Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/04/30
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
https://www.turminhadobarulho.tk/ O revolucionário aliado (talk) 02:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 04:50, 30 April 2021 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Non-trivial logo --Krdbot 08:51, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Ich möchte nicht mehr, dass meine Bilder hier gezeigt und verwendet werden können. Ehesklave-michel (talk) 11:20, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied as G7. JGHowes talk 13:02, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license (No license since) Theklan (talk) 13:24, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- The image didn't have a license, but it is a screen capture fro OurWorldInData, so it is cc-by-sa-4.0. -Theklan (talk) 13:26, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: looks OK now. --JuTa 13:30, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Obvious copyright violation - the source is likely https://www.espncricinfo.com/player/rob-woodman-216186/photos which says clearly that it's copyright CricInfo Blue Square Thing (talk) 05:56, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:56, 30 April 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: Obvious copyright violation https://www.espncricinfo.com/player/rob-woodman-216186/photos --Krdbot 14:51, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Obvious copyright violation - source is probably https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/36355287 where it is credited to an agency Blue Square Thing (talk) 05:59, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:56, 30 April 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: Obvious copyright violation from agency - source appears to be the only web use of it https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/36355287 --Krdbot 14:51, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Shutterstock's editorial-use-only license is not sufficiently free C.Fred (talk) 15:34, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio: https://www.shutterstock.com/editorial/image-editorial/xxxtentacion-at-i-heart-radio-station-1035-the-beat-fort-lauderdale-usa-26-may-2017-8847724a. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:42, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Meaningless screen capture. Pierre cb (talk) 13:38, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Wdwd at 16:31, 30 April 2021 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos of or by non-contributors) and CSD G10 (files created as advertisements) --Krdbot 20:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Outside scope: a personal diploma should not be of Commons. Pierre cb (talk) 13:44, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 16:32, 30 April 2021 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 20:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope for Commons: a persona diploma is not a subject. Pierre cb (talk) 13:46, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 16:32, 30 April 2021 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 20:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Outside scope: fake diploma Pierre cb (talk) 13:47, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 16:32, 30 April 2021 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 20:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope for Commons. Pierre cb (talk) 13:48, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 16:32, 30 April 2021 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 20:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Pierre cb (talk) 13:51, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 16:32, 30 April 2021 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 20:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Pierre cb (talk) 13:52, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Wdwd at 16:28, 30 April 2021 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos of or by non-contributors) and CSD G10 (files created as advertisements) --Krdbot 20:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Pierre cb (talk) 13:52, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 16:32, 30 April 2021 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 20:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Pierre cb (talk) 13:56, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 16:32, 30 April 2021 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 20:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: screen capture of Wikipedia Pierre cb (talk) 13:59, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 16:32, 30 April 2021 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 20:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: screen capture Pierre cb (talk) 14:02, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 16:32, 30 April 2021 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 20:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Description has nothing to do with the image. Copyvio likely Pierre cb (talk) 14:41, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 16:32, 30 April 2021 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 20:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
FoP not present for sculptures in US Filetime (talk) 06:11, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The sculpture is prominent in the center of the image so it quite clearly does not fall under de minimis. Epicgenius (talk) 14:26, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
3D artwork in public places is protected under copyright by us FoP law. Filetime (talk) 04:55, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The image is tagged as {{PD-US-1978-89}}. However, one-of-a-kind artwork is not considered "published" merely by being on public display. DMacks (talk) 06:57, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Not licencse allowed Galopax (talk) 06:51, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: F4. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:30, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
FoP not present for sculptures in US Filetime (talk) 06:11, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 18:48, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1175).jpg
[edit]useless photo with no useable information Krok6kola (talk) 21:47, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: looks like withdrawn. --JuTa 00:28, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 118).jpg
[edit]useless photo with no useable information Krok6kola (talk) 21:48, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: looks like withdrawn. --JuTa 00:27, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1186).jpg
[edit]useless photo with no useable information Krok6kola (talk) 21:49, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: looks like withdrawn. --JuTa 00:26, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1187).jpg
[edit]useless photo with no useable information Krok6kola (talk) 21:49, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: looks like withdrawn. --JuTa 00:25, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1194).jpg
[edit]useless photo with no useable information Krok6kola (talk) 21:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: looks like withdrawn. --JuTa 00:24, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1195).jpg
[edit]useless photo with no useable information Krok6kola (talk) 21:51, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: looks like withdrawn. --JuTa 00:23, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1191).jpg
[edit]useless photo with no useable information Krok6kola (talk) 21:52, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: seems withdrawn. --JuTa 00:21, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
COM:ADVERT in the description and out of scope Yeeno (talk) 18:10, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Jdx at 02:31, 2 Mai 2021 UTC: Content created as advertisement (G10) --Krdbot 08:47, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
no evidence of freely available license - copyrighted magazine Evaders99 (talk) 23:08, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. --✗plicit 12:18, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
no evidence of license - taken from social media Evaders99 (talk) 23:10, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. --✗plicit 12:19, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
no evidence of freely available license Evaders99 (talk) 23:13, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. --✗plicit 12:19, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
no evidence of freely available license - from social media Evaders99 (talk) 23:19, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. --✗plicit 12:19, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
COM:FLICKRWASHed images from the uploader's own Flickr account. The uploader is a likely sockpuppet of Wakkun-a (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) /Yamacyan (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) .
- File:Beautiful-caucasian-white-dress-001.jpg
- File:Beautiful-caucasian-white-lingerie-05.jpg
- File:Beautiful-caucasian-white-lingerie-02.jpg
- File:Beautiful-caucasian-white-lingerie-03.jpg
- File:Beautiful-caucasian-white-lingerie-01.jpg
- File:Beautiful-caucasian-pink-lingerie-01.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 14:19, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 16:44, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Useless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:41, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Useless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:41, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:07, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Useless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:41, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:08, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Drone Shot of Quaid-e-Azam Medical College.jpg
- File:Aerial view of the Quaid-e-Azam Medical College on the occasion of "Sports Week".jpg
- File:Quaid-e-Azam Medical College Front.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:38, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:03, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mannjanbazm (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Farah Nabulsi.jpg
- File:IT lawn 1.jpg
- File:Hawk eye captures AUST.jpg
- File:Inaguration of AUST.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:39, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:03, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ricky Arians
[edit]Out of project scope: low quality personal pictures without educational purpose.
Lymantria (talk) 07:07, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:04, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JordBenion (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work as claimed, one is clearly an official photo, PCP
- File:The General outside the Aso Rock Presidential Villa, Abuja.jpg
- File:Lt. Buratai's official portait.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:17, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JordBenion (talk · contribs)
[edit]All official photos and logos, not own work as claimed
- File:Osinbajo-potrait.jpg
- File:Chief of Air Staff, Nigeria.jpg
- File:Chief of Defence Staff, Nigeria .jpg
- File:Portrait of the Chief of Army Staff.jpg
- File:Official Portrait Hon. Austin .jpg
- File:Aisha Buhari .jpg
- File:Seal of the First Lady of Nigeria.png
- File:Chief-defense-staff.jpg
- File:Cds seal.png
- File:NIGERIA - AIR CHIEF OF STAFF.png
- File:NIGERIA - ARMY CAF SEA.png
Gbawden (talk) 14:17, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:05, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arthur.grigoryan1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Old photos, unlikely to be own work
- File:Հովհաննիսյան Մնացական 1965.jpg
- File:Գուրգեն Վարդանյան.jpg
- File:Հովհաննիսյան Մնացական պատվոգրեր սպորտի վարպետների ընտանիքի անդամներով.jpg
- File:Հ.Հովհաննիսյան ՀՀ պատանիների հավաքական 16-05-1993.jpg
- File:Հովհաննիսյան Մնացական 1956.jpg
- File:Հովհաննիսյան Մնացական 20տ.jpg
- File:Մնացական Հովհաննիսյան.jpg
- File:Մնացական Բենիամինի Հովհաննիսյան.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 13:19, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:25, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aba Da Bagga (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:Skittles Screenplay.pdf
- File:FINAL DRAFT - LETTER TO LOST SOUL.pdf
- File:WIDE ANGLE FILMS - SCREENPLAY.pdf
- File:FOLKTALES FROM INDIA.pdf
- File:THE INTRODUCTION - MARK ONE.pdf
- File:CLIPS.pdf
- File:CAUSES OF 1857 REVOLUTION.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:15, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Engrzaid022 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:Latest trends in computing security.pdf
- File:Feed forward neural network for SIM numbers.pdf
- File:Research Paper Arming Future Security by Prof. Engr.Zaid Mazhar.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:17, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:21, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emmanuel Gerardo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:17, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:17, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Александр Малков (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:18, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:18, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nika Somkhishvili (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:18, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
I am concerned that these images were only uploaded today, reviewed by the Flickr bot as ok and yet I get a 404 error on each of them. Rather than a deletion request as such I'm suggesting that this warrants some human reviewing. Thanks
- File:Wedding-dress-002.png
- File:White-lingerie-001.png
- File:Pantyhose-001.jpg
- File:White-tights-02.jpg
- File:White-tights-001.png
- File:High-socks-001.jpg
- File:Thigh-high-socks-001.jpg
- File:Wedding-dress-001.jpg
Herby talk thyme 12:16, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:13, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Apparent license laundering. Watermarks credit "Danila Panfilov," which is not the same person as the source Flickr user "Din Muhammad Sumon"
Эlcobbola talk 20:02, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:37, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Outside project COM:SCOPE, scribbles not useful for Wikipedia.
Ytoyoda (talk) 18:27, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:19, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dr Sachin Kapur Fanclub (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Video-www instagram com-16197971952900.jpg
- File:Dr Sachin Kapur.jpg
- File:Dr Sachin Kapur Photo.jpg
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:43, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:19, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dr Sachin Kapur Fanclub (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope/ spam
- File:Dr Sachin Kapur Thinking.jpg
- File:Dr Sachin Kapur with Sunglasses.jpg
- File:Dr Sachin Kapur Fanclub.jpg
Hoo man (talk) 23:44, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:19, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
this file is not in use and i the uploader want to delete it ZericaRibica (talk) 00:58, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see Commons:License revocation. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:26, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
fuzzy photo of an unidentified individual, not used in any Wiki Oaktree b (talk) 01:31, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:27, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
artistic photo, out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 01:34, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:04, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover Johnj1995 (talk) 01:56, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:27, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted movie poster Johnj1995 (talk) 03:29, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:28, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution (500 × 333px, 75 KB) and missing decent EXIF metadata. I suspect this is not own work by the uploader, who had been warned about suspected or obvious copyright violations. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:34, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:30, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
FoP not present for sculptures in US Filetime (talk) 06:11, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The sculpture is in the center of the image so it quite clearly does not fall under de minimis. I took this image, but I did not realize I shouldn't have uploaded it to Commons. Epicgenius (talk) 14:16, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:31, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
FoP not present for sculptures in US Filetime (talk) 06:11, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The sculpture is prominent to the left of the image so it quite clearly does not fall under de minimis. I took this image, but I did not realize I shouldn't have uploaded it to Commons. I did make a cropped version, File:High Line Nov 2019 14 (cropped).jpg, which does not include the sculpture at all. Epicgenius (talk) 14:25, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:31, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Pointless, fails COM:SCOPE. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:06, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:10, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope 17jiangz1 (talk) 18:53, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:10, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Surely not uploaders own work. More then 1,000 matches with TinEye. GeorgHH • talk 19:55, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:09, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
This is the cover of a record by the Electric Light Orchestra (aka ELO). We need both evidence that the uploader is the photographer, as claimed, and that the recording artists and the record company have taken the extremely unusual step of allowing the photographer to retain full copyright in the cover art. At present we have no evidence for either of those. JBW (talk) 20:08, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Since posting the above message I have discovered that there is also a file showing the back of the same record cover, at File:ELO Secret Messages record cover back.jpg. That image contains a copyright notice which is not entirely clear at this resolution, but it is clear that it says "all rights reserved". It is therefore even less likely that the uploader has the authority to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license, as claimed. JBW (talk) 20:17, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
I am assuming that this is where I reply to this deletion request? I am a new user and it is clear I have made some fundamental mistakes. Not least having 2 user names of Hagsphotograph and Haghagis. I don't know how but assume the latter I created many years ago and had forgotten. Hence when I uploaded the two pictures I didn't realise I was logged in to my old user name hagsphotograph. This may appear to be irrelevant to this discussion except I would like to delete hagsphotograph which I assume will then delete both these images and start again?
To directly address your deletion request having now completed further reading on wiki's acceptable licencing I see that I did not answer the fields correctly. I should have 'licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license' For 'Low Resolution'.
My desire was to see a better quality reproduction of my work for both front and back whilst accepting that I am not the soul owner of the copyright as creator of the works. Specifically in the case of the back of the sleeve it was to provide more information of relevance to the text concerning the content of the back cover.
What I would take issue with is that I have never sold my sole copyright to a record company but have licensed that use for the said product. To transfer my copyright there would need to be a signed agreement stating such a transaction. This is generaly ignored by record companies as is true in this case. It is complicated as the elements in the front cover of the sky, cooling towers, street & grass and the creation of that composition are my sole works. I have not assigned the full copyright of this to anybody even though it has been used on many occasions without request or credit to myself.
What I would like to do as I summarised in my first paragraph is delete one of my double user names then re submit the images at much lower resolution specifically.....
'The copy is of sufficient resolution for commentary and identification but lower resolution than the original cover. Copies made from it will be of inferior quality, unsuitable as artwork on pirate versions or other uses that would compete with the commercial purpose of the original artwork'.
On the question of having non evidence of proving I am the creator of the work or am who I say I am all I can suggest is that you send me an email from my Hags Photography web site to confirm this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hagsphotograph (talk • contribs) 14:44, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
I look forward to your comments and any advice would be gratefully received. Template:Hagsphotograph — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hagsphotograph (talk • contribs) 14:37, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:09, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Image caption at source is "© Tous droits réservés" GeorgHH • talk 20:11, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:08, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
This is the cover of a record by the Electric Light Orchestra (aka ELO). We need both evidence that the uploader is the photographer, as claimed, and that the recording artists and the record company have taken the extremely unusual step of allowing the photographer to retain full copyright in the cover art. At present we have no evidence for either of those. Moreover, the image contains a copyright notice which is not entirely clear at this resolution, but it is clear that it says "all rights reserved". JBW (talk) 20:12, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:07, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Photograph of a book; not own work so likely copyrighted. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:13, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:07, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Per description, "Terraria fan art". Not really in COM:SCOPE, and likely copyright problems due to possible close resemblance of a game character. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:14, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:07, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:42, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:06, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:44, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:06, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
drive-by upload of low-res professional looking cartoon -- likely copyvio 151.194.65.120 21:45, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:05, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope unused logo AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:59, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:03, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
This pattern is sacrate for Assurini people. I did this digitalization before I undertand I shouldn't do it. So the right think to do is deleting it, and if someday one from this etnic group uploud a similar image, just then it will be respectfull. For now, deleting is the only respectfull choice. Pescarts (talk) 21:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I trust the nominator. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:04, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
This pattern is sacrate for Javaé people. I did this digitalization before I undertand I shouldn't do it. So the right think to do is deleting it, and if someday one from this etnic group uploud a similar image, just then it will be respectfull. For now, deleting is the only respectfull choice. Besides that, this image is Innacurate. Pescarts (talk) 21:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I trust the nominator. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:04, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be the uploader's own picture (missing expected metadata), likely copied from some webpage. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dog5.png which is visibly copied from a webpage. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 10:33, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:41, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
unfocused photo of a random parking lot, out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 00:28, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 16:05, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
personal photograph, out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 00:45, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 16:09, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
This looks like a scan from something, based on the image quality and the caption. I couldn't find a source online, but I doubt that it's the uploader's own work from 2016. TheCatalyst31 (talk) 01:10, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, obviously scanned from print. Thuresson (talk) 16:14, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
According to en:File:RichardBachman.jpg, this is a fair use image Johnj1995 (talk) 03:08, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 16:16, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
According to en:File:FigureSlabAvalanche.jpg, this image is from a book which was published in 2004 and is therefore copyrighted. Johnj1995 (talk) 02:10, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, fair use at en:File:FigureSlabAvalanche.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 16:43, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, somebody's school essay. COM:NOTHOST. Thuresson (talk) 16:25, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, but EXIF data shows that this is from either Facebook or Instagram. Thuresson (talk) 16:27, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: From Linkedin CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Originally published at http://markkodiakukena.blogspot.com/2015/03/ihsa-varsity-boys-basketball-class-3a.html. Please follow the directions at COM:OTRS to verify the license information. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:01, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 02:33, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
According to this Ebay listing, this photo was used as an Official SRU Players Card. Unlikely to be uploader's "own work". Needs permission from copyright holder/s via COM:OTRS. Howhontanozaz (talk) 17:11, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Well done with the research! Thuresson (talk) 16:32, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
From a Flickr account with a single image, pretty obvious attempt at COM:FLICKRWASH judging by the uploader’s edit history. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:05, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:45, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Way too close to her face! Nestwild668 (talk) 15:47, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Deletion request opened by a "new" user that uploads several copyright violations. File is in use in arz.wikipedia.org كاتى بيرى, ast.wikipedia.org Katy Perry. be.wikipedia.org Кэці Перы, ca.wikipedia.org Katy Perry, cy.wikipedia.org Katy Perry, diq.wikipedia.org Katy Perry, en.wikipedia.org 1984; User:Spinster/Celebrities who are still alive, eu.wikipedia.org Urriaren 25; Katy Perry Txantiloi:Jaiotza garrantzitsuenak/10/25/Mundua, gl.wikipedia.org Wikipedia:Lista de mulleres con artigo na Wikipedia en galego, ky.wikipedia.org, Кэти Перри, no.wikipedia.org Katy Perry, pl.wikipedia.org Katy Perry, ro.wikipedia.org Katy Perry; Listă de oameni din statul California, ru.wikinews.org Категория:Кэти Перри, ru.wikiquote.org Кэти Перри, se.wikipedia.org Geavaheaddji:Jon Harald Søby (WMNO)/Nissonat, sl.wikipedia.org Katy Perry, www.wikidata.org Q42493 and zh-yue.wikipedia.org 姬蒂佩里. Tm (talk) 16:47, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is widely used, from arz:كاتى بيرى to zh-yue:姬蒂佩里. Under COM:INUSE, a used file is in scope whatever its quality. --bjh21 (talk) 09:54, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 05:16, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused, bad crop. Too close BartoloCorp (talk) 08:56, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep In use and is potentially useful for several Wikimedia projects. Thuresson (talk) 16:19, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 10:45, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
This image was used by the uploader to create a hoax article on THWikipedia and probably was photoshopped. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Just Sayori (talk • contribs) 05:13, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:17, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Hoo man (talk) 11:09, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:46, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
black frame, no useful purpose Askeuhd (talk) 11:35, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:46, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Personal image without educational use Drakosh (talk) 11:43, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:46, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
What is the use of this image? Can it be deleted? JopkeB (talk) 14:24, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:47, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:47, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:47, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:47, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:47, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File available at File:Call stack layout.svg, this is a duplicate with no useful difference. EpicPupper (talk) 17:24, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:49, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
non-free logotype, will be reuploaded locally on w:slwiki A09090091 (talk) 17:26, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:49, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Cambio de estado.svg EpicPupper (talk) 18:14, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:48, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Essentially a duplicate of File:SVG Text tutorial Text SVG.svg, and the other version seems to be superior in terms of paths vs. <text>. EpicPupper (talk) 18:19, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:49, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Logos of YouTube users based on a non-free game; not own work.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:44, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:50, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1126).jpg
[edit]photo of unidentified usesless information Krok6kola (talk) 20:56, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn, see file history. --Minoraxtalk 10:53, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1127).jpg
[edit]Photo of unidentified, useless information Krok6kola (talk) 20:57, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Useless, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:01, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn, see file history. --Minoraxtalk 10:53, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1128).jpg
[edit]Photo of useless information Krok6kola (talk) 20:59, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- {{Kept}} No valid motivation. BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 20:26, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn, see file history. --Minoraxtalk 10:53, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1129).jpg
[edit]Useless, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:00, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn, see file history. --Minoraxtalk 10:53, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 113).jpg
[edit]Useless, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:01, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn, see file history. --Minoraxtalk 10:53, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1130).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:02, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn, see file history. --Minoraxtalk 10:55, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1131).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn, see file history. --Minoraxtalk 10:55, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1132).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:04, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn, see file history. --Minoraxtalk 10:55, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1133).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:04, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn, see file history. --Minoraxtalk 10:55, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1134).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:05, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn, see file history. --Minoraxtalk 10:55, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1135).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:05, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn, see file history. --Minoraxtalk 10:55, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1136).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:06, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn, see file history. --Minoraxtalk 10:55, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1137).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:06, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn, see file history. --Minoraxtalk 10:55, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1138).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:07, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn, see file history. --Minoraxtalk 10:55, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1139).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:07, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn, see file history. --Minoraxtalk 10:55, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1160).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:21, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn, see file history. --Minoraxtalk 10:59, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1161).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:22, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn, see file history. --Minoraxtalk 10:59, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1162).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:22, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn, see file history. --Minoraxtalk 10:59, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1163).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:23, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn, see file history. --Minoraxtalk 10:59, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1165).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:24, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --Minoraxtalk 10:52, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1166).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:24, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --Minoraxtalk 10:52, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1167).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:25, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn, see file history. --Minoraxtalk 10:58, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1168).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:26, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn, see file history. --Minoraxtalk 10:58, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
ca ne correspond plus a l'agence avec la quel cet photo est associe New madison artdep (talk) 10:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Sorry but the metadata makes too likely the file is own work. Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker Overleg • CA 10:05, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason to delete. Bencemac (talk) 16:21, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ankry (talk) 14:31, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 114).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:08, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: see Special:PermaLink/559124075#Mass deletion requests. --Minoraxtalk 14:42, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1140).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:09, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: see Special:PermaLink/559124075#Mass deletion requests. --Minoraxtalk 14:43, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1141).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:09, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: see Special:PermaLink/559124075#Mass deletion requests. --Minoraxtalk 14:43, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1142).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:10, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: see Special:PermaLink/559124075#Mass deletion requests. --Minoraxtalk 14:43, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1144).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:11, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: see Special:PermaLink/559124075#Mass deletion requests. --Minoraxtalk 14:43, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1145).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:12, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: see Special:PermaLink/559124075#Mass deletion requests. --Minoraxtalk 14:43, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1146).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:12, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: see Special:PermaLink/559124075#Mass deletion requests. --Minoraxtalk 14:43, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1147).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:13, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: see Special:PermaLink/559124075#Mass deletion requests. --Minoraxtalk 14:43, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1148).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:13, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: see Special:PermaLink/559124075#Mass deletion requests. --Minoraxtalk 14:42, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1149).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:14, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: see Special:PermaLink/559124075#Mass deletion requests. --Minoraxtalk 14:42, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 115).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:15, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: see Special:PermaLink/559124075#Mass deletion requests. --Minoraxtalk 14:42, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1150).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:15, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: see Special:PermaLink/559124075#Mass deletion requests. --Minoraxtalk 14:42, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1151).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:16, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: see Special:PermaLink/559124075#Mass deletion requests. --Minoraxtalk 14:42, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1152).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:16, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: see Special:PermaLink/559124075#Mass deletion requests. --Minoraxtalk 14:42, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1153).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:17, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: see Special:PermaLink/559124075#Mass deletion requests. --Minoraxtalk 14:42, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1155).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:18, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: see Special:PermaLink/559124075#Mass deletion requests. --Minoraxtalk 14:42, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1156).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:19, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: see Special:PermaLink/559124075#Mass deletion requests. --Minoraxtalk 14:42, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 1159).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:20, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: see Special:PermaLink/559124075#Mass deletion requests. --Minoraxtalk 14:42, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1910-1920- Outgoing, Executive- Treasury, Secretary, 01-12-1914 To Treasury, Secretary, 10-28-1916 (1 of 2) - DPLA - 5025282cf7a3b790c1925b5a09c216f3 (page 116).jpg
[edit]Useless photo, no relevant info Krok6kola (talk) 21:21, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: see Special:PermaLink/559124075#Mass deletion requests. --Minoraxtalk 14:42, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Essentially a duplicate of File:"V škufo" nesejo v rjuhi seno, Sp. Trenta 1952 (2).jpg. EpicPupper (talk) 21:24, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 04:21, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Potential copyvio. This image can be found in other news reports which were published on 04/01~02 (e.g. [1][2]). However the source was published on 04/03 per search result. Thus Legislative Yuan seem not the original author. COM:OTRS permission is needed. SCP-2000 07:05, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:48, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused, bad crop BartoloCorp (talk) 09:00, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:26, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
投稿者です。誤ってPNG形式で書き出したファイルをアップロードしてしまいました。JPGで書き出した写真をアップし直したので、こちらの削除をお願いします。 KKPCW (talk) 10:15, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. --✗plicit 03:39, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
投稿者です。誤ってPNG形式で書き出したファイルをアップロードしてしまいました。JPGで書き出した写真をアップし直したので、こちらの削除をお願いします。 KKPCW (talk) 10:15, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. --✗plicit 03:40, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
投稿者です。誤ってPNG形式で書き出したファイルをアップロードしてしまいました。JPGで書き出した写真をアップし直したので、こちらの削除をお願いします。 KKPCW (talk) 10:20, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. --✗plicit 03:46, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
投稿者です。誤ってPNG形式で書き出したファイルをアップロードしてしまいました。JPGで書き出した写真をアップし直したので、こちらの削除をお願いします。 KKPCW (talk) 10:20, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. --✗plicit 03:46, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
There is no proof that this image was released with a CC0 license. The license is not mentioned on the VanMoof website. Sanbonani (talk) 10:57, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:17, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
There is no proof that this image was released with a CC0 license. The license is not mentioned on the VanMoof website. Sanbonani (talk) 10:57, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:18, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
There is no proof that this image was released with a CC0 license. The license is not mentioned on the VanMoof website. Sanbonani (talk) 10:58, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:18, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
There is no proof that this image was released with a CC0 license. The license is not mentioned on the VanMoof website. Sanbonani (talk) 10:58, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:18, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
There is no proof that this image was released with a CC0 license. The license is not mentioned on the VanMoof website. Sanbonani (talk) 10:58, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:18, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
There is no proof that this image was released with a CC0 license. The license is not mentioned on the VanMoof website. Sanbonani (talk) 10:58, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:18, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
There is no proof that this image was released with a CC0 license. The license is not mentioned on the VanMoof website. Sanbonani (talk) 10:58, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:18, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
There is no proof that this image was released with a CC0 license. The license is not mentioned on the VanMoof website. Sanbonani (talk) 10:58, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:18, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
There is no proof that this image was released with a CC0 license. The license is not mentioned on the VanMoof website. Sanbonani (talk) 10:58, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:18, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
There is no proof that this image was released with a CC0 license. The license is not mentioned on the VanMoof website. Sanbonani (talk) 10:58, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:18, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
There is no proof that this image was released with a CC0 license. The license is not mentioned on the VanMoof website. Sanbonani (talk) 10:58, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:18, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
There is no proof that this image was released with a CC0 license. The license is not mentioned on the VanMoof website. Sanbonani (talk) 10:59, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:19, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Fantasy diagram, out of project scope, like all other uploads from same user. Smooth O (talk) 11:49, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:50, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Suspect licensing. If this really is by an artist who died in 1952, then it's not the "own work" of a Wikipedia editor. Hoary (talk) 12:01, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:25, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [3]. Yann (talk) 21:05, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Likely out of COM:SCOPE. Also no permission from the photographer (see EXIF). Ankry (talk) 12:04, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:22, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Bad quality and low image resolution. SCP-2000 13:14, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:37, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Election maps created by User:The Empire of History
[edit]- File:Utah Atlas, 2016 Election.png
- File:Revised Louisiana Map.png
- File:Michigan U.S. Election Atlas.png
- File:Texas 2016, U.S. Election Atlas.png
- File:Tennessee 2016, U.S. Election Atlas.png
- File:Wisconsin 2016, U.S. Election Atlas.png
- File:Wisconsin 2016 Counties.png
- File:Georgia 2016, U.S. Election Atlas.png
- File:Virginia Atlas Map.png
- File:Virginia Counties, 2016 Electoral Results.png
- File:Florida Election Results by County, 2016.png
- File:Arkansas Atlas, 2016 Election.png
These are hoax election maps, created by a (now blocked) user that was using wikipedia as a host for their alternate election fanfiction. The vast majority of this users creations were already deleted in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by The Empire of History, but these were missed because the user uploaded these to the English Wikipedia and they were then trans wikied to commons by other users. These should be deleted because they are out of commons scope and there is a real risk of them finding their way into articles as nothing in their name or description makes it clear that these are someone's alternate history fanfiction. 192.76.8.91 13:28, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 03:17, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:01, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:28, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
This file has an OTRS permission, which covers its original elements. But it seems to be a derivative of Salvador Dali art (elephant, old man, and other elements), so probably under copyright. Darwin Ahoy! 14:14, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:40, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be uploader's "own work". A larger photo can be found published as early as December 2019 (https://www.facebook.com/TicketMagazine/photos/a.464361288169/10156775731103170). Howhontanozaz (talk) 15:13, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:36, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eridon Manuka (talk · contribs)
[edit]User is only uploading personal images for advertising, has not been active in Wikipedia in the past
Migebert (talk) 15:43, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:20, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Happiee ssingh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:21, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Salim Abbasbhai Pathan (talk · contribs)
[edit]User is only uploading personal images for advertising, no cooperation to see at wikipedia projects in the past
Migebert (talk) 16:05, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:19, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Metadata shows the photo is from Facebook/Instagram. OTRS verification needed. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:09, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:41, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Previously published at https://www.fmsite.net/reemplazos/shavon-john-brown-r1657/, need to verify ownership Ytoyoda (talk) 17:11, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:45, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
COM:FLICKRWASH. The source for this photo is a low-res version of https://www.flickr.com/photos/cubagallery/6509684407/, marked All Rights Reserved.
Another photo from this Flickr user, File:Autumn tree 1.jpg, sourced to https://www.flickr.com/photos/69008562@N06/6932017261/ is similarly stolen, but original has a CC license so does not need to be deleted. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:59, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: If somehow this ends up not being deleted, then please rename it. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 23:28, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:38, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
I did upload the photo which has the wrong size for competition. Thatkaguruguy (talk) 22:32, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: larger file uploaded as File:A Smiling woman harvest tea leave at Bumbuli Plantation.jpg. --✗plicit 03:49, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Es wurde ohne gültige Lizenz vom Urheber hochgeladen. Der Urheber ist nicht mit dem Upload seines Bildes einverstanden, da er einer Lizenzierung in der Wikipedia nicht zugestimmt hat.Bundesstefan (talk) 14:45, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Als Urheber bist du angegeben und du hast das mit gültiger Lizenz hochgeladen und veröffentlicht, dieses kannst du nachträglich nicht zurückziehen, der Löschantrag ist damit abzulehnen. Alles weitere siehe Commons:Deletion requests/File:Delfosse DVD small.jpg. --ɱ 17:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete:Uploader's request less than 24 hours after upload. --Achim (talk) 18:41, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: I was going to delete this picture per Achim, and had it actually already deleted, but I'm changing my decision now, as COM:CSD#G7 is only applicable for " recently created (<7 days) unused content", and this picture is in use in an article in German-language Wikipedia. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:37, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
"Fukusuke"sculpture is made by 松久宗淋(died 1992)[4]. No FoP in Japan. Iso10970 (talk) 01:36, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- This photo was taken by me.The statue is installed outdoors and anyone can see it freely.It is not prohibited to take picture.I want to know the reason for the deletion request.この写真は私が撮影しました。銅像は屋外に設置されていて誰もが自由に見ることができます。またそれは撮影が禁止されていません。私は削除依頼理由を知りたいです。--Naokijp (talk) 03:09, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Naokijp: COM:FOP Japan. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:32, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- 現在、福助本社に画像を載せていいかメールにて問い合せしています。この画像が削除対象になるのなら、wikimediaに同じ福助像の画像がありますがすべて削除対象になるという事でしょうか?Naokijp (talk) 18:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- 本日2021.5.27に、Fukuske Corporationより問い合わせの返信があり、福助像の画像の使用は問題ないと回答を頂きました。Fukuske Corporationが画像の使用を認めているためCOM:FOP Japanを理由とする削除依頼は、無効であり、実情を知らない方からの言いがかりです。削除依頼は取り消してください。Fukusuke Corporation replied that there is no problem in using the image of the Fukusuke statue.Please cancel the image deletion request as soon as possibleNaokijp (talk) 06:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
- 現在、福助本社に画像を載せていいかメールにて問い合せしています。この画像が削除対象になるのなら、wikimediaに同じ福助像の画像がありますがすべて削除対象になるという事でしょうか?Naokijp (talk) 18:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Naokijp: COM:FOP Japan. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:32, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: copyright belongs to 松久宗淋, not the Fukusuke Corporation. --Yasu (talk) 15:28, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
投稿者本人による削除依頼 Mc681 (talk) 08:16, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion: uploader requested deletion on the day of upload. --Yasu (talk) 15:30, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
unidentified location, photo is fuzzy and unused on any wiki Oaktree b (talk) 00:32, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
photo is out of focus, easily replaced by others already on commons Oaktree b (talk) 00:43, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
unused photo, non-notable individual Oaktree b (talk) 00:51, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Info May have something to do with en:The Heatmakerz. Thuresson (talk) 16:13, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Subject is Rsonist of The Heatmakerz, in scope. ✗plicit 03:44, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Clearly copyrighted. This is the uploader's only contribution. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 00:57, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Restored per VRT. -- Geagea (talk) 19:23, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
I'm afraid that this logo beyonds COM:TOO Taiwan Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:55, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Ditto for File:Cartoon Network Taiwan logo (2005-2011).png. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:55, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Not a simple logo, see en:File:Hiawatha service logo.jpg Johnj1995 (talk) 02:27, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted movie poster Johnj1995 (talk) 02:42, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- I completely agree with the removal.--Князь Полтавський (talk) 05:37, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted album cover Johnj1995 (talk) 02:59, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Just realized the painting on the side of the vehicle may count as artwork. Better safe then sorry. Mbrickn (talk) 03:12, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
According to en:File:Snipping Tool 10 Icon.png, this is a fair use image Johnj1995 (talk) 03:17, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:28, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
According to en:File:Suzanne Malherbe.jpg, this is a fair use image Johnj1995 (talk) 03:24, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:29, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
This book was published in 1930 and will remain copyrighted until 2026. Johnj1995 (talk) 03:27, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:29, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Far too low resolution in order to be considered as own work. At the same time, the absence of metadata doesn't really help here. Glorious 93 (talk) 07:45, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:31, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Poor transcription. (I'm the creator.) Nachtbold (talk) 09:26, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:35, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Poor transcription. (I'm the creator.) Nachtbold (talk) 09:27, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:35, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Poor transcription. (I'm the creator.) Nachtbold (talk) 09:27, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:36, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Siyaset Meraklisi 1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Meral Akşener Grup Toplantısı'nda Konuşuyor.jpg AA shared on 17 February 2021. [5]. Uploaded to Commons on 4 April 2021.
- File:Meral Akşener Portre.jpg [A photo shared by the Bursa provincial headquarter of the Good Party. [6] Uploaded to Commons on 4 April 2021.
- File:Akşener 2. Olağan Kurultay.jpg A photo possibly has been taken by AA in 2. congre on 20 September 2020. [7] This photo isn't in gallery here, but media outlets have used other photos taken by AA. [8] Uploaded to Commons on 9 April 2021.
- File:Akşener 1. Olağan Kurultay'da.jpg A photo possibly has been taken in 1. congre on 10 December 2017. Source: [9] Also the news of 1. congre on AA. [10] Uploaded to Commons on 9 April 2021.
- File:İYİ'lerin Evi.jpg Good Party shared on 11 November 2017. [11] Uploaded to Commons on 9 April 2021.
- File:Akşener Olağanüstü Kurultay'da.jpg AA shared in 1. extraordinary congre on 1 April 2018. [12] [13] Uploaded to Commons on 9 April 2021.
- File:Tüzük Kurultayı.jpg YeniÇağ shared on 25 May 2019. [14] Uploaded to Commons on 9 April 2021.
- File:2. Olağanüstü Kurultay.jpg Gazetekritik shared on 12 August 2018 with this attribution (Fotoğraf: AA). [15] Uploaded to Commons on 9 April 2021.
- File:4. Olağanüstü Kurultay.jpg Egedensoz shared on 3 August 2019. [16] Uploaded to Commons on 9 April 2021.
I said, generally the owner of these photos is AA (gouvernement agency). Works of state institutions in Turkey are copyrighted. Copyright owner of the other photos are others. Therefore, these photos should be deleted by copyright rules. Regards. Uncitoyen (talk) 10:14, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:36, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Siyaset Meraklisi 1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work. No original author or permission.
- File:Sevil Atasoy 1.jpg
- File:Atasoy Toplantıda.jpg
- File:Sevil Atasoy, Üsküdar Üni.jpg
- File:Sevil Atasoy Kitap 2019.jpg
- File:Sevil Atasoy PIMS7E1.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 11:04, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:21, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation (https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=167811835158040&set=a.167811821824708) Patchall (talk) 10:55, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:43, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ChristopherWard1996 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Given sources not available. No indication for use of CC license.
GeorgHH • talk 10:56, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:44, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Endre Szász died in 2003. Copyrighted indoor artwork in Hungary. Regasterios (talk) 11:07, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:44, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, and possible non-free video game snaphot. looks like minecraft Eaaaaugh (talk) 12:14, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:46, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
transparency doesn't work as expected with this jpg image. Remplaced by a working png picture. Pldx1 (talk) 12:27, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:47, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Inconsistent statements about the authorship and copyright: the filename and EXIF declared the photo as copyrighted work by Havlík. However, the uploader User:IBartosova declared it as her own work with her own license. Permission by Vojtěch Havlík is missing. ŠJů (talk) 13:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:47, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
definitely not own work, probably copyrighted Joostik (talk) 13:12, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:48, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
From a confirmed COM:FLICKRWASH account. See COM:QFI. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:01, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:08, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Adjective brut isn't declinable, see German Wiktionary: brut, so there is no inflection bruten Jeuwre (talk) 14:02, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:09, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Adjective brut isn't declinable, see German Wiktionary: brut, so there is no inflection bruter Jeuwre (talk) 14:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:09, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Adjective brut isn't declinable, see German Wiktionary: brut, so there is no inflection brutes Jeuwre (talk) 14:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:09, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Conditions stated within the file description as well as in the source contradict cc-by-sa and cannot be accepted Mussklprozz (talk) 13:39, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 02:51, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Photographs of identifiable people 被写体となる人物の了承を得ず撮影・アップロードしている可能性。屋外で通行人として紛れている場合や顔がはっきりしない状態ならまだしも、個人の分別が簡単に可能になるよう望遠で撮影しているものは問題があると考えられる。 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 02:31, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:25, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 06:33, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:25, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
This is a comic modification of File:Октябрьская улица, Кибергино - Mapillary (qQjlJYPkzpmD5Y9OL8BYWQ).jpg. colt_browning (talk) 07:57, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:25, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
typo, completely unneeded — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olea (talk • contribs) 10:15, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: It's redirected. --Missvain (talk) 17:26, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested. --JuTa 19:40, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
barely a picture, looks horrendous 5.24.107.3 13:28, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 17:26, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
no upload rationale provided by the author, no proof that the uploader took/owns the image Lugnuts (talk) 14:10, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Image is a personal document containing personal information. SierraTangoCharlie1 (talk) 14:10, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
no upload rationale provided by the author, no proof that the uploader took/owns the image Lugnuts (talk) 14:10, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
no upload rationale provided by the author, no proof that the uploader took/owns the image Lugnuts (talk) 14:11, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
no upload rationale provided by the author, no proof that the uploader took/owns the image Lugnuts (talk) 14:11, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
no upload rationale provided by the author, no proof that the uploader took/owns the image Lugnuts (talk) 14:12, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
no upload rationale provided by the author, no proof that the uploader took/owns the image Lugnuts (talk) 14:12, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from poster. Should be blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
out os scope , unused , have little value to educational material Encik Tekateki (talk) 14:48, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
No information is provided regarding the copyright status of the depicted sculpture. AFBorchert (talk) 15:16, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
File uploaded by me, that isn't compatible with commons license (cc-by-nc-sa-2.0) Akira YL (talk) 15:28, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
I have replaced the photo that was in PDF format with another in JPG format. Anitxu (talk) 15:30, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Pitpisit
[edit]- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 1.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 2.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 3.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 4.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 5.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 6.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 7.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 8.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 9.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 10.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 11.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 12.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 13.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 14.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 15.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 16.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 17.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 18.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 19.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 20.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 21.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 22.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 23.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 24.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 25.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 26.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 27.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 28.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 29.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 30.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 31.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 32.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 33.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 34.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 35.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 36.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 37.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 38.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 39.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 40.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 41.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 42.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 43.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 44.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 45.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 46.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 47.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 48.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 49.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 50.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 51.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 52.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 53.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 54.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 55.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 56.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 57.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 58.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 59.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 60.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 61.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 62.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 63.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 64.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 65.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 66.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 67.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 68.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 69.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 70.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 71.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 72.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 73.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 74.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 75.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 76.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 77.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 78.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 79.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 80.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 81.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 82.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 83.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 84.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 85.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 86.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 87.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 88.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 89.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 90.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 91.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 92.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 93.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 94.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 95.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 96.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 97.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 98.jpg
- File:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009) Page 99.jpg
- Category:Draft Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (No. ...) BE ... (2009)
- Reasons
- A draft constitution is not a constitution and is a copyrighted work, because Template:PD-TH-exempt only applies to "Constitution and legislation". And these files are not otherwise exempted from copyright. As regards the category, it will be empty and will no longer be used upon deletion of the files. --Bitterschoko (talk) 16:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:29, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright infringement გიო ოქრო (talk) 17:09, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:29, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. გიო ოქრო (talk) 17:10, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:29, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Originally from https://vsco.co/lilstance-/media/6052f75eb96dee66909335aa, please verify the source information Ytoyoda (talk) 17:14, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:29, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Improper copyright description Ambiroz (talk) 19:35, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:29, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Accidently put bad filename unintentionally and confusingly prefixed with file. Apologies Djm-leighpark (talk) 20:10, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- This shouldn't be up for delete. This is actually OK. and needs o be closed as keep.Djm-leighpark (talk) 17:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 17:29, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 20:20, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:29, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
This photo is a derivative of the painting, held by the demonstrator, and violates the copyright of the painter and makes the free license on Flickr bogus. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:34, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Same painting contained in:
- File:Andrew Brown Protest in Graham (2021 Apr 27) (51144606715).jpg — However, here de minimis might be discussed.
- Keep this one as de minimis--A1Cafel (talk) 08:43, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- This is nowhere near de minimis. It might fall under COM:TOO as a trivial piece of design work for a protest placard, but it's clearly the central theme of the photo. It would also pass fair-use, for use on Wikipedias (unless there were already similar images from the same protest), but that's of no use relevance for Commons.
- I would weakly keep this, per TOO, but I agree it's marginal. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:32, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete File:Andrew Brown Protest in Graham (2021 Apr 27) (51144595300).jpg. Fails de minimis and surpasses TOO. It's a piece of artwork, it doesn't matter how visually appealing it is. Anarchyte (talk • work) 12:20, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:44, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
This picture was not taken with my permission on private property. Please delete immediately. 88.98.94.195 19:22, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - anonymous requests are never honored here. You may make the request at OTRS, but be prepared to prove that it is your property and that the photo was taken while trespassiing. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:48, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Sergey Timokhov's Art
[edit]- File:Белая береза, обрезная ксилография 2011 copy.jpg
- File:Облако. Б. акварель. 2013 г. 55х77.jpg
- File:Утес. Из серии Туман. 2013.jpg
- File:Черное озеро. Лист 1. Картон.пастель 2014г. 50х70.jpg
- File:Оборона острога. 2018г. Обр.ксилограф. 37х70.jpg
- File:Шуты и дамы.jpg
Original artworks of the contemporary Russian painter Sergey Timokhov: OTRS needed. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:10, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:48, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
No sources 83.200.35.234 22:08, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
I support this demand: counter-educational and misleading file, pure personal work claiming to represent a part of the Amazigh people, while there exists no source to support such claim. --Fanfwah (talk) 18:16, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:49, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
No sources 83.200.35.234 22:08, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
I support this demand: counter-educational and misleading file, pure personal work claiming to represent a part of the Amazigh people, while there exists no source to support such claim. --Fanfwah (talk) 18:14, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:49, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
No sources 83.200.35.234 22:09, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:49, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
No sources 83.200.35.234 22:10, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
I support this demand: counter-educational and misleading, pure personal work claiming to represent a part of the Amazigh people, while there exists no source to support such claim. --Fanfwah (talk) 18:07, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:49, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
No sources 83.200.35.234 22:10, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
I support this demand: counter-educational, pure personal work claiming to represent a part of the Amazigh people, with no supporting source. --Fanfwah (talk) 18:01, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:49, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
No sources 83.200.35.234 22:11, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 13:56, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Cryptic-waveform, I support this demand: pure personal work claiming to represent a part of the Amazigh people with no supporting source → counter-educational and even misleading. --Fanfwah (talk) 17:56, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:49, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Uploaded by Mistake. this is the intended version باسم (talk) 23:38, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:51, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MartinHansV as Fair use (EDP). No FoP in Italy. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:44, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:51, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Courtesy per this edit. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:05, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep According to the Commons guidelines for courtesy deletions there are seven aspects re courtesy deletions.
- "Admins shall only delete for:
- Existing policy reasons
- Is the file within our project scope?
- How long ago did you upload the file?
- Is the file something we have lots of, or something that is pretty much irreplaceable?
- How good is the quality of the file?
- Is the file in (non-trivial) use on other Wikimedia projects?
- Is there community consensus for the deletion?"
As far as I can see, the answers to these questions are:
- The file was uploaded to Commons on 13 October 2020 (as a crop from the original file, also in Commons), under a CC-BY-SA-2.0 license given by the photographer on his Flickr account in 2019, as confirmed by FlickreviewR 2 on the same day.
- The file is within the project scope of Commons: it is a photo of a well-known economist from the Netherlands.
- The photo was made in October 2019, and was uploaded to Commons on 13 October 2020.
- Commons holds 4 photographs of Heleen Mees, plus 2 cropped photographs.
- The quality of the file is OK.
- The file is in use in several other Wikimedia projects.
- There is no community consensus for deletion, as far as I know. Vysotsky (talk) 16:12, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
{{Vk}}per Vysotsky. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:55, 1 May 2021 (UTC)- Switching to Neutral per the uploader and other deletes below. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:17, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- The quality of the cropped photo is bad and it is simply an attempt by misogenyst Wikipedia editors like Vysotsky to lower the standing of Heleen Mees. The photographer clearly never intended the larger frame to be used this way. Also, the larger frame will remain on Wikimedia commons, it is just the cropped image that should be deleted for courtesy reasons. Bmwz3hm 17:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Arguments ad hominem mostly pop up when other arguments fail. I guess I am the first mysogynist editor whose first upload on Commons was a photo of a Dutch feminist and certainly the first mysogynist editor who started a few dozen articles about women (incl. Nobel Prize laureates and Heads of State) in Dutch Wikipedia. Vysotsky (talk) 18:54, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- The misogeny of Wikipedia with all its double standards for men and women is well-known. And the fact that you have gay friends doesn't mean that you don't discriminate against LGBT people. There is a proper image on Wikimedia Commons of Heleen Mees. The photographer also asks that the cropped photo is removed. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:Deletion_requests/File:HeleenMees2019.jpg Bmwz3hm 20:12, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Arguments ad hominem mostly pop up when other arguments fail. I guess I am the first mysogynist editor whose first upload on Commons was a photo of a Dutch feminist and certainly the first mysogynist editor who started a few dozen articles about women (incl. Nobel Prize laureates and Heads of State) in Dutch Wikipedia. Vysotsky (talk) 18:54, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- The quality of the cropped photo is bad and it is simply an attempt by misogenyst Wikipedia editors like Vysotsky to lower the standing of Heleen Mees. The photographer clearly never intended the larger frame to be used this way. Also, the larger frame will remain on Wikimedia commons, it is just the cropped image that should be deleted for courtesy reasons. Bmwz3hm 17:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- I'm just a passer-by with not much pull on Commons (though I'll tell you I blocked a couple of this account's socks on Wikipedia, back before they learned how to edit within guidelines, and semi-protected the article when all that socking was going on), but I don't see any (common-sense) reason at all for keeping this image here. Mees has been subject to various kinds of harassment, certainly in real life, and while I am staying out of the blame game and I don't want to impugn Vysotsky, I think that considering the BLP we should do more, not less, and err on the side of caution. What I would suggest to the (male) editors and admins here is that a close-up of a grown woman in a pose that shows that *gasp* she has wrinkles just like real people is really not a fair thing to keep on record here--and surely I don't have to explain systemic sexism here. Personally I think she's beautiful and it's a lovely smile, but I'm just an old guy and if I've learned anything, it's that sometimes I just need to shut up and listen to women. We have another photo, and it's better; Commons's seeming desire for redundancy is just not helpful here. So, editors and admins, just delete the file--yes, "just" delete it, since it's not a big deal, it is the right thing to do, and in doing so you are removing something whose purpose, besides for sexist reasons, is just completely unclear. And Vysotsky, sorry, but I really think you should withdraw from the Mees matter altogether, on all the Wikis. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 23:11, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Courtesy deletion says: The Wikimedia Foundation urges editors to "[treat] any person who has a complaint about how they are portrayed in our projects with patience, kindness, and respect, and [encourage] others to do the same." This is a poor quality image, and there is a vastly better image of Mees available here on Commons. Both the subject and the photographer are unhappy with this crop. Those people should be treated with patience, kindness, and respect as the WMF expects of us in such cases. It is sad to see disrespect here. Cullen328 (talk) 00:45, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per Cullen above. Ched (talk) 17:32, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I am the one who took the photo and as the originator I second the removal of this photo. The quality of the crop is too low and the crop takes away from the quality of the photo and image taken. (Mark Vletter (talk) 09:26, 4 May 2021 (UTC))
- Delete per Cullen above. BBBjng (talk) 12:52, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I always take advice from other editors in Wiki seriously and think about their considerations. The advice by User:Drmies to me (above) is quite clear: “withdraw from the Mees matter altogether, on all the Wikis.” As Drmies is an experienced editor, I looked at my edits in the “Mees matter”. I counted a dozen edits across Wiki over a period of 7 years (totaling 0,1 per mille of my edits), with a neutral character, mainly adding (open access) publications by Mees and removing vandalism. I also uploaded three photographs to Commons, incl. the cropped image discussed here. My last edit on Dutch Wiki (my home Wiki) re Heleen Mees was in November 2017, removing vandalism. I will nonetheless consider the advice by Drmies. I also got advice from User:Bmwz3hm, via Wiki mail 5 days ago, after my "keep" above. It was short (3 words only, unlike previous friendly e-mails) and pointy (“Go fuck yourself”). User:Bmwz3hm made more than 500 edits crossWiki (all regarding Heleen Mees -100%, as can be seen here), is a single-purpose editor and seemingly very close to Mees. It is rather curious therefore, that I am the one advised to stay away from “the Mees matter altogether”. Food for thought. For now: Il faut cultiver notre jardin. Vysotsky (talk) 06:43, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- PS I wouldn't exactly call repeated removal of descriptions, categories and links, like User:Bmwz3hm recently did here and here learning how to “edit within guidelines”. Vysotsky (talk) 06:43, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Vysotsky: I have warned them for such vandalism. Some of us appreciate your edits countering such vandalism. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:15, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- I apologize for the vandalism and won't do it again. However, Vysotsky told Mark Vletter that the cropped photograph could not be removed or overwritten by a higher quality photograph even though Wikimedia Commons does consider courtesy deletions. The vandalism started with Vysotsky introducing the cropped photograph and then falsely telling the maker that nothing could be done about it. Also, Vysotsky falsely suggested that the 2020 photograph was somehow illegitimate even though the magazine Nouveau gave a full release to Wikimedia Commons for the use of the photograph. Vysotsky also threatened me "not to push my luck". I don't believe that Vysosky's conduct is acceptable under the guidelines of Wikimedia Foundation. Bmwz3hm 09:10, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- Link to my actual words to Mark Vletter can be found here. I didn't in any way suggest the 2020 photograph was illegitimate. On the contrary: my Wiki-mail to User:Bmwz3mh on 12 March 00:26 hr.: "Dank voor het regelen van die mooie foto van Heleen Mees door Carin Verbruggen. Toch is die foto over een week of wat weg, als je geen actie onderneemt. Want Verbruggen moet zelf een e-mail sturen naar permissions-nl@wikimedia.org waarin ze de foto vrijgeeft onder een Creative Commons-licentie, zie https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:OTRS/Procedure. [...] Als je nog assistentie nodig hebt, mail me dan gerust." (My translation: "Thanks for arranging that beautiful photo of Heleen Mees by Carin Verbruggen. However, the photo will be removed within a week if you don't act. Verbruggen has to send an e-mail to OTRS releasing the photo under a Creative Commons license. [....] If you need any assistance, don't hesitate to e-mail me.") It was User:Yuraily Lic who initially proposed the 2020 photo for deletion because of missing permission. Please read more carefully, and stop accusing me falsely. Vysotsky (talk) 09:39, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- I had already obtained full permission from Nouveau and forwarded it to Wikimedia Commons before I uploaded the photograph on Wikimedia Commons. While the photograph is now on the English and Dutch Wikipedia page of Heleen Mees, the cropped image is the main photograph of Heleen Mees on Google. The crop is of low quality and it should be removed for courtesy reasons now all parties agree that there is a much better photograph. See how carefully I read Vyotsky's messages: "Don't push your luck, please. Vysotsky (talk) 15:02, 29 April 2021 (UTC)". It is both a threat and implies that I was "lucky" that the Nouveau photograph was accepted by Wikimedia Commons. Thanks again. Bmwz3hm 10:42, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- I have never raised any doubt on the permission from Nouveau, but you always seem to assume bad faith. And no, I wasn't referring to the 2020 photo when making that remark. That's easy to check, by clicking on the link under my remark: a direct link to your repeated edit warring on the 2019 photo. It was a reference to the "last warning" you had recently received from @User:Эlcobbola, and your old indef block on the Dutch and English Wiki. Regarding the occurence of photographs of Mees after a Google search: you'll soon find out that the 2019 cropped photo will fall low, as the photo isn't featured in the main Wikipedia language versions nor in Wikidata. I guess you know that searches with Google are personalised, so it also depends on your own search history. Vysotsky (talk) 07:21, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. The cropped photo won't fall low. There are photos that haven't been used for ages that still pop up on the Google search page and other search machines. The surest way to end that is to remove the photo. BBBjng (talk) 19:23, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- Most people only "vote" once. But since you're a newcomer, and a single-purpose editor too, I don't mind. Vysotsky (talk) 11:52, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- The newcomer only found this page, for a contribution. Lidewij (talk) 09:01, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Most people only "vote" once. But since you're a newcomer, and a single-purpose editor too, I don't mind. Vysotsky (talk) 11:52, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per Cullen above. Bmwz3hm 10:41, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry. Against delete. The photo gives a positive insight into who this person is. This is never the case with an artificial state portrait. Lidewij (talk) 08:24, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree with Drmies -- my reaction on first seeing the image was thinking "good looking women". However, we have several other images so we can do without this one. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:54, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
"Source flickr": Probably from https://www.flickr.com/photos/canburak/sets/72157622751426594/ . This page is in Turkish with several pics. Who says that this specific picture was made in Algeria? There is not the slightest evidence. 92.213.12.43 20:33, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/canburak/4082524126/ says ARR. --Achim (talk) 20:38, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
No proof of Algerian origin. See also original picture. 92.213.12.43 20:34, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Source Own work - false information or flag is not official / appropriating someone else's image O revolucionário aliado (talk) 20:37, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Source Own work - false information or flag is not official / appropriating someone else's image O revolucionário aliado (talk) 20:38, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Source Own work - false information or flag is not official / appropriating someone else's image O revolucionário aliado (talk) 20:38, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Please send permission to OTRS Docosong (talk) 20:49, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
No sources 83.200.35.234 22:05, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
I support this demand: no source, purely personal work, mixing design and colors of Amazigh and Algerian flags. --Fanfwah (talk) 16:30, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
No sources 83.200.35.234 22:07, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
File:GLADIATOR. THE TRUE STORY - Exhibition at Basel Museum of Ancient Art and Ludwig Collection (Ank Kumar) 07.jpg
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Martin Sg. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: photographs by others. COM:FOP Switzerland may apply. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:19, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - works in interior spaces are not covered by Swiss FoP. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:00, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Сторінка, для якої призначений був файл мною, як автором, видалена Olexander Penkov (talk) 07:50, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Сторінка, для якої призначений був файл мною, як автором, видалена Olexander Penkov (talk) 07:26, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, now out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Pas d'autorisation écrite des parents pour l'utilisation des dessins sous licence CC-BY-SA 4.0 Παιδιστί (talk) 07:27, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sanandros (talk) 20:48, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Es wurde ohne gültige Lizenz vom Urheber hochgeladen. Der Urheber ist nicht mit dem Upload seines Bildes einverstanden, da er einer Lizenzierung in der Wikipedia nicht zugestimmt hat.Bundesstefan (talk) 14:45, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Als Urheber bist du angegeben und du hast das mit gültiger Lizenz hochgeladen und veröffentlicht, dieses kannst du nachträglich nicht zurückziehen, der Löschantrag ist damit abzulehnen. Alles weitere siehe Commons:Deletion requests/File:Delfosse DVD small.jpg. --ɱ 17:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per User:M. --Sanandros (talk) 20:53, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Essentially a duplicate of File:"Sušiuna" (sušilna) jama, okrogla, pri Jerkot, Velike Češnjice 1950.jpg EpicPupper (talk) 21:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Not really, it is taken from a different angle. --Sporti (talk) 06:57, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per Sporti. --Sanandros (talk) 20:53, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Panam2014 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.aljazeera.net/news/reportsandinterviews/2011/11/26/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D9%86%D8%B2%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%8A-%D8%A8%D9%8A%D9%86-%D8%B9%D9%87%D8%AF%D9%8A%D9%86. File on claimed source has been cropped differently. Per TinEye, Reuters looks to be the original source, but the earliest TinEye has is 2013 broken links. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:56, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Ours is from 2012. If you find a pic earlier than 2012 then we can discuss it again. --Sanandros (talk) 20:56, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was uploaded April 2012. It is actually a cropped version of a photo which has been used before 2012, see this post from November 24, 2011 and this post from the next day, which both credit Reuters and the Middle East News Agency as attribution – the second link (for CBC News) stated that the photo was taken on the preceding Thursday (November 24, 2011).
While I could not dig up the original Reuters report nor the Middle East News Agency file, I think it is safe to say that this file was taken before April 2012 and that the copyright belongs to the Middle East News Agency. TGHL ↗ talk 02:09, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Full image at link provided and sourced at link. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz: not actually deleted? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:47, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
- Deletion error, file renamed into File:Deletion error 083.jpg. Ellywa (talk) 22:06, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
'own work' and date obviously not true. Website https://www.hugo-rost.de/unternehmen/hugo-rost-co-gmbh/timeline is copyrighted MBq (talk) 07:55, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
this fotos belongs to the company Hugo Rost & Co. GmbH, and shows its founder Paul Hugo Rost, the foto can be used commonly and should be shown on the site Hugo Rost — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hugo Rost (talk • contribs) 08:49, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- The licensing looks acceptable, as your account belongs to this company (verified by de.wiki's support team). 'Own work' should be replaced by the actual photographer's name, at least if he's not you, Hugo // German translation: Die Lizensierung scheint akzeptabel, weil dein Konto zu der Firma gehört (verifiziert durch unser Supportteam). Du solltest statt 'eigenes Werk' den Namen des tatsächlichen Fotografen eintragen, jedenfalls wenn Du das nicht bist --MBq (talk) 14:20, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 15:17, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Luan as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Escudo de clube esportivo brasileiro. A parte colorida lembrando uma bola não é uma forma geométrica simples. A conta já subiu vários arquivos, sem comprovação das licenças, com inserção de várias permissões aleatórias.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:46, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Same problem with:
Deixo algumas perguntas para avaliarem a possibilidade de eliminação:
- File:S.C. Rio Grande.png: qual o nome das formas geoméricas que foram a parte redonda colorida? Elas são formas geométricas simples? File:S.C. Rio grande.jpg já foi eliminada pelo mesmo motivo.
- File:Stade Reims.svg: na geometria, qual o nome das 4 formas geométricas presentes na imagem do escudo esportivo francês? A fusão estilizada das letras "S" e "R" resulta em "texto" ou em "forma geométrica simples"? O mesmo vale para o arquivo File:Stade de reims.jpg.
- File:AA Alagoinhas - BA.svg: se as formas geométricas na cor branca ao centro do escudo esportivo brasileiro forem simples deve haver um nome para elas, então qual seria? A combinação e sopreposição de letras é "só texto"?
- File:FFC crest.svg: se as formas geométricas na cor branca ao centro do escudo esportivo brasileiro forem simples deve haver um nome para elas, então qual seria? A combinação e sopreposição de letras é "só texto"?
--Luan (talk) 14:25, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Delete. --Luan (talk) 19:37, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Delete. Copyright infringement. Perfektsionist (talk) 22:25, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: According to the club website, the symbol was already that one in 1914, so it's an obvious case of PD-OLD. The rest are all letters with very old and simple designs, and well below ToO in Brazil - all kept by {{Textlogo}}. -- Darwin Ahoy! 23:49, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Wrong license and logo still under copyrights. Per https://www.uefa.com/termsconditions/, country of origin is Switzerland. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:08, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deletedper above -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:57, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Je l'ai mis en ligne par erreur 2A01:CB1A:403A:E13F:5D19:CBF8:365:992D 10:37, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#G7. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
No sources 83.200.35.234 22:12, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
I support this demand: counter-educational, pure personal work claiming to represent a part of the Amazigh people, with no supporting source. --Fanfwah (talk) 17:27, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
fictious and hoax 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:D5FE:E544:9E48:3E0B 15:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:30, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Use {{Factual accuracy}} instead. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:46, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
No sources 83.200.35.234 22:13, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
I support this demand: counter-educational, pure personal work claiming to represent a part of the Amazigh people, with no supporting source. --Fanfwah (talk) 17:38, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
No sources 83.200.35.234 22:14, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
I support this demand: no source, purely personal work, combining design and colors of Amazigh and Algerian flags. --Fanfwah (talk) 16:38, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
No sources 83.200.35.234 22:15, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
I support this demand: the file is pure personal work and not educationally useful, the claim to represent a part of the Amazigh people is supported by no source. --Fanfwah (talk) 17:13, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
fictious and hoax 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:D5FE:E544:9E48:3E0B 15:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fictious flag 2A01:CB08:8EB:7100:A576:438C:CB83:F696 16:15, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Use {{Factual accuracy}} instead. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
No sources 83.200.35.234 22:17, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
I support this demand: counter-educational, pure personal work claiming to represent a part of the Amazigh people, with no supporting source. --Fanfwah (talk) 17:28, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
fictious and hoax 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:D5FE:E544:9E48:3E0B 15:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:28, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Use {{Factual accuracy}} instead. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:45, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
No sources 83.200.35.234 22:17, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
I support this demand: counter-educational, pure personal work claiming to represent a part of the Amazigh people, with no supporting source. --Fanfwah (talk) 18:01, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
fictious and hoax 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:35B9:6775:89A0:7E14 15:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:22, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Use {{Factual accuracy}} instead. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
No sources 83.200.35.234 22:18, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Poorly described, unused flag of unclear scope. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hairy Dude as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader not proven to own copyright, not otherwise in public domain (published 1988) AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:59, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Erring on the side of above COM:TOO. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:04, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Drakosh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Company logo, advertising, not own work. No TOO data in COM:Ukraine AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:26, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:58, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Logo AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:32, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:58, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bastoche* as Copyvio (Copyvio). Found online at http://agencesartistiques.com/Fiche-Artiste/716912-ludovik-.html and https://www.astalents.fr/talent/comediennes/ludovik_.htm, but those are quite a bit smaller. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:58, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Randykitty as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as depicted person is notable and image has OTRS-confirmed permission.-- Túrelio (talk) 09:38, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Túrelio: Notable? The bio on enWP was deleted (redirected) for lack of notability. What makes him notable here? --Randykitty (talk) 10:00, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- May be scope would have been the better term. Though Commons was original created to simplify media-usage in wikipedias, since long we are actually a stock-image provider, whether we like it or not. Even when an image is currently not in use on a Wikimedia-project, that doesn't automatically mean it's not in scope. Otherwise, most of our files would have to go. So, for the discussion whether the depicted person (or that image) is in scope, a broader audience of discussants would be desirable. --Túrelio (talk) 10:28, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Túrelio Over the years, you have deleted dozens of files that I had tagged F10. The only difference between those files and this one that I see is that this one has a valid OTRS. But to me that hardly seems a reason to deny F10. What am I missing? (I'm not contesting your judgment, you obviously have a deeper knowledge of Commons than I do, I just want to understand this so that I can save you and me time in future :-) --Randykitty (talk) 10:39, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Likely more than dozends :-). (That is also has OTRS-permission is just 1 additional point, but not decisive.) Don't give this single case too much importance. In scope or not, is often a sort of judgement call or weighing up. Here, my opinion has no more weight than of other users. Therefore, I would prefer more participation of others in this discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 10:56, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Túrelio, this has now been hanging around for half a year, how can we get some more participants to this discussion? --Randykitty (talk) 11:19, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Likely more than dozends :-). (That is also has OTRS-permission is just 1 additional point, but not decisive.) Don't give this single case too much importance. In scope or not, is often a sort of judgement call or weighing up. Here, my opinion has no more weight than of other users. Therefore, I would prefer more participation of others in this discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 10:56, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Túrelio Over the years, you have deleted dozens of files that I had tagged F10. The only difference between those files and this one that I see is that this one has a valid OTRS. But to me that hardly seems a reason to deny F10. What am I missing? (I'm not contesting your judgment, you obviously have a deeper knowledge of Commons than I do, I just want to understand this so that I can save you and me time in future :-) --Randykitty (talk) 10:39, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- May be scope would have been the better term. Though Commons was original created to simplify media-usage in wikipedias, since long we are actually a stock-image provider, whether we like it or not. Even when an image is currently not in use on a Wikimedia-project, that doesn't automatically mean it's not in scope. Otherwise, most of our files would have to go. So, for the discussion whether the depicted person (or that image) is in scope, a broader audience of discussants would be desirable. --Túrelio (talk) 10:28, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep FastSpring has an article and an picture of one of the co-founders can plausibly be used there. The AfD also just barely failed to meet GNG, so it is definitely possible for him to become Wikipedia-notable in the future - we want to have images of these borderline-notable people on reserve if or when that happens. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:59, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: imho the image is in scope, there is a wikidata item d:Q52274571 with another image of the same person and I now made a category of both images, per Category:Jason Foodman. In addition, Jason Foodman is redirect on en: wikipedia. --Ellywa (talk) 19:28, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Завантажена векторна версія цього зображення Олексій Непота (talk) 19:29, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:TOO Russia, simple creative works are above threshold of originality. Therefore this image has to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 19:32, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the show on YouTube is available under CC license from 2013-09-27. Screenshots from older videos that are not explicitly under CC license, should be deleted.
- File:Jan Kalousek Show Jana Krause.jpg
- File:Jana Hlavacova Show Jana Krause.jpg
- File:Ludek Munzar Show Jana Krause.jpg
- File:Yvetta Simonova Show Jana Krause.png
Gumruch (talk) 22:12, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Měl jsem za to, že screenshoty z pořadu Show Jana Krause jsou licenčně volné. Pokud tomu tak není, souhlasím s jejich smazáním a omlouvám se za potíže. V tom případě upozorňuji ještě na soubor File:Veronika Zilkova Show Jana Krause.jpg, který jsem pořídil stejným způsobem. Radek Linner (talk) 22:40, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Radek Linner: This file is OK. I tried to check all files in the category. Ten soubor je v pořádku, problém je jen s videy bez volné licence, tedy do 20. září 2013. Jen výjimečně jsou starší díly připomínány v nových (tak to bylo třeba u Špinarové). Pro uživatele je zřejmě matoucí, že pro zobrazení licence musí kliknout na ZOBRAZIT VÍCE/SHOW MORE, aby se objevila. Gumruch (talk) 23:57, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:36, 30 December 2021 (UTC)