Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Qudusexpert

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Qudusexpert}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Qudusexpert

[edit]
[edit]

Rationale, discussion and results

[edit]

Reason: These users all upload promotional images to Commons, often to use in promotional items at wikidata. Remarkably the descriptions often mention "wikidata" and not much more. Also remarkable is the addition of structured data P180:Q2013. There is a connection with d:Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Marcyway4 where more socks may be found that have been active at wikidata. Lymantria (talk) 11:37, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

08 April 2021

[edit]
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]

Reason: This user makes uploads with the same edit signature as described above: descriptions mention "wikidata" and not much more. Lymantria (talk) 06:40, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Same for Dollylov. Lymantria (talk) 14:33, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Added 3 possible socks. Lymantria (talk) 09:38, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And one more. Lymantria (talk) 07:22, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21 April 2021

[edit]
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]

Reason: This user makes uploads with the same edit signature as described above: descriptions mention "wikidata" with bogus categories added. Lymantria (talk) 09:55, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

23 April 2021

[edit]
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]

Reason: These users make uploads with the same edit signature as described above, including the bogus categories. Lymantria (talk) 15:33, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

+Timmie Dc004, same edit pattern. Lymantria (talk) 06:35, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
+Damilola qodri, again same edit pattern. Lymantria (talk) 06:50, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
+Greatfulsoul. Lymantria (talk) 07:15, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
+Klever221. Lymantria (talk) 17:35, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
+Kennytech01. Lymantria (talk) 07:07, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
+Topcoden12, Hasabygold. Lymantria (talk) 07:07, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
+Panelanimaker. Lymantria (talk) 15:44, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
+3 --Lymantria (talk) 07:07, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Elcobbola: There's a lot here. MarioJump83! 03:28, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
+Kennytech123. Lymantria (talk) 07:08, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
+Pakpro123, same edit pattern. Lymantria (talk) 10:40, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Half done - Kennytech123, Kennytech01, Kennytech155, Hasabygold, Youdesk, Pakpro123, and Oriyomi0990 are Likely/ Confirmed, but I'm going to stop there. These socks are on many different ranges and in narrower bands (e.g., /24) with many unrelated users. The CU data are thus of somewhat limited use as differentiation relies heavily on behaviour. Accordingly, and given that COM:RFCU is "a last resort for difficult cases" (note, for example, that {{Duck}} is under the "request declined" indicator header), going forward please simply report obvious socks at COM:ANB. Эlcobbola talk 15:12, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
    Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
    above, in a new section.