User talk:Flamenc
Pincerno - Groß-Hamburg 2.png
[edit]Hello. I´ve found a mistake at your picture, Harburg is Wilhelmsburg and Wilhelmsburg is Harburg, you can check it at this historical map. Can you fix it? --Vlout (talk) 11:22, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
- I think you're totally wrong, it's hard to say so, but so it is. Harburg and Wilhelmsburg have been independent cities. Wilhelmsburg and Harburg merged only in 1927, before finally the nazis creater Groß Hamburg in 1937, so there's no reason to correct anything.--Flamenc (talk) 20:24, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
- Well, if you look at your map, Harburg is north from Wilhelmsburg, at that historical map (and on this picture) Harburg is south from Wilhelmsburg. So, do you still think there is nothing to fix? --Vlout (talk) 06:51, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- I misunderstood your first text, that was not very clear. Writing «Harburg is Wilhelmsburg and Wilhelmsburg is Harburg», I understood that you wanted to say da HB & WB where the same city, what they were indeed, only a very short time (1927-1937). With your new comment, I now understand that you meant that on that map, Picerno who created it interverted the legends Harburg and Wilhelmsburg, and there you're right, but it is not «my» map, it is user Pincerno who created it. Maybe you better explain it to the author.--Flamenc (talk) 13:09, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- OK, and sorry for my first unclear sentence. --Vlout (talk) 15:08, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- In fact, Pincerno is inactive from 2012 ([1]). So I´ve repaired it myself. --Vlout (talk) 15:42, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- I misunderstood your first text, that was not very clear. Writing «Harburg is Wilhelmsburg and Wilhelmsburg is Harburg», I understood that you wanted to say da HB & WB where the same city, what they were indeed, only a very short time (1927-1937). With your new comment, I now understand that you meant that on that map, Picerno who created it interverted the legends Harburg and Wilhelmsburg, and there you're right, but it is not «my» map, it is user Pincerno who created it. Maybe you better explain it to the author.--Flamenc (talk) 13:09, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Well, if you look at your map, Harburg is north from Wilhelmsburg, at that historical map (and on this picture) Harburg is south from Wilhelmsburg. So, do you still think there is nothing to fix? --Vlout (talk) 06:51, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Foto OBarroca Catalana 2015.jpg
[edit]
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Foto OBarroca Catalana 2015.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Foto OBarroca Catalana 2015.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:24, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Cookie : he enviat la còpia del mail amb l'autorització del propietari dels drets a (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).--Flamenc (talk) 19:32, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Foto Josep Torrent i Alabau.jpg
[edit]
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Foto Josep Torrent i Alabau.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Foto Josep Torrent i Alabau.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Cookie : he enviat la còpia del mail amb l'autorització del propietari dels drets a (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).--Flamenc (talk) 19:32, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Watermolen Van Doren in Rotselaar
[edit]Beste, deze watermolen ligt NIET op de Winge, maar op de Dijle. Groeten, Dirk Vansintjan (molenbewoner)
|
File:SamberMerbesleChâteau.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 22:24, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
images restored
[edit]Hi Flamenc, I have restored File:Simenon.jpg and File:Simenon closer.jpg, as Belgium has recently enacted FOP exception. --Túrelio (talk) 21:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Carte du comté de Hainaut.jpg
[edit]
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Carte du comté de Hainaut.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
--178.51.29.13 18:52, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:Lesse-Ootchamp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 15:09, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
|
Neumünster Prison (JVA) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
192.164.136.20 17:29, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Finkenwader Brücke
[edit]
Moin Flamenc, ich habe eine Frage zu den Koordinaten von obenstehendem Bild, das Bauwerk liegt scheinbar irgendwo in Frankreich. Ich suche gerade Bilder heraus um die Liste von Brücken in Hamburg zu bebildern. Stimmt bei dem Bild die Bildunterschrift oder stimmen die Koordinaten? Fragende Grüße, --Enter (talk) 18:12, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Maria Canela la notable pianista.jpg
[edit]
Copyright status: File:Maria Canela la notable pianista.jpg
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Maria Canela la notable pianista.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:35, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Port de Liège - douane.jpg
[edit]
|
|
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Port de Liège - douane.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
廣九直通車 (talk) 09:28, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Cumulative-co-emissions.svg
[edit]
Copyright status: File:Cumulative-co-emissions.svg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Cumulative-co-emissions.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Pedra de la Kerkebeek a Zedelgem.jpeg
[edit]
Copyright status: File:Pedra de la Kerkebeek a Zedelgem.jpeg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Pedra de la Kerkebeek a Zedelgem.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:08, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
