:41, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
no description, no cats, not localizable Joschi71 (talk) 17:16, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Location categories added since nomination. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:32, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:47, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:42, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lego Technic 8216 - Turbo 1
[edit]COM:DW of complex models/designs by Lego; see also COM:TOYS.
- File:Lego-technic-8216-detail-heck.jpg
- File:Lego-technic-8216-detail.jpg
- File:Lego-technic-8216-formel1-racer.jpg
- File:Lego-technic-8216-heck.jpg
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:43, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:43, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lego Mars Mission
[edit]COM:DW of complex models/designs by Lego; see also COM:TOYS.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:55, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:44, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Katherinedrib (talk) 19:15, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:45, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Vinícius Boaventura (talk) 01:57, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:46, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Used for promo on en.wp. No other use.
- File:David Arce - DlagTV.jpg
- File:David Arce DlagTV.jpg
- File:David Arce .jpg - Used to illustrate a fat person, so kept --George Chernilevsky talk 17:07, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- File:David Arce aka DlagTV.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:59, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:07, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Spam. Uploaded by Long term abuse Andres camilo ruiz.
- File:Message from Brayan Rivas.wav
- File:Feels by Brayan Rivas.jpg
- File:Brayan Rivas Logo.png
- File:You Dont Know Me By Brayan Rivas.jpg
SCP-2000 07:18, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, deleted remaining two files. --Strakhov (talk) 16:24, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
SupportThis flag is fictitious Waran18 (talk) 09:01, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:37, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 11:20, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:08, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 11:21, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:09, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 11:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:09, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Ahmed der 7. oder AH7 Ist auf diesem Bild zusehen wie man sieht ist er sehr müde von seinen Heldentaten da er Heute 10std am Stück kämpfte das ist sehr Lange für ihn.jpg
[edit]
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 11:48, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Cartoon of unknown copyright origin and out-of-scope. Pierre cb (talk) 12:56, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:09, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope. Poor quality. SCP-2000 12:01, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:10, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:11, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:12, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:12FactorsApp OverView v1.6.png
- File:12FactorsApp DetailledView v1.6.png
- File:WHY DevOps Think BIG (part) v3.8.png
- File:API World v2.1.png
_v3.8.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:13, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:40, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE, and COM:NOTHOST. People are not identified, so may not be notable. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:52, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Decent photo, but if the bar code is considered a watermark, the image would be per se inadmissible. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:52, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Personal photo by user who uploaded this in 2018, and has no other contributions. Yes, decent photo - of two unidentified people in unidentified location. OOS. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:34, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment They're on a boat, and the point is that it could be kept as a portrait. But since I suspect the bar code is a type of inadmissible watermark, I will not argue strongly for keeping the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:13, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bootmuncher (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality COM:NUDITY
Dronebogus (talk) 18:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:14, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
personal photo, used at Wikidata:User:Dananja Madushanka, but non-contributor Estopedist1 (talk) 18:33, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:15, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
_4x3_(rectangle).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_4x3_(rectangle).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright from ANATEL Librero2109 (talk) 21:28, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
_4x3_(rectangle).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:16, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
_4x3_(rectangle).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright from ANATEL Librero2109 (talk) 21:30, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:16, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright from ANATEL Librero2109 (talk) 21:30, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:16, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright from ANATEL Librero2109 (talk) 21:30, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:16, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is my photo that was uploaded by me (I changed my nickname after that, so it is different in summary) to use at Wikipedia personal page but a long time it is not used and won't be used again. The photo has no value for Wiki. Kanafana (talk) 23:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom; unused personal photo. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:03, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:15, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is my own picture, I replace it with another one, more recent picture. Cu6Si6O18.6H2O (talk) 15:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 17:49, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 00:07, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Cambodia A1Cafel (talk) 07:40, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 00:08, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This design never belonged to Greg Stewart and was never released to public domain. I am the creator of this design and I have the dated files to prove it. This work is stolen. Strangebrownbag (talk) 00:06, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:19, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal logo, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 00:13, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:20, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Doubtful this is own work. Is this below COM:TOO, and thus in the public domain? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:34, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:21, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, and I think this is above COM:TOO. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:38, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:21, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
The source does not release this file, but does credit it to DIEGO SPIVACOW / AFV, which indicates that this is a photo from a newswire. The site states Todos los derechos reservados, so this appears to be a copyright violation. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:22, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Appears to be graffiti, not mural. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:23, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:23, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:23, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Probably not PD, no real basis to think it is. The original uploader agrees, uploaded before really understanding these issues. Jmabel ! talk 04:53, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:24, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Honduras A1Cafel (talk) 07:00, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:25, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Seems to be an app logo already existing in 2014 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 08:28, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:31, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Photograph of an album CoffeeEngineer (talk) 08:31, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:31, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 08:32, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:32, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of an Android app CoffeeEngineer (talk) 08:34, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:31, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
There is a copyright notice in the text under the source video: "℗ & © 2006 - Stuffed Monkey" Iwego (talk) 08:39, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:32, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Possible ad for a mortgage company CoffeeEngineer (talk) 08:39, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:33, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
low resolution file Basavaraj M (talk) 08:41, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I didn't notice the date of the upload before. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:54, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Adequate resolution for article use. No requirement to delete. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:34, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a professional wrestling company CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:01, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:35, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a professional wrestling company CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:01, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; CV, false claims. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:35, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
unclear copyright and probably copyright violation: only contribution of the user Hoyyjoya, who is also a CAOU user on EN wp. .Anja. (talk) 09:02, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:35, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a professional wrestling company CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:02, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:36, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 19:25, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=840324186#File:PCW-Ultra.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
very likely violation copyright; only contribution of Hoyjoya who is also a CAOU on EN WP .Anja. (talk) 09:05, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:36, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused graphic CzarJobKhaya (talk) 19:03, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (and rather dubious license claim). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:55, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
unknown photographer Goesseln (talk) 19:04, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Taken from webpage with clear copyright notice; no indication of claimed free license. (Too bad this was put in use in multiple projects apparently without anyone bothering to check). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:52, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:IRELAND#Stamps, the copyright of stamps of Ireland published after 1 January 1984 are copyrighted by An Post. I see no evidence of release of this stamp under a free license, so I believe this should be deleted as lacking evidence of a free license. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 20:04, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:51, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope, not for encyclopedic use. Taichi (talk) 20:18, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: apparent copyviol. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:50, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
The source for this image neither claims to be the copyright holder of this image nor claims to provide a free license for this image. As such, I see no evidence of a valid free license and this should be deleted as a violation of our licensing policy. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 20:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:49, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Rémy Duval died in 1984. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:CD36:8569:C6F6:711E 20:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Artist of France, work still under copyright by heirs; no reason this would be an exception offered; taken from Tumblr. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:48, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
own work? Seems to be a screenshot or copypaste of another source Ezarateesteban 20:54, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unused & uncat since 2017. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
own work? Slow resolution, no metadata Ezarateesteban 21:01, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused, lacking context. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:43, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
own work? Slow resolution, no metadata. Copyvio? Ezarateesteban 21:01, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused, only incidental category, lacking context info. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:43, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
The author of the photo is unknown, but there is no evidence of an anonymous publication. According to the source, this photo was taken in 1918, which means it is less than 120 years old. Iwego (talk) 09:31, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep It meets the license for "PD-EU-no author disclosure", publication is being made public, not appearing in a magazine, if it was shown this image remained with the photographer, I would agree it was never made public. --RAN (talk) 05:31, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:29, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
The author of the photo is unknown, but there is no evidence of an anonymous publication. According to the source, this photo was taken in 1918, which means it is less than 120 years old. Iwego (talk) 09:32, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep It meets the license for "PD-EU-no author disclosure", publication is being made public, not appearing in a magazine, if it was shown this image remained with the photographer, I would agree it was never made public. --RAN (talk) 05:31, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:31, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
The author of the photo is unknown, but there is no evidence of an anonymous publication. According to the source, this photo was taken during the World War I (1914-1918), which means it is less than 120 years old. Iwego (talk) 09:38, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Might or might not be PD for some reason, but without actual source info that cannot be determined. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:28, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright © by Z FILMS INC. MCMLXXXII Iwego (talk) 09:49, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination; copyviol, false claims. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:27, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I uploaded it by mistake Xtrls (talk) 10:09, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:26, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely own work. Leonel Sohns 10:41, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - clearly not the work of the uploader as claimed, but a screenshot of Windows proprietary software under a non-free licence. Obvious copyright violation. - Ahunt (talk) 13:24, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:25, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Die Brille AH7s ohne sie er nicht der Superheld wäre den wir heute kennen AH7 ist sehr Stark durch die Brille Wolken sind auf dem Bild zusehen.jpg
[edit]
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 11:49, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep This is an art composition that seems in-scope. However, it should be renamed to a more descriptive title. Pierre cb (talk) 12:52, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per above. Obvious possible use in an article about reflections, reflections on lenses, reflections in photography. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:40, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:25, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 11:50, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep You mean no encyclopedic use that's obvious to you. My question would be whether this is some kind of trademarked toy that can't be used for that reason, but otherwise, it's a cube with a particular pattern and there's no reason why it couldn't be useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:03, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep This seems to be a modified Rubik's cube, totally in-scope. However it should be renamed according instead of the actual unrelated name file. Pierre cb (talk) 12:50, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. (Renaming mighte be useful, but is not a deletion issue.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:24, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Image is probably copyrighted but dubiously listed under a Creative Commons license Goji1895 (talk) 13:18, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:22, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
_-_edit.jpg){kind=link}
_-_edit.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Oursana as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Porträt des Carl Georg Adolph Hasenpflug (Holzstich).jpg|keep the other older and smaller file with same pixels.
Not an exact or scaled-down duplicate -- one has a watermark -- so not eligible for speedy. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:04, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
_-_edit.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep this one and delete the other one because of the watermark. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:56, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The files are different, this one is a derivate work from the other. I'm confused, I don't understand why this file in use should be deleted. Also I was not notified the speedy deletion. --Phyrexian ɸ 17:00, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion; no requirement to delete and no consensus to do so. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:16, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
_-_edit.jpg){kind=link}
Text-only file, should be wikitext GeorgHH • talk 15:57, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unused, no evident in-scope usefulness. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:15, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Matr4x-404 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The file in licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0 . This is because on archlinux.org/art, It states the sourcefiles for the artwork are at sources.archlinux.org/other/artwork/. If you download the tarball (here) and expand it, there is a COPYING file. This file states that this work is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0.
I've updated the to use [2], which is GNU GPL v2 per [3]. Is revdel required for the others? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:11, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
![[2]](https://github.com/archlinux/archweb/blob/master/public/static/logos/archlinux-logo-dark-scalable.svg){kind=link}
- Hello, I have never used revdel, so I'm pretty unsure whether its needed. Matr4x-404 (talk) 20:16, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- By the way, I contacted Thayer Williams (the person who made the logo) via email and he stated the following:
- Hi there,
- I am forwarding your request to the trademark team, as technically I forfeited ownership of the logo to Arch dev team once it was adopted by the project. Hopefully they can provide further clarification.
- Regards,
- Thayer
- Waiting for further correspondence
- Matr4x-404 (talk) 20:07, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I've just realized I missed something obvious. On archlinux.org/art, It says the following: "The following Arch Linux logos are available for press and other use, subject to the restrictions of our trademark policy.". At section 1.3 of the trademark policy, it disallows commercial use. This is not allowed on Commons, and therefore the image must be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matr4x-404 (talk • contribs) 14:52, 1 October 2022 (UTC) Matr4x-404 (talk) 14:57, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:14, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Election Posters with Image of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and Sheikh Mujibur Rahman - Chittagong Hill Tracts - Bangladesh (13185308883).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 16:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:13, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
nothing to see, no description, no cats, no use Joschi71 (talk) 17:14, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Since categorized for location. Rather low res, but we have only a few images of that park. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:12, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
This is a low-quality photograph of an unnamed person that is simply labeled "Foto of mine". I'm doubtful that this is within COM:SCOPE given that it seems to be a low-quality black-and-white photo of a random person that is partially obscured by someone's hair; I don't see how this would be realistically useful for educational purposes. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:15, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Good argument, except it's in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per Ikan Kekek. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:11, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
no description, no cats, not localizable Joschi71 (talk) 17:15, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: Clearly the same location as File:Endpoint01.jpg. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:48, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per @Ikan Kekek: - if one is able to the identify the location of an unidentified photo, adding that info to the photo page is often helpful. I have added relevant categories from other file. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:06, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- I try to do that. Sorry I missed this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:26, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks! -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:52, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
The picture, claimed as own work by the uploader, is watermarked with "ORF live". ORF is the public broadcaster of Austria, but COM:NOP Austria indicates that Austria's exemptions to copyright for government works are very limited and it does not appear that works of the ORF are exempt from copyright. As such, this appears to be a screenshot of a copyrighed broadcast for which I cannot find any evidence of a free license, so this should be deleted as a likely copyright violation. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW, false claim, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:07, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lego Worlds
[edit]Screenshots (or other COM:DW) of copyrighted video game.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:07, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:02, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope, unclear what this represents Dronebogus (talk) 18:21, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep In use, so can't be out of scope by definition. Jilat jari is Malay/Indonesian for "finger licking". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:45, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Ikan Kekek. Category:Licking added. Unfortunately rather poor quality photo, but in use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:00, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jamaludin FN as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10. Re-nominating due to prior discussion; but seems to no longer be COM:INUSE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:55, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek It doesn’t seem to have been removed recently by the nominator, which is good, but means I have no way of finding where it was in use. Do you remember? Brianjd (talk) 12:45, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- It was still in use as of no earlier than Oct. 7; see the previous deletion request thread. If it lacks a free license, though, it needs to be deleted on that basis, so I'll cross out my vote for that reason, but I find it generally concerning that files that were recently kept immediately get nominated for deletion again when they've been removed from Wikipedia articles. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:36, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek Your reply doesn’t answer my question.
- I also find it concerning when a recently used file is nominated for deletion, which is why I checked whether the nominator was the one who removed it. Unfortunately, I have no way of investigating further. Was the file removed by a vandal? Was it removed after extensive discussion? Was it somewhere in between? Did it turn out that the file shouldn’t have been used there to begin with? These answers would be relevant to the discussion here, and if someone remembers where the file was used, it would help.
- For what it’s worth, the previous deletion request was linked from the file’s talk page, so the nominator should have seen it. Brianjd (talk) 03:49, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
- See Commons:Village pump/Technical#Previously used, but currently unused, files. Brianjd (talk) 03:54, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
- I don't remember what article it was used in, so I can't look up the article history in id.wikipedia, sorry. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:35, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
- I just realised that I should check the uploader’s contributions too; I found that they added the image to id:Lonte (equivalent of en:Slut) on 24 September 2022, the same day as they uploaded it. It was then removed by another user on 21 October 2022.
- In that article, it was captioned: Seorang gadis yang menjilati jari telunjuknya; merupakan tindakan asusila yang umum di internet. (DuckDuckGo translation: A girl licking her index finger; is a common immoral act on the internet.)
- This doesn’t really suggest that the file is useful.
- Having said that, the file (which appears to be a still from the cited video) shows a girl holding her index finger vertically and licking it in the middle; I do not see any other images in the categories Human licking or Erotic licking like this. So it may be useful. Brianjd (talk) 15:14, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
- I don't remember what article it was used in, so I can't look up the article history in id.wikipedia, sorry. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:35, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
- See Commons:Village pump/Technical#Previously used, but currently unused, files. Brianjd (talk) 03:54, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
- It was still in use as of no earlier than Oct. 7; see the previous deletion request thread. If it lacks a free license, though, it needs to be deleted on that basis, so I'll cross out my vote for that reason, but I find it generally concerning that files that were recently kept immediately get nominated for deletion again when they've been removed from Wikipedia articles. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:36, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I was going to say that the description (Salam 501 — .Examples of popular immoral acts, which are exposed on the internet.) is concerning, but then realised that the cited source provides no indication of a free licence. Brianjd (talk) 12:48, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete copyvio per Brianjd. --HyperGaruda (talk) 18:41, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per Brianjd. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:17, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lallint as Copyvio (Copyvio)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as source-site is under a CC license. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:04, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- How is this not incredibly obviously a copyvio? It's a 4chan screenshot. Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 18:10, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- How should I know? You just wrote "copyvio" w/o any further information.
- Anyway, I now found that it's discussed at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:The Backrooms.--Túrelio (talk) 18:42, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Ellywa. --Rosenzweig τ 11:13, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Urheber ist nicht der Fotograf Dirk Lenke (talk) 16:13, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Sigrun stellte mir dieses Foto 2010 für den Katalog für die Ausstellung in Schwelm zur Verfügung. Sie konnte mir damals schon nicht sagen, wer der Fotograf war. Kann man mit Autor unbekannt zurechtkommen oder sollte ich besser ein Foto von mir hochladen? MalerFrank (talk) 08:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- @MalerFrank: Wenn du ein selbst fotografiertes Bild hochladen kannst, ist es definitiv besser. Das hier werden wir wegen urheberrechtlicher Probleme löschen müssen. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 17:51, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Diese Datei kann gelöscht werden, ich habe ein eigenes Foto hochgeladen. Beste Grüße
- Frank MalerFrank (talk) 11:55, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
- @MalerFrank: Wenn du ein selbst fotografiertes Bild hochladen kannst, ist es definitiv besser. Das hier werden wir wegen urheberrechtlicher Probleme löschen müssen. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 17:51, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 11:58, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyvio + is that literally a photo of a screen? Dronebogus (talk) 02:44, 4 March 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 15:27, 14 March 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 12:50, 26 March 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:28, 26 March 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope garbage Dronebogus (talk) 21:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:33, 3 April 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope junk
Dronebogus (talk) 00:08, 30 April 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:09, 30 April 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope
Dronebogus (talk) 12:17, 6 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:07, 6 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS junk files Dronebogus (talk) 12:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 20:08, 12 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
More OOS junk
Dronebogus (talk) 16:30, 15 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 06:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC) Out of scope junk Dronebogus (talk) 22:07, 20 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:10, 21 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS crap junk Dronebogus (talk) 04:20, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
No copyright info + OOS Dronebogus (talk) 05:18, 10 June 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. Yann (talk) 11:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted I'm closing this since the files were already deleted. Feel free to revert if there's a reason the discussion should still be open. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:57, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Load of OOS crap This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
More OOS crap Dronebogus (talk) 05:54, 23 June 2022 (UTC) Deleted I'm closing this since the files were already deleted. Feel free to revert me if there's a reason the discussion should still be open. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Oos garbage Dronebogus (talk) 15:39, 26 June 2022 (UTC) Deleted I'm closing this since the files were already deleted. Feel free to revert if there's a reason the discussion should still be open. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:01, 2 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 20:27, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 13:56, 2 July 2022 (UTC) Deleted --Adamant1 (talk) 05:34, 3 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
That was fast. More junk as usual Dronebogus (talk) 01:32, 4 July 2022 (UTC) Deleted The images were deleted. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 18:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:50, 26 September 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 20:49, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:23, 28 September 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 14:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nom, some apparent copyviols from social media. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:58, 7 October 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope crap Dronebogus (talk) 05:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:44, 15 October 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Garbagé de OOS Dronebogus (talk) 11:06, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 11:58, 20 October 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 18:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:41, 2 November 2022 (UTC) |
_2.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_posted_on_Instagram_CPvlHbYFa7t(JPG).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Files in Category:1
[edit]Instagram crap
Dronebogus (talk) 11:05, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:49, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:1
[edit]Usual collection of Instagram crap
Dronebogus (talk) 01:55, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:23, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:1
[edit]Oos garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 22:35, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:40, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:1
[edit]Usual oos crap
Dronebogus (talk) 12:41, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Derivative work of logo. Source country is unknown, so we cannot be sure in freedom of panorama. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:1
[edit]Personal spam and potential copyright violations
- File:Azmy Ehab21.jpg
- File:BALSA EUCLIDES.webp
- File:JARDIM BALNEARIO EUCLIDES.webp
- File:MAPA EUCLIDES.webp
- File:Moatazelmasry1632004.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 01:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:37, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Germany#Stamps Wdwd (talk) 12:58, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The artist is Brigitte von der Linde (from the city of Sindelfingen). I couldn't find a date of death or birth for her and don't know if she's still alive, so the file can be restored in 2100 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 11:06, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
The author of the photo is unknown, but there is no evidence of an anonymous publication. According to the source, this photo was taken in 1917, which means it is less than 120 years old. Iwego (talk) 09:28, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 19:21, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
A similar file by uploader has FB metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:24, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:55, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
The "CC-BY-SA-4.0" license is not specified on the source page, I think this file is mislicensed. — Metamorforme42 (talk) 13:50, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment - I think the right license is either Template:PD-font since it is identical to Unicode Character “🅒” (U+1F152 Negative Circled Latin Capital Letter C), or else Template:PD-textlogo since someone could have slapped it together in Photoshop instead of just rasterizing a font. But I don't think this file can be deleted on copyright grounds. Mathnerd314159 (talk) 21:36, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support - I support deleting this since per [4] and [5] there is no Carbon language logo and they are deliberately avoiding creating one. The way this tangentially-related image is used on current en WP as the logo is just misleading in this respect. Mathnerd314159 (talk) 21:36, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep License changed to {{PD-text}}; seems simple enough to qualify under COM:TOO United States. I have added a {{Trademark}} notice as well, which is not a copyright matter. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:21, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per PD-textlogo and COM:INUSE. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:39, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
COM:DW of complex models/designs by Lego; see also COM:TOYS.
- File:8815-b-modell-front.jpg
- File:8815-b-modell.jpg
- File:8815-Speedway-Bandit.jpg
- File:Speedway-Bandit-8815-front.jpg
- File:Speedway-Bandit-8815-heck.jpg
- File:Speedway-Bandit-8815-lenkrad.jpg
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:44, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:41, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
COM:DW of complex models/designs by Lego; see also COM:TOYS.
- File:8857-frontdetail.jpg
- File:Lego-technic-8857-lenker.jpg
- File:Lego-technic-8857-motordetail.jpg
- File:Lego-technic-8857-trike.jpg
- File:Lego-technic-trike-frontblick.jpg
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:45, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:41, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
COM:DW of complex models/designs by Lego; see also COM:TOYS.
- File:42061-teleskoplader-arm-ausgefahren.jpg
- File:42061-teleskoplader-arm-oben.jpg
- File:42061-teleskoplader-fahrerhaus.jpg
- File:42061-teleskoplader-heckansicht.jpg
- File:42061-teleskoplader-kabine-detail.jpg
- File:42061-teleskoplader-schaufel-geklappt.jpg
- File:42061-teleskoplader.jpg
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:45, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:42, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Advertisement is likely not permanently installed and thereby not covered by Hungary's freedom-of-panorama terms. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:35, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Help_desk&oldid=691690187#Screenshot_from_the_music_video, apparently this is from a copyrighted YouTube video with no free license. Jmabel ! talk 15:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:35, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
own work, seems to be screenshot Ezarateesteban 20:55, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:35, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
own work? seems to be a screenshot Ezarateesteban 20:55, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:36, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
own work? seems to be a screenshot Ezarateesteban 20:56, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:36, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
screenshot of a copyright source Ezarateesteban 20:57, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:36, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
slow resolution, no metadata, copyvio? Ezarateesteban 20:57, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:36, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
slow resolution, no metadata. Copyvio? Ezarateesteban 20:58, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:36, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 11:59, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Sri Lanka A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:06, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:07, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Guam/United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:32, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:07, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Guam/United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:33, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:07, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Per description, the statue was installed in 2018, there is no freedom of panorama in Russia for non-architectural works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 07:37, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:07, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Per description, the statue was installed in 2018, there is no freedom of panorama in Russia for non-architectural works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 07:38, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:07, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Per Flickr description, this is Madame Tussauds in Washington, D.C., and no FoP in the United States for 3D works A1Cafel (talk) 07:55, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:07, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 16:14, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:07, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 16:17, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:07, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 16:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:07, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:18, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:57, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:18, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:57, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:18, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:57, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:18, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:57, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:18, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:57, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:18, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:57, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:18, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:57, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:57, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:58, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:58, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:58, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:58, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:58, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:58, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:58, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:58, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:58, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:58, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:58, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:58, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:58, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:58, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:58, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:59, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:59, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:59, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:59, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:59, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:59, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 16:14, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:59, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
seems to be a scanned photo, not an own work Ezarateesteban 16:56, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:59, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jesse Viviano as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This is a screenshot of a Lotus 1-2-3, a non-free program, so the screenshot cannot be released into the public domain. Darklanlan (talk) 00:20, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- All charts must be created with a free software?? The screenshot is not taken from software's demo. I input data and chose the charting format. Even the software is a non-free program, the chart is my own work. Darklanlan (talk) 00:21, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- I think that for an image generated by non-free software to not count as copyrigted, none of the user interface has to be present. Since a chart is drawn with the user interface software that is left in the chart, I think that this is something that needs to be looked at. Jesse Viviano (talk) 14:29, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - everything in the image is computer generated and therefore has no copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:24, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Costa Rica. A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Public works, especially unauthored works like this one, have no copyright limitations or intellectual properties in the context of freedom of information in Costa Rica. See Gamboa, F. L. (2004). El derecho fundamental a la propia imágen y la publicación de fotografías. Revista de Ciencias Jurídicas, (105). And http://www.sice.oas.org/int_prop/nat_leg/costa/l6683.asp Bobjgalindo (talk) 16:38, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:26, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
no permission from photographer - see "foto genomen door Céline Gladiné" Hoyanova (talk) 05:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- We DO have permission from the photographer. Mattmvh (talk) 11:47, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Mattmvh: Then please send their permission to COM:VRT. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:36, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:27, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
no permission from photographer see metadata "Author John Van de Mergel" Hoyanova (talk) 05:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Metadata incorrect. Photographer is Céline Gladiné, and we have her permission to use this picture. Mattmvh (talk) 11:48, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Mattmvh Then please send their permission to COM:VRT. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:37, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:27, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Atlasunivers (talk · contribs)
[edit]Artist Miguel A. Fleitas is still alive. Although source said image was submitted with the approval from the artist, evidence is required. If you do receive the permission from the artist, please submit it to VRT.
- File:Miguel Fleitas Jr. 2013.jpg
- File:Angela by Miguel Fleitas.jpg
- File:Tulipanes al Viento 2007.jpg
- File:Tulipanes al Viento 2019.jpg
- File:Tulipanes al Viento 2020.jpg
- File:28 Tulipanes al Viento.jpg
- File:Homenaje A Mi Padre.jpg
- File:The Breast Project Floreciendo 2021.jpg
- File:The Breast Project 2018.jpg
- File:Late At Night In The Courtyard.jpg
- File:Gallo Giro (Red), 2013.jpg
- File:Gallo Indio — I’m Here 2013.jpg
- File:Gallo Giro 2013.jpg
- File:Miguel Fleitas Jr. with Ana Laura Fleitas.jpg
,_2013.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 07:10, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:28, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by حاتم العتيبي as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: هذا الملف بحث أصيل يحوي معلومات مضللة، مثل وجود مدينة عرعر على الخريطة وعرعر حديثة الانشاء تم تاسيسها عام 1950، وكذالك تم وضع مدينة تبوك ضمن الخريطة، وهي مدينة تابعة للحجاز للدولة العثمانية حينها، وليس لإمارة آل رشيد، وأيضاً تم وضع جزء كبير من أقليم الأحساء داخل الخريطة، وأقليم الأحساء برمته كان تابع للدولة العثمانية من حدود الكويت حتى حدود قطر تحت مسمى ولاية البصرة عندما استحوذ عليها مدحت باشا عام 1870 في حملته المعروفة ووضع الكويت والأحساء وقطر تحت الحماية العثمانية، لذالك كيف تصل إمارة آل رشيد لجنوب وشمال الأحساء وقطر؟ وهو نفوذ عثماني بحت، حيث ان إمارة آل رشيد لم تطل يوماً على بحر الخليج العربي، ولم يكن لها منفذ أو ميناء عليه بحكم تبعيته للدولة العثمانية كاملاً، وكذالك جنوب نجد الأفلاج ووادي الدواسر لم يكن تابع للإمارة، وايضاً الخريطة تبين مجاورة حدود إمارة آل رشيد لأقليم عسير، وهذا خطأ فادح، حيث لم تشترك حدود الإمارة يوماً بحدود عسير ولايوجد مصدر واحد يذكر جميع الملاحظات التي ذكرتها بالأعلى، لذالك الخريطة فيها تضليل كبير جداً، حيث ضمت أراضي لم تكن تحت نفوذ الإمارة، ووضع مدن حديثة الانشاء على الخريطة، ولم تكن هذا المدن حينها موجودة، لذالك العمل كان شخصي لم يستند إلى أدلة وفيه أخطاء فادحة.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as image is still in use. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Per machine translation, issues with historical inaccuracy of map, includes cities not yet existing at at time depicted, misleading. Currently in use in it:w. Appears to be very similar to more widely used File:Alrasheed hail english.png other than language of captions. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:29, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - in use. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
معلومات غير صحيحة ولايوجد لها سند او مصدر تاريخي مثل هذه الصفحات تقلل من موثوقية ويكيبيديا ويصبح الموقع مصدر معلومات لايعتمد عليه ولا يتوقف على ذلك بل يحمي المعلومات الخاطئة والمضللة من الحذف او التعديل استاذ مبارك (talk) 10:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- This is the same rationale as last time, and the map is still in use at it:Ha'il. Deletion cannot take place until there is consensus to remove the image from the article. —holly {chat} 18:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. In use. --Bedivere (talk) 00:42, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
low resolution file Basavaraj M (talk) 08:43, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I didn't notice the date of the upload before. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:54, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:31, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Unsourced and potentially problematic especially in a geopolitical sense of a so called irredentist "Undivided India" map. Anyone could create a map of their own country and annex its neighbours and claim that it's "undivided". In this particular case, the inclusion of Tibet and Afghanistan is really stretching it. The only time "India" was larger than it is today was during British colonial rule, when it had also included Bangladesh, Pakistan and Myanmar (detached in 1937 to become its own colony). 175.197.219.194 19:10, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Agree, the image is extremely misleading and should be deleted. Blatantly putting Tibet as part of India without any proper reasoning or reference. Tanvir Ahmed Zubair (talk) 10:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with all the criticisms of the map, but it's in use to illustrate Hindu nationalism and cannot be deleted per policy. Please understand that tendentious content can and even must be covered in order to show what extremists are saying and doing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:05, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination not in use now. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:32, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The date of the photgraph is wrong, The source gives no information, No trace that the autor Greg Oliver agrees ith his work being shared CoffeeEngineer (talk) 08:53, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:53, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The date of the photgraph is wrong, The source gives no information, No trace that the autor Greg Oliver agrees ith his work being shared CoffeeEngineer (talk) 08:53, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:53, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lego Creator
[edit]- File:LEGO-Creator-31017-a0.JPG
- File:LEGO-Creator-31018-a0.JPG
- File:LEGO-Creator-31029-a0.JPG
- File:LEGO-Creator-31030-a0.JPG
Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:59, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lego Creator
[edit]COM:DW of complex models/designs by Lego; see also COM:TOYS.
- File:LEGO - Happy New Year 2017 - Year of the Rooster - 2.jpg
- File:LEGO - Happy New Year 2017 - Year of the Rooster.jpg
- File:Lego 10234 Sydney Opera House.jpg
- File:Lego Big Ben.jpg
- File:Lego Creator 10276 Colosseum Display @ Lego Store Taipei.jpg
- File:Lego Creator Expert Volkswagen T1 Camper Van.jpg
- File:Lego Ferris Wheel.jpg
- File:Lego Tower Bridge Image.jpg
- File:LEGO-Creator-31017-a1.JPG
- File:LEGO-Creator-31017-a2.JPG
- File:LEGO-Creator-31018-a1.JPG
- File:LEGO-Creator-31018-a2.JPG
- File:LEGO-Creator-31018-a3.JPG
- File:LEGO-Creator-31029-a1.JPG
- File:LEGO-Creator-31029-a2.JPG
- File:LEGO-Creator-31030-a1.JPG
- File:LEGO-Creator-31030-a2.JPG
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:50, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:24, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
COM:DW of complex models/designs by Lego; see also COM:TOYS.
- File:Lego Space - Set 6928 Uranium Search Vehicle (1984) - (1).jpg
- File:Lego Space - Set 6928 Uranium Search Vehicle (1984).jpg
_-_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:56, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:24, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
COM:DW of complex models/designs by Lego; see also COM:TOYS.
- File:Lego Space - Set 6950 Mobile Rocket Transport (1982) - Unloading the Rocket for launch.jpg
- File:Lego Space - Set 6950 Mobile Rocket Transport (1982).jpg
_-_Unloading_the_Rocket_for_launch.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:57, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:24, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lego Space Police
[edit]COM:DW of complex models/designs by Lego; see also COM:TOYS.
- File:Lego Space Police III - Set 5974 Galactic Enforcer (2009) - (front view).jpg
- File:Lego Space Police III - Set 5974 Galactic Enforcer (2009).jpg
_-_(front_view).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:01, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:24, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lego Blacktron
[edit]COM:DW of complex models/designs by Lego; see also COM:TOYS.
- File:Lego Space Blacktron - Set 6876 Alienator (1988).jpg
- File:Lego Space Blacktron - Set 6987 Message Intercept Base (1988).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:02, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:23, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
painter still alive, copyvio as for all other paintings in this category Culex (talk) 23:36, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Painter is still alive, and has kindly uploaded examples of their work to Wikimedia Commons under free licenses. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Infrog. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung; keine Rechte an gezeigten Fotos, keine Panoramafreiheit. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:20, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:53, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
File:Ballot papers for the 2022 Andalusian parliamentary election - Cádiz - IMG 20220814 122245.jpg
[edit]
Duplicate of File:Ballot papers for the 2022 Andalusian parliamentary election - Cádiz - IMG 20220814 122149.jpg —Ismael Olea (talk) 19:46, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Suggested replacement deleted at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ballot papers for the 2022 Andalusian parliamentary election - Cádiz - IMG 20220814 122149.jpg. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:08, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
File:Ballot papers for the 2022 Andalusian parliamentary election - Cádiz - IMG 20220814 122544.jpg
[edit]
duplicate of File:Ballot papers for the 2022 Andalusian parliamentary election - Cádiz - IMG 20220814 122125.jpg —Ismael Olea (talk) 19:47, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:11, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. Cjp24 (talk) 23:57, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:04, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
obvisously not a selfie, wrong author Culex (talk) 23:38, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No reason to just assume that. (Camera timers are very common and easy to use.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:02, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment It was uploaded by "User:Joaquín Romero Redondo" (not "Vicente Romero Redondo") so even if were a selfie, it may need a COM:VRT permission. Strakhov (talk)
- Comment If it has to be deleted for that reason, so be it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:04, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep no reason to doubt provided permission from an apparent relative. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:29, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per above, COM:AGF. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:29, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Not PD. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Stamps of Paraguay, 1974 Bedivere (talk) 00:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment This appears to be from Chile, not Paraguay; not sure why that other listing is relevant here. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:21, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- Derived from deleted File:Pinochet-estampilla.jpg, which was a Paraguayan stamp. Bedivere (talk) 20:33, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, source file has been deleted, which means we can't keep this. --Gbawden (talk) 13:19, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Appalanaidu Pappala (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlike that own work. Unlike that images at File:Head of the Department.jpg are all own work. VRT-permission is needed
Estopedist1 (talk) 07:18, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 13:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Uploaded a better, higher quality and more professional file at File:SarahFalk Judge.jpg PascalsCalculatingHamster (talk) 14:08, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per above, but can you substitute the other image at the Wikidata link where this is in use? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:00, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. There is nothing wrong with the photo that is being nominated for deletion. There is nothing wrong with multiple free images. Nothing here is defamatory or puts the subject in a bad light. The photo is low resolution, but clearly free because of OGL. The replacement is not even clearly superior because it is also low resolution and badly cropped. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:44, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per irongargoyle. --Gbawden (talk) 13:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
I'm the derivative creator of the file, and realized the colours are incorrect. QuickDelete, please. 1000mm (talk) 15:51, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Just edit suitably and upload a new version using the "Upload a new version of this file" on the lower left. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:53, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- The point is I thought the ribbon I needed was white + black-red-black, and used a ribbon that is bright blue + black-red-black as a base for it. After studying photo of the actual medal more thorough, I realized that the existing one (bright blue + black-red-black) was the one I was looking for. No point in uploading a new version of my file, when the new version will be exactly as an existing one - it even has correct filename. 1000mm (talk) 19:21, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment If there's no problem with the file, just state that you're withdrawing the deletion request. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:11, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- There is a problem, it's a non existing medal ribbon. The one I used as a base to create "RUS Imperial Boxer-Rebellion ribbon.svg" is the correct one. If I had looked at better photos before I made it, I wouldn't have made it at all. 1000mm (talk) 19:08, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- OK, you confused me above. If we already have an accurate image, this one should be deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:02, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
slow resolution, no metadata. Copyvio? Ezarateesteban 20:59, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment In use; not found elsewhere in reverse image search. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:45, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: PCP, probably taken from Instagram. --Gbawden (talk) 13:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gonioul as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.mariages.net/chateau-mariage/seine-et-marne/dammarie-les-lys SD contested by uploader. Yann (talk) 20:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour, Vous avez supprimé sur la page du Château des Vives-Eaux, dont je suis le propriétaire, la photo du château que j'ai prise cet été, apparemment après qu'un "robot" ai vu la même photo sur la page du château sur mariage.net .
- Je vous confirme qu'il s'agit dans les deux cas de la même photo, que j'ai prise personnellement, dont je détient donc les "droits", et que j'ai moi-même publié cette photo sur la page du château sur le site de Wikipédia
- Je pense qu'il est plus judicieux, en 2022, de publier une photo du château prise en 2022, et non plus ma photo de 2016
- Cordialement, Jean-Michel PONTET, propriétaire du Château des Vives-Eaux PONTET (talk) 22:40, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
- +1. Mais lire w:fr:Aide:Image vous concernant#Fournir une photographie (je crois qu'il y a une autorisation à donner). Polymagou (talk) 23:14, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Pas dans ce cas à mon avis. Celle de Commons est plus grande et a les données EXIF. Yann (talk) 09:31, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- +1. Mais lire w:fr:Aide:Image vous concernant#Fournir une photographie (je crois qu'il y a une autorisation à donner). Polymagou (talk) 23:14, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I don't see any concerns with the image, explanation, or license. —Tcr25 (talk) 19:03, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Weak delete. In such cases, the uploader needs to verify the donation through the process described on COM:VRT per COM:PRP. --Xover (talk) 11:28, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
I think that this logo passes the threshold of originality. If this does, then this is copyrighted as per the brand guidelines page at https://www.redditinc.com/brand Matr4x-404 (talk) 21:56, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I would personally disagree with you. While the mascot seems to be complex, it's just made out of circles and lines. JustDan7178 (talk) 18:37, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Artwork looks complex enough to qualify for copyright. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:41, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep It does not pass threshold of originality. Its parts are
- smiley face
- two circles, one for each ear
- bent line with a circle at the end for antenna
- {{PD-textlogo}} describes that we routinely assume public domain when a "logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes". This logo is the combination of only a few simple shapes. I see no claim of copyright in the reddit brand guidelines, but even if there were, we still evaluate the claim ourselves. Bluerasberry (talk) 19:09, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Matr4x-404: As this logo is used to represent the Web-site on multiple language editions of Wikipedia which allow for fair-use, have you notified those communities of this discussion, so that, if the file will be deleted from Commons, it can be exported to the respective locations? This is the great problem with Commons. As for the logo itself, the “reddit” is obviously unoriginal. As for the design, a comparison with decisions of the Review Board is highly instructive. The unregistered Ariat Shield, Fruit Brunch, Chat Box, and Stace Face are illustrative. As to some of the shapes being more complex, Come and Drink It rejects that idea. The combination of individual elements to represent a face is not an original idea, for which proposition see Stace Face and Pimm and Tomo (the latter deals with derivative works primarily). See also Ten App Logos. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 02:34, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete It seems the logo is copyrighted. From Reddit's brand guidelines:
The Brand Assets are protected by trademark, copyright, and other laws. Reddit owns trademarks and copyrights in the United States and other countries
- Delete The PBS logo, with its similar degree of complexity, has a registered copyright. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 03:50, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- I got geeky and went digging through US copyright registrations owned by Reddit, Inc. Unfortunately, they don't show you thumbnails of what works were registered, only what Reddit calls them. I did ascertain that the Reddit Alien and a work they dubbed Alternate Icon1 were copyrighted. The Reddit icon is primarily the Snoo face, leading me to think it's copyrighted. That's as close as I can get to anything definitive. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 12:17, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- From the above-linked brand guidelines:
“Brand Assets” means the Snoo character and depictions thereof, all versions of the Reddit logo and wordmarks
- From the above-linked brand guidelines:
- I got geeky and went digging through US copyright registrations owned by Reddit, Inc. Unfortunately, they don't show you thumbnails of what works were registered, only what Reddit calls them. I did ascertain that the Reddit Alien and a work they dubbed Alternate Icon1 were copyrighted. The Reddit icon is primarily the Snoo face, leading me to think it's copyrighted. That's as close as I can get to anything definitive. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 12:17, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Everything can be reduced to "simple geometric" shapes: in computer graphics most things are ultimately made up of triangles, and the pixels on your screen are rectangular (or even sometimes square). Just because something can be broken down to simple geometric shapes does not mean it "consists" entirely of simple geometric shapes. {{PD-textlogo}} has application for large parts of the logo (the circle background, the text parts, etc.), but it does not cover the maskot thingy figure ("Snoo character"). --Xover (talk) 11:40, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion, case seems clear, over TOO, copyrighted. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:11, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
_Wellcome_M0000116.jpg){kind=link}
_Wellcome_M0000116.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
bad quality image which is not in use. we already have a good picture showing this 1857 watercolour. Zello (talk) 22:56, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
_Wellcome_M0000116.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep per rationale at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis. Wellcome L0046077.jpg. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:25, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Neither identical nor equivalent to alternate image. --Xover (talk) 12:05, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:12, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
_Wellcome_M0000116.jpg){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:Arms EldestSon OfMonarch OfUnitedKingdom.svg. 191.9.57.28 01:58, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Files are not identical, and both are INUSE. The files do appear to be equivalent, but I have no opinion on whether one is superior to the other. That's mostly an issue for the sister projects though. --Xover (talk) 09:56, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:20, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Luis Correas Sub??as (in metadata) is the uploader? this photo is a profile photo, and VRT of photographer may be needed Ezarateesteban 16:55, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete for lack of permission. The photographer's name seems to be Luis Correas Subías with the "??" being mojibake for "í" (i with accent). TilmannR (talk) 12:21, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Xover (talk) 11:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:19, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
File:Ballot papers for the 2022 Andalusian parliamentary election - Cádiz - IMG 20220814 122535.jpg
[edit]
Duplicate of File:Ballot papers for the 2022 Andalusian parliamentary election - Cádiz - IMG 20220814 122256.jpg —Ismael Olea (talk) 19:40, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Not identical. I think this is probably the superior copy of the two. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:12, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Weak keep. I don't think there's much value to keeping both, but so far as I read current policy there's not a valid rationale for deletion. --Xover (talk) 11:24, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:18, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
File:Ballot papers for the 2022 Andalusian parliamentary election - Cádiz - IMG 20220814 122233.jpg
[edit]
Duplicate of File:Ballot papers for the 2022 Andalusian parliamentary election - Cádiz - IMG 20220814 122314.jpg —Ismael Olea (talk) 19:43, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Unsure. The other one is better lit, but this one is better framed. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:14, 26 December 2022 (UTC)- Weak keep. I don't think there's much value to keeping both, but so far as I read current policy there's not a valid rationale for deletion. --Xover (talk) 11:25, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:18, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yves Bosch (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright concerns. The uploader says of each that (i) it is his own work; (ii) it is the work of Ernst Kraft. Whether or not Bosch is Kraft, a copyleft release directly from Kraft is required.
- File:Un passage dans la forêt.jpg
- File:Monumento al migrante desconocido, Ernst Kraft, 2021 - Instalación,Tijuana, México..jpg
- File:De nasleep.jpg
- File:Oorlogsgedichten XVI.jpg
- File:Poemas de guerra - War poems IV, Ernst Kraft, 2018 Acrylic on coated paper - (4x) 200 x 53 cm. CECUT, Tijuana.png
- File:'El laberinto del Patio'.jpg
_200_x_53_cm._CECUT,_Tijuana.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Hoary (talk) 22:20, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Dear Hoary,
- Photos of the works are indeed mine. I am also in possession of the express consent in writing by the artist that I can use the photos of his work. In case you would require a copy of this document, I will be very glad to send it to you or to whom it may concern. Please advise if I require to do so or anything else. Thanks a lot in advance! Yves Bosch 62.235.227.81 08:52, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Yves Bosch, you're under no obligation to log in before commenting, but communication will be much easier if you do. ¶ The identity of the photographer of a two-dimensional artwork isn't an issue; what matters is who "authored" the artwork. And Wikipedia can't accept the assurance of the uploader that the "author" (and thus copyright holder) gave permission. Please ask Ernst Kraft to see Commons:Email templates, Commons:Modelos de mensajes, or Commons:E-mailsjablonen (the same content/utility, but in English, Spanish and Dutch respectively). Hurry! -- Hoary (talk) 21:48, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. COM:VRT required per COM:PRP and does not appear to be forthcoming. --Xover (talk) 12:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion; uploader is not the original copyright holder of works photographed. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:17, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
bad quality image which is not in use. we already have a good picture showing this 1857 watercolour. Zello (talk) 22:55, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. There are no superior versions I see linked here. There are other versions linked in the image description, but I would not call them unambiguously superior. Some uses may want to include the gold frame, others may not. I am also wondering if this is not the correct file nominated because this is clearly not a watercolor. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:21, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Weak delete. Even if not identical, it is equivalent but technically inferior to File:Portrait of Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis (1818 - 1865) Wellcome V0027138.jpg. I don't see any value to keeping both. --Xover (talk) 12:04, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
_Wellcome_V0027138.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: No requirement to delete, no consensus to do so. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:16, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
_Wellcome_V0027138.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
bad quality image which is not in use. we already have a good picture showing this 1857 watercolour. Zello (talk) 22:56, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
_Wellcome_V0027138.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep per rationale at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis. Wellcome L0046077.jpg. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:26, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. I'm not seeing an equivalent but technically superior alternative. --Xover (talk) 12:06, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussing. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
_Wellcome_V0027138.jpg){kind=link}
bad quality image which is not in use. we already have a good picture showing this 1857 watercolour. Zello (talk) 23:01, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per rationale at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis. Wellcome L0046077.jpg. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:27, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. I'm not seeing an equivalent but technically superior image. --Xover (talk) 12:07, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:18, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Incorrect license. Please check whether it comes under pd-ineligible Vssun (talk) 02:58, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. It is a correct license. A trivial w:text mode table is really ineligible for copyright – the matrix of abstract characters is trivial, and the font is a raster one. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:07, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Trivial screenshot of uncopyrightable data. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:48, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jesse Viviano as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This is a screenshot of a Lotus 1-2-3, a non-free program, so the screenshot cannot be released into the public domain.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Also:
- File:Lotus 1-2-3 on PC-98 DOS spreadsheet.jpg
- File:HP 95LX Pocket Computer.JPG - rather clearly de minimis
- Yes, de minimis for the last one. I have to say, though, this is old technology and no longer sold, so the idea that pictures of it could result in legal action strikes me as very odd. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:09, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- (Especially for File:HP 95LX Pocket Computer.JPG, keep.) The interface consists of a couple of words and a generic spreadsheet. If this is copyrightable, than LibreOffice has a problem. In any case, if a decision is made to remove the last one let me know and I'll blank the interface out, since a loss of this photo would be of great harm to the article. Best, Przemub (talk) 00:15, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep all. Unlike a graphical user interface, these old text-based interfaces have very little that could even conceivably be copyrighted. The physical design of the HP 95LX and its manual could conceivably be so, but I think a pragmatic assessment in light of TOO and de minimis suggests this is a non-issue in practice. The physical design is very close to entirely dictated by function, and mostly consists of basic geometric figures and text. There is the trademarked HP logo, but that's a non-copyright restriction. --Xover (talk) 10:57, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: extremely simple interface, other elements de minimis. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:07, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Murals in Nicaragua
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Nicaragua.
- File:22.Casa Sandinista de Granada (9).JPG
- File:Mural San Carlos 2.JPG
- File:Mural San Carlos 3.JPG
- File:Mural San Carlos 4.JPG
- File:Mural San Carlos 5.JPG
- File:Mural San Carlos 6.JPG
- File:Mural San Carlos 7.JPG
- File:Mural San Carlos1.JPG
- File:Murales Corn Island 2.jpg
- File:Nicaragua en 1984 - 42.jpg
- File:Nicaragua en 1984 - 43.jpg
- File:Nicaragua en 1984 - 44.jpg
- File:Nicaragua en 1984 - 75.jpg
- File:Nicaragua en 1984 - 87.jpg
- File:Nicaragua en 1984 - 89.jpg
- File:Primitivist Mural - Convento y Museo San Francisco - Granada - Nicaragua (31797747892) (2).jpg
- File:San Juan de Limay Mural.jpg
- File:Sandinista Mural.JPG
- File:Sandinista.mural.jpeg
- File:Sandino Mural with Loungers - Playa Hermosa - South of San Juan del Sur - Nicaragua (31900542085) (2).jpg
- File:Santa Rosa del Peñón - Cafetín el Guiricero.jpg
File:Scene at Cafe Campestre - Balgue - Ometepe Island - Nicaragua - 01 (30940640793).jpgCropped so can be kept without copyrighted part, Ellywa (talk) 16:41, 10 February 2023 (UTC)- File:Street Collage - Matagalpa - Nicaragua (31336472990).jpg
File:Street Scene - Matagalpa - Nicaragua - 02 (30867711664).jpgCropped so can be kept without copyrighted part, Ellywa (talk) 16:41, 10 February 2023 (UTC)- File:Wall along the street in Masaya.jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep File:Street Scene - Matagalpa - Nicaragua - 02 (30867711664).jpg as graffiti, not mural (and 2ndary inclusion of street view) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk)
- Why is the difference between a mural and graffiti significant? --Xover (talk) 10:40, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Lean Weak keep File:Scene at Cafe Campestre - Balgue - Ometepe Island - Nicaragua - 01 (30940640793).jpg; incidental inclusion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:11, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- Weak keep File:Sandino Mural with Loungers - Playa Hermosa - South of San Juan del Sur - Nicaragua (31900542085) (2).jpg, primary figure in mural is from PD photo of Augusto Sandino. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:12, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hmm. PD is not "infectious" (cf. e.g. GPL). You can use PD material to create a new creative work that gets independent copyright protection. Why would that not apply to this image? Xover (talk) 10:48, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep File:Murales Corn Island 2.jpg, primary focus of photo is the people gathered; only bits of sketch of incomplete mural seen. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:13, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Others I have not mentioned above unless free license from artists can be shown. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:17, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all per nom. But with a caveat that I may yet be persuaded that some of Infrogmation's keep exceptions above are legitimate. Not seeing it right now, but I've been wrong / persuaded before. --Xover (talk) 10:51, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Per discussion cropped two files so they could be kept. Took them from the category. The PD image on File:Sandino Mural with Loungers - Playa Hermosa - South of San Juan del Sur - Nicaragua (31900542085) (2).jpg is so changed it becomes a new copyrighted work. The other metioned in the discussion, File:Murales Corn Island 2.jpg is photographed because of the people painting mural, so I think the mural is not de minimis, although it is a sketch only, so also that image has been deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 16:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
File:Torre della Lanterna vista dal moderno Centro Direzionale di Genova S. Benigno ed elicoidale - Torre MSC singola.jpg
[edit]
No FoP in Italy. The tower now become too prominent that fails de minimis A1Cafel (talk) 16:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi. FoP is de facto applied in Italy, so the picture should not be deleted at all. This is the result of long discussions that established that similar pictures of Italian skyscrapers should be maintained. {{FoP-Italy}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Plumbago Capensis (talk • contribs)
- If the photographed subject is a work of a living artist (or architect), it can only be freely used for scientific or educational purpose only, as there is a de facto FOP for non-commercial purpose. Unfortunately, Commons cannot allow images with non-commercial purpose to be hosted.--A1Cafel (talk) 02:12, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. {{FoP-Italy}} as currently phrased is nonsense, and even COM:FOP Italy makes clear that the exceptions are severely limited. Absence of a FOP exception in the copyright act just means that general copyright rules apply, not that copyright suddenly ceases to exist. --Xover (talk) 11:12, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:55, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy. The tower now become too prominent that fails de minimis A1Cafel (talk) 16:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
ːHi. FoP is de facto applied in Italy, so the picture should not be deleted at all. This is the result of long discussions that established that similar pictures of Italian skyscrapers should be maintained. {{FoP-Italy}} --Plumbago Capensis (talk) 07:52, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Plumbago Capensis As far as I've read COM:FOP Italy and related prev. discussions, the only reason some files may apply the tag you mentioned is for buildings by living architects that are not creative or artistic enough to be copyright-protected, to me this depends on how this building is simple. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:18, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. {{FoP-Italy}} as currently phrased is nonsense, and even COM:FOP Italy makes clear that the exceptions are severely limited. Absence of a FOP exception in the copyright act just means that general copyright rules apply, not that copyright suddenly ceases to exist. --Xover (talk) 11:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:55, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung; keine Rechte an gezeigten Fotos, keine Panoramafreiheit.
- File:Drachenlochmuseum2.jpeg
- File:Drachenlochmuseum Neandertaler2.jpeg
- File:Drachenlochmuseum Münzen.jpeg
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- What about this one?--Parpan05 (talk) 13:22, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- That one seems absolutely fine. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:58, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- What about this one?--Parpan05 (talk) 13:22, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep File:Drachenlochmuseum Neandertaler2.jpeg as de minimis. The image in the background is not a central focus and is badly obscured by glare. Delete the rest. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:57, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete File:Drachenlochmuseum2.jpeg per nom and IronGargoyle. Keep for File:Drachenlochmuseum Neandertaler2.jpeg per IronGargoyle. And Keep for File:Drachenlochmuseum Münzen.jpeg since these look more like scans of coins (mechanical reproduction) than photographs of coins, so the remaining copyrightable elements in the photo are just the text on the cards in the display case which are de minimis. --Xover (talk) 11:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:55, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Converted it into svg years ago from an existing file, not own work, a new signature (in svg format) is avaliable from other upload (not by me). Want it deleted for copyright reasons - at the time did not know. A better version of the signature exists in the said other file and there is no reason for this one.
Best regards, Wikisempra Wikisempra (talk) 21:11, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Wikisempra: I am failing to understand under what policy-based rationale you are proposing that this file be deleted. In particular, signatures are not generally protected by copyright. Xover (talk) 11:31, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 05:56, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Not my own work. Wikisempra (talk) 12:41, 1 November 2024 (UTC)