Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Uploads by Matlin/temp

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Extended content
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photos made not by uploader. Some derrivative works (artworks, posters, cards, Flickr screenshots).

Matlin (talk) 11:43, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:36, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry personal photographs with no apparent educational value. Out of COM:SCOPE.

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:49, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comic apparently featuring DC Universe characters, as evidenced by file description; see w:Fawcett City for context. COM:DW at best.

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:55, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative works or out of scope (personal photos or spy-like photos).

Matlin (talk) 08:08, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Forced to stay at school. (38451174161).jpg even appears to fall under COM:DW. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:19, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:41, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OOS, derrivate works, previously deleted etc.

Matlin (talk) 09:06, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:07, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, private photos uploaded by non-author, derrivative works, random pedestrians etc.

Matlin (talk) 11:45, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Drinking from the Flickr firehose gives us a lot of COM:FREE content, but I'm not seeing COM:SCOPE in these. If anyone wants to keep particular ones as having some value, I'd be fine what that. But I can't see anything here worth keeping. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I agree. Most are indeed out of scope and/or copyright violation (like File:Avatar (718206733).jpg and others on the last page). I would like to keep though:
--JopkeB (talk) 16:59, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep all and shutdown this kind of lazy DRs in the future. Deletionists (as above) will say that if inclusionists want to keep any of these 1703 files (let me say this again: seventeen undred and three files!!) we should simply indicate which ones and why. That’s completely backwards. -- Tuválkin 15:42, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've always been against long bulk nominations for just that reason, and I'm about as inclusionist as it gets. But I eyeballed all of this batch and couldn't see anything here, just lots of holiday snaps (in just that pejorative sense). Plenty are notable tourist destinations where we do need content of them; but at the same time, that notability means that we already have that content, and we have a better version of it without the eponymous tourist standing in front.
So unusually for me, delete the lot. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 02:53, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Further deletion requests/2021/12/23

Moved to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Uploads by Matlin/temp/2021/12/23, following up on Krok6kola's Help Desk request. - Jmabel ! talk 18:04, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors), derrivative works, one sculpture from France (no fop), etc.

Matlin (talk) 22:34, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--JopkeB (talk) 03:41, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete File:2020 08 27 Wien 154236 397 (50376007971).jpg as text-only COM:OOS image. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 03:59, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@1234qwer1234qwer4: Why is this photo out of scope? I cannot find a reason. --JopkeB (talk) 04:12, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JopkeB, Files that contain nothing educational other than raw text. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰, This is a quotation. Are all quotations not educational? Why do we have such an elaborate category structure (see Category:Quotations) for them? I think they are educational, this one also. Even raw text can be educational; we also have books in Commons. So I disagree. --JopkeB (talk) 16:22, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I never said it wasn't educational, but this kind of educational material is specifically exempt from Commons' scope (per the policy cited above), since it is better stored on Wikiquote. The category seems to a large extent to consist of quotes with additional media rather than just raw text, and others can be deleted on a similar basis (OTHERSTUFF is an argument to avoid). Full books are generally considered to be of additional value, as they can be used to illustrate the original source (such as done on Wikisource, even though the raw text is hosted there in parallel), but this is already explained in the policy I linked. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:03, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
But in Wikiquote you cannot store photos like this one, only add plain text. This is not plain text, this is a photo of a text, probably of a plaque somewhere in Vienna. I hope that this is an exception to the rule you are referring to. Otherwise you might as well delete all the files in Category:Quotations and then you could never add a photo of a plaque with a quotation in Wikipedia, Wikiquote or elsewhere, as an illustration. For this photo: There might in the future be a quote in Wikiquote with this text, then this photo might be an illustration. So I still want to keep this photo. --JopkeB (talk) 05:29, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It looks to me that this deletion request has not been well thought out:

  1. By no means all files are in Category:Uploads by Matlin/temp (for instance: File:"Yellow Snow Guy" (316953708).jpg, File:"Quien no cae, no se levanta." (10881132673).jpg and File:"Entrepreneur is just French for has ideas, does them." -- @alexisohanian (10726431215).jpg). This makes it very hard for others/us to judge those which are not there. It is not doable to check them one by one.
  2. There are too many files which may not be deleted already, only by a quick look by Infrogmation of New Orleans and me.

My request and proposal is: this deletion request will be withdrawn and Matlin makes a new one, now more carefully, with only files that indeed are out of scope or have a copyright issue AND are all in one category, gallery page or other overview. And please, make seperate deletion requests for copyright violation and out of scope. --JopkeB (talk) 04:23, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment This person (Matlin) has uploaded thousands of files. See Category:Uploads by Matlin. For a long time I categorized what I could. But there were so many near duplicates and junk files, I stopped. A good result of this "incident" is that Matlin has begun to categorize some of his own files. The category Category:Uploads by Matlin/temp was not created by Matlin, but by an editor seeking a way to deal with suggesting deletion of some file. I don't think there is another way to do a batch task. Krok6kola (talk) 17:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, please be more selective in future. --Gbawden (talk) 13:51, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photos uploaded non by author.

Matlin (talk) 20:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 01:55, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors), derrivative works, out of scope etc.

Matlin (talk) 16:37, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:23, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - private photos, anonymous models, dogs etc.

Matlin (talk) 15:17, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. JopkeB (talk) 16:57, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Mostly agree (though File:Windsor 035DSC 0299 (48975090193).jpg and File:Sassari 213DSC 0239 (49378461422).jpg should be deleted per COM:DR/COM:FOP Italy and COM:FOP UK).  Keep File:Tonight is totally a colacao night. (5270206848).jpg since the only other image of this beverage appears to be File:Colacao.jpg. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:55, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Fitindia Did you intend to close these? Also, what is the reason you deleted the File:Tonight is totally a colacao night. (5270206848).jpg contrary to my reasoning above? 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:03, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@1234qwer1234qwer4 ✓ Done - FitIndia Talk 02:41, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --- FitIndia Talk 02:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derrivative works, interior of museums etc.

Matlin (talk) 15:27, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --- --- FitIndia Talk 06:31, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2.2 Out of scope

   2.2.1 Not educationally useful

Matlin (talk) 11:21, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fitindia More nominations you probably wanted to close. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 06:00, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --- --- FitIndia Talk 06:31, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derrivate work

Matlin (talk) 11:29, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --- --- FitIndia Talk 06:31, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derrivate works - one blurred photo.

Matlin (talk) 17:03, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:30, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]