Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/07/02
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_13.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
![42 File:Robert "Bo" Luellen.jpg](#File:Robert_"Bo"_Luellen.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![118 File:Copertina e CD di "Zero Comico".jpg](#File:Copertina_e_CD_di_"Zero_Comico".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
1942.jpg){kind=link}
01.jpg){kind=link}
copyrighted Syced (talk) 14:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy deleted. From : gettyimages.com"The first Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev poses solemnly as he takes the oath at the Congress of Deputies, here 15 March 1990 in Moscow. / AFP / AFP FILES / V.ARMAND (Photo credit should read V.ARMAND/AFP via Getty Images)". Thuresson (talk) 08:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Otávio Roberto (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work, copyrighted album covers, publicity photos, cropped from other images (File:Teixeirinha.popular.jpg: https://www.bombinhas.sc.gov.br/noticias/ver/2019/08/oficina-sobre-o-edital-de-culturas-populares).
- File:Coraçãode luto.jpg
- File:Teixeirinha.popular.jpg
- File:José.portella.jpg
- File:Teixeira.gau.jpg
- File:Teixeirinha.jpng.jpg
- File:VilagraneDelavy.png
- File:Monalisatw.jpg
- File:Bai.jpg
MKFI (talk) 06:18, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all - All the images uploaded by this account are copyvio.--SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 06:55, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Comment - The rationale for all of these (on each image's page) seems to point to the same image, not the relevant image in each case. --Northernhenge (talk) 14:57, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 09:34, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
out of scope, private CV Migebert (talk) 07:43, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo at 14:46, 5 July 2021 UTC: Content created as advertisement (G10) --Krdbot 20:38, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
This is from his Instagram, so is not a free use image SSSB (talk) 18:13, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:32, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
This is from his twitter and therefore not a free use image SSSB (talk) 06:43, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:37, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & composite of several pixelated fragments. I have replaced the file with File:Ammonium-octanoate-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality alternative. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:19, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Wostr (talk) 22:37, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:19, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
_13.jpg){kind=link}
_13.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Ich habe es aus Versehen hochgeladen. Alter Fritz (talk) 20:25, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
_13.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 00:09, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
_13.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Prenz Leoren (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE, personal images by a contributor who hasn't contributed images not relating to himself or his acquaintances. See also COM:PARTYPICS.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:52, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete GeorgHH • talk 16:07, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:33, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 05:41, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose. Ies (talk) 07:56, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:35, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 08:04, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:36, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Cabayi (talk) 08:28, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:36, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
A bunch of documents of no apparent purpose and no real educational value, with descriptions like: "Français : yes men".
- File:GHR SARL.png
- File:USA1.png
- File:USA.png
- File:Letra-credit-agricol.jpg
- File:Anahowaanake.png
- File:Atikamanger.png
- File:Hcer.png
- File:Mondial Relay.png
- File:DEFENSE.png
- File:Expliquationdevers.png
- File:Sg.png
- File:Mondial.jpg
Pibwl (talk) 12:40, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:39, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE selfie. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:52, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE selfies.
- File:ANSHIKA HD PIC (2).jpg
- File:PATEL (37).jpg
- File:PATEL (53).jpg
- File:PATEL (153).jpg
- File:Anshika Vijay Patel.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:53, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:40, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:41, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AbbaszadeElnur (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:41, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:43, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:43, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal essay, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:43, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abdoul Wassiou Bance (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:43, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:27, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:43, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dirty Mind Detroit Don (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, seems to be only done for advertising/promotion of the band Dirty Mind Detroit, which does not have an article on any Wikipedia. See also User:Dirty Mind Detroit Don.
- File:Dirty Mind Detroit Logo 1.jpg
- File:Dirty Mind Detroit At The Detroit Music Awards 2018.jpg
- File:Dmd van pic.jpg
- File:DMD With Mel Rubofest Stage.jpg
- File:DMD Beer Break Outside.jpg
- File:DMD Flint Whole Band.jpg
- File:DMD Flint MI The Band.jpg
Trijnsteltalk 15:41, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:44, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by प्रवीण शास्त्री (talk · contribs)
[edit]only selfies, this is not social media here
- File:Jpg 20200309 120034.jpg
- File:Jpg गंगा नहर, हरिद्वार, उत्तराखंड.jpg
- File:Jpg चौधरी चरण सिंह घाट, हरिद्वार.jpg
- File:Jpg पतंजलि योगपीठ, हरिद्वार.jpg
- File:Jpgजनेश्वर मिश्रा पार्क, लखनऊ, उत्तर प्रदेश.jpg
- File:Jpgनील कंठ, ऋषिकेश.jpg
- File:Harki20180201 193521.jpg
- File:Jpg20210608 191318.jpg
Migebert (talk) 15:42, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:44, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Offtopic/out of scope. Trijnsteltalk 15:53, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Javed Shah khajrana indore (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:46, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:46, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Coat of arms of Switzerland.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:35, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:47, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Distorted duplication of File:Flag of Paraguay (reverse).svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:36, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:47, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplication of File:Flagge Deutsches Reich - Dienstflagge zur See (1921-1926).svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:41, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:47, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplication of File:Seedienstflagge 1926-1933.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:42, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:48, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE Ankry (talk) 17:00, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:48, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo or personal image without clear purpose, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:41, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:48, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res simple diagram without purpose, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:43, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:54, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable performers, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:44, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:55, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:44, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:55, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Owais Khursheed (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Owais Khursheed and Yahya Shabir practicing abs exercise.jpg
- File:Civil engineers of Emax college (site surveying of Hotel Raddison, Panchkula, Haryana) 5.jpg
- File:Civil engineers of Emax college (site surveying of Hotel Raddison, Panchkula, Haryana) 4.jpg
- File:Civil engineers of Emax college (site surveying of Hotel Raddison, Panchkula, Haryana) 3.jpg
- File:Civil engineers of Emax college (site surveying of Hotel Raddison, Panchkula, Haryana).jpg
- File:Sleeping kid.jpg
- File:Civil engineers of Emax college.jpg
- File:Dilbag Sandhu (Student of Education Maximum School of Engineering and Applied Research).jpg
- File:A boy from Srinagar.JPG
- File:Medical shop in srinagar.jpg
- File:Tajamul Islam and Yasir Dar 2014-08-19 23-42.jpg
- File:Zeeshan and Azaan 2014-08-17 04-47.jpg
- File:Indo pak border at udii 2014-08-14 23-39.jpg
- File:Nitesh Sharan hiking 2014-08-11 05-39.jpg
- File:Swimming in Rangil water treatment plant 2014-08-10 23-37.jpg
- File:Survey Camp in Haridwar 2014-08-09 23-50.jpg
_5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:48, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal sketch, COM:WEBHOST, little educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:51, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
![17:51, 2 July 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/07/02#c-P199-2021-07-02T17:51:00.000Z-File:Robert_"Bo"_Luellen.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
![06:58, 9 July 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/07/02#c-George_Chernilevsky-2021-07-09T06:58:00.000Z-File:Robert_"Bo"_Luellen.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Maverickmaddy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:The team of techvibes.jpg
- File:Code storm.JPG
- File:Robotics team.JPG
- File:Paper presentation.JPG
- File:TECHVIBES.JPG
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:54, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:59, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable athlete, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:59, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:01, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res photo of non-notable athletes, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:59, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:02, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Unicodesnowman (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused screenshots, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Wikidata items without statements.png
- File:Wikidata Class and Property Browser.png
- File:WikiPeriod Screenshot.png
- File:Rocs.png
- File:Rocs-control.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:01, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:02, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GVC Gaesco (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logo and low-res diagram without context, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:01, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:03, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:02, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:03, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal images, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:05, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:04, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused logos and text diagrams without context, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO.
- File:Framework Romob.png
- File:Usostandar1.png
- File:Usopremium1.png
- File:Usoprofessional1.png
- File:Romobfin.png
- File:Usopremium.png
- File:Usoprofessional.png
- File:Usostandar.png
- File:Usobasico.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:06, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:04, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:06, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Royal Corp Travel (RCT) Gurgaon, Sushil Yadav, Director- 9416725362 (M).jpg
- File:Royal Corp Travel (RCT) Gurgaon, Sushil Yadav, Director- 9416725362.jpg
_Gurgaon,_Sushil_Yadav,_Director-_9416725362_(M).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Gurgaon,_Sushil_Yadav,_Director-_9416725362.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:06, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:07, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gamaliel Yacabalquiej (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images/logos, no educational value, out of scope.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:08, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RW Lynch2014 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:08, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:09, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:07, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:10, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:07, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:11, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:07, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:11, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW, individual images are not attributed. And promotional corporate image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:12, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:13, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused DW, missing essential info and permission, and unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:14, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:15, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aleksandari2222 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused screenshot and low-res diagrams without context, little educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:15, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
unused self-promotional image Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:18, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, COM:WEBHOST, little educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:21, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res diagram without context, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:21, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:21, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:16, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:22, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:16, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:23, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:16, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:24, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:16, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused low-res diagram without context, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:24, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:17, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Unused text docs, out of scope.
- File:Table 3. Acts related to rehabilitation counseling.pdf
- File:Table 2. Minimum items of the short-version FCE protocols.pdf
- File:Table 1. Description of the activities of the Isernhagen Work Systems (IWS) FCE.pdf
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:24, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:25, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal doodle, COM:WEBHOST, little educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:26, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:27, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:32, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused text diagram, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:34, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused text table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:31, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:34, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused text table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:31, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:34, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res diagram without context, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:34, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:33, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:34, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:33, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:35, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:34, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:35, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused and redundant montage, individual images already on Commons. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:35, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:35, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, COM:WEBHOST, little educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:35, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:36, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HOWRAH SANGRAM SANGHA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused photos of non-notable event and persons, no context/location, no educational value, unusable and out of scope.
- File:WP 001119.jpg
- File:WP 001112.jpg
- File:WP 001118.jpg
- File:WP 001110.jpg
- File:WP 001114.jpg
- File:WP 001111.jpg
- File:WP 001113.jpg
- File:WP 001115.jpg
- File:WP 001108.jpg
- File:WP 001109.jpg
- File:WP 001122.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:36, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:36, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused montage of non-notable persons, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:38, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:36, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused low quality photo of nondescript sign, no educational use, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:40, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:37, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res image of a cloud with huge watermark, unusable. Superseded by numerous better cloud photos already on Commons. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:42, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:37, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Someone's family album, out of scope. The group photo has no context (country?) and is of mediocre quality.
Pibwl (talk) 22:16, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:14, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
out of scope, unused, unknown subject, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 22:17, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
unknown subject, mediocre quality, unused, uncat., sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 22:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
out of scope, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 22:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
somebody's holiday photo of a thumbnail size, no real educational use. Pibwl (talk) 22:22, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
a thumbnail photo of no realistic use Pibwl (talk) 22:24, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
a thumbnail photo of no realistic use Pibwl (talk) 22:25, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
out of scope, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 22:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
No es mi Facebook. 191.119.240.225 22:54, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Not in use file, seems to be copied from somewhere else. The Commons cannot be a repository for just anything and it is not an online photo album. Ldorfman (talk) 23:35, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope and possible copyright violation. Eaaaaugh (talk) 00:00, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Amalsemilon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Abdul Karim Pazheri.jpg
- File:Ancient Roof Tile.jpg
- File:Kizhakkumkara Devi Temple.jpg
- File:Old Travancore Coins.jpg
- File:Kumbha Bharani Annam.jpg
- File:Keezhperoor.jpg
- File:Mooppil swmiyar.jpg
- File:Thirupalkadal Rennovation.jpg
- File:Murajapam.jpg
- File:Uthradam thirunal.jpg
- File:Devaprasnam Thirupalkadal.jpg
- File:Thirupalkadal.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:29, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Likely not own works: taken from FB as per EXIF data.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:15, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:29, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nkalbarracin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Clearly not own works as per watermarks.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:53, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:30, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mahbub19702002 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: disparate sizes, quality, and styles, missing EXIF data. Some clearly are photos of photos (DW work, missing original author). And unused logo and artwork.
- File:Arshad Solo 6.jpg
- File:Arshad Solo 4.jpg
- File:RS 3.jpg
- File:Arshad Solo 3.jpg
- File:Arshad Solo 2.jpg
- File:Imran Solo 2.jpg
- File:Imran Solo 3.jpg
- File:Mainul Solo.jpg
- File:Mahbub Solo 2.jpg
- File:Rock Strata Spelling.jpg
- File:Rock Strata Logo.jpg
- File:RS First Lineup.jpg
- File:Mainul First Ever.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:30, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Not an own work. E4024 (talk) 15:56, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 16:28, 29 März 2021 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 20:49, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
the image is not present at the given source, no permission Krd 08:50, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Elcobbola. --Minoraxtalk 12:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DanielCabatbatOroPhotos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification via COM:OTRS correspondence is required so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous instances on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites.
- File:Rrfamilyspringresort2.jpg
- File:Nasulispringbuk2.jpg
- File:Quezonbukmunicipalhall.jpg
- File:Maramagpublicmarket.jpg
- File:Maramagaerialviewbydanielc.jpg
- File:Luanluanspringbukidnon.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:27, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:23, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DanielCabatbatOroPhotos (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Likely not own works: transmission code in EXIF data.
- File:Ultrawindsbukidnoncdo.jpg
- File:Rrfamilyspringresort.jpg
- File:Nasulispringbuk.jpg
- File:Bluewatercavebukidnon.jpg
- File:Bluewatercavebukidnoninterior.jpg
- File:Overviewnatureandculturepark.jpg
- File:Luanluanbukidnon2.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:24, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all. Transmission codes seem to indicate these were originally published on Twitter or some socmed platform. Even if these are uploader's self-photographed images, previously published works require COM:OTRS correspondence for identity verification and confirmation of the use of licensing. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:00, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Andy moog.jpg
- File:Taffyabel.jpg
- File:Hockey player Mike Karakas.png
- File:الضريبة الأنثوية.jpg
- File:Alok in free fire.jpg
- File:Kshmr in free fire.jpg
- File:Cristiano in free fire.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:42, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Robert Bierman seen on the Right was working on the set of Uncanny xmen as a personal assistant- 2013-08-26 03-38.jpeg
[edit]
Likely not own work: subject is same as uploader. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:52, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:16, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
DW: photo of photo, missing essential info. And who is this anyway? Out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:53, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:16, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW, individual images are not attributed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:03, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:16, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
exact duplicate of File:Dr. Lynn R. Webster.jpg, except for rotation Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:06, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 12:16, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emmi Felice (talk · contribs)
[edit]Works of an artist which is still alive. Autorization needed, see Commons:OTRS/fr.
- File:Misha Sydorenko. Fontaine Medicis II. Huile sur toile. 100x73cm. Collection privée. 2019.jpg
- File:Misha Sydorenko. Allégorie de l'Automne. Huile sur toile. 130x81cm. 2021.jpg
- File:Misha Sydorenko. Nymphes de Vallons. Huile sur toile. 130x81cm. 2020.jpg
Shev123 (talk) 20:01, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Ticket:2021070310002378 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 09:00, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for the three files listed above. Collection privée. 2019.jpg” under ticket:2021070310002378. --Ww2censor (talk) 20:35, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: permission given. --Minoraxtalk 12:17, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
"Copyright Los Angeles Times" Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:44, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 16:31, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
copyrighted Syced (talk) 14:35, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
![14:35, 2 July 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/07/02#c-Syced-2021-07-02T14:35:00.000Z-File:Copertina_e_CD_di_"Zero_Comico".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 07:28, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
![07:28, 15 July 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/07/02#c-Explicit-2021-07-15T07:28:00.000Z-File:Copertina_e_CD_di_"Zero_Comico".jpg){kind=link}
copyrighted Syced (talk) 14:37, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 07:28, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Impossible to be own work: subject is also the alleged uploader, clearly not a selfie. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:57, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 07:28, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
nudity Kimjon12 (talk) 09:16, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. ✗plicit 10:05, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
fieses bild 91.45.207.224 14:25, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Keep Not to my taste, but "nasty picture" (="I don't like it") is not a reasons to delete images, unless you can somehow argue it's out of COM:SCOPE. Rodhullandemu (talk) 14:38, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ✗plicit 10:03, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Apparent Flickrwashing - uploaded to Flickr 2 July 2021, then immediately uploaded to Commons 2 July 2021 (what serendipity!). Image previously appeared here in much more complete version. Uploader has been warned about copyright issues related to w:Draft:Tobias Adrian and has many revdeletions due to the same. Quack. Эlcobbola talk 18:13, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what the correct process is here. It is a personal picture whose owner has placed it in the public domain. Hanjaf1 (talk) 18:18, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Elcobbola, This link doesn't work. Where did you find the image?— Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:09, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Diannaa: - The link works for me; try this, or see it here (open the image in a new tab for the full size). Эlcobbola talk 20:48, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, that looks to be the source of the headshot. I can assure you that I did not harvest the picture from Tobias Adrian's blog, but if it is a problem then I could use a different one. I have exchanged messages with the owner of the picture, who can provide an alternative if necessary. Hanjaf1 (talk) 00:35, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- As I mentioned previously, I'm not sure quite how this review process works. If somebody could give me a bit of guidance, I would be grateful. Hanjaf1 (talk) 19:10, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, that looks to be the source of the headshot. I can assure you that I did not harvest the picture from Tobias Adrian's blog, but if it is a problem then I could use a different one. I have exchanged messages with the owner of the picture, who can provide an alternative if necessary. Hanjaf1 (talk) 00:35, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Diannaa: - The link works for me; try this, or see it here (open the image in a new tab for the full size). Эlcobbola talk 20:48, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; blatant flickrwashing. --Gbawden (talk) 07:56, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Melmann as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No evidence of CC-BY-SA license; website says content is CC-BY-SA-NC: https://noyb.eu/en/legal#copyright COM:TOO Austria may or may not apply; it's hard to tell with so few examples. The other concern is that it seems like the user who uploaded this file represents the company. This might mean we have permission to use it, but it's also possible the uploader was confused. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 02:18, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
noyb uploaded the logo by ourself, therefore we gave the permission to use it. -Noybeu 2:56, 6 July 2021 CET — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noybeu (talk • contribs) 12:57, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Assuming good faith and I think it's not a very original logo so we'rein the clear. --Missvain (talk) 21:14, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image license missing. The image was taken from the Internet and is most likely not free. Kursant504 (talk) 04:15, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:14, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Source website has "All Rights Reserved." clause, no indication of a free license. MKFI (talk) 06:13, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:14, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation, source [1]. Kacir (talk) 06:49, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:14, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Advertisement, no educational value or useful in Wikimedia projects. Velma (talk) 06:55, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Material related to notable election SecretName101 (talk) 21:15, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 21:14, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
This picture looks bad Aulivia Gabyriela REVI (talk) 07:00, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 21:15, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
This picture looks bad Aulivia Gabyriela REVI (talk) 06:56, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 21:15, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Advertisement, no educational value, not useful in Wikimedia projects. Velma (talk) 06:57, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Anything related to WMF work is inherently in scope. (Should be properly categorized, though, and the permission ofr the photo should be explocitly stated.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:27, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the notice
[edit]
The image was used by my organization to let people know that we have a Wikipedian in Residence and then to 'meet' her through a Tweet Chat since meeting physically was quite off due to COVID-19. It wasn't meant as an advertorial. The image is for use in writing the report for the Wikipedia in African Libraries course. If the image breaks any rules, please kindly delete. Thank you.
AfricanLibrarian (talk) 11:07, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 21:15, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Advertisement, no educational value, not useful in Wikimedia projects. Velma (talk) 06:57, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Keep Material related to a noteworthy election. SecretName101 (talk) 21:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 21:15, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Brexit does not mean the removal of one star from the logo of the EU, since the stars don't necessarily represent the member states of the EU. Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 07:36, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- I'd think it's pretty obvious to everybody that the "removal" of a star was a purely symbolic representation, and that the EU flag would never really look like this. But I really don't care one way or the other, since the image was used to illustrate the prolonged Brexit process itself. Now that it's over, there's no urgent use for the image any longer; the best reason to keep it is for historical purposes. Asav | Talk 11:36, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep What is the nomination here? Of course the logo of the EU [sic] hasn't had a star removed from it, that's not what this image is. But as a symbol of protest against brexit, this has been a very popular design. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:58, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 21:15, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
non-free image of artistic work (author is not dead for 70 years) A09090091 (talk) 10:16, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:15, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yarnalgo as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:PIA24625-MarsIngenuityHelicopterViewsPerseveranceRoverFromAir-20210425.jpg
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion per Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates (PNG ->JPEG). -- Túrelio (talk) 10:21, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep and tag with {{PNG version of JPEG}}. My mistake. I didn't notice that it was a different filetype. --Yarnalgo (talk) 17:13, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 21:15, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Is this your license? What kind of source is "bukansky"? Rohalamin (talk) 10:51, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:16, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
This is not a free image. The Knesset site specifically states it is copyrighted to the State of Israel. Number 57 (talk) 11:05, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:16, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
I am requesting a deletion for this file because it is being used on the Wikipedia articles Shirley Temple and The Little Princess (1939 film). Although it's in the public domain, people are going to the article to read about it, not watch it. Wikipedia is not netflix and nor is Commons. I label this be deleted. Thanks for reading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SomeWhatLife (talk • contribs) 13:12, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Not a reason for deletion. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:39, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. The Wikimedia project also serves as a repository for cultural artifacts, and that includes works such as films, books, songs and whatnot. The work's length is irrelevant in the purpose of archiving it for scholarly purposes so as long as it is under a free/libre licence. Blakegripling ph (talk) 02:42, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep What??? Tm (talk) 03:37, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep - No valid reason provided for deletion. Nomination completely misses the point of Commons. -- Whpq (talk) 00:00, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 21:16, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 13:22, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:16, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Unused near duplicate of File:ATL-Madrid-Lokomotiv001-Thomas (cropped).jpg. ✗plicit 13:25, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:16, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bahrain A1Cafel (talk) 13:27, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:16, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bahrain A1Cafel (talk) 13:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:16, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bahrain A1Cafel (talk) 13:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:16, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 13:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:16, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 13:31, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:16, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 13:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:16, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 13:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:42, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 13:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:42, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 13:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:42, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 13:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:42, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Fictitious flag, out of project scope. Has obviously been misleading to some extent, as it is being wrongly used in an itWikipedia article about Missouri in the American Civil War. As Missouri secession hasn't been very likely since 1861, and the flag this is based on wasn't in use in 1861, this appears to not be useful and to be possibly misleading. Hog Farm (talk) 13:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:43, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina A1Cafel (talk) 13:34, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- The following is the link to the copyright law of Bosnia and Herzegovina of 2010, and in it there's nothing that forbids panorama photographs. https://wipolex-res.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/hr/ba/ba011hr.html My-wiki-photos (talk) 12:34, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- @My-wiki-photos: Isn't that restriction ruled by Article 52? From WIPO:
| “ | (1) The free use of the works permanently located in squares, parks, streets or other places accessible by the public shall be permitted. (2) The works referred to in paragraph (1) of this Article shall not be reproduced in three-dimensional form, used for the same purpose as the original work or used for gaining economic advantage. (3) In the case of the use referred to in paragraph (1) of this Article, the source and authorship must be indicated if they are indicated on the work used. |
” |
--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:53, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- Oh wait, its Article 23 (2) a. said something that against architectural works from copyright protecting?
| “ | (2) The provisions of paragraph (1) of this Article shall not apply to the use of: a) architectural structures, |
” |
Ditto for Article 34 (3) b.?
| “ | (3) The provisions of paragraphs (1) and (2) of this Article shall not apply to the use of: b) architectural structures, |
” |
and with my search of "architect" in [2], is this a signal hints that BiH has an architectural-only FOP that can be Commons-acceptable?! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:00, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: Yes, the Article 52 of the Copyright Law of Bosnia and Herzegivina addresses this topic. The second paragraph "(2) The works referred to in paragraph (1) of this Article shall not be reproduced in three-dimensional form, used for the same purpose as the original work or used for gaining economic advantage." means, for instance, that it is prohibited to make a scale model of a copyrighted work to sell it in order to make a profit. However, photographs don't fall in the category of three-dimensional form. If such photographs were prohibited for the free use, that would have been said in the Article 52. My-wiki-photos (talk) 03:59, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:43, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina A1Cafel (talk) 13:34, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:43, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina A1Cafel (talk) 06:31, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:21, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina A1Cafel (talk) 13:35, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:43, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Dubious license. Uploader seems not to be creator or rightholder of the logo. No verification that logo was released under CC license. Bujo (talk) 13:40, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:43, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Uploader claims the image is CC licensed but the metadata includes a different copyright claim. ElKevbo (talk) 13:47, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Comment - Similar problem with this file that was uploaded on a day earlier by the same uploader. Appears to have been downloaded from a University of Minnesota website, but the uploader appears has no connection with that university. 50.231.49.42 01:16, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:43, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Is Wu Xin-gang = Alwinwu? IMO identity verification is needed A1Cafel (talk) 13:53, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:43, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
copyrighted Syced (talk) 14:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
screenshot of copyrighted software Syced (talk) 14:33, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
background image presumably copyrighted Syced (talk) 14:37, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
copyrighted Syced (talk) 14:39, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from art on wall. Should be cropped/blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Impossible to be own work: the man on the bed is also the alleged uploader. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
stills from a 32 years old video (can be found on youtube), circulating on the Internet prior to the upload here without attribution, unlikely own work.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
TFerenczy (talk) 14:57, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Impossible to be own work: uploader is also in the photo, clearly not a selfie. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:10, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from poster. Should be blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:14, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
This file was uploaded mistakenly by the author Imamul Ifaz (talk) 16:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
this file was uploaded mistakenly by the author Imamul Ifaz (talk) 16:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Japan for statues. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Jorenji (Itabashi, Tokyo). Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:35, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:37, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be a promotional logo, not used in any articles. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:03, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:45, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
This is my own portrait image and I do not need keep this image on internet hereafter. I'll add some new images. For now I need to delete this. Rukmaldeniya (talk) 17:36, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:45, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
This is my own portrait image and I do not need keep this image on internet hereafter. I'll add some new images. For now I need to delete this. Rukmaldeniya (talk) 17:40, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:45, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Logo above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:07, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:45, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:18, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:45, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
DW work, missing original author, source, date, and permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:37, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:45, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate uploaded in error by myself Chris j wood (talk) 19:12, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:45, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Complex logo, no evidence uploader is the copyright holder. Also, {{PD-CAGov}} does not apply to school districts. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:53, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:45, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
copyright https://www.ivendaslojadepartamentos.com.br/ Lentoster (talk) 20:01, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:45, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Richa Gulati1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploader is apparently the subject. Photographer unknown. Watermarked images, previously published (https://www.newznew.com/after-conquering-the-music-arena-richa-gulati-is-ready-for-big-screen/, https://www.zoomnews.in/en/news-detail/after-conquering-the-music-arena-richa-gulati-is-ready-for-big-screen.html). OTRS permission needed.
MKFI (talk) 20:08, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:46, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
This clearly is not just a simple typeface (compare the "D" "E" and "A") . Masem (talk) 20:14, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:46, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Is there a source for this artwork or is it just self-made fantasy? GerritR (talk) 20:27, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Coupé and 2x azur??? very strange.--Carolus (talk) 09:44, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- GerritR, why ask if there is a reference without bothering to check the image description which clearly provides one? --Brookford (talk) 22:50, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- I added some words to the file description.--GerritR (talk) 05:41, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- GerritR, why ask if there is a reference without bothering to check the image description which clearly provides one? --Brookford (talk) 22:50, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 21:46, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Walter Benner
[edit]copyright violation; artist died in 2005; no freedom of panorama.
- File:St. Peter (Birkesdorf) 06.jpg
- File:Vilich-stiftskirche-st-peter-45.jpg
- File:Vilich-stiftskirche-st-peter-53.jpg
- File:Vilichinnen.jpg
_06.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 20:43, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:46, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; living artist; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 21:49, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:46, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
The image is supposedly in the public domain as a work of the US Government. I do not believe that the US Government would make the campaign logo for Jeff Jackson's 2022 Senate campaign. Therefore, the presumption would be that this is a copyrighted image without fair use justification (at present). RoanokeVirginia (talk) 22:00, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:46, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
incorrect details Jerilj (talk) 22:01, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:46, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:GEORGIA, "Copyright shall commence upon creation of a work and shall run for the life of the author and for 70 years after his/her death, except for the cases provided for by Article 32 of this Law.[2112-IIS/2017 Article 31.1] If a work is published anonymously or under a pseudonym, copyright lasts for 70 years from year of publication unless the author reveals themself or there is no doubt about who they are, in which case it lasts for 70 years after their year of death.[2112-IIS/2017 Article 32.1]" For this photograph, we don't know who took it or when it was first published, so the copyright status cannot be determined. The subject died in 1959 so it is not old enough for PD-old-assumed. Buidhe (talk) 22:04, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:46, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Not-in-use formal PR picture. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 23:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:47, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 8-hachiro as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not a map of Kagoshima prefecture It clearly is a map, because I used an actual map outline of the prefecture to create this image. Perhaps 8-hachiro misunderstands the purpose of the flag-maps series of images. Fry1989 eh? 00:50, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- This map includes areas other than Kagoshima prefecture. --8-hachiro (talk) 04:53, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- The shape is different from the correct map.
- File:Shadow picture of Kagoshima prefecture.png, File:Kagoshima-geo-stub.png --8-hachiro (talk) 05:03, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:34, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Subida de forma errónea Lidya cabrero (talk) 09:00, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#G7. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:34, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Very possible copyright violation: Non-free images (de minimis is questionable), author is not same person as uploader, even though uploader claims it is her picture. A09090091 (talk) 10:19, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:33, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own-work: small size Masoud bukani (talk) 16:47, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, but ordinary claims require ordinary evidence, in this case nothing more than AGF for a picture of schoolchildren that doesn't appear elsewhere online. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:36, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Unknown publication history makes it impossible to determine copyright status Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:16, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:28, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
1942.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
1942.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright status cannot be determined because publication history is unknown Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:18, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
1942.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:28, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
1942.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright status cannot be determined because publication history is unknown Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:29, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
01.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright status cannot be determined because publication history is unknown Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:23, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
01.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:29, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
01.jpg){kind=link}
Likely not own works: taken from FB as per EXIF data. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:50, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:29, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Çünkü öyle Özçekim Enessubasi33 (talk) 17:59, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:29, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina A1Cafel (talk) 13:36, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Remote view of the building, similar examples also available here Category:Remote views of Bosmal City Center. --Smooth O (talk) 17:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: De minimis. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 16:32, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
+
- File:Указ в заштат суздальской епархии.jpg
- File:Указ назначения настоятелем Успенского храма.jpg
- File:Указ на второй крест с украшениями.jpg
- File:Ukaz o naznachenii shtatnym svashennikom.jpg
- File:Грамота во Пресвитера.jpg
- File:Удостоверение о монашеском постриге Адриана Брагина.jpg
- File:Ставленническая грамота Михаила Тюнина.jpg
- File:Ставленическая грамота епископа Адриана.jpg
- File:Указ возведения в архимандрита.jpg
- File:Удостоверение иноческого пострига.jpg
Very likely not own work, since those are official documents of an organisation. Veverve (talk) 12:12, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
PS: an admin might want to look into the other uploads of this user. Veverve (talk) 12:19, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- "Very likely" I'm those documents holder, couldn't Thou ever imagine that? I can show U em in Russia if U please. So, I really doubt U gave a good advice to admin.Radeoff (talk) 13:09, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Radeoff: What do you mean "holder"? Possessing documents does not mean you have any authors' right over them. Are you someone from the Moscow Patriarchate habilitated to change the copyright of those documents? If yes, then an OTRS must be filled. Veverve (talk) 13:36, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no indication of user's own work. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:18, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
لا دليل على حقوق النشر أبو تائب (talk) 19:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1250060305385824259/4Wnml5oR_400x400.jpg&imgrefurl=https://twitter.com/momoutaoukil/status/893517506090086400&tbnid=WqP7FCohvvE0ZM&vet=1&docid=OYBXwOCCZN7rHM&w=400&h=400&itg=1&source=sh/x/im — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yassinos101 (talk • contribs) 12:10, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Nikolay Chkheidze
[edit]These photos are credited to his daughter, but a death date is not given for her, nor can I find one. Georgian copyright law protects for 70 years after death, and based on when he lived it's likely his daughter would have lived past 1950. Also lacking PD-US rationale.
Buidhe (talk) 22:12, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep ::I'm very opposed to deletion. Much of what you say is assumptions, i.e. what if this daughter die of cancer or pneumonia and didn't live past 1950? Judging by unique contributions of user who first upload this file, they appear have some type of personal connection to Leuville estate in France where Georgian exiles lived and they also seem to have documented other (I must say very unique) photographic uploads appropriately, so I give them benefit of the doubt as should any reasonable person, this is too much nitpicking.--LeontinaVarlamonva (talk) 23:38, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Buidhe and LeontinaVarlamonva: We call these as "URAA-protections", to which we currently don't always delete files only based on that. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:51, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- What the guideline actually says is "If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under U.S. or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle." However, I think the primary issue is that it is likely copyright in the source country. Unless we can find the creator's death date or confirm that the copyright holder intends to release under a free license, it must be deleted per COM:PRP as potentially copyrighted in the source country (Georgia, or even France which also has a 70 year copyright term). Buidhe (talk) 01:05, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- The key word there I think is "significant" doubt; I see doubts expressed but I'm not sure I would call them "significant". If this person had lived much later in time, and copyright claimed author+ 70 years, perhaps these doubts would be more "significant" then, i.e. died in 1980 and tag claims author + 70 years--LeontinaVarlamonva (talk) 01:14, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- What the guideline actually says is "If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under U.S. or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle." However, I think the primary issue is that it is likely copyright in the source country. Unless we can find the creator's death date or confirm that the copyright holder intends to release under a free license, it must be deleted per COM:PRP as potentially copyrighted in the source country (Georgia, or even France which also has a 70 year copyright term). Buidhe (talk) 01:05, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete According to w:Nikolay Chkheidze, he died in 1926 and his wife died in 1943. It is not implausible to assume that his daughter was born when he was 20-40 years and that she lived until she was 80-90 years old, which would make this copyrighted for several more decades. If the uploader thinks that she has been dead for at least 70 years old, then the uploader should provide evidence of the death year. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:36, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- What does his wife's death year has to do with any of this? Also, if you're comfortable assuming that everyone would live to 90 years old, why not also give some benefit of the doubt to the uploader who is clearly connected to the family and Leuville estate? It is a troubling double standard. --LeontinaVarlamonva (talk) 17:46, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- See COM:EVID. The uploader needs to show that the photographer (the subject's daughter) died more than 70 years ago. I only need to show that there is a possibility that she didn't die more than 70 years ago. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:00, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- What does his wife's death year has to do with any of this? Also, if you're comfortable assuming that everyone would live to 90 years old, why not also give some benefit of the doubt to the uploader who is clearly connected to the family and Leuville estate? It is a troubling double standard. --LeontinaVarlamonva (talk) 17:46, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, I see this image used in other sources, outside wikipedia. There is a book printed by IDFI & National Library of Georgia ([3], [4]) with the above mention image used as cover. I think if there is a copyright owner, they aren't against using the image in public domain. Most likely the image is from Veronique Chkheidze Collection. --Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ★ 11:33, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- See COM:PRP. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:01, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- Stefan2 before deleting, to gather more info, I will ask book publishers (and maybe even their source), I am deeply assured that the owners won't mind using the image here.--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ★ 07:35, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. There has been sufficient time for uploader to provide death date of actual photographer. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:21, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khánh Snake (talk · contribs)
[edit]This gallery is about half from facebook, the other half may have transmission data suggestive of source from social media. File sizes (but one) are all small and of low quality.
- File:Nguyen Thi Kim Ha.jpg
- File:Ngan Ngoc Nghia.jpg
- File:Lê Đền Ngọc Quế 1.png
- File:Lễ Đền Ngọc Quế.png
- File:Den Ngoc Que.jpg
- File:Lê Đăng Khánh.jpg
- File:Trường THCS Mộc Lỵ.jpg
- File:THPT Mộc Lỵ.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:58, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- Moved from discussion page I hereby declare that I am the creator and/or sole owner of the copyright of this image: * File:Nguyen Thi Kim Ha.jpg
- File:Ngan Ngoc Nghia.jpg
- File:Lê Đền Ngọc Quế 1.png
- File:Lễ Đền Ngọc Quế.png
- File:Den Ngoc Que.jpg
- File:Lê Đăng Khánh.jpg
. I agree to publish the work under the Cc-by-4.0 . license
I acknowledge that I am at all times the copyright holder of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in the manner chosen by the license. Adjustments made by others to my work will not be attributed to me.
I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that images may or may not be kept in perpetuity at a Wikimedia Commons.
June 4, 2021, Le Dang Khanh
- @DHN: Tôi xác minh tất cả ảnh như trên như thế kia được không, sao vấn đề ảnh lằng nhằng thế nhỉ? Khánh Snake (talk) 00:49, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Khánh Snake: Đối với hình nhân vật nổi tiếng mà chính bạn giữ bản quyền, bạn nên tải lên phiên bản đầy đủ metadata hình, độ phân giải cao thay vì hình đã đăng trên mạng xã hội ở độ phân giải thấp. Việc sử dụng hình ảnh độ phân giải thấp có dấu hiệu lấy từ mạng xã hội sẽ gây rất nhiều nghi vấn. Cách khác để tránh vấn đề là gửi thư xác nhận qua OTRS. DHN (talk) 01:20, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- @DHN: Cảm ơn bạn tôi sẽ gửi thư xác nhận qua OTRS. Thân mến Khánh Snake (talk) 01:26, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz: This photo is taken by me with my rights, I uploaded the photo on facebook, and facebook is infringed on copyright of the photo? Khánh Snake (talk) 01:22, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- @DHN: Cảm ơn bạn tôi sẽ gửi thư xác nhận qua OTRS. Thân mến Khánh Snake (talk) 01:26, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Khánh Snake: Đối với hình nhân vật nổi tiếng mà chính bạn giữ bản quyền, bạn nên tải lên phiên bản đầy đủ metadata hình, độ phân giải cao thay vì hình đã đăng trên mạng xã hội ở độ phân giải thấp. Việc sử dụng hình ảnh độ phân giải thấp có dấu hiệu lấy từ mạng xã hội sẽ gây rất nhiều nghi vấn. Cách khác để tránh vấn đề là gửi thư xác nhận qua OTRS. DHN (talk) 01:20, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- @DHN: Tôi xác minh tất cả ảnh như trên như thế kia được không, sao vấn đề ảnh lằng nhằng thế nhỉ? Khánh Snake (talk) 00:49, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Khánh Snake: Since the photos were previously published, we need you to fill in the simple email form at COM:OTRS. Best! Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:29, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ticket:2021060410001477 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 14:00, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz: Have you verified that this voting paper is finished? Dear! Khánh Snake (talk) 00:26, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Khánh Snake: Not up to me, it's in OTRS now. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Now has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:11, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sasquatch as Copyvio (copyvio) Washuotaku (talk) 23:16, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- I stopped the speedy deletion in hopes to buy time for the original uploader or the owner of the image to provide permission/CC for the image in question. I am aware this is now a ticking clock of at least a few days of grace, otherwise it will be permanently removed if no remedy has been provided. --Washuotaku (talk) 23:21, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- The Trash Taste podcast mentioned, in #55, that apparently CDawgVA did, in fact, upload the images. I'm unsure if Learnean is actually him, but it seems likely given the words and timing of the edit and the podcast upload. Of course, it'd be much better to have proper verification of the username. Edit: Never mind, the wording is ambiguous. TechnicusFatuus (talk) 09:55, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- I strongly support no deletion to the file as it is the intention of CDawgVA to share an image on Wikimedia Commons in effort to add an image on his Wikipedia page. The reality that not everybody understands the complexity of the rules that governs Wikimedia Commons should allow some benefit of the doubt to accept that the submitter is likely the author of the image. --Washuotaku (talk) 19:07, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, obviously, unless a valid permission is received. Te guys on the YouTube video even say they uploaded pictures of one another, suggesting neither of them owned the copyright for the images they were uploading. The picture clearly wasn't taken by CDawgVA, unless he has an unusually long left arm. Sionk (talk) 10:48, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- Response - Nearly all cameras have a timer function to allow the subject to both frame and be in the shot; to say "the picture clearly wasn't taken by CDawgVA" is to assume he is incapable of using a camera, despite owning a high-end camera and recording all video and photographs from it. Also, the mention of them uploading each other's photos only shows of their failed understanding of the rules of Wikimedia Commons and we should not ignore the intent behind the effort by them as we know, you confirming it, that adding an image is the stated goal of the effort. --Washuotaku (talk) 14:18, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- CDawgVA does confirm that he is the photographer: https://www.instagram.com/p/CGZn69rAQwd/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:02, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Response - Nearly all cameras have a timer function to allow the subject to both frame and be in the shot; to say "the picture clearly wasn't taken by CDawgVA" is to assume he is incapable of using a camera, despite owning a high-end camera and recording all video and photographs from it. Also, the mention of them uploading each other's photos only shows of their failed understanding of the rules of Wikimedia Commons and we should not ignore the intent behind the effort by them as we know, you confirming it, that adding an image is the stated goal of the effort. --Washuotaku (talk) 14:18, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete until proper permissions are actually received. Copyright violations expose Wikipedia and Wikimedia to serious liability so procedures must be followed strictly. Sasquatch (talk) 17:06, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- There is an VRTS email received for “File:CDawgVA Picture.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2021081410000964. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:21, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- This is an outbound email, which I've had moderate success with in the past. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:22, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Still no VRT confirmation. --JuTa 06:43, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Nominating this template that I created, as it appears the Burundian FOP is not free enough for Commons. See also: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump/Copyright&diff=571314405&oldid=571298884 JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:42, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Also the ff. templates that comprise this template, all created by me too:
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 16:53, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artworks (stained glass windows, poems, etc.); no freedom of panorama.
- File:20201031 Kloster Heilig-Kreuz Püttlingen 04.jpg
File:20201031 Kloster Heilig-Kreuz Püttlingen 05.jpg- Fenster sind hier Beiwerk Peli (talk) 01:01, 8 July 2021 (UTC). I will crop this image to remove the windows. Ellywa (talk) 17:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)- File:20201031 Kloster Heilig-Kreuz Püttlingen 06.jpg - Nicht bewiesen das dies 'junge Kunst' ist Peli (talk) 01:01, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- File:György Lehoczky Püttlingen Vogelfenster Kranich Text (2018-01).jpg
- File:György Lehoczky Püttlingen Vogelfenster Specht Text (2018-01).jpg
File:Püttlingen Kloster Heilig-Kreuz 01.JPG- Fenster sind hier Beiwerk. Deleting this file means loosing an exterior image too, see file history Peli (talk) 01:01, 8 July 2021 (UTC). Can be maintained per COM:FOP Germany. Ellywa (talk) 17:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)File:Püttlingen Kloster Heilig-Kreuz Kirche Innen 01.JPG- Fenster sind hier Beiwerk Peli (talk) 01:01, 8 July 2021 (UTC). Agree, de minimis. Ellywa (talk) 17:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)File:Püttlingen Kloster Heilig-Kreuz Kirche Innen 03.JPG- Fenster sind hier Beiwerk Peli (talk) 01:01, 8 July 2021 (UTC). Agree, de minimis, Ellywa (talk) 17:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 21:53, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Objection. At least five (out of 8) of these deletion requests are highly discutable, since the art is either de minimis, or not proven to be young art. This mass deletion request is far too unprecise to be taken seriously. This building is considered a cultural heritage monument of architecture and therefore it belongs to all of us. The continuous intention to make these sorts of interiors invisible to the current audience shows that nominator does not fully understand the scope of this project. Peli (talk) 01:01, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination deleted some, kept those were the art/windows can be considered de minimis. --Ellywa (talk) 17:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:St. Josef, Aachen
[edit]Copyright violation, contemporary artworks (by Schaffrath who died in 2011 / by Lausberg who is born in 1965), no freedom of panorama in german churches.
- File:Empore St. Josef Aachen.JPG
- File:Kirchenschiff St. Josef, Aachen (2).JPG
- File:Kirchenschiff St. Josef, Aachen.JPG
- File:StJosefAachenInnenWest.jpg
- File:Triptychon St. Josef Aachen (links).JPG
- File:Triptychon St. Josef Aachen (mitte).JPG
- File:Triptychon St. Josef Aachen (rechts).JPG
- File:Tryptychon St. Josef, Aachen.JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 20:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:36, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:St. Josef, Aachen
[edit]copyright violation; contemporary artworks (stained glass windows; sculpture; painting); no freedom of panorama.
- File:20200904 St. Josef Aachen 01.jpg
- File:20200904 St. Josef Aachen 03.jpg
- File:20200904 St. Josef Aachen 04.jpg
- File:20200904 St. Josef Aachen 05.jpg
- File:20200904 St. Josef Aachen 06.jpg
- File:20200904 St. Josef Aachen 07.jpg
- File:Mittelschiff St. Josef Aachen.JPG — hier träfe m. E. de:Beiwerk zu ArthurMcGill (talk) 17:29, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- File:Schiff des Lebens St. Josef Aachen.JPG
- File:StJosefAachenInnenOst.jpg — hier träfe m. E. de:Beiwerk zu ArthurMcGill (talk) 17:29, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Martin Sg. (talk) 22:00, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- bei zwei Bildern (oben markiert) lege ich Einspruch gegen eine Löschung ein, da ich diese Fälle als "de:Beiwerk" ansehe, denn Schwerpunkt der Bilder sind die Totalaufnahmen des Kirchenschiffes ArthurMcGill (talk) 17:29, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. de minimis is always a bit subjective, but I consider the presence of the large hanging object not de minimis. Therefore, all have been deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 17:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artworks (see Fenster des Aachener Doms); no freedom of panorama.
- File:20200904 Aachen Cathedral 03.jpg - overview-image; clearly de minimis wrt the windows. --Túrelio (talk) 09:47, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- File:Aachen Cathedral Nikolauskapelle window.jpg - by Wilhelm Geyer (d. 1968); for other windows by him a permission has been obtained from the artists son. --Túrelio (talk) 09:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- File:Aachen Germany Imperial-Cathedral-07.jpg
- File:Aachen Germany Imperial-Cathedral-07a.jpg
- File:Aachen Germany Imperial-Cathedral-11.jpg - check if Beiwerk applies --Wuselig (talk) 09:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- File:Aachen Germany Imperial-Cathedral-16.jpg
- File:Aachen Germany Imperial-Cathedral-18.jpg - check if Beiwerk applies --Wuselig (talk) 09:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- File:Aachen Kaiserdom Innen Chor 2.JPG
- File:Aachener Dom - Flickr - tm-md (1).jpg - check if Beiwerk applies --Wuselig (talk) 09:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- File:Aachener Dom - Flickr - tm-md (2).jpg
- File:Aachener Dom - Flickr - tm-md (4).jpg - check if Beiwerk applies --Wuselig (talk) 09:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- File:Aachener Dom Chorfenster 2014.jpg - no artistic details recognizable --CaS2000 (talk) 18:40, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- File:Aachener Dom Fenster Chorhalle 2014 (2).jpg - no artistic details recognizable --CaS2000 (talk) 18:40, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- File:Aachener Dom Fenster Nikolauskapelle.jpg - by Ernst Jansen-Winkeln (d. 1992) -- Artist: Ernst Jansen-Winkeln; Photo: Research Center for 20th Century Glass Painting Foundation e.V .; Publication permitted by the Jansen-Winkeln family per E-Mail --CaS2000 (talk) 00:17, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Aachener Dom Hauptaltar. Übergang Oktogon Chor (H).jpg- check if Beiwerk applies --Wuselig (talk) 09:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC). Agree, Ellywa (talk) 17:17, 30 January 2022 (UTC)File:AachenerDomKapelle.jpg- check if Beiwerk applies --Wuselig (talk) 09:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC). I will crop this image. ~~- File:Aacheni dóm 03.jpg - check if Beiwerk applies --Wuselig (talk) 09:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- File:AC Dom Nikolauskapelle Glasfenster.JPG - by Wilhelm Geyer (d. 1968); for other windows by him a permission has been obtained from the artists son. --Túrelio (talk) 09:37, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dom Aachen - Flickr - tm-md (15).jpg - check if Beiwerk applies --Wuselig (talk) 09:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dom Aachen - Flickr - tm-md (16).jpg - check if Beiwerk applies --Wuselig (talk) 09:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dom Aachen - Flickr - tm-md (17).jpg - check if Beiwerk applies --Wuselig (talk) 09:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dom Aachen - Flickr - tm-md (21).jpg - check if Beiwerk applies --Wuselig (talk) 09:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dom Aachen - Flickr - tm-md (22).jpg
- File:Dom van Aken 2.jpg
- File:Dom van Aken 3.jpg
- File:Dom van Aken 4.jpg - check if Beiwerk applies --Wuselig (talk) 09:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- File:Duomo di aachen, vetrate 01.jpg - check if Beiwerk applies --Wuselig (talk) 09:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- File:Duomo di aachen, vetrate 02.jpg
File:Strahlenkranzmadonna.jpg-Windows are Beiwerk, perhaps make the crop narrower. --Wuselig (talk) 09:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC). Agree, will cropp this image further. Ellywa (talk) 17:17, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 22:12, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 07:48, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- -- no mass deletion. Images have to be individually checked, if the windows are mere Beiwerk --Wuselig (talk) 09:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- For the works by Wilhelm Geyer (d. 1968) another uploader had obtained a permission from the artists son (see File:Glasfenster von Wilhelm Geyer, St. Margareta in Margrethausen.jpg). --Túrelio (talk) 09:51, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- --It doesn't make sense to lump everything together. Many photos show no real details of the artefact and the artistic level of creativity is quite low.--CaS2000 (talk) 23:40, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- ich lehne die derzeitgen Massenlöschanträge (wie auch auf St. Josef, St. Foillan, etc...) ab und bin mit dem hier von Martin Sg ausgelösten Prozedere nicht einverstanden, dies führt nämlich nur Missverständissen und Verärgerungen, da hier alles in einem Topf gemischt und evtl. auch so entschieden wird.
Ich stimme aber ausdrücklich dem zu, dass die bereits von User:Wuselig und User:Túrelio markierten Bilder unter de:Beiwerk zu sehen sind und nicht gelöscht werden sollten. Denn das hieße sonst im Umkehrschluss, dass man in keiner Kirche mehr Innenaufnahmen als Gesamtansicht machen darf, da immer irgendwelche Fenster mit ins Bild rücken würden. Dies wäre der Tod eines sinnvoll bebilderten Artikels und die Demotivation pur für alle unsere Hobbyfotografen, die in den verschiedensten Kirchen in ihrer Freizeit Fotos unter anderem für die Wikipedia machen. Wenn das so weitergeht, sind bald hunderte Bilder gelöscht und die Artikel verarmt. ArthurMcGill (talk) 07:57, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- ich lehne die derzeitgen Massenlöschanträge (wie auch auf St. Josef, St. Foillan, etc...) ab und bin mit dem hier von Martin Sg ausgelösten Prozedere nicht einverstanden, dies führt nämlich nur Missverständissen und Verärgerungen, da hier alles in einem Topf gemischt und evtl. auch so entschieden wird.
- --It doesn't make sense to lump everything together. Many photos show no real details of the artefact and the artistic level of creativity is quite low.--CaS2000 (talk) 23:40, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- it's worth a try to contact Wilhelm Geyer's son, i think. And sure: No mass deletion.
- I think every(!) single deletion request should have its own page and a very detailed rationale as to why it should be deleted.
- For most of the images you can postulate "de minimis".
- Qwertzu111111 (talk) 15:05, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- Alle Fenster des Domes sind hier zu sehen Forschungsstelle Glasmalerei. Und das mit öffentlichen Forschungsmitteln. Urheberrechte werden offensichtlich nur für Künstler anerkannt, die in VG-Kunst organisiert sind.--CaS2000 (talk) 13:10, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- Die von Dir verlinkte Publikation hat nichts damit zu tun, wie wir auf Commons Bilder publizieren. Es wird ausdrücklich im Impressum darauf hingewiesen, das ALLE Bilder (und andere Inhalte) in dieser Publikation urheberrechtlich geschützt sind. Hier diskutieren wir darüber, ob für einzelne der bei uns hochgeladenen Bildern ein Urheberechtsanspruch der zeitgenössischen Bilder nicht anwendbar ist, weil sie zum Beispiel nur Beiwerk darstellen. --Wuselig (talk) 15:52, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- Alle Fenster des Domes sind hier zu sehen Forschungsstelle Glasmalerei. Und das mit öffentlichen Forschungsmitteln. Urheberrechte werden offensichtlich nur für Künstler anerkannt, die in VG-Kunst organisiert sind.--CaS2000 (talk) 13:10, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- Unter welcher Lizenz werden denn die Bilder der Forschungsstelle veröffentlicht? Sie können jedenfalls für den privaten Gebrauch genutzt werden!--CaS2000 (talk) 16:18, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- Für private Nutzung bedarf es keiner weiteren Lizenz. Sie geben an, dass die Bilder urheberrechtlich geschützt sind. Um Dir Bilder in einem Bildband anzuschauen bedarf es auch keiner Lizenz. Wie Du schon bemerkt hast gibt es offfensichtlich Vereinbarungen mit der VG-Kunst. Die anderen Künstler können auch ihre Rechte einfordern. Aber Du darfst urheberrechtlich geschütze Bilder aus einem Bildband auch nur privat nutzen und zum Beispiel hier auf Commons hochladen.--Wuselig (talk) 18:59, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- Unter welcher Lizenz werden denn die Bilder der Forschungsstelle veröffentlicht? Sie können jedenfalls für den privaten Gebrauch genutzt werden!--CaS2000 (talk) 16:18, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination deleted most. De mimis is always a bit subjective, I considered most NOT de minimis as the windows were too clearly visible. If photographer wanted to photo details they should have zoomed in. @Túrelio: regarding permission, the permission was not listed on the file pages. If permission is indeed received, images can of course be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 17:20, 30 January 2022 (UTC)