This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file does not meet meet . The subject of the face is covered with hands in the way and someone feeding something to them. Their head is not centered properly and hence, takes the focus away to understand and recognize the face. It's distracting. 2001:56A:FA4D:3000:BD8D:3DAB:1064:CEC318:04, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only 3 photos whose the subject is himself. Tangopaso (talk) 13:21, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only 3 photos whose the subject is himself. Tangopaso (talk) 13:22, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
(1) different size of atoms of the same element, (2) incorrect spatial configuration due to a combination of two images → this image has no educational value (3) possible licence violation as this is a derivative work of uncited original files made by indef-blocked user that had problems with proper licensing. Wostr (talk) 22:01, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
(1) different size of atoms of the same element, (2) incorrect spatial configuration due to a combination of two images → this image has no educational value (3) possible licence violation as this is a derivative work of uncited original files made by indef-blocked user that had problems with proper licensing, (4) incorrect source and author. Wostr (talk) 22:32, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Derivative work copyright violation: this image depicts a copyrighted work of art in public space that is not covered by the freedom of panorama in the United States, which is only limited to architecture only (and not other works like statues, sculptures, or murals like this). The artist, Parris Stancell, is apparently still alive (at least as of 2018). A COM:OTRS authorization correspondence from the artist is required if he agrees this image of his work to be licensed under commercial CC licensing.
Note that the American de minimis concept is far more restricted (triviality instead of incidental inclusion), which means this mural is not DM as it is not trivial to the whole depiction of the image.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Commons is a "commercial" enterprise?? I must have misinterpreted what was meant by "copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format". Please could you advise which licence(s) the Flickr user would need to use for this image to be available for upload Commons? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:07, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The source does not say this work is free under a creative commons license. The link goes to a news article that makes zero mention of any free use of the image. Putitonamap98 (talk) 14:10, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The source does not say this work is free under a creative commons license. The link goes to a news article that has zero mention of any free use of the image. Putitonamap98 (talk) 14:11, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
All of the sites pages had the Creative Commons mark at the bottom. I don't know why the website was deleted? It was working fine a couple days ago.. What about Wayback machine? i do not think it should be deleted as the website had the license and is irrevocable. Lori155 (talk) 01:57, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[3] since the orignal source wasn't archived this was the best I could find. All of the pages on o2news.tistory.com had the identical license as in this archive. If you look on the right side there are DMA and 2ne1 tags, proving that the tistory site had the images I uploaded Lori155 (talk) 17:20, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawing above nomination sorry for not responding sooner, the site must have been down when I checked. I apologize for the trouble. Ytoyoda (talk) 21:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Looking at the source site, https://aatd.tistory.com/, does not look like the tistory account is the owner of these photographs. Looks like a mix of screenshots and 3rd party photographs.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Likely copyright issues with the satellite imagery used for the background. While works by BART are {{PD-CAGov}}, the copyright for the imagery rests with another party - probably a commercial provider. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:55, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I understand if this needs to be deleted. I thought since it was in a BART presentation it would be fair use, but I don't want there to be a copyright issue. So please delete if you are concerned. Edwyth (talk) 05:37, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Kept: Possibly, or possibly not. Until some court decision or other convincing legal document concerning this logo shows up, I'll keep it. --Rosenzweigτ20:34, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Straight-up grabbed a random media picture with zero evidence of rights release under cc-by-sa in the link. Author field is (probably) incorrectly used for author of the news story, not person who took the picture. SnowFire (talk) 03:13, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - see talk page of this deletion request - uploader says "I have no idea who took the picture". Commons doesn't host recent pictures of unknown provenance or ownership. SnowFire (talk) 04:03, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
License laundering, the Flickr user is compiling images from across the web and uploading them as freely licensed without authorization. Among these three photos, there are watermarks by two different people.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I highly doubt that the YouTube uploader has the authority to license this photo. It was just a part of a compilation of photographs which the Commons uploader cropped. Howhontanozaz (talk) 06:13, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I highly doubt that the YouTube uploader has the authority to license this photo. It was just a part of a compilation of photographs which the Commons uploader cropped. Howhontanozaz (talk) 06:13, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by KyloRen3 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Improper licensing Converted to regular DR as no evidence was provided. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:41, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Oppose. - I took this photo, along with other photos during a trip to the region. The file here doesn't have metadata because I cropped the image on my computer before uploading. If there's any way to add metadata after that, do let me know. CuriousGolden (talk) 16:58, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep Doesn't meet the threshold of originality. Just change the ownership information if it's not the person that uploaded it. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:45, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
All files I checked here can be found online in various magazines and with attribution to different organizations. I can't see anything suggesting they are actual own work by the uploader or CC release by the copyright holders.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File is not actually a photo of the ship, but a photoshopped image of a model, and has been erroneously spread on the internet and to the main Wikipedia particle via this file being present here. BUZZLIGHTYEAR99 (talk) 16:41, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
@Yuraily Lic: sounds like you're the expert here! But let me understand. I take it you're seeing the artefact as coming under, "reproduction of artistic works located permanently in open places accessible to the public, such as streets and parks, or at places easily seen by the public, such as the outer walls of buildings, only for non-commercial purposes." Is that correct?Erasmus Sydney (talk) 23:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Yuraily Lic: Gosh. That's a 16,000 word document, written in Japanese. I guess I was hoping you might be able to help me understand it as you seem to know it well. And helping me solve a problem - I'm just trying to improve an article. There are loads of images of statues and robots and 3D things and people in great articles on aspects of life in Japan. So, I'm trying to find a respectful way of doing that.Erasmus Sydney (talk) 23:30, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @JWilz12345: Thanks for joining in. Can you tell me more about the postcard analogy? I take you to mean that, like a postcard, the image can be reproduced, but only if it's done by commercial consent. Am I reading you correctly?Erasmus Sydney (talk) 23:30, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Erasmus Sydney: . For example, your image of a certain copyrighted Japanese sculpture or some 3D artwork was printed on a post card, and then that post card was made to be sold commercially. Due to Japanese copyright law as it stands today, this means infringement of the copyright of the artist who created the artwork, and per Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle this situation is best avoided. The exploitation for post card is permitted in countries like UK and Germany due to applicable freedom of panorama. However, in Japan this FOP only extends to regular and/or average buildings, like Tokyo Metropolitan Government building and Tokyo Skytree. Any depictions of other works (e.g. statues and sculptures created by still-living or recently-dead artists) are only allowed to be exploited for noncommercial purposes. Per policies and in compliance with the mission of providing free educational media that can be used by anyone for any purpose, noncommercial is not allowed here. JWilz12345(Talk|Contrib's.)02:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @JWilz12345: Okay, in that scenario, if someone used the image on wiki, to make a postcard in Germany, that would be an infringement of the rights of the person who - according to law in Japan - in fact owns the copyright. And I guess we would assume that the copyright is held by the owner of the intellectual property of Gundam (which, I think, would be Bandai Namco). Am I following you?Erasmus Sydney (talk) 07:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yep @Erasmus Sydney: . Though existing jurisprudence in courts worldwide tend to be mixed: some tend to follow the copyright law of the country of origin, while others like the U.S. tend to apply their own copyright law over foreign 3D public works (U.S. has no FOP for such works, however, and unfortunately Gundam is "not a building" in the eyes of U.S. FOP). But for the copyright holder of that Gundam artwork I'm not sure if either Bandai Namco or the person who designed them owns the copyright (or, if the person who designed these was actually working for Bandai Namco, I'm not sure however). JWilz12345(Talk|Contrib's.)07:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: So, I've done a good look around wikimedia commons, and there are many approved shots of robots in Japan, and many shots of sculptures too. I assume they've been uploaded and okayed in good faith. What's the approach?Erasmus Sydney (talk) 11:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: There are old and new sculptures in Japan that feature on wiki. So I'm wondering what principle allows that. Would love your thoughts on that. Also, would be interested in any guidance you would have with regards a release from the owner of the IP. If wiki was sent a statement from the creator of the Gundam, that would satisfy matters do you think?Erasmus Sydney (talk) 23:01, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Erasmus Sydney: for old Japanese sculptures they should be fine. For new sculptures, however, you may launch deletion requests by yourself (just choose the "Nominate for deletion" on the left), but you need to provide information on who designed the new sculptures and when these were unveiled or created in your deletion request. If you have user rights to do so, you may want to activate Visual File Change to do a batch nomination (but that's a very powerful tool and shouldn't be abused). For statement, I think it's Gundam who needs to send a statement explicitly allowing your images of their work to be made and released under the CC license that you chose for your images. See also COM:OTRS for a more detailed info regarding this. JWilz12345(Talk|Contrib's.)03:45, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: I had the impression you supported freedom of panorama shots - maybe I was wrong. Tell me where you're coming from in the whole topic. Me? I'm an inclusionist in almost every way. (I want information to be shared freely, just as long as the creators of artwork are paid properly at some point, but that's just me.)Erasmus Sydney (talk) 23:29, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Erasmus Sydney: I am pro-FOP personally. That's why I am watching our situation here, and hopefully that amendemnt to our copyright law containing an FOP provision based on Australian FOP shall be passed. Also I fully support South African Wikipedians' efforts to have FOP introduced in their country. I'm not sure in Japan, if there's anyone attempting to lobby their legislature to include (at the very least) sculptures and other 3D works located in public places and in publicly-accessible premises. JWilz12345(Talk|Contrib's.)00:20, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No indication in the description (also no EXIF details) that the uploader is the author of this file for Professor Krzysztof Jan Konsztowicz, or has permission to add the file to Wikimedia. Acabashi (talk) 15:52, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: Name does not match inscription of statue (which appears to end in 盟, which cannot be romanized as "te" under any romanization scheme). --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠05:24, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This is quite a complex work and there's no source or other information provided to verify this has been released as licensed or that the uploader is the copyright holder. The account that uploaded this only has a few edits and all of them are related to this file, but there's nothing to on the account user page which allows verification that the uploader and the artist are the same person. So, it seems at the very least that this should require COM:VRT verification or copyright ownership. I thought about tagging the file with {{Npd}} and notifying the uploader, but decided a DR was probably a better approach to take this time around. FWIW, the same image can be seen here being used on what looks to be November 18, 2019 (which is prior to it being used on Commons), but that still doesn't preclude the possibility that the uploader and the artist are the same person. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:40, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am the creator, Mattias Adolfsson of this file and I give permission to keep it,— Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.174.22.106 (talk • contribs) 07:21, June 29, 2021 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
FoP is complicated verging on impossible when handling international projects, this DR is not a reflection on yourself as the uploader. At least in this case the artist is known and the work is signed. --Fæ (talk) 10:30, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Since the mural per this photograph is used on Wikipedia's Frederick Douglass page, which seems quite an honoring of the artwork, hopefully the artist can either approve its use or approve another image of the work. Randy Kryn (talk) 16:04, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Now someone has blurred the image of the mural, making it look as if the blur is the mural as a form of art. This misleads the reader. Please return the real image until this is resolved, thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 20:56, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Artist has been emailed to clarify what 'release' of image re: their rights means. OTRS release generator has been provided also. So I'm adding an OTRS pending template to the page. Stinglehammer (talk) 22:16, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have not had a reply from the artist. IMO Teeernteexperte's edits are disruptive vandalism. I'd revert them but then a potential copyvio would show up on my upload list, so I'd rather some admin did that. If the photograph cannot be accepted due to copyright law, then it should be deleted, rather than vandalised. -- Colin (talk) 19:34, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The artist has not replied. I think it is sensible to assume, that the artist is OK with his image being available on commons. BUT: Decade-long policy of Commons is just the opposite! No permission from the artist - no image at commons. If Fae hat not started a DR, but added the permission missing template to the image it would have been deleted in early July! The DR for the other depictions of the mural was started AFTER this DR and it was enacted in July! There is no objective to not delete this image at once. Actually the deletion of the image might trigger the artist to finally send a permission (that happened with one of "my" files that was deleted than restored). An undeletion is always possible if new information becomes available. Even the other images of the mural may be undeleted in such a case. @Colin: you could notify the artist, that the other fotos of his mural have been deleted and that this last one will very soon also be deleted, it may show him the urgency of a reply. --C.Suthorn (talk) 20:50, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not minded to email the artist further. I got no reply to my first email, so out of politeness I'm not going to press the matter. Stinglehammer indicates other communications, leading to an OTRS pending tag. Melissa Highton, as the photographer, has been in contact with the artist (per their blog post about the presidential gift). So that channel seems more appropriate, though their comment above seems to indicate they aren't fussed.
The mural portrait itself is a derivative work of (old) photographs of someone who the blog post says was one of the most photographed people of his time. The Wikipedia article is not short of images. So the value of the mural is as street art, and not as a rare portrait of Douglass for the internet. The photograph of the mural, which we have here, was a presidential gift, and has plenty artistic merit itself, though I wish we had a higher resolution version. It is a shame if UK law does not permit free use of it, but the same is true of many great photos and we just have to deal with it. It is an embarrassment to Commons that it is currently vandalised. -- Colin (talk) 09:49, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The mural hasn't been released by its artist under a free license; if that happens then it can be re-uploaded. Blurring the image resolves the copyright issue but without the mural it has no useful purpose - it's no longer a photo of Douglass, and it's an inaccurate representation of the presidential gift. -M.nelson (talk) 22:02, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'll contact Ross again, he isn't as tuned in to the issues of copyright on wikimedia as some. Certainly the image is ruined by being blurred, and that's a shame for him and for the people in the community in Edinburgh who were delighted with the coverage.Melissa Highton (talk) 16:16, 5 September 2021 (UTC) Just to note, when Colin emailed Ross previously, Ross contacted me and Stinglehammer to discuss. So he didn't ignore it, just wanted clarification.Melissa Highton (talk) 16:55, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Melissa Highton, thanks for the info. As we all seem to agree about the blurring, I think it would be fine if Melissa reverted the vandal and restored the original (just click on 'revert' next to a previous unvandalised version). I am curious whether the mural is still there, as I read that some of these murals were temporary. -- Colin (talk) 07:53, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, I'm having trouble reverting it because of the browser cache on my machine. Yes the mural is still there, thank you for asking. In fact Ross updated it recently to include information about Douglass and due to its local fame it has become a popular spot for instagrammers. Since Ross is well aware of the image and hasn't ever asked for it to be taken down I think the risk is low.Melissa Highton (talk) 08:30, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"The risk is low" is not the way commons works. If you are in contact with Ross Blair and a request for permission has been sent (by Stinglehammer) and received by Blair, but no permissin sent by Blair to OTRS, than the file needs to be deleted. [I had DRs for some of "my" images with the copyright owner agreeing to the publication but not sending a permission to OTRS. The files were deleted - than the owner sent permision, the files got restored - much work that wouldn't have beeen needed if the copyright owner had just answered the permission request. Or may I in future answer DRs with user:Melissa Highton assured that there is low risk?] (another point: If Blair in the end gives permission: Will it be for specifically this and only this foto? Or also for the fotos already deleted? What about future fotos? And what about the instagram selfies, if there is permission from the selfie-person to upload on commons, does Blair permit that also?). --C.Suthorn (talk) 10:49, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
C.Suthorn, your comments and mocking tone are not helpful. That fact that you are even asking if permission is only for this photo suggests you don't understand what is necessary. Ross has to consider more than just allowing Wikipedia to display his mural in this photo, but instead freely licence his mural for anyone to reproduce in any form on any platform. There's a potential loss of income and control that comes from offering their work with a free licence. -- Colin (talk) 21:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The conversation I've had with him has been about this photo specifically. As I say, I've alerted him again to the need to do this release to satisfy Wikimedia rules. He and I have copies of the images we can use to tell the story of what happened with the Biden gift, so it may be that we end up with this image taken off wikipedia. I've been browsing the other UK murals pages such as the Belfast murals to see what common practice is. Melissa Highton (talk) 11:06, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think you making assumptions about the simplicity of the process, decision making and of priorities in other peoples lives that are unjustified. There are admins and OTRS agents others experienced with copyright matters who can handle this. Why not just unwatch and chill somewhere else on Commons. -- Colin (talk) 21:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Colin! Ich weiß nicht, warum Du willst, dass Blair sich die Mühe macht eine Freigabe für nur 1 spezielles Foto von seinem Mural zu geben, wenn er mit dem gleichen (!) Aufwand auch alle Fotos, die von diesem speziellen Mural gemacht wurden und in der Vergangenheit in Commons hochgeladen wurden oder noch werden, freigeben kann. Insbesondere, da Melissa Highton erwähnt hat, dass Blair des Mural modifiziert hat, wäre es eine gute Sache, wenn es auch möglich wäre Bilder von der modifizierten Verision hier zu haben (und ohne dass erneut eine Freigabe erstellen muss). Und unterlass bitte dieses paternalistische Gehabe und zieh das nicht auf eine persönliche Ebene ("mocking", "chill"). Deine Annahme, dass ich keine Erfahrung mit OTRS-Freigaben hätte, ist falsch. --C.Suthorn (talk) 21:39, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Literal Google Translation of C. Suthorn's German reply: "Colin! I don't know why you would want Blair to bother to give a release for only 1 special photo of his mural, if he with the same (!) Effort also all photos that were made of this special mural and in the Past uploaded to Commons, or may be, can be shared. Especially since Melissa Highton mentioned that Blair modified the mural, it would be a good thing if it were also possible to have pictures of the modified version here (and without having to re-release it). And please refrain from this paternalistic behavior and do not take it to a personal level ("mocking", "chill"). Your assumption that I have no experience with OTRS shares is wrong." _ translation added by JWilz12345(Talk|Contrib's.)04:37, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That is an interpretation contrary to all that has been done on commons until now. Thousends of images (a number of them by me) would need to be undeleted, if this was the case. --C.Suthorn (talk) 18:10, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
First line in the category: "This category should only contain images and categories which depict murals that are out of copyright or have permission from their copyright owner, as Freedom of panorama does not apply to murals in the UK. If the mural is truly a "de minimis" element of the photo then the photo will not function as a depiction of the mural and should not be categorized here. Copyright violations should be deleted." --C.Suthorn (talk) 10:36, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Ross Blair – Frederick Douglass.jpg has been deleted and this was not closed. I am pursuing the matter. Ultimately I have uploaded a small number of files that breach C.Suthorn's interpretation, mostly under Category:Chichester but possibly under Category:Havant and need this handled appropriately if necessary. The fact the Derry mural have now been placed for deletion I may raise on an existing thread on WikiProject Ireland for views. In the end I want consisting consistency and clarity. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 22:21, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung - als Urheber wird die Musikinstrumentensammlung genannt diese ist mit dem Hochlader offensichtlich identisch. Eine Sammlung kann aber per definitionem nicht Urheber sein, da keine natürliche Person. Nur eine solche kann jedoch der Fotograf sein, Lutheraner (talk) 09:44, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. This is the name of a user account (a pseudonym) and does not automatically mean the author is not a natural person. --Rosenzweigτ13:11, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep Generally birth certificates are PD-ineligible, they contain only factual information, the names of the parents and the names of witnesses. --RAN (talk) 02:37, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
A few tourist, which don't dominate the composition of the photograph cannot be always a reason to delete file. Also social events and pictures of daily life in public places may have educational value through it's historical values.
I list files, that I vote for to keep. (Keep, i dont have time to describe all reasons to keep):
(social activism and public events in London, there are a few files not listed here, because there are portraits and doesn't have any value [no transparents, signs etc.])
File:-BigIf (8998046283).jpg
File:-BigIf (8998067635).jpg
File:-BigIf (8998061927).jpg
File:-BigIf (8998078639).jpg
File:-BigIf (8999239762).jpg
File:-BigIf (8999245060).jpg
File:-BigIf (8999259740).jpg (landscape)
File:-BigIf (8999267042).jpg (landscape)
File:-BigIf (8999269168).jpg (landscape)
File:202008- Porini Mara Trip-51 (50231877153).jpg
File:-fire place (4280700587).jpg (plain fireplace)
Kept: Procedural close. Nomination too broad to be handled by current admin work force. Please nominate individual images to be considered out of scope, or in smaller batches. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 03:28, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
According to this article, the statue was unveiled in September 2011 and the creators were Alexander Demchenko (still living) and Vladimir Goncharov (still living).— Diannaa🍁 (talk) 00:55, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The only thing that can be seen of this church is a vulgar door and some windows, i.e. nothing that shows the distinctiveness of this buildings as the most part is behind either trees or other plants. Tm (talk) 18:20, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I’d consider that the apparent simplicity of the building, with clear lines and a soft regularity, is part of the choices of the architect here, and so that we cannot play the indistinctiveness card. But I understand it’s arguable. 37.164.6.10813:56, 1 July 2021 (UTC) [the deletion requester][reply]
Delete. The nomination is correct. As a further comment, there is no link between IP protection and the features deemed worthy of heritage designation.--Labattblueboy (talk) 05:10, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This is on Commons as a public domain work, as it is claimed to have been published in 1919. However, this is a forgery - this kind of currency was not produced by the Makhnovist faction. As such, the date that this ficticious note was created and published cannot be verified, along with the date of the creator's death. This could be copyrightable in either the United States or Ukraine (or a different country, depending on where this was actually made) and as such should be deleted per COM:PCP. 2601:186:80:6B90:5483:8E7:3013:CA0003:42, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: No reason for deletion of this image. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral image is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The image is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 13:31, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Esta imagem que publiquei aqui no Wikimedia já não mais está em uso, pois a figura do Complexo Serra Negra que este documento dá direitos de uso não mais será utilizado em virtude das novas demarcações territoriais entre Bahia e Sergipe. Ricardo L1ma (talk) 13:10, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Esta figura que possuo direitos não mais está de acordo com os dados. A nova demarcação territorial da divisa Bahia e Sergipe muda toda a proporção territorial que ambos estados dividem do Complexo Serra Negra. Ricardo L1ma (talk) 13:12, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:SS. This might be a screenshot of non-free software, as claimed by A1Cafel, but it is not obvious enough for me to speedily delete. To me, this seems consistent with an annotated photograph self-made by LeptonStorkk (talk) 13:39, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Not "too simple" to be under PD-text/PD-simple. The map is a product of the creative activity of the author of the game (although this activity is the programming of the map generator) YarTim (talk) 14:29, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment of administrator in Russian Wikipedia Alex Spade:
I wouldn't say it's PD-text/PD-simple: the maps (as positions of anything) in Dwarf Fortress are similar to the maps in Rimworld in terms of creativity - the only difference is the way they are expressed - in symbols or sprites. To deny DF maps protection simply because they are expressed in symbols is to potentially suggest that all 2D level maps are unprotectable in and of themselves - which is too powerful a statement
Very different from Rimworld - sprites are definitely not the same as symbols, because the building blocks of the map are copyrighted for one case and not the other. RNG maps are not inherently copyrightable; only renderings of them are, if rendered using copyrightable graphics. I would venture that if I had a data file of a SimCity 3000 city I built myself on a software-generated map, it would not be a copyvio to upload it, as it is only storing the locations of things and not the artwork required to render it. (Of course, it would be out of scope as an unsupported file format, but I digress.) -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠05:13, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
So yes, indeed it's true that "all [machine-generated] 2D level maps are unprotectable in and of themselves" - it's just that in 99% of cases the rendering of them introduces enough originality to garner copyright protection. This one happens to be part of that 1%. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠05:18, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A potential factor: The game's world is generated through procedural generation on every run, so in terms of this being a map of "artistic creation" of the author, that is of some question. This would reflect the output of the programmers' algothim to create a rational geographic world from procedural generation so one may argue there could be copyright carried by that since this is more than just noise. --Masem (talk) 13:13, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In my opinion, the specific choice of colors and symbols is below COM:TOO. So it hinges on how much of an influence the creator of the game has on the final algorithmic output. I think the desire to "create a rational geographic world from procedural generation" reflects more of an idea than an expression of an idea; you have cyan on one side, and then a green island surrounded by a dark blue sea. Other maps look very different from this one besides the general structure of the regions, which is only an idea. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠05:02, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
If this coat of arms is correct, it should be under {{PD-UA-exempt}} license, but it has no source and seems not to be detected by tineye or google images prior to uploading here. No description of coat of arms of this settlement is easy found either, so it can be supposed, that it is false. At least, I cannot find similar (or any other) images. Moreover, filename can be translate as simple 'snapshot', 'picture' from Ukrainian and Russian languages. WindEwriX (talk) 15:06, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: No reason for deletion of this image. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral image is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The image is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 19:11, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This map seemed very old, so I supposed that it was in public domain but I had not determined the date definitely. For this reason, it might not be in the public domain. Visnelma (talk) 23:01, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Matlin (talk) 11:30, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Keep, because really it is simple text. Rodney Araujo (talk) 02:07, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Speedy keep see above. --Ras67 (talk) 16:44, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Comment This would be unauthorized copy from here[4]. --毒島みるく (talk) 05:36, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
There is an VRTS email received for “File:MattiasAdolfsson.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2021081310002222. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:31, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![28 File:"Prudence" @ Jardin Catherine-Labouré @ Paris 7 (31444156881).jpg](#File:"Prudence"_@_Jardin_Catherine-Labouré_@_Paris_7_(31444156881).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![81 File:Raidījuma "Rīta panorāma" vadītāji 2020. gada 1. jūnijā.jpg](#File:Raidījuma_"Rīta_panorāma"_vadītāji_2020._gada_1._jūnijā.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_bukhari_(r.a).jpg){kind=link}
_bukhari_(r.a).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
![10:04, 28 June 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/06/28#c-Racconish-2021-06-28T10:04:00.000Z-File:"Prudence"_@_Jardin_Catherine-Labouré_@_Paris_7_(31444156881).jpg){kind=link}
![06:14, 9 July 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/06/28#c-Explicit-2021-07-09T06:14:00.000Z-File:"Prudence"_@_Jardin_Catherine-Labouré_@_Paris_7_(31444156881).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![14:45, 28 June 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/06/28#c-Gimnazists123-2021-06-28T14:45:00.000Z-File:Raidījuma_"Rīta_panorāma"_vadītāji_2020._gada_1._jūnijā.jpg){kind=link}
![20:07, 27 July 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/06/28#c-Missvain-2021-07-27T20:07:00.000Z-File:Raidījuma_"Rīta_panorāma"_vadītāji_2020._gada_1._jūnijā.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_bukhari_(r.a).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_bukhari_(r.a).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_bukhari_(r.a).jpg){kind=link}
_bukhari_(r.a).jpg){kind=link}
_bukhari_(r.a).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_bukhari_(r.a).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_bukhari_(r.a).jpg){kind=link}
_bukhari_(r.a).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(4941003926).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&diff=next&oldid=571909365){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Info Also marking {{Subst:npd}} because not sure if the website owner is the author. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 04:34, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Question @Ricardo L1ma: Esta imagem é útil para manter para fins históricos? Is this image useful to keep for historical purposes? -M.nelson (talk) 10:16, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
