Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/03/17
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
quite certainly copyright violations
Discostu (talk) 09:25, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deleted per COM:CSD#F1/F3. -- CptViraj (talk) 09:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate with File:AWA-abj-inaugural.jpg Sm105 (talk) 10:00, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 10:27, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
The big gettyimages waterwork is a dead giveaway this isn't an "own work". Also the creator is likely a Aryashahnaughty sock. Eostrix (talk) 07:13, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyvio. --Minoraxtalk 15:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
This photographi is a blatant copyright violation. The uploader did not take this photo. The uploader did not bring a permission for that PD license. And the best: The photo itself is not in the public domain. The copyright of the object is surely done and the ocject can be photographed as you want but nevertheless the creator of a photograph can claim copyright of their own work.
The uploader obviously took from the given source, see file page but they did not bring any permission. So, delete it. 480days (talk) 12:47, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 13:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
no encyclopedic value, just being used for vandalism Nthep (talk) 15:45, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - per nom, vandalism. Pahunkat (talk) 15:53, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Nick (talk) 15:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
image is unencyclopedic and does not convey useful information about the subject of the page. - ~~~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by PooleParty247 (talk • contribs) 02:39, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
image is unencyclopedic and does not convey useful information about the topic of the page. PooleParty247 (talk) 02:44, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - A photo of nebula is within scope and conveys a visual image if the nebula. Whpq (talk) 02:53, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim (talk) 21:58, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
wrong color Erryseo (talk) 06:25, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 22:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
600px Flag of Võro.svg should be merged with File:Flag of Võro.svg. The former has a better file, but the latter has a better filename. Iketsi (talk) 21:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Blackcat (write me here) 21:51, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
F9: Media file copyright violation without credible claim of fair use or permission Lackland123 (talk) 14:18, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, (C) Derek Storm/Everett Collection. --Túrelio (talk) 11:26, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
compromettant Joakim1999 (talk) 21:58, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
compromettant Joakim1999 (talk) 21:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:38, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Would like this photo deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miscellieneous (talk • contribs) 15:05, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 11:20, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 04:57, 19 März 2021 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Non-trivial corporate logo --Krdbot 09:42, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by أسامه عبدالله هديان (talk · contribs)
[edit]No License, Uploaded from Google
- File:حمود عاطف.jpg
- File:عبدالقادر باجمال.jpg
- File:Mesfer Abdullah Al-Numair.png
- File:عبد الملك سليمان المعلمي.png
- File:م. عوض سعد السقطري.png
- File:البنك اليمني للانشاء والتعمير.jpg
- File:مخطوطات أثرية قديمة ٢.jpg
- File:مخطوطات أثرية.jpg
- File:قلعة مهلهل العسكرية.jpg
- File:مدينة خمر ٣.jpg
- File:مدينة خمر ٢.jpg
- File:مدينة خمر.jpg
- File:فن تشكيلي.jpg
إسلام (talk) 22:41, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and Copyvio --Alaa :)..! 11:49, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by أسامه عبدالله هديان (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:احمد علي عبدالله صالح.png
- File:حمير عبدالله الاحمر.jpg
- File:طارق محمد صالح.jpg
- File:الشيخ عبدالله بن حسين الاحمر.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete all. One is from Facebook and others swiped from the net, social media etc. The uploader needs a short rest to understand how to contribute to Commons, IMHO. --E4024 (talk) 13:56, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:16, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abdullah HEH (talk · contribs)
[edit]Bits and pieces of the Khan Academy logo
- File:Capture hehe BOI UR A LEGEND.jpg
- File:Hehe khan 6.jpg
- File:Hehe ka 5.jpg
- File:Heheh ka.jpg
- File:Hellojeffbezo.jpg
- File:Hellot.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 01:44, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete per COM:SCOPE if nothing else. — Rhododendrites talk | 19:34, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Comment I want to assume good faith but I suspect the user is screwing with us. Ytoyoda (talk) 01:22, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:27, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Looks like a photo of a television, which would almost certainly be copyrighted. —SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 01:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Can probably be safely speedy deleted as an obvious copyvio. — Rhododendrites talk | 19:35, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. This looks to be a cellphone picture taken of Mindy Kaling's Character, Kelly Kapoor, from the show The Office, meaning it is definitely without a doubt copyrighted. SomeBodyAnyBody05 (talk) 18:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:24, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be flickrwashing. The Flickr account was just created and features only this photograph with a statement that the image is "fair use", which is not allowed on Commons. The metadata suggests this is a screenshot of another image file, not an original photograph. I think we need an COM:OTRS email from the copyright owner. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:38, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This image has been listed under the CreativeCommons Attribution-Share Alike License 2.0, meaning it is able to be used under a license and is not published anywhere else on the web. I have contacted the copyright owner and requested that they send a COM:OTRS email EllenBuckland (talk) 14:47, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
There is an OTRS email received for “File:Gemma Collins 2021 headshot.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2021031710009852. --Ww2censor (talk) 15:31, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- I have updated the image and removed the ‘fair use’ statement as it was incorrect and corrected the date it was taken on.Messinwithbruce (talk) 23:51, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: I, Bruce Denstin, took this image on 8 February 2021 and have and allowed it to be used under Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.0, I’ve updated the description on Flickr to remove the mistaken ‘fair use’ caption that was added. (non-admin closure) --Messinwithbruce (talk) 23:56, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: still no OTRS confirmation. --JuTa 05:29, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Non-educational use, and possible copyright violation with the gif. 2601:40:C003:9550:254C:972C:A2EF:180A 00:41, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete clear copyvio/out of scope. Elli (talk) 05:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete copyvio --Nintendofan885T&Cs apply 15:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
It's a meme. (Wait, he can Capitalize?) (Always has been.)--Fallencow30 (talk) 13:16, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 21:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Non-free comic. Image Source was here >>> https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/i-wish-i-was-at-home-they-dont-know <<< 2601:40:C003:9550:254C:972C:A2EF:180A 01:07, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
I believe this particular image is public property. LouisCartier (talk) 09:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - can probably be safely speedy deleted. Based on a copyrighted work which appears widely. would need documentation of explicit license by the original creator(s). — Rhododendrites talk | 19:28, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 21:26, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Redundant and less useful version of File:Khan Academy logo (2018).svg. Ytoyoda (talk) 01:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 21:26, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Does FoP in France apply to this file? (All the one-sided propaganda in description does not deserve a reply, BTW.) E4024 (talk) 02:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Uh it's auto generated from fickr, I don't think freedom of panorama applies here. As laid out in several other cases, it's also not the main subject. Des Vallee (talk) 03:29, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- E4024 Upon further examination it might be not acceptable under France's extremely strict Panorama laws. I can try to get in touch with the person who wrote the file to see if they have permission. Des Vallee (talk) 03:31, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) Uh! "it's also not the main subject." When you confuse and contribute to this project as a platform for propaganda you can say such a sentence. Yes, the mural is de minimus here. The photo is about the piece of sky. E4024 (talk) 03:35, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Your English is incoherent however you literally state here it is completely under creative commons. Des Vallee (talk) 14:33, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- My English is not good enough, while the italics are better. My French is even worse. Thanks to our War of Liberation under the genius of all times, Atatürk, we did not become a Brit or French colony and could not learn well one of those languages. Thanks to the Turkish Revolution my mother was very well educated at the Erenköy Kız Lisesi though. (I mean I had home education, on "humanities", of which I am proud.) --E4024 (talk) 15:32, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- E4024 Keep yourself on topic, what you stated had nothing to do with anything, which just exemplifies this strange deletion request. Although this text seems machine translated, are you just attempting to delete the file because you support Turkey and dislike Rojava? What on earth. Des Vallee (talk) 01:49, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- My English is not good enough, while the italics are better. My French is even worse. Thanks to our War of Liberation under the genius of all times, Atatürk, we did not become a Brit or French colony and could not learn well one of those languages. Thanks to the Turkish Revolution my mother was very well educated at the Erenköy Kız Lisesi though. (I mean I had home education, on "humanities", of which I am proud.) --E4024 (talk) 15:32, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Your English is incoherent however you literally state here it is completely under creative commons. Des Vallee (talk) 14:33, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
No evidence this is the work of the uploader. Image is posted on the subject's website saying it is by himself [1] TJMSmith (talk) 05:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. We would need otrs permission. --Amada44 talk to me 21:29, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document. Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 19:33, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
I posted it without owning the property, I don't have the right to upload it, please delete it, thank you. Pip Squeak patty number one (talk) 18:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:16, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
I posted it without owning the property, I don't have the right to upload it, please delete it, thank you. Pip Squeak patty number one (talk) 18:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 19:55, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
I posted it without owning the property, I don't have the right to upload it, please delete it, thank you. Pip Squeak patty number one (talk) 18:05, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 19:55, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Unclear educational use (unused) Elli (talk) 05:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Somehow this image is lacking captions. --Amada44 talk to me 21:30, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Wrongly uploaded out of focus photo, Please delete - IndrajitDas 06:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 21:34, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 10:57, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 21:36, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Multi-purpose hall and mortuary of the San Isidro Labardor Parish Church (Pulilan, Bulacan)
[edit]The multipurpose hall / mortuary is a 2017 addition to the public domain (18th cent.) church. This 2017 building was designed by architect Rey Mariano (revealed by this image which by itself is a derivative work problem). Freedom of panorama is not yet provided in the Philippine copyright law, and regular rule of obtaining permission from the architect is still required.
- File:7757San Isidro Labardor Parish Church Pulilan 08.jpg
- File:7757San Isidro Labardor Parish Church Pulilan 10.jpg
- File:7757San Isidro Labardor Parish Church Pulilan 12.jpg
- File:7757San Isidro Labardor Parish Church Pulilan 13.jpg
- File:7757San Isidro Labardor Parish Church Pulilan 14.jpg
- File:7757San Isidro Labardor Parish Church Pulilan 15.jpg
- File:7757San Isidro Labardor Parish Church Pulilan 16.jpg
- File:7757San Isidro Labardor Parish Church Pulilan 17.jpg
- File:7757San Isidro Labardor Parish Church Pulilan 18.jpg
- File:7757San Isidro Labardor Parish Church Pulilan 19.jpg
- File:7757San Isidro Labardor Parish Church Pulilan 21.jpg
- File:7757San Isidro Labardor Parish Church Pulilan 22.jpg
- File:7757San Isidro Labardor Parish Church Pulilan 23.jpg
- File:7757San Isidro Labardor Parish Church Pulilan 27.jpg
- File:7757San Isidro Labardor Parish Church Pulilan 28.jpg
- File:7757San Isidro Labardor Parish Church Pulilan 29.jpg
- File:7757San Isidro Labardor Parish Church Pulilan 30.jpg
- File:7757San Isidro Labardor Parish Church Pulilan 31.jpg
- File:7757San Isidro Labardor Parish Church Pulilan 32.jpg
- File:7757San Isidro Labardor Parish Church Pulilan 33.jpg
- File:7757San Isidro Labardor Parish Church Pulilan 35.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:04, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:20, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
COM:Derivative work - contains an underlying image. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:08, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Iampurabpatel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Unused or used in uploads gallery.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:43, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Iampurabpatel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope.
- File:Certificate of ownership.png
- File:Certification badge.png
- File:Certificate Of Purab Patel Logo.png
- File:Full logo trans.png
- File:Purab Patel Logo.png
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:08, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:43, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used or used in unapproved draft.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:31, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:51, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 17:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:06, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
out of scope 92.40.203.47 17:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 10:44, 2 April 2021 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 14:16, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in France ComputerHotline (talk) 05:51, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep Hi,- Max Blondat died in 1925 so this image is acceptable here (No FOP in France is a right argument if the artist is still alive or died in the last 70 years).
- ----Benoît (d) 06:27, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per Benoît, as the artist died long enough ago, lack of FoP in France isn't an issue here. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:01, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 06:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom, COM:CSD#F10. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:30, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close: already deleted by Fitindia. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:06, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Yakimchenko died in 1929. Obviously incorrect description. — Redboston 13:16, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Update. This foto was made by Roberts Johansons (Q4202951) (source). He died in 1959. {{PD-Russia}} is incorrect license. — Redboston 16:30, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 15:34, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative work of a screen showing a copyrighted feed/presentation from the church. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:57, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:32, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Exterior of the Baclaran Church
[edit]This church building was completed in 1958 and the architect, Cesar Homero Rosales Concio Sr., died in 2003 according to Lakbay ng Lakan. Freedom of panorama is not yet provided in the Philippine copyright law, and regular rule of obtaining permission from Concio's heirs is still required even if the proposed bill amending the copyright law is now pending.
- File:5872Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 03.jpg
- File:5872Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 04.jpg
- File:5977Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 32.jpg
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 14.jpg
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 15.jpg
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 16.jpg
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 19.jpg
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 20.jpg
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 21.jpg
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 22.jpg
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 23.jpg
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 24.jpg
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 25.jpg
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 26.jpg
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 27.jpg
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 31.jpg
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 32.jpg
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 33.jpg
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 34.jpg
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 37.jpg
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 38.jpg
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 39.jpg
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 41.jpg
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 42.jpg
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 45.jpg
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 46.jpg
- File:6025Baclaran Church Shrine Parañaque City 48.jpg
- File:6074Baclaran Church Markets Roads Parañaque City 01.jpg
- File:6074Baclaran Church Markets Roads Parañaque City 02.jpg
- File:6074Baclaran Church Markets Roads Parañaque City 03.jpg
- File:6074Baclaran Church Markets Roads Parañaque City 04.jpg
- File:6074Baclaran Church Markets Roads Parañaque City 06.jpg
- File:6074Baclaran Church Markets Roads Parañaque City 07.jpg
- File:6074Baclaran Church Markets Roads Parañaque City 08.jpg
- File:6074Baclaran Church Markets Roads Parañaque City 09.jpg
- File:6074Baclaran Church Markets Roads Parañaque City 10.jpg
- File:6074Baclaran Church Markets Roads Parañaque City 11.jpg
- File:6074Baclaran Church Markets Roads Parañaque City 12.jpg
- File:6074Baclaran Church Markets Roads Parañaque City 13.jpg
- File:6074Baclaran Church Markets Roads Parañaque City 14.jpg
- File:6074Baclaran Church Markets Roads Parañaque City 15.jpg
- File:6074Baclaran Church Markets Roads Parañaque City 16.jpg
- File:6074Baclaran Church Markets Roads Parañaque City 17.jpg
- File:6074Baclaran Church Markets Roads Parañaque City 18.jpg
- File:Baclaran Church (close-up) (Roxas Boulevard cor. Redemptorist, Paranaque)(2017-12-31).jpg
- File:Baclaran Church at night.jpg
- File:Baclaran Church.jpg
- File:National Shrine of Our Mother of Perpetual Help.jpg
- File:NationalShrineofOurMotherofPerpetualHelpjf9967 01.JPG
- File:NationalShrineofOurMotherofPerpetualHelpjf9967 02.JPG
- File:NationalShrineofOurMotherofPerpetualHelpjf9967 03.JPG
- File:NationalShrineofOurMotherofPerpetualHelpjf9967 04.JPG
- File:NationalShrineofOurMotherofPerpetualHelpjf9967 05.JPG
- File:NationalShrineofOurMotherofPerpetualHelpjf9967 06.JPG
- File:NationalShrineofOurMotherofPerpetualHelpjf9967 07.JPG
- File:NationalShrineofOurMotherofPerpetualHelpjf9967 08.JPG
- File:NationalShrineofOurMotherofPerpetualHelpjf9967 09.JPG
- File:NationalShrineofOurMotherofPerpetualHelpjf9967 10.JPG
- File:NationalShrineofOurMotherofPerpetualHelpjf9979 01.JPG
- File:NationalShrineofOurMotherofPerpetualHelpjf9979 02.JPG
- File:NationalShrineofOurMotherofPerpetualHelpjf9979 04.JPG
- File:NationalShrineofOurMotherofPerpetualHelpjf9984 02.JPG
- File:NationalShrineofOurMotherofPerpetualHelpjf9984 05.JPG
- File:NationalShrineofOurMotherofPerpetualHelpjf9984 06.JPG
- File:NationalShrineofOurMotherofPerpetualHelpjfN9953 02.JPG
- File:NationalShrineofOurMotherofPerpetualHelpjfN9953 03.JPG
- File:NationalShrineofOurMotherofPerpetualHelpjfN9953 04.JPG
- File:NationalShrineofOurMotherofPerpetualHelpjfN9953 05.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Info the local image of Patrickroque01's w:File:Baclaran Church (close-up) (Roxas Boulevard cor. Redemptorist, Paranaque)(2017-12-31).jpg has been restored via w:Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion, to replace the Commons-sourced infobox image of the architecture's enwiki article. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:32, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:33, 24 April 2021 (UTC) Restored per UnDR . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative work of a copyrighted poster.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:18, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete COM:ADVERT and derivative image. Image is somewhat relevant for archival regarding Catholicism and missionaries in the 21st Century so would like feedback from other users. Markoolio97 (talk) 05:08, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Markoolio97: unfortunately, there's no precise date on when this poster was created. Even if an underlying image here is PD now, the entire poster constitutes a separate work. Without the exact date or year of creation, I cannot add <noinclude>[[Category:Undelete in xxxx]]</noinclude> for the potential future restoration of this image file. Also, might pose COM:URAA problem as the poster was created after January 1, 1996. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:30, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative work of a screen that broadcasts the copyrighted poster. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete derivative work and COM:ADVERT. Markoolio97 (talk) 05:04, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:30, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative work of a screen broadcasting or showing/displaying a copyrighted audiovisual feed from the church. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:22, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete but proper nomination is for audio-visual works instead of broadcasting as broadcasting rule under RA 8293 refers to NTC-registered broadcasting networks. Markoolio97 (talk) 05:28, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reworded my rationale per Markoolio97. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:12, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:30, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative work of a screen broadcasting or showing or displaying a copyrighted audiovisual feed from the church. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:24, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete but proper nomination is for audio-visual works instead of broadcasting as broadcasting rule under RA 8293 refers to NTC-registered broadcasting networks. Markoolio97 (talk) 05:29, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: Reworded my rationale per Markoolio97 at Commons:Deletion requests/File:04309jfBaclaran Church Jubillee Exhibitfvf 10.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:12, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:30, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative work of a screen broadcasting or showing displaying a copyrighted audiovisual feed from the church. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:25, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Markoolio97: IMO, while the texts are simple, the video/broadcast itself is copyrightable. According to COM:Philippines#General rules: "Broadcasts are protected for 20 years from the date the broadcast took place." Presentations broadcast in forums and meetings are copyrighted, so do the church's broadcast feed. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:12, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Info Citing RA 8293:
Section 215. Term of Protection for Performers, Producers and Broadcasting Organizations. - 215.1. The rights granted to performers and producers of sound recordings under this law shall expire:
- (a) For performances not incorporated in recordings, fifty (50) years from the end of the year in which the performance took place; and
- (b) For sound or image and sound recordings and for performances incorporated therein, fifty (50) years from the end of the year in which the recording took place.
215.2. In case of broadcasts, the term shall be twenty (20) years from the date the broadcast took place. The extended term shall be applied only to old works with subsisting protection under the prior law. (Sec. 55, P.D. No. 49a)
However, in my checking of RA 8293, sec 213.6 applies better for this nomination as this is audio-visual work instead of sec 215.2 which refers to broadcasting stations which are rightly NTC-registered broadcasting networks.
With this, Delete then as per audio-visual rule for IP as per RA 8293. Markoolio97 (talk) 05:25, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reworded my rationale per Markoolio97. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:08, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:30, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative work of a screen broadcasting or showing/displaying a copyrighted audiovisual feed from the church. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete but Disagree with nomination as subject is generic text. Will rather consider this for deletion for being unused. Cheers! Markoolio97 (talk) 05:00, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- IMO, while the texts are simple, the video/broadcast itself is copyrightable. According to COM:Philippines#General rules: "Broadcasts are protected for 20 years from the date the broadcast took place." Presentations broadcast in forums and meetings are copyrighted, so do the church's broadcast feed. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:13, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: Reworded my rationale per Markoolio97 at Commons:Deletion requests/File:04309jfBaclaran Church Jubillee Exhibitfvf 10.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:10, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:30, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable person / not a clear educational use Elli (talk) 05:16, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:33, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
As per COM:ADVERT , self promotion Ts12rAc (talk) 06:00, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:33, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 06:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:33, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 06:28, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:33, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo without education use Drakosh (talk) 07:43, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:34, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo without education use Drakosh (talk) 07:43, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:34, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
アップロードは間違いです Juliet・Nanami (talk) 09:25, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete by mistaken upload -- Netora (talk) 08:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minoraxtalk 07:34, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
out of project scope HerrAdams (talk) 10:16, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- absolutly in scope. --C.Suthorn (talk) 11:42, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 07:35, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Uploaded by now blocked sock. Eostrix (talk) 10:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:35, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Made of several Derivative works and low quality Nintendofan885T&Cs apply 13:11, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete; suspiciously close to F10able. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 13:39, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:36, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Looks like not own work, but screenshot with unknown origin. Taivo (talk) 13:13, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:36, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo, copyvio, without educational use Drakosh (talk) 13:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:36, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo, copyvio, without educational use Drakosh (talk) 13:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:36, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Certainly not only "simple geometric shapes or text" designer as well as trademark owner request the deletion (Ticket:2021031610006777) Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 00:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
We need the logos of the "Verkehrsverbünde", all other "Verkehrverbünde" have logos (VRR, RMV, VRS, MVV München, etc. If you will delete this logo, we have to delete all the logos. Regards Woehlecke 10:05, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep not above the threshold of originality, and in use on multiple projects. COM:TOO/COM:INUSE. — Rhododendrites talk | 19:25, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Rhododendrites. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:58, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
I created this file and have realized the way I displayed the statistics does not account for inflation. AristarchusValen (talk) 01:13, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- It's in use on enwiki and was uploaded nearly a year ago, so a courtesy deletion isn't likely. If it's an error as opposed to a different calculation, perhaps you could just upload a new version and replace it? — Rhododendrites talk | 19:29, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Rhododendrites, and in use. You can always clarify that inflation is not accounted for. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:59, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Self wrong file upload Riquix (talk) 05:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Blurry/high-artifact JPEG version of logo now superseded by File:VFW 2018-08-14 two-color logo with name.svg: can be replaced in all instances. Deletion discussion because format changes are usually not eligible for speedy. Closeapple (talk) 07:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, screenshot from Facebook Bodhisattwa (talk) 07:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:02, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
I replaced this image with a graph template. AristarchusValen (talk) 01:27, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:14, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
I replaced this image with a graph template. AristarchusValen (talk) 01:27, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:14, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
I replaced this image with a graph template. AristarchusValen (talk) 01:28, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:14, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
The New York Times does not appear to released this clipping under a Creative Commons license. Billhpike (talk) 01:28, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:15, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
File does not appear to have been released under a Creative Commons license. Billhpike (talk) 01:30, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, fails COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:16, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Unclear source but probably not user's own work given that their other upload was taken from Henry-Spires' Twitter. Person does not have articles anywhere so photo is not educationally useful here. Elli (talk) 05:24, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:17, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Redundant and inaccurate compared to File:NZ House of Representatives November 2020 Map.png Elli (talk) 05:40, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:18, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in France ComputerHotline (talk) 05:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep Bonjour,
Argument sans objet :
- Paul Gasq est mort en 1944 (1944 + 70 = 2014, nous sommes en 2021) dont pas de souci (si la notion juridique liée à l'absence de liberté de panorama en France est floue, je peux donner des explications).
Benoît (d) 06:33, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Benoît Prieur: COM:URAA? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:55, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hi,
- My opinion is that deletion request is not applicable: it is about a piece of art installed in France and created by someone who died there are more than 70 years (Commons:Copyright rules by territory/France).
- ----Benoît (d) 10:00, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Benoît Prieur. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:19, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in France ComputerHotline (talk) 05:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep Bonjour,
Argument sans objet :
- Paul Gasq est mort en 1944 (1944 + 70 = 2014, nous sommes en 2021) dont pas de souci (si la notion juridique liée à l'absence de liberté de panorama en France est floue, je peux donner des explications).
- On a ici une signature ce qui ne rentre pas directement dans le cadre d'une oeuvre de l'esprit.
Benoît (d) 06:33, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Benoît Prieur: COM:URAA? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:54, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hi,
- My opinion is that deletion request is not applicable: it is about a piece of art installed in France and created by someone who died there are more than 70 years (Commons:Copyright rules by territory/France).
- ----Benoît (d) 10:00, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Benoît Prieur. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:20, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
The image summary tells that the author (ja:利用者:光朝) took this photo in 1981, but according to his profile on jawiki he was born in 1975. The quality of this image suggests that it is scanned from some book or magazine, so it is unlikely that he really took this photo as 6 years old boy. In short, this photo is strongly suspected as copyright violation. 毒島みるく (talk) 06:13, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:23, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
This image was imported from jawiki. The image summary tells that the author (ja:利用者:光朝) took this photo in 1978, but according to his profile on jawiki he was born in 1975. It is unlikely that 3 years old boy could take this photo. In short, this photo is strongly suspected as copyright violation. 毒島みるく (talk) 06:47, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Then why don't you ask the original uploader first? The reason for deletion is based only on the assumption that the information on a user page must be correct. Such information is not verifiable (and I can't read it anyway). And who is to say that a three-year-old can't take photos? He might have had help by his parents. Never understimate kids. --Voyager (talk) 07:05, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- I see, I asked him at his talk page. --毒島みるく (talk) 07:27, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Judging from the angle from which the photo was taken, the shooting position is higher than the poles in the photo; it would be impossible for a three-year-old child to shoot from this angle. There were no structures at this location that ordinary people could climb without permission, so amateur photographers would not be able to take pictures. There is a blog that has a video (captured from a TV program) taken from a lower position after the line was discontinued. The image is at the bottom, and you can judge the approximate height of the poles. This image has been moved from Wikipedia(ja) to Commons, but this user has silenced or removed many questions and warnings on the Japanese talk page, so we can't expect an honest answer.--KAMUI (talk) 20:36, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:24, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
A svg file of this map is made TylerKutschbach (talk) 07:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- speedy keep, an SVG version being available is no valid reason for deletion. The raster image can still prove useful and isn't at all out of scope. Kingofthedead (talk) 06:07, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Kingofthedead. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:25, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
A svg file of this map is made so there’s no need to have this anymore. 174.100.108.45 22:52, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Please provide a link to the svg version to show this is redundant. I did not find it, so the file has to be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 21:02, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for indoor works in North Korea A1Cafel (talk) 07:28, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per my comments at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Great Leader and Dear Leader 위대한지도자 경애하는지도자.jpg – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:35, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Great Leader and Dear Leader 위대한지도자 경애하는지도자.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:28, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Ventura County is not right on this map TylerKutschbach (talk) 07:30, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, unless there is a better equivalent. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:30, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Maybe above COM:TOO A1Cafel (talk) 07:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:33, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for indoor works in North Korea A1Cafel (talk) 09:05, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep @A1Cafel: yes there is. COM:FOP North Korea North Korean law only specifies "copyrighted work... in public places", irrespective of whether the works are 2D or 3D or the public places are indoor or outdoors. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 02:57, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Per COM:FOP: The exception generally applies only to works on permanent public display, unless some countries accepted public interiors like UK, Austria, India, etc. Public space generally means outdoor only, as not everyone can enter an indoor area. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- The law itself does not specify what a "public place" (공공장소) is. It is possible that the term is defined in another law. It is certainly the case that the meaning varies not only according to law but also according to language. I don't know much Korean, but my general impression is that there is nothing about the word itself that restricts it to outdoor spaces. It would take someone native in Korean to confirm this. We're not interested in the FOP exception generally but how it works in this particular jurisdiction. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep N. Korean FOP clause is beyond our rule, that the indoor artworks are also ok, I agree that this "panorama" is rarely seen, but it's true. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:11, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:28, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 10:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:35, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Clear an unambigour copyright violation as images takedn from here https://www.usmagazine.com/entertainment/pictures/super-bowl-2021-celebs-react-to-the-weeknds-halftime-show/ or some other location. Not uploader's own work. Walter Görlitz (talk) 11:06, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:37, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Original picture taken by wildlife photographer Vincent Munier, see https://photoetmac.com/2012/04/nikon_d4_vincent_munier/ & https://nps.nikonimaging.com/members/vincent_munier/ Dominique Roux (talk) 11:08, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:38, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Original picture taken by wildlife photographer Vincent Munier, see https://photoetmac.com/2012/04/nikon_d4_vincent_munier/ & https://nps.nikonimaging.com/members/vincent_munier/ Dominique Roux (talk) 11:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:38, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused promo photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 11:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:41, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Non free. See: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Vladimir OKC. — Redboston 11:28, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:42, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense, Blurry Chhrls (talk) 12:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:43, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
File:ACM curricula recommendations for related computer science programs in vocational-technical schools, community and junior colleges, and health computing (IA acmcurriculareco03asso).pdf
[edit]1983 publication date. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:51, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:43, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
not own work. Pemission is needed
Estopedist1 (talk) 13:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:44, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Not fair use https://www.vrf.us/index.html, fair-use version prefered Cookieman1.1.1 (talk) 13:17, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:44, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Not fair use. http://www.oak-forest.org/site/copyright Lower quality fair use version should be used. Cookieman1.1.1 (talk) 13:24, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
That page says nothing about the logos copyright
That page says nothing about the logos copyright if I’m not mistaken. It just says “CivicPlus, all rights reserved.”. Civic Plus is the copyright on the website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jack Ryan Morris (talk • contribs) 13:29, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete non-free logo above the theshold of originality. Verbcatcher (talk) 15:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
@Jack Ryan Morris: "All content © 2006-2021 Oak Forest, IL and its representatives. All rights reserved." Fair use version is prefered. --Cookieman1.1.1 (talk) 18:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:43, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
document without educational use Drakosh (talk) 13:57, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:44, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Promotional photo (logo on document) without educational use Drakosh (talk) 13:58, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Promotional paper scan, without educational use Drakosh (talk) 14:00, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Suspicious file size and EXIF information doesn't seem to be uploader own work. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 14:00, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, found online using Google Images. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:46, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo, copyvio, without educational use Drakosh (talk) 14:00, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo, copyvio, without educational use Drakosh (talk) 14:00, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
award used for promotion, without educational use Drakosh (talk) 14:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo, copyvio, without educational use Drakosh (talk) 14:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo, copyvio, without educational use Drakosh (talk) 14:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo, copyvio, without educational use Drakosh (talk) 14:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo, copyvio, without educational use Drakosh (talk) 14:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Соколова и Хоменко на конференции Код ИБ в качестве почетных гостей и представителей Высшей школы программирования.jpg
[edit]Personal photo, copyvio, without educational use Drakosh (talk) 14:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project scope. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mister War (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used.
- File:Caligrafia Ag pdf.pdf
- File:Caligrafia A.g foto dia da mulher 02.jpg
- File:Caligrafia A.g foto dia da mulher 01.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: 18:30, 4 May 2021, by Anthere. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:48, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:48, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Diederickdan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:Beslissing-kvk-bezwaar-VSN-12-maart-2021.pdf
- File:Oproep tot ALV per email op 6 januari 2021 om 02.40.png
- File:2021-03-09 - Uitspraak Kort geding KG ZA 21-197.pdf
- File:2012-03-05 - Email Freddie Klifman.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Breach of privacy (file 1, 3, 4). The Dutch courts only publish anonymized cases (file 3). File 2 is irrelevant to this project.The Banner (talk) 13:15, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:49, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:50, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:50, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:50, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:50, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
not educationally useful Nintendofan885T&Cs apply 15:00, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:52, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:IMG-20191009-WA0032.jpg
- File:Ganiyu Sarafadeen Tunde 12.jpg
- File:IMG-20191009-WA0029.jpg
- File:IMG-20191009-WA0028.jpg
- File:Ganiyu Sarafadeen Tunde 10.jpg
- File:Ganiyu Sarafadeen Tunde 9.jpg
- File:Ganiyu Sarafadeen Tunde 8.jpg
- File:Ganiyu Sarafadeen Tunde 7.jpg
- File:Ganiyu Sarafadeen Tunde 6.jpg
- File:Ganiyu Sarafadeen Tunde 5.jpg
- File:Ganiyu Sarafadeen Tunde 4.jpg
- File:Ganiyu Sarafadeen Tunde 3.jpg
- File:Ganiyu Sarafadeen Tunde 2.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:53, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
out of scope (COM:ADVERT) Nintendofan885T&Cs apply 15:06, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:53, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity article. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:53, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ricardocruzliga (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:54, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:54, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TheWikiEditor1234
[edit]- File:LFC echo newspaper.jpg
- File:LFC vs STROM.jpg
- File:Liverpool vs Barcelona Official Match Programme.jpg
- File:Liverpool vs Barcelona Newspaper.jpg
- File:MarcaSportsPage.jpg
- File:Newspaper for Liverpool win over crystal palace.jpg
- File:Newspaper after Crystal Palace vs Liverpool.jpg
- File:C-3po and r2d2.jpg
- File:Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo.jpg
None of these image are public domain, contrary to the author uploading them as such. All the football images do not meet any of the criteria of Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United Kingdom for public domain material, and the C3PO and Samsung phone images are also clearly just taken from websites which are copyrighted. Note that one of their uploads File:Diogo Jota signig for liverpool.jpg already has a deletion discussion, so not listed here, but should also be deleted. --Joseph2302 (talk) 15:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all - The newspapers pages and the CP3O are all obviously copyrighted, and the Samsung appears to be so as well. This should probably be closed quickly, as pretty blatant copyright infringements. Hog Farm (talk) 04:02, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all I knew it didn't look right. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 14:33, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:55, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:55, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:55, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:56, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by THE VXID RECORDS (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:56, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Website screenshot - not useful, not used anywhere, and at least the candidate photos are covered by copyright. Elli (talk) 17:04, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:56, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 17:20, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:56, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
advertising Satirdan kahraman (talk) 17:20, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:57, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
advertising Satirdan kahraman (talk) 17:22, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:57, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Not educationally useful (campaign button for a local politician) Elli (talk) 17:28, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:57, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Not educationally useful (picture of someone non-notable). Not speedying this because it's been here for eleven years. Elli (talk) 17:29, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:57, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of unidentified man. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 17:34, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:57, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
https://iydb.adalet.gov.tr/Home/PersonelDetay/40 E4024 (talk) 17:57, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: that website is not the source. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:02, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
reuploaded file with different name as I could not overwrite Hodeld (talk) 18:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected to File:Etiki donut diagram.svg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in en:v:User:Eml 4500.f08.delta 6.specht/HW2, en:v:User:Eml 4500.f08.delta 6.specht/New HW2 and en:v:User:Eml4500.f08.delta 6.krueger/Notes Monday September 15th with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 18:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep That is not a precise enough replacement for
In particular, it's relying on subtle colour hints to indicate the boxes, rather than drawing boxes (I don't know if the boxes are possible in TeX, I suspect they are, simply beyond my skills to draw them). But we should not prioritise a trivial dogma over a significant accessibility problem. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:52, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- In principle, boxes can be drawn with TeX. With the limited functionality of TeX available to us here, this is not possible in a satisfactory manner. The reason for this is that lines are only available for arrays. However, arrays cannot be drawn overlapping. This leads to two problems. For one thing, the lines are not drawn solid in the case of nested arrays. On the other hand, the alignment of the individual lines is not centered if they belong to different arrays. I documented the aborted attempt to implement this on the image page.
- For this reason, I did not use lines in the first attempt in order to be able to achieve a representation in pure TeX. Instead, I used colors to indicate the individual boxes. In order to make the content accessible to people with achromatopsia, double coding with text color and font weight bold was used.
- If a representation is desired that is closer to the original image, different techniques have to be combined.
- In principle, boxes can be drawn with TeX. With the limited functionality of TeX available to us here, this is not possible in a satisfactory manner. The reason for this is that lines are only available for arrays. However, arrays cannot be drawn overlapping. This leads to two problems. For one thing, the lines are not drawn solid in the case of nested arrays. On the other hand, the alignment of the individual lines is not centered if they belong to different arrays. I documented the aborted attempt to implement this on the image page.
K = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
- Thanks for the good idea to revise the representation again. Through the nested use of HTML tables and TeX, a very good result could be achieved that is completely rendered by the browser, so that it is displayed crystal clear even at high magnifications. Since the representation is achieved entirely through text, different explanatory tool tips can even be assigned for the individual areas of the matrix. Finally, the two boxes and their intersection could be colored in adding background colors to further assist the reader. However, since my original color scheme was not appreciated, I made a conscious decision not to use it. From my point of view, this image can be deleted. --WIKImaniac 12:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 18:38, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:02, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 18:38, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:02, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 18:39, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:02, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in fr:Stéphane Lupasco with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:03, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in en:b:Three Dimensional Electron Microscopy/Particle Picking with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:28, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:03, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused file Jelican9 (talk) 19:45, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- So what? Keep. --E4024 (talk) 19:50, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: low quality version of File:Otoyol levha2.svg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:04, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
blurry image 92.40.203.36 19:55, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: No COM:EDUSE. --Achim (talk) 16:39, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:04, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
poor scan from a book - the uploader is not the photographer. Pibwl (talk) 20:04, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:04, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Promotional image, not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:42, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:05, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by A7medibnmo7med (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by A7medibnmo7med (talk · contribs)
[edit]personal photo for non wikipedian, and not own work.
- File:عزام.jpg
- File:على الشامى.jpg
- File:المخرج محمد بريش.jpg
- File:أحمد محمد ممثل مصرى.jpg
- File:الممثل عمرو الشاطر.jpg
- File:الممثل أحمد محمد.jpg
- File:محمدين السيد عبد الله برغوت.jpg
Faisal talk 22:18, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:05, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by A7medibnmo7med (talk · contribs) 3
[edit]Likely not own works: disparate low-res sizes and styles, missing EXIF data.
- File:حمد البلوشي.jpg
- File:الشاعر هاني عبد الكريم.jpg
- File:الممثل الشاب المصرى احمد محمد.jpg
- File:ممثل مصري.jpg
- File:Eslam Saad.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:15, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:28, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by A7medibnmo7med (talk · contribs) 4
[edit]Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:16, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:28, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
This pattern is sacrate for Javaé people. I did this digitalization before I undertand I shouldn't do it. So the right think to do is deleting it, and if someday one from this etnic group uploud a similar image, just then it will be respectfull. For now, deleting is the only respectfull choice. Besides that, this image is Innacurate. Pescarts (talk) 21:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I trust the nominator. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:04, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
This pattern is sacrate for Assurini people. I did this digitalization before I undertand I shouldn't do it. So the right think to do is deleting it, and if someday one from this etnic group uploud a similar image, just then it will be respectfull. For now, deleting is the only respectfull choice. Pescarts (talk) 21:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I trust the nominator. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:04, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio. 176.59.42.78 21:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Disagree, How is this copyvio when the author and the link to the original had been cited? This file is freely distributable under CC BY SA 3.0 License. Following attempts on deleting this file based on "copyviolation" can be considered destructive and not acceptable by the rules of Wikipedia. SummerKrut (talk) 22:04, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete To upload videos from Youtube to Wikipedia, you need to make sure that the video itself has a Creative Commons license. If RIA Novosti indicated the source and author, it doesn't mean that this screenshot can be used for commercial purposes and create derivatives from it. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 14:10, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The cited page clearly says "© The Voice Kids Russia/Голос Дети/ Youtube" beneath her picture. You could claim fair use, but fair use is not allowed on Commons. –Fredddie™ 14:33, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious copyvio. --rubin16 (talk) 13:57, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be a previously published image: https://www.google.com/search?safe=active&tbs=simg:CAQSbAmc3njT0H6V0xphCxCo1NgEGgIIQgwLELCMpwgaOgo4CAQSFIY5pCSLMoo79CLEB-4ajCvCIu0bGhq64_1Vf73xCEvFqSn2a7pcFl5vjGoyCzIW-ZCAFMAQMCxCOrv4IGgoKCAgBEgSRKK5dDA&sxsrf=ALeKk01FOaalr5Ml1EVaU3V8xub0-RQtuQ:1616002234051&q=chris+shaffer+&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwifhfe47bfvAhXNMVkFHeadDjwQ2A4oAXoECAEQMw&biw=1505&bih=911 Please see COM:OTRS. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:31, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah it was my bad to put this picture on the wiki, I dont have the rights to it, feel free to delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pip Squeak patty number one (talk • contribs) 17:43, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 11:07, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
A traced and colored version of a picture of characters from the Sonic the Hedgehog franchise from Sega. Blatant copyright violation. ···日本穣Talk to Nihonjoe 22:42, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 17:11, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure this logo is above the threshold of originality. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:40, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- I agree. But only the last version of the logo is problematic and should be deleted. The first version is OK.--Carniolus (talk) 19:26, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Reverted to the free image that had been here, deleted the copyvio that overwrote it. --DMacks (talk) 20:12, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
On January 5, 2021, I, Andrea Cauthen, the subject of this photograph, replaced it with another image of myself that is in the public domain for professional reasons as it is more relevant to my work. Acauthen8 (talk) 17:43, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Black Lunch Table, the project that I edit with is the original uploader/creator of this image, with the subject asking for deletion and having already been replaced with a similar file of the same subject, this file should be eligible for speedy deletion. --Raggachampiongirl (talk) 12:08, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- I think this should fall under Commons:Courtesy deletions, given the personal request on someone's own portrait, and that it's unused on any project.--Pharos (talk) 16:03, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination as requested by the subject, per COM:COURTESY. No reason to keep, as this is an unused image and an alternative portrait is available File:Andrea Cauthen.png. --Elly (talk) 21:16, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Failed de minimis (failed {{NoFoP-South Korea}}): the stadium is also copyrighted (1984 stadium, its architect w:Kim Swoo-geun died in 1986). As SoKor has no commercial freedom of panorama, COM:OTRS correspondence to obtain permission from Mr. Kim's heirs is required, if they would agree to the commercial license the uploader used in the photo of their architectural work. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:04, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 07:18, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Seoul Olympic Stadium
[edit]Unfree/copyrighted architecture: completed in 1984 and its architect, w:Kim Swoo-geun, died in 1986. As SoKor has no commercial freedom of panorama, COM:OTRS correspondence to obtain permission from Mr. Kim's heirs is required, if they would agree to the commercial license the uploaders used in the photos of their architectural work.
- File:Korea-Seoul-Jamsil Olympic Stadium-01.jpg
- File:Olympic Park Stadium.jpg
- File:Seoul Olympic stadium (from Ttukseom Resort).jpg
- File:Seoul Olympic Stadium .jpg
- File:Seoul Olympic Stadium aerial view.jpg
- File:Seoul Olympic Stadium in 2018.jpg
- File:Seoul Olympic Stadium.jpg
- File:Seoul.Olympic.Stadium.01 copy.jpg
- File:Seoulolympicstadium2005.JPG
- File:View of the Seoul Olympic Stadium from the Jamsil Baseball Stadium.jpg
- File:蚕室 01.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 07:24, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
I made a svg file of this map TylerKutschbach (talk) 07:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- speedy keep, an SVG version being available is no valid reason for deletion. The raster image can still prove useful and isn't at all out of scope. Kingofthedead (talk) 06:05, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept, I did not find the better map. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
PNG is a bad format for this type of image and the state is misshapen in this file 2600:1009:B061:DF52:7590:FC48:39AF:BD3C 03:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from posters. Should be blanked/cropped to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, image also out of COM:SCOPE. --Túrelio (talk) 13:46, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Nissan publicity shot, not uploader's own work mr.choppers (talk)-en- 04:17, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
The file is an image published in a Voice of America reporting, in which it's watermark clearly stated "AP", indicating the file is from the Associated Press. As Template:PD-USGov-VOA explicitly exclude any images from external sources, the file is likely to be copyrighted by AP and unfree. 廣九直通車 (talk) 04:22, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in France ComputerHotline (talk) 05:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep Bonjour,
Là encore, on peut s'interroger sur la démarche et sur l'argumentaire proposée.
Je n'ai pas de certitude sur cette statue, mais je présume que c'est une variation de Hébé et l'Aigle de Jupiter par François Rude (mort au XIXe siècle je crois).
De plus la statue est peu identifiable et endommagée.
Là encore l'argument est à côté de la plaque.
Benoît (d) 06:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per Benoit. Ruthven (msg) 14:59, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in France ComputerHotline (talk) 05:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep Bonjour,
Très probable variation d'Hébé et l'Aigle de Jupiter par François Rude (mort au XIXe siècle je crois).
Là encore l'argument est à côté de la plaque.
Benoît (d) 06:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per Benoit. Ruthven (msg) 15:00, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Above threshold of originality in the USA - not "own work" as claimed Elli (talk) 06:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:00, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
No CC license was in original video link Lullabying (talk) 07:20, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Lullabying: Please refer the File:スーパー戦隊出身女優・大久保桜子、初ヤンマガは沖縄で弾ける！【ヤングマガジン49号】.webm, the license had been reviewed on 7 December 2019. And follow the mention of the template, "This file should not be deleted if the license has changed in the meantime. The Creative Commons license is irrevocable." --AT (talk) 07:35, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- That's fair. I'll withdraw the deletion request. Lullabying (talk) 07:49, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. Ruthven (msg) 15:00, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Oeuvres complètes. Publiées par la Société hollandaise des sciences (IA oeuvrescomplte22huyguoft).pdf
[edit]Whilst Huygens original works would be long out of copyright, the concern here is any translation or new material, in a 1950 publication. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: The publishers were David Bierens de Haan († 1895), J. Boffcha († 1911), Diederik Korteweg († 1941) and Johan Adriaan Vollgraff († 1965). Undelete in 1965+71=2036. Ruthven (msg) 15:26, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Risk of copyright violation, image is a Facebook post that is dated before the upload to Commons.[2] Verbcatcher (talk) 10:50, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:26, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Because it's mine StratusNimbusCumulus (talk) 11:11, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: upload by WEAREGENAQ. Ruthven (msg) 15:27, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from music.
- File:عرض افريقى فى فندق ايناشيبى, نيفاشا, مومباسا - كينيا.webm
- File:رقص من نفس الفرقة اثناء العرض.webm
- File:رقص جميل من نفس الفرقة.webm
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:27, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Per Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Spain and COM:DIGNITY — Rhododendrites talk | 19:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Speedy keep I don't see what is undignified about this image, and the accepted practice seems to be to apply Commons:Country specific consent requirements only to identifiable subjects; this subject does not seem to be identifiable. In use. Brianjd (talk) 13:35, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- It's a low resolution creepshot... — Rhododendrites talk | 14:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:28, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
All Images are small without any Exif, uploaded by a new commons-user from a new single Flickr-user. Some images i found at tripadvisor. I assume that all images are copyright violations.
- File:Restaurant Berlin 3.jpg
- File:Essen Berlin.jpg
- File:Borchardt.jpg
- File:Restaurant Treffen.jpg
- File:Restaurant Berlin.jpg
- File:Bundestag Restaurant -.jpg
- File:Essen FDP.jpg
- File:Bundestag Treff.jpg
- File:Bundestag FDP Treff.jpg
- File:Bundestag Restaurant.jpg
Migebert (talk) 19:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:28, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
kullanmak istemiyorum Qmer67 (talk) 22:56, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: F10, personal image by non-contributor. --Achim (talk) 21:07, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:29, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Es ist offensichtlich, dass die Lizenz fehlerhaft ist Angeblich ist der Urheber Ivo Rabanser, der Abgebildete Ivo Rabanser und der Hochlader Ivo Rabanser - es handelt sich aber ganz eindeutig nicht um ein Selfie Lutheraner (talk) 23:42, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Das Bild wurde mit Selstbauslöser getätigt und stammt aus dem Privatarchiv Ivo Rabanser — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivorabanser (talk • contribs) 10:44, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per Ivorabanser. Ruthven (msg) 15:32, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Es ist offensichtlich, dass die Lizenz fehlerhaft ist Angeblich ist der Urheber Ivo Rabanser, der Abgebildete Ivo Rabanser und der Hochlader Ivo Rabanser - es handelt sich aber ganz eindeutig nicht um ein Selfie Lutheraner (talk) 23:44, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Das Bild stammt aus dem Privatarchiv Ivo Rabanser — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivorabanser (talk • contribs) 10:46, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: Selbstauslöser photo. Ruthven (msg) 15:33, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Uploader = creator = depicted person. This cannot be true, creator must be someone else. This picture was nominated for deletion before and reson for keeping it was "self-timer photo". The photo must be taken by the person who is belaying. 2A02:810D:6C0:2FB0:5015:75A4:A17D:6DA7 10:24, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:27, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
photo owner decided not to cede rights and did not actually send otrs e-mail (as agreed with me, uploader) Flor WMCH (talk) 14:40, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded the file upon request by the festival Solothurner Filmtage request. Once they had to formally liberate the rights, they refused to do so, therefore the file should be deleted. Thanks in advance!--Flor WMCH (talk) 17:54, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: 23:45, 3 April 2021, by JuTa. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:48, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Es werden falsche Tatsachen behauptet. Es handelt sich nicht um ein Gebäude der ehemaligen Hammermühle. Das fotografierte Objekt ist kein Objekt bzw. Dokument der Zeitgeschichte. Meine Einwilligung zum Fotografieren und Veröffentlichen des Objektes lag und liegt nicht vor. Meine Datenschutzinteressen werden verletzt. 2003:C4:7F2A:86EC:386C:9F42:2211:D85F 22:34, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hatten wir das nicht schon einmal? Wilhelm, war das von öffentlichem Grund und Boden aus aufgenommen oder standest du auf einem Privatgrundstück? --Achim (talk) 16:56, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Found and linked, file had been renamed or reuploaded. --Achim (talk) 17:08, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hallo Achim, 2x ja: hatten wir schon, ist von öffentlichem Grund aufgenommen.
- Zum Vorwurf, da wäre keine Hammermühle gewesen, s. hier.
- Gleiche LAs betreffen alle nicht-Schwarzweiss-Bilder der Category:Hammermühle Arnsdorf. Ich hatte damals (ohne Notwendigkeit, auf Bitte des dort wohnenden) wegen dessen Angst, es könne seiner Bewerbung oder beruflichen Entwicklung schaden, die Koordinaten und Adresse auskommentiert - (versprochen war, für drei Jahre). Werde das auch nach der Frist wieder herstellen. Ich hatte gehofft, er würde bei den drei (weniger wertvollen Bildern) der Westansichten mal den Hof aufräumen oder mich in die Ruine lassen. Diese drei könnten auch wirklich weg, stören ihn wohl am meisten. Falls mal aufgeräumt ist oder ich direkt in die Ruine darf, gibt es bessere. Wenn das passiert, würde ich die älteren Versionen der Westansicht sowieso löschen lassen wollen, also könne sie auch gleich weg. Die drei Südansichten behalten, da wird es wohl nie mehr bessere Bilder geben. Danke und viele Grüße --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 18:38, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep: No valid reason for deletion. No FoP issue. --Achim (talk) 19:46, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 20:47, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Datenschutz- und Eigentümerinteressen verletzt 2003:C4:7F28:6814:3CBB:3D13:1F49:4103 11:31, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. Wilhelm, hast du beim Fotografieren auf öffentlichem Grund und Boden gestanden oder auf Privatgelände? --Achim (talk) 12:33, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- Behalten. Danke für die Anfrage, das Foto ist von öffentlichem Grund aus gemacht worden. Ist natürlich für Besitzer und ordnungsliebende Menschen ein verschandeltes Ortsbild, andererseits - und darauf kommt es hier an - historisches Objekt, Überreste der abgebrannten prinzlichen Hammermühle. Wenn mal jemand Geld hat, wird es abgerissen, das Foto ist dann Zeitdokument. Viele Grüße --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 12:50, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:35, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Es werden falsche Tatsachen behauptet. Immer schön bei der Wahrheit bleiben! Es handelt sich nicht um ein Gebäude der ehemaligen Hammermühle. Das fotografierte Objekt ist kein Objekt bzw. Dokument der Zeitgeschichte. Meine Einwilligung zum Fotografieren und Veröffentlichen des Objektes lag und liegt nicht vor. Meine Datenschutzinteressen werden verletzt. Ich erwäge die Einleitung strafrechtlicher Schritte. 2003:C4:7F2A:86EC:386C:9F42:2211:D85F 22:45, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Es werden falsche Tatsachen behauptet. Immer schön bei der Wahrheit bleiben! Es handelt sich nicht um ein Gebäude der ehemaligen Hammermühle. Das fotografierte Objekt ist kein Objekt bzw. Dokument der Zeitgeschichte. Meine Einwilligung zum Fotografieren und Veröffentlichen des Objektes lag und liegt nicht vor. Meine Datenschutzinteressen werden verletzt. Ich erwäge die Einleitung strafrechtlicher Schritte. 2003:C4:7F2A:86EC:386C:9F42:2211:D85F 22:50, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Behauptungen machen es nicht besser. Zu sehen sind Überreste des Mühlen-Antriebs. In Recherchen des Lehrers Horst Bormann aus der "Elster-Chronik" steht etwas von der prinzlichen Hammermühle, die abgebrannt ist und nicht wieder aufgebaut wurde. Gehört habe ich, dass das eine Mühle war, die nicht nur als "Hammermühle" (zum Schmieden), sondern auch anderweitig genutzt wurde, das kann ich aber im Moment nicht belegen. Ich kann daher auch nur den Begriff Hammermühle verwenden. Das tut der Sache auch überhaupt keinen Abbruch. Die beschriebene Mühle kann auch nicht woanders gestanden haben - es gibt am Schwarzwasser in Ruhland, Arnsdorf und dazwischen keine entsprechenden Mauerreste. Das zugegeben weniger bekannte Granit-Hochwasserstauwerk war bzw. hatte nie eine Mühle.
- Im Übrigen hätte ich keine Probleme damit, mir bisher unzugängliche Unterlagen zu fotografieren und die Information zu den Fotos zu verbessern. Viele Grüße --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 10:31, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 19:40, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per Achim. Ruthven (msg) 15:29, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Es werden falsche Tatsachen behauptet. Immer schön bei der Wahrheit bleiben! Es handelt sich nicht um ein Gebäude der ehemaligen Hammermühle. Das fotografierte Objekt ist kein Objekt bzw. Dokument der Zeitgeschichte. Meine Einwilligung zum Fotografieren und Veröffentlichen des Objektes lag und liegt nicht vor. Meine Datenschutzinteressen werden verletzt. Ich erwäge die Einleitung strafrechtlicher Schritte. 2003:C4:7F2A:86EC:386C:9F42:2211:D85F 22:53, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. Photographer has been standing on a public road, so no FoP issue. --Achim (talk) 19:02, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per Achim. Ruthven (msg) 15:29, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
_en_février_2021.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_October_2020_-_Preliminary.png){kind=link}
_-_médaillon_par_Paul_Gasq.jpg){kind=link}
_-_inscription_-_signature_de_Paul_Gasq.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_en_février_2021.jpg){kind=link}
_en_février_2021.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_en_f%C3%A9vrier_2021.jpg){kind=link}
_en_f%C3%A9vrier_2021.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_en_février_2021.jpg){kind=link}
_en_février_2021.jpg){kind=link}
_(Roxas_Boulevard_cor._Redemptorist,_Paranaque)(2017-12-31).jpg){kind=link}
_(Roxas_Boulevard_cor._Redemptorist,_Paranaque)(2017-12-31).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_October_2020_-_Preliminary.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_October_2020_-_Preliminary.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_m%C3%A9daillon_par_Paul_Gasq.jpg){kind=link}
_-_m%C3%A9daillon_par_Paul_Gasq.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_médaillon_par_Paul_Gasq.jpg){kind=link}
_-_médaillon_par_Paul_Gasq.jpg){kind=link}
_-_médaillon_par_Paul_Gasq.jpg){kind=link}
_-_inscription_-_signature_de_Paul_Gasq.jpg){kind=link}
_-_inscription_-_signature_de_Paul_Gasq.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_inscription_-_signature_de_Paul_Gasq.jpg){kind=link}
_-_inscription_-_signature_de_Paul_Gasq.jpg){kind=link}
_-_inscription_-_signature_de_Paul_Gasq.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_en_f%C3%A9vrier_2021.jpg){kind=link}
_en_f%C3%A9vrier_2021.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_en_février_2021.jpg){kind=link}
_en_février_2021.jpg){kind=link}
_en_février_2021.jpg){kind=link}
_en_f%C3%A9vrier_2021.jpg){kind=link}
_en_f%C3%A9vrier_2021.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_en_février_2021.jpg){kind=link}
_en_février_2021.jpg){kind=link}
_en_février_2021.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Es werden falsche Tatsachen behauptet. Immer schön bei der Wahrheit bleiben! Es handelt sich nicht um ein Gebäude der ehemaligen Hammermühle. Das fotografierte Objekt ist kein Objekt bzw. Dokument der Zeitgeschichte. Meine Einwilligung zum Fotografieren und Veröffentlichen des Objektes lag und liegt nicht vor. Meine Datenschutzinteressen werden verletzt. Ich erwäge die Einleitung strafrechtlicher Schritte. 2003:C4:7F2A:86EC:386C:9F42:2211:D85F 23:00, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Ich tendiere zum Delete. Wilhelm, du bist von der Straße aus 10 m nordwärts auf dem Zuweg zum Anwesen gegangen, als du dieses Foto gemacht hast. Wenn dieser Stichweg Privatgelände ist, muss das Foto gelöscht werden. Vielleicht kann Bernd was dazu sagen. --Achim (talk) 19:15, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Wie hier bereits gesagt: die Westansichten sollten sowieso weg. Dann braucht die Frage nach dem Weg auch nicht geklärt werden. Die Südansichten behalten. Viele Grüße --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 19:59, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: private ground. Ruthven (msg) 15:31, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Es werden falsche Tatsachen behauptet. Immer schön bei der Wahrheit bleiben! Es handelt sich nicht um ein Gebäude der ehemaligen Hammermühle. Das fotografierte Objekt ist kein Objekt bzw. Dokument der Zeitgeschichte. Meine Einwilligung zum Fotografieren und Veröffentlichen des Objektes lag und liegt nicht vor. Meine Datenschutzinteressen werden verletzt. Ich erwäge die Einleitung strafrechtlicher Schritte. 2003:C4:7F2A:86EC:386C:9F42:2211:D85F 23:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: No FoP issue. Ruthven (msg) 15:30, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Es werden falsche Tatsachen behauptet. Immer schön bei der Wahrheit bleiben! Es handelt sich nicht um ein Gebäude der ehemaligen Hammermühle. Das fotografierte Objekt ist kein Objekt bzw. Dokument der Zeitgeschichte. Meine Einwilligung zum Fotografieren und Veröffentlichen des Objektes lag und liegt nicht vor. Meine Datenschutzinteressen werden verletzt. Ich erwäge die Einleitung strafrechtlicher Schritte. 2003:C4:7F2A:86EC:386C:9F42:2211:D85F 23:07, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
fff Zusatz zum Löschantrag vom 17.03.2021 bezüglich der drei Fotos der "File:Ruhland, Nebengebäude Mauerreste, ehemalige Hammermühle Westansicht 01.jpg", "File:Ruhland, Nebengebäude Mauerreste, ehemalige Hammermühle Westansicht 02.jpg" und "File:Ruhland, Nebengebäude Mauerreste, ehemalige Hammermühle Westansicht 03.jpg": Zum Fotografieren wurde mein Grundstück ohne meine Einwilligung betreten, was Hausfriedensbruch bedeutet und Verletzung der Privatsphäre!. Das Vorgehen des Herrn Zimmerling ist an Frechheit nicht zu überbieten!!! 2003:C4:7F2A:86EC:386C:9F42:2211:D85F 23:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Write to COM:VRT to prove privacy issues. Ruthven (msg) 15:31, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
croped from https://roar.media/bangla/main/sports/monica-chakma-an-tremendous-bangladeshi-footballer eien20 (talk) 17:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:31, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
No evidence this photo is owned by the submitter. TJMSmith (talk) 21:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:22, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:15, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:15, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:15, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abrahamvwi7 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Berom.png
- File:His Majesty Da. Jacob Gyang Buba.png
- File:His-Majesty-Da-Jacob-Gyang-Buba-CON.jpg
- File:Senator GNS Pwajok.png
- File:Senator Jang.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:15, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:14, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Doesn't look like "own work", at least the source image. Elli (talk) 17:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:14, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be a screenshot of a broadcast. Please see COM:DW Ytoyoda (talk) 17:29, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:13, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Image has previously appeared at https://fanonesport.com/2020/08/03/estadio-metropolitano-de-barranquilla-listo-para-las-eliminatorias-a-qatar-2022/. Previously published images require OTRS permission. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:12, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Images looks too professional to be own work - The title is "FBSprinter" so I'm asusming this was taken off of a FaceBook page, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 19:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- The comment is self explanatory Brian. The image looks like it was taken by a professional photographer (although of ofcourse the uploader themselves could be that photographer in which case they'd need to go to OTRS - It doesn't look like your standard quality image that was my point.) –Davey2010Talk 14:15, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Uploader's three photos were taken using three different cameras. TinEye found this one all over the web before it was uploaded here. Brianjd (talk) 13:53, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:12, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No indication that uploader owns the copyright to the book cover, rather than just the photo. Joshua Issac (talk) 19:43, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:10, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
non free logo 92.40.203.36 19:55, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:10, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
URV-Verdacht, Bild vor 1945 kann nicht vom genannten Urheber stammen AxelHH (talk) 20:38, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:08, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. Used in draft EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:18, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 09:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 15:18, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation - the statue was erected in 1962. Since copyright in its country of origin lasts 95 years from publication, it is not in the public domain. There is also no freedom of panorama in the United States for 3D artwork (only for buildings). See COM:CRT/United_States for more information. Also, Commons does not accept fair use as per COM:FAIRUSE. ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 21:18, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- The media can be undeleted in 2058. (1962+95+1) --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 21:21, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment @ShyAlpaca482: since the statue was unveiled in 1962, it may be in public domain if it was not registered or having no indication of copyright marks. More research is needed. See also {{PD-US-no-notice}} and {{PD-US-not-renewed}}. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:00, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: What you say might be true. I based my decision on these pictures on the English Wikipedia that were marked as fair use. Perhaps this was just an application of the precautionary principle and the statue is indeed in the public domain because copyright was never registered or not renewed, but I assumed that someone did the research already over on the English Wikipedia. --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 00:48, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- After doing some more research, it was found that the statue may still be copyrighted as it was in compliance with US formalities at the time of publishing. There is a copyright inscription at the back-right side of the statue, according to this link. --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 14:29, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Sorry JWilz, that statue's copyright was registered, so neither {{PD-US-no-notice}} nor {{PD-US-not-renewed}} works. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:20, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 15:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes of North Korea
[edit]By using nothing but a Creative Commons license, the uploaders claim to own the copyright of other people's works. Commons:Currency doesn't say anything about the copyright status of North Korean Banknotes. Suggestions?
- File:10 north korean won obverse.jpg
- File:10 north korean won reverse.jpg
- File:5 north korean won obverse.jpg
- File:5 north korean won reverse.jpg
- File:50 north korean won obverse.jpg
- File:50 north korean won reverse.jpg
- File:North Korea Banknotes.jpg
- File:North Korean Won.jpeg
- File:Won-1000-anverso.jpg
- File:Won-1000-reverso.jpg
- File:Won-200-anverso.jpg
- File:Won-200-reverso.jpg
- File:Won-500-anverso.jpg
- File:Won-500-reverso.jpg
El Grafo (talk) 16:22, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: en:Copyright law of North Korea -> See chapter 4 Alan (talk) 16:54, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes of North Korea
[edit]Per COM:CUR North Korea, commercial use was disallowed
- File:1978-100won-1.jpg
- File:1978-100won-2.jpg
- File:1978-10won-1-a.jpg
- File:1978-10won-2-a.jpg
- File:1978-1won-1-a.jpg
- File:1978-1won-2-a.jpg
- File:1978-50won-1-a.jpg
- File:1978-50won-2-a.jpg
- File:1978-5won-1-a.jpg
- File:1978-5won-2-a.jpg
- File:1992-100won-1.jpg
- File:1992-100won-2.jpg
- File:1992-10won-1.jpg
- File:1992-10won-2.jpg
- File:1992-1won-1.jpg
- File:1992-1won-2.jpg
- File:1992-50won-1.jpg
- File:1992-50won-2.jpg
- File:1992-5won-1.jpg
- File:1992-5won-2.jpg
- File:1998-10won-1.jpg
- File:1998-10won-2.jpg
- File:1998-500won-1.jpg
- File:1998-500won-2.jpg
- File:1998-5won-1.jpg
- File:1998-5won-2.jpg
- File:200 вон КНДР.jpg
- File:2000 вон КНДР.jpg
- File:2002-1000won-1.jpg
- File:2002-1000won-2.jpg
- File:2002-10won-1.jpg
- File:2002-10won-2.jpg
- File:2002-5000won-1.jpg
- File:2002-5000won-2.jpg
- File:2002-50won-1.jpg
- File:2002-50won-2.jpg
- File:2002-5won-1.jpg
- File:2002-5won-2.jpg
- File:2005-200won-1.jpg
- File:2005-200won-2.jpg
- File:2006-1000won-1.jpg
- File:2006-1000won-2.jpg
- File:2006-5000won-1.jpg
- File:2006-5000won-2.jpg
- File:2007-500won-1.jpg
- File:2007-500won-2.jpg
- File:2008-100won-1'.jpg
- File:2008-100won-2'.jpg
- File:2008-200won-1'.jpg
- File:2008-200won-2'.jpg
- File:2008-500won-1'.jpg
- File:2008-500won-2'.jpg
- File:2013 - 5000won-1.jpg
- File:2013 - 5000won-2.jpg
- File:50 вон КНДР.jpg
- File:500 вон КНДР-р.jpg
- File:500 вон КНДР.jpg
- File:500 вон.jpeg
- File:5000 вон КНДР 2014 года.jpeg
- File:Billet Corée du Nord 1 Won Dos.png
- File:Billet Corée du Nord 1 Won Face.png
- File:DPR Korea's Money 2.jpeg
- File:DPR Korea's Money 3.jpeg
- File:DPR Korea's Money.jpeg
- File:HD-north-korea-1000-won-2006-obverse.jpg
- File:HD-north-korea-1000-won-2006-reverse.jpg
- File:HD-north-korea-1998-5-won-obverse.jpg
- File:HD-north-korea-1998-5-won-reverse.jpg
- File:HD-north-korea-2002-10-won-back.jpg
- File:HD-north-korea-2002-10-won-front.jpg
- File:HD-north-korea-5-won-2002-back.jpg
- File:HD-north-korea-5-won-2002-front.jpg
- File:Img09723 thm.jpg
- File:Nkorea08-1000a.jpg
- File:Nkorea08-1000b.jpg
- File:Nkorea08-100a (1).jpg
- File:Nkorea08-2000a.jpg
- File:Nkorea08-200b.jpg
- File:Nkorea08-5000a.jpg
- File:Nkorea08-5000b.jpg
- File:Nkorea92-50b.jpg
- File:North korea dprk 5000 won 2013.00.00 b58a pnl 0031333 f.jpg
- File:North korea dprk 5000 won 2013.00.00 b59as pnls 0000000 f.jpg
- File:P-31a.jpg
- File:P-31b.jpg
- File:P-32a.jpg
- File:P-32b.jpg
- File:P-33a.jpg
- File:P-33b.jpg
- File:P-34a.jpg
- File:P-34b.jpg
- File:P-35a.jpg
- File:P-35b.jpg
- File:P-36a.jpg
- File:P-36b.jpg
- File:P-37a.jpg
- File:P-37b.jpg
- File:P-38a.jpg
- File:P-38b.jpg
- File:Skorea5015a.jpg
- File:Вона.jpg
- File:КНДР-10 вон-а.jpg
- File:КНДР-10 вон-р.jpg
- File:КНДР-5 вон-а.jpg
- File:КНДР-5 вон-р.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 07:38, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel: Why aren't all files included? Some files are excluded. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:28, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: Copyright terms of DPRK last for 50 years, so only banknotes published after 1960 are copyrighted. Others entered the Public Domain. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:16, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes of North Korea
[edit]- File:10 Won 2009 Obverse.jpg
- File:10 Won 2009 Reverse.jpg
- File:5 Won 1998 Obverse.jpg
- File:5 Won 1998 Reverse.jpg
Ox1997cow (talk) 16:30, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes of North Korea
[edit]- File:Бона. Северная Корея 5 чон 1988 год. Валютный сертификат для гостей из социалистических стран...png
- File:Бона. Северная Корея 5 чон 1988 год. Валютный сертификат для гостей из социалистических стран..png
- File:Северная Корея 1 вона 1988 год. Музейный комплекс дружбы..jpg
- File:Северная Корея 1 вона 1988 год. Музейный комплекс дружбы.jpg
- File:Северная Корея 1 чон 1988 год. Валютный сертификат для гостей из социалистических стран..png
- File:Северная Корея 1 чон 1988 год. Валютный сертификат для гостей из социалистических стран.png
Ox1997cow (talk) 18:13, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes of North Korea
[edit]Per COM:CUR North Korea, non-free currency.
- File:5 North Korean Won obverse.jpg
- File:5 North Korean Won reverse.jpg
- File:5000 North Korean Won obverse.jpg
- File:5000 North Korean Won reverse.jpg
- File:D.P.R.Korea Banknote 3rd 100won.jpg
Ox1997cow (talk) 15:39, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:27, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. – GeMet [talk] 04:31, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- And neither is it simple enough for Template:PD-textlogo. Delete. Sigvid (talk) 20:34, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 17:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR Ethiopia A1Cafel (talk) 14:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep : This file has been used without complaint for 14 years on Wikipedia. This is of course not a sufficient reason, but it puts the deletion request in perspective. As for the reason given, i. e. COM:CUR Ethiopia, I beg to differ, since there is a double internal contradiction in this rationale : 1. "Ethiopia's copyright law excepts "any official text of a legislative, administrative or of legal nature, as well as official translations thereof".[410/2004 Article 5(b)] The term "official text" does not seem to include banknotes." : "does not seem is an unfounded assertion, and there is no reason why banknotes should not be seen as any other official document, excepted from copyright. 2. Furthermore, the same § goes on : "Note that, as of May 2016, Ethiopia is not a party to the Berne Convention, so Ethiopian banknotes are not protected by US copyright law. However, Commons' policy is that works must be free in both the US and the source country." : if Ethiopia is not a Party to the Berne convention, images of banknotes are NOT protected under US copyright law, and are therefore free in the US. Quod erat demonstrandum : being unprotected by copyright law both in the source country and in the US, Ethiopian banknotes may by pictured in Wikimedia Commons. Baronnet (talk) 16:07, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Interpretation of "any official text of a legislative, administrative or of legal nature, as well as official translations thereof" as applicable banknotes is novel--contrary to at least the common language of the provision and to the accepted position of COM:CUR Ethiopia. This is, however, moot as, even if true, the banknotes are not mere "text", but include (and are indeed primarily) graphic images. Futher, per COM:EVID, "In all cases, the burden of proof lies on the uploader or other person arguing for the file to be retained to demonstrate that as far as can reasonably be determined: [...] the file is in the public domain." (underline added) This has not been done, and that the issue was not noticed until 2021 provides no context or perspective whatsoever. --Эlcobbola talk 17:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR Ethiopia A1Cafel (talk) 14:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep : This file has been used without complaint for 14 years on Wikipedia. This is of course not a sufficient reason, but it puts the deletion request in perspective. As for the reason given, i. e. COM:CUR Ethiopia, I beg to differ, since there is a double internal contradiction in this rationale : 1. "Ethiopia's copyright law excepts "any official text of a legislative, administrative or of legal nature, as well as official translations thereof".[410/2004 Article 5(b)] The term "official text" does not seem to include banknotes." : "does not seem is an unfounded assertion, and there is no reason why banknotes should not be seen as any other official document, excepted from copyright. 2. Furthermore, the same § goes on : "Note that, as of May 2016, Ethiopia is not a party to the Berne Convention, so Ethiopian banknotes are not protected by US copyright law. However, Commons' policy is that works must be free in both the US and the source country." : if Ethiopia is not a Party to the Berne convention, images of banknotes are NOT protected under US copyright law, and are therefore free in the US. Quod erat demonstrandum : being unprotected by copyright law both in the source country and in the US, Ethiopian banknotes may by pictured in Wikimedia Commons. Baronnet (talk) 16:07, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Interpretation of "any official text of a legislative, administrative or of legal nature, as well as official translations thereof" as applicable banknotes is novel--contrary to at least the common language of the provision and to the accepted position of COM:CUR Ethiopia. This is, however, moot as, even if true, the banknotes are not mere "text", but include (and are indeed primarily) graphic images. Futher, per COM:EVID, "In all cases, the burden of proof lies on the uploader or other person arguing for the file to be retained to demonstrate that as far as can reasonably be determined: [...] the file is in the public domain." (underline added) This has not been done, and that the issue was not noticed until 2021 provides no context or perspective whatsoever. --Эlcobbola talk 17:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
I made a svg file of this map TylerKutschbach (talk) 07:28, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- speedy keep, an SVG version being available is no valid reason for deletion. The raster image can still prove useful and isn't at all out of scope. Kingofthedead (talk) 06:07, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:53, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
obsolete, png and unused TheHaloVeteran2 (talk) 15:52, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- Stop claiming that maps of past elections are "obsolete." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:40, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:50, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
PNG is a bad format for this type of image and the state is misshapen in this file 2600:1009:B06C:30DC:AC0E:50C0:723A:7E94 06:07, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Unused, low quality, redundant with File:West Virginia Presidential Election Results 1980.svg Consigned (talk) 20:21, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
A svg file of this map is already made TylerKutschbach (talk) 07:33, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- speedy keep, an SVG version being available is no valid reason for deletion. The raster image can still prove useful and isn't at all out of scope. Kingofthedead (talk) 06:06, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:53, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
I made a svg file of this map with color shadings. TylerKutschbach (talk) 00:21, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Superseding is no reason to delete an image. Kingofthedead (talk) 05:45, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Just change all the links to the new image. --Running (talk) 15:30, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kaldari (talk) 01:06, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
I made a svg file of this map TylerKutschbach (talk) 07:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- keep, old raster versions are usually kept and no valid reason for deletion. Already kept. See the above discussion @TylerKutschbach: . Kingofthedead (talk) 07:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:53, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
PNG is a bad format for this type of image and the state is misshapen in this file 2600:1009:B061:DF52:7590:FC48:39AF:BD3C 03:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- keep, see above nominations and rationale Kingofthedead (talk) 06:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
PNG is a bad format for this type of image, the state is misshapen in this file and is unused 2600:1009:B05F:E5D6:3CD4:9736:DE24:4928 02:53, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- keep per above and do something about this user please Kingofthedead (talk) 06:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
A map for this election already exists which is an SVG. Let's try not to upload .png or .jpeg images of elections like this. Mr.Election (talk) 00:46, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hystrix (talk) 03:24, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
A svg file of this map has been made TylerKutschbach (talk) 07:38, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:53, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
This map is unused and serves little purpose 2603:6010:F006:964B:9447:501:289B:B438 14:46, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep No deletion reason was given. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:05, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --✗plicit 07:25, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
PNG is a bad format for this type of image and the state is misshapen in this file 2600:1009:B061:DF52:7590:FC48:39AF:BD3C 04:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- keep, see above nominations and rationale Kingofthedead (talk) 06:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
A svg file of this map has been made TylerKutschbach (talk) 07:40, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- speedy keep, an SVG version being available is no valid reason for deletion. The raster image can still prove useful and isn't at all out of scope. Kingofthedead (talk) 06:06, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:53, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes of Algeria
[edit]Per COM:CUR Algeria, commercial use was disallowed
- File:1000 Dinars Algériens - Série 1992 - Revers.jpg
- File:ALGERIA -134F - 100 DINARS 1983 copy.jpg
- File:Algerie 1992 1000DZD 0157987821 05106 17294 r 300dpi.jpg
- File:Dinar 500.jpg
- File:DINAR1000.jpg
- File:Dinar200.jpg
- File:Dinar2000.jpg
- File:Dinar50.jpg
- File:دينار الجزائري 1000دج الوجه الاول.jpg
- File:دينار الجزائري 1000دج الوجه الثاني.jpg
- File:دينار الجزائري 100دج الوجه الاول.jpg
- File:دينار الجزائري 2000دج الوجه الاول.jpg
- File:دينار الجزائري 2000دج الوجه الثاني.jpg
- File:دينار الجزائري 200دج الوجه الاول.jpg
- File:دينار الجزائري 200دج الوجه الثاني.jpg
- File:دينار الجزائري 500دج الوجه الاول.jpg
- File:دينار الجزائري 500دج الوجه الثاني.jpg
- File:ورقة نقدية.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 07:43, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:54, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
A svg file of this map is made TylerKutschbach (talk) 07:44, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Creator of the image in question - The SVG file refenced above seems to be referring to this file, which looks much better than my attempt almost a decade ago. Endorse deletion of the PNG image. --Super Goku V (talk) 06:00, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- speedy keep, an SVG version being available is no valid reason for deletion. The raster image can still prove useful and isn't at all out of scope. Kingofthedead (talk) 06:06, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:53, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
This map not showing the shadings of the vote percentages serves little purpose 2600:1009:B044:3D20:59F7:312E:D667:B997 05:04, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:07, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
I made a svg file of this map TylerKutschbach (talk) 07:45, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- speedy keep, an SVG version being available is no valid reason for deletion. The raster image can still prove useful and isn't at all out of scope. Kingofthedead (talk) 06:05, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:53, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Someone made a svg file of this map TylerKutschbach (talk) 07:49, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- speedy keep, an SVG version being available is no valid reason for deletion. The raster image can still prove useful and isn't at all out of scope. Kingofthedead (talk) 06:05, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:53, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
A svg file of this map is made TylerKutschbach (talk) 07:51, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- speedy keep, an SVG version being available is no valid reason for deletion. The raster image can still prove useful and isn't at all out of scope. Kingofthedead (talk) 06:05, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:53, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
PNG is a bad format for this type of image and it has simplified many of the county borders GraydenCat (talk) 02:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Disruption by sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:39, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
I made a svg file of this map TylerKutschbach (talk) 07:58, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:53, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
JPG is a bad format for this type of image and the state is misshapen in this file 2600:1009:B05F:E5D6:3CD4:9736:DE24:4928 02:46, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
A map for this election already exists which is an SVG. Let's try not to upload .png or .jpeg images of elections like this. Mr.Election (talk) 01:00, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hystrix (talk) 03:29, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
A svg file of this map is made TylerKutschbach (talk) 08:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:53, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes of South Africa
[edit]There is no evidence that South African banknotes are free for any reason.
- File:20-za-rand.JPG
- File:2rands.jpg
- File:2randss.jpg
- File:Counterfeit.jpg
- File:SA Bank Notes.jpg
- File:SouthAfrica-10Rand-banknote 038.JPG
- File:Sudafrica-observe.jpg
- File:Sudafrica-reverse.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 14:55, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:59, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes of South Africa
[edit]Per COM:CUR South Africa, currencies of South Africa are copyrighted.
- File:10 Suid-Afrikaanse rand, 2018 (agterkant).jpg
- File:10 Suid-Afrikaanse rand, 2018 (voorkant).jpg
- File:10-rand-gefaltet-muster.jpg
- File:10-rand-hinten-muster.jpg
- File:10-rand-vorn-muster.jpg
- File:100 Suid-Afrikaanse rand, 2018 (agterkant).jpg
- File:100 Suid-Afrikaanse rand, 2018 (voorkant).jpg
- File:20 Suid-Afrikaanse rand, 2018 (agterkant).jpg
- File:20 Suid-Afrikaanse rand, 2018 (voorkant).jpg
- File:200 Suid-Afrikaanse rand, 2018 (agterkant).jpg
- File:200 Suid-Afrikaanse rand, 2018 (voorkant).jpg
- File:2RandNote.jpg
- File:50 Suid-Afrikaanse rand, 2018 (agterkant).jpg
- File:50 Suid-Afrikaanse rand, 2018 (voorkant).jpg
- File:South African banknotes and coins (modern banknotes and coins ).jpg
- File:Suid-Afrikaanse rand, 2018.jpg
- File:ZAR notes current August 2020.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 15:05, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:57, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR Zambia A1Cafel (talk) 15:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:57, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR Zambia A1Cafel (talk) 15:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:57, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for sculptures. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:57, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Please remove EXIF data of image taken indoors, or remove the entire image and I will upload it with stripped EXIF data Pieceofmetalwork (talk) 18:39, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: Uploader's request for unused image. Marbletan (talk) 13:55, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Irreplaceable, in-scope image. Would support COM:REVDEL of compromising metadata after a stripped version is uploaded. Brianjd (talk) 13:50, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: the first version with Exif data per nomination, kept the second freshly uploaded version w/o the data. --Rosenzweig τ 10:05, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by LGA as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyvio of the stadium due to the lack of any FOP in France
Converted to DR by me, as it should be discussed whether the depicted part of the building has enough originality to be copyrightable in France. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:27, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Shows the interior architecture of the 1998 stadium. No FOP in France, and missing permission for free licensing from architects Michel Macary, Aymeric Zublena, Michel Regembal, and Claude Constantini. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Pourquoi lancer une demande de suppression? _ transclude from talk page (wrong venue). Please reply here and not on talk page, as deletion case pages are not like Wikipedia articles.
@Randy110912: Pardon me if I cannot speak or read French (reading without the aid of Google translate). You may want to translate my input via Google Translate. Since you're asking why this was initiated, the simple answer is that France has no freedom of panorama (see Commons:Copyright rules by territory/France/fr#Liberté de panorama for French explanation). Freedom of panorama permits publications and release of images of copyrighted buildings and sculptures under commercial licensing (Creative Commons or PD licensing). Copyrighted means the architects or sculptors are either still alive or dead for several years (in France the copyright lasts to 70 years after their deaths). Commons doesn't accept noncommercial licensing from the said creators. You must obtain permission from the architects I mentioned above via COM:OTRS correspondence (preferably via email) - see Commons:Messages type (that is in French). Ask from the architects if they are willing to release their stadium under free licensing and agree to your use of commercial licensing on your image of their copyrighted architectural work. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:57, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Google Translate - rough translation to Français — Pardonnez-moi si je ne peux pas parler ou lire le français (lecture sans l'aide de Google translate). Vous voudrez peut-être traduire mon entrée via Google Translate. Puisque vous demandez pourquoi cela a été initié, la réponse simple est que la France n'a pas de liberté de panorama (voir Commons: Règles de droit d'auteur par territoire / France / fr # Liberté de panorama pour l'explication française). La liberté de panorama permet la publication et la diffusion d'images de bâtiments et de sculptures protégés par le droit d'auteur sous licence commerciale (licence Creative Commons ou PD). Le droit d'auteur signifie que les architectes ou sculpteurs sont soit encore vivants, soit morts depuis plusieurs années (en France, le droit d'auteur dure jusqu'à 70 ans après leur mort). Commons n'accepte pas les licences non commerciales desdits créateurs. Vous devez obtenir l'autorisation des architectes que j'ai mentionnés ci-dessus via COM: correspondance OTRS (de préférence par courrier électronique) - voir Commons:Messages type (c'est-à-dire en français). Demandez aux architectes s'ils sont prêts à libérer leur stade sous licence libre et acceptez votre utilisation de la licence commerciale sur votre image de leur œuvre architecturale protégée par le droit d'auteur. _ added by JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and explanation. --Ellywa (talk) 21:49, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Flickr uploader name suggests that this may be flickrwashing (uploaded by the subject?). Ankry (talk) 08:06, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep In no capacity does the flickr uploader name (annikabengtson3) suggest that this file is flickrwashed? Tm (talk) 14:33, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- We have also a complaint in OTRS from a person claiming to be the author (photographer) and declaring the photo to be stolen. However, thay can provide no evidence to prove their words. Connecting this with the declared Flickr uploader name being the same as the declared subject name, I started this DR for the community to decide whether these doubts are enough to delete the image per COM:PCP or per courtesy. Note: I see no clear copyvio evidence here, only doubts. Ankry (talk) 11:22, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and explanation of Ankry. The fact that the image is now deleted from Flickr strenthens the case that the image was authored by the person who wrote the OTRS ticket. --Ellywa (talk) 21:54, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Source website gives permission as CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 which is not allowed. MKFI (talk) 13:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Pahoittelen, tekijänoikeusrikkomus ei ollut tahallinen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tarttolainen (talk • contribs) 18:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:24, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation likely. Marked as own work, photo taken 98 years ago. Larry Hockett (talk) 13:40, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: colorized version of File:Lou Gehrig as a new Yankee 11 Jun 1923.jpg, which as a 1923 photo is in the PD in the US. --Rosenzweig τ 11:26, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The original image is a copyrighted Associated Press photograph. See for instance https://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2011/07/world-war-ii-axis-invasions-and-the-fall-of-france/100098/ Le Petit Chat (talk) 21:39, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Delete the image can be found on the Official AP Images website: https://www.apimages.com/metadata/Index/Watchf-AP-I-FRA-APHS393655-WWII-France/8a1e46a15c5a40c7afcb2ed166f7f851 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Remitamine (talk • contribs) 19:02, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. I'm not sure if the original 1940 US news agency photo actually IS still copyrighted (which would mean several formalities would have to be done right, registration, renewal etc.), but I'll assume it could be and delete this colorized version. The file can be restored in 2036, when 1940 US works that are still protected will enter the PD. --Rosenzweig τ 11:18, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted per COM:CUR Angola A1Cafel (talk) 09:30, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:48, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
There is freedom of panorama in Taiwan only outdoors, but this photo is made indoors. Copyright of artist, who draw the little witch, is violated. Taivo (talk) 12:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:48, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
There is freedom of panorama in Taiwan only outdoors, but this photo is made indoors and the photo violates artists' copyright. Taivo (talk) 12:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:48, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR Sierra Leone A1Cafel (talk) 14:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:48, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR Sierra Leone A1Cafel (talk) 14:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:49, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Unfortunately, I couldn't find any evidence that Goldsmith released his performance copyright under a free license, and since he isn't an employee of the federal government, the copyright exemption for the U.S. government doesn't apply. Kaldari (talk) 08:47, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Also see similar past cases such as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lin Manuel Miranda White House Poetry Jam 2009.webm, Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Blind Boys of Alabama perform "Free at Last" on Feb 9th 2010 at the White House.webm, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bob Dylan performs The Times they are a Changin' at the White House.ogv, etc. Kaldari (talk) 08:50, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 11:51, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Per Commons:CUR Democratic Republic of the Congo A1Cafel (talk) 14:06, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 11:52, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
not own work; https://trebicsky.denik.cz/zpravy_region/sedrene-prdele-od-fotbalu-i-rozjety-covid-prectete-si-nej-bizary-roku-vysociny-2.html?cast=5 Tomas62 (talk) 14:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- it is my photo, I bought it and Třebíčský deník just used it because it was free to use (on the page is the source: Piráti Vysočina) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hana.hajnova (talk • contribs) 2021-03-18T20:37:17 (UTC)
- @Tomas62: Odkazovaná stránka v Třebíčském deníku neobsahuje žádnou informaci, ze které by vyplývalo, že autorkou fotografie není osoba, která ji do projektu nahrála a za autorku se prohlásila. Naopak je z uvedeného zdroje pravděpodobné, že fotografie zde v Commons byla zveřejněna s vědomím a souhlasem fotografované a pravděpodobně i fotografující osoby a za účelem, za kterým byla pořízena.
- @Hana.hajnova: Zde nejde o vlastnictví fotografie, ale o autorská práva. Pokud si koupíte dům, obraz nebo fotografii, tak se tím ještě nestáváte držitelem autorských práv. Navíc Vaše tvrzení o tom, že jste fotografii koupila, je v rozporu s Vaším prohlášením na stránce souboru, kde dvakrát tvrdíte, že jde o Vaše vlastní dílo. Samotné autorství je neprodejné (autorem zůstává vždy autor), ovšem autor/autorka vám mohl (může) udělit práva k některým způsobům užití díla, například k jeho rozmnožování a rozšiřování. Pak je ovšem třeba údaje o autorství a údaje o rozsahu a podmínkách takto udělených práv správně uvést. --ŠJů (talk) 21:45, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:EVIDENCE. @Hana.hajnova: you can follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the photographer to publish the image on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 11:55, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Inaccurate and redundant compared to the accurate File:NZ House of Representatives November 2020 Map.png (based off of initial result projections and unused). Elli (talk) 16:57, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. If an image is correct should be decided on the project. This image is not used and the date is cleary noted in the title. --Ellywa (talk) 11:57, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
No source is given for the inset sperm and pedometer images. The image is also out of date, since there is more confidence in the data now. 24.178.6.186 18:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: I consider the insets as de minimis and I will add a template to the file page. If the image is out of date should be decided on the projects. The image is still in use today. --Ellywa (talk) 11:59, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Romania and COM:DIGNITY — Rhododendrites talk | 19:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I don't see what is undignified about this image, although Commons:Country specific consent requirements#Romania does seem to require its removal (or at least anonymisation). Brianjd (talk) 13:04, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 12:07, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Superseded by SVG version File:Gate Pā Māori Flag.svg +mt 19:42, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:REDUNDANT. --Ellywa (talk) 12:07, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
JAXA releases its logos not under free conditions! Ras67 (talk) 21:28, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Assumed to be copyrighted by JAXA; no evidence that they released it under a CC license. JAXA's works tend to be copyrighted according to its website. -M.nelson (talk) 12:44, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 12:08, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Author request. E4024 (talk) 21:56, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader reqeust, image not in use, so deleted per COM:COURTESY. --Ellywa (talk) 12:12, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
This picture is from a 1982 book illustrated by Shi Fu 石夫 see http://p1.pstatp.com/large/141b0004f6482b5db027 Yinweiaiqing (talk) 23:31, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Link does not exist (any more), deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 12:14, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
