Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/10/01
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Photoshopped photograph, original was photographed by Daniel Pockett/AAP. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/feb/22/here-today-gone-tomorrow-tabloid-knives-are-out-for-nines-georgie-gardner Bidgee (talk) 00:08, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:43, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS. BriefEdits (talk) 00:23, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:41, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Irelevant photos and out of scope
- File:2001 08 29 Rovinj DSCF0109 (50985939047).jpg
- File:2001 12 24 Karácsony 050 (50966399837).jpg
- File:2001 12 24 Karácsony 051 (50965586198).jpg
- File:2001 12 24 Karácsony 053 (50965586168).jpg
- File:2001 12 24 Karácsony 054 (50965586113).jpg
- File:2001 12 24 Karácsony 059 (50966292521).jpg
- File:2001 12 24 Karácsony 061 (50966399637).jpg
- File:2001 12 24 Karácsony 062 (50965585973).jpg
- File:2001 12 25 Karácsony 063 (50965585948).jpg
- File:2001 12 25 Karácsony 064 (50966399562).jpg
- File:2001 12 25 Karácsony 065 (50966290751).jpg
- File:2001 12 25 Karácsony 066 (50965585893).jpg
- File:2001 12 25 Karácsony 067 (50966292286).jpg
- File:2001 12 25 Karácsony 068 (50966292251).jpg
- File:2001 12 25 Karácsony 069 (50966399417).jpg
- File:2001 12 25 Karácsony 070 (50966399397).jpg
- File:2001 12 25 Karácsony 071 (50966399357).jpg
- File:2001 12 25 Karácsony 072 (50965585703).jpg
- File:2001 12 25 Karácsony 073 (50966399302).jpg
- File:2001 12 25 Karácsony 074 (50966292031).jpg
- File:2001 12 25 Karácsony 075 (50965585588).jpg
- File:2001 12 25 Karácsony 076 (50966291951).jpg
- File:2001 12 25 Karácsony 077 (50966399207).jpg
- File:2001 12 25 Karácsony 078 (50966291851).jpg
- File:2001 12 25 Karácsony 079 (50966399152).jpg
- File:2001 12 25 Karácsony 080 (50965585398).jpg
- File:2001 12 26 Karácsony 087 (50966291526).jpg
- File:2001 12 26 Karácsony 088 (50966398747).jpg
- File:2001 12 26 Karácsony 089 (50966291411).jpg
- File:2001 12 26 Karácsony 090 (50965584998).jpg
- File:2001 12 26 Karácsony 091 (50965584943).jpg
- File:2001 12 26 Karácsony 092 (50966398582).jpg
- File:2001 12 26 Karácsony 094 (50965584328).jpg
- File:2001 Alcsi 20210122174053 01 (50981858676).jpg
- File:2001 Alcsi 20210122174257 01 (50981964297).jpg
- File:2001 Alcsi 20210122174306 01 (50981858696).jpg
- File:2002 04 10 Mika (51002998492).jpg
- File:2002 04 15 Mika (51002881571).jpg
- File:2002 07 13 Bratislava 050 (51018740971).jpg
- File:2002 07 27 Alcsi szülinapja 003 (50995994521).jpg
- File:2002 07 27 Otthon 063 (50995297678).jpg
- File:2002 07 27 Prater 009 (50995994406).jpg
- File:2002 07 27 Prater 011 (50995994341).jpg
- File:2002 07 27 Prater 041 (50995298078).jpg
- File:2002 07 27 Prater 043 (50996109132).jpg
- File:2002 07 27 Prater 044 (50995298028).jpg
- File:2002 07 27 Prater 050 (50995993786).jpg
- File:2002 07 27 Prater 051 (50995993761).jpg
- File:2002 09 07 Porec 001 (51007860688).jpg
- File:2002 09 07 Porec 002 (51007862513).jpg
- File:2002 09 07 Porec 013 (51007862378).jpg
- File:2002 09 07 Porec 014 (51008669642).jpg
- File:2002 09 07 Porec 032 (51007860678).jpg
- File:2002 09 07 Porec 033 (51007862183).jpg
- File:2002 09 08 Porec 050 (51007862068).jpg
- File:2002 09 09 Porec 064 (51008668977).jpg
- File:2002 09 09 Porec 065 (51008568556).jpg
- File:2002 09 09 Porec 066 (51008668927).jpg
- File:2002 09 09 Porec 067 (51007861673).jpg
- File:2003 05 15 Budapest 131 (51038978361).jpg
- File:2003 05 15 Budapest 135 (51039074487).jpg
- File:2003 05 15 Budapest 136 (51038247643).jpg
- File:2003 05 15 Budapest 137 (51039074422).jpg
- File:2003 05 15 Budapest 139 (51038978271).jpg
- File:2003 05 15 Budapest 143 (51038978231).jpg
- File:2003 05 15 Budapest 144 (51038247478).jpg
- File:2003 05 17 Berlin 093 (51025281551).jpg
- File:2003 05 17 Berlin 099 (51024545898).jpg
- File:2003 05 17 Berlin 100 (51025376177).jpg
- File:2003 05 17 Berlin 102 (51024545818).jpg
- File:2003 05 21 Berlin 174 (51024545693).jpg
- File:2003 05 21 Berlin 181 (51025375977).jpg
- File:2003 05 21 Berlin 192 (51024545613).jpg
- File:2003 05 22 Berlin 316 (51025375827).jpg
- File:2003 05 22 Berlin 317 (51024545408).jpg
- File:2003 05 Berlin 167 (51025281336).jpg
- File:2003 08 16 Berlin 001 (51025378852).jpg
- File:2003 08 16 Berlin 002 (51025378832).jpg
- File:2003 08 16 Berlin 006 (51024548603).jpg
Orizan (talk) 23:12, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:42, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Private photos that should not have been uploaded
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 189 (51062159642).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 190 (51062076406).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 191 (51061360013).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 192 (51062076341).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 193 (51061359958).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 194 (51061359908).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 195 (51062158422).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 196 (51062159442).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 197 (51061359863).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 198 (51062076181).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 199 (51062159397).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 200 (51061359768).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 201 (51062076066).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 202 (51062159307).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 203 (51061359688).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 204 (51061359663).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 205 (51062159212).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 206 (51061359633).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 207 (51062159162).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 209 (51062075876).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 210 (51062075826).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 211 (51061359498).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 212 (51061358513).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 213 (51061359473).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 214 (51061359433).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 215 (51062075681).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 216 (51062158962).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 217 (51062075621).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 218 (51061359253).jpg
- File:2004 12 24 Karácsony 219 (51061359203).jpg
- File:2008 01 25 Iván 046 (51136026699).jpg
- File:2008 03 09 Ich 001 (51138076245).jpg
- File:2008 03 09 Ich 002 (51138076235).jpg
- File:2008 03 09 Ich 003 (51137746519).jpg
- File:2008 03 10 Ich 004 (51137186783).jpg
- File:2008 03 10 Ich 005 (51138076190).jpg
- File:2008 03 15 Ich 006 (51136295357).jpg
- File:2008 03 15 Robert Foto0030 (51134570297).jpg
- File:2008 03 15 Robert Foto0031 (51134570267).jpg
- File:2008 03 15 Robert Foto0032 (51136025279).jpg
- File:2008 03 19 Ich 007 (51137186733).jpg
- File:2008 03 19 Ich 008 (51138076165).jpg
- File:2008 03 19 Ich 009 (51137746414).jpg
- File:2008 04 04 Szentgotthárd 009 (51137741214).jpg
- File:2008 04 04 Szentgotthárd 010 (51136965271).jpg
- File:2008 04 04 Szentgotthárd 012 (51138071105).jpg
- File:2008 04 04 Szentgotthárd 013 (51136289192).jpg
- File:2008 04 05 Szalafö (48) (51137181688).jpg
- File:2008 04 05 Szalafö (67) (51138071030).jpg
- File:2008 04 05 Szalafö (68) (51138071000).jpg
- File:2008 05 02 Cesky Krumlov 298 (51135245576).jpg
- File:2008 05 02 Cesky Krumlov 316 (51136023914).jpg
- File:2008 05 03 Cesky Krumlov 400 (51134568967).jpg
- File:2008 05 03 Cesky Krumlov 404 (51136353860).jpg
- File:2008 05 03 koreaiak 1071 (51142814260).jpg
- File:2008 05 03 koreaiak 1072 (51141923053).jpg
- File:2008 05 04 Wien 052 (51141714351).jpg
- File:2008 05 04 Wien 183 (51142489649).jpg
- File:2008 05 11 Riva del Garda (17) (51143180337).jpg
- File:2008 05 11 Riva del Garda (57) (51144632159).jpg
- File:2008 05 17 Szentendre DSCN3440 (51142816975).jpg
- File:2008 05 17 Szentendre DSCN3461 (51142816955).jpg
- File:2008 05 17 Szentendre DSCN3462 (51142491739).jpg
- File:2008 05 18 Bártfa DSCN3678 (51141039352).jpg
- File:2008 05 18 Sárospatak DSCN3591 (51142817675).jpg
- File:2008 05 19 Kassa (131) (51141041372).jpg
- File:2008 05 19 Kassa (226) (51142493989).jpg
- File:2008 05 19 Kassa (227) (51142819290).jpg
- File:2008 05 19 Kassa DSCN3882 (51141718641).jpg
- File:2008 05 19 Kassa DSCN3883 (51142493894).jpg
- File:2008 05 19 Kassa DSCN3955 (51141718581).jpg
- File:2008 05 19 Kassa DSCN3959 (51141718546).jpg
- File:2008 05 19 Kassa DSCN3960 (51142493804).jpg
- File:2008 05 19 Kassa DSCN3961 (51141041187).jpg
- File:2008 05 19 Kassa DSCN3964 (51142819105).jpg
- File:2008 05 19 Kassa DSCN3965 (51142819085).jpg
- File:2008 05 19 Kassa DSCN3966 (51142493709).jpg
- File:2008 05 19 Löcse DSCN3808 (51142818065).jpg
- File:2008 05 19 Löcse DSCN3809 (51141927053).jpg
- File:2008 05 19 Szepes DSCN3819 (51141927468).jpg
- File:2008 05 19 Szepes DSCN3828 (51141927423).jpg
- File:2008 05 19 Szepes DSCN3846 (51141040542).jpg
Orizan (talk) 01:37, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:43, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Uploader suggests they are the person in the photo, need permission from the photographer to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 02:14, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:43, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 19:17, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
This image was already deleted once before at Commons, in 2013. Also, from the quality it seems very possible that the image was lifted from a newspaper or magazine photograph of a group. The Summary permissions seem lacking since the image is dated April 3?... Shearonink (talk) 04:19, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - The uploader's claim to being the copyright holder is not credible. See this. Clearly cropped from some other source. -- Whpq (talk) 12:54, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:00, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
it violates copyright Faith Buyaki (talk) 10:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 12:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Es una captura de pantalla obtenida de Google Maps, la cual tiene derechos de autor no compatibles con Commons. Wguayana (talk) 13:59, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:27, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
birch trees of Wisconsin Brokenlandphotography (talk) 16:44, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 19:30, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
image says it is copyrighted on it? 2A00:23C5:FF80:F301:D9E9:1664:F5AB:B3A9 21:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Uploader's copyright & userpage image. --Achim (talk) 21:36, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Prawdopodobnie plik narusza zasady publikacji; data śmierci tłumacza (Józef Józefczak pseudonim Adam Drowicz 1894 – ?) nie jest ustalona.
Possibly violating the publishing policy. The date of translator's death (Józef Józefczak pseudo Adam Drowicz 1894 – ?) is not established. Seboloidus (talk) 20:15, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Ankry at 20:17, 1 October 2021 UTC: unclear copyright status: death date of Adam Drowicz vel Józef Józefczak (* 1894) unknown --Krdbot 02:01, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Edit wiki peadia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unfree logos and likely copyvio soccer photos. Photographs have no metadata, are web resolution, and uploader has previously uploaded a blatantly copyrighted image and claimed it as own work.
- File:Fazal naizer.jpg
- File:Sujan perera.jpg
- File:Sri lanka cricket team logo.png
- File:CF CLUB LOGO.png
- File:Col fc logo.png
- File:Colombo football ogo.png
- File:Colombo fc logo.png
- File:Sri Lanka national football federation logo.jpg
- File:Sri Lanka national football team logo.jpg
IronGargoyle (talk) 20:16, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:54, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Edit wiki peadia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted images uploaded without permission from the author as a own work.
- File:Yohani d. Silva.jpg
- File:Wanindu H.jpg
- File:Fazal naizer.jpg
- File:Sujan perera.jpg
- File:Sri lanka cricket team logo.png
- File:CF CLUB LOGO.png
- File:Col fc logo.png
- File:Colombo football ogo.png
- File:Colombo fc logo.png
- File:Sri Lanka national football federation logo.jpg
- File:Sri Lanka national football team logo.jpg
Superatp (talk) 12:48, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:54, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:11, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep COM:IDONTLIKEIT See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chateau de farciennes 447 001.jpg.
- Plese stop repeatedly filing invalid DRs. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:56, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept per previous del req-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:04, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 05:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:25, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 09:54, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete This is the profile photo of TikTok personality Khaby Lame, clearly not the uploader’s work. Ytoyoda (talk) 11:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:26, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 09:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:26, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
private vacation photo. out of scope Orizan (talk) 23:06, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:26, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
private vacation photo. out of scope Orizan (talk) 23:05, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:27, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
private vacation photo. out of scope Orizan (talk) 23:06, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:28, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:14, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: insufficient VRTS validation (the uploader is clearly not the author). Ruthven (msg) 11:42, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Someone who isn't a Wikipedian, is just trying to promote himself Osama Eid (talk) 11:23, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:30, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:31, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Very poor quality, orphaned. Leyo 11:35, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:31, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused thumbnail-size pic without context Fl.schmitt (talk) 13:19, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:32, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope personal image Orizan (talk) 13:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:33, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope personal image Orizan (talk) 13:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:33, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope personal image Orizan (talk) 13:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:33, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope personal image Orizan (talk) 13:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete See my comment in Commons:Deletion requests/File:2004 05 29 Cesky Krumlov DSCN3395 (51051028018).jpg. howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 17:28, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:33, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope personal image Orizan (talk) 13:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:35, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope personal image Orizan (talk) 13:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:35, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope personal image Orizan (talk) 13:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:35, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope personal image Orizan (talk) 13:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:35, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope personal image Orizan (talk) 13:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:38, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope personal image Orizan (talk) 13:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:38, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope personal image Orizan (talk) 13:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:38, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope personal image Orizan (talk) 13:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:38, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope personal image Orizan (talk) 13:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:39, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope personal image Orizan (talk) 13:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:38, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope personal image Orizan (talk) 13:26, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:39, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope personal image Orizan (talk) 13:26, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:39, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope personal image Orizan (talk) 13:26, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:39, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope personal image Orizan (talk) 13:26, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:36, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope personal image Orizan (talk) 13:26, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:37, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope personal image Orizan (talk) 13:26, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:37, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope personal image Orizan (talk) 13:33, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:37, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope personal image Orizan (talk) 13:33, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:35, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope personal image Orizan (talk) 13:33, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:36, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Selfie + CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) JopkeB (talk) 13:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:40, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Selfie + CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) JopkeB (talk) 13:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:40, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:41, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:41, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:41, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:42, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be a school project that is out of project scope. Document has clipart images that are likely copyrighted. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:09, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:08, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
File name has "Photo by Ully Zoelkarnain for Forbes Indonesia": OTRS permission from Forbes needed.
- File:Sunarso Bank BRI.jpg
- File:ULZ04772 Photo by Ully Zoelkarnain for Forbes Indonesia-1.jpg
- File:Sunarso BRI.jpg
MKFI (talk) 10:44, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:56, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Shahram Jazayeri Interview with YJC news.png
- File:Shahram Jazayeri with his childerens.jpeg
- File:Shahram Jazayeri Arab in coffe shop.jpg
- File:Shahram Jazayeri Arab in his office.jpg
- File:Shahram Jazayeri Arab 2016.1.jpg
- File:Shahram Jazayeri Arab 2016.jpg
- File:Shahram Jazayeri Arab Public.jpeg
- File:ArshiyaJazayeri.jpg
- File:Arshiya Jazayeri.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:57, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Image is from a video posted to Telegram - https://www.news.com.au/national/crime/police-charged-two-men-after-allegedly-finding-bomb-extremist-material-in-raids/news-story/e0b74140866c3c57982fa88c3f68a7ca Melbguy05 (talk) 00:05, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:16, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
A 1929 German work by "Leon Amar (1887-?)" is not clearly public domain in the US or Germany or even in life+50 countries. Prosfilaes (talk) 00:16, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete no indication of date of death in w:de:Leon Amar, nor on a page about his stamp designs on the website of the Jewish Museum in Berlin[URL lost]. He may well have died during World War II (his full name suggests that he was Jewish), but that is insufficient. All the files in Category:Leon Lico Amar should presumably also be deleted, except for the text-only images. Some or all are PD in the US so could be uploaded to enwiki, but the rules for dewiki may be more restrictive. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:27, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:17, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: FOP in Japan. Yassie (talk) 02:21, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:18, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
The direct link is https://www.interlinea.com/gallery/. Really need to know the original source and hopefully the author to determine the license of the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 02:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, no free license at the declared source. The source URL is presumably https://www.interlinea.com/gallery-foto/album-laboratori-e-incontri-con-lautore-22.html#1. I can't see a free license on the website, and even if there were we should not assume that they own the rights to historical images on their website. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:43, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:18, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument of Youth
[edit]No freedom of panorama in the Philippines.
- File:Mandaluyong Montage.png
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7278 31.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7278 37.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7278 38.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7278 41.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7278 42.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7278 43.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7278 44.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7278 45.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7323 02.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7323 03.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7323 04.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7323 05.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7323 06.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7323 07.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7323 08.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7323 09.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7323 10.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7323 11.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7323 12.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7323 13.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7323 14.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7323 15.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7323 16.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7323 17.JPG
Kelly (talk) 16:27, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 07:45, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument of Youth
[edit]http://www.manilastatues.com/monuments/189/Bantayog%20Para%20Sa%20Kabatan - 1997 statue. No freedom of panorama in the philippines
- File:0012jfBarangays Boni Avenue Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Cityfvf 17.jpg
- File:0012jfBarangays Boni Avenue Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Cityfvf 20.jpg
- File:0012jfBarangays Boni Avenue Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Cityfvf 21.jpg
- File:0012jfBarangays Boni Avenue Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Cityfvf 22.jpg
- File:0037jfBarangays Boni Avenue Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Cityfvf 01.jpg
- File:0037jfBarangays Boni Avenue Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Cityfvf 02.jpg
- File:0037jfBarangays Boni Avenue Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Cityfvf 04.jpg
- File:0063jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Cityfvf 13.jpg
- File:0063jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Cityfvf 14.jpg
- File:0063jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Cityfvf 15.jpg
- File:0063jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Cityfvf 16.jpg
- File:0063jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Cityfvf 17.jpg
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7323 20.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 02:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:20, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Uploader does not appear to be the author noted in the metadata; need their permission to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 02:42, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:51, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Need permission from the author and copyright holder listed in the metadata to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 02:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:53, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/"Disney Channel Canada"
[edit]Yes, some videos uploaded by Disney Channel Canada appear with a CC-BY license on YouTube. But it is highly unlikely that this license is for real. Normally, I wouldn't question free licenses apparently issued by the copyright owner, but this seems too much like the infamous Ubisoft case. To refresh memories: Based on a correspondence with a guy from Ubisoft Germany's PR, people assumed that Ubisoft released screenshots of its games under a free license, until Ubisoft headquarters, asked by Wikimedia France, told that they had never heard of such an agreement and don't wish to release media under a free license. So, it was actually a representative of Ubisoft people relied upon for their assumption (not from the legal department, not authorised to give such a broad license), but common sense should have made clear from the beginning that this is an impossible thing. Ubisoft, notoriously keen on protecting their rights, suddenly releasing their intellectual property under a free license? Anyone could now freely use Ubisoft game characters commercially, print them on T-shirts or mugs and sell them? For that's what the free license would have meant. That was so extremely implausible that the ultimate outcome should have been clear to everyone from the beginning.
And now Disney. Disney! Probably no other big media company is so associated with their insistence on their copyright, and their attempts to extend it as far as possible. They're one of the leading parties behind the Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998, after all. If they would now start to release some of their content under a free license, this would be a massive sensation, an earth-shaking revolution in the world of copyright. Disney embraces CC-BY! This would mean: As, for example, the trailer to Big Hero 6: The Series is uploaded under CC-BY to YouTube (and now here on Commons), you could now use any of the characters in this trailer for your derivative works, also commercially, only attribution is needed. Print them on T-Shirts, make your own animated series with them, whatever you want.
Well. This is so massively unlikely that COM:PCP dictates that we should delete that content. It is far more plausible that some employee of Disney Channel Canada chose the wrong license when uploading to YouTube, not aware of what exactly a CC-BY license means, than that the legal department of Disney has suddenly decided: "We think we no longer want money from people using our content, anyone should be able to use it commercially for free". Of course, there will be arguments along the lines of "but such a big company surely knows what they are doing! If Disney decides to release content under CC-BY, we shouldn't question it but be glad!" To this I answer that such uploads are not done by a monolithic "big company" entity that exactly knows what happens everywhere in its structure, but by some (PR) employee of a branch of this company, and would reject that argument. The Ubisoft case should be a lesson.
- File:Big hero six series trailer.webm
- File:Z-O-M-B-I-E-S Disney Channel.webm
- File:Sofia Wylie.jpg
- File:Olivia Rodrigo.png
- File:Meg Donnelly.jpg
- File:Joshua Rush.jpg
- File:Jenna Ortega as Harley Diaz.png
- File:Madison Hu.jpg
- File:Jenna Ortega as Harley Diaz 2.png
- File:Jenna Ortega on Stuck in the Middle.png
- File:Kayla Maisonet on Stuck in the Middle.png
- File:Cozi Zuehlsdorff 2018.png
Gestumblindi (talk) 20:34, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep It is an official Disney Youtube Channel and a valid licensing. The bare assumption (based on a previous case many years ago where a completely different company made an error) that the licensing could be a mistake is not a sufficient reason to delete these files. Thus there is no other reason than this assumption these files are to be kept.
- In the previous discussion on German WP I already suggested that someone should write an e-mail to Disney so that we could verify wheter this was a mistake or intented. If Disney then tells us that this was a mistake we still can delete these files. Chaddy (talk) 21:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- I knew that you would write this here, too. "It's an official channel! It's valid!" I really think we can spare us the repeated "Ubisoft" exercise, trying to get through to someone from Disney's legal department to tell us that Disney, of course, is not releasing content under a free license, and for once just apply common sense and COM:PCP. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:59, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- As a side note — before someone thinks it needs pointing out —, I notice now that I actually decided to keep File:Madison Hu.jpg in a previous deletion request last year, per the CC-BY license at YouTube and nominator's withdrawal of the request, but I must not have noticed the Disney provenance back then. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:38, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- The Ubisoft case does not matter here. It IS a valid license and we have to believe bona fide what stands there as it is NOT an obvious mistake - there is NOT a significant doubt about the licensing. There is no valid reason for deletion. I do not agree switching our standards to deleting files with valid licencing from official sources just because we think the licencing seems unrealistic or just because we do not believe the copyright holder really wanted what he explicitly did.
- If we apply this standard we would have to delete EVERY file where we speculate that the license seems unrealistic, therefore in fact almost everywhere where we don't have an explicit OTRS documented permission (and also this would not be enough, see the Ubisoft case).
- And yes, of course we should invest the time to get through to someone from Disney's legal department to tell us what's the case here! Chaddy (talk) 23:56, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- As I note below, Disney Channel Canada is not an official outlet owned and controlled by The Walt Disney Company. It is owned and controlled by Corus Entertainment who licenses some Disney content and the brand Disney Channel for use in Canada. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:31, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete It is implausible to the point of being risible that Disney would release any of its intellectual property for unrestricted free-use. This is an obvious mistake supported by the fact that no other country's Disney outlets releases Disney content free-use. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:47, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- It is not to us to decide if this licensing is a mistake or intended. We have to believe bona fide what Disney did there. As long as this license is stated there it is legally valid - until Disney declares it was a mistake (if so). Thus we also do not get into difficulties because we acted in good faith as we literally can not know if Disney just made a mistake there. There is NO reason to delete these files. Chaddy (talk) 23:56, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Disney has nothing to do with what happens in the Corus Entertainment outlet labeled Disney Channel Canada, they just let Corus use their content under license, Corus will not have the authority to re-license it for free-use, only Disney proper can do that. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:04, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Can someone contact them please? That would remove the doubts! --Mhhossein talk 07:41, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Gestumblindi douts the license information on the Youtube Channel so I think it would be up to him. Though I wrote an e-mail to Disney Channel Canada now. Let's see what they answer. Chaddy (talk) 14:49, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Did you explicitly point out in your e-mail that this is about a license that allows full commercial re-use and derivative works? Because, if read at all, it will probably be answered first by some PR person, maybe the exact same PR person who mistakenly chose that license for their uploads, and then we have the same case as for Ubisoft (sorry for always using that comparison, but I think it's fitting) with misleading statements by someone who is not actually in charge of legal affairs. So, if I would ask (which I don't think necessary, as the mistake is that obvious), then very clearly along the lines of "Did you really intend to release your content under a license that allows commercial re-use of the content, and for example making your own animated series with these characters? Is that the new Disney approach?", so that even a PR person without knowledge of legal details might understand that there's something wrong. Gestumblindi (talk) 18:05, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Note that Disney Channel Canada is not a part of Disney, it is owned by Corus Entertainment who licenses some Disney content and the Disney name for use in Canada. See W:Disney Channel (Canadian TV channel). Corus will not have the authority to release Disney content to free-use, only The Walt Disney Company can legally do that, and there is no way in hell that would ever happen. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:57, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Geraldo Perez has provided good points along with the nominator on why the images should be removed from this project. As Disney Channel Canada is just a distributor of the material in question, they can't override non-free licensing that's owned by the Walt Disney Company, home of the United States. 1989 20:27, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/"Disney Channel Canada"
[edit]Per rationale above.
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:59, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:20, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yanguas as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.odetesaopaio.com.br/. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:03, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:53, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Logo
COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:05, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: above too. --Krd 09:54, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
This photo was taken before June 1, 2021 in mainland China, so indoor FoP doesn't apply. 沈澄心✉ 03:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:54, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 沈澄心 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:34, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:57, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since) GerritR (talk) 05:44, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Historical drawing. Proper license tag must be used if it's in public domain. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: pd-old-100. --Krd 09:57, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Wappen von Zimmermann: Bürgerliche Wappen aus dem Rheinland, S. 384 Woytt, Georg Christian *1694, Darstellung ist älter als 70 Jahre, daher gemeinfrei.(So geändert) 16Exul82 (talk) 18:11, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:41, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:57, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
This image is almost certainly copyright protected. Dubious source. It's taken from a Fandom wiki. Christian Bolz (talk) 06:42, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:58, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:46, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:58, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. MKFI (talk) 10:42, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:00, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:53, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:00, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope personal image Orizan (talk) 13:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Looking at Category:Bread bowls, there is no other picture that shows a person eating a bread bowl. I'd say Weak keep this but delete File:2004 05 29 Cesky Krumlov DSCN3394 (51051028048).jpg. howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 17:20, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 10:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Il s'agit d'une photo de moi dont je ne souhaite pas la diffusion. 89.3.1.164 18:07, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Je ne souhaite pas la diffusion de cette image qui me représente. Laclédusonge (talk) 18:19, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
{{delete}}
Laclédusonge (talk) 18:50, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
{{Speedydelete droit à l'image}}
Laclédusonge (talk) 18:53, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
{{Speedydelete / violation du droit à l'image}}
Laclédusonge (talk) 18:55, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Keep The subject is notable, the image is properly licensed, the image does not seem to be made in private context; I see no valid reason for deletion. Ankry (talk) 19:41, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept, per Ankry. Taivo (talk) 15:32, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
I am Laura Alcoba and I oppose the publication of this image. 2A01:CB08:281:9D00:E9DD:6C1D:6996:47EA 13:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Je suis Laura Alcoba et je m'OPPOSE à la publication de cette image qui est une atteinte à ma personne. 2A01:CB08:281:9D00:E9DD:6C1D:6996:47EA 14:13, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Photo diffusée sans accord de Laura Alcoba 80.13.50.138 14:44, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- "I don't like it" has never been a valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 15:19, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 10:12, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Cette image a été prise à mon insu. Je m'oppose à sa diffusion. 2A01:CB08:281:9D00:56E:7844:E040:565A 20:11, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Je m'oppose à la publication de cette photo qui me représente. Je l'ai déjà fait savoir au photographe qui ignore mes demandes. 2A01:CB08:281:9D00:6119:C0CA:70B5:F8FD 17:17, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ticket:2021101410006838 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 23:00, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per Ticket:2021101410006838. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:09, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Je demande la suppression de cette photo qui a été prise à mon insu. 2A01:CB08:281:9D00:8525:F767:211B:5B94 17:03, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per Ticket:2021101410006838. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:10, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Publication faite en total désaccord avec la personne représentée. 2A01:CB08:281:9D00:D567:7D17:F309:D64 14:16, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep No new reason given for deletion, vexatious reopening of multiple previously resolved DRs. 69.174.144.79 00:18, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yuliátomos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:13, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Chemically incorect: bonds are attached through the ligand ("Ln") instead of the metal ("M"). The uploader has corrected the image, but uploaded it with a different filename (File:Terminalcorrect.png). This version is therefore no longer needed. Marbletan (talk) 18:47, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- The corrected version, File:Terminalcorrect.png, is unused and can be replaced with text and wikimarkup, so perhaps it can be deleted as unneeded as well. Marbletan (talk) 18:48, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Basic image of plain text which could be easily recreated in Wiki code or TeX. I think, both files might get deleted. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:08, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:46, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Scope, too blurr Afifa Afrin (talk) 19:03, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:43, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Content in the phone is copyrighted, no evidence of a free license for that. Yann (talk) 21:35, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:27, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Content in the phone is copyrighted, no evidence of a free license for that. Yann (talk) 21:36, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:27, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Content in the phone is copyrighted, no evidence of a free license for that. Yann (talk) 21:36, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Derivative work of non-free content. De728631 (talk) 16:08, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:26, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Not an actual SVG file, no improvement over File:"I'm Beamin'" Lupe Fiasco Single Cover.png. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:26, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG logo of non-notable company. No relevant Google hits outside Commons. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:25, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful self licensed, several TinEye matches GeorgHH • talk 22:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:21, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG file depicting text that can be rendered using wiki markup. Not used on any content pages. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:30, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:21, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Dumbo Arts Center Flickr set
[edit]- File:Mixed Media Painting by Jenny Eisenpresser Dumbo Arts Center Art Under the Bridge Festival 2009 20090926.10D.54708.P1.L1.CC SML (3972281649).jpg
- File:Mixed Media Painting by Dean Russo Dumbo Arts Center Art Under the Bridge Festival 2009 20090926.10D.54881.P1.L1.CC SML (3982131665).jpg
- File:100% Acrylic Art Guards by Agata Olek Dumbo Arts Center Art Under the Bridge Festival 2009 SML.20090926.10D.54531.P1.L1 (3960375556).jpg
- File:100% Acrylic Art Guards by Agata Olek Dumbo Arts Center Art Under the Bridge Festival 2009 20090926.10D.54798.P1.L1.C23 SML (3976525467).jpg
- File:Wedding under the Bridge Dumbo Arts Center Art Under the Bridge Festival 2009 20090926.10D.54550.P1.L1.C23.BW SML (3963429924).jpg
- File:100% Acrylic Art Guards by Agata Olek Dumbo Arts Center Art Under the Bridge Festival 2009 20090926.10D.54777.P1.L1 SML (3976342837).jpg
- File:Mixed Media Painting by Dean Russo Dumbo Arts Center Art Under the Bridge Festival 2009 20090926.10D.54886.P1.L1.CC SML (3982222091).jpg
- File:Mixed Media Painting (Detail) by Choichun Leung Dumbo Arts Center Art Under the Bridge Festival 2009 20090926.10D.54929.P1.L1 SML (3990049531).jpg
- File:Mixed Media Painting by Dean Russo Dumbo Arts Center Art Under the Bridge Festival 2009 20090926.10D.54890.P1.L1.CC SML (3983055366).jpg
- File:Drawings FASTFORWARDFOSSIL Part 2 by Ellen Driscoll at Smack Mellon Dumbo Arts Center Art Under the Bridge Festival 2009 20090926.10D.54765.02.P1.CC SML (3974796692).jpg
- File:Mixed Media Painting Work-in-Progress inside Dean Russo's Studio Dumbo Arts Center Art Under the Bridge Festival 2009 20090926.10D.54887.P1.L1 SML (3986460468).jpg
- File:100% Acrylic Art Guards by Agata Olek Dumbo Arts Center Art Under the Bridge Festival 2009 20090926.10D.54776.P1.L1.SQ SML (3977093736).jpg
- File:Collaborative Installation I left this here for you to read by Tim Devin Dumbo Arts Center Art Under the Bridge Festival 2009 20090926.10D.54697.P1.L1.CC SML (3973726394).jpg
- File:Mixed Media Painting by Dean Russo Dumbo Arts Center Art Under the Bridge Festival 2009 20090926.10D.54883.P1.L1.CC SML (3982942828).jpg
- File:Drawings FASTFORWARDFOSSIL Part 2 by Ellen Driscoll at Smack Mellon Dumbo Arts Center Art Under the Bridge Festival 2009 20090926.10D.54765.P1.CC SML (3974013261).jpg
- File:100% Acrylic Art Guards by Agata Olek Dumbo Arts Center Art Under the Bridge Festival 2009 20090926.10D.54773.P1.L1 SML (3976287643).jpg
- File:Mixed Media Painting ContinentalDivide lr by James Cospito at Brooklyn Art Project HQ Dumbo Arts Center Art Under the Bridge Festival 2009 20090926.10D.54629.P1.L1.SQ SML (3969048682).jpg
- File:Art Inspires the Curious Minds 100% Acrylic Art Guards by Agata Olek Dumbo Arts Center Art Under the Bridge Festival 2009 20090926.10D.54792.P1.L1.CC SML (3977227610).jpg
- File:Mixed Media Painting (Detail) by Choichun Leung Dumbo Arts Center Art Under the Bridge Festival 2009 SML.20090926.10D.54933.P1.L1 (3990108219).jpg
- File:The Line Up 100% Acrylic Art Guards by Agata Olek Dumbo Arts Center Art Under the Bridge Festival 2009 20090926.10D.54790.P1.L1.CC SML (3977211894).jpg
- File:Mixed Media Painting (Detail) by Choichun Leung Dumbo Arts Center Art Under the Bridge Festival 2009 20090926.10D.54927.P1.L1.C23 SML (3990573818).jpg
- File:Mixed Media Painting (Detail) by Choichun Leung Dumbo Arts Center Art Under the Bridge Festival 2009 20090926.10D.54932.P1.L1.C23 SML (3990072885).jpg
- File:100% Acrylic Art Guards by Agata Olek Dumbo Arts Center Art Under the Bridge Festival 2009 20090926.10D.54783.P1.L1.C23 SML (3977155062).jpg
- File:Mixed Media on Paper by Julia Colavita 20101016.7D.06828 SML (5112215625).jpg
Photos of artwork by living artists uploaded to Flickr by someone other than the artists. To have them here we would need permission from the artists. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:12, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:25, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artwork; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 23:32, 1 October 2021 (UTC) Eine Urheberverletzung liegt nicht vor, weil der Künstler Markus Hohlstein bei meiner Fotoaufnahme zugegen war und mir die Erlaubnis erteilt hat. Er hat mir auch die Erlaubnis für eine Veröffentlichung bei Wikipedia erteilt.Dudotto (talk) 12:50, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:24, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Composite promotional image for a band. Unlikely to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:34, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Im a band member, and it's our property so there is no problem with that — Preceding unsigned comment added by Makowiecki69 (talk • contribs) 16:10, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission. --Krd 10:13, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from movie screenshot. Should cropped/blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:15, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gavinlooker1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of questionable notability.
- File:Array Spawn Event Graph 2.png
- File:MES ViewPort.png
- File:MES Event Graph.png
- File:Array Spawn Event Graph 1.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:16, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:49, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no evidence, that the license applies. Creation year is unknown, the postcard can be still copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 11:10, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:43, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no evidence, that the license applies. Creation year is 1960–1970, the postcard is still copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 12:26, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:43, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no evidence, that the license applies. Creation year is unknown, the postcard can be still copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 12:17, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:44, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no evidence, that the license applies. Creation year is 1918, the postcard can be still copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 12:00, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:45, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no evidence, that the license applies. Creation year is unknown, the postcard can be still copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 11:47, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:45, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no evidence, that the license applies. Creation year is 1918, the postcard can be still copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:46, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no evidence, that the license applies. Creation year is unknown, the postcard can be still copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:47, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no evidence, that the license applies. Creation year is unknown, the postcard can be still copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 11:31, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:47, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no evidence, that the license applies. Creation year is 1930–1960, the postcard can be still copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 11:24, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:48, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no evidence, that the license applies. Creation year is 1914, the postcard can be still copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 11:22, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:48, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no evidence, that the license applies. Creation year is unknown, the postcard can be still copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 11:19, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Lobbes Quartier de l'Eglise et le Pensionnat de la Visitation (après le passage des troupes allemandes).jpg
[edit]Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:49, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no evidence, that the license applies. Creation year is unknown, the postcard can be still copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 11:17, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:23, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no evidence, that the license applies. Creation year is 1905, the postcard can be still copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 13:13, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:27, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no evidence, that the license applies. Creation year is 1918, the postcard can be still copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 13:06, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:30, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no evidence, that the license applies. Creation year is unknown, the postcard can be still copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 12:55, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:34, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no evidence, that the license applies. Creation year is unknown, the postcard can be still copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:42, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no evidence, that the license applies. Creation year is unknown, the postcard can be still copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 12:41, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:2,2,4-Trimetilheptan.svg. Leyo 13:16, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete There is no need to keep the low quality version if there is a better one. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:31, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:20, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:2,3,6-Trimetilheptan.svg. Leyo 13:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete There is no need to keep the low quality version if there is a better one. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:31, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:20, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Commons is not a good place to publish a novel. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 02:54, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:11, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused logo. Lymantria (talk) 09:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Diegonexplore (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LMV Productions (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:13, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:13, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arshil khan ashrafi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:13, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Газета Ростов-на- дому (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:14, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
From a e-reputation agency (indefinitely blocked in fr.wiki) Hyméros --}-≽ ♥ Yes ? 15:12, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:14, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 15:49, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:16, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG logo of non-notable band. Not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:02, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:19, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG logo of non-notable band. Article on Wikipedia (Eleiko) was deleted. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:05, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:18, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Logo of non-notable company, Wikipedia article Osklen was deleted. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:07, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:18, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
On Wikipedia, it says that this can't be hosted here until 2020 due to Russian copyright law. Is this so? If this needs to be deleted, please make sure the English Wikipedia's versions of the file and description are kept. —innotata 21:59, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:16, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Unclear why this is thought to be in the public domain. If it is due to copyright expiration, then see COM:HIRTLE#Sound recordings. All sound recordings created before 2023 enter the public domain in the United States on 1 January 2022 and can't be on Commons until then. See also {{PD-US-record}}. Stefan2 (talk) 11:47, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It's in the public domain because it's from the Musopen project and released into the PD by the musician/recorder.--Prosfilaes (talk) 12:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep The file has been here for years, and was once a "featured sound", therefore this has to be in the public domain. But let's assume we are stupid and somehow missed it, the source of which this audio can be found is in Musopen. For the direct link, see here, of which in the description thing on Google search, it says "Download royalty free music in mp3 for Karine Gilanyan for free, and without copyrights from Musopen.org." therefore, we have proof that this doesn't have any copyright on it. Thanks - RandomEditorAAA (talk) 23:26, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:25, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused JPEG logo, should be SVG if useful. Yann (talk) 21:05, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 09:48, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
On work? 2020, Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:00, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Kun Kipcsak (talk) 09:36, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Unsure, this the logo of a Romanian TV station. A deletion decision would be based on the threshold of originality, but COM:Romania does not give any guidance on the applicable threshold. This design would be allowable for US logo, but not for a UK logo. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Re-upload of Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of television channels and networks of Romania and part of an instance of mass-violation of Commons rules. Gikü (talk) 19:36, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:00, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Great Wall graphic design logos
[edit]Complex logos exceeding COM:TOO China.
Wcam (talk) 12:06, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:00, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
無断転載画像。色調を変更しても同一画像であることは明白。(メリー・クリスマス! 地域を彩るイルミネーション! - 港区まち創り研究会(まち研)ブログ) ブルーメンタール (talk) 00:47, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Different perspective and different lighting conditions show that it is a different image. --Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 15:19, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept, per Asmodea Oaktree. Probably this is public place and a lot of people have made quite similar photos. Taivo (talk) 14:49, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
学長ブログからの無断転載。(水曜公開礼拝(公開オンライン礼拝)の録画撮り) ブルーメンタール (talk) 00:49, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:55, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Famous 1998 artwork by KA EDUARDO CASTRILLO. No freedom of panorama in the phils Mrcl lxmna (talk) 02:29, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:00, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE self-made flag "proposition", violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 02:58, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:15, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JBW as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: It is totally implausible that the government of India has licensed this identity document for free copying and reuse by anyone at all, for any purpose whatever, as claimed by the uploader. In the EXTREMELY unlikely event that it is so licensed, we certainly need evidence. Should be discussed whether {{GODL-India}} applies. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:05, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- King of Hearts {{GODL-India}} includes a list of exemptions, beginning Exemptions: The license does not cover the following kinds of data ..." That list includes "identity documents", which I should think covers this image. It is true that it is only a specimen, and doesn't actually contain anyone's personal information, but the idea that a government would grant "a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to use, adapt, publish" a specimen identity document, seems far less likely than that they would interpret "identity documents" as including specimens. Otherwise, I could legally set up a business creating blank copies of identity documents, with spaces where my clients could fill in personal details of their choice, which seems to me highly unlikely. However, I am not an Indian lawyer, and I don't claim that my opinion is definitive. JBW (talk) 21:29, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- I feel like the reproduction of identity documents would be restricted for reasons other than copyright. For example, US banknotes are public domain, but you can't just go about making exact copies of them. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:14, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I do not know, do GODL-India license apply, but I see, that here is no source. I do not take position about copyright. Taivo (talk) 15:21, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MiguelAlanCS as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source. Please supply evidence of copyvio. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:07, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:23, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 117.198.119.16 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: There is no such image or labels in provided source. User has deliberately modified it to suit their propaganda. See here --> https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-61941-z/figures/1 Mys_721tx (talk) 04:16, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: doctored diagram,
copyvio. Uanfala (talk) 07:04, 1 October 2021 (UTC)- How can it be a copyvio? It is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license from the Nature Journal. It is public and neither behind a paywall.213.162.73.138 07:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ah, you appear to be right about the copyright: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-61941-z#rightslink says it's available under Creative Commons (I don't have much of an understanding of copyright, but I assume that's compatible with Wikipedia's license). However, The diagram has been substantially modified: there has been cutting and stretching so that most of data points have different x-asis values (esp. in the middle), and the relationships in the bottom-right have fundamentally been altered. Uanfala (talk) 07:49, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- How can it be a copyvio? It is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license from the Nature Journal. It is public and neither behind a paywall.213.162.73.138 07:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- The licence allows you to transform it, so it does not appear to be illegal. Whether it is right, however, is another matter. It seems that the easiest way to resolve this is to upload the original one. Hzh (talk) 08:02, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- I won't object to replacing this image with the original. But we'd then really need to keep an eye on it and its uses. There appears to have been a tenacious effort at inserting this image together with what look like dubious statements in several places on enwiki, see for example the recent history of en:Genetics and archaeogenetics of South Asia. Uanfala (talk) 08:08, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- I don't really want to discuss the modification made, but frankly the changes do not look to be particularly significant in the way the diagram is used. Of course, do point to the particularly edit you think is dubious so we can assess whether it has been used incorrectly. The labels added need not be there, since Europe, East Asia and Indian Dravidian are in the original diagram, it is not necessary and may be misleading to use the terms West-Eurasian, South-Eurasian, and East-Eurasian, particularly South Eurasian since that term is not used in the paper. Hzh (talk) 08:45, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- I don't want to discuss the modifications made either, but we are discussing them and so we might as well get things straight. We're not talking about changes to the presentation of the data (like rounding of numbers, or tweaks to the colours), we're talking of changes to the actual data shown. Tampering with the underlying data is never OK, regardless of scale, and here it is definitely not insignificant. Look for example at Pakistan, in light green. In the original there's an outlier population that's far up and to the right, alongside the Central Asian population in purple. In the derived image, this outlier has been cut and pasted so that it now appears right along the main Pakistani group. Look also at the left-right extent of Central Asia above and of the Pakistan – Indian Indo-European – Indian Dravidian below. The Central Asia group has been stretched, with gaps inserted between some of the clusters, whereas the group below has been squished together. And see also the relation between Khasi and PNG on the right: in the original they're separated by a gap, with PNG having higher x-axis values than Khasi; in the derived image this has been inverted (Khasi now has higher values), the gap has been eliminated, with the result that all the surrounding populations appear as though they're on a single cline. The uploader claims below that this image is derived from data available elsewhere in the article. If that is the case, then I would like to hear more, because I don't see anything obvious in the supplements, and I'm finding it difficult to imagine that they would have meticulously recreated all the styling of the original raster image (colours, fonts, label positions...) while using data from somewhere else. Uanfala (talk) 11:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- I don't disagree with you that the figure has been changed and that it is wrong to change such figure (I'm not going speculate whether this is deliberate or accidental). That is not my point. The point is whether the figure has been used in article to make a dubious claim. I'm not seeing it, but do give a link to any edit that makes such claim. I do think that a modified figure that shows different data points should not be used and I would support its removal from articles for reason of accuracy, but a simple upload of the original should fix the issue. Hzh (talk) 12:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- I have now made clear that it is based on Figure 1B from Srivastava et al. 2020. I should have made this more clear before. Anyway, it is now clearly mentioned as based on etc.. The deletion request is invalid in any case. I suggest to make an indipendent upload of the original Figure 1B PCA and mention it as other version, which is thr correct way rather than to replace this one.Mev Shreb (talk) 10:46, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, it is precisely with figure 1B that we have been comparing so far. You still haven't provided any explanation for any of the changes you've made. Again, I won't object to keeping the file, but only if it's faithful to the source. I don't believe there's a place on Commons for diagrams that misrepresent research. Uanfala (talk) 13:16, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- I have now made clear that it is based on Figure 1B from Srivastava et al. 2020. I should have made this more clear before. Anyway, it is now clearly mentioned as based on etc.. The deletion request is invalid in any case. I suggest to make an indipendent upload of the original Figure 1B PCA and mention it as other version, which is thr correct way rather than to replace this one.Mev Shreb (talk) 10:46, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- I don't disagree with you that the figure has been changed and that it is wrong to change such figure (I'm not going speculate whether this is deliberate or accidental). That is not my point. The point is whether the figure has been used in article to make a dubious claim. I'm not seeing it, but do give a link to any edit that makes such claim. I do think that a modified figure that shows different data points should not be used and I would support its removal from articles for reason of accuracy, but a simple upload of the original should fix the issue. Hzh (talk) 12:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- I don't want to discuss the modifications made either, but we are discussing them and so we might as well get things straight. We're not talking about changes to the presentation of the data (like rounding of numbers, or tweaks to the colours), we're talking of changes to the actual data shown. Tampering with the underlying data is never OK, regardless of scale, and here it is definitely not insignificant. Look for example at Pakistan, in light green. In the original there's an outlier population that's far up and to the right, alongside the Central Asian population in purple. In the derived image, this outlier has been cut and pasted so that it now appears right along the main Pakistani group. Look also at the left-right extent of Central Asia above and of the Pakistan – Indian Indo-European – Indian Dravidian below. The Central Asia group has been stretched, with gaps inserted between some of the clusters, whereas the group below has been squished together. And see also the relation between Khasi and PNG on the right: in the original they're separated by a gap, with PNG having higher x-axis values than Khasi; in the derived image this has been inverted (Khasi now has higher values), the gap has been eliminated, with the result that all the surrounding populations appear as though they're on a single cline. The uploader claims below that this image is derived from data available elsewhere in the article. If that is the case, then I would like to hear more, because I don't see anything obvious in the supplements, and I'm finding it difficult to imagine that they would have meticulously recreated all the styling of the original raster image (colours, fonts, label positions...) while using data from somewhere else. Uanfala (talk) 11:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- I don't really want to discuss the modification made, but frankly the changes do not look to be particularly significant in the way the diagram is used. Of course, do point to the particularly edit you think is dubious so we can assess whether it has been used incorrectly. The labels added need not be there, since Europe, East Asia and Indian Dravidian are in the original diagram, it is not necessary and may be misleading to use the terms West-Eurasian, South-Eurasian, and East-Eurasian, particularly South Eurasian since that term is not used in the paper. Hzh (talk) 08:45, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- I won't object to replacing this image with the original. But we'd then really need to keep an eye on it and its uses. There appears to have been a tenacious effort at inserting this image together with what look like dubious statements in several places on enwiki, see for example the recent history of en:Genetics and archaeogenetics of South Asia. Uanfala (talk) 08:08, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- The licence allows you to transform it, so it does not appear to be illegal. Whether it is right, however, is another matter. It seems that the easiest way to resolve this is to upload the original one. Hzh (talk) 08:02, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- KEEP: There is no rational in deleting this PCA. It did neither got modified nor is it a copy right violation. The zoom out of the Kol cluster got removed and the population density of the Kol on India (Figure A) got removed. The copyright license grant anyone the right to edit and modify it anyway. This deletion request is a POV mission of the other IP, which eveb tagged it under speedy deletion.213.162.73.138 07:28, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Not copyvio, see article - [1], it's listed as Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 that allows you to "remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially". The plot looks different though, some of the data points (a block of data from Kol outlier to Southeast Asia) have been shifted. I won't comment on the modifications made, but whatever the rationale for deletion, it's not copyvio. Hzh (talk) 07:36, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: It is not a copyright violation as it is published under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. Furthermore I simply removed Figure A and the zoomed Kol cluster, which would be not useful for the overview. The graph is mostly resembling the original, and the data points are fixed using the raw data material at the end of the study, which anyone can confirm. I.e. I am aware that some are slightly shifted, but this is obviously not altering the graphs results nor in contradiction with the SNPs and allele sharing results. There is no reason to delete the graph.Mev Shreb (talk) 07:54, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- I would suggest that you simply re-upload the original diagram, someone might even find the zoomed part useful. Hzh (talk) 08:12, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- I've done that now and re-uploaded a new version, Hzh. I think Mev Shreb should give more explanation how and why they changed the diagram. As the page was, it said "Uploaded a work by Anshika Srivastava, ..." without any mention of the substantive modifications. -- Pelagic (talk) 04:35, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- I have now made clear that it is based on Figure 1B from Srivastava et al. 2020. I should have made this more clear before. Anyway, it is now clearly mentioned as based on etc.. The deletion request is invalid in any case. I suggest to make an indipendent upload of the original Figure 1B PCA and mention it as other version, which is thr correct way rather than to replace this one.Mev Shreb (talk) 10:46, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Your figure is clearly incorrect, therefore you should not have tried to restore your own figure. Given that a correct one has been uploaded, your incorrect one can be delete. Hzh (talk) 18:21, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- I have now made clear that it is based on Figure 1B from Srivastava et al. 2020. I should have made this more clear before. Anyway, it is now clearly mentioned as based on etc.. The deletion request is invalid in any case. I suggest to make an indipendent upload of the original Figure 1B PCA and mention it as other version, which is thr correct way rather than to replace this one.Mev Shreb (talk) 10:46, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- I've done that now and re-uploaded a new version, Hzh. I think Mev Shreb should give more explanation how and why they changed the diagram. As the page was, it said "Uploaded a work by Anshika Srivastava, ..." without any mention of the substantive modifications. -- Pelagic (talk) 04:35, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- I would suggest that you simply re-upload the original diagram, someone might even find the zoomed part useful. Hzh (talk) 08:12, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete the first upload, keep the replacement uploaded Pelagic. Scientific data should be accurately represented, and it is wrong to present inaccurate data. Hzh (talk) 18:31, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept, per discussion, but I'll delete first version. Taivo (talk) 15:32, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 117.198.119.16 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: User is misrepresenting/modifying source - This image is about how Leang Panninge sample can be modeled, not Onge/Andamanese. See source here -> https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03823-6/figures/3 Mys_721tx (talk) 04:16, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: Not a copyright violation nor a misinterpretation/modification. This is the chart for Onge (Andamanese). In the reference. We can see it below of the chart of the Leang Panninge sample. Further it is published under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.Mev Shreb (talk) 07:36, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete : @Mev Shreb: Study describes Leang Panninge can be modeled as either Papuan + Tianyuan or Papuan + Onge. -> "we were able to model the Leang Panninge genome as a mixture between Papuan and Tianyuan (51 ± 11%) or Onge (43 ± 9%) (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Table 26)." Here is Fig.3a image https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03823-6/figures/3 - which you cropped and added here misinterpreting it as Onge admixture. Those two bars represent two ways Leang Panninge can be modeled, also stated under the Fig. 3a "Admixture proportions modelling Leang Panninge as a combination of Papuan49 and Tianyuan or Onge." So yes, you did misrepresent/modify the source to suit yourself.117.198.122.174 07:52, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 15:48, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
There is no reason to host full-resolution TIFs as this clutters up category galleries and requires updating metadata at both locations. UpdateNerd (talk) 07:06, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 16:03, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
There is no reason to host full-resolution TIFs as this clutters up category galleries and requires updating metadata at both locations. See Category talk:PD-Gotfryd UpdateNerd (talk) 07:08, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 16:01, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
unlikely own work of the uploader, so no permission
- File:Mogul Emereld.jpg
- File:Infantry Russian Empire.jpg
- File:Cavalry officer Russian Empire Military.jpg
- File:Russian Empire (Military officer).jpg
- File:Imperial Coat of Arms of the Mughal dynasty.png
- File:Flag of Mysore Hyder Ali & TipuSultan.jpg
- File:ShahAlamII antiquity.jpg
- File:Flag of the Afghan (Durrani Emirate).jpg
- File:9 Crescent flag Persia.png
- File:Persian flag South Caucasus.jpg
- File:3 Crescent flag of Persia.png
- File:League of Shadows.jpg
Krd 07:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment On File:Russian Empire (Military officer).jpg, Túrelio said: "To me this looks to be from the 19th century. If true, it should be in the PD." -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:25, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I've checked it and found that it was taken from the 1989 book The Russian Army of 1812, Issue 3, illustrated by the Russian artist Oleg Konstantinovich Parkhaev (born 1954) who is still alive.--Russian Rocky (talk) 19:02, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- I've uploaded a better and accurate version of File:ShahAlamII antiquity.jpg. You can Delete this file too. It's not an engraving of Shah Alam II (1728–1806), but Jahangir (1569–1627), according to Royal Collection Trust. The artist is Renold Elstrack (1570–1625).--Russian Rocky (talk) 19:02, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, unreliable uploader, not own works. Some files can be in public domain due to age, but without proper source we cannot be sure. I'll delete file:Flag of Agha Khan.png due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 16:08, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
This is one of the collection of the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum, and the museum regulate the usage of this image by a system of permits. Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum (talk) 07:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Who made this photo? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:33, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept, per {{PD-Japan-oldphoto}} such old photos do not need permission. I'll change the license. Taivo (talk) 16:25, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Vadim Sakharov is born in 1959, copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:BD9D:35B3:BC83:9CEC 09:15, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:33, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
What proof (or even evidence) is there that this photo is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. AmirahBreen (talk) 09:35, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, the evidence is presumably that this is a low-resolution crop of an image on a VOA website with a VOA watermark,[2] and that VOA is published by the US Government. If this rationale is intended then the {{PD-USGov-VOA}} tag should be used. The text displayed by the tag includes "Use caution when uploading recently-published images or when a specific Voice of America photographer is not identified": no photographer is identified on the VOA webpage. The BBC has published this image with a 'SOCIAL' watermark.[3] TinEye shows multiple matches that predate the VOA report, some with higher resolution and wider crops. If this had been taken by a VOA photographer then they would have used a higher-resolution copy. If it can be established that this is a work of Somalia then {{PD-Somalia}} could be used, otherwise delete because there is real doubt. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:24, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept, presumably free from copyright due to PD-Somalia. Taivo (talk) 16:42, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Updated image on another link — Preceding unsigned comment added by GCVinicius (talk • contribs) 06:04, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept, uploader's request is valid reason for deletion only during first week after upload. Here multiple years have passed. The file is used. Taivo (talk) 16:47, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
La imagen es falsa, esta editada. El archivo original es el siguiente: https://borderperiodismo.com/2021/01/08/javier-milei-sobre-los-comicios-presidenciales-de-estados-unidos-todo-da-a-entender-que-se-robaron-la-eleccion/.Sargen220 (talk) 00:34, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, undeclared derivative work of non-free image - the declared date is after the date of the news article linked above. Also a misleading image. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:45, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, copyright violation. Source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 16:51, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ManFromNord as no permission (No permission since). Converting to regular DR, npd is not the right way to challenge a PD claim. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:56, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, decision to create regular DR was correct. If the photo was published in Poland before 1995, then it is free from copyright. Sometimes we get such evidence. If somebody presents the evidence, then the photo can be restored. Taivo (talk) 16:57, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ManFromNord as no permission (No permission since). Converting to regular DR, npd is not the right way to challenge a PD claim. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:56, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, if you have evidence, that the photo was published in Poland before 1995, then the photo can be restored. Taivo (talk) 17:00, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
I doubt that this image is genuine because there is no reliable source for it. The desciption is "Sheikh Muhammad bin Salim Al Qasimi, Ruler of Ras Al Khaimah, raises the flag of the emirate on the island of Tunb, in the presence of British Navy officers" while the face of the man in Arabic attire is unrecognizable and the flag is unseen. We are not even sure about the location of the picture. It is tagged PD-UAE while the author and date of publication are unknown. Pahlevun (talk) 21:20, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- The source is archived here, which is linked from here. The source includes a caption in Arabic - can an Arabic speaker translate this? All the search matches I have found have Arabic text, which suggests this is probably not a Royal Navy photograph. The description is inaccurate because it looks like a British naval rating is lowering or raising a flag. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no real source, no publication data. That way we cannot be sure, that the license applies. Taivo (talk) 18:05, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Udalostizhk
[edit]The user appears to have been on the production team of the Czech movie Narušitel. They have uploaded multiple files related to the film as "own work", which may be true for some of the files, but for others it is obvious that it is either not true or maybe true but not free (i.e. if the camera operator shot footage for the film, it's technically their own work but property of the production company). The first two have descriptions indicating that they are screenshots from the movie, while the third is a logo. - ZLEA T\C 23:26, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete most uploads of Udalostizhk due to copyright problems. If camera data exists, then mostly different. I do not delete photos taken with DMC-FZ50, they are likely taken by same person. I'll delete Actoress logo as out of project scope, the company is not mentioned in en.wiki and has no article in cz.wiki. Taivo (talk) 18:22, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Another hoax by User:Kriestovo Nysian. Photo of unknown architectural detail, claimed (without any backing) to represent a person that's probably completely made up by the uploader. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Google search does not give any evidence, that Jan Nyski has ever existed. Probably you are right. Deleted as hoax. Taivo (talk) 18:35, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Not own work, not taken in September 2021; widely published image: https://thethaovanhoa.vn/van-hoa/tao-ra-nhung-cu-hich-van-hoa-giua-mua-dich-am-dam-n20210621090236882.htm MKFI (talk) 10:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:47, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emfletch91 (talk · contribs)
[edit]British council reports and newspaper articles from 1946 to 1972. They are still copyrighted and can't be uploaded without permission from the author or publishers.
- File:Council report.jpg
- File:Council report page.jpg
- File:Textile Industry 61st Edition 1946 - Advert.jpg
- File:Textile Industry 61st Edition 1946.jpg
MKFI (talk) 10:53, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:51, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since) GerritR (talk) 12:18, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Historical coat of arms. Proper license tag must be used if it's in public domain. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:08, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Das Wappenbuch ist älter als 100 Jahre. Ich korrigierte die Lizenz.16Exul82 (
talk) 10:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Georg August von Görner, Advokat in Breslau, in Wien am 18. Juli 1697 vom Kaiser. Das Wappen ist älter als 70 Jahre und ist gemeinfrei.16Exul82 (talk) 18:08, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept, seems like we have correct license now. Taivo (talk) 19:02, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
A postcard from 1931 is unlikely the own work of the uploader that can be released under a Creative Commons license. This needs a proper source and more information to determine its copyright status. AFBorchert (talk) 12:20, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, {{PD-Vietnam}} says, that for anonymous photos 75 years from creation is needed. But maybe photographer's name is on backside of postcard? If you can show backside of postcard, then the postcard can be restored. Taivo (talk) 19:10, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Added a duplicate of a cropped image. Reason for deletion of this copy (not the other one), e. g. "later upload".Resnjari (talk) 12:52, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 19:31, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 18:22, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:33, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 18:23, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:33, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. 2A02:A03F:C714:A300:619E:89CF:BBC5:F9DB 18:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:33, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. 2A02:A03F:C714:A300:619E:89CF:BBC5:F9DB 18:32, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:33, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. 2A02:A03F:C714:A300:619E:89CF:BBC5:F9DB 18:32, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. 2A02:A03F:C714:A300:619E:89CF:BBC5:F9DB 18:33, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. 2A02:A03F:C714:A300:619E:89CF:BBC5:F9DB 18:35, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. 2A02:A03F:C714:A300:619E:89CF:BBC5:F9DB 18:36, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. 2A02:A03F:C714:A300:619E:89CF:BBC5:F9DB 18:37, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. 2A02:A03F:C714:A300:619E:89CF:BBC5:F9DB 18:38, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 18:52, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 18:52, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 18:53, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 18:53, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 18:53, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 18:54, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 18:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 18:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 18:56, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 18:56, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 18:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 18:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 18:58, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 18:58, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 18:59, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 18:59, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:00, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:00, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:01, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:01, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:19, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:19, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:20, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:20, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:23, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:26, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:26, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:27, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:28, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:29, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:29, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:29, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:35, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:32, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:35, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:32, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:35, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:32, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:36, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:32, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:37, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:32, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:39, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:41, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:41, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:42, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:42, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:42, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:43, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:43, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:44, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:44, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:44, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:45, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:46, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:46, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:47, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:47, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:47, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:48, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:48, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:49, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:49, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:49, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:51, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:51, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:51, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:52, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:52, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:53, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:53, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:54, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:54, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:54, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:56, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:59, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:32, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:00, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:32, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:28, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:32, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:29, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:32, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:30, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:32, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:30, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:32, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:32, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:32, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:32, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:32, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:33, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:32, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:36, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:32, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:37, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:32, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:37, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:32, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:38, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:32, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:38, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:32, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:39, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:39, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:41, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:41, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:42, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:42, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:32, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:43, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:44, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:32, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:45, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:45, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:45, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:46, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:46, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:47, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:47, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:48, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:48, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:49, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:49, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:51, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:51, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:52, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:53, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:53, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:54, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:56, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:58, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:59, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:00, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:00, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:01, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:02, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:02, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:03, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:03, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:03, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:04, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:04, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:05, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:06, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:07, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:08, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:10, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:10, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:11, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:12, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:13, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:13, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:13, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:14, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:15, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:15, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:16, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:30, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:18, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:18, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:19, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:19, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:20, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:20, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:31, 20 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon --Krdbot 19:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:37, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Mais pourquoi? -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:33, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:38, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Mais pourquoi? -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:33, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:26, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Mais pourquoi? -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:36, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:32, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Mais pourquoi? -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:35, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:39, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Mais pourquoi? -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:35, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:43, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Mais pourquoi? -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:35, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:48, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Mais pourquoi? -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:40, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 20:56, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Mais pourquoi? -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:36, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:01, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Mais pourquoi? -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:35, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimer. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 21:06, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Mais pourquoi? -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:34, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:00, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Mais pourquoi? -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:36, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, by Krd yesterday per Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon. Taivo (talk) 14:50, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep PD-anon-70-EU --RAN (talk) 21:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, by Krd yesterday per Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon. Taivo (talk) 14:52, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:30, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, per Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon. Taivo (talk) 14:54, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, per Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon. Taivo (talk) 15:10, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, per Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon. Taivo (talk) 15:12, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:32, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Mais pourquoi? -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:33, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, per Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon. Taivo (talk) 15:16, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:32, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, per Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon. Taivo (talk) 15:17, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:33, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, per Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon. Taivo (talk) 15:19, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:33, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, per Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon. Taivo (talk) 15:22, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:33, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, per Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon. Taivo (talk) 15:23, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:34, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, per Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon. Taivo (talk) 15:25, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:45, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Mais pourquoi? -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:34, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- * Keep PD-anon-70-EU for the entire series that was nominated, all are prior to 1950, I can see horses and wagons for transportation. Some are postmarked in the early 1900s. Noobs always use the default license and list themselves as authors because it is never clear if your asking who did the scan, or who did the original art when you first contribute. If we deleted every one that was done this way, we would have no new contributors. --RAN (talk) 22:09, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, by Krd yesterday per Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon. Taivo (talk) 15:26, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Supprimé ce fichier. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 19:59, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep PD-anon-70-EU --RAN (talk) 22:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, by Krd yesterday per Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 95#deletion request by User:L'Élan Wallon. Taivo (talk) 15:28, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Worse version (color, quality, resolution) of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anglo-Dutch_fleet_in_the_bay_of_Algiers_as_support_for_the_ultimatum_demanding_the_release_of_white_slaves_on_august_26_1816_(Nicolaas_Baur,_1818).jpg Incorrectly named "Egyptian Nile Fleet" (in Arabic), it's the Anglo-Dutch fleet in Algeria Hypnôs (talk) 06:43, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The file is still used and I could not replace it, because I do not understand Arabic at all. Taivo (talk) 15:57, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: superseded by File:Anglo-Dutch fleet in the bay of Algiers as support for the ultimatum demanding the release of white slaves on august 26 1816 (Nicolaas Baur, 1818).jpg, replaced on ar:WP. --BrightRaven (talk) 09:59, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
While the image is licensed freely, there is no freedom of panorama in Seychelles for image files published on or after August 1, 2014.
The artwork was incepted in 2016, thus COM:VRT correspondence of permission from the sculptor of this recent work is required. This file fails the eligibility for the still-in effect FOP in the now-repealed 1991 copyright act of Seychelles as this image was published post-2014. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:42, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:01, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since) GerritR (talk) 13:42, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Historical coat of arms. Proper license tag must be used if it's in public domain. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Wappen der Schweizer Gernet ist grafisch überarbeitet worden, Grafik von Jürgen Gerner 1/2018. Blasonierung ist älter als 70 Jahre alt und so gemeinfrei.16Exul82 (talk) 18:04, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, modern drawing, permission from Jürgen Gerner is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Seychelles National Assembly
[edit]Image files may be freely-licensed, but Seychelles has no freedom of panorama whatsoever for any protected public works. The building was incepted in 2008.
Image files fail the only exception to no FOP at COM:FOP Seychelles because these were published after August 1, 2014. COM:VRT permission from the architect is required. If possible, the most-used image may be transferred to enwiki under w:Template:FoP-USonly licensing.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, per nomination. I uploaded File:Seychelles National Assembly.jpg, relying on the license applied by the Seychelles News Agency, which should know the copyright law there. You have not nominated File:Seychelles National Assembly session.jpg and File:Seventh Seychelles National Assembly.jpg: is that because you consider the architecture to be de minimis in these? I have uploaded a cropped version of this last file as File:Seventh Seychelles National Assembly (cropped).jpg, to sufficiently exclude the copyrightable elements. Verbcatcher (talk) 14:21, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Verbcatcher: the other file you mentioned is 50-50 case. Maybe COM:DM, but unsure. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I delete only nominated files. If somebody wants to delete other files mentioned here, feel free to create a regular request. Taivo (talk) 10:08, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Uploader has history of copyright violations. Image has suspicious border and no EXIF data. Unlikely to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 10:03, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Iliasalikpt (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploader has history of copyright violations. Unlikely to be own work.
IronGargoyle (talk) 14:28, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:15, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marcos Belgrano (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Escuela Elemental de Niñas.jpg
- File:Escuela Vucetich.jpg
- File:Escuela Normal Mixta (Mercedes).jpg
- File:Hotel Odeón.jpg
- File:Fachada SCA.jpg
- File:Petit Hotel Ing. White.jpg
- File:Las Hormigas.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:24, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since) GerritR (talk) 15:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC) Hallo GerritR, du siehst doch das Wappen ist von 1534, was für ein Problem gibt es da zu den Rechten an der Abbildung. Es gibt doch keine Urheberrechte mehr, wo ist das Problem. Warum willst du die Abbildung löschen??? 16Exul82 (talk) 18:45, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ich habe einen Schnelllöschantrag in einen normalen Löschantrag abgemildert, was Dir Zeitgewinn verschafft. Insofern sind Vorwürfe in meine Richtung unangebracht. Den jüngsten Löschzirkus um Deine Wappenuploads hast Du EugeneZelenko zu verdanken.--GerritR (talk) 08:35, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- @16Exul82 and GerritR: Sorry, I don't know German :-( Obviously this image is not your own work and you could not set bogus license for it. Proper license tag must be used for works in public domain. Same for all similar uploads made by you. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hallo EugeneZelenko, ich hoffe jetzt ist die Lizenz / licence tag richtig eingestellt.16Exul82 (talk) 18:06, 9 October 2021 (UTC) 2003:C1:F70B:6223:8E:964C:6FDA:C927 17:57, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Nein, ist sie nicht, Zelenkos Hinweis auf die falsche Ausgabe der Zeichnung als dein eigenes Werk hast du nicht abgeholfen. Du musst die Behauptung, das Bild sei dein eigenes Werk, ganz entfernen (schreib einfach "unbekannt", also {{unknown}} statt {{own}}), und kannst auch kein "PD-self" als Lizenzbaustein benutzen, weil da dann steht, du wärest der Rechteinhaber an der Datei, was nicht stimmt (richtig wäre wohl "PD-old").--Jordi (talk) 23:51, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hallo EugeneZelenko, ich hoffe jetzt ist die Lizenz / licence tag richtig eingestellt.16Exul82 (talk) 18:06, 9 October 2021 (UTC) 2003:C1:F70B:6223:8E:964C:6FDA:C927 17:57, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept, in my opinion the file is free from copyright due to age. I'll fix attribution and license. Taivo (talk) 09:27, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hallo Jordi, danke dir für den Hinweis, ich setze -unbekannt- ein beim Autor.16Exul82 (talk) 19:10, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by IronGargoyle as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyvio of https://www.facebook.com/iliasaliinc/photos/a.111272594100986/126949342533311 (while there is a different background, the foreground image is identical)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as our upload is 4 days older than the presented external hit, so it's unlikely the source. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:20, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Uploader has history of blatant copyright violations. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:26, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:13, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
I own the rights to this file and I never granted permission. Pjmaher2 (talk) 14:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I've looked at the permission form sent in ticket 2013051710004511, and it's not acceptable. The VRT permissions on this file are not valid. ···日本穣Talk to Nihonjoe 18:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, per Nihonjoe. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:56, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Yes, I believe it does. I took this picture myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trocker767 (talk • contribs) 15:39, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I don't think so. Canada has freedom of panorama for 3D, but not for 2D objects. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Urheberrehte sind doch nicht eindeutig geklärt Burgdorfer (talk) 15:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:01, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
File carries a copyright notice shown on the linked page(www.thunderballs.org/thelivingdaylightsproductionstills?lightbox=dataItem-k9pssimj3) 2A00:23C7:2B86:9800:6040:6FF1:608F:F51A 15:54, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - seems pretty clear cut to me, archive.org shows the copyright declaration was there at the time it was uploaded to commons as well. Should actually just be speedied as a copyvio. Canterbury Tail (talk) 17:28, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Even without the copyright notice, is there is no licence or other exception on the photo, this is a copyvio. FOARP (talk) 13:43, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Probable copyvio, appears to have been lifted from this Facebook profile. Rummskartoffel (talk) 16:33, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete all uploads of AhmadWzd (talk · contribs) as copyvios from Facebook. Taivo (talk) 11:09, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). 1913 Ottoman photo, converting to DR for discussion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:34, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete This photo was published in 2021; it will be protected by copyright until 2092 (2021 + 70 + 1) according to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Turkey. Thuresson (talk) 08:53, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is incorrect. {{PD-Turkey}} says: "For works published after the death of their owner, the protection period is 70 years after the date of death." Commons gives author 50 years for dying plus 70 years for copyright expiring, so the file can be restored after copyright expiration in 2034. Taivo (talk) 11:17, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Image copied from a book: "Al-Andalus: The Art of Islamic Spain" (1992), on page 52. The book is out of print and is now fully available to read for free online by various means including Google Books and pdf download (links to all these can be found here at the publisher's page here: https://www.metmuseum.org/art/metpublications/Al_Andalus_The_Art_of_Islamic_Spain). However, as far as I know, there's no indication that the copyright owners have relicensed the pictures for reuse. R Prazeres (talk) 17:00, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:24, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Image is copyrighted at: http://islamicart.museumwnf.org/database_item.php?id=object;ISL;tn;Mus01;7;en. Copyright is still indicated on the image itself. R Prazeres (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I see copyright message on image itself. Taivo (talk) 11:25, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Image is copyrighted at: http://islamicart.museumwnf.org/database_item.php?id=object;ISL;tn;Mus01_A;35;en R Prazeres (talk) 17:07, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:27, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Image is copyrighted at: http://islamicart.museumwnf.org/database_item.php?id=object;ISL;tn;Mus01;13;en. Copyright is still indicated on the image itself. R Prazeres (talk) 17:10, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I see copyright message on image itself. Taivo (talk) 11:28, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
The copyright owner is allegedly Benny Productions (of which the person in the photo is the sole proprietor), but the uploader is Jelle Hessing, so much is unclear. ErikvanB (talk) 17:35, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, copyright holder is not Benjamin van Valen and not uploader, but photographer. VRT-permission from photographer is needed to restore the photo. Taivo (talk) 11:31, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. This is a thumbnail of an image copyrighted at: http://islamicart.museumwnf.org/database_item.php?id=object;ISL;tn;Mus01;4;en. Note: this is a photo of a thousand-year-old book page, so the book is not protected by copyright. However, the image itself is clearly copied from this website and that website explicitly claims copyright over it. R Prazeres (talk) 17:35, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:34, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Guppyswish613 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Non-free logos that do not adhere to fair use policy
- File:Channel 5's Milkshake! logo 2002.png
- File:Milkshake! 2005.svg
- File:Channel 5's Milkshake! logo 2000.png
- File:Milkshake! 1997.png
EvergreenFir (talk) 17:32, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept, the logos are generally too simple for copyright protection. I agree to delete the first logo, but change licenses for others and keep them. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rajanadkat (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unfree logos, unlikely to be own work.
IronGargoyle (talk) 18:04, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all, as the entirety of uploads by this user are copyright violations with falsified licensing information. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 17:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: simple logos that are probably below COM:TOO in India and the US. Licence and source corrected. --BrightRaven (talk) 13:14, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Jan Myšák (talk) 19:38, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 13:17, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Poorly photoshopped images that paste modern faces on religious icon bodies. While the background may be in the public domain, the faces are likely not, making these copyrighted derivative works of the original photos. Also, this is completely out of project scope with no conceivable educational use.
IronGargoyle (talk) 20:22, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 13:18, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Not used anywhere. Making way for File:Visa policy of Taiwan - new.svg (which is higher-quality) to be moved to this filename. Numberguy6 (talk) 19:02, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:10, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
This is not own work taken with an Apple iPhone. The watermark gives clearly "Not for Public Distribution"; The user has many other images with the same problem. Wouter (talk) 19:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete all 13 uploads of Watchtowerben (talk · contribs), 6 due to aforementioned watermark and 7 because screenshots of 1959 movie are not own work. Taivo (talk) 15:37, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Is this below COM:TOO? Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:48, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no, this is complex logo. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:47, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Michael tok (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small images without metadata, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 20:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:49, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Two problems here, one is that metadata says creator is Ben Fong, second this depicts calligraphic artwork not created by Mr. Fong or the uploader making this a derivative work which cannot be free-hosted on Commons. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:51, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment @Ellin Beltz: Have you considered that perhaps {{FoP-Hong Kong}} may apply to the image? I'm assuming that the photograph was taken in Hong Kong, of course. --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 22:42, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep After doing some more research, it was found that {{FoP-Hong Kong}} likely applies to the image, and we can change the metadata as needed. The subway station is obviously a public location. It boils down top whether calligraphy can be considered a "work of artistic craftsmanship." According to a similar case which was kept, artistic works in subway stations are probably covered under that exception. However, whether calligraphy is a "work of artistic craftsmanship" is less clear-cut, and I can see where you are coming from. However, I still believe that the image should be kept. --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 10:19, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment On an unrelated note, it would be worth considering the TOO status of the image. Personally, I think this is unlikely because of the low TOO in Hong Kong, but it's good to be thorough. --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 10:23, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, the aforementioned DR depicted mural, which is artistic craftsmanship and FoP applies. But signature is graphic work and FoP does not apply. Chinese signatures (just like British signatures) are considered copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 15:58, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work on this image, very small size, low resolution, unlikely due to subject being famous, picture being tiny and not apparent other actual "own work" in entire gallery of uploads. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:52, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept, now real author and source are given. Taivo (talk) 16:05, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in South Korea, the photo already shows most of the permanent exterior architecture, which is subject to copyright A1Cafel (talk) 16:21, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- Could you explain where the difference is between this and the previous picture from 2018? I just wanted to contribute to this page and wasn't aware of FOP because there is no such regulation in Germany. Because the building was still under construction i saw no problem in uploading this picture.__Lucas.lango (talk) 09:12, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - In most countries, including both South Korea and Germany, architectural works are copyrighted. In Germany, there is a special rule, which we call Freedom of Panorama, which allows photos of certain created works, including architecture, provided (in Germany) that they are permanently displayed and can be photographed from a public road. No such exception exists in South Korea (and about half of all countries), so this image infringes on the architect's copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:24, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
The buildings is completed in 2019 by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill. There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. Permission from the architectural firm is required. A1Cafel (talk) 01:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
I think one could reasonably argue that the buildings are de minimis in this picture which mainly shows the beach: notice that the original Flickr photo was titled "La plage Haeundae". Of course, I wasn't aware that SK has no FoP when I uploaded this, hence the less desirable name used on Commons. But if others think this should be deleted, I'll be happy to upload it to Wikipedia instead. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 15:16, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. Main object is the buildings. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
The file size and resolution of this image as well as the metadata suggest very strongly it was copied from an online source and is not the own work of the uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:52, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. In addition, the depicted object itself is protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 16:10, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
This image is cropped version of File:Haeundae Beach and Haeundae LCT The Sharp.jpg. Although original image can be applied de minimis, main objects of this cropped image are copyrighted buildings, so this image cannot be applied de minimis. There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. 221.133.172.75 17:28, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:08, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
There should be a source for this map as it's unlikely to actually be own work. See Legend lower right corner and north arrow - both in a very old style which would correspond with the 1963 date in the title. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:54, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:12, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/insource:"mynewsdesk.com/se/sonybmg"
[edit]Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files from mynewsdesk.com with unreviewed licenses/Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2019/06#Mynewsdesk_2, and it seems clear to me that Sony Music Entertainment Sweden is mis-licensing photographs that don't belong to them. For example, File:Miley Cyrus The Kid LAROI.tif is likely the work of photographer Alana O'Herlihy]. File:LNX - MONTERO Wide Use 2 (Credit Charlotte Rutherford).jpg belongs to Charlotte Rutherford (and she's credited in the file name). It seems extraordinary that Sony Music Sweden could unilaterally change the license on behalf of photographers and Sony subsidiaries worldwide.
Now, I'm aware that this request includes images that have been reviewed, but in each case, the review happened before the above-linked Village Pump thread.
- File:Kygo pressbild2.jpg
- File:'What Other People Say' Press Image 1 (Photo Credit Angelo Kritikos).jpg
- File:Miley Cyrus The Kid LAROI.tif
- File:Elena Tsagrinou - El Diablo.jpg
- File:Frans Jeppsson Wall.jpg
- File:Amanda Jenssen 2009-09-03 001.jpg
- File:Melissa Horn 2013-05-22.jpg
- File:Style of Eye Press Photo by FREDRIK-SKOGKVIST - Small.jpg
- File:Jon Henrik Fjällgren 2014-05-18 001.jpg
- File:24Goldn - pressbild.jpg
- File:JTR 2014-06-10 002.jpg
- File:Måneskin in 2021.jpg
- File:Picture of Victor Leksell.jpg
- File:Newkid in 2021.jpg
- File:LH press1 hi-res.jpg
- File:Mauro Scocco 2011-04-06 001.jpg
- File:LNX - MONTERO Wide Use 2 (Credit Charlotte Rutherford).jpg
- File:First Aid Kit 003.jpg
- File:Newkid by Adrian Pehrson.webp
- File:Pressbild Peg Parnevik.jpg
- File:Lead Pic - Touch Me.jpg
- File:Lilla Namo.jpg
- File:Jon Henrik Fjällgren 2014-05-18 001 (cropped).jpg
- File:Jon Henrik Fjällgren 2014-05-18 001 (cropped smaller).jpg
- File:Amanda Jenssen 2008-04-15 001.jpg
- File:Andreas Weise 2012-07-16 001.jpg
- File:The Kid LAROI (cropped - 2021).tif
- File:Estraden.jpg
- File:Newkid-Photo by Mika Aberra.jpg
- File:Kygo x Zoe Wee Composite WEB Photo@JohannesLovund press.jpg
- File:MollySanden-byFredrikEtoall-2-WebLowres.jpg
- File:The Kid Laroi.tif
- File:Amanda Jenssen 2012-02-09 001.jpg
- File:Amanda Jenssen 2012-10-16 001.tiff
- File:Miss Li in 2021.jpg
- File:KLATA-IMEN0024 6 (1).jpg
- File:First Aid Kit 2014-01-24 001.jpg
- File:Ozuna in 2019.jpg
- File:JTR 2014-06-10 001.jpg
- File:First Aid Kit 2014-02-19 001.jpg
- File:MB 2021 PUB PH-MatthewPriestley 04 446.jpg
- File:Einár släpper kärlekslåten Rymden och tillbaka.jpg
- File:Zachariasblad pressbild 2.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 13:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - Premeditated (talk) 13:33, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Neutral I have license reviewed several of these photos. Neutral about keep or delete, but since many photos from Newsdesk was uploaded many years ago, the request should stay open for at least 7 days. Thuresson (talk) 16:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Neutral I did upload a great part of those files, but I find it extremely weird that images such as File:Miss Li in 2021.jpg can't be kept since, if you google it, you won't find any result except wiki pages and Sony Music Entertainment Swedent's mynewsdesk. Also, @Ytoyoda: , the same mass deletion request should be applied to the files in Category:Free-licensed photos by Warner Music Sweden (most of those links direct to this error page), don't you think so? --France3c0 (talk) 17:33, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- @France3c0: Thanks for responding here. I only listed Sony Music images because they were the ones I noticed and I wanted to be careful not to list too many images at once (even this feels like a lot). And taking a look at the Warner Music images, yes, I have doubts about their licensing. Anyway, I'm wondering if it makes sense to just list images that are explicitly credited to third-party photographers and/or from Sony's non-Swedish divisions. Ytoyoda (talk) 22:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I agree it's unlikey that the non-Swedish images have correct license, but for the Swedish ones, it is not as obvious. Ainali (talk) 16:16, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 01:04, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mehedi Al Mahmud 27 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Account is globally locked. Seeing the variety of names and material, and the amount of copyright violations, everything by this account is doubful, and needs at least a detailed review.
- File:Bangladesh Navy corvette BNS Shadhinota (F111) image-2.jpg
- Found in https://www.flickr.com/photos/davids_world_2011/47854432101, EXIF in Commons most likely a fabrication. pandakekok9 02:00, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Bangladesh Navy minor surface combatants.jpg
- File:Sea Dolphin class gunboat.jpg
- Found in https://www.flickr.com/photos/davids_world_2011/47582397832, EXIF in Commons most likely fabricated pandakekok9 02:00, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Bangladesh Navy corvette BNS Bijoy (F35) in Beirut port.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy inshore patrol vessel BNS Surma (P313) on display.webm
- File:Bangladesh Navy inshore patrol vessel BNS Padma (P312).webm
- File:Bangladesh Navy inshore patrol vessel BNS Jamuna (P212).webm
- File:Metal Shark 38 Defiant Twin Diesel Water-Jet image-1.jpg
- File:Audio Visual of Newly Commissioned Five Navy Ships.webm
- File:Bangladesh Army exercise " Assault River Crossing ".jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy ready for rescue and relief work.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy to provide emergency rescue, medical assistance and relief.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy Type 76 dual-37 mm AA gunsfiring exercise.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy container vessel MV Nou Kollan 1.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy container vessel MV Nou Kollan 1 and 2.jpg
- File:Otomat Mk-2 Block IV.jpg
- File:C-704 Short to Medium Range Anti-Ship Missile Weapon System.jpg
- File:Ex-Royal Navy Castle-class patrol vessel.jpg
- File:IMDEX Asia 2017 Changi Naval Dockyard Singapore image-1.jpg
- File:IMDEX Asia 2015 Changi Naval Dockyard Singapore image-1.jpg
- File:IMDEX Asia 2017 Changi Naval Dockyard Singapore image-2.jpg
- File:BNS Bangabandhu (F25) firing FM-90 SAM system.jpg
- File:BNS Abu Ubaidah (F19).jpg
- File:BNS Umar Farooq (F16) front image.jpg
- File:BNS Umar Farooq (F16).jpg
- File:Royal Navy HMS Roebuck (H130) image-1.jpg
- File:HMS Roebuck (H130) image-1.jpg
- File:Royal Navy HMS Roebuck (H130) image-2.jpg
- File:HMS Roebuck (H130) image-3.jpg
- File:HMS Roebuck (H130) image-2.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy Landing craft utility (LCU) BNS Hatiya (L904).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy Landing craft utility (LCU).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy frigate BNS Samudra Avijan (F29).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy Gunboat BNS Dhansiri (P1014).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy submarine tugboat.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy frigate BNS Bangabandhu (F25) image-1.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy Large Patrol Craft (LPC).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy task force in Bay of Bengal.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy Corvette BNS Shadhinota (F111) image-1.jpg
- File:বানৌজা সংগ্রাম (F113) ও বানৌজা প্রত্যাশা (F114).jpg
- File:Opv 1800 sea axe.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy offshore patrol vessel BNS Kapatakhaya (P912).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy offshore patrol vessel BNS Sangu (P713).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy offshore patrol vessel BNS Turag (P714).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy offshore patrol vessels.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy Frigate BNS Abu Bakar (F15).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy inshore patrol vessel BNS Magna (P211).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy OPV BNS Karatoa (P913).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy corvette BNS Bijoy (F35).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy submarine chaser BNS Nirbhoy (P812) photo 1.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy gunboat BNS Salam (P712).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy floating drydock BNFD Sundarban (A711) image 1.jpg
- File:BNS Sagar (M91) image 1.jpg
- File:BNS Padma (P312) and BNS Jamuna (P212) on patrol.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy LPC BNS Nirmul (P813) back image.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy floating drydock BNFD Sundarban (A711).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy Jarip (survey) boat (JB-01).webm
- File:Bangladesh Navy frigate BNS Ali Haider (F17) image 3.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy LPC BNS Nirmul (P813).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy Damen Stan Tug 3008 BNT Shibsha (A724).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy Submarine commissioning ceremony.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy submarine chaser BNS Nirbhoy (P812) image 1.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy submarine chaser BNS Tista (P315) front image.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy missile boats on maintenance.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy frigate BNS Ali Haider (F17) image 1.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy frigate BNS Ali Haider (F17) image 2.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy deployed in UN peacekeeping mission.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy annual exercise (1).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy LPC BNS Nishan (P815) launching ceremony.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy landing craft utility.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy annual exercise.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy submarine chaser BNS Nirbhoy (P812).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy missile boat BNS Uttal (P 8141).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy frigate BNS Osman (F18).jpg
- File:X-12 class fast patrol vessel of Bangladesh Navy and Bangladesh Coast Guard.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Coast Guard 20-meter rescue boat (Japan).webm
- File:Bangladesh Coast Guard operations (3).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Coast Guard operations (2).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Coast Guard operations (1).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Coast Guard operations.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Coast Guard Ship CGS Syed Nazrul (PL71).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy frigate BNS Samudra Joy (F28).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Army landing craft vehicle personnel Type-c.jpg
- File:BNS Prottoy(F112) firing missile.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy frigate BNS Bangabandhu(F25).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy ships on naval exercise.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy corvette BNS Prottoy(F112).jpg
- File:BNS Shadhinota(F111) front view.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy corvette BNS Dhaleshwari(F36).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy corvettes on rescue mission.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy frigate BNS Abu Ubaidah(F19).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy fleet tanker BNS Khan Jahan Ali (A515).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy Corvette BNS Dhaleshwari.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy LPC BNS Durjoy (P811).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy Corvette BNS Shadhinota.jpg
- File:BNS Somudra Joy.jpg
- File:FM-90 SAM System onboard BNS Bangabandhu (F25).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy High Speed Boat (HSB).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy patrol vessel BNS Padma.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy diving boat scale model.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy X12 Fast patrol craft.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy LCT 103(A586).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy minesweeper BNS Shaikat (M-96).jpg
- File:Bangladesh Navy Type 035G (Ming class) submarine.jpg
Yann (talk) 21:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 21:30, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
The license seems to be bogus; No indication that the pic is in the public domain in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:46, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution. Will be exchanged by the same motiv with a higher resolution FerdiB62 (talk) 21:52, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio, no free license. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ksh.andronexus (talk · contribs)
[edit]Appear to be screenshots of drone footage not original work.
Ytoyoda (talk) 18:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:55, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ksh.andronexus (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable own work claim. Photographs from buildings in different countries without metadata and low resolution.
- File:Embassy of India, Tehran.jpg
- File:Embassy of India, Seoul.jpg
- File:India House, London in night.jpg
- File:Embassy of India, Tel Aviv.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:08, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Wherever the images came from they clearly aren't the uploaders own work unless they work for the government of India and travel a lot as part of the job or something, but that's extremely unlikely. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:34, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:25, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:St. Hubertus (Jägersfreude)
[edit]copyright violation; stained glass windows by Émile Probst (1913–2004); no freedom of panorama.
- File:DSCF2668 Kirche St. Hubertus Dudweiler-Jägersfreude.jpg
- File:DSCF2700 Kirche St. Hubertus Dudweiler-Jägersfreude.jpg
- File:Fenster Kath. Kirche St. Hubertus Jägersfreude.jpg
- File:Fenster Pfarrkirche St. Hubertus Jägersfreude-Dudweiler.jpg
- File:Fenster Pfarrkirche St. Hubertus Jägersfreude.jpg
- File:Fensterr St. Hubertus, Jägersfreude.jpg
- File:Kirchenfenster Hubertuskirche Jägersfreude.jpg
- File:Kirchenfenster Kath. Pfarrkirche St. Hubertus, Jägersfreude.jpg
- File:Kirchenfenster katholische Kirche St. Hubertus, Jägersfreude.jpg
- File:Kirchenfenster Pfarrkirche St. Hubertus, Jägersfreude.jpg
- File:Kirchenfenster St. Hubertus Jaegersfreude.jpg
- File:Kirchenfenster St. Hubertus, Dudweiler-Jägersfreude.jpg
- File:Kirchenfenster St. Hubertus, Jägersfreude.jpg
- File:Kirchenfenster St. Hubertus, Saarbrücken-Jägersfreude.jpg
- File:Kirchenfenster St. Hubertuskirche, Jägersfreude.jpg
- File:St. Hubertus Jägersfreude Kirchenschiff mit Chor.jpg
- File:St. Hubertus Kirchenfenster, Jägersfreude.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 23:37, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Die Kirchenfenster von St. Hubertus habe ich in Absprache mit der Kirchengemeinde St. Hubertus (Diakon Gerd Fehrenbach) fotografiert und auch mit dessen Einverständnis bei Wiki hochgeladen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dudotto (talk • contribs) 12:56, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- Danke; das ist ehrenhaft – es reicht aber nicht für eine Veröffentlichung hier, ausser es könnte nachgewiesen werden, dass die Kirchgemeinde die Urheberrechte an den gezeigten Kunstwerken besitzt. Martin Sg. (talk) 18:00, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:55, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Files uploaded by Foxglovesi
[edit]- File:StratfordTheatreAndObsevationTower stratford-computers.co.uk.jpg
- File:StratfordHenleyStAerial.jpg
- File:BackOfStGeorges.jpg
- File:UpperBrailes2.jpg
- File:UpperBrailes.jpg
- File:AerialShotLowerBrailes.jpg
- File:ShipstonTownCenter.jpg
These are of questionable copyright status - they all have a description indicating that they are copyrighted by Stratford computers. looking on their website I can't locate these images but the website carries a standard copyright disclaimer with no indication that it's contents are released under a creative commons licence. These images are also of not particularly high quality and they have been plastered with an enormous watermark containing the website of the computer repair business that claims copyright of them. These were added to a number of articles on the English Wikipedia by the uploader replacing better quality and long used images, which leads me to believe that they were uploaded to promote the computer repair business, in the same manner as the north face mess that happened a while back 192.76.8.74 18:41, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- It matters not at all that the images are not hosted yet at the web address. They are my images and are under a creative commons license. When has copyright ever worked that way? They have not been 'plastered with an eneourmous watermark that is the default watermark settings exported from Adbobe Lightroom, what is it your concern how large the watermark is? I have not removed anyone elses image.. How could this be promoting my business? I guess all the other image on this site with a watermark are also promoting their photography companies? Ludricous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Foxglovesi (talk • contribs) 19:14, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- I saw those images when they were first uploaded, and I had concerns about the big watermarks, as they clearly go against the watermarking policy, so I tagged them as such. However I did a Google image search on them, and couldn't find any obvious indication that they were from a copyrighted source, so assuming good faith I left them. Personally I considered re-uploading them with the watermarks cropped out, but didn't get round to it, hoping that the uploader would take some action. Personally I think if these images are the uploaders work as they state, and they are under a free licence, then I think they should be acceptable if they are re-uploaded with the watermarks either cropped out or digitally removed. G-13114 (talk) 20:00, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Obviously a new ploy of advertising. The filenames have to be cleaned up anyway, files containing spam watermarks should be deleted. The way it is there seems to be a lack of COM:EDUSE as the photographs have been removed on en:wp articles like en:Stratford-upon-Avon. --Achim (talk) 20:46, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- I saw those images when they were first uploaded, and I had concerns about the big watermarks, as they clearly go against the watermarking policy, so I tagged them as such. However I did a Google image search on them, and couldn't find any obvious indication that they were from a copyrighted source, so assuming good faith I left them. Personally I considered re-uploading them with the watermarks cropped out, but didn't get round to it, hoping that the uploader would take some action. Personally I think if these images are the uploaders work as they state, and they are under a free licence, then I think they should be acceptable if they are re-uploaded with the watermarks either cropped out or digitally removed. G-13114 (talk) 20:00, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- No watermark in File:StratfordTheatreAndObsevationTower stratford-computers.co.uk.jpg. The filename's still offensive, though. —Cryptic (talk) 00:34, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all except File:StratfordTheatreAndObsevationTower stratford-computers.co.uk.jpg, which as Cryptic notes, no longer has the watermark; however, its "Description" line still consists of a copyright notice. I believe this copyright notice is at odds with Commons terms, so needs to be changed on this file as soon as possible. Foxglovesi appears not to understand that by uploading an image at Commons, they surrender their right to claim copyright on it; at least that is my understanding? However, they have indeed removed the watermark on that one file as a demonstration of good faith, as stated in this edit on en.wikipedia, and they make a valid point there that that image is encyclopedically useful, showing a later version of the building as well as showing a street discussed in the article text. They appear to have overwritten the file on en.wikipedia and replaced it here on Commons via cross-wiki upload; File:Watermark size.png, which they uploaded for use on their talk page at en.wikipedia, shows the earlier version of the file. (The file also needs to be moved to remove the ad and correct the misspelling; I'd do that now if it were not under discussion.) Yngvadottir (talk) 02:47, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Yngvadottir: while the description was unnecessarily confusing, your understanding is not correct. No one automatically "surrender their right to claim copyright on it" by uploading to Commons. While they can choose to do so where allowed by law, we do not require it. All we require is the image is released under a sufficiently free licence. This means anyone can use the image under the terms of the licence, which has to be broad enough to pretty much allow anyone to use the image including to create derivatives provided they obey some minimal terms. These minimal terms can include requiring attribution and releasing any derivatives under the same licence (Wikipedia:en:Copyleft), however they cannot demand attribution in the form of a watermark. However the copyright holder still retains their copyright, otherwise the concept of a licence does not exist. This means they can also chose to licence the image under different terms including for payment if someone wants that. They can also sue anyone who uses their image without either obeying the licence terms or following other allowances under the law to use the image without a licence (such as Wikipedia:en:fair use in the US), something not possible if they've given up all copyright. The Creative Commons logo explicitly acknowledges the holder retains copyright by the "some rights reserved" bit. Note that it would be incorrect for someone to claim copyright, all rights reserved, since it's not possible to do so, but that doesn't seem to have been what Foxglovesi did. Nil Einne (talk) 13:45, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- This is what I have said the entire time but of course it was ignored and instead assumptions were taken on face value. I've even now been banned for reverting a change, their note was "understand that by uploading an image at Commons, you surrender your right to claim copyright on it" - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stratford-upon-Avon&action=history. It's actually not very confusing at all because in massive letters it says under CC license next to the image.. Foxglovesi (talk)
- Thanks, Nil Einne, I had indeed misunderstood that; I'm sorry. What changes need to be made for the images to be kept? I take it the remaining watermarks are still a breach of Commons policy and need to be removed, and that the file names that include the business URL are inadvisable, but what if anything needs to change on the file description pages? I see that Achim55 changed the description line at File:StratfordHenleyStAerial stratford-computers.co.uk.jpg to replace the copyright statement with a description of the image subject, and that File:BackOfStGeorges - stratford-computers.co.uk.jpg was uploaded with a description of the subject in that field in addition to the copyright statement; does the copyright statement need to be removed from such description lines, or is adding a description in that line sufficient? Foxglovesi has indeed been blocked on en:wp (I've indented their response to you above), and I'm off now to the AN/I section on en to point out what you've said here. Yngvadottir (talk) 22:08, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- I know people here are only doing their best to maintain Wikipedia and I do appreciate you spend your precious time doing great work, however. This entire thing has been quite the colossal waste of my time. Like a gambler £50,000 in the hole, here I am coming back to the table not to place a bet but instead to try and pointlessly convince you my images are neither spam or advertisements. So here I go again:
- Firstly I understand watermarks are not allowed, Fine. Glad we have at least come to the conclusion that I do infact own the copyright to my own images. It's not as if I hadn't said this the entire time. I'd never have argued the point of the watermark if the criticism wasn't that it was 'enormous' instead of the actual point of the matter.
- The only reason I have the URL in the file name is because I followed the format of this long standing existing image Image with URL in filename. Why is it an issue for me? I want a full explanation because this is ridiculous.
- I just spent a moment to click 'random file' in the wikipedia sidebar and to my "surprise" plenty of users link their Flickr accounts or external websites under author in the description box. I suppose these people are also advertising their photography and their content should be ban.. wait a minute this is half the images on wikipedia.
- I am going to when I am unbanned upload my images again without a watermark and at least have the author as Stratford Computers. I have edited the one of the RSC tower to reflect this. Please let me know if somehow this is incorrect. I would appreciate being unbanned considering the circumstances of my ban were because someone reverted my image on false grounds as shown in my last comment. The admin also made a specific point that having the URL in the file name was advertising in my appeal..
As it's been a month and nothing's happened. I've decided to reupload the watermarked images with the watermarks cropped out. I hope that resolves this. G-13114 (talk) 20:22, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- And that's crap as you cropped badly. I checked File:ShipstonTownCenter.jpg only: a) width decreased from 4000 to 2560, b) jpeg quality increased from 82 to 100, c) EXIF data removed. That's a good example how a crop should not be done. --Achim55 (talk) 07:41, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
I'm thinking this should be closed now, given that the issues appear to have been fixed, and nothing has happened here for nearly six months. G-13114 (talk) 15:31, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: All outstanding issues have been resolved. 1) "Copyright stratford-computers.co.uk" is not at odds with the CC license. And as these images cannot be found on that website, we can COM:AGF that the uploader is in fact who they claim to be. 2) The spammy watermark has now been cropped out. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:56, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Image seems to be credited to the Press Trust of India, not the Press Information Bureau as suggested in the description: https://www.deccanherald.com/national/modi-biden-bilateral-meet-will-strengthen-india-us-relation-boost-quad-says-white-house-official-1032613.html
It doesn't look like the uploader has provided a URL for this image. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:53, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Do not delete it, licences had been provided including Direct URL,I wonder why someone thinks it's from Deccan Herald, if it was already source mentioned was PMO India. Ksh.andronexus (talk) 00:11, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per Ksh.andronexus remark and link. --Ellywa (talk) 23:29, 7 April 2022 (UTC)