Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/05/10
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
I uploaded it by mistake Omollo12 (talk) 02:39, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 06:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Non-free image from WWE Mann Mann (talk) 07:16, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio[1]. --Túrelio (talk) 07:51, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
alla luce del fatto che mi è stato comunicato che la seguente immagine è in verità una manipolazione digitale del 2003, e non un originale d'epoca come dichiarato all'interno del libro da cui l'ho presa, è necessaria una immediata rimozione Beaest (talk) 07:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:47, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
No source, invalid OTRS permission. Xasley 02:46, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Genuinely curious, what makes it invalid? Primefac (talk) 07:43, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Only COM:VRTS volunteers (or admins) may place the {{PermissionTicket}} template, but not for sources. Xasley 11:26, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Gee, I guess it's a good thing I'm a VRT volunteer. Primefac (talk) 11:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- You are not a VRT volunteer yet, so to do is mw:Volunteer Response Team/Volunteering. Xasley 14:29, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- You're taking the piss, right? I'm pretty sure this says that I'm a VRT volunteer, as well as this. Primefac (talk) 14:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- You are not a VRT volunteer yet, so to do is mw:Volunteer Response Team/Volunteering. Xasley 14:29, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Gee, I guess it's a good thing I'm a VRT volunteer. Primefac (talk) 11:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Only COM:VRTS volunteers (or admins) may place the {{PermissionTicket}} template, but not for sources. Xasley 11:26, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - additionally, Xasley is strongly cautioned not to waste the community's time with tedious behaviour. --Nick (talk) 15:33, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyvio + is that literally a photo of a screen? Dronebogus (talk) 02:44, 4 March 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 15:27, 14 March 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 12:50, 26 March 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:28, 26 March 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope garbage Dronebogus (talk) 21:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:33, 3 April 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope junk
Dronebogus (talk) 00:08, 30 April 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:09, 30 April 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope
Dronebogus (talk) 12:17, 6 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:07, 6 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS junk files Dronebogus (talk) 12:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 20:08, 12 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
More OOS junk
Dronebogus (talk) 16:30, 15 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 06:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC) Out of scope junk Dronebogus (talk) 22:07, 20 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:10, 21 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS crap junk Dronebogus (talk) 04:20, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
No copyright info + OOS Dronebogus (talk) 05:18, 10 June 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. Yann (talk) 11:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted I'm closing this since the files were already deleted. Feel free to revert if there's a reason the discussion should still be open. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:57, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Load of OOS crap This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
More OOS crap Dronebogus (talk) 05:54, 23 June 2022 (UTC) Deleted I'm closing this since the files were already deleted. Feel free to revert me if there's a reason the discussion should still be open. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Oos garbage Dronebogus (talk) 15:39, 26 June 2022 (UTC) Deleted I'm closing this since the files were already deleted. Feel free to revert if there's a reason the discussion should still be open. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:01, 2 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 20:27, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 13:56, 2 July 2022 (UTC) Deleted --Adamant1 (talk) 05:34, 3 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
That was fast. More junk as usual Dronebogus (talk) 01:32, 4 July 2022 (UTC) Deleted The images were deleted. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 18:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:50, 26 September 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 20:49, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:23, 28 September 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 14:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nom, some apparent copyviols from social media. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:58, 7 October 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope crap Dronebogus (talk) 05:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:44, 15 October 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Garbagé de OOS Dronebogus (talk) 11:06, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 11:58, 20 October 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 18:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:41, 2 November 2022 (UTC) |
Files in Category:1
[edit]Instagram crap
Dronebogus (talk) 11:05, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:49, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:1
[edit]Usual collection of Instagram crap
Dronebogus (talk) 01:55, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:23, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:1
[edit]Oos garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 22:35, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:40, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:1
[edit]Usual oos crap
Dronebogus (talk) 12:41, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Delete. Derivative work of logo. Source country is unknown, so we cannot be sure in freedom of panorama. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:1
[edit]Personal spam and potential copyright violations
- File:Azmy Ehab21.jpg
- File:BALSA EUCLIDES.webp
- File:JARDIM BALNEARIO EUCLIDES.webp
- File:MAPA EUCLIDES.webp
- File:Moatazelmasry1632004.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 01:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:37, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Porque é Sem sentido RODRIGO ZL. (talk) 21:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 05:57, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's just self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Take a look at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Duncan_Robinson_(basketball)&action=history. LPS and MLP Fan (talk) 21:19, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Elcobbola at 21:53, 10 May 2022 UTC: Content intended as vandalism (G3) --Krdbot 01:41, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's just self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Uploaded by User:BingBongBoing1, who uploaded another image I nominated for deletion for the same reason. LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 21:32, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Elcobbola at 21:53, 10 May 2022 UTC: Content intended as vandalism (G3) --Krdbot 01:41, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Scaled-down dupes of File:P20220325AS-0966 (52035880811).jpg 219.78.190.126 07:30, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete no objections--A1Cafel (talk) 16:46, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Additional categories copied to larger version. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:53, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 13:09, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Wutsje at 15:57, 11 May 2022 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 19:38, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Uploaded as own work but can be found online as a Pixabay file credited to REFLEX_PRODUCTION (https://pixabay.com/photos/studio-camera-photographer-smoke-7165178/), uploaded in 2022 and hence not compatible with Commons per {{Pixabay}}. No evidence of being uploader's own work relicenced here, and they have also uploaded images by other artists as their own work. Lord Belbury (talk) 08:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 07:37, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work. See also COM:FOP US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:55, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 03:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Too complex for commons. See COM:TOO UK
- File:Aberdeen-international-airport-vector-logo.svg
- File:BAA-Heathrow-Logo.svg
- File:BHX logo CMYK 281 PB 636 2717.png
- File:BHX logo PMS 281 PB 6-B6FFE.JPG
- File:Birmingham Airport 2010.png
- File:Brighton City Airport Logo.png
- File:Dsa-logo cmyk 1.png
- File:Dundee air logo.svg
- File:Gatwick Airport logo.png
- File:Gatwick Airport logo.svg
- File:Kirkwall air logo.svg
- File:LJLA-FEF-LOGO-PRINT-1-1024x307.jpg
- File:LLA Logo.svg
- File:Logo Blackpool Airport.svg
- File:Logo-a347ca56f1.png
- File:Newquay airport logo.svg
- File:Norwich International Airport logo.svg
- File:Oban airport logo.svg
- File:QQNRdxWq (1).jpg
- File:Robin Hood Airport Doncaster Sheffield Logo.svg
- File:Stornoway air logo.svg
- File:Sumburgh air logo.svg
- File:Swansea airport logo.svg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:44, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Move to EN Wiki. AtomCrusher (talk) 23:53, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:55, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama except for buildings in the United States Ox1997cow (talk) 15:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 14:49, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
The uploader wrote "I don't know who is the producer". Copyright violation HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 22:00, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep Logos of a national public broadcaster are certainly in scope. Not being in vector format is also not a valid reason for deletion, unless a vector version also exists to replace the raster image with. Fry1989 eh? 15:35, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Logos of the Lithuanian National Radio and Television are clearly in scope and as this logos are trivial are corretly licensed. Per Fry1989, not being vectorial is also not a reason to delete. Tm (talk) 17:08, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
AgnTve (talk). The Lithuanian National Radio and Television is a public broadcaster and they have recently changed their logo. Leaving the previous logo would be confusing and misleading.
Kept: per Tm. --Strakhov (talk) 22:01, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
My mistake. I did not understand Commmons policy back then. This is a derivative work of a presumably copyrighted photo, and de minimis doesn't apply here. Please delete this photo. Thanks! Suiren2022 (talk) 17:11, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 22:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Afsarnayakkan (talk) 17:18, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: early requested by uploader. --Strakhov (talk) 22:05, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Afsarnayakkan (talk) 17:18, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: early requested by uploader. --Strakhov (talk) 22:05, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, possibly a minor, outside of COM:SCOPE Vera (talk) 17:43, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & questionable own work. --Strakhov (talk) 22:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license (No license since). Undelete in 2054. — Draceane talkcontrib. 18:45, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, self-portrait by Josef Olexa (1901-1983) (Q51555739). --Strakhov (talk) 22:09, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
personal attack by LTA Jphwra (talk) 20:09, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, I believe this image instead qualifies for speedy deletion as per https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#F10.
- -- Aimarekin (talk) 20:41, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Strakhov (talk) 22:11, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
No documentation that this is the author's own work; this image has floated around on the Internet since at least 2009 also without attribution 72.197.169.98 00:10, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:43, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:26, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Who is ? 191.126.179.79 01:51, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unused personal photo by non-contributor. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:38, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Com:Nude 191.126.179.79 01:57, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, low quality unused butt-selfie. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:39, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Facebook, collage 191.126.179.79 01:58, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:39, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Clearly fictional, as the design on the left was not created until the 20th century; uploader has been attempting to represent it on enwiki as a flag of Civil War Arkansas, which it is not. Outside of project scope in any use. Hog Farm (talk) 02:03, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:40, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Not sure how acceptable this is. Most of these images are not free to use. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 02:18, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; COM:DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:41, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
I would like to delete this picture. I made this picture by mistake. Thank you. Dreamwork1 (talk) 03:03, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:41, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
This file comes from Well's website. There is no indication that the user who uploaded this got permission to upload this file. It is most likely a copyright violation. Steelkamp (talk) 04:57, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no evidence of free license status. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:42, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Image comes from a website. Website says all rights reserved. No indication that the user who uploaded this got permission from the website to do so. Steelkamp (talk) 05:01, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:43, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Delete this file from Wiki Commons. I will upload it to English Wikipedia. Because it is "Non-free media" Borhan (talk) 05:54, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:44, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Not a freely licensed file, no indication of CC BY-SA 4.0 in sources 113.160.44.130 06:10, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; blatant copyright violation, false license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:45, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NimaWilliam (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to wm projects.
Achim55 (talk) 06:26, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:02, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Low-quality (small, oddly-aligned) text; have File:Artikel-8.svg, but this could easily be done in wikitext/tex anyway DMacks (talk) 06:41, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. In this case, clearly Wikitext or TeX should be used instead. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:47, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:37, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
No proof given that this work is actually licensed under CC-By-SA. The file appears to match https://rothko.nga.gov/Detail/objects/2264 (although is somewhat overexposed). James (talk) 06:52, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:04, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
No proof provided that this is CC-By-SA licensed. Appears to have been copied from https://www.sfmoma.org/artwork/76.106/ James (talk) 06:58, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:04, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Mural in the US. No FOP in the US unfortunately Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:05, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot from FlightGear game Gbawden (talk) 07:25, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:05, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Certificate of appreciation from a private volunteer organization, its logo is presumably copyrighted. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 07:31, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; DW; unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:06, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Maine State Senate is not part of the US Federal Government, thus the PD license is invalid 219.78.190.126 07:48, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:06, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Very small, advertising, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 08:19, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as a copyright violation. (Oinkers42) (talk) 15:37, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:08, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Very small image, poor quality, advertising, no potential educational use, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 08:32, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:10, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
"source: Internet"; unused; we have plenty more maps including Category:SVG labeled maps of administrative divisions of India (location map scheme) Enyavar (talk) 08:38, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:11, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
no permission non free image Hoyanova (talk) 10:47, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:17, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Same image was being used at lower resolution on a Hong Kong sales website a few months ago (https://www.carousell.com.hk/u/ca_me_lli_a/), uploader seems to be in India. Seems likely both users took the photo from somewhere else. Lord Belbury (talk) 10:55, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:19, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
1961 photo, not own work in 2021 Gbawden (talk) 11:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:20, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
If the author is unknown, then the photo is probably protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no evidence for claimed free license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:21, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:18, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:21, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Atom label (H) overlaps with bond; File:7-TMT_structure.png does not have this issue. Leyo 14:36, 10 May 2022 (UTC) PS. The same applies to several other uploads of this user (see Special:ListFiles/Alliegaytor).
- Delete per nom. I have uploaded File:7-N,N-Trimethyltryptamine-2D-skeletal.svg as SVG version and replaced its use on en.wikipedia.org. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:37, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely this image is available under a free license. Per the BBC article it's a stock photo from Sputnik / Alamy. This RT article on the same subject credits RIA Novosti / Sergey Titov. Copyright in the Soviet Union was life of the author + 25 years. Mackensen (talk) 11:31, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Here's the link to the photo on Sputnik Images: http://sputnikimages.com/search/9877/19050.html?query=ufa&area=all Photo was taken in 1989 by Sergey Titov. Referencer12(talk)
- Quick websearch for Sergey Titov photographer seems to indicate was alive in recent years; no reason to think copyright is expired; no evidence for claimed CC license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:30, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Unsupported false license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:29, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Photograph of a photograph. Possibly copyright violation HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:08, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Music album. Copyright violation HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:27, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:37, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Music album cover. Copyright violation HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:27, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- No educational value: Crontinallia is a fictional nation in an online game. While the game itself is notable, it has more than 260k nations, of which Crontinallia seems to be of no particular relevance.
- Copyright: A flag with the same tree has been uploaded as "own work" by a different user in 2015. It seems likely that neither user is the actual author. TilmannR (talk) 12:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:37, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
I am the original artist of this piece. I made it back in 2015. Since then someone stole it and reported my original on RedBubble, getting it taken down. My own drawing has been circulating and being sold by others without my permission, and any time I try to repost my own drawing, it just gets taken down. It really hurts not being able to post my own drawing, so to the uploader of this file, I'd appreciate if you took this down, please. If not, I will resort to reporting. 72.138.36.58 15:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment Generally I would recommend sending information as detailed at COM:VRT in such cases, but as the image is not used in Wikimedia, uncategorized, and unclear why it would be on Commons, I am deleting anyways. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:41, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:41, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Unused trivial logo with no educational value; out of COM:SCOPE. Cf. Commons:Deletion requests/File:LOGOS TRANSPARENT-01.png. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:18, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:53, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![44 File:Благодарность межрегиональной благотворительной организации "Надежда".jpg](#File:Благодарность_межрегиональной_благотворительной_организации_"Надежда".jpg){kind=link}
_(5158630119).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_mantelgescheckt,_schwarz-weiß._Bundessieger_2019.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_posted_on_Instagram_CPvlHbYFa7t(JPG).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(5158630119).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(5158630119).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(5158630119).jpg){kind=link}
_(5158630119).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused copies of Charles II of England in Coronation robes and its cropped version with slightly changed size and color. Uploaded by a sockpuppeteering spam account.
_-_Charles_II_(1630-1685)_-_RCIN_404951_-_Royal_Collection.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- File:Charles II of England (29 May 1630 - 6 February 1685) Reigned (29 May 1660 - 6 February 1685) in Coronation Robes (23 April 1661) Variant 1.jpg
- File:Charles II of England (29 May 1630 - 6 February 1685) Reigned (29 May 1660 - 6 February 1685) in Coronation Robes (23 April 1661).jpg
- File:Charles II of England (1630-1685) Reigned (1660-1685) in Coronation Robes (1661) by John Michael Wright (1617-1694) 4.jpg
- File:Charles II of England (1630-1685) Reigned (1660-1685) in Coronation Robes (1661) by John Michael Wright (1617-1694) 2.png
- File:Charles II of England (1630-1685) Reigned (1660-1685) in Coronation Robes (1661) by John Michael Wright (1617-1694) 3.jpg
- File:Charles II of England (1630-1685) Reigned (1660-1685) in Coronation Robes (1661) by John Michael Wright (1617-1694).jpg
- File:Charles II of England in Coronation robesFXD High Resolution.jpg
- File:John Michael Wright (1617-94) - Charles II (1630-1685) - RCIN 404951 - Royal Collection - High Resolution.jpg
- File:John Michael Wright (1617-94) - Charles II (1630-1685) - RCIN 404951 - Royal Collection - Modified.jpg
- File:H.M. King Charles II of England in Coronation Robes.jpg
- File:Charles II by John Michael Wright modified 2.jpg
- File:Charles II by John Michael Wright 1.jpg
- File:John Michael Wright (1617-94) - Charles II (1630-1685) - RCIN 404951 - Royal Collection - Modified 1.jpg
- File:John Michael Wright (1617-94) - Charles II (1630-1685) - RCIN 404951 - Royal Collection - Modified 2.jpg
- File:John Michael Wright (1617-1694) - Charles II (1630-1685) 2.jpg
- File:John Michael Wright (1617-1694) - Charles II (1630-1685) Cropped 2.jpg
- File:John Michael Wright (1617-1694) - Charles II (1630-1685) Croped.jpg
- File:John Michael Wright (1617-1694) - Charles II (1630-1685).jpg
- File:Charles II of England in Coronation Robes (Wright).jpg
- File:Charles II of England in Coronation Robes (Wright) 4.jpg
- File:Charles II of England in Coronation Robes (Wright) 2.jpg
- File:Charles II of England in Coronation Robes (Wright) 3.jpg
- File:Charles II of England in Coronation Robes (2).jpg
- File:Charles II of England in Coronation Robes, 1630-1685. Reigned 1660-1685.jpg
- File:Charles II of England in Coronation Robes.jpg
_Reigned_(29_May_1660_-_6_February_1685)_in_Coronation_Robes_(23_April_1661)_Variant_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Reigned_(29_May_1660_-_6_February_1685)_in_Coronation_Robes_(23_April_1661).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Reigned_(1660-1685)_in_Coronation_Robes_(1661)_by_John_Michael_Wright_(1617-1694)_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Reigned_(1660-1685)_in_Coronation_Robes_(1661)_by_John_Michael_Wright_(1617-1694)_2.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Reigned_(1660-1685)_in_Coronation_Robes_(1661)_by_John_Michael_Wright_(1617-1694)_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Reigned_(1660-1685)_in_Coronation_Robes_(1661)_by_John_Michael_Wright_(1617-1694).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Charles_II_(1630-1685)_-_RCIN_404951_-_Royal_Collection_-_High_Resolution.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Charles_II_(1630-1685)_-_RCIN_404951_-_Royal_Collection_-_Modified.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Charles_II_(1630-1685)_-_RCIN_404951_-_Royal_Collection_-_Modified_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Charles_II_(1630-1685)_-_RCIN_404951_-_Royal_Collection_-_Modified_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Charles_II_(1630-1685)_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Charles_II_(1630-1685)_Cropped_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Charles_II_(1630-1685)_Croped.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Charles_II_(1630-1685).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
TilmannR (talk) 20:04, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:56, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Charles II, King of Great Britain (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused copies of Charles II of England in Coronation robes and its cropped version with slightly changed size and color. Uploaded by a sockpuppet of a spam account.
- File:John Michael Wright (1617–1694) Charles II (1630–1685) Reigned (1660–1685) RCIN 404951.jpg
- File:John Michael Wright (1617-94) Charles II (1630-1685) 01.jpg
- File:John Michael Wright (1617-94) Charles II (1630-1685) 02.jpg
- File:JOHN MICHAEL WRIGHT (1617-94) Charles II (1630-1685) 04.jpg
- File:JOHN MICHAEL WRIGHT (1617-94) Charles II (1630-1685) 03.jpg
- File:JOHN MICHAEL WRIGHT (1617-94) Charles II (1630-1685) 01.jpg
- File:JOHN MICHAEL WRIGHT (1617-94) Charles II (1630-1685) 02.jpg
_Charles_II_(1630%E2%80%931685)_Reigned_(1660%E2%80%931685)_RCIN_404951.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Charles_II_(1630-1685)_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Charles_II_(1630-1685)_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Charles_II_(1630-1685)_04.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Charles_II_(1630-1685)_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Charles_II_(1630-1685)_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Charles_II_(1630-1685)_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
TilmannR (talk) 20:09, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Duplicates. Farcical claim of own work by sock puppet. DrKay (talk) 14:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:57, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Charles II, King of Great Britain (talk · contribs)
[edit]Wrong license, no source, no attribution. Uploaded by sock, now blocked.
- File:Coat of Arms of England (1660-1689).svg
- File:Coat of Arms of England (1603-1649).svg
- File:Coat of Arms of Great Britain (1707-1714).svg
- File:Coat of Arms of England (1702-1707).svg
- File:Coat of Arms of England (1694-1702).svg
- File:Coat of Arms of England (1689-1694).svg
- File:Coat of Arms of Scotland (1660-1689).svg
- File:Coat of Arms of Scotland (1603-1649).svg
- File:Coat of Arms of Great Britain in Scotland (1707-1714).svg
- File:Coat of Arms of Scotland (1689-1694).svg
- File:Coat of Arms of Scotland (1694-1702).svg
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 16:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- This files uploaded by user:Sodacan in 2010 year as their own work, the license is there. Vladimir Solovjev (talk) 18:05, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep. I assume Yann accidentally clicked on the wrong user. I hope none of the files that were speedied belonged to Sodacan. TilmannR (talk) 19:29, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. I don't understand why VFC on Special:Contributions/Charles II, King of Great Britain leads to this list... --Yann (talk) 19:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Suphakorn343 (talk · contribs)
[edit]All of the user's uploads (as far as I could see from a brief glance) are improperly licensed, with false CC By-SA 4.0 claims. If any can be proven to be in the public domain or appropriately licensed, I'll strike them from the nomination.
- File:พงส์ สารสิน.jpg
- File:เสริม ณ นคร.jpg
- File:สมภพ โหตระกิตย์.jpg
- File:ปรีชา เร่งสมบูรณ์สุข2012.jpg
- File:วิเชษฐ์ เกษมทองศรี2013.jpg
- File:สุรศักดิ์ กาญจนรัตน์.jpg
- File:วราวุธ ศิลปอาชา2020.jpg
- File:ชิดชัย วรรณสถิตย์2019.jpg
- File:ปุระชัย เปี่ยมสมบูรณ์2017.jpg
- File:อุทัย พิมพ์ใจชน2021.jpg
- File:พระยานิติศาสตร์ไพศาลย์ (วัน จามรมาน).jpg
- File:เขมชาติ บุณยรัตพันธุ์.jpg
- File:พระนิติธารณ์พิเศษ (ชุบ มัธยมจันทร์).jpg
- File:พระยาลัดพลีธรรมประคัลภ์ (วงศ์ ลัดพลี).jpg
- File:ประกอบ หุตะสิงห์.jpg
- File:ชาญชัย ลิขิตจิตถะ.jpg
- File:สมศักดิ์ เกียรติสุรนนท์2013.jpg
- File:เดือน บุนนาค.jpg
- File:ชัยเกษม นิติสิริ2021.jpg
- File:ไพบูลย์ คุ้มฉายา2016.jpg
- File:นิยม เวชกามา2021.jpg
- File:เล็ก สุมิตร.jpg
- File:ปิยะณัฐ วัชราภรณ์.jpg
- File:ไพโรจน์ นิงสานนท์.jpg
- File:บุญพันธ์ แขวัฒนะ.jpg
- File:อาทิตย์ อุไรรัตน์2019.jpg
- File:มนตรี พงษ์พานิช.jpg
- File:สมศักดิ์ เทพสุทิน2021.jpg
- File:สัญญา คุณากร2020.jpg
- File:พิมพา พรศิริ2020.jpg
- File:เฉลิมพล มาลาคำ2022.jpg
- File:ธีระเกียรติ เจริญเศรษฐศิลป์.jpg
- File:วันมูหะมัดนอร์ มะทา2020.jpg
- File:พินิจ จารุสมบัติ2017.jpg
- File:มงคล ณ สงขลา2013.jpg
- File:เฉลิม อยู่บำรุง2022.jpg
- File:วิทยา แก้วภราดัย2019.jpg
- File:วิทยา บุรณศิริ2016.jpg
- File:ปิยะสกล สกลสัตยาทร2019.jpg
- File:มงคล อมาตยกุล.jpg
- File:สุดารัตน์ เกยุราพันธุ์2021.jpg
- File:ธีมะ กาญจนไพริน2019.jpg
- File:สุทิน คลังแสง2021.jpg
- File:สนธิ ลิ้มทองกุล2022.jpg
- File:เสนาะ เทียนทอง2019.jpg
- File:ประจิน จั่นตอง2019.jpg
- File:ชิงชัย มงคลธรรม2018.jpg
- File:มารุต บุนนาค.jpg
- File:สมศักดิ์ ปริศนานันทกุล2018.jpg
- File:อดิศัย โพธารามิก.jpg
- File:ศรีเมือง เจริญศิริ2019.jpg
- File:ชินวรณ์ บุณยเกียรติ2020.jpg
- File:วรวัจน์ เอื้ออภิญญกุล2021.jpg
- File:ต่าย อรทัย2018.jpg
- File:สุชาติ ธาดาธำรงเวช2021.jpg
- File:พงศ์เทพ เทพกาญจนา2020.jpg
- File:จาตุรนต์ ฉายแสง2021.jpg
- File:ณรงค์ พิพัฒนาศัย2017.jpg
- File:นกน้อย อุไรพร2021.jpg
- File:สมจิตร บ่อทอง2020.jpg
- File:หมอลำอุดมศิลป์2017.jpg
- File:ดาว์พงษ์ รัตนสุวรรณ2020.jpg
- File:ป.ฉลาดน้อย ส่งเสริม2017.jpg
- File:นพดล ดวงพร2020.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Paul_012 (talk) 16:50, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:48, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Suphakorn343 (talk · contribs)
[edit]As with the previous nomination, all of the user's uploads are improperly licensed, with false CC By-SA 4.0 claims.
- File:Suwat Jangyodsuk2022.jpg
- File:General Suchinda Kraprayoon.jpg
- File:Suchinda Kraprayoon.jpg
- File:Sala Khunnawut.jpg
- File:Paiboon Koomchaya.webp
- File:Chatumongol Sonakul.jpg
Paul_012 (talk) 20:40, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No educational value: This is a PNG version of an older version of Coat of Arms of Scotland (1660-1689 and 1702-1707).svg, which had used the wrong blason. Uploaded as vandalism by a sockpuppet. TilmannR (talk) 20:51, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
- Delete Previous discussion demonstrated that this rendition of the arms does not match the blazon, which was corrected on the svg file. This appears to be an attempt by the sock master to circumvent consensus. DrKay (talk) 14:07, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per above discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Out of project scope Aimarekin (talk) 21:28, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Taken from – https://www.nhlpa.com/news/2-26934/lightning-sign-coach-jon-cooper-to-extension-through-2024-25 – Sabbatino (talk) 17:21, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:08, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
copyright image - promotional image https://www.hancinema.net/kim-kyung-nam-to-star-in-come-and-hug-me-117009.html Evaders99 (talk) 18:27, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:08, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
copyrighted star wars toys Clodion (talk) 20:00, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:08, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope Aimarekin (talk) 21:59, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:07, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Неправильное оформеление, лучше загружу на обычную википедию и там всё подробно распишу, здесь неудобно Лорд666 (talk) 09:01, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 09:53, 21 May 2022 UTC: as per COM:SPEEDY. --Krdbot 13:25, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
There's no CC license tag in the description. sB talk 12:53, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 07:19, 21 May 2022 UTC: created by abuser --Krdbot 13:25, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
File:+Clitoral Intimate piercing with ring of palladium and hairy shame of a transgender woman.jpg
[edit]
This is probably unique but I cannot fathom what it’s supposed to illustrate Dronebogus (talk) 11:58, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. "Shame" is the wrong word (I'd suggest "crotch"), but otherwise, it illustrates exactly what it says it does. And it's apparently unique in scope, considering the pictures at Category:Transgender (Genital piercings). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:04, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment If kept, should be renamed; labeling genitalia as "shame" is entirely inappropriate. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:34, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- Agreed, of course. I suggested "crotch" above. I could rename it now, but would that break the link? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:31, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Done. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:17, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
withdrawn by nominator, no dissenting votes. Dronebogus (talk) 22:12, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Sorry this picture is not interesting for an encyclopedia Irshadpp (talk) 22:00, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Very blurry. --Yann (talk) 19:23, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author request. No real point in keeping these photos with the station now open. Nick Boppel (talk) 00:11, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Construction photos are useful historical documentation - they do not lose value just because the station is completed. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per Pi.1415926535. Commons is *not* restricted to most recent versions of things only. Documenting construction and history of in-scope subjects can be useful and is not a problem. I see no reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 19:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author request. No real point in keeping these images with the station now open. Nick Boppel (talk) 00:13, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Construction photos are useful historical documentation - they do not lose value just because the station is completed. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep In scope; no evident reason to delete. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:30, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 19:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author request. No real point in keeping these images with the station now open. Nick Boppel (talk) 00:13, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Construction photos are useful historical documentation - they do not lose value just because the station is completed. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 19:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author request. No real point in keeping these images with the station now open. Nick Boppel (talk) 00:14, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Construction photos are useful historical documentation - they do not lose value just because the station is completed. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per Pi.1415926535. Documents while the station was under construction, something that more recent photos cannot show. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:35, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 19:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Author request. This was taken from the window of a Red Line train and I have now obtained much better photos of Commuter Rail trains at JFK/UMass from the actual CR platform. Nick Boppel (talk) 00:16, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- I'd say Keep; I don't understand why you are requesting deletion. Great that better photos are now available, but this is not a bad photo in any way I can see, and having multiple different images of in-scope subjects is not a problem. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 19:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
licensed image taken via a news portal website Ochsenvelt (talk) 00:59, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per PD-IDOld-Art58, 50 years protection in Indonesia. --RAN (talk) 05:30, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 19:25, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
licensed image taken via a news portal website Ochsenvelt (talk) 00:59, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per PD-IDOld-Art58, 50 years protection in Indonesia. --RAN (talk) 05:31, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 19:25, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
So, after I searched the source of image, which is here as pointed out in the description although it only mentioned the website, the website captioned the image with source from Wikimedia Commons! As far as I know, this image (or similiar) is not exist before the news was written. The actual place where the image was taken is from here and it has been deleted by an administrator because it has no source and/or license. How would you know that this image was created in 1930s if the original source was not provided? AnsyahF (talk) 04:19, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:23, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleting collage 191.126.179.79 01:45, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:25, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Usuario solamente hace pagina de usuario 191.126.179.79 01:47, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:28, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Usuario solamente hace pagina de usuario 191.126.179.79 01:47, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:28, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Usuario solamente hace pagina de usuario 191.126.179.79 01:47, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:28, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Own violacion 191.126.179.79 01:48, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:25, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Who is this Chap Varakorn? 191.126.179.79 01:50, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:26, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Not my own work 191.126.179.79 01:52, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:26, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Is own ? 191.126.179.79 01:54, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:26, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Is own, is scope? 191.126.179.79 01:54, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:26, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Founder Assal Ravandi and her Illustrated Boob 191.126.179.79 01:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:28, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Unused low res diagram without clear purpose, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:28, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Non-free in its home country until 2035 Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:51, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:29, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Per my previous comments I believe this is a copyright violation.--Kai3952 (talk) 04:00, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Shutterstock images are not licensed under Creative Commons TaurusEmerald (talk) 04:05, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Subject never gave permission for image to be used outside of personal use per https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Emily_Jane_White&oldid=1062031662. Nate • (chatter) 05:18, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
keep she doesn't have to give permission the person who owns the photo does. this is Wikipedia not her own personal website. Redsky89 (talk) 17:58, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
I'm the author of the 3 photos, so I don't know if I shall vote here (keep). I took them during her concert in 2011 in Germany, is it needed to ask for the consent in such a case? Vonvon (talk) 21:21, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 19:31, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Diethynylbenzenes
[edit]Poor geometry, some chemical mistakes also (the anion is the C on the end of the triple bond, not on a position bonded beyond that). Most have in-image caption text that inhibits reuse in general and is typographically incorrect itself. Have File:Ortho-Diethynylbenzene-dianion.svg as a high-quality MOS-compliant diagram of this chemical.
- File:Orthodiethynylbenzene dianion.png
- File:Step 4 - Orthodiethynylbenzene dianion.png
- File:Step 4 - The final step in the process of synthesizing Ortho-diethynylbenzene dianion. The ionized parent compound once again, through collisional activation, loses another Carbon dioxide molecule. But the charge is still present.png
- File:Step 4 -Orthodiethynylbenzene dianion.png
- File:Step4-Orthodiethynylbenzene dianion.png
DMacks (talk) 07:53, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:22, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Diethynylbenzenes
[edit]These files have the negative charge one bond away from the end of the triple-bond, but en:diethynylbenzene has the negative charge on the triple-bonded atom itself (such as File:O-diethynylbenzene dianion.png--same as in previous batch. Therefore, these actually represent different chemicals. They're not very high quality anyway, so if someone did have a use for these propynyl structures, it would be easy to draw to MOS.
- File:Image-Meta-diethynylbenzene dianion.png
- File:Meta-diethynylbenzene.png
- File:Metadiethynylbenzene dianion.png
DMacks (talk) 06:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all three. I agree that the way the alkynes are drawn, it appears as if there are extra carbon atoms in each chemical structure. Marbletan (talk) 17:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:39, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Looks extremely similar to a still from a Sony Music live video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDXisu5pLp0, at 2:09. This image is higher resolution but raises the question of how a fan photographer was able to get such a good shot from the same angle as a Sony camera rig. Lord Belbury (talk) 06:14, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Good afternoon, the uploaded image was sent to me by some friends from Cuba who went to Shakira's concert in 2003, 2006 and 2011. I can ask why, according to them, the photo is theirs, but anyone can let me know.AlexanderShakifan29 (talk) 18:03, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- @AlexanderShakifan29: Taking a closer look at this and superimposing one over the other in an image editor, the uploaded image here is an exact match for a frame at 2:09, the aspect ratios are just a little different. It must have been sent to you by somebody who took a screenshot from official Sony Music footage of a concert.
- Should we be concerned that your upload of File:ShakiraBellyDance.jpg may be a similar situation? --Lord Belbury (talk) 18:32, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
I'm going to ask them in a moment, if so I'm very sorry for the misunderstanding and I'll delete it. Thank you AlexanderShakifan29 (talk) 19:28, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:40, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
As requested per original author. Huffssumps (talk) 06:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Why? Image has been on Commons since last July. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 19:41, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I have lied about the copyright status of this file. This image, along with others that I've uploaded in 2021, were actually taken by my friend and were uploaded by me without his consent. He has discovered part of my uploads a year ago and asked me nicely to delete them. However, those deletion requests which I have submitted were not granted and the files continued to stay up. Please help me delete all the files that I've uploaded in 2021 as all of them were my friend's and were uploaded without his permission. Huffssumps (talk) 21:29, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:19, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
As requested per original author. Huffssumps (talk) 06:25, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 19:41, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I have lied about the copyright status of this file. This image, along with others that I've uploaded in 2021, were actually taken by my friend and were uploaded by me without his consent. He has discovered part of my uploads a year ago and asked me nicely to delete them. However, those deletion requests which I have submitted were not granted and the files continued to stay up. Please help me delete all the files that I've uploaded in 2021 as all of them were my friend's and were uploaded without his permission. Huffssumps (talk) 21:29, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:19, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
As requested per original author. Huffssumps (talk) 06:25, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 19:42, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I have lied about the copyright status of this file. This image, along with others that I've uploaded in 2021, were actually taken by my friend and were uploaded by me without his consent. He has discovered part of my uploads a year ago and asked me nicely to delete them. However, those deletion requests which I have submitted were not granted and the files continued to stay up. Please help me delete all the files that I've uploaded in 2021 as all of them were my friend's and were uploaded without his permission. Huffssumps (talk) 21:29, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:19, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
As requested per original author. Huffssumps (talk) 06:25, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 19:42, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I have lied about the copyright status of this file. This image, along with others that I've uploaded in 2021, were actually taken by my friend and were uploaded by me without his consent. He has discovered part of my uploads a year ago and asked me nicely to delete them. However, those deletion requests which I have submitted were not granted and the files continued to stay up. Please help me delete all the files that I've uploaded in 2021 as all of them were my friend's and were uploaded without his permission. Huffssumps (talk) 21:29, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:19, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Poor quality, barely readable. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 07:20, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:43, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Source and author unknown Caulfield (talk) 07:25, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. PD-ineligible. --Yann (talk) 19:44, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Only use is on an English Wikipedia article, en:Asvin Srivatsangam, nominated for speedy deletion. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:51, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:45, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Source and author unknown Caulfield (talk) 07:51, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-Art. --Yann (talk) 19:45, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Kip Moore
[edit]Very small images (4 KiB, 110 × 80px), poor quality, advertising, no potential educational use, not used, out of scope.
- File:Kip Moore on Walmart Soundcheck RISERS May 2012 (6986762110).jpg
- File:Kip Moore on Walmart Soundcheck RISERS May 2012 (6986762148).jpg
- File:Kip Moore on Walmart Soundcheck RISERS May 2012 (6986762202).jpg
- File:Kip Moore on Walmart Soundcheck RISERS May 2012 (6986762252).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 08:25, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:46, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Very small image, poor quality, advertising, no potential educational use, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 08:27, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:47, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Nickelback
[edit]Very small images, poor quality, advertising, no potential educational use, not used, out of scope.
- File:Nickelback Soundcheck Live Set from "Here & Now" Tour (6967371142).jpg
- File:Nickelback Soundcheck Live Set from "Here & Now" Tour (6967371318).jpg
- File:Nickelback Soundcheck Live Set from "Here & Now" Tour (6967371374).jpg
- File:Nickelback Soundcheck Live Set from "Here & Now" Tour (7113448047).jpg
- File:Nickelback Soundcheck Live Set from "Here & Now" Tour (7113448079).jpg
- File:Nickelback Soundcheck Live Set from "Here & Now" Tour (7113448155).jpg
- File:Nickelback Soundcheck Live Set from "Here & Now" Tour (7113448233).jpg
- File:Nickelback Soundcheck Live Set from "Here & Now" Tour (7113448333).jpg
- File:Nickelback Soundcheck Live Set from "Here & Now" Tour (7113448369).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 08:31, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:47, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vinayakavm (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Alternate history map: never before did I hear of Azad Hind conquering so much of British India, apparently uniting Burma, Assam and Sri Lanka under their control. Fiction/fantasy
- File:AZAD HIND MAP.jpg
- File:AZAD HIND MAP 1944.jpg
- File:AZAD HIND MAP 1944-45.jpg
- File:AZAD HIND MAP 1945.jpg
Enyavar (talk) 08:46, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:47, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
This is not the work of Plus TV Africa, but a government feed rebroadcast by them (a state TV watermark can be seen behind theirs when they play the clip). ― Tartan357 Talk 08:52, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:48, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Image has been previously published in https://www.hunterng.com/. VRT permission needed. MKFI (talk) 09:31, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:48, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
no source no permission, privacy violation Hoyanova (talk) 09:53, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment Looks like a public place, so it should be legally ok. But there would be nothing wrong with deleting a poor quality image of a random street scene. --Watchduck (quack) 11:38, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:48, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyright infringement, copy of File:Adem Jašari, bista u Tirani.JPG (1st version) falsely declared as "own work" by uploader. -- Aspiriniks (talk) 10:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:48, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
no permission, copyvio from [2] Hoyanova (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:49, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tyg728 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: 作者请求删除自己的作品
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as file does not qualify for G7-speedy. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:00, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:17, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tyg728 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: 请求删除的原因：G7. 作者或上傳者請求刪除
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as file does not qualify for G7-speedy. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:59, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 19:49, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/184781479@N08
[edit]Suspected flickrwashing. Some photos were added to commons in 2022 and almost immediately the flickr account was cleared. Most of the photos have no meaningful exif, and some indicate that the photos are from Insta. Sadly I don't think this flickr user can be trusted.
- File:Winterland Ecotrail.jpg
- File:Port Au Bras, NL.jpg
- File:Salvage, Newfoundland.jpg
- File:Harbour Mille, NL.jpg
- File:Harbour Mille, NL 2.jpg
- File:Centreville-Wareham-Trinity, NL.jpg
- File:Sandy Cove Beach, Lord's Cove.jpg
- File:Frenchman's Cove, Burin Peninsula.jpg
- File:Chambers Cove - St. Lawrence 2.jpg
- File:Chambers Cove - St. Lawrence.jpg
- File:Broad Cove, Newfoundland.jpg
- File:Ferry to St. Brendan's, Newfoundland.jpg
- File:Sandy Cove sign, Lord's Cove.jpg
- File:Lord's Cove, NL.jpg
- File:Sacred Heart Church, Placentia.jpg
- File:Baine Harbour, NL.jpg
- File:La Manche Bridge 2020.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:50, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- The entire account has been deleted so I don't think you can say it was specifically flickrwashing. Also the photos are of local content and it is unlikely they were stolen from elsewhere on the Internet. Also Flickr on Commons is an irrevocable license so the account being deleted doesn't mean all the photos should be deleted as they passed Commons at the time.--142.167.135.137 04:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:52, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
File EXIF shows "Author RohitJainParas". VRT permission from Rohit Jain Paras needed. MKFI (talk) 13:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:54, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Web scrape: Google Lens shows the image originated at https://vickyt.com/, and there's no evidence of a free license C.Fred (talk) 13:18, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:54, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Professional portraits of recording artists all signed to Neuron Music. Requires COM:VRT permission from original photographer(s).
@Heej2202: 공용:자원봉사 대응팀을 확인해주세요.
✗plicit 13:50, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:55, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by احمد العلي (مطرب) (talk · contribs)
[edit]SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
JopkeB (talk) 14:05, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:55, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CAPTAIN AREWA (talk · contribs)
[edit]SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JopkeB (talk) 14:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:55, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Carreguei por engano Gengibri (talk) 14:12, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:56, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Xzcursed aboba (talk · contribs)
[edit]SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
JopkeB (talk) 14:23, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:56, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
JopkeB (talk) 14:26, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:56, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:27, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:56, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
- File:Benyamin arefi.jpg
- File:Benyaminarefii.jpg
- File:Benyaminarefie.jpg
- File:Benyamin arefii.jpg
- File:Benyaminarefie1.jpg
JopkeB (talk) 14:27, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:56, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Item states it is used with permission by CBS - no evidence that this is true - uploader doesn't seem to work for CBS. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Lee Vilenski: Did you actually check the licence section? There is a link to a VRT ticket, which presumably links to evidence on the permission. Even if you know the uploader's work history (i.e. you have reason to believe he did not work there), that doesn't mean he cannot have gotten permission. –LPfi (talk) 17:08, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Permission is there. --Yann (talk) 19:57, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Inkorrekt bild och avsaknad av information. Deteon (talk) 15:05, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep You need to present evidence that the wrong person is identified, and even then we do not delete, we fix the name. --RAN (talk) 01:19, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. --Yann (talk) 19:58, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Not evidently a work by Mehr News Agency photographer HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:08, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:58, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot of article infobox (https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Винча_(Топола) - unused, unneccessary Enyavar (talk) 15:28, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:58, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
source unknown Caulfield (talk) 15:36, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Person shown died in 1899 at age 73; he looks perhaps some 30 years younger here. While lack of sourcing is unfortunate, photo seems very unlikely not to be PD. Reverse image search shows multiple other versions clearly from same original photo online, however I have not found photographer credit. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:52, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 19:59, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Please empty my trash (Watchduck 2022)
[edit]Please delete everything in Category:Watchduck; trash (but not the category itself).
- 296 images + template directly in it
- 26 files + template in Category:4-ary Boolean functions; 16*24 diamond
- 101 files + template in Category:4-ary Boolean functions; BEC; trash
- 13 files + template in Category:Decomposition of 4-ary Boolean functions (image set with related Euler diagrams)
- 7 files + template in Category:Hexadecachoric group; lattice; signed inversion sets
These files have been adequately replaced by other files.
Here are some examples of replacements: (Do not delete!)
- Category:3D chess pieces (white with direction colors) (fiddled with colors)
- Category:Single 3-bit Walsh permutations; SVG Fano plane (replaced red by colored cycles)
- Category:Venn spheres rgby; 16 cells (replaced white by transparent background)
- Category:4-ary Boolean functions; BEC (24 × 16×16) (correction of labels)
A few ill-conceived images like these do not need replacements.
Thank you, Watchduck (quack) 11:14, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:49, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Transgender (Cock ring)
[edit]Commons is not an amateur porn site
- File:*+* Photographic documentation on sexual education - Transgender on the way to women - Months after removal of testicles - Penis 5 hours after taking Tadalafil 40 mg by motivation of Meike photographer's wife.jpg
- File:*+* Photographic documentation on sexual education - Transgender on the way to women - Totally removed of the frenulum (ribbon on the foreskin) – Penis ring made of platinum - With still partially trimmed foreskin 1.jpg
- File:*+* Photographic documentation on sexual education - Transgender on the way to women - Totally removed of the frenulum (ribbon on the foreskin) – Penis ring made of platinum - With uncircumcised stretched foreskin 1-.jpg
- File:*+* Photographic documentation on sexual education - Transgender on the way to women - Totally removed of the frenulum (ribbon on the foreskin) – Penis ring made of platinum - With uncircumcised stretched foreskin 2-.jpg
- File:+ Wedding ring and its secret - Photographic time documentation of a photographer – Transgender in a pleated skirt on the way to the CSD 2021 in Berlin - Image 4.jpg
- File:+ Wedding ring and its secret - Photographic time documentation of a photographer – Transgender in a pleated skirt on the way to the CSD 2021 in Berlin - Image 6.jpg
- File:+Photographic documentation of a transgender to woman impotent by hormonal ingestion – Erection 5 hours after taking Tadalafil 20 mg with ejaculation – Image 004.jpg
- File:+Photographic documentation of a transgender to woman impotent by hormonal ingestion – Erection 5 hours after taking Tadalafil 20 mg with ejaculation – Image 006.jpg
_%E2%80%93_Penis_ring_made_of_platinum_-_With_still_partially_trimmed_foreskin_1.jpg){kind=link}
_%E2%80%93_Penis_ring_made_of_platinum_-_With_uncircumcised_stretched_foreskin_1-.jpg){kind=link}
_%E2%80%93_Penis_ring_made_of_platinum_-_With_uncircumcised_stretched_foreskin_2-.jpg){kind=link}
Dronebogus (talk) 12:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:39, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Source unknown Caulfield (talk) 15:38, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:00, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Policy is very clear -- a gallery is a collection of images or other media files. There is no provision at Com:Galleries for using them for any other purpose. In fact, quite the opposite,
- "Galleries without media are not galleries at all. They are considered out of the project scope and meet the criteria for speedy deletion."
An appropriate Category can easily serve the function of an index. . . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I don't have a definitive opinion about this, but this page presents educational content, and it seems useful for some people. I am not sure the same information can be presented in a category. BTW there is 亜東印画輯 with the same case. Yann (talk) 15:47, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- A simple solution is to include media files from each subpages to this page, inside the table - could be the first image of every subpages. I believe this page would be useful. Stang★ 22:09, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Done. But I think the policy is too strict and should be modified because categories cannot convey enough information about the gallery and exceptions like this should be allowed. --Upload for Freedom (talk) 23:29, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No an empty gallery anymore. May be the policy needs to be updated?. --Yann (talk) 20:28, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
This is me on the picture, I just would like it to be deleted for a private reason. Thewealthyone (talk) 16:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:29, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
copyrighted cover book Clodion (talk) 20:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:29, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Transgender (Eiaculatio)
[edit]Commons is not an amateur porn site
- File:+Photographic documentation of a transgender person on the way to a woman (hormone treatment) –Impotence - pre-ejaculation + taking potency agent Tadalafil + sexual stimulation by the photographer's wife -1.jpg
- File:+Photographic documentation of a transgender person on the way to a woman (hormone treatment) –Impotence - pre-ejaculation + taking potency agent Tadalafil + sexual stimulation by the photographer's wife -2.jpg
- File:+Photographic documentation of a transgender person on the way to a woman (hormone treatment) –Impotence - pre-ejaculation + taking potency agent Tadalafil + sexual stimulation by the photographer's wife -3.jpg
- File:+Photographic documentation of a transgender to woman impotent by hormonal ingestion – Erection 5 hours after taking Tadalafil 20 mg with ejaculation – Image 005.jpg
_%E2%80%93Impotence_-_pre-ejaculation_%2B_taking_potency_agent_Tadalafil_%2B_sexual_stimulation_by_the_photographer%27s_wife_-1.jpg){kind=link}
_%E2%80%93Impotence_-_pre-ejaculation_%2B_taking_potency_agent_Tadalafil_%2B_sexual_stimulation_by_the_photographer%27s_wife_-2.jpg){kind=link}
_%E2%80%93Impotence_-_pre-ejaculation_%2B_taking_potency_agent_Tadalafil_%2B_sexual_stimulation_by_the_photographer%27s_wife_-3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Dronebogus (talk) 20:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Transgender genitalia
[edit]I can’t fathom what these are supposed to represent
- File:+ Married transgender on the way to a woman - with shave of shame on - Nudist beach in Berlin - June 2011 - Picture 002.jpg
- File:+ Married transgender on the way to a woman - with shave of shame on - Nudist beach in Berlin - June 2011 - Picture 003.jpg
- File:+ Married transgender on the way to a woman - with shave of shame on - Nudist beach in Berlin - June 2011 - Picture 004.jpg
- File:+ Married transgender on the way to a woman - with shave of shame on - Nudist beach in Berlin - June 2011 - Picture 006.jpg
- File:+ Verheirateter + Married transgender on the way to a woman - with shave of shame on - nudist beach in Berlin - June 2011 - Picture 001.jpg
- File:+Beach nudity - Transgender and transsexual men - at the FKK Badesee Berlin - 2019 - Picture 001.jpg
- File:+Beach nudity - Transgender and transsexual men - at the FKK Badesee Berlin - 2019 - Picture 002.jpg
- File:+Beach nudity - Transgender and transsexual men - at the FKK Badesee Berlin - 2019 - Picture 003.jpg
- File:+Transgender in Hungary - Budapest August 2010 - Picture 001.jpg
- File:+Transgender in Hungary - Budapest August 2010 - Picture 002.jpg
- File:+Transgender in Hungary - Budapest August 2010 - Picture 003.jpg
- File:+Transgender in Ungarn - Budapest August 2010 - Picture 004.jpg
Is this a transgender man, or a man transitioning to a woman, or a transgender person traveling to a woman? And what the hell is a “shave of shame”? What body part are we even looking at? A scrotum? A neovagina? Literally the only comprehensible words are “Married” “picture” and “Nudist beach in Berlin June 2011” Dronebogus (talk) 20:11, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- "Shaved shame" means shaved pubic hair. I think this is a mistranslation of "pudenda." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:13, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Wow that’s some engrish there. Dronebogus (talk) 10:57, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Most of the world's population are not native English speakers, but many of them know English better than I and perhaps you know Swahili, so... -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:38, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Yes but Swahili is not a widely spoken language (internationally speaking); a better analogy might be Spanish or French. Additionally, if your ability to communicate im English is so poor as to be incomprehensible you are not particularly helpful to the project. Dronebogus (talk) 00:09, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
- I figured it out. Any of the photos that are useful could be renamed. Swahili is a major international language, though, by the way. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:08, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Really? Where is it spoken besides Kenya? Dronebogus (talk) 02:05, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Read w:Swahili language. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:26, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Cool, but this is getting off topic. Dronebogus (talk) 16:26, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- No, really? :-P It's just the result of an aside I made that made the point that most of the world does not speak English well, and that's nothing to make fun of. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:22, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Only this user doesn’t just use mediocre English— their writing seems like It’d be extremely idiosyncratic, bordering on incomprehensible, even in German (which I believe is their native language), particularly their baffling use of punctuation. Dronebogus (talk) 09:59, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- No, really? :-P It's just the result of an aside I made that made the point that most of the world does not speak English well, and that's nothing to make fun of. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:22, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Read w:Swahili language. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:26, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- I figured it out. Any of the photos that are useful could be renamed. Swahili is a major international language, though, by the way. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:08, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Most of the world's population are not native English speakers, but many of them know English better than I and perhaps you know Swahili, so... -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:38, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- "Shaved shame" means shaved pubic hair. I think this is a mistranslation of "pudenda." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:13, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:32, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Can’t fathom what this is supposed to represent Dronebogus (talk) 20:12, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:32, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Penis
[edit]
Dronebogus (talk) 14:34, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:39, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Penis
[edit]Unremarkable WP:PENIS pics
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Dronebogus (talk) 15:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by User:Gbawden. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:43, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Penis
[edit]Low quality penis images
File:Enlarge 2425408393.png- File:Erect circumcised penis.jpg
- File:Male anus, perineum, scrotum and penis II.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 15:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I do not understand the benchmark for "low quality". It demonstrates exactly what it stated. I believe in regards to both empirical characteristics (resolution, clarity, etc) and usefulness, it surpasses many other images left under this category. Rafe101 (talk) 17:14, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I just realized the first one is not low quality and in use; removing Dronebogus (talk) 22:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- The world makes a little more sense. Thanks Rafe101 (talk) 22:22, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete the rest. 186.175.219.84 22:27, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I just realized the first one is not low quality and in use; removing Dronebogus (talk) 22:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 06:26, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Penis
[edit]SERIOUSLY WE DO NOT NEED MORE DICK PICS
- File:Human Male Ejaculation (1).gif
- File:Human Male Ejaculation (2).gif
- File:Human Penis (1).jpg
- File:Human Penis (10).jpg
- File:Human Penis (11).jpg
- File:Human Penis (4).jpg
- File:Human Penis (5).jpg
- File:Human Penis (6).jpg
- File:Human Penis (7).jpg
- File:Human Penis (8).jpg
- File:Human Penis (9).jpg
- File:Human Penis+.jpg
- File:Human Penis-.png
- File:Low and tight circumcision.jpg
- File:Male penis flaccid to erect.jpg
- File:My dick.jpg
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Dronebogus (talk) 11:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:26, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of project scope, advertisement of self-published book, relevant article on Chinese Wikipedia deleted. Stang★ 21:49, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:34, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:ISS Expedition 67 EVAs
[edit]Everything by Larry Connor, a Private Astronaut and sadly Axiom didn't released anything into free use.
- File:ISS-67 Artemyev waves during EVA.jpg
- File:ISS-67 Matveev and Artemyev EVA (2).jpg
- File:ISS-67 Matveev and Artemyev EVA (3).jpg
- File:ISS-67 Matveev and Artemyev EVA.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Erick Soares3 (talk) 22:49, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. EXIF info clearly states these are personal photographs. It's unfortunate that NASA doesn't do a better job of differentiating NASA vs. non-NASA images. — Huntster (t @ c) 03:11, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:35, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Claudiapeppi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Escudo de la Orden de la Santa Ampolla.jpg
- File:Rubén Cedeño y el Príncipe Rubén Alberto Gavaldá y Castro.jpg
- File:Rubén Cedeño en la Enciclopedia de la Música.jpg
- File:RUBEN LIBROS.jpg
- File:Baron2 web.jpg
- File:Prof. Rubén Cedeño.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:42, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Claudiapeppi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Barom9.png
- File:Ruben caballero.jpg
- File:Ruben cruz matara.jpg
- File:Ruben Cedeno bibliografia.jpg
- File:Rubèn Cedeño en piano de Conny Méndez.jpg
- File:Don Rubén Cedeño.jpg
- File:Rubén Cedeño.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:13, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Estimada/o EugeneZelenko, no entiendo a què se refiere con EXIF, disculpe, quisiera explicarme por favor? Soy relativamente nueva aquí he intentado subir 1 artículo y solo he encontrado obstáculos. Necesito que alguien por favor me ayude. Quiero hacer aportes a Wikipedis sobre Naturología, Ciencias complementarias, artes y filosofía más me han bloqueado el usuario y borrado el único artículo que he subido de un eprsonaje con relevancia enciclopédica y de conocimiento internacional. Por favor puedes ayudarme? Gracias. Claudiapeppi (talk) 18:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Cabe aclarar que las imágenes compartidas sí son de mi autoría, tal vez estoy fallando en algún elemneto técnico que desconozco, no sé que es EXIF, pero son imágenes propias, no sé cuál es el método para dar cuenta de eso. Si puedes aclararme por favor. Gracias. Claudiapeppi (talk) 18:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:35, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Unused trivial logo with no educational value uploaded for promotion; out of COM:SCOPE. Cf. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Redler int.jpg 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:16, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:50, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
File:Englisches Widderkaninchen (Weibchen), mantelgescheckt, schwarz-weiß. Bundessieger 2019.jpg
[edit],_mantelgescheckt,_schwarz-wei%C3%9F._Bundessieger_2019.jpg){kind=link}
,_mantelgescheckt,_schwarz-wei%C3%9F._Bundessieger_2019.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Ich bin Urheber des Fotos. Dieses wird für "Qualzuchtpropaganda" verwendet. Eine sofortige Löschung wird hiermit beantragt! 91.248.158.129 20:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 23:48, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Source and author unknown Caulfield (talk) 15:29, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: it's not signed, but it says copyright 1900 and Aschenbrödel was first performed in 1901, so it should be old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 20:36, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
This chemical structure has incomplete stereochemical information. It is lower resolution. It has been replaced by File:Esomeprazole.svg. 180.214.233.88 03:37, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 09:29, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:54, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
copyrighted posters, no FOP in Indonesia Krd 04:43, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Ticket:2022051010001171 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 01:00, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per PD-IDGov. --Krd 11:56, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR Norway. It will be undeleted in 2046. Ox1997cow (talk) 01:23, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:37, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR Norway. It will be undeleted in 2042. Ox1997cow (talk) 01:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR Norway. It will be undeleted in 2055. Ox1997cow (talk) 01:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:34, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
As requested per original author. Huffssumps (talk) 06:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Why? Image has been on Commons since July, a bit late to request deletion with no reason offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:40, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
As requested per original author. Huffssumps (talk) 06:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:40, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
As requested per original author. Huffssumps (talk) 06:25, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:41, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Scan of a photo, not own work as claimed Gbawden (talk) 07:13, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:43, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation? This sculpture is made by an artist (Marga Bles) who is still living, so it is not in the public domain. It does not look like it is in the public space either, I do not see an address or other indication, so no FOP. I do not see a VRT ticket either. JopkeB (talk) 07:50, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Jopke, op user:Margables is nog geen melding geplaatst, op user:Marga bles wel dus. (Soms is het jammer dat er op iedere pagina meerdere links staan om bestanden te nomineren voor verwijderen, of problemen te taggen, maar geen enkele directe koppeling voor de rechtenhebbenden naar pagina's met OTRS-info en formulier generator). Het lijken uploads van de kunstenaar zelf, maar of deze het bericht op tijd zal zien blijft de vraag. Daarom zojuist e-mail naar maker verstuurd. Groet. Peli (talk) 09:31, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Artist answered and said that she already gave her permissions by e-mail to the VRT team. It's her sculpture, her photo and her upload. See also Marga Bles, sculptuur gazelle 01.jpg Peli (talk) 23:24, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: free via tivcket 2022051110012264. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:46, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Image taken without credit from https://unsplash.com/photos/dO-MrJ2bCtA, uploaded there last month. Per {{Unsplash}}, Unsplash photos from after June 2017 cannot be hosted on Commons. Uploader has also uploaded other artists' work as their own work, so unlikely to be the original artist relicensing for Commons.
Lord Belbury (talk) 08:41, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GTG Entertainment (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional images of a non-notable band; no educational value. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:ADIDI vocalist and dancer-2022.jpg.
- File:Three members of the musical boy band MTGT 2022.jpg
- File:Logo MTGT Boy Band.png
- File:MTGT Music Boy Band 2022.jpg
- File:Logo MTGT-2022 Music.jpg
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:39, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:53, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
tiny, no metadata - probably not "own work" Xocolatl (talk) 16:20, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:55, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
19 kb, no metadata - probably not "own work" Xocolatl (talk) 16:21, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:55, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
need OTRS Ticket Caulfield (talk) 16:42, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: free via VRT ticket 2022051710011807. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:56, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 19:23, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OOS. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:57, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Derivatives of book pages and other documents with unclear copyright status, all uploaded as 'own works'.
- File:Боевой листок Башкавдивизии.jpg
- File:Журнал Сэсен.jpg
- File:Сэсэн шура.jpg
- File:Газета карван сарай.jpg
- File:Абу Абдулла Мухаммад.jpg
- File:Qíssa-i Yosıf 1.jpg
- File:Qíssa-i Yosıf.jpg
- File:Башкорт аймагы4.jpg
- File:Башкорт аймагы3.jpg
- File:Башкорт аймагы1.jpg
- File:Башкорт аймагы2.jpg
- File:Башкорт аймагы.jpg
- File:Самый большой спиральный хоровод.jpg
- File:Татарский энциклопедический словарь4.jpg
- File:Татарский энциклопедический словарь3.jpg
- File:Татарский энциклопедический словарь2.jpg
- File:Татарский энциклопедический словарь1.jpg
- File:Красные конники 08.jpg
- File:Красные конники 01.jpg
- File:Красные конники 02.jpg
- File:Газета Башкурт №20.jpg
- File:Бабич Кем осон.jpg
- File:Йомағужина Сәхиә Хәйбулла ҡыҙы.jpg
- File:The cultural part of the wiki-conference 2017. 24.jpg
- File:Башкирский комсомол (энциклопедия)1.jpg
- File:Петь только то, что жизнью накипело 03.jpg
- File:Табын ырыуының IV йыйыны 50.jpg
- File:Табын ырыуының IV йыйыны 48.jpg
- File:Табын ырыуының IV йыйыны 42.jpg
- File:Табын ырыуының IV йыйыны 29.jpg
- File:Табын ырыуының IV йыйыны 30.jpg
- File:Табын ырыуының IV йыйыны 28.jpg
- File:Табын ырыуының IV йыйыны 9.jpg
- File:Табын ырыуының IV йыйыны 4.jpg
- File:Табын ырыуының IV йыйыны 2.jpg
- File:Табын ырыуының IV йыйыны 3.jpg
1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Xunks (talk) 05:38, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:09, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Derivatives of non-free posters, murals and billboards, no FoP in Russia except architecture.
- File:Башҡорт кавалерия дивизияһының хәрби юлы.jpg
- File:Баймаҡ районы Тауылай ауылы.jpg
- File:Toponymy of Galiakbar.jpg
- File:Табынфест 2019 10.jpg
- File:Табынфест 2019 09.jpg
- File:Табынфест 2019 08.jpg
- File:Табынфест 2019 02.jpg
- File:Красные конники 07.jpg
- File:Monument to Salawat Yulayev, Paldiski 06.jpg
- File:140-сы башҡорт гимназияһы 11.jpg
- File:140-сы башҡорт гимназияһы 10.jpg
- File:140-сы башҡорт гимназияһы 07.jpg
- File:140-сы башҡорт гимназияһы 09.jpg
- File:Республиканская премия имени Булата Султангареева 03.jpg
- File:Республиканская премия имени Булата Султангареева 01.jpg
- File:Табын ырыуының IV йыйыны 14.jpg
- File:Табын ырыуының IV йыйыны 13.jpg
Xunks (talk) 05:45, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:10, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:History of Bashkortostan
[edit]Fake Creative Commons tags, copyright status is to be clarified.
- File:Биишев Ахмед Альмухаметович.jpg
- File:Бөрйән районының алдынғы малсылары Өфөлә экскурцияла.16-19 октяббрь 1960 йыл.jpg
- File:Исхаков Ибрагим.jpg
- File:Ишмурзин Сулейман Галяутдинович.jpg
- File:Ишмурзин, Аухади Галяутдинович.jpg
- File:Низаметдинов, Казыхан Низаметдинович.jpg
Xunks (talk) 05:48, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:11, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Һәҙиә
[edit]- File:Колхоз һәм совхоздар өөсөн етәксе кадрҙарҙы әҙерләү курсының сығарылыш уҡыусылары. Өфө ҡалаһы, 1964.jpg
- File:Колхоз һәм совхоздар өөсөн етәксе кадрҙарҙы әҙерләү курсының сығарылыш уҡыусылары. Өфө ҡалаһы, 1980.БСХИ.ФПК.jpg
The participant has uploaded old photos as their own. Creation time is incorrect. — Redboston 09:36, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:52, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Fake 'own work' claims, all images are grabbed from the web.
- File:Сәғитов Рауил Әхмәтшәриф улы.Чернобыль һәләкәте эҙемтәләрен бөтөрөүҙә ҡатнашыусы.jpg
- File:Бөрйән районы Ҡурғашлы ауылындағы .РТП хужалығы хеҙмәткәрҙәре Аҫҡарҙа Фрунзе колхозына уңыш йыйыуҙа ярҙамда(1980-се йылдар).jpg
- File:МТС-ты беҙ төҙөнөк.jpg
- File:Ремонт-техник предприятие (РТП) эшмәкәрлеге (1990-сы йылдар).jpg
- File:РТП--ың ағас ярыу цехы ( пилорама ) эшселәре.jpg
- File:092 - копия.jpg
- File:Агроснаб хеҙмәткәрҙәре.jpg
- File:МТС-ың (РТП) тәүге эшселәре.1950-се йылдар.jpg
- File:Тарихи фотография. Бөрйән районы Ҡурғашлы ауылы. 1990-сы йылдар.jpg
- File:Тарихи фотография."Ағиҙел" урмансылыҡ хужалығы хеҙмәткәрҙәре. Етәкселәре Әмиров Рәмил Зиннур улы. 1980-се йылдар.jpg
- File:Тарихи фотография.Ремонт-техник станция администрацияһы.Етәксеһе Хәлиуллин Әлфир Сәғит улы1994 йыл.jpg
- File:Дибаева Зилә Сиражетдин ҡыҙы.jpg
- File:“Шоңҡар “ журналының 2016 йылғы лауреаты Л. М. Яҡшыбаеваға бирелгән диплом.jpg
- File:Лира Миңнәхмәт ҡыҙы Якшыбаеваға бирелгəн ҡатнашыусы дипломы.jpg
- File:Жәлил Кейекбаев исемендәге премияның билдәһе.jpg
- File:Рамаҙан Өмөтбаев исемендәге премия.jpg
- File:Л. М. Якшыбаеваға бирелгән М. Аҡмулла исемендәге премия тураһында диплом.jpg
- File:Ғәҙелшина Мөнирә Зәкир ҡыҙы.jpg
- File:Әхмәҙиева Шәһүрә Шәкир ҡыҙы.jpg
- File:Яйыҡбаев Камил Яҡшыгилде улы.jpg
- File:Сәғитов Ирек Хаммат улы.jpg
- File:Сәғитов Әхәт Ҡәйүм улы.jpg
- File:Рысбаева (Ишкильдина) Мәрйәм Әхмәт ҡыҙы.jpg
- File:Әминева Ғәтифә Зекрия ҡыҙы.jpg
- File:Салауатова Хәсбиямал Сабит ҡыҙы.jpg
- File:Ғәлиәкбәр мәктәбе уҡытыусылары.jpg
- File:Сәғитов Зәки Хаммат улы (1929-1995 йй).jpg
- File:Барый Ҡәйүм улы Сәғитов.jpg
- File:Вәлиева Гөлнара Рәшит ҡыҙы.jpg
- File:Ҡайраҡ таш.jpg
- File:Стерлетамаҡ педагогия институты.Бөрйән районы студенттары.jpg
- File:Башҡорт АССР-ы Бөрйән районы студенттары.jpg
- File:Мырҙағолова Бикә Сәләхетдин ҡыҙы.jpg
- File:Ҡолмөхәмәтова Лилиә Абдулғани ҡыҙы.jpg
- File:Аҡбутина Земфира Хәкимйән ҡыҙы.jpg
- File:Латиницала яҙылған тыуыу тураһында таныҡлыҡ.jpg
- File:Бөрйән районының алдынғы малсылары Өфөлә экскурцияла.16-19 октяббрь 1960 йыл.jpg
- File:Суяргулов Мәхмүтдин Фәттәх улы. чабан-бригадир колхоза им. Буденного Бурзянского района Башкирской АССР -в 1930 году добился по от.jpg
- File:Бөрйән районы алдынғылары. 24 июнь1940 йыл.Мәскәүҙәге ауыл хужалығы күргәҙмәһе.jpg
- File:Бөрйән районы студенттары (1960 йылдар).jpg
- File:Стәрлетамаҡ дәүләт педагогия институты студенттары.1960 йылғы сығарылыш.jpg
- File:Мораҙым тулы булмаған урта мәктәбе коллективы (1990-сы йылдар).jpg
- File:Байназар урта мәктәбе коллективы, 1984 йыл.jpg
- File:Тыуыу тураһында таныҡлыҡ.jpg
- File:Стәрлетамаҡ дәүләт педагогия институты студенттары (1955-1960 йй.).jpg
- File:Стәрлетамаҡ дәүләт педагогия институтында уҡып йөрөүсе бөрйән студенттары.jpg
- File:Стәрлетамаҡ дәүләт педагогия институтында уҡып йөрөүсе бөрйән студенттары (1955-1960 йй.).jpg
- File:Стәрлетамаҡ дәүләт педагогия институтында уҡып йөрөүсе бөрйән студенттары (1960 йыл) демонстрацияла.jpg
- File:Стәрлетамаҡ дәүләт педагогия институты студенттары (1955-1960 йылдар).jpg
- File:Стәрлетамаҡ дәүләт педагогия институтында уҡып йөрөүсе бөрйән студенттары (1955-1960 йылдар).jpg
- File:Хатмуллина (Ишмөхәмәтова) Көнһылыу Ғүмәр ҡыҙы.jpg
- File:Стәрлетамаҡ дәүләт педагогия институты (1955-1960 йылдар).jpg
- File:Башҡорт дәүләт ҡурсаулығы.jpg
- File:Yaktykul lake.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D1%8D%D1%88%D0%BC%D3%99%D0%BA%D3%99%D1%80%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%B5_(1990-%D1%81%D1%8B_%D0%B9%D1%8B%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%80).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D1%8D%D1%88%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BB%D3%99%D1%80%D0%B5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D1%82%D3%99%D2%AF%D0%B3%D0%B5_%D1%8D%D1%88%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BB%D3%99%D1%80%D0%B5.1950-%D1%81%D0%B5_%D0%B9%D1%8B%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%80.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D0%9C%D3%99%D1%80%D0%B9%D3%99%D0%BC_%D3%98%D1%85%D0%BC%D3%99%D1%82_%D2%A1%D1%8B%D2%99%D1%8B.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F%D0%BB%D0%B0.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D0%9A%D3%A9%D0%BD%D2%BB%D1%8B%D0%BB%D1%8B%D1%83_%D2%92%D2%AF%D0%BC%D3%99%D1%80_%D2%A1%D1%8B%D2%99%D1%8B.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Xunks (talk) 05:52, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, historical images and scans, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 09:43, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:38, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Yann: you’ve closed your own nomination and left a good deal of files above. Is that you were going to do? --Xunks (talk) 20:35, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, the last 2 are quite obviously not own works. For the rest, more time is needed for checking. Some could be PD for some reason. Yann (talk) 20:38, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Small image, poor quality, advertising, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 08:23, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- WRT "out of scope", about a decade someone called for the deletion of an image I uploaded of a Danube excursion vessel, arguing that the presence of tourists in the image made it out of scope. My counterargument was that it was appropriate for some images of venues which were tourist destinations to contain tourists. I offered the Statue of Liberty as an example. We have lots of images of it, and while some images were taken when it was closed to tourists, lots of those images did contain tourists. I argued that was appropriate as wikipedia coverage of the Statue should show the presence of tourists.
Similarly, Henry Santos is a professional musician, and, I suggest, it is appropriate that our coverage of him include images showing he is a professional musician.
- WRT "advertising"... About a decade ago I offered what may have been my first defence of an image of male sex organs. The challenger argued we "already had plenty" of images of penises, (actually, only a couple of dozen, at that point in time), and there was nothing special about this image. After taking a couple of minutes to review those other images, for the first time, I found that assertion wildly untrue. The image in question was a time sequence of five images, showing a penis going from the flaccid state, to erect. No other image on the commons showed this. I argued this made it highly educational, for (1) all pre-pubescent males; (2) all women and girls who had not yet experienced sexual intimacy; (3) all women whose only experience of sexual intimacy had been in the dark.
In particular, I argued that the original flickr uploader's intent was irrelevant, if an image was in scope. This imaage is one of approximately 1000 uploaded to flickr, under a free license, by a firm that specializes in helping musicians market their work. Challenger Yann called this advertising. And I argue that, just as with that dick pic, their intent was irrelevant, because we want to have images of well-known musicians.
- WRT small, and poor quality... Over on en.wiki, occasional use is made of fair use images. There is a convention there to reduce the resolution of those fair use images, to about 200px or 300px. I suggest the use of those image at low resolution shows that low resolution images can retain usefulness. Geo Swan (talk) 09:41, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- This might be useful if it were not blurred screenshot. BTW the question of derivative work is also relevant here. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:49, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:LL and COM:DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:16, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Ik dacht toestemming voor een Creative Commons licensie te kunnen krijgen van de uitgever, maar uiteindelijk is dit niet gelukt. Excuses. Schenkstroop (talk) 13:54, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:17, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Biden, Democrats, Republicans, and the US Judiciary are one big collective abomination (51213376342).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image is automatically generated spam, appears in irrelevant searches. 2601:5CC:100:42F0:EC28:DFFB:5CA2:28BE 16:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:18, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Protected artwork, uploader is not copyright holder, no CC licensing. 217.239.14.205 19:05, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:19, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio, watermark in the image, uploader is not copyright holder 217.239.14.205 19:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:18, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Uploader is not copyright holder, "permission: yes" does not prove the copyright holder has consented to a CC licensing 217.239.14.205 19:09, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:19, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
File:*+* Prince Albert piercing in modern form of the third millennium from a transgender - On the way to man - woman - Berlin 2018 - Image 002.jpg
[edit]
This is probably one of the most unnecessarily documented penises on Commons. I Dronebogus (talk) 20:21, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:20, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Spam COM:PENIS— we don’t need like a dozen photos of the same thing, most of them bad.
- File:*+* Prince Albert piercing in modern form of the third millennium from a transgender - On the way to man - woman - Berlin 2018 - Image 001.jpg
- File:*+* Prince Albert piercing in modern form of the third millennium from a transgender - On the way to man - woman - Berlin 2018 - Image 003.jpg
- File:*+* Prince Albert piercing in modern form of the third millennium from a transgender - On the way to man - woman - Berlin 2018 - Image 004.jpg
- File:*+* Prince Albert piercing in modern form of the third millennium from a transgender - On the way to man - woman - Berlin 2018 - Image 005.jpg
- File:*+* Prince Albert piercing in modern form of the third millennium from a transgender - On the way to man - woman - Berlin 2018 - Image 006.jpg
- File:*+* Prince Albert piercing in modern form of the third millennium from a transgender - On the way to man - woman - Berlin 2018 - Image 007.jpg
- File:*+* Prince Albert piercing in modern form of the third millennium from a transgender - On the way to man - woman - Berlin 2018 - Image 008.jpg
- File:*+* Prince Albert piercing in modern form of the third millennium from a transgender - On the way to man - woman - Berlin 2018 - Image 009.jpg
- File:*+* Prince Albert piercing in modern form of the third millennium from a transgender - On the way to man - woman - Berlin 2018 - Image 010.jpg
- File:*+* Prince Albert piercing in modern form of the third millennium from a transgender - On the way to man - woman - Berlin 2018 - Image 012.jpg
- File:*+* Prince Albert piercing in modern form of the third millennium from a transgender - On the way to man - woman - Berlin 2018 - Image 013.jpg
- File:*+* Prince Albert piercing in modern form of the third millennium from a transgender - On the way to man - woman - Berlin 2018 - Image 017.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 20:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:20, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
wrong date, wrong author ("own work"...) Xocolatl (talk) 16:14, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Delete: This is a fake photograph of H. P. Lovecraft. All of the real ones can be viewed here. Susmuffin (talk) 20:54, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:04, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Subject never gave permission for image to be used outside of personal use per https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Emily_Jane_White&oldid=1062031662. Nate • (chatter) 05:18, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
keep she doesn't have to give permission the person who owns the photo does. this is Wikipedia not her own personal website. Redsky89 (talk) 18:23, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
I'm the author of the 3 photos, so I don't know if I shall vote here (keep). I took them during her concert in 2011 in Germany, is it needed to ask for the consent in such a case? Vonvon (talk) 21:21, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment If no model release was given, then the subject reserves the right to revoke their use. Nate • (chatter) 03:25, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Unnecessary duplicate DR, bundling to main: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Emily Jane White, Henry Nagle - Stuttgart - 2011.jpg. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:33, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Source site is all rights reserved. Now threshold of originality must be questioned. Maybe this is complex logo? Source country is USA. The seconf problem: I did not find the logo from source site. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Centennial Real Estate is the current owner and operator of Hawthorn Mall. It seems they have changed their logo since this version has been uploaded to Commons. An updated version can be found at the bottom of page https://www.shophawthornmall.com/. The original one can be found via webarchive: https://web.archive.org/web/20210514024559/https://www.shophawthornmall.com/. Njd-de (talk) 19:47, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Below COM:TOO US for me.Jonteemil (talk) 19:27, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Below COM:TOO US. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:40, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Gif comes from a youtube video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k98kHptU2Yw) where the link between the content creator and the uploader of the file isn't explicitly mentioned, as well as the authorization from said content creator to publish a part of his work on commons Furmarley (talk) 14:00, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:46, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Gif comes from youtube video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmplHSGLm-I, from 0:41 to 0:45). Uploader seems to impersonate the content creator, as the uploading date coincides with the upload of another probably stolen animation (see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Animation_de_drapeau_Mississippi_-_Arkansas.gif) Furmarley (talk) 14:35, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:47, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Source and author unknown Caulfield (talk) 15:32, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No source necessary, {{PD-old-assumed}}. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:47, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unknown source Caulfield (talk) 15:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Kept: No source necessary, {{PD-old-assumed}}. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:47, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Source unknown Caulfield (talk) 15:41, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No source necessary, {{PD-old-assumed}}. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:49, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Source unknown Caulfield (talk) 15:42, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No source necessary, {{PD-old-assumed}}. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:49, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Source unknown Caulfield (talk) 15:44, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No source necessary, {{PD-old-assumed}}. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:48, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Source and author unknown Caulfield (talk) 15:50, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:48, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
source unknown Caulfield (talk) 15:54, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No source necessary, {{PD-old-assumed}}. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:48, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Source unknown Caulfield (talk) 16:45, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No source necessary, {{PD-old-assumed}}. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:49, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
The company's logo is no longer up to date. Arte.charpentier.communication (talk) 14:10, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 15:07, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
The Newark Bay accident was in 1958. Unlikely that this is the user's own work without further explanation. Mackensen (talk) 11:17, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Unlikely but definitely not impossible. If the photographer was 18 in 1958, they'd be 81 or 82 now. I agree that if it was really the uploader's own work, we would expect a bit of a narrative. But isn't there some way to do an image search and see if this photo can be found elsewhere on the web and thereby possibly settle the issue (if it's not a scan of a book, etc.)? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The image appears in the New York Daily News of September 16, 1958 credited to one George Mattson. That might be our uploader, but if so, he must say so. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:40, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
duplicate with File:Zh-Qianwei-ba4.ogg Terfili (talk) 06:58, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Delete as duplicate file. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:01, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:56, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Sieht nicht nach Selbstporträt aus, sondern nach URV gegenüber dem Fotografen, keine Freigabe durch diesen ersichtlich Jbergner (talk) 05:01, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Ganz einwandfrei eine Urheberrechtsverletzung - hätte man sogar schnell beseitigen können Lutheraner (talk) 00:17, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 14:15, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license (No license since) Undelete in 2054. — Draceane talkcontrib. 18:48, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:40, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Das Foto ist von 1937 und nicht von 2016, falsche deklaration und wohl URV gegenüber dem Fotografen Jbergner (talk) 08:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:25, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Das Foto ist von 1937 und nicht von 2016, falsche deklaration und wohl URV gegenüber dem Fotografen Jbergner (talk) 08:25, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:25, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Keine ausreichende Lizenzierung durch den Urheber Lutheraner (talk) 11:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Es liegt die Bewilligung der Rechteinhaberin (Verlegerin) vor, ebenso der ausdrückliche Wunsch der Dargestellten (Hanna Gagel). Genügt das nicht?
Am 09.05.2022 um 11:01 schrieb Yvonne-Denise Köchli <info@xanthippe.ch>:
- Liebe Frau Dorn
- Ja, die Bildrechte können Sie gerne haben.
- Freundlichst
- Yvonne-Denise Köchli Sbd1 (talk) 05:23, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Sbd1: Bitte diese Bewilligung per E-Mail dokumentieren lassen. Details siehe COM:VRT/de. --Rosenzweig τ 07:40, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, apparently no VRT permission was sent after 4 1/2 months. --Rosenzweig τ 19:38, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unattributed Derivative Files
[edit]- File:Escudo de Francisco Moreno Barrón.svg, derivative from File:Coat of arms of Francisco Moreno Barrón.svg
- File:Escudo de Hipólito Reyes Larios.svg, derivative from File:Coat of arms of Hipólito Reyes Larios.svg
- File:Escudo de Ruy Rendón Leal.svg, derivative from File:Coat of arms of Ruy Rendón Leal.svg
- File:Escudo de Daniel Sturla (arzobispo).svg, derivative from File:Coat of arms of Daniel Fernando Sturla Berhouet.svg
- File:Escudo de Daniel Sturla.svg, derivative from File:Coat of arms of Daniel Fernando Sturla Berhouet.svg
- File:Escudo de Dante Gustavo Braida.svg, derivative from File:Coat of arms of Dante Gustavo Braida Lorenzón.svg
- File:Escudo de Luis Armando Collazuol.svg, derivative from File:Coat of arms of Luis Armando Collazuol.svg
- File:Escudo de Marcelo Daniel Colombo.svg, derivative from File:Coat of arms of Marcelo Daniel Colombo (archbishop).svg
- File:Escudo de Marcelo Cuenca Revuelta.svg, derivative from File:Coat of arms of Marcelo Cuenca Revuelta.svg
- File:Escudo de Ramón Alfredo Dus.svg, derivative from File:Coat of arms of Ramon Alfredo Dus.svg
- File:Escudo de César Daniel Fernández.svg, derivative from File:Coat of arms of Cesar Daniel Fernandez.svg
- File:Escudo de Rubén Oscar Frassia.svg, derivative from File:Coat of arms of Rubén Oscar Frassia.svg
- File:Escudo de Eduardo Horacio García.svg, derivative from File:Coat of arms of Eduardo García.svg
- File:Escudo de Pedro María Laxague.svg, derivative from File:Coat of arms of Pedro María Laxague.svg
- File:Escudo de Marcelo Julián Margni.svg, derivative from File:Coat of arms of Marcelo Margni.svg
- File:Escudo de Marcelo Fabián Mazzitelli.svg, derivative from File:Coat of arms of Marcelo Fabián Mazzitelli.svg
- File:Escudo de Carlos María Franzini.svg, derivative from File:Coat of arms of Carlos María Franzini.svg
- File:Escudo de Gustavo Alejandro Montini.svg, derivative from File:Coat of arms of Gustavo Alejandro Montini.svg
- File:Escudo de Santiago Olivera.svg, derivative from File:Coat of arms of Santiago Olivera.svg
- File:Escudo de Agustín Roberto Radrizzani.svg, derivative from File:Coat of arms of Agustin Roberto Radrizzani.svg
- File:Escudo de Carlos Alberto Sánchez.svg, derivative from File:Coat of arms of Carlos Alberto Sanchez.svg
- File:Escudo de Salvador Cristau.svg, derivative from File:Coat of arms of Salvador Cristau Coll.svg and File:Escudo de Escudo de Luiz Carlos Dias.svg
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
These ecclesiastical coats of arms were uploaded originally by the user Sebas RS, now Jac ÁlGa, attributing their authorship to himself, although they are mere modifications of files uploaded by other authors (Ivan03, SajoR and myself) to whom they have not been attributed as required by the Creative Commons license with which they were uploaded, thereby violating our copyright policy.
The uploader user, with numerous previous irregularities ([3]), has already been warned of the need to attribute derivative works, both on his talk page ([4], [5] and [6]) and that of user Marium Alberto ([7]) of which he is a sockpuppet ([8]). I doubt that those warnings have taken effect.--Macucal (talk) 04:51, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep and add the proper attribution. Why would you even bring this up for deletion, when you already know what needs to be done to fix them? --RAN (talk) 05:35, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep and just change the attribution. I'm not super up on my Roman Catholic law or whatever, but 99% of the time coats of arms are PD. My only point of reference would be Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Vatican City, which says copyright lasts for 70 years after the death of the artist and each one would have to be nominated individually to figure out who the artists of them are and if they died 70 years ago or not. You can't really do a blanket nomination for something like that though. Especially for the reasons the nominator gives. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:52, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: proper attribution added. Ruthven (msg) 08:33, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Subject never gave permission for image to be used outside of personal use per https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Emily_Jane_White&oldid=1062031662. Nate • (chatter) 05:20, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
keep she doesn't have to give permission the person who owns the photo does. this is Wikipedia not her own personal website. it is not for promo use it is for facts and history of the person. also I want to note that if you looked though the history of that page you would see that the editor has been doing the same thing since 2014. they constantly keep uploading copyrighted photos from the artists website and claiming to be her. if it was her she would know how to properly license the photos. it is just a fan pretending to be her. Redsky89 (talk) 17:53, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
I'm the author of the 3 photos, so I don't know if I shall vote here (keep). I took them during her concert in 2011 in Germany, is it needed to ask for the consent in such a case? Vonvon (talk) 21:21, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment If no model release was given, then the subject reserves the right to revoke their use. And Redsky89, that comment is unhelpful; going back to 2011 she has tried to remove the image from en.wiki, so this is a long term case of IDHT, this time against the subject herself (You never told her how to go about posting her photos at all). Nate • (chatter) 03:24, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure on the person's talk page on Wikimedia commons it tells them why their photos were deleted and how to get them restored but they chose to ignore it. also since when do we need a model release? is that new or something ? Redsky89 (talk) 04:11, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Back to August 2011, the subject wanted them removed, and on en.wiki I saw absolutely no text on her user page trying to guide her to that from anyone, so she's been in the dark for so long but thrown vandalism warnings instead which were all unhelpful. Nate • (chatter) 23:37, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not talking about her wiki user page I'm talking about her wiki commons talk page it shows what she needed to to to have the photos restored.Redsky89 (talk) 18:50, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Three unhelpful robo-notices on a page she's never read are not helpful in the least. The subject is more likely to read her en.wiki talk page than here, and be welcome to guidance actually typed out by an experienced editor who can help her out. Nate • (chatter) 01:28, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
- but they still upload them 3 different times so they had to have seen the first one and they still did nothing but upload it without any proper documentation. Redsky89 (talk) 22:16, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
- Three unhelpful robo-notices on a page she's never read are not helpful in the least. The subject is more likely to read her en.wiki talk page than here, and be welcome to guidance actually typed out by an experienced editor who can help her out. Nate • (chatter) 01:28, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure on the person's talk page on Wikimedia commons it tells them why their photos were deleted and how to get them restored but they chose to ignore it. also since when do we need a model release? is that new or something ? Redsky89 (talk) 04:11, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep per Redsky89. I'm pretty sure Commons doesn't need the woman's permission to host the files. She's the one who decided to let Redsky89 take her picture as a public figure. She can't just came along years later and dictate how the photographs are used. Except maybe unless she can prove they are being used for harassment, doxing, or some other illegal use/policy violation. But I don't see any indication anything like either is going on here. So there's zero basis for deleting the files. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:58, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Again, repeating that two months after the picture was uploaded, the subject removed the image from her article, thus she had an expectation that it would only sit in an album or on the wall of a fan, but that it was violated. She did not expect it to represent her on Wikipedia, and we've been IDHT'ing her clear revocation of use of the image since then, which is unacceptable. Ninety days is a reasonable timeframe to revoke all but personal use of the picture, and she was within it, and since then she's been frustrated by our bureaucracy in trying to have a more appropriate image represent her. Nate • (chatter) 02:45, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: a diff is not a valid removal request. Please contact VRT. Ruthven (msg) 08:42, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
duplicate with https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zh-Qianwei-si5.ogg Terfili (talk) 06:59, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:43, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Нарушение авторских прав третьих лиц - кадр взят из фильма "12 стульев", защищённого авторскими правами. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 07:18, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; "uploaded by Guaglione". Ruthven (msg) 08:43, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Di (they-them) as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Clearly not own work May be old enough. Please give a source and a date. Yann (talk) 11:58, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. As far as I can tell, this photograph was first published in Who's There?: The Life and Career of William Hartnell (1996), which would make it ineligible for the public domain. It has also been incorrectly tagged and credited. – Rhain ☔ 03:58, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per Rhain. Ruthven (msg) 08:44, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
The licence says it was a photograph, but the description seems more like a cinematographic work which according to Article 34 loses copyright 50 years after the death of the last surviving author. And en:Carlos Hugo Christensen for example only died in 1999. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Jo-Jo Eumerus. It is not a cinematographic work. It is a film still (see its Wikipedia article), a photograph taken during the film's shooting, used for promotional purposes, as was customary then. The source even specifies that this is a lobby card. For the posters or advertisements, frames from the film itself were not used, but a photographer was present taking pictures. In this case, the correct thing to do would be the PD-AR-Photo template, but even if it were from an American movie it would also be in the public domain (see: Template:Publicity still). All the best, --Bleff (talk) 18:08, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Does this picture fulfill the requirements helpfully listed at Template:PD-1996? Hekerui (talk) 12:55, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: clearly a still frame and it's PD-1996. Ruthven (msg) 08:45, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
This is not the official logo of Power Unlimited. The official logo you can find with this link: https://pu.nl/OG-logo.png 62.195.111.142 12:28, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep It's possible that they used the logo for their website at some point or that the logo is from somewhere else on it then the link provided by the nominator. There's zero reason to delete the file if either scenario turns out to be true. I don't have the time to research if either one is, but the only other option would be that the image was created by the uploaded as a simpler derivative, which wouldn't warrant the logo being deleted anyway. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:04, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Adamant1. Ruthven (msg) 08:45, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Crown Copyright (through Victorian Government) on this photo CommanderOzEvolved (talk) (contribs) 14:03, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Additional information on copyright here suggests that an appropriate licence can be applied, but I'm not sure what licence it needs or if the photo is allowed on Commons. CommanderOzEvolved (talk) (contribs) 14:08, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright rules of the website do not allow commercial usages. see https://new.parliament.vic.gov.au/copyright/. Ruthven (msg) 08:47, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
unfree, Josef Olexa died in 1983 – undelete in 2054 — Draceane talkcontrib. 18:48, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:53, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
unklar, ob Urheber identisch mit Nicole Maskus-Trippel/boensee-fotografen.de ist Dirk Lenke (talk) 15:19, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, a COM:VRT permission would be needed to host this file. --Rosenzweig τ 19:39, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Urheber ist nicht die Fotografin Dirk Lenke (talk) 15:29, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Per the Exif data, Alwin Buchmaier is the author of this photograph; a COM:VRT permission would be needed to host this file. --Rosenzweig τ 19:40, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Нарушение авторских прав - сайт Правительства Санкт-Петербурга не публикует материалы под свободными лицензиями. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 12:57, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. "Because the photo was published on the official website of the administration of St. Petersburg with a special button for downloading" is not a PD rationale. --Rosenzweig τ 21:16, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
The file is not PD in the US. The {{PD-URAA}} date in Vietnam is 23 December 1998. sB talk 15:59, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Was it official correspondence or a letter sent as a private individual? Because the former would be "{{PD-VietnamGov}}". --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:10, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Donald Trung: this is kind of off topic, but do you know if that usually covers letters written by military personnel? --Adamant1 (talk) 22:08, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Adamant1: Yes, "According to the decree No. 22/2018/ND-CP of February 23, 2013, documents specified in Clause 2, Article 15 of the Intellectual Property Law includes "documents issued by state agencies, political organizations, socio-political organizations, sociopolitical-professional organizations, social organizations, socio-professional organizations and people’s armed forces units."." The Democratic Republic of Vietnam's / The Socialist Republic of Vietnam's armed forces are called the People's Army, so their documents are also exempt from copyright protection. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:32, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: For the Vietnam side, it doesn't really matter if this was official or not, Ho Chi Minh died in 1969, and they have 50 years pma, so it's in the PD there either way. For the US side, it's trickier. Per [9], this was apparently first published in 2007 on a Russian archive web site. This means we're in the realm of {{PD-US-unpublished}}, and that has 70 years pma for works by authors with known death dates. So the file can be restored in 2040. --Rosenzweig τ 21:39, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
