Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/01/17

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 17th, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:14, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per comment - If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:35, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:46, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:16, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:16, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:16, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:51, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered; false claim, as in use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:19, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:19, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, per above; inappropriate renomination. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The 'French Infantry Command' is not a thing Coldstreamer20 (talk) 17:07, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep INUSE and no valid reason for deletion. Taylor 49 (talk) 20:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 06:15, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:19, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:19, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:09, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:19, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:08, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:08, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. In use in multiple projects. Inappropriate renomination. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:22, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Who is Arthur Discretion, and do you plan on requesting deletion again in a few months when your request is shot down again? It looks to me like you are requesting the deletion of every image you uploaded. Why do you think that's fine to do? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:22, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:08, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep In use on en.wikipedia. Can you give a substantive reason why it would serve the cause of knowledge to delete this diagram? Also, why are you nominating it again after having given another non-explanatory reason (see above) in January that was shot down? Will you nominate it for deletion again early next year? -- Ikan Kekek (talk)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:08, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:56, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:08, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:08, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:09, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:24, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:24, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:24, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:24, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:26, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:26, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:26, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:28, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:27, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:28, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:09, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:18, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File is in use. w:Alaska Defense Command -- Mjchael (talk) 01:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy kept, per above, in use, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; shows work by living artists. Martin Sg. (talk) 12:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no copyright violation because the shown photo is our very own work! 2003:D4:7F0E:6A01:A8D0:7B8D:A6C7:76D9 13:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Is the photographer is also the painter and copyright holder of the frog artwork? If not, this is derivative work, and would need explicit permission from the artist/copyright holder or it is a copyright violation. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 18:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture is not up to date and of no good quality Wildlife Sculptor (talk) 16:16, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: In use on de:wp. --Achim55 (talk) 16:31, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy kept, in use, was subject of deletion discussion earlier this month -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:14, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from tp --Achim55 (talk) 17:37, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{schnell löschen|File is of pure quality and is not longer needed. It is my own copyright! Wildlife Sculpture}} --Wildlife Sculptor (talk) 14:17, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leider nicht schnelllöschfähig, weil das Foto derzeit verwendet wird und der Upload mehr als 7 Tage her ist. --Achim55 (talk) 14:48, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Achim55,
Zur Abbildung ist leider festzustellen, dass es sich anders verhält:
Es handelt sich um eine Fotomontage mit eingefügten Elementen (Person).
Wir sind, leider unbedarft, davon ausgegangen, weil wir das Bild bearbeitet haben, haben wir demnach auch das Copyright. Das ist leider nicht so, da das ursprüngliche Bild doch jemand anderes gemacht hat. Es muss daher gelöscht werden.
Wildlife Sculptor --Wildlife Sculptor (talk) 14:30, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ich habe das noch mal gründlich recherchiert.
Das gesamte Bild ist doch von einer anderen Person fotografiert worden und von uns auch nicht nachträglich bearbeitet worden. Demnach haben wir auch nicht das ::Copyright. Von daher bitte umgehend löschen!
Danke Wildlife Sculptor --Wildlife Sculptor (talk) 17:40, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: DW, author unknown, unclear copyright situation, lack of permission. Please recheck ticket:2022011710009087. --Achim55 (talk) 17:46, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Achim,
why is the picture still there and not deleted?
Weshalb ist das Bild nach der nun langen Zeit noch immer nicht gelöscht?
Wildlife Sculptor --2003:D4:7F48:4201:E938:A2DA:3A34:4344 13:07, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
See above, permission ticket sent and received ticket:2022011710009087 Can someone review it please? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:15, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The permission (in German) appears valid for the painting on the photo. And "Wildlife Sculptor" claims he owns the copyright. Too late for a deletion per COM:COURTESY, certainly because the subjects on the photo agree, so no personality rights problems or privacy problems. --Ellywa (talk) 12:05, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

vayase a la mierda, pendejo, a la verga Nicolás Orona (talk) 17:18, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: (non-admin closure) due to the vandalistic nature of the nomination.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license is not compatible with the stated license. I incorrectly thought it was CC-BY, but it is not. Could this please be deleted, or are the steps I can do to do so. Apologies for the inconvenience!! Andrawaag (talk) 19:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ciell at 19:56, 17 January 2022 UTC: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7): Commons:Deletion requests/File:Didemnum vexillum Kott, 2002 3400422529.jpg: The license is not compatible with the stated license. I incorrectly thought it was CC-BY, but it is not. Could this please be deleted, or are the steps I can do to do so. Apologies for the inconvenience!! --Krdbot 02:15, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque no me gustan esas pendejadas Nicolás Orona (talk) 00:15, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

caguense culeros pendejos de mierda Nicolás Orona (talk) 17:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 08:18, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque é Um autorretrato Rui T. Pinto (talk) 16:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no - it's not. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:13, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque é Sem sentido Rui T. Pinto (talk) 16:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no, it's not. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:15, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
 Delete: A collage image with the face of (いないいないばぁっ!のワンワン) pasted on the photo of Mt. Kiribayama . Please delete it now!

Deleted: Vandalism G3, user blocked for abusing multiple accounts. --Achim55 (talk) 21:33, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
 Delete:

A collage image in which the face of Prime Minister (Fumio Kishida) is changed to the face of (タイゾウ) of(ゴーゴー!キッチン戦隊クックルン). Since it is an image of the problem that appeared on the net and became a net news article, please delete it as soon as possible.


Deleted: Vandalism G3, user blocked for abusing multiple accounts. --Achim55 (talk) 21:34, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Standort Köln existiert nicht mehr, daher die Fotos bitte löschen. Lea Jacobi (talk) 14:46, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep as uploader: No valid reason for deletion. The building is a listed cultural heritage monument. Raymond 16:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Raymond, also for historical reasons. --Leyo 01:35, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Standort Köln existiert nicht mehr, daher bitte die Fotos löschen. Lea Jacobi (talk) 14:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep as uploader: No valid reason for deletion. The building is a listed cultural heritage monument. Raymond 16:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Raymond, also for historical reasons. --Leyo 01:36, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry this picture is not interesting for an encyclopedia Mizzinno (talk) 01:09, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Polarlys at 20:34, 18 January 2022 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 02:13, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image - SM Entertainment Evaders99 (talk) 21:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation. --plicit 04:41, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lack of permission Cheep (talk) 11:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Herbythyme at 16:53, 19 January 2022 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 20:29, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Likely promotion ⁂๖ۣۜJon ๖ۣۜDaenerys໖ 01:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree  Delete The motif has a lack of significance. Future use is unlikely. Probably advertising. -- Mjchael (talk) 02:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Almost G10. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:21, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. Likely promotion ⁂๖ۣۜJon ๖ۣۜDaenerys໖ 01:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree  Delete The motif has a lack of significance. Future use is unlikely. Probably advertising. -- Mjchael (talk) 02:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely promotion ⁂๖ۣۜJon ๖ۣۜDaenerys໖ 01:28, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree  Speedy delete Seems to be a screenshot. Clear copyright violation. Own work is implausible. -- Mjchael (talk) 02:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PT TB (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely promotion or advertisement.

⁂๖ۣۜJon ๖ۣۜDaenerys໖ 01:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree  Delete Pure advertising. -- Mjchael (talk) 02:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete as copyright violations dating back to months/years before upload. Note that these images do not constitute promotion per se, so I would not delete for that reason. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:29, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not all are promotion, but the most . furthermore: The pictures without logos have no special message, so that future use is unlikely. -- Mjchael (talk) 23:48, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nguyenlka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files created with advertisement purpose.

⁂๖ۣۜJon ๖ۣۜDaenerys໖ 02:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree  Delete Pure advertising. -- Mjchael (talk) 02:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely delete the first seven as promotion/OOS. Not fully sure about the last two yet, since they appear to be generally in scope but may not have adequate permission from the author (as spam uploads tend to do). 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:34, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Agree  Speedy delete Clear copyright violation. I looked at all the pictures again. They all have a winery as their theme. The photos are most likely from a website and copyrighted. I am a sign maker and I would be badly mistaken if it were otherwise. Own work is implausible. -- Mjchael (talk) 00:02, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Viviandavie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files created with advertisement purpose.

⁂๖ۣۜJon ๖ۣۜDaenerys໖ 02:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree  Speedy delete Clear copyright violation. Own work is implausible. Pure advertising. -- Mjchael (talk) 02:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete G10. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:35, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Likely promotion ⁂๖ۣۜJon ๖ۣۜDaenerys໖ 02:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree  Delete Pure advertising. (See url top left. -- Mjchael (talk) 02:36, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: Promotional and derivative of potentially non-free art. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:36, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hadsg1107 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files created with advertisement purpose.

⁂๖ۣۜJon ๖ۣۜDaenerys໖ 02:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree  Speedy delete Clear copyright violation. Screenshot. Own work is implausible. -- Mjchael (talk) 02:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: Copyvio and no apparent educational value either. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:37, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Photo courtesy of Vanessa Fajardo." Insufficient permission, photographer needs grant permission via COM:VRT. P 1 9 9   02:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:29, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright holder, Maria Cerda, did not authorize this upload or its use in the public domain. Beyawnd8 (talk) 03:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom & EXIF. --Achim55 (talk) 10:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:29, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:29, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:29, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete While under TOO depending on the jurisdiction, this definitely does not seem to have any educational use. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:14, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:29, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:29, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:29, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BIGGUYGAMERS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

fantasy/alternative reality maps. Out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 11:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per Nom. --Jahobr (talk) 21:49, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:43, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete; see also similar uploads on enwiki now at FfD. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:44, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 13:18, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:FOP US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:51, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 13:18, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:FOP US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 13:18, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:FOP US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 13:19, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:FOP US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 13:20, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:FOP US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 13:20, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:FOP US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 13:20, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:FOP Ireland. Doesn't apply to 2D text. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:56, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 13:20, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see Commons:FOP Sri Lanka. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: No evidence that copyright has expired and no freedom of panorama. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:12, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 13:21, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 13:21, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ali andalousi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work. No EXIF, all files available on-line on various sources.

Smooth O (talk) 09:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:26, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MissGala (talk · contribs)

[edit]

taken from https://www.i24news.tv/en/profiles - needs OTRS

Gbawden (talk) 11:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Laferg69 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Laferg69 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Art without COM:OTRS permission of artist/s or heirs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook 191.126.139.8 01:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The image is in use in a WMF project. --Érico (talk) 12:42, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook 191.126.139.8 01:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The image is in use in a WMF project. --Érico (talk) 12:43, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook 191.126.139.8 01:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The image is in use in a WMF project. --Érico (talk) 12:43, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook 191.126.139.8 01:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The image is in use in a WMF project. --Érico (talk) 12:43, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook 191.126.139.8 01:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The image is in use in a WMF project. --Érico (talk) 12:43, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook 191.126.139.8 01:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree  Delete Unused file. The motif has a lack of significance. Private photo. No persons of public interest. -- Mjchael (talk) 02:28, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: Out of scope; Commons is not a private photo album. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:24, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 12:44, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: low-resolution portrait without further context. If person is actually famous, there's already a better picture on Commons. Unused. Enyavar (talk) 10:51, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 12:44, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: low-resolution portrait without further context. If person is actually famous, there's already a better picture on Commons. Unused. Enyavar (talk) 10:51, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 12:44, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictional flag of Siberia Enyavar (talk) 10:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 12:44, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Jan Myšák (talk) 12:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 12:45, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I agree with Minorax; hardly imaginable that this should have encyclopedic value. --Mosbatho (talk) 22:24, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 12:50, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 12:51, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 12:51, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 12:51, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RMFotoSucre (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 12:51, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One of the OH groups is attached incorrectly. The original uploader has already corrected the image, but gave it a different file name (File:Omethylxerocomic acid corrected.tif). This now-unused incorrect version is no longer needed. Marbletan (talk) 18:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 21:40, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falscher Titel! Der Standort Wielandsdorf war an einem anderem Ort. Korrekte Fotos werden in den nächsten Tagen hoch geladen. Naoag (talk) 20:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Noch besser wäre es, das Bild zu belassen und den Titel auf "Rohrwald Waldweg.jpg" umzubenennen. Naoag (talk) 18:45, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Löschantrag nicht mehr notwendig! Datei wurde umbenannt. Naoag (talk) 08:43, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can be easily solved by renaming. Don't nominate such files! - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 13:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

kept - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 13:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope: Fictional outline of a restored "Greater Tibet". No further context given, probably entirely fictional and without background in reality Enyavar (talk) 10:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:53, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lorivi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo and promotional catalogue-type images claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 21:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The images are in scope (they are decent images of polo shirts which could be used edcationally), however doubful copyright status per COM:PRP. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:58, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Redqueenad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NOTHOST/COM:ADVERT - unused, non-notable person apparently uploaded for promotional purposes (uploader redqueenad is an advertising agency/"social media advertising firm") - also likely copyvio (appears part of this set)

Эlcobbola talk 15:16, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:21, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Redqueenad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Instagram selfies (eg. https://www.instagram.com/p/CX8njGFBWpl) of three different people, uploaded as the own work of a single uploader.

Lord Belbury (talk) 15:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:40, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Saved PDF version of a Wikipedia draft article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Aarzoo_dahiya) which would be rejected and deleted if ever reviewed. Out of COM:SCOPE for commons. Embedded picture appears to be an Instagram copyvio, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Redqueenad, the uploader has uploaded Instagram selfies of two different people as their "own work". Lord Belbury (talk) 15:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Embedded image has since been deleted from commons. --Lord Belbury (talk) 08:54, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:17, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Pressefoto" does not mean "Creative Commons" license. 91.34.42.45 07:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: No evidence of permission from the photographer of the press photo. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:13, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:51, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:51, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wndrboy86 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:Derivative works, copyrighted packaging. See COM:PACKAGING AND COM:TOYS.

MKFI (talk) 10:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:22, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

film screenshot under copyright law, needs OTRS permission Caulfield (talk) 17:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derechos de autor 191.126.139.8 01:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete Clear copyright violation. Own work is implausible. Seem to be a screenshot. -- Mjchael (talk) 02:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Copyvio: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/othersports/article-3773626/Rio-2016-Paralympics-watch-summer-s-Games.html. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per above. -- CptViraj (talk) 17:30, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. No educational use. Hulged (talk) 07:56, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete: F10. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:15, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 17:33, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. No educational use. Hulged (talk) 07:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete: F10. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:15, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 17:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Userpage that didn't edit by other users, in order to cooperate my user page with metawiki. To Japanese sysop; ローカルページを、Metawikiと連携させたいため、全般8で即時削除をお願いします。 Sethemhat (talk) 13:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User request within own userspace. -- CptViraj (talk) 17:36, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Omega45 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 17:42, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Omega45 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

complex logos. might exceed COM:TOO.

RZuo (talk) 00:02, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:40, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Copyright 2021. All rights reserved" in metadata, will not be accepted unless a VRT email received. Stang 23:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 06:20, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation? This might be a cropped version of a photo on http://cctbelfort.canalblog.com/archives/2019/06/26/37459719.html and on https://www.calciofemminileitaliano.it/media-premi/elisabetta-betty-vignotto-nella-hall-of-fame-del-calcio-italiano/ JopkeB (talk) 16:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Photo taken in Japan in 1986, if anyone can make sense of the almost incomprehensible babble at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Japan? Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 18:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:36, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer used in the German Wikibooks

[edit]

The files were created for the German Wikibook Guitar. I'm the creator, even if they were uploaded from my old Homepage by Red Rooster (That was still in the beginning of the book project). The files were altogether replaced worldwide by SVG. Not always one to one, but with equal or better quality graphics. Or there wer completely deleted. They do not appear on any official wiki page. Future reuse is more then unlikely. Because today most requests are rejected, I am both the leading author of the guitar book and the administrator of the German wikibooks, as well as working in media design, so that I can judge that these graphics will never be used again.And that likelihood bordering on certainty. --Mjchael (talk) 00:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:48, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook 191.126.139.8 01:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, not own work. --P 1 9 9   01:49, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derechos de autor 191.126.139.8 01:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:51, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, artist Pat Trivigno died in 2013, no reason given why uploader would have authority to license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:52, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status— this is a work of art on a postcard, not a mundane piece of postage Dronebogus (talk) 03:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:53, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status— clearly a work of art (albeit on a post card) and not a technical drawing or mundane piece of postage Dronebogus (talk) 04:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:53, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Expl2301_-_Flickr_-_NOAA_Photo_Library.jpg. 2600:1700:A2A0:FB50:59A9:3312:194C:D009 04:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: this one is higher quality, deleted and redirected the other as duplicate. --P 1 9 9   01:58, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Expl2297_-_Flickr_-_NOAA_Photo_Library.jpg. 2600:1700:A2A0:FB50:59A9:3312:194C:D009 04:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: this one is higher quality, deleted and redirected the other as duplicate. --P 1 9 9   02:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File EXIF shows "Copyright holder ANDREW LUNN PHOTOGRAPHY Online copyright statement www.AndrewLunnPhotography.com". VRT permission from Andrew Lunn needed. MKFI (talk) 07:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold MKFI (talk) 15:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from talk page:

Requested confirmation of copyright waiver from photographer.User:ACALLP2


Deleted: per nomination. Undelete if ever permission has been received. --P 1 9 9   02:01, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image has been previously published in https://olatorera.com/gallery/, which has a "Olatorera Oniru Images on this page can be used for promotional content related to Olatorera Oniru" disclaimer. This is not suffient for Commons:Licensing. Explicit VRT permission is needed. MKFI (talk) 07:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:01, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright belongs to Babiche Martens, not John King Nauseous Man (talk) 07:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:02, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seemingly an image of a logo, claimed as 'own work'. Copyright holder in metadata does not match the uploader. The logo itself is of a UK brand. Due to the complexity of the logo it will be above COM:TOO UK as sufficient effort (from a UK perspective) is likely to have been expended and the logo is potentially sufficiently original to qualify for copyright protection in its country of origin (the UK). The logo is the subject of the image so Commons:De minimis does not apply. mattbr 07:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:02, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image has been previously published: https://www.premiumtimesng.com/entertainment/music/483175-interview-cliques-politics-stalling-growth-of-nigerian-gospel-music-industry-marvellous-odiete.html. I suspect uploader is the subject, in which case photographer is unknown. VRT permission needed to verify copyright. MKFI (talk) 09:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:03, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio no permission see metadata - all rights reserved by Ariane Kok© Hoyanova (talk) 10:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:04, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: There is no indication which parts were left out, which leaves this map worthless. No year indicated. Unused Enyavar (talk) 10:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:04, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright Nino Cocchini (talk) 13:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request on day of upload. --Achim (talk) 16:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Map of a fictional alternate reality with undefeated Austria in WW I Enyavar (talk) 10:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:05, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictional Arabia location map Enyavar (talk) 10:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Map of a fictional alternate reality with undefeated Austria in WW I Enyavar (talk) 10:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I couldn't find a source for this image, but given the low resolution and uploaders past history I suspect this is a copyright violation. MKFI (talk) 10:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, taken from FB as per EXIF data. --P 1 9 9   02:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictional outline maps of a unified arabian state Enyavar (talk) 10:39, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Map of a fictional alternate reality Enyavar (talk) 10:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Map of a fictional alternate reality (alternate Warsaw pact members??) Enyavar (talk) 10:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Map of a fictional alternate reality (no context given which areas are considered as "Mongolian" and why) Enyavar (talk) 10:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Personal concept flag of an artist, apparently not even really "proposed" Enyavar (talk) 10:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Personal concept flag of an artist, apparently not even really "proposed" Enyavar (talk) 10:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:VRT required as source reads "حقـوق النـشر وحقـوق الملـكية الفـكرية اعمل بيزنس للاستشارات المالية و الإدارية". In addition might be intentional link spam. Achim55 (talk) 10:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Personal concept flag of an artist, apparently not even really "proposed" Enyavar (talk) 10:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Personal concept flag of an artist, apparently not even really "proposed" Enyavar (talk) 10:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio see metadata that read "Copyright statusCopyrighted Online copyright statementwww.jaapreedijk.com Keywords jaap reedijk Usage terms All rights biy Jaap Reedijk Contact information jaap@jaapreedijk.com www.jaapreedijk.com Westdijk 55 Sommelsdijk, Zuid Holland, 3245BM Nederland, the Netherlands Hoyanova (talk) 10:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:08, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Personal concept flag of an artist, apparently not even really "proposed" Enyavar (talk) 10:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Based on File:Lesser coat of arms of Portuguese West Africa.svg, but no evidence that this particular variation has ever been discussed; out of scope. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:22, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:12, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Fictional map of alternate reality "German Mittelafrika" Enyavar (talk) 10:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:12, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: low-resolution portrait without further context. If person is actually famous, there's already a better picture on Commons. Unused. Enyavar (talk) 10:51, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: in scope (Pierre Elliott Trudeau) but not own work. --P 1 9 9   02:12, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: low-resolution portrait without further context. If person is actually famous, there's already a better picture on Commons. Unused. Enyavar (talk) 10:51, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not own work. --P 1 9 9   02:12, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: low-resolution portrait without further context. If person is actually famous, there's already a better picture on Commons. Unused. Enyavar (talk) 10:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not own work, and unusable. --P 1 9 9   02:13, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: low-resolution portrait without further context. Mr. Croozer is apparently not a real person, or had an actual name.Unused. Enyavar (talk) 10:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: real person (Conor Cruise O’Brien) but not own work. --P 1 9 9   02:16, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Googlemaps copyvio AND fantasy map AND fantasy flags. Triple score! Enyavar (talk) 10:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:14, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Fictional flag of Siberia Enyavar (talk) 10:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:14, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo by non-contributor. Used for self-promoting in bnwiki. Yahya (talk) 11:09, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:16, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not really a good distribution map, it just highlights entire countries no matter how large the area. According to File:Distribution of the galanthus species.png Spain is much less affected by snowflowers. Low res map, has better alternatives. Unused. Enyavar (talk) 11:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment What a weird and outdated map (it is from 1991?, 1992?), it has Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia and the USSR is partition in a weird way.  Delete per above. --C messier (talk) 17:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:17, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleMaps Copyvio Enyavar (talk) 12:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:17, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:18, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:18, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:18, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:18, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:18, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:56, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:18, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roshni3423 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 13:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:18, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per EXIF, the image comes from Facebook. Better sourcing and proof of permission are needed. Gikü (talk) 13:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:21, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a screenshot seemingly uploaded in error Darrelljon (talk) 14:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:22, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lidioneitor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:22, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly uploaded it. I do not have its copyright. Toofllab (talk) 18:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:23, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mario20212 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own work on these two tiny image, one is an album cover the other is a photo of a performer.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:56, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Jim. --Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mario20212 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Older drawings of chickens, obviously not own work. There are reproduction artefacts and similar images were found on internet website http://www.leghorn.nl/index.php/leghorns-132/exchequer

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:29, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:56, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mario20212 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Obviously not own works, no evidence of a free license, or public domain. User blocked for copyvios.

Yann (talk) 20:40, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep the appear to meet "PD-RO-photo". Romania does not copyright ordinary portraiture and "art photos" were only given 5 years protection.

Deleted: per nomination - No evidence of publication dates,. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:52, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photograph contains a logo of a website with a copyright notice. Ymblanter (talk) 21:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:56, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" claim is very dubious. This would seem far more likely to be Michelin's work. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:28, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Роман Овсюк (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A gallery of images unlikely to have been created by uploader, yet claimed as "own work. Low quality images that appear to be from books, a poster, some kinds of documents, some images that are Facebook sized, and etc.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:26, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo with uncertain license, probably out of project scope. Stang 23:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:27, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, possibly from Facebook due to size/quality. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:27, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that the sports club logo is available under a free license. There is a copyright mark on the site. GAndy (talk) 00:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Missing permission. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:20, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 07:32, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:FOP US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When I transferred this photo here, I've of course read FOP-US and decided that purely informatinal sign like this may not be considered as an artwork (image of the seal of New Hampshire on the top looks OK too). Sorry, if it was a mistake and a mistake of enwiki uploader that I brought here WindEwriX (talk) 05:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's definitely a borderline case so it's not a big deal. In this case, I am more worried about the text. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-1978. --King of ♥ 07:32, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not found elsewhere online, low-res with no EXIF alone is not a valid reason to delete. --King of ♥ 07:36, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: For an old upload, low-res with no EXIF alone is not a valid reason to delete. --King of ♥ 07:34, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:46, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not found elsewhere online, low-res with no EXIF alone is not a valid reason to delete. --King of ♥ 07:35, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Original upload from 2008, no reason for suspicion. --King of ♥ 00:46, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion in use. Ruthven (msg) 11:53, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 11:53, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 11:53, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 11:53, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uso de copyright de un movimiento político CarlosArturoAcosta (talk) 05:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:54, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uso de copyright de un movimiento político CarlosArturoAcosta (talk) 05:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:54, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uso de copyright de movimiento político CarlosArturoAcosta (talk) 05:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree to delete it. In fact, I thought I had postulated this image. Muago (talk) 18:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:54, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uso de copyright de un movimiento político CarlosArturoAcosta (talk) 05:09, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:54, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uso de copyright de un movimiento político CarlosArturoAcosta (talk) 05:09, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cuestión de simplemente revertirlo a la versión de 2019, alguien lo cambió para que tuviera la flor --Plank (talk) 22:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Plank (copyvio version deleted). Ruthven (msg) 11:55, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry photo and unclear details. Barely usable on a Wikimedia project. Prahlad (talk to me / what I've done) 09:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete OOS; high-quality alternatives at Category:Bauhinia tomentosa. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:17, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:00, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TriinuSu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

1) Parikas' photos are not free (see en:Brothers Parikas). 2) OTRS-permission is needed

Estopedist1 (talk) 11:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The image of Johann Voldemar Jannsen is a derivative image in the public domain in Estonia and the USA reproduced by the Brothers Parikas to be sold as a souvenir postcard. The image is dated 1870 before either of the brothers was born and has been reproduced multiple times. See for instance the engraving of the same image by August Weger (1823–1892). Selling a derivative copy doesn't restart the copyright clock or transfer the copyright any more than it does for Getty Images or Alamy when they sell copies of public domain images. The second photo is the interior of a museum and does not involve the Brothers Parikas. --RAN (talk) 20:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per RAN. Ruthven (msg) 12:02, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yanlışlıkla yükledim Kwkensj (talk) 11:09, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 12:02, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DERIV, montage of https://m.facebook.com/shekimiz.az/photos/a.205547362978609/1668707659995898 and another image Lord Belbury (talk) 11:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:02, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, lacks EXIF data, possibly a copyvio. C messier (talk) 11:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:02, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, with watermark, EXIF data indicate it is a work of Sasha Popovic. Possibly a copyvio. C messier (talk) 11:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:02, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Orangeotto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Mix of cameras, one credited to Laufer's website. Needs OTRS

Gbawden (talk) 11:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:03, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no exif, likely a still from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENFeg_qBa4s&list=RDENFeg_qBa4s&index=1 - PCP Gbawden (talk) 11:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:03, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that it is own work, very low resolution. Uploader has added only this file. Lots of alternatives exist. Papuass (talk) 12:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:03, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Standort Köln existiert nicht mehr, daher bitte die Fotos löschen. Lea Jacobi (talk) 14:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep as uploader: No valid reason for deletion. The building is a listed cultural heritage monument. Raymond 16:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 12:03, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie with no encyclopedic value? Darrelljon (talk) 14:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 12:03, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable claim to textlogo. See COM:TOO Russia. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:03, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Statue from 1982, artist fi:Eila Hiltunen died in 2003, still copyrighted. Commons:FOP#Finland is for buildings only. Undelete in 2074.

MKFI (talk) 09:26, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As a photo of a recent artwork, this seems like it would count as a copyrightable derivative work. I also think the title should be salted after deletion as it's too vague. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a case of homonymy. The artwork in this picture is from artist Walter Zanoli. I obtained the information from this brochure, where on the second page all of the artworks of the exhibition "Sentiero delle espressioni" are listed by author. The woodden statues of this exhibition were created starting from 2014. Kaitu (talk) 16:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no FoP for artworks in Italy. Sculptor's permission missimg. Ruthven (msg) 12:04, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from puppets. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:07, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Psnshow (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:07, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:07, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:07, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidentally wrong copyright information. Btq2022 (talk) 18:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Btq2022: , you could change the license to {{Pd-textlogo}} without a deletion. Copyright info lgtm. Stang 18:28, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 12:08, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the legal owner of this photo, request that it be removed. Masoud bukani (talk) 19:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The file has been uploaded in 2015 under a free license. Ruthven (msg) 12:09, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es descubierto que existía, es unos de los solidos de Catalan llamado, octaedro hexakis o dodecaedro disdiakis, ver: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hexaquisoctaedro Jose J. Leonard (talk) 19:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 12:10, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the legal owner of this photo, request that it be removed. Masoud bukani (talk) 19:56, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: uploaded in 2014. no reason to delete. Ruthven (msg) 12:09, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Файл позиционирован как собственная работа - неправильная лицензия Dmikar (talk) 20:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:10, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Soglyadataij (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Facebook or smaller images - two the same - which appear to be promotional for the architecture or some such.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:10, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of ownership; low quality file lacks EXIF data. – Rhain 23:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:10, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of ownership; low quality file lacks EXIF data. – Rhain 23:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:10, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
 Delete: Naughty image of naked and sticking hands in the butt.

It is used in (Shinji Mizushima) and (Dokaben)'s Wiki, and the internet has become rough, so please delete it.


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: in use. Ruthven (msg) 12:11, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Our of project scope. No educational use. Hulged (talk) 17:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: File is in use on one or more WIkimedia projects in main namespace. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:54, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Smaller (cropped) version of this image exists as a Twitter profile picture, but it was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons later. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:57, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 02:30, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Italy, this sculpture failed to meet the "De facto exception" for buildings. Stang 18:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: There's a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 02:03, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo (according to its description provided by the uploader) depicts a sculpture by Ezio Dadone who is still alive. No information has been given where this photo was taken. Hence, it appears to be likely that this was taken in Italy where we have unfortunately no freedom of panorama. Hence, we need a written permission by the sculptor that is to be passed to our support team. AFBorchert (talk) 21:20, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’m Ezio Dadone and this is the written permission required for publiching the image of Papuscia. This sculpure is istalled in Montechiaro, Bastia Mondovì (Italy). Is a marble sculpure, Made by myself in 2008 —07zene07 (talk) 17:18, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@07zene07: Thanks for this clarification, 07zene07. But this has to be verified through our support team. Please contact permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. --AFBorchert (talk) 21:47, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per VRTS. Ruthven (msg) 12:07, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploads by Bojsebijebije

[edit]

In just one year, the uploader apparently travelled the least friendly places on the planet - or did they?


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:05, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplikat zu File:Russian DPs at Trier-Petrisberg 1945.jpg Goesseln (talk) 21:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:40, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Source is right there "FROM BUCH: means "from Book" followed by title. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: taken from an 1887 book (online here), no photographer named -> {{PD-old-assumed-expired}}. --Rosenzweig τ 21:48, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Epistula non erubescit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own works due to small size, low quality and who is depicted.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 21:53, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:British_Association_of_Urological_Nurses 191.126.139.8 01:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep file is used in w:Draft:British Association of Urological Nurses -- Mjchael (talk) 02:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Mjchael. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:48, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:FOP US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Molandfreak. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:48, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not PD— one author died in 1956 (only 66 years ago, not 70+) and the other died in 1990, and the govt. of Monaco doesn’t seem to grant copyright exemption to stamps Dronebogus (talk) 04:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Monaco works of the Governemnt of Monaco are public domain. I presume that would apply to postage stamps. That said, it looks like we don't have a relevant template. Should we? Is some clarifcation in the page of Monaco copyright info page desirable?. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:46, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same reason as https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Fdr-six-fingers.png Dronebogus (talk) 04:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Same reason. (If my interpretation is incorrect, many other media in "Stamps of Monaco" should be reviewed.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:49, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per the EXIF data, the copyright to this photo is owned by Kate Magee Photography, not the Glenn Youngkin gubernatorial campaign. Evidence that the photographer has published this photo under an acceptable license, or that they have granted the Youngkin campaign the authority to do so, would be needed to accept it. B (talk) 11:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:49, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO UK --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ad. Bermuda is part of British Overseas Territory so TOO probably runs in line with the UK. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an artwork by Markku Katajisto and it's unlikely licensed for free use. Puppe100 (talk) 14:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; contemporary artist, no evidence of free license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an artwork by Markku Katajisto and it's unlikely licensed for free use. Puppe100 (talk) 14:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:52, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1961 East German Hans and Sophie Scholl stamp

[edit]

Per COM:Germany#Stamps, German stamps are not official works, and they are certainly not the uploader's own work with a CC license as previously claimed for two of these files. {{PD-Germany-§134-KUG}} will apply, but only 70 years after publication, so in 2032 for these files. The files can be restored then.

Rosenzweig τ 14:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. I'm with Rosenzweig. And if we can move to a type of "archive" and keep in until 2032 it'll be better. Stv26 (talk) 14:11, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete And undelete at the earliest possible date (seems to be 2032). ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 12:31, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:53, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains a school district logo, date given is 2020. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Magog the Ogre: Dear Administrator,

This is a Real Official District Flag in Malaysia, not a school district logo. see more at the official website.

If it's look like a school district logo, please share the file link.

Thank you ---MyPicWiki (talk) 01:15, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:54, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader request Jackch1 (talk) 18:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Has been on Commons over 5 years, far to long to delete by uploader request with no reason given; in use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:56, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the legal owner of this photo, request that it be removed. Masoud bukani (talk) 19:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @Masoud bukani: why? --Orijentolog (talk) 08:10, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Orijentolog: I have a picture of myself. I want to remove it from Wikimedia Commons, what should I do? Masoud bukani (talk) 21:51, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We don't have any other photo of this stadium, so I strongly suggest that we keep it. It's not wise to upload files, keep it four years and properly categorize it, and then ask for deletion without strong reason. --Orijentolog (talk) 23:08, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. 5 years is too long to wait for deletion with no reason other than author request. You, as legal owner of the photo, have shared it under a an irrevocable free license. No evident problems seen; in scope. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images of the Sibelius Monument 14

[edit]

The following photographs are derivative works of the Sibelius Monument (Q2584017), a 1967 sculpture by Eila Hiltunen (1922–2003; Q460402), located in Helsinki, Finland:

The Sibelius Monument is still under copyright and thus not in public domain until 2074-01-01. Freedom of panorama is for buildings only in Finland.

Related cases:

––Apalsola tc 22:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:10, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jelican9 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyright Polarlys (talk) 22:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rather unspecific rationale, I see nothing wrong with a foto of a passport 77 years old. --Polarlys (talk) 22:36, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't see it was the PD-75. Don't be sorry.  Keep Jelican9 (talk) 23:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:12, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WendelNo17 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional images for the Doctor depicted, not own work of uploader.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you say this? What evidence do you have that it is not the Uploader's work? --Headlock0225 (talk) 21:05, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
See https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6792811/Dr-Simon-Fishel-talks-experiences-worlds-IVF-clinic-Bourn-Hall.html and http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8232146.stm from 2009 where image previously published. And https://www.thestar.co.uk/health/professor-simon-fishel-ivf-has-become-almost-commodity-being-demonised-conventional-medical-practice-38383 for the other image published in 2019. Prior Publication requires COM:OTRS from original creator to be retained. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the links. I can now agree that these files need a confirmation of permission via COM:OTRS as you suggest--Headlock0225 (talk) 21:36, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:11, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidentally wrong copyright information. Btq2022 (talk) 18:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:54, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted picture already used at subject's official website as a headshot https://www.sphpc.cuhk.edu.hk/rogerchung AngusWOOF (talk) 19:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:53, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am afraid but we will have to delete this file because it shows copyrighted puppet and stage design, and we do not have the necessary authorisation from the rightsholder(s). (The fact that the photo was taken by a US government agent only causes the photo itself to be in the public domain, not the artworks in it.) Gnom (talk) 19:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:52, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am sorry but the puppet in this image is protected by copyright and we do not have the necessary permission from the rightsholder. Gnom (talk) 19:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:51, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am sorry but the puppet in this image is protected by copyright and we do not have the necessary permission from the rightsholder. Gnom (talk) 19:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:52, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no source (No source since) which is utterly correct. However the postcard looks old and it is possible we might be able to keep it if we knew the actual date and source of the work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

автор неизвестный, фото снято в начале 20 века FF1973 (talk) 08:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:22, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: Copyvio, [4]. --Rosenzweig τ 21:24, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be Flickrwashing -- album covers, live shots, CDs, many of which appear elsewhere on the Internet predating the recent Flickr uploads. Note that if you do own the copyright to all of these, please see COM:OTRS to see how you can authenticate this.

Rhododendrites talk21:41, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ruby and the Rednecks- The Origin of Punk Rock NYC.jpg is in use in many places on the internet, predating the upload here, with no indication of a free license. Also appears to be e.g. one of the album covers. Other upload nominated because all of this user's other uploads have already been deleted, making it a likely copyvio, too.

Rhododendrites talk20:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Second image seems to come from Facebook. --Rosenzweig τ 21:29, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image found in Category:Incomplete deletion requests - missing reason. Nominated by uploader same day as upload. Duplicate of File:Yxskaftkälen vy 20180609 154541.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 20:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, duplicate nominated for deletion by uplaoder on the same day as upload. --Rosenzweig τ 21:26, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image - from video trailer owned by Netflix - https://www.instagram.com/p/CXkJS20stex/ Evaders99 (talk) 21:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Picture was not taken from the said source, it was a screenshot I took from a video a watched on Youtube..

Deleted: per discussion, uploader wrote it's a Youtube screenshot, so not own work. --Rosenzweig τ 20:02, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file isn't used anywhere and has a superior SVG alternative. HynekJanac (talk) 15:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused JPG derivative of SVG original. --Rosenzweig τ 09:11, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolutions file without any metadata. Not likely own work Afifa Afrin (talk) 21:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvio from https://brur.ac.bd/vice-chancellor/. --Rosenzweig τ 09:16, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran Rohalamin (talk) 05:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For me the statue looks like it could be old enough. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:58, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Per COM:EVID, the uploader should show the image can be licensed freely. In this case, the sculpturer is unknown, so we do not know whether the statue is in PD in Iran. --Ellywa (talk) 08:05, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation 2A00:23C5:FF80:F301:5597:6074:B478:45DC 12:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this file to be useable for non-commercial purposes as it reflects historical data under CC-BY-NC-SA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meowrobotiks (talk • contribs) 12:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source page shows a CC link referring to commercial and non-commercial use, pointing to CC BY 4.0. --Achim55 (talk) 12:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The old map from the 1890's is in PD, source: https://maps.nls.uk/os/townplans-england/info.html. --Ellywa (talk) 08:13, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this allowed according to Copyright rules in the United Arab Emirates (see Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United Arab Emirates? It looks like a kind of exhibition of contemporary art. JopkeB (talk) 15:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. In addition there is no freedom of panorama in the UAE, COM:FOP UAE. --Ellywa (talk) 08:15, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image with several alternatives in Category:OpenOffice.org_Writer DustDFG (talk) 17:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the image is in use on some user pages, therefore kept until it is replaced on those pages. Please nominate again in that case. --Ellywa (talk) 08:16, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like part of a commendation by a club, bearing its logo, and thus there may be a copyright violation. C messier (talk) 17:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploader – who was notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. --Ellywa (talk) 08:19, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DMacks as no permission (No permission since) Elisfkc (talk) 18:40, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Kermit makes up part of the image, should be De minimis if anything. Elisfkc (talk) 18:41, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per COM:DM. --Jcb (talk) 12:00, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am sorry but I have to re-nominate this file for deletion: The puppet is copyrighted, and it is one of the main subjects of the photograph (notably, it is used in three different wikis for that exact purpose). For this reason, it does not meet the requirements of the de minimis rule. Please see the most recent guidance from the WMF legal department here: meta:Wikilegal/De Minimis Use of Protected Works under US Copyright Law. Gnom (talk) 19:46, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. I agree Kermit is not de minimis in this photo. It can be cropped if somebody would take the trouble. In that case, please request for temporary undeletion on my talk page. --Ellywa (talk) 08:21, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo, low quality but a copy of a professional image - unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:09, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. @Allsvenskan productions: please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder/photographer to publish the image on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 08:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sobilon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Gallery of images promotional of a person, but without proper source and author information. These images are not "own work" but some may be old enough with proper information to be kept.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, kept two per discussion and notes. --Ellywa (talk) 08:36, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]