Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/04/13

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 13th, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotional,out of scope -


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of the image on the PC screen. Not own work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:11, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 13:33, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect Md Tabin Mujtaba (talk) 06:15, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 17:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal information is seen on metadata. BezlaLLC (talk) 16:46, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[[Category:{{subst:delete2|image=File:Worst Question Hotel Sales People Ask.pdf]]


Deleted: out of scope, uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 19:29, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotional,out of scope - IndrajitDas 05:59, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Gbawden at 08:48, 13 April 2021 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Krdbot 20:55, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Its not this person, see : http://t3.gstatic.com/licensed-image?q=tbn:ANd9GcTVyVc_xhlsnHQU_BPF1sd8jRD1QYTYQeRT8JhBaufvs2ZCufTU-NFG1PGqowHP Remy34 (talk) 20:42, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:04, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License doesn't apply to the standards of Commons Notanyproblems (talk) 23:45, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:39, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commercial. E4024 (talk) 04:07, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 07:37, 14 April 2021 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) + out of scope --Krdbot 14:55, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source provided, no EXIF - IndrajitDas 04:10, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Gbawden at 08:26, 14 April 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Miss World New Zealand 2010.jpg --Krdbot 14:55, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Page of plain text, out of project scope. Achim (talk) 18:08, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is a personal photo. See COM:PS

Rodney Araujo (talk) 13:53, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 11:09, 15 April 2021 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 14:51, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake RuhoolAhmadKawa (talk) 12:31, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 12:50, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image with watermark = copyvio 92.40.203.110 17:43, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete as a copyvio of https://in.pinterest.com/pin/796714990309934926/?autologin=true .   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 03:37, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 21:25, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted content and no source has been provided - IndrajitDas 05:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:50, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I dont want it on here anymore Hunter.freas (talk) 21:33, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted already. --E4024 (talk) 19:32, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I dont want it on here anymore Hunter.freas (talk) 21:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: self-made unofficial work. no need to keep. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:48, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chemical structure in incorrect file format; replaced by File:Phenylphosphateine Structural Formula V1.svg by the same uploader. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 10:02, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:51, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a low quality screen shot of a chemical structure with an extraneous red smudge in the low left corner. There are plenty of high quality alternatives in Category:Cyclohexylamine. Marbletan (talk) 12:55, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:51, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out-of-focus; have multiple high quality in Category:Toluene. The filename suggests it's potentially not "own work" either (COM:DW?). DMacks (talk) 13:31, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:51, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

in my opinion photos of someone's frozen corpseshould not be shared on commons and used as an illustration in articles. In my it disrespects the deceased person 95.41.106.225 01:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ahmadtalk 03:45, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lallint as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 17:07, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I no longer want this photo of me on the Internet. Please take it down immediately. Thank you. Peanutbutterlove25 (talk) 01:16, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; not in use. --Ahmadtalk 03:47, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want it deleted (I made it) Hunter.freas (talk) 02:48, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, G7. --Túrelio (talk) 06:44, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotional, out of scope - IndrajitDas 03:42, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. It is also likely to be a copyright violation. --Ahmadtalk 03:53, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotional, out of scope - IndrajitDas 03:57, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 03:57, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotional, out of scope - IndrajitDas 04:11, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 03:57, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Olamummyyy3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files was uploaded much probably for spam, and I have serious concerns about their utility. This account created items on Wikidata for "entrepreneurs" (a classic way of SPAM), so I think these files should be deleted here + majority self-published but without metadata, possible copyvio

stanglavine msg 15:27, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Support See also Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Qudusexpert. Lymantria (talk) 09:17, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 05:45, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very unlikely to be an own work 2600:6C58:4B7F:6084:690E:881A:67B:3FF1 02:34, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 10:18, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Malikn55 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Claimed as own work but taken from FB per MD

Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:29, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pablo934 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A mix of old photos and scans of photos, claimed as own work, Needs OTRS

Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:29, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Robert Marchand (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Claimed as own work, some have the name of the real author in the exif, others in the description eg Foto K. Peeters

Gbawden (talk) 08:44, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:29, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 3jqhwubv (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Fake election map, OoS

Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:30, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lbalbalba11122 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos dating back to the 60's claimed as own work, no meaningful exif The art work needs OTRS permission as well

Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:32, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Deithon Jeighps (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/incosnsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:17, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lnjenns (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own work: credit in EXIF data not matching the uploader.

P 1 9 9   15:16, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 13:14, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Basma El-Nezamy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, non-admin-closing this request because the files have already been speedied. —Born2bgratis (talk) 02:58, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Basma El-Nezamy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos are above COM:TOO. And one unused logo, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   15:19, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 13:14, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Barhlyush (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 13:14, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by James Allen Bruce (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 13:14, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by James Allen Bruce (talk · contribs)

[edit]

1) Paintings that need permission from the artist 2) high quality aviation photos with no exif that are unlikely to be own work

Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:38, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Claudemir Tavares (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EugeneZelenko Aqui é Claudemir tavares ., qual o problema com você meu amigo ... em querer deletar minha contribuição .... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Claudemir Tavares (talk • contribs) 15:48, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 13:15, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of GeoGebra.svg, not used -- sarang사랑 12:26, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation:
I tried to get things into a better relation. There are three such logos (or icons),

The first one had been object of edit struggles. Now it should be acceptable for everybody, including user:GeoGebra.
It has the wrong name Geogebra.svg, and because it had been impossible to rename it to GeoGebra.svg, I made a redirect.
The first and the second one are now used for Created with GeoGebra, the third one with the long name is unused.
It would be more senseful to have the first file renamed (instead of the redirect to it) - when somebody can do it. -- sarang사랑 16:08, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 22:57, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vojtechcekal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promo, subject not deemed notable by cswiki

TFerenczy (talk) 19:34, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:50, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mattyszek489 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution png picture(s) of a youtuber with 3 million subscribers, unlikely own work. (video screenshots?)

TFerenczy (talk) 19:39, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:50, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PeterParaguay (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probable copyvios, given the uploader's history.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 02:17, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment File:Francisco Oviedo.jpg is not a copyvio. I found the source and did the changes. The rest can be deleted IMO. Frodar (talk) 20:36, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment PeterParaguay uploaded some 17 new files since this request was made. Please consider delete all of them per same reason. Frodar (talk) 03:25, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Frodar: I agree, all new files since I started this DR should also go, for the same reason.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 04:49, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:27, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PeterParaguay (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

Probable copyvios, given the uploader's history.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 22:45, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. PCP. Deleted what's left. --Minoraxtalk 11:10, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files from HBO Chernobyl

[edit]

Photos taken from different web-sources (like: https://zen.yandex.ru/media/id/5ccd4a123e66cc00af04c3f7/chernobyl-vot-kak-vygliadiat-aktery-i-realnye-liudi-kotoryh-oni-sygrali-5cf8e44b92015300af0bf9b9 ) without permission; Not own work.--Wdwd (talk) 07:12, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:29, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I upload this file and I want it deleted. Notanyproblems (talk) 23:48, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:31, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I upload this file and I want it deleted. Notanyproblems (talk) 23:48, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:31, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I upload this file and I want it deleted. Notanyproblems (talk) 23:48, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:31, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I upload this file and I want it deleted. Notanyproblems (talk) 23:48, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unless I'm mistaken, I don't believe that's how this works (?) May I ask why? The licensing doesn't appear to be invalid. Have a wonderful day.--Bettydaisies (talk) 03:50, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:31, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I upload this file and I want it deleted. Notanyproblems (talk) 23:48, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:32, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I upload this file and I want it deleted. Notanyproblems (talk) 23:48, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:32, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this file and I want it deleted. Notanyproblems (talk) 23:49, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not original uploader. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:32, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this file and I want it deleted. Notanyproblems (talk) 23:50, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not original uploader. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:33, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this file and I want it deleted. Notanyproblems (talk) 23:52, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:34, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Aama223 (talk) 02:02, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio from: http://elecciones.ultimahora.com/informacion/?id=57 --Aama223 (talk) 02:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 17:57, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Aama223 (talk) 02:04, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 17:57, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Aama223 (talk) 02:05, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 17:58, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Aama223 (talk) 02:05, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 17:58, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not free logo Aama223 (talk) 02:09, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - see here, for example. --Эlcobbola talk 17:59, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrightedd game screenshot 92.40.203.110 17:33, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 04:55, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published on March 3, 2021 to Unsplash under the Unsplash License (not CC0 1.0), only files which were published on Unsplash.com prior to 5 June 2017 are CC0 1.0 licensed (see Template:Unsplash for more information) Lalalulilalia (talk) 19:24, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 06:43, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iamtheyeishow (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Hard to believe the uploader's claim that these are their own work, when in fact their talk page reveals they were sent with various notices on provlematic uploads. Various resolutions and missing or dubious EXIF data. One image, File:Fatadeneevemarkperriversion2.jpg, is a collage that is missing the source and authorship info of the component images. Uploader's last set of uploads.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:13, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See also: Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Iamtheyeishow. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:30, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 13:27, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not free seal Aama223 (talk) 02:10, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Minorax at 11:10, 28 April 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by PeterParaguay --Krdbot 14:26, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no free license Cheep (talk) 01:15, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The sourcing of this portrait image is from the photographer Braian Reyna while working for Andina, which is a news organization that is funded by the Peruvian government. Is there some possibility that it is thus a public work? https://andina.pe/agencia/noticia-elecciones-2021-pedro-castillo-ratifica-propuesta-para-cambiar-constitucion-840618.aspx Mewnst (talk) 02:13, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I should add that the Peruvian government is the sole proprietor of Andina. However, I am too unfamiliar with the I.P. laws of Peru to comment further. Mewnst (talk) 02:22, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Andina is owned by Editora Perú. As far as I know, it is a private company funded by the government just like IRTP (TVPerú). Therefore it cannot be a work of the government nor does it fulfill its legislative, judicial or administrative character to enter the public domain.--DSan (talk) 15:24, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clearing that up. I then concur with removing this file for having no free license. Mewnst (talk) 08:09, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Andina is a company funded by the government, but this image has been officially published by the government through the National Jury of Elections, as it remains an official portrait. The image is license free. Please do not remove. Búfalo Barreto (talk) 01:32, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"© 2017 Agencia Peruana de Noticias. Todos los derechos reservados." Non free license. MiguelAlanCS (talk) 12:09, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 01:20, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:02, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aktcfrd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/files storage. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:24, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aktcfrd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:49, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:28, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotional, out of scope - IndrajitDas 05:14, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 13:50, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotional, out of scope - IndrajitDas 05:15, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 13:50, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotional, out of scope - IndrajitDas 05:15, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 13:49, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotional, out of scope - IndrajitDas 05:15, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 13:48, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotional, out of scope - IndrajitDas 05:16, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 13:50, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotional,out of scope - IndrajitDas 05:30, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 13:48, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotional,out of scope - IndrajitDas 05:47, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 13:48, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:58, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jcarl82 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7 - Uploaded 4 months ago, thus not speedyable. Achim (talk) 20:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 18:51, 10 Mai 2021 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 02:17, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Derivative work copyvio: substantial inclusion of a tarpaulin ad containing underlying image of food, cannot be COM:De minimis as it is the essential element of the nominated photos. Consent for free license from the advertisement's artists or graphics production company is required. I'm not sure with several others in the same category that show the KFC Col. Sanders logo, if it is still in copyright or if the Col. Sanders logo copyright has expired.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:59, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These photos are temporary in time, maybe not encyclopedic, but some pictures also inter alia I browsed from some ads in other countries dwell on these; hence, no objection and sincerelyJFVelasquez Floro (talk) 10:09, 13 April 2021 (UTC).[reply]
@JFVelasquez Floro: wrong comparison. The main subject of the image from Hong Kong is the bus, and the copyrighted 2D art is incidental or de minimis. The 2D art in the images I nominated is not incidental, but essential element thus failing de minimis. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:17, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also to add (similar DW problems)

Could someone check some of the other uploads in this category? _ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:56, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:52, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 陳建民 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Raw text and that should be imported to other projects. Also the uploader has uploaded much of copyvio files before and these files may copyvio too.

SCP-2000 02:48, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no OTRS confirmation. --JuTa 03:54, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF, contains JPG artifacts, and strange black bar at the bottom suggests it is not the uploader's own work. This is their last remaining upload. plicit 13:42, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:18, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 19:39, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; also broken upload in unsuitable format for a photo. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:20, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, already uploaded and part of the collection of "Skovgaard Museum". 87.49.45.118 22:35, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Per nom & very poor quality. --Achim (talk) 09:31, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: low-quality duplicate. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:21, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement: https://www.sgtrains.com/train-c801a.html 132.147.76.199 15:09, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:31, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown provenance, probably copyvio. Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 00:45, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom : most probable copyvio. Kathisma (talk) 16:48, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:52, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Definitely not released under CC BY-SA, it is most likely copyvio. Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 00:51, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:52, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unofficial version of the logo, should be replaced by the correct version — Preceding unsigned comment added by Urmelbeauftragter (talk • contribs) 14:41, 12 April 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:53, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong format and resolution — Preceding unsigned comment added by Urmelbeauftragter (talk • contribs) 12:36, 12 April 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:53, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can't see any indication that the file is licensed as indicated. In fact, the site the file is taken from explicitly says otherwise: [1]. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 02:04, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:53, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I suppose this complex logo is copyrighted. The club website (https://clubpatinraspeig.es/) is copyrighted (© Copyright 2019 Club Promoción Patín Raspeig). I could not learn more about the logo's copyright status as I did not see there any section about terms of use of the site material. E4024 (talk) 02:06, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:54, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot. E4024 (talk) 02:15, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:54, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot E4024 (talk) 02:18, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:54, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Загружено по ошибке Sumuis (talk) 02:25, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:54, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prior usage of this picture is always vandalism as proven by the Wikipedia contribution of the uploader and its sockpuppets/IPs, and does not depict anything useful for the project. Andra Febrian (talk) 02:31, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:54, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. The metadata cites the Associated Press. Photos by the AP are not Public Domain. RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 02:32, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:54, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken of an image on the PC screen. Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:39, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:54, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AplombTzu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos taken of images on the PC screen.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:43, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:55, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotional, out of scope - IndrajitDas 03:47, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:57, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Copyright holder: Depiction PhotoStudio" - requires OTRS permission. E4024 (talk) 03:53, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:57, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, source provided doesn't state it is licensed under CC 4.0 or other CC version. Paper9oll (talk) 04:37, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:58, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright: original uploader, or City of Scottsdale? — hike395 (talk) 04:50, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:58, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotional, out of scope - IndrajitDas 05:18, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:58, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotional, out of scope - IndrajitDas 05:19, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:58, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotional,out of scope - IndrajitDas 05:46, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:58, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We want to delete it because we no more require it. Ramananandamaharshisiddhaguru (talk) 05:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:58, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unecessary. DerekJLoewen (talk) 05:56, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:58, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of recent non-free sculpture; no FOP in the United States Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:20, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:59, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is not Pu Yi but his brother Pujie instead Hellbat31 (talk) 06:24, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:59, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspicious copyright Maometto97 (talk) 06:31, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:59, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dublicate of the Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 06:51, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:59, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello, I'm the creator of the picture. I want to delete the picture, because the picture is outdated. This is because I was looking at old sources. Also I didn't mean to upload this image. MODsue (talk) 06:55, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:00, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dublicate of the Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 07:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT DELETE since this is not a valid deletion nomination, since User:Dr.Wiki54 did not leave a valid deletion nomination on my user talk page. I'm getting really tired of people who leave broken templates on my user talk page, instead of a valid deletion nomination. AnonMoos (talk) 22:55, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 03:00, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dublicate of the Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 07:04, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 03:00, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dublicate and worse version of the Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 07:17, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. They are different photos. Not the same. Poor quality of the photo cannot not be a reason for deletion --Interfase (talk) 07:19, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. They can be. Bad\poor quality can be the reason for a deletion. --Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 20:16, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:00, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dublicate of the Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 07:18, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. They are different photos. Not the same. There is no any dublicate here. --Interfase (talk) 07:20, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. They can be not %100 same. But it is the picture of the same thing. Also it is the bad version (poor quality) of this photo. --Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 20:37, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:00, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Have better and original forms, Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 07:20, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:00, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CoolGab19 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Orphaned images, only used for creating hoaxes on the English Wikipedia.

plicit 07:27, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potential copyvio. Low image resolution and missing valid exifdata. COM:OTRS permission is necessary. SCP-2000 07:39, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

這張照片是我拍攝的。shot by user:kuyohong — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kuyohong (talk • contribs) 07:41, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I'm going to assume good faith and this is used in an article. I'm going to give User:Kuyohong ONE WEEK to provide COMMONS:OTRS permissions. If they do not, we will delete the image. Thank you. --Missvain (talk) 03:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising - a picture of a generic hinge, with phone number and URL photoshopped onto it. User has been adding it to EnWiki articles about hinges. Girth Summit (talk) 07:50, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising - photograph of generic hinges with phone number/URL added. Girth Summit (talk) 07:51, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:02, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Drawing by Benoît Poelvoorde. His permission is necessary. BrightRaven (talk) 08:10, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:02, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fan art: redrawing of copyrighted material ([2]). Copyright violation. BrightRaven (talk) 08:18, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:02, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The drawing of the stele (comic book characters) is copyrighted. If the stele is placed in a public space in Belgium, it might be covered by Belgian FOP, but there is no information about the location. BrightRaven (talk) 08:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:02, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

original work and wrong principle also unsourced: identity function is done with linear regression models Malo77 (talk) 08:29, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:02, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader request. The logo appears to be fictitious (the actual logo is here). Gervant of Shiganshina (talk) 09:16, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:02, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional, out of scope - IndrajitDas 09:20, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:02, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional, out of scope - IndrajitDas 09:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:02, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, no exif, clearly not CC own work. There's lots of pictures of the subject freely licensed & available. Kissa21782 (talk) 09:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, clearly not own work as it is from an official Christmas photoshoot. There are a couple of CC licensed images from the photoshoot in the government's image bank, but not this one. The image needs a valid source where the license can be seen or it has to be deleted. -kyykaarme (talk) 22:43, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:03, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:03, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File appears in 2014 on this site : https://www.compagniedephalsbourg.com/philippe-journo/ with no credit or license 212.234.115.225 09:34, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:03, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:COPYVIO, content copied from Instagram Frontman830 (talk) 09:35, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:03, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyright violation of en:Nexhmije Hoxha's right (or those of her heirs). On page 2 of the document, copyright protection is mentioned. Obviously not CC Albinfo (talk) 09:35, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:03, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be "own work". Small file with no EXIF data and was the fourth photo uploaded by the user. Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:14, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:03, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jonh takuma (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation

Timtrent (talk) 10:22, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The screenshot is copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 11:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:12, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Grafiks1 - Copy.jpg Papuass (talk) 11:26, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:12, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LocXMali (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work. Tineye finds this online before upload, no exif, PCP

Gbawden (talk) 11:27, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file, photo of a 1967 book, unclear copyright status Papuass (talk) 11:29, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file, photo of a 1967 book, unclear copyright status Papuass (talk) 11:29, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Few Wikipedias use this image as main portrait of Yolanda of Flanders, Latin Empress. It's evidently a very bad quality collage of images and the face looks to be made with Paint... Do we really need to have this sort of fakes on Commons? During the 17-19th centuries painters often produced imaginary portraits of Medieval kings and queens, to fill a void in dynastic collections of portraits. But it's a very different policy and it has a historical value. Actually I'm not really agree to have modern digital fake portraits here. I'm not really sure that the uploader is really the author of it, because all the other files he uploaded are normal historical images. Kaho Mitsuki (Dis-moi) 11:39, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem as here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mhmrodrigues/Archive_8#File:Constance_de_Bretagne.jpg. Such fictional drawings are out of scope. Please delete.--GerritR (talk) 17:07, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Searching better, I found others fake digital portraits (File:Anna Kyburg.jpg, File:MargaretEngland.jpg, File:Philippa of Ulster.jpg, File:Matilda Bethune.jpg, File:Gertrud of Saxony.jpg, File:Adela Vermandois.jpg, File:Isabella of Luxembourg.jpg, File:Ogiva of luxembourg.jpg, File:Beatriz1.jpg, File:ConstançaBorgonha.jpg, File:Sibilla d'Anjou.jpg, File:Elfrida of Wessex.jpg, File:Blanche d'Artois.jpg, File:Alix d'Anjou.jpg, File:Marie de Blois.jpg, File:Marguerite Capet countess of Artois.jpg, File:Blanche of Bourbon.jpg, File:Yolande de Bourgogne.jpg, File:Michael Asen.jpg). So maybe he's really the author... In any way they are out of scope, as you said.--Kaho Mitsuki (Dis-moi) 09:24, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The first two portraits of this type he uploaded: File:Joana de Portugal.jpg, File:IsabellaPortugal.jpg. They are originally from a now closed Flickr Account called The Lost Gallery. Another user has collected them in a Flickr album [:https://www.flickr.com/photos/146186554@N04/albums/72157680103846366/with/31988486434/]. Some of them are rationally listed here [:https://ladyreading.forumfree.it/?t=76904143]. As I explained in that forum (my nickname there is *§Yue§*) they are photomontages of existing paintings, miniatures etc., widely modified with Photoshop (for ex: in the forum I show the origin of the "portrait of Leonor d'Aragona", the second one, based on a Saint Catherine of Simone Martini). This type of fake portraits should not be here on Commons and by the way I'm not sure their original author authorized a free use of them. Unfortunaly they are everywhere (forums, Pinterest, history pages etc.), so I will not be surprised that they could come back, uploaded by an inexperienced user (thinking they are old paintings). Most part (or all?) of the bad portraits uploaded by Mhmrodrigues are originally from The Lost Gallery, eventually modified again by him (for example: File:Elfrida of Wessex.jpg comes from [:https://www.flickr.com/photos/146186554@N04/32678669412/in/album-72157680103846366/]). I ping @Eric: , because I saw that he already managed the problem "Lost Gallery".--Kaho Mitsuki (Dis-moi) 10:14, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete most of these files indeed come from a (now defunct) flickr account named "TheLostGalery". As I have already complained about File:Blanca II de Navarra.jpg, they are recent photomontages, some made of 19th c. paintings, of pieces taken here and there, even of some wiki-created coats of arms. These files have no educational use and should be used under no circumstances. Kathisma (talk) 17:02, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:14, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sorbitolith (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:26, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 03:14, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious application of {{PD-Ineligible}}, this logo is far too complex to fall below the threshold of originality.

plicit 12:39, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:15, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even if the threshold of originality in Italy is very high, this logo has complex graphical elements and we need a permission to publish it and to make a derivative version. Ruthven (msg) 08:30, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 22:40, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious application of {{PD-Ineligible}}, this logo is far too complex to fall below the threshold of originality.

plicit 12:40, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:15, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corporate logo, design appears to be complex enough for copyright protection and should not be hosted here. Ravensfire (talk) 12:49, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation; can usually be uploaded to your local Wikipedia as fair use if an article exists (F1). --Missvain (talk) 03:15, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 12:53, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation; can usually be uploaded to your local Wikipedia as fair use if an article exists (F1). --Missvain (talk) 03:16, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

technical issue Burocan (talk) 13:15, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 03:16, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a part of the Procession Scene in the Anak Tomb No.3 which was made in Goguryeo, not Former Yan nor any Chinese dynasties. The tomb is one of the Complex of Goguryeo Tombs which is UNESCO heritage of North Korea. This file shouldn't be in the Chinese Armour document. Wjung927 (talk) 12:53, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 16:13, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The caption is misleading as it suggests Goguryeo to be another Chinese clan/civilization, while it is Korean. Please take it down or specify in the caption! :) suggestion: "...emigre, Goguryeo." -> "...emigre who took political asylum in Goguryeo." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Happywalrusa (talk • contribs) 15:19, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happywalrusa (talk) 14:57, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 03:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Infobox screenshot. Should be replaced with real one. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Agentpromovator (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo; user's only activity is self-promo: m:Special:CentralAuth/Agentpromovator

Gikü (talk) 15:08, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:18, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification via email correspondence is required so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. For email template, see COM:OTRS#Email message template for release of rights to a file. Better still, have the original image overwrite this FB-derived image. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:13, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:18, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification via email correspondence is required so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. For email template, see COM:OTRS#Email message template for release of rights to a file. Better still, have the original image overwrite this FB-derived image. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:14, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:18, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SeafoodCapiz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Suspected not own self-photographed images: missing or questionable EXIF metadata, inconsistent resolutions, and some under .png format while others .jpg format. Uploader has uploaded some questionable images, see their talk page. Google Images and TinEye didn't found other identical versions of the nominated files, so a deletion request is hereby commenced.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:18, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Port of Culasi.png and File:Roxas Airport (RXS).png are png versions of two suspected Facebook images now at separate deletion requests: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Culasi Port.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:RXS Airport.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:20, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:19, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:19, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:19, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (according to the description, this is a crop of an other image that has meanwhile been deleted for copyright violation) Dominique Roux (talk) 15:29, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:19, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This illustration was uploaded under the assumption that it is a simple photograph published before 1969 but an illustration is not a photograph. Also, the illustrator is not anonymous, in fact the name of the illustrator is at the bottom right of the cover. Thuresson (talk) 15:29, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation; can usually be uploaded to your local Wikipedia as fair use if an article exists (F1). --Missvain (talk) 03:19, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:19, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unclear context Testingitro (talk) 15:40, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:24, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:24, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, meaningless, no context Testingitro (talk) 15:47, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giorgis68 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Greece.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LindorMin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused low quality photos of random classroom, no educational value, unusable and out of scope.

P 1 9 9   15:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification via email correspondence is required so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. For email template, see COM:OTRS#Email message template for release of rights to a file. Better still, have the original image overwrite this FB-derived image. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:07, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:26, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork, COM:WEBHOST, little educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:07, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:26, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo may be simple, but where is the source of this logo? The uploader didn't just created this logo on its own, but definitely grabbed elsewhere (in .jpg and not .png format too, adding suspicion). Uploader has also history of questionable uploads, see User talk:Iamtheyeishow. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:15, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:27, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from Facebook, requires OTRS permission. E4024 (talk) 16:33, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:27, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, as this serves no purpose. Acagastya (talk) 16:41, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:27, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alfredo mesquita.png Jonathan N M Machado (talk) 16:41, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 03:27, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the creator and owner of this image I would like to request that it be deleted. The image has been replaced by another file of improved quality. Thank you. AndrewFletcher (talk) 16:43, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:28, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vlvescovo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The photographer is Tamara Stubbs not Vlvescovo, please send a proof via COM:OTRS that you (Vlvescovo) are Tamara Stubbs or that you have the right to publish this photo under a free licence, else COM:PCP!

Ras67 (talk) 16:50, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Hi, vlvescovo here. I submitted comments, I think on the file deletion notifications, that Ms. Tamara Stubbs transferred all copyrights over these photos over to me, specifically so that they could be published on Wiki Commons. As you will see from my history, I do not submit very many articles, and thus I am inexperienced in how to upload the content. If I erred in how it was done, there was no desire to obfuscate the ownership. I did not see how I could properly credit her as the photographer while also making the submission as the Copyright holder. I am more than happy to identify her as the photographer of the works, while also submitting them as the actual copyright holder. Also happy to send the copyright transfer documents to anyone else besides permissions-commons (I am not sure if I did it correctly). Any assistance in how to rectify this if there is still an issue would be welcome. There is no attempt at all on my part to inappropriately submit a work whose copyright is held by another. Vlvescovo (talk) 19:33, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for your quick response, but i'm not an OTRS member, please send your permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. You can use the Interactive Release Generator. Please also add Tamara Stubbs' submission and please use an "official" email address so that the OTRS member can recognize you. Thanks for your efforts. Warm regards --Ras67 (talk) 01:34, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The contractual situation has been cleared and hence the permission is okay now. I am a support agent, and another agent has come to the same conclusion. The automatic setting of the OTRS badge into this discussion after acceptance of the permission did not work; there was a macro error. --Mussklprozz (talk) 05:59, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 03:28, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the owner and uploader of this image I would like to request that the image should be deleted. The reason is that I uploaded the raw SVG by mistake, it should be a high resolution JPG. I already replaced the article from SVG with JPG. Thanks in advance Arabella Klinik (talk) 17:08, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arabella Klinik (talk • contribs) 17:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 03:28, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in en:Draft:Matrix elements ( Mathematics) with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:10, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:28, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplication of File:Flag of Europe.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:16, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:28, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio 92.40.203.110 17:26, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:29, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Umar-askira (talk) 18:05, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:29, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains mostly non-free art Carniolus (talk) 18:05, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete Yes. They are clearly {{Copyvio}} Ox1997cow (talk) 16:25, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:29, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Поскольку Селфи Stnovaff (talk) 18:08, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 03:29, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artist died in 1995; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 18:09, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HaJoFr: Yes, the artist Philipp Mendler died in 1995. The picture was taken along the exhibition (in Wechterswinkel) on 12th July 2018 by Carola Mendler (widow of Philipp Mendler). Philipp was my father in law and the family has been invited for this special exhibition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HaJoFr (talk • contribs) 20:14, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:30, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a posed photo taken as part of Florence Kajuju's position in the Kenyan government; it is unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Nathan2055talk - contribs 18:10, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:30, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artist died in 1979; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 18:43, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:30, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional photo of non-notable performer, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:17, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:30, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its not a real map, i just made a wikibox with it. Kevin12.cartography (talk) 19:26, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:30, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

How is this image from a 1957 film the uploader's own work? C.Fred (talk) 19:53, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:30, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image. User not active. E4024 (talk) 20:12, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:31, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Peter Mannox as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7 Uploaded 5 months ago, thus not eligible for speedy deletion. Achim (talk) 20:20, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:31, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from https://www.amo.gov.hk/en/monuments_popup.php?largeImg=../graphics/en/monuments/large/124/1241.jpg&largeImg=../graphics/en/monuments/large/124/1241.jpg&largeImg=../graphics/en/monuments/large/124/1241.jpg&mid=1&mdesc=Semi-circular arch, granite copings and reticulated surfaces.&old_mdesc=Semi-circular arch, granite copings and reticulated surfaces.&old_mdesc=Semi-circular arch, granite copings and reticulated surfaces.&old_mdesc= Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 20:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:31, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Željko Kipke is still alive, work not in PD. 190.231.219.124 20:34, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Željko Kipke is still alive and the work not in PD. I am the owner of this painting, it is my private property! --Silverije (talk) 16:41, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:32, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a valid copyright tag. But this painting could be in PD according the laws of Croatia. 190.231.219.124 20:37, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:32, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a valid copyright tag, but this image could be in PD according the laws of Croatia 190.231.219.124 20:42, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The painter of this painting died 300 years ago. --Silverije (talk) 17:17, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 03:32, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screen shot from https://hlm2016aids.unaids.org/index.php/en/home/ - no evidence the webpage can be released as free-licenced Dl2000 (talk) 20:53, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:32, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1) Extremely poor quality. 2) Some regional encyclopedia is stated as a source (no details given). 3) The uploader has claimed that it is created by "various authors". Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:13, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope KandidKansan (talk) 21:18, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:39, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:34, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced as "photo is taken by Ingrid Bugge who died in 2020", thus no clear permission, as she can't be the uploader. 87.49.45.118 22:46, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is uploaded by Karl Hansen, TinCanWeb. The photo is taken by Ingrid Bugge who died in 2020. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TinCanWeb (talk • contribs) 05:08, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation; can usually be uploaded to your local Wikipedia as fair use if an article exists (F1). --Missvain (talk) 03:34, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in-use picture of an unknown woman. The Commons is not an online photo album and cannot be a repository for just anything. Ldorfman (talk) 23:33, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:34, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear, not-in-use picture of books (+ copyrights viloation). The Commons cannot be a repository for just anything. Ldorfman (talk) 23:35, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:34, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality unused photo, no EXIF. Also, suggested to be a selfie. Ankry (talk) 23:59, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:34, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark on the file implies different owner. OTRS permission is required. E4024 (talk) 02:57, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:37, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe this one can go under PD-text if we crop out the bottom hand sticker? --Slashme (talk) 09:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Seems an appropriate solution. The second sticker may actually just happen to be included, but not the main focus. Bohemian Baltimore are you ok with such cropping? Platonides (talk) 00:35, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine with me. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 00:38, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination--A1Cafel (talk) 02:49, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Two things: Firstly, if this file was kept after being cropped (due to lack of FoP in the concerned country) then the original image should have to be deleted. Secondly, the sticker is a propaganda medium by the church that has distributed it, as it reflects the internet site of that institution. IMHO delete it altogether, but if others do not agree with my concerns, then at least delete the uncropped original. E4024 (talk) 03:15, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted only the first version. Commons needs every kind of images, including such queer propaganda. Taivo (talk) 16:48, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable performers, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:06, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a photo of Sarah Harmer. Mindmatrix 11:51, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 16:24, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Of course it is not an "own work", but could be PD? E4024 (talk) 04:24, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, 1951 photo, source country is unknown (Soviet Union or Turkey?), no publication data, unknown author. That way we must delete it. Taivo (talk) 17:00, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gegen mein Foto des Grabkreuzes eines bekannten Bildhauers (de:Hans Ladner) in München, auf dem auch drei weitere Familienangehörige mit ihren Lebensdaten genannt sind, wendet User:Schroeder.r ein: „In der jetzigen Form verletzt dieses Bild und andere Bilder mit gleichem Inhalt die Persönlichkeitsrechte der Familien Ladner, Liebermann und Schröder. Nur Hans Ladner ist eine Person öffentlichen Interesses. Die anderen Personen nicht.“

Aufgrund der Namensgleichheit kann man vermuten, dass der Benutzer ebenfalls ein Verwandter ist. Insofern hätte er wohl – unabhängig von der deutschen Rechtslage – den wikipedianischen Anspruch, um eine Courtesy deletion zu bitten.

Da es sich nicht um ein Foto der Personen handelt, ist Commons:Photographs of identifiable people nicht anwendbar. Aber wie sieht es mit „postmortalem Persönlichkeitsrecht“ (einschließlich Datenschutz) aus? (Laut Diskussionsseite ist jener WP-Artikel allerdings unzulänglich.) Die Verstorbenen werden durch das Foto nicht verunglimpft (beleidigt, lächerlich gemacht o. ä.). Greift das Argument des Datenschutzes? Immerhin steht das Grabkreuz auf einem öffentlichen Friedhof, die Daten liegen also nicht verschlossen in einem Aktenfaszikel.

In einer Forums-Diskussion schrieb Túrelio 2012: „"Persönlichkeitsrecht" dürfte nur bei Grabsteinfotos, auf denen der Name klar identifizierbar ist, von vor kurzem verstorbenen Personen relevant sein.“ (Im vorliegenden Fall ist 2014 das letzte Todesjahr.) – In ähnlich gelagerten Fällen wurden Löschanträge unterschiedlich entschieden: „Deleted: per nomination and no permission“ oder aber „Kept: no valid reason for deletion“. – Und die Fotos, für die ähnliche Anträge gestellt werden könnten, sind zahlreich.

Betroffen sind drei Fotos:

Behalten? Löschen? (Und sei es ggf. auch einfach mit der Begründung der Courtesy deletion?) Danach Upload eines mit schwarzen Datenschutz-Balken versehenen, manipulierten Fotos? Martinus KE (talk) 06:45, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, during first week after uploading the user can demand deletion of own uploads with any reason or without reason at all, so I delete the files. But if one week would have passed from uploading, then I would keep them. Which personality rights of dead person? Here are dates of birth and death, that's all and they are freely available in de:Hans Ladner. Taivo (talk) 17:26, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks like a scan of a photo of a painting, and the photo was apparently published in a book (from 2010). The original work (the painting) is certainly not the uploader's "own work" under a CC license as claimed, and it is not from 2021. The man depicted in the painting died in 1936, so the painting could be from 1936 or earlier, but it could also be painted later using a photograph as a model. We just don't know.

We need more information about the original author (the painter) and the time of creation of the painting to be able to determine the copyright status of this file. If it can't be shown that the work is in the PD or under a free license, the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 10:24, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, in der angegebenen Quelle steht leider kein Herkunftsnachweis des Bildes.--Der wahre Jakob (talk) 11:29, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, if we know more about author of the image, then the file can be undeleted. Taivo (talk) 17:30, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be uploader's "own work". This photo was published by Ms. David on her Instagram page (https://www.instagram.com/p/ti_273F8l4/) two years before being uploaded here in Commons. Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:09, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:34, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Andere naam en dus overbodig. BT1985 (talk) 14:32, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 17:35, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File caricato due volte Elena Roveda (Museo Civico Modena) (talk) 14:58, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 17:37, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I stopped working for this company, I dont have the rights for this image anymore, so please delete it. Mrkskla (talk) 15:35, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, this is not a reason to delete anything. Such simple graphs are ineligible for copyright. Taivo (talk) 17:40, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Deathskull (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Different names (Dósa Evelyn, Vass Zoltán, Magyar Nóra) given by the uploader, and these files were taken with different cameras. It is not possible to decide which one was taken by the uploader, which one was not.

Regasterios (talk) 15:35, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, even those photos, where Deathskull is claimed author, have different cameras. Taivo (talk) 18:02, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Foster.mcaffee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works but scans without original author/date/source/permission.

P 1 9 9   15:58, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification via email correspondence is required so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. Also, this seems to be a montage: no identifiable source and author information of the two images. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:05, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:15, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOO China 忒有钱 (talk) 19:20, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:31, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW, needs COM:OTRS to prove that uploader is indeed the copyright holder. P 1 9 9   19:55, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:38, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely non-free logo, COM:Romania has no data on TOO. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:58, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:40, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work. —SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 20:22, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:42, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Andere naam en dus overbodig. BT1985 (talk) 20:31, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 18:44, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Andere naam en dus overbodig. BT1985 (talk) 20:32, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 18:45, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Barejsha02 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation

These are a sample of this uploader huge portfolio of pictures. Please will a copyright expert and a Commons Scope expert examine them with a view to determining if they should remain here

Timtrent (talk) 21:48, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all the photos are unused and practically undescribed. Educational value is not shown and I delete them all as out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation Timtrent (talk) 22:07, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:53, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Here is a comment from a judge (Bingbing Yao) in Nanjing. He personally thought the author (Bin Bao) of this flag still owned the copyright, and the government is only the cilent. Njzjz (talk) 22:52, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, really, I did not find good license. Deleted as copyvio. Taivo (talk) 18:59, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If author of this 1936 photo is unknown, then how do you know, that the photographer is 80 years dead? No evidence of anonymous work, no publication data. Taivo (talk) 10:53, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Taivo it's a simple photograph prior 1926 as it was taken on her graduation day. She was a professor at the university of Valencia, so from her birth in 1896 taken in 1920-21 or so. I uploaded a raw version spread on most of the Net. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 17:00, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Kept -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:55, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Regional Federal reserve banks are not part of the Federal government, so these photos are not in the public domain and there is no evidence of a free license.

Dylsss (talk) 16:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 16:12, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source falsification. Pages 47-48 and Map 2 (which is on page 147) do not correspond to the claim made by the uploader, see more in: https://archive.org/details/georgievintroductiontothehistoryoftheindoeuropeanlanguages1981/page/n149/mode/2up?q=Map+2 Macedonian (talk) 19:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per remark of M.nelson. --Ellywa (talk) 11:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]