Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/06/11
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_2021-06-10_-_1.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Cimetière_de_Montmartre,_Paris._DSC09041.jpg){kind=link}
![201 File:ЗЗСО "Прилиманський ліцей" Авангардівської селищної ради.jpg](#File:ЗЗСО_"Прилиманський_ліцей"_Авангардівської_селищної_ради.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright Satyamfxr (talk) 03:51, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 04:51, 11 June 2021 UTC: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo --Krdbot 14:12, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Подъездной путь к бывшей 46-й центральной базе материально-технического снабжения Министерства обороны в Реутове.jpg
[edit]
Because it is Nonsense Hiccky Brakham (talk) 03:17, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Keep, where exactly is the nonsense? All I see is a picture of a railway that is 1) in scope 2) used in a russian article -Nutshinou Talk! 08:12, 11 June 2021 (UTC)- Keep Can be {{FoP-Russia}} appliable, some graffitis are shown, but no matter for me. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:16, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept (non-sysop closed): No valid reason for deletion. --(｀・ω・´) (talk) 00:30, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Mauvaise qualité et reflets (je remettrai une meilleure photo). Merci de bien vouloir la supprimer. Caux9 (talk) 08:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 06:26, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
This person is unknown and the family has not given their consent for the publication of this photo. I am the author of this photo and therefore ask you to delete it. Caux9 (talk) 18:17, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 06:26, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
This portrait is private BBC440 (talk) 12:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 13:11, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
По желанию правообладателя TranekBatler (talk) 18:38, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
== [[:File:Rolelushanimepiano.jpg]] ==
|
File:Rolelushanimepiano.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
- Шаблон Применение Для быстрого удаления TranekBatler (talk) 22:52, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- По желанию правообладателя TranekBatler (talk) 18:38, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Шаблон Применение Для быстрого удаления TranekBatler (talk) 22:07, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- по требованию исполнителя TranekBatler (talk) 22:10, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request, seems out of scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:15, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- Remove duplicated DR templates, causing archiving issues. --Minoraxtalk 03:21, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
All Rights Reserved on Flickr. No proof that OGL license overrides All Rights Reserved license of Flickr. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Prime Minister Theresa May and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.jpg A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deleted per COM:CSD#G7, uploader had placed SD template. -- CptViraj (talk) 16:59, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
All Rights Reserved on Flickr. No proof that OGL license overrides All Rights Reserved license of Flickr. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Prime Minister Theresa May and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.jpg A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deleted per COM:CSD#G7, uploader had placed SD template. -- CptViraj (talk) 17:01, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright infringement from [1] Gahukuro (talk) 07:27, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 16:00, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It was a copied version of my previous image. Doctorine Dark (talk) 10:49, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 00:09, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation Amino ring 2 (talk) 17:27, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep, PD-textlogo. Logo consisted of text is ineligible for copyright protection in the United States (it is trademarked and Commons only care about copyright in this case).--Vulp❯❯❯here! 01:13, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Per above. Text and fonts are not eligible for copyright protection. Di (they-them) (talk) 01:56, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per above EpicPupper (talk) 04:41, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Text logos are ineligible for copyright, and therefore public domain in the United States. --Stylez995 (talk) 16:30, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Speedy keep Wait a minute! Was it nominated by a sock of an LTA account, user:PEMNCX? It appears it was nominated solely for trolling. --Stylez995 (talk) 11:17, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Delete Copyright copyed from other discord I request for deletion Amino ring 2 (talk) 15:13, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- @Amino ring 2: Text logos cannot be protected by copyright, due to lack of originality. Please see Commons:Threshold of originality for more information. --Stylez995 (talk) 08:56, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: nomination from a LT vandal. --rubin16 (talk) 11:35, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
profile picture of a youtube user with (currently) 231 subscribers, currently has no article (and probably won't ever have one), out of scope - Nutshinou Talk! 18:53, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 08:50, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
No longer want the full-resolution version of the file to be public TDG09232020 (talk) 21:33, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 03:47, 16 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 8 June 2021 --Krdbot 14:01, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Commons is not a host for tourism photos per COM:HOST. Missvain (talk) 04:11, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:28, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
personal Baratiiman (talk) 06:11, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:29, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 08:13, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:30, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
minecraft skin, out of scope - Nutshinou Talk! 08:29, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:30, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
terrible-quality Puerto Rico flag which can already be found on commons at File:Flag of Puerto Rico.svg - Nutshinou Talk! 08:31, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:31, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
very low quality screenshot of some character, out of scope - Nutshinou Talk! 08:34, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:31, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
very bad picture of clouds, FBMD can be found in the metadata and there is no proof of own work/OTRS ticket - Nutshinou Talk! 08:40, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:32, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
out of scope picture of grandpa learning how to use a fidget spinner Nutshinou Talk! 08:45, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:33, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Advertisement. RaFaDa20631 (talk) 09:07, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:33, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
small picture of a (probably) non-notable person, the description, which reads "5i97tr6l0h" tells us nothing on who the man is - Nutshinou Talk! 09:31, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:34, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
personal file, see the four contributions by the uploader - Nutshinou Talk! 09:34, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
personal file, see the four contributions by the uploader - Nutshinou Talk! 09:34, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
personal file, see the four contributions by the uploader - Nutshinou Talk! 09:34, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
The text should be writte directly into some project, but it is out of project scope in Commons. Taivo (talk) 09:49, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:36, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
personal file only used for a trash draft article on wikipedia (en:Draft:Brighton Joseph Benavidez), a one-liner about the sole contributor to the page - Nutshinou Talk! 09:50, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:37, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo. Unidentifiable scene through rainy window. No educational use. Malcolma (talk) 09:58, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:37, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo. Unusuable quality photo taken through car window. No educational use apart possibly from example of poor image processing. Malcolma (talk) 10:01, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:37, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abubakar Khan Suri (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self promo on enwp
- File:Picture of Abubakr Suri.jpg
- File:Abk Pictures .jpg
- File:Abks Pic.jpg
- File:Abubakar khan .jpg
- File:Abubakar Suri’s Pic.jpg
- File:Abubakar Suri.jpg
- File:ABK.jpg
- File:Abubakar Khan Suri.jpg
Minoraxtalk 10:15, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:04, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 10:23, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:38, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 10:26, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:38, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Personal image, out of scope, used for promotion in ruwiki Drakosh (talk) 12:36, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:39, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:42, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:43, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andreos-2020 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Calculations.jpg
- File:New step.jpg
- File:3 step - 1.jpg
- File:1,2 calculations.jpg
- File:1 step - 1.jpg
- File:3 calculation.jpg
- File:2155 AndrP2020Poly.jpg
- File:1-шаг.jpg
- File:2-шаг.jpg
- File:3-шаг.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:05, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andreos-2020 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:02, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:17, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andreos-2020 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:Реакция опоры.jpg
- File:Рычаг.jpg
- File:Новая 5 задача.jpg
- File:Новая 2 задача.jpg
- File:Новая 4 задача.jpg
- File:5 действие.jpg
- File:4 действие.jpg
- File:29.05.2020-study.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:05, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andreos-2020 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:44, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alin Sbantu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:44, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Completely dark file, no educational use A1Cafel (talk) 14:32, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:45, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Game Event.jpg
- File:London 12@.png
- File:London@.png
- File:NIC .jpg
- File:Gec islamabad.jpg
- File:Ayyan Butt.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:46, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
No permission/source.
- File:JakandDaxter.jpg
- File:TRILOGIA.jpg
- File:Biplanet.png
- File:Ratchet Clank.jpg
- File:GOD OF WAR.jpg
- File:UNCHARTED.png
- File:Gran turismo.png
Minorax (talk) 10:24, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:14, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Jupp Heynckes ganador del histórico triplete con el Bayern Múnich en la temporada 2012-2013.jpg
- File:Heynckes.jpg
- File:Jupp Heynckes entrenador del Bayern Munich en 4 etapas, logrando 9 títulos, incluyendo el histórico Triplete del 2013.jpg
- File:Estrategia-competitiva-cinemex-e2-1-638.jpg
- File:900x600.jpg
- File:CINEMEX.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:05, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Not in-use picture of an unknown person. The Commons is not an online photo album and cannot be a repository for just anything. Ldorfman (talk) 14:38, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:46, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:47, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:47, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nástroj Matematika (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Юлія Слободянюк (talk · contribs)
[edit]Author info, "FBMD" or other information in metadata that indicates these images are not the uploader's work.
- File:Селищний голова.jpg
- File:Спорт Авангард.jpg
- File:Житло дітям.jpg
- File:Колектив ЦНАП.jpg
- File:Скейт-парк, с. Прилиманське.jpg
- File:КЗ “Центр безпеки громадян”.jpg
- File:ЦНАП Авангардівської селищної ради.jpg
- File:Zvit 2019 08.jpg
- File:Авангардівська-селищна-рада-адмінбудівля.jpg
- File:Изображение viber 2020-10-20 15-50-52.jpg
- File:Лого Авангард33 curv (1) — копия.jpg
_%E2%80%94_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%8F.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ytoyoda (talk) 15:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:05, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Юлія Слободянюк (talk · contribs)
[edit]“FBMD” in metadata. Previously published photographs require COM:OTRS verification.
- File:Будівництво ЗОШ на 240 місць.jpg
- File:ЗДО "Мадагаскар", смт Авангард.jpg
- File:Сквер імені В. Добрянського.jpg
- File:Село Прилиманське.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 11:51, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - also published in other websites. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:27, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
out of scope picture of uploader - Nutshinou Talk! 16:51, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:49, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
out of scope picture of uploader - Nutshinou Talk! 16:52, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:49, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
out of scope picture of uploader - Nutshinou Talk! 16:52, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:50, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
out of scope picture of uploader - Nutshinou Talk! 16:52, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:50, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE - Nutshinou Talk! 16:58, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:50, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE with a bunch of oversaturation effects - Nutshinou Talk! 16:58, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian- Out of Scope
--Alaa :)..! 17:30, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:52, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
as the description states, this is a mockup flag, out of scope. - Nutshinou Talk! 17:37, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:52, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
picture that simply reads "HOME FUCK HIVE SUCK the first ever homefuck fanart. by ParanormalMoron" out of COM:SCOPE - Nutshinou Talk! 18:15, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
nonsense - Nutshinou Talk! 18:39, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:54, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
personal COM:SELFIE - Nutshinou Talk! 19:43, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
personal COM:SELFIE - Nutshinou Talk! 19:44, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Naimu Kassrottaran (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal files, out of scope.
GeorgHH • talk 19:58, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:58, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
out of scope screenshot of uploader's youtube channel - Nutshinou Talk! 20:11, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:58, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
A higher quality vector image already exists here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:21st_SS_Division_Logo.svg Kj1595 (talk) 06:13, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:54, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
see nomination above, despite the result being delete the file hasn't been deleted, nor was it deleted then recovered, I believe it was kept by accident - Nutshinou Talk! 21:05, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 06:21, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
out of scope and self-advertisement - Nutshinou Talk! 22:20, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
advertising Satirdan kahraman (talk) 23:08, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
advertising Satirdan kahraman (talk) 23:09, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:01, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
advertising Satirdan kahraman (talk) 23:10, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:03, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
advertising Satirdan kahraman (talk) 23:10, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:04, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
advertising Satirdan kahraman (talk) 23:10, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:04, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Williambeke (talk · contribs)
[edit]These look like generic promotional/catalogue photos, a TinEye search showing earlier appearances on various industry websites for all of them, prior to their upload here.
- File:Haco-q5-turrent-punch.jpg
- File:Afkantpers-haco.png
- File:A HACO notching machine..jpg
- File:HACO plate bending rolls.jpg
- File:HACO press brake (Pressmaster).png
- File:FAT HACO Tur 4 MN CNC lathe.jpg
- File:HACO Q5 punching machine.jpg
- File:HACO fiber laser cutting machine.jpg
- File:HACO Pressmaster Press Brake machine.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Lord Belbury (talk) 12:22, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:19, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. No EXIF data. All files can be found on-line, even in larger formats, on different sources.
- File:Landini Serie 2.png
- File:Landini Serie 7-240 auf dem Feld.png
- File:Landini Logo .png
- File:McCormick Logo neu.png
- File:McCormick X4.50 T4i Feld 2.png
- File:McCormick X6.430 VT-Drive.png
- File:McCormick X7.624 VT-Drive.png
- File:McCormick X8.680 VT-Drive.png
- File:LA RS29 5Series Field Rake 002(1).jpg
- File:McCormick Traktor im Einsatz.jpg
- File:Argo Logo klein.jpg
- File:Argo Tractors Logo.jpg
- File:MC RPE7 X7.6 Field DiscHarrow 004.jpg
- File:Landini Serie 5.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Smooth O (talk) 19:04, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:19, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
This is my file and I'd like it taken on Wikimedia Commons Gator954 (talk) 20:48, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete uploader request for recently uploaded file - MPF (talk) 23:06, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:20, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Again, this is my file and I'd like it deleted off WC Gator954 (talk) 20:49, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete uploader request for recently uploaded file - MPF (talk) 23:06, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:20, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
This is my file and I would like it taken off Wikimedia Commons Gator954 (talk) 20:50, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete uploader request for recently uploaded file - MPF (talk) 23:05, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:20, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
This is my file and I'd like it taken off Wikimedia Commons. Can you please delete all my uploads? Gator954 (talk) 20:50, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete uploader request for recently uploaded file - MPF (talk) 23:04, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:20, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
This is my file, please take it off Wikimedia Commons Gator954 (talk) 20:51, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete uploader request for recently uploaded file - MPF (talk) 23:04, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:20, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Problem regarding c INDV100 (talk) 03:38, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Speedy delete as copyvio. Vague claims of 'fair use', but that's not permissible on Commons Andy Dingley (talk) 18:41, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 18:05, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Run n Fly as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: fails {{GODL-India}}. See copyright (http://loksabhaph.nic.in/Copyright.aspx?linkid=1) says clearly For any other re-use of the material you are required to seek permission by sending a mail to us. Under Section 2 (k) of the Copyright Act (No. 14 1975), the copyright for the reproduction of any material from the debates and ancillary publications vests with the Lok Sabha Secretariat. which is never done. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:44, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete See copyright (http://loksabhaph.nic.in/Copyright.aspx?linkid=1) says clearly For any other re-use of the material you are required to seek permission by sending a mail to us. Under Section 2 (k) of the Copyright Act (No. 14 1975), the copyright for the reproduction of any material from the debates and ancillary publications vests with the Lok Sabha Secretariat. Run n Fly (talk) 14:24, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:34, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
著作権違反。書物を写したもの 宗教研究家 (talk) 03:45, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No FOP for sculptures in Japan. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:11, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:06, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
著作権違反。書物を写したもの 宗教研究家 (talk) 03:46, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Comment Pardon? Which thing is the topic? It may or may not be DM-applied. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:12, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
This is a photo taken from the magazine picture page. It is infringing copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 宗教研究家 (talk • contribs) 03:50, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:06, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Obviously not a photograph taken by NASA. 4ing (talk) 07:34, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:07, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted by YouTube, I think Geoprofi Lars (talk) 08:10, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, out of scope -Nutshinou Talk! 08:19, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:07, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation? I cannot find that this photo from this website may be used in Commons and there is no OTRS statement JopkeB (talk) 09:44, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:07, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Potential copyvio. Low image resolution and missing exifdata. The uploader has been warned as copyvio before. SCP-2000 14:19, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:07, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:08, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Credit in watermark doesn't uploader. Other upload by this user was a clear screenshot copyvio, so this user is unreliable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:40, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:08, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Krystiantracz91 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:08, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Watermark crediting Nadine Abbass in the image Ytoyoda (talk) 15:09, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:08, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Trademark piracy 1 company\product in Vietnam Thienhau2003 (talk) 15:24, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:08, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by UserːJuliahudson8
[edit]Promotional pictures for Aly Baig, whoever that is. Also if you check Juliahudson8's contributions, he has never done anything here besides uploading these.
- File:Aly Baig Green Global Listening Party.png
- File:Aly Baig - Green Listening Party.png
- File:Aly Baig Green International Timezones.png
- File:Aly Baig Green Timezones.png
- File:Aly Baig - Green Pre Save.png
- File:Aly Baig Vinyl Pre Order.png
- File:Aly Baig Green Vinyl.png
- File:Aly Baig Green CD Pre Order.png
- File:Aly Baig Green Pre Save.png
- File:Aly Baig Green.jpg
- File:Aly Baig Green CD.png
- File:Aly Baig Green Banner.png
- File:Aly Baig - Green LP Vinyl.png
- File:ALY BAIG.jpg
- File:Aly Baig.jpg
-Nutshinou Talk! 08:50, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 12:09, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
official picture of Charlie Brown, copyrighted - Nutshinou Talk! 18:23, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 12:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
138 hits on tineye, not own work, likely copyrighted - Nutshinou Talk! 19:17, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 12:08, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Private Picture. Out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 19:42, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment adding File:2021 01 13 07 33 IMG 0660.jpg to the nomination, same uploader, same deletion reason -Nutshinou Talk! 19:48, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 12:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
picture of groot, copyrighted - Nutshinou Talk! 19:47, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 12:08, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
promotional photo from the Web, clearly not own work. Better check all uploads from this user 87.6.70.62 22:38, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 12:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Despite watermark, this does not look like own work and I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:33, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 03:20, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Sharifulislamnaik.jpg Shariful Islam Naik (talk) 02:00, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sanandros (talk) 18:43, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Photo-_Shariful_Islam_Naik.jpg Shariful Islam Naik (talk) 08:37, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sanandros (talk) 18:44, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
_-_2021-06-10_-_1.jpg){kind=link}
_-_2021-06-10_-_1.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Because it is Nonsense Hiccky Brakham (talk) 03:16, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
_-_2021-06-10_-_1.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep No sense deletion request. Chabe01 (talk) 03:19, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete @Chabe01 and Hiccky Brakham: I can give you both a valid reason: No FOP in France. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:13, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Freedom of panorama can't be applied here as this is not an artwork. Besides, if it was that, the author has died for more than 70 years because this type of street sign what created during the middle of the 19th century. Chabe01 (talk) 08:54, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment @Liuxinyu970226, Hiccky Brakham, and Chabe01: first of all, does the sign fulfill {{PD-France}}? If not, is the sign not passing Commons:TOO France (threshold of originality)? The file can be kept under such circumstances. Nevertheless I am certain that the wording here is not a copyrightable literary work. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:08, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per Chabe. --Sanandros (talk) 18:49, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
_-_2021-06-10_-_1.jpg){kind=link}
This is a massively inferior version of File:Canal 22 Logo 2011.jpg Adamant1 (talk) 06:01, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: not scaled down version. --Sanandros (talk) 18:50, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
this photo is a derivative work of several fictional characters Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:19, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment also see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bookshelf with stuff.jpg. --MGA73 (talk) 14:04, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 18:55, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Hate to do do this but: This is a photo of a framed picture. Uploader was indef-blocked for repeatedly uploading un-free files files, and this one sure looks unfree to me. Cited source is a Flickr account that has no apparent connection to the artist indicated in the title of the image. File page presumably incorrectly refers to the owner of that Flickr account as the author (they are presumably only the author of the derivative photograph, not the underlying work) and gives what is presumably the date and time of the photograph or of some upload as the date of the work. Jmabel ! talk 06:27, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- By the way, there was a famous Bolivian-born Los Angeles math teacher named "Jaime Alfonso Escalante Gutierrez", the subject of the film Stand and Deliver. I have no idea whether he is the same person who created this portrait, but if he is then there is some chance of tracking down his heirs and getting the relevant permission. - Jmabel ! talk 06:29, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: This Re:Form School seems to be something newer [2] so no permission until today. So I delete it. --Sanandros (talk) 19:00, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colour image is credited to CBC at https://www.cbc.ca/radio/nowornever/keeping-the-memory-of-war-alive-1.4391788/what-s-on-ian-hanomansing-s-now-or-never-list-1.4397267 , unlikely that SFU is the author, or had the right to license it under CC. Yeeno (talk) 07:16, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Hmm, good catch and you are probably correct. The photo is from this set https://www.flickr.com/photos/sfupamr/albums/72157704170055352 and Hanomansing was with Christopher Wylie in April 2019: https://twitter.com/ianhanomansing/status/1118262762696654848, in fact they were all there together ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqUc91sXpAo&t=3783s ) but these photos no longer look like they were SFU sourced. // sikander { talk } 🦖 13:04, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Also found the image at the CBC Media Centre, pretty much confirms CBC as the author. Yeeno (talk) 07:54, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 19:10, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
very bad picture of clouds, FBMD can be found in the metadata and there is no proof of own work/OTRS ticket - Nutshinou Talk! 08:26, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 19:11, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
I learned that I'm not authorised to use this picture. Kasqkasq (talk) 08:39, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 19:11, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
probably useless, text is too small to be readable - Nutshinou Talk! 09:26, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: curretnly in use. --Sanandros (talk) 19:20, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
probably useless, text is too small to be readable - Nutshinou Talk! 09:27, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: currentliy in use. --Sanandros (talk) 19:20, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 19:21, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Photo-_Shariful_Islam_Naik.jpg Shariful Islam Naik (talk) 02:04, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: F10. --Minoraxtalk 08:27, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mysterymanblue as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No FOP in US A1Cafel (talk) 09:40, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Please see the related deletion discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Black Lives Matter street mural, Palo Alto, California 01.jpg. Mysterymanblue 20:27, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete My initial deletion message should read "No FOP in US for artwork". Something I overlooked in the initial request was the full extent of the street mural's copyright status. The street mural was commissioned by the City of Palo Alto, as you can see in these minutes from the Palo Alto public art commission. As it turns out, commissioned works generally belong to the artist, not the client who commissions them, so the street mural is indeed protected by copyright (that of the artists'). I also think it is pretty clear that this mural falls above the threshold of originality. All in all, the mural does appear to be protected by copyright, and the absence of FOP for artwork means it should be deleted. Mysterymanblue 20:27, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 05:37, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
As can be seen on the left bottom corner, copyright protected image. Nanahuatl (talk) 18:10, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- File:Pantural graphic designer 1.jpg
- File:Pantural graphic designer 2.jpg
- File:Pantural graphic designer 3.jpg
- File:Pantural graphic designer 4.jpg
- File:Pantural graphic designer 5.jpg
- File:Pantural graphic designer 6.jpg
- File:Pantural graphic designer 7.jpg
- strong keep The inscription in the left corner of the picture is the name of the person who make up the face of the actor who participated in the photo shoot. I am the author of the picture.--Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 19:35, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Maybe you can provide the original image to COM:VRT to verify that you are the original author. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 00:34, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- I hereby declare that I am the sole owner of exclusive copyrights for the work. I upload new photos - Original author Elshad Iman.--Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 19:18, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Watermark laundering. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:44, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Several potential issues here, 3 copyrights may be involved, copyrights on the original characters, copyrights on the artistic scupture/artworks, copyrights on the photos. It seems that we have only licenses for the last ones.
- File:Winnie the Pooh Count Money.jpg
- File:Tom & Jerry Time To Count The Money.jpg
- File:Pikachu Loves Money.jpg
- File:Donald Duck.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:22, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hi there, thank you for your attention.
- The artwork does not infringe copyright, as you can see, they are all published and the artist has all the required permissions.
- Autodesk - Gal Yosef
- Forbes - Gal Yosef
- --ברטוביניו (talk) 07:13, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: These are clear infringements on characters licensed to Disney, Warner Brothers, etc. --Guy Macon (talk) 02:14, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:27, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
https://www.lapresse.it/sport/2015/12/24/atletica-morto-carlo-vittori-storico-allenatore-di-mennea/. Published elsewhere prior to being uploaded here. FDW777 (talk) 07:36, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:27, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
https://tineye.com/search/67c17b89ac5cc97f2469cc7942b5a680e525a6af?sort=crawl_date&order=asc&page=1. Used in various places long before it was uploaded here. FDW777 (talk) 07:42, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:27, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
small crop of copyrighted stock image - Nutshinou Talk! 08:05, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:30, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
supposedly artwork of a certain "Simonetta Gherardelli", obviously not own work - Nutshinou Talk! 08:39, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:30, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
supposedly artwork of a certain "Simonetta Gherardelli", obviously not own work - Nutshinou Talk! 08:40, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:30, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
picture of a certain "Simonetta Gherardelli", non-notable person - Nutshinou Talk! 08:40, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:30, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
very bad picture of clouds, FBMD can be found in the metadata and there is no proof of own work/OTRS ticket - Nutshinou Talk! 08:40, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:31, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
dark, blurred, unidentified, unused — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:50, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:31, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
What is this photo about? In what context might it be used? Where was the photo taken? When? Is it indeed own work of the uploader (it is a very small format and there are no metadata of the photo)? JopkeB (talk) 09:49, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:34, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Dubai - Downtown Dubai - Sheikh Zayed Road - HHH Tower - HHH وسط مدينة دبي - شارع الشيخ زايد - برج - panoramio.jpg
[edit]
Derivative work copyright violation: there is no freedom of panorama in Dubai, UAE, and there is no evidence that the architect Al Hashemi firm agreed to the Panoramio user's use of commercial licensing for their image of their architectural artwork from 2010. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:18, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:34, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Dubai ^ Acico Twin Towers ^ Radisson Royal Hotel – 269 m ^ Nassima Tower 200 m - panoramio.jpg
[edit]
Violation of architect's copyright. There is no freedom of panorama in UAE for commercial reuses of images of copyrighted public space works like Dubai architectural artworks, like this building.
- Details
- Completion: 2010
- Author: architectural firm Bothe Richter Teherani Architekten BDA JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:28, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:34, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
bad crop Jgwikid (talk) 10:43, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 18:35, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copied from Google Street, as there is a Google watermark on it. そらみみ (talk) 10:47, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:35, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Photo is on https://kkm.org.in/workshop.php; in https://kkm.org.in/termofuses.php is stated that the use of content of this site "is strictly prohibited". JopkeB (talk) 11:45, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:35, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
If we do not know even country, then the photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:57, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:35, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 12:14, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:35, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 12:14, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:35, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
1971 is too recent to be in the public domain for Vietnam, please add this file to an "Undelete in 20XX" category. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:26, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:36, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in COM:IRAN. 4nn1l2 (talk) 13:46, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:36, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No evidence the ballot paper/image is in the public domain. Zoozaz1 (talk) 13:52, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete COM:DM Peru. MiguelAlanCS (talk) 13:54, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete see Copyright rules by territory/Peru#De minimis. Cheep (talk) 23:27, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete breaching COM:DM Peru. Darubrub (Inform me) 00:36, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 18:36, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete as original research. There's not a single definition of the Third World, and it would be a stereotype to refer to developing countries as "third world countries". Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 14:14, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:36, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from non-trivial logos. Should cropped/blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:36, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Probable copyvio: this photo, uploaded as "own work" and dated 1 May 2021, is almost identical to one appearing in https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/19195600.conservative-hartlepool-by-election-candidate-labour-taken-granted/ on 30 March - not identical, but almost certainly part of the same photo shoot - same location and outfit, same scarf tied identically, etc PamD (talk) 15:30, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:36, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Probable copyvio: uploaded as "own work" date 10 June 2021 but appears to be the photo used in https://nij.edu.ng/nij-appoints-first-female-registrar/ on 24 March PamD (talk) 15:44, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Apparently a scan of a printed map and not an own work. C messier (talk) 15:45, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Video game cover; no fair use on Commons. Mosbatho (talk) 15:48, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Stolen Image. Uploader was not the author. 108.51.225.107 15:51, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Can you please explain where it is stolen from? SHB2000 (talk) 09:58, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete – that's a clear case: © 2009 Seth Gaines, all rights reserved (original at Flickr). --El Grafo (talk) 08:00, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
The flag is obviously a result of original research and wrong since there was no Gothic in Qin. Konno Yumeto 16:04, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
It is a wrong original research since Shu Han called itself Han instead of Shu. Konno Yumeto 16:09, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
It is a wrong original research since there was no Ming in Jin. Konno Yumeto 16:11, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
It is a wrong original research since there was no Gothic in Qi. Konno Yumeto 16:12, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cocoablini (talk · contribs)
[edit]The user has uploaded several obvious copyvio images and tagged them as their own, so I have questions about the licensing of these photos without camera exif data.
- File:590 Madison Ave.jpg
- File:Ground view of CMB tower at night.png
- File:China Merchants Bank.jpg
- File:China Merchants Bank Street View.jpg
- File:China Merchants Bank Night Shot.jpg
- File:JohnMYLee portrait.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 16:43, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
It was mistakenly published Neon Blueskin (talk) 17:06, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:38, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
It seems that this photo is copied from a blog: https://hwsln.pixnet.net/blog/post/68727986-羊葡舊鐵道遇石鵝：彰化%E2%80%A7埔心自行車道%7e%7e そらみみ (talk) 17:24, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:38, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
90x90 picture of what looks like an advertisement for a t-shirt - Nutshinou Talk! 17:26, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:38, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 17:27, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:38, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 17:28, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:38, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
I, being the author of this flag, changed it by mirroring, and therefore the old version of the flag is no longer needed. Валя Беляев (talk) 18:10, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- DO NOT DELETE since this is not a valid deletion nomination until and unless Валя_Беляев has the simple common courtesy to leave a valid deletion notification on my user talk page. I'm getting really really tired of people leaving broken templates on my user talk page, instead of a valid deletion notification... AnonMoos (talk) 19:50, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 18:38, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
I, being the author of this flag, changed it by mirroring, and therefore the old version of the flag is no longer needed. Валя Беляев (talk) 18:11, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 18:38, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
pointless copy of File:Polistes carnifex - Mazatlán, Sinaloa, Mexico - 15 August 2015 - Francisco Farriols Sarabia.jpg. - Nutshinou Talk! 18:18, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:38, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
copyrighted picture from Assasin's Creed - Nutshinou Talk! 18:22, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:39, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot that says "E-King" above a blue marker. Nonsense. - Nutshinou Talk! 19:01, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:39, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
pointless low-res copy of File:Baganuur khot sign.jpg - Nutshinou Talk! 19:06, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:39, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No additional educational value beyond File:DSC 0272 (49258227456).jpg. (Uploader's request.) Tokfo (talk) 20:01, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:39, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No additional educational value beyond File:DSC 0272 (49258227456).jpg. (Uploader's request.) Tokfo (talk) 20:03, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:39, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Redundant to File:DSC 0297 (49258205061).jpg. (Uploader's request.) Tokfo (talk) 20:23, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:39, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is my file. I don't wan't it on Wikimedia Commons anymore. Can you please delete it Gator954 (talk) 20:46, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Uploader deletion requests are usually treated sympathetically when done soon after upload, but it would be nice to know why you no longer want it here, please! - MPF (talk) 22:55, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 18:39, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
low-quality duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Alexander_Krull.JPG, not used in any articles FMSky (talk) 22:40, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:40, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Јелена Тинска.jpg 188.95.55.49 22:45, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. 188.95.55.49 22:47, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- How? This image carries an OTRS-confirmed permission-ticket. --Túrelio (talk) 15:41, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Uploader not have permission from the author / photographer. Serious copyright infringement. Delete urgently 188.95.55.59 16:28, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 18:40, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Educational value is not shown. Taivo (talk) 10:36, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- I disagree. The image is a diagram for the Luca App, which is an app used by Germany.--Albin Schmitt (talk) 15:44, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: In-use images are automatically in COM:SCOPE. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Touristy photo uploaded by Flickr bot. Unsure what educational value this provides us - an unidentified area in Sonoma County (where I live) with a random non-notable person as the subject. Per COM:HOST. Missvain (talk) 02:22, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:27, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is a picture of en:Alex Newport uploaded by User:Alexnewport, looks like copyright problem. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:26, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by JuTa at 21:17, 3 August 2021 UTC: No permission since 26 July 2021 --Krdbot 01:38, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
This is a picture of en:Alex Newport uploaded by User:Alexnewport, looks like a copyright problem. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:26, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by JuTa at 21:17, 3 August 2021 UTC: No permission since 26 July 2021 --Krdbot 01:38, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
This is a picture of en:Alex Newport uploaded by User:Alexnewport, looks like a copyright problem. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:26, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by JuTa at 21:17, 3 August 2021 UTC: No permission since 26 July 2021 --Krdbot 01:38, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
advertising Satirdan kahraman (talk) 23:08, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:15, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Not own work. Wrong licence Каракорум (talk) 07:22, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:02, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Logo; no evidence presented to support nomination for speedy deletion — billinghurst sDrewth 10:47, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Over TOO, dubious license claim, unused. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:05, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Apparently bogus license. No purported OGL Canada license at source; uploader themselves indicated image is non-commercial use. Эlcobbola talk 19:19, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:06, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
No FOP for artwork in the U.S. (the logo contains nonfree elements, i.e. the drawing of a pepper) Mysterymanblue 20:31, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Cropped to remove most of the background sign (DW problem may be debatable, but erring on side of caution). Cropped version Kept, uncropped version Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:11, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, user is known to be a license washer. though most of his uploads with this account seem to be fine but I woukd advise people to look them over. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:23, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment, going over their Flickr account I would say that it's likely to be their own work, but the metadata is sketchy. I will try to find it somewhere else online first, if not, then it probably is own work. It's just that this person has a history of license-laundering. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 23:12, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, the Flickr account this image was "stolen" from is the Globally Locked 🔒 Sockmaster, so they should be allowed to irrevocably change their own license. The other Flickr account that licensewashes is unlikely to be them, but this Flickr account uploads their photographs 1:1 at the same time as there, so I no longer doubt the authorship. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:17, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Close as Kept, nominator has decided to "Keep", no disagreements. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:32, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
=== File:Ballot paper – 2021 Peruvian presidential election.jpg ===
No evidence the ballot paper is in the public domain Zoozaz1 (talk) 13:52, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 
I withdraw my nomination
- See [3]. Cheep (talk) 22:44, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Never mind then. Zoozaz1 (talk) 00:00, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ballot_paper_–_2021_Peruvian_presidential_election.jpg&diff=568939503&oldid=568492465){kind=link}
Close as Kept, withdrawn -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:29, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
první graf nezobrazuje anomálie globální, ale jen antarktické, které jsou dvakrát větší. Stačilo by ale změnit škálu vlevo... Jenikhollan (talk) 15:34, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
The first graph shows but Antarctic anomalies, the global ones are half that large (unfortunately, this is a common mistake). Changing the scale at left would solve it... Jenikhollan (talk) 15:36, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: The nominator states that a change in scale inside the drawing would overcome his objection. Deletion of the image is inappropriate, which nominator may not realize because of limited experience on Wikimedia (see User contributions for Jenikhollan). I will look for alternatives for the top graph, and urge an admin to close this Deletion Request without deleting the file. 16:10, 11 June 2021 (UTC) Update: I plan to change caption(s) to reflect the content of the chart, rather than find and adapt a new chart. —RCraig09 (talk) 03:45, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- Update: The caption for the top graph has been changed to more accurately describe what is graphed. Any rationale for deleting the entire file has been overcome. Closing of this Deletion Request is requested. —RCraig09 (talk) 02:22, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 18:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
repost: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arbeitsweise Zweitakt.gif Tucvbif (talk) 12:38, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:00, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ariieliithovrg0505 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files using unsourced satellite-based material.
- File:Alimentadora delta.png
- File:Alimentadora maravillas.png
- File:Alimentadoras Portales de la Arboleda.png
- File:Recorrido de rutas Alimentadoras San Jerónimo.png
- File:Alimentadoras San Juan Bosco.png
GeorgHH • talk 17:55, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:00, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Various military coats of arms of Waffen-SS
[edit]Higher vector image exists for every of these:
- File:1divss.gif – (File:1. SS-Panzer-Division Leibstandarte-SS Adolf Hitler.svg)
- File:2divss.gif – (File:SS-Panzer-Division symbol.svg)
- File:3divss.gif – (File:3rd SS Division Logo.svg)
- File:4divss.gif – (File:4. SS-Polizei-Panzergrenadier-Division.svg)
- File:5divss.gif – (File:5th SS Division Logo.svg)
- File:6divss.gif – (File:6th SS Division Logo.svg)
- File:7divss.gif – (File:7th SS Division Logo.svg)
- File:8divss.gif – (File:8th SS Division Logo.svg)
- File:9divss.gif – (File:9th SS Division Logo.svg)
- File:14divss.gif – (File:14. SS-Freiwilligen-Infanterie-Division „Galizien”.svg)
- File:15divss.gif – (File:15divss.svg)
- File:16divss.gif – (File:16th SS Division Logo.svg)
- File:17divss.gif – (File:17th SS Division Logo.svg)
- File:18divss.gif – (File:18th SS Division Logo.svg)
- File:19divss.gif – (File:19th SS Division Logo.svg)
- File:20divss.gif – (File:20th SS Division Logo.svg)
- File:22divss.gif – (File:22nd SS Division Logo.svg)
- File:23divss.gif, File:23divss.png – (File:23rd SS Division Logo.svg)
- File:24divss.gif – (File:24th SS Division Logo.svg)
- File:25divss.gif – (File:25. Waffen-SS-Division („Karstjäger”)(2. Version).svg)
- File:26divss.gif – (File:26th SS Division Logo.svg)
- File:27divss.gif – (File:27. SS-Freiwilligen-Grenadier-Division „Langemarck“ (1. flämische).svg)
- File:28divss.gif – (File:28. SS-Freiwilligen-Grenadier-Division, „Wallonien”.svg)
- File:31divss.gif – (File:31th SS Division Logo.svg)
- File:32divss.gif – (File:32. SS-Freiwilligen-Grenadier-Division „30. Januar”.svg)
- File:33divss.gif – (File:33. SS-Waffen-Grenadier-Division „Charlemagne”.svg)
- File:34divss.gif – (File:34th SS Division Logo.svg)
- File:35divss.gif – (File:35divss.svg)
- File:36divss.gif – (File:Dirlewanger Crossed Grenades symbol.svg)
- File:37divss.gif – (File:Symbol of the 37. SS-Freiwilligen-Kavallerie-Division.svg
- File:38divss.gif – (File:38th SS Division Logo.svg)
(2._Version).svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
-Nutshinou Talk! 22:03, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Was nominated but missing on this list: Ellywa (talk) 19:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: we do not delete raster images just because there is now also a vector version available. --Rosenzweig τ 20:46, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
File:+ 00000000001 Image Abschlußzeugnis Staatlich gepüfter Betriebswirt Freistaat Sachsen Germany.jpg
[edit]
Hohheitszeichen, Siegel, Flaggen werden trotz alleinigem Nutzungsrecht der Orte, Gemeinden, Staaten eingebaut, sie sind nach einer Ansicht nicht GNU FDL-konform (auch nicht mit einer Genehmigung der Gemeinde wie im Fall Lippstadt), nach anderer sehr wohl, da die Lizenz nur die eingebrachte eigene geistige Leistung betreffen kann, aber nicht Verfügungsbeschränkungen hinsichtlich des dargestellten Inhalts. Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 08:52, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Habe noch eine PD Lizenz ergänzt, sollte so in Ordnung sein.--Sanandros (talk) 19:19, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
- Danke!! Ich sehe das in gegebener Sachlage genauso!! - "Papst und päpstlicher" - "Einige "USER" bei Wiki nehmen Sachlage "Sehr Ernst!" -. Hoffentlich ist das nun mit "Siegel" bei Wiki geklärt??! Freundliche Grüße und von Herzen - Danke! --Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 16:18, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- Bitte an Adminstator: - Antrag Vermerkung Richtlinien Wikipedia (Ergänzung) - zur Gemafreiheit und Zulässigkeit (Siegel) im Zusammenhang als neues Teil - "Werk" in Deutschland - Freundliche Grüße --Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 17:16, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- Es gibt bereits de:Wikipedia:Wappen eine Richlinie. Aber bedeutet deine Antwort, dass due den Antrag zuückzeihst?--Sanandros (talk) 19:59, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Lupus in Saxonia: Bitte antworten?--Sanandros (talk) 20:47, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Da nach Klärung das Bild bei Wiki Commonns zulässig ist (Wiki Commonns Richtlinien) - "Klar ziehe ich den "Löschantrag" zurück. Aus meiner Sicht "Erledigt"!! Danke für Euer aller Mühe! und liebe Grüße vom--Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 13:35, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Lupus in Saxonia: Bitte antworten?--Sanandros (talk) 20:47, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Es gibt bereits de:Wikipedia:Wappen eine Richlinie. Aber bedeutet deine Antwort, dass due den Antrag zuückzeihst?--Sanandros (talk) 19:59, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- Bitte an Adminstator: - Antrag Vermerkung Richtlinien Wikipedia (Ergänzung) - zur Gemafreiheit und Zulässigkeit (Siegel) im Zusammenhang als neues Teil - "Werk" in Deutschland - Freundliche Grüße --Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 17:16, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- Danke!! Ich sehe das in gegebener Sachlage genauso!! - "Papst und päpstlicher" - "Einige "USER" bei Wiki nehmen Sachlage "Sehr Ernst!" -. Hoffentlich ist das nun mit "Siegel" bei Wiki geklärt??! Freundliche Grüße und von Herzen - Danke! --Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 16:18, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, also DR was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 18:36, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Es handelt sich um das alte Logo der DGKJP. Ich bitte um entsprechende Löschung. DGKJP (talk) 11:03, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I believe this is still in scope; an encyclopedia article about this organization may wish to use their old logo for historical purposes. Note that licenses are non-revokable (though {{PD-textlogo}} might be more appropriate for this file). -M.nelson (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion, no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 18:40, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Letter from Vadim Kazeev
[edit]- File:Letter from Vadim Kazeev 01.jpg
- File:Letter from Vadim Kazeev 02.jpg
- File:Letter from Vadim Kazeev 03.jpg
The author of this letter is Vadim Kazeev (Q81654761) but not Erokhin. — Redboston 18:39, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Not own work, recent creation = copyrighted. Mysterymanblue 02:09, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 07:13, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
this photo is a derivative work of a fictional character Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:19, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I judged it to be De minimis. It's like 5% of the picture that is showing Donald Duck. --MGA73 (talk) 11:57, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note that about two points 1/ is it incidental? 2/ does it pass the test "will we notice that the object be removed from the image". The answer is of course no for the both points, i.e. it is very unlikely that someone would have took that photo without the head of Donald depicted in it. It is obvious that the Donald head is the main subject, it is also obvious that we will notice if it is removed, and furthermore the photo would have (IMO) not a single EV without that head. That makes the head the main subjet and purpose of that photo. For those reasons De minimis seems inappropriate to me. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:15, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- A similar discussion is raised at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jumbobøger.jpg. The books ("Jumbobog") is a comic with adventures from en:Donald Duck universe. The books to the left of Donald is also comics from the Donald Duck universe. Those books are however not as famous in Denmark as "Jumbobøger".
- Originally the books had a text like "1. Onkel Joakims Trillioner" and "10. Kvikke Mickey" (PD-ineligible). Later they added drawings like Donald on the back of the book. So if someone want to illustrate the books the face of Donald is not important. I could go take a photo of some of the other books to illustrate the exact same. But then there would be the face of Mickey or Pluto or another drawing from the universe. I't is a bit like taking photos of Category:Walt Disney World Resort. It is hard to avoid copyrighted characters.
- If you look at Commons:De_minimis#France then it has been decided that File:Louvre_at_night_centered.jpg is okay. You could make the same point as you did above: "it is also obvious that we will notice if it is removed" (see result at File:Louvre at night centered censored.jpg). At least I would notice. --MGA73 (talk) 14:03, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that we should take France as exemple, fisrty and especially because we don't talk about french cases.. Furthermore French justice is able to say all and its opposite, e.g. this image is not ok just because of the small text above the door, that the majority of Commons users would find both below ToO and De minimis (Link given from Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/France#cite_note-Paradis-30). In all cases that is just my opinion but I think that french law is entirely irrelevant regarding potential issue with USA fictional characters. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:33, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with Christian Ferrer above that this exceeds de minimis. The purpose of the photo is to show the series of books (as evidenced by the photo's use at da:Jumbobog), which unfortunately contain as their main element a copyrighted character. -M.nelson (talk) 12:59, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Cropping would not be usefull for the article on da:WP where the image is uses. --Ellywa (talk) 22:32, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Da nicht zweifelsfrei geklärt werden kann ob die Schiff- und Feld-Post der USA - mit verwendeten Briefmarken ggf. nach dem 1. Januar 1978 auch wenn sie nur „Beiwerk“ darstellen – ggf. urheberrechtlich geschützt sind - schlage ich zur „Sicherheit aller“ die Löschung vor. Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 08:19, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The postmark should be {{PD-USGov}} (it is not a stamp). The stamp bears an image of Surrender of General Burgoyne, a painting which is old enough to be in the public domain. The stamp is also from 1977 (source) so it is in the public domain per {{PD-USGov-pre1978stamp}}. Mysterymanblue 02:00, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Mysterymanblue's remark. --Ellywa (talk) 22:34, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Da nicht zweifelsfrei geklärt werden kann ob die Schiff- und Feld-Post der USA - mit verwendeten Briefmarken ggf. nach dem 1. Januar 1978 auch wenn sie nur „Beiwerk“ darstellen – ggf. urheberrechtlich geschützt sind - schlage ich zur „Sicherheit aller“ die Löschung vor. Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 08:21, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The postmark should be {{PD-USGov}} (it is not a stamp). The stamp bears an image of Surrender of General Burgoyne, a painting which is old enough to be in the public domain. The stamp is also from 1977 (source) so it is in the public domain per {{PD-USGov-pre1978stamp}}. Mysterymanblue 02:00, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Mysterymanblue's remark. --Ellywa (talk) 22:34, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
File:+Schiffspost - Maritime Mail - US Navy - United States Ship - Forster - DER 334 - AGANA - GUAM - JUL 28 1971 - Bild 002.jpg
[edit]
Hohheitszeichen, Siegel, Flaggen werden trotz alleinigem Nutzungsrecht der Orte, Gemeinden, Staaten eingebaut, sie sind nach einer Ansicht nicht GNU FDL-konform (auch nicht mit einer Genehmigung der Gemeinde wie im Fall Lippstadt), nach anderer sehr wohl, da die Lizenz nur die eingebrachte eigene geistige Leistung betreffen kann, aber nicht Verfügungsbeschränkungen hinsichtlich des dargestellten Inhalts. Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 08:45, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Habe noch PD-USGov ergänzt. Sollte so ausreichend sein mit der Lizenz und daher plädiere ich für behalten.--Sanandros (talk) 19:14, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Basic embossed seal that is a work of the U.S. government. Public domain, with the derivative photograph being freely licensed. Mysterymanblue 01:53, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Mysterymanblue's remark. --Ellywa (talk) 22:35, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
File:+Schiffspost - Maritime Mail - US Navy - United States Ship - Forster - DER 334 - AGANA - GUAM - JUL 28 1971 - Bild 003.jpg
[edit]
Hohheitszeichen, Siegel, Flaggen werden trotz alleinigem Nutzungsrecht der Orte, Gemeinden, Staaten eingebaut, sie sind nach einer Ansicht nicht GNU FDL-konform (auch nicht mit einer Genehmigung der Gemeinde wie im Fall Lippstadt), nach anderer sehr wohl, da die Lizenz nur die eingebrachte eigene geistige Leistung betreffen kann, aber nicht Verfügungsbeschränkungen hinsichtlich des dargestellten Inhalts. Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 08:47, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Habe noch PD-USGov ergänzt. Sollte so ausreichend sein mit der Lizenz und daher plädiere ich für behalten.--Sanandros (talk) 19:15, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Basic embossed seal that is a work of the U.S. government. Public domain, with the derivative photograph being freely licensed. Mysterymanblue 01:53, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Mysterymanblue's remark. --Ellywa (talk) 22:35, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Alchemica as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: I'm both the author and the guy on the pic: I never used this image on any Commons project and I guess it will never be used by anyone, since there are a couple of better pics by better photographs available. Fire at will. Thanks in advance, Alchemica (talk) 13:31, 10 June 2021 (UTC). Commons has enough room for the photo, quiality is not very bad. Depicted person is notable, fr:Julien Roturier exists. The matter can be discussed for a week. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- (+ Delete.) Hey there! Well I'm not the most well-known French writer ever so I doubt this unused self-portrait will be sorely missed. But if people think it should be kept, I see no problem with that either. Alchemica (talk) 09:16, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 22:39, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mysterymanblue as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: At the time this photo was taken, Pete Buttigieg was not yet a federal government employee. Therefore, his webcam image could not possibly be public domain under the stated rationale and must be assumed to be nonfree. A1Cafel (talk) 09:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- I understand that the inclusion of Buttigieg's image may be argued to be de minimis, but I feel that he is obviously the focus of the photograph and that de minimis is not valid reasoning. Mysterymanblue 21:11, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not certain that the focus of the image is necessarily the particular person being met with - even though that's what the title claims. I think it's more likely than not that Buttigieg's webcam image is de minimis, however it's less certain the actual author of the image - it clearly wasn't Blumenthal, and while I'm unsure, I believe that WP:PRP would necessitate deletion unless information about the author is present. Note that people may post images that violate copyright on their twitters if they want - the mere posting of an image on a US government official's account does not make it public domain. Berchanhimez (talk) 04:41, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and dicussion. I also wonder who made the photo of Blumenthal from a high standpoint. Might be somebody else. Uploader did not comment. --Ellywa (talk) 22:42, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Source said previously published on Facebook, not own work
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. Uploader themself stated previous upload to Facebook AND "I clicked it ...". However, TinEye[5] suggest distribution via agency in 2015 (none earlier!). But our upload is from 2013. A mess. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:34, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Assuming good faith, the uploader stating "I clicked it myself, previously published on Facebook" is believable. I don't see any evidence to dispute their claim of being the photographer - it may have perpetuated around the internet after they posted it here and to Facebook. -M.nelson (talk) 13:02, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per remark of M.Nelson. --Ellywa (talk) 22:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 宗教研究家 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: 著作権違反 — billinghurst sDrewth 10:39, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- please proceed. 宗教研究家 (talk) 03:36, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Question @宗教研究家: Why is it a copyright violation? -M.nelson (talk) 12:45, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request. Also out of scope, image is not used and apart from the name the person is undefined. --Ellywa (talk) 22:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
,_Cimeti%C3%A8re_de_Montmartre,_Paris._DSC09041.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Cimeti%C3%A8re_de_Montmartre,_Paris._DSC09041.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Racconish as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: derivative of Brauner's work — billinghurst sDrewth 10:47, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- The image is a photograph of a tombstone that is on permanent display in a public cemetery. Wilafa 12 Aug 2021
- Delete No COM:FOP France - even if it's on permanent public display. -M.nelson (talk) 09:43, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and remark of m.nelson. --Ellywa (talk) 22:47, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: " foto tomada por Daniel Francisco de la Cruz Mosqueda" — billinghurst sDrewth 10:48, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- We have nothing linking upload to being Daniel Francisco de la Cruz Mosqueda, COM:OTRS is required. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:33, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The uploader's user page says that they are Daniel Francisco de la Cruz Mosqueda, I don't see any reason not assume good faith. A few of their other uploads have the same credit to the same name. -M.nelson (talk) 13:10, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per remark of M.nelson. Uploader did not comment, but is not active since a long time. --Ellywa (talk) 22:49, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patsagorn Y. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: un verified uploader uploaded from Bitkub.com; not clearly copyright for originality, put before community — billinghurst sDrewth 10:49, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Unfortunately we don't have guidance at COM:TOO Thailand, but applying the precautionary principle, it isn't unreasonable to think that this logo meets the following criteria to be copyrighted:
- From https://www.thailandlawonline.com/translations/copyright-law-thailand-intellectual-property, an artistic work includes "drawing, that is a creation of configuration consisting of either lines [continued...]" meaning that it's reasonable to consider this logo (not the text) an artistic work
- From https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/w-011-3581, artistic works "must also meet the following four elements: expression of an idea, expression in a recognised work, originality and non-illegality".
- If the uploader is actually Saab Sugrit of the company Bitkub, they should provide permission through COM:VRT. -M.nelson (talk) 13:29, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and remark. No info about TOO level in Thailand, see Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Thailand. --Ellywa (talk) 22:51, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- also file:Réponse du ministere des affaires étrangeres.png
If the info is useful, then it should be written directly into some project. Files are unused, educational value is not shown. Taivo (talk) 11:30, 11 June 2021 (UTC) - Delete No apparent educational value; doesn't meet COM:SCOPE -M.nelson (talk) 09:45, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 22:53, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Başkasının Zhryldiz (talk) 16:16, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The uploader has indicated that this is not an own work, so the stated licensing information is incorrect. Mysterymanblue 02:03, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:54, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be the work of the Odessa government, though I'm not sure of the copyright status: https://avangard.odessa.gov.ua/investytsiynyy-pasport-terytorialnoi-hromady/rozdil-ii-ii-sotsialno-ekonomichnyy-profil/ Ytoyoda (talk) 16:30, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Ukraine. No exeption for government photo's on the discripton on that page. --Ellywa (talk) 22:57, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Need more source info, considering Flickr is not the actual source Ytoyoda (talk) 18:21, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Flickr user is not the original source. The source might be https://pedagogics.livejournal.com/1825.html, linked on the Flickr page, which has no indication of a free license. The photo is almost certainly too modern to meet {{PD-old}}, and without evidence that the photographer released it under a free license, it should be deleted. -M.nelson (talk) 13:35, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and remark. --Ellywa (talk) 22:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
File:Rza Talibov - Chief of the Citizenship Issues Head Department of the State Migration Service of the Republic of Azerbaijan, III rank State Migration Service Counselor 1.jpg
[edit]
Copyvio Nanahuatl (talk) 18:26, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- strong keep Please look carefully at the dimensions of the picture, they are completely different in size. The original picture is what I posted. I am the author of the picture.--Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 20:15, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Question I believe you when you say you took this photograph, but how did they get this photograph? Were you working for this news agency at the time? Are you sure that you did not transfer copyright to ABC.az? If they own the copyright, we cannot host it here even if you are the photographer. Mysterymanblue 02:08, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per remark of uploader, whos name is as copyrigh holder on meta data. --Ellywa (talk) 23:00, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
L'image de remplit pas les conditions de l'art. 5 de la loi (suisse) sur le droit d'auteur citée dans les conditions d'utilisation. Violation des conditions d'utilisation du site d'où elle a été tirée (https://www.geneve.ch/fr/mentions-legales) Sherwood6 (talk) 22:19, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination; doesn't seem to meet {{PD-Switzerland-official}} -M.nelson (talk) 09:51, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and comment. --Ellywa (talk) 23:02, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Bunun herkese görünür olacağını bilmiyordum Zhryldiz (talk) 12:08, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Uploader request deletion of an unused image. Mysterymanblue 02:02, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 12:39, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
