Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/10/04
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_in_LIMA-2015.jpg){kind=link}
_poster.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_class_frigate_BNS_Abu_Bakar_(F15).jpg){kind=link}
_-_fleuron_-_title_page.png){kind=link}
_grande_-_Ideal_para_hojas_enteras_tamaño_carta_o_similar.png){kind=link}
_mediano_-_Ideal_para_fondos_a_colores.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_grande_-_Ideal_fondos_de_color_de_gran_tamaño.png){kind=link}
_mediano_-_Ideal_para_caratulas_tamaño_carta_o_similar.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_1.jpg){kind=link}
_Unnoficial_flag_of_Tarn_et_Garonne.png){kind=link}
I uploaded it by mistake Ram20001725 (talk) 18:43, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 18:55, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
missing licence Darkdeath-2 (talk) 02:12, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Darkdeath-2: Not sure what you mean: license is there. --Joalpe (talk) 02:20, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by an Android app user. --Achim (talk) 08:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Darkdeath-2 (talk) 02:16, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- This is part of permanent artistic installations at Praça Adolpho Bloch, in São Paulo. Thus, it is of evident interest for this project. --Joalpe (talk) 02:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by an Android app user. --Achim (talk) 08:36, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Source: here User3204 (talk) 09:25, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- @User3204: tagged it as copyvio and it should be deleted any moment now. SHB2000 (talk) 10:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 13:24, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Source: here User3204 (talk) 09:26, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- @User3204: tagged it as copyvio. Should be deleted any moment now. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:36, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 13:25, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Changed idea Wild Country FM (talk) 06:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 06:49, 4 October 2021 UTC: Changed idea --Krdbot 14:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
I would prefer a png file Wild Country FM (talk) 06:49, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 06:52, 4 October 2021 UTC: I would prefer a png file --Krdbot 14:06, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Pete Tillman (talk) 00:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Erroneous bot tag. I labelled and licensed this and th eparent image as {{PD-Art|PD-old-100}}
The rug itself is a 2-D object [doh] and it's ~500 years old! Fix your bot, please. --Pete Tillman (talk) 00:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Speedy keep: file has a license. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:57, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
no country or year stated, fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:10, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
no country or year stated, fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
no country or year stated, fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:10, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
This image is my copyright. It is not in the public domain and should not be available under this license. cease and desist immediatly. 38.87.7.234 22:17, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Comment If the image is your copyright, can you please explain this website? Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:38, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Please see "Commons:Deletion requests/File:INGSOC flag.svg" (second nomination). As the result of that deletion request may affect this file I am nominating this file so its authors are notified of the ongoing discussion. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:39, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment, note that 1984 (nineteen-eighty-four) is a British film, a country with a notoriously low "COM:TOO". --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:41, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I have edited the page to make sourcing more clear. From [1] which states Free Art License. Is there reason to think this is not correct? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:03, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation: , this file was being raised for deletion over at the flag discussion raised above and an admin could have closed to delete this version as well if not properly tagged. I haven't had time to go into deeper investigation due to real life issues, but by tagging it the Wikipedia's where this file is used will be notified of this ongoing discussion (by the Community Tech Bot). Note that if this license applies here the flag is DW of a free file so also acceptably licensed if it would be tagged accordingly. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note that the two logos are NOT the same. Both were inspired by the fictional "INGSOC" of Orwell's novel en:Nineteen Eighty-Four, but are different. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:24, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation: , going over this file, I withdraw this nomination and will add in the original DR that this file is freely licensed. I saw the original nomination and panicked that this "COM:INUSE" file may be deleted based on the other discussion. I should have read the previous discussion above. I must admit that after some users started insulting me claiming that I "wasn'tfa here to educate people" that I got sloppy in trying to prove that I am not on this project to be "trolling", obviously a sloppy request like this isn't going to help in such a case. Anyhow, as this file is demonstrably freely licensed ot shouldn't be up for deletion. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note that the two logos are NOT the same. Both were inspired by the fictional "INGSOC" of Orwell's novel en:Nineteen Eighty-Four, but are different. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:24, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation: , this file was being raised for deletion over at the flag discussion raised above and an admin could have closed to delete this version as well if not properly tagged. I haven't had time to go into deeper investigation due to real life issues, but by tagging it the Wikipedia's where this file is used will be notified of this ongoing discussion (by the Community Tech Bot). Note that if this license applies here the flag is DW of a free file so also acceptably licensed if it would be tagged accordingly. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Close as Kept per discussion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
That's why its name is wrong WasiurRahman1 (talk) 15:46, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 18:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
{{copyvio|source=https://www.flickr.com/photos/48970996@N04/12744509713}} Jauhsekali (talk) 03:26, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 20:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mercromino86 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Album covers and band artwork, missing original author, source, date, and permission.
- File:EXTRAÑO Y CONDECORADO (20015).jpeg
- File:COCINANDO CON SATÁN (2014).jpeg
- File:SONIDOS DORADOS (2010).jpeg
- File:EL HOMBRE MUERTO (2009).jpeg
- File:VOYAGER 1 (2008).jpeg
- File:LA CAJA NEGRA (2007).jpeg
- File:META1.jpg
- File:METAZOO (2006).jpeg
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:10, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Louenas.93 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small file from Facebook and logos, obviously not works, no evidence of a free license.
- File:FDAT.png
- File:GRA1.png
- File:SSI.Photo.jpg
- File:SSI LOGO.png
- File:Logo DGSN1.png
- File:Logo DGSN.png
- File:InsigneANP.png
- File:GOSPinsigne.png
- File:116 rmo.png
- File:104rmologo.png
- File:BMPJ2.png
Yann (talk) 20:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:15, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
للبببلببد\\\دككز وط 50.60.136.104 19:41, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ankry (talk) 21:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
without use Javisbg618 (talk) 07:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Keep this image is currently in use? --Nutshinou Talk! 12:03, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Speedy kept. Useful, properly categorized, in use in Wikipedias in 2 languages. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:05, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Logo
University logo, should be dated and discussed whether any expiry-related reasons apply here. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, false license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:17, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
It's a logo, so not own work. But I'm not sure if it meet or no the threshold of originality. stanglavine msg 23:43, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, false license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:10, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom. SHB2000 (talk) 10:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:59, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope, some joke, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 19:36, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:00, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused and unexplained diagram. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 10:48, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:01, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused and unexplained graph. Without explanation it is of no educational value. Malcolma (talk) 10:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:01, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused and unexplained graph. No educational value without explanation. Malcolma (talk) 10:52, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:02, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Educational value is not shown. Taivo (talk) 11:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:02, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused graph with no explanation. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 11:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:02, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
COM:ADVERT Nutshinou Talk! 12:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:03, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abantesigmano (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos and advertising, far above COM:TOO and little educational value, out of scope.
- File:Sigma Chi Epsilon SIGMANS 1975.jpg
- File:46th Years Anniversary Sigma Chi Epsilon SIGMANS Fraternity Sorority.png
- File:46th Years Anniversary Sigma Chi Epsilon SIGMANS.jpg
- File:Sigma Chi Epsilon SIGMANS Fraternity Sorority @46 Anniversary-D7.png
- File:Sigma Chi Epsilon SIGMANS Fraternity Sorority @46 Anniversary-D8.jpg
- File:Sigma Chi Epsilon SIGMANS Fraternity Sorority @46 Anniversary-D6.png
- File:Sigma Chi Epsilon SIGMANS Fraternity Sorority @46 Anniversary-D5.png
- File:Sigma Chi Epsilon SIGMANS Fraternity Sorority @46 Anniversary-D1.png
- File:Sigma Chi Epsilon SIGMANS Fraternity Sorority @46 Anniversary.jpg
- File:PROSPERIDAD.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:05, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Clarencexlabongray (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:36, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:05, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vinzleonardo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Vinz Leonardo YouTuber 06.jpg
- File:Vinz Leonardo YouTuber 05.jpg
- File:Vinz Leonardo YouTuber 04.jpg
- File:Vinz Leonardo YouTuber 02.jpg
- File:Vinz Leonardo YouTuber 03.jpg
- File:Vinz Leonardo YouTuber 01.jpg
- File:Vinz Vlog at conference in Manila 2018.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:43, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:07, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:06, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
image used only by promotional page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 14:58, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Same for File:Hint Mint Logo.jpg. DS (talk) 14:59, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:07, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Makopotato (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:08, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable band, no educational value, out of scope. Likely not own works: FB code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:06, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:08, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused text doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:09, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:09, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pentecostales de san ramon puebla (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertising, promotional images, out of scope. And DW also.
- File:COLONIA DE SAN RAMON PARA CRISTO.png
- File:Ipun san ramon puebla.png
- File:JESUS TE PUEDE LIBERTAR.png
- File:IPUN SAN RAMON PUEBLA.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:12, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:09, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:10, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arykarami98 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:10, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal text doc, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:15, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:12, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused corporate/promotional images, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:20, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:12, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:14, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused promotional image for a school, no educational value, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:14, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AryPimentel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:15, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Curiosidades cosa y to (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused grainy and personal image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, unusable and out of scope.
- File:Foto del "grisc" en luz verde.PNG
- File:OJO DEL "GRICH"(la leyenda olvidada) desde muy cerca.PNG
- File:El grich en la oscuridad.PNG
_desde_muy_cerca.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:25, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete ab in die Tonne damit... --Joschi71 (talk) 15:43, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:15, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CECILIAJARAMILLORENDON (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertising, and low-res images of nondescript hotel room, little educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:27, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:16, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:16, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:16, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MOHAMADASIF (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused photos of non-notable event, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:17, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res diagram without context or clear purpose, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:17, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused photos of non-notable persons, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:39, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:18, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:45, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:46, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:46, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:18, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused icon/image without context, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:18, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:20, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, COM:WEBHOST, little educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:21, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal family tree, COM:WEBHOST, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:21, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal collage of ships, COM:WEBHOST, unusable, out of scope. And DW. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:21, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused tiny thumbnail of nondescript object, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:22, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused corporate promotional diagram, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:22, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, COM:WEBHOST, little educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:23, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused tiny thumbnail image of non-notable group, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:23, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sobuj boyati (talk · contribs)
[edit]All are self photo. No educational value. No usage. Out of commons scope. Third one is used for self promo in enwiki.
Yahya (talk) 16:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:24, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not within scope. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 18:10, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:25, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Appears to be using Commons for self-promotion. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:26, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unimportant person, hence OOS A09090091 (talk) 19:11, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:26, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
per COM:OOS. A09090091 (talk) 19:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:28, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
per COM:OOS. A09090091 (talk) 19:20, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:28, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, probably just selfpromotion of a non-notable person Jan Kameníček (talk) 22:20, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
per COM:OOS A09090091 (talk) 19:29, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:28, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:41, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:29, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
per COM:OOS A09090091 (talk) 19:49, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:29, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Advertising, promotional upload by user, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:50, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:30, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
per COM:OOS. Selfies are not appropriate for encyclopedic articles A09090091 (talk) 19:58, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:30, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:31, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal images, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:UE77BM7 f-g.jpg
- File:K5KgCH1O7RE.jpg
- File:T0UnHWXCt9I.jpg
- File:SNvO0SJiqyY.jpg
- File:DkoliRb9Wps.jpg
- File:Gg Kzh3021o.jpg
- File:3WoFXr3EPME.jpg
- File:P sVERl0onU.jpg
- File:SQi9THi3uN.svg
- File:SQi9THi3uNw.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:10, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:32, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused tiny thumbnail, unusable, out of scope, and likely a screengrab. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:33, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
per COM:WEBHOST A09090091 (talk) 20:32, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:34, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miki Ionescu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Diagrams of doubtful notability, should be SVG if useful.
- File:SharePoint components in a zenified architecture 2.jpg
- File:SharePoint components in a zenified architecture.jpg
- File:Information displayed at topic level.jpg
- File:Functions of the digital workplace.jpg
- File:Key topics for employee in the digital work space.jpg
Yann (talk) 20:36, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:34, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Upload error, corrupt file Robert Weemeyer (talk) 20:45, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:35, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Self promo pic of non-notable person. No encyclopedic value Vera (talk) 21:59, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:35, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Small images without metadata, last remaining files, unlikely to be own works.
- File:كنيسة القديس يوليوس الاقفهصى من الخارج بديرمارمينا بوادى النطرون.jpg
- File:مبنى مركز الميكروفيلم بديرمارمينا بوادى النطرون.jpg
- File:كنيسة رئيس الملائكة ميخائل بدير مارمينا.jpg
- File:كنيسة القديس يوليوس الاقفهصى من الداخل بدير مارمينا وادى النطرون.jpg
- File:كنيسة القديس أثناسيوس بدير مارمينا بمريوط.jpg
- File:كنيسة القديس ابوسيفين بالمضيفة بدير مارمينا بمنطقة مريوط.jpg
- File:كنيسة السيدة العذراء مريم بدير مار مينا 2.jpg
- File:كاتدرائية القديس مينا بمصر.jpg
- File:قارورة تحمل صورة القديس مارمينا.jpg
- File:صورة بالمزاييك للبابا كيرلس السادس وخلفها نموذج للطاحونة بدير مارمينا.jpg
- File:الواجهة الزجاجية لمقبرة البابا كيرلس.jpg
- File:مكتبة دير مارمينا بوادى النطرون.jpg
- File:مذبح كنيسة الانبا ثاؤفيلس وتظهر قواعد الاعمدة التى كانت تحمل قبة المذبح بمنطقة ابو مينا الاثرية.jpg
- File:مزار البابا كيرلس السادس بديرمار مينا بمريوط.jpg
- File:مبنى المضيفة بدير مرمينا بوادى النطرون.jpg
- File:كنيسة القديس مارمرقس من الداخل بدير مارمينا بمريوط.jpg
- File:كنيسة السيدة العذراء بدير مارمينا.jpg
- File:صحن كاتدرائية مارمينا.jpg
- File:تيجان اعمدة ووحدات زخرفية قبطية يرجع تاريخها للقرن الساد س الميلادى مستخدمة فى الكاتدرائية.jpg
- File:البابا كيرلس السادس يضع حجر اساس دير مارمينا الحديث.jpg
Yann (talk) 21:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:25, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Blurry, Nonsense Unnamed UserName me 23:20, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- The Commons app definitely needs better grammar/choices. Unnamed UserName me 23:22, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely own work, xvideos.com watermark. --Strakhov (talk) 11:05, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Copy - cópia - Copy&paste https://www.metropoles.com/brasil/jovem-foi-morta-em-goiania-porque-amiga-queria-testar-se-era-psicopata?amp J De cinema (talk) 01:29, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:51, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
copy - cópia = copy&paste - https://g1.globo.com/go/goias/noticia/2019/04/15/acusado-de-chacina-que-deixou-4-jovens-mortos-na-serra-das-areias-e-julgado-em-aparecida-de-goiania.ghtml J De cinema (talk) 01:30, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:51, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
An identical image is found on the Internet here: https://www.newsindiatimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/IMG-20211003-WA0008.jpg Without authentication of owner uploading this could be a copyvio. Bri (talk) 02:26, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
I got this image directly from Shree herself. That website does not have the rights to the photo. Mezmax (talk) 02:50, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, missing permission. @Mezmax: Please take a look at COM:VRTS. --Wdwd (talk) 11:54, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
COM:CSD#G10 SEO for https://www.nomadicmatt.com/ DanielPenfield (talk) 02:27, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:55, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
COM:CSD#G10 SEO for https://www.nomadicmatt.com/ DanielPenfield (talk) 02:27, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:55, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
COM:CSD#G10 SEO for https://www.nomadicmatt.com/ DanielPenfield (talk) 02:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:55, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan. 223.255.225.68 06:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Although there is not Freedom of Panorama, this image depicts a generic cityscape by night. Although individual buildings (which may be copyright protected) are visible and distinguishable, they are all far away, and none of them is the clear object of the image. As it is a night image, furthermore many of the features that may make those building copyright protected are not visible (and thus not infringed). They thus can all be classified as "incidental", which is allowed. L.tak (talk) 07:52, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per L.tak. --Strakhov (talk) 11:07, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Will no longer be useful due to the changes of the station Wild Country FM (talk) 06:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Commons hosts old and outdated logos to show history. Taivo (talk) 07:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per Taivo. --Strakhov (talk) 11:08, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
without use Javisbg618 (talk) 07:03, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep useful -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:07, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 11:08, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GoldenKron (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: disparate sizes, quality, and styles, missing or inconsistent EXIF data. All photos of same person, unlikely that uploader was present at all these diverse places and times.
- File:אהרון פרנקל עם ראש הממשלה של ישראל בינימין נתניהו.jpg
- File:אהרון פרנקל עם ראש הממשלה בינימין נתניהו 01.jpg
- File:אהרון פרנקל עם בינימין נתניהו.jpg
- File:אהרון פרנקל, מאיה רות פרנקל ושמעון פרס.jpg
- File:Aaron Frenkel with Esther Hayut.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:15, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:31, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GoldenKron (talk · contribs)
[edit]No metadata, unlikely to be own work as the uploader has a history of copyvio
- File:Prince Albert II of Monaco and Aaron Frenkel.jpg
- File:Aaron G. Frenkel with Prime Minister of Israel Naftali Bennett.jpg
- File:Aaron Frenkel and Yitzhak Herzog.jpg
- File:Aaron Frenkel and Reuven Ruvi Rivlin.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unlikely own work, COM:PRP. --Strakhov (talk) 11:09, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
GoogleMaps copyvio. Please use OpenStreetMap next time. Enyavar (talk) 12:54, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 11:11, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
GoogleMaps Screenshot = copyvio. Please use OSM next time. Enyavar (talk) 12:57, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 11:12, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely own work. --Strakhov (talk) 11:14, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Johnson Space Center JSC NASA Houston Space City United States America The States USA US (24745392685).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photograph of a photograph, with therefore wrong license information. Can be replaced by File:Ap11-s69-31740.jpg or any other version of the official photograph. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 15:15, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, this image can be used to demonstrate how the Lyndon B. Johnson Space Centre honours these blokes. It would also be a useful image to demonstrate the collections of this Space Centre. This image and "File:Ap11-s69-31740.jpg" have demonstrably different functions and are educationally useful in different ways. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 21:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per Donald Trung. --Strakhov (talk) 11:15, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res image of nondescript store, no meaningful description, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:42, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
{{Vk}}: It is identified as a store inside The Westin Taipei hotel. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:59, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for identifying it. But looking at the image again, I now think it is not own work. There is a white border all around it, meaning it is a screengrab or crop from somewhere else. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:04, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Looks like you’re right: Tineye has 40 (!) matches and while most are more recent than this upload, a page at expedia.co.jp seems to have had this photo since 2014. Unless this photo was already on zh.wp back then, it’s a copyvio. I suggest we delete it given COM:PRP. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 23:58, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Looks like you’re right: Tineye has 40 (!) matches and while most are more recent than this upload, a page at expedia.co.jp seems to have had this photo since 2014. Unless this photo was already on zh.wp back then, it’s a copyvio. I suggest we
Deleted: per discussion, COM:PRP. --Strakhov (talk) 11:17, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
sem notoriedade ou interesse público Samuel Quinto (talk) 19:29, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete per nom as "no notoriety or public interest", COM:CSD#F10, and COM:CSD#G10. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Strakhov (talk) 11:27, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Philippe HENRION - works by Pierre Saint-Paul
[edit]Artist died in 2018, copyrights remain with heirs. Need COM:VRT ticket from heirs.
- File:Pierre Saint-Paul (1968), 33,5 x 41, huile sur toile.jpg
- File:Pierre Saint-Paul (1976), 120 x 120, huile sur toile.jpg
- File:Pierre Saint-Paul (2015), 40 x 57 x 20, technique mixte, photo Ph. Henrion.jpg
- File:Pierre Saint-Paul (1964), 89 x 116, huile sur toile.jpg
- File:Pierre Saint-Paul (1983), 100 x 100, technique mixte.jpg
- File:Pierre Saint-Paul (1998), 195 x 130, huile sur toile.jpg
- File:Pierre Saint-Paul (2013), 60 x 80, technique mixte.jpg
- File:Pierre Saint-Paul (2011), 195 x 130, huile sur toile.jpg
- File:Pierre Saint-Paul (2005), 130 x 195, huile sur toile.jpg
,_33,5_x_41,_huile_sur_toile.jpg){kind=link}
,_120_x_120,_huile_sur_toile.jpg){kind=link}
,_40_x_57_x_20,_technique_mixte,_photo_Ph._Henrion.jpg){kind=link}
,_89_x_116,_huile_sur_toile.jpg){kind=link}
,_100_x_100,_technique_mixte.jpg){kind=link}
,_195_x_130,_huile_sur_toile.jpg){kind=link}
,_60_x_80,_technique_mixte.jpg){kind=link}
,_195_x_130,_huile_sur_toile.jpg){kind=link}
,_130_x_195,_huile_sur_toile.jpg){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:59, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Artist has conveyed copyright to Philippe Henrion in 2013, hand-written document to be found within Ticket:2021100410010904. --Mussklprozz (talk) 14:38, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per Mussklprozz. --Strakhov (talk) 11:31, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tilottamwagh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small images without metadata, last remaining images, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Krushi Mahotsav 2020 All.jpg
- File:Krushi Mahotsav 2020.jpg
- File:Gurumauli social work.jpg
- File:Aabasaheb Girish More.jpg
- File:Nitin-Bhau-12.jpg
- File:Tilottamwagh88.jpg
Yann (talk) 20:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PRP, but 3rd and 5th are obviously copyvio. A09090091 (talk) 20:19, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely own work. --Strakhov (talk) 11:28, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
News article is not old enough to be PD. A09090091 (talk) 20:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 11:28, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Obvious vandalism Jkbw (talk) 04:12, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Content intended as a threat or attack/#G3. --Wdwd (talk) 12:04, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Bulgaria. 223.255.225.68 06:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: individual buildings or sculptures are visible and distinguishable, which may be copyrighted. But they are far away, and none of them is the clear object of the image. -> de minimis. --Wdwd (talk) 12:11, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
He died in 2012, yet this photo is uploaded in 2020 by a new user claiming it is his own work. Senator2029 06:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Use at Financial Times has "© Getty Images" in caption. Obviously this file will be deleted, but it is used in many Wikipedia articles. Senator2029 06:59, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:14, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Noto own work: copied from Facebook? See here: https://it-it.facebook.com/maga.mandina (only registred users) Bradipo Lento (talk) 07:39, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
copyrighted album covers and promo image, not own work as claimed
- File:J014533 - JH single cover 1600x1600px.jpg
- File:JadeHollandDoitRightRelease2020.jpg
- File:JadeHolland2020.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 07:39, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:17, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
No permission given, source unkown. Julius Senegal (talk) 10:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:48, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
No permission given, source unkown. Julius Senegal (talk) 10:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:48, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Accidental upload Bensteves9999 (talk) 12:02, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Uploaded without subject's permission Bensteves9999 (talk) 12:02, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Does not have permission of subject. Please delete 196.188.55.226 10:55, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo by non-contributor. --Wdwd (talk) 13:54, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
spiderman is a copyright of marvel/sony C4ca4238a0b923820dcc509a6f75849b (talk) 15:09, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Mexico have FOP --Trade (talk) 16:09, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Unsure if COM:FOP Mexico can also apply to sculptures of copyrighted characters created in areas outside Mexico (Spiderman is not a Mexican character, but an American character). @Trade: , this may also run into COM:CHARACTER. Anyway, I'll ping @Clindberg, Aymatth2, and Jameslwoodward: if they would state otherwise. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:22, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Really not sure. Is that a sculpture, or just someone in a costume? Not the biggest fan of deleting cosplay photos, but this one does seem more focused on the copyrighted character in particular, and not any particular environment. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:06, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
The photo has been tagged as 'Cosplay' on Flickr. It's also a part of a group named 'Best Cosplay Mexico'. @Clindberg: --Trade (talk) 21:16, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Agree For the record, we have also reached Disney for this on their official copyright email hotline tips@disneyantipiracy.com about the potential possibility that Wikimedia Commons is full of photos or other files that infringe their copyright. It is horribly alarming that people even need to discuss whether to remove this or not, and a horrifying question of how many similar images were kept on Commons. Earlier this year, Japan Government where cosplay originated raised concerns and clarifications that spreading photos of cosplay is a violation of copyright. Especially if they are being sold or for other commercial purposes. It is equivalent to selling counterfeit merchandise. Cosplays are derivative works so selling these derivative works are counterfeit merchandising. While a costume is not copyrightable by itself, cosplays are always presented as the character portrayed. So selling photos of cosplay is selling the character, not the costume, not the background, whatsoever. It is also not a matter of debate where the photo was taken. Copyright discussions are meant to be about who owns the copyright. This photo in particular closely resembles the actual character. It IS the character. Putting it on Creative Commons means it can be used for commercial purposes? That is blatant violation of copyright. It doesn't matter if it has been taken on Mexico. Spiderman is a Disney and Marvel property. Going to Mexico does not change it, it does not make it eligible for selling.
Disney really needs to take a look at this and at other files uploaded on Commons that have been kept based on these ridiculous debates that do not even address the real issue of copyright. Incredibly absurd.110.54.139.114 17:39, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @110.54.139.114: have you included the URL of this deletion requests case page in the correspondence to Disney? Disney must either submit COM:VRT correspondence of complaint over the existence of character depictions here through cosplays and costumes, or a COM:DMCA notice (which is a "death penalty" to this and possibly all other images of Disney characters' costumes). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:55, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Info @Trade, Clindberg, Jameslwoodward, and 110.54.139.114: the relevant information on cosplays and copyright infringement for commercial exploitations (in Japan) can be found on this JapanTimes article from January this year. And this article states that users are now worried over possible effects of the new copyright rules, even in the first point of wearing copyrighted characters' costumes (not yet taking photos and hosting them on Commons or socmed websites). Likely COM:COSPLAY will fall out of date soon as the copyright rules become final. But if ever these become official, we must abide by COM:CARES principle. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:48, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Delete As a general rule, costumes that include masks have copyrights. Therefore, this has a copyright and this infringes. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:41, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Closed as Kept; cosplay (per context on Flickr), generous FOP in Mexico; see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Spiderman and child.jpg. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:58, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_in_LIMA-2015.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_LIMA-2015.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{copyvio|source=https://www.pixelsnipers.com/project/malaysia-langkawi-part-2/}} Jauhsekali (talk) 03:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
_in_LIMA-2015.jpg){kind=link}
- Needs more discussion, as the external hit[2], which is claimed as work of MARK ROURKE, has far lower resolution (1600x976) than our upload. --Túrelio (talk) 07:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Source is https://www.flickr.com/photos/urklesaviation/17175308346/ by Mark Rourke, ARR. We should delete all tagged "own" uploads of this locked User:Shariar 375 even if they have metadata. 1) There are a lot of different cameras and b) at least some are taken from flickr. Google image search and Yandex don't find these. --Achim (talk) 09:59, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
![[2]](https://i1.wp.com/www.pixelsnipers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/0U9A7464.jpg?w=623&h=380&ssl=1){kind=link}
Deleted: Copyvio, ARR. --Achim (talk) 10:01, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
_in_LIMA-2015.jpg){kind=link}
This chemical structure is incorrect. The methyl group at the top is in the incorrect position. We have a correct version at File:Estradiol benzoate.svg. Marbletan (talk) 17:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:04, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:18, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
The terms for automatic permission by Microsoft has restrictions on usage and modifications, which is not acceptable for hosting their software screenshots on Wikimedia Commons. Stylez995 (talk) 20:48, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. SHB2000 (talk) 10:41, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete This template is unnecessary. Ox1997cow (talk) 11:20, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 07:44, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Bonjour, une erreur de saisie a été communiquée à la BIU Santé concernant l'identité de la personne représentée. Il n s'agit pas de Pierre Alphonse Huard, mais de Serge Huard. Nous avons pu modifier les métadonnées de l'image mais nous ne pouvons pas modifier le nom du fichier téléchargé. Serait-il possible de modifier le nom de l'image en "Huard, Pierre Paul Serge CIPB1798.jpg", ou si ce n'est pas possible de supprimer cette fiche pour que nous puissions retélécharger l'image proprement ? BIU Santé - Solenne Coutagne (talk) 13:10, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: file renamed, no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 16:58, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Bonjour, une erreur de saisie a été communiquée à la BIU Santé concernant l'identité de la personne représentée. Il n s'agit pas deSerge Huard, mais d'Ernest Huant. Nous avons pu modifier les métadonnées de l'image mais nous ne pouvons pas modifier le nom du fichier téléchargé. Serait-il possible de modifier le nom de l'image en "Huant, Ernest CIPB1913.jpg", ou si ce n'est pas possible de supprimer cette fiche pour que nous puissions retélécharger l'image proprement ? BIU Santé - Solenne Coutagne (talk) 13:15, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: file renamed, no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 16:58, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Flag of Poland.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:54, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:50, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
copyvio; COM:ALBUM -- Nutshinou Talk! 11:40, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:04, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ข้อมูลมาตรฐาน (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works: File:ພຣະທາດຫຼວງວຽງຈັນ ຫຼື ພຣະທາດໂລກະຈຸລະມະນີ້.jpg was found on Flickr here (all rights reserved) and File:ເຜົ່າຕະໂອ້ຍ.jpg taken from FB as per EXIF data.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:27, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:04, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
_poster.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_poster.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
- also affecting
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
per COM:POSTER. A09090091 (talk) 19:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
_poster.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: by EugeneZelenko. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:04, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
_poster.jpg){kind=link}
Going by Template:PD-SG-artisticwork and this it looks like we need to wait a few years still before the copyright lapses. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:49, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
GoogleMaps Screenshot = copyvio. Please use OSM next time. Enyavar (talk) 13:00, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
GoogleMaps Screenshot = copyvio. Please use OSM next time. Enyavar (talk) 13:00, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:26, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
GoogleMaps Screenshot = copyvio. Please use OSM next time. Enyavar (talk) 13:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:26, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
GoogleMaps Screenshot = copyvio. Please use OSM next time. Enyavar (talk) 13:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HISOTRIA DE LA ARQUITECTURA GRUPO 6 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: low-res screengrabs and DW.
- File:La Bòveda .jpg
- File:Jerarquia Romana.jpg
- File:Desarrollo de la Ciudad de Roma.jpg
- File:Sistema Arquitectonico Romano.jpg
- File:La Ruinas del Imperio Romano.jpg
- File:Alta Edad Media.jpg
- File:La Nueva Liturgia.jpg
- File:La Basilica Paleocristina.jpg
- File:Portada del trabajo .jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:26, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal images of non-notable teams, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:26, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
per COM:POSTER A09090091 (talk) 19:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:25, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
per COM:ALBUM, this one is not simple. A09090091 (talk) 20:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:25, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
There is no reason to host full-resolution TIFs as this clutters up category galleries and requires updating metadata at both locations. See Category talk:PD-Gotfryd UpdateNerd (talk) 07:08, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 16:01, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
There is no reason to host full-resolution TIFs as this clutters up category galleries and requires updating metadata at both locations. UpdateNerd (talk) 07:06, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 16:03, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Well above the ToO, no indication of free license on source site. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Fair use is generally not accepted on Commons. --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 22:44, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:54, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Likely derivative work of a web photo: https://www.cricketwa.com/17874/player/ishan-pranav-kumar-pandey-kishan.aspx Ytoyoda (talk) 17:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 21:23, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
"FBMD" in metadata = Facebook download Ytoyoda (talk) 12:58, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, per COM:PCP. --Túrelio (talk) 12:22, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Instagram photo: https://www.timesnownews.com/sports/cricket/article/csk-star-ruturaj-gaikwad-reacts-to-rumours-of-relationship-with-actor-sayali-sanjeev/757556
Ytoyoda (talk) 17:29, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 17:59, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Low- and low-ish res images from a sockpuppet with a history of uploading third-party photos and claiming self-made.
- File:Chigari BRTS Dharwad logo.png
- File:RN Shetty Stadium Dharwad.png
- File:DWD station.png
- File:DWD railway station at afternoon.png
- File:Dharwad railway station 2021.png
- File:Dharwad railway station building.png
- File:BhuvanHampi.png
- File:Stone Chariot Hampi Karnataka.jpg
- File:Ghanashyam Nayak2.jpg
- File:Unkal Lake.png
- File:Shri Nuggikeri Hanuman temple Dharwad.png
- File:Malaprabha River.jpg
- File:Shri Laxminarayan Prasanna .jpg
- File:Shri Lord Damodar potrait.jpg
- File:Shri Damodar Temple Goa outdoor.jpg
- File:Shri Damodar Temple Goa shrine.jpg
- File:Shri Damodar Temple Goa interior.jpg
- File:HDMC logo.jpg
- File:Infosys office Dharwadwiki.png
- File:Dharwad Railway station.png
- File:Karnatak University Dharwad (K.U.D).png
- File:Infosys office, Hubli-Dharwad .png
- File:Infosys, Dharwad .png
- File:Kittur Chennamma Park, Dharwad.png
- File:Airport, Dharwad, Karnataka.png
- File:Karnataka College Dharwad.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ytoyoda (talk) 00:54, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:06, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo is a COM:DERIVATIVE of the underlying work. No indication that the underlying work is freely licensed or in the public domain. howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 19:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Krd at 15:42, 5 November 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Uploads by Matlin/temp --Krdbot 18:34, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not within scope Tol (talk | contribs) @ 18:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Taken from https://www.mrtoys.com/Silly-Puppets-25-Inch-Tommy-Full-Body-SP2771 or https://www.creativemin.com/creative123/pc/Tommy-Full-Half-Body-Professional-Boy-Puppet-15p1476.htm A09090091 (talk) 20:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- @A09090091: Thanks for catching that! Tol (talk | contribs) @ 20:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:18, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Attached copyright notice says people can only use the work for reasonable purpose, for example, reporting, commenting, teaching, and researching. Hansen033 (talk) 18:25, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Agree, should've upload to wikipedia if the media falls into fair use criteria. -- @assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 21:54, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by YawThompson (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: all taken from FB as per EXIF data. Unreliable uploader, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Frema Adunyame.jpg.
- File:Frema Adunyame .jpg
- File:Young bendre thompson face.jpg
- File:Studio section during Entamoty live show.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:16, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Déjà publiée sur https://www.leparisien.fr/oise-60/clermont-60600/a-clermont-sur-les-traces-du-peintre-oublie-17-08-2018-7855605.php Habertix (talk) 22:15, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:16, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Own work claimed here, but also uploaded as non-free to w:File:Chandigarh emblem.png. Heavily used file, so I'm starting a deletion request instead of tagging with {{Copyvio}} in case someone could prove PD due to age or something. Stefan2 (talk) 22:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:16, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Alexphangia as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: w:File:Chandigarh emblem.png. Widely used, converting to DR for discussion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 04:15, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, recreation g4 as well. --Gbawden (talk) 08:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Habertix as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Licence à vérifier : photos téléchargées sur WP en français avec la mention "Crédit photo : Yvette Pourcelot-Roubeau" King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:20, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. Needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 07:16, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). Opening DR to see if there is a way to crop this image to put it below COM:TOO but still remain useful for the article. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
The lack of licensing is due to my limited knowledge of how to use licensing tags. I got the email from the Terry McAuliffe campaign on Oct 4, 2021, the day of the Facebook outage. I took a screenshot and uploaded it to Wiki Commons. I believe this screenshot is acceptable for use in Wikipedia, but I don't know how to tag it. SnappingTurtle (talk) 23:27, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- @SnappingTurtle: That would require uploading the image directly to English Wikipedia under its fair-use policy. Honestly, I don't think this is sufficiently relevant to the article to meet NFCC. But it's OK as a decorative illustration, which would require us to find a way to keep it on Commons (which would involve paring it down to only non-copyrightable components like simple shapes and short text). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Not sure exactly what the claimed issue is here. The campaign logo is clearly below TOO. I'm unsure if this amount of text is really an issue. Elli (talk) 00:58, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- That's why we have a discussion here, to see what is acceptable. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:46, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah, so I'm asking - does anyone see an issue here? Elli (talk) 01:57, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- That's why we have a discussion here, to see what is acceptable. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:46, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- I'll gladly make the necessary changes if someone tells me how. Alternatively, someone could just make the changes and I'll learn from that. As for the issue of whether or not the image belongs in the article 2021 Facebook outage, I believe it does. Without getting bogged down in philosophies of information transmittal, examples often clarify written information, even if the examples do not provide new information. In this case, the image, including the logo, provide an example of the responses to the outage. SnappingTurtle (talk) 02:05, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, it belongs, but it is necessary for the reader's understanding to have this example? It's fine as an illustration, so it can be used if it is not copyrighted, but it would require a lot more to be usable under fair use. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:44, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- I'll gladly make the necessary changes if someone tells me how. Alternatively, someone could just make the changes and I'll learn from that. As for the issue of whether or not the image belongs in the article 2021 Facebook outage, I believe it does. Without getting bogged down in philosophies of information transmittal, examples often clarify written information, even if the examples do not provide new information. In this case, the image, including the logo, provide an example of the responses to the outage. SnappingTurtle (talk) 02:05, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete no evidence of free license. (If be copied to en:w may be acceptable under "fair use there. Unless it is specifically free licensed by the author/copyright holder, it does not belong here on Commons.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:14, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Random photo from internet Unnamed UserName me 23:19, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment. This is a painting by Charles de Steuben from the early-mid 1800s, so this is unquestionably in the public domain per {{PD-old-100}}. There is a higher quality version here: File:Steuben - Charles the Bald.jpg. It doesn't have the caption though. I would honestly suggest replacing this version with the nicer image, but there may be an editorial reason that the captioned version is desired. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:56, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment. I have just noted that the current usage seems to be of a different personage than was originally intended by the artist. It's further worth noting that the artist lived about 1000 years after the subject, so this is likely not a realistic image of either the intended subject nor the one who it is currently depicting. I am honestly leaning towards deleting after it is removed from the English Wikipedia article because of the inaccuracy of the caption (in regards to the artist's intent). I will hold off for a few days from removing it in case someone else wants to comment on the history of this image. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as false captioned image. Now unused and we have a higher quality version of the underlying public domain image. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:24, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per IronGargoyle. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:26, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
This edition is published after 1926 (I'm the orginal uploader of this file) TsunTsky (talk) 03:10, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The work is a US work that's PD-no notice in the US. 1926 is only relevant if there's a copyright notice and it's been renewed.--Prosfilaes (talk) 08:41, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Closed as Kept, concerns resolved. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:51, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
_class_frigate_BNS_Abu_Bakar_(F15).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_class_frigate_BNS_Abu_Bakar_(F15).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{copyvio|source=https://www.pixelsnipers.com/project/malaysia-langkawi-part-2/}} Jauhsekali (talk) 03:37, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:54, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
{{copyvio|source=https://www.flickr.com/photos/unmissmultimedia/27364948700}} Jauhsekali (talk) 03:42, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:55, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
_-_fleuron_-_title_page.png){kind=link}
_-_fleuron_-_title_page.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Published in UK, 1925, unknown author. Moved to Wikisource as only under US public domain. Inductiveload (talk) 06:27, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
_-_fleuron_-_title_page.png){kind=link}
- Although since the author of this decoration is anonymous, is it actually publication + 70, in which case it is fine? Inductiveload (talk) 06:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Closed as Kept, Inductiveload appears to be correct (even assuming that the fleuron was newly created in 1925). -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:58, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
_-_fleuron_-_title_page.png){kind=link}
Not below COM:TOO. 223.255.225.68 06:49, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom and dubious license/source claims. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:59, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
With high probability it can be assumed that this picture is not the "own work" of the uploader - as it is claimed here. The same image can be found with the same resolution [ http://jurnalteritorial.blogspot.com/2011/09/kodam-viiwirabuana.html here] Mosbatho (talk) 15:26, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:17, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
File:LOGO UMSA (RGB transparente y negro) - Formato editable de color y fondo a elección para pantalla y plóter.pdf
[edit]Es de mi autoría y quiero mejorarlo, ya que tiene algunas fallas Randywilliamsdg (talk) 07:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per uploader request; unused. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:12, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
File:LOGO UMSA (CMYK negro) - Formato editable para imprenta de color negro y fondo a elección.pdf
[edit]Es de mi autoría y quiero mejorarlo, ya que tiene algunas fallas Randywilliamsdg (talk) 07:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per uploader request; unused. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:13, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
File:LOGO UMSA (CMYK blanco y negro) - Formato editable para imprenta de color negro y fondo blanco.pdf
[edit]Es de mi autoría y quiero mejorarlo, ya que tiene algunas fallas Randywilliamsdg (talk) 07:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per uploader request; unused -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:04, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
File:LOGO UMSA (RGB blanco y negro) - Formato editable de color negro y fondo blanco para pantalla o plóter.pdf
[edit]Es de mi autoría y quiero mejorarlo, ya que tiene algunas fallas Randywilliamsdg (talk) 07:15, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per uploader request; unused -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:04, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
File:LOGO UMSA (RGB blanco y negro) grande - Ideal para hojas enteras tamaño carta o similar.png
[edit]_grande_-_Ideal_para_hojas_enteras_tama%C3%B1o_carta_o_similar.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_grande_-_Ideal_para_hojas_enteras_tama%C3%B1o_carta_o_similar.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Es de mi autoría y quiero mejorarlo, ya que tiene algunas fallas Randywilliamsdg (talk) 07:15, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per uploader request; unused -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:06, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
_mediano_-_Ideal_para_fondos_a_colores.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_mediano_-_Ideal_para_fondos_a_colores.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Es de mi autoría y quiero mejorarlo, ya que tiene algunas fallas Randywilliamsdg (talk) 07:15, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per uploader request; unused -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:05, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Nonsense description. 223.255.225.73 08:48, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom, unused. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:32, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:32, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:43, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 15:54, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:16, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own work: small size, another version: http://www.kazeroonnema.ir/fa/news/19921/%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%87%E2%80%8C%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B2%DB%8C-%D8%A8%DB%8C%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%85-%D8%B9%D9%84%DB%8C%D8%B9-%DA%A9%D8%A7%D8%B2%D8%B1%D9%88%D9%86-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D8%A2%DB%8C%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%87%E2%80%8C%D8%A7%DB%8C-%D9%86%D8%B2%D8%AF%DB%8C%DA%A9 Rohalamin (talk) 10:50, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:46, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
We have no source link, so we cannot be sure, that the photo is really published under CC-0 license. Taivo (talk) 11:12, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:47, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Depicted person was born in 1948, so the photo is likely made on 1970s. Own work is unlikely, the uploader has been blocked for copyvios. I suspect again copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:41, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Clearly from printed reproduction, not scan of original photo. Lacking factual info on source, date, etc. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:51, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
doubtful if this is "own work" see : https://tineye.com/search/7308fc1006e653f583dbc4c68c11293c613aa733?sort=score&order=desc&page=2 Saschaporsche (talk) 12:18, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:52, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
I tagged this file for speedy deletion as I found it on the Internet elsewhere. The uploader claims it's a screenshot from a video in the public domain and removed the template, even though they haven't proved it's free to use. -sasha- (talk) 12:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Quick edit from uploader: I agree on the basis of the precautionary principle. Zagreus99
I violated the precautionary principle. Zagreus99 (talk) 12:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted uploader concurs -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:53, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Please see "Commons:Deletion requests/File:INGSOC flag.svg" (second nomination). As the result of that deletion request may affect this file I am nominating this file so its authors are notified of the ongoing discussion. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:39, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. This is not an original creation simply inspired by the book by Orwell, but rather is specifically reproducing the logo depicted in the 1984 British film, created for that film. Relevant: COM:TOO UK -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:31, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Photo is non-free and is taken from the RedBull website: https://www.redbull.com/fr-fr/theredbulletin/pierre-gasly-interview-f1-2021 Democfest (talk) 12:39, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:41, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be an official promotional shot, author has history of uploading non-free images Democfest (talk) 12:41, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete this is clearly to the user's own work and I doubt it is subject to free use.SSSB (talk) 10:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I have just nominated a similar file for deletion (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Esteban ocon.(cropped)jpg.png).SSSB (talk) 10:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
jpg.png){kind=link}
Deleted. Uploader apparently just grabs photos from websites and photoshops in black background. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:46, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Non free image, author has history of uploading copyrighted works Democfest (talk) 12:43, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:44, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Uploader does not appear to be the author and copyright holder noted in the metadata, need permission to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:54, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:56, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Not own work. Copyright? Higher resolution is available. See here Wouter (talk) 14:26, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:04, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
One can clearly see that this is a scanned book page. The copyrights holder is very likely not the uploader. The uploader has not provided any evidence that they have the permission to upload this work here as "own work". Mosbatho (talk) 14:59, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:05, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
This isn't a public domain image; as per en:File:Jarrah-2000-Flying-Florida.jpg its copyright belongs to someone who is under sanctions per en:International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which is not the same thing as not being under copyright Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:07, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, as suggested at sv:Wikipedia:Bildfrågor#Hovet. LPfi (talk) 08:51, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Photographer and Record company contacted, as documented in the linked discussion thread after nomination. Neither objects to the file remaining here. –LPfi (talk) 13:36, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Wikimedia needs explicit permission from copyright holder to release under free license. Submit to COM:VRT if they are willing to do so. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk)
Old photo of Hov1 Anonymous2085 (talk) 15:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:11, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of noncontributing user. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep if scope is the thing that matters here, I see some value for depicting science laboratories and chemistry lessons in the Category:National Autonomous University of Mexico / Category:Facultad de Química, UNAM. Strakhov (talk) 11:20, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept per Strakhov. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:47, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. Online years before uploader's supposed photo date (eg [3] -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:51, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since). This song was written before the 1940's and the actual author is unknown. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 15:56, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, this musical score 🎼 is a derivative work from the 1941 score found in "Hymnes et Pavillons de Indochine" which is in the public domain. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 15:59, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept per Donald Trung; license changed to PD-Vietnam per similar in same category. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:56, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
According to https://www.piqsels.com/terms-of-service then "...You can't use or redistribute these images on free stock photo websites or apps, you can't sell and/or redistribute these images implying you're the photographer; and you can't sell and/or redistribute these images as stock photography" so that does not comply with a free license. MGA73 (talk) 15:57, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:58, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as Dw no source since (dw no source since). This map is stolen from Google Maps, is it possible to replace it with one from OpenStreetMap? Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment, I nominated this file for deletion so the Vietnamese-language Wikipedia would be notified and could replace it with a free version as the Community Tech Bot often doesn't notify files tagged with "No license". --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
COM:LL - the Flickr source explicitly says "Image credit: Northrop Grumman"; Flickr account is not a Northrop account and there is no evidence it is authorized to license on Northrop's behalf. Эlcobbola talk 16:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment It's an official NASA account according to the description, which is backed up by the fact that it's linked to from the NASA JWST website (see also [4]). clpo13(talk) 16:12, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept per above; PD-NASA tag added. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:00, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
_grande_-_Ideal_fondos_de_color_de_gran_tama%C3%B1o.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_grande_-_Ideal_fondos_de_color_de_gran_tama%C3%B1o.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Es de mi autoría y quiero mejorarlo, ya que tiene algunas fallas Randywilliamsdg (talk) 07:15, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per uploader request; unused -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:10, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
_mediano_-_Ideal_para_caratulas_tama%C3%B1o_carta_o_similar.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_mediano_-_Ideal_para_caratulas_tama%C3%B1o_carta_o_similar.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Es de mi autoría y quiero mejorarlo, ya que tiene algunas fallas Randywilliamsdg (talk) 07:16, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per uploader request; unused -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:11, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Norn Of Iceland (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: promo pics, DW, disparate sizes, quality, and styles, missing or inconsistent EXIF data. Missing original author/date/source/permission.
- File:Smutty-400.jpg
- File:Smutty.jpg
- File:Havalinas 1990.jpg
- File:The Havalinas in LA.jpg
- File:The Havalinas .jpg
- File:The Havalinas- Tim Scott McConnel and Smutty Smiff.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:25, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mjavadirani3 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW, photo of extant image (notice glare of flash). P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:10, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. The building was built in 2011-2013. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 17:58, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Pavel Karous born in 1979 could not be an author of this photograph taken cca 1940, thus its rights violation. Černá micka (talk) 19:37, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Probably imagevio. It looks like a photocopy of a book. The year 1961 is probably the year of creation and Pavel Karous is younger. Černá micka (talk) 19:39, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Imagevio. Indoor artwork is not free in the Czech Republic. Černá micka (talk) 19:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:42, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Probably imagevio. Scan from a magazine, hight probability its not free to use. Černá micka (talk) 20:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Listenthinkact (talk · contribs)
[edit]These three files are derived works of the Paulaner logo and (in case of the bottle) of additional art. No information has been provided regarding the copyright status of the logo. We need a permission for this.
- File:Paulaner Münchner Hell (c) Paulaner Brauerei.png
- File:Paulaner Brauerei Logo.jpg
- File:Paulaner-Sudhaus.jpg
_Paulaner_Brauerei.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
AFBorchert (talk) 14:49, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted DW in some, in other clear false license -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
No indication of free license at source site. I'm also pretty sure this is above the threshold of originality in the United States. Even assuming Germany has a higher ToO, Commons requires works to be free in the both the U.S. and the country of origin. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:27, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom, unsupported license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:09, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Magazine covers are copyright protectable. A09090091 (talk) 20:27, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:10, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hussa al huss (talk · contribs)
[edit]Clearly not own work. Furthermore, some files (43 to 54) do not seem to be freely licensed.
- File:ماجد النفيعي.jpg
- File:Lahli 1985.jpg
- File:2002 ahli.jpg
- File:دابو اسيا.jpg
- File:Abdulrazaq abudawod.jpg
- File:امين 911.jpg
- File:راجخان.jpg
- File:Unnamedd.gif
- File:Somah 9 9.png
- File:تسسسير.jpg
- File:خالد المولد3.jpg
- File:خالد المولد.jpg
- File:احمد يريسو.jpg
- File:احمد عيد سعد3.jpg
- File:Al-ahli-vs-barcelona 12icrs3l2uos41uias1j30vq5u.jpg
- File:Alahli 1986.jpg
- File:Alahli - brazil.jpg
- File:Sulimani arab.jpg
- File:Taisser jaber.jpg
- File:Hussain sulimani.jpg
- File:Mohammed abduljawad.jpg
- File:Khalid ben abdullah.jpg
- File:Mohammed Alabdullah.jpg
- File:Mosailem.jpg
- File:المسيليمم.jpg
- File:موسعد14.jpg
- File:احمد الصغير 93.jpg
- File:احمد عيد الاهلي.jpg
- File:عبدالرزاق ابو داود 34.jpg
- File:احمد الصغير 9.jpg
- File:دوري وكاس 19709.jpg
- File:Alahli league 1984.jpg
- File:Logo alahli 1937.jpg
- File:دابو معتمد.jpg
- File:اللي جابو.png
- File:دابو شعار.jpg
- File:دابو خليج.jpg
- File:دابو ملك.jpg
- File:اسطورة دابو.jpg
- File:Amen Dabo legend of alahli club.jpg
- File:Легенда футбола Марадона с Аль-Ахли из Саудовской Аравии на праздновании Аль-Ахли в 1987 году.jpg
- File:كاس ولي عهد 982.jpg
- File:كاس ولي عهد 98.jpg
- File:شعار النادي 1937.png
- File:Crown prince cup 1957.jpg
- File:Basketball alahli.jpg
- File:Prince Abdullah Alfaissal.jpg
- File:King Abdullah issues a royal order naming Al-Ahli Club an ambassador for the country in the sports sector.jpg
- File:سانتانا الاهلي.jpg
- File:الاسطورة الهولندية كرويف واسطورة الاهلي دابو.jpg
- File:Amen dabo The legend of alahli club.jpg
- File:Abdulbaset Hindi.jpg
- File:League and King's Cup 1978.jpg
- File:Saudi League 1968.jpg
Unnamed UserName me 16:06, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep the following as {{PD-Saudi Arabia}}, being photographs prior to 1979.
- Delete the rest per nom. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:19, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Most Deleted. A few Kept and retagged as {{PD-Saudi Arabia}} per IronGargoyle. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:03, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yemisi Shyllon Museum of Art (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from modern art.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:00, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
probably copyviol — danyele 18:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Clearly photoshopped picture, red bg has been cropped off. Multiple instances of red bg are found, eg.: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0999225/ A09090091 (talk) 19:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Cuerpo de Guardia
[edit]
Imagevio, film scenes are copyrightable. --A09090091 (talk) 20:15, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 20:00, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
_1.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:22, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
_1.jpg){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
No FOP in France. Not sure if this is the same image as last time Elisfkc (talk) 20:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 15:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
No sources 86.212.243.110 22:12, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Saya mengunggahnya secara tidak sengaja Adamsetiawan92 (talk) 15:15, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted OOS, uploader request, irrelevant description -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:54, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Saya mengunggahnya secara tidak sengaja Adamsetiawan92 (talk) 15:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted OOS, unsourced DW. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Saya mengunggahnya secara tidak sengaja Adamsetiawan92 (talk) 15:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted OOS, unsourced DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:50, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Newspaper is not old enough to be PD, no correct license is shown about being this article a PD case. A09090091 (talk) 20:06, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:49, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
A bigger version exists at [5] Boylarva99 (talk) 19:12, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
![[5]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Oji_zoo,_Kobe,_Japan_(6631356045).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:57, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 19:25, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:56, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Peter Bergquist ONZM investiture.jpg Schwede66 22:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:54, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
_Unnoficial_flag_of_Tarn_et_Garonne.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Unnoficial_flag_of_Tarn_et_Garonne.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplication of File:Flag of Tarn-et-Garonne.svg. 223.255.225.73 08:40, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
_Unnoficial_flag_of_Tarn_et_Garonne.png){kind=link}
- Speedy delete per CSD F5 (missing essential information). Source of derivative work not specified since 29 December 2021. Image also contains destructive and promotional watermarks. — Ætoms (talk) 11:24, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:03, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
_Unnoficial_flag_of_Tarn_et_Garonne.png){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:28, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Atletico Olimpo photos
[edit]Marked as "own work" but obvious scans from sport magazines. Not PD in Argentina so they are less than 25 years old, terms stipulated on Law 11.723, art. 34.
Affected files:
- File:Olimpo 1997.jpg
- File:Olimpo 1998.jpg
- File:Olimpo 1999.jpg
- File:Olimpo 2003.jpg
- File:Olimpo 2009.jpg
- File:Olimpo 2016.jpg
- File:OlimpoCampeon.jpg
- File:Olimpocampeón.jpg
Fma12 (talk) 18:39, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:28, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
This is a pdf copy of a promotional enwiki userpage that has been deleted from enwiki. The account has been indefinitely blocked there as an advertising-only account. This file serves no useful educational purpose: COM:EDUSE. Marbletan (talk) 13:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --Rosenzweig τ 12:25, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Paddy2674 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Ich bin der Urheber des Fotos und möchte, dass es aus den Wikimedia Commons gelöscht wird.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as file does not qualify for G7-speedy. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete due to low image-quality. --Túrelio (talk) 13:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Uploader request. Blurry, hard to see any details of actual medal in photo. Image currently in use in de:w. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Derivative work of coin of uncertain copyright status. Date makes it appear that the coin is relatively recent. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:08, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. I'm not sure this 1994 coin is devoid of copyrights as well. --Rosenzweig τ 23:07, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, lack of metadata, see for an alternate use https://toprankinmag.wixsite.com/website.
Lymantria (talk) 16:55, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- This photo is a selfie taken by DJ Astro Black and later used by Too Rankin Mag — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 120.18.10.32 (talk) 13:17, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Autor: Patricio Casassus Fontecilla Carlos yo (Discusión) 03:26, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: It's unclear if the named author is identical with the uploader or not, therefore deleted per the precautionary principle. --Rosenzweig τ 13:44, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Depicted person died in 1933. How do you know, that the photographer is 70 years dead? Maybe the photo is still protected with copyright? When and where the photo was first published? Taivo (talk) 11:20, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Application of current US copyright law is inappropriate in this instance. Under Polish copyright law, and, to be sure, under US copyright, a photograph published without a clear copyright notice was in the public domain (the US changed that rule in 1976 and Poland in 1994).
- The term of life plus seventy years only came into effect in the US in 1998 with the passage of the "Sonny Bono Copyright Extension Act." The law this photograph would be subject to would more likely be the 1926 statute (in effect until 1952) photographs entered the public domain ten (10) years after its creation. 208.125.143.178 15:57, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Very well. When and where the photo was first published? Was it really ever published in Poland? Taivo (talk) 08:00, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. Not enough information to be able to determine the copyright status of this image. --Rosenzweig τ 13:22, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Claim of own work seems dubious - this seems to be 3D rendering and only tiny image was uploaded. Maybe I am too suspicious, but... I considered using it and was too scared to actually do it. How this image was made? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 08:49, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. After looking through this user's uploads both here and at de.wp, I have doubts all the images used are really own work as claimed. The isolated images (as this one) were all created with Photoshop CS (so far so good, but the photographs have Exif data of 5 or more different cameras. There's no definitive proof that the images used are not own work, but significant doubt, therefore I'll delete them per the precautionary principle. --Rosenzweig τ 14:38, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Indonesia. 223.255.225.68 06:18, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 14:07, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be the uploader's own work based on the colour used for NZ and South Africa. The uploader also has a history with copyvios and is globally locked. On top of that, it appears this map is fictional and is entirely the uploader's creation because File:Defence Defense Labour Labor British American spelling by country.svg + other dictionaries seems to suggest that NZ and South African spelling is not the same as Australian. SHB2000 (talk) 10:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 14:08, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
The E-signature of Joy Belmonte was uploaded by Bryant2000 without consent and not authorized to be in the Wikimedia Commons website. QC PAISD (talk) 12:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: On the guidelines of Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines it is not described whether this country has copyright laws that define a threshold of originality too show which images are not copyrighted. Therefore it must be assumed this signature is copyrighted. Consequently, it must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 14:12, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
invalid Polish pronunciation, see: https://sjp.pwn.pl/poradnia/haslo/Spolszczona-wymowa-nazwy-stolicy-Burkina-Faso;21297.html Olaf (talk) 13:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, of no educational value, not used on the projects and therefore out of COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 14:13, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
invalid Polish pronunciation, see: https://sjp.pwn.pl/poradnia/haslo/Spolszczona-wymowa-nazwy-stolicy-Burkina-Faso;21297.html Olaf (talk) 13:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, of no educational value, not used on the projects and therefore out of COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 14:13, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Paddy2674 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Ich bin der Urheber des Fotos und möchte, dass es aus den Wikimedia Commons gelöscht wird.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as file does not qualify for G7-speedy. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:22, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, too late for a deletion based on COM:COURTESY. --Ellywa (talk) 14:16, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Das Bild ist für die Verwendung in einem Wikipedia-Artikel irrelevant, und im Übrigen ungeeignet. 2003:C0:1F37:3201:31B1:35E:BFC6:B34A 08:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Nonsensical and irrelevant deletion reason. First of all, it's untrue, but secondly, Commons does not exist only as a repository of images used in Wikipedia articles. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:56, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Das Bild ist für die Verwendung in einem Wikipedia-Artikel irrelevant, und im Übrigen ungeeignet. Außerdem enthält das Bild Werbung für alkoholische Getränke, die ich auch für die Wikipedia nicht geeignet finde. --Paddy2674 (talk) 15:07, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Bitte dieses Bild dringend löschen. Herzlichen Dank.
- Please delete this picture. Thank you. @Paddy2674 2003:C0:1F3E:3501:3C8E:C213:7106:889C 00:04, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
- Bis jetzt fehlt immer noch eine Begründung gemäß den Löschrichtlinien. --Achim55 (talk) 07:01, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for a deletion given. --Wdwd (talk) 15:13, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Irrelevante Werbung für Alkohol. Ich habe das Foto versehentlich gemacht und veröffentlicht. Paddy2674 (talk) 17:58, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Way beyond the courtesy deletion period, and doesn't look irrelevant to me (irrelevant to what?). The only potential issue could be copyright. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:32, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per previous. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:40, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
There is no explanation on the source Wikipedia as to why this image would not be under copyright; enwiki has the same image as fair use Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:00, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- The Spanish law for intelectual property says.
- Real Decreto Legislativo 1/1996, de 12 de abril,.. de Propiedad Intelectual...
- Artículo 128. De las meras fotografías. Quien realice una fotografía u otra reproducción obtenida por procedimiento análogo a aquélla, cuando ni una ni otra tengan el carácter de obras protegidas en el Libro I, goza del derecho exclusivo de autorizar su reproducción, distribución y comunicación pública, en los mismos términos reconocidos en la presente Ley a los autores de obras fotográficas.
- Este derecho tendrá una duración de veinticinco años computados desde el día 1 de enero del año siguiente a la fecha de realización de la fotografía o reproducción.
- Translation:
- Royal decree 1/1996 of april 12...of Intelectual Property...
- Article 128. From "meras fotografías" (in English "just a picture". It means the English concept of pictures that are not a master piece or an artistic one). Who makes a picture or another copy got by similar method, when none of then are protected on the Book I (The book I defines the concepts of author and object protected. The object protected is an artistic, literary, etc. It means an effort and an original work to produce the object), he has the exclusive right of authorize its reproduction, distribution, and public communication, under the same conditions of this law to the authors of the pictures.
- This right will have 25 years of protection, starting from January the first of the next year of publication.
- Consequently, as this picture is just a "mera fotografía" (it is not an artistic work) and it was made in 1982, we have the right to use it.
- Thanks JuanMRS (talk) 15:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- That's for Spanish law, but I don't see any link to Spain that would make its copyright law the pre-eminent one. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:55, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Dear Jo-Jo Eumerus: Thank you very much for your words. First of all, I beg your patience because I am not a lawyer and new publishing in Wiki, so, I may make some mistakes. I have been writing with the author of the picture. He owns all the rights of the picture. Consequently, the image should be deleted. Additionally, I have some questions, please:
- I have uploaded some isolated frames that I got from Youtube, with no problem. Will be them accepted always or just when they come from a particular account from Youtube.
- I need some explanation because I am confused for this contradiction: Yo said "enwiki has the same image as fair use. So, as a consequence, I can see the picture form Spain, because the "fair use" allows to publish it, in English, even to Spain.
- You say, and it is obviously correct, that the Spanish law is not the pre-eminent. Using the same principle, enwiki is not either the pre-eminent. At least, here in Europe.
- Using your point of view the fair use should be restricted to USA and UK, and should not be possible to see the picture from Spain.
- Thanks very much for your help. Yours sincerely JuanMRS (talk) 16:13, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 14:17, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploader did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. --Ellywa (talk) 14:18, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
The work is apparently not don by User:assanges, it's a property of New Taipei Metro Corporation Hansen033 (talk) 18:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- But it seems like he/she have edited the work more than once, so it can be totally original work.
- However, the work includes a trademark of New Taipei Metro Corporation, and I don't think uploading it here falls into reasonal purpose for copyright law of Taiwan. Hansen033 (talk) 18:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- LOL. One does not simply judge others work, please do some research next time. I can confirm this was my original work, the visual design took Sapporo Municipal Subway as reference, how could it be NTMC's work? -- @assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 06:13, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Speedy keep, the issue unsolved over months, also the reason of nomination has been disappeared as I removed all copyrighted materials. -- @assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 18:07, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion, no relation to the original map found here. --Ellywa (talk) 14:46, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Irrelevant crop of File:Letter by Nicolaus Copernicus to Johannes Dantiscus, 3 March 1539.jpg, uploaded in the mistaken belief that it's a manuscript of Copernicus, but this is in fact just a completely unrelated letter by some random unknown author, which just happened to be placed next to Copernicus' letter in the addressee's archive (the real item by Copernicus is the one below in the larger file, partly obscuring this one). Used for a hoax by User:Sibinia. No educational value in the absence of information about authorship, language and content of this text. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, currently not in use. --Ellywa (talk) 14:47, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Legal issues- copyvio: This image was published in 1997, and no earlier publication information has been provided, and no author information is provided. I have been unable to find a previous publication. It therefore does not meet c) of the licence used (or a) or b)). I can see no other appropriate licence that could be used instead. Peacemaker67 (talk) 23:18, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 14:48, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stewart Stuart
[edit]- File:Hacienda Riquelme logo.png
- File:Hacienda Riquelme Poolside.jpg
- File:Hacienda Riquelme Golf.jpg
- File:SCORE CARD HACIENDA PDF1564149398-page-002.jpg
(I am not manually compiling the entire list, the above 4 are just pars per toto). All uploads of the user are centered around some golf resort in Spain, and may be found on the resort's website. A majority but not all images have a copyright mark in one of the corners; the user has so far not responded to a user-mail or the regular discussion. The article on the resort in en-WP suggests self-promotion, but I'm in doubt about the usability on commons. --Enyavar (talk) 15:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. I will nominate the other uploads for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 14:21, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stewart Stuart (talk · contribs)
[edit]serious suspicion of copyright violations by uploader. Some are showing a copyright logo in the lefthand corner. No Exif data. Please also note this deletion request: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Stewart Stuart. Uploader did not comment to explain copyright situation, so I think the following images have to be deleted as well. Some can easily be found on other websites. I decided to keep two files which have exif data, however with different camera's.
- File:Golf buggies.jpg
- File:El Casón Riquelme Gardens.jpg
- File:Hacienda Riquelme Golf putting green.jpg
- File:Hacienda Riquelme apartments.jpg
- File:Hacienda Riquelme Golf - 9th green.jpg
- File:Flora and fauna on Hacienda Riquelme.jpg
- File:Multi-sports area.jpg
- File:1. Escudo nobiliario de los Riquelme.jpg
- File:Hacienda-147.jpg
- File:Hacienda Riquelme Gardens.jpg
- File:Hacienda Riquelme's Five Large Lakes.jpg
- File:Hacienda Riquelme driving range.jpg
- File:El Palomar Cocktail Bar.jpg
- File:Hacienda Courtyard.jpg
- File:El Casón de Riquleme and Gardens.jpg
Ellywa (talk) 14:31, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Paddy2674 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Ich bin der Urheber des Fotos und möchte, dass es aus den Wikimedia Commons gelöscht wird.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as file does not qualify for G7-speedy. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:20, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, too late for deletion per COM:COURTESY. --Ellywa (talk) 08:16, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Das Bild ist für die Verwendung in einem Wikipedia-Artikel irrelevant, und im Übrigen ungeeignet. Paddy2674 (talk) 08:47, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Nonsensical and irrelevant deletion reason. First of all, it's untrue, but secondly, Commons does not exist only as a repository of images used in Wikipedia articles. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:57, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Das Bild ist für die Verwendung in einem Wikipedia-Artikel irrelevant, und im Übrigen ungeeignet. Außerdem enthält das Bild Werbung für Glücksspiel, die ich für die Wikipedia nicht geeignet finde. --Paddy2674 (talk) 15:15, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 15:14, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Irrelevante Werbung für Glücksspiel um Geld. Ich habe das Foto versehentlich gemacht und veröffentlicht. Paddy2674 (talk) 17:56, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Nonsensical non-reason for deletion again. Give up! CC licenses are irrevocable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:33, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: too late for courtesy deletion, below TOO:Germany; kept twice before. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:40, 6 November 2023 (UTC)