Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/05/03
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
_3.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_from_Platform_7.png){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
_1._jpg.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(Niobrara_Formation,_Upper_Cretaceous;_Gove_County,_Kansas,_USA)_(33740630636).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(17802167333).jpg){kind=link}
I uploaded it by mistake Hirakel (talk) 11:49, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Delete per nom and as a copyvio of https://m.facebook.com/armeemaroc1/photos/a.385917348869281/694794274648252/?type=3&_rdr . — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:37, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 18:20, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
{{copyvio|1=Foto extraída desse [https://alexferraz.com.br/2021/04/08/instituto-ronald-mcdonald-completa-22-anos-atuando-em-prol-de-criancas-e-adolescentes-com-cancer-no-brasil/ sítio/site]}} Kongs (talk) 18:04, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 18:25, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Meant to upload to English Wikipedia instead of Commons. Flaggingwill (talk) 18:31, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 18:33, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Personal photo under a fake name. Pierre cb (talk) 12:30, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:14, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Out-of-scope personal signature Pierre cb (talk) 12:31, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:14, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Out-of scope personal signature Pierre cb (talk) 12:32, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:14, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Out-of-scope personal family photo Pierre cb (talk) 12:33, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:15, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Out-of-scope personal signature of a fake person. Pierre cb (talk) 12:35, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:13, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
out-of-scope personal photo under a fake name Pierre cb (talk) 12:35, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:13, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 17ademoladav (talk · contribs)
[edit]fantasy diagams, out of project scope
Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:53, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Not own work: https://www.alyaum.com/articles/1009109/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%B6%D8%A9/%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF-%D8%BA%D8%B2%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%8A-%D9%8A%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%8A HeminKurdistan (talk) 22:34, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:01, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Doubt this is free Dronebogus (talk) 02:48, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:03, 6 May 2022 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 19:36, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 11:40, 7 May 2022 UTC: Media without a license as of 2 May 2022 --Krdbot 19:35, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Aramark.svg --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:59, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, add redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 21:04, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
probably not "own work" Xocolatl (talk) 18:33, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 14:04, 8 May 2022 UTC: Exact or scaled-down duplicate (F8): https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%A2%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B9_%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%B0.jpg --Krdbot 19:35, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
unused personal artwork, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:10, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:36, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RouibaCity (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: low-res/web-sized images with disparate quality and styles, missing or inconsistent EXIF data; many with FB/transmission code in EXIF data. Unreliable uploader with proven copyvios.
- File:Place du Stade.png
- File:EL Kenz.png
- File:Centre ville de Rouiba.png
- File:Mairie de Rouiba.png
- File:Jardin du Petit bois Lassalas.png
- File:Petit lac Jardin de Rouiba.jpg
- File:Jardin de Rouiba 5.jpg
- File:Jardin de Rouiba 3.jpg
- File:Jardin de Rouiba 4.jpg
- File:Jardin de Rouiba 2.jpg
- File:Horloge Florale Jardin de Rouiba 2.jpg
- File:Jardin de Rouiba 1.jpg
- File:Horloge Florale Jardin de Rouiba 1.jpg
- File:Jardin Public de Rouiba Horloge.jpg
- File:Jardin Public de Rouiba 2018.jpg
- File:Hôpital de Rouiba, Batiment de la Direction.jpg
- File:Jardin des Roses 2 Rouiba.jpg
- File:Jardin des Roses Rouiba.jpg
- File:Jardin Botanique de Rouiba 53.jpg
- File:Jardin Botanique de Rouiba 52.jpg
- File:Jardin Botanique de Rouiba 51.jpg
- File:Jardin Botanique de Rouiba 50.jpg
- File:Complexe sportif de rouiba coupe d'algérie Judo.jpg
- File:Complexe sportif de Rouiba.jpg
- File:Complexe sportif de Rouiba 2.jpg
- File:Jardin Botanique de Rouiba 34.jpg
- File:Jardin Botanique de Rouiba 33.jpg
- File:Jardin Botanique de Rouiba 31.jpg
- File:Jardin Botanique de Rouiba 32.jpg
- File:Jardin Botanique de Rouiba 30.jpg
- File:Jardin des roses 2 Rouiba.jpg
- File:Horloge Florale Jardin de Rouiba.jpg
- File:Hydrographie Rouiba.jpg
- File:Ferroukhi.jpg
- File:Rouiba.jpg
- File:Rouiba vue.jpg
- File:Rouiba vue panoramique de la daira.jpg
- File:Rouiba aerial view 3.jpg
- File:Lotissement CADAT, Rouiba.jpg
- File:Mosquée Errahma, Rouiba.jpg
- File:Zone industrielle de Rouiba au Nord.PNG
- File:Stade de Rouiba match.jpg
- File:Rouiba aerial view 2.jpg
- File:Stade du 13 Avril 1958 de Saïda.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:41, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:36, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AlanaGuijon1980 (talk · contribs)
[edit]2 Found here before upload - https://www.instagram.com/p/CKoo6CmHDIe/ - needs OTRS, PCP for the other as the MD also indicates its from Insta
- File:La artista Orellana.jpg
- File:María José López Orellana- Artista Hondureña .jpg
- File:María José López Orellana.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:37, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
COM:ADVERT VScode fanboy (talk) 12:03, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:01, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
advertising VScode fanboy (talk) 12:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:00, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
I am not sure if this suited for educational purpose. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:28, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:59, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
I am not sure if this suited for educational purpose. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:38, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ANTONIETA SANTIS ESPINOSA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:55, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:54, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:55, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:54, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PartiallyObservable (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
_w.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
_3.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused poor composition, nothing in particular visible, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:50, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
_3.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:51, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
_3.JPG){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:49, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 17:46, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:49, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
low quality, no category, unused, no description, not much encyclopedic value, etc F (talk) 19:02, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:49, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Its got nothing to do with Santa Clause JohnObree (talk) 19:02, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:48, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Frenchsessaphoto (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:NOTHOST/COM:ADVERT - see image descriptions - images of non-notable persons uploaded to promote photo studio
- File:Seattle photographers.jpg
- File:Seattle Wedding Photographers.jpg
- File:Couples Photography Seattle.jpg
- File:Seattle Corporate Event Photographer.jpg
- File:Seattle Event Photography for Corporate Office.jpg
- File:Seattle area wedding photographers.jpg
- File:Seattle Wedding and Family Photographers.jpg
- File:Wedding Photographer Washington.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 19:35, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:48, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE image of a non-notable individual – ro:Wikipedia:Pagini de șters/Niki Ieremciuc Gikü (talk) 20:09, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:46, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
COM:NOTUSED Gikü (talk) 20:18, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Personal fantasy flag, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. Also added:
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:37, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly out of scope. — Baidax 💬 19:45, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Text-only image, no educational value and should be in wiki-markup, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. Also added:
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:38, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:44, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose Guerillero Parlez Moi 21:14, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- how so? Alwayswatching247 (talk) 21:22, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:43, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 21:15, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:43, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 21:30, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:43, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 21:34, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 21:34, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Unidentified and unused spreadsheet CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:43, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope image of unidentified individual. Yeeno (talk) 23:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:41, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Wrong date, see Metadata. The uploader seems to categorize all pictures as "own work". 2001:7C0:0:254:0:0:0:4 15:35, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 17:08, 11 May 2022 UTC: No permission since 3 May 2022 --Krdbot 19:27, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Melodigroup (talk · contribs)
[edit]SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
JopkeB (talk) 09:25, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 22:21, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -Vaibhav265 (talk) 07:41, 10 January 2022 (UTC) Uploader request
Uploader request Vaibhav265 (talk) 07:46, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, in scope and in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:32, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Deppty as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Spam Yann (talk) 16:02, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- The file is only used for promotional purposes, see simplewiki simple:Dyal Singh Kollianwali and enwiki en:Draft:Dyal Singh Kollianwali. Deppty (talk) 16:05, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- This person may not be notable enough to have an article in Wikipedia, but his portrait is IMO in scope on Commons. Now I am not sure this is own work, so we may need a formal written permission from the photographer. Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:08, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio (copy from twitter). --Wdwd (talk) 15:38, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
No value VScode fanboy (talk) 12:05, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- You can at least be more patient to see where it ends up. I am planning to use it on the Selfie article on Wikipedia as a perceptible example of mirror type selfies. --Morita Akio (talk) 12:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:38, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
If this is cropped - where is the original? No metadata... 2001:7C0:0:254:0:0:0:4 15:39, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- It's a copyright violation: the image is clearly taken from a live broadcast. The background is that of TG5, which is an italian newscast. --Dread83 (talk) 14:48, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by others. --Rosenzweig τ 11:39, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files found with Special:Search/195265879@N04
[edit]Flickrwashing. Flickr account belongs to Rabie who is in all the photos. Joined March 2022, 0 followers
- File:Mohamed Rabie Directing.jpg
- File:Mohamed Rabie dp.jpg
- File:Amir ElMasry, Mohamed Rabie, Tarek Elebiary.jpg
- File:Mohamed Rabie.jpg
- File:Mohamed Rabie Egyptian director.jpg
- File:Mohamed Rabie Egyptian film director.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:41, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:27, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Does not fall into educational use. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:13, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
accidentally uploaded. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:15, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
I am not sure if this suited for educational purpose. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:17, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
I am not sure if this suited for educational purpose. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:18, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
I am not sure if this suited for educational purpose. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:18, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
I am not sure if this suited for educational purpose. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:18, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
I am not sure if this suited for educational purpose. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:18, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
I am not sure if this suited for educational purpose. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
I am not sure if this suited for educational purpose. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
I am not sure if this suited for educational purpose. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
I am not sure if this suited for educational purpose. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
I am not sure if this suited for educational purpose. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
I am not sure if this suited for educational purpose. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:20, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
I am not sure if this suited for educational purpose. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:20, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
I am not sure if this suited for educational purpose. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:20, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:29, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
I am not sure if this suited for educational purpose. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:20, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:29, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
I am not sure if this suited for educational purpose. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:20, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:29, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
I am not sure if this suited for educational purpose. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:20, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:29, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
I am not sure if this suited for educational purpose. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:22, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:29, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
I am not sure if this suited for educational purpose. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:22, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:29, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
I am not sure if this suited for educational purpose. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:22, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:29, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
_from_Platform_7.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_from_Platform_7.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I am not sure if this suited for educational purpose. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:23, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
_from_Platform_7.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:31, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
_from_Platform_7.png){kind=link}
I am not sure if this suited for educational purpose. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:27, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:31, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
I am not sure if this suited for educational purpose. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:27, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:31, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
I am not sure if this suited for educational purpose. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:27, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:31, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
I am not sure if this suited for educational purpose. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:28, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:31, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Original uploader request. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 12:44, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:31, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Suspicous own work claim, used as Youtube profile image: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCh8LfCxT0_PNEa5GUxLd97A MKFI (talk) 12:47, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:31, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: file EXIFs have "Copyright holder www.theartisan.es".
MKFI (talk) 12:51, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:32, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vijayasuvarna (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploader is apparently the subject. Photographer(s) not mentioned. Two files have EXIF "Author THE AP STUDIO Copyright holder ANANND_PUNJABI_PHOTOGRAPHY" and need VRT permission.
- File:Vijaya Suvarna board meeting.jpg
- File:Vijayacoaching.jpg
- File:Vijaya Suvarna black saree.jpg
- File:Vijaya Suvarna coaching.jpg
- File:Vijaya Suvarna 2012.jpg
- File:Vijaya suvarna 2011.jpg
MKFI (talk) 13:38, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:32, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Noeggplant (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: low-res/web-sized images with disparate quality and styles, missing EXIF data. One file (File:JoseMunoz5.jpg) with transmission code in EXIF data. All photos of same person, unlikely that uploader was present at all these diverse places and times.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:03, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:33, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Own work? This is a cropped version of a photo on for example this page where is also given © Martin Falbisoner. Wouter (talk) 07:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright violation? see metadata. Xocolatl (talk) 18:29, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
_2.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Copyright viloation. Clearly marked "copyright holder=BigH Studios" in exif data Velella (talk) 06:47, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:24, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yanlinnnaung (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own's works due to low file size with no metadata.
- File:Pawdawmu.jpg
- File:Myeik Welcome Triforium.jpg
- File:Welcometodawei.jpg
- File:Welcometomyeik.jpg
- File:Myeik University.png
- File:KaLa island.jpeg
- File:Kala island.JPG
- File:General Aung San statue.jpeg
- File:Theindawgyi pagoda.jpeg
- File:Pawdawmuu pagoda -banner-1.jpg
- File:Pawdawmuu Pagoda banner.jpg
- File:Night View of Myeik from The Theindawgyi pagoda platform.jpeg
- File:The Mahartheintdizaya Pagoda.jpg
- File:Images-25.jpeg
- File:Images-37.jpeg
Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 08:20, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Thanks Yanlinnnaung (talk) 09:04, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:45, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
_1._jpg.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1._jpg.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright violation? see metadata. Xocolatl (talk) 18:28, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
_1._jpg.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
_1._jpg.jpg){kind=link}
File:GAUk4Joj6nrN4F41GaSWhgEmkOCrkH08Dq8R1-scXLynMprhy8OJKbH98qTFAU4Nn8XeTbmfPet OE1iWR-8fkc1.jpg
[edit]
The file was uploaded by mistake, this person is not related to Wikipedia articles Helge123123123 (talk) 23:49, 3 May 2022 (UTC) Template:Subst : delete2 ~ Helge123123123 (talk)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 07:16, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
no source and no permission Hoyanova (talk) 07:43, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hello Hoyanova, what does not suit you in the photo of Bisscops painting? Chimanie (talk) 08:00, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 13:54, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Dubious claim of "own work". These are all described as WikiLee33's "own work". Yet one is described as being by Ben Newbould, and three others are described in en:Draft:Mohammad Barrangi as being by Mohammad Barrangi. I don't see how WikiLee33 can be both Newbould and Barrangi. Something is wrong here.
- File:The artist with Waiting for a Saviour (2022).gif
- File:Mohammad Barrangi working, photo taken by Ben Newbould.png
- File:Dreamland exhibition view.png
- File:Waiting for a Saviour (2022).jpg
- File:The Cat that Wanted to be a Tiger, 2021.jpg
- File:Discussions in a Surreal World, 2021.jpg
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Hoary (talk) 12:01, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 13:56, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
In public domain in 2026 (french ad issued in 1955) Culex (talk) 12:48, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 13:54, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Mistakes were made on the user end that are unable to be removed. The upload needs to be remade. DialloTelliDisciples (talk) 07:52, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 14:32, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Depicted sculpture seems to be recent enough to be still in copyright. Regrettably, Russia has no freedom-of-panorama exception for such works. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:33, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No exif, similar to https://profile.ir/masoud.nematkhah/about - i think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 10:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:31, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Old photo, uploaded in 2021, not own work Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:39, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
COM:ADVERT VScode fanboy (talk) 12:04, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 14:29, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
copyvio https://www.paarbalance.de/prof-dr-ludwig-schindler/ MBq (talk) 14:00, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as a copyvio. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 19:15, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:40, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Reconstruction of Xiphactinus sp. (fossil fish) (Niobrara Formation, Upper Cretaceous; Gove County, Kansas, USA) (33740630636).jpg
[edit]_(Niobrara_Formation,_Upper_Cretaceous;_Gove_County,_Kansas,_USA)_(33740630636).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(Niobrara_Formation,_Upper_Cretaceous;_Gove_County,_Kansas,_USA)_(33740630636).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Museum mural. FunkMonk (talk) 17:13, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Image is watermarked as "Climax Fashion Studio" and is unlikely the users own work, since if it was they would be able to upload the image from their camera rather than saving the watermarked version. Terasail[✉️] 17:17, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:27, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bidgee as no permission (No permission since) Tag removed by IP claiming it was taken by their wife. Which reinforces the need for permission needed. Bidgee (talk) 04:52, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- We need email confirmation of the license from the photographer. Verbcatcher (talk) 10:17, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT). → 
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 15:15, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Нарушение авторских прав - Ютуб-канал КВНа не распоряжается материалом в коммерческих целях. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 08:13, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: screnshot. — Racconish 💬 15:23, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
The depiction of the screen-content in this image constitutes a derivative of not own work and is hardly covered by Armenia's freedom-of-panorama exception as being indoors. To solve the problem, it could simply be blacked-out.-- Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 15:14, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
The page which this file was acquired has no evidence it has been released under a free license. Steel1943 (talk) 08:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 15:18, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Uploader purports to be subject İsmayıl Məmmədli ("Mən İsmayıl Məmmədli"). Copyright initially vests in the author (photographer), not the mere subject. Accordingly, as image is not a selfie, evidence of permission from the actual author is needed. See also uploader history of copyvios and false authorship claims. Эlcobbola talk 16:13, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 15:17, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Possible publicity shot, image was available at the same resolution nine months prior to upload here, at https://clean-conference.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/speaker_christine_figgener.jpg Lord Belbury (talk) 18:23, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 15:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Unathorised publication of a Spanish Wikipedia editor's personal account on Facebook Bankster (talk) 22:28, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 15:15, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Self nomination VScode fanboy (talk) 08:21, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: SD F1 no free license on source site. --GPSLeo (talk) 19:30, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
While this may be is a legitimate copy of a draft of a supreme court decision, such draft have NEVER been published to the public normally, and this was noted to be a leak. This is not typical USGov work and should not be considered in that manner. Masem (talk) 03:56, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep. Wikimedia Commons is not censored, the document is clearly informative. There's no "leaked-documents exception" to USGov works being in the public domain. I see no reason to delete. TorbenTT (talk) 08:21, 3 May 2022 (UTC).- Keep: Normally, I'd agree, but the Chief Justice of the United States has confirmed its authenticity here. I would, therefore, mark it as "leaked", but indeed note that it is a USGov work. Javert2113 (talk) 23:05, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: Since the document's authenticity was officially confirmed by the Chief Justice, it is therefore a work of the Supreme Court and should be treated like any other opinion, even if it is only a draft. -- Politicsfan4 (talk) 23:09, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: Seems no different than any other US government leaks, like File:Prism-slide-8.jpg (via Snowden). Legoktm (talk) 04:11, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep It's still public domain. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:00, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Still a US gov work, still in the public domain; leaked or no. Ciridae (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Unless there is reason to believe it has special copyright protections other leaked government works don't have, there is no reason this shouldn't be on Commons. aismallard (talk) 19:55, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Keep it to maintain transparency. There are numerous opinions in various media misrepresenting passages of the draft. There are mass politicization campaigns surrounding the draft. The full draft is fairly widespread, sections are very widely disseminated. The only way for people to know the true content of the draft is to read it. At this point, deletion is censorship. 24.56.117.200 07:52, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with Masem's claim that "This is not [a] typical USGov work" however I fail to see any reason the exceptional manner in which this document was released in any way limits it's suitability for publication on Commons. CmdrDan (talk) 19:51, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per Legoktm. TrangaBellam (talk) 17:43, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept (non-admin closure). Coolperson177 (talk) 13:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
- Fix. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:SpaceX Crew-4 Preflight (NHQ202204270045).jpg Gildir (talk) 04:59, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:27, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
copyvio: https://twitter.com/Airbus/status/1521119062637654018 Marc Lacoste (talk) 06:18, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- I have changed the source to the correct one. Please remove this template. RayAdvait (talk) 07:04, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Still a picture (c) Airbus, not Creative Commons.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 07:30, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:27, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
copyviolence
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Barbarian (talk) 07:13, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:27, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
copyrighted Theklan (talk) 09:31, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:28, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Image obtained from Twitter: https://twitter.com/pelpasha/status/743478551366799360/photo/1 No metadata, Not own work HeminKurdistan (talk) 22:30, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:30, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo HeminKurdistan (talk) 22:30, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:30, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation: https://www.abdullahdgear.com/product/kaftan-arabic-long-sleeve-thobe HeminKurdistan (talk) 23:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:30, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The file was uploaded by mistake, its not related to Wikipedia articles Helge123123123 (talk) 23:50, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:30, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Possible copyright violation/missing license info? The earliest instance of this photo that I could find is from an archived DeviantArt page around 2014: https://web.archive.org/web/20140605042720if_/http://visiousdesigns.deviantart.com/art/Windows-Splash-457823379 SergioFLS (talk) 23:52, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Speedy delete Leonel Sohns 12:26, 6 May 2022 (UTC)- Delete This is a derivative of the Windows logo. Even if it were freely licensed, as per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Windows logos without wordmark, Windows logos likely fall above TOO and cannot be kept here. --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 17:08, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:29, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pankajsaweditor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Suspected copyright violation: claimed own work but file EXIF shows "Author Rehan Sayyed Copyright holder Rehan Sayyed". VRT permission from Rehan Sayyed needed.
MKFI (talk) 12:53, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:38, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
No exif, other uploads of this user were deleted - unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:35, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
++++ RE-DECIDED. It can stay. --Micheal Strahnke (talk) 22:56, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn no reason provided in original request. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:34, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
++++ RE-DECIDED. It can stay. --Micheal Strahnke (talk) 22:55, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn no reason provided in original request. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:34, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
++++ RE-DECIDED. It can stay. --Micheal Strahnke (talk) 22:55, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn no reason provided in original request. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:34, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
The source is "own work". Mentioned is "This file was uploaded via Mobile Android App (Commons mobile app) 3.0.3~017151873.", whereas it is a cropped version of File:Lagopus muta japonica Mount Tsubakuro.jpg. Wouter (talk) 07:12, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:28, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: indeed, it was a copyright violation; it is possible to correct the license and authorship but no need in it. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:55, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
First published in November 2016: [1], no indication of a free license. Xunks (talk) 08:44, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:15, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Requesting courtesy removal as I would like to retire my Wiki related accounts and their associated uploads Vaibhav265 (talk) 12:56, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, 17 months after uploading. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:23, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake ScriptKKiddie (talk) 15:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope of the project. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:24, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
I don't know exactly what is supposed to be going on here, but this clearly is not Donald Trump. It appears to be an anime character, and there is no evidence that the uploader actually has the rights to the character's image. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete i doubt "own work"; copyvio --Jahobr (talk) 20:16, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete No inherent educational use. Very likely copyrighted image uploaded. — BriefEdits (talk) 02:07, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:25, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in france Dronebogus (talk) 02:59, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep. The building does not have "a definite artistic character". Its design lacks originally and is purely utilitarian. I do not understand why this deletion request was filed at all. Ruslik (talk) 19:48, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- France has a copyright on lighting, how am I supposed to know what counts as “purely utilitarian”? Dronebogus (talk) 23:56, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- No, there is no copyright on lighting, but on a show on Eiffel Tower.
- This was certainly done after an extensive work by an architect, so Delete. Yann (talk) 11:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- France has a copyright on lighting, how am I supposed to know what counts as “purely utilitarian”? Dronebogus (talk) 23:56, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, definite artistic character. Taivo (talk) 06:53, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
There is a copyright symbol below in the image Rohalamin (talk) 06:05, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The existence of a Copyright symbol is not a reason to delete it.--Parsa 2au (talk) 16:58, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep There's no any "copyright" actually, Panoramio bot uploaded it under proper license, and watermark fits an author. Nonsensical request. --Orijentolog (talk) 06:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Orijentolog
- In the metadata, you can even see the name of the copyright holder. Maybe the uploader didn't know what he is doing! I was reading these two pages and still think that this work should be deleted:
- https://www.dictionary.com/e/trademark-copyright-registered-symbols/
- https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/law-and-life/what-do-copyright-trademark-symbols-mean/ Rohalamin (talk) 13:06, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Uploader knew what he was doing, because he picked up a license which was transferred here by a bot. Uploader also did the same with hundreds of other photos which are available here on Commons, all under the same license. --Orijentolog (talk) 13:15, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Never been in Panoramio but maybe choosing a CC license in the Panoramio is mandatory and the uploader has chosen it carelessly to just upload his photos otherwise, why should he upload an image with a copyright symbol under CC BY-SA 3.0 license? Rohalamin (talk) 18:45, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- And please do not use words such as "Nonsensical" because it's not polite. Be civil please. Rohalamin (talk) 18:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Nonsensical means nonsensical in a very civil sense. There are precisely 240 images by Omid Jafarnezhad on Commons, all have the same license, and many have (C) symbol which actually stands for demanding an attribution, as license tag itself says. Your request is based on speculations like "maybe the uploader didn't know what he is doing", "the uploader has chosen it carelessly" and so on. The similar case is with deletion request of map by Nima Farid, an author of 570 transport maps on Commons. For you it's "dubious" but for me it's a nonsense. --Orijentolog (talk) 00:54, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- "many have (C) symbol" Not all of them? very interesting!
- "nonsense" is more ok than "nonsensical" to me. "Nonsensical means nonsensical" really? a super professional definition! Hat off! Rohalamin (talk) 10:01, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Nonsensical means nonsensical in a very civil sense. There are precisely 240 images by Omid Jafarnezhad on Commons, all have the same license, and many have (C) symbol which actually stands for demanding an attribution, as license tag itself says. Your request is based on speculations like "maybe the uploader didn't know what he is doing", "the uploader has chosen it carelessly" and so on. The similar case is with deletion request of map by Nima Farid, an author of 570 transport maps on Commons. For you it's "dubious" but for me it's a nonsense. --Orijentolog (talk) 00:54, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Uploader knew what he was doing, because he picked up a license which was transferred here by a bot. Uploader also did the same with hundreds of other photos which are available here on Commons, all under the same license. --Orijentolog (talk) 13:15, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept, I do not call the request nonsensical, but the file is still kept. The file was published under double license, one of them is "All rights reserved" and the other is free license. Double licensing is totally legal and not even very rare. That case reusers can choose any license of the two available. Commons chooses free license and rejects "All rights reserved" license. Taivo (talk) 07:05, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Incorrect source and author. The battle honors 'L'Ourcq 1914', "Ypres 1914" and "La Marne 1918" were added to the flag in the 1920s, after the death of the alleged author. The color shades of the photograph also indicate that the photograph is quite recent, at least after 1970. Le Petit Chat (talk) 07:38, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Source et auteur incorrects. Les inscriptions "L'Ourcq 1914", "Ypres 1914" et "La Marne 1918" ont été ajoutées au drapeau après les années 1920, soit après la mort de l'auteur indiqué. Les tons de couleurs de la photographe indiquent également que la photographie est assez récente, au moins après 1970.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 09:29, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, if you know the correct author and license, then please make an undeletion request and the file can be restored. Taivo (talk) 07:11, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Depicted monument seems to be recent enough to be still in copyright. Regrettably, Russia has no freedom-of-panorama exception for such works. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:02, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:31, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Self-nomination VScode fanboy (talk) 08:21, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- For what reason? Why not just tag for G7 speedy deletion? Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:00, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, by Ruthven on 3rd of June due to missing essential information. Taivo (talk) 07:44, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Depicted seems to be above COM:TOO and rather recent, and thereby copyrighted. As being located obviously indoors, not covered by Armenia's freedom-of-panorama exception.-- Túrelio (talk) 09:08, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:46, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Incorrect source, incorrect date and incorrect author. The flag wear the inscriptions Paris and Strasbourg 1944, received after World War II.Source incorrecte, date incorrecte et auteur incorrect : le drapeau porte les inscriptions Paris et Strasbourg 1944, reçues après la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Le Petit Chat (talk) 09:31, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:53, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect source, date and author: the battle honor Valmy 1792 was added in 1989. Source, date et auteur incorrects : l'inscription Valmy 1792 a été ajoutée en 1989 ([2]) ! Le Petit Chat (talk) 09:34, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Incorrect source, date and author: the battle honor Valmy 1792 was added in 1989. Source, date et auteur incorrects : l'inscription Valmy 1792 a été ajoutée en 1989 ([3]) ! Le Petit Chat (talk) 09:34, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:56, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect source, date and author: the battle honor Valmy 1792 was added in 1989. Source, date et auteur incorrects : l'inscription Valmy 1792 a été ajoutée en 1989 ([4]) ! Le Petit Chat (talk) 09:35, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:57, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
irredentist fantasy map of Azerbaijan conquering large parts of Iran. Unused Enyavar (talk) 10:23, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, educational value somehow exists, but as the file is unused, I agree to delete it. Taivo (talk) 08:00, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Requesting courtesy removal as I would like to retire my Wiki related accounts and their associated uploads. Additionally, when searching my username, this image and geolocation is showing up, which I would like to have removed for privacy reasons. Vaibhav265 (talk) 12:55, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept, no valid reason for deletion. Actually the file is twice nominated for deletion in the past (both times kept). Taivo (talk) 08:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
It's hard to believe that the user who uploaded this image owns it since not only is the image elsewhere on the internet, but it's for a game that doesn't appear to have any relation to the user. Blaze Wolf (talk) 12:59, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- To be a bit more specific, I have reason to believe this image is non-free, however I don't feel that I have enough concrete proof to speedy this image. Blaze Wolf (talk) 13:01, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete used for example at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCms8Bzn4iCyNmOgZEuiFD5Q/about or https://www.facebook.com/Block-Strike-BR-228794010789082/photos/. That image needs a permission sent to VTRS. --Jarekt (talk) 02:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete needs VRT perm. EpicPupper (talk) 03:51, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- @EpicPupper: So the template on the page says the file will be deleted within 7 days of the notice being added. It's been 7 days so should I request the file be speedily deleted as a copy vio or what? I'm only asking as I'm unfamiliar with how commons works. Blaze Wolf (talk) 14:22, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Blaze Wolf, the template is a CSD tag :) An admin will get around to deleting it soon, and close this request. Cheers! EpicPupper (talk) 14:40, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- @EpicPupper: Oh neat! Like I said, i'm not familiar with how things on commons work. Blaze Wolf (talk) 14:44, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Blaze Wolf, that's okay! I had no idea either when I made my first edit; I was asked to do something in a GAN review and discovered Commons accidentally. Commons is one of the projects that is even more so suitable to learn to contribute to with experience. Have a great day! EpicPupper (talk) 14:46, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Explicit and EugeneZelenko: , Would you please review this deletion request? As it has been over 7 days of nomination. Fade258 (talk) 14:57, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Blaze Wolf, that's okay! I had no idea either when I made my first edit; I was asked to do something in a GAN review and discovered Commons accidentally. Commons is one of the projects that is even more so suitable to learn to contribute to with experience. Have a great day! EpicPupper (talk) 14:46, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- @EpicPupper: Oh neat! Like I said, i'm not familiar with how things on commons work. Blaze Wolf (talk) 14:44, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Blaze Wolf, the template is a CSD tag :) An admin will get around to deleting it soon, and close this request. Cheers! EpicPupper (talk) 14:40, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- @EpicPupper: So the template on the page says the file will be deleted within 7 days of the notice being added. It's been 7 days so should I request the file be speedily deleted as a copy vio or what? I'm only asking as I'm unfamiliar with how commons works. Blaze Wolf (talk) 14:22, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:14, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded a slightly edited (lighter) version of this picture, so I want to delete this almost duplicate image Scooterhistorian (talk) 13:39, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 08:19, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. It is scanned postcard. This user uploaded many files like this one and they have deleted. belong to other people 5.25.131.140 13:44, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Is a purchased postcard copyrighted please don't blunt contributors' request Anon4144 (talk) 20:55, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- When you purchase a postcard, it does not mean you can have image rights. Image rights belong to its creator. LuCKY 💬 ✒️ 📂 10:41, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- If we adopt this approach, many artists' photos such as Müslüm Gürses should be removed. This postcard is very old and has no commercial concerns. It is harmless. Anon4144 (talk) 22:30, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Anon4144: This kind of argument is not considered valid here, see Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. Regards, HaeB (talk) 08:14, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Müslüm Gürses's photo can be remain only locally because its license is fair use, he does not live so it is not possible to take a free image anymore. It can not be uploaded here, only locally. LuCKY 💬 ✒️ 📂 17:09, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- If we adopt this approach, many artists' photos such as Müslüm Gürses should be removed. This postcard is very old and has no commercial concerns. It is harmless. Anon4144 (talk) 22:30, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
- When you purchase a postcard, it does not mean you can have image rights. Image rights belong to its creator. LuCKY 💬 ✒️ 📂 10:41, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete (including the previous versions overwritten by the uploader), per nom. Regards, HaeB (talk) 08:14, 16 May 2022 (UTC)`
Deleted, @Anon4144: , if you buy a book, then you will not become copyright holder of the book. If you buy a CD with music, then you will not become copyright holder of the music. You incorrectly said: "This postcard is very old". The postcard is made in 1970s, so this is modern postcard, not old. Also you incorrectly said "[it] has no commercial concerns". You correctly said, that many other files should be deleted due to copyright problems, and Commons users are working in that direction. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Unused file, poor quality (and I uploaded it, but I appreciate that doesn't really count) ~TNT (talk • she/her) 13:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Unused file, can be deleted due to the author's request. Kadı Message 21:35, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept, I looked through category:Point Battery, Portsmouth and category:Square Tower, Portsmouth to search a better photo about Square Tower (not made from air) and did not find. Taivo (talk) 08:44, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for text or art in Norway MPF (talk) 16:43, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- I do not understand the cancellation request because this is a public notice displayed on the beach of the city of Longyearbyen (Svalbard). Moreover, as can be seen from the photograph of the sign nailed to a wooden panel, there are no references to copyright (this is a "Pictures of public domain objects / Public domain objects are not protected by copyright, so objects of this kind can be freely photographed and the pictures can be published both royalty free and commercially, at least so far as copyright law is concerned (there may be contractual or other restrictions on picture-taking, though, especially on private property). Moreover, pictures of public domain objects can be freely modified and derivative works can be freely developed." ). However, if otherwise there are reasons why it is believed that this photograph violates some rights, I apologize Buiobuione (talk) 12:47, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, although this is public message, it does not belong into public domain. Per {{PD-Norway70}}, art falls into public domain, if their author is dead more than 70 years. Per {{PD-NorwayGov}}, legal texts are not protected with copyright, but this is not a legal text. Both text and drawings are protected with copyright. Freedom of panorama in Norway applies only for architecture, not for sculptures, text or drawings. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
clearly a copyright violation 2A00:23C5:FF94:6F01:C22:9CA9:E728:F9C6 17:44, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:02, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
found elsewhere on the web before that date Karim185.3 (talk) 20:10, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, only 234×330 pixels. Taivo (talk) 09:06, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
The larva in this picture is misidentified, in fact it is a weevil larva (Curculionidae, probably Curculio sp but this is very tentative). I do not see much value in keeping the file, as it would be hard to identify it, and there are pictures of better quality available. Bagous (talk) 20:17, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Without a precise identification, this isn't very useful, and not high enough quality to identify. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:58, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept, all that can be true, but the file cannot be deleted on that reason, because it is used (and even in multiple projects). Quality is not the best, so after the photo is replaced (or at least removed) from every project, it can be re-nominated for deletion. Taivo (talk) 09:10, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as appears to be copyrighted. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 18:55, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:14, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Akita Northern Happinets
[edit]Dubious claims of own work due to low resolution and lack of metadata. Uploader has history of copyright violations.
- File:Dasichi Taniguchi.jpg
- File:Ken Takahashi CNA.jpg
- File:Makoto Hasegawa Head Coach.jpg
- File:Mizumacho.jpg
- File:Ray Turner CNA.jpg
- File:Shige Taguchi.jpg
- File:Shoya Uchimura.jpg
- File:Yuto Otsuka CNA.jpg
Ixfd64 (talk) 23:56, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
File:Happinets 2019.jpg and its derivatives
[edit]
Possible license laundering as File:Happinets 2019.jpg could be found on another website prior to the upload to YouTube. I was able to trace at least one other image from the video to Getty Images. Although the copy on Commons has a higher resolution, I believe this is because it was resized in the video.
- File:Happinets 2019.jpg
- File:Noboru Hasegawa.jpg
- File:Ryosuke Shirahama 2.jpg
- File:Ryuto Yasuoka.jpg
- File:Takuya Nakayama 2.jpg
Ixfd64 (talk) 21:18, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted. Taivo (talk) 09:18, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio. This user uploads files that do not belong him/her. LuCKY 💬 ✒️ 📂 22:09, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Could you explain with the sources whether the image belongs to me or not? otherwise please apologize Anon4144 (talk) 21:01, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- It is a postcard and can be found on the internet easily. Many people have these postcards, they are over 40 years old. You are not the photografher of them. They are someone else's work. You should stop uploading them here. LuCKY 💬 ✒️ 📂 10:39, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:22, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
No source, copyright status unclear HeminKurdistan (talk) 22:10, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Source is provided British Library, India Office Records, IOR/L/PS/10/332, f 77. VivereInPace (talk) 12:00, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
- It is Open Government. Nomination withdrawn. HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:11, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept, the nomination is withdrawn. Taivo (talk) 09:25, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio. This user uploads files that do not belong him/her. LuCKY 💬 ✒️ 📂 22:10, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:27, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bdearing36 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:11, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:30, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SomedayMyLove (talk · contribs)
[edit]Doubtful sources of images. The person on the photos died in 1997. Information about the initial publication of some images is not available.
- File:AdrianaCaselottiIn1935.jpg
- File:Caselotti1937TBWR.jpg
- File:CaselottiNaughtyMarietta.png
- File:DisneyLegendsAdrianaCaselotti.jpg
- File:CaselottiAndFriends1988.jpg
- File:Adrianaingarden.jpg
- File:Adrianapozodelosdeseos.jpg
- File:Adiana-caselotti-feat.jpg
- File:Adriana-caselotti-wiki-doblajes-animados-fandom-powered.jpg
- File:Adriana Caselotti - Blancanieves.jpg
Maxinvestigator (talk) 05:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:44, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SomedayMyLove (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:12, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep for File:GuidoFatherAdrianaCaselotti.jpg which is PD-Italy with only 20 years protection. --RAN (talk) 12:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept, but one is deleted. If Santa Ana Muriel is 19 years old on the photo, then it is made in 1999. Source country Argentina demands 25 years from creation plus 20 years from publication. Even if 20 years from publication has probably passed, 25 years from creation has not. Taivo (talk) 09:40, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Map of Arabistan-Map of Northern Arabia- in Illustration of Lady Anne Blunt’s Journeys.png
[edit]
Copyright by Edward Stanford Ltd. The source says: "The Library of Congress is providing access to these materials for educational and research purposes and is not aware of any U.S. copyright protection (see Title 17 of the United States Code) or any other restrictions in the Map Collection materials. Note that the written permission of the copyright owners and/or other rights holders (such as publicity and/or privacy rights) is required for distribution, reproduction, or other use of protected items beyond that allowed by fair use or other statutory exemptions. Responsibility for making an independent legal assessment of an item and securing any necessary permissions ultimately rests with persons desiring to use the item. " HeminKurdistan (talk) 22:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Author of map is stated as A. Blunt, deceased: 15 December 1917 (copyright would have been expired). But if publication date is indeed 1949 as stated in web source, undeletion request for 2044. --Enyavar (talk) 11:25, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, will be restored in 2045 (95+1 years from publication). Taivo (talk) 09:48, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Annals of the South African Museum - Annale van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum (1990) (17802167333).jpg
[edit]_(17802167333).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(17802167333).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Little indication other than Flickr why this 1990 publication should be freely licenced. FunkMonk (talk) 22:27, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, this is strange case. We have South African drawing with creation year 1898 and publication year 1990. Author is unknown. Per Commons rules, we give author 50 years to die (death year 1948) and South Africa demands 50 years for copyright expiration (1998). That means: the file was not in public domain in source country on URAA date in 1996. That case USA demands 95 years from publication and the file can be restored in 2086 (95+1 years from publication). If you have evidence, that the drawing is anonymous or that author died before 1948 or that the work was commissioned by an organization or that the drawing was published before 1990, please present it and the file can be restored. Taivo (talk) 10:04, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Caricatures of Vladimir Putin
[edit]Derivative works. We need the formal written permission from the artists. There may be more in the same category.
- File:( CEA ) Demonstration against the election fraud, to support free and fair elections in Russia - The Hague, Netherlands December, 10, 2011 (6488392045).jpg
- File:27 Feb 2022 in Stockholm. Demonstration against the Russian invasion of Ukraine. 07.jpg
- File:27 Feb 2022 in Stockholm. Demonstration against the Russian invasion of Ukraine. 32.jpg
- File:Bladimiro.jpg
File:Czar of Russia and Crimea.jpg- File:Größenwahn Stop Putin.jpg
- File:Matteo Salvini - Vladimir Putin (MO) (cropped).jpg
- File:Matteo Salvini - Vladimir Putin (MO).jpg
- File:Matthias Laurenz Gräff, "Der europäische Altar (Wind of Change). Feuchte Träume. Perverse Schwärmerei.".jpg
- File:Matthias Laurenz Gräff, "Putin. The Killing Machine".jpg
- File:Obama Putin Faceoff - Caricatures (13220749473).jpg
- File:Part of Superputin strip 3 by Sergei Kalenik.png
File:PresidentPutin.JPG- File:Russian Tendem skolkovo (skolkovland) (4771126475).jpg
File:Stop Putin sign.pngFile:STOP Putin.pngFile:Stop Ruscism.jpg- File:Vladimir Putin as fake Caritas (Detail from a larger dyptich).jpg
- File:Vladimir Putin caricature by Valeriy Osipov.jpg
- File:Women's March LA 2019 (31864309817).jpg
_Demonstration_against_the_election_fraud,_to_support_free_and_fair_elections_in_Russia_-_The_Hague,_Netherlands_December,_10,_2011_(6488392045).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._Feuchte_Tr%C3%A4ume._Perverse_Schw%C3%A4rmerei.%22.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(4771126475).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 07:39, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- These images are taken from the artist's website, where they are labeled CC BY-SA 3.0, e.g. http://superputin.win/episode1.html. We normally accept such website disclaimers and don't require "formal written permission", unless there are indications that the works were not in fact published under a free licence with the copyright holder's consent. Are there any such indications in this case? Sandstein (talk) 08:35, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Which one? There are caricatures from several sources and several artists. If we have implicit permission, this should be clearly written in the file description. Thanks, Yann (talk) 11:20, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment I am removing File:PresidentPutin.JPG and derivatives of it, File:STOP Putin.png and File:Stop Putin sign.png, from this listing, since the cartoonist (Peter Wellman) is the uploader (please take a moment to check such details before including such media in deletion requests in the future). -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:54, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Likewise File:Czar of Russia and Crimea.jpg, another work by Wellman. It looks like there are a number of other images that seem to be properly licensed by their creators in this mass deletion request which appears to me has inappropriately been made without due diligence in assessing individual images. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:04, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Likewise File:Stop Ruscism.jpg -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- The works by Flickr caricaturist "DonkeyHotey" seem to be reworkings of CC photos properly credited (eg [5]). @Yann: what is your reasoning for including them in this request? -- 17:17, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Seconded. This artist sources all their work from CC-licensed images and adapts them accordingly. Kingofthedead (talk) 17:32, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep Nomination without justification. File:Stop Ruscism.jpg is my work - combination File:STOP Putin.png and flag of Russia. Also Yann deleted other my file File:Putin is terrorist.jpg from the same series. I write - I'm the author. I write for the second time, for the third time, and he writes «Probably not.». This administrator is probably tired of the administrator's rights or does not understand them. --Микола Василечко (talk) 18:25, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep (and a massive trout to the nominator) This sort of scatter-gun deletion request across a category is unworkable. What is the reason for deletion? It either varies across the images and their many different issues, or else it's a simple IDONTLIKEIT for anything derogatory to Putin (and we've had enough of that sort of POV editing lately). I can see this: File:( CEA ) Demonstration against the election fraud, to support free and fair elections in Russia - The Hague, Netherlands December, 10, 2011 (6488392045).jpg (is it de minimis?) vs. File:Vladimir Putin - Caricature (51117986397).jpg (a CC-by on the author's Flickr source, so no idea what the claimed nomination is for that). Andy Dingley (talk) 19:02, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment OK, I removed the files from DonkeyHotey, that was an error. Yann (talk) 20:15, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- I also restored File:Putin is terrorist.jpg, which was tagged by User:Veverve. Yann (talk) 20:21, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
̈ Comment These images are from the artist's website, where it is marked CC BY-SA 3.0. User Welleman (https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Czar_of_Russia_and_Crimea.jpg&uselang=de)). A remix File:Größenwahn Stop Putin.jpg by me is therefore allowed and the license Sharing under equal conditions has been respected by me.--Birkho (talk) 15:38, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep all, nominate individual ones after actual review Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 20:47, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Closing as kept; overbroad deletion request of very different images in different countries and situations (including a good number of images that were specifically free licensed by their creators). Note: Some individual images may qualify for re-nomination for reasons specific to individual or narrow groups of images from same source; this closure does not prejudge all cases. This wide net deletion request was not helpful. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:32, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 12:01, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, TOO uncertain; clear copyright notice on source. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:38, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
How do you know, that author of the photo is anonymous? How do you know, that the photo was ever published before invention of Internet? I suspect copyright violation. First publication data are needed. Taivo (talk) 09:45, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The precautionary principle demands that there be "significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file", not hypothetical speculation. We can speculate that every iPhone image uploaded has had the date manipulated, that the person who uploaded didn't actually take the image, maybe three people pressed the shutter at the same time and it is now a collective work, every non-famous person has been misidentified, and every image without GPS data has the wrong location. You need to present evidence, not hypothetical speculation. Commons:Publication explains the URAA and Berne definition of publication (made public), the distribution of a copy to anyone other than the photographer and his immediate family is being made public, not appearing in a magazine, although that is one way to be made public. That the sitter signed the image in 1930 would satisfy Occam's razor, that the image was made public in 1930. --RAN (talk) 04:19, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- Current license is wrong. The photo has Russian license. In 1930 Sadoven lived in West Europe. Which is the source country of the photo? We need correct license. In addition, how do you know, that the photo is anonymous? Maybe photographer's name is printed on backside of the photo? Taivo (talk) 07:10, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- The photograph is signed "Belgrade, 1930". Cannot we use Template:PD-Serbia here? Serbian photographs are in PD if published before 1973. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:21, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Still evidence of publication is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:43, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: We know almost nothing about this photo. It is said to show a certain person, and it has a signature and Belgrade - 1930 written on it. Where and when was it made? In which country? Was it published, and if so, where and how? Is a photographer named on a print or on a publication? COM:EVID says that “In all cases the uploader must provide appropriate evidence to demonstrate either that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence” and “In all cases, the burden of proof lies on the uploader or other person arguing for the file to be retained to demonstrate that as far as can reasonably be determined [...] the file is in the public domain or is properly licensed”. But the only evidence I really have is that this photo was probably not taken any later than 1930. I cannot assume that this is anonymous based on the law of Russia or Serbia or any other country if I don't even know the basic facts mentioned above. So all I can do is apply {{PD-old-assumed}} in 2051, 120 years after the 1930 date we have. The file can be restored then. --Rosenzweig τ 12:52, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
This is Ludwig Fischer from Ettal and this picture is copyrighted material of Schützengau Werdenfels website. Uploader is definitely not the owner and the picture looks cheaply colorized with imagecolorizer.com . The actual black white picture is here in this pdf (page 4) https://www.gauwerdenfels.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Gauchronik-13-02-2020.pdf Thank me later. 2A02:3032:201:3C4C:A907:73EF:1FD2:C96C 23:27, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --Rosenzweig τ 16:41, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
