Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/01/03
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
https://www.facebook.com/elaynablack1/photos/a.2492106380805778/2709040359112378 discospinster (talk) 02:19, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 06:35, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Probably copyright violation, no meaningful use imaginable. Xocolatl (talk) 00:56, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy delete Screenshots of a copyrighted broadcast that cannot be used without the expressed written consent of the National Football League and its broadcast partners. Ytoyoda (talk) 01:04, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Achim55 (talk) 09:01, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Starace, the illustrator, died in 1950. — Racconish 📥 16:35, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. It seem that the uploader was correct in his description that this illustration is anonymous. It was published without a name of author and it seems that its author is unknown. That is the definition of anonymous. Another user changed the description page yesterday [1] to attribute the illustration to Starace and he linked to an article as his source, but that source explains that this particular illustration, which illustrates the cover of the first book in the series, is unsigned and is of a very different style than the illustrations of the other books in the series, which are signed by Starace. Here is the exact quote from the article: «Cette première couverture, qui n’est pas signée, est d’un style très différent de celles de Starace. Il est très probable qu’elle ne soit pas de lui.» [2] (translation: «This first cover, which is unsigned, is of a very different style than those by Starace. It is very probable that it is not by him.») If the author of this illustration is unknown, then Commons should not speculate to attribute it. The objective fact is that the illustration was published without a name. Anonymous works published in 1911 would have entered the public domain in France in 1971 (51 y. pp + 9 y. ext.) and could be PD-1923 in the U.S. Although the tag PD-old should not have been used with an anonymous work, the file could probably have the tags PD-1923 and Anonymous-EU (which is not explicit in cases like this, but good enough). -- Asclepias (talk) 20:03, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- I agree this is a quality source. The quoted footnote actually contradicts the text of the same article which says the opposite : "Gino Starace reprend ici à son compte des codes visuels efficaces, et ne laisse nulle place à la polysémie, la multiplicité vagabonde de la lecture de l’image". The same writer, Annabel Audureau, confirms her attribution to Starace in her book Fantômas: un mythe moderne au croisement des arts : "c'est le premier février 1911, en reprenant la structure d'une affiche publicitaire créée pour les pilules Pink que Gino Starace va immortaliser la silhouette d'un des plus célèbres bandits masqués, Fantômas"(p.37). I nominated for deletion following another article, by Bérengère Vachonfrance-Levet, also published by Belphegor according to which : "L’illustrateur-maison de l’éditeur Fayard, Gino Starace, avait illustré la première de couverture du roman en s’inspirant d’une affiche publicitaire anonyme vantant une boite de pilules (Pink) qui avait retenu l’attention de Pierre Souvestre et Marcel Allain. Il avait remplacé la boîte de pilules par un poignard sanguinolent et fait disparaître les pilules lâchées sur Paris." [3]. The illustration is also attributed to Starace in this article of the New York Times: "This was the cover drawn by Gino Starace for the 1911 edition of “Fantômas,”". Cheers, — Racconish 📥 20:23, 1 February 2015 (UTC) modified 22:50, 1 February 2015 (UTC) added quote from Audureau's book 10:01, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, it's strange. -- Asclepias (talk) 00:23, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- See also Pulp Surrealism: Insolent Popular Culture in Early Twentieth-century Paris by Robin Waltz, University of California Press, 2002. "Illustrator Gino Starace designed the covers of the original series" (p.46). "Allain conveyed the story line to Gino Starace who illustrated the cover" (p. 52). Cheers, — Racconish 📥 09:55, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hello. (First, sorry for my bad english.) I uploaded this work, indeed. ;-)
Most "Fantômas scholars" told that Starace is not the author of this painting. In fact, Annabel Audureau's book does make for pleasant reading but it's not always error-free ; in his chapter "Fantômas et la critique" (in Le Rocambole. Bulletin des amis du roman populaire, n° 54, "Fantômas centenaire", spring 2011, p.24), Alfu says : "Ce livre d'Annabel Audureau reste une pièce importante dans le dispositif, encore une fois fort modeste, de la critique fantômassienne. Un sacré bémol toutefois : le manque de rigueur dans le traitement des informations de seconde main. Car la recopie de ces informations n'est pas toujours exempte d'erreurs ou d'approximations et, souvent les références sont absentes. Je prendrais l'exemple de ce qui est dit à propos de Gino Starace. Rappelons que le brillant artiste italien n'est pas l'auteur de la première couverture du roman, qui représente un Fantômas lupinien, bien loin des silhouettes qu'il propose par la suite.".
I recopy other helpful information sources :
"Restait à trouver une illutration saisissante pour la couverture du premier volume. Aucun des projets présentés n'étant assez percutant, Fayard suggère alors de fouiller dans le carton rempli d'affiches publicitaires, qu'un dessinateur éconduit a laissé dans son bureau. Marcel Allain y déniche un projet d'affiche concernant les "Pillules Pink pour personnes pâles". Elle représente un homme masqué en habit de soirée qui enjmabe les toits de Paris ; sa main droite laisse échapper dans le ciel une traînée de pilulles. Une idée à creuser, mais dont l'auteur a omis de laisser nom et adresse. Il ne s'est jamais fait connaître depuis la naissance du mythe à l'imagerie duquel il a contribué malgré lui. Voici comment : "Puisque vous tenez à cette affiche, propose Fayard, il n'y a qu'à effacer la traînée de pillules, remplacer la boîte par un poignard, et ça fera l'affaire..." Ainsi est née, selon l'expression de Robert Desnos, une image classique de l'onirologie parisienne. Elle n'a cessé d'inspirer illustrateurs et peintres. L'un d'eux, Magritte, s'est borné à la reproduire en remplaçant le poignard par une rose.", (Francis Lacassin, preface to Fantômas, Paris: Robert Laffont, 1987, pp.21-22 ; text reproduced in Francis Lacassin, À la recherche de l'empire caché : mythologie du roman populaire, Paris: Julliard, 1991, p.129.)
"Dans les pages précédentes et suivantes, nous donnons un panorama de ces différentes séries et, en couleurs, la reproduction de planches originales pour la série principale, les œuvres de Ponson du Terrail et les "Fantômas" de Souvestre & Allain. La 1ère couverture de cette dernière série, reproduite ci-dessous [in black and white] est anonyme. Il s'agit en fait d'un montage effectué à partir d'un projet d'affiche publicitaire retouché pour les besoins de la cause.", (Alfu, Patrice Caillot and François Ducos, Gino Starace : l'illustrateur de "Fantômas", Amiens: Encrage, 1987, published without pagination).
And I must have keep somewhere the words used by Marcel Allain himself (in Noël Arnaud, Francis Lacassin et Jean Tortel, Entretiens sur la paralittérature. Centre culturel international de Cerisy-la-Salle, 1er septembre-10 septembre 1967, Paris: Plon, 1970), I will also check into it. Regards. Montmorency1- I agree Alfu claims Starace is not the author. But I quoted a number of other specialists who disagree with Alfu. In my opinion PCP applies. Cheers, — Racconish 📥 12:38, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Not only Alfu. Above all, Francis Lacassin introduces the same nuance about the Fantômas covers. In fact, Lacassin is historically the first specialist to claim that Starace is not the author of the cover n°1 because Marcel Allain told directly this anecdote to the public of the Centre culturel international of Cerisy-la-Salle (september 1967). Therefore, Lacassin is the only Fantômas scholar to quote his source, unlike Annabel Audureau and Bérengère Vachonfrance-Levet. Regards. Montmorency1
- Everybody agrees Allain said the poster was inspired by an anonymous poster for the Pink pills. The disagreement is on who made the Fayard cover. And there is a good reason to consider it was Starace : he was doing all Fayard covers at the time. Cheers, — Racconish 📥 13:30, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- "And there is a good reason to consider it was Starace : he was doing all Fayard covers at the time" : it's only a conjecture, isn't it ? Plausible, indeed, because Starace was a very important artist of the collection "Le Livre Populaire" at Fayard. But he was not the only one ! There was Georges Conrad, for example. A fortiori, all Gino Starace's covers (and even posters) contain his signature according to Alfu, Patrice Caillot and François Ducos. It's clearly visible in their book about Starace : only the first Fantômas cover doesn't contain Starace's signature. We can assume that Gino didn't want to sign a painting which was not of his making... but then again, a conjecture (maybe a relevant one, we don't know ;-)) ! Regards. Montmorency1
- OK, I clarify : Fayard's house illustrator according to Walz [4]. Cheers, — Racconish 📥 14:22, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Non, no, it was crystal clear, don't worry ! ;-) Starace was without doubt a pillar of the collection "Le Livre populaire" as Alfu, Caillot and Ducos also told us. But Gino didn't paint all the covers : for example, he didn't illustrate the literary works of Gustave Aimard, Louis Noir or Pierre Sales published in the same collection (Alfu et alii). Whether the first Fantômas cover was a Starace's painting (strangely not signed ?) although not an original pictorial composition or whether it was the work of some anonymous artist (in order to touch up the above-mentioned details) is anyone's guess, for now. But upon reflection : Annabel Audureau contradicts herself ; Bérengère Vachonfrance-Levet does not quote her sources (as The New York Times) ; lastly, Robin Walz is right about Allain & Starace routine but he doesn't tell specifically the same rule applies to the first cover. So I'm agree with Asclepias : "Commons should not speculate to attribute it. The objective fact is that the illustration was published without a name". Regards. Montmorency1
- In short, according to you whoever writes Starace is the author is wrong. But what about PCP ? Cheers, — Racconish 📥 16:03, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- No : in short, whoever writes without sources Starace is the author is wrong. ;-)
Walz does not assert anything about the first cover specifically, The New York Times journalist is hardly an acknowledged expert and Audureau rectifies herself her assertion in her article ! (Please note that Audureau's first work is one of Vachonfrance-Levet's source, and Vachonfrance-Levet herself is a "young researcher" [5]) Finally, four french popular literature specialists (which three are Starace's biographers) and Alfredo Castelli (Fantomas. Un secolo di terrore, 2011) told this illustration is not related with Gino.
Therefore we have an anonymous painting, unsigned (unlike the usual procedure of Gino) and not credited at the time (1911). That's a fact, and no legitimate authentication allows to express strong doubts about that. Anything more is simply speculation. In sum, I don't think PCP applies. Regards. Montmorency1- I agree with you when you claim some authors deny the attribution to Starace, but I disagree when you claim the attribution to Starace is not sourced or the authors of such attribution are not specialists. It would be more neutral to say there is a lack of consensus between specialists. Can we leave it there and let somebody else draw the conclusions ? Cheers, — Racconish 📥 18:13, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- I do not wish to have an argument with you but why do you disagree when I said that "the attribution to Starace is not sourced" ? Where are the sources of these specialists, then ? Audureau changed her statement in her note ; Vachonfrance-Levet and the journalist Dave Kehr merely assert that Starace's the author, they never give reasons.
I don't want also to do unflattering generalizations about Dave Kehr of the New York Times : I mean to say he's a movie critic and not a popular literature specialist. ;-) Regards. Montmorency1- The authors I have quoted claiming Starace is the author of this image are Audureau, Walz, Vachonfrance-Levet and Kehr. I agree Alfu and Castelli claim he is not. Cheers, — Racconish 📥 22:11, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- You forgot Lacassin, Caillot et Ducos. And I did not get any answers for my question. ;-) Regards. Montmorency1
- Here is another one, Richard Abel in "The thrills of grande peur: crime series and serials in the belle epoque", The Velvet Trap, Spring 1996 : "The public fascination with these novels was due, in part, to the paradoxical figure of Fantomas himself, as apache, anarchist, and bourgeois gentleman, captured vividly in the first book cover illustration by Gino Starace: a gigantic masked man in formal dress literally brooding over Paris, with one foot testing the strength of a bridge on the Seine and his right hand clenching a barely concealed dagger". By the way, Caillot and Ducos are the co-authors of Alfu's book and you are interpretating Lacassin. Cheers, — Racconish 📥 22:52, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Indeed, the cover is not attributed to anyone, Starace or some anonymous artist, Lacassin dixit. However, the co-author Ducos is an expert on the topic and not Alfu's clone (and Caillot is a specialist of the French press).
Anyway, are film critics Kehr & Abel scholars who specialise in the field of popular literature ? Once again, what are their sources of information ? Therefore, a quality source or a minor source ? Regards. Montmorency1 - (Je repasse au français :-))
J'ai adressé ce courriel à Robin Walz, entre autres auteurs :
"Je me permets de vous contacter car j'ai une question relative à votre étude Pulp Surrealism: Insolent Popular Culture in Early Twentieth-Century Paris. En effet, vous affirmez page 46 que l'"Illustrator Gino Starace designed the covers of the original series". Cependant, la première couverture - non signée - serait inspirée par une affiche des pillules Pink, selon la fameuse anecdote de Marcel Allain. (...) Je voulais connaître votre opinion à ce sujet. Attribuez-vous la couverture du roman à Gino Starace ? Ou bien dissociez-vous ce dernier de cette couverture, finalement anonyme ?"
Robin Walz m'a fort aimablement répondu de manière précise :
Robin R Walz <rrwalz AT uas.alaska.edu> Date : 03/02/2015 00h50 Objet : Re: Fantômas et Gino Starace
"Il y a longtemps depuis Pulp Surrealism a paru, et j'ai honte à déclarer qu'il est de petites fautes dans mon texte. Mais je crois que cet exemple n'est pas parmi eux.D'abord, vous avez raison ; la première couverture reste un énigme, dessinée par un illustrateur anonyme. Le reste des couvertures de la série originale était de Gino Starace. Dans mon texte : la référence à Gino Starace comme l'illustrateur de la série originale (p. 46), c'est aux premiers volumes du « Livre Populaire » (112 vols.), pas de « Fantômas ». L'histoire des « Pilules Pink » est raconté sur p. 50. Selon Allain, c'était Fayard qui a remplacé la petite bouteille avec le poignard (j'ai oublié à mentionner que le dessinateur de l'affiche et de la couverture originale était inconnu). Après le premier volume, c'était Allain qui donnait l'intrigue de chaque épisode suivante à Starace pour dessiner la couverture (p. 52)."
Cordialement. Montmorency1- @Montmorency1: Thanks for checking with Robin Walz. Based on his opinion, I withdraw my nomination. Cheers, — Racconish 📥 18:30, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Indeed, the cover is not attributed to anyone, Starace or some anonymous artist, Lacassin dixit. However, the co-author Ducos is an expert on the topic and not Alfu's clone (and Caillot is a specialist of the French press).
- Here is another one, Richard Abel in "The thrills of grande peur: crime series and serials in the belle epoque", The Velvet Trap, Spring 1996 : "The public fascination with these novels was due, in part, to the paradoxical figure of Fantomas himself, as apache, anarchist, and bourgeois gentleman, captured vividly in the first book cover illustration by Gino Starace: a gigantic masked man in formal dress literally brooding over Paris, with one foot testing the strength of a bridge on the Seine and his right hand clenching a barely concealed dagger". By the way, Caillot and Ducos are the co-authors of Alfu's book and you are interpretating Lacassin. Cheers, — Racconish 📥 22:52, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- You forgot Lacassin, Caillot et Ducos. And I did not get any answers for my question. ;-) Regards. Montmorency1
- The authors I have quoted claiming Starace is the author of this image are Audureau, Walz, Vachonfrance-Levet and Kehr. I agree Alfu and Castelli claim he is not. Cheers, — Racconish 📥 22:11, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- I do not wish to have an argument with you but why do you disagree when I said that "the attribution to Starace is not sourced" ? Where are the sources of these specialists, then ? Audureau changed her statement in her note ; Vachonfrance-Levet and the journalist Dave Kehr merely assert that Starace's the author, they never give reasons.
- I agree with you when you claim some authors deny the attribution to Starace, but I disagree when you claim the attribution to Starace is not sourced or the authors of such attribution are not specialists. It would be more neutral to say there is a lack of consensus between specialists. Can we leave it there and let somebody else draw the conclusions ? Cheers, — Racconish 📥 18:13, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- No : in short, whoever writes without sources Starace is the author is wrong. ;-)
- In short, according to you whoever writes Starace is the author is wrong. But what about PCP ? Cheers, — Racconish 📥 16:03, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Non, no, it was crystal clear, don't worry ! ;-) Starace was without doubt a pillar of the collection "Le Livre populaire" as Alfu, Caillot and Ducos also told us. But Gino didn't paint all the covers : for example, he didn't illustrate the literary works of Gustave Aimard, Louis Noir or Pierre Sales published in the same collection (Alfu et alii). Whether the first Fantômas cover was a Starace's painting (strangely not signed ?) although not an original pictorial composition or whether it was the work of some anonymous artist (in order to touch up the above-mentioned details) is anyone's guess, for now. But upon reflection : Annabel Audureau contradicts herself ; Bérengère Vachonfrance-Levet does not quote her sources (as The New York Times) ; lastly, Robin Walz is right about Allain & Starace routine but he doesn't tell specifically the same rule applies to the first cover. So I'm agree with Asclepias : "Commons should not speculate to attribute it. The objective fact is that the illustration was published without a name". Regards. Montmorency1
- OK, I clarify : Fayard's house illustrator according to Walz [4]. Cheers, — Racconish 📥 14:22, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- "And there is a good reason to consider it was Starace : he was doing all Fayard covers at the time" : it's only a conjecture, isn't it ? Plausible, indeed, because Starace was a very important artist of the collection "Le Livre Populaire" at Fayard. But he was not the only one ! There was Georges Conrad, for example. A fortiori, all Gino Starace's covers (and even posters) contain his signature according to Alfu, Patrice Caillot and François Ducos. It's clearly visible in their book about Starace : only the first Fantômas cover doesn't contain Starace's signature. We can assume that Gino didn't want to sign a painting which was not of his making... but then again, a conjecture (maybe a relevant one, we don't know ;-)) ! Regards. Montmorency1
- Everybody agrees Allain said the poster was inspired by an anonymous poster for the Pink pills. The disagreement is on who made the Fayard cover. And there is a good reason to consider it was Starace : he was doing all Fayard covers at the time. Cheers, — Racconish 📥 13:30, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Not only Alfu. Above all, Francis Lacassin introduces the same nuance about the Fantômas covers. In fact, Lacassin is historically the first specialist to claim that Starace is not the author of the cover n°1 because Marcel Allain told directly this anecdote to the public of the Centre culturel international of Cerisy-la-Salle (september 1967). Therefore, Lacassin is the only Fantômas scholar to quote his source, unlike Annabel Audureau and Bérengère Vachonfrance-Levet. Regards. Montmorency1
- I agree Alfu claims Starace is not the author. But I quoted a number of other specialists who disagree with Alfu. In my opinion PCP applies. Cheers, — Racconish 📥 12:38, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hello. (First, sorry for my bad english.) I uploaded this work, indeed. ;-)
- See also Pulp Surrealism: Insolent Popular Culture in Early Twentieth-century Paris by Robin Waltz, University of California Press, 2002. "Illustrator Gino Starace designed the covers of the original series" (p.46). "Allain conveyed the story line to Gino Starace who illustrated the cover" (p. 52). Cheers, — Racconish 📥 09:55, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, it's strange. -- Asclepias (talk) 00:23, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. Yann (talk) 19:04, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
superseded by a larger and clearer file. This file is smaller and blurrier as compared to File:Fantomas 1911.jpg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:01, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Noémie2602 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely own work.
- File:Google Chrome Logo.jpg
- File:Logo Indicator.jpg
- File:Secure logo.png
- File:Info or Not secure.png
Leonel Sohns 11:06, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and unused small JPEG/PNG drawings. Should be SVG if useful. --Yann (talk) 20:00, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Broken file. Leonel Sohns 11:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:58, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Broken file. Leonel Sohns 11:25, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:59, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Broken file. Leonel Sohns 11:25, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:58, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
File not in use and accidentally uploaded Alssa1 (talk) 13:33, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 20:30, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
File:Chihiro.png HS1208 (talk) 15:57, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 16:01, 3 January 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Anime/manga/comics --Krdbot 20:08, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
High threshold of TOO in UK Stang★ 19:17, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Bad file 61wi17 (talk) 19:29, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
File deleted by Túrelio for the reason This file is ONLY published under a license that does not allow unrestricted commercial use. Under Commons licensing policy, files must be published under at least one license which permits unrestricted commercial use. The file will be deleted without notice unless it is relicensed or multi-licensed in accordance with the Commons licensing policy. Njd-de (talk) 21:16, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Portrait of non relevant person Stegop (talk) 23:17, 3 January 2022 (UTC) Desejo excluir este arquivo pois não me agrada e não me sinto confortável expondo informações minhas neste site, um funcionario de vocês chamado 79 reeditou um artigo que eu fiz no final do artigo escrevendo suas fracassadas empresas novamente venho pedir a remoção ou terei que tomar ações judiciais. Pablo Vinicius L. (talk) 23:19, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:WEBHOST. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:04, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
from Google Hangouts, probably a copyrighted tune --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:57, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by DMacks at 00:35, 4 January 2022 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:EmailIncoming.ogg: from Google Hangouts, probably a copyrighted tune --Krdbot 08:05, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Parthsiddhpura (talk · contribs)
[edit]This are all claimed to be "Own Work", but they don't look like selfies, so the actual photographer owns the copyright. Also, they are all personal files of a non-contributor and therefore out of scope.
- File:With dad.jpg
- File:Withfriends(2).jpg
- File:Withfriends.jpg
- File:Parth siddhpura.jpg
- File:Parthsiddhpur.a.jpg
- File:Parthsiddhpura.jpg
- File:Parth.siddhpura.jpg
- File:Itzmeparth.jpg
- File:Withfriends(1).jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:17, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Cross wiki puppet account - gone. --Herby talk thyme 14:33, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
This page was made to make fun of myself and wasn't made by me 220.244.179.11 09:52, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-notable subject, uploader consents to deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:28, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Old photo Dsupa englus (talk) 23:39, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:59, 5 January 2022 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) --Krdbot 14:07, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
真抱歉，此圖片對於百科全書沒有意義 Yu tptw (talk) 16:46, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#G7. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:32, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
I wish to retract the file Sumberjaya2014 (talk) 01:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 16:03, 6 January 2022 UTC: per COM:NETCOPYVIO. --Krdbot 19:58, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Highly unlikely that this is uploader's own work, as the picture is available in some Indian entertainment websites dating back to 2019 (https://www.zee5.com/zee5news/webstories/style/malayalam-stars-who-aced-all-black-look) Vaishakh1234 (talk) 01:26, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- How do I change the attribution to the actor himself? It was taken from his Instagram, https://www.instagram.com/p/B2WseOwlhqF/
- I wasn't sure I could put his Insta as the source. Subrus (talk) 06:28, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- You can't just simply take photo of his Instagram and post it in Commons. You need to have permission stating you have been authorised in posting in Commons within public domain. Vaishakh1234 (talk) 05:07, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: by Billinghurst. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:04, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Justlettersandnumbers as no permission (No permission since). However, it was tagged with {{Own}}, so I'm curious what other permission is needed. Keep. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 03:31, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, well, Michael Bednarek, this and this are also tagged by the same editor as "own work", which they very obviously are not (the former is apparently taken from this page dated 18 August 2021). As with other files of doubtful provenance, the photographer should send permission to VRTS. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- I was aware of the uploader's other dubious uploads, but this one seems different. There are millions of photos on Commons only with {{Own}} – and a few dozen of them from me – that don't require a VRTS ticket, so this seems a case of tarring all uploads by an editor with the same brush. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 00:52, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- What permission would anyone like? I got the photo from Timothy Jackson himself. Should I upload the email giving it to me?68.38.138.4 18:59, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hello. I did some digging around as to what I should do, and I've today emailed the people who gave me the picture telling them to send an email based on the template at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Email_templates to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org .
- One ambiguity I wasn't sure how to deal with is when someone (a) has a license to use an image, and (b) modifies the image by cropping. Is it "own work"? I think maybe under copyright law, the modifier has a license for the original image and copyright for the modified image, the original image merely being an input into the process. A collage would be an interesting case too. Just of theoretical interest, but in writing the instructions, since they're trying to be very careful, maybe some explanation of what to do in such cases would be useful. Editeur24 (talk) 20:50, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- What permission would anyone like? I got the photo from Timothy Jackson himself. Should I upload the email giving it to me?68.38.138.4 18:59, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- I was aware of the uploader's other dubious uploads, but this one seems different. There are millions of photos on Commons only with {{Own}} – and a few dozen of them from me – that don't require a VRTS ticket, so this seems a case of tarring all uploads by an editor with the same brush. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 00:52, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
There is an VRTS email received for “File:Jackson Timothy L.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2022010510000769. —MdsShakil (talk) 06:11, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- This photograph, dated 29 October 2021 on commons.wikimedia.org, already had been used on 30 October 2020 on the page Timothy Jackson of the French WP. I just sent a message to the author of this French page to ask him where he had found the photograph. — Hucbald.SaintAmand (talk) 13:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hucbald.SaintAmand: That's not possible. What you observe is the retrospective effect of the French template fr:Modèle:Infobox Biographie2 which fetches all its data, including the image, from Wikidata. Because of this behaviour of the French infobox, you're not seeing the exact version as it was then when you look at the first version (31 October 2020) of the article there. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 02:23, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- This photograph, dated 29 October 2021 on commons.wikimedia.org, already had been used on 30 October 2020 on the page Timothy Jackson of the French WP. I just sent a message to the author of this French page to ask him where he had found the photograph. — Hucbald.SaintAmand (talk) 13:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Jackson Timothy L.jpg” under ticket:2022010510000769. —MdsShakil (talk) 17:30, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: VRT verified. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:04, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
A version is found here http://www.psychotherapeutonline.at/wordpress/ and the uploader claims to be Kucera. Think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Ticket:2022010310007248 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 13:00, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- There is an VRTS email received for “File:Kucera 2021.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2022010310007248. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 15:55, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Kucera 2021.jpg” under ticket:2022010310007248. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 21:25, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: VRT verified. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:03, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
The metadata credits the photo to Yvonne Hemsey from Getty Images. RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 11:15, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied as clear copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 09:56, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mr. Tripto Rahman (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal photo
Afifa Afrin (talk) 16:42, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as F10, I'd already speedied the first one because Mr Rahman had taken the deletion template off of it. --Lord Belbury (talk) 10:00, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom and Lord Belbury. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:08, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, spam-only user. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
unknown individual, out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 01:49, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:54, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
fuzzy photo, translats as "family photo", out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 01:51, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- No indication that it is with our COM:SCOPE Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 11:35, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:WEBHOST. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:57, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
non-notable individual, unused photo Oaktree b (talk) 01:53, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 03:00, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
photo of a non-notable individual Oaktree b (talk) 01:53, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 03:01, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
unknown individual, unused photo Oaktree b (talk) 02:11, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 03:07, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
unused photo, unknown individual Oaktree b (talk) 02:14, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: the person is relatively known but the picture seems to violate someone's copyright: https://twitter.com/OASIS_ZJY0108/status/1465676126877990921. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 03:10, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
low res photo, unknown individual, out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 02:15, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 03:13, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
unused photo, unidentified individual Oaktree b (talk) 02:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: a guy from a certain Italian reality show, might be used. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 03:22, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Iulipopa97 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted elements; in any case the majority of, if not all, logos are fake – product of uploader's own imagination. This is not the first account to have this behavior (see Danut100, 8Dodo8); please consider blocking on sight.
- File:CME Logo.png
- File:PRO TV CHISINAU 2017 logo.png
- File:PRO TV INTERNATIONAL 2017 logo.png
- File:PRO TV PLUS.png
- File:PROTV.png
- File:A7 TV.png
- File:ProfitNews.png
- File:PrimaTV.png
- File:MedikaTV.png
- File:ComedyEST.png
- File:Cinemaraton.png
- File:LasFierbinti-logo.png
- File:MasterChef Romania 2022.png
- File:LaMaruta.png
- File:ZUTV 2021.png
- File:INTACT Media Group.png
- File:PROTV-SRL.png
- File:DIGI Sport 1 2 3 4.png
- File:Logo Digi Sport 3.png
- File:Logo Digi Sport 4.png
- File:Antena International.png
- File:B1 tv 2020.png
- File:ROMANIA TV logo.png
- File:Realitatea-Sportiva-HD.png
- File:RealitateaPLUS-HD.png
- File:RealitateaStar-HD.png
- File:Utv Romania logo.png
- File:DIGI Sport group.png
- File:Puterea-dragostei.png
- File:Mireasa2020.png
- File:Mireasapentrufiulmeu.png
- File:ZaZaSing.png
- File:LectiideViataLogo.png
- File:WelcomeLasFierbinti.png
- File:Neatza 2021.jpg
- File:XFACTOR.png
- File:TE-CUNOSC-DE-UNDEVA.png
- File:IUMOR.png
- File:INSULA-IUBIRII.png
- File:Chefi-la-cutite.png
- File:Adela.png
- File:Ce-spun-romanii.png
- File:AccesDirect.png
- File:SuperStar.png
- File:Masked-Singer-S2.png
- File:SURVIVOR.png
- File:Kanald-logo.png
- File:AntenaPLAY.png
- File:PRO TV INTERNATIONAL logo 2017.png
- File:PRO X logo 2017.png
- File:PRO GOLD logo 2017.png
- File:PRO CINEMA logo 2017.png
- File:PROTV logo 2017.png
- File:Acasa TV logo.png
- File:PRO 2 logo 2017.png
- File:Happy Channel.png
- File:Antena3 HD.png
- File:Antena Stars HD.png
- File:Antena Stars HD White.png
- File:Antena Stars 2021.png
Gikü (talk) 08:26, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:29, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Daniel2786 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos and graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:Logo king.png
- File:Kinghotel.gif
- File:Teste 1.png
- File:R72775900493.png
- File:MECCS.png
- File:Xe1kMFx.png
- File:F20763355482.png
- File:Recepcao paraiso com portal-removebg.png
- File:Ceufdsfsd.png
- File:Sssda.png
- File:Impar EDITADO.png
- File:R71b4996492d682d1cfeece4686037f19.png
- File:Kisspng-habbo-room-point-and-click-building-shed-reception-5abf398cd4bfd7.3250823315224815488714.jpg
- File:R63896773af8a1c48929d2ba4c5dcdead.png
- File:Dsdsa.png
mattbr 11:30, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete 1989 (talk) 04:19, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:19, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:Chromium(II)-sulfate-2D-structure.svg as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 11:22, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Wostr (talk) 15:35, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Comment Should be in SVG if useful. --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 22:11, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- @ShyAlpaca482: I have already uploaded a high-quality SVG version (cf. nomiantion text). — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 10:32, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 14:44, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Light and pixelated. File:Bombesin skeletal.svg is a nice replacement DMacks (talk) 19:56, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The replacement is much better. Wostr (talk) 15:35, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:24, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:51, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Category:Etizolam has a bunch of comparable style and orientation, but without colorful background or JPG artifacts. DMacks (talk) 20:17, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Wostr (talk) 15:36, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. We have File:Etizolam ball-and-stick model.png as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:22, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:49, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Small and pixelated. Category:Etizolam has a bunch of PNG and SVG alternatives. DMacks (talk) 20:19, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Wostr (talk) 15:36, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. We have File:Etizolam.svg as potential replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:25, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:48, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Small and pixelated, with in-image caption text. Category:Allyl chloride has several PNG and SVG alternatives. DMacks (talk) 20:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Impractical due to the caption. Wostr (talk) 15:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I have uploaded File:Allyl-chloride-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:15, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Md. Rakibul Hasan37 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images. Commons is not a web hosting service. Thanks
- File:Md Rakibul Hasan 00000011.jpg
- File:Md Rakibul Hasan27.jpg
- File:Md Rakibul Hasan73.jpg
- File:Md Rakibul Hasan.jpg
Herby talk thyme 11:57, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- I agree on principle, but these two should be
kept for their encylopedic value depicting rail vehicles. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 01:36, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- (If kept, these two need Krd to undelete Category:2021 at Kamalapur Railway Station and its patent cats.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 01:57, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:54, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Already his images there in Wikipedia Helloo 68 (talk) 13:28, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Not good Helloo 68 (talk) 13:48, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Keep - deceased actor. Not possible to get another image with permission release from actor. -Jacob.jose (talk) 14:58, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:43, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Vijay Barot (talk) 17:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:16, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 02:32, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: After 3 years upon uploading we have no clue to realize who is this person. Deleted for COM:WEBHOST. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:38, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
unused photo of an undientified individual Oaktree b (talk) 02:34, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Although the article about this guy had been deleted from en.wiki, he is notable to a certain degree: [6] [7]. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:12, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
unused photo of an unidentified individual Oaktree b (talk) 02:35, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: it's rather known Belgian singer Udo Mechels. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:28, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
personal photo, out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 02:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:32, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
unused personal photo Oaktree b (talk) 02:51, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:35, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
unused photo of an unidentified individual Oaktree b (talk) 02:55, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:37, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
unused photo of a non-notable individual Oaktree b (talk) 02:59, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:45, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
F10. (Personal photos by non-contributors) ชาวไทย (talk) 03:00, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:50, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
non-notable individual Oaktree b (talk) 03:00, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:45, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
unused photo of a non-notable graph Oaktree b (talk) 03:01, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:54, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
unidentified, non-notable individual Oaktree b (talk) 03:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:54, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
unidentified individual, unused photo, translates as " photo session" Oaktree b (talk) 03:14, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:56, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
non-notable individual Oaktree b (talk) 03:18, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: It's a leading Afghan sport journalist. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:58, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
child's drawing, out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 03:18, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 03:19, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
dark photo, out of scope, non-notable individual Oaktree b (talk) 03:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:19, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
unidentified individual, unused photo Oaktree b (talk) 03:25, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:19, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
low res personal photo, out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 03:26, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:20, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
unidentified individuals Oaktree b (talk) 03:39, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: important politicians from Nigeria. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:25, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
unused photo, unidentified individuals Oaktree b (talk) 03:50, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: very small, low quality, probably not an own work. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:30, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
low res photo, unidentified, non-notable building Oaktree b (talk) 03:52, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: uploaded as an advertisement of a small construction company. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:34, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
non-notable individual Oaktree b (talk) 04:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:40, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover. Nanahuatl (talk) 05:52, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Published in 2003, probably copyrighted. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:51, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Ads, entire page not relevant to any Wikimedia project Mys_721tx (talk) 06:46, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:53, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Wrong name. CzarJobKhaya (talk) 06:57, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep we correct names, not delete.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
promotion purpose image, out of project scope Stang★ 07:06, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:55, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
The author of the picture obviously is not Suvi Ahonen herself. According to metadata it is Stanislav Voronin. A likely copyright issue. Matthäus Gehägeberg (talk) 10:29, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: screenshot from https://www.permanto.fi/fi/player/vod?assetId=78860424, obvious copyright violaiton. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:09, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
identical names of displayed person and uploader + not a selfie + newspaper photo leading to conclusion: source and photographer are wrongly credited Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 12:40, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
identical names of displayed person and uploader + not a selfie + newspaper photo leading to conclusion: source and photographer are wrongly credited Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 12:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:16, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
main object completly blurred Kenraiz (talk) 14:32, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- it's fine for me! Images don't have to be perfect. Geoprofi Lars (talk) 13:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: we have literally 100 photographs of this plant at this location, see Category:Veronica triphyllos in Hockenheim. For no educational reason the worst of them might be used. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:24, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
personal photo, out of scope Jan Myšák (talk) 19:22, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:30, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
personal photo, out of scope Jan Myšák (talk) 19:22, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:30, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
unused private photo of low quality, uncategorized, without description, out of scope... Xocolatl (talk) 20:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:31, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
out of scope, no description, no category... wikimedia is not private webspace! Xocolatl (talk) 20:03, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:32, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
out of scope, low qua Xocolatl (talk) 20:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:32, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
One of thousands... picture without category, flickr-spam Xocolatl (talk) 21:40, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copy of File:07 Cmentarze pod Bochnią nr 336 Gierczyce - luty 2014 (22).JPG. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:43, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 23:57, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:51, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Small and pixelated, with in-image caption text. Category:Diallyl ether has several PNG and SVG alternatives. DMacks (talk) 20:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Impractical due to the caption. Wostr (talk) 15:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I have uploaded File:Diallyl-ether-2D-skeletal.svg as direct, high-quality replacement according to MOS. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 09:29, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:01, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Small and pixelated, with in-image caption text. Category:Allyl bromide has several PNG and SVG alternatives. DMacks (talk) 20:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Impractical due to the caption. Wostr (talk) 15:38, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I have uploaded File:Allyl-bromide-2D-skeletal.svg as direct, high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 06:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:00, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Small and pixelated, with in-image caption text. Category:Allylamine has several PNG and SVG alternatives. DMacks (talk) 20:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Impractical due to the caption. Wostr (talk) 15:38, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I have uploaded File:Allylamine-2D-skeletal.svg as direct, high-quality vector replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:07, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:00, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Small and pixelated, with in-image caption text. Category:Carboplatin has several PNG and SVG alternatives. DMacks (talk) 20:55, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Impractical due to the caption. Wostr (talk) 15:38, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. We have File:Carboplatin-2D-skeletal.png as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 22:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:00, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Small and pixelated, with in-image caption text. Category:Furosemide has several PNG and SVG alternatives. DMacks (talk) 20:56, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Impractical due to the caption. Wostr (talk) 15:38, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. We have File:Furosemide.svg among various other replacements in Category:Furosemide. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 06:39, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:59, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Badly pixelated; have File:Lofepramin.svg as high-quality replacement. DMacks (talk) 22:01, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- As the uploader (not the creator, I simply transferred this from enwiki), I say Delete. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:30, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete the replacement is much better. Wostr (talk) 15:39, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:57, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 20:12, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gallery Alchemia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art, need OTRS from each artist
- File:Krople - L.Kiersztyn.jpg
- File:W powietrzu.jpg
- File:Ona - Lidia Kiersztyn.jpg
- File:Fala - Lidia Kiersztyn.jpg
- File:Inny świat.jpg
- File:Flemingi.jpg
- File:Obraz na płótnie - On.jpg
- File:Kot- Lidia Kiersztyn.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 07:43, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:47, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Promo on wikidata
- File:X.app image.svg
- File:X.app QR code.svg
- File:X.app cover image.svg
- File:X.app logo color.svg
- File:X.app small logo color.svg
- File:X.app small logo grayscale.svg
- File:X.app logo grayscale.svg
- File:X.app icon.svg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:13, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- These images are related to "X.app" page https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q110266341
- I'm / X.app LLC is the owner. Xappcom (talk) 08:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:50, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mr. .shik.cfz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images outside the scope of our project. Commons is not a web hosting service, thanks
Herby talk thyme 13:00, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:53, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
While the uploader is the credible copyright owner of the photographs, there is no freedom of panorama in Italy and a multimedia installation would be considered creative works protected by copyright.
Ytoyoda (talk) 20:11, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Sto cominciando ad infastidirmi. La fotografia è mia. E' stata scattata all'interno del Museo, ho inviato la mail con dichiarazione di proprietà e fatto il procedimento di rilascio dell'autorizzazione per il copyright. Perché qualcuno decide di cancellarla? Se proprio volete, ditemi dove si dovrebbe trovare o da quale sito l'ho presa. L'ho scattata io ed è pubblicata solo qui su Commons. --Fliv (talk) 10:29, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Fliv Please read the discussion before responding. No one is questioning whether you took the photo. The issue is that there is no freedom of panorama in Italy, and photographs of copyrighted content would not be allowed. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:44, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- It's not a multimedia installation, it's a reproduction of posters that are in that museum. The place inside the museum are free and could be photographed and the photos are published everywhere. Moreover, nowhere it's written around the museum that photos are forbidden.
- As I wrote on my profile there is a "conflict of interest" because I work for and in this museum. Fliv (talk) 19:34, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Fliv Thank you for disclosing your relationship with the museum. A couple of things:
- The question isn't whether photographs are allowed. It's that the photograph shows a collection of artwork that may (or may not) be protected by copyright. Of course people are free to take photographs. But the point of Commons is to publish copyright-free content.
- I think one can reasonably argue that the way the posters are presented could be considered a work of art in itself.
- And I think the wall and floor projection in File:Proiezione_manifesti.jpg would definitely be considered a multimedia presentation.
- Now, all these questions could be resolved if the museum's public affairs representative or some other official at the museum declared that the exhibits are not protected by copyright, and anyone is free to publish and use the images for commercial purposes. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:29, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- . The artworks shown in the picture are very old advertising posters and they are not protected by copyright.
- . It's not a work of art because it's like a multimedia catalog of the Collection owned by the Museum the same that you can see herehttp://www.collezionesalce.beniculturali.it/?q=collezione.
- . The File:Proiezione_manifesti.jpg has been payed and realized by the Ministry of Culture, so it's free.
- I'm someone from the museum and I think I have already declared (by email and through the CC website that all the pictures and consequentially what they represent are not protected by copyright. Fliv (talk) 15:59, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Fliv Thank you for disclosing your relationship with the museum. A couple of things:
- There is an VRTS email received for “File:Proiezione manifesti.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2021123010003601. Ruthven (msg) 17:45, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Proiezione manifesti.jpg” under ticket:2021123010003601. Ruthven (msg) 15:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: VRT permission + de minimis for the single posters. Ruthven (msg) 15:12, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Possible Copyvio and/or conflict of interest. Uploaded by confirmed sock-puppet of Remitbuber MexTDT (talk) 00:22, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:55, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Historical map without sources. Not reliable, no educational value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 00:53, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:57, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 01:57, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 01:58, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:39, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:42, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:39, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:43, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:39, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
copyright Jelican9 (talk) 22:51, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:37, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dr.Wiki54 as no source (No source since) Jelican9 (talk) 22:56, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:35, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:57, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:34, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted newspaper clip. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:01, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:31, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Franz Landgraf died in 1953, so this is not in the public domain yet. The file can be restored in 2024. Rosenzweig τ 23:18, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- I have added SD information and added, corrected several description. This as to have as complete data when it is restored. (no edits posible for several years.Smiley.toerist (talk) 09:41, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:31, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
According to the filename, it's taken from Facebook. We can't confirm if the uploader is the original creator of the file or not. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:32, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:28, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Image is claimed as own work, but looks like either a promotional shot or screen cap, and the Metadata indicates this comes from Facebook. Ravensfire (talk) 23:34, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:28, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Can be found on the Internet, not the own work of the uploader. No information about the creator nor date. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:52, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the current and former Afghan government allows this image to be in the public domain. 
Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 23:53, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the current and former Afghan government allows this image to be in the public domain. Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 23:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:19, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the current and former Afghan government allows this image to be in the public domain. Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 23:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:19, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
The background is a stock photo. No evidence that the uploader is the original creator of the file. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:55, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:10, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the current and former Afghan government allows this image to be in the public domain. Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 23:56, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:19, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the current and former Afghan government allows this image to be in the public domain. Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 23:56, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:19, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the current and former Afghan government allows this image to be in the public domain. Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 23:56, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:17, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Per image-note, this has undefined E/Z stereochemistry, whcih is correctly diagrammed as Z in several alternatives in Category:Zimelidine DMacks (talk) 22:06, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Wostr (talk) 15:41, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:00, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Redundant to File:Infogramlogo.svg sourced directly from the organisation. No usage on Wikimedia projects.
mattbr 22:07, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:00, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:08, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:Social Radio App.png
- File:Mytv.png
- File:Infokanal.gif
- File:Ferie1.png
- File:Dynamo Invent AS.png
- File:53.no.png
- File:Aktuelt Haugalandet.png
mattbr 22:14, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tanmayajain (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional image, logo and website screenshot claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 22:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:57, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Divyajain489 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 22:26, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:55, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:28, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:55, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 22:30, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:55, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:31, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:54, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:Oddziały PHD.jpg
- File:LOGO polskie hurtownie dachowe.jpg
- File:Logo PHD 1000x400 przezroczysty.png
- File:MAPA PHD.jpg
- File:Informacje-o-phd.jpg
mattbr 22:34, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:54, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:35, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:53, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shin default (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Batch of student-tutors.jpg
- File:Tutor and Tutee.jpg
- File:Tutor and her tutee.jpg
- File:Learners as tutors.jpg
- File:The tutor and her tutees.jpg
- File:During COVID-19 Pandemic.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:42, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/156746983@N07
[edit]Blatant Flickrwashing; for example: File:H. S. Khan.jpg uploaded to Flickr 19 July 2019, uploaded to Commons 19 July 2019, but here 27 December 2018; File:Divya Sathyaraj.jpg uploaded to Flickr 4 January 2020, uploaded to Commons 4 January 2020, but here 28 December 2019; etc. There are six different cameras in EXIF (!!!), File:MasoomS.jpg EXIF credits "HM CREATIONS"; File:Parvatii Nair.jpg EXIF credits "Shamnadkottakkalphotography"; File:GV Prakash Kumar.jpg EXIF credits "ARUNCAPTURE", etc.
- File:Vishnupriya Ravi.jpg
- File:MasoomS.jpg
- File:GV Prakash Kumar.jpg
- File:Divya Sathyaraj.jpg
- File:Ajesh Ashok.jpg
- File:GVPrakashKumar.jpg
- File:Gayathri River.jpg
- File:Parvatii Nair.jpg
- File:H. S. Khan.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 20:55, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. No evidence that the uploader is the original photographer. -- Ab207 (talk) 15:44, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:44, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
A text presented as a picture, out of scope of the project. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 08:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Unclear copyright on background. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 03:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:32, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: File is now in use on Impedimed (Australia) (Q104480726). --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 04:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Flickr-Spam. We have hundreds and thousands of pictures without useful name, description, categorization... this ist one of them... Xocolatl (talk) 20:44, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Masur (talk) 22:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Pixelated; have File:Dimenhydrinate.svg as this exact combo and ionization state, and Category:Dimenhydrinate and others have the individual pieces and other ionizations DMacks (talk) 22:04, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Wostr (talk) 15:40, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. There is a high-quality replacement available and I have replaced all uses by that one. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 11:39, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:17, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Small and pixelated/{{BadJPG}}, each has one or more equivalent SVG And/or higher-quality PNG in their individual categories.
- File:構造式piperidine.jpg
- File:構造式piperazine.jpg
- File:構造式morpholine.jpg
- File:構造式thiazole.jpg
- File:構造式isothiazole.jpg
- File:構造式isoxazole.jpg
- File:構造式oxazole.jpg
- File:構造式pyrazole.jpg
- File:構造式imidazole.jpg
- File:構造式pyrrole.jpg
- File:構造式furan.jpg
DMacks (talk) 21:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 10:07, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
unused photo of a painted pavement square, out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 01:59, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:39, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
unused photo of an unidentified non-notable Oaktree b (talk) 02:03, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:39, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
unused photo, vacation photo, out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 02:13, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:39, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
It’s a hoax. I’ve added it to Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia. Brinerat (talk) 02:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
I would support deletion. The image appears to derive from silkimperialcrown.com site, who's blog entry is a bit of a giveaway, as is its Whois entry and the 'donate to us' link, and lack of any 'About' information. The site has all the hallmarks of a hoax, using Wikipedia as backup for ridiculously priced gift posters on an unidentifiable website or no known address. It looks like the site's owner, an Igor Vrabel in Houston claims to be a "Cultural Investigator at RICA" (Russian Institute Cultural Affairs) which doesn't appear to exist, but they are linked to www.1896coronation.com and elsewhere lists themselves as an "art and design worker" in New York State. This person may claim to live here, although another more upmarket addresses for them can also found quite easily. Nothing about this website rings true. They also promote this nonsense on Twitter. Nick Moyes (talk) 01:35, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:40, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
It’s a hoax. I’ve added it to Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia. Brinerat (talk) 02:49, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
I would support deletion. The image appears to derive from silkimperialcrown.com site, who's blog entry is a bit of a giveaway, as is its Whois entry and the 'donate to us' link, and lack of any 'About' information. The site has all the hallmarks of a hoax, using Wikipedia as backup for ridiculously priced gift posters on an unidentifiable website or no known address. It looks like the site's owner, an Igor Vrabel in Houston claims to be a "Cultural Investigator at RICA" (Russian Institute Cultural Affairs) which doesn't appear to exist, but they are linked to www.1896coronation.com and elsewhere lists themselves as an "art and design worker" in New York State. This person may claim to live here, although another more upmarket addresses for them can also found quite easily. Nothing about this website rings true. They also promote this nonsense on Twitter. Nick Moyes (talk) 01:35, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:40, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
unused photo, out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 03:06, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:41, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
unused logo Oaktree b (talk) 03:07, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:41, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
unused logo Oaktree b (talk) 03:38, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:43, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 03:40, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:43, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 03:44, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:43, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
unused, out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 03:46, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:43, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
unused logo, non-notable Oaktree b (talk) 03:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:43, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
out of scope, photo of three fingers Oaktree b (talk) 03:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:43, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
low res, unused, out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 03:57, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:43, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
unused medical diagram Oaktree b (talk) 04:00, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:43, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
copyright vio, no educational use Joschi71 (talk) 05:06, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:44, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EurAsiaInfo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE: Unused logo for an organization of little notability.
Mys_721tx (talk) 06:51, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:44, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Photo of Banner made from newspaper extract for which the artitlce author and/or newspaper holds copyright Arjunaraoc (talk) 07:07, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:44, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
No educational value, out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 08:33, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:45, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
A text presented as a picture, out of scope of the project. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 08:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
A text presented as a picture, out of scope of the project. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 08:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
The cover of a self-published book (https://www.amazon.com/Sufi-Poems-Inspirational-Verses-Twenty/dp/1658024702), no educational value. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 08:39, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:00, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:47, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:47, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:06, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:47, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dhaval & Milan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 09:07, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sergio Roos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos claimed as 'own work' and blurry image with no distinctive qualities. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 09:13, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:17, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
testfile from testuser; file exists as Flag of Savoie.svg -- sarang♥사랑 09:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Susanrheiser (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 10:01, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:26, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:29, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:30, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Youness.ma (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work' and seemingly as examples of the work of the uploader. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:Darlkhir شعار موقع دار الخير.jpg
- File:Artist.ma شعار موقع ارتست.jpg
- File:Iminifri شعار موقع منطقة امينيفري.jpg
- File:Ayhaja شعار موقع أي حاجة.jpg
- File:Arabicpens شعار أقلام عربية.jpg
- File:Youness.ma مصمم شعارات.png
- File:Youness.ma مصمم شعارات.gif
mattbr 10:35, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- yes my work my logos my design!! 41.248.7.57 00:42, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all: Spam. youness.ma is not known by google's dns server nor by .ma's own server ns1.geniousdns.com. --Achim55 (talk) 09:20, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:39, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:40, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:43, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
This is an assocation logo under private licence (baleinesousgravillon.com)--Abalg (talk) 10:50, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:58, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:01, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:03, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:06, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:08, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo and promotional screenshot/image claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 11:09, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:11, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Picture of a screen with a logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:12, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:16, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:18, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:19, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Colombosara69 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 11:22, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:25, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:33, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:53, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated by the uploader as 'self made'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:53, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:38, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:39, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:40, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:43, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:46, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:47, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:49, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:50, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tommyeducato (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 11:52, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:52, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:53, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:55, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Image of a logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:58, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:00, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:01, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 12:04, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Self-promotion of another famous rapper. Commons is not your personal free web host. ru:Участник:Нэстас has been deleted three times.
Achim55 (talk) 12:23, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom Herby talk thyme 16:51, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
This photo has been taken from a blog posting. The blog itself provides no information from where this photo has been obtained or about its copyright status. AFBorchert (talk) 12:32, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- hi yes i did so lets delete this!:-)--MKoala (talk) 12:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
58 kb? Probably a screenshot and not an "own work". Xocolatl (talk) 12:43, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Imperceptions (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos and image claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:Magazine Logo (No Background).png
- File:IMRN Logo.jpg
- File:IMRN Logo (No Background).png
- File:Dr. Jennifer Brout.png
mattbr 12:44, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:51, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:52, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:55, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 12:58, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:00, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:03, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:30, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:31, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- It's the logo of the biggest Yahoo Invisible Detector website. Once there was a dozen of application that could detect if a user was or not invisible on Yahoo Messenger and IMVisible was the biggest in the world. Forallatlantis (talk) 09:38, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- That may be the case but unfortunately the website does not have a page on a Wikimedia project because ro:IMvisible was deleted in 2012. Files are only hosted here if they have an educational purpose (such as being used on a page about the topic). There are also problems with the licence which would need to be fixed if the file is kept. mattbr 12:14, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:32, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bmpsolutions (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 13:33, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:51, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:18, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:52, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:18, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by In travel agency (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo and graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 14:04, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:18, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. Metadata includes an 'all rights reserved' statement. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 14:06, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:18, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo and screenshots claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:IN-Technologies-wikipedia-snapshot-.png
- File:IN-Technologies-wiki-Screenshot2.png
- File:IN-technologies-Wiki-preview-Screenshot.png
- File:IN-Technologies-Logo.png
- File:IN-Technologies logo.jpg
mattbr 14:08, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:18, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 14:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:18, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RoshniDonny (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images uploaded to accompany a now deleted article (w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddie Avil). No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 14:12, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:18, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 14:14, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 14:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 14:23, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 14:23, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 14:31, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 14:38, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
No single reason why would it be Terloy, why would it be taken at Oshni at 1906. Macuser (talk) 00:07, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:34, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
There is no reason to believe, the author is хууш дац, date of 1906 is correct and place is Oshni. Also the photographer from 1906 would not put his photo on instagram. Macuser (talk) 00:25, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:34, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Historical map without sources. Not reliable, no educational value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 00:56, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:35, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Historical map without sources. Not reliable, no educational value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 00:59, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not in use, poor quality, unusable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:35, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Historical map without sources. Not reliable, no educational value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:08, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:37, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
I wanted to retract the file Sumberjaya2014 (talk) 01:09, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:38, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Historical map without sources. Not reliable, no educational value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not in use and certainly not own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:38, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Historical map without sources. Not reliable, no educational value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:16, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Which sources do You whant? This file also shows as Osman beylik the same territory.
HALİL İNALCIK whrote: Ankara-Eskişehir uç bölgesinden hareket eden Ertuğrul’a en ileri hatta Söğüt’te yurtluk, Domaniç’te (Domalic) yaylak verildiği anlaşılmaktadır. Ertuğrul’un halkı Söğüt’te yerleşmiş olmakla beraber yazın sürüleri Domaniç’e yaylaya götürülüyordu. Удивленный1 (talk) 07:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC) - Keep. Sources and factual accuracy aren’t an obligatory requirement on Commons, especially, when the file is used in Wikimedia projects. Even fiction could be stored here, if you have any issues with map’s accuracy, please, follow to the talk pages of articles to remove the map if it is wrong. PS: As I see, it was created by ru.wiki users per @Зануда request rubin16 (talk) 15:35, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Just noticed that we even have {{Inaccurate-map-disputed}} for such cases rubin16 (talk) 15:19, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_sulfate.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(28534830473).jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
_photo.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_Logo.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Fantomas1911.jpg&diff=148536072&oldid=56256256){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_sulfate.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_sulfate.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
-sulfate-2D-structure.svg){kind=link}
_sulfate.png){kind=link}
_sulfate.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(28534830473).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(28534830473).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: no evidence at source website of a free license for the topographical base map. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:42, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
unused photo, non-notable individual Oaktree b (talk) 02:04, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- If this is this Ewa Siedlecka, she is notable. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 03:04, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Андрей Романенко. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:45, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- It's probably not the same person XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Matlin (talk) 10:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sergio Lanna (talk · contribs)
[edit]All of these works are labeled as own work, but the paintings are being used on w:it:Adriana Darù as examples of her work, and the Ballerinas appear to be signed by her. Adriana Darù. As can be seen from the Italian Wikipedia/Wikidata/the uploader's user page, the painter died in 1997. So we need VRTS for these. The photograph of the Madonna is (presumably) own work, but of a presumably copyrighted statue, the Ritratto Daru photo is probably old enough (1922-1923) (PD-Italy/PD-US-expired, if we assume it was taken in Italy and published at some reasonably early point.) The last photo is possibly PD-Italy--except there's a painting in the picture?--but quite probably not PD-US, and no evidence is included as to date or photographer.
- File:Torero Darù.jpg
- File:Ondina Darù.jpg
- File:Pierrot Darù.jpg
- File:Gigolò Darù.jpg
- File:Ballerina 23x32cm.jpg
- File:Ballerina 17x28cm.jpg
- File:Ballerina 16x21cm.jpg
- File:Ballerina 10x15cm.jpg
- File:Madonna (5).jpg
- File:Ritratto Daru da giovane.jpg
- File:Adriana Darù.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Prosfilaes (talk) 02:18, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
doubtful to be own work PlanespotterA320 (talk) 02:58, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:47, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Historical map without sources. Not reliable, no educational value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 03:03, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Historical map without sources. Not reliable, no educational value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 03:06, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not in use, too small to be usable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Historical map without sources. Not reliable, no educational value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 03:14, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per Nanahuatl. Kadıköylü (talk) 20:02, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Historical map without sources. Not reliable, no educational value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 03:23, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- As it is, you are right. Now there are two possibilities: 1- for my part, I would tend to propose to correct it and make it exact based on the academic sources Grosser Atlas zur Weltgeschichte, Westermann 1985, ISBN 3-14-100919-8, Putzger historischer Weltatlas, Cornelsen 1990, ISBN 3-464-00176-8 and Történelmi atlasz, Hungarian academy 1991, ISBN 963-351-422-3. But when I clean, complete or correct images or maps, I am sometimes reverted, and the stains or mistakes are restored on behalf of WP:CROP ([8]); 2- delete this map, but it's really too bad to get to delete documents because some contributors are opposed to their improvement (they call it "manipulations"). --Claude Zygiel (talk) 11:25, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Claude Zygiel: . Many users react like "what the hell do you mean?!?! Here are the sources" style, so thanks for your kindness :) THe thing is, the Internet is full of maps of the Ottoman Empire, and most of them are totally wrong. Even this one, not all of Azerbaijan got lost in sudden in 1735 for example. The thing is, those maps should be created and uploaded with references. We can't find references later, according to the map. Since there are tons of maps, we can use more reliable ones.--Nanahuatl (talk) 22:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
as the creator of this map, i wholeheartedly agree it should be deleted. infact if i could delete it myself without a request since i uploaded it myself, i would. this map was created 2 years ago and i didnt have much knowledge about the subject back then (as opposed to now) and judging with current knowledge, saying this is inaccurate is an underestimtion. the map nears fantasy userd898 (talk) 011:55, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Historical map without sources. Not reliable, no educational value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 03:23, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Historical map without sources. Not reliable, no educational value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 03:26, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Historical map without sources. Not reliable, no educational value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 03:26, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Nanahuatl: If the map had a source, it would be within scope, so the rationale is merely "Missing source", I think, not OoSc. Has also a bad resolution; but if the uploader provided source and a higher resolution version, it should be kept. Note that same uploader also provided File:Ottoman Empire Turkish Map.jpg - also as "own work" and in an unreadable condition. --Enyavar (talk) 00:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- I mean references for the info, not for the image. So we can't just create maps with our own information and mislead the readers. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:42, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- You actually noticed something that is incorrect with the map? I can hardly see anything there. And I don't think the uploader created their "own work", they copied this obvious print-book scan from a Facebook post. They need to name the book it comes from, and upload a better resolution: then keep. Otherwise I support deletion. --Enyavar (talk) 11:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- I mean references for the info, not for the image. So we can't just create maps with our own information and mislead the readers. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:42, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and most unlikely that the base map is own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
copyrighted software Oaktree b (talk) 03:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and unused, no educational value. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
likely copyvio Oaktree b (talk) 03:53, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
No es trabajo propio 191.116.29.195 04:03, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, transmission code in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
No es trabajo propio 191.116.29.195 04:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:57, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot from a mobile app. Content distribution copyright probably belongs to the owner/distributor of the app. ⁂๖ۣۜJon ♥ ๖ۣۜDaenerys໖ 04:55, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:58, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. The person in the photo died in 1991. Maxinvestigator (talk) 05:19, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:59, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Historical map without sources. Not reliable, no educational value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 05:33, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
- + copyright infringement, not own work [9] 07 (talk) 14:57, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and User:07. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:58, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
No source for the map, possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:59, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
It's not the own work of the uploader. No source, original creator nor the creation/publication date exist. We can't comment on its license. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:59, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Most taken from FB per MD. Estonian Style.jpg has the authors (c) details in exif. File:KRI KalaHitam 828.jpg found here in 2012 - https://garudamiliter.blogspot.com/2012/04/condor-class.html - PCP for the rest as these are not own work
- File:Tabel kredit Handphone.jpg
- File:Estonian style.jpg
- File:The Boston Cooking School Cook Book.jpg
- File:Kebakaran.jpg
- File:Forumen.jpg
- File:Implan gigi 1.jpg
- File:Implan gigi 2.jpg
- File:KRI Teluk Penyu (513).jpg
- File:KRI KalaHitam 828.jpg
- File:Ngangget Don Bingin di Pura Dalem Desa Lukluk.jpg
- File:Mepeed Sukawati.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:28, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Susiebubble (talk · contribs)
[edit]Author Kristina Mordokhovitch per eif, not own work as claimed
Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:28, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Ethnographic map without sources. Not reliable, no educational value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:16, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:29, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
No exif, similar photos found here in 2019 - https://www.waterkant.net/suriname/2019/11/11/evita-tjon-a-ten-bezorgt-suriname-miss-top-of-the-world-plus-size-titel/ - think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 07:39, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Dat klopt! In overleg is het toegestaan om de foto te gebruiken, gezien het feit dat het profiel in kwestie 1. de dame op de foto is en tevens eigenaar van het profiel. 31.20.175.97 21:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
_photo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_photo.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As far as I understand, this is a logo of this website: https://dimasathairili.blogspot.com/ Seems to be out of scope of the project. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 08:16, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
_photo.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
_photo.png){kind=link}
Logo of a British organisation. The threshold of originality is very low for UK works, see COM:TOO UK. The graphic element is distinctive, with multiple shapes overlaid and changing colours (gradient and an arced line). The logo is likely to be sufficiently original to qualify for copyright protection in its country of origin (the UK). For public domain works Wikimedia Commons only accepts media that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work. mattbr 08:35, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, clearly above the UK threshold of originality. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:39, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
No meaningful exif, likely from insta, credited to Myrid Carten per watermark. I think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, transmission code in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
This image was used in 2012 https://www.digar.ee/arhiiv/en/%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F/10369 - but this crop was uploaded in 2021. Think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. 83.220.239.208 11:31, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, low-res/web-size screengrab image without EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. 83.220.239.208 11:32, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, low-res/web-size screengrab image without EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. 83.220.239.208 11:32, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, low-res/web-size screengrab image without EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
This file has destructive watermark in it, see COM:Watermark for details Vitaium (talk) 13:27, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:39, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Where is the permission to publish this image? Xocolatl (talk) 13:46, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- I can send it by email. What is the email address again? Stian MP (talk) 18:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Needs COM:VRT. Undelete if ever permission has been received. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:41, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:InbaLogo.png. Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:Inba logo (2).png
- File:Indian National Bar Association.png
- File:INBA Logo.png
- File:Inba logo.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
mattbr 14:40, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:43, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 14:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:43, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 14:42, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:43, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 14:43, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:43, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
NOTE: To my belief, this file was earlier uploaded as File:Profielfoto simon bekaert.jpg and File:Simon Bekaert.jpg. — This file is missing evidence of permission. It has an author and source, but there is no proof that the author of the file agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide evidence of permission by either providing a link to a site with an explicit grant of permission that complies with the licensing policy or by forwarding email communication granting permission to permissions-commons-at-wikimedia.org ErikvanB (talk) 14:43, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- I got an email from the owner and the photographer of this picture, giving me the authorisation.
- In bijlage foto in hoge resolutie.
- Destijds besteld en betaald, dus ik neem aan dat ik er vrij over kan over beschikken.
- Maar ik zet voor de zekerheid de uitstekende fotograaf Jan Darthet in cc. Is dat okay voor u Jan? Wenst u naamvermelding?
- Als u dan toch bezig bent voor de Catalaanse wikipedia. Kan u die foto dan tegelijk ook toevoegen op de Nederlandstalige wikipedia? Daar bestaat een pagina van mij, https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Bekaert , maar er staat geen foto bij.
- Simon Bekaert
- Antwoord van de fotograaf Jan Darthet:
- Gebruik naar hartelust !
- Naamsvermelding is altijd fijn
- Op maandag beperkte toegang tot mail.
- Vriendelijke groeten,
- Jan Darthet
- 0475647745
- www.fotograafjan.be Flamenc (talk) 15:23, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Needs COM:VRT. Undelete if ever permission has been received. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:44, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 14:44, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:45, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dukedarkness (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos and graphics claimed as 'own work' promoting a company. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:Chargebox-eve-inch logo-720x405.jpg
- File:InChargeUK.png
- File:InCharge Vattenfall logo linear grey RGB.png
- File:Incharge box.png
mattbr 14:58, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 14:59, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:00, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Prob. COPYVIO. That an image is free to use for Press is not the same as put under a free license. The publisher behind the author states that the images is ONLY free to use when marketing or presenting the author or their books (http://www.rabensjogren.se/press/bildarkiv) Vätte (talk) 15:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:47, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Wrong license and highly unlikely to be own work (low resolution and absence of metadata). Glorious 93 (talk) 15:06, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:47, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:11, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by INCOGNITOEA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 15:12, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Diana.yakimchuk (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos and graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 15:17, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bratisan as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7
Converted to regular DR, as file does not qualify for speedy deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:17, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, photo of non-notable person. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flag of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:19, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused Commons screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, this is AKA AKA. We want to have the photo deleted as it's not corresponding to our live show today. We will upload a new picture when this one is removed. Thank you. AKAAKA.official (talk) 15:25, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- No valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 20:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:26, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:26, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by La Phổ Quang (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:Sudheesh-Sankar-Arundas-indall-com.jpg
- File:Indall-com-logo.png
- File:Bell-matrimony.png
- File:Asf-logo2.png
mattbr 15:28, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
It looks like it is unused personal photo, even in ptwiki Matlin (talk) 15:35, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:53, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Unused trivial sign of questionable notability. Netora (talk) 15:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:45, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:46, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:47, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, transmission code in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
File:Independencia energética, movimiento por un mundo independiente de energías fósiles y contaminantes- 2013-10-28 09-02.png
[edit]
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:28, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Duplicated file, and was an older version of the other file that were recently updated Douuwwurunwuuzhe 16:31, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio, taken from https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/ir_per19.html and written under another name HistoryofIran (talk) 16:35, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
New user suddenly appeared and states uploading various flags to pov push in Wikipedia? Already one of them has been identified as copyvio https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kashkay_Turkish_Nation_Flag(west_of_South_Azerbaijan).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
The others are probably copyvio as well. HistoryofIran (talk) 16:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
New user suddenly appeared and states uploading various flags to pov push in Wikipedia? Already one of them has been identified as copyvio https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kashkay_Turkish_Nation_Flag(west_of_South_Azerbaijan).jpg
The others are probably copyvio as well. HistoryofIran (talk) 16:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:05, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
New user suddenly appeared and states uploading various flags to pov push in Wikipedia? Already one of them has been identified as copyvio https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kashkay_Turkish_Nation_Flag(west_of_South_Azerbaijan).jpg
The others are probably copyvio as well. HistoryofIran (talk) 16:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:05, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
New user suddenly appeared and states uploading various flags to pov push in Wikipedia? Already one of them has been identified as copyvio https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kashkay_Turkish_Nation_Flag(west_of_South_Azerbaijan).jpg
The others are probably copyvio as well. HistoryofIran (talk) 16:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:05, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:38, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:05, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused file, and this was actually outdated as the movement changed their flag to that of the CPC without the Map behind the H&S Douuwwurunwuuzhe 16:38, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per self-nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:00, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:38, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: There is no chance that anyone would use this in good faith. It is obviously out of scope. Susmuffin (talk) 22:12, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:05, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
taken from facebook Afifa Afrin (talk) 16:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:07, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:43, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:07, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
New user suddenly appeared and states uploading various flags to pov push in Wikipedia. Already one of them has been identified as copyvio.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kashkay_Turkish_Nation_Flag(west_of_South_Azerbaijan).jpg HistoryofIran (talk) 16:44, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:07, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:44, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:07, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:45, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:07, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:46, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:07, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 16:50, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:07, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:51, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:07, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Low res, no EXIF, visual characteristics suggest screenshot, all other user uploads of politicians copyvios, etc. Duck/PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 17:04, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: This is an obvious copyright violation by a user with a history of uploading them. Susmuffin (talk) 04:06, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:07, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
New user suddenly appeared and states uploading various flags to pov push in Wikipedia. Already one of them has been identified as copyvio.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kashkay_Turkish_Nation_Flag(west_of_South_Azerbaijan).jpg%7Csubpage=File:The flag of the Khalaj Turks.jpg HistoryofIran (talk) 17:17, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg%7Csubpage=File:The){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
likely copyright violation, the uploader's youtube account was deleted for the same reason Patchall (talk) 17:22, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, fails COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nithingopal33 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work' without Commons:VRT permission. Likely to be above both COM:TOO US and COM:TOO India due to the complexity.
mattbr 17:43, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:10, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
User who uploaded wants to delete Dimukho (talk) 17:52, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of ordinary sky picture (numerous alternatives already on Commons). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:11, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo claimed as 'own work' but missing Commons:VRT permission. Likely to be above Commons:Threshold of originality due to the complexity of the graphic (stylized recreation of the building frontage). mattbr 18:50, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:11, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 18:52, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 18:53, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 18:55, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 18:55, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:12, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 18:58, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:12, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Fair-Use is not allowed on Commons, per COM:FAIRUSE Animalparty (talk) 03:39, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: Could be PD-Textlogo? --Amitie 10g (talk) 05:19, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 16:53, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:00, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:04, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:09, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:12, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:13, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
I don't think this falls under Commons:Project scope The helper5667 (talk) 19:13, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:16, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:14, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:18, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:14, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 19:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:14, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:14, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:14, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:25, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:14, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo and screenshot (containing Microsoft Windows elements) claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:27, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:14, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:28, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:14, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 19:29, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:14, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EikonDigital (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 19:30, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:33, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:34, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:39, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Industriaskaren (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 19:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:42, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:45, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Redundant to File:INDXX logo.png. No usage on Wikimedia projects.
mattbr 19:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
https://www.kartenplanet.ch/schweiz/st.gallen/17213/kirche-st.-peter-wil-sg Martin Sg. (talk) 19:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:17, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Redundant to File:Logo INEA nominativo.png. No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 19:59, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:18, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
_Logo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Logo.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The dragon image seems to take this image above the threshold of originality and not just a text logo. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:00, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
_Logo.png){kind=link}
- Hello Ytoyoda,
- This is the official Barcelona Dragons logo, it's an original logo. You can see it in https://www.barcelona-dragons.com. This logo is used in all the language versions in Wikipedia, like the other teams' logos from European League of Football (ELF). The reason that you shows is not applicable.
- Thank you,
- Carles CarlesGat (talk) 20:31, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- @CarlesGat I'm not questioning whether it's an original logo or it's in use on Wikipedia. It's being listed because the logo is likely protected by copyrighted and not released under a free license. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:53, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:18, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
_Logo.png){kind=link}
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:19, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unidentified people, strange image detail, mass upload of uncategorized Flickr images Xocolatl (talk) 20:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:19, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:06, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:19, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unidentified people, strange image detail, mass upload of uncategorized Flickr images Xocolatl (talk) 20:06, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:20, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unidentified people, strange image detail, mass upload of uncategorized Flickr images Xocolatl (talk) 20:07, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Three of three reasons aren't vaild reasons. If you don't know some people of political organisations or country - don't call it unidentified people. EOT. Matlin (talk) 16:38, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:20, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:08, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:21, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unidentified people, strange image detail, mass upload of uncategorized Flickr images Xocolatl (talk) 20:09, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:20, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:21, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:12, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:21, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:18, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:21, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:21, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
(c) Cameron Laird Polarlys (talk) 20:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
File:USS New Jersey fires a salvo of 16 in shells into an enemy troop concentration near Kaesong, Korea (48229884351).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
uploader at flickr is certainly not the creator Polarlys (talk) 20:27, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and duplicate of File:USS New Jersey BB-62 salvo Jan 1953.jpeg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:25, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:29, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:21, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:35, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:21, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anthonykatz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 20:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:21, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Flickr-Spam without useful description and categorization. That's not a ministry, that's am woman with a baby... Xocolatl (talk) 20:39, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Dubious own-work claim. This is clearly a professional map that the uploader has just slapped some text on. Since it's unused anyway, I don't see why this should be kept. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 20:40, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:40, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- I Agree with the deletion. Do I need to do something? Lufraec (talk) 14:06, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:45, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:27, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:46, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:27, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
just another example of matlin's flickr-spam. no description, no useful category, one of thousands of pictures... Xocolatl (talk) 20:47, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Rishikesh36 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo claimed as 'own work' and personal images by a contributor who is not active. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:Team Inferno at Zephyr, 2015.jpg
- File:Team Inferno at Technovanza, 2015.jpg
- File:Black Pearl ( Left ) Vs RDX ( Right).jpg
- File:Inferno Robotics Logo.tif
_Vs_RDX_(_Right).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
mattbr 20:49, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:51, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:53, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:58, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Variant of the image here in April 2020, well before September 2020 Commons upload. COM:VRT requires additional evidence of permission for previously published images. EXIF also credit "PicturePeople GmbH Co KG"; uploader is unambiguous Flickrwasher (see Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with 156746983@N07), etc. PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 20:59, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:04, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EMPYREUM ENTEPRISES (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 21:06, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:08, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SidhardhRamesh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Apparent copyvios: professionally staged/shot images of notable persons, at least six different cameras in EXIF, appeared elsewhere prior to upload (e.g., File:Srikanth actor.jpg is here; File:Divya Sathyaraj 2020.jpg is here, etc.), uploader is unambiguous Flickrwasher (see Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with 156746983@N07), etc. PRP issue.
- File:Srikanth actor.jpg
- File:Priyadarshan 4.jpg
- File:Priyadarshan 3.jpg
- File:Priyadarshan 2.jpg
- File:Priyadarshan.jpg
- File:Director Priyadarshan.jpg
- File:Tony Babu.jpg
- File:Tanya Hope.jpg
- File:Divya Sathyaraj 2020.jpg
- File:Parvatii Nair 1.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 21:09, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. No evidence that the uploader is the original photographer. -- Ab207 (talk) 15:43, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PokeCanada (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 21:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:12, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:14, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:15, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:17, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JulianGerull (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 21:22, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MaximTusken (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 21:23, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:28, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:34, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:39, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope, low quality, no description... Xocolatl (talk) 21:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Out of scope: why? Political meeting with minister? Maybe these mothers aren't educational (but they are from Matki I Kwartału organisations), but meeting is. Low quality - no comment. No description - see album page on Flickr. EOT. Matlin (talk) 16:33, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- There is no minister on this photograph. I also suppose this picture is of no use. Andrei Romanenko (talk)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:34, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No description, unidentified people, flurry... Xocolatl (talk) 21:50, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Agree with description above. No educational value. Krok6kola (talk) 02:17, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:34, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:55, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:57, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:59, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Fictional flag made up by random blogger at http://zebratigerfish.blogspot.com/2011/12/blog-post_03.html. Should not be used in any article on any project. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of Howland Island (local).jpg Reywas92 (talk) 22:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Not used in a meaningful way. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:38, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.PNG){kind=link}
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:03, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:38, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:04, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - The article Infoglide Software was deleted from en wikipedia. --Sreejith K (talk) 04:42, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:38, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Fictional flag that is not and should not be used on any project, fails COM:EDUSE Reywas92 (talk) 22:04, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:39, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Fictional flag that is not and should not be used on any project, fails COM:EDUSE Reywas92 (talk) 22:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:39, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Fictional flag that is not and should not be used on any project, fails COM:EDUSE Reywas92 (talk) 22:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:39, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Fictional flag that is not and should not be used on any project, fails COM:EDUSE Reywas92 (talk) 22:14, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:39, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Fictional flag that is not and should not be used on any project, fails COM:EDUSE Reywas92 (talk) 22:15, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:39, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Flags by User:NebulousTheIllogical
[edit]- File:Flag of Jarvis Island (local).jpg
- File:Flag of Baker Island (local).gif
- File:Split Flag of Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan Da Cunha.png
- File:Split Flag of Bolivia.svg
- File:Uruguay Split Flag.svg
- File:Split Flag of Monaco.svg
- File:Afghanistan Split Flag.svg
- File:MyLogo.png
- File:Flag of the Niger Delta.svg
- File:Monochrome.gif
- File:Pastel Rainbow.gif
- File:Rainbow.gif
- File:Deep Rainbow.gif
- File:Flag of Yolngu.svg
- File:Flag of Wangkatha.svg
- File:Flag of Noongar.svg
- File:Flag of Koori.svg
- File:Flag of Warlpiri.jpg
- File:Flag of Ngunnawal.svg
- File:Flag of Wajarri.jpg
- File:Bukavu Flag.svg
- File:Flag of Bukavu.gif
- File:Flag of Ibar Kolašin (North Kosovo).svg
- File:Fife Autonomist Flag.svg
- File:Rotating Seychelles Banner.gif
- File:Flag of Crișana.svg
- File:Proposed Flag of the Bininj People.svg
- File:Proposed Flag of Anindilyawka.jpg
- File:Flag of Serranilla Bank.jpg
- File:Flag of the Kermadec Islands.jpg
- File:Peter I Island Flag (Proposed).jpg
- File:Micronation of Oeno Island Flag.jpg
- File:Flag of the Antipodes Islands.jpg
- File:Flag of Macquarie Island.jpg
- File:Flag of the Bounty Islands.jpg
- File:Flag of the Snares Islands.jpg
- File:Flag of Heard Island and the McDonald Islands.png
- File:Flag of Auckland Islands.jpg
- File:Flag of the Solander Islands.jpg
- File:Flag of Three Kings Islands.jpg
- File:Flag of Campbell Islands.jpg
- File:Flag of Los Roques.jpg
- File:Flag of Isla La Tortuga.jpg
- File:Flag of Isla La Orchilla.jpg
- File:Flag of Isla La Blanquilla.jpg
- File:Kerguelen Islands Flag (Proposed).jpg
- File:Flag of the Crozet Islands (Proposed).jpg
- File:Flag of Île Saint-Paul (Proposed.jpg
- File:Flag of Île Amsterdam (Proposed).png
- File:Flag of Henderson Island (unofficial).jpg
- File:Proposed Flag of Gough Island.jpg
- File:Coral Sea Islands Flag (Proposed).jpg
- File:Flag of Bouvet Island (Proposed).jpg
- File:Glorioso Islands Flag (Proposed).jpg
- File:Europa Island Flag (Proposed).jpg
- File:Tromelin Island Flag (Proposed).jpg
- File:Juan de Nova Island Flag (Proposed).jpg
- File:Bassas Da India Flag (Proposed).jpg
- File:Proposed Jarvis Island Flag.jpg
- File:Proposed Howland Island Flag.jpg
- File:Proposed Flag of Baker Island.jpg
- File:Proposal Flag of Bajo Nuevo Bank.jpg
- File:Proposed Flag of Ashmore and Cartier Islands.jpg
- File:Proposed Flag of Kingman Reef.jpg
- File:Flag of Guadeloupe Changing Colors.gif
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
These are fictional flags apparently designed by the uploader. They are not and should not be used on any project, fail COM:EDUSE. --Reywas92 (talk) 22:34, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello User:Reywas92. I am extremely sorry for any inconveniences you feel about this situation. All of these flags mentioned are all used for my user (sub)pages (mainly this one). It seems that you have mentioned my logo as well, but it still only will be used on my user page.
⋮
Now, have I really created these flags? For the most part, no. They are either split flags (used for galleries to display more than one flag in one box (I am fairly new with galleries so if there is some CSS displaying item that I can use to create the same effect, I will consider using.)) or flags made by other people which I have recreated in higher quality. (I asked for permission!)
⋮
I understand all of your concerns, but I don't want to make my page to feel incomplete for me or other users. NebulousTheIllogical (talk) 22:53, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Commons is not a webhost for your personal page: COM:NOTHOST. Also see Commons:Project scope/Pages, galleries and categories. Your logo should be deleted too, because that's not what this website is for. You've licensed all of these as your own work so if they were made by other people you've lied about their origin. Reywas92 (talk) 23:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- I don't want to spark an argument, but here I prove you wrong on some statements you laid.
- ⋮
- "You've licensed all of these as your own work so if they were made by other people you've lied about their origin. "
- I in fact have made all of the files (some of which are pretty old.) Even if I did not, I did ask for permission on recreating their flags and putting them on wikipedia.
- ⋮
- "Not Informative" or "Not Your Personal Page"
- 1. Commons:User-specific galleries, templates and categories states that users are free to create galleries. The subpage of mine that I use the flags in is technically considered a gallery.
- Note: I may have misinterpreted this on the 2nd points onward.
- 2. If a gallery of flags is not allowed on Wikimedia, then Cultural flags shouldn't exist either
- 3. Just in case you didn't see the page, the text colour underneath the flags have a legend at the top. All of the flags above are all proposed flags so they are coloured more red as a notice.
- ⋮
- "The logo should be deleted too"
- Commons:User pages tells us that images and other file types are allowed that represent the user. My logo does in fact represent me in many ways.
- ⋮
- Note: The Oeno Island (Flag of a Micronation) and Jarvis Island flags are free to be deleted.
- Not intended to sound hurtful in ANY way, I'm extremely sorry if you feel harmed in some sort. NebulousTheIllogical (talk) 01:18, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. Not meaningfully used. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. 83.220.239.208 11:38, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 21:05, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:St. Josef (Moers)
[edit]copyright violation; artist of stained glass windows died in 1963; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Moers St. Josef Chorfenster.jpg
- File:Moers St. Josef Glasbilder der drei Chorfenster.jpg
- File:Moers St. Josef Sterngewölbe.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 18:23, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 01:25, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:St. Peter und Paul (Höxter)
[edit]copyvio; artworks 1995; no fop. (see http://www.glasmalerei-ev.net/pages/b5890/b5890.shtml)
- File:St. Peter und Paul Höxter nördlich Seitenfenster.JPG
- File:St. Peter und Paul Höxter südliche Seitenfenster.JPG
Martin Sg. (talk) 18:31, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 01:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation: sculptures and mosaic are contemporary; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Augsburg St. Elisabeth Altar und Chor.jpg
- File:Augsburg St. Elisabeth Blick nach vorne.jpg
- File:Augsburg St. Elisabeth Innenpanorama mit Altar.jpg
- File:Interior of St. Elisabeth (Augsburg-Lechhausen) DSC7209.jpg
- File:Interior of St. Elisabeth (Augsburg-Lechhausen) DSC7213.jpg
- File:Interior of St. Elisabeth (Augsburg-Lechhausen) DSC7237.jpg
- File:St Elisabeth Augsburg 2.jpg
- File:St Elisabeth Augsburg 3.jpg
- File:St Elisabeth Augsburg 4.jpg
- File:St Elisabeth Augsburg 5.jpg
_DSC7209.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_DSC7213.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_DSC7237.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:15, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 01:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Historical map without sources. Not reliable, no educational value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 03:07, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: Derivative work information added. Тhere are sources, they are reliable. It's used in the Bulgarian Wikipedia as a localized replacement of the English one and is the Infobox of the article about the Belgrade pashaluk. --StanProg (talk) 08:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: FIle is in use, and therefore in scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:24, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Historical map without sources. Not reliable, no educational value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 00:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- for the sources part, i added the sources i used. as for "Not reliable, no educational value, Out of project scope" part, i've found you copy-paste this same exact sentence in all your deletion requests (about 7, all of them between 1 and 4 january, most are in 2 and 3) like this, this, and this. the issue here is that since this is a copy-pasted template statement, it doesnt always make sense, like here "no educational value" does not make an actual sense, how does it hold no educational value? and "out of project scope" part is totally irrelevant. which project and what scope is it out of, and why? Userd898 (talk) 12:40, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:48, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
"The Möbius loop symbol, originally created by 23-year-old student Gary Anderson, is in the public domain, and is not a trademark. The CCA originally applied for a trademark on the design, but the application was challenged, and the corporation decided to abandon the claim. As such, anyone is free to use the recycling symbol, although local laws may restrict its use in product labeling." makes is misleading.
Failed trademark attempt does not influence copyright status as far as I know. In particular, withdrawing trademark application does not release logo into a public domain.
And if it is ineligible for copyright it should be {{PD-shape}}, not PD-User - if it is eligible for copyright then it is a derivative work. If ineligible for copyright then "released into the public domain by its author, Cbuckley" is misleading and makes no sense. Or is it referring to source code of SVG? Is it possible to have copyrighted SVG code representing work below threshold of originality? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 11:28, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Regarding the copyright of the SVG code itself, see Help:SVG#Copyright. Since this SVG seem to have been written by the user who put the {{PD-User}} template on the file I'd say that it is PD code-wise at least. Even if the user would've wanted to claim copyright on the SVG code I think that it wouldn't be above the threshold of originality anyway, but I'm no lawyer so what do I know. Image-wise I say it is {{PD-shape}} so Keep for me.Jonteemil (talk) 21:28, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-shape. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:49, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Refreshing88 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Stolen archive image. For me, this is a weak cause Which archive? Marcus Cyron (talk) 13:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:50, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
The focus of this photo is the group displayed on the monitor, which is an inappropriate derivative work. ✗plicit 14:47, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:50, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be the work of the architectural firm, appears at https://construction.ctba.me/ (you'll have to locate Zagreb on the map). This upload has FBMD in the metadata so it's not an original photo. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:46, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:51, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright eligibility is claimed (cc license tag) but unlikely that the uploader is the designer of all that logos. If the uploader is, permission needs to be documented. File:Aagencia.jpg and File:Elespectadorr.jpg and File:Ameeerica.jpg and File:Radiodelplata.jpg and File:Valee.jpg may be {{PD-textlogo}} (contrary to the current license tag).
- File:Aagencia.jpg
- File:Ftvvv.jpg
- File:Elespectadorr.jpg
- File:Estacionsur917.jpg
- File:Elespectador.jpg
- File:Valee.jpg
- File:Lared.jpg
- File:Chowww.jpg
- File:Ameeerica.jpg
- File:Radiodelplata.jpg
- File:Diezzzzz.jpg
- File:Angelitodebrito.jpg
- File:Mgzn.jpg
Saibo (Δ) 02:03, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
- Comment I don't really think the uploader has created this amount of Argentine logos. A PD-textlogo would be ok for those cases, obviously uncrediting the uploader as the creator. Fma12 (talk) 16:46, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: not simple enough for PD-textlogo and obviously not own work. JuTa 09:28, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:AdrianJCr. User blocked indefinitely at eswiki. Questionable if File:Ciudadddddddddd.jpg is in scope of PD-textlogo (or PD-whatever, due to the graphic effects), however unlikely "own work".
Gunnex (talk) 18:49, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 07:42, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 21:53, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
And 3 more unused logos, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:29, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Indiana National Road marker
[edit]Roughly cropped photographs of the National Road Marker in Indianapolis. Neither are in use and the poor cropping makes it rather low quality compared ot other files. We have better quality images of this section of the marker in Category:Indiana National Road marker. Thanks.
Missvain (talk) 18:51, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Generally much lower quality than this is required for deletion, especially for a category with relatively few images. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:28, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Historical map without sources. Not reliable, no educational value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 03:03, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep it is used, so obviously in scope and has value. Factual inaccuracy (if any) isn’t a reason for deletion on Commons, especially when the file is used rubin16 (talk) 15:56, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:24, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:St. Mariä Himmelfahrt (Wesel)
[edit]copyright violation; contemporary artworks (see http://www.glasmalerei-ev.net/pages/b3968/b3968.shtml etc.); no freedom of panorama.
- File:Glasbild des Propheten Jesaia.jpg
- File:Glasbild vom Hl. Dominikus.JPG
- File:St. Mariä Himmelfahrt Wesel.jpg
- File:Wesel Mariä Himmelfahrt 2019.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 18:35, 3 January 2022 (UTC) Ich vermute, der Löschantrag ist berechtigt, weil das neuere Architektur ist und muss leider zustimmen, dass mein Foto gelöscht wird. Barghaan
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 11:47, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
4nn1l2 (talk) 18:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 11:47, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation; shows artwork from 1993; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Rickenbach TG katolika preghejo 175.JPG
- File:Rickenbach TG katolika preghejo 176.JPG
- File:Rickenbach TG katolika preghejo 177.JPG
- File:Rickenbach TG katolika preghejo 181.JPG
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:39, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 11:46, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Undeleted per request here. — Racconish 💬 17:37, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
copyvio; artist died in 1996; no fop (see http://www.glasmalerei-ev.net/pages/b863/b863.shtml)
- File:St.-Johannes-Kirche Dinslaken- Eppinghoven Fenster Ostseite.jpg
- File:St.-Johannes-Kirche Dinslaken- Eppinghoven Fenster Westseite.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 18:28, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the stained glass windows are by de:Egbert Lammers. The files can be restored in 2067. --Rosenzweig τ 22:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
copyvio; artwork from 1960; no fop (see http://www.glasmalerei-ev.net/pages/b5890/b5890.shtml) Martin Sg. (talk) 18:31, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the artwork is by Clemens Ortmann. I don't know when he died, but if he was alive in 1960 he obviously died less than 70 years ago or is perhaps still alive. --Rosenzweig τ 22:20, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Historical map without sources. Not reliable, no educational value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 00:58, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:56, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Historical map without sources. Not reliable, no educational value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:00, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: still in use. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:56, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Historical map without sources. Not reliable, no educational value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: still in use. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:56, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation; artist died in 1994; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 11:33, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:58, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
copyvio; artworks 1980 (see http://www.glasmalerei-ev.net/pages/b1713/b1713.shtml), no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 18:51, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
copyright Jelican9 (talk) 22:59, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely own work. --GPSLeo (talk) 13:02, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Das Logo ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Ich führe gerade einen Urheberrechtsprozess gegen Spreadshirt, die mit meinem Logo seit 2015 widerrechtlich Bekleidung vertrieben. Ich werde von dem Rechtsanwalt Fortmeyer vertreten, der auf der sofortigen Löschung besteht, da wir sonst den Prozess verlieren würden. Es ist sehr wichtig, da mit hohen Kosten verbunden. Art Direction Werbeagentur (talk) 21:45, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- For the record: Citing uploader Brigitte Neubert 2021-12-16 on https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Benutzer_Diskussion:He3nry&oldid=218229284: Ich bin die Designerin des Logos und gehöre zur Väth Familie. Wenn ich das nicht erwähnen darf möchte ich dass mein Logo entfernt wird. Ich trete auch eine Urheberrechte nicht ab. Bitte lösche mein Logo. Mein Anwalt Herr Fortmeyer hat eine eidesstattliche Erklärung von mir, dass ich Urheberin des Logos bin.
- It looks like Art Direction Werbeagentur = Brigitte Neubert. File:OMEN Logo Original Pfad.jpg has been uploaded on 2021-12-10, so her DR is within one week, however, not placed here but on de:wp. Therefore I'm tending to Delete. --Achim55 (talk) 22:34, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, please delete my logo. It is very important for my current copyright litigation. I own the copyrights and I don’t want to share it or give any licenses. I was wrong about the explanation and therefore declared a challenge. Me: Brigitte Neubert, my agency is called Art-Direction Werbeagentur. www.brigitte-neubert.de Admins blocked my account because they didn’t believe me, that I'm the designer. For further questions please contact my lawyer:
- Jan-Alexander Fortmeyer, Rechtsanwalt
- Fachanwalt für Urheber- und Medienrecht
- Tätigkeitsschwerpunkt Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz
- c/o Landgraf & Schneider RAe
- Zeppelinallee 21, 60325 Frankfurt am Main
- Tel 069 - 713 731 8-0, Fax -50
- ra@fortmeyer.de
- ______________________ Art Direction Werbeagentur (talk) 00:28, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- The creator uploaded the logo and released it under Creative Commons. Afterwards she insulted authors of the german wikipedia and threatened to suit them. Imho the uploading and licencing is legally correct. Therefore the file should be kept. --Frank Murmann (talk) 06:04, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep as User:Frank Murmann wrote, can fully confirm, keep! --Joschi71 (talk) 07:54, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per Achim55, as a courtesy deletion requested shortly after upload, even if I dislike the uploader's behavior and the legal drama about this whole affair. --Rosenzweig τ 10:50, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Based on https://ascotelul.ro/echipa/ and the file format, appears to be a web download, not an original photo Ytoyoda (talk) 18:34, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete nom is right. Gikü (talk) 20:29, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:36, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
"The copyright holder of this work allows anyone to use it for any purpose including unrestricted redistribution, commercial use, and modification. " - where it is stated?
page is dead now but I found http://web.archive.org/web/20130911142452/http://www.nordwesten.net/Radfahren/Routenberater/Routen-Details.php?routenID=1617 that has http://web.archive.org/web/20130128111226/http://www.nordwesten.net/Radfahren/Impressum/index.php with
"Nutzer dürfen den Inhalt dieser Web-Seiten nur für den eigenen (privaten) Bedarf laden, ausdrucken und kopieren. Jegliche Veränderung, Vervielfältigung, Verbreitung oder öffentliche Wiedergabe der Webseite oder von Teilen hiervon, on- oder offline, bedarf einer vorherigen schriftlichen Genehmigung. Mit der Nutzung/Öffnung der vorliegenden Webseiten erklärt der Nutzer gleichzeitig sein Einverständnis mit den hier formulierten Nutzungsbedingungen. Die Nutzung ist zu unterlassen, wenn den Nutzungsbedingungen nicht zugestimmt wird."
"Users are only allowed to load, print out and copy the content of this website for their own (private) use. Any change, duplication, distribution or public reproduction of the website or parts thereof, online or offline, requires prior written approval. By using / opening this website, the user simultaneously declares his consent to the terms of use formulated here. Use is not permitted if the terms of use are not accepted."
is there anything overriding this?
Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 16:57, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 17:16, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Historical map without sources. Not reliable, no educational value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:07, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- To your observation, what on the map is against the known facts? Are cities or elayets misplaced or misnamed? Boundaries of modern-day Serbia are debated here? I am sure the map can be improved by placing it more exactly on the timeline, Hungarian spelling also to be corrected, but more arguments for a deletion support would be welcome. Pasztilla (talk) 07:07, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion of these images. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral image is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 20:26, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Historical map without sources. Not reliable, no educational value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 03:04, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion of this file. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral file is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 20:28, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Historical map without sources. Not reliable, no educational value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 03:06, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
The source you are missing is in the summary. Do you need anything else? --Regasterios (talk) 03:53, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- The source for the information... It doesn't exist. Nanahuatl (talk) 05:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
You can see the source of the information at the source file. See also the file history there. --Regasterios (talk) 06:11, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion of this file. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral file is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 20:29, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Two of the source files (File:0016xa.jpg and File:Hills south west of Sanandaj near the village of Kilaneh.jpg) were deleted as copyright violations, compromising this collage. They either need to be replaced and have the previous revisions of this file deleted, or the file should be deleted outright. ✗plicit 03:00, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- I have just replaced the incriminated images in the file, so there shouldn't be any remaining issues with copyright violations for now and you can delete the previous revisions of the images to keep only the last version. Fabienkhan (talk) 08:31, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion now. Deleted the older versions. --Ellywa (talk) 21:06, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1968. Derivative of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:26, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Ещё в 2016 году один из участников Украинской Википедии поставил шаблон перехода в общественное достояние в нынешнем 2022 году. Поэтому я забыл, что автор памятника умер в 1968 году, соответственно переход в общественное достояние состоится 1 января 2039 года. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 09:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. can be undeleted in 2039.. --Ellywa (talk) 20:32, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
no evidence this is in the public domain in the United States Hekerui (talk) 09:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- This painting is in the web of the Independent Administrative Institution national Museum of Arte in this link:
- https://search.artmuseums.go.jp/search_e/records.php?sakuhin=4253 Bigjap (talk) 13:15, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:41, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Certain Indian recordings
[edit]- File:Abdul Wahid Khan - Raga Patdip.ogg — undelete in 2036
- File:Abdul Wahid Khan - Raga Multani.ogg — undelete in 2058
- File:Abdul Wahid Khan - Raga Darbari Kanada.ogg — undelete in 2058
- File:Gangubai Hangal - Raga Durga 1935.ogg — undelete in 2058
These files are not in the public domain in the United States under Title II of the Music Modernization Act, per COM:PD. Hekerui (talk) 09:53, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The US term of protection for File:Gangubai Hangal - Raga Durga 1935.ogg (a sound recording published in 1935) is 100 years after publication. It can be undeleted in 2036. If information on the other files is correct, and they were all published in 1947, then, since the US term of protection for sound recordings published in 1947 is 110 years after publication, they can be undeleted in 2058. —RP88 (talk) 04:28, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:45, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO China --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:23, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. --SCP-2000 23:42, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:46, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- It is one of rather many participants pictures of a certain Wikimedia event in Indonesia, see Category:Pengguna Bebaskan Pengetahuan 2014. If all the rest of these pictures might stay, this one might stay as well. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:28, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per remark of Andrei Romanenko. --Ellywa (talk) 20:47, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Uploader's request. Because of inappropriate personal information. Thecatcherintherye (talk) 18:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, too much time after the upload in 2015. @Thecatcherintherye: , you can edit the image to remove personal information in a new version and nominate the older version to be deleted. Image is in us on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 20:49, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
This song (as well as his other songs) is still under copyright in the US because under the Under the Classics Protection and Access Act, it will not become public domain until 2037 The helper5667 (talk) 18:33, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination.. --Ellywa (talk) 20:50, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the current and former Afghan government allows this image to be in the public domain. Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 19:31, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The design can be treated as {{PD-ineligible}} as it's made up of heavily-used symbols that lack any clear original authorship. ― Tartan357 Talk 00:19, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Terrorist organisations with no international recognition are hardly in a position to dictate copyright. Fry1989 eh? 14:11, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- That is not a valid argument. Copyright holders do not have to dictate anything, that is not how a copyright works. It is inherent until waived. Nor do they have to be the ones who set the laws for copyright protections to apply. By your logic, only a government can ever hold a copyright. No. The copyright law of the recognized Afghan government applies to works created in Afghanistan by anyone. The point of Commons is to be a repository of media freely released by its creators, and we do not stray from that purpose. Files can be uploaded as fair use on Wikipedia. That said, I believe this particular file is in the public domain. ― Tartan357 Talk 01:32, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- It absolutely is a valid argument. There is a difference between recognising the copyright of governments, corporations, and private entities, and recognising the copyright of an illegal organisation which has no rights in law to begin with. Fry1989 eh? 12:55, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Again, the purpose of Commons is to host content that is intended to be freely used by its creators. What we are legally allowed to host is a different thing (fair use content would likely be allowed legally but it is not the purpose of this site). And absent any evidence that the Taliban is legally denied copyright protections under *both* Afghan and American law, what you are advocating is fair use. ― Tartan357 Talk 03:43, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- It absolutely is a valid argument. There is a difference between recognising the copyright of governments, corporations, and private entities, and recognising the copyright of an illegal organisation which has no rights in law to begin with. Fry1989 eh? 12:55, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- That is not a valid argument. Copyright holders do not have to dictate anything, that is not how a copyright works. It is inherent until waived. Nor do they have to be the ones who set the laws for copyright protections to apply. By your logic, only a government can ever hold a copyright. No. The copyright law of the recognized Afghan government applies to works created in Afghanistan by anyone. The point of Commons is to be a repository of media freely released by its creators, and we do not stray from that purpose. Files can be uploaded as fair use on Wikipedia. That said, I believe this particular file is in the public domain. ― Tartan357 Talk 01:32, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The fact that the image consists of heavily used symbols does not mean this image has achieved a new copyright. I think it does show a creative act and it is copyrighted. Therefore the image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:55, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Evidence of a free license? Yann (talk) 20:03, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Splitted in 5 versions as follows: File:Escudo de Tumbes.png (original version of 2015), File:Escudo de Tumbes (2016 May).png, File:Escudo de Tumbes (2016 June).png, File:Escudo de Tumbes (2019).png, File:Escudo de Tumbes (2020).png (the nominated version). Ellywa (talk) 21:47, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kept: the original and 3 other versions, deleted the latest version. --Ellywa (talk) 21:48, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
