Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/12/01
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 00:04, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:25, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 00:32, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:23, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 00:33, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:24, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Error de subida SantosGastón (talk) 03:05, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:50, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Screen cap of an anime program. So likely copyrighted. Adamant1 (talk) 06:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Thibaut (talk) 11:25, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Files of "Chinatown, My Chinatown" (Screen Songs, 1929)
[edit]Files affected:
Claiming the animated short film a public domain is proven invalid, the original copyright Paramount Pictures for it was renewed by U.M. & M. on October 1, 1956. See on the IADB forum thread and Commons:Village Pump/Copyright#Copyright discussion regarding Fleischer/Famous-produced animated short films for more.
HarvettFox96 (talk) 10:58, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Plus, here's a link of the page on the copyright catalogue. Just delete and wait them to be restored until the first day of January 2025.
- HarvettFox96 (talk) 11:13, 1 December 2021 (UTC), edited on 11:25, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:04, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MdsShakil as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 00:11, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Photo of person who died in 1887, looks like from old printed source - most likely public domain (and in scope, good to keep). We just need to correct the image page information. @Ribute: more information on source? Do you know when this was published? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:30, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- @DidymThe image is from a museum who scanned their original photographic print. At my request they have released it on a CC 4.0 licence which I eMailed as a PDF to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org on 22Nov21. How do I correct the image page information to properly reflect this please? Ribute (talk) 07:33, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Great, thank you for your attention to detail. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:53, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- @DidymThe image is from a museum who scanned their original photographic print. At my request they have released it on a CC 4.0 licence which I eMailed as a PDF to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org on 22Nov21. How do I correct the image page information to properly reflect this please? Ribute (talk) 07:33, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Close as Kept. Photo by Jean Gleiser (1848 - 1923), well in the public domain. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:57, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
No indication on the source page given that the image is released under a commons-compatible licence. In fact it clearly asserts copyright at the bottom of the page AAhelifan (talk) 07:39, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: SD, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 20:15, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
I was the uploader and I uploaded this by mistake. There is no freedom of panorama with regard to artwork in the United States, and the artwork pictured here is not in the public domain. Epicgenius (talk) 14:08, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per COM:CSD#G7. Brianjd (talk) 14:53, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, nominated by uploader, courtesy deletion. Thuresson (talk) 21:04, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
It Is copyrighted image Robjensen1 (talk) 15:57, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, nominated by uploader whose talk page shows that she/he has in the past made problematic uploads. Thuresson (talk) 21:20, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Image vandalism Taking Out The Trash (talk) 17:33, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, copyvio from [1]. Thuresson (talk) 21:29, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Likely copyvio- marked as own work. 198.51.61.246 20:17, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- This user may be Lobods123, currently blocked by Infrogmation. Typically, Lobods123 uploads images of Judy Garland with bad perms. Then immediately, an IP in Cardiff uses the image in a Judy Garland related article, as just happened with this image.[2] HouseOfChange (talk) 22:32, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. Clear copyviol. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:44, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 10:12, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:41, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Md Fishan Rabbi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/files storage. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:52, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Md Fishan Rabbi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:ফেচবুক লক আইডি আনলক করুণ মাএ 2মিনিটে.jpeg
- File:মোঃফিশান রাব্বির ইতিহাস।.jpeg
- File:সেই বিখ্যাত ছেলে মোঃফিশান রাব্বি।.jpeg
- File:মোঃফিশান রাব্বি উইকিপিডিয়ায় কর্মত.jpeg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 12:58, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Md Fishan Rabbi (talk · contribs)
[edit]File pages without files.
Leonel Sohns 13:34, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, CSD#F7. --Achim55 (talk) 18:51, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Md Fishan Rabbi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
unclear permission status HouseOfChange (talk) 21:46, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:29, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zoologic06 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Image and logo not used on any projects.
Yeeno (talk) 04:25, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Promotional images with no educational value. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:38, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - I like the logo for some reason but yeah unfortunately as per 1234 neither image are inscope here. –Davey2010Talk 12:33, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 09:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 05:56, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - Belongs on Facebook, not a media repository site. –Davey2010Talk 12:35, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 09:20, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 05:59, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 09:21, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Facebook image Prince ovy (talk) 10:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 09:22, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Esamsibrhem (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.
Mitte27 (talk) 13:35, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 09:26, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 13:37, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 09:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 13:53, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 09:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 13:54, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 09:30, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 09:32, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 09:33, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 09:34, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 09:34, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
It is a double for https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Creator:Maulana_Azhar Nous (talk) 16:01, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: redirected by Carl. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 09:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 16:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 09:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal photograph, out of scope. —howcheng {chat} 17:16, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 09:39, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 16:05, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:55, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 13:23, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, readily found online. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:17, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 22:12, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 09:41, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 21:49, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 09:42, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Cover of music album. Obviously not free work Venzz (talk) 05:43, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; needs VRT permission. --Ahmadtalk 11:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
I no longer want the picture of myself on Wikimedia Commons (after further thought) Breadyornot (talk) 07:37, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per COM:CSD#G7. Brianjd (talk) 09:40, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - Hasn't been categorised since upload so chances are no one other than uploader would've known this existed, I see no problems with granting deletion here. Breadyornot please be aware that licences are irrevocable and so generally speaking once you upload your images here they cannot be deleted unless with very good reason. –Davey2010Talk 12:41, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Davey2010 That assumes that the uploader actually owns this image’s copyright, as claimed. Since the uploader also claims to be the subject, this claim seems suspicious. Brianjd (talk) 12:45, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- Good point. I hadn't read the image description and the image itself didn't sink in. Indeed the photographer themselves may be the actual copyright holders, who knows, So yeah if not for user request then it should be deleted for protentional copyvio concerns, Good job you're on the ball today Brian! :), –Davey2010Talk 12:49, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 11:27, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
out of scope: defaced copy of File:Map_of_Bennett_Island_1902.jpg in order to promote a fictional micronation Enyavar (talk) 09:49, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted OOS private joke/troll, unused. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:42, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
out of scope: promotional picture of a fictional micronation; possibly copyright vio Enyavar (talk) 09:50, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Clear CV of commercial advertising -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:40, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
out of scope: promotional picture of a fictional micronation Enyavar (talk) 09:50, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted OOS private joke/troll, unused. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:42, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
صورتي الشخصيه واحببت ان اغيرها بأخرى الشريف البركاتي (talk) 14:55, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader request, not used. --Ahmadtalk 13:39, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
book cover, unused, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 17:38, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 13:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fictitious flags of questionable notability.
- File:Israel Pakistan real size.png
- File:Iran Mauritania real size.png
- File:Germany turkey real size.png
- File:France Canada real size.png
- File:Cuba Slovakia real size.png
- File:China Angola real size.png
- File:Bolivia Ethiopia real size.png
- File:Bulgaria Saudi arabia real size.png
- File:Armenia Lebanon real size.png
- File:USA Vietnam real size.png
- File:South africa east timor real size.png
- File:Papua new guinea montenegro real size.png
- File:Portugal sri lanka real size.png
- File:Macedonia South kore areal size.png
- File:Taiwan argentina real size.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:52, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Image vandalism Taking Out The Trash (talk) 17:33, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted troll image, OOS -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:42, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
false licensing Ribeiro2002Rafael (talk) 18:30, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
ReDeleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:40, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: Logos related to the "MHoC" role playing group, see their wiki. Enyavar (talk) 00:51, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: Logos related to the "MHoC" role playing group, see their wiki. Enyavar (talk) 00:54, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: Logos related to the "MHoC" role playing group, see their wiki. Enyavar (talk) 00:54, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: Logos related to the "MHoC" role playing group, see their wiki. Enyavar (talk) 00:54, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: Logos related to the "MHoC" role playing group, see their wiki. Enyavar (talk) 00:54, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: Logos related to the "MHoC" role playing group, see their wiki. Enyavar (talk) 00:54, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: Logos related to the "MHoC" role playing group, see their wiki. Enyavar (talk) 00:54, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: Logos related to the "MHoC" role playing group, see their wiki. Enyavar (talk) 00:54, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: Logos related to the "MHoC" role playing group, see their wiki. Enyavar (talk) 00:55, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: Logos related to the "MHoC" role playing group, see their wiki. Enyavar (talk) 00:55, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: Logos related to the "MHoC" role playing group, see their wiki. Enyavar (talk) 00:55, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: Logos related to the "MHoC" role playing group, see their wiki. Enyavar (talk) 00:55, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: Logos related to the "MHoC" role playing group, see their wiki. Enyavar (talk) 00:55, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: Logos related to the "MHoC" role playing group, see their wiki. Enyavar (talk) 00:55, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: Logos related to the "MHoC" role playing group, see their wiki. Enyavar (talk) 00:56, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: Logos related to the "MHoC" role playing group, see their wiki. Enyavar (talk) 00:56, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: Logos related to the "MHoC" role playing group, see their wiki. Enyavar (talk) 00:56, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:Oxomalonaldehyde-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:15, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:35, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Only upload by this user. Low resolution and Facebook metadata suggest copyvio. Possibly out of scope too. Brianjd (talk) 10:05, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Not a free file. Fluttershy — talk 10:06, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Not a free file. Fluttershy — talk 10:07, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
copyvio from bookseller page https://www.wsqn.pl/ Masti (talk) 10:30, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:36, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 17:23, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:36, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 17:26, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:36, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
out of scope hoax, Romania has not suddenly started using their communist symbol again in 2021 TFerenczy (talk) 17:32, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, uploaded by a problematic user who has uploaded the swastiska as the new coat of arms of Germany, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of Germany (2021-present).svg. Thuresson (talk) 21:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:36, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
unused, no cat, does not seem to have educational value Pibwl (talk) 17:34, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:36, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
out of scope, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 17:34, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:36, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
out of scope, unused, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 17:41, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:36, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
out of scope, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 17:44, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:36, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
This appears to be a googlemaps screenshot with superimposed text. If so, copyvio. Enyavar (talk) 17:50, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:36, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Very likely a GoogleMaps screenshot. If so, copyvio; please delete. Dear uploader, OSM.org maps are allowed. Enyavar (talk) 17:53, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:35, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be a poorly-cropped duplicate of File:Coat of arms of Greece.svg. Fry1989 eh? 14:44, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Map author suggested deletion on talk page and created a replacement map: File:Demokratische Republik Kongo Pressefreiheit 2008.png. Unless someone is able to fix the several issues that are wrong in the SVG file here, it is of little use. Enyavar (talk) 00:20, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, file corrupt (+unused). --Wdwd (talk) 20:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: Not educationally useful Théodu57 (talk) 10:32, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 02:54, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
out of scope ❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 17:49, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- that's for my user page man. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shahriar Islam Alvi (talk • contribs) 09:50, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Active contributor. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:01, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Not used anywhere. Out of scope. Yahya (talk) 19:26, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per previous DR. --✗plicit 02:56, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, no usage, pure text. Mys_721tx (talk) 01:37, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Please note that a similar file File:0撸党.jpg has been deleted previously. --GY Fan★ 02:51, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:42, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Found on Getty, likely copyvio. Sumanuil (talk) 03:20, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:43, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, not used on any projects. Likely promotional. Yeeno (talk) 04:18, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:43, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Gbcopyvios
[edit]Flickrwashing. O followers, 0 following, single use flickr account
- File:18m IDSN Antenna (2978265352).jpg
- File:32m IDSN Antenna (2977408863).jpg
- File:Chandrayaan 1 (2980620709).jpg
- File:IDSN Image (2977409049).jpg
- File:Moon Impact Probe (2980801873).jpg
Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Gbcopyvios SB19
The photo passed the automatic Flickr review, but descriptions state: "Photos are strictly not for commercial purposes. © All Rights Reserved." or © 2021 ShowBT Philippines. All Rights Reserved.
I don't think these are freely licensed and in fact I think this account is probably flickrwashing as most of the photos seem to be credited to ShowBT
- File:Ikalawang Yugto -SB19 - 51083866911.jpg
- File:Ikalawang Yugto -SB19 PABLO.jpg
- File:SB19 'What?' MV Stills.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:18, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
- Files in from 185867096@N02
Suspected flickrwashing. The one image has been deleted from Flickr and the other says Copyright holder Andrew Mason in the exif. Account has 1 follower, 0 following. PCP
Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:48, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Gbcopyvios musiccomposer77
All supplied by Duagherty. All need OTRS. Other uploads of this user have been deleted as copyvios
- File:Composer Michael Daugherty and Conductor David Alan Miller.jpg
- File:Glenn Watkins.jpg
- File:L-R- Donald Scavarda, Robert Ashley, Roger Reynolds, Gordon Mumma at ONCE.MORE, November 2010, Ann Arbor, Michigan.jpg
- File:Michael Daugherty and Roger Reynolds at ONCE.MORE, November 2010, Ann Arbor, Michigan.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 07:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:13, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Gbcopyvios Flickrwashing
Flickrwashing, new account that only has these 6 photos, most of which have FB MD
- File:Asa Asika.jpg
- File:CKay Yo Yo.jpg
- File:CKay Yo!.jpg
- File:CKay Yo.jpg
- File:Diana Eneje.jpg
- File:Kelechief.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:38, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:43, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Gbcopyvios D1
2 different uploaders claiming the same file as own work. We need OTRS
Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:09, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Gbcopyvios D2
The same as his FB profile pic https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=352433473550220&set=a.352433446883556 which if you look carefully is a screenshot (bottom left) of something. Needs OTRS - File:Screenshot of candidate infobox on Chrome mobile.jpg also needs to be deleted if these files are deleted
- File:Screenshot of candidate infobox on Chrome mobile.jpg
- File:Simon Lepori (cropped).jpg
- File:Simon Lepori.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:09, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- 4 Files in Category:Gbcopyvios
FB screenshots - clearly the Joe Biden photo is not own work. All need OTRS to keep
- File:31greenhouseWeb-02-facebookJumbo.jpg
- File:Screenshot 20230120 180036 Facebook.jpg
- File:Screenshot 20230302 212612 Facebook.jpg
- File:Screenshot 20230414 045453 Facebook.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:29, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:40, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Gbcopyvios 0824a
[edit]Most of these credited to Niger Delta Insider Facebook Page and claimed as CC0 - no exif, PCP. Not own work unlike other works by this user
- File:Abonnema the York City in Rivers State.jpg
- File:Arial View of Charles Dale Memorial International School.jpg
- File:Bayelsa Fisherman.jpg
- File:Bolt Paddling during Ijaw Nation Day Festival in Lagos State.jpg
- File:CFC Junction Aba Road Port Harcourt City.jpg
- File:Charles Dale Memorial International School Administrative Block.jpg
- File:Charles Dale Memorial International School Graduating Class of 2024 PROM Night.jpg
- File:Charles Dale Memorial International School Graduating Class of 2024.jpg
- File:Charles Dale Memorial International School Logo.png
- File:Dancers at Ijaw Nation Day Festival in Lagos State.jpg
- File:Golf Estate Okuru-ama Port Harcourt.jpg
- File:Ijaw Nation Day Festival in Lagos State bolt paddling display.jpg
- File:Ijaw Nation Day Festival in Lagos State Elder.jpg
- File:Ijaw Nation Day Festival in Lagos State libation.jpg
- File:Ijaw Nation Day Festival in Lagos State Man dressed in rafia palm.jpg
- File:Ijaw Nation Day Festival in Lagos State on local custom and dry gin.jpg
- File:Ijaw Nation Day Festival in Lagos State Pouring libation.jpg
- File:Ijaw Nation Day Festival in Lagos State traditional display.jpg
- File:Ijaw Nation Day Festival in Lagos State.jpg
- File:Isam also Called Piom Piom or Periwinkle.jpg
- File:Periwinkle (Isam) Picking.jpg
- File:Periwinkle also called Piom Piom and popularly called Isam.jpg
- File:Periwinkle also called Piom Piom or Isam.jpg
- File:Periwinkle also known as Isam or Piom Piom.jpg
- File:Periwinkle Farmers.jpg
- File:Piom Piom also called Periwinkle or Isam.jpg
- File:Salvation Ministry Hand of God Cathedral in Rivers State.jpg
- File:Wigwe University aerial view.jpg
- File:Wigwe University by Herbert Wigwe.jpg
- File:Wigwe University campus.jpg
- File:Wigwe University Gate.jpg
- File:Wigwe University Isiokpo building.jpg
- File:Wigwe University Isiokpo Rivers State Nigeria.jpg
- File:Wigwe University Isiokpo Rivers State.jpg
- File:Wigwe University Isiokpo.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 15:12, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Gbcopyvios 0824b
[edit]The inaturalist link says CC BY NC which is not compatible with commons
- File:Black Shama.jpg
- File:Cebu Boobook.jpg
- File:Little Slaty Flycatcher.jpg
- File:Mindanao Brown Dove.jpg
- File:Mindoro Boobook.jpg
- File:Rombloon Boobook.jpg
- File:White-cheeked Bullfinch.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 15:16, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ticket:2024082210001255 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 03:00, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Kept: all files have a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 15:39, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
I doubt this is PD-OWN, and if it is then it’s stealth promotion from a really desperate MySpace band. Dronebogus (talk) 13:24, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. Unused, OOS, dubious claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:55, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictional flag with no resemblance to actual versions; at best causes confusion Enyavar (talk) 00:37, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:31, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictional map of an alternate reality without given context or date. At best causes confusion. Enyavar (talk) 00:38, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:31, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: montage of a parliament with alternate german flags Enyavar (talk) 00:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:31, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Category:User page images 191.116.164.168 00:59, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:31, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Images only used on Wikidata (d:Q106044120) for promotional purposes.
- File:BSN Logo 06 05 2021.jpg
- File:Bravo Savings Network Favicon 300x300.png
- File:Bravo Savings Network Favicon 65x65.png
- File:Bravo Savings Network Favicon 192x192.png
- File:Michele-Legnaioli Bravo Savings Network.jpg
- File:Marco-Farnararo BravoSavingsNetwork.jpg
- File:Bravo-Savings-Network favicon.png
- File:Claudio-Veratti-BravoSavingsNetwork.jpg
- File:Bravo-Savings-Network LOGO.png
Yeeno (talk) 04:32, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- The images should be converted to SVG format if useful. --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 18:44, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, advertising. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:32, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Images not used on any projects.
Yeeno (talk) 04:53, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:32, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Orangeninja27 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope?
- File:The Lifecycle of Black Lives Matter (BLM).pdf
- File:Corning Community College (CCC) Demographics (name redacted).pdf
Brianjd (talk) 14:25, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:35, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
"FBMD" in metadata indicates download from Facebook Ytoyoda (talk) 14:46, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- It has been used on Facebook in various pages. Verman1 (talk) 14:48, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:36, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: VRT ticket received. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:15, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:36, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since)
The original work, which can be seen in full at [3], was published in France in 1904. I'm not sure who the artist is, however. Because of the publication date, it's definitely {{PD-US-expired}}, but it may or may not be {{PD-France}}. I don't see any signature or other indication of who the illustrator is near the relevant pages (unlike other illustrations in the magazine), but it may be noted elsewhere. A Google search didn't bring anything up, either. clpo13(talk) 19:18, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Close as Kept. Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/France#General: " if the work is anonymous, pseudonymous or collective, it is 70 years following the end of the year of publication of the work". Good faith efforts have been made to determine any individual author, without success, so reasonable to assume this proviso applies. (No prejudgement if additional information is found.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:45, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal artwork with no educational value.
- File:Афиша. Copyright. Вечность минус один день.jpg
- File:Афіша. Пераклад Drupal 1.jpg
- File:Афиша. Drupal-клуб 2.jpg
- File:Афиша. Drupal-день.jpg
- File:Афіша. Пераклад Drupal. Паскаральнік.jpg
- File:Афиша. Drupal-клуб. Сезон 2.jpg
- File:Афиша. Турнир Неформалов 3. Дворовые бега.jpg
- This one is used anf has OTRS, I kept it (it was addressed in a separate request as well)--Ymblanter (talk) 21:15, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- File:Pirate pin up.jpg
- File:Look to (on) the right.jpg
- File:KonstantSin.jpg
- File:The process was aborted.jpg
- File:Guard of the room.jpg
- File:Cyber selfportrait.jpg
- File:God (by Sviatlana Jermakovič).jpg
- File:Skinhead (by Sviatlana Jermakovič).jpg
- File:Pain (by Sviatlana Jermakovič).jpg
- File:Annunciation (by Sviatlana Jermakovič).jpg
- File:Renaissance Revival.jpg
- File:Salvador Dali, savior of the painting!.jpg
-mattbuck (Talk) 01:10, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- This artworks has a value because these are artworks under creative commons license.
- This in not usual in Belarusian landscape.
- With the help of these work belarusian creative commons comunity will pr the licences.
- If to speak about posters. These posters belong to Falanster community and Zabej community in Belarus.
- This is community of people making social experiments. And on the falanster site you can find different events in which a lot of people took part.
- -svetit 10:48, 3 January 2014 (UTC+3)
Deleted: The only Google hits for this artist are these images. We do not keep art work by artists who have not achieved a certain notability and this one apparently has none. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:45, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Fylers with no educational value.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:28, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- These posters are used in specific article. Why do you want to delete them? They are also under free licenses.~ Svetit (talk) 18:00, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- As far as I can see, these posters are not currently used on any page on a Wikimedia project. The deletion rationale is stated in the nomination. Licensing is not the only inclusion criterion on Commons. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Now in use. [4] (Svetit's edit) whym (talk) 11:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:52, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Depicts (accidental?) exposure of nipples. I don't think this is a valid reason to delete the image, but there seems to be a push to delete images that depict accidental exposure of nipples, and an in-use image has already been deleted (see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Nipple slip and the category discussion linked there). Pinging @Infrogmation, Rhododendrites. Brianjd (talk) 01:31, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- If this image is kept, someone should review the categories, especially the "topless" ones. Brianjd (talk) 01:33, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, I've noticed categories related to women's breasts seem to be used rather haphazardly. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Allen is an outspoken singer, i imagine she finds the idea of her stage outfits being accidental amusing. --C.Suthorn (talk) 05:20, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- @C.Suthorn This is a poor example, having been taken a full 6 years prior to the image under discussion here. Anyway, the argument that if someone is OK with exposing themselves in one situation, they must be OK with exposing themselves in other situations, is disturbing.
- Skimming through her English Wikipedia article, I found no reference to revealing outfits being deliberate. Am I missing something? Brianjd (talk) 05:31, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep from googling both the performer name and "V Festival" + topless. The performer seems rather known for exposed breasts in public, and there seems to be a fair amount of toplessness at the event. (I have removed "Category:Nipple slip" from the file page. I am opposed to Commons hosting actual photos of inadvertent "wardrobe malfunctions" exposing body parts at times and places where such exposure is considered inappropriate or embarrassing to the subject. From all I've gathered, this is not such a case.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:57, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, this is most probably not an accicental nipslip but rather intentional and the singer certainly seems to be both aware of it and fine with it. Ove Raul (talk) 00:55, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Close as Kept, no support for deletion; even nominator thinks not a reason to delete. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:57, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused and lower quality version of Angel_Beats_logo.svg Adamant1 (talk) 05:51, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:54, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Peteralice435 (talk · contribs)
[edit]2 are labelled press photos, one is watermarked UPI. Not own work. Needs OTRS
- File:Press photo 1.jpg
- File:Press Photo ddg.jpg
- File:Andrea Alverta Ward3.jpg
- File:Andrea Alverta Ward4.jpg
- File:Andrea Alverta Ward2.jpg
- File:Andrea Alverta Ward1.jpg
- File:Andrea Alverta Ward.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Peteralice435 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope/spam
- File:James William Tralie.jpg
- File:COCO765.jpg
- File:JUIU656.jpg
- File:Acceptancefurthernoticeplease.png
- File:Htmlryrui.png
Юрий Д.К 12:06, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:33, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
A headshot, almost the same as his FB profile pic - https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=282600320352404&set=pb.100058073141536.-2207520000..&type=3 - no exif, unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 11:40, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:15, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Sarmiento de Formosa “Año 2019”.jpg
- File:Sarmiento Campeón.jpg
- File:Bochas Inclusivo.jpg
- File:Inauguración parquet.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:15, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to be own work but taken from online news.
- File:Dấu chân Người Rừng.jpg
- File:Kienthuc-batutut-09 vvvc.jpg
- File:02ce4e51b0de2f7e2a6b09c6bde7c6b522c239a6 hq.jpg
- File:Anh 2 tphw.jpg
NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 15:17, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:15, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Image is not free; belongs to Sony Pictures Television and CBS. 24.147.21.249 16:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:15, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
sole upload, unused, doubtful copyright Pibwl (talk) 18:01, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:16, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Modern art, needs OTRS. Uploader claims to be Keen but I think that needs to be verified
- File:Wong Keen Empty.jpg
- File:Wong Keen Nude with Black Stocking I.jpg
- File:Wong Keen Run in the Family II.jpg
- File:Wong Keen Lotus 1965.jpg
- File:Wong Keen Arms Stretching 1963.jpg
- File:Wong Keen Untitled 1964.jpg
- File:Bicycle, 1959.jpg
- File:Lotus, 1956.png
- File:Abstract ink II.jpg
- File:Abstract ink VI.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:26, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- I am Wong Keen. How do you want me to verify this? Wongkeen (talk) 15:31, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- Would a photo of me holding a note saying "I am Wong Keen and I am uploading files to commons" work? You can check that photo to other online ones.
- Sorry but I'm quite old and new to this. Wongkeen (talk) 16:27, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Wongkeen: Hi. Could you please follow the steps at COM:OTRS and then we can sort this out Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, have generated the copyright release email. Thanks for your guidance, I understand that it's suspicious that someone would suddenly upload so many images of artworks. Wongkeen (talk) 14:28, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: permission received and verified. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:18, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely own work by uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:54, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:20, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
different author in metadata Agora (talk) 12:11, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:20, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Not own work: see watermark and transmission/FB code in EXIF data. And no FOP in Philippines. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:20, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Likely taken from facebook https://www.facebook.com/acemc.tac/photos/a.625425934270114/2390152747797415/ -M.nelson (talk) 15:24, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:20, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in the United States. Public art is protected by copyright. Ytoyoda (talk) 02:30, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; apparently an authorized mural, not illegal graffiti. (See explanation at Category:The Great Wall of Los Angeles - this seems to be our only photo of details of the artwork, at present other photos in category seem general views of the structure.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
This case is kind of "tricky". This file was uploaded from Flickr and has all the metadata which, normally, means that the image is legit. However, on the other hand, it also seems a case of Commons:License laundering. The Flickr account that posted this image, only posted this image and nothing else. Also, this image can be found everywhere on internet (see here, here and here). It seems like a publicity image and someone thought it would be a good idea to post it on Flickr under a CC0 license, so it would be kept here. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 04:57, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom (Note: Looking at adjacent photos in Flickr users streams is useful for both nominators and closers in deletion requests.)-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:44, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Taken from http://disco80.xyz/?grigoriy_reznichenko. No permission Venzz (talk) 05:38, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:46, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Taken from http://disco80.xyz/?grigoriy_reznichenko. No permission Venzz (talk) 05:42, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:45, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused duplicate of the better quality File:5cm per second logo.svg Adamant1 (talk) 05:45, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- The SVG version is badly traced, probably auto-tracing from Inkscape, Keep until it is correctly traced.
In the meantime, file is used on the French Wikipedia (the uploader replaced the raster file on every wiki). --Thibaut (talk) 06:40, 1 December 2021 (UTC) - Keep Per @Thibaut120094: the logo has been traced approximately and seems to stray from the original. Generally, resorting to automatic path tracing is avoided and even less substituting such a file by deleting the bitmap version. If we don't have a correct SVG file (that conforms to the authentic logo), we should surely keep the bitmap one. — Baidax 💬 11:55, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept per above -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:47, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
A copyrighted publication from Royal Horticultural Society. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:11, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- I uploaded this image to illustrate an article about The Plant Review, but I later realised I could upload it elsewhere in order to illustrate the article under fair use. Mike L Grant (talk) 20:56, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- No "fair use" of copyrighted material allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Please take care to be honest and accurate with statements of authorship and licensing. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:49, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:49, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Has the watermark of a photographer, need permission from that person to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:50, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
A better version exists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد (talk • contribs) 09:34, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, in use, and any png image will look fuzzy when scaled down (due to design decisions discussed in phab:T192744). — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:32, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:54, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be non free. Year specified only states 20s and requests inquiry for licensing purposes.
https://www.imogencunningham.com/artworks/categories/47/2227-imogen-cunningham-succulent-1920s/ Nathanielcwm (talk) 06:44, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. No evidence of free licensed status seen. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Obviouly fotograhy of of an older picture, serious doubts that the new photographer owns the copyright Alpöhi (talk) 07:49, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- The person was born in 1929. If this picture was taken as "own work" in 2021, as the uploader claims, Mr. Amstutz looks surprisingly young for his 92 years.
- Seriously now: 1978 as in the file name makes a lot more sense. I think we may safely assume this is a derivative work from somewhere. --91.34.41.252 15:59, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Quite. That's the point; that the uploader's claims of authorship and licensing seem as bogus as their claimed date. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:57, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:57, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright lies with Alamy; surely no "own image". See for example source given at [5] Chtrede (talk) 09:11, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- No one reserves any copyright to this file, not even Alamy. This photo was a portrait taken by then military head of state of Sierra Leone before the advent of digital cameras and uploads. It was printed and distributed all over the country in Sierra Leone. No one ever knew the photographer, apart from the subject himself. The advent of digital uploads has enabled many people to scan and upload a copy of the file. Alamy will never be able to identify the photographer because the file is not their proprietary - it's public property. The subject in the photo was a public figure, he was the head of state of Sierra Leone (1992 - 1996). So please, let the photo stays. Do not delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hassanjalloh1 (talk • contribs) 16:10, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, Sierra Leone has life + 50 years, Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Sierra Leone. Thuresson (talk) 21:00, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Well, according to Section 33 of Sierra Leone's current and actual copyright law, "The Copyright Act, 2011": "..the publication of the portrait of the author or other owner of copyright is permitted without the author's authorization if publication is related to scientific, educational or cultural purposes in general or to facts or events of public interest that have occured in public." (S33, Copyright Act, 2011). NO ONE has copyright to the original file (which was a printed hard copy version), except for the subject in the photo, as there was never a mention of the photographer, probably as the military junta were very discrete at the time. So Alamy, like many other entities or people, were able to digitize a copy and uploaded it to their website for commercial purpose - which is actually not permitted according to Sierra Leone Law, because they commercialize it (Section 10, Subsection 1 of The Copyright Act, 2011), while Wikipedia/Wikimedia is clearly in line with Section 33 of the Copyright Act (2011). So deleting the photo has no point, except for other reasons other than copyright. Hassanjalloh1 (talk) 20:14, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted; no evidence of free license status, whether or not Alamy has any legitimate claim. Alamy may or may not hold authority to license the photo, but the uploader certainly does not. The sited Sierra Leone law is interesting, but does not seem inclusive enough to be considered a free license for Commons; "publication of the portrait of the author or other owner of copyright is permitted without the author's authorization if publication is related to scientific, educational or cultural purpose" - Commons requires reuse for whatever purpose, including commercial. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:06, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright logo Ryse93 (talk) 11:49, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, false license, false claims. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:11, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
This is not actually a photograph of Aleister Crowley. Susmuffin (talk) 02:00, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Photo is COM:INUSE. If you believe that the file is incorrectly identified, it is grounds for renaming, not deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:25, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Susmuffin as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 12:30, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- This photograph is an obviously edited one without any sign of its origin. Since it is a fictitious portrayal of its subject, it could have been made at any time. Furthermore, the edits might be copyrightable, depending on the jurisdiction that this fake photograph was made in. Honestly, we should not be storing fraudulent photographs of historical figures here. Susmuffin (talk) 15:31, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, false license, false claims by uploader. Neither the original photo nor the added artwork are sourced. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:14, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Maxinvestigator as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 12:30, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted; claimed license unsupported by source site. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:27, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
I doubt this is PD-OWN, and if it is then it’s stealth promotion from a really desperate MySpace band. Dronebogus (talk) 13:24, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. Unused, apparently OOS, questionable license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:29, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Base Image taken from a clockwork orange, parodic use only covered by fair use (which commons does not host) Dronebogus (talk) 14:26, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, a derivative image based on a still from w:en:A Clockwork Orange (film), compare with the IMDb image.[6] Also probably based on an unidentified photograph of Donald Trump which may be non-free. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:37, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted COM:DW by Flickr user. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
The photographer, Lucien Aigner, died in 1999. The photograph is likely still copyrighted. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:48, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted No indication Flickr account has authority to license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Lo subí por error LG UltraLink (talk) 16:18, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted prompt uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:37, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
1957 or 1985 or...? Xocolatl (talk) 17:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- This is an image of Nilakantha Das, taken by a professional photographer in 1957, but published in the book (by Lila Ray) in 1985, from which I photographed it and cleaned up the background. I have the permission from the non-profit publisher of the book to use/modify their images according to the needs of this wiki page.
- I will change the date of the picture to 1957. BELLSHOA (talk) 21:23, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- If you have permission to free license from third party copyright holder, that can be sent via COM:VRT. Note however that Commons needs either explicit free license from the copyright holder, or verifiable reason that the image is in the public domain. Since the photographer was credited as "unknown", copyright holder permission seems unlikely. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:42, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:42, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
No date and photo creator. Hashmat56 (talk) 17:30, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reverse image search proves that there is no copyright and that is originates as a free photo from the source. --Weaveravel (talk) 21:36, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept, sourced to website with clear free license. Commons has Category:Images from Pxhere so apparently the source is considered reliable for Commons. (If not, a more general request might be in order.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:48, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo with no educational value and is out of project scope. Likely uploaded as part of advertisement/promotion. BRP ever 21:48, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted' per nom; unused image by non-contributor, OOS -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:26, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Unfortunately this photo is not from NASA but from Fokker Space. The source PDF from NASA says thereto:
"This NASA conference publication contains both U.S. Government works and non-government works. NASA has been granted permission to publish and disseminate non-government works contained herein with all other rights presumably retained by the authors and/or copyright owners. For U.S. Government works, no copyright is claimed in the United States under Title 17, U.S. Code. All Other Rights Reserved."
Presumably you can upload it as a fair use image to the English Wikipedia. Ras67 (talk) 23:57, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- I have found a similar image that is within the public domain and this image is free to be deleted now. James Denesuk (talk) 23:49, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:28, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR NK, North Korean Banknotes cannot be uploaded. This banknote was designed in 2008, so it is copyrighted. Ox1997cow (talk) 11:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:02, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Hardly own work by uploader. Published here in February 2021 and image credited to " FOTO: MIŠO HOCHSTATTER". -- Túrelio (talk) 10:39, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:24, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
No evidence provided that this press shot - widely used in a number of Internet articles - is indeed released under this licence. It's a straighforward copyvio AAhelifan (talk) 13:53, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- I work for the label Parlophone and we own this copyright. Abackham (talk) 15:09, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Abackham: please arrange for an authorized person at Parlophone to email the Volunteer Response Team to confirm the license. Verbcatcher (talk) 20:34, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- I have emailed from my warner music email. Please let me know when I can reupload. Abackham (talk) 19:26, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Abackham: thank you for emailing permission. You should not reupload the file. If the VRT team confirms that your email is sufficient then the file will be tagged accordingly, and it will be undeleted if it has been deleted. Please see Commons:Volunteer Response Team. You can ask questions at Commons:Volunteer Response Team/Noticeboard. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:34, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- I have emailed from my warner music email. Please let me know when I can reupload. Abackham (talk) 19:26, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Abackham: please arrange for an authorized person at Parlophone to email the Volunteer Response Team to confirm the license. Verbcatcher (talk) 20:34, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: No OTRS. --Herby talk thyme 11:26, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
previously published at https://www.passionescherma.it/armi-volanti/, needs more complete source info Ytoyoda (talk) 14:31, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:27, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
The video is not available and there is no proof that it was licensed creative commons. MGA73 (talk) 17:49, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:28, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be taken from the subject's official website: https://kansawada.com/ Ytoyoda (talk) 17:53, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:28, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: according to Tineye, it seems to have been posted in 2014 by Cisco. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:01, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:29, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
This is uploaded under own work which sounds fishy. The picture of high quality and looks like a photoshoot. The image has no metadata. The upload says its date as September but the image is available online way before https://udayakala.news/darshans-24-years-to-cinemas-life-a-fest-for-fans-on-11th-august/ . Image caption has one word and that is Dboss which a fan-given name to the actor. I highly doubt that the uploader is the genuine creator of the image APPU (talk) 18:34, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:29, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Not "own work" as claimed. This appears to have been created for a play in 2020. See http://artscenter.uhh.hawaii.edu/conversion-of-kaahumanu —howcheng {chat} 18:57, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:30, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
not own work, it's some promotional picture, see https://www.genova24.it/2020/04/trasporto-pubblico-svelato-il-progetto-del-filobus-per-genova-ora-mancano-solo-i-soldi-da-roma-234335/ Bultro (talk) 20:11, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:31, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
"Nipple slip" photograph. Is this a violation of Commons:Photographs_of_identifiable_people#Moral_issues? Notes: I have no objection to bare breasts photographed in consensual circumstances. This appears to be "accidental nudity" per categorization? The "Oops" in the title was added by the Commons uploader, not in the original Flickr upload. File was previously nominated in group deletion request, Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Nipple slip, which I closed as the circumstances of the images were significantly different, and discussion seemed more focused on the "Category:Nipple slip" than evaluation of individual images. Questions: Is the bared nipple considered improper or scandalous in the context of this event, or in South Korean culture in general? Or unremarkable? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:11, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It's just a tiny thing, which I don't think most people would even notice if we weren't talking about it. And you can't really see anything anyway, because it's covered with mud. It looks like her left nipple is visible through her clothing. Does anyone care about that? Brianjd (talk) 09:36, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment "Does anyone care about that?" That is a key question! This is why am interested to get some information on local context. From a little online searching, it seems that Korean society did not have a stigma about exposed breasts similar to US/Western Europe in the 19th and early 20th century, but attitudes have since changed to be closer to the US. In the US in general, there is recent almost frantic obsessive prudery generally labeling women's exposed nipples as inappropriate and scandalously embarrassing to benippled person. Meanwhile, there are also significant exceptions in the US, times/places/events where exposed breasts are considered acceptable/unremarkable. Might the "Boryeong Mud Festival" be in a similar category? A quick websearch for "Boryeong Mud Festival" + topless reveals multiple copies of this very photo. This suggests that this is exceptional. Anyone have more information on cultural context? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:29, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - You can find other photos here. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:48, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
I want this file that I uploaded to be deleted please, thanks! AnonymousUser103591 (talk) 02:57, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment It might be helpful if you explained *why* you think they should be deleted. Asking more than 2 &1/2 months after upload is too late for automatic courtesy deletion by uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: UNused. Courtesy deletion. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:48, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
I want this file that I uploaded to be deleted please, thanks! AnonymousUser103591 (talk) 02:57, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:48, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
I want this file that I uploaded to be deleted please, thanks! AnonymousUser103591 (talk) 02:57, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion of unused file. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:48, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
I want this file that I uploaded to be deleted please, thanks! AnonymousUser103591 (talk) 02:57, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion of unused file. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:48, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
I want this file that I uploaded to be deleted please, thanks! AnonymousUser103591 (talk) 02:57, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion of unused file. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:48, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
I want this file that I uploaded to be deleted please, thanks! AnonymousUser103591 (talk) 02:57, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion of unused file. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:48, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
I want this file that I uploaded to be deleted please, thanks! AnonymousUser103591 (talk) 02:57, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion of unused file. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:48, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
I want this file that I uploaded to be deleted please, thanks! AnonymousUser103591 (talk) 02:57, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion of unused file. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:48, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
I want this file that I uploaded to be deleted please, thanks! AnonymousUser103591 (talk) 02:58, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion of unused file. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:49, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
I want this file that I uploaded to be deleted please, thanks! AnonymousUser103591 (talk) 02:58, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion of unused file. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:49, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
I want this file that I uploaded to be deleted please, thanks! AnonymousUser103591 (talk) 02:58, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion of unused file. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:49, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
I want this file that I uploaded to be deleted please, thanks! AnonymousUser103591 (talk) 02:58, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion of unused file. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:49, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
I want this file that I uploaded to be deleted please, thanks! AnonymousUser103591 (talk) 02:58, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion of unused file. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:49, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
I want this file that I uploaded to be deleted please, thanks! AnonymousUser103591 (talk) 02:58, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion of unused file. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:49, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
I want this file that I uploaded to be deleted please, thanks! AnonymousUser103591 (talk) 02:58, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion of unused file. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:49, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
I want this file that I uploaded to be deleted please, thanks! AnonymousUser103591 (talk) 02:58, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion of unused file. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:49, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
I want this file that I uploaded to be deleted please, thanks! AnonymousUser103591 (talk) 02:58, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion of unused file. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:49, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
I want this file that I uploaded to be deleted please, thanks! AnonymousUser103591 (talk) 02:59, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion of unused file. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:49, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Delete There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for three dimensional works of art. This statue was installed in 2010[7], making it automatically subject copyright. No evidence exist to support the artwork being available under a Commons compatible license. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 03:35, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:49, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
The card has a design, so it should be copyrighted by the designer/owner ArnabSaha (talk) 08:28, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:50, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a privately owned photo of ABC Pathway Group's Founder and Chairman, and should not be placed on Wikimedia for free usage. 218.253.70.90 09:15, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:50, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
COM:Derivative work of a copyrighted mural. VRT permission from artist Shaun Logan needed. MKFI (talk) 09:41, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- How do I show that I have permission to post this from from the artist? Should I have him create an account himself to verify that it is him in the photo and that it is his photo? JessieMMarie (talk) 19:46, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
- Here are several articles noting that this is his work.
- 9. ^ "https://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/blog/2012/05/the-other-facebook-artist.html?page=all
- [1]
- 10. ^ "https://www.newstimes.com/business/article/Facebook-s-Main-Street-feels-like-an-amusement-5910381.php
- [2]
- 11. ^ "https://www.wired.com/2014/11/take-tour-facebooks-giant-corporate-art-lab/
- [3]
- 12. ^ "https://www.wescover.com/p/murals-by-shaun-logan-at-facebook--PrkLluPg2McZ
- [4]
- 9. ^ "https://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/blog/2012/05/the-other-facebook-artist.html?page=all
- <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/blog/2012/05/the-other-facebook-artist.html?page=all|title=The Other Facebook Artist|last=Reyes|first=Lemery|date=2012-05-11|website=Silicon Valley Business Journal|access-date=2021-02-19|language=en-US}}</ref>
- 10. ^ "https://www.newstimes.com/business/article/Facebook-s-Main-Street-feels-like-an-amusement-5910381.php
- <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.newstimes.com/business/article/Facebook-s-Main-Street-feels-like-an-amusement-5910381.php|title=Office Space: Facebook’s Main Street feels like an amusement park|last=Balise|first=Julie|date=2014-11-04|website=newstimes|access-date=2021-02-19|language=en-US}}</ref>
- 11. ^ "https://www.wired.com/2014/11/take-tour-facebooks-giant-corporate-art-lab/
- <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.wired.com/2014/11/take-tour-facebooks-giant-corporate-art-lab/|title=The Amazing Murals Created by Facebook’s Artists-in-Residence|last=Metz|first=Cade|date=2014-11-24|website=Wired|access-date=2021-02-19|language=en-US}}</ref>
- 12. ^ "https://www.wescover.com/p/murals-by-shaun-logan-at-facebook--PrkLluPg2McZ
- <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.wescover.com/p/murals-by-shaun-logan-at-facebook--PrkLluPg2McZ|title=Zipper|website=Westcover|access-date=2021-02-19|language=en-US}}</ref> JessieMMarie (talk) 19:56, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
- Hey there, this is me! I took this photo, well my friend did with my camera the day I finished this mural at the facebook offices in Menlo Park. Is there something else you would need to approve this image? Thanks for your time. Shaun C Logan (talk) 20:11, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
References
- ↑ Reyes, Lemery (2012-05-11). The Other Facebook Artist (in en-US). Silicon Valley Business Journal. Retrieved on 2021-02-19.
- ↑ Balise, Julie (2014-11-04). Office Space: Facebook’s Main Street feels like an amusement park (in en-US). newstimes. Retrieved on 2021-02-19.
- ↑ Metz, Cade (2014-11-24). The Amazing Murals Created by Facebook’s Artists-in-Residence (in en-US). Wired. Retrieved on 2021-02-19.
- ↑ Zipper (in en-US). Westcover. Retrieved on 2021-02-19.
- This is getting rather murky. @JessieMMarie: you uploaded this image with the assertion that it is your own work; that is you took the photograph yourself. Now @Shaun C Logan: says that his friend took the photograph. JessieMMarie, are you that friend?. The original reason why I nominated this image for deletion is the mural shown in the photograph. The mural is indeed the work of Shaun Logan, and that means that any photographs published must have permission from both the photographer and Shaun Logan.
- @Shaun C Logan: you are the author of the painting, but the photograph author would be your friend. Given the above uncertainty, this would really need explicit permission from both you and the photographer. Please send the permission by VRT. You can use Commons:Wikimedia VRT release generator. MKFI (talk) 09:43, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:50, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
This member is no longer active on Flickr. Blue Fox xyz (talk) 10:15, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - It was flickrreviewed, so while the author may have stopped distributing under a free licence, there's no reason for us to. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:27, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: invalid reason, file was verified Denniss (talk) 11:03, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
The previous discussion about personality rights was focused on the fact that the subject is unidentifiable. Perhaps Commons has moved on since then. After all, Commons:Photographs of identifiable people#Moral issues says:
- The provenance of an image may taint its use irredeemably. A "downblouse" or "creepshot" photograph is not made ethically acceptable just because the subject's face is cropped out.
Pinging @Mormegil as admin who closed previous discussion about personality rights. Brianjd (talk) 10:44, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Just to clarify, the discussion shown above on this page is not relevant. I am referring to a discussion on a different page: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:The gogo-dancers red G-String.jpg. Brianjd (talk) 10:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per Brianjd reasoning above. Upskirt/creepshot isn't ok, we do not know if the photographer had permission to take such shot (and not likely to know since the account no longer exists on Flickr). Bidgee (talk) 10:56, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:50, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Sorry, I have not much idea of a female urinal but as far as I know girls have to pee the other way round using these urinals. Therefore, this picture is wrong and hence out of scope. ALE! ¿…? 21:31, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- You might want to check that out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_urination_device --Avril1975 (talk) 21:37, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - Well within scope, as referred to by Avril1975 - such device is commonly known as a "She-pee", or to give it the proper name, a FUD or Female Urination Device. This image is perfectly acceptable and within the scope of Commons to hold. BarkingFish (talk) 21:42, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Nominator isn't familiar with the device, or is confusing it with a different device. No privacy issue due to obscured faces. Dcoetzee (talk) 21:47, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep maybe the girls use this thing: [8] --AtelierMonpli (talk) 22:30, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Maybe I was confused by the category "Female urinals" below the image which in the case fo a FUD is not applicable. So maybe some other admin can close the deletion request and remove the category "Female urinals". --ALE! ¿…? 07:12, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 11:08, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
This image shows people using a toilet that appears to be inside a building, where they presumably have a reasonable expectation of privacy, with no evidence of consent. Back in 2011, we said that is not a problem, because the faces are not visible. Things have changed since then. Brianjd (talk) 11:16, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, faces are not visible. Thuresson (talk) 21:02, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Thuresson Commons:Photographs of identifiable people#Moral issues says:
- The provenance of an image may taint its use irredeemably. A "downblouse" or "creepshot" photograph is not made ethically acceptable just because the subject's face is cropped out.
- I don't think the guideline specifically addresses this situation. But using the toilet is normally considered one of those personal things that you are not supposed to take photos of without consent. Brianjd (talk) 01:23, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Thuresson Commons:Photographs of identifiable people#Moral issues says:
- Delete per nom - Indeed unless they consented to this very image then no they have a right to privacy like everyone else. I'm all for INCOPE and all that but there are some boundaries you don't cross. –Davey2010Talk 12:33, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:50, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
The better version: File:信義區夜景 - panoramio (2).jpg Solomon203 (talk) 12:29, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:51, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Netora as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 12:35, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:51, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 12:41, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Well-Informed Optimist as no permission (no permission) Didym (talk) 12:43, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Какие могут быть разрешения на свои же работы?!!!!!!!! Нойон (talk) 20:52, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mdaniels5757 as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 12:52, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused, uneducational file - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kharkivian as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 13:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:53, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
seems to be incorrect file. Mostly white file, unlike that correct one Estopedist1 (talk) 13:20, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:53, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|Wrong name. It's supposed to say "FavijFake", not "FaviFake"}} FaviFake (talk) 14:26, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- @FaviFake: please request that the file is renamed, see Help:RenameLink or Template:Rename. Note that rename requests can take several hours to be implemented. Verbcatcher (talk) 20:45, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 16:53, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal logo, out of scope and uploader's request. Yann (talk) 15:45, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, this image is the top Google result when you search for "FaviFake" (my username) and it is outdated, so I want to delete it as the uploader of the image as it is no longer relevant and i only used it once. Also, no other site links here FaviFake (talk) 16:24, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Hey there, As Yann @Yann: said, this image is the top Google result when you search for "FaviFake" (my username) and it is outdated, so I want to delete it as the uploader of the image. FaviFake (talk) 1:07, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Endorse deletion. - Jmabel ! talk 16:11, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- No reason not to delete. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:23, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:18, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Superseded by File:Observance of International Workers' Day RGBY.svg, which is the same map with a different, higher contrast colour scheme. The newer map has also been brought up to date by changing the colour for Trinidad and Tobago. Lord Belbury (talk) 14:29, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:53, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Redirect with a typo: КР531АП12 is different IC. Красный wanna talk? 14:52, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:54, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Redirect with a typo: Tsentralnaya 54 is another building. Красный wanna talk? 14:54, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:54, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Redirect with a typo Красный wanna talk? 14:56, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:54, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
صورتي الشخصيه واحببت ان اغيرها بأخرى الشريف البركاتي (talk) 14:57, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:54, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
This does not look like any logo used by the company (cf. [9]) and should be deleted because it is misleading. The file is also unused and there are two true-to-original files already on Commons. IceWelder [✉] 15:16, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:54, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Casanova50 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Bogus {{PD-1996}} claim. Even assuming {{PD-Spain-photo}} applies, 1972 + 25 + 1 = 1998, well after the 1996 URAA date. Images must be free in country of origin and the US; not free in the US until ca. 2068 (1972 + 95 + 1).
Эlcobbola talk 16:52, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Elcobbola in any case the {{PD-Spain-photo}} applies, but the {{PD-1996}} does not, we just take out this one and keep it as the Spain law, this was from 1972, 1972-2021= 49 years already more than 25 per Spain's copyright law. Casanova50 (talk) 16:56, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- As I said, " Images must be free in country of origin and the US." This is per COM:L: "Uploads of non-U.S. works are normally allowed only if the work is either in the public domain or covered by a valid free license in both the U.S. and the country of origin of the work." (bold and italics in original) Эlcobbola talk 16:59, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- I am not seeing an original author on the picture, there it only says "Diez Minutos" but there is no a copyright mark or an specific author, in any case we could also apply this one as an {{Anonymous work}}, it has no markings and not an specified author or photographer. Casanova50 (talk) 17:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- "I don't see an author" is not the same as "anonymous work", which is a defined scenario requiring reasonable inquiry. It also does not resolve the URAA issue (it makes it worse: 1972+50+1 = 2023 is also well after 1996). This is also not a faithful 2D scan, but a photograph of the card as an object and thus a COM:DW for which the photographer's permission would be needed. Эlcobbola talk 17:07, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- I am not seeing an original author on the picture, there it only says "Diez Minutos" but there is no a copyright mark or an specific author, in any case we could also apply this one as an {{Anonymous work}}, it has no markings and not an specified author or photographer. Casanova50 (talk) 17:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- As I said, " Images must be free in country of origin and the US." This is per COM:L: "Uploads of non-U.S. works are normally allowed only if the work is either in the public domain or covered by a valid free license in both the U.S. and the country of origin of the work." (bold and italics in original) Эlcobbola talk 16:59, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- For closing admin: Casanova50 is Confirmed sock of TheBellaTwins1445, serial copyvios and socking. Эlcobbola talk 18:44, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:55, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
This file has not been updated in quality and photography, raising concerns about deleting it. The language version document also does not have clear image quality and the image and graphics have not been updated. Commons File:丸に十六目結.In jpg File history, the original file is updated in quality. You have the right to delete this file because the history and language version documents have not been updated. It seems that the file is not compatible. Request deletion. Gameposo (talk) 09:31, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
There is no standard for this file to be registered in public. The file itself is old and does not guarantee anything, and files that already exist in svg form are suitable as alternative files. This file has no criteria and is inappropriate to use as a file. Takuyakoz (talk) 18:50, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: UNused logo - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:55, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Although I wasn't able to find this image using tineye or Google, this is highly unlikely to be "own work" as claimed, as uploader has history of falsely claiming authorship (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Picture of Queen Kaʻahumanu of Hawaii.jpg and this diff). It's possible that this is a public domain painting, but without provenance we can't determine that. —howcheng {chat} 19:01, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:55, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 19:41, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:56, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
out of scope: no educational value Headlock0225 (talk) 20:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- If this had more information - even what city/town it was photographed in - I likely would have voted "keep" as an illustration of everyday culture of such-and-such place. Without any context or location, I must agree with the nomination. Delete -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:24, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:56, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Gioconda (soprano), figurino di Alfredo Edel per La Gioconda (1876) - Archivio Storico Ricordi ICON005187 - Restoration.jpg
[edit]Since this photo is a copyrighted and owned file according to the owner's rights, similar two files need such deletion measures. Takuyakoz (talk) 20:41, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep PD-100. --RAN (talk) 20:51, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Public domain artwork - If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:56, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Gioconda (soprano), figurino di Alfredo Edel per La Gioconda (1876) - Archivio Storico Ricordi ICON005187 - Restoration.png
[edit]Since this photo is a copyrighted and owned file according to the owner's rights, similar two files need such deletion measures. Takuyakoz (talk) 20:41, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Clear PD-100, I am not sure of the rationale for this deletion, other than not using a standard template. --RAN (talk) 04:25, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Public domain artwork - If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:56, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eiga-Kevin2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative work of album jacket art from Japan, unclear why American copyright laws apply here.
Ytoyoda (talk) 20:56, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:56, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Camping2021 (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
- File:Die Erholungssuchenden am Blauen See.jpg
- File:Bau des Kiosk am Blauen See.jpg
- File:Zelten am Blauen See 1952.jpg
- File:Das Restaurant 1950 .jpg
- File:Die Wasserrutsche am Blauen See.png
- File:Luftbild Blauer See Garbsen.jpg
- File:Blauer See Garbsen.jpg
- File:Wake and Ski Anlage.jpg
- File:Schäferwagen Blauer See Garbsen.jpg
- File:Aquapark Blauer See Garbsen.jpg
- File:Bergdörfchen.jpg
Didym (talk) 22:09, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyright violation - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:56, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
It's abuse and the time codes for these subtitles are copied from the TimedText example. Pacha Tchernof (talk) 18:22, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:52, 29 December 2021 (UTC)