Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/07/29
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
_–_Indo-Chinese_Chocolate_Albatross.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(20742035946).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
I uploaded it by mistake Siam Ahmed Zitul (talk) 05:29, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 10:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Two uploads, the first credited to http://www.minci.gob.ve/efemeride-1974-fue-creado-poliedro-caracas/, the second cropped a little and instead credited to the uploader as their own work. Given the user's other copyvios, these may also be copyvios, rather than the user deciding to credit their own work differently on the second upload.
Lord Belbury (talk) 17:44, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 17:58, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Image stolen from online porn sites, see https://www.google.com/search?tbs=simg:CAQS_1AEJezeozrW2-BEa8AELEKjU2AQaAggYDAsQsIynCBo6CjgIBBITggX6EniFGa4h9B3PJt4g3hLQOBobhALpwhppSzVcgddbRu5wyPMPddrMGqa-9iaEIAUwBAwLEI6u_1ggaCgoICAESBA3bJaQMCxCd7cEJGoUBChkKB2Rpc2Vhc2XapYj2AwoKCC9tLzAyN3gzChcKBHVnbHnapYj2AwsKCS9hL2IwZGdwMwoYCgVldmVudNqliPYDCwoJL20vMDgxcGtqChgKBWRpcnR52qWI9gMLCgkvYS80cjlmdHAKGwoIY2xvc2UtdXDapYj2AwsKCS9tLzAyY3FmbQw&sxsrf=ALiCzsZP83KxrW7JzaXaoQNRVCUh15lH7w:1659124767716&q=disease&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjIuauz8Z75AhWJYcAKHX6mBaIQ2A4oAXoECAIQNQ&biw=1280&bih=1250&dpr=1 ♦♦♦thibaultmol♦♦♦ (talk) 20:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:22, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Blurry and unused photo of a penis, we have better pics available. Tabercil (talk) 05:15, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. very low quality, useless --:bdk: 05:24, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
it’s my file, my picture, and i want it deleted immediately Flameon393 (talk) 22:01, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. Why did you load it up?. --Achim55 (talk) 22:03, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/72/Male_Penis.jpg Yiwopa6021 (talk) 22:29, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PENIS. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:18, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Delete per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:53, 12 November 2024 (UTC)- Delete per nom. ShaanSenguptaTalk 09:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:02, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete and lock title Dronebogus (talk) 21:24, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Allegedly some starting (born 2010) raper from Russia, deleted for no notability from Ruwiki. Do we really need his photo here? Ignatus (talk) 23:18, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deletion, F10. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:44, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Per the reasons in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bank Mellat logo.svg Thuresson (talk) 17:29, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. The logo will be in Public Domain when +30 years in use. HeminKurdistan (talk) 09:44, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:17, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PartizanishRus (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:PCP. Mostly low-resolution photographs (as well as 3D models clearly created by an external software of professional artist); at least the majority unlikely to be own work – four files uploaded on their alt account, Partizanish (talk · contribs), are definite copyvios (cf. their talk page). EXIF data, where present, is different for virtually all files, with cameras used being Canon EOS 7D, 600D, and 650D, but also different parameters, such as "Orientation: Normal" (and no other data), on arbitrary files. No way to determine the PD status of the historical images, File:Сыктывкар коммунистическая .jpg and File:Ордженикидзе (сыктывкар).jpg, either.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- File:Syk 1979.jpg
- File:Syk railway station.jpg
- File:Название города на коми языке.jpg
- File:Памятник букве "ö" коми алфавита.jpg
- File:Доска почета Коми.jpg
- File:Гимназия им. А.С. Пушкина.jpg
- File:Театр драмы им. В.Савина.jpg
- File:Многофункциональный Комплекс "Торговый Двор" (Сыктывкар).jpg
- File:Penthaus syktyvkar .gif
- File:Отель "Сыктывкар".jpg
- File:Администрация Сыктывкара.jpg
- File:Коммунистическая улица в НГ.jpg
- File:Площадь перед театром оперы и балета .jpg
- File:Пожарная колонча syk.jpg
- File:Угол Парка Кирова.jpg
- File:Avalon-syk.jpg
- File:Бабушкина-Первомайская улица.jpg
- File:Сыктывкар на въезде.jpg
- File:ЖД вокзал Сыктывкара.jpg
- File:Дом молитвы христиан-баптистов.jpg
- File:Свято-Стефановский кафедральный собор.jpg
- File:Сыктывкар коммунистическая .jpg
- File:Ордженикидзе (сыктывкар).jpg
- File:Кронверк синема в сыктывкаре.jpg
- File:Kronverk Cinema v Syktyvkare.jpg
- File:Театр оперы и балета в Сыктывкаре.jpg
- File:Lizny stadion im. Smetaninoy.jpg
- File:Stadion Syktyvkar.jpg
- File:Kardiologichesky Centr Syktyvkar.jpg
- File:Syktyvkar Universitet.jpg
- File:Parma i Avrora.jpg
- File:Maksi Syktyvkar.jpg
- File:Автобус Сыктывкар.jpg
- File:Mondi-Syktyvkar .jpg
- File:Syk titul.jpg
- File:Emb145 KAT.jpg
- File:Терминал аэропорта Сыктывкара (второй этаж).jpg
- File:SCW титульный.jpg
- File:B737-500 в аэропорту Сыктывкара.jpg
- File:Терминал Сыктывкар.jpg
- File:Панорама перрона с КДП.jpg
- File:Действующий международный терминал.jpg
- File:Вид на терминал внутренних авиалиний со стороны перона.jpg
- File:Интерьер нового терминала..png
- File:Макет нового терминала..jpg
- File:План расположения нового терминала.png
- File:Главная стела в Сыктывкаре.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:40, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:43, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Partizanish (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:PCP; same as Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by PartizanishRus (including the fact that four other uploads from this accounts are definite copyvios), except here the majority is relatively high-res though too professional to be likely own work considering the circumstances. Camera is a Canon EOS 600D on one photo and a PowerShot G1 X on a different one; rest of the files does not appear to have any EXIF at all.
- File:Панорама с КДП. Аэропорт Сыктывкар.jpg
- File:ЖК "Петергоф" в Сыктывкаре.jpg
- File:Размещение нового терминала в аэропорту Сыктывкара.jpg
- File:Премиум вагон фирменного поезда "Сыктывкар".jpg
- File:Стефановская площадь (Сыктывкар).jpg
- File:Avalon hotel in Syktyvkar.jpg
- File:МФК "Торговый двор" в Сыктывкаре..jpg
- File:Памятник Рублю. Сыктывкар..jpg
- File:Кронверк Синема в Сыктывкаре.jpg
- File:Поскадка Б737 в Сыктывкаре.jpg
- File:Boeing 737 in SCW air.jpg
- File:Boeing 737 UTair in SCW air.jpg
- File:Center SCW.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:41, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:46, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused picture of an unspecified sportswear (?); no educational value, unusable, out of scope. COM:SPAM Feyth (talk) 00:28, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:40, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Uploaded for w:Mohammed Hijab. No other use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:45, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:39, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:41, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Logo of a non-notable company; out of COM:SCOPE. Might exceed COM:TOO. -M.nelson (talk) 08:46, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:41, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Benjaminares (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused photos of a non-notable individual, out of COM:SCOPE
-M.nelson (talk) 08:51, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:28, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:50, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:29, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:50, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:30, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:51, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:30, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:51, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:30, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:53, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 13:56, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope - personal photo Mindmatrix 14:29, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Source is "Shutterstock". The rest of the user uploads also seem to be all a case for F1. Hangman'sDeath (talk) 07:12, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Unlikely to have been published under a free license. Uploader failed to provide a proper link to the source. --Strakhov (talk) 16:53, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
As the description states "This picture was collected from mehazabien chowdhury's facebook account.", this is clearly not the author's own work. Ilhamnobi (talk) 07:21, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 16:53, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Not free image. User didn't show that foto was published under free license. Link hasn't this foto and any permission for free commercial use.. Kursant504 (talk) 07:28, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no free license at the source link. --Strakhov (talk) 16:54, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
It is not my work Semmy1960 (talk) 13:12, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete but if it wasn't your own work, then why did you upload it? SHB2000 (talk) 06:08, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: low quality/resolution collage image. Unlikely to be own work, as suggested. --Strakhov (talk) 16:57, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
copyviol: photo by RADIONORBA / Francesco Liuzzi, cf. davidemaggio.it — danyele 15:34, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete As likely copyvio per the nominator. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:22, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Strakhov (talk) 16:59, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
copyviol, cf. spettacolo.eu — danyele 15:44, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete As likely copyvio per the nominator. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:23, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Strakhov (talk) 17:00, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:17, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 17:02, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Obviously a hoax. The Roman Empire didn't cover Norway and Sweden in 117. Achim55 (talk) 21:18, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:53, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 17:04, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Uploaded by the author of the book for promotional purposes MexTDT (talk) 23:28, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Update: This is spam. The source link is where the novel is being published. MexTDT (talk) 04:56, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of a free license at source. --Strakhov (talk) 17:05, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
exact copy of 70377 Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 13:24, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, the two photos are identical, so it's fine to delete one of them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:33, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 13:17, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
File:Close Wing of Appias lyncida eleonora (Boisduval, 1836) – Indo-Chinese Chocolate Albatross.jpg
[edit]_%E2%80%93_Indo-Chinese_Chocolate_Albatross.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E2%80%93_Indo-Chinese_Chocolate_Albatross.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I uploaded it by mistake XonamvongchukRjr (talk) 17:08, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 18:53, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 20:25, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 18:39, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
person died in 1930, cannot be own work of 2022. Original date, author? Source? Publication status? Drakosh (talk) 07:04, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- А как надо написать какую категорию написать для файла подскажите я исправлю . ? Wahmistr (talk) 18:01, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The uploader did not give sufficient evidence that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence, per COM:EVID. Therefore the file has to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 09:37, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Не удаляйте я размещаю информацию о своих предках из достоверных источниках что будет если начну удалять контент исходя сугубо из политических убеждений так ведь я этого не делаю так что подумай те о своих действиях?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wahmistr (talk • contribs) 15:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Possible copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 20:29, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:15, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 20:29, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:15, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Possible copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 20:31, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:15, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 20:32, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:15, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 20:32, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:15, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The user posted it without my permission, I'm the author ARO243ARO (talk) 08:55, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 10:21, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The user posted it without my permission, I'm the author! ARO243ARO (talk) 08:56, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 10:20, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Orjen as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyvio from webpage www.xxxxxxx.com
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as per this edit-commentary the rationale seems not to be the claimed copyvio, but privacy or changed will (nominator seems to be the author). Courtesy-deletion should be considered. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:46, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion and scope?. --Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Ich habe es aus Versehen hochgeladen. 4al2 (talk) 07:20, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 21:46, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Version consolidée du traité instituant la Communauté européenne européenne, 10 novembre 1997.djvu
[edit]doublon ce fichier est un extrait de [File:Communautés_européennes_-_Journal_officiel_des_Communautés_européennes,_C_340,_10_novembre_1997.djvu] Cunegonde1 (talk) 07:54, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 21:46, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
LienardWiechertPotentialFastElectron.pdf Hydromechanik (talk) 08:07, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 21:47, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
This image is no longer in use. Please delete it for me. Thank Itechmap (talk) 09:16, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 21:48, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
This image is no longer in use. Please delete it for me. Thank Itechmap (talk) 09:16, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 21:48, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
This image is no longer in use. Please delete it for me. Thank Itechmap (talk) 09:16, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 21:48, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
The original file has all rights reserved: https://www.flickr.com/photos/13328329@N06/40731847001/ Wikimanedit98 (talk) 04:30, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:14, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Not licensed under Creative Commons. From https://facebook.com/thejoshuaweissman/ QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 04:48, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:13, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Very likely not an own work. License to be checked. See also https://floorballflash.at/de/person/110 Florentyna (talk) 05:06, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:12, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
I highly doubt that this really is the uploaders own work Hangman'sDeath (talk) 07:13, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:12, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maya-cem-invest (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images apparently all taken from kingdom-of-atlantis.com, which does not appear to CC licence its content.
- File:THE KINGDOM OF ATLANTIS LETTER TO THE UNITED NATIONS.jpg
- File:THE KINGDOM OF ATLANTIS SEASTEADING CONCEPT.jpg
- File:CLAIMED SOVEREIGN TERRITORY OF THE KINGDOM OF ATLANTIS.jpg
- File:ATLANTEAN CITIZEN NOMINEE CERTIFICATE.jpg
- File:PLANETARY ORGANIZING STRUCTURE.jpg
- File:PLANETARY GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE.jpg
- File:THE KINGDOM OF ATLANTIS CONSTITUTION.jpg
- File:HRM CHAIRMAN MICHAEL PUZZOLANTE.jpg
- File:KOA GOLD 1.png
- File:KOA FLAG.jpg
- File:KOA COAT OF ARMS FINAL JPEG.jpg
- File:THE KINGDOM OF ATLANTIS COAT OF ARMS.jpg
Lord Belbury (talk) 08:48, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:12, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Not own work: see metadata Bradipo Lento (talk) 09:09, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:10, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:St. Anna (Karlsfeld)
[edit]copyvio, mosaics 1957ff; no fop.
- File:Karlsfeld, St. Anna (2).jpg
- File:Karlsfeld, St. Anna (3).jpg
- File:Sankt Anna in Karlsfeld - baptismal font.jpg
- File:Sankt Anna in Karlsfeld - interiors.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 09:12, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:10, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Author stated in exif, not own work as claimed, needs OTRS
- File:20211005 Fotos Gruppenfoto Regierung Monauni Frick Risch Has.jpg
- File:20210325 Fotos Frick Manuel Portrait.jpg
- File:20210416 Fotos Marok Wachter Graziella Portrait.jpg
- File:20210325 Fotos Monauni Sabine Portrait.jpg
- File:20210325 Fotos Hasler Dominique Portrait.jpg
- File:20210325 Fotos Risch Daniel Portrait.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:09, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
found online before upload - https://www.elcorreo.com/pantallas/cine/tras-pista-mikel-20210216132343-ntrc.html - needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:09, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Likely Flickrwashing. Appears to be an aggregator Flickr account and the use of the image at https://www.bkmag.com/2014/10/09/the-average-rent-for-a-bushwick-1-bedroom-is-higher-than-in-boerum-hill/ predates the Flickr upload. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:49, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:07, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Likely flickrwashing, previously published at https://www.tatlerasia.com/power-purpose/ideas-education/nfts-fad-or-future-tatlercommunity Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:52, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:06, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Metadata credits EVANWALSH/BLACKHATSTUDIOS Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:08, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:05, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Thumbnail-size, bot-imported pic of unidentified location without context. Fl.schmitt (talk) 17:45, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:05, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 1234qwer1234qwer4 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://tineye.com/search/83c8acd478135d534bb3b0c3a35c6548c78566bd (at least center image found before upload here). Heavily-used upload from 2016, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:39, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Ok. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Partizanish/Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by PartizanishRus for additional background. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:58, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:49, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:01, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sissy Sofeea (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributiions to wm projects.
- File:SissySofeea 2.jpg
- File:SissySofeea 4.jpg
- File:SissySofeea 9.jpg
- File:SissySofeea 11.jpg
- File:SissySofeea 10.jpg
- File:SissySofeea , crossdresser , crossdressing , transvestites.jpg
Achim55 (talk) 20:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:01, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SinteGaleshka (talk · contribs)
[edit]Paintings of an artist still alive, autorization needed, vsee Commons:OTRS/fr
- File:Amazonia115x118.jpg
- File:La jarre de Tesgüino.jpg
- File:Indien à la coiffe.jpg
- File:Kuiliy 2014.jpg
- File:1877 nezpercé 2014.jpg
- File:Stoicisme 2017.jpg
Shev123 (talk) 20:35, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Authorization has been granted by artist. SinteGaleshka (talk) 20:56, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:00, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
This is a Derivative Work. While the the author of the text is given, there are numerous diagrams and screenshots. The copyright status of each of these needs to given. Headlock0225 (talk) 21:38, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:59, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Randomly taken frım the Internet. Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:55, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:58, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:27, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Comment COM:CSD#F10 does not apply because he has an article: w:Samer Hassan. Smaller versions of this image are circulating widely online, e.g. https://cyber.harvard.edu/people/shassan. As such, COM:CSD#F1 does not apply since the Wikimedia copy cannot be proven to be taken from any publicly available version of this photo. On the other hand, there are still doubts regarding the origin of this file since it lacks EXIF metadata and it only stayed up for one day in 2019 before being deleted under F10, so the other websites also probably did not get it from us. If the uploader is the actual photographer, they should upload a JPEG with original EXIF metadata to prove their authorship. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:34, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:58, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
No FOP in Morocco. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:50, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:55, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
No FOP in Morocco. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:51, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:55, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:29, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:30, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:39, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:42, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:43, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:44, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:44, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:04, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The gate is part of the Genghis Khan Statue Complex, which as per w:en:Equestrian statue of Genghis Khan, is "a visitor centre, itself 10 metres (33 ft) tall, with 36 columns representing the 36 khans from Genghis to Ligdan Khan. It was designed by sculptor D. Erdenebileg and architect J. Enkhjargal and erected in 2008." There is no acceptable freedom of panorama in Mongolia; free use of public art and works is only allowed in reporting of current events, not free commercial exploitations. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:18, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:29, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP that covers buildings and 3D art. Abzeronow (talk) 21:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
The image from [1], not cc license.Maybe copyvio shizhao (talk) 12:33, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:29, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Bogus self claim/cc license - discussion needed whether below TOO in Venezuela Эlcobbola talk 18:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:29, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
probably copyviol, cf. user uploads' history — danyele 15:45, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete As likely copyvio per the nominator. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:23, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:26, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
probably copyviol, cf. user uploads' history — danyele 15:49, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete As likely copyvio per the nominator. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:22, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:26, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:21, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep Yet another good portrait photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:29, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:27, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:22, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep This series is good and not personal but portraits of a model. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:41, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:27, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:27, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Good, and not personal but a portrait of a model. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:42, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:27, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:27, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Maybe a little dark in places, but a good portrait for 2009. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:44, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:27, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Moheen Reeyad as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader request. Out of project scope. Actually, this is a nice portrait. Yann (talk) 12:08, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- You think so! OK.
I withdraw my nomination. You can close this DR. Regards. ~ Moheen (keep talking) 12:12, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:50, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:27, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Pretty good portrait and did you notice it was previously kept in 2017? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:25, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:27, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:29, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Very good portrait. You are creating a lot of work by nominating so many portraits for deletion. I'd ask you respectfully to consider carefully whether a photo is artistic or is a good demonstration of a person wearing a specific kind of clothing such as an ao dai before nominating it for deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:27, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:29, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Good portrait. I don't have time to look at all of these right now, but so far, I think every single one of them should be kept. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:28, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:30, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep No, a posed artistic portrait. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:25, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:41, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Pretty good posed photo of a model, not a "personal photo". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:40, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:44, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep This series is a good depiction of an ao dai, which some people will want to see, and types of clothing - in this case, a national dress - are absolutely on topic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:38, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I forgot to tell the filemover that do not create redirects. FanNihongo (talk) 20:42, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Images that look like usually are either F1 (stolen from twitter) or F10 (self promotion). Hangman'sDeath (talk) 06:54, 29 July 2022 (UTC) Same for File:Ikiwblackk.jpg. The iamges are listed on id:Ikiwblack but it looks like self promotional content to me. --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 06:56, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Same for File:Ikiiwblack.jpg --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 05:38, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:48, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
This is a reproduction from a book. A photograph of a photograph is not considered personal work Lil-unique1 (talk) 09:28, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Just got an email notification. Keep this for the following reasons:
- If you flip the book linked by Lil-unique1 to its front, you see that it was originally published in London and New York in 1922, reprinted several times since then. As of January 01 2022, all such publications from 1926 or before are in public domain (1, 2). The photograph is of a 2-D inscription artwork that is over 2000 years old, and itself was recorded and published much earlier in the 19th century. The photograph challenged above is thus a personal work photograph of a public domain photograph in a public domain book published long ago.
- The photograph in the book is a photograph of 2-D artwork. In other words, it is simply a faithful reproduction of an old, public domain, two-dimensional work of art. Wikimedia's PD-Art guidelines apply.
- I had checked years ago with Wikimedia admins about both the PD-Art guidelines and whether it is okay to upload photos of public domain photographs. I believe one of the admin was James (check his talk page under my name) for the discussion and why it was okay to upload then. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 18:28, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. As stated above, its PD image.- Nizil Shah (talk) 06:56, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per Nizil Shah. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:50, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
copyviol, cf. latarma.it — danyele 15:42, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:52, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Text says Emerik Blum in 1984 and date says 1984 so it can't be published before 1977 and be PD. MGA73 (talk) 18:42, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:55, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
delete it 77.246.74.65 19:12, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- If you are User:Hovigkoyounian7 log in please. --Achim55 (talk) 20:05, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep This user is an obvious vandal and should be blocked for wasting everyone's time by uploading this map every day and then demanding that it be deleted. Or the map should be deleted if there's anything wrong with it, but what's most important is to block this user and all their IP socks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:19, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:56, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope fictional future map, unused. Enyavar (talk) 18:03, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- To me it looks more like nonsense. 181.43.5.222 18:13, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. This is nonsense - a whole conglomeration of theories about how countries could split up or change borders, and hypothetical flags for the hypothetical new countries that would be created. Obviously, no one knows what will happen to world politics in the next 800 years, and there's no educational purpose to this speculation. Omphalographer (talk) 22:01, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 20:12, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused picture of nondescript random tree, no meaningful context, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:55, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Miscategorized but a perfectly reasonable photograph. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:17, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep not a "random tree", rather a Fraxinus nigra. --Webfil (talk) 12:49, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Within scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:57, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Identical to File:Jjj Expwy S3901 sign with name.svg Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:23, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:38, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
F10 Nupixe (talk) 23:01, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. COM:SPEEDY#G7: Uploader's request to delete unused file. Marbletan (talk) 19:41, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hi,
- Please delete. Thank you very much! Nupixe (talk) 05:07, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- This is not "recently created (<7 days) content" in the sense of CSD#G7. Exactly why should this file be deleted? Wutsje 06:16, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- We have some copyright issues. This is our original image but it looks like the one from the web. The other company asked us to take it down. 96.55.13.247 02:21, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- We have some copyright issues. This is our original image but it looks like the one from the web. The other company asked us to take it down.
- Why it take so much to delete the file? Nupixe (talk) 05:27, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:39, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Not PD in both South Korea (will enter public domain in 2038) and the US (will enter public domain in 2063). Billytanghh (talk) 02:51, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:26, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Just a shipping box photo. Not the actual product or product box ♦♦♦thibaultmol♦♦♦ (talk) 11:28, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:31, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
It's the same image but with a red cross trough it.. Doesn't seem within scope ♦♦♦thibaultmol♦♦♦ (talk) 11:35, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:31, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio; earliest hits on Tineye from March 2014 Frodar (talk) 13:31, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio; earliest hit on Tineye from April 2016 Frodar (talk) 13:34, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
By mistake this is done Theankitjais12 (talk) 15:40, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:24, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
By mistake this is done Theankitjais12 (talk) 15:42, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:24, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Two of these uploaded as "own work" with different source URLs in the description, other two likely not to be own work either.
- File:Cognitive process of memorization.png
- File:2 Views of Chunking (Figure 2).jpg
- File:Ebbinghaus’s Forgetting Curve (Figure 1).jpg
- File:The modal model.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Lord Belbury (talk) 18:13, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:34, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 20:20, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: per uploader attestation on talk, EXIF data, and lack of reverse image hits. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:33, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Possible copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 20:21, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per uploader attestation on talk, EXIF data, and lack of reverse image hits. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:33, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 20:21, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per uploader attestation on talk, EXIF data, and lack of reverse image hits. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:33, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 20:22, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per uploader attestation on talk, EXIF data, and lack of reverse image hits. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:33, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 20:22, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per uploader attestation on talk, EXIF data, and lack of reverse image hits. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:33, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 20:22, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per uploader attestation on talk, EXIF data, and lack of reverse image hits. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:33, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 20:23, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per uploader attestation on talk, EXIF data, and lack of reverse image hits. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:33, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 20:23, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per uploader attestation on talk, EXIF data, and lack of reverse image hits. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:33, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 20:23, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per uploader attestation on talk, EXIF data, and lack of reverse image hits. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:33, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 20:23, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per uploader attestation on talk, EXIF data, and lack of reverse image hits. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:33, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 20:24, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per uploader attestation on talk, EXIF data, and lack of reverse image hits. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:33, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 20:24, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per uploader attestation on talk, EXIF data, and lack of reverse image hits. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:33, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 20:32, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Dipralb
, la foto dovrebbe essere in regola, è presa dal sito ufficiale del CSKA Sofia e quindi dovrebbe essere valido il template {{CSKA}}. --SonoGrazy (talk) 21:40, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:23, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
And also
- File:Пам'ятник військовому льотчику П. М. Нестерову.jpg
- File:Перемоги просп., 100-1 (1).jpg
- File:Перемоги просп., 100-1 (2).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 1989. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor Євген Карпов and architect Анатолій Сницарев. Микола Василечко (talk) 15:03, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:41, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
copyviol: photo by TUTTOROCK / Nino Saetti, cf. tuttorock.com — danyele 15:32, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:40, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
probably copyviol, cf. user uploads' history — danyele 15:40, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete As likely copyvio per the nominator. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:21, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:39, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
file in copyviol, cf. crisalidepress.it — danyele 15:51, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:39, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image is sideways. Correctly rotated image already extracted by bot ♦♦♦thibaultmol♦♦♦ (talk) 13:54, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:13, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyviol: photo by SPETTACOLOMANIA / Angelo Costanzo, cf. spettacolomania.it — danyele 15:37, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per the nominator unless SPETTACOLOMANIA / Angelo Costanzo can provide COM:VRT permission. I doubt they will though. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:22, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:23, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
probably copyviol, cf. user uploads' history — danyele 15:49, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:22, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
L'artiste n'est pas dans le domaine public. ChateauNantesNumérique (talk) 07:52, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Per [2], the artist Noëlie Couillaud lived 1881–1960, so the file can be restored in 2031. --Rosenzweig τ 15:36, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
L'artiste n'est pas dans le domaine public. ChateauNantesNumérique (talk) 07:52, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Per [3], the artist Noëlie Couillaud lived 1881–1960, so the file can be restored in 2031. --Rosenzweig τ 15:36, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
I don’t know how a song being traditional makes the recording PD, this is obviously extremely likely to be copyrighted for a very long time per the second tag. Dronebogus (talk) 09:03, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:36, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HannahRose 139 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Previously published at https://www.wiltwyckcemetery.org/our-grounds, need COM:VRT tickets.
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:19, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:33, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
It looks like a visualization of a construction project. A corresponding license would be necessary. Most likely not your own work. Lukas Beck (talk) 13:39, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:32, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Looks a lot like someone re-photographed an old photo here. However, there is no authorization for this. Lukas Beck (talk) 13:52, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Really terrible-quality photo of unidentified people. I'd tend to support deletion on that basis, regardless of any other issue. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:31, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, yes this photo was directly captured from a low resolution video. Currently we do not have the original photo with us. Is it possible to keep this one for the time being till we obtain the original photo ? Dajguru (talk) 09:07, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:32, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused poor composition image of nondescript car trunk, no educational value, unusable, out of scope. Numerous better images of CR-V's already on Commons. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Matlin (talk) 13:12, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:31, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files found with Special:Search/Birds Fly during Sunset incategory:"All media needing categories as of 2022"
[edit]Photos of non descript birds in flight and clouds and sunsets. We have enough photos of sunsets and the birds are not the best quality. No EDUSE in my opinion
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 21.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 44.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 07.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 31.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 37.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 41.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 43.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 12.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 38.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 13.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 04.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 30.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 42.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 33.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 14.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 15.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 29.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 36.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 25.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 11.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 39.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 01.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 17.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 23.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 34.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 10.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 22.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 24.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 09.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 20.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 02.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 28.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 06.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 18.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 40.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 19.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 32.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 08.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 03.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 16.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 05.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 35.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 26.jpg
- File:Birds Fly during Sunset 27.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I'd tend to keep these, as they are on topic, certainly not terrible, and there's no premium on image space on Commons, but it's not like I'd cry or something if they're deleted on the basis of your argument. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:36, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Support deleting. This user uploaded over 100 photos of the same subject (here are only 44 of them). This is not helpful at all for end users to choose the right one when they need such a photo. My advise for the uploader: selection, selection, selection. Pick only the very best photos to upload, help the end user by making a selection for them. We on Commons indeed have enough photos of skies and birds (and better ones), see for instance Category:Birds in flight and Category:Birds in flight at sunset. This is excessive.- @User:Gbawden Why did you not nominate the other ±60 also for deletion? Are they good enough? JopkeB (talk) 13:02, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:37, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It's just a box with the shipping label ♦♦♦thibaultmol♦♦♦ (talk) 11:27, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- There are also these that I think should be deleted as well, but didn't want to spam the deletion requests with them
- File:Nikon_D90_Arrival_(3204668891).jpg
- File:Nikon_D90_Arrival_(3204667901).jpg
- File:Nikon_D90_Arrival_(3205511892).jpg
- File:Nikon_D90_Arrival_(3205513840).jpg
- File:Nikon_D90_Arrival_(3204665823).jpg
- File:Nikon_D90_Arrival_(3204687667).jpg
- File:Nikon_D90_Arrival_(3205532430).jpg
- File:Nikon_D90_Arrival_(3205539312).jpg I guess this one atleast shows what the original packing method was like
- This one is borderline: File:Nikon_D90_Arrival_(3204678991).jpg ♦♦♦thibaultmol♦♦♦ (talk) 11:31, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:39, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(20742035946).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20742035946).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
image is me and searchable. i didn’t consent it to be here. i would like it removed. 2600:1001:B005:72C7:911F:D7E7:23BC:8B1 02:46, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
_(20742035946).jpg){kind=link}
Question IMC Berea College didn't have you sign a release form? This is a nice photo, but it's not in use and I would support honoring your wishes to have the image removed from here, but the source for the image is IMC Berea's Flickr account, so if you really want this photo to disappear from the Internet, you need to contact them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:56, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:34, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
_(20742035946).jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by River Epstein (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dodgy copyright status. These are all described as River Epstein's "own work"; but if I understand the descriptions correctly, one is by Hedi Slimane, one by Charlotte Zoller, one by Alejandro Tavera, and one by Brian Butler. Epstein could be any one of these four, but not two or more of them. And it makes the copyright status of the other three dubious as well.
- File:1982 Performance MAK.jpg
- File:Charles Derenne Rock en Seine.png
- File:Melody Syndrome.jpg
- File:Charles Derenne in Mexico by Alejandro Tavera 2017.jpg
- File:Charles Derenne & Douglas Gordon.jpg
- File:Charles & Kenneth.png
- File:Charles Derenne & Agnès B.jpg
Hoary (talk) 08:05, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi Hoary,
Thanks a lot for your message. As you mentioned above, I must have made a mistake. How can I upload pictures that I have been given the right by it's author? Thanks a lot for your help to improve this article. Best,
River. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2600:1700:4E00:3840:E4E3:A36D:257E:BE1 (talk) 13:30, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- It's a question that's frequently asked, River Epstein. Please read Commons:Volunteer Response Team#Licensing images: when do I contact VRT?, carefully. Note that at the top of that page there are links to versions of the page in other languages. -- Hoary (talk) 21:56, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Hoary, thanks for your message. I read carefully the link you sent me. Can you help me with one detail. I have the right for two pictures ( As i shot them myself) and the other ones I can have the permission as requested. There is just one little thing I cant find. on the link you gave me it says: Please ask the copyright holder to send a permission statement to the address listed above.
- I scrolled and read and can't find the address. I want to ask to the three persons who shot the other pictures to send their permissions, so I can move on in the process. Once again sorry for the back and forth, It's my first time editing an article about an artist I like.
- Best River . River Epstein (talk) 20:40, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- River Epstein, sorry but it's only today that I notice your question. The address for correspondence in English is permissions-commons@wikimedia.org ; the address for correspondence in another language might be different, but for example Commons:Équipe des répondeurs bénévoles says that for French it may be either permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (i.e. the same address) or permissions-fr@wikimedia.org . I hope that this is clear. -- Hoary (talk) 12:35, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot Hoary. It's super clear. A permission submission has been sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org.
- Regarding the rest of the article and the elements that lacked of sources they have been either sourced or removed, thanks to look at the article submission when you can for validation.
- Best River. River Epstein (talk) 17:17, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- River Epstein, sorry but it's only today that I notice your question. The address for correspondence in English is permissions-commons@wikimedia.org ; the address for correspondence in another language might be different, but for example Commons:Équipe des répondeurs bénévoles says that for French it may be either permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (i.e. the same address) or permissions-fr@wikimedia.org . I hope that this is clear. -- Hoary (talk) 12:35, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
There is an VRTS email received for “File:Charles Derenne in Mexico by Alejandro Tavera 2017.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2022102010016706. --Yahya (talk) 17:54, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Undelete if ever proper permission has been received. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:37, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
only a single usage; nonsense description (in de); there for sure is a more general solution; Herzi Pinki (talk) 12:34, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:38, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:29, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment I don't like this series as much as most of the other ones you've nominated, but these are portraits, not "personal photos". I would leave the decision on this series to the judgment of an admin, but in my opinion, there was no really good reason to nominate them for deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:46, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:39, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:39, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Weak Keep I'd keep it. Not a great portrait but decent. The other one in this series is poorly lit, so I don't care about it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:39, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:39, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Fake China National Expwy numbers
[edit]Fake number that not used locally.
- File:China Expwy G4503 sign with name.svg
- File:China Expwy G4503 sign no name.svg
- File:China Expwy G4502 sign no name.svg
- File:China Expwy G4502 sign with name.svg
- File:China Expwy G3501 sign no name.png
- File:China Expwy G3501 sign with name.png
- File:China Expwy G0501 sign with name.png
- File:China Expwy G7801 sign no name.png
- File:China Expwy G7801 sign with name.png
- File:China Expwy G1802 sign no name.png
- File:China Expwy G1802 sign with name.png
- File:China Expwy G1801 sign with name.png
- File:China Expwy G1821 sign no name.png
- File:China Expwy G1203 sign no name.png
- File:China Expwy G1201 sign with name.png
- File:China Expwy G1202 sign with name.jpg
- File:China Expwy G1204 sign with name.png
- File:China Expwy G1203 sign with name.png
- File:China Expwy G6901 sign with name.png
- File:China Expwy G6901 sign no name.png
- File:China Expwy G1601 sign no name.png
- File:China Expwy G1601 sign with name.png
忒有钱 (talk) 16:54, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uncontested. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:40, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Has all the appearances of a screenshot or other capture mechanism. Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. These are a sample of this uploader's claimed Own Work. After reaching a verdict on this sample please check the remainder for licence issues.
- File:Gemma Collins 2022 Birmingham.jpg
- File:Megan McKenna 2017j.jpg
- File:Megan McKenna 2017a.jpg
- File:Megan McKenna 2017b.jpg
- File:Megan McKenna 2017c.jpg
- File:Sabrina Carpenter 2017c.jpg
- File:Sabrina Carpenter 2017b.jpg
- File:Sabrina Carpenter 2017a.jpg
- File:Ali Bastian 2019.jpg
- File:Shona McGarty 2019.jpg
- File:Tilly Keeper 2019 2.jpg
- File:Tilly Keeper 2019.jpg
- File:Megan McKenna 2 2017.jpg
- File:Megan McKenna 2017.jpg
🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 17:46, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, I'm not completely well versed with Commons so forgive me if I have formatted this response incorrectly. All of these photos were taken by me when I either met these people or saw them in concert/in person. I keep all of my photos from events on a private Instagram account to save storage on my phone and when I see it fit to upload a photo from it, I screenshot it from the post, crop myself out if I'm in the photo and upload it to here. I didn't realise that the files being screenshots as opposed to raw camera files was an issue but I will keep this in mind going forward. I am happy to provide proof of my ownership of these files in whatever way possible, but may I ask that I do not have to upload any parts of my face onto this site in the photographs please.
Meena (talk) 17:53, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info, Meena. Is there any way you could add the original EXIF data to all the photos? That would make it clearer that you took them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:22, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Meena Please use COM:VRT to regularise the licencing. The issue is that no-one can tell whether you are the copyright owner or not. COM:PCP is important, as is protecting any copyright owner's rights. No-one is interested in seeing your face in public. Anonymity is important. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 21:37, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Timtrent: I've emailed the volunteers. I'm happy to provide any uncropped versions of the images in private too if this will aid my case to keep my uploads. Meena (talk) 00:48, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Meena The volunteer response team is the place to tell this to. They will handle everything from this point forward. It is important that you regularise the licencing for 100% of your uploads. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 06:58, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- An ID number has been added to each of the uploads listed. What happens to this deletion request now? Meena (talk) 14:14, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Meena The volunteer response team is the place to tell this to. They will handle everything from this point forward. It is important that you regularise the licencing for 100% of your uploads. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 06:58, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Timtrent: I've emailed the volunteers. I'm happy to provide any uncropped versions of the images in private too if this will aid my case to keep my uploads. Meena (talk) 00:48, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Meena Please use COM:VRT to regularise the licencing. The issue is that no-one can tell whether you are the copyright owner or not. COM:PCP is important, as is protecting any copyright owner's rights. No-one is interested in seeing your face in public. Anonymity is important. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 21:37, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- The next step would presumably be to withdraw the deletion request. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:37, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek No. The Volunteer Response Team will handle the regularisation of the licencing. An administrator will handle the deletion request. If it happens that the files are deleted then part of the VRT process would be to reinstate them.
- We do not make assumptions however good our faith in the uploader. We allow processes to take their course. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 19:20, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- So "The Wikimedia Foundation has received an e-mail confirming that the copyright holder has approved publication under the terms mentioned on this page. This correspondence has been reviewed by a Volunteer Response Team (VRT) member and stored in our permission archive" is not good enough for you to withdraw. Noted. It sounds like the people you're not assuming good faith from include the VRT. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:18, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek Please try very hard not to make accusations, especially baseless ones. The discussion will be closed in due course by an experienced Commons admin. There is no urgency here. The process is being followed. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 08:57, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- "It sounds like" is an observation. I'm sorry you think I'm accusing you of something. If I'm accusing you of anything, it's precisely that you are not withdrawing a deletion request that appears baseless now. Why would you be upset at that observation, especially considering that you seemed to be stating that you don't assume good faith on the part of the uploader, but VRT has already determined that the licensing is good? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:13, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek Please see this explanation of your faux apology. You obviously have some sort of a point to make. You are welcome to make it on my talk page if you wish. I regret that you found my words unclear. I take the blame for that. I apologise for my lack of clarity. I do not and can not apologise for your misinterpretation of my meaning. Were I to do so I feel that would be rude of me.
- I am not interested in resolving how many angels can dance on the head of a pin, nor in whether you are correct or I am. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 17:26, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- As far as I can tell, you're upset at me for no reason, and this is a super-annoying subthread. Enjoy your day and try to forget about unimportant things like this. I'll do the same. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:44, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- "It sounds like" is an observation. I'm sorry you think I'm accusing you of something. If I'm accusing you of anything, it's precisely that you are not withdrawing a deletion request that appears baseless now. Why would you be upset at that observation, especially considering that you seemed to be stating that you don't assume good faith on the part of the uploader, but VRT has already determined that the licensing is good? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:13, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- So "The Wikimedia Foundation has received an e-mail confirming that the copyright holder has approved publication under the terms mentioned on this page. This correspondence has been reviewed by a Volunteer Response Team (VRT) member and stored in our permission archive" is not good enough for you to withdraw. Noted. It sounds like the people you're not assuming good faith from include the VRT. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:18, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- The next step would presumably be to withdraw the deletion request. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:37, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info, Meena. Is there any way you could add the original EXIF data to all the photos? That would make it clearer that you took them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:22, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: permission received via VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:44, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Base map is unknown. Possible copyvio or DW from coprighted map Alex Spade (talk) 17:54, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:48, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
A better and good quality image has already been added by me. Hence considering this as a duplicate which is not using anywhere suggested to be deleted. Mydreamsparrow (talk) 19:35, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, superseded by File:Bechu Kurian Thomas, Judge.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:50, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
A better and good quality image has already been added by me. Hence considering this as a duplicate which is not using anywhere suggested to be deleted. Mydreamsparrow (talk) 19:36, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Mydreamsparrow, please link the better image. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:18, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- File:Bechu_Kurian_Thomas,_Judge.jpg, have a look Ikan Kekek:- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 19:39, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. That is indeed a better photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:42, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- Since a better quality picture is added, this and the above one can be deleted IMO. Both are, comparatively, poor pictures. Mydreamsparrow (talk) 18:35, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. That is indeed a better photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:42, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- File:Bechu_Kurian_Thomas,_Judge.jpg, have a look Ikan Kekek:- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 19:39, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, superseded by File:Bechu Kurian Thomas, Judge.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:50, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Not a free image. Taken from the official website of the club. Mr.Drax (talk) 12:18, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- А кто сказал, что участник, загрузивший файл, не является фотографом клуба, который решил поделиться фотографией с Викискладом? Я вижу метаданные, говорящие о том, что это непосредственный файл-первоисходник. А на сайте «Локомотива» вижу только урезанные для веб-версии картинки типа 450x600 пикселей. И интернет (Яндекс-картинки) даёт только урезанные версии этого файла. Где автор мог взять версию 4480×6720px, если он не сам фотограф? Soul Train (talk) 14:47, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: PCP. Uploader may be the photographer but unlikely. Can be undeleted with OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Pulpit of Jesuskirken
[edit]The artist, w:en:Mogens Bøggild died in 1987, and so this carefully-crafted pulpit is unfree until 70 years after the sculptor's death. There is no freedom of panorama for non-architecture in Denmark.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:14, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- The question: is a massive stone pulpit architectural or ornamental. --RAN (talk) 01:53, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): the proper question should have been: "is it a building or work of art?" Danish FOP is much narrow, only allowing free exploitations on "buildings" only and not on other forms of artistic works. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:32, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Can you point to some Danish case studies that distinguish between an architectural element of a building and an ornamental work of art. --RAN (talk) 04:10, 29 July 2022 (UTC)--RAN (talk) 04:10, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): the only real life FOP case there is about the infamous Statue of Little Mermaid. Nevertheless you must accept that Denmark's FOP is too limited, only allows commercial exploitations of buildings. All other types of artistic works still in copyright, ornaments included, are unfree until 70 years after the artist's death. It is simple, buildings are the only freely-exploitable copyrighted works in Denmark. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:27, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Can you point to some Danish case studies that distinguish between an architectural element of a building and an ornamental work of art. --RAN (talk) 04:10, 29 July 2022 (UTC)--RAN (talk) 04:10, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The pulpit was crafted several decades after the church was built. This indicates to me that it is not an integral part of the building architecture. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:59, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
ToO in South Korea is not clear to clarify if this is qualified for copyright. Billytanghh (talk) 02:54, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP, more complex than example at COM:TOO South Korea. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:53, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
ToO in South Korea is not clear to clarify if this is qualified for copyright. Billytanghh (talk) 02:55, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP, more complex than example at COM:TOO South Korea. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:53, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
L'identification des galaxies présentes sur cette image s'avère fausse : NGC 6622 est en réalité NGC 6621 (et inversement), cela est dû principalement aux sources du "Site du professeur C. Seligman" (qui répertorie les galaxies) où la même erreur (ou confusion) a été réalisé. GommeMagique (talk) 13:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: image with questionable label, not in use. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:51, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by C.Fred as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: All-rights-reserved license per https://www.mbs.jp/anime/. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:44, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP. This does not seem to be a standardized typeface and there seems to be individual expression in each character, which seems comparable to the caligraphy example at COM:TOO Japan. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The studio album is from 1967, so the copyright still applies. Lukas Beck (talk) 13:54, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep. Keep per {{PD-US-no notice}}. Published in the US before 1978 with no copyright notice (see https://www.ebay.com/itm/325359267732 for both sides of sleeve and record). IronGargoyle (talk) 14:30, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion per IronGargoyle. --Ellywa (talk) 21:28, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Photo published in 1962, enters PD in Hong Kong but not in USA because of URAA 219.77.88.143 15:14, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: There has been no discussion about this image, therefore I do not see sufficient arguments for deleting it. The Wikimedia Foundation – through the statement of the Legal department - does not see a reason to delete content simply because of general concern about the URAA. The document on Commons at COM:URAA states “A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion. If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under U.S. or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle.” Nobody took the effort to participate in this discussion, therefore I decided to keep the image, because it has a correct licence for the country where it originated. In addition, the file page is showing a warning sign that a licence tag is missing which will show the image is possibly not in public domain in the USA which will prevent re-users from USA to use it freely without additional research. If you do not agree with this decision, you are kindly requested to nominate the image again for deletion in order to have a broader discussion about it. --Ellywa (talk) 21:31, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
