Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/05/24
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_HOME;RUN_현장포토.jpg){kind=link}
_KH_edit_Minquas_Map.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_von_den_dankbaren_Bauern_im_Gegendtal,_Arriach,_Villach-Land_19022017.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
copyvio. getty image. https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/guan-xiaotong-attends-the-screening-of-pain-and-glory-news-photo/1149885685 Robertsky (talk) 14:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete Getty Images photos and other works of commercial photo agencies do not require a discussion before deletion. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:20, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 16:47, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Anime character, unlikely to be user's own work and probably copyrighted Mannivu · ✉ 17:11, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 17:43, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Fake content. Title means "eggs" with a more than probable intentional mistake. The image would be as a joke Lost in subtitles (talk) 06:37, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. Personal joke/insult image; OOS. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:23, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Fictional "alternate History" map. This is private artwork, only used in fantasy sandbox, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:08, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. OOS. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:28, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Fictional "alternate History" map. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:16, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. Per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:33, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Fictional "alternate History" map. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:16, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. Per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:32, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
it's blanc and i don't same able to fix it Skaldis (talk) 10:26, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. Prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Fictional "alternate History" map. This is private artwork, only used in fantasy sandbox, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. Per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:35, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Fictional "alternate History" map. This is private artwork, only used in fantasy sandbox, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. Per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:36, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Fictional "alternate History" map. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:32, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. Per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:37, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Fictional "alternate History" map. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:32, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. Per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:38, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Fictional "alternate History" map. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:32, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. Per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:38, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Original file is here: https://www.historynet.com/saving-boxer-22-the-largest-rescue-mission-of-the-vietnam-war.htm Cobatfor (talk) 12:09, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. Per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:39, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Delete Taken from Facebook [1] without any indication at the source the the image is available under a license compatible with Commons. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 15:13, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. Per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:40, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Taken from https://www.asianz.org.nz/about-us/25-to-watch/angad-nayyar/ Pbrks (talk) 16:28, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:19, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This is not the uploaders own work. Inexpiable (talk) 20:29, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:37, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
удаляю свои страницу вместе с фотографией ДК Карабаново (talk) 12:18, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no license. --JuTa 00:19, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
The ODT does not publish its photos under a free license Schwede66 23:43, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination, clear copyright violation. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:00, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
clear case of Flickr washing Schwede66 23:18, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Completely my mistake here in uploading, should be deleted. --LivelyRatification (talk) 23:28, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 10:37, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Probable copyvios, given the uploader's history
- File:GL Zoo Banner.png
- File:Gumuk Pasir Parangkusumo, Bantul.jpg
- File:Happy Asmara, Ratu Trending Indonesia.jpg
- File:Stadion Sultan Agung 02.jpg
- File:LogoPersiba Bantul.png
- File:Stadion Sultan Agung 01.jpg
- File:Masjid Agung Manunggal, Bantul.jpg
- File:Alun-alun Paseban, Bantul 02.jpg
- File:Alun-alun Paseban, Bantul 01.jpg
- File:Pasar Satwa PASTY di Jalan Bantul.jpg
- File:Logo Hartono Mall Yogyakarta.png
- File:Hartono Lifestyle Mall Yogyakarta.jpg
- File:Happy Asmara GTV 2.jpg
- File:YIA Banner.jpg
- File:Parangtritis Beach Banner.jpg
- File:Golek Ayun-Ayun.jpg
- File:CURUG PULOSARI.png
- File:Gapura Bantul.jpg
- File:Hutan Pinus Pengger, Bantul.jpg
- File:Pantai Parangtritis, Bantul.jpg
- File:Happy Asmara GTV.jpg
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:00, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Closing adminstrator, please review uploader gallery, there seem to be additional images from same camera which were not included in this nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: long-term sock account with history of copyvios/flickrwashing/etc. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:58, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE (a whole set). I'm not sure what these are. Some look like spammed job adverts, others suggest that they're some sort of language teaching exercise (including the writing of such adverts). But we're not here as a web host for someone's language school and these are too poorly executed to have any value here. These are texts: they just shouldn't be images in the first place.
Likewise:
- File:Sangeeta2Teacher.jpg
- File:Sangeeta 2Teacher.jpg
- File:Sangeeta 2Teacher 2.jpg
- File:Sangeeta 2Teacher 3.jpg
- File:Sangeeta 2Teacher 4.jpg
- File:Sangeeta 2Teacher 5.jpg
- File:Sangeeta 2Teacher 6.jpg
- File:Sangeeta 2Teacher 7.jpg
- File:Sangeeta 2Teacher 8.jpg
- File:Sangeeta 2Teacher 9.jpg
- File:Sangeeta 2Teacher 10.jpg
- File:Sangeeta 2Teacher 11.jpg
- File:Sangeeta 2Teacher 12.jpg
- File:Sangeeta 2Teacher 13.jpg
- File:Sangeeta 2Teacher 14.jpg
- File:Sangeeta 2Teacher 15.jpg
- File:Sangeeta 2Teacher 16.jpg
Andy Dingley (talk) 15:29, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope advertisement. --Sreejith K (talk) 04:07, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Meaningless name. Unused in any article. Gpkp (talk) 08:33, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted. Unneeded junk redir. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:25, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 12:38, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:21, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 12:39, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Also delete https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:L%C3%A6rdal_komm.png&redirect=no
Deleted: per nomination, unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:22, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 12:46, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:22, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 12:46, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:22, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 12:47, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:22, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 12:47, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:22, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 12:47, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:23, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
It is embarrassing Nick19931993 (talk) 18:07, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, request by uploader, courtesy deletion. Thuresson (talk) 23:30, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
It is embarrassing Nick19931993 (talk) 18:43, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, request by uploader, courtesy deletion. Thuresson (talk) 23:26, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
It is embarrassing Nick19931993 (talk) 18:44, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, request by uploader, courtesy deletion. Thuresson (talk) 23:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
It is embarrassing Nick19931993 (talk) 18:45, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, request by uploader, courtesy deletion. Thuresson (talk) 23:29, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. personal photo Adamgerber80 (talk) 03:08, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:43, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:21, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
It is embarrassing Nick19931993 (talk) 18:45, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, request by uploader, courtesy deletion. Thuresson (talk) 23:24, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
ordinary person Mateus2019 (talk) 15:36, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:12, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
It is embarrassing Nick19931993 (talk) 18:46, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, request by uploader, courtesy deletion. Thuresson (talk) 23:25, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carlosdevivo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a photo album. I acknowledge that this user is a valid contributor to the projects, these are only used on his user page. While one or 2 is OK, there are just too many
- File:CARLOS RONDON DE VIVO 18.jpg
- File:CARLOS DE VIVO 17.jpg
- File:Carlos Gabriel Rondón De Vivo 13.jpg
- File:Carlos Rondón De Vivo 14.jpg
- File:Carlos Rondón De Vivo 12.jpg
- File:Carlos Rondón De Vivo 11.jpg
- File:Carlos Rondón De Vivo 10.jpg
- File:Carlos Rondón De Vivo 9.jpg
- File:Carlos Rondón De Vivo 8.jpg
- File:Carlos Gabriel Rondón De Vivo 6.jpg
- File:Carlos Rondón De Vivo 5.jpg
- File:Carlos Rondón De Vivo 4.jpg
- File:Carlos Rondón De Vivo.jpg
- File:Carlos Rondón De Vivo 3.jpg
- File:Carlos Rondon 2.jpg
- File:Carlos Rondón.png
Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:21, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Self promotion ☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 10:09, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:34, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Self promotion ☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 10:10, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:34, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Self promotion ☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 10:10, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:34, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Self promotion ☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 10:11, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:35, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Self promotion ☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 10:11, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:35, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Self promotion ☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 10:11, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:36, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Self promotion ☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 10:12, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:36, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Self promotion ☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 10:12, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:36, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Self promotion ☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 10:12, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:37, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Fictional "alternate History". This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:33, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:37, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Fictional "alternate History" map. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:34, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:37, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Fictional "alternate History" map. This is private artwork, only used in fantasy sandbox, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:37, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:38, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Fictional "alternate History" map. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:40, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:38, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Fictional "alternate History" map. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:40, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:39, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Fictional "alternate History" map. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:41, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:39, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Promotional text, probably copyrighted photo. No educational use. Drakosh (talk) 11:15, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:40, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:40, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:41, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flag of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: For context, I uploaded the picture for testing and experimental purposes. Abiding by the Commons:Project scope, I support the removal of this file, and would like to request a deletion for the image. Pink Saffron (talk) 00:30, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: Can you delete it now? Pink Saffron (talk) 20:34, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:43, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:41, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Sure, go ahead and delete. I was just playing around with wikimedia as an input to wikipedia. FWIW, Neonto is my company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adam.Wasserman (talk • contribs) 14:57, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:43, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:44, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: trivial logo of questionable notability. Used in promotional Wikidata item EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:44, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:45, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arjmandi.mohammad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:45, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arjmandi.mohammad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Doubtful own work. Bunch of different cameras and varying sizes/ File:Dr._Shakibaei_Clinic1.jpg states "FarbodJafarpourPhotography" to be the author.
- File:Dr.shakibaei in school of dentistry michigan.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaei.jpg
- File:Dr.shakibaei Penn Dental Medicine.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaei Conference (3).jpg
- File:Dr.shakibaei carl zeiss dental academy symposium.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaei (2).jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaei Conference (2).jpg
- File:Dr.shakibaie carl zeiss dental academy symposium micro dentistry and micro surgery specialist.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaei Clinic1.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaei Conference.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaei Clinic.jpg
- File:Dr.shakibaei microVision congress.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaie, 2019, European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry (EAED), Munich, Germany.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaie, 2017, presenting at WAUPS International Conference, New Delhi, India.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaie, 2018, presenting at University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaie, 2014, presenting at AMED International Meeting, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaie, 2018, presenting at University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaie, 2010, receiving The German Periodontology Award, Bonn, Germany.jpg
- File:Dr.Shakibaie.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaie, 2017, conducting practical course of Zeiss Dental Academy, Istanbul, Turkey.jpg
- File:Dr. Shakibaie, 1998, Dentistry Graduation, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Munich,_Germany.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:09, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- also of doubtful SCOPE Zenwort (talk) 21:52, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:09, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by UnknownSoldierYT (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:45, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by N.AbdulRahman123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused image with text, the only contributions of uploader, out of scope
Pippobuono (talk) 15:39, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:46, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:47, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Text with nonsensical content. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 17:04, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:47, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dangerpanditankit (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion of another famous social media star, out of project scope. No contribs to any wm project.
Achim (talk) 18:26, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:48, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zoé Capetillo Ramírez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal file collection, all unused, out of scope.
- File:Richard Hidalgo García.jpg
- File:Richard Hidalgo García en áfrica.jpg
- File:Richard Hidalgo García en el rio carrizal con su mascota.jpg
GeorgHH • talk 20:23, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:49, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
unused, limited purpose Askeuhd (talk) 20:27, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:50, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
unused, limited purpose Askeuhd (talk) 20:28, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:51, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Text files are out of project scope! Ras67 (talk) 22:50, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:52, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Self-promotion only. No educational information. Out of scope. GeorgHH • talk 22:59, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete self-promotion Andy Dingley (talk) 23:09, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:53, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SamShiroff (talk · contribs)
[edit]Fake license, clearly maked (C) at source
Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:34, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:03, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:28, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Some doubt about claimed authorship by uploader, as image has no metadata and - according to TinEye - was found already in 2014 as a stock image with Corbis[2]. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:00, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:28, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
This file has missing license. And there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 19:08, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:27, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
screenshot of a copyrighted television program. file already exists on wikipedia as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Big_Chungus.png - Nutshinou Talk! 19:11, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:27, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Vandalism/self-promotion? Appears to once have been on gettyimages [3], but the page is gone now. Boylarva99 (talk) 20:38, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:26, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
non-free book cover (for deleted article in ru-wiki) Khinkali (talk) 21:18, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:26, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work 4ing (talk) 21:37, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:26, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
There is an error in the description of the attribute of one of the enantiomeric drug Valliappan Kannappan (talk) 08:17, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Request by uploader. --Leyo 11:46, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Error in naming one of the enantiomers Valliappan Kannappan (talk) 11:28, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Request by uploader. --Leyo 09:58, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
This is a Getty Image, and rights are claimed to be owned by NBCUniversal. Although uploader purports to be author: a) even if true, that is distinct from being the copyright holder; and b) previously published images and require COM:OTRS evidence of permission (anyone can create any username and make any statement, so verification is needed). Эlcobbola talk 16:13, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:19, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Plagiarism (see watermarks). MinervaAustral (talk) 16:17, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:17, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- also file:IBIZA ROCKS THE BOAT.jpg
Small photos without metadata. Look watermark "IBIZA ROCKS THE BOAT" in bottom right corner. I suspect not own work, but promo photo of unknown company. Taivo (talk) 16:53, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:00, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rudolf Hortz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Bogus CC/self claims - random internet plane images. If free, actual COMEVID needed.
- File:Bristol Beaufighter TF Mk X.jpg
- File:Tree view of the Bell P-63 Kingcobra.jpg
- File:Bell P-63 Kingcobra USAAF.jpg
- File:Hawker Hurricane Mk IIB Birmania.jpg
- File:Tree view of the Hawker Hurricane Mk IV.gif
- File:Supermarine Spitfire Mk VII.jpg
- File:Lockheed P-38 Lightning RED.jpg
- File:Supermarine Spitfire Mk Vb 316 Squadron Polish.jpg
- File:Tree view of the Supermarine Spitfire Mk XIV.jpg
- File:North American P-51 Mustang G.jpg
- File:Messerschmitt Bf 109 in service croatian in toward 1945.webp
- File:Focke Wulf Ta 154.jpg
- File:Ambrosini SAI 403 Luftwaffe.jpg
- File:Dewoitine D.520 Luftwaffe.jpg
- File:Bell P-39 Airacobra of the Aerouautica Cobeligerante Italiana.jpg
- File:Tree View of Republic P-43 Lancer.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 17:16, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:35, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rudolf Hortz (talk · contribs)
[edit]More of the same - bogus self/CC license - actual provenance information needed.
- File:Tree view of the Blackburn Skua.png
- File:Yak9psilh.jpg
- File:Tree view of the Hispano-Aviacion Ha 1109.jpg.webp
Эlcobbola talk 18:18, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:59, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:25, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:57, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
In the bottom structure, "C" and "CH" should be switched. This has been fixed in File:Isoprene synthesis-fr.svg. Marbletan (talk) 17:51, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 11:47, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Bad quality, low-res, doesn't even resemble the entrance of a roller-coaster. Jonteemil (talk) 19:40, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Quality. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:52, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 13:56, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
I don't believe this is own work. Timk70 (talk) 20:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- +1. Please, see other uploads of this User. All of them are copyvio. Lesless (talk) 06:06, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 13:43, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
I don't believe this is own work. Timk70 (talk) 20:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- +1. Please, see other uploads of this User. All of them are copyvio. Lesless (talk) 06:07, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 13:43, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
NonCommercial Creative Commons licenses are not allowed on Wikimedia Commons Marek BLAHUŠ (talk) 20:11, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:41, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Was image for my user page, which is not used anymore and does not have any other educational use Patrick1905 (talk) 20:24, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:40, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Error Photo Das076 (talk) 20:56, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 13:40, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Replaced by File:Carboni-Lindsey Übersicht V2.svg, same uploader a few hours later, that has better MOS DMacks (talk) 22:50, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 11:48, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
COM:TOO not free logo Ezarateesteban 22:55, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:38, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Error Photo Das076 (talk) 23:59, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 13:37, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -Vickynorum (talk) 17:40, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Incomplete deletion request by original uploader. Skeezix1000 (talk) 23:32, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Arquivo: Forcefire ao vivo em Mangaratiba, Brasil.jpg
[edit]
REASON FOR DELETION Vickynorum85 (talk) 19:54, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 05:43, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Delete my old photo, i upload in my old account vickynorum. I haven't had an account since 2008 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vickynorum85 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Why should it be deleted? - Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:56, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
this photo is mine and was placed by me in 2008, in an account to which i no longer have access to vickynorum. i want to remove the photo because it was for wikipedia in 2008, as my band the text was not approved the photo was abandoned at wikicommons. I want the photo to be removed and deleted because we are not famous musicians and I am in the photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vickynorum85 (talk • contribs) 01:38, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Low res photo of non-notable band. Minimal if any in-scope usefulness. Support courtesy deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:49, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Whilst licences are irrevocable and whilst it is categorised under Category:Music in 2008 - the file is of low/poor resolution and the guy in the image is non-notable anyway so given the aforementioned issues the file wont ever be used on or off wiki so in this specific case I too support a courtesy deletion.
Please also be aware Vickynorum courtesy deletions are very rare and never ever happen unless there's mitigating reasons so please don't upload files and then change your mind etc, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:49, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Keep - Well given the user has now go on from personally attacking people to canvassing I'm placing myself here. The file is of non-notable people however it's categorised under "Music in 2008" as it shows an image from that era.
- This might seem spiteful but if the user wants to blatantly personal attack people and then canvas then no I don't see why a courtesy deletion should continue.
- (I've added the file to Category:People with handheld microphones and Category:Topless men in Brazil.) –Davey2010Talk 11:35, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: No reason for courtesy deletion when the uploader makes liberal use of insults and profanity to support his case. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 06:47, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Comment Vickynorum85 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) has canvassed numerous editors talk pages (e.g. [4]) with the subject line "Vote delete photo" and a link to this DR. If this photo is to be deleted, it shouldn't be a "courtesy deletion" (it would be rewarding them and set a dangerous precedent for future DR cases). Bidgee (talk) 05:18, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete In my opinion, the photo and all the attitudes of the person responsible for placing the item for removal, all that is happening is only giving more publicity for this person to appear. User talk:jimrogersjames 19:45, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Publicity is not our problem. We're here to provide useful images to the world, Being blunt and to the point > It's not our problem if the photo uploader wants to make a complete ass out of themselves. –Davey2010Talk 20:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Interesting that jimrogersjames (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) is a new account and the only edit was a vote to delete in this DR. Bidgee (talk) 21:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. small unused personal photo without metadata, the user's only upload. Looks like not own work, but copyright violation. Also I will block Jimrogerjames indefinitely as sockpuppet. Taivo (talk) 07:00, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
All claimed as own work, but all (C)
- File:Carmien Michels (c) Mathias Hannes.jpg
- File:Carmien Michels (c) Mathias Hannes (2019).jpg
- File:Tom Lanoye Web (c) Johan Jacobs.tif
_Mathias_Hannes.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Mathias_Hannes_(2019).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 07:51, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:19, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
2019 Euro coin issued by Ireland. Not freely licensed according to Commons:Currency#Ireland. Thuresson (talk) 07:18, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:32, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Found here - https://www.spur.uzh.ch/en/aboutus/Personen/staff/carlotadebenito.html - and other sites before upload. We need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:32, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
_-_HOME;RUN_%ED%98%84%EC%9E%A5%ED%8F%AC%ED%86%A0.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_HOME;RUN_%ED%98%84%EC%9E%A5%ED%8F%AC%ED%86%A0.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No evidence of freely available license Evaders99 (talk) 07:59, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
_-_HOME;RUN_현장포토.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:34, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
_-_HOME;RUN_현장포토.jpg){kind=link}
_KH_edit_Minquas_Map.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_KH_edit_Minquas_Map.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Likely copyvio: derived (I assume the red marker for Rose Valley is the only difference with the original) from Indian Paths of Pennsylvania by Paul A.W. Wallace. Published in 1971, so too soon for PD-US-expired. Not entirely sure about {{PD-US-no notice}}, hence a DR instead of SD. HyperGaruda (talk) 10:12, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
_KH_edit_Minquas_Map.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:34, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
_KH_edit_Minquas_Map.jpg){kind=link}
i want to change the filename and will re-upload Cainesap (talk) 11:27, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- So just move the file to the correct name. What do you want for it? Andy Dingley (talk) 10:42, 27 May 2021 (UTC):
Oppose please use Template:Rename --Jahobr (talk) 10:46, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 02:37, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Subject barely recognizable. Out of COM:SCOPE as it has no educational use. Myloufa (talk) 12:52, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:37, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Year Walk
[edit]These are screenshots cited as being taken from a video game app (https://apps.apple.com/gb/app/year-walk-companion/id597879895). If they originate from older public domain illustrations, I can't find any evidence of that: all TinEye searches just return screenshots of the game, making them look like original artwork.
- File:Year Walk (Bäckahästen).PNG
- File:Year Walk (Kyrkogrimen).PNG
- File:Year Walk (Mylingen).PNG
- File:Year Walk (Nattravnen).PNG
- File:Year Walk (Skogsåret).PNG
- File:Year Walk (årsgång).PNG
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Lord Belbury (talk) 13:26, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Noting that the uploader has replied "Screens. If bother you delete them." on their talk page. --Lord Belbury (talk) 10:34, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:37, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Claimed as own work per exif Copyright holder Copyright 2020, FX Networks. All Rights Reserved. Gbawden (talk) 13:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:37, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The permission from the person depicted in the photograph has never been obtained. Even though she is a public person, I think it is a violation of the personal rights. There is no interest for the public since the picture was taken at a book presentation and not during her professional activity as a journalist. VeWa.00 (talk) 13:38, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, but you are wrong. The photo was taken during the "Festival der Regionen" art festival in Perg, where Renata Schmidtkunz officially moderated at talk about social warmth, as you can see here. As can be seen further, the photo "Renata Schmidtkunz Festival der Regionen 2019 BHO-2191.jpg" shows Mrs. Schmitzkunz looking straight into the camera with a smile in her face as she gave her consent to be photographed for Wikimedia. Dromedar61 (talk) 20:09, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 02:39, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
old test file — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newts~commonswiki (talk • contribs) 00:39, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:39, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
agency clarified that they do not hold copyright Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:00, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:40, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
I am uploader; agency clarified that they do not hold copyright Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:00, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:40, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
I am uploader; agency clarified that they do not hold copyright Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:00, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:40, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Hate to say it, but that statue is almost certainly copyrighted, and there is no evidence of permission from the sculptor. Jmabel ! talk 14:06, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:41, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:41, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea (per COM:FOP SK) Even if this building is applied French laws, there is no freedom of panorama in France, too. (per COM:FOP France) Ox1997cow (talk) 16:03, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete violation of architect's copyright. SoKor laws apply: see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Australian Embassy in Paris.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Japanese embassy in Iceland.JPG. See also a failed UNDEL req. at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2021-03#File:US Embassy Athens.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:41, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea (per COM:FOP SK) Even if this building is applied French laws, there is no freedom of panorama in France, too. (per COM:FOP France) Ox1997cow (talk) 16:03, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete violation of architect's copyright. SoKor laws apply: see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Australian Embassy in Paris.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Japanese embassy in Iceland.JPG. See also a failed UNDEL req. at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2021-03#File:US Embassy Athens.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:41, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea (per COM:FOP SK) Even if this building is applied French laws, there is no freedom of panorama in France, too. (per COM:FOP France) Ox1997cow (talk) 16:04, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:41, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea (per COM:FOP SK) Even if this building is applied French laws, there is no freedom of panorama in France, too. (per COM:FOP France) Ox1997cow (talk) 16:04, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:41, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Statue Kaiser Josef II. (1881) von den dankbaren Bauern im Gegendtal, Arriach, Villach-Land 19022017.jpg
[edit]_von_den_dankbaren_Bauern_im_Gegendtal,_Arriach,_Villach-Land_19022017.jpg){kind=link}
_von_den_dankbaren_Bauern_im_Gegendtal,_Arriach,_Villach-Land_19022017.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
a quality image photo from Johann Jaritz is already up loaded. Please delete, Thank you! Naturpuur (talk) 16:08, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 02:41, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
No FOP in UAE CutlassCiera 16:16, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:42, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in UAE CutlassCiera 16:16, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:42, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FOP in UAE CutlassCiera 16:17, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:42, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 126.158.17.154 as Copyvio (Copyvio) DMacks (talk) 16:29, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep by default, as the uploader claims own-work/cc-by-sa-4.0 and tagger provides no reason to doubt it. No google-image hits except WMF sites. DMacks (talk) 16:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 02:42, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Violation of personality rights 61.120.241.72 03:01, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment How so? - Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:04, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Weak delete This image is currently unused, and it is not clear what it actually depicts.
- The uploader's only other global contributions are a large number of edits to ja:Lilly island; in fact, the uploader seems to be the main contributor to that article. Perhaps this image depicts the subject of that article? Actually, the uploader created that article using this image, but later removed this image from the article. The uploader also removed several warning templates from the article, including speedy deletion and "BLP unsourced". Brianjd (talk) 13:34, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal image with no permissions. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:06, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Low quality image (small, overexposed), can be replaced by other images within the category A1Cafel (talk) 16:44, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:42, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyviol from https://itacanotizie.it/2020/10/22/nascere/ Antonio1952 (talk) 17:18, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Well, isn't it a too simple shape for applying copyright on it? However, I'm pro to the delating, because it isn't the official CoA of Misiliscemi and, therefore, it shouldn't be used in the articles related to it.--Gb89.2 (talk) 18:46, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Nominated by original author for undisclosed/personal/other reasons Psubhashish (talk) 10:37, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hmm, for an image uploaded >2 years ago and re-used externally, you should provide a sound deletion-rationale. --Túrelio (talk) 20:26, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Kept, no rationale why the photo should be deleted. Thuresson (talk) 22:14, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Nominated by original author for undisclosed/personal/other reasons Psubhashish (talk) 17:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- This is for @Thuresson: and @Túrelio: : per request by the person appearing in the picture. The picture is no longer used in any external site. --Psubhashish (talk) 17:33, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Because it is A selfie Jfvoll (talk) 19:51, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: This is not a selfie. --Missvain (talk) 02:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Logo appears to be too complex to qualify as public domain under Template:PD-textlogo. Nathan2055talk - contribs 19:56, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Logo appears to be too complex to qualify as public domain under Template:PD-textlogo due to the gradients used. Nathan2055talk - contribs 19:59, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep the slight gradients don't push the logo above TOO. Elli (talk) 20:04, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 02:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
This file has missing license. And there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 22:38, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
This file has missing license. And there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 22:39, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
This file has missing license. And there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 22:39, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file has missing license. And there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 22:40, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:48, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
This file has missing license. And there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 22:40, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:48, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MiguelAlanCS as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: [5]
However, that image was published under a cc-by-sa licence on flickr. Le Petit Chat (talk) 12:59, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Fue publicado con una licencia errónea en Flickr, la imagen corresponde a la campaña presidencial de 2016. Además la cuenta de Flickr no es oficial, y ya sabemos que pueden existir usuarios que publican imágenes que no les pertenecen en Flickr: la imagen no tiene datos EXIF (It was published under the wrong license on Flickr, the image corresponds to the 2016 presidential campaign. Furthermore, the Flickr account is not official, and we already know that there may be users who post images that do not belong to them on Flickr: the image has no EXIF data). MiguelAlanCS (talk) 13:08, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete This image looks like a modified image from other existing ones on different websites. Here some existing images (some from 2016) : 1, 2 3, 4 5 --Ovruni (talk) 14:28, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It could be useful, and F*CK COPYRIGHT Mausebru (talk) 21:59, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per comments. --Materialscientist (talk) 10:15, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Obivously not own work of the uploader created on 24 May 2021 as stated. Published at https://www.reddit.com/r/megalophobia/comments/ibpys0/spongebob_of_nightmares/ and https://www.reddit.com/r/Bossfight/comments/a5gxar/p%C3%B8%C5%88%C4%9D%C4%99_b%C3%B8b_the_exiled_from_the_deep_sea/ 9 months ago. Exif metadata and location data are missing. ŠJů (talk) 15:16, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 10:14, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
This file has missing license. And there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 19:13, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This image originates in the United States and qualifies for PD-textlogo. I have applied the appropriate license. Fry1989 eh? 16:34, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per comments. --Materialscientist (talk) 10:12, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Jfvoll (talk) 19:54, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Можете детальнее описать причину? — Alexandr Kovacs (talk) 20:41, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- В переводе с английского: «Потому что нонсенс (ерунда, непонятно что это)». Мне и самому трудно разобрать. Если это карта, то её может стоит привязать к координатной сетке и указать границы регионов России? Или хотя бы уголок «Условные обозначения». А лучше: и то, и другое. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 21:56, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Исправил карту следовательно вашим советам — Alexandr Kovacs (talk) 10:57, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Координатная сетка улучшит карту. Я бы добавил населённые пункты (и сделал бы их надписи крупнее), и на самой карте написал бы названия района (районов). В условных обозначениях можно объяснить, что красный, розовый, бледно-серый и тёмно-серые цвета. В названии карты я бы написал что-то типа «Карта расселения северорусского субэтноса Заонежане. Россия». --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 05:08, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Исправил карту следовательно вашим советам — Alexandr Kovacs (talk) 10:57, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- В переводе с английского: «Потому что нонсенс (ерунда, непонятно что это)». Мне и самому трудно разобрать. Если это карта, то её может стоит привязать к координатной сетке и указать границы регионов России? Или хотя бы уголок «Условные обозначения». А лучше: и то, и другое. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 21:56, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Materialscientist (talk) 10:11, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Wrong creator. https://www.facebook.com/gilad.erdan/photos/5109714579068612 states Shahar Azran as photographer. Tomer T (talk) 10:15, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 14:22, 15 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 7 June 2021 --Krdbot 01:43, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
No own work, author is on the picture. Missing permission from the photographer. Velocitas (talk) 11:22, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 14:22, 15 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 7 June 2021 --Krdbot 01:43, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
No own work, author is on the picture. Missing permission from the photographer. Velocitas (talk) 11:22, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 14:20, 15 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 7 June 2021 --Krdbot 01:43, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Probably no own work, see this user's other uploads. Missing permission from the photographer. Velocitas (talk) 11:23, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 14:20, 15 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 7 June 2021 --Krdbot 01:43, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Verdun by Charles Phillipe Germain Aristide Pillet, 1917, bronze - Portland Museum of Art - Portland, Maine - DSC03964.jpg
[edit]
Artist Charles Pillet will not be in Public domain until 2031 (died in 1960), so this work is still under copyright Culex (talk) 14:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Greetings and best wishes! I am not an attorney and cannot claim to understand copyright law. However, here is part of a publication about US copyright from the US government [6]:
- Publication
- Copyright law defines “publication” as the distribution of copies of a work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership or by rental, lease, or lending. Offering to distribute copies to a group of people for purposes of further distribution or public display also constitutes publication. A public display does not in itself constitute publication.
- A work of art that exists in only one copy, such as a painting or a statue, is not regarded as published when the single existing copy is sold or offered for sale in the traditional way, such as through an art dealer, gallery, or auction house. A statue erected in a public place is not necessarily published. When the work is reproduced in multiple copies, such as in reproductions of a painting or castings of a statue, the work is published when the reproductions are publicly distributed or offered to a group for further distribution or public display.
Please note the last sentence. It seems to (not expert) me that under US law, this medal is in the public domain because it was "publicly distributed or offered to a group for further distribution" in 1917.
Again - all best wishes, and I am interested in your thoughts, Daderot (talk)
Deleted: per nomination - It is, probably, PD in the USA. However, COmmons policy requires that works be free in both the country of origin and the USA. The sculptor was French and, as noted, it is not PD in France. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:51, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
w:en:Princess Victoria Louise of Prussia turned 8 years old in 1900. Obviously wrong picture description. I would date the photo sometime between 1913 and 1930. The license is obviously wrong: in any case, the uploader is not the author of a 90-110 year old imagesугсго 14:56, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- First of all, the author is unknown (if capable of English). All dates on that page are designated with "in the 1900's.", it's an estimate. I don't know why this hurts your feelings, but I think you are wrong here. Obviously you cannot speak German. "Lizenz: Gemeinfrei." means "License: Public domain.". I don't waste my time on this. Wikimedia Commons has rules. Respect them and don't waste the time of other edidors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jagdrevier.566 (talk • contribs) 15:50, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Du bist wohl blind. Die Dame wurde 1892 geboren, um 1900 ist eine offensichtliche Fehldatierung. Die beiden haben unmittelbar vor dem 1. Weltkrieg geheiratet. Nach dem Alter der abgebildeten, sind in ihren 20er oder 30er. Und die Lizenz ist CC-0, also eine Freigabe durch einen Berechtigten. sугсго 18:01, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Das Datum ist sekundär und bildet keinen Gegenstand einer Löschung. Den Rest deiner Lizenzgespenster kannst du dir sparen. Wer lesen kann ist im Vorteil. 4.Klasse Niveau hier. --Jagdrevier.566 (talk) 19:35, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Wieso 4. Klasse, Dein Verhalten ist eher von einem möchtegern Bully aus der Vorschule. sугсго 19:39, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Das Datum ist sekundär und bildet keinen Gegenstand einer Löschung. Den Rest deiner Lizenzgespenster kannst du dir sparen. Wer lesen kann ist im Vorteil. 4.Klasse Niveau hier. --Jagdrevier.566 (talk) 19:35, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Du bist wohl blind. Die Dame wurde 1892 geboren, um 1900 ist eine offensichtliche Fehldatierung. Die beiden haben unmittelbar vor dem 1. Weltkrieg geheiratet. Nach dem Alter der abgebildeten, sind in ihren 20er oder 30er. Und die Lizenz ist CC-0, also eine Freigabe durch einen Berechtigten. sугсго 18:01, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - An unknown author cannot have given a CC-0 license. This is too recent to assume the author has been dead for 70 years. And who did the colorization, and when? It too has a copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:55, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [7]. Yann (talk) 18:04, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
![[7]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=651058300#File:Prinz_Ernst_August_und_seine_Braut,_Prinzessin_Victoria_Luise.jpg){kind=link}
there is a litle problem with this image, maybe should be reuploaded a new version ? Pippobuono (talk) 15:42, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:56, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
I don't see how this is PD with a 1980 publication date. FDW777 (talk) 21:46, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- As an official presidential portrait it may fall under {{PD-KoreaGov}}, in which case the licence tag needs changing. However the source isn't clear, so we can't tell this. Otherwise we'd have to delete it, unless it can be shown otherwise. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:08, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- [8]- Evidence that this portrait is the work of Republic of Korea Government. Comoelto (talk) 16:00, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
![[8]](https://www.pa.go.kr/images/online_contents/president/simg_president05.jpg){kind=link}
pa.go.kr has a copyright notice of "COPYRIGHT 2019 ⓒ PRESIDENTIAL ARCHIVES. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED". I'm no expert on when {{PD-KoreaGov}} applies, but there doesn't appear to be anything about photos on it. FDW777 (talk) 19:23, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:18, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Official opening of the Fourth Assembly, June 7 2011 Official opening of the Fourth Assembly, June 7 2011 Agoriad swyddogol y Cynulliad newydd, 7 Mehefin 2011 (5841762241) (cropped).jpg
[edit]_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Doublet -- Llywelyn2000 (talk) 13:51, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted the duplicate file. --Sreejith K (talk) 19:40, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ablaa model pantyhose (talk · contribs)
[edit]LQ, no educational-value fetish uploads. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Women pantyhose (sock nominations).
- File:ابن حميدو.png
- File:مساعدة الساحر ديفيد كوبر فيلد لابسة شراب منقط.jpg
- File:.مرا لابسة شراب كريستال.jpg
- File:Trapeze 1956 gena lollo brigida pantyhose.jpg
- File:Glitter pantyhose1968.jpg
- File:Black pantyhose1934.jpg
- File:6937pantyhose.jpg
- File:شراب كولون بيج شفاف.jpg
- File:نايلون.jpg
- File:كولون لامع.jpg
- File:شراب كولون لامع.jpg
- File:شراب.jpg
- File:شراب شبك.jpg
- File:شراب شبيكة.jpg
- File:كولون.jpg
- File:كولون شبك.jpg
- File:كولون شفاف كريستال نايلون.jpg
- File:جورب بيج شفاف مطرز بالاستراس.jpg
- File:جورب كريستال شفاف.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:34, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 19:26, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Taken from press photo at https://www.bth.se/eng/staff/daniel-mendez-fernandez-dmz/ Pbrks (talk) 02:28, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:29, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
It is unclear about the authorship and license of source images. I cannot find them on Commons, at least the Coat of Arms hardly will be a creation of the uploader. More info necessary, or has to be deleted. A.Savin 00:49, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Thanx for taking care A.Savin, all pictures are mine. And why i have to upload them to Commons, any request ? --Mile (talk) 08:33, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Coat of Arms also yours? And the pictures are taken at different seasons (Christmas, summer, etc.), really all yours?
- Best way to avoid deletion = upload original stuff. And attribute the CoA properly. --A.Savin 10:50, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Nothing new, this was "talked about" in 2010. Check there, so yes coat of arms too. And yes, all are my shots. Interesting, when I put my 1st uploads from Jerusalem from 1st digital camera Admin thought they are too good, and not from me (because of that). I am sure you did over search to find "original images". They exist, but just on my PC. I could not find summer in this photo. It was a very cold day in winter I know that, since I went to sleep at 18h that day and it was completely dark. Weihnachten time. --Mile (talk) 17:10, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept, I believe you. Taivo (talk) 16:41, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo of flag with folds... copyrightable. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:38, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep I'm unsure what is copyrightable here. Is it the folds or the text? As I understand it the flag is from 1850 so the copyright has expired. I know that we usually only say that photos and scans of 2D works are not copyrightable but in this case I would say the folds are too flat to make the photo copyrightable. In fact all 2D works are 3D if we use a super-monster-gigantic-crazy microscope. --MGA73 (talk) 09:56, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept, 1850 work is in public domain due to age. In addition, as USA has quite high threshold of originality, in my opinion it would be free from copyright anyway. Taivo (talk) 17:23, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by BCuzwhynot (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: too small to be realistically useful anywhere.
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:46, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:09, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Photo sous licence non libre 2A01:CB00:80AA:4500:CC52:BE44:2475:9FC5 01:58, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:32, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, not permanently placed. Taivo (talk) 17:40, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Probable copyright violation. Bizarre BizarreTalk modern to me 04:04, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Idem. Photo provenant du livret du disque donc image soumises aux droits.--Lefringant (talk) 13:35, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, by Fitindia on 23rd of July due to missing permission. Taivo (talk) 16:20, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be uploader's own work. Possibly from artist Facebook page. JalenFolf (talk) 04:11, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata. I'll delete file:Arys Trancemission.jpg due to same reason. These are the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 16:34, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
The uploader request to delete this file. Kejunorg (talk) 04:33, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request. I allow courtesy deletion due to missing source. Taivo (talk) 16:41, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
The uploader request to delete this file. Kejunorg (talk) 04:33, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request. I allow courtesy deletion due to missing source and weak educational value. Taivo (talk) 16:48, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
The uploader request to delete this file. Kejunorg (talk) 04:33, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request. I allow courtesy deletion due to missing source. Taivo (talk) 17:28, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
The uploader request to delete this file. Kejunorg (talk) 04:34, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request, courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 17:33, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
The uploader request to delete this file. Kejunorg (talk) 04:36, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept, beautiful photo, I do not agree to delete. Taivo (talk) 18:48, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
obviously not own work Thespoondragon (talk) 04:55, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 18:55, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of freely available license Evaders99 (talk) 05:04, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, not own work, the uploader's only contribution. Still no evidence of free license. Taivo (talk) 19:17, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
The uploader request to delete this file. Kejunorg (talk) 04:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request, courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 19:39, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
This logo has been blatantly copied from the official site (direct link). I don't see a copyright notice, and certainly really doubt it was released under a free license to say the least. Because COM:TOO UK is rather low as seen by previous cases involving logos, I don't think it could be hosted here under that mechanism either. This file should be moved to each wiki that needs it (looks like just enwiki so far) which allows non-free content with proper attribution. MSG17 (talk) 15:11, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hi @MSG17: , I think that if we just leave it there won't be any issues raised, as it's non-commercial and the G7 probably wouldn't mind either. Though if we need to go through the proper procedure, then sure, anything to save the logo, we can move it to enwiki, though I'm kinda noob on the technical steps, apologies Halo FC (talk) 16:51, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- We can't assume if they probably won't mind or not. Copyright is a serious matter: you need to make sure that a file is free-use (including for commercial purposes) when uploaded to Commons, either because it was released under the right license, it's copyright expired, or because it is under the threshold of originality. You can't attach a license that the file is not actually licensed under. If it is actually CC BY-SA 4.0, then you should be able to prove it. If you think you can get the required permission, then try to get the license holder to submit an OTRS ticket. I hope I'm not being too tough on you, but the reality is that adhering to copyright law is essential for this project. MSG17 (talk) 23:04, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- As a point of comparison: the G7 2017 site has a copyright notice on this page, stating "Unless indicated otherwise, the contents published on this site (text, images, photographs, video, etc.) fall under the license CC-BY 3.0." This allows Commons to host File:G7 2017 logo.svg freely.
- We can't assume if they probably won't mind or not. Copyright is a serious matter: you need to make sure that a file is free-use (including for commercial purposes) when uploaded to Commons, either because it was released under the right license, it's copyright expired, or because it is under the threshold of originality. You can't attach a license that the file is not actually licensed under. If it is actually CC BY-SA 4.0, then you should be able to prove it. If you think you can get the required permission, then try to get the license holder to submit an OTRS ticket. I hope I'm not being too tough on you, but the reality is that adhering to copyright law is essential for this project. MSG17 (talk) 23:04, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll e-mail the G7 organizers Halo FC (talk) 10:51, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I feel, that it is not a simple logo by British rules. It would be simple by American rules, but not British. Taivo (talk) 19:31, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (msg) 03:13, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 19:16, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the user's last remaining contribution, not yet nominated for deletion. I suspect again copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:53, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:46, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Compilation of presumably-copyrighted materail, not the original work of a federal employee. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:30, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- I don't think so, i'm pretty sure it was uploaded for educational purposes. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 141.193.118.3 (talk) 17:47, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete According to https://lssmedia.com/projects/smithsonians-great-americans-conversations-history-makers-copy/ the program was produced by Long Story Short Media, not the federal government itself (or its employees)t so not eligible for {{PD-USGov}}/Smithsonian. -M.nelson (talk) 22:05, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 21:55, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
_-_2021-05-23_-_6.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-22_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-22_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-22_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-22_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-21_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-21_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
The building shown is w:fr:Maison des Hommes et des Techniques, built in 1917 and authored by René Ménard, who died in 1958. As there is no commercial freedom of panorama in France (see COM:FOP France), this architectural work is still under his posthumous copyright and is unfree. Copyright expires on January 1, 2029 (70+1 years after his death), at which point these photos will be restored/undeleted.
- File:Maison Hommes Techniques - Nantes (FR44) - 2022-09-18 - 4.jpg
- File:Maison Hommes Techniques - Nantes (FR44) - 2022-09-18 - 3.jpg
- File:Maison Hommes Techniques - Nantes (FR44) - 2022-09-18 - 2.jpg
- File:Maison Hommes Techniques - Nantes (FR44) - 2022-09-18 - 1.jpg
_-_2022-09-18_-_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2022-09-18_-_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2022-09-18_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2022-09-18_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:49, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Wrong license and logo still under copyrights. I'd say the logo's copyrighteability should be discussed. Above or below COM:TOO US? Jonteemil (talk) 19:49, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- I do not understand why this is the second time this image has been marked for deletion. I own the explicit rights to this image and release them to the public domain.
There is no filed copyright with this image. I would like to release this under the GNU doctrine without having to monitor my Wikipedia account. RealSaddy (talk) 21:15, 24 May 2021 (UTC)- @RealSaddy: This isn't a second deletion request. This is just a so-called speedy deletion, that's only is supposed to be used for obvious uncontroversial deletions, turned into a deletion request which is how you respond to a speedy deletion request. You only removed {{Copyvio}} from the file and that's not the correct way to do it, this is :).Jonteemil (talk) 21:37, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Jonteemil: Oh alright, thank you for the clarification. Well, please mention me if there is anything for me to do--ciao! RealSaddy (talk) 01:29, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- @RealSaddy: This isn't a second deletion request. This is just a so-called speedy deletion, that's only is supposed to be used for obvious uncontroversial deletions, turned into a deletion request which is how you respond to a speedy deletion request. You only removed {{Copyvio}} from the file and that's not the correct way to do it, this is :).Jonteemil (talk) 21:37, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, appears to be the uploader's own work per discussion above so the existing CC license is valid. -M.nelson (talk) 22:07, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 22:04, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
