Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/01/30
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
File:Flag_of_the_Pacific_Ocean.svg John emil hernandez (talk) 16:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request & fictional. --Achim55 (talk) 19:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Este archivo fue borrado. 191.126.6.132 02:16, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted. Uploader's request and fictional. Taivo (talk) 12:22, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake MS140116 (talk) 11:22, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 13:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Has no copyright TayfunEt. (talk) 15:40, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy delete per COM:CSD#G7 and this edit. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 17:25, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake 66tarara (talk) 17:05, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy - uploader's request within 7 days of upload. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since) AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Rank insignia in the US w:Civil Air Patrol, should be {{PD-USGov-Military-Air Force}} AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: yeah, just gonna speedy keep this. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:24, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
no needed 82.36.58.54 19:17, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedily kept: Is in use in more than one hundred Wikipedia pages. --AFBorchert (talk) 22:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
This is the image that appears in Jewish Encoclopedia from 1901 to 1906, but somehow this photo depicts palestine in 1930s. How did they manage it? ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 18:00, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Keep See https://jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/907-agricultural-colonies-in-palestine. Description was incorrect, I fixed it. Jklamo (talk) 00:53, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 04:49, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Nomination withdrawn. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:20, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
カメラの機種など、個人の特定につながる、データを消し忘れました。 Urushi.bito (talk) 14:40, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:36, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Photos and screenshots without original authors and permission (example 1, example 2). All other uploads from same user are deleted as copyvios.
- File:Ivan Palćčić.jpg
- File:Ahmet Ibukić gs.jpg
- File:Pjer gs.jpg
- File:Ljiljana pirolić.jpg
- File:Sli- gs.jpg
- File:Slika 4 gs.jpg
- File:Slika4 gs.jpg
- File:Slika gs3.jpg
- File:Boris Matanić.jpg
- File:Vlatka Vorkapić gs.jpg
- File:Josip Tomin gs.jpg
- File:Ive Čaće gs.jpg
- File:Stara straža gs.jpg
- File:Crkva sve. jakova gs.jpg
- File:Crkva sv. jakova gs.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 19:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:26, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:David Mehnert
[edit]A batch of unused personal artworks and self-portraits uploaded between two accounts, both seemingly owned by the artist himself. Out of project scope.
- File:AfreetMehnert.jpg
- File:AspernPapersSituationly.jpg
- File:BlackSwanMerrillInscription.jpg
- File:CohenDeadSeaScrolls.jpg
- File:DavidMehnertBlackHat.jpg
- File:DeathOfASimorgh.jpg
- File:ElephantGolem.jpg
- File:GeldbegAbejaVariations.jpg
- File:Geschwitz2.jpg
- File:Geschwitz3.jpg
- File:Geschwitz4.jpg
- File:GräfinGeschwitz.jpg
- File:Guilala.jpg
- File:HebronCrossMerrill.jpg
- File:HolyHafezInDiaMole.jpg
- File:MadMoisel.jpg
- File:MandylionOdessa.jpg
- File:MehnertMerle.jpg
- File:PasoDobleSellfPortrait.jpg
- File:Prometheus3Studies.jpg
- File:SelfPortraitMehnertLibertyMemorial.jpg
- File:StrangerMusicInscription.jpg
- File:TheBluestEye.jpg
- File:TochterMabuse.jpg
✗plicit 01:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Works of non-notable author with no educational value. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:25, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:30, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
COM:TROPHY Maometto97 (talk) 13:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As long as the shot is not close, there is no problem. The images are in low quality and we do not look at a full-HD file that shows the details of the TROPHY/Cup. Definitely not a problem as long as these images are not cropped or not a close shot. Lyrische (talk) 19:45, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 14:12, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
COM:TROPHY Maometto97 (talk) 13:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As long as the shot is not close, there is no problem. The images are in low quality and we do not look at a full-HD file that shows the details of the TROPHY/Cup. Definitely not a problem as long as these images are not cropped or not a close shot. Lyrische (talk) 19:49, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Cropped. --4nn1l2 (talk) 14:13, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Promo photos and album cover. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Swirl Season Image.jpg
- File:Swirl Season Performing.png
- File:Swirl Season Gateway 3 The Forbidden Odyssey Cover Art.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 11:27, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Commons is not a COM:WEBHOST. Also, doubtful copyright status.
- File:Swirl Season Family Photo.jpg
- File:Dgi7CV8VAAAtKTC.jpg
- File:Swirl, Jordan, Deonquez basketball.jpg
- File:Swirl Season Speaking.jpg
- File:Swirl Season Jordan Virginia Beach 2002.jpg
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:08, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:33, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Imagen personal de una pareja 191.126.132.136 18:33, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:08, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, probably also copyvio
- File:Hsbc-glcm-fit-for-the-future-infographic.pdf
- File:From-reaction-to-action-corporates-infographic (1).pdf
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be copyrighted by BBC Filetime (talk) 02:47, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: No evidence of permission/licensing information. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:32, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Potential copyright violation. Low image resolution and missing EXIF data. Some of images can be found on the Internet. The uploader has uploaded copyvio images berfore.
- File:MayFair Lake Resort Raipur.png [1]
- File:Maa Bamleshwari, Dongargarh.png
- File:Temple in Dongargarh.png
- File:Bamleshwari Talab, Dongargarh.png
- File:Buddha Statue, Dongargarh.png [2]
- File:Dongargarh Railway station.png
- File:Maa Bamleshwari dongargarh montage pic.png
- File:Rajnandgaon Railway Station.png
- File:Rani sagar Chaupati, Rajnandgaon.png
- File:Digvijay Stadium, Rajnandgaon.png
- File:Patal Bhairavi Temple, Rajnandgaon.png
- File:Government medical college, Rajnandgaon.png
- File:Gurudwara Rajnandgaon.png
- File:International Hockey Stadium Rajnandgaon.png
- File:Manglore International Airport logo.png
- File:Thiruvananthapuram International Airport logo.png
- File:Guwahati International Airport logo.png
- File:Jaipur International Airport logo.png
- File:Principal Accountant General, (CAG) Building Chhattisgarh.png
- File:Chhattisgarhi Thali (Chhattisgarhi Cuisine).png
- File:Cheela Chutni, Chhattisgarhi Cuisine.png
- File:Chhattisgarhi Cuisine (Bara, Bhajiya, Fara, puri).png
- File:Kanker, Chhattisgarh.png
- File:Police training school, Mainpat.png
- File:Buddhist Monastery, Mainpat.png
- File:Tiger point, waterfall.png
- File:Ulta pani Mainpat.png
- File:Tiger point waterfall, mainpat.png
- File:Mainpat hills 2.png
- File:Mainpat hills 1.png
- File:Buddhist temple in Mainpat.png
- File:Bilaspur railway station.png
- File:District Hospital, Ambikapur.png
- File:Ghunghutta Dam, Ambikapur.png
- File:Ambikapur Railway station.png
- File:Mahamaya temple, Ambikapur.png
- File:Gandhi stadium, Ambikapur.png
- File:Raghunath palace, Ambikapur.png
- File:Central Library, Bilaspur 565.png
- File:Central Library, Bilaspur 564.png
- File:SECL logo.png
- File:SECL Headquarter, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.png
- File:Bango Dam, Korba, Chhattisgarh.png
- File:Bango dam Reservoir, Korba.png
- File:Devpahri Waterfalls, Korba.png
- File:NTPC Power Plant, Jamnipali, Korba.png
- File:Bagdara Hill view from Chaiturgarh, Korba , Chhattisgarh.png
- File:Maa Sarvamangla Devi temple, Korba.png
- File:Mahadev Mountain, Satrenga Korba.png
- File:Ghanta Ghar Chowk, Niharika, Korba.png
- File:The Palm Mall, Korba, Chhattisgarh.jpg
- File:Coal mines in Gevra , SECL.png
- File:Open cast coal mines in Gevra, SECL.png
- File:SECL Gevra Coal mines 3456.png
- File:SECL Gevra coal mines 3457.png
- File:Ambikapur Aerial view in night.png
- File:BPIA, Bhubaneswar.png
- File:Central Business District, Sector 21 Naya Raipur.png
- File:Residential Buildings in Lalpur, Ranchi.png
- File:Rama Magneto Mall.png
- File:NTPC sipat 3467.png
- File:I love Bilaspur sign.png
- File:High Court of Chhattisgarh 3465.png
- File:High court of Chhattisgarh 3466.png
- File:NIT Ghat, Patna.png
- File:Buddha Smriti park.png
- File:Digha-Sonpur Rail-road bridge in Patna.png
- File:AIIMS Patna in 2021.png
- File:Bihar Museum 3452.png
- File:Patna Sahib, Bihar.png
- File:Patna High court 2356.png
- File:Patna Skyline 45236.png
- File:An Aircraft taking off from Patna Airport.png
- File:Ratanpur temple, Bilaspur.png
- File:Satrenga Korba 3458.png
- File:Satrenga Korba 3456.png
- File:Satrenga Korba.png
- File:Ambikapur City night view Bird's eye.png
- File:Laxman Temple Sirpur.png
- File:Bhoramdeo Temple,.png
- File:Achanakmar Wildlife Sanctuary 8978 , Chhattisgarh.png
- File:Paddy fields in Chhattisgarh.png
- File:Mor Raipur sign.png
- File:IIM Raipur 6547.png
- File:Telibandha lake, Raipur.jpg
- File:IndiGo Aircraft taking off from Raipur Airport.png
- File:Ghadi chowk, (Clock tower) Raipur.png
- File:Mahadev Ghat, Raipur.png
- File:Saroda dam, Kawardha.png
- File:Great Eastern rd, VIP chowk (GE road Raipur).png
- File:Magneto Mall, Raipur.png
- File:Chitrakoot falls Jagdalpur 56578.png
- File:Chitrakoot falls in Jagdalpur 56579.png
- File:Indore montage pic 2021.png
- File:Chhattisgarh Montage picture 2021.png
- File:Atal Path Expressway, Raipur.jpg
- File:Jaipur Intn'l Airport.png
- File:Raipur City Montage 2021.png
- File:Mata Kaushalya Temple, Raipur.jpg
- File:Shri Ram statue at Mata Kaushalya Temple, Raipur.jpg
- File:Bilaspur Aerial view.png
- File:Surya Treasure Island mall, Bhilai.png
- File:Magneto the mall , Raipur.png
- File:Raipur metropolitan area 2020.png
- File:Raipur in 2019 GE road.png
- File:Western Peripheral Expressway.png
- File:Interstate Bus Terminus, (ISBT) Raipur.jpg
- File:Qazigund - Banihal road tunnel.png
- File:Tirupati International Airport , Terminal Building.png
- File:Raipur Airport Airside view from Terminal.png
- File:Terminal Building view from Apron , Raipur Airport.png
- File:Orissa High Court.png
- File:Sindhudurg Airport.png
- File:Tirupati International Airport.png
SCP-2000 06:49, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Certainly not own work. Taken from official websites, Google Maps, etc. Some are from government institutions' websites which are allowing reproduction but not comercial use or derivatives or is unclear. All deleted except 5 which are {{PD-textlogo}}. -- CptViraj (talk) 15:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
User with a long list of copyright violations, blocked for 3 months, small PNG images without metadata, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Dehradun International Cricket Stadium.png
- File:Hyatt Raipur.png
- File:Saya Ji Raipur.png
- File:Courtyard By marriott, Raipur.png
- File:ITC welcom hotel, Guntur.png
- File:Taj Gateway hotel, Vijaywada.png
- File:Taj Gateway Hotel, Visakhapatnam.png
- File:Novotel Varun, Vijaywada.png
- File:Mayfair Lake Resort, Raipur.png
- File:Rajesh Mehta.png
- File:Saurabh Bhardwaj.png
- File:A Starbucks outlet in Raipur.png
- File:Chhattisgarhi Thali.png
- File:Chhattisgarhi Chila roti and tomato Chutni.png
- File:Anji Khad Bridge under construction 2022.png
- File:Chenab Rail bridge under construction 2022.png
- File:Durgam Cheruvu Hanging Bridge , Hyderabad.png
- File:Buddha Statue, Hussain Sagar Lake, Hyderabad.png
- File:Charminar, Hyderabad in 2020.png
- File:Statue of Equality, Hyderabad.png
- File:Financial District Hitech City road Hyderabad.png
- File:Avinash Magneto Mall, Raipur.png
- File:Chaudhary Charan Singh Statue at Lucknow Airport.png
- File:Ranchi Airport Evening view of Apron.png
- File:Pantnagar Airport.png
- File:Terminal building SXR.png
- File:Srinagar Airport terminal front view.png
- File:Terminal Interior Srinagar International Airport.png
- File:Apron view at Srinagar International Airport.jpg
- File:Dainik Bhaskar Office in Raipur.png
- File:Pt. Devkinandan chowk, Bilaspur.png
- File:Hotel East Park, Bilaspur.png
- File:CGhighcourt Bilaspur.png
- File:Terminal building view from ATC complex at Indore Airport.png
- File:Indore Airport terminal building view from ATC complex.png
- File:Baggage Belt at Indore Airport.png
- File:Mata Kaushalya Temple, Raipur.png
- File:NH MMI Narayana Super Speciality Hospital, Raipur.png
- File:Gompa Buddhist Temple, Itanagar.png
- File:Arunachal Pradesh Secretariat Building, Itanagar.png
- File:Itanagar- Hollongi Highway.png
- File:Itanagar Aerial view.png
- File:Geker Sinying (Ganga Lake) Itanagar.png
- File:Ita fort, Itanagar.png
- File:ItanagarAirport terminal.png
- File:CBD Raipur sec 21, Atal nagar.png
- File:Utkal Heights, Bhubaneswar.png
- File:Eastern Peripheral Expressway.png
- File:Western Peripheral Expressway.png
- File:Amritsar–Jamnagar Expressway.png
- File:Mor raipur logo.png
- File:AAI chairman Sanjeev kumar briefs about Airport's specifications to PM Modi.png
- File:PM modi visits Deoghar Airport.png
- File:Aerial view of Runway at Deoghar Airport.png
- File:Baggage Conveyor belts at Deoghar Airport.png
- File:Bundelkhand Expressway 2022.png
- File:Cafe coffee day store.png
- File:Indian Coffee House, Restaurant In Raipur.png
- File:Barista Cafe.png
- File:Departure area in terminal at Jaipur Airport.png
- File:Check-in counters and Concourse area at Jaipur Airport's terminal 2.png
- File:Terminal 2 airside view at Jaipur airport.png
- File:Check-In Counters in Vadodara Airport's terminal.png
- File:Evening view of Terminal at Vadodara Airport.png
- File:Terminal view of Vadodara Airport from Airside.png
- File:Sohna Elevated Corridor.png
- File:Chandigarh Airport terminal.png
- File:Jet bridge at Airside of Terminal at Chandigarh Airport.png
- File:AIIMS in Deoghar.png
- File:IndiGo A320 Airbus at Deoghar Airport.png
- File:Busiest Airports in India April 2021- March 2022, AAI data.png
- File:Currency tower GE road Raipur.png
- File:Jail park, Ranchi Night view.png
- File:Ranchi City Skyline from Rock Garden in Ranchi.png
- File:JSCA International Stadium Complex (Ranchi International Cricket Stadium).png
- File:Jharkhand Legislative Assembly (Jharkhand Vidhan Sabha) (झारखंड विधानसभा).png
- File:Nucleus mall Ranchi.png
- File:Magneto mall, Raipur GE road.png
- File:Ambuja City Centre , Patna (Ambuja Neotia City Center, Patna).png
- File:Banihal Qazigund Road Tunnel.png
- File:Atal Tunnel, Rohtang North Portal.png
- File:Maharaja Bir Bikram Airport, Agartala (New terminal in 2022).png
- File:Vyapm Bhawan ( Chhattisgarh professional examination board).png
- File:Chhattisgarh Police Headquarter (पुलिस मुख्यालय, छत्तीसगढ़).png
- File:Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission (CGPSC) building, छत्तीसगढ़ लोक सेवा आयोग, नया रायपुर.png
- File:Commercial Department State GST bhawan, Chhattisgarh.png
- File:Aranya Bhawan (Forest and wilderness department of Chhattisgarh government).png
- File:Chhattisgarh State Election Commission.png
- File:Headquarters of CECB (Chhattisgarh Environment and Conservation board) and Chhattisgarh Housing board.png
- File:Chhattisgarh PWD ( Public Works Department).png
- File:Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur.png
- File:Chhattisgarh Vidhan Sabha (Chhattisgarh State Assembly) छत्तीसगढ़ विधानसभा, रायपुर.png
- File:Haldiram's restaurant in Raipur.png
- File:NMDC Nagarnar Steel plant, township, Jagdalpur, India.png
- File:NMDC Nagarnar Steel plant, Jagdalpur, India.png
- File:NMDC Nagarnar Steel plant.png
- File:Koilwar Bridge on National Highway, Bihar.png
- File:Aerial View of New Phulera Station near Jaipur , Rajasthan situated on the Western Dedicated Freight Corridor.png
- File:Under Construction Raipur-Visakhapatnam Expressway in 2022.png
- File:Satelite view of Under construction Delhi-Mumbai Expressway near Ratlam, India.png
- File:Gandhi Setu Patna in 2022.png
- File:City Center mall , Raipur.png
- File:Currency tower, Raipur.png
- File:Terminal interior 2 at Raipur Airport (Swami Vivekananda International Airport) 2062022.png
- File:Terminal interior at Raipur Airport (Swami Vivekananda International Airport) 2062022.png
- File:AMD Airport.png
- File:Terminal 2 Ahmedabad International Airport.png
- File:New ATC tower cum complex at Raipur airport.png
- File:ATC tower cum building at Deoghar Airport.png
- File:X-ray machine and Security checks area inside terminal at Deoghar Airport.png
- File:National flag at deoghar airport.png
- File:Check-in Counters inside terminal of Deoghar Airport.png
- File:Concourse area inside terminal building at Deoghar Airport.png
- File:Boarding gate of terminal building at Deoghar Airport.png
- File:Terminal building night view at Deoghar Airport.png
- File:Bundelkhand Expressway.png
- File:Airfield Apron view at Raipur Airport.png
- File:Amcho Bastar Sign.png
- File:Gwalior Airport terminal.png
- File:Chaiturgarh temple, korba Chhattisgarh 68760.jpg
- File:Dilip buildcon headquarter, Bhopal.png
- File:Road to Mantralaya, sector-19, Naya Raipur.png
- File:Patna Airport terminal in 2022.png
- File:Kolhapur airport terminal.png
- File:IndiGo ATR72-600 Aircraft at Jagdalpur Airport.png
- File:BRTS bus point in Sector 19, Naya Raipur.png
- File:Jagdalpur Airport (Maa Danteshwari Airport).png
- File:Sector-29, Naya Raipur, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar.png
- File:Telibandha Talab, Raipur in 2021.png
- File:FlyBig, ATR72-600 VT-TMC.png
- File:Trans Haryana Expressway.png
- File:Delhi-Mumbai Expressway.png
- File:Dehradun Airport new terminal building in 2022.png
- File:Sindhudurg Airport terminal.png
- File:Sindhudurg Airport.png
- File:A Car cruising at Nagpur-Mumbai Expressway.png
- File:Pasighat Airport terminal.png
- File:Aerial view of Pasighat Airport.png
- File:Tezpur Airport.png
- File:Nagpur-Mumbai Expressway aka (Mumbai-Nagpur Expressway) Maharashtra Samruddhi Mahamarg.png
- File:Jaipur International Airport during night.png
- File:Raipur Airport night view.png
- File:Miraj Cinema, Naya Raipur atrium.png
- File:Miraj Cinema Concession stand, Naya Raipur.png
- File:Miraj Cinema, screen Naya Raipur.png
- File:Inox Ambuja mall, Raipur.png
- File:PVR, Magneto Mall , Raipur.png
- File:Magneto the mall, Raipur.png
- File:Drone view of Raipur International cricket stadium during Road Safety World series 2020-2021.png
- File:Jaistambh Chowk, Raipur (Center point of Chhattisgarh).png
- File:Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh Aerial view from plane.png
- File:Raipur Junction.png
- File:Ghadi chowk, Raipur (Nagar Ghadi) Nagarghari , Clock Tower Raipur.png
- File:Bhatagaon Bus stand, Raipur.png
- File:Raipur New bus stand ISBT.png
- File:Dehradun Airport (Jolly grant Airport) in 2021.png
- File:Gondia Airport terminal.png
- File:Deoghar Airport.png
- File:Raghunath palace Ambikapur.png
- File:Roads in Ambikapur CG.png
- File:Ambikapur Bus stand.png
- File:Devi ganj road Ambikapur.png
- File:Korba city, Collectorate road.png
- File:Korba Railway station, Chhattisgarh.png
- File:Sunset view in Satrenga.png
- File:Mountains (Mahadev mountain) near Satrenga, Korba Chhattisgarh during monsoon season.png
- File:Road safety world series 2021 during Final Match , Raipur, Chhattisgarh.png
- File:Children Park in Satrenga korba.png
Yann (talk) 11:17, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:55, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Small size, lacks EXIF data, possible copyvio. C messier (talk) 11:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:47, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Karanraj 748282 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:51, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:54, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rakibhasanayz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/files storage. Not used.
- File:Rakib-Hasan.jpg
- File:Musician-TAWHID HASAN LEON.jpg
- File:TAWHID HASAN LEON.jpg
- File:Heaven Single.jpg
- File:Cyclone single.jpg
- File:Sloween.jpg
- File:The Ultimate Rakib.jpg
- File:Dr. Art town.jpg
- File:Rakibhasanayz.jpg
- File:By Rakibhasanayz.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:57, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom, COM:CSD#F10. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:51, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deleted by Fitindia as per COM:CSD#F10. -- CptViraj (talk) 15:00, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
All uploads by this user appear to be copyright violations.
- File:Miley2022.jpg
- File:Grammys 2019.jpg
- File:Miley cyrus world.jpg
- File:Grammys 2018.jpg
- File:Voice miley cyrus.jpg
- File:Mtv 2015 promo.png
- File:2015 alfombra.jpg
- File:Vmas 2014.jpg
- File:Rock and roll.jpg
- File:Monterrey miely.jpg
- File:Miley cyrus.jpg
- File:Cyrus 2013.jpg
Eureka Lott 18:50, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination, no proof of CC licence. -- CptViraj (talk) 15:05, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background & colored atoms. I have replaced it with File:Ethoxyethyne-2D-structure.svg as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:49, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Wostr (talk) 04:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:46, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
COM:TROPHY Maometto97 (talk) 13:20, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As long as the shot is not close, there is no problem. The images are in low quality and we do not look at a full-HD file that shows the details of the TROPHY/Cup. Definitely not a problem as long as these images are not cropped or not a close shot. Lyrische (talk) 19:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 17:48, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
COM:TROPHY Maometto97 (talk) 13:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As long as the shot is not close, there is no problem. The images are in low quality and we do not look at a full-HD file that shows the details of the TROPHY/Cup. Definitely not a problem as long as these images are not cropped or not a close shot. Lyrische (talk) 19:47, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 17:48, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
COM:TROPHY Maometto97 (talk) 13:22, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As long as the shot is not close, there is no problem. The images are in low quality and we do not look at a full-HD file that shows the details of the TROPHY/Cup. Definitely not a problem as long as these images are not cropped or not a close shot. Lyrische (talk) 19:48, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 17:49, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
non-free logos and COM:TROPHY. Maometto97 (talk) 13:25, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As long as the shot is not close, there is no problem. The images are in low quality and we do not look at a full-HD file that shows the details of the TROPHY/Cup. Definitely not a problem as long as these images are not cropped or not a close shot. Lyrische (talk) 19:48, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 17:49, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
non-free logos and COM:TROPHY. Maometto97 (talk) 13:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As long as the shot is not close, there is no problem. The images are in low quality and we do not look at a full-HD file that shows the details of the TROPHY/Cup. Definitely not a problem as long as these images are not cropped or not a close shot. Its not close. Lyrische (talk) 19:52, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: hardly can be seen. --4nn1l2 (talk) 17:51, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
COM:TROPHY Maometto97 (talk) 13:48, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As long as the shot is not close, there is no problem. The images are in low quality and we do not look at a full-HD file that shows the details of the TROPHY/Cup. Definitely not a problem as long as these images are not cropped or not a close shot. Lyrische (talk) 19:52, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 17:50, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
non-free logos and COM:TROPHY. Maometto97 (talk) 13:53, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, Its done. Lyrische (talk) 19:39, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: blurred. --4nn1l2 (talk) 17:53, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
non-free logos and COM:TROPHY. Maometto97 (talk) 13:54, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As long as the shot is not close, there is no problem. The images are in low quality and we do not look at a full-HD file that shows the details of the TROPHY/Cup. Definitely not a problem as long as these images are not cropped or not a close shot. Lyrische (talk) 19:53, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 17:54, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
non-free logos and COM:TROPHY. Maometto97 (talk) 13:54, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As long as the shot is not close, there is no problem. The images are in low quality and we do not look at a full-HD file that shows the details of the TROPHY/Cup. Definitely not a problem as long as these images are not cropped or not a close shot. Lyrische (talk) 19:55, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 17:55, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
non-free logos and COM:TROPHY. Maometto97 (talk) 13:56, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As long as the shot is not close, there is no problem. The images are in low quality and we do not look at a full-HD file that shows the details of the TROPHY/Cup. Definitely not a problem as long as these images are not cropped or not a close shot. Lyrische (talk) 19:55, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 17:55, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
non-free logos and COM:TROPHY. Maometto97 (talk) 13:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As long as the shot is not close, there is no problem. The images are in low quality and we do not look at a full-HD file that shows the details of the TROPHY/Cup. Definitely not a problem as long as these images are not cropped or not a close shot. Lyrische (talk) 19:56, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 17:56, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
non-free logos and COM:TROPHY. Maometto97 (talk) 13:58, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As long as the shot is not close, there is no problem. The images are in low quality and we do not look at a full-HD file that shows the details of the TROPHY/Cup. Definitely not a problem as long as these images are not cropped or not a close shot. Lyrische (talk) 19:56, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 17:56, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
non-free logos and COM:TROPHY. Maometto97 (talk) 13:59, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As long as the shot is not close, there is no problem. The images are in low quality and we do not look at a full-HD file that shows the details of the TROPHY/Cup. Definitely not a problem as long as these images are not cropped or not a close shot. Lyrische (talk) 19:56, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep for the set, the logos and trophy are minimal. --RAN (talk) 07:33, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 17:57, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
non-free logos and COM:TROPHY. Maometto97 (talk) 13:59, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As long as the shot is not close, there is no problem. The images are in low quality and we do not look at a full-HD file that shows the details of the TROPHY/Cup. Definitely not a problem as long as these images are not cropped or not a close shot. Lyrische (talk) 19:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 17:57, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
non-free logos and COM:TROPHY. Maometto97 (talk) 14:02, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As long as the shot is not close, there is no problem. The images are in low quality and we do not look at a full-HD file that shows the details of the TROPHY/Cup. Definitely not a problem as long as these images are not cropped or not a close shot. Lyrische (talk) 19:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 17:58, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
non-free logos and COM:TROPHY. Maometto97 (talk) 14:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As long as the shot is not close, there is no problem. The images are in low quality and we do not look at a full-HD file that shows the details of the TROPHY/Cup. Definitely not a problem as long as these images are not cropped or not a close shot. Lyrische (talk) 19:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 17:46, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
non-free logos and COM:TROPHY. Maometto97 (talk) 14:32, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As long as the shot is not close, there is no problem. The images are in low quality and we do not look at a full-HD file that shows the details of the TROPHY/Cup. Definitely not a problem as long as these images are not cropped or not a close shot. Lyrische (talk) 19:58, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 17:59, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
.non-free logos and COM:TROPHY Maometto97 (talk) 14:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As long as the shot is not close, there is no problem. The images are in low quality and we do not look at a full-HD file that shows the details of the TROPHY/Cup. Definitely not a problem as long as these images are not cropped or not a close shot. Lyrische (talk) 19:58, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 17:59, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
.non-free logos and COM:TROPHY Maometto97 (talk) 14:35, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As long as the shot is not close, there is no problem. The images are in low quality and we do not look at a full-HD file that shows the details of the TROPHY/Cup. Definitely not a problem as long as these images are not cropped or not a close shot. Lyrische (talk) 19:59, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 18:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
.non-free logos and COM:TROPHY Maometto97 (talk) 14:36, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As long as the shot is not close, there is no problem. The images are in low quality and we do not look at a full-HD file that shows the details of the TROPHY/Cup. Definitely not a problem as long as these images are not cropped or not a close shot. Lyrische (talk) 19:59, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 18:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
COM:TROPHY Maometto97 (talk) 14:38, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As long as the shot is not close, there is no problem. The images are in low quality and we do not look at a full-HD file that shows the details of the TROPHY/Cup. Definitely not a problem as long as these images are not cropped or not a close shot. Lyrische (talk) 20:00, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 18:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
COM:TROPHY Maometto97 (talk) 14:47, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As long as the shot is not close, there is no problem. The images are in low quality and we do not look at a full-HD file that shows the details of the TROPHY/Cup. Definitely not a problem as long as these images are not cropped or not a close shot. Lyrische (talk) 20:00, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 18:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
.non-free logos and COM:TROPHY Maometto97 (talk) 14:48, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As long as the shot is not close, there is no problem. The images are in low quality and we do not look at a full-HD file that shows the details of the TROPHY/Cup. Definitely not a problem as long as these images are not cropped or not a close shot. Lyrische (talk) 20:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 18:02, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lord Belbury as Fair use (fair use). COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:00, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept, after consulting COM:TOO India I decided, that the logo is simple. Taivo (talk) 09:23, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
no photographer given Goesseln (talk) 12:02, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-EU-no author disclosure" would be the correct license for an image prior to 1953 with no author disclosed. --RAN (talk) 08:23, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} is not applicable to pre-1995 German works, and that we don't know the author does not mean that (s)he is anonymous in a legal sense anyway. --Rosenzweig τ 21:35, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Persona fuera del contexto de Commons 191.126.132.136 18:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:27, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Private e-mail Sakhalinio (talk) 09:17, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per Sakhalinio. Kadıköylü (talk) 09:20, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. per nomination. Satirdan kahraman (talk) 20:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per reason 𝗩𝗶𝗸𝗶𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗿 ℣ 20:35, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Maurice Flesier (talk) 20:38, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Anerka (talk) 21:02, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Taivo, and also this. Kind regards. Kadıköylü (talk) 18:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:19, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Copyvio| 1=https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-newspaper-printing-press-1898-99-135097900.html}} Mackle.td (talk) 20:14, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Billinghurst: Hi sorry. New webpage added, sorry, thank Mackle.td (talk) 22:34, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Db-g7}} Mackle.td (talk) 13:28, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-US-expired, the fact that Alamy is selling it does not change its status. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:13, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: Hi Can I delete this current B&W image to replace it with this image from: https://www.heatherdcurtis.com/popular-media-global-expansion/ it has the original signature and more color.Mackle.td (talk) 16 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Db-g7}} would like to pls replace with this image:https://www.heatherdcurtis.com/popular-media-global-expansion/ it includes a signature and more color Mackle.td (talk) 01:47, 17 February 2022 (UTC) {{Db-g7}} Mackle.td (talk) 20:35, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- @King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ Hi Can I delete this current B&W image to replace it with this image from: https://www.heatherdcurtis.com/popular-media-global-expansion/ it has the original signature and more color. Mackle.td (talk) 20:38, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- @King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠Please I am begging. Can I delete this image. I'm scared I messed up. I can reupload with a more appropriate version: https://collections.mcny.org/C.aspx?VP3=SearchResult_VPage&VBID=24UP1GVKG4V5&SMLS=1&RW=1432&RH=732&VP3=SearchResult_VPage&VBID=24UP1GVKG4V5&SMLS=1&RW=1432&RH=732#/SearchResult&VBID=24UP1GRA8LPCD&PN=1&WS=SearchResults Mackle.td (talk) 00:05, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Keeping. Esta parece más grande. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.116.20.130 (talk) 22:34, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- @King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠I'm really not sure if this is in the public domain. I just listed the date it was made (I don't know when it was published). Is there anyway to get this taken down. Please, I made a mistake I should have checked first. I'm so sorry. Mackle.td (talk) 22:57, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Also could this be applied? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope/Precautionary_principle Since the image was taken by the Byron Company (which is still around) and the collection is here: https://collections.mcny.org/C.aspx?VP3=SearchResult_VPage&VBID=24UP1GVKG4V5&SMLS=1&RW=1432&RH=732&VP3=SearchResult_VPage&VBID=24UP1GVKG4V5&SMLS=1&RW=1432&RH=732 which requires licensing to use the images. Mackle.td (talk) 23:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Close as Kept. No reason for deletion; disruptive multiple templates. (Clearly public domain in US, country of origin- 1898 is old enough even if not published at time.) A different version of a public domain work may be uploaded without deleting an existing version. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:25, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Copyvio |1=Although the original photo is in the public domain, this is a derivative work from here: https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-newspaper-printing-press-1898-99-135097900.html and as such copyrighted by the stock image contributor. The pd image can be used, but as you can see there are significant changes between the pd and the derivative work. https://www.heatherdcurtis.com/popular-media-global-expansion/}} Mackle.td (talk) 08:17, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
@Storkk: Your deletion is contrary to the previous admin decision. Would you please review this page and work it through with the admin as this looks like a brute force deletion request. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:13, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for bringing this to my attention. This was an obvious error on my part. I've checked the surrounding deletions in Category:Copyright violations I made, and think those were correct, so I must have selected this one by accident. Storkk (talk) 11:29, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- I've added a nowiki tag to the template to avoid transclusion and categorization. A full deletion request, upon which people can comment, supercedes a speedy deletion request except in the most obvious cases. Storkk (talk) 11:35, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Offering an image for sale does not transfer the copyright or restart the copyright clock. --RAN (talk) 02:08, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Copyvio | 1= This image is originally taken from the (and is most likely published by) the Byron Collection at the Museum of the City of New York (google ID number: MNY17174). Looking at the page it requires licensing. If the image was previously unpublished, the museum may be the publisher/copyright owner. It would be important to present or get permission from the museum before other users can use this image (also read museum's policy on rights and reproductions of image). Please reconsider this issue as situation as copyright violations not only harm Wikipedia's redistributability, but also create legal issues for others. url= https://collections.mcny.org/CS.aspx?VP3=SearchResult&VBID=24UP1GRA8LPCD&PN=1&WS=SearchResults}} Jujutacul65 (talk) 14:48, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Comment As there was already an open deletion discussion, no need to redundantly relist. Just give your comments in the ongoing discussion. Thanks. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:31, 18 February 2022 (UTC)- Keep per previous discussion; any Copyfraud (slapping a notice on something that was already copyright expired) does nothing to change the underlying PD status. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:56, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No creative alterations has been made which warrants a copyright protection in the US according to our rules on PD-art and PD-scan. This is a slavish and faithful recreation of the original work. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:54, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: as the previous two decisions. --Rosenzweig τ 23:08, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Image blurry and not of good quality; Image out of scope WikiFan (talk) 19:58, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:10, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
A collage of photos (que no es usado y nadie sabe si son libres) 191.126.132.136 00:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Agree Speedy delete I agree with the nominator. The file is of low quality and falls outside of the Wikimedia Commons scope since it does not have a realistic educational purpose and does not have much use. I am seeking to have this file removed as a courtesy deletion since there are plenty of more useful and higher quality files on the same subject that Wikimedia Commons holds that can be used instead of this file. I believe this to be a well-reasoned request for a courtesy and/or speedy deletion and am hoping an administrator can help with this request. Thank you. WikiFan (talk) 19:53, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep shows a foreskin retraction in stages, useful illustration, no valid reason to delete. Dronebogus (talk) 04:07, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete In all honesty, there are many other files on Wikimedia that are much higher quality and more scientifically detailed. If this file were to be removed, little or no information will be lost. I do still maintain that this file falls outside of Commons scope since it is not realistically purposeful. I continue to request that this file be removed as a courtesy deletion. Thanks for any help. WikiFan (talk) 20:56, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Why do you keep uploading dick pics only to ask for them to be deleted later? @Ringmaster32571: --Trade (talk) 00:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- This file was uploaded some time ago. I only ask that it be deleted as a courtesy for the reasons listed. I most definitely do not want to cause any hardships and am kindly requesting to have it removed by an administrator. WikiFan (talk) 00:31, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Could you nominate them all at once and just one at a time? @Ringmaster32571: --Trade (talk) 18:06, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Trade, yes I would prefer to have them all nominated at once and removed at the same time. However, I am not sure how to do that. I did not initiate many of the current deletion requests myself although I agree with their deletions/removal from Commons. Any suggestions for their speedy removal is most welcomed and appreciated. Thanks. WikiFan (talk) 21:52, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Could you nominate them all at once and just one at a time? @Ringmaster32571: --Trade (talk) 18:06, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused, self-requested. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:20, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
the licence in the source 4.0 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs International (only) is not allowed at WM Commons. The licence given in the Commons file is wrong. Mateus2019 (talk) 09:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:21, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
license does not match the one in the source, which states an unlawful one in terms of WM Commons lic. policy Mateus2019 (talk) 09:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:21, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
CC 4.0 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs International - as stated in the source (only) - is non-interoperable at WM Commons Mateus2019 (talk) 09:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:21, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Scanned by Albertomos - but who is the author? Copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 13:23, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep We have over 1,000 postcards with author=unknown, no need to delete it, Italy only affords 20 years of protection. --RAN (talk) 07:21, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Possible copvio: one of the picture by default on Windows XP CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:03, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
An obvious copy from https://www.linz.at/politik/stadtsenat_22514.php where it is marked as copyrighte by the original(!) photographer. Tsui (talk) 15:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:03, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
on_2009_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
_MOD_45167686.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![176 File:"Night of the Books".jpg](#File:"Night_of_the_Books".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Building_Chhattisgarh.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Raipur.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Raipur.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Itanagar.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(%E0%A4%9D%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%96%E0%A4%82%E0%A4%A1_%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%A7%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%AD%E0%A4%BE).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_building,_%E0%A4%9B%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%80%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%97%E0%A4%A2%E0%A4%BC_%E0%A4%B2%E0%A5%8B%E0%A4%95_%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BE_%E0%A4%86%E0%A4%AF%E0%A5%8B%E0%A4%97,_%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%BE_%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%AA%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%B0.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_and_Chhattisgarh_Housing_board.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E0%A4%9B%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%80%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%97%E0%A4%A2%E0%A4%BC_%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%A7%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%AD%E0%A4%BE,_%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%AA%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%B0.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2062022.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2062022.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Maharashtra_Samruddhi_Mahamarg.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Nagarghari_,_Clock_Tower_Raipur.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_2021.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_near_Satrenga,_Korba_Chhattisgarh_during_monsoon_season.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
on_2009_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
on_2009_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
on_2009_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
on_2009_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
Is this a picture of an actual building? Or is this image and its exif data artificially created?
This uploader was banned from editing the related article in the English Wikipedia yesterday due to his promotional activities. 2409:4073:10:7589:0:0:CA1:F0A0 15:36, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The uploader of this image getting blocked on any other wiki isn't a legit reason for getting this image deleted. I tried searching similar images on Google and I don't feel this image violates any copyright. The uploader claims it to be own work, and I don't see any problem with that. It serves educational purpose. ─ The Aafī (talk) 18:28, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per TheAafi. Hunc (talk) 10:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:03, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
No copyright TayfunEt. (talk) 15:41, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete F3, screenshot from a videogame. --Lord Belbury (talk) 09:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:03, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
_MOD_45167686.jpg){kind=link}
_MOD_45167686.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It does not represent what is being described in the metadata. A-68A was roughly 50km long for 200m thick. One can easily deduce that the aspect ratio of this iceberg does not match whatsoever. Maybe it's a chunk coming from it, but it is a pretty average iceberg that is roughly 1km long. 2A02:8109:8340:58E4:74EA:1583:CB4B:27E2 16:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
_MOD_45167686.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep This photo is used within Iceberg A-68 and thereby within COM:SCOPE per COM:INUSE. You are free to discuss this at Talk:Iceberg A-68 or at File talk:Iceberg A-68(a) MOD 45167686.jpg. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:50, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- BTW, this could be a photo of one of the many smaller parts that split off the original iceberg. See, for example, this satellite imagery, documenting some of the split-offs named A-68H to A-68L. Then it would be helpful to properly identify this split-off. --AFBorchert (talk) 17:41, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, obviuously. If needed, then rename. And a question: Why are we allowing IPs to initiate DRs?! They should not even be allowed to vote, for obvious reasons, why then they are allowed to create voting events? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 23:43, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, no valid reason for deletion. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:56, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
_MOD_45167686.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:22, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
_MOD_45167686.jpg){kind=link}
GoogleMaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 16:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
The photo was heavily edited. The lettering on the signs is not real. Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 18:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Fake and probably a copyright violation, COM:PCP. --Ras67 (talk) 18:12, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as shown by Ras67 this is a copyright violation. --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 07:49, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by King Arthur's Tools (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 18:35, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since) AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:22, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The cutoff for PD-Colombia is 1942, and this image of Arcesio Aragón (1872-1956) is from 1912. --RAN (talk) 00:51, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-Colombia. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Uploader's name matches image-subject but it's not a selfie, so we need clarity about permission from the actual photographer. And it's only used as part of a several-years-running and repeatedly-declined set of draft articles by this editor...either COI or non-notable/borderline-promotion at best. DMacks (talk) 19:32, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:00, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
No place on Wikipedia for amateur artwork which is not shown to be based upon serious scientific reconstructions of lifeforms. Has been removed from article and its retention would only serve to cause future misinformation Nick Moyes (talk) 20:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:59, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Created to illustrate an attack-page sandbox biography on Wikipedia, so presumably uploaded without permission. Lord Belbury (talk) 21:51, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- User has since stated on Wikipedia that ha ha it was a joke autobiography, they were insulting themselves! So speedy delete as COM:F10. --Lord Belbury (talk) 08:32, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:59, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tour Montparnasse
[edit]There is no FOP in France, see COM:FOP#France. I have selected pictures where the tour is the subject of the picture.
- File:La Tour Montparnasse - panoramio.jpg
- File:La Tour Montparnasse vue de la rue de Rennes - panoramio.jpg
- File:La Tour Montparnasse.jpg
- File:Montparnasse - panoramio.jpg
- File:Necker, Paris, France - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Necker, Paris, France - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Paris 2008 Montparnasse - Bienvenüe - panoramio.jpg
- File:Paris 2009 Montparnasse - Bienvenüe - panoramio.jpg
- File:Paris 75015 Tour Montparnasse 20111231 (02).jpg
- File:Paris Centre Commercial Maine-Montparnasse 003.JPG
- File:PARIS Montparnasse - Bienvenüe - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Paris Montparnasse - Bienvenüe - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:PARIS Montparnasse - Bienvenüe - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Paris Montparnasse - Bienvenüe - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:PARIS Montparnasse - Bienvenüe - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:PARIS Montparnasse - Bienvenüe - panoramio.jpg
- File:Paris Montparnasse - Bienvenüe - panoramio.jpg
- File:Paris Tour Montparnasse.jpg
- File:Petit-Montrouge, 75014 Paris, France - panoramio.jpg
- File:Pixel Art - Tour Montpanasse - Téléthon 2015.jpg
- File:Tour Montparnasse (6170039633).jpg
- File:Tour Montparnasse (8128925808).jpg
- File:Tour Montparnasse - panoramio.jpg
- File:Tour montparnasse 2011 - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Tour Montparnasse 2011 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Tour montparnasse 2011 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Tour montparnasse 2011, vue par la gare - panoramio.jpg
- File:Tour Montparnasse @ Paris (31226504251).jpg
- File:Tour Montparnasse icon 1.svg
- File:Tour Montparnasse.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep Hi PierreSelim, you state that you have selected pictures where the tour is the subject of the picture. Here the subject is Galeries Lafayette, the tour is/was only part of the picture. Regards Alfvanbeem (talk) 09:57, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- It is also a no FOP case ... and the Tour is also the subject (it's the title of the picture and it's the main description). --PierreSelim (talk) 18:23, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
PierreSelim (talk) 19:20, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:29, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tour Montparnasse
[edit]The building was completed in 1973 by architect Eugène Beaudouin (1898–1983), Urbain Cassan (1890–1979), Jean Saubot (1906–2002), and Louis de Hoÿm de Marien (1920–2007). Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in France. The copyright terms of France lasted for 70 years, and the images can be undeleted in 2078.
- File:Juin 2008 003.jpg
- File:Montparnasse.jpg
- File:Paris (75015) Tour Montparnasse 03.jpg
- File:Paris 75014-75015 Rue du Départ towards Tour Montparnasse 2017-12-22.jpg
- File:Paris DSC 1453 (49630640776).jpg
- File:Paris Montmartre Blick auf den Tour Montparnasse.jpg
- File:Paris Tour Montparnasse 1.jpg
- File:Rue de Renne with the Tower in Montparnasse, Paris.JPG
- File:RuedeRennes.JPG
- File:Tour Montparnasse @ Rue du Commandant René Mouchotte @ Train station @ Montparnasse @ Paris (31226510471).jpg
- File:Tour Montparnasse seen from Arc de Triomphe.jpg
- File:Tour Montparnasse1.JPG
- File:TourMontparnasse VueDeLux.jpg
- File:Vue Tour Montparnasse depuis Parc St Cloud Paris 2.jpg
- File:Панорама Парижа на закате - panoramio.jpg
_Tour_Montparnasse_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 07:36, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Given the lack of discussion, I have kept a few marginal ones that could plausibly fall under COM:DM and deleted the rest. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:09, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tour Montparnasse
[edit]COM:FOP France only allows non-commercial use; building is not yet in the public domain.
- File:Night @ Tour Montparnasse @ Montparnasse @ Paris (30106952203).jpg
- File:Parijs 2005 (2843374501).jpg
- File:Parijs 2005 (2843375103).jpg
- File:Parijs 2005 (2843375717).jpg
- File:Tour Montparnasse @ Paris (31060547566).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:22, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Request from the author and the upload the files. The files uploaded in December 2021. He s asked deletion of the files in my talk page.
- File:006 As Eyck Can - tribute to Jan van Eyck.jpg
- File:005 Rinascita - Giorgio Vasari coining the term Rinascita (‘Renaissance’ in italian) in his book The Lives of the artists.jpg
- File:004 Triptych Trinity - tribute to Michelangelo.jpg
- File:003 Leonardo checkmating the Angel of Death in the backyard of his birthplace in Anchiano, outside the center of Vinci.jpg
- File:002 Abstract’ Renaissance - Giotto Draws a red circle on wood panel in front of a flock of sheep in the nature of Tuscany.jpg
- File:002 Brunelleschi Perspective - Brunelleschi performs a linear perspective vanishing point in front of The Baptistery, Florence.jpg
- File:001 The Divine Kiss Dante and Beatrice Kissing out side a cave overlooking the island of Es Vedra, Spain.jpg
_in_his_book_The_Lives_of_the_artists.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-- Geagea (talk) 14:32, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi everyone, I made a terrible mistake by uploading that photos. This is my art, and I didn’t know about this website anything. After I have posted the images, I talked with a lawyer and he told me to delete that photos. Please, I made a mistake and I really appreciate if you can support the deleting. Best regards, Piniwikli (talk) 16:42, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per CSD#G7. Original author or uploader requests deletion of recently created unused content. -- Geagea (talk) 20:59, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality. Low resolution and blurred. Excessive noise. There are other similar images Category:Night_in_Istanbul. SCP-2000 12:52, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- @SCP-2000, It is my own work but an administrator could delete it because I agree with you. Kadıköylü (talk) 13:11, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:35, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Wrong license (must be by-nc-nd/4.0 according to the source https://archive.org/details/WolfgangMozartPianoClassics/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ These licences are only valid for media files if they are jointly licensed under another, free license, such as the GFDL (which is not done here). Mateus2019 (talk) 07:10, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:14, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
CC 4.0 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs International as stated in the source (only) is non-interoperable with WM Commons Mateus2019 (talk) 11:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:14, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
CC 4.0 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs International as stated in the source (only) is non-interoperable at WM Commons Mateus2019 (talk) 11:05, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:15, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
CC 3.0 Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works as stated in the source (only) is non-interoperable with WM Commons lic. policy. Additionally, the license does not match the one in the source (which is licence washing). Mateus2019 (talk) 11:55, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:15, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
CC 3.0 Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works as stated in the source (only) is non-interoperable with WM Commons lic. policy. Additionally, the license does not match the one in the source (which means license washing). A publication at WM Commons is unlawful under these circumstances. Mateus2019 (talk) 12:10, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:15, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Unlawful license. CC 3.0 Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works as stated in the source (only) is non-interoperable with WM Commons lic. policy. Additionally, the license does not match the one in the source (which means license washing). Mateus2019 (talk) 12:12, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:16, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Unlawful license. CC 3.0 Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works as stated in the source (only) is non-interoperable with WM Commons lic. policy. Additionally, the license does not match the one in the source (which means license washing). Mateus2019 (talk) 12:23, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:16, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Unlawful license. CC 3.0 Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works as stated in the source (only) is non-interoperable with WM Commons lic. policy. Additionally, the license does not match the one in the source (which means license washing). Mateus2019 (talk) 12:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:16, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Unlawful license. CC 3.0 Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works as stated in the source (only) is non-interoperable with WM Commons lic. policy. Additionally, the license does not match the one in the source (which means license washing). Mateus2019 (talk) 12:28, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:16, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Unlawful license. CC 3.0 Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works as stated in the source (only) is non-interoperable with WM Commons lic. policy. Additionally, the license does not match the one in the source (which means license washing). Mateus2019 (talk) 12:29, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:17, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Unlawful license. CC 3.0 Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works as stated in the source (only) is non-interoperable with WM Commons lic. policy. Additionally, the license does not match the one in the source (which means license washing). Mateus2019 (talk) 12:30, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:17, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Unlawful license. CC 3.0 Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works as stated in the source (only) is non-interoperable with WM Commons lic. policy. Additionally, the license does not match the one in the source (which means license washing). Mateus2019 (talk) 12:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:17, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Unlawful license. CC 3.0 Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works as stated in the source (only) is non-interoperable with WM Commons lic. policy. Additionally, the license does not match the one in the source (which means license washing). Mateus2019 (talk) 12:32, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:17, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Unlawful license. CC 3.0 Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works as stated in the source (only) is non-interoperable with WM Commons lic. policy. Additionally, the license does not match the one in the source (which means license washing). Mateus2019 (talk) 12:33, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:18, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Unlawful license. CC 3.0 "Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works-Brazil" as stated in the source (only) is non-interoperable with WM Commons lic. policy. Additionally, the license does not match the one in the source (which means license washing). Mateus2019 (talk) 13:41, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:17, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Unlawful license. "CC 3.0 Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works-Brazil" as stated in the source (only) is non-interoperable with WM Commons lic. policy. Additionally, the license does not match the one in the source (which means license washing). Mateus2019 (talk) 13:43, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Unlawful license. "CC 3.0 Attribution - Noncommercial - No Derivative Works - Brazil " as stated in the source (only) is non-interoperable with WM Commons lic. policy. Additionally, the license does not match the one in the source (which means license washing). Mateus2019 (talk) 13:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Chronic license-violator (or undisclosed paid editing). These are all highly promotional/stylized images of this editor's focus topic.
- File:Etibaroqlu.jpg
- File:Sananorxan.jpg
- File:Orex.jpg
- File:Orxan bayramov4.jpg
- File:Orxan bayramov2.jpg
- File:Orxan Bayramov1.jpg
DMacks (talk) 19:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 09:53, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
siline madde 6ye istinaden 94.54.60.158 19:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Fan fiction flag. Beshogur (talk) 11:03, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, hoax, such imamate does not exist. I'll delete also file:Imamate of Aqchayistan vertical flag.png due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 09:21, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
siline delet oluna 94.54.60.158 19:23, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, hoax, such imamate does not exist. Taivo (talk) 09:18, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:11, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 15:51, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
This photo is a personally identifiable image of our late daughter - Shailee Thapar. It was pointed out to us by a known person who found this photo by chance on the internet. It’s a personal photo of Shailee which she would not want in free circulation/use now after her death in 2018. Further, it’s also not of any educational use on Wikimedia Commons / platforms. On behalf of her and her close family (Mother, Father aged 80 years ) requesting your help for deletion of this photo from public domain for maintaining her privacy and avoiding any misuse of this image. Thanks, kindly help with early deletion of image. HThapar (talk) 11:05, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, auxiliarily F10. --Achim55 (talk) 12:58, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Shailee has done nothing in Commons, except userpage and uploading a selfie, which is used nowhere, except on the userpage. All her activity in Commons is out of project scope. Also I will block Shailee indefinitely, because she is dead. Taivo (talk) 08:48, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Must be used the English name of the city; see all the other subcategories of Category:Genoa. Should be moved back to Category:Paintings in the Gallery of Palazzo Rosso (Genoa) again, keeping the page's history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by N.Longo (talk • contribs) 23:02, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- I agree --User:G.dallorto (talk) 02:22, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 22:32, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:44, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Luis1944MX as Copyvio (copyvio). COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep; seems to be about the level of creativity for the first example at COM:TOO Mexico. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:41, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept, difficult decision, but in my opinion we can keep it. Taivo (talk) 08:19, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Redundant to File:AOPM Bio Pic (Cropped).png. Jonteemil (talk) 18:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
- Hi Jonteemil,
- I'm new to editing in Wiki and I uploaded some images without realizing they would become available in WikimediaCommons for public use. Can you please delete all the images I have uploaded so far? (UserID: ZenSunflower). The filenames are:
- AOPM Bio Pic (Cropped2).png (2 different versions are available for this filename.)
- AOPM Bio Pic (Cropped).png (2 different versions are available for this filename.)
- AOPM1.jpg
- 1. I am still scrambling to understand how this wiki thing works and I just now figured how to reply to you.
- 2. Is there a way for me to temporarily upload images in my Sandbox without having to making it public while I'm still trying to figure out things?
- Please help! ZenSunflower (talk) 12:08, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- @ZenSunflower: Hello! The concept of Wikimedia Commons is to host files which can be used for anyone for any purpose. You cannot upload a file only to be used on a participar page, e.g. your sandbox, all files here must allow for adaptation and free usage. If you don't agree with the terms you may request your files to be deleted.Jonteemil (talk) 00:18, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Jonteemil,
- I agree with the terms.. however, these are not the pictures I am ready to share for free usage. Could I please request to delete the pictures I have uploaded so far? I will upload some other pictures as part of my article for free usage.
- Thanks! ZenSunflower (talk) 21:14, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- I've nominated the other files for deletion as well, however there is a chance that they might be kept anyway since the licensing is irrevocable.Jonteemil (talk) 19:24, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, Jonteemil. If the nomination does get approved, how long does it take normally to get it removed? ZenSunflower (talk) 00:22, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- Instantly.Jonteemil (talk) 17:11, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you! ZenSunflower (talk) 14:07, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Instantly.Jonteemil (talk) 17:11, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, Jonteemil. If the nomination does get approved, how long does it take normally to get it removed? ZenSunflower (talk) 00:22, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- I've nominated the other files for deletion as well, however there is a chance that they might be kept anyway since the licensing is irrevocable.Jonteemil (talk) 19:24, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- @ZenSunflower: Hello! The concept of Wikimedia Commons is to host files which can be used for anyone for any purpose. You cannot upload a file only to be used on a participar page, e.g. your sandbox, all files here must allow for adaptation and free usage. If you don't agree with the terms you may request your files to be deleted.Jonteemil (talk) 00:18, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 09:53, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Contains a conspicuous watermark, and we have a version with no watermark already RAN (talk) 07:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
-2022-01-30T07:03:00.000Z-File:Sr.-Rebecca-Brenner-1926.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: But this one has the VRT permission, so this is a bit of quandary. I'll keep it and give it some template that there's a preferred version. --Rosenzweig τ 18:32, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
pour inutilité Xuvier (talk) 16:20, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Je ne comprend pas ta demande. La photo est utilisée dans l'article Caducée. --H2O(talk) 17:10, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- je comprends, mais vu que ces gens comment ils ont supprimé tout ce que j'ai écrit, cela m'a bcp dérangé. Du coup je voudrais supprimer cette image. Xuvier (talk) 09:13, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 18:39, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
aucune utilité Xuvier (talk) 19:14, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Pas un argument pour la suppression. --H2O(talk) 19:57, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Useful, per Jmh2o, and this is the same argument you used unsuccessfully in January. Do you plan on trying the same argument again in a few months? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:31, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 20:50, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
je n'ai plus besoin de cela. Xuvier (talk) 22:10, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:43, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
POur inutilité Xuvier (talk) 16:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 18:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
aucune utilité Xuvier (talk) 19:10, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep This is the third time you've nominated this for deletion for no good reason and the second time you've claimed it was useless. There's nothing useless about this street scene. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:47, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Speedy Kept: C'est utile. In scope; no valid reason for deletion. On Commons far too long to be deleted simply by uploader request without any reason. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:20, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
copyright problem. please delete this picture because there is a copyright violation. thank you 80.187.120.221 17:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Deleting would be fine. 80.187.120.221 17:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- ok 159.48.53.173 17:32, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: I don't see why this would be a copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 19:02, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
not Matt Damon, no educational value bdijkstra (overleg) 21:23, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Personal content, out of scope. GeorgHH • talk 14:32, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:13, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Own work 191.126.132.136 03:08, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: apparently taken from [4] and presumably copyrighted. We'd need a VRT permission for this, see COM:VRT. --Rosenzweig τ 15:40, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright violation; contemporary artwork; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 10:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. The painting shown is by de:Dominique Rebourgeon, who is still alive. The file can be restored 70 years pma. --Rosenzweig τ 18:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
wrong spelling and Category:Île de France exists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smiley.toerist (talk • contribs) 22:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep and use {{Catred}} instead. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:05, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: already redirected. --Rosenzweig τ 18:35, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
invalid source, sounds like a modern recording (possibly license washing) Mateus2019 (talk) 12:52, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: 1986 recording by Deutsche Grammophon; per 2011/77/EU this recording is protected until at least the end of 2056 in the EU (when the first publication was also in 2056). --Rosenzweig τ 18:24, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
invalid source ("Archiv Productions / Deutsche Grammophon"), probably a recent commercial recording Mateus2019 (talk) 12:54, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: 1986 recording by Deutsche Grammophon; per 2011/77/EU this recording is protected until at least the end of 2056 in the EU (when the first publication was also in 2056). --Rosenzweig τ 18:23, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
invalid source ("Archiv Productions / Deutsche Grammophon"), probably a recent commercial recording Mateus2019 (talk) 12:54, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: 1986 recording by Deutsche Grammophon; per 2011/77/EU this recording is protected until at least the end of 2056 in the EU (when the first publication was also in 2056). --Rosenzweig τ 18:24, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by White.lost (talk · contribs)
[edit]copyright violation; artist died in 1986 (public domain in 2056)
- File:Walter Niemann, Worpsweder Mühle.jpg
- File:Häuserruine.tif
- File:Himmel mit Bäumen.tif
- File:Steine am Wasser.tif
- File:Landschaft mit Autowrack.tif
- File:Düsterer Himmel über sumpfigem Gebiet.tif
- File:Kleines Dorf.tif
- File:Bäume im sumpfigen Morast.tif
- File:Landschaft mit Bäumen.tif
- File:Sumpfige Landschaft mit Männern.tif
- File:Landschaft mit Weg.tif
- File:Landschaft mit Burgruine.tif
- File:Mann mit Mantel.tif
- File:Gesicht mit Falten.tif
- File:Mann mit Mütze.tif
- File:Russischer Soldat.tif
- File:Russin beim Kartoffelschälen.tif
- File:Russe mit Wollmütze.tif
- File:Junge Frau mit Kopftuch.tif
- File:Krankenschwester.tif
- File:Frauengesicht.tif
- File:Boote auf der Beeke, im Hintergrund der Weyerberg.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 13:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- There is more coming. For instance, I seriously doubt that the uploader really took this photo themselves:
- Also, they now uploaded a bunch of audio files with recordings by Ursula Ziebarth who died in 2018, so anything she had the copyright for is certainly not public domain at this point. Plus a bunch of new pictures that were not included in the above list.
- Some of the uploads, like this one, are VRT tagged "This work is free", but I don't really see how that can be. --217.239.3.109 13:04, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: all files have a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 18:30, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Whatyouknowaboutrollingdowninthedeep --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:37, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:32, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
A képen látható személy 1910-ben született. A kép, állítólag 1940-es. Jól látható, hogy a képen nem egy harminc (30) éves ember látható. Ez egyértelműen látszik. A megadott forrásban nem szerepel (nem is szerepelhet), hogy 1940-ben készült (vagy akkor publikálták) a kép. A képen látható személy minimum 50 feletti. 1910+50=1960, tehát legkorábban is 1960-as képről van szó, de valószínűbb, hogy későbbi. Mivel szerzője ismeretlen, így a fénykép még nem közkincs, ezért Delete. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 08:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Math doesn't lie! --RAN (talk) 19:40, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:37, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
no source, no free license, no OTRS ticket Mateus2019 (talk) 09:10, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- The foto was taken by myself. Musicproducer (talk) 23:07, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- This is not the reason for this RfD. The reason is copyvio / unfree material. You cannot legally just upload any user manual. --Mateus2019 (talk) 01:46, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- The foto was taken by myself. Musicproducer (talk) 23:07, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, derivative work of copyrighted image. --Rosenzweig τ 19:38, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Coat_of_arms_of_Paul_Joseph_Pham_Dinh_Tung.svg Turtle-bienhoa (talk) 09:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- No "worse files" need to be deleted here. Both files can coexist. That's how it is.--NeverDoING (talk) 15:26, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 19:39, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Redundant to File:KuU-Logo.png which has less whitespace. No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 09:38, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, first attempt by same uploader (though simplay uploading a new version under the same file name would have been easier and better). --Rosenzweig τ 19:41, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Unused and non educational photo Encik Tekateki (talk) 09:59, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per es:Tao te kin apparently a notable band (for es.wp at least). --Rosenzweig τ 19:44, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. Timtrent (talk) 10:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, per [5] apparently not "own work". --Rosenzweig τ 19:46, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Small size, lacks EXIF, user has uploaded many copyvio, possibly a copyvio. C messier (talk) 10:12, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Not that small, lacking Exif is not a reason, not found on the web prior to its upload here. --Rosenzweig τ 19:49, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Probably copyright violation. "Own work"? 2021? Xocolatl (talk) 13:40, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, 1960 US book could be copyrighted. --Rosenzweig τ 19:59, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Fake album cover? Out of COM:SCOPE. Lord Belbury (talk) 14:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 20:00, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: old logo of pl:K2 Holding, which seems to be a company in scope (at least for pl.wp). --Rosenzweig τ 20:04, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since) AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:05, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Historical poster, not own work. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 03:21, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete named author es:Miguel Antonio Arroyo Arboleda died in 1966. Undelete in 2047 when it should become public domain in Colombia Abzeronow (talk) 16:45, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Table of contents / price list of a 1926 magazine, {{PD-ineligible}}. Arroyo is not the author, but the person correspondence should be addressed to. --Rosenzweig τ 20:08, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope and purpose material. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:33, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, apparently the logo of a defunct Algerian online shopping website. --Rosenzweig τ 20:16, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Trabajo propio? Imagen personal 191.126.132.136 21:40, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: apparently a board member of Wikimedia Switzerland, compare this user's other uploads (though categorization could be better). --Rosenzweig τ 20:23, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio; stock image from Alarmy https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-flamingo-walking-along-beach-33694038.html?irclickid=UKxxAzUyCxyIT5L3A2TloyoAUkGye8TBnzy%3A3U0&irgwc=1&utm_source=77643&utm_campaign=Shop%20Royalty%20Free%20at%20Alamy&utm_medium=impact and joke picture CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:25, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Own work? I don't think so... Xocolatl (talk) 13:41, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
There is an VRTS email received for “File:Schoepfungselement Erde Nikolaikirche Fuerstenberg Oder.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2022052310006589. --Nagy (talk) 18:26, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 04:25, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
geschütztes Werk Haster2 (talk) 16:33, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- The artist asked me by email on 13 January 2022 to publish this photo. Could you please help me if further steps have to be taken? Thank you. Verbum (talk) 09:30, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- There is an VRTS email received for “File:Goldminiatur Stadtpfarrkirche Altlandsberg Brandenburg von Annelie Grund.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2022052310006589. --Nagy (talk) 18:26, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 04:25, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Facebook 191.126.132.136 02:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Unknown person, out of scope, possibly copyvio from Facebok (transmission code in Exif). --Rosenzweig τ 19:39, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Profile Dr Jacob Hen-Tov.png 191.126.132.136 03:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- "Foto von englischer Webseite": "photo from English webpage". Casts doubt on own work claim. Delete all three uploaded versions per COM:PCP. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:35, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion, COM:PRP. ALso File:Profile Dr Jacob Hen-Tov.png and File:Prof Hen-Tov.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 19:37, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
This photo was initially uploaded to Planespotters.net. According to the website's Terms of Use, the photo author retains copyright to the photo. There is no indication from Bradley Bygrave, the author, that he has released the photo under a Commons-compatible licence. feminist (talk) 04:02, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:33, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 18:32, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:51, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DorisProdutions1999 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 18:47, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete NOTHOST Andy Dingley (talk) 18:52, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:50, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 00:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: The matching watermark makes it more likely that it is own work. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:25, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Flicker span of nameless people with no location. No encyclopedic value. Krok6kola (talk) 00:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Seems to be from the 2017 LGBT Pride in New York City. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 15:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep on the basis of the above comment. Krok6kola (talk) 20:25, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Files are not kept based on "Seems to be" in Commons. Suspicions are reason for precautionary deletion principle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frog informs (talk • contribs) 03:39, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- (COM:PRP applies to copyright, not accuracy of content. For that we have {{Disputed}}.) However, my reason for thinking this is the Flickr user tag the image with
new york gay prideand added this to the photo album titledGay Pride 2007which has the description Gay Pride celebrations around New York City. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:13, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: COM:PRP is not applicable to COM:SCOPE concerns. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Promotional image of a non-notable person. No educational value, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:11, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:31, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Promotional image of a non-notable person. No educational value, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:11, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:31, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Promotional image of a non-notable person. No educational value, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:11, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: F10. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:26, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:31, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Historical map without a reference. Non-reliable, non-educational. Nanahuatl (talk) 02:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - Likely copyright violation. Here is a high-resolution version, where we can finally read what is on the little logo in the bottom right, namely "History Time", a Facebook and Youtube channel. While not being exactly this file, this 2018 Facebook post indicates that History Time is the creator and thus the copyright owner of the map. --HyperGaruda (talk) 05:10, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:27, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
No evidence of ownership or permission to release under a free license. CentreLeftRight ✉ 05:10, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Found at http://redsun.org/ in 2013 by TinEye; dubious authorship claim. COM:PCP applies. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:44, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: Similar image File:Abimael_Guzmán_Sendero_Luminoso.jpg#Licensing has a message box saying that that image is in the public domain in Peru (where this photograph was originally taken) because it was created by the Shining Path, which is designated as a terrorist group in Peru. I have adjusted the licensing disclosure on the nominated file because it's clearly not "own work". aismallard (talk) 20:53, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-PCP-SL. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
No FOP in Iran. There is a big and clear and high resolution view of Chamran Hotel in this image. Rohalamin (talk) 06:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep It's just a skyline view of the city and the building doesn't occupy a big portion of it. Rizorius (talk) 06:30, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per Rizorius, de minimis. --Orijentolog (talk) 08:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Book cover, possibly photographed by the uploader, but not likely own cover art. 87.49.147.91 06:37, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:31, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not meet {{PD-PRC-exempt}}. This is not laws; regulations; resolutions, decisions and orders of state organs; other documents of legislative, administrative and judicial nature; and their official translations; SCP-2000 07:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
no valid source, no musician given, and what means "from Ravel" (deriative work?) -- one of several bad Uploads by Spencerpiers Mateus2019 (talk) 07:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- This sounds like a computer rendering of a public domain work. It seems to me that this would be public domain because the rendition doesn't meet the threshold of originality. intforce (talk) 15:52, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- The sound file was played by a computer. Spencerpiers (talk) 14:00, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-ineligible. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:29, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
no valid source, thus the licence may be fictional Mateus2019 (talk) 07:47, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- This sounds like a computer rendering of a public domain work. It seems to me that this would be public domain because the rendition doesn't meet the threshold of originality. intforce (talk) 15:53, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- The sound file was played by a computer. Spencerpiers (talk) 14:00, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Spencerpiers: your information is not helpful. What means "Source: Piano Sonata 29"? (mysterious like "the holy spirit") Who programmed the music und where does the license come from? It is all so cryptic and intransparent, so that I have started this DR. The person who programmed the music would state "own work" or "myself" but not "Piano Sonata 29" ... --Mateus2019 (talk) 15:17, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- The sound file was played by a computer. Spencerpiers (talk) 14:00, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-ineligible. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:29, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
no valid source, thus the license is probably fictional Mateus2019 (talk) 07:50, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- This sounds like a computer rendering of a public domain work. It seems to me that this would be public domain because the rendition doesn't meet the threshold of originality. intforce (talk) 15:53, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- The sound file was played by a computer. Spencerpiers (talk) 13:59, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-ineligible. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
no valid source, thus the license is probably fictional Mateus2019 (talk) 07:51, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- This sounds like a computer rendering of a public domain work. It seems to me that this would be public domain because the rendition doesn't meet the threshold of originality. intforce (talk) 15:53, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- The sound file was played by a computer. Spencerpiers (talk) 13:59, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-ineligible. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
no valid source, thus the license is probably fictional Mateus2019 (talk) 07:53, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- This sounds like a computer rendering of a public domain work. It seems to me that this would be public domain because the rendition doesn't meet the threshold of originality. intforce (talk) 15:53, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- The sound file was played by a computer. Spencerpiers (talk) 13:58, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-ineligible. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
no valid source, thus the license is probably fictional Mateus2019 (talk) 07:54, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- This sounds like a computer rendering of a public domain work. It seems to me that this would be public domain because the rendition doesn't meet the threshold of originality. intforce (talk) 15:51, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- The sound file was played by a computer. Spencerpiers (talk) 13:58, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-ineligible. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
no valid source, thus the license is probably fictional Mateus2019 (talk) 07:54, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- This sounds like a computer rendering of a public domain work. It seems to me that this would be public domain because the rendition doesn't meet the threshold of originality. intforce (talk) 15:50, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- The sound file was played by a computer. Spencerpiers (talk) 13:57, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-ineligible. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
no valid source, thus the license is probably fictional Mateus2019 (talk) 07:55, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- This sounds like a computer rendering of a public domain work. It seems to me that this would be public domain because the rendition doesn't meet the threshold of originality. intforce (talk) 15:51, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- The sound file was played by a computer. Spencerpiers (talk) 13:57, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-ineligible. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
no valid source, thus the license is probably fictional Mateus2019 (talk) 07:55, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- This sounds like a computer rendering of a public domain work. It seems to me that this would be public domain because the rendition doesn't meet the threshold of originality. intforce (talk) 15:51, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- The sound file was played by a computer. Spencerpiers (talk) 13:57, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-ineligible. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
no valid source, thus the license is probably fictional Mateus2019 (talk) 07:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- This sounds like a computer rendering of a public domain work. It seems to me that this would be public domain because the rendition doesn't meet the threshold of originality. intforce (talk) 15:52, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- The sound file was played by a computer. Spencerpiers (talk) 13:56, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-ineligible. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
no valid source, thus the license is probably fictional Mateus2019 (talk) 08:06, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- This sounds like a computer rendering of a public domain work. It seems to me that this would be public domain because the rendition doesn't meet the threshold of originality. intforce (talk) 15:52, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- The sound file was played by a computer. Spencerpiers (talk) 13:56, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-ineligible. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Small size, lacks EXIF data, possible copyvio. C messier (talk) 10:48, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:33, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Small size, lacks EXIF data, possibly copyvio. C messier (talk) 10:51, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:33, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Small size, lacks EXIF data, also here, publicity photo? Possibly copyrights violation. C messier (talk) 10:56, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:33, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright problem. Xocolatl (talk) 13:36, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PRP. Flickr link was removed, unknown copyright information. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: It is pretty clear that Flickr user = Wikimedia user. However, it seems that they did not actually understand the terms of the CC license: "It is strictly forbidden to steal Hai Bu Vape's intellectual property rights for personal or business benefit." @Haibuvape: If you want this restored, please confirm that you are aware that CC-licensed images may be used by others for commercial purposes. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:38, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
unvalid source, thus the license is out of the uploader's phantasy (unless the uploader performed the music piece). "Own work" is contested by me, because Mr. Latso a.k.a. Giorgi Lazabidse is stated as the pianist (and he is still alive). Mateus2019 (talk) 13:49, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:40, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:18, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:41, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:41, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Also File:K-Waltz.jpg.
Logo claimed as 'own work'. Unremarkable and comparatively low resolution image seemingly of a band uploaded by someone associated. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:41, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lotus logos
[edit]Logo for the British car company Lotus marked as public domain. The threshold of originality is very low for UK works, see COM:TOO UK. The logo comprises numerous graphical elements arranged distinctively. Sufficient effort (from a UK perspective) is likely to have been expended and the logo is potentially sufficiently original to qualify for copyright protection in its country of origin (the UK). For public domain works Wikimedia Commons only accepts media that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work.
mattbr 18:30, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Transferred to w:File:Lotus Cars logo.svg. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:43, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lotus logos
[edit]Likely COM:TOO UK
メイド理世 (talk) 15:00, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Might not be PD in Russia. The author died in 1958, and Russia is 70PMA. Alex Cohn (talk) 19:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
![19:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/01/30#c-Alex_Cohn-2022-01-30T19:09:00.000Z-File:"Night_of_the_Books".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2029. Unless Stepanova worked during the Second World War, then copyright is extended for four years, and the file can be restored in 2033. --Rosenzweig τ 12:55, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
![12:55, 2 June 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/01/30#c-Rosenzweig-2022-06-02T12:55:00.000Z-File:"Night_of_the_Books".jpg){kind=link}
Algunos derechos reservados C 2018 191.126.132.136 00:12, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: No evidence of permission. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:18, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 18:05, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Ethno-historical map without a reference. Non-reliable, no educational value. Nanahuatl (talk) 00:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per the precautionary principle. This does not look like an "own work" as claimed, but rather like a scan from some recent publication. --Rosenzweig τ 18:09, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by J4V13R5R3M3R (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 08:48, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:10, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:56, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:11, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:58, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:13, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:13, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:06, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:14, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:08, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:15, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:10, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:16, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:17, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:19, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Logos, diagrams and product images claimed as 'own work'. The diagrams are derivative works, incorporating seemingly stock images. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:Jvs-mairistem.jpg
- File:AOL - Niveaux de maturite - Etude de cas.jpg
- File:AOL - Niveaux de maturite.jpg
- File:AOL - Domaines de competence.jpg
- File:AdministrationOnLine Logo.jpg
- File:JVS Box 3d small.png
- File:JVS Box 3D.png
mattbr 08:54, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:42, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:30, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:19, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:20, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by K Orange Red MX (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 09:36, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:37, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 09:43, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:39, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Logos / graphics. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 09:48, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:40, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yusufalhadid (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely that uploader is creator and copyright holder of these images. They are lacking exif data, and some can be found elsewhere on the web. E.g. File:Hopwood dupree.jpg at https://hopwoodxiv.com/167-2/.
Njd-de (talk) 13:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:47, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yusufalhadid (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely that uploader is the original creator and copyright holder. Images lack exif data, and appear to be screenshots/scans w/o information about original creator and date of creator. Note e.g. the box in right corner of File:Hind2.jpg.
- File:Hind2.jpg
- File:Hopwood family tree.jpg
- File:Shaher Picture 1.jpg
- File:Barjas pic 2.jpg
- File:Barjas pic.jpg
Njd-de (talk) 13:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep File:Hopwood family tree.jpg, a family tree is not eligible for copyright unless it contains commentary. This just has facts. --RAN (talk) 08:04, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The family tree might be ok copyright-wise, but it's just an out of scope text diagram. --Rosenzweig τ 18:46, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lalkrishnan6152 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE. Unused company logo of questionable notability.
Netora (talk) 14:51, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:25, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:35, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jp slovakia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:34, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:02, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:33, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 18:36, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 18:38, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:31, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 18:40, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:31, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 18:42, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete NOTHOST Andy Dingley (talk) 18:50, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:32, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
No es trabajo propio 191.126.132.136 02:06, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio from [6]. --Rosenzweig τ 17:20, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Own work 191.126.132.136 02:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per the precautionary principle, looks like it was taken straight from either https://luiscarlosochoa.com/ or a social media account. --Rosenzweig τ 17:12, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Own work 191.126.132.136 02:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: apparently a copyvio, screenshot of a short film. --Rosenzweig τ 17:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Own work 191.126.132.136 02:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: apparently a copyvio, screenshot of a short film. --Rosenzweig τ 17:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:08, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --Rosenzweig τ 19:29, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --Rosenzweig τ 19:29, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo, not "own work", no permission Drakosh (talk) 08:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: {{PD-textlogo}}. --Rosenzweig τ 19:32, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF, just a note attributing the photo to saat24.com. Possible copyvio. C messier (talk) 11:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:37, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Small size, EXIF data indicate it is from facebook, possibly copyvio. C messier (talk) 11:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:39, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
No confirmation of free license Kamolan (talk) 12:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: derivative work of d:Q471379. --Rosenzweig τ 19:47, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
MMAnytt (the Youtube channel) are a MMA news provider. As such as they aren't the copyright holder of the footage filmed inside the cage that the sceengrab is taken from, the copyright for that would remain with the original promotion/broadcaster. FDW777 (talk) 12:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 20:30, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
файл бесполезен Мечников (talk) 13:25, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The author is named as "Antonio Barros" and apparently not identical with the uploader; no evidence for the CC0 license tag. --Rosenzweig τ 19:50, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
файл бесполезен Мечников (talk) 13:25, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The author is named as "Antonio Barros" and apparently not identical with the uploader; no evidence for the CC license tag. --Rosenzweig τ 20:24, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
файл бесполезен Мечников (talk) 13:25, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The author is named as "Antonio Barros" and apparently not identical with the uploader; no evidence for the CC license tag. --Rosenzweig τ 20:25, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
файл бесполезен Мечников (talk) 13:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio: RIA Novosti news agency photo, photographer is named in Exif as "CHESNOKOVA", no evidence for CC license tag. --Rosenzweig τ 20:27, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
unused and unnecessary combination of 2 pictures Mykhal (talk) 14:53, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. You can easily put them side by side in an article if needed. --Rosenzweig τ 20:20, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Refactor11 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:54, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
"Own work" improbable, cannot identify base map (Google?). Unused, uploaded as "example route map", of which we have hundreds already. Enyavar (talk) 16:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 20:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
POur inutilité Xuvier (talk) 16:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no description, no category, not in use. --Rosenzweig τ 20:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
POur inutilité Xuvier (talk) 16:52, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per source probable copyvio of MMORPG graphics (MapleStory). --Rosenzweig τ 20:05, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
This feels like a copyvio, but I can't find it elsewhere online prior to Wikimedia Commons. However, is it even in scope to begin with? --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:53, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I can't show that it's a copyvio, so per AGF I shouldn't claim it is. However it seems to fail COM:SELFIE Andy Dingley (talk) 17:11, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: apparently this is some kind of bodybuilder from India, not really notable however apparently. I found a few similar photos with the same guy and the same horse on Facebook that predate this one by a few weeks. --Rosenzweig τ 20:10, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Unidentified person, not clear why this would be in scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 20:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Architectural firm's visualization with logos in the corner. Doubtfully CC own work. Kissa21782 (talk) 17:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 20:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bgqurb3ub22 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Professional/media photos, unlikely to be the uploader's own work. The second file, which seems to be the same photograph as the first but different crop, has EXIF crediting Adam Scotti / PMO (Canadian Prime Minister's Office). If the uploader has permission from the photographer/copyright holder(s) to upload these files under a free license, it should be provided to COM:VRT.
- File:Anand November 2019.png
- File:2019-11-20 1 Ottawa AS-209.jpg
- File:Anand in October 2021.jpg
- File:Anita Anand October 2021.jpg
-M.nelson (talk) 17:52, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 20:17, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
not simple geometric shapes or text shizhao (talk) 02:01, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Keep, because really it is simple text. Rodney Araujo (talk) 02:07, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 18:36, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Possibly above COM:TOO South Korea --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:54, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Possibly, or possibly not. Until some court decision or other convincing legal document concerning this logo shows up, I'll keep it. --Rosenzweig τ 20:34, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Westwing11 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 16:18, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:58, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
COM:OOS. Artwork with tiny resolution and unidentifiable subject. If it is not possible to tell what a file is supposed to represent, then it isn't educationally useful. 46.132.186.82 13:45, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Apparently it's supposed to be a miniature version of File:1000-PT Class.png, but that tiny and in JPG format that won't work. --Rosenzweig τ 23:56, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by user:Abrogs
[edit]Abrogs (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- File:Admins.png
- File:Events (2).png
- File:Events Dark Nations.png
- File:No Current Events.png
- File:Creative.png
- File:The Dark Nations Server.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Trivially simple promotional banners for their Minecraft server. Nothing here for COM:SCOPE, and COM:NOTWEBHOST applies. --Andy Dingley (talk) 13:48, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Also including File:AdminsDarkNations.png and File:Buisness Room.png. --Rosenzweig τ 23:53, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
è sbagliato, non è questo il principio di funzionamento dell'angolo diedro. 93.66.50.65 15:17, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also accd. to file talk page the diagram was "plain wrong". --Rosenzweig τ 23:51, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Hoax. Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. There are no sources for the content presented on the map. PawełMM (talk) 17:56, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:40, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by LMLM as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Verbcatcher (talk) 19:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete,
the 'no source' is invalid because this is claimed to be a photograph taken by the uploader. The location is indicated by "Iglesia María Auxiliadora, Ourense", indicating that the photo was taken in this church in Spain. However, there may be a problem because this photograph is a derivative work of the depicted artwork. The artwork looks too modern to be public domain. Freedom of panorama does not apply inside buildings in Spain. To keep this we would need to to identify the sculptor, and either establish that they died more than 70 years ago (see COM:SPAIN) or obtain permission from them or their descendants. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:28, 30 January 2022 (UTC)- Or we could establish that the artwork is sufficiently old to be assumed to be public domain: for 'Life + 70 years' jurisdictions we usually require 120 years. This artwork could be that old, but it may date from the opening of the church in 1954 (see w:es:Parroquia de María Auxiliadora (Orense)). Verbcatcher (talk) 19:41, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. The sculptor of the depicted artwork is w:es:Xosé Cid Menor [7] and he is alive. The sculpture is dated in 2010 and it is inside the church [8] so FOP does not apply. LMLM (talk) 21:36, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Or we could establish that the artwork is sufficiently old to be assumed to be public domain: for 'Life + 70 years' jurisdictions we usually require 120 years. This artwork could be that old, but it may date from the opening of the church in 1954 (see w:es:Parroquia de María Auxiliadora (Orense)). Verbcatcher (talk) 19:41, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per LMLM, artist still alive, no FOP inside building. --Rosenzweig τ 23:43, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Picture of a non-Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 19:42, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not a notable person, out of scope. --Rosenzweig τ 23:46, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Very small size, no EXIF, a higher resolution, but latter photo photo exists here. Possible copyvio. C messier (talk) 11:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per the precautionary principle. Small version is at [9] (larger, but also later), middle version is at [10] from 2012 and "all rights reserved". --Rosenzweig τ 19:53, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE photo of a non-notable individual (ro:Ionut mircioaga) Gikü (talk) 23:18, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:42, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate of a higher quality image File:Кёне - Башенная корона о трех зубцах серебряная.svg. Both images are mine. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 19:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:04, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 00:33, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: for now. While this user uploaded several copyvios and this file looks a bit like a video screenshot, I couldn't find direct any copyvio evidence for any of the uploads by this user showing actual life dogs. So I'll keep it. If someone has evidence that this is a copyvio, please nominate the file for deletion again. --Rosenzweig τ 17:29, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low quality (Flickr-mass-upload, there are lots of similar images) Xocolatl (talk) 14:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- KeepFirst being a mass upload or one upload is irrelevant and Commons does not have a celing in the number of images of the same event or institution. Good quality image )better than several images uploaded by the deletion request like File:AIMG 0554 (2) Eberdingen um 1954.JPG and File:AIMG 0554 (2) Eberdingen um 1954.JPG) of an event by the french École Polytechnique, one of the most prestigious and selective grandes écoles in France. Tm (talk) 14:40, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
_Eberdingen_um_1954.JPG){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 17:21, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
En France, il n'est pas légal de publier la photo de la tombe d'un enfant ainsi que sa photo (posée sur la tombe) sans aucune autorisation de sa famille... Jean-Paul Corlin (talk) 20:43, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no freedom of panorama in France. --Rosenzweig τ 17:19, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
See the watermark "Photography by Airwane.com". No proof this photographer/agency gave their permission for it to be free. Furthermore, this picture was already published on Facebook in September 2018 (before the date of upload, which was December 2018): https://www.facebook.com/mincongo/photos/pcb.10156592625358618/10156592623998618/ Titlutin (talk) 20:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:44, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chema Escuer (talk · contribs)
[edit]certainly not own work given previous copyright violations regarding images of public figures and events; couldn't find the source of these images however
- File:Noemí Galera Nebot.jpg
- File:Sara Fernández Escuer (Zaragoza).jpg
- File:Collage atentado en Zaragoza del 11 de diciembre de 1987.jpg
- File:Fiestas de Bagüés 2015.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Polarlys (talk) 22:02, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. File:Fiestas de Bagüés 2015.jpg has Facebook metadata, and I found one of the collage images here on Facebook as well (in B&W though, so apparently it was colorized too). --Rosenzweig τ 19:41, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low quality - Flickr-upload Xocolatl (talk) 14:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete OOS Dronebogus (talk) 09:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: not "low quality", but intentionally focused on the background. --Rosenzweig τ 01:08, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Highly-possible copyvio since no proof of author and source Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 19:25, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Is that really public domain? It seems like made with some specific font (looks like handwriting). Can you (or someone else) proove that this is common style of Cirilic letters? --Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 11:20, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 01:29, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since) with comment "Historical document". Based on , these appear to be scans of founding documents for a football club formed in 1957. Even if we assumed this was anonymous, it wouldn't be PD in Greece until after 2027. The signatories may be considered authors, in which case copyright would run until 70 years from the death of the last surviving author. I can't read the documents to be able to find out more.
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:32, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 01:11, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
A megadott dátum szerint a képen látható személy 32 éves. Jól látható, hogy ezen a képen egy 32 évesnél jóval idősebb ember szerepel, így bizonyosra vehető, hogy a kép se nem készült 1940-ben, se nem publikálták akkor. A megadott forrásban nem szerepel, hogy ki a szerzője, sem az, hogy mikor készült a kép, sem az, mikor hozták nyilvánosságra. A forrás alapján nem kizárt az 1999-es publikálás sem. A kép jogi helyzete aggályos, ezért Delete. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 16:06, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 17:54, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
GSI Maps aerial shots do not appear to be public domain, a translation of the about page says "Copyright. Geospatial Information Authority of Japan. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED." Lord Belbury (talk) 10:32, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Uploader has now added the {{AerialPhotograph-mlitJP}} template to this image, so perhaps all rights aren't reserved after all. --Lord Belbury (talk) 10:53, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: we have multiple other images from that source with that license tag, so either they're ok or we would need to nominate them all for deletion. I'll go with the former. --Rosenzweig τ 07:36, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
license in the Commons file is fictional, it is either a screenshot or a photograph off a monitor, the uploader tells us "Bildschirmanzeige" and it is diplayed in the Animation in Rungehaus Wolgast. This graphic is not from Runge and a artist's impression from modern times. The uploader also states "Dr.-Ing. S.Wetzel" as the author. Overall, it seems to be a self-service of a computer artwork. His okay is not stated, unless the uploader is the same guy (which we don't know). Mateus2019 (talk) 09:39, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:42, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
"Date = 1951. január 3." Ha 1951-es a kép, akkor hogyan hozhatták nyilvánosságra 1943-ban vagy az előtt? Az egészen biztos, hogy nem 1943 előtt készült a kép, mivel jól láthatóan nem egy 40 éves ember van a képen. Az 1951-es dátum valamivel valószínűbb, de sajnos erre sincsen semmilyen forrás. A megadott forrás alapján még az is előfordulhat, hogy valójában csak 1999-ben publikálták a képet, hiszen a megadott forrás addig foglalkozik a benne lévő adatokkal. A kép jogtisztasága erősen kétséges, így Delete. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 07:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:53, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Direction de la formation humaine et militaire de l'Ecole polytechnique (40315425364).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low quality. Xocolatl (talk) 14:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Why would you upload this. Dronebogus (talk) 18:14, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, blurryness does not seem intentional here. --Rosenzweig τ 11:56, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Geschütztes Werk Haster2 (talk) 16:33, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. To host this file, a VRT permission like the one for File:Schoepfungselement Erde Nikolaikirche Fuerstenberg Oder.jpg (showing a work by the same artist) would be needed. --Rosenzweig τ 12:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
A feltöltő szerint 1936-os a fénykép nyilvánosságra hozatalának dátuma, de a megadott forrás alapján még az is előfordulhat, hogy valójában csak 1999-ben publikálták a képet, hiszen a megadott forrás addig foglalkozik a benne lévő adatokkal. Az egészen biztos, hogy a képen látható ember nem 38 éves, márpedig Kukán Ferenc 1898-ban született. A kép jogtisztasága erősen kétséges, így Delete. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 10:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep This one actually looks like the image of a 38 year old man, so the date appears to be correct. The other examples you have brought to deletion were marked as "before 1940" with no exact date, and were clearly created after 1940. "Published" in international copyright law, means made available to the public, not just appearing in a book, magazine, or newspaper. When a photographer makes a print from their original negative and the sitter pays for that copy and brings it home, a tangible copy has changed hands from the creator to the public. --RAN (talk) 23:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- "Published" in international copyright law, means made available to the public, not just appearing in a book, magazine, or newspaper. When a photographer makes a print from their original negative and the sitter pays for that copy and brings it home, a tangible copy has changed hands from the creator to the public. -- Ez nagyon nem így van. Ha így lenne, akkor minden, fotós által készített fénykép nyilvánosságra hozott volna. Nem tudom, honnan szeded ezt az állítást, de ez nem valós. Logikailag sem állja meg a helyét. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 07:29, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- If a photographer retains a photo and only shows it his family members, or close friends, it remains unpublished. Once a discernable copy changes hands it is published. Published=available to the public. There is good case law on images that remained with the photographer as photographic negatives or as a contact sheet, and the copyright clock did not start on them. For instance Corbis/Getty Images buys photo negative collections directly from photographers and newspaper photo morgues that have never been distributed and remain under copyright, even though some images in the series have been published. Unlike photos, a painting hanging on the wall in a museum, may never have a copy made, so we go by the 70 years after death rule. --RAN (talk) 08:16, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Once a discernable copy changes hands it is published. Published=available to the public. – Ha egy magánszemély átvesz egy fotót, amit róla készítettek az sehogyan sem minősülhet nyilvánosságra hozatalnak, hiszen magánszemély, pont ez a lényeg. Magánszemély =/= nyilvánosság. Ha a magánszemély valahol közzéteszi, onnantól van nyilvánosságra hozva. Attól, hogy egy fotó gazdát cserél, nem lesz jól látható senki más által, csak azoknak, akik átadják-átveszik egymástól a képet, hiszen csak a fotós és a lefényképezett (illetve az, aki a képet átveszi, ha van ilyen) láthatja.
Egyébként sem érvényes minden nemzetközi jog minden országban, az adott ország saját törvényeit is figyelembe kell venni. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 08:50, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. I don't see where the oddly very precise 1936 date given in the file description comes from, and I won't keep it because someone thinks that the photo "actually looks like the image of a 38 year old man". Nor, for the record, do I buy into the theory that a photographic print made from a negative for a single customer already constitutes "publication". --Rosenzweig τ 15:30, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Kurdistan 24
[edit]Logos for the Iraq-based television network en:Kurdistan 24 claimed as 'own work' (by different uploaders). There is no guidance as to whether the work could be considered to be in the public domain in the source country at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Iraq and the logos would be considered sufficiently original in some jurisdictions (particularly File:Kurdistan24.png with the background). Without suitable guidance the images should be deleted according to the precautionary principle.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
mattbr 16:51, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --Rosenzweig τ 18:34, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Redundant to File:K8 logo.png which has VRT permission. No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 17:06, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Almost-duplicate of File:K8 logo.png (only different background color), file format JPG is less well suited for graphics than PNG. --Rosenzweig τ 18:38, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Is this the logo of Wall's ice cream (Langnese) not fairly used? Tepofut (talk) 17:39, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: not as I see it; no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 18:39, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Logo claimed as CC but missing VRT permission. Likely to be above COM:TOO US due to the combination of gradients, 3D effects, embellishment of the letters and the rectangle containing 'racing' and varying width black bars, and the modified letter 'X'. mattbr 10:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Looking through the examples at COM:USA#Threshold of originality, I'm not sure which side of the threshold this one is, so I'll delete it per the precautionary principle. --Rosenzweig τ 20:16, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Rodelar as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyright violation: https://www.pozadelasal.es/. As the file is heavily used, I allow discussion for a week. Taivo (talk) 10:32, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- I think it is not the same image or the same format as the coa of the source site. It should not be deleted, in my opinion. Lopezsuarez (talk) 11:25, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Regardless of the use, which is somewhat modifiable, it presents a license incompatible with Commons. --Rodelar (talk) 12:23, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The graphics match that from the municipal website, and {{PD-SpanishGov}} apparently does not cover coats of arms. --Rosenzweig τ 20:09, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Rodelar as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyright violation: https://www.pozadelasal.es/. I allow discussion for a week. Taivo (talk) 10:33, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- It presents a license incompatible with Commons. --Rodelar (talk) 12:24, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The graphics match that from the municipal website, and {{PD-SpanishGov}} apparently does not cover coats of arms. --Rosenzweig τ 20:10, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Rodelar as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyright violation: https://www.pozadelasal.es/. I do not find the image on source site and the file is heavily used, so I allow discussion. Taivo (talk) 10:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- I haven't found the image on the source site either. I think this should not be deleted. Lopezsuarez (talk) 11:22, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Regardless of the use, which is somewhat modifiable, the CoA presents a license incompatible with Commons. --Rodelar (talk) 12:23, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The graphics match that from the municipal website, and {{PD-SpanishGov}} apparently does not cover coats of arms. --Rosenzweig τ 20:10, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: a bigger picture is avaialble on the web and in the website of the Maharishi University and the compiter is one of Apple CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Taken from an old version of the university web site (compare [11]), so we'd need a COM:VRT permission to keep this file, even if it was uploaded by a user named Muit. --Rosenzweig τ 22:14, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
First published in Japan in 1967 and unlikely to have been republished in the US, {{PD-Japan-organization}} after 2017, but non-free in the US due to the URAA until 2063. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:55, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Quote from Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Japan: "The work may be protected by copyright under U.S. laws because its copyright in the U.S. was restored by the URAA. However, the current policy on Commons is to accept it. This policy may change in the future, depending on the outcome of community discussions. Also, it may be deleted if Commons receive a valid takedown notice." Andriy.v (talk) 01:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I don't think that the above quote aligns with current practice (and COM:URAA), which is that files copyrighted in the US due to the URAA are ineligible for Commons. -M.nelson (talk) 21:28, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:54, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Certainly not an own work, the photo dates from the 1930s or 1940s. Here is the full photo [12], which is also signed, so it is possible that it isn't in public domain yet. C messier (talk) 11:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- The picture comes from the personal archive of Eleni Coutsoudis - Iolas who is Alexander Iolas's niece (daughter of his brother, Dimitris Coutsoudis). She has personally e-mailed it to me in order to replace the picture shown before and I did so following her request. The picture also appears in her book (Coutsoudis – Iolas, Eleni (2021). My Uncle Alexander Iolas The Man Behind the Myth. Publications Minoas S.A. Athens. page 140) as well as in several interviews of the author (https://www.mononews.gr/agores/interviews/eleni-koutsoudi-iola-o-iolas-den-chorouse-sto-kadro-tis-ikogenias & https://esquire.com.gr/culture/biblia/18475/o-alexandros-iolas-piso-apo-tin-axlu-tou-fantaxterou-muthou-tou). It is her personal wish to used this picture because she feels it better suits Iolas's personality. Cbertsis (talk) 12:10, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Cbertsis: we need more information about the photo. When was the photo created? It wasn't in 2022, as Iolas died in 1987. Who was the photographer? It will be very helpfull if Eleni Coutsoudis - Iolas can provide us these informations. --C messier (talk) 14:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- According to his Ms Coutsoudis-Iolas, this picture was taken at a photo studio in Egypt, around 1935. Therefore, given that he was born in 1908, in the picture he is 27 y.o. Cbertsis (talk) 09:35, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Cbertsis: we need more information about the photo. When was the photo created? It wasn't in 2022, as Iolas died in 1987. Who was the photographer? It will be very helpfull if Eleni Coutsoudis - Iolas can provide us these informations. --C messier (talk) 14:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Excellent detective work finding the higher quality version, autographed. The image needs to be taken before 1953 to qualify for "PD-EU-no author disclosure". Are there any clues to the date? He was born in 1908 so does he look younger than 45 years old? He looks about age 30 to me. --RAN (talk) 07:40, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- I found the photo that was cropped to provide the uploaded version here, but doesn't provide any evidence about the date of the photograph. He looks be in his 20s, so maybe it is from 1930s (old enough for PD to be a possibility). --C messier (talk) 13:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per above. --Achim55 (talk) 09:55, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Accd. to the discussion, this was taken ca. 1935 in Egypt by a local photography studio, so I don't see why the prematurely inserted {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} tag should apply, regardless if the portrayed person was Greek, Egyptian or Chinese. Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Egypt offers a variety of possibilities how a ca. 1935 photograph could be in the public domain by now, but they all require either a named author plus said author's death date more than 50 years ago or anonymous/posthumous publication and a publication date more than 50 years ago. We are given neither of those things though (and no, I don't buy into the theory that a photographic print made from a negative for a single customer already constitutes "publication".) So the only way I see, with the information we currently have, is to delete the file and restore it in ca. 2036 with {{PD-old-assumed}} (a term of 100 years because Egypt has 50 years pma, not 70). --Rosenzweig τ 00:28, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. Undelete in 2036 .. --Ellywa (talk) 22:53, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
