Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/08/10

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 10th, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the owner of this photograph never give consent to the photo being published, it is privacy matter. 103.139.105.98 01:35, 10 August 2022 (UTC

{{speedydelete|it is copyright problem, the contributor doesn't have the right to post it}}

{{copyvio| copyright problem, not allowed to post by owner}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reny Yasinta (talk • contribs) 02:31, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:46, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nome com caracteres especiais Josimoreira (talk) 01:19, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Renaming is enough. You don't have to nominate your own upload for deletion, if it only needs a rename! Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 10:41, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. No evidence that Al Qaeda published this image under CC 4.0 129.78.56.156 02:33, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 07:38, 10 August 2022 UTC: Copyright violation. No evidence that Al Qaeda published this image under CC 4.0 --Krdbot 14:06, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be from https://forward.com/news/breaking-news/340180/steve-gutow-named-to-j-street-political-post/ Adeletron 3030 (talk) 05:01, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:06, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DerkMahen12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality photographs of non-notable people that are likely outside COM:SCOPE

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:52, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:46, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DerkMahen12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Globally blocked user with untrustworthy claims of own work, taken in different countries on different cameras.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 05:50, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. None in use, some clear copyright viols. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:20, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from https://twitter.com/rise_0731/status/1552301291992653825/photo/1 DoctorDoughnut (talk) 10:55, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:29, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think the author is "google" and is sharing it via Free licence. Furthermore, the original set of pictures comes from a blog (https://www.prettyrealblog.com/2020/06/how-to-hang-floating-shelves-using.html#/) that is not publishing their work using a free licence Thaïti Bob (talk) 12:49, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:29, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

request by uploader Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 13:21, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per prompt uploader request (inadvertent dupe). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:59, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can not be used Machibito (talk) 14:34, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per fairly prompt uploader request; apparent license mistake. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:37, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by שמחה קבלה (talk · contribs)

[edit]

While the licensing here may be ok I'm not sure these are within our scope. I'm not sure what use these would be to the project. Eqully there is a large amount of excessive text on the images that is certainly outside our scope. Could be speedy I guess

Herby talk thyme 11:19, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:49, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete per nom & Yann, and COM:CSD#G10 for the spam factor (I have already cut down on most of the spam, but some remains in the metadata).   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:02, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:34, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense Suhayl091 (talk) 16:51, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: File in use. -- Geagea (talk) 23:01, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recently uploaded. Low quality. Redundant to File:Yamaha logo.svg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:14, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:28, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused vanity logo. Out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:25, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:29, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused vanity logo. Out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:25, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:29, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aahyoursugar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, not used, not in scope

Avron (talk) 08:24, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:30, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matthews321123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

fantasy diagrams, out of project scope

Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:42, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:31, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused small diagram without meaningful explanantion. Ske (talk) 09:09, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:31, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The chemical structure on the left should have a positive charge. We have File:Tetrazolium reduction.svg as a correct, high quality replacement. Marbletan (talk) 12:42, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This chemical structure is incorrect. There is a methyl group missing. See Pubchem for comparison. We have File:Ardisiaquinone G.svg as a correct, high quality replacement. Marbletan (talk) 12:45, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks You are right. I don't remember the source. Better to replace it by suitable pic. Regards Vojtěch Zavadil (talk) 13:14, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dextran is a polysaccharide, not a trisaccharide as shown in this image. Also, stereochemical information is missing. This image is only used on a rejected draft article and there are plenty of correct, high quality alternatives in Category:Dextrans that can be used instead. Marbletan (talk) 12:52, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete it is quite common in databases like PubChem (likely source of this diagram) that entries for polymers have only a fragment of structure presented. And while it can be sufficient for specific purposes in such databases, it can't be propagated to Wikimedia projects like this. Wostr (talk) 18:24, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:33, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The wedge bond on the left is pointing the wrong direction. At the bottom right, a stereobond is used where there isn't a stereocenter. Correct and higher quality options are available: File:Ochratoxin B.png and File:Ochratoxin B.svg. Marbletan (talk) 12:55, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:35, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of non-notable company. Possibly also above the threshold of originality, with no evidence the uploader is the copyright holder. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:28, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:27, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of non-notable company. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:31, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:28, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LVdigital (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:04, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kokononattsu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Unused or used in promotional draft.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:06, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:06, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality, not used, alternatives in Category:Caprylic acid. Wostr (talk) 17:17, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:08, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality, not used, alternatives in Category:Lauric acid. Wostr (talk) 17:18, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:08, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality, not used, alt's in Category:Myristic acid. Wostr (talk) 17:19, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:07, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense description, unused except for a random "user data dump", no apparent educational use ···日本穣 Talk to Nihonjoe 18:38, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:09, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense description, unused except for a random "user data dump", no apparent educational use ···日本穣 Talk to Nihonjoe 18:38, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:09, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense description, unused except for a random "user data dump", no apparent educational use ···日本穣 Talk to Nihonjoe 18:38, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:10, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality selfies, using commons as a webhost, see also this user

Praxidicae (talk) 00:35, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:03, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Phanchung2009 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused uploads with no explanation of what they are, and which look like screenshots of an app or web page.

Lord Belbury (talk) 16:05, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:05, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

my photo should be updated! Bawatna (talk) 23:18, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My photo should be updated! Bawatna (talk) 23:19, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:07, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no longer required Bawatna (talk) 20:53, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:07, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category is empty and misspelled (valued images of Stockholm can be found in Valued images of Stockholm. --EdTre (talk) 18:03, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio. (non-admin closure) Marbletan (talk) 18:50, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Atteinte aux droits d'auteurs de Marvel Studios. Les logos des films et séries sont généralement placés sous Copyright en tant que "Marque déposée" MrFaabz (talk) 15:19, 30 July 2022 (UTC) Alors pourquoi tous les autres logos sont partout sur internet et wikiédia/wikipédia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ARNPIC3101 (talk • contribs) 19:08, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Parce que les logos de films et séries sont soumis aux droits d'auteur et n'ont rien a faire sur Commons. Il faut les téléverser sur Wikipédia directement.MrFaabz (talk) 19:46, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by EugeneZelenko (Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo). (non-admin closure). Marbletan (talk) 18:52, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by MrFaabz as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-free logo. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 20:37, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko (Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo). (non-admin closure). Marbletan (talk) 18:53, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Essentially a dup of en:File:Schiemann reaction Ü V4.svg. I picked V4 to keep because it's apparently what the uploader preferred (later datestamp and same uploder as V3), but I don't have a strong content-based pref. DMacks (talk) 01:00, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 23:01, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality photographs that appear to be out of scope and often depict non-notable minors.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 06:00, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. Inappropriately over broad. Closing of this mass request does not prejudge relisting of some individual images or more carefully selected subsets of images. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:42, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure if this is above the threshold of originality, but copyvio it is: screenshot from a university class. 217.239.14.111 06:19, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, apparently uploader lacks authority to license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:44, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per en:File:Mariano_Marcos_State_University_logo.png on enwiki (of which this image is essentially a duplicate) and its associated non-free rationale, this logo is not available under a Commons-compatible license, and there is no evidence that the uploader has the authority to release it under such. Kinu (talk) 07:04, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:45, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was the creator with my previous (inactive and not accecible account). I was new user then with out much experience of commons. The Santa Claus cap icon i think is from internet pic, not free use. Is not a picture of commons. Alpha334 (talk) 15:17, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Apparent DW; not used in article space. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:46, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Infrogmation: , did you forget to delete the file? 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:32, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted content from the source site http://генофонд.рф/?page_id=5500 Bogomolov.PL (talk) 19:41, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:51, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the scope of the project. Copyright situation looks also unclear. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:10, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep I am the uploader. We have already determined that a funeral notice, as opposed to an obituary or the text from a eulogy, only contains public information and is devoid of creative content to meet the threshold of creativity. We have also determined that when an image stored here is used by a sister Wiki project, it is automatically in-scope. --RAN (talk) 21:15, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wikidata requires that an entry must "be described using serious and publicly available references", don't you think a funeral notice is both public and serious? Can you please quote me the exact Wikilaw broken? After all, I showed you that it meets the requirements for inclusion. They are also not an "unknown person", what you are describing is a "famous person", and fame is subjective. If you want to come up with a set of objective requirements for inclusion different from the current ones, lets us all know what they are. --RAN (talk) 04:54, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Of course it does not, as far as a funeral notice in most cases (including this one) does not describe a person to the degree of WP or WD notability. Your willingness to make Wikidata a mirror of FindAGrave and legacy.com does not seem correspondent with this project's tasks. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:06, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • All I can say is for you to lobby for your changes to the definition of notability and come up with rigid standard how people need to be "described". Do it at Commons and at Wikidata. Make a list what you expect to see for references, get it approved, and then we can delete every entry that doesn't meet your standards. To make Wikidata a "mirror of FindAGrave and legacy.com" I would need to load every entry from the source. We do not possess an index of those websites, and no one has agreed to create an index, and even if we had an index, no one has approved a bot to load them to Wikidata because of the time and effort it would take to match to existing entries and to figure a way to disambiguate all the people with identical names. The last large database of people was The Peerage and it took over a year to match to existing entries, fix errors, and merge duplicates. Findagrave is 10 times larger than the The Peerage, and will require 10 times the effort. --RAN (talk) 23:34, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No apparent problem requiring deletion; no consensus to delete. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:49, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like this photo deleted. Sjgdzn (talk) 20:12, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:51, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like this file deleted as a courtesy for personal reasons. Thank you. Sjgdzn (talk) 03:19, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   02:58, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like this photo deleted. Sjgdzn (talk) 20:13, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like this file delete as a courtesy for personal reasons. Thank you. Sjgdzn (talk) 03:18, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   02:58, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like this photo deleted. Sjgdzn (talk) 20:13, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate Madamebiblio (talk) 03:03, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:07, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Of low quality and no real use anymore. Has been globally replaced by File:Blason ville fr Gardouch (Haute-Garonne).svg. Heraldrist (talk) 06:29, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there's now also a vector version available. --Rosenzweig τ 19:08, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused screenshot of a presentation slide without many explanations ( deletion should apply to all file from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Dr.Rajeev_Jain_FCA ) Ske (talk) 09:14, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and not in use. --Ezarateesteban 18:01, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to French law n° 2016-1321 of october 7, 2016, freedom of panorama in France applies only to humans and not to organizations, and furthermore excludes commercial use. Architect Franck Hammoutène as copyright holder demands deletion per Ticket:2022080810006852 Mussklprozz (talk) 12:03, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:09, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Onana Tamba Gérôme Olivier (talk) 13:46, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:11, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture Peterwurm.jpg used on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Peterwurm.jpg violates personal rights, since the according Wikipedia-Site “Peter Wurm” is used by Peter Wurm, Austrian politician, born 1965 in Hall in Tirol. However, the Peterwurm.jpg mentioned above is a portrait of Peter Wurm, Austrian artist, born 18.08.1969 in Vienna. I kindly ask to remove this picture from the database, since it violates personal rights by using it for a different person. Downtown Messenger (talk) 15:05, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: No valid reason for deletion & VRT passed. --Achim55 (talk) 21:21, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There is a valid reason for deletion: This picture was linked to another person with the same name and thus is still misleadingly showing up in search results. Downtown Messenger (talk) 07:09, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Still no valid reason. We will not delete an image just because there is another person having the same name. I disambiguated Category:Peter Wurm by courtesy. --Achim55 (talk) 08:16, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 19:12, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Michael Rowe (talk) 16:52, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are two fairly prominent crosses at the church, which are quite close to each other. I uploaded one before realising that the other is more on the west side of the church. I have a picture of the cross on the west side, which I can upload when this one has been deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael Rowe (talk • contribs) 07:13, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:13, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsche Hausnummer Geyersberg (talk) 17:31, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: file was renamed. --Rosenzweig τ 19:15, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsche Hausnummer Geyersberg (talk) 17:38, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: file was renamed. --Rosenzweig τ 19:15, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The still image of the film "showgirl" is not the property of this Flickr account of Phoenix Fry Vera (talk) 22:17, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:16, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old Michigan US Highway shields

[edit]

These graphics have all been superseded by newer graphics that use the actual shield design standards and typefaces. These were based on imperfect templates and typefaces and do not reflect what would have been in use from 1926 through 1948. The images are not in use in any articles. --Imzadi 1979  19:01, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 16:02, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description translates to "Your Body (2005, fiberglass and paint, 270 x 160 x 150 cm) at the Saatchi Gallery, The Revolution Continues: New Art from China, 2008". Thus this is a photograph of a modern sculpture, with no evidence of permission of the sculptor. Prosfilaes (talk) 03:08, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: VRT permission needed. Ruthven (msg) 16:02, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional. The account was appointed by the local government branch to advertise the hospital. MexTDT (talk) 05:14, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Herbert Ortner. Ruthven (msg) 15:58, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional. The account was appointed by the local government branch to advertise the hospital. MexTDT (talk) 05:15, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:59, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional. The account was appointed by the local government branch to advertise the hospital. MexTDT (talk) 05:15, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not a very informative corridor. Ruthven (msg) 15:59, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No sourse. La loi et la justice (talk) 08:14, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:00, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bild mit eingefügtem Copyright widerspricht der WP-Nutzung Dirk Lenke (talk) 09:45, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: VRT permission. Ruthven (msg) 16:01, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same-res crop of author photo at https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/A1eSXlrrGDL.jpg Lord Belbury (talk) 10:31, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:02, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No free license at the declared source.[1] Verbcatcher (talk) 11:58, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:02, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not sure about the license/copyright of the foto. Emplasa (Sao Paulo Company for Metropolitan Planning = Empresa Paulista de Planejamento Metropolitano SA), Brazilian state-owned company. Originally uploaded to Panoramio in 2008. The Emplasa logo in the upper right corner and the number 3 in the lower right corner indicate that the photo is probably a screenshot of an original document (e.g. a pdf file). I couldn't find any official website. It is probably an unintended license laundering as the file was uploaded by a bot "Panoramio upload bot". Nemracc (talk) 13:12, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:03, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am not sure if was allowed to use the original file File:Football pitch metric.svg to create a new one. Please check it. Alpha334 (talk) 15:21, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: derived versions of files hosted on Commons are generally allowed. Ruthven (msg) 16:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am not sure in was allowed to use the original file File:Marginoferror95.PNG to create a new one. Please check it. Alpha334 (talk) 15:34, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: it's fine. Ruthven (msg) 16:05, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Не Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International НАндреев (talk) 16:05, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: VRT permission needed. Ruthven (msg) 16:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source given for this file. This file's name appears incorrect. Another user noted the probable mis-identity. I agree it is not the person in the file name after reviewing the category of Robert S. Garrett -The identity of this is only a guess without a source. Ooligan (talk) 01:56, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:29, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader claims to be his own work but more likely a photo capture of an official photo of unknown source. Pierre cb (talk) 03:33, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:29, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional. The account was appointed by the local government branch to advertise the hospital. MexTDT (talk) 05:14, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and likely not own work. --P 1 9 9   18:32, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional. The account was appointed by the local government branch to advertise the hospital. MexTDT (talk) 05:15, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and likely not own work. --P 1 9 9   18:32, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Second upload, also for promotion. Banned user on eswiki, possibly related to the first uploader. MexTDT (talk) 06:16, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:32, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an official logo, contains a fascist symbol and reference to an extremist site. Only use was a highly unacceptable troll userbox. Dronebogus (talk) 08:13, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Banners8chan.png, also uploaded by the same user (who's username is a fictional Nazi from an old American sticom), appears similarly useless and trolly. Grayfell (talk) 06:42, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominating as of right now Dronebogus (talk) 12:13, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:35, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is blurred, wrong exposure, too dark. Uploaded by the bot "Panoramio upload bot". The staircase of the Residencial Palmares in the district of Grajaú, Sao Paulo is probably shown. Due to the poor quality, this photo will hardly be used. Non educational. Out of scope. Nemracc (talk) 12:23, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Here's a slightly better photo. --Nemracc (talk) 12:32, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:36, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

user request Dkarahan0 (talk) 13:20, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, no longer in use. --P 1 9 9   18:37, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

yanlış eklendi Dkarahan0 (talk) 13:21, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   18:37, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no idea about the educational value and being in scope. Unidentifiable image, can't suggest any usage rubin16 (talk) 14:40, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:40, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"PMO photo 1994" - uploader appears not to be the photographer; no evidence for claimed free license Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:13, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:40, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"1994 in Jerusalem in a GPO photo." So it is not a 2022 photo taken by the uploader as claimed. No evidence for claimed free license. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:15, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:40, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Web resolution photo. I did not find in quick reverse image search, but most or all of the other uploads by this user were either blatant copyright violations or dubious source/license claims; without more informaton no reason to assume this one is any better. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:17, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:41, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright holder want me to take this down,as i didnot consult with them before uploading this pic. Indianspy007 (talk) 16:07, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --P 1 9 9   18:42, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by МуслимФ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyviolence

Barbarian (talk) 16:50, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, obviously no own work. --Druschba 4 (talk) 23:49, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:44, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A person of no notability, copyright status is not verified. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:15, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep As the uploader, click on the link, the entire yearbook has been scanned from cover to cover, there is no copyright notice, and there is no registration in the copyright database. Images used by sister projects are always in-scope. --RAN (talk) 21:12, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please quote the relevant Wikilaw that you are referring to? If your going to tell me the answer is in the Bible, give me the chapter and verse, so I can read it myself. Don't just wave the Bible and tell me all the answers are in here. --RAN (talk) 23:42, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There is wikidata:Wikidata:Notability. The entry for Sheila A. Wolf was deleted according to this policy but undeleted soon afterwards to allow the addition of references. Regarding Commons, one could cite COM:SCOPE, but as I mentioned below, the file is being used which makes it meet the requirements. De728631 (talk) 13:14, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per De'. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:30, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source is a Fandom, with no further explanation of the image’s license. RodRabelo7 (talk) 22:48, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, it should be added that it was added by a user called “WolfenSkin”. He apparently hasn’t any relation with the person in the photo, Paulo Kogos, a Brazilian YouTuber. We cannot prove the image’s owner allowed it to be posted on Wikimedia. RodRabelo7 (talk) 22:52, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@RodRabelo7 I confirmed with Kogos himself that the photo was correctly licensed in that libertarian website, but I'll try to get to him to get a more sound clarification, if the original website one is not enough. Darwin Ahoy! 15:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I’m quite sure it’s mandatory Kogos to send an e-mail confirming he allows the photo to be published here under a certain license. See VRT. RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:11, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@DarwIn: I have found an image of Kogos licensed under CC-BY and uploaded it to File:Paulo Kogos.png. If you think that was a mistake, please let me know. I have also changed the photo in Kogos’s page in the Portuguese Wikipedia. Feel free to replace it with the original one if it’s proven that it doesn’t violate any Commons policies. RodRabelo7 (talk) 05:06, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@RodRabelo7 Thanks, that's really great. Since that one has a clearer license, I think it will be easier to stick to it, for the time being. Darwin Ahoy! 16:52, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is licensed correctly, and it's use was openly authorized by the person depicted in more than one ocasion. If necessary, i can contact the person depicted (Paulo Kogos) through his publically available email (falecompaulokogos@gmail.com) and get him to formalize an authorization to use the picture. -R.Arden (talk) 21:37, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pois o faça então. Enquanto não houver comprovação de que Kogos permite seu uso, o ideal é que a foto utilizada no artigo seja uma de licença mais clara. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:41, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Para qual meio ele deve enviar a autorização? Já me comuniquei com ele pelo email supracitado e o mesmo confirmou que aquela foto é dele e o mesmo autoriza seu uso dentro da licença lá especificada. Aproveito para informar também que a outra imagem (Paulo_Kogos.png) é de uso indevido e sua licença é incorreta - pois o autor (Peter Tugurniev) não possui conta na Wikipedia e nunca autorizou o uso daquela foto - tratando-se de propriedade intelectual do mesmo com copyright tal qual todo o conteúdo do seu canal no Youtube. -R.Arden (talk) 02:24, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
COM:YT. RodRabelo7 (talk) 22:24, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Foi realizado o envio da referida autorização pelo próprio Paulo Kogos, conforme a página que você indicou. O bot logo abaixo confirmou o envio. Assim sendo, peço que seja mantida a imagem e anulado o presente pedido de remoção. -R.Arden (talk) 20:40, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
O envio do e-mail foi inconclusivo. Assim que houver precisão maior quanto à licença autorizada pelo próprio Paulo Kogos, certamente este pedido será trancado. RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:52, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A informação de que (Paulo_Kogos.png) é de uso indevido é falsa, na descrição do vídeo usado como fonte, está a dizer que o vídeo usa a licença do creative commons. Gabriel Duartez (talk) 18:07, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:29, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image made with some kind of cartoon avatar generator, other versions are common online (Eg. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxERodrjrFf7KJl_u3ELtig) Lord Belbury (talk) 19:25, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

--Lord Belbury (talk) 19:26, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 05:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Map 2

[edit]

I was the uploader with my previous (inactive and not accecible) account. At first I though they were created with Open Street Map. But I checked it and seems they are not. I may used another non-free map. I apologized to the community. --Alpha334 (talk) 18:33, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Regardless of whether the introduction is legitimate or not (see Special:CentralAuth/Alpha334), these are clearly crearted by the default OSM viewer and therefore freely licensed. No valid reason for deletion; files are COM:INUSE. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:25, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Indicated source says "© ХНТУСГ, 2022, Усі права захищені". Unless I am very mistaken, "Усі права захищені" means "All rights reserved". What, if anything, is the basis for the claimed license? Jmabel ! talk 18:17, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:34, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res and no EXIF, unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Lord Belbury (talk) 19:29, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:51, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like this photo deleted. Sjgdzn (talk) 20:12, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason provided. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was uploaded to Unsplash after 5 June 2017. GeoO (talk) 20:46, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I moved this photo from Unspalsh to Wikimedia Commons. I'm sorry, I wasn't attentive. --GeoO (talk) 20:49, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:27, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was uploaded to Unsplash after 5 June 2017. GeoO (talk) 20:50, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I moved this photo from Unspalsh to Wikimedia Commons. I'm sorry, I wasn't attentive. --GeoO (talk) 20:50, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:25, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a work of US Government per metadata - © Lynnette's Portrait Design 2017. Connormah (talk | contribs) 21:51, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If true, don't forget to tag the cropped version: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pete_Stauber_official_photo_(cropped).jpg 47.223.90.202 23:43, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Use File:Pete Stauber, official portrait, 116th Congress.jpg or File:Pete Stauber, official portrait, 116th Congress (cropped).jpg instead. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:27, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 22:31, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:24, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to Commons:Deletion requests/Files on User:Rubin16/review5, Commons:Deletion requests/Files on User:Rubin16/review4 and others: I have manually reviewed uploads of one user and marked those that couldn't be considered trivial enough and couldn't be kept due to lack of FoP for statues in Russia. That is the last in my review of uploads of this user: it took me a year since April 2021...

rubin16 (talk) 13:02, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:11, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aaron Frenkel and Vladimir Putin

[edit]

When I uploaded the following pictures I had a misunderstanding about the right to use the pictures. Now, the copyright owner of the photos contacted me and made it clear to me that he did not give me the right to use the photos. I would like to remove this photos please, Unlike87 (talk) 13:45, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:12, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

KAMAZ is public company, not state-only-owned, {{PD-RU-exempt}} is not applicable here. And {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} is fake too, © KAMAZ PTC 1999-2022. Similar file had already been delted in 2013. Logo should be used only by fair-use in local projects where it is possible. WindEwriX (talk) 06:30, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:47, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted content from the source site http://генофонд.рф/?page_id=5500 Bogomolov.PL (talk) 19:22, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Вопрос: в каком виде должно быть письменное разрешение на использование подобной работы от ресурса генофонд.ру? Достаточно ли будет электронного письма от правообладателя данной карты, или Викимедиа требует всё в физическом виде - с печатью, подписью, бумагой и так далее? Спрашиваю потому, что не могу знать всех нюансов правил Вики по получению разрешения. Знаю точно, что данный ресурс Генофонд.ру открыт к размещению подобных генетических карт в теме Мокшане, и этому есть доказательства в виде полученного мной недавно разрешения на публикацию похожей на эту, работы непосредственно от её правообладателя с официального сайта генофонд.ру (могу письмо показать или же самому можно связаться с данным ресурсом через официальный email, чтобы убедиться). И еще вопрос, быть может нужна на их сайте какая-либо специальная пометка в виде знака или символа, говорящая о праве использования той или иной работ(ы) в Викимедиа?GMStudio (talk) 07:55, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Ворованный контент должен быть удален в любом случае - никакого разрешения нет, а значит удалять. Почитайте Википедия:Лицензирование изображений, там всё написано. Подробнее на интересующий Вас предмет читайте тут (про письма). Bogomolov.PL (talk) 09:20, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:49, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

А кто сказал, что контент ворованный? Он же говорит, что контент не ворованный. --95.24.60.6 01:38, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

false "own work" license, copyrighted printed book scan Bogomolov.PL (talk) 19:26, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:49, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence the author Arnaud Fournet provided free license permission Bogomolov.PL (talk) 19:40, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:49, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zwar unscharfes Bild, aber es zeigt im zentralem Fokus das urheberrechtlich geschützte Gemälde "Aufgelöste Kartei" von Eberhard Göschel (* 1943) aus dem Jahr 1994 (grundsätzlich sind Innenaufnahmen im Gebäude untersagt). Paulae (talk) 16:22, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:12, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potential copyright violation: these files are stills taken from 30tv Navarra's recording of Andosilla's 2022 Passion play. The uploader(s) seem(s) to have taken care to crop out the timestamp and logo visible in the original video. One can only guess why, but it could be interpreted as an attempt to circumvent copyright claims.

HyperGaruda (talk) 17:24, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:13, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation ? The author of the picture is alive, no ORTS. Zunkir (talk) 17:26, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:12, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation ? The author of the picture is alive, no ORTS. Zunkir (talk) 17:27, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:12, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Includes artwok by Astri Welhaven Heiberg (1881–1967). No indication they were working in the US at date of publication. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:53, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ShakespeareFan00: taking a look at the map on https://rkd.nl/nl/explore/artists/36961 Lotje (talk) 16:14, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Were the illustrations published earlier in Norway? The country of residence does not matter for "country of origin"; it is the country they were first published in. If this was the original publication of the illustrations, they are fine. Carl Lindberg (talk) 05:28, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@ShakespeareFan00: , now I see what you mean. to be honest, I don't have a clue Lotje (talk) 11:23, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The book seems not to be a translation, but an original, compiled from different sources. Some of the stories are attributed as "from the Norwegian of Louis Moe", which seems to imply they are self-illustrated works first published elsewhere. I don't find Heiberg and Bridgman, though, so her illustrations may be original for this book –LPfi (talk) 20:21, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, then  Keep unless there is evidence of earlier publication of the illustrations. Carl Lindberg (talk) 21:25, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Per discussion, PD-US-not renewed. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:21, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same photo is tagged © All rights reserved at Flickr, where uploaded nearly 2 years earlier. Needs evidence that Saadtowheed here is the same Saad Towheed who owns the photo at Flickr, and not an impersonator who has stolen Saad's photo from Flickr. MPF (talk) 14:37, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - uploader has changed the Flickr license to match here, so withdrawing the deletion nomination - MPF (talk) 20:35, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nomination withdrawn. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:48, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The website given as the source of this image is marked "© Swisscom 2022". There is no evidence that the uploader has permission to relicense this image as {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Marbletan (talk) 17:16, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: I found this claim of cc-by-sa-4.0 credited to Relaxnews, but since it post-dates the upload to Commons, it could very well be perpetuating license fraud from the Commons upload. I've found no indication that Relaxnews (now ETX Studios) or AFP routinely (or ever) released their content under CC-BY licenses. See also the image at the AFP photo archive --Animalparty (talk) 22:06, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I've decided to replace the English [3] and Russian Wikipedia [4] article images with a new version. A diehard editor (talk) 14:48, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:53, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark says copyright belongs to OlavarríaDrone, which seems unrelated to the uploader's username. Frodar (talk) 19:29, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:00, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mögliche Urheberechtsverletzung. Es hat sich herausgestellt, dass ich nach meinem Hochladen die Herkunft nicht korrekt eruieren konnte. Bitte Schnelllöschung Ἀστερίσκος (talk) 16:17, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:33, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:United States#Stamps, U.S. postage stamps issued after 1978 are not in the public domain. Eureka Lott 16:18, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:33, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyright violation, licensing claims CC 4.0 but nothing on source page (official club website) indicating this is the case Crowsus (talk) 18:08, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:14, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan photo

[edit]

I was the uploader with my previous (inactive and not accecible) account. I was new user, my fist step in Wikipedia. I upload the image to wikipedia and they were moved here. They are scan of non-free images or photo of non-free images.--Alpha334 (talk) 17:48, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 05:57, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Allervous (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful authorship, no embedded metadata.

Larryasou (talk) 16:26, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep No reason or evidence to doubt authorship of an established user. Lack of metadata is merely suspicious but not conclusive. SinghIsFxing (talk) 00:04, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. Established? I guess they have been around a few years. Looking through this user's uploads, however, is concerning. First of all, there is definitely some history of blatant copyright violations claimed as own work. It is true that these images don't return hits on reverse image searches, but they could be from any number of social media sites whose images don't show up in reverse image searches. These particular images very much have a Facebook vibe to them. Most are also of relatively low resolution. It's also odd that the file names from this user switch between multiple languages (and more than just the English and Japanese shown here). There's nothing wrong with being multilingual, but it's just odd to randomly switch between languages for different images you upload. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:03, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I see they have around 7,000 edits on the Chinese Wikipedia. SinghIsFxing (talk) 04:20, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, small photos without metadata, uploader did not comment. Deleted as copyvios. Taivo (talk) 10:17, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Allervous (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlike own work, low resolution or missing metadata.

Larryasou (talk) 12:51, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These are actually all my works, formally they were only available on Q-zone. Allervous (talk) 00:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed here are some photos of campus club in Qufu normal university, for instance, File:漢服スポークスマンコンペティション.jpg, which had been released on Bilibili earlier as video cover (direct link). Would you mind sharing the original photos to clear the doubts?--Larryasou (talk) 03:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP, User:Allervous, could you please be so kind to upload the original files with exif data?. --Ellywa (talk) 08:28, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicates File:Pan-american-hwy-north-1.jpgFredddie 14:31, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 14:46, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was the creator with my previous (inactive and not accecible account). I was new user then with out much experience of commons. The Santa Claus cap icon i think is from internet pic, not free use. Is not a picture of commons. Alpha334 (talk) 15:18, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 14:47, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source is not from the official website of the government, the license applies to content from the website only. Frodar (talk) 04:49, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image belonging to this website, which is copyrighted. --Aroblesm (talk) 03:31, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not voting keep or delete. Just pointing out some facts: materials generated by the Government of Chile are not automatically public domain; in 2010-2011, a resolution by Minister Secretary General of Gov. Ena Von Baer licensed materials published on gob.cl/gov.cl and most central government agencies as CC-BY; a decree was passed during Bachelet's second government making it mandatory to all government agencies to publish materials under a "free license" (does not specify which). This particular image used to be available at the Michelle Bachelet foundation, now unavailable, archivomichellebachelet.cl, which only said ""Los archivos contenidos son públicos y pueden ser descargados y reproducidos. Sólo se debe citar la fuente de donde proceden."" (published files are public and may be downloaded and reproduced. Source must be cited). Taking the 2010 resolution by Von Baer, this photograph is under a CC-BY license as it was available on the official Government site [5] [6]. I don't have a strong opinion on the matter, but sourcing and licensing should be corrected accordingly and it may be kept. --Bedivere (talk) 04:01, 17 August 2022 site.)

I'm voting keep, in reality the image belonging to [7] this photograph is under a CC-BY license as it was available on the official Government site.--Oli (talk) 01:50, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find any declaration on the copyright status of the files of that website (gobiernodechile.cl), that is different from gob.cl, the usual site from which we're accepting files with the Template:cc-Gobierno de Chile. —Frodar (talk) 02:41, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
it applies to all government websites. Gob.cl is the current url but gobiernodechile.cl still redirects to gob.cl after its move in late 2010. Bedivere (talk) 18:42, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Again it applies to all government websites. Gob.cl is the current url but gobiernodechile.cl still redirects to gob.cl after its move in late 2010. Oli (talk) 13:28, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If so, the license should be clear about that. The English and Spanish version of the template links the attribution as [www.gob.cl Gobierno de Chile] and the Spanish version goes further saying in its first line "Este archivo proviene de la página del [www.gob.cl Gobierno de Chile]", not counting other websites as options. —Frodar (talk) 19:38, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Will update accordingly later today Bedivere (talk) 13:44, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Really will update accordingly later Oli (talk) 05:26, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
? Bedivere (talk) 17:10, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. Source has been revised since the original DR and relates to gov. of Chile. --Ellywa (talk) 20:04, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Es ist wegen der aufgelegten Bildbeschreibung «Johann Gottlieb Willamov(ius) 1736–1777» eine Fälschung des nebenstehenden Bildes:
Friedrich Bury - Johann Gottlieb Fichte 1801
Gloser (talk) 06:40, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Meine Ansprache an den Ersteller «Angebliches Bild von Johann Gottlieb Willamov» vom 15. Jun. 2022 war erfolglos geblieben. Die Seite «Jacob Willamowius ehemals Wilamowski», für die er das Bild geschaffen hatte, ist heute gelöscht worden.--Gloser (talk) 09:29, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. File has been correctly renamed, but has bad quality and is not in use today. Deleted based on {{COM:REDUNDANT]]. --Ellywa (talk) 20:07, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Данный логотип банка устаревший. С 2021 банком используется обновленный логотип согласно новому наименованию. Анна2102 (talk) 07:24, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion per IronGargoyle. --Ellywa (talk) 20:08, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that the uploader is actually Aleš Fevžer who is professional sports photographer Snowflake91 (talk) 09:15, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: 1 week for COM:VRT. @Sportart97: Please send VRT agreement with Aleš Fevžer as he is most likely copyright holder. As friendly reminder, CC license is not specific to WP projects.
OP (@Snowflake91): Next time think about tagging such files with {{No VRTS permission since}}. A09090091 (talk) 10:17, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. No VRT permission ticket is included on the file page. If this is found, the file can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:19, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Como propietaria del archivo solicito su eliminación definitiva 6JULIA9 (talk) 10:00, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per discussion and per COM:COURTESY. @6JULIA9: to delete the image based on courtesy, we need more motivation then "I don't want this here anymore". Please provide more detail why this image must be deleted after 11 years of use on Wikipedia and possibly elsewhere. Decided to keep also because there is no alternative photo available with a free license as far as I am aware. --Ellywa (talk) 20:48, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

After writing above motivation, I did find two more images on Commons, now in Category:Pitingo, but these can not be considered an alternative for the nice portrait of 6JULIA9. Ellywa (talk) 20:54, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SD tag is used as G7. But this file was uploaded over 7 days before him. Therefore, they are not eligible for immediate deletion. Therefore, I will issue a deletion request on behalf of the author. @Indo Watch: Please tell us why you want to delete this file. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 17:01, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:32, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

for PD-Old in Russia the publication date is important, not the creation date. The source has no proof that the photo was published in 1931, I wasn't able to find a better source either rubin16 (talk) 13:28, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain to me how copyright can be transferred from the author to the first publisher. Based on what? 2A00:23C7:4215:B201:E82A:80A6:4D01:6BEC 15:28, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:39, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One of the file that was used to create the image was deleted File:600px Quadrado Branco com uma figura olimpica grega.PNG due to copyright. Alpha334 (talk) 14:23, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:41, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was the creator with my previous (inactive and not accecible account). I was new user then with out much experience of commons. The circles and torch are from internet pic, not free use. Alpha334 (talk) 14:35, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:43, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Specific renewal : "Grammar minimum essentials. © 10Apr31; A35780. Edith H. Tressler (W); 6Nov58; R224130." ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:10, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:43, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo belongs to Sonia Balady ..... no evidence is offered that this is not theft Victuallers (talk) 17:33, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was authorized by the photographer herself. I will bring supporting documents. Please give me a few days for my arrangements. Grateful Mvfurtado (talk) 18:16, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Below is the text of the photographer herself translated about the permission to use the photo:
On Mon., 14th of Mar. 2022 at 21:38, Sonia Balady
wrote:
Hi Marcus
Follows the photo.
I authorize the use on the wikipedia page of Mrs. Odete Eid.
I don't know how to upload the image to the Wikimedia Commons platform. I think I need your help. abs
Sonia
I can forward the original e-mail to some contact to confirm the veracity.
I am available to bring another document if needed. Grateful Mvfurtado (talk) 18:57, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Mvfurtado, please ask the copyrights holder to send a permissions email at VRT, best through COM:RELGEN, and avoid sharing contact details of others in public. Thanks. ─ The Aafī (talk) 03:38, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:44, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original non-free image was scan from a book before edited. Alpha334 (talk) 18:01, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Commons:Deletion requests/Maps. --Krd 14:42, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original non-free image was scan from a book before edited. Alpha334 (talk) 18:01, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Commons:Deletion requests/Maps. --Krd 14:42, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maps

[edit]

Municipalities/Communities maps

Quarters/Communities maps

I was the uploader with my previous (inactive and not accecible) account. But I made a terrible mistake. All these images created by editing a map that is not free-use. I though was free to use but is not. All files must be deleted for copyright. I apologized to the community. --Alpha334 (talk) 18:28, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Alpha334: Hello, could you provide more information (link etc.) ? Kadı Message 17:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Alpha334: I find this whole scenario very suspicious, that a veteran sysop of Wikimedia is unable to access his account and also suddenly dveleops an urge to undo all their past uploads. SinghIsFxing (talk) 00:15, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep all. I agree that there is something suspicious here. Simple outlines of geographic areas are not creative and the fact that no source was provided for the supposed infringement is odd. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:18, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The borders of the administrative divisions of Cyprus are not copyrightable, and presumably that is the supposedly copyrighted base map. Besides, I also harbor suspicions as to the veracity of the nominator’s claim, and I don’t think that that should form the basis of a deletion. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 18:49, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. Evidence for copyright violation shall be provided. --Krd 14:42, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was the creator with my previous (inactive and not accecible account). I was new user then with out much experience of commons. The circles and torch are from internet pic, not free use. Alpha334 (talk) 14:34, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyrighted logo, no permission. --Krd 15:34, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Specific renewal for N.M and intro. " HAWTHORNE, NATHANIEL. The House of the Seven Gables. Edited by Ward H. Green. (Golden key series) © on introd., bibliography, questions & problems; 19Jun31; A39310. Ward H. Green (A); 6Nov58; R224135." ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:16, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


  • Keep. This work was not properly renewed. The work’s copyright page gives the proprietor of the copyright as “D. C. Heath and Company”; however, the renewal is in the name of “Ward H. Green.” As Mr. Green did not own the copyright in this work, he had no authority to renew the same; thus, the work was not properly renewed. As it was not properly renewed, the work has entered the public domain. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 01:17, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Authors can renew their works in most instances no matter who was the proprietor of the copyright.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:35, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion, PCP. --Krd 15:32, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False copyright information(own work) Takumiboo (talk) 18:16, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:29, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

after discussion with photographed people (bad quality picture that will be replaeced) Lucyin (talk) 19:02, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:30, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE: just a wall. The filename betrays the uploader's intent, which wasn't the contribution to this project, and caused their indefinite block from multiple 'pedias. Rojelio (talk) 19:52, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Question How was this photo, which is a perfectly valid motif and in scope, and the filename used for vandalism? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:57, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Pretty much any of the author's edits cross-wiki: Special:CentralAuth/Mohammd_tajik, e.g. [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]...
    It's a useless photo of some random wall (I quote: "An image does not magically become useful by virtue of the argument that it could be used to illustrate a Wikipedia article on X, merely because X happens to be the subject of the photograph") whose only claimed significance, as expressed by its filename, comes from the unsourced (and unreliable) opinion of an individual showing maniacal/obsessive behavior (sorry if that sounds like an attack, it's not my intention, but I don't know how to describe it otherwise). -- Rojelio (talk) 17:59, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Walls are on topic and this is a perfectly good photo, and the description can be changed. However, if it's impossible to keep this user's socks off wiki and they are going to vandalize less if this photo is deleted...I don't know. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:23, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Sure, they're blocked on several language Wikipedias, but they're not on Commons or in fact on any other WMF project. If there's a problem with the file name, you can ask for it to be renamed. SHB2000 (talk) 10:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 15:31, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Артём 13327 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Windows 7 calculator is not free. I allow discussion, look license. Taivo (talk) 13:51, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This license is listed incorrectly Артём 13327 (talk) 14:03, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and remarks. The fact that the calculator looks familiar does not mean it is not copyrightable. Imho this is above threshold of originality and therefore copyrighted for many years to come. --Ellywa (talk) 22:14, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: as per [13]. Yann (talk) 20:36, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality file Trivialist (talk) 21:20, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep how many other videos of cunnilingus do we have? Dronebogus (talk) 12:30, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
About 14. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:42, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, such a film does not exist yet in Category:Males performing cunnilingus. Imho this is educational useful and in scope of the project. --Ellywa (talk) 22:20, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of copyright. (1) Deletion nomination in Feb. was closed wrongly. The GWOIA is only valid for "the Executive Yuan's website" (i.e. " www.ey.gov.tw ", not "websites"), and it is not valid for the "Executive Yuan History Display" website ( history.ey.gov.tw ). (2) Even though the same image can be found at "www.ey.gov.tw"( [14]), the page containing this image specifically states "All content is copyrighted by either the Executive Yuan or another party. Any usage of this content requires the agreement or authorization of the original copyright owner(s), unless this usage qualifies as fair use.", so I think this image is excluded by GWOIA. Additional note is that the GWOIA excludes this kind of image because of Article II-C, "For some videos, photos, sheet music and contracted case writings or other works, the administration must especially state that the approval must be duly obtained before use." S099001 (talk) 10:10, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In the earlier DR: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Bingobingo102080, closed by User:Rosenzweig, they decided to keep the image based on {{GWOIA}}, as mentioned on the file page. I come to another conclusion. The text about copyright of the source website of Executive Yuan, on this page allows free use and even changes of the material. However, lower on the page (translated with Google translate) it is written: “In using the materials and materials provided by this license, the relevant information must not be maliciously altered. If the information displayed after use does not match the original materials and materials, the user shall bear civil and criminal responsibilities.” Imho this is not compatible with the licensing on Commons and not in agreement with {{GWOIA}}. Licenses on Commons all allow alterations/derivative works without any exceptions (apart from personality rights perhaps). Therefore the file must be deleted imho. Ellywa (talk) 19:45, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:02, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]