Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/05/27

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 27th, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just want to change "October" in the title to September. Sw3dPix (talk) 16:09, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I see no reason for deletion. @Sw3dPix, do want a file rename? If yes, I can help you with this file. A deletion is not necessary. Regards, Mosbatho (talk) 19:28, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

kept - No reason to delete this, when only a rename is needed. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 19
39, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

protected logo copyvio no source no permission Hoyanova (talk) 13:56, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Wutsje at 17:30, 27 May 2022 UTC: Content created as advertisement (G10) --Krdbot 01:34, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Latasin kuvan testinä vahingossa ja se pitäisi poistaa heti. Anppalaa (talk) 14:19, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 18:31, 27 May 2022 UTC: Testiksi tarkoitettu kuva --Krdbot 01:34, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No fair use media here on Commons. Achim55 (talk) 21:00, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Didym at 21:25, 27 May 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:35, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo for non wikipedian. Faisal talk 06:06, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, speedied as obviously unfree. --Túrelio (talk) 08:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

'Comment' in File history states 'Uploaded a work by 大坂尚子 from https://www.asahi.com/......'. 'asahi.com' is a newspaper publisher in Japan and 大坂尚子 is its writer. This file is uploaded from asahi.com[1], as this comment states. This file violates copyrights unless User:ブルーゾンビ is not 大坂尚子 or asahi.com. Kurihaya (talk) 02:13, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:53, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gani Gashi atelier (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images all infringe the copyright for the paintings shown. They cannot be kept on Commons without a free license from the painter using VRT. Note that while I could not confirm that this account belongs in Category:Sockpuppets of Gani Gashi piktor, the name is similar and some of the works have been uploaded by accounts in that category and then deleted.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:33, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. This as a long-term abuser who does not want to abide by our terms and conditions. If the uploader wishes to restore any files, they can follow the correct process. [24Cr][talk] 14:47, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yosobreip (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res/web-sized images with FB code in EXIF data.

P 1 9 9   18:46, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:31, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor derivative (very low resolution) of File:Kaliumdichromat.JPG. Leyo 08:07, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (processed as "duplicate"...redirected to original). --DMacks (talk) 12:55, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality chemical structure due to incorrect file format. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 09:55, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (File:Naphthalene-1,5-dione.svg is available replacement). --DMacks (talk) 12:57, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. This is not a "a legislative text." Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:28, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 14:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The copyright holder is the entity who drew the map, not the person who scanned it. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:30, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 14:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Udhayaraj saravanan (talk) 08:49, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 00:47, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Copyright violations Ilda Lusha (talk) 10:26, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 00:49, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Uploaded by mistake, same as ->
Woltersdorf Luftbild 0887-Pano Torsten Baetge

  Herzliche Grüße
   Torsten Bätge 
   12:17, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 00:50, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: stock image found all over the internet. P 1 9 9   18:16, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 00:57, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spelling mistake Trade (talk) 23:05, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, was replaced by Template:Sportspeople from Colombia by year. --Rosenzweig τ 00:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A cropped version of Koy Detmer.jpg that serves only to cut off Detmer's left elbow. This image is redundant, as the aforementioned Koy Detmer.jpg is the exact same picture, just showing slightly more of Detmer. Rubythrees (talk) 03:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep this crop is done in a 3x4 proportion, which is more ideal for certain usage. SecretName101 (talk) 05:45, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:09, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free license - It belongs to Hamshahri Institute نارنجستان (talk) 18:43, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --4nn1l2 (talk) 15:17, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Conflicting license "do not edit and use commercially" means NC & ND, both of which are not allowed here. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:14, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 20:45, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:40, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not free work, author died in 1958, 70 years have not passed since the author's death Gampe (talk) 17:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, undelete in 2029. --Túrelio (talk) 16:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower resolution version of File:Oldřich Koníček Ve stromovce (1908).jpg GeXeS (talk) 20:07, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Scaled-down duplicate. --De728631 (talk) 21:10, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

missing evidence of permission Aishik Rehman (talk) 15:17, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:58, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:NUDITY. 180.214.232.18 13:19, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It delivers what it advertises. Wikipedia has a page on doggy style sex. NudistPhotographer (talk) 15:02, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:32, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cleaning up unused photos and videos NudistPhotographer (talk) 17:42, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept. The fact that it is porn is not a reason to delete it. Taivo (talk) 11:16, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is porn 81.191.203.225 15:39, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per two previous listings; in use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:21, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pornographic content without educativ purpose 80.146.8.244 10:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep Not a valid reason. Definitely educational (and we don't have many of these). Previously kept allready. --PaterMcFly (talk) 13:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Educational? Seriously? 181.43.1.187 16:09, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, because pictures (or videos) of different sex practices are suitable to illustrate related articles. Pictures are suitable for illustration here. This one is even in use, which means by definition that it is in scope (see COM:INUSE) --PaterMcFly (talk) 19:09, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I hope you learned your lesson well, then. 181.43.1.187 20:04, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Obvious troll nomination Dronebogus (talk) 19:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of Aaronson Andrew, not 'own work'. 2607:F140:8801:0:0:0:1:25 15:29, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am Aaronson Andrew. This is my own work. NudistPhotographer (talk) 05:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:34, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cleaning up unused photos and videos NudistPhotographer (talk) 17:42, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Taivo (talk) 11:43, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This content serves no educational purpose. Bilksneath (talk) 14:47, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:24, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of Aaronson Andrew, not 'own work'. 2607:F140:8801:0:0:0:1:25 15:31, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Obviously not. Andrew is the man in the image, so he can't be the photographer. --PaterMcFly (talk) 17:32, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
?! 186.172.185.222 18:00, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I got this probably wrong. The description says that Andrew is the actor. But since the video is apparently taken with a frame (the camera doesn't move), he can of course also be the copyright holder. That would lead to the assumption that the uploader is the Artist, which seems reasonable, since he's in all of his videos, sometimes even alone. --PaterMcFly (talk) 18:22, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good. Take this motivation to also accept that there is no photography or photographer around. This is about a "vídeo". How do you think Youtubers work, hiring a cameraman? 186.172.185.222 18:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No one is even talking about YouTube, I feel like you're trying to find copyvio where there's none. A09 (talk) 19:23, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
?! 186.172.185.222 19:32, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am Aaronson Andrew. This is my own work. NudistPhotographer (talk) 05:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for confirmation. That was the only reasonable conclusion for me, anyway. Hence  Speedy keep, all of these videos. PaterMcFly (talk) 06:20, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:35, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cleaning up unused photos and videos NudistPhotographer (talk) 17:43, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep being unused is not a reason to delete if in scope. Dronebogus (talk) 10:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Taivo (talk) 11:46, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons nie jest amatorską stroną pornograficzną 188.147.12.36 21:50, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You could not be more right. 186.172.172.85 21:53, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Correct that this is not an amateur porn site, but human sexuality is within project scope. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:22, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of Aaronson Andrew, not 'own work'. 2607:F140:8801:0:0:0:1:25 15:30, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am Aaronson Andrew. This is my own work. NudistPhotographer (talk) 05:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:35, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cleaning up unused photos and videos NudistPhotographer (talk) 17:43, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Taivo (talk) 11:48, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is Porn. There seems to be some sketchy content on his computer. 194.233.96.67 14:50, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 18:50, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of Aaronson Andrew, not 'own work'. 2607:F140:8801:0:0:0:1:25 15:32, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am Aaronson Andrew. This is my own work. NudistPhotographer (talk) 05:29, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:34, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PENIS, not in use Seawolf35 (talk) 00:01, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per second deletion discussion, it has been in use and is therefore in scope. How many other videos of this particular kind of sex toy do we have? Dronebogus (talk) 12:50, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong name Ten-nen 03:12, 27 May 2022 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, try {{Rename}} instead. 単なるファイル名の誤りであれば {{Rename}} で対処願います. --Yasu (talk) 15:18, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free image Ceahjlazco1882 (talk) 01:07, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9   17:41, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.34.231 01:09, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; small crop from an unknown source, missing essential source info. --P 1 9 9   17:42, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This section of the video is attributed to the Associated Press. The "AP" watermark has been cropped out of the photo. Bait30 (talk) pls ping me when you reply 02:13, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete AP credited. ― Tartan357 Talk 08:14, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:43, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was posted on his personal/campaign Twitter account (@TonyGonzales4TX). His Congressional Twitter account is @RepTonyGonzales. For this reason, I do not believe this image satisfies "as part of that person's official duties". Bait30 (talk) pls ping me when you reply 02:28, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trump's statements on January 6th were posted to his then-active @RealDonaldTrump account. Not @POTUS. It's on Commons. See File:Trump remarks on Capitol storming, January 6 2021 0417PM EST.webm Pennsylvania2 (talk) 02:31, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:44, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Repetido 2marco4 (talk) 03:19, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not own work. --P 1 9 9   17:46, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution file, also based on the uploader's history I don't believe this is his work 219.78.190.22 03:29, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution file, also based on the uploader's history I don't believe this is his work 219.78.190.22 03:38, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es Mercedes Corrientes, no Mercedes Buenos Aires 2marco4 (talk) 03:42, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   17:48, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-Free content 기나ㅏㄴ (talk) 03:48, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:48, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

same rationale as Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_BEAT060; was used for a now-deleted spam item on Wikidata Jamie7687 (talk) 04:14, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:49, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no direct source that proofs this work is under a CC license Putitonamap98 (talk) 04:15, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:49, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 04:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:51, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 04:26, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:51, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 04:27, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:51, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 04:27, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:51, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 04:30, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:51, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 04:30, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:51, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 04:31, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:51, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 04:33, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:51, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 04:33, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:50, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 04:34, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:50, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lallint as Copyvio (copyvio). I don't think this is a copyvio; it is highly plausible that this is self-created given their username. However, it seems to be out of scope as a map of a non-notable fictional location. King of ♥ 04:41, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's a screenshot from the game Minecraft, screenshots of video games are considered copyvios Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 12:36, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Vinayan916 (talk) 04:48, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   17:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader request Jelican9 (talk) 20:47, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   17:54, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i hate it Omarsoukan (talk) 21:38, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i hate it Omarsoukan (talk) 21:40, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i hate it Omarsoukan (talk) 21:44, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i hate it Omarsito 1972 (talk) 22:06, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Quebec Autoroute 641.png Andy Dingley (talk) 22:36, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The file is not used. FanNihongo (talk) 00:58, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion of low-res thumbnail route shield. --P 1 9 9   17:56, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 05:27, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:00, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 05:27, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:00, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although Germany has freedom of panorama, this signboard is not permanently installed. So freedom of panorama does not apply this signboard. Ox1997cow (talk) 05:51, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:00, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo for non wikipedian. Faisal talk 06:04, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:01, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio see metadata that read Copyright holder Arie IJdo Fotografie Date and time of data generation 17:19, 25 June 2016 Orientation Normal Horizontal resolution 72 dpi Vertical resolution 72 dpi Software used Photos 1.5 File change date and time 17:19, 25 June 2016 Exif version 2.3 Date and time of digitizing 17:19, 25 June 2016 DateTimeOriginal subseconds 81 Contact information arie@arieijdo.nl www.arieijdo.nl Oostlaan 145 Pijnacker, ZH, 2641 BN The Netherlands +31 6 29209640 Hoyanova (talk) 06:13, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:01, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source no permission - according to uploader this was copied from a book Hoyanova (talk) 06:14, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:01, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xtydime (talk · contribs)

[edit]

professional portraits of (notable?) models, uploaded by a new account, dubious self-work claim

FASTILY 06:39, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all consistent EXIF data, maybe own work but not notable, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   18:03, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source no permission, privacyproblem Hoyanova (talk) 06:41, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:05, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source no permission privacy problem Hoyanova (talk) 06:42, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:05, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright violation: watermarked image. MKFI (talk) 06:56, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:05, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

magazine's cover. Unlike that own work Estopedist1 (talk) 07:14, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The editor of the page is representative of Estonian Kennel Union, who is the publisher of the magazine. Hmaarit (talk) 07:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, insufficient permission. If uploader indeed holds the rights to the photo, then submit permission via Com:VRT. --P 1 9 9   18:05, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work by uploader, taken from :de de:Datei:WP Friedrich Gustav von Bramann.jpg, where it is considered possibly unsuitable for Commons due to URAA. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:40, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:06, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 08:02, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:06, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE: Unclear what criterion the map is actually coloured by. Also, there's a typo in the filename; I was about to move-request to correct it when I realised that I didn't know what utility the image has, which should be explicated if it is to be kept. Arlo James Barnes 08:16, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:07, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Disney image Clodion (talk) 08:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:10, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Disney image Clodion (talk) 08:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Disney image Clodion (talk) 08:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Disney image Clodion (talk) 08:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Disney image Clodion (talk) 08:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Disney image Clodion (talk) 08:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Disney image Clodion (talk) 08:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Disney image Clodion (talk) 08:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Disney image Clodion (talk) 08:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Disney image Clodion (talk) 08:23, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Disney image Clodion (talk) 08:23, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Disney image Clodion (talk) 08:23, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Disney image Clodion (talk) 08:23, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Disney image Clodion (talk) 08:23, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Disney image Clodion (talk) 08:24, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Disney image Clodion (talk) 08:24, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Disney image Clodion (talk) 08:24, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's an exhibition, those photographs are not permanently displayed, so COM:FOP Poland does not work here and all files must be treated as deriviative works and permission from original copyright holders would be necessary to keep them on Commons.

~Cybularny Speak? 08:50, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; kept one as DM. --P 1 9 9   18:11, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. Spokoyni (talk) 09:13, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:11, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. Spokoyni (talk) 09:15, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:11, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kiro Bassem as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: Out of scope and unused
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. IMO, the depicted item is well in COM:SCOPE and should be kept, though its description should be completed. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:17, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   18:12, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. Spokoyni (talk) 09:17, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:12, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

'Go Your Own Road' (2008) is By Erik Johansson - thats what the page says and v prob. not Charlottes as the page claims Victuallers (talk) 10:07, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:LL, "copyright TED Conferences, LLC. All rights reserved.". --P 1 9 9   18:14, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It says This is an artwork by Erik Johansson called 'arms break, vases don't'. - so what evidence is there that Erik gave his permission? It IS a great image Victuallers (talk) 10:13, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:LL. --P 1 9 9   18:16, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OOS CRAP Dronebogus (talk) 10:16, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:17, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong date, wrong source, wrong author... Xocolatl (talk) 11:18, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing all essential info. --P 1 9 9   18:17, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong date, probably wrong author and wrong source. Xocolatl (talk) 11:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alte Fotografie, gescannt am 27. Mai 2022 EinLegdener (talk) 11:36, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. COM:DW, missing original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9   18:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong date. Solomon203 (talk) 11:25, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unneeded redirect. --P 1 9 9   18:19, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a purebred Bichon Frise and the photo should not be under Bichon Frise. Bichon Frises have curly hair and their ears do not stick up like that. Dogedits (talk) 11:50, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi
He had curly hair and normal bichon style ears till 16 years old but since then,his body start to change till 3 weeks ago when he leave us for good!
I have no idea why but he goes blind,death,mute first and then his hair goes very soft,thin and strait and his ears goes up and his eyes goes wide open,his skin always was salt & pepper like but at the end was pure pink! with big fat boil and lots of other strange changes,but please notice he was 18 years and about 6 month old when he passed! so I believe it was normal some unusual changes of his body at this age!
anyway I have lots of his picture when he was younger with those details you mentioned if necessarily I can show you all.
thanks Alexsiuf (talk) 14:25, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; use {{Fact disputed}} instead. --P 1 9 9   18:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dupe of File:Radio control pulse scheme.svg. Only difference is a mis-spelled title that shouldn't be in there anyway (it would be best added as a caption) Andy Dingley (talk) 12:28, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:23, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleting recolour attempt, better to update the original SVG rather than creating a seperate file. -Hunobukokaitobukainokukinkinokukango 13:08, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, G7. --P 1 9 9   18:24, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file, didnt really think to keep this much longer -Hunobukokaitobukainokukinkinokukango 13:09, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   18:24, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same reason as the eurasian flag, didn't feel to keep this much longer in the commons -Hunobukokaitobukainokukinkinokukango 13:10, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   18:24, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by en:Ralph Schraivogel, uploaded as "own work". Sitacuisses (talk) 13:25, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:24, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by en:Ralph Schraivogel, uploaded as "own work". Sitacuisses (talk) 13:26, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:25, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused tiny photo, out of project scope due to small size. Taivo (talk) 13:40, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:25, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 13:46, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:26, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, low quality photo Mindmatrix 14:12, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:26, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chandan Modi Photography (talk · contribs)

[edit]

SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

JopkeB (talk) 14:16, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:26, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TinEye search says that the image is from a forum. Unlike that own work because in 1997 the ship was scrapped, see etwiki article et:Tallinn (suur allveelaevahävitaja). Etwiki also says that the image is taken in 1981 -- Estopedist1 (talk) 14:23, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:27, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

authorship is false, here is the true author of the photo: Photos: Press Service of H.I.H. Grand Duke Georgiy Romanov of Russia, Chaumet Wasa Kawasaker (talk) 14:32, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:32, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the uploader who credited the photo, which depicts the prince here: [2]. He made a mistake in the description in the dates for this photo: 2020/2021. Most likely, this photo with the view of the prince was stolen. Wasa Kawasaker (talk) 14:36, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9   18:30, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation? Looks like a poster or other publication from a maker that is not 70+ years dead, so it is not in the public domain. And I do not see a VRT ticket. And if it really was "own work" by the uploader than I may hope that the artist uploaded a better version. JopkeB (talk) 14:39, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:32, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exact lower-resolution duplicate of File:Лаборатория СКФУ 03.jpg. Both are claimed to be own work, but by different people. Jochen Burghardt (talk) 14:44, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:34, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hacker rain sharma (talk · contribs)

[edit]

SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

JopkeB (talk) 14:46, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:35, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like to create a new page in the biography section of wikipedia Nandhanfilm (talk) 15:25, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But how is this related to requesting the deletion of this file? --Ameisenigel (talk) 15:36, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: missing permission from photographer. --P 1 9 9   18:37, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Topiary in the United States Elisfkc (talk) 15:43, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:38, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Topiary in the United States Elisfkc (talk) 15:47, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:38, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Topiary in the United States Elisfkc (talk) 15:48, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:38, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mugs are art, delete per FOP Elisfkc (talk) 15:51, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Meant to say that their is art on the mug, not every mug is art. Also, I know this is my upload, this was before I knew as much about copyright issues. --Elisfkc (talk) 15:52, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9   18:38, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sadly nominating these images, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Topiary in the United States (wish they could stay, but I know the rules)

Elisfkc (talk) 18:24, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment some, like File:United Kingdom Pavilion (14062935620).jpg, may qualify for De minimis. Elisfkc (talk) 18:26, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most, kept two per COM:DM. --Jcb (talk) 16:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No topiaries allowed, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Topiary in the United States

Elisfkc (talk) 17:56, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are plenty of other photos in Category:Topiary in the United States that don't seem to have correct permission. Why aren't they nominated? --Mjrmtg (talk) 18:01, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Mjrmtg: I am looking at Category:Epcot International Flower & Garden Festival, not Category:Topiary in the United States. Elisfkc (talk) 19:45, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:46, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Topiary in the United States

Elisfkc (talk) 15:53, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:39, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of a poster/piece of art Elisfkc (talk) 15:54, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Yes, I know this is my upload, that was back when I didn't know as much about copyright issues. --Elisfkc (talk) 15:54, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:39, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by POitor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:01, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by POitor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inocnsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:01, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by POitor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Complex logo, no EXIF data, professional photos: this user is uploading images they found on the web and claiming them as their own.

Vera (talk) 16:05, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:43, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of a piece of art, no FOP in the US for art Elisfkc (talk) 16:27, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:44, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Either No FOP in the US for art and/or COM:Toys Elisfkc (talk) 16:49, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:44, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not relevant anymore Davidcantens (talk) 17:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   18:45, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not relevant anymore Davidcantens (talk) 17:23, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not your upload, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   18:45, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation? see metadata. Xocolatl (talk) 19:13, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright. The metadata give Auteur: Jan Willem Huethorst and Auteursrechtenhouder: Copyright Dutch Gelderland Group 2021 Wouter (talk) 19:26, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality scan, surpassed by File:Oldřich Koníček Boka Kotorská.jpg GeXeS (talk) 20:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:48, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality scan, surpassed by File:Oldřich Koníček Podzim na Závisti.jpg GeXeS (talk) 20:05, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:49, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gampe as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Out of scope, experiments
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as images of chicken are basically in scope. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:14, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Same situation with: File:Smaragdová levandule při koupení.jpg


Deleted: one as out of focus (numerous better alternatives available), and kept one as in scope. --P 1 9 9   18:51, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-educational and therefore OOS. Nacaru (talk) 20:48, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:51, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inaccurate Semono Drines (talk) 22:14, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   18:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i hate it Omarsito 1972 (talk) 22:18, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Autoroute 515.gif Andy Dingley (talk) 22:36, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I don't think this designation was ever used, hoax. --P 1 9 9   19:05, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality scan, surpassed by File:Oldřich Koníček Boka Kotorská.jpg GeXeS (talk) 20:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The latter file is in fact of a resolution that depicts the structure of the canvas. However, this may not be desirable for certain uses, so in my opinion it would be prudent to have a slightly filtered version like the nominated file. De728631 (talk) 21:14, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of focus/blurry. --P 1 9 9   19:10, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deze beelden zijn voor 31 oktober 2020 op een andere site gepubliceerd.[1] Toch zeker geen eigen werken ?


  1. cancam.jp (24 oktober 2014)

トトト (talk) 22:38, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:05, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-portrait, used in an attempt to use user page as part of political campaign on eswiki MexTDT (talk) 22:39, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   19:06, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fehllizenzierung als "eigenes Werk" - laut Bildbeschreibung Fotografin Maria La Torre, kein ausreichender Hinweis, dass der Hochlader berechtigt ist, das Foto unter eine CC-Lizenz zu stellen Lutheraner (talk) 23:01, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lutheraner The photo seems to bear the signature of the staff (MDCStaff User), despite the fact that the title speaks of "Photo by Maria La Torre". In the absence of a release sent correctly to the OTRS service, the photo is to be considered without the necessary license to stay in Commons. Camelia (talk) 15:18, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9   19:08, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant, superseded by File:C9orf91 Transmembrane (Corrected).png P 1 9 9   17:56, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 18:06, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stadtmarketing Marburg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused promotional images, COM:WEBHOST, COM:DW and out of scope.

P 1 9 9   18:26, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:22, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted poster Morning (talk) 14:59, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Please quote the rule/guideline that says deriative works violates Wikimedia guidelines. In my opinion, this picture does not qualify as it is taken from a distance, and not a photograph "upon a photograph" sort of issue. If it is a "photo upon photo", then I think it applies. The picture does not feature the people in the poster per se, but rather about an event itself. Anyway, the picture also 2 real people in the foreground besides the posters.
Let me quote comparable examples. If a picture featuring posters (from a distance) still constitute a deriative work, then it means that the following similar works are also tantamount to copyright violations:

Mr Tan (talk) 09:12, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:FOP#Malaysia Ezarateesteban 16:51, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTER are not permanently located in public area, so FOP cannot be applied here 219.78.190.22 04:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:33, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused screenshot snippet, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:29, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:33, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cleaning up unused photos and videos NudistPhotographer (talk) 17:44, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:32, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. P 1 9 9   18:08, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:31, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:39, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:31, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text doc without clear purpose, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:39, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:31, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text image, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:41, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:31, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cleaning up unused photos and videos NudistPhotographer (talk) 17:42, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:25, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of Aaronson Andrew, not 'own work'. 2607:F140:8801:0:0:0:1:25 15:25, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How do you come to that conclusion? I don't see the name "Aaron Andrew" anywhere in the description. --PaterMcFly (talk) 17:23, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am Aaronson Andrew. This is my own work. NudistPhotographer (talk) 05:27, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary image which does not add encyclopedic value; we already have plenty of similar images. The Anome (talk) 08:36, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep as specious. Which other photos of naked men standing on tennis courts do we have?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:17, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:01, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cleaning up unused photos and videos NudistPhotographer (talk) 17:44, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:24, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary video which does not add encyclopedic value; we already have plenty of similar images. The Anome (talk) 08:35, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep as specious. Which other videos of naked men standing posed in woods do we have?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:19, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:01, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cleaning up unused photos and videos NudistPhotographer (talk) 17:44, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:24, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of Aaronson Andrew, not 'own work'. 2607:F140:8801:0:0:0:1:25 15:31, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am Aaronson Andrew. This is my own work. NudistPhotographer (talk) 05:29, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:32, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary image which does not add encyclopedic value; we already have plenty of similar images. -- The Anome (talk) 08:33, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep While I wouldn't exactly consider these uploads to be the high point of humanity's achievements in the arts, I don't believe the specific sentiments they probably triggered are valid reasons for deletion. They also happen to be rather good representatives of their genre. And the user's seven uploads over two years are far from being a matter of concern. This applies to the two other uploads by user on this page as well. (@The Anome: multiple connected RfDs are usually listed together, see plenty of examples on this page.) --Karl Oblique (talk) 12:17, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep as specious and per Karl Oblique. Which other photos of naked men standing and pleasuring themselves with this toy do we have?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:22, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep yet another one of those “ew naked people delet this” nominations. Human sexuality and naked people are in scope. Agree with Jeff— I don’t think we have any other images similar to this one so of course it has encyclopedic value by virtue of its uniqueness. Dronebogus (talk) 10:15, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:01, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cleaning up unused photos and videos NudistPhotographer (talk) 17:44, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:24, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9   18:46, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete logo of Randolph College but no idea if it's pd. RZuo (talk) 07:33, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:26, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LaurenBrown706 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused photos of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. Article deleted on en.wp.

P 1 9 9   18:48, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nomination. GeorgHHtalk   20:10, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete some guy in south carolina https://www.jeffcookrealestate.com/ . RZuo (talk) 07:26, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:25, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stereorecords (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: promotional images with disparate quality and styles, missing EXIF data or credit not matching the uploader (Author SOORAZ_SHRESTHA).

P 1 9 9   18:19, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:49, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mueterelmustachio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused low-res hoax images, unusable, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   18:24, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:49, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:01, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:26, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tqzhang1010 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text images/math equations, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   18:37, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:28, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SKAM63 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused promotional product images and logo, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   17:31, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:51, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Debe ser reemplazado por el SVG 2marco4 (talk) 17:11, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Entiendo entonces que no debería borrarse la página y que queden enlaces caídos en tantos artículos, sino subir una nueva versión del archivo cambiando su formato a SVG. Saludos! --Fedejr712 (talk) 18:05, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: we don't delete raster images just because there is now also a vector version available. --Rosenzweig τ 07:22, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW screenshot, missing all essential info. Likely that this image is PD, and if so, we should have a high-quality copy from an official source, not a screenshot. Also crop included:

P 1 9 9   17:46, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: one as a duplicate, kept the other after adding the necessary information. --Rosenzweig τ 07:33, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work as per description, needs COM:VRT. P 1 9 9   18:04, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:42, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, and likely not own work but promotional image from the school. P 1 9 9   18:17, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:42, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused book cover, DW, COM:WEBHOST, promotional and out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:00, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:25, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mdot2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: DW and low-res/web-sized images with disparate quality and styles, missing EXIF data. Some are clearly screengrabs (File:MMAMELEEMUSIC.jpg even shows the "click here" button).

P 1 9 9   18:34, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mdot2 (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

Complex logos above COM:TOO.

P 1 9 9   18:36, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:27, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: low-res/web-sized image with FB code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9   18:43, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:29, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant, superseded by File:Risetime both2-01.jpg P 1 9 9   18:47, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:32, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:49, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:31, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Olafstandan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logo and advertising image, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   18:50, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:33, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional product image, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:50, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:32, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Indah Meitasari (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res/web-sized images with transmission code in EXIF data.

P 1 9 9   17:30, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:08, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Danny Song (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res/web-sized images with disparate quality and styles, missing EXIF data or with transmission code.

P 1 9 9   17:58, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment I'm sorry; I didn't notice that all of these files were nominated for deletion and created Category:David Park. If that category would be empty if all the nominated photos are deleted, you would probably want to nominate the category for deletion, too, as an empty category wouldn't be useful and I do not have the power to delete anything on this site. I'll also say that you're probably right in your suspicions. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:05, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:09, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sapex.julio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal charts, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   18:14, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:00, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in the US. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Partners Statue at Magic Kingdom & Commons:Deletion requests/File:"Partners"- Taken by Mackenzie Conway.jpg Elisfkc (talk) 16:27, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 04:11, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:59, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 04:13, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in the US. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Partners Statue at Magic Kingdom & Commons:Deletion requests/File:"Partners"- Taken by Mackenzie Conway.jpg Elisfkc (talk) 16:31, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:57, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused album cover, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:38, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: apparently related to en:Goodiepal, so I guess it is in scope. Has a VRT permission, so should be ok copyright wise. --Rosenzweig τ 07:48, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PenangFan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   18:43, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:12, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:52, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:13, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in the public domain in India as of URAA date 1 January 1996 and therefore not in the public domain in the US Hekerui (talk) 11:56, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep URAA should not be the sole reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 12:18, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The official policy Commons:Licensing clearly says that Wikimedia Commons only accepts media that are explicitly freely licensed, or that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work. Since there is no free license here, the second condition must be met for us to be able to keep this file.

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/India#Durations, “With a cinematograph film, copyright subsists until 60 years from the year in which the film is published.” Apparently, that has been the case since the 1957 Indian copyright law. So on the URAA restoration date, January 1, 1996 for India, this 1958 film was still protected in India. Even if we treat this still as a photograph, which were (until 2012) protected for 50 years after creation (for creation before 1958), and for 60 years after publication (for publication after 1957), it still would have been protected by copyright in India on the URAA restoration date. Which means its copyright in the USA was restored, and it is still protected there until the end of 2053.

So the result of the evaluation (per Commons:Licensing#Uruguay Round Agreements Act) is that the file is still protected by copyright in the USA and must therefore be deleted. It can be restored in 2054. --Rosenzweig τ 11:22, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KSD Kransysteme GmbH (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW, missing original author, source, date, and permission. And promotional corporate images, only used on sandbox pages of user without meaningful edits.

P 1 9 9   18:23, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:34, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:54, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 10:46, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.34.231 01:11, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:01, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Blazingdragon91 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Complex logos above COM:TOO.

P 1 9 9   17:53, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as COM:TOO South Korea appears to be rather low. --Rosenzweig τ 19:45, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:Munucipality of Libon Seal.jpg P 1 9 9   19:37, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:46, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:54, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; also the file has a FB transmission code, indicating possible copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 21:09, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rodrigo Leal Unilog (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res/web-sized images with disparate quality and styles, missing or inconsistent EXIF data or with transmission code.

P 1 9 9   19:00, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:28, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arthur blumfield (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused photo of non-notable event and people, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   19:02, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Location has article and images could be used there. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:59, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brigid M. Balfour photos

[edit]

Original file was deleted for lack of permission. See File:Brigid M. Balfour (1914-1994).tif --FunnyMath (talk) 04:54, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Please link to the debate for the deletion of the original image. If there was uncertainty whether this was her official government portrait, I would like to see the debate, and what evidence was presented. The image was vetted in 2016 when it was nominated for Picture of the Year. --RAN (talk) 05:25, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    As far as I can tell, the original deletion went as such: As a government department, the MRC National Institute for Medical Research, was getting shut down, an employee got permission to release the archive. They were uploaded, and everyone accepted that this was an upload with permission. Then, years later, when the whole organisation didn't exist, someone decided to demand evidence that the employee, no longer on Wikipedia, had permission to release the archive. Because there was no longer an organisation, nor was the employee on Wikipedia, they deleted everything. Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:34, 27 May 2022 (UTC)ee[reply]
    I'm sorry to hear that! Now I feel bad for nominating these photos for deletion. I raised the same problem at Commons:Deletion_requests/Rosalind_Pitt-Rivers_photos and nobody objected, so I didn't know. But without VTRS or other concrete evidence, I'm still not sure if we should keep the photos. FunnyMath (talk) 15:41, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • You can always withdraw your nomination, and even ask at DR for restoration of the Rosalind Pitt image. In 2016 it was assumed that these were their official government portraits taken by a government employee. Even if we negate the CC license that the uploader released them under, and negate the creator was a government employee, they would still be public domain, if we assume that they were made public by copies being viewed by people other than the photographer. They would still have to be registered by the copyright office up until 1 March 1989 and there are no descriptions in the copyright database under the names of people that appear in the images. --RAN (talk) 17:10, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Are you treating this under American laws? It's UK. Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:59, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, sorry! For some reason I was under the impression this was a US based image, sorry, the original is gone, and I last saw it in 2016. My mistake. --RAN (talk) 01:02, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Can you share a link to the vetting that occurred in 2016? I'll probably be OK with assuming good faith and that our fellow volunteers did their job correctly. And also Adam Cuerden is right; the copyright notice or copyright registration requirement applies to the US, not the UK, where the photo was taken. FunnyMath (talk) 19:56, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    It's kind of hard, because I don't have the name of the original uploader because they're all deleted. There were hundreds of photos deleted from the MRC National Institute for Medical Research. At the very least, they had huge access to the archive which was not publicly available. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:25, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I did find File:Martin_Rivers_Pollock.jpg which has a permission document attached. Reading that document may or may not clarify things. If it is broad, a mass restore is in order. Consider also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mary Lobban.tif Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:36, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Based on the archives available at Wayback Machine: [3] [4], the original uploader was SHopkins1. Thank you for sharing that permission document. It may or may not help because the uploader of the Pollock photo is different. The Lobban photo was not archived on the Wayback Machine, so I have no idea who the original uploader was. If we do end up keeping the two Balfour photos, the closing admin should also restore all other deleted photos from the MRC archives that have been uploaded. I don't know if SHopkins1 and Fnorman-london are the only MRC uploaders, so the closing admin should also make sure all uploaders are identified and have their uploads restored. FunnyMath (talk) 21:16, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    History of Medical Research and SHopkins1 are the same user because of a rename. So if SHopkins1 is indeed an MRC employee, then the deletion of the Lobban photo seems to be legitimate. FunnyMath (talk) 21:35, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    But it's also some evidence that they were acting as a MRC employee. The pattern... Feels legit here, but so much has been hastily deleted. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:11, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. On User talk:SHopkins1 many images are shown which are deleted. These have perhaps been overlooked. I cannot find a Deletion request for these images. Of course, perhaps the whole bunch can be reconsiderd for undeletion, but please discuss this elsewhere after finding proof for a free licence. --Ellywa (talk) 15:30, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any proof of a free license? NB: it was changed here. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:34, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. I originally uploaded this many years ago. It was given to me along with a number of other historical photos of the Technocracy Inc. organisation. Those photos were scanned by a member of the organisation who got permission for them to be uploaded to Wikipedia by the organisation (at least the local branch of the organisation). I was never a member of the organisation, the photos were given to me digitally for the purpose of putting them on Wikipedia. Honestly, I don't know what license they were supposed to be under. It was unclear to me then and now. Since the photo is 92 years old it may be out of copyright entirely, but I don't know. I would vote to keep, on the grounds that permission was given by the owners and it may not be in copyright anyway. --Hibernian (talk) 19:06, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not enough information to determine the copyright status. The 1930 date is only tentative, and there is no information at all about the author and if/when/where/how this was first published. --Rosenzweig τ 10:55, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:47, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kilianpictures (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused icons/graphics without clear purpose, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   17:27, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Артём 13327 (talk) 18:53, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I think is a useful icon. It represent a generic worker, this image don't use a helmet but it use a cap, then is more generic than other icons. What we get deleting it?
(talk) Santi Gomà (talk) Santi Gomà (talk) 13:43, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:47, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free image. Tis is a GIS analysis of the old map. Image is here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2009.04.001. I uploaded the free source to: File:Distribution of Nomad Population of the Beersheba Sub-district, 1947.png (Though it is less informative). Danny lost (talk) 19:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No comments. Anyway thanks for your great work File:Distribution_of_Nomad_Population_of_the_Beersheba_Sub-district,_1947_(retouched).png. Somewhere there must be the British original of the map. --Wickey (talk) 15:56, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The original is already here. It's just not a great scan. Looks like some ambient light penetrated, and the resolution is medium. Danny lost (talk) 15:36, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:48, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This user wrote in the description the following: "Redo the original better looking version, This file used to be on the Commons as File:Biáng-order.gif before it was replaced by another version. It had been released into the public domain. with UploadWizard.". But this has false information. Which will be explained bellow.

  • This user didn't redo anything, he just take an old version and uploaded it as if he was the author. I am FanNihongo, and I am the original author of this image's version. It can be verified in the file history of the original image:
  • That file once was on Commons, but it was updated by another version, not replaced.
  • Check the original image's license, it has a more restrictive license, it was never released into public domain.

Note I modify the license and the data. The main reason to delete this file, is that it is redundant. Above is the other version of this file.
On the other hand, I want to point out, that the animated image above will be updated, with an already improved version of the Biáng character(this one ) FanNihongo (talk) 23:59, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:59, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]