Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/03/02
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
1111.jpg){kind=link}
2020.png){kind=link}
_PH_Money_2020.png){kind=link}
2020.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![199 File:Нагорода "За створення сприятливого інвестиційного клімату на Львівщині".jpg](#File:Нагорода_"За_створення_сприятливого_інвестиційного_клімату_на_Львівщині".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
I need to delete this my girlfriend doesn't like it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarlidwe (talk • contribs) 11:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 15:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
No proof of permission of the copyright holder or the portrayed person to publicly transmit or display the photograph. The image has been previously published in other media with no indication of a license that allows use for third parties. Examples of previous publication: 1 2 . Moreover, this same file has been deleted several times, including recently: 3 Awikimate (talk) 10:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:40, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
No proof of permission of the copyright holder or the portrayed person to publicly transmit or display the photograph. The image has been previously published in other media with no indication of a license that allows use for third parties. Examples of previous publication: 1 2 Awikimate (talk) 14:46, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:40, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
{{db-author}} Alexmarzea1 (talk) 15:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Does not qualify for G7; image uploaded 2 years ago. --Túrelio (talk) 15:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
{{Delete |reason = I don't have copyright for this picture |subpage = Commons:Deletion requests/File:10 august.jpg |day = 2 |month = March |year = 2021 }} Alexmarzea1 (talk) 15:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Confirmed, as published in year before upload: https://stirileprotv.ro/stiri/actualitate/seful-parchetului-militar-znu-avem-date-despre-compozitia-gazelor-utilizate.html . --Túrelio (talk) 17:26, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 17:26, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
This is Artandimage. The artist did NOT grant permission to put this image into the public domain. He granted permission for me to post it for Wikipedia purposes only. It must be removed! Help! Artandimage (talk) 03:17, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
This is Opendude42. Artandimage has attempted to remove the Help:Contents page. This has disabled users from using the Help pages. The image shoould be removed, but the page should not! Opendude42 (talk) 17:27, 14 December 2012 (GMT)
Kept: per Opendude42 McZusatz (talk) 23:41, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Category:Bahnstrecke Weilheim-Schongau Karl432 (talk) 17:28, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, of course I want the listed category file to be deleted (due to a mistype in its name), not the help file itself which I inspected only to see how I do this. I simply assumed that when I click "nominate for deletion" I had first to specify the file which I wand to be deleted. -- Karl432 (talk) 17:31, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept (non-admin closure): test nomination. darkweasel94 21:26, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
No PLans To use This Page Richard Alexander Cadieux (talk) 03:40, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense DR. ★ Poké95 11:20, 25 July 2016 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
i dont want to put this picture in common DgitalTechs (talk) 17:54, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense DR. --Achim (talk) 21:04, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bali_Democracy_Forum Diplik (talk) 02:06, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense, no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 03:59, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Personal photos Marcello Hughes (talk) 00:52, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- Admins, please warn the DR opener seriously. --E4024 (talk) 01:02, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense, speedy closed. --jdx Re: 01:09, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
File: Slumber Party - Rebels in Pinkville - 2018.jpg Arik Mirondo (talk) 15:43, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense, speedy closed. --jdx Re: 17:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archivo:Iglesia_del_Sagrado_Coraz%C3%B3n_Jiquilpan_Michoac%C3%A1n.jpg Jackie RGarcia (talk) 20:59, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Speedy kept, the photo of the church is not a reason to delete Help:Contents. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:57, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Pexels-photo-3772623.jpg Franz.zilvah (talk) 01:44, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Keep (non-admin closure): Nonsense nom. Why this page is nominated for some many times... Stang★ 02:14, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
No proof of permission of the copyright holder or the portrayed person to publicly transmit or display the photograph. The image has been previously published in other media with no indication of a license that allows use for third parties. Examples of previous publications: 1 2 3 Awikimate (talk) 16:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:40, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
It seemingly violates copyright. Author and Uploader are not identical. PedroTheSloth (talk) 18:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 19:29, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Lo subí por error Xurxosanz (talk) 21:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request, dupe of File:La Marina de València.jpg. --Achim (talk) 21:52, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Fake photoshopped picture. A close inspection bears this out it has been crudely photoshoped. GreenC (talk) 18:07, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Procedural close as OP. The photo may not be photo-shopped, it was an assumption based on my limited expertise. Changes to the description ("Dr. Graham told me") will require private communication to authenticate identity. -- GreenC (talk) 17:41, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment. The lighting is a little off on this photo but I'm not sure I can see evidence of digital manipulation as clearly as has been suggested. Maybe you can provide some more information? TheDragonFire (talk) 18:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Dr. Graham told me he has no idea whose these people are -- and they are NOT on his staff. The photo is random and the caption is factually incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcbaran (talk • contribs) 19:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- And who is Jcbaran? (I mean the OP could respond for themselves.) --E4024 (talk) 19:22, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Comment: The lady at the right is clearly wearing a NIH badge that reads "EMMA BURNELL" or the like. Might be not staff but a group of visitors or NIH people from a different division. A NIH related E.B. is referenced here. Unfortunately fotoforensics doesn't give a clear answer. --Achim (talk) 19:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep: Had a closer look: The photo is definitely not faked. Too many properties do fit: a) The reflections on eyes and teeth, b) the chromatic noise, c) the distribution of chromatic aberration, d) the even lack of sharpness caused by bad focus or depth of field, e) the other photos on flickr taken on the same event. --Achim (talk) 21:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept and closed per withdrawal by the OP. E4024 (talk) 17:50, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE personal photo of a user with no valid contribs: m:Special:CentralAuth/Tng.ssg. Gikü (talk) 00:30, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
duplicate Dionysio.Calucci (talk) 18:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: but redirected the other. --JuTa 11:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
it's a duplicate and the original has been uploaded. Dionysio.Calucci (talk) 09:38, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: in case thats relay important, I swapped the 2 files now. --JuTa 15:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Doesn't provide any suffcient information Patrick799 =) (talk) 20:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Racconish at 13:57, 7 März 2021 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 21:30, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Chemical mistakes: missing several H on N and O. Have File:Willardiine.svg as higher-quality image of correct content. DMacks (talk) 02:43, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 11:47, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Screencap from a movie - not users own work Sillyfolkboy (talk) 00:07, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:58, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ioana nirvana77 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos of a printed material. No proof that uploader is the author.
Gikü (talk) 11:43, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 07:20, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ioana nirvana77 (talk · contribs)
[edit]All these uploads are either photos or scans of pages of some brochures or magazines. The default sourcing and permission are not valid. User is not at their first offense.
- File:MDS00637.jpg
- File:MDS00625.jpg
- File:MDS00624.jpg
- File:MDS00622.jpg
- File:MDS00621.jpg
- File:MDS00619.jpg
- File:MDS00618.jpg
- File:MDS00617.jpg
- File:MDS00614.jpg
- File:MDS00613.jpg
- File:MDS00574.jpg
Gikü (talk) 00:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:36, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ioana nirvana77 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Scans or photos of printed material. No proof of permission. See user's previous DRs.
- File:Prof. CONSTANTINESCU Cristina.jpg
- File:Prof. DRAGOȘ Cornel.jpg
- File:Prof. CHIRCIU Marin.jpg
- File:Prof. dr. BROȘTESCU Maria.jpg
- File:Prof. BĂDIȚĂ Aurel Valentin.jpg
Gikü (talk) 18:25, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:14, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ioana nirvana77 (talk · contribs)
[edit]As usual for this user (this is the 4th DR on the same issue): photos or scans of pages of some brochures or magazines = not own work.
- File:Conacul din Vlaici (Olt).jpg
- File:Puțul lui popa Onete, Strâmbeni (comuna Suseni), pe malul Lacului Morii.jpg
- File:Biserica cu hramul „Adormirea Maicii Domnului” din Budeasa, ctitoria familiei Budișteanu.jpg
- File:Conacul familiei Budișteanu.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_pe_malul_Lacului_Morii.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gikü (talk) 16:50, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:47, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE personal photo of a user with no valid contribs: m:Special:CentralAuth/LONEGK23. Gikü (talk) 00:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:47, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE personal photo of a user with no valid contribs: m:Special:CentralAuth/Paler Alexandru-Gabriel. Gikü (talk) 00:30, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:47, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Above TOO in US, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:PEO-octocat-1.svg Larryasou (talk) 05:36, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 06:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 08:49, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. Also source/authorship information is doubtful. jdx Re: 11:12, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:50, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:50, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:50, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 11:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:50, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tomorrow0810 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 04:33, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per num. -- Geagea (talk) 04:37, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tomorrow0810 (talk · contribs)
[edit]A collection of images comprising a screenshot of a smartphone wallpaper, screenshot of a messaging app message, and text describing the subject as handsome. Out of project scope.
ƏXPLICIT 13:51, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:51, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:BFM installed in Baltimore substation.jpg
- File:PM174 Analyzer installed on power lines.jpg
- File:PM180 with touchscreen.jpg
- File:PM180 module side.jpg
- File:PRO-EM235 with modules.jpg
- File:BFM-II-Full-Version-05-2016 S.jpg
- File:PM180 @ Gamesa.jpg
- File:PM130 test bench.jpg
- File:EzPAC installed in Sochi.png
- File:BFM II installed in substation.jpg
- File:SATEC's PM296 Power Meter.png
- File:SATEC PM288 Power Meter.jpg
- File:SATEC Jerusalem HQ.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by عبدالله براهوئی (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:پدر و مادر عادل و میعاد.jpg
- File:میعاد مالدران.jpg
- File:عادل مالدران.jpg
- File:عادل و میعاد.jpg
- File:مرحوم محمدلال شاهوزهی.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:39, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Lechones del Carnaval de Santiago.jpg
- File:Jugada en el Espacio.jpg
- File:Ciudades Espaciales.jpg
- File:Firma Bolivarq.png
- File:Firma Bolivar Q.png
- File:Autorretrato a lápiz de Bolivar Quiñones.jpg
- File:A-19 Ciudad Colonial.jpg
- File:A-45 Vieja con pipa.jpg
- File:Bodegon con Anforas y Frutas No.03103428128-001.jpg
- File:A-15 Viejo con pipa.jpg
- File:A -01 Dama paseando en la zona Colonial.jpg
- File:A-4 Paisaje campestre en atardecer.jpg
- File:A-3 Coche después de la lluvia.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:26, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:32, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:56, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:32, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:56, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:56, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ceosocialpathic (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Just Rich Gates rapper South Carolina Native.jpg
- File:Layzie Bone, Burgos And Unknown Friend.jpg
- File:Anthony Burgos.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:57, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:57, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:46, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:57, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:57, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 17:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:54, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
out of scope The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 18:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:54, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Very low quality - grainy, badly vignetted corners, birds unidentifiable blurry blobs MPF (talk) 18:32, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
unused personal animated gif, no educational use, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 18:49, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Motivos pessoais História do Porto (talk) 23:55, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Uso indevido da imagem 189.127.212.66 00:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- See also: File:Miniatura de Maria Perpétua Calafate de Souza.jpg. --E4024 (talk) 00:23, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request. No source, no author. That way the file cannot stay in Commons. Taivo (talk) 09:18, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
The file is a satellite map from Voice of America, which clearly stated that it is based on Google Map. Due to the fact that Template:PD-USGov-VOA only extends to Voice of America employees, and contents from Google Map is all rights reserved, the file is in fact, copyrighted and unfree. 廣九直通車 (talk) 13:36, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: I agree. --sasha (krassotkin) 00:34, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 08:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 19:45, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope; personal photo with no educational value; small resolution. Jcornelius (talk) 12:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 19:46, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Background is apparently CC-NC licenced which is not allowed. Also out of COM:Scope, personal artwork. MKFI (talk) 20:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 20:17, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
License fail: graphical composite of uncited originals. DMacks (talk) 02:45, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The low quality of this file is the result of the composition of fragements from other files. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:06, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:20, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
License fail: graphical composite of uncited originals. DMacks (talk) 02:46, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The low quality of this file is the result of the composition of fragements from other files. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:08, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:20, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Freedom of panorama is not yet provided in the Philippine copyright law, and permission from the architect of this 2005 mall building is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:51, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:Derivative work of a copyrighted 2D graphic work (a billboard), which is temporary in nature. No applicable FOP, and permission from the graphics artist or the production company is a must. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Also the following by Judgefloro (talk · contribs):
- File:06482jfSan Lazaro Overpass Bridge Park SM City Lacson Avenue Manilafvf 03.jpg
- File:06467jfSan Lazaro Overpass Bridge Park SM City Lacson Avenue Manilafvf 13.jpg
- File:06452jfSan Lazaro Overpass Bridge Park SM City Lacson Avenue Manilafvf 11.jpg
_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:31, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:45, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
no proof of free licence - both from author and photographer. Pibwl (talk) 22:59, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 14:46, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
"Funny" montage with no obvious educational value. Uploader is indefinitely banned at fr:wiki after vandalizing Thuresson (talk) 23:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 14:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
copyrighted material Einsamer Schütze (talk) 23:26, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 14:40, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Proper work not indicated Patrick799 =) (talk) 21:30, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
- I don't understand why you want to delete an image whose author has put into the public domain. The nomination is absurd and even ridiculous. --Stalin990 (talk) 21:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 16:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
per COM:DW and COM:FOP US, photographs of 3D art are considered copyrighted Ytoyoda (talk) 21:49, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:35, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
He is not famous and its photo copyright Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 22:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributor. --Wdwd (talk) 16:08, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
New version uploaded Johnsamps (talk) 22:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 16:07, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
new version uploaded Johnsamps (talk) 22:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 16:07, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
new version uploaded Johnsamps (talk) 22:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 16:07, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
new version uploaded Johnsamps (talk) 22:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 16:06, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
new version uploaded Johnsamps (talk) 22:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 16:06, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Uploader now says this image is not their 'own work', see [1] MrOllie (talk) 22:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:04, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Uploader now says this image is not their 'own work', see [2] MrOllie (talk) 22:30, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Uploader now says this image is not their 'own work', see [3] MrOllie (talk) 22:30, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:04, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Uploader now says this image is not their 'own work', see [4] MrOllie (talk) 22:30, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:04, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Uploader now says this image is not their 'own work', see [5] MrOllie (talk) 22:30, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:04, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
"Funny" montage. Unknown educational value. Was used to vandalize fr:Le Tour du monde en quatre-vingts jours. Uploader blocked indefinitely from fr:wiki. Thuresson (talk) 22:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 15:55, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
blurred thumbnail, no apparent notability, doubtful authorship. Pibwl (talk) 22:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributor. --Wdwd (talk) 15:57, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|<Error. Is not my work>}} Icspiro (talk) 15:10, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- copyvio. Is not my work. Icspiro (talk) 11:25, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I believe. Taivo (talk) 08:57, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
unused personal artwork. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 17:46, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:18, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by National association of myths and legends (talk · contribs)
[edit]Cover art and apparent publicity photographs. Two images copied from https://soundcloud.com/rad_1_rad/sets/the-ephmereal and https://soundcloud.com/rad_1_rad/sets/2-docile, suspect the others are copyvios as well.
- File:The shock of the back lash threw his focus elsewhere. He seemed to poke fun at the fears of his critics both legitimate and illegitimate. This offsetting nuance caused his music to lose its original message. Th.jpg
- File:Aggravation was captured in the projects cover art. For some the cover art totally exposed his overall objective.jpg
- File:Out of Philadelphia, PA Reny-Rad’s background is mainly R&B, Punk Rock and Gospel.jpg
- File:Renyrad is one half of an up and coming alternative hiphop and R&B group called 'Others' (Currently on artistic hold by the American government).jpg
- File:Reny-Rad is also one half of the alternative Hip-Hop and R&B group by the name 'Others".jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
MKFI (talk) 21:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:18, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot of wiki page. I see no use in that, if needed one can just copy the table from the wiki. Jahobr (talk) 21:26, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:17, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 22:21, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:17, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 22:21, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:16, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
I could find no context for "Cordell Hull v John G. Winant" on google. Assumed to be "alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 22:26, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:16, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Too complex for PD-textlogo Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:15, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation, see [6] Einsamer Schütze (talk) 23:21, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:15, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Flavmi as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: No FOP in Italy — Racconish 💬 06:51, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted already. --E4024 (talk) 15:37, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
No free Youtube license at the source. Leoboudv (talk) 07:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Confirm no Creative Commons Youtube license, and it's not in the Internet Archive. --GRuban (talk) 15:31, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete agree to be delete and confirm it’s my mistake as the uploader, I didn’t double check this one. This image should be deleted as soon as possible. 😩 sorry for my mistake--Lukewon (talk) 04:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also G7. --Túrelio (talk) 17:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Personal file used for vandalism on fr.wikipedia VateGV ◦ taper la discut’ ◦ 08:12, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 17:27, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
1) SM City San Lazaro building
[edit]This building was designed by Jose Siao Ling & Associates and completed in 2005. As freedom of panorama is not yet provided in the copyright law, permission from them is required. Note that this building is included in their (Jose Siao Ling & Associates) website, which means they hold its copyright. Also included: its intricate interior architecture.
- File:06233jfSan Lazaro Tayuman Lacson SM City Streets Pedestrian overpass Santa Cruz Manilafvf 01.jpg
- File:06233jfSan Lazaro Tayuman Lacson SM City Streets Pedestrian overpass Santa Cruz Manilafvf 07.jpg
- File:06233jfSan Lazaro Tayuman Lacson SM City Streets Pedestrian overpass Santa Cruz Manilafvf 08.jpg
- File:06233jfSan Lazaro Tayuman Lacson SM City Streets Pedestrian overpass Santa Cruz Manilafvf 11.jpg
- File:06246jfSan Lazaro Lacson SM City Streets Pedestrian overpass Santa Cruz Manilafvf 04.jpg
- File:06246jfSan Lazaro Lacson SM City Streets Pedestrian overpass Santa Cruz Manilafvf 05.jpg
- File:06246jfSan Lazaro Lacson SM City Streets Pedestrian overpass Santa Cruz Manilafvf 08.jpg
- File:06246jfSan Lazaro Lacson SM City Streets Pedestrian overpass Santa Cruz Manilafvf 09.jpg
- File:06246jfSan Lazaro Lacson SM City Streets Pedestrian overpass Santa Cruz Manilafvf 10.jpg
- File:06246jfSan Lazaro Lacson SM City Streets Pedestrian overpass Santa Cruz Manilafvf 11.jpg
- File:06246jfSan Lazaro Lacson SM City Streets Pedestrian overpass Santa Cruz Manilafvf 12.jpg
- File:06246jfSan Lazaro Lacson SM City Streets Pedestrian overpass Santa Cruz Manilafvf 13.jpg
- File:06261jfSan Lazaro Lacson SM City Streets Pedestrian overpass Santa Cruz Manilafvf 03.jpg
- File:06371jfSan Lazaro SM City Lacson Avenue Overpass Landmarks Manilafvf 10.jpg
- File:06371jfSan Lazaro SM City Lacson Avenue Overpass Landmarks Manilafvf 11.jpg
- File:06436jfSan Lazaro Tourism Business Park SM City Lacson Avenue Manilafvf 02.jpg
- File:06436jfSan Lazaro Tourism Business Park SM City Lacson Avenue Manilafvf 03.jpg
- File:06452jfSan Lazaro Overpass Bridge Park SM City Lacson Avenue Manilafvf 10.jpg
- File:06467jfSan Lazaro Overpass Bridge Park SM City Lacson Avenue Manilafvf 08.jpg
- File:06467jfSan Lazaro Overpass Bridge Park SM City Lacson Avenue Manilafvf 14.jpg
- File:06467jfSan Lazaro Overpass Bridge Park SM City Lacson Avenue Manilafvf 15.jpg
- File:06482jfSan Lazaro Overpass Bridge Park SM City Lacson Avenue Manilafvf 04.jpg
- File:06482jfSan Lazaro Overpass Bridge Park SM City Lacson Avenue Manilafvf 12.jpg
- File:06482jfSan Lazaro Overpass Bridge Park SM City Lacson Avenue Manilafvf 14.jpg
- File:06566jfSan Lazaro SM City Landmarks Buildings Santa Cruz Manilafvf 08.jpg
- File:06566jfSan Lazaro SM City Landmarks Buildings Santa Cruz Manilafvf 09.jpg
- File:06566jfSan Lazaro SM City Landmarks Buildings Santa Cruz Manilafvf 10.jpg
- File:06566jfSan Lazaro SM City Landmarks Buildings Santa Cruz Manilafvf 11.jpg
- File:06566jfSan Lazaro SM City Landmarks Buildings Santa Cruz Manilafvf 12.jpg
- File:06566jfSan Lazaro SM City Landmarks Buildings Santa Cruz Manilafvf 13.jpg
- File:06566jfSan Lazaro SM City Landmarks Buildings Santa Cruz Manilafvf 14.jpg
- File:06566jfSan Lazaro SM City Landmarks Buildings Santa Cruz Manilafvf 15.jpg
- File:06581jfSan Lazaro SM City Tourism Business Park Tous Les Jours Manilafvf 01.jpg
- File:06581jfSan Lazaro SM City Tourism Business Park Tous Les Jours Manilafvf 02.jpg
- File:06581jfSan Lazaro SM City Tourism Business Park Tous Les Jours Manilafvf 03.jpg
- File:06581jfSan Lazaro SM City Tourism Business Park Tous Les Jours Manilafvf 04.jpg
- File:06581jfSan Lazaro SM City Tourism Business Park Tous Les Jours Manilafvf 05.jpg
- File:06581jfSan Lazaro SM City Tourism Business Park Tous Les Jours Manilafvf 06.jpg
- File:06581jfSan Lazaro SM City Tourism Business Park Tous Les Jours Manilafvf 08.jpg
- File:06581jfSan Lazaro SM City Tourism Business Park Tous Les Jours Manilafvf 09.jpg
- File:06581jfSan Lazaro SM City Tourism Business Park Tous Les Jours Manilafvf 10.jpg
- File:06581jfSan Lazaro SM City Tourism Business Park Tous Les Jours Manilafvf 11.jpg
- File:06581jfSan Lazaro SM City Tourism Business Park Tous Les Jours Manilafvf 12.jpg
- File:06612jfSan Lazaro SM City Tous Les Jours Landmarks Manilafvf 03.jpg
- File:06612jfSan Lazaro SM City Tous Les Jours Landmarks Manilafvf 05.jpg
- File:FvfMetroManila9958 01.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila9958 26.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila9958 27.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila9958 28.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila9958 30.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila9958 31.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila9958 32.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila9958 33.JPG
- File:SMCitySanLazarojf1705 01.JPG
- File:SMCitySanLazarojf1705 02.JPG
- File:SMCitySanLazarojf1705 05.JPG
- File:SMCitySanLazarojf1705 06.JPG
- File:SMCitySanLazarojf1705 08.JPG
- File:SMCitySanLazarojf1705 09.JPG
- File:SMCitySanLazarojf1705 11.JPG
- File:WTMP Foodtrippings B23.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
In line with foregoing Legal Discussions I humbly beg the Commons Community to Put on Hold and or DEFER Any and All Mass Nominations for Deletions in My Talk Pages by Herein Mass Nominator; I humbly Suggest that Any User of Commons may Re-Nominate Objectively and in Line with the cited a) Legal, b) Moral Reasons and in the c) LIGHT OF the Universal Code of Conduct of Users inter alia
- CONSOLIDATED Strongest CONTINUING Legal Objection Ever to the Non-Stop Mass Deletions Requests by herein Nominator: Counter-argument: the Supreme Court’s Revised Rules on IP Cases which aimed for Litigation, Driving Innovation and Creativity December 23, 2020: "The Intellectual Property of the Philippines (IPOPHL) said the Supreme Court’s (SC) 2020 Special Rules on the Prosecution of Intellectual Property (IP) Cases is testament to the whole-of-society work in ensuring an effective and speedy adjudication of IP rights cases – essential in creating an environment that fosters innovation, investments and entrepreneurship; it was participated and signed by "IPOPHL Deputy Director General Nelson P. Laluces IPOPHL’s Bureau of Patents Director IV Lolibeth R. Medrano Former IPOPHL DG Ricardo R. Blancaflor IP Rights Practitioner Atty. Ferdinand M Negre IP RIghts Practitioner Atty. Ramon S. Esguerra";
- The Supreme Court solely interprets the law when a ripe case reaches it via Stare Decision or Obiter Dictum;
- However, its S.C. Circulars and Memoranda especially En Banc is Law; it is not mere interpretation but obeying its Constitutional Mandate on its Judicial Supremacy; now, the MOMENT has come, UNPRECEDENTED that it was joined by Great Minds including the "IPOPHL Deputy Director General Nelson P. Laluces IPOPHL’s Bureau of Patents Director IV Lolibeth R. Medrano Former IPOPHL DG Ricardo R. Blancaflor IP Rights Practitioner Atty. Ferdinand M Negre IP RIghts Practitioner Atty. Ramon S. Esguerra";
- Your statement that "SC circular you're pertaining to cannot overwrite Sec. 172.2, xxx is highly misplaced and without any legal support; for the cited 2019 Circular never erased or even interpreted the law but it IMPLEMENTS it enumerating the Formal and Substantive Requirement;
- On your statement that my "your interpretation of the burden of evidence xxx", I submitted to the Commons Community my Legal Treatise, as User with One Vote, like anyone here, even if I am a Wikimedia Lawyer and Judge; for I hold that I leave the legal policies to foreign Wikimedia Lawyers to vote on Deletion and Non-Deletion;
- When a Nominator tags for Deletion, even say he or she is an administrator or mere user, as such, he or she cannot be the Prosecutor, the Arbiter, the Trial Judge and Justice who will decide on deletion or keeping; it would turn Commons to “Juez de Cuchillo” - “Law of the Knife”, a Juez de Cuchillo or moral farce, Censorship so to speak;
- I am 6 of Commons most active editor and uploader; but in my totalt al edit count: 1,700,373+ user has been on Wikimedia Commons for 13 years, 8 months and 2 days, I do Upload and few edits but ZERO tagging of Deletions; I leave that matter to Commons Community;
- It is a sad day for Commons if a) the Smart One b) a Check user previously on hold c) and now, a Starter of Mass Deletion Requests, flooding my talk pages with Mass Deletions on FOP:
- If you argue via discussion that I am legally wrong, my fish vendor and hired Trike Drivers joined many open mouths and told me this or that, but they do not have Evidence;
- Any one can cherry pick Commons Policies to tailormade their stance, however, the Supreme Court and the IPO et Bureau of Copyright already Spoke fully implementing the FOP rules on Copyright Infringement;
- As Legal Challenge, I demand you to Email the IPO and Bureau of Copyrights and submit all my Legal Contradictions to your Stance, put your cards on the table, since in the Webinar and Communications I had, they are open to Reply as Mandated by the Strict provisions of R.A. 6713, and then let the IPO and Bureau of Copyrights Rule as to Whose Legal Stance on FOP on Commons Uploading is Correct Mine or Yours; then and there, if it will say Delete, then I will appeal the matter to the IBP and or DOJ Secretary for final ruling; Commons is not in a hurry to Grant or Deny your Mass Deletions Request; Commons administrators do Balance the Rights of Commons, the benefits to the Cultural Heritage of Filipinos and the Commons Policies;
- I respectfully quote the following Verba and Important Notes of Commons Administrators on the matter:
- " Are photos of "request letter and letter of receipt" by Judgefloro within scope of Commons?
- Vide: Category:Letter to Josephine Rima-Santiago (Philippines) Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago of Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines. Letter to Intellectual Property Office (Philippines) IPO Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago (Philippines) 6 pages Letter from Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr. or User:Judgefloro regardings Commons:Freedom of panorama specifically Freedom of panorama Philippines Re: Request for a Definitive Opinion on Freedom of panorama concerning Wikimedia Commons Photography - Uploading - Publishing vis-a-vis the IP Code of the Philippines (Act No. 8293) (2015 Edition), Chapter VIII ("Limitations on copyright) which does not appear to make any exception for photographs of copyrighted works. This letter is mailed today via LBC mail as evidenced by Category:LBC Express receipts Very sincerely yours, Judgefloro 08:23, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- The Mass Deletion Requests by herein Nominator, I underscore, for clarity's sake - Mass Deletion Requests by herein Nominator are NULL and VOID ab Initio as they are a) Unlawful under Philippine Laws, and b) contrary to the Universal Code of Conduct of Users inter alia;
- The Mass Deletion Requests by herein Nominator is a Virtual and Desperate Attempt to Erase Valued Images or Most Important Cultural Heritage Treasures of the Philippines from Commons Ownership without any Valid Legal Basis, but just mere copy paste citations or Provisos of Laws, without any Jurisprudential Support - to be specific - rather trying so hard to get the uploads of what seems a fellow countryman deleted, but anyhow I don't think these files should be deleted ...
- In-scope. Any files that are used by the projects for their own functioning can be in-scope. This extends to useful information that supports Commons deletion discussions;
- WHEREFORE, premises considered, your Mass Nominations for Deletions, including your legal sayings without any Jurisprudential either Phil or US are hereby DENIED with finality for utter lack of merit in Philippines Law and Fact;
- In line with foregoing Legal Discussions I humbly beg the Commons Community to Put on Hold and or DEFER Any and All Mass Nominations for Deletions of Herein Nominator; I humbly Suggest that Any User of Commons may Re-Nominate Objectively and in Line with the cited Legal, Moral Reasons and in the LIGHT OF the Universal Code of Conduct of Users inter alia;
- Keep I humbly submit the Unabridged Legal Treatise, ONLY as persuasion to Keep; I underscore that amid my Legal Expertise, I have just One Commons Editor Vote co-equal with any Nominator or Opposing Uploader under the Commons Admin who will keep or delete; the foregoing Legal Submissions are not meant to touch upon Commons Legal Policy on FOP;
- Keep PREMISES CONSIDERED, I humbly submit and register a the Strongest Legal Objections EVER to the Requested Mass Non-Stop Deletions of herein Nominator and Fervently Appeal to Commons Community to wait for the Supreme Court Ruling on the Matter of FOP and I guess that would be my starting point... I reiterate with all due respect, that I respectfully and humbly submit to the Sound Discretion of the Commons Community considering that the subject photos are National Cultural Treasures Most Valued Photos for present and future generations, very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:09, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- a) Your opinion - like that of my b) fish vendor which had tons of wisdom not only in Fish but in Commerce, of my c) Trike Driver who is expert in Transportation - may be believed by the onlookers or Voters in Elections Periods; but without Citation of Philippine Jurisprudence, without basing you argument on any USA or Federal ruling, and worst, without supporting your above Repeated opinions-comments-mirror replies, whatever you may term them - is not worth a Lawyer's salt, or here, a Commons Community Policy on keeping or deleting; rest assured that if you are believed, I never filed or would ever file any Undeletions Requests, for I know my limitations in time and effort; I would rather go inside the corridors of the DOJ, the IPO and or Bureau of Copyright for Official Statements, PROMISE Judgefloro (talk) 11:17, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:21, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
2) Statues / wax figures of copyrighted characters
[edit]The following images (by @Judgefloro: ) show temporary installation of copyrighted characters (e.g. Batman, Wonder Woman), and missing permission from the DC Comics/Marvel. Copyvios for licensing images of their characters under commercial licensing.
- File:06552jfSan Lazaro SM City Landmarks Buildings Santa Cruz Manilafvf 06.jpg
- File:06552jfSan Lazaro SM City Landmarks Buildings Santa Cruz Manilafvf 10.jpg
- File:06552jfSan Lazaro SM City Landmarks Buildings Santa Cruz Manilafvf 12.jpg
- File:06552jfSan Lazaro SM City Landmarks Buildings Santa Cruz Manilafvf 13.jpg
- File:06552jfSan Lazaro SM City Landmarks Buildings Santa Cruz Manilafvf 14.jpg
- File:06566jfSan Lazaro SM City Landmarks Buildings Santa Cruz Manilafvf 03.jpg
While in the following images, there's a female fan/patron in the front, the copyrighted character wax figure behind her seems not de minimis and is intentionally included:
- File:06552jfSan Lazaro SM City Landmarks Buildings Santa Cruz Manilafvf 02.jpg
- File:06552jfSan Lazaro SM City Landmarks Buildings Santa Cruz Manilafvf 03.jpg
_JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:51, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Uploader's identical reply the same as reply above
|
|---|
|
In line with foregoing Legal Discussions I humbly beg the Commons Community to Put on Hold and or DEFER Any and All Mass Nominations for Deletions in My Talk Pages by Herein Mass Nominator; I humbly Suggest that Any User of Commons may Re-Nominate Objectively and in Line with the cited a) Legal, b) Moral Reasons and in the c) LIGHT OF the Universal Code of Conduct of Users inter alia
|
Delete as per nomination. Markoolio97 (talk) 17:12, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:21, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sober Bhutan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's draft was speedily deleted in January 2021 as promotional. Out of project scope.
ƏXPLICIT 10:37, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, uploader has problems with copyright. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:51, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Smaal undescibed image. No educative value Richard Avery (talk) 13:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused and undescribed file, in current state out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
small, undescibed and unused image. No educative value Richard Avery (talk) 13:07, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted movie poster, OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 13:10, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused, undescribed screenshot. No obvious educative or exemplar value Richard Avery (talk) 13:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Clevermindentertainment (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images and cover art of Young Beast artist. Suspected copyright violations: Multiple different cameras used, File:Young Beast Laughing.jpg EXIF shows "Author: Tiara Brown". Photographers for other photos unknown. Cover art artists unknown.
- File:Young Beast With Fan At a Party.jpg
- File:Young Beast More Than Just Music Cover Art.jpg
- File:Young Beast Mr. Self Explanatory Cover Art.jpg
- File:Young Beast Greatness Photo.png
- File:Young Beast High Octane Cover Art.jpg
- File:Young Beast Garden Of Eden Cover Art.jpg
- File:Young Beast American Gangster Cover Art.jpg
- File:Young Beast Video Shoot Photo.jpg
- File:Young Beast On Train Tracks.jpg
- File:Young Beast Video Shoot Image.jpg
- File:Young Beast At Club Vault All Black Event In Miami.jpg
- File:Young Beast With Fans.jpg
- File:Young Beast Smiling Photo.jpg
- File:Young Beast Outside Club Three Fingers In Miami.jpg
- File:Young Beast Outside Club Three Fingers.jpg
- File:Young Beast Outside Of Coco's Strip Club In Miami.png
- File:Young Beast With Fan Bending Over On Him.jpg
- File:Young Beast Performing Live At Club Foxy Ladies In Miami.jpg
- File:Young Beast With fan.jpg
- File:Young Beast With Spectacular From Pretty Ricky At The Office Strip Club In Miami.jpg
- File:Young Beast At Miami Live In Miami.jpg
- File:Young Beast At Strip Club The Body In Miami.jpg
- File:Young Beast With Babi Breez.jpg
- File:Young Beast With Breez.jpg
- File:Young Beast Performing Live At Sandals.jpg
- File:Young Beast Performing Live At Club Sandals Big Girl Thursday.jpg
- File:Young Beast On The Phone.jpg
- File:Young Beast Outisde Photo.png
- File:Young Beast Close Up Image.jpg
- File:Young Beast Before Club Sandals Performance.jpg
- File:Young Beast Sitting On Car.jpg
- File:Young Beast At The Gym.jpg
- File:Young Beast Full Body Photo.jpg
- File:Young Beast In Recording Studio Photo.jpg
- File:Young Beast Live At Club Vault All Black Event In Miami.jpg
- File:Young Beast Live At The Office Strip Club In Miami.jpg
- File:Young Beast Performing Live at Club Sandals.jpg
- File:Young Beast Laughing.jpg
- File:Young Beast Photo.jpg
- File:Young Beast Image.jpg
MKFI (talk) 21:08, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Although this is claimed to meet the threshold of originality, I do not believe this is the case. O Still Small Voice of Clam 11:47, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:02, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Previously published at https://ayominzy.wordpress.com/2014/09/13/official-photos-of-2ne1-in-myanmar-august-1-2-2014/. Requires COM:OTRS verification
Ytoyoda (talk) 02:31, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:30, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
The source page, https://o2news.tistory.com/, no longer exists. Not sure if there's any other way to verify the license.
- File:Bom Park DMA 2009 2.jpg
- File:Bom CyWorld Digital Music Awards 2009.jpg
- File:Dara DMA 2009.jpg
- File:Bom Park DMA 2009 3.jpg
- File:Bom Park DMA 2009.jpg
- File:2NE1 DMA 2009.jpg
- File:2NE1 DMA 2009 2.jpg
- File:2NE1 DMA 2009 3.jpg
- File:Yuri 2009 2.jpg
- File:Krystal 2009 4.jpg
- File:Yuri 2009.jpg
- File:Krystal 2009 3.jpg
- File:Krystal 2009.jpg
- File:Krystal 2009 2.jpg
- File:Minzy 2009 2.jpg
- File:Dara DMA 2009 2.jpg
- File:2NE1 Cy Digital Music Awards 2009.jpg
- File:Minzy 2009.jpg
- File:CL 2009.jpg
- File:Dara 2009.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 14:08, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
All of the sites pages had the Creative Commons mark at the bottom. I don't know why the website was deleted? It was working fine a couple days ago.. What about Wayback machine? i do not think it should be deleted as the website had the license and is irrevocable. Lori155 (talk) 01:57, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- The page is there. It's a Korean-language page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:29, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
[7] since the orignal source wasn't archived this was the best I could find. All of the pages on o2news.tistory.com had the identical license as in this archive. If you look on the right side there are DMA and 2ne1 tags, proving that the tistory site had the images I uploaded Lori155 (talk) 17:20, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Withdrawing above nomination sorry for not responding sooner, the site must have been down when I checked. I apologize for the trouble. Ytoyoda (talk) 21:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --ƏXPLICIT 00:58, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Looking at the source site, https://aatd.tistory.com/, does not look like the tistory account is the owner of these photographs. Looks like a mix of screenshots and 3rd party photographs.
- File:Taeyang 2009 MAMA.jpg
- File:2NE1 2009 MAMA 4.jpg
- File:2NE1 2009 MAMA 2.jpg
- File:GD Taeyang 2009 MAMA.jpg
- File:2NE1 2009 MAMA 3.jpg
- File:Dara 2009 MAMA.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 14:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:59, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Unlike the other Vogue Taiwan videos, the source video of the photos below is not released under a CC license (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55hGW69Ia5M)
- File:Choi Siwon Vogue Taiwan 2015 1.png
- File:Choi Siwon Vogue Taiwan 2015 2.png
- File:Namie Amuro Vogue Taiwan 2015 2.png
- File:Namie Amuro Vogue Taiwan 2015 3.png
- File:Namie Amuro Vogue Taiwan 2015 1.png
LX | Talk 00:52, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:35, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Not own work: football team logo (see here: https://www.facebook.com/c.c.sangregorio/) Bradipo Lento (talk) 20:09, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:02, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
I wonder if a Turkish lady is authorized to upload these Koreans' image to Flickr... What does the review bot think about it? E4024 (talk) 19:49, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Files of User:Komugupta
[edit]- File:What Is Video Marketing? Social Media & Video Marketing Benefits.jpg
- File:Bharat Biotech Warns, Don’t Forget These People “Covaxin”.jpg
- File:What Is Keyword Research And Why Is It Important For SEO?.jpg
- File:What Is Domain Authority and How to Improve Your Score.jpg
- File:Five Things to Consider When Choosing a B2B Marketing Agency.jpg
- File:Best Ways For Shop Online.jpg
The first 5 files are graphics from a blog site which has "all rights reserved" info in its terms and conditions and no evidence of a Creative Commons license. The last file is no longer at the website linked but the website has no licensing information, including any CC licenses. All probably self-promotional or advertising, where the uploader has a history of being warned about that. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Copyright infringements and spam (out of project scope). --De728631 (talk) 17:09, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Self-promo article deleted from huwiki. Not used anywhere, not needed. Bencemac (talk) 10:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:49, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Naked young boys 178.176.134.183 22:25, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- Keep That's not a reason to delete. Jafeluv (talk) 23:33, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Speedy keep Mass bad faith nomination by since-blocked anon IP - see Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User:178.176.146.22. Argument given confuses simple nudity with sexual content and per COM:SEX: "Except for images prominently featuring genitalia or sexual activity, mere partial or total nudity are generally not considered sexual content." Tabercil (talk) 02:56, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
The image depicts identifiable people. There is no proof about the consent from the boys in question. It therefore infringes their privacy. Walker99 (talk) 18:46, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - All Rights Reserved - Takabeg (talk) 18:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. The current Flickr licensing is not an issue, as the page confirms that the photo was properly licensed at the time of upload. The privacy issue is not a real problem: boys of that age, who are now 6 years older and presumably look rather different, in a third-world city of 327,000 people, are for practical purposes not identifiable. Sandstein (talk) 19:01, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. Sandstein is right, though I think it's not important to stress the city to be "third-world" or not: The boys bath openly in a public place and seem proud of it, one of them even openly smiles at the photographer, apparently they're acting in public, and it's right that after 6 years the now no longer little boys are for practical purposes not identifiable... The licence is OK, and nudity by consent isn't a crime as such. Aidas (talk) 21:08, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
- You can't argue that there is no privacy issue because it is from a "third world country" with "a lot of people". India or America, this is an infringement of privacy. Do only people from the so called first world have privacy rights? One cannot publish these nude images without consent. Walker99 (talk) 01:01, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
- This tank is not a place where people openly take photographs or openly stare at those boys. Only a paedophile would do so. Therefore we cannot say an implicit consent is given. Even though the boys may look different now, they are identifiable. Especially for people who know them. Therefore you cannot argue that this picture is okay since it is 6 years old. Aidas says "nudity by consent isn't a crime as such.". The problem is that there is no apparent consent from all the boys involved in this photograph. They are not skinny dipping in order to display their nudity. They are doing it because they don't have wet clothes. Just because one boy appears to looks in the direction of the camera, you cannot argue that they are "proud" of the nudity, or that they have given the consent. In a tank like this, no one is expected to start at a naked boy. Therefore, photography is not accepted or expected there. Walker99 (talk) 01:01, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
- Keep The picture has validity and is merely simple nakedness. Timtrent (talk) 23:16, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Moral crusading against child nudity. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 03:35, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep, essentially agree with analysis by Sandstein (talk · contribs), above. It's basically Naturism. -- Cirt (talk) 05:33, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: per Aidas. These kids are bathing in a public place, plus you can't really see anything. Mentioning paedophilia is in particular bad taste. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 14:38, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
2nd boy from right has an erection 116.240.159.164 08:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Invalid and false rationale and even if it was true not a reason to delete. Also this IP lost time to see an low resolution image of 699 × 468 and make this kind of comments is "creepy and inappropriate comment", per Sandstein comment below. Tm (talk) 14:40, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 20:49, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
2nd boy from right appears to have an erection 116.240.159.164 10:40, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- That is (a) a creepy and inappropriate comment, and (b) not a reason for deletion even if true. Sandstein (talk) 10:55, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Ivnalid and false rationale and even if it was true not a reason to delete. Also this IP lost time to see an low resolution image of 699 × 468 and make this kind of comments is "creepy and inappropriate comment", per Sandstein comment ãbove. Tm (talk) 14:40, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep the same keep arguments apply now, applied last time, and will apply in the future. Also the twin nominations should be combined please. Timtrent (talk) 13:18, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 20:49, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Persistent flickrwashing (I believe this image is under copyright). 2001:4452:11E:F200:6849:CCEC:B321:3698 14:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
KEPT. The file is reviewed so many times during last 18 years the file has been in Commons. This is vandalistic nomination and I must protect the file. Taivo (talk) 20:02, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
1871 photos are not own work. Real source is needed. Also better description than "une femme de art" is needed. In current state the photo is out of project scope due to missing educational value. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: just change the information. Ruthven (msg) 20:49, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Facebook metadata found ("FBMD..."). Uploaders of images previously published on Facebook require confirmation and verification of identity via COM:OTRS correspondence to make sure that the uploader is indeed the copyright holder of the image, and not just "grabbed from Facebook". JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:08, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:53, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
I cannot find license on source site. Copyright violation? Taivo (talk) 11:55, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Es el logotipo de una institución educativa pública que publica el logo en https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1lFTWPhdXbYIClsqR-iE0pUkeUyUN2Hma acesible desde su web libre de copyright PatriaDeTodos (talk) 12:51, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- I still do not see evidence of free license. Taivo (talk) 09:57, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Debido a que es un logo de una institución pública no tiene derechos de autor. --PatriaDeTodos (talk) 12:53, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination & wrong licence anyways. @PatriaDeTodos: Cuando encuentras donde dicen que los logotìpos de la web de la Junta está publicados con licencia CC BY-SA 4.0, puedes pedir de recuperar el fichero a Commons:Undeletion_requests. Gracias. Ruthven (msg) 20:59, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
I don't like problems. I prefer to withdraw from wikimedia Wladia drummond (talk) 12:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete reflection of the copyrighted statues of the Korean War Veterans Memorial. Will remain copyrighted until the 70th anniversary of sculptor Gaylord's death. Unless the United States copyright law is amended to include sculptures in the U.S. FOP. See also w:Freedom of panorama#United States and the relevant case Frank Gaylord v. United States (United States Postal Service) on Google searching. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:38, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:59, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unidentified person. Unused, no clear exemplar or educative value Richard Avery (talk) 13:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:59, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Gaming name for non-notable person. Unused. no educative value Richard Avery (talk) 13:31, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:59, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
An undescibed screenshot. Not used and no obvious use in this context. Richard Avery (talk) 13:33, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:00, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
An unused screenshot with poor description and no context. No obvious value Richard Avery (talk) 13:35, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:00, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
No reference to a particular fossil specimen it could be based upon + low quality Conty (talk) 14:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:00, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
No reference to a particular fossil specimen it could be based upon; inacurrate proportions; low quality. Conty (talk) 14:17, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:00, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
No reference to a particular fossil specimen it could be based upon + low quality Conty (talk) 14:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:00, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Not an "own work", not even one file uploaded by this user is an "own work" as claimed. E4024 (talk) 14:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- This user can take pictures of people playing the guitar several months after they die. I would block such a user. --E4024 (talk) 14:23, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, found readily online. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:55, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Not an "own work", not even one file uploaded by this user is an "own work" as claimed. E4024 (talk) 14:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:53, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case. Monuments and memorials are not "architectural works", so the US FOP is not applicable here. We cannot keep this image without a license from the designer of the memorial. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Delete I copied the file to Commons with my bot along with thousands of other files. The monument is located in the us and per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_States we have to delete because it is not a building. --MGA73 (talk) 13:10, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
It is well established that the 19 statues in the KWVM are under copyright and that the sculptor, Frank Gaylord enforces that copyright -- see the DR above. Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Korean War Veterans Memorial, and the warning at Category:Korean War Veterans Memorial. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:31, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
No FOP for sculptures in the USA. The statues are the main subject. 67.84.96.111 00:34, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
While a "reflection", the copyrighted statues by Frank Gaylord is still visible here. Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Korean War Veterans Memorial. Violation of the recently-deceased sculptor's copyright. Also, as this filename has been reused more than three times (see also eponymous images at the batch DR), this name needs to be locked (w:WP:SALT) until the 70th anniversary of Gaylord's death (which means this sculptural work finally falls into public domain). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Non-free image that has uploaded several times without processing COM:UNDEL, suggest to white-paper protect it. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:59, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Not made by the uploader Overcast07 (talk) 19:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment As per COM:FAIRUSE, fair use is not accepted on Commons. --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 16:07, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 14:09, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by SeeTheSeer as Speedy (Db-author). Older than 7 days. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Hello! I am the author and would like this file removed, as the project for which it served its purpose has been abandoned (Wikipedia article draft was declined and deleted). Thank you! SeeTheSeer (talk) 10:13, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:00, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by SeeTheSeer as Speedy (Db-author). Older than 7 days. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Hello! I am the author and would like this file removed, as the project for which it served its purpose has been abandoned (Wikipedia article draft was declined and deleted). Thank you! SeeTheSeer (talk) 10:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:00, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE Mormegil (talk) 09:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Probably this boy. Seems not to be notable. 22. listopadu 2014 v soutěži jednotlivců na gymnastickém Přeboru ČR v povinných sestavách získal v kategorii do 11 let "republikový bronz". [8]--ŠJů (talk) 23:59, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:00, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 14:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:06, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
アップロードミス Fluorite44 (talk) 14:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:59, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
アップロードミス Fluorite44 (talk) 14:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:59, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
アップロードミス Fluorite44 (talk) 14:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:59, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope material. Glorious 93 (talk) 14:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep Logo with OTRS clearance and image, that with 30 seconds of search, can be seen to be clearly in scope mater of en:ARCA Midwest Tour, en:Dells Raceway Park and en:2009 ASA Midwest Tour season. Tm (talk) 14:43, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep Images don't have to be in use to be in the project scope, and Tm has explained why this one should be kept. De728631 (talk) 18:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --ƏXPLICIT 12:02, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 14:52, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:06, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 15:10, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:07, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 15:37, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:06, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 15:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:07, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 15:48, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:07, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 15:49, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:07, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 15:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:06, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 15:51, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:06, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 15:52, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:07, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 15:52, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:07, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 15:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:07, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 15:59, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:07, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 15:59, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:07, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 16:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:06, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:07, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 16:07, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:07, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ARG International (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Thunderjet motor.jpg
- File:Thunderjet brass wheels.jpg
- File:Xtraction.jpg
- File:Tuff One reproduction.jpg
- File:Johnny Lightning Camaro 2.jpg
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:01, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Imagem de sem autorização de uso Lokal333 (talk) 00:23, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Uso sem autorização Caroline ilhabela (talk) 00:34, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
uso sem autorização Caroline ilhabela (talk) 00:36, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
uso sem autorização Caroline ilhabela (talk) 00:45, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Uso indevido da imagem Caroline ilhabela (talk) 00:47, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Who uploaded it? --E4024 (talk) 02:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
preciso que elimine este ficheiro Caroline ilhabela (talk) 00:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- We also have File:Miniatura de Maria Perpétua Calafate de Souza.jpg, but this one looks better. E4024 (talk) 00:20, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, still no acceptable source and no author. Taivo (talk) 07:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
1111.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
1111.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Probably, not own work. Very similar images can be found on the web. e.g. https://projectscot.com/2020/05/plan-unveiled-for-low-carbon-development-in-dunbar/ Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
1111.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, license review failed (all rights reserved). This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 07:57, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
1111.jpg){kind=link}
2020.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2020.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope, non-existent currency design of the Philippine peso (Self-created artwork without obvious educational use.) PyroFloe (talk) 01:10, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
2020.png){kind=link}
Deleted, nobody protested. Taivo (talk) 07:59, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
2020.png){kind=link}
_PH_Money_2020.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_PH_Money_2020.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope, non-existent currency design for the Philippine peso (Self-created artwork without obvious educational use.) PyroFloe (talk) 01:09, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
_PH_Money_2020.png){kind=link}
Deleted, nobody protested. Taivo (talk) 08:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
_PH_Money_2020.png){kind=link}
2020.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2020.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope, non-existent currency design of the Philippine peso (Self-created artwork without obvious educational use.) PyroFloe (talk) 01:10, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
2020.png){kind=link}
Deleted, nobody protested. Taivo (talk) 08:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
2020.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong license, COM:CSD 36.72.216.177 02:21, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, the icon is very simple and free from copyright. Deleted as out of project scope: Lama Google is not mentioned in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 08:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Non-free icon 36.72.216.177 02:26, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, the icon is very simple and free from copyright. Deleted as out of project scope: Baru Google is not mentioned in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 08:08, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
non-free icon 36.72.216.177 02:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, the icon is very simple and free from copyright. Deleted as out of project scope: Lama Google is not mentioned in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 08:10, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by GuillaumeG as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: COM:PEOPLE AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:12, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- It is a picture of an identifiable person with the comment "she suffers from depression". GuillaumeG (talk) 14:47, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete all contributions of John Ndirangu Thagana (talk · contribs) as copyright violations. Small photos without metadata. All descriptions can be described as insults. Depicted people are unidentified, probably non-notable. Taivo (talk) 08:20, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by SeeTheSeer as Speedy (Db-author). Older than 7 days. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Hello! I am the author and would like this file removed, as the project for which it served its purpose has been abandoned (Wikipedia article draft was declined and deleted). Thank you! SeeTheSeer (talk) 10:12, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, depicted person is non-notable, en:Draft:Laurențiu Marga was deleted. Taivo (talk) 08:31, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
I did not base this skull drawing on a single specimen (and the primary specimen I used are now classified as Cosmoceratops) Conty (talk) 03:34, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept, but the file is still used. Taivo (talk) 08:35, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Está a interromper outras oerações Onelli Barras (talk) 05:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 08:52, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yuraily Lic as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: not own work. The same images can be found on the web. https://www.google.com/searchbyimage?image_url=https%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2Fd%2Fd7%2FShahram_Kabiri.png — Racconish 💬 06:37, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:59, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
obviously misspelled, see German Wiktionary:Junggesellen (with double-'g'), renaming isn't needed because filename with double-'g' allready exists, hear: . Jeuwre (talk) 07:51, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, on 28th of March by Reinhard Kraasch. Taivo (talk) 09:51, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely Own work, small resolution and non-original metadata.--Hashmat56 (talk) 08:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:53, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Person on the photo died in 2004, so author could't take a photo of this person in 2012 7elteven (talk) 08:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is uploading date. Taivo (talk) 09:54, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement 94.45.0.106 08:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
I represent interests of Alexey Lebedinsky, the person who's depicted on this image, and who has an exclusive right of using this image anywhere. Bondesign (talk) 20:34, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is strange. Normally copyright belongs to photographer, not to depicted person. For restoring the photo OTRS-permission from copyright holder (Alexey Lebedinsky?) is needed with documents, which show copyright transfer from photographer to current copyright holder. If such documents do not exist, then OTRS-permission from photographer is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:08, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement 94.45.0.106 08:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
I represent interests of Alexey Lebedinsky, the person who's depicted on this image, and who has an exclusive right of using this image anywhere. Bondesign (talk) 20:33, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is strange. Normally copyright belongs to photographer, not to depicted person. For restoring the photo OTRS-permission from copyright holder (Alexey Lebedinsky?) is needed with documents, which show copyright transfer from photographer to current copyright holder. If such documents do not exist, then OTRS-permission from photographer is needed. I'll delete file:Lebedinsky performing.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 10:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Hardly own work by uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:32, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- An identical version found here. Maybe a governmental work (see {{PD-IDGov}}),
butand the official website of Medan's municipal governmentsaid otherwisecontained a banner with the image without background - the person depicted is the vice mayor of Medan.--Spring Roll Conan ( Talk · Contributions ) 14:31, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata. PD-IDGov does not apply for vice mayors. Taivo (talk) 10:35, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hashmat56 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: [9] (کپی رایت 2021, کلیه حقوق برای روزنامه 8صبح محفوظ است) Copyright 2021, All rights reserved for 8am.af
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as image is very likely in the public domain due to age. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, we have no correct license (CC is wrong), we have no correct author (Alfred Grey is depicted person and likely not photographer), we have no publication data, we have even no source country. Taivo (talk) 10:51, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Impossible to be own work by user:Robinkral from 2021-02-27, because it displays a situtation from 2015. The image was published many times, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/afp/article-3167769/Senegal-puts-ex-Chad-dictator-trial-atrocities.html states ©Seyllou (AFP) as the author. ŠJů (talk) 09:49, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:54, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, low quality Askeuhd (talk) 10:07, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:03, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Facebook metadata found ("FBMD..."). Uploaders of images previously published on Facebook require confirmation and verification of identity via COM:OTRS correspondence to make sure that the uploader is indeed the copyright holder of the image, and not just "grabbed from Facebook". JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:08, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:05, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope - images of children who may not have consented to the publication of this image Askeuhd (talk) 10:12, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Chris Jamnaj (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in nl.wiki and uploading some personal files, which are used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:20, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. TinEye detected a use of the very same image at https://www.pinoyexchange.com/discussion/665207/gma-films-basement-starring-gma-artists-centers-artists/p3 (though dated a year after its upload here), with the exact, larger (uncropped) image at https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bf4T9a5CcAEA1tG.jpg. Another one is found at https://www.pep.ph/celeb/gift-guide/29244/pep-gift-guide-day-17-chynna-ortalezas-new-favorite-iced-tea-drink (image: http://contents.pep.ph/images2/writeups/23ead9bd6.jpg), which in the TinEye preview shows the "uncropped portions" at the left and right sides. Most likely this image was taken from the social media accounts of the actress. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:33, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 10:52, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Further investigation suggests it to be a vanity pic, thus out of scope for Commons. Timtrent (talk) 12:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
The file name seems to imply this image comes from an advertisement. Doubtful "own work" claim as a result. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:50, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
No proof that this is uploader photo, but "Arktisk Institut". Matlin (talk) 11:39, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, free in source country Denmark due to age, but copyrighted in USA until 2053 due to URAA. Taivo (talk) 11:59, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works of copyrighted movie posters. MKFI (talk) 13:22, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:03, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope material. Glorious 93 (talk) 13:46, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Why would sporting logos be out of scope? Has valid OTRS ticket, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:26, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, per en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extreme Kayak Fishing the organization is non-notable. Taivo (talk) 12:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Unidentified person, no exemplar or educative value. Richard Avery (talk) 13:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Has an article and a cat. --E4024 (talk) 14:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata. No article, no cat, no dog. Taivo (talk) 12:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
No reference to a particular fossil specimen it could be based upon + low quality Conty (talk) 14:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request, unused, courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 12:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Not based on any genus. It should be. Conty (talk) 05:21, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- Keep I suppose that reason amounts to "out of scope", but it is used on a wiki, which by definition makes it within scope. So whatever we think of its quality etc, keep. --Tony Wills (talk) 07:46, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Sorry, the reason for the request in not really understandable. As the image is used, it is kept. -- Cecil (talk) 20:22, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
No reference to a particular fossil specimen it could be based upon + low quality Conty (talk) 14:21, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept. It is still used and per COM:INUSE in our project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:22, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
I have recently uploaded a new, updated version of this restoration. Therefore, this version can be removed Conty (talk) 14:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept, per COM:INUSE. Taivo (talk) 12:28, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
I have recently uploaded a new, updated version of this restoration. Therefore, this version can be removed Conty (talk) 14:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept, per COM:INUSE. Taivo (talk) 12:31, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Author is given as the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency, not the uploader ~★ nmaia d 14:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope material. Glorious 93 (talk) 14:37, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 12:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
アップロードミス Fluorite44 (talk) 14:47, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
アップロードミス Fluorite44 (talk) 14:48, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:47, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Video was removed from YouTube, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 14:55, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, that's why we have license review system. Taivo (talk) 12:53, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
COM:EDUSE, just picture of private certificate, dublicate of deleted file File:2017 рік - Роман Матис "Нагорода "За створення сприятливого інвестиційного клімату на Львівщині".jpg Renvoy (talk) 15:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, the file is used and consequently has educational value. Deleted as copyright violation: small photo without metadata, own work is unlikely. Taivo (talk) 12:59, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
COM:EDUSE, just picture of private certificate, dublicate of deleted file File:2016 рік - Премія "Люди Львова. Золотий Лев 2016" Номінація "Інвестиційний прорив Львівщини".jpg Renvoy (talk) 15:07, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, the file is used and consequently has educational value. Deleted as copyright violation: small photo without metadata, own work is unlikely. Taivo (talk) 12:57, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept, now used. Too simple for copyright. Taivo (talk) 13:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
an 1980s-dated logo, not a free or CreativeCommons-licensed file — danyele 19:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 13:08, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 15:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete all contributions of Popeson (talk · contribs) as copyvios. Taivo (talk) 09:05, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Roy Cooper
[edit]An uncropped version of the file was published at https://salisburypost.com/2015/10/23/patrick-gannon-family-matters-in-race-for-nc-governor/ prior to the stated date on the file. Previously published files require COM:OTRS verification.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ytoyoda (talk) 15:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:22, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope material. Glorious 93 (talk) 15:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, per en:Draft:Osh-Tekk Warriors the subject is non-notable. Taivo (talk) 09:33, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with "Disney Channel Canada" which led to deletion of other files from that outlet. This is a screen shot from a TV series. Corus Entertainment d.b.a. Disney Channel Canada who owns the YouTube channel the file came from and who gave the free-use release is not a licensing agent of the Walt Disney Company, the actual copyright holder, and is a Canadian company that is not a part of Disney. See Commons:License laundering - this is a case of that. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Also see Special:Search/"Disney Channel Canada" with
- File:Olivia Bizaardvark Spring Break Video.png
- File:Olivia Bizaardvark Spring Break Video 3.png
- File:Olivia Bizaardvark Spring Break Video 2.png
- which also should be deleted for same reason. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:36, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
From my comments on the previous discussion - Note that Disney Channel Canada is not a part of Disney, it is owned by Corus Entertainment who licenses some Disney content and the Disney name for use in Canada. See W:Disney Channel (Canadian TV channel). Corus will not have the authority to release Disney content to free-use, only The Walt Disney Company can legally do that, and there is no way in hell that would ever happen. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:57, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, per detailed explanation by Geraldo Perez. Taivo (talk) 09:41, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from photo. Should be blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:48, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work of a wax figure of a copyrighted character. See COM:CHARACTER. Missing permission from the DC Comics in licensing this image of their character under commercial license. No applicable FOP too. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:37, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:49, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Highly unlikely to be own work. Most probably taken from elsewhere.
Converted to regular DR, as rationale is a bit weak. I found no external hits. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:40, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, unused photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:52, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the user's only upload. Taivo (talk) 09:53, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:55, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright banknote of Mexico. Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 15:49, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, surprisingly bad quality anyway. Taivo (talk) 09:56, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
copyrighted and not free svg Gatto bianco (talk) 15:51, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Based on information gathered from their homepage, it appears that the country of origin of this logo is Italy. It should be tagged as PD-textlogo (and probably Trademarked) instead of CC0 as the threshold of originality in Italy is quite high in Italy. For example, File:Logo_of_AC_Milan.svg and File:Inter_Old_Logo_(2007-2014).svg were quite complex logos that were deemed acceptable. See COM:CRT/Italy#Threshold_of_originality for more information. --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 16:09, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Keep, change license to PD-textlogo and Trademarked. See my comment above. --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 16:10, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- "Change to" or "add"? Do you disagree with the CC0 declaration for the .svg code? -- Asclepias (talk) 01:56, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- There can be a CC0 declaration for the SVG code if the author wishes, but if we make the argument that the logo itself is insufficiently original to be eligible for copyright protection, it does not make sense to "license" the SVG code under CC0 (which would imply that the logo would be eligible for copyright protection). --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 12:56, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- I see your point. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:53, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- There can be a CC0 declaration for the SVG code if the author wishes, but if we make the argument that the logo itself is insufficiently original to be eligible for copyright protection, it does not make sense to "license" the SVG code under CC0 (which would imply that the logo would be eligible for copyright protection). --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 12:56, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is not a simple logo, despite high threshold of Italy. Source site is all rights reserved. Taivo (talk) 10:06, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the user's only upload. Taivo (talk) 10:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:12, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:13, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:14, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:16, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Photo is credited to a photographer named Ryan Jerome according to this Inlove Magazine article. Howhontanozaz (talk) 08:07, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 17:33, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The owner of this image wants it to be deleted. Enciclopedia1993 (talk) 16:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Keep, INUSE and CC licenses are irrevocable. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Wcam as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7|special:diff/537969423 AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- The uploader said on my TP that "must be deleted because copyright doesn't belong to me. I had exactly the same problem with other images and they were deleted without any problem. The image was not taken by me and I don't have the copyright. It's very simple. The real owner of that image wants it to be deleted (I uploaded it to wikimedia without permission)"
- Please post here in future @Enciclopedia1993: Gbawden (talk) 06:21, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
may be re-post deleted file (see:Commons:Deletion requests/File:ポートフォリオ.jpg) Netora (talk) 07:10, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: not a re-upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:32, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Cropped duplicate of File:RN242-0240-JPVL.jpg. Savhñ 09:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep this version is better (slight rotation and more centered on the subject) --A1AA1A (talk) 13:22, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Source link of original file is dead. The file was uploaded 9 years ago and the license was never reviewed. That way I cannot be sure, that the file was ever published on source site under free license. Taivo (talk) 10:31, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:Taivo. Moreover the source (ferropedia.es) was a wiki, so that could not have been the original source of this image. Unknown original author and copyright status. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:38, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
unused draw, out of scope, no educational purpose Pippobuono (talk) 16:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:34, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:23, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Middle-profile Moth (talk · contribs)
[edit]Professional photography. OTRS permission required.
Wcam (talk) 16:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion (not found elsewhere using Google Images). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:42, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- @P199: With all due respect, professional photo is a valid reason for deletion (see [10] [11]) as it amounts to significant doubt about the freedom of the file. --Wcam (talk) 17:11, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Wcam: I disagree, including with the decision of those DR's. Just vaguely claiming "Professional photography" should never be a deletion reason (in fact there are many great photographers contributing to Commons with professional quality images). Moreover, with such a huge backlog of DR's, please lighten our load by providing more evidence. As per COM:DR: "Please give reasons for your opinion, preferably based on your knowledge of..." etc. In this case, I even bothered to check Google Images, and not found. Of course, this doesn't stop anyone from starting a new DR if new evidence has been found. Thanks. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:17, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
![[10]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:27_photo_superbeaver1-e1462101911470.jpg){kind=link}
![[11]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Maleek_Berry_Professional.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- I agree, probable copyright violation. Dr. Coal (talk) 07:17, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, taken from FB as per EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:42, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:43, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
low defintion book cover, too small to be of educational use. Richard Avery (talk) 16:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:43, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
This is most likely not Bruce Johnson or the "White On Black" CD cover. I think it is an unused private image, with no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 16:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:44, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Uses https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ComputerAnimatedHand.png a fair use image. No fair use on Commons. (could be moved to en-wiki) Jahobr (talk) 17:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:45, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F4, License review NOT passed: Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: Google search.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as I couldn't find any valid Google-hit for this image. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:38, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- The available Google-hits are for a different photo from nearly the same point[12][13]. --Túrelio (talk) 08:40, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
![[12]](https://assets.eberhardt-travel.de/2019/Argentinien/72207_Fahrtimpressionen_vom_Zug_in_die_Wolken_La_Polvorilla-Viadukt_original.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep per nom. Image also has complete EXIF data and is in high resolution, so I don't see any reason to doubt that the uploader is the photographer of this file. --pandakekok9 09:03, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, sorry, they looked so similar. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:06, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --Achim (talk) 20:04, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as «no license» (No license since) because this user (unlogged and/or through a sock puppet) vandalized their own filepage info. It should be kept, as discussed in previous and related DRs. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Info: The nonsense goes on: I just noticed that File:Tren a las Nubes, República Argentina.jpg is a duplicate of this one, although with a considerable filesize difference. Anyone to take on the task of which is better suited for deletion per {{Duplicate}}? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- The dupl. is in Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list… Not sure if that’s legit, after all this user had their sockpuppet award themself an Admin barnstar… -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:42, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Info (sigh): And here’s another duplicate: File:Tren de Las Nubes.jpg. Easy to decide for its deletion per {{Duplicate}} though, as this version of the photo has no EXIF. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per above. Do we really need to let EduWiki keep torturing us like this? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:02, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- If only he’d hire Pricasso to paint a portrait of Larry Sanger… -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 05:47, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:50, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation of Amico Controller; no proof that it falls under the Creative Commons; see Commons:Licensing Yoshiman6464 (talk) 17:30, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:53, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
An unused, undescribed and unidentified timetable. Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 17:31, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:53, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
undescribed, unexplained image. No educative or exemplar value Richard Avery (talk) 17:33, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: The image appears to be an image used to vandalize the "DJ Hero" Wikipedia page, seen here. The description of the image was "A black turntable with three buttons on the rotating deck residing in its natural habitat". Yoshiman6464 (talk) 17:37, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No encyclopedic use; used for vandalism. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 12:26, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:53, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Exact image from Google Earth. location=23.393890° 113.299187° image version=2017-02-06 --Baycrest (Talk) 17:44, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Nobody is going to believe you unless you provide a link to the Google map. Eti15TrSf (talk) 04:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:56, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Exact image from Google Earth. location=40.068613° 116.605273° image version=2017-05-23 --Baycrest (Talk) 17:48, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Nobody is going to believe you unless you provide a link to the google map. Provide a link please. Eti15TrSf (talk) 04:03, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:56, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Exact image from Google Earth. location=37.464634° 126.438859° image version=2017-06-02 --Baycrest (Talk) 17:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Nobody is going to believe you unless you provide a link to the Google Map. Please provide a link. Eti15TrSf (talk) 04:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:56, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
it's a duplicate and the original has been uploaded. Dionysio.Calucci (talk) 09:38, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:12, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Provenant de la page Facebook Renault Phildelo (talk) 18:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload (and duplicate of File:Renault 2021.svg). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:16, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
unused, unknown notability, unclear authorship, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 18:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:09, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Authorship by User:Sannhetsministeriet88 uncertain or doubtful. Logo is above threshold of originality and does not sort under fair use. Asav | Talk 18:54, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- This is the original Alliansen-logo, and I do have the right to use it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sannhetsministeriet88 (talk • contribs) 21:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- We need some sort of written proof that you are authorized to release this image under a creative commons share alike license. Alternatively the logo itself can be marked as released as CC-BY-SA 4.0 on the organization's website. Asav | Talk 15:10, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Undelete if ever OTRS has been received. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:16, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
This file was uploaded by accident. I want to delete it. DAVAIFERAI (talk) 18:59, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:10, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright 188.120.85.130 00:25, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Detstoreb: Have you nominated this photo for deletion and why? Thuresson (talk) 21:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close: already deleted by JuTa. --Gestumblindi (talk) 17:36, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright Detstoreb (talk) 19:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: 12:48, 28 March 2021, by JuTa. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:10, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
FBMD at MD. (i.e. Taken from Facebook) When I see someone's all uploads are copyvio or OoS I generally -"generally", not always- open DRs one by one to give time to the uploader to react and find PD pics or take own photos to replace those that are going to be deleted. FYI . E4024 (talk) 15:01, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Taken from Facebook. (I cannot remember if it is the same previously-deleted file.) I am still not sure if we delete all FB files, because I remember having seen one or two DRs that closed as keep, without the corresponding OTRS permissions.
OTOH, please also see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Erica Nicoli 04.jpg. E4024 (talk) 19:05, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, yes previously deleted. Not the same as 04. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:19, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused and implausible, or broken redirects. Also, This file has same file. Türk Süvarisi (talk) 08:21, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. Fry1989 eh? 19:03, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I mentioned reasons are still valid. Türk Süvarisi (talk) 09:16, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion. russavia (talk) 04:03, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
unused file Jelican9 (talk) 19:07, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: low-res, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:19, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: google search Nathan2055talk - contribs 19:09, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. The only hits on Google Images are wikimedia projects. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:26, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Any Information about place R.B.Bayramli (talk) 19:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:26, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure that this picture is copyrighted or it has a wrong license. This picture got deleted last week but couple days after that it got reuploaded. Vacant0 (talk) 19:36, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no free license at source website. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:28, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be from https://www.benjaminkrohn.de/produkte.html Ytoyoda (talk) 19:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:30, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Mesa redonda sobre los trabajos en la fosa común realizados en el cementerio de San José (40734494144).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Commons doesn't allow fair use content and most of the book covers are copyrighted. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 20:34, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:30, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
In description you can read that it's a photo on a shirt. Therefore it most likely is copyrighted — Dudek1337 (talk) 20:43, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:31, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
In description you can read that it's a photo on a shirt. Therefore it most likely is copyrighted — Dudek1337 (talk) 20:44, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:31, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
The question is whether Rasender reporter01 had the permission to upload this photo to Commons under a free CC license. The EXIF data indicates that it is an official photo of the TV network SWR. Incidentally, there is no evidence for a CC license there in the EXF info. Mosbatho (talk) 20:44, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:32, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyrighted materials. not own work by uploader — Dudek1337 (talk) 20:45, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:32, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Both images were found uploaded elsewhere at https://www.yelp.ca/biz_photos/il-giardino-italiano-vancouver?userid=fnkjdhvRC20zWUjB-fwMvA and the versions uploaded to Commons do not have any EXIF data. This makes it unlikely that the uploader is the original photographer.
Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:34, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Uploader is apparently the subject of the images. Photographer unknown. OTRS permission needed.
MKFI (talk) 20:54, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:33, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Publicity photograph, lower resolution versions are available in the web. I suspect it's taken from https://www.itsmrkristopher.com/ but I was unable to find it on the current page. MKFI (talk) 21:03, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:35, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Jcornelius (talk) 21:05, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:35, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
English description is not properly filled out Patrick799 =) (talk) 21:08, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Work includes material may be protected as a trademark Patrick799 =) (talk) 21:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, below TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Uploader does not state enough information Patrick799 =) (talk) 21:22, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Taking someone elses work from another website is still obeying the creative commons attribution-sharealike 3.0 license but the website this is derived from is copyrighted. Patrick799 =) (talk) 19:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
{{Delete}} just get rid of the file its been 2 weeks since nominated for deletion Patrick799 =) (talk) 13:15, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete, Image from copyrighted Roblox game Adopt Me! by DreamCraft! — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:47, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: 11:04, 15 March 2021, by EugeneZelenko. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:37, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 126.247.131.112 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This file was not CC. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:26, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 11:02, 19 Mai 2021 UTC: No permission since 11 May 2021 --Krdbot 13:39, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Johannes Schreiter
[edit]The artist is still alive, there is no FOP because the photos were taken inside German churches, and the images are not de minimis because they focus on the artistic glass windows.
Rosenzweig τ 19:33, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
NB: I uploaded a cropped version of File:Limburg-Dom4.JPG showing the statue, see File:Limburg-Dom Statue Madonna and Child.jpg.--Havang(nl) (talk) 11:57, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- That one should probably be
OK, as the statue seems to be quite old enough and the window is de minimis in this crop IMO. --Rosenzweig τ 12:19, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- But they're looking pretty simple for Germany--Sanandros (talk) 23:30, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- What do you mean by that? --Rosenzweig τ 23:37, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- It seems for me to be more handcraft rather than art.--Sanandros (talk) 08:09, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think so, I don't have any doubt that this is fine art. --Rosenzweig τ 10:18, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- I don't c that, where is the complexity? To order some colors to one of two sides and cut some round shape is too easy.--Sanandros (talk) 13:19, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think so, I don't have any doubt that this is fine art. --Rosenzweig τ 10:18, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- It seems for me to be more handcraft rather than art.--Sanandros (talk) 08:09, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- What do you mean by that? --Rosenzweig τ 23:37, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- But they're looking pretty simple for Germany--Sanandros (talk) 23:30, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- In the case of fine art that doesn't matter, fine art is not applied art (where it would matter). The Red square by Malevich is also quite simple, but still fine art. --Rosenzweig τ 13:26, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- And it's copyrighed?--Sanandros (talk) 13:40, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- In the case of fine art that doesn't matter, fine art is not applied art (where it would matter). The Red square by Malevich is also quite simple, but still fine art. --Rosenzweig τ 13:26, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- Not any more, since Malevich (Category:Kazimir Malevich) died in 1935 and the painting is from 1915, but until a few years ago, it was. --Rosenzweig τ 15:42, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- And who said that?--Sanandros (talk) 16:14, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- Not any more, since Malevich (Category:Kazimir Malevich) died in 1935 and the painting is from 1915, but until a few years ago, it was. --Rosenzweig τ 15:42, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- I just said so. But if you don't want to believe me, I can't stop you. --Rosenzweig τ 16:36, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- Is there no legel comparison like the walking eye?--Sanandros (talk) 17:33, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- I just said so. But if you don't want to believe me, I can't stop you. --Rosenzweig τ 16:36, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- de:Schöpfungshöhe#Schöpfungshöhe unterschiedlicher Werkarten and de:Kleine Münze (in German law). Also de:Schöpfungshöhe#Besondere Fälle. --Rosenzweig τ 17:43, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- Kleine Münze gives us only the walking eye as example. And windows are not part of architecure.--Sanandros (talk) 18:46, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- de:Schöpfungshöhe#Schöpfungshöhe unterschiedlicher Werkarten and de:Kleine Münze (in German law). Also de:Schöpfungshöhe#Besondere Fälle. --Rosenzweig τ 17:43, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
I sent an e-Mail to someone who is possibly able to gain permission from the author. -- Rillke(q?) 22:07, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thx, und ist es beabsichtigt dass du nur deine Zeit angibst?--Sanandros (talk) 20:55, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
- Nein. Das war es nicht. Bis heute ist leider keine weitere Antwort eingetroffen. Ich werde einmal nachhaken. -- Rillke(q?) 22:07, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons FASTILY (TALK) 03:38, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:Johannes Schreiter
[edit]copyright violation; works by living artist; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Johannes Schreiter- Glasbild.jpg
- File:Kitzingen Katholische Pfarrkirche St. Johannes der Täufer 07.jpg
- File:Mainzer Dom Schreiterfenster 3.jpg
- File:Marienaltar -im-Chor-der-Marienkirche.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:03, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 17:04, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Johannes Schreiter
[edit]copyright violation; works by living artist; no freedom of panorama.
- File:EvangelischeKircheGonsenheim SchreiterfensterNordseite 20200227.jpg
- File:EvangelischeKircheGonsenheim SchreiterfensterSüdseite 20200227.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:33, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 17:04, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Johannes Schreiter
[edit]copyrigth violation; stained glass windows by living artist, no freedom of panorama.
- File:Hofen Kirche Schreiter-Fenster 1.JPG
- File:Langen Maria vom Frieden innen.jpg
- File:Medenbach, Autobahnkirche (03).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 11:27, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ja, da hast Du unzweifelhaft recht. Allerdings: Das Maria-vom-Frieden-Bild würde ich behalten, da ist doch quasi nichts davon zu sehen. Gruß, --Subbass1 (talk) 11:37, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Also deleted the Maria vom Frieden image because that building is a work by architect Johannes Kepser (born 1935, apparently alive). --Rosenzweig τ 15:51, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Barry Taylor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Suspected copyright violations: a movie poster, image with a large "stock photo" watermark and File:Monty Scott photo.jpg is uploaded as own work yet marked "Taken by Shawn McPherson".
- File:Apocalypse Pooh poster.jpg
- File:Monty Scott photo.jpg
- File:Todd Graham - Bustin' Loose cover.jpg
MKFI (talk) 13:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- (The following is copied from the talk page:)
- I am the owner of the Monty Scott Photo and Bustin' Loose album cover. I absolutely own all rights to both photos throughout the universe in perpetuity. The photo of Monty Scott was taken by Shawn McPherson which is why we gave him credit however Shawn McPherson has no ownership of the image. We can remove the photo credit if it is an issue with Wikipedia. I run Comedy Records which owns the rights to the Bustin' Loose album cover throughout the universe in perpetuity and has the right to publish. Any documentation required as evidence can be provided upon request. Please do not delete the images. I can provide any signed documentation needed to validate these claims. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barry Taylor (talk • contribs) 15:09, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Barry Taylor: , please send ownership documentation via OTRS. You can use the Commons:Wikimedia OTRS release generator. MKFI (talk) 18:43, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
MKFI (talk) 13:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)What form of documentation will safice for this matter? Please provide examples and will upload — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barry Taylor (talk • contribs) 13:56, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
On hold OTRS ticket being processed: [14] MKFI (talk) 12:44, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Ticket:2021033010008177 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 10:00, 3 April 2021 (UTC)- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Monty Scott photo.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2021033010008177. --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:22, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Todd Graham - Bustin' Loose cover.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2021033010008177. --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:23, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Monty Scott photo.jpg” under ticket:2021033010008177. --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:33, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- For File:Monty Scott photo.jpg, there is a handsigned valid release note from the photographer attached to the ticket. Hence we should keep that one. I made the necessary changes.
- For * File:Todd Graham - Bustin' Loose cover.jpg, there are also handsigned release notes attached to the ticket. However, we should not accept photos with a huge stock photo watermark.
- File:Apocalypse Pooh poster.jpg is not mentioned in Ticket:2021033010008177.
- --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:42, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Todd Graham - Bustin' Loose cover.jpg” under ticket:2021033010008177. --Mussklprozz (talk) 19:51, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per VRT permission. Deleted file Apocalypse Pooh poster.jpg. Ruthven (msg) 15:31, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
false authorship declaration: real author is a Soviet/Russian painter w:ru:Дешалыт, Ефим Исаакович (1921-1996) but not a photographer of his painting. Painting was finished in 1970, its author died in 1996 so painting is copyrighted in Russia, original painting is in Lenin's Memorial Museum in Ulyanovsk city (Russia) w:ru:Ульяновский музей-мемориал В. И. Ленина Bogomolov.PL (talk) 15:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:07, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Low res, higher resolution found at [15][16], indicating that this photo is probably not owned by uploader. --Baycrest (Talk) 18:05, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
![[16]](http://airasiavietnam.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Ve-may-bay-gia-re-di-TruongSaHoNam-1.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; stained glass windows are works from 1952; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:34, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; shows contemporary artwork; no freedom of panorama Martin Sg. (talk) 19:59, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Why deletion? Do you want to delete all photographic interior views of churches in the entire Wikimedia? Gruenschuh (talk) 11:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - We delete files that infringe on the rights of the creators of the art. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:10, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Eberhard Linke
[edit]Copyright violation; showing works by living artist; no freedom of panorama.
Martin Sg. (talk) 20:26, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:10, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Mariano Alejandro luna
[edit]
COPYVIO. These photos are from Gaceta Marinera site, thus, they are not avaible for upload. --Malvinero10 (talk) 16:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Malvinero10: could you provide a link to the page on that site where these photos can be found? -M.nelson (talk) 22:38, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The uploader wrote "Autor desconocido" Author unknown, so possibly copyrighted and deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 11:38, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dovno as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo of a political youth organization. Reuploaded after it was already deleted for the copyvio. PD in the US, likely below COM:TOO Israel AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- I guess that's a judgement call. Most of the logo is indeed just letters so likely below the threshold of originality. But one prominent graphical element in the logo is a uniquely stylized combination of one of the letters with a waving flag, which to me seems to indicate application of creativity. Dovno (talk) 22:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The documentation about COM:TOO Israel is rather vague. I think the discussion should be held broader. There are many logo's in Category:Logos in Hebrew which show some form of creativity. Template:Re:Dovno perhaps you can start a broader discussion about this to change the policy page about TOO. --Ellywa (talk) 11:41, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Violetbonmua as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: PD in Vietnam, not PD in US AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- This person was born in 1919. The year this picture was taken in Vietnam is unknown but it must be around 1937 (18 year old) or later.
- According to the Vietnamese Law on Intellectual Property (Law No. 50/2005/QH11; See translation): for photographic work: "fifty years as from the date of its first publication". => PD in Vietnam after (1937 + 50) = 1987 or later.
- According to en:Template:PD-US: "Works published outside the U.S. between 1926 and 1977 which were in the public domain in their home countries on January 1, 1996."
- So after checking again, I think I made a wrong conclusion on this case (small issue is that the published year is also unknown). ~ Ultraviolet (talk2me) ~ 16:55, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: The publication date of this image is not known. Therefore it is not proven this image is in PD in Vietnam. The image can be undeleted safely 120 years after the image was taken, which will be 1937+120=2058.. --Ellywa (talk) 09:30, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded this artwork as {{PD-Art|PD-UKGov}} as it appeared to be done by the artist in his capacity as a British military officer. A new editor edited the page, removing the source(!) and claiming to be the copyright holder. If his claim is correct, the image should be deleted (or he could prove it and grant a licence); if not, his edit should be reverted. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:59, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: If the one-time editor is a copyright holder of this image - which is contested because it was made by a British military officer at the time - , he could write to VRT to prove his rights, or to the legal department of the Wikimedia Foundation. --Ellywa (talk) 09:36, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:37, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- DeleteNo free FOP in Denmark as per COM:FOP Denmark.廣九直通車 (talk) 04:12, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Respectfully, COM:FOP Denmark specifies no restrictions on buildings, only people. I took this image and there are no people in it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark Renier (talk • contribs) 09:21, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Peter Schannong died in 1950, so it should be free, unless some of his heirs subsequently got the rights. TherasTaneel (talk) 16:26, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- @TherasTaneel and Mark Renier: URAA might be another problem for Commons to keep, when this thing was "published"? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:48, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Not sure - there is, or were at least, a similar one from the mid 1930s at Søkvæsthuset (where the license is stated as CC BY, likely by Museum of Copenhagen, as it seems to be from their collection). Perhaps someone else knows about the one at Bakkehuset in particular. TherasTaneel (talk) 11:28, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- The image in the external link appears to be the same one that I took a photo of. Mark Renier (talk) 10:40, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- Yep, I guess they just moved it or made a similar one, either way should still be free. TherasTaneel (talk) 17:40, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- The image in the external link appears to be the same one that I took a photo of. Mark Renier (talk) 10:40, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- Not sure - there is, or were at least, a similar one from the mid 1930s at Søkvæsthuset (where the license is stated as CC BY, likely by Museum of Copenhagen, as it seems to be from their collection). Perhaps someone else knows about the one at Bakkehuset in particular. TherasTaneel (talk) 11:28, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- @TherasTaneel and Mark Renier: URAA might be another problem for Commons to keep, when this thing was "published"? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:48, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Peter Schannong died in 1950, so it should be free, unless some of his heirs subsequently got the rights. TherasTaneel (talk) 16:26, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The FOP exception in Denmark for buildings does not extend to mural, plaques, sculptures, etc that are attached to buildings, so that doesn't make the photo ok. According to the link provided by TherasTaneel, the artist who made the plaque is Utzon Frank, which must be Einar Utzon-Frank (1888–1955), so it is not old enough to be ok. The only way for it to be ok that I can think of, is for it to be below the threshold of originality, but that does have some merit. It is in my opinion comparable to the panda logo of the WWF, which was found to be below the threshold in a Danish court. Peter Alberti (talk) 18:09, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Per Peter Alberti, below Danish TOO rules. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:23, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I do not see sufficient information on COM:TOO Denmark to be convinced that this image is below TOO. Therefore the image has to be deleted. Artist died in 1955, see en: Einar Utzon-Frank. The image(s) will be in PD 70 years after this year and can be undeleted in 2026. Can be undeleted earlier if permission for publication with a free licence is obtained from the heirs per VRT. --Ellywa (talk) 09:53, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
La Difesa Della Razza
[edit]The images from fascist magazine "La Difesa della Razza" (italian for "The Defense of Race") have been uploaded under a PD-old license (a deprecated generic model that should not be used for new uploads). However, PD-old specifies that the reason is that the author(s) died more than 70 years ago, when in fact the authors of these pages died more recently. Likewise, the editor of the journal (to whom any anonymous articles must be referred under copyright law), Telesio Interlandi, died in 1965 (56 years ago). The PD-old license is not good for uploading pages from journals published more than 70 years ago.
Then, all images have been taken from website http://digiteca.bsmc.it/ (part of Biblioteca di storia moderna e contemporanea, National Library of modern and contemporary history), where there is this notice: "Scans may be freely downloaded for research and study purposes; for any use of the images for editorial or commercial purposes permission must be requested from the Library using the appropriate form. The Library can provide high resolution scans of requested images." But all images lack permission from the library. --Holapaco77 (talk) 16:03, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- File:La Difesa Della Razza 1.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 1 n.2, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 1 n.4, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 1 n.5, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 1 n.6, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 2 n.1, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 2 n.2, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 2 n.3, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 2 n.4, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 2 n.5, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 2 n.6, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 2 n.7, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 2 n.8, Tumminelli, Roma.png
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 2 n.9, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 2 n.10, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 2 n.11, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 2 n.12, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 2 n.13, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 2 n.14, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 2 n.15, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 2 n.16, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 2 n.17, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 2 n.18, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 2 n.19, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 2 n.20, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 2 n.21, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 2 n.22, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 2 n.23, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 2 n.24, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 3 n.1, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 3 n.2, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 3 n.3, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 3 n.4, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 3 n.5, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 3 n.6, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 3 n.7, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 3 n.8, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 3 n.9, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 3 n.10, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 3 n.11, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 3 n.12, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 3 n.13, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 3 n.14, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 3 n.15, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 3 n.16, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 3 n.17, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 3 n.18, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 3 n.19, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 3 n.20, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 3 n.21-22, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 3 n.23, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 3 n.24, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 4 n.1, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 4 n.2, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 4 n.3, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 4 n.4, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 4 n.5, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 4 n.6, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 4 n.7, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 4 n.8, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 4 n.9, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 4 n.10, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 4 n.11, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 4 n.12, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 4 n.13, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 4 n.14, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 4 n.15, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 4 n.16, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 4 n.17, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 4 n.18, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 4 n.19, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 4 n.20, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 4 n.21, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 4 n.22, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 4 n.23, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 4 n.24, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 5 n.1, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 5 n.2, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 5 n.3, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 5 n.4, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 5 n.5, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 5 n.6, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 5 n.7, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 5 n.8, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 5 n.9, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 5 n.10, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 5 n.11, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 5 n.12, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 5 n.13, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 5 n.14, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 5 n.15, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 5 n.16, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 5 n.17, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 5 n.18, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 5 n.19, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 5 n.20, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 5 n.21, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 5 n.22, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 5 n.23, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 5 n.24, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 6 n.1, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 6 n.2, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 6 n.3, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 6 n.4, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 6 n.5, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 6 n.6, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 6 n.7, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 6 n.8, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 6 n.9, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 6 n.10, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 6 n.11, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 6 n.12, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 6 n.13, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 6 n.14, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 6 n.15, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, anno 6 n.16, Tumminelli, Roma.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, n.1, Tumminelli, Roma 1938 (page 18 crop).jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, n.1, Tumminelli, Roma 1938 (page 52 crop).jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, n.1, Tumminelli, Roma 1938 (page 9 crop)-subtitle2.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza, n.1, Tumminelli, Roma 1938 (page 9 crop)-titolo.jpg
- File:Portrait from Fischer Lexikon.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-subtitle2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-titolo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- File:La difesa della razza (1938 n.02 p.7).jpg
- File:La difesa della razza (1938 n.1 p.34).jpg - author: Antonio Petrucci (1907–1981)
- File:La difesa della razza (1938 n.1 p.35).jpg - author: Antonio Petrucci (1907–1981)
- File:La difesa della razza (1939 n.11 pp. 12 e 13).jpg - author: Edmondo Vercellesi
- File:La difesa della razza (1939 n.14 p.22).jpg - author: Ugo Fugagnollo (stll alive in 1982)
- File:La difesa della razza (1939 n.14 p.23).jpg - author: Ugo Fugagnollo (still alive in 1982)
- File:La difesa della razza (1941 n.07 p.25).jpg
- File:La difesa della razza (1941 n.07 p.32).jpg
- File:La difesa della razza (1942 n.12 p.10).jpg - Authors: Lino Businco (1908–1997), Julius Evola (1898–1974)
- File:La difesa della razza (1942 n.12 p.11).jpg - Author: Julius Evola (1898–1974)
- File:La difesa della razza (1943 n.13 p.3).jpg
- File:La difesa della razza (1943 n.16 p.3).jpg
- File:La difesa della razza anno 1 n.2 publicità 1.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza anno 1 n.4 publicità 1.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza anno 1 n.4 publicità 2.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza anno 1 n.5 publicità 1.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza anno 1 n.6 publicità 1.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza anno 3 n.14 publicità 1.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza anno 5 n.20 publicità 1.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza anno 5 n.23 publicità 1.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza anno 5 n.23 publicità 2.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza anno 5 n.24 publicità 1.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza anno 5 n.8 publicità 1.jpg
- File:La difesa della razza documentazione (anno 1 n.5).jpg
- File:La difesa della razza polemica (anno 1 n.3).jpg
- File:La difesa della razza questionario(anno 2 n.2).jpg
- File:La difesa della razza scienza(anno 1 n.6).jpg
- File:La difesa della razza; Protocolli dei Savi di Sion.jpg
- File:Manifesto razzismo italiano.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- The nom makes the claim that "the authors of these pages died more recently [than 70 years ago]." Who, specifically, are the authors of these pages? What are their names, and what is the evidence that the died more recently than 70 years ago? Without this information, the claim is merely an unsourced contention. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:16, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- List of authors is here: w:it:Numeri de La difesa della razza. --Holapaco77 (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Wait for Commons:Deletion requests/File:La difesa della razza, n.1, Tumminelli, Roma 1938.djvu to be solved, as it is very relevant for this case. Ruthven (msg) 21:06, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Update: The other DR has been closed with keep by Elly. --Ruthven (msg) 15:37, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- ( @Ruthven: Sorry, I did not see the ping, my full username is Ellywa. I changed my autograph because of this confusion appeared to reoccur).
- I read the arguments and motivations on the other DR and concluded with this note on the file page: Important note: This is a collective work published more then 70 years ago in Italy. As a complete work it is not copyrighted. However, the individual articles and photos may be still copyrighted by the original authors. Cropped versions of this work might not be acceptable as a PD work. More information: Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Italy, Legal advise and Discussion about this document
- So imho, in this case, the complete files, for instance front pages of the magazine can be maintained as collective works (I would advise to add the same note), but the other individual pages of a single author, or cropped images should be deleted, unless it is certain the author died more then 70 years ago. Ellywa (talk) 11:28, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Ellywa (I've got the right username this time!) The main issue is that Commons guarantees that files can be republished, and modified for any purpose. In the djvu file we have a work that has limitations on reuse (the note you added). A clear case is in this DR, where single pages or crops cannot be used because under copyright. It's a complex issue, I admit ;) Ruthven (msg) 11:35, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: , of course I fully agree with our mission, the ideal of our projects. But - there is always a "but" -:
- 1. We cannot prevent that people who want to reuse the material do not read the details of the licence, or the details listed on a file page (not only the -BY of CC-BY-SA, but also warnings about Trademarks, De minimis, even the Deletion template). Mistakes with reuse of the material are frequently made. Sometimes this has severe consequences, luckily most of the time it hasn't.
- 2. I personally try to follow the Commons guidelines as close as I can. In the guideline I consulted for the other DR, Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Italy, it is stated that collective works are in PD 70 years after publication. Reading some more about this today (I'm still learning) I even found a template for this situation, Template:Collective work. So I thought this work could be kept.
- I think that a discussion about this should be held more general, about Commons:Collective work. The outcome could be that only collective works older then 120 years can be maintained, like anonymous photographs. Kind regards, Ellywa (talk) 09:05, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Ellywa I don't think that we've to go until 120 years in this case: all the authors are known as well as their year of death. But for the general case, I tend to agree with you. Ruthven (msg) 14:26, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Ellywa (I've got the right username this time!) The main issue is that Commons guarantees that files can be republished, and modified for any purpose. In the djvu file we have a work that has limitations on reuse (the note you added). A clear case is in this DR, where single pages or crops cannot be used because under copyright. It's a complex issue, I admit ;) Ruthven (msg) 11:35, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- Update: The other DR has been closed with keep by Elly. --Ruthven (msg) 15:37, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Delete So, what we have here is the likelihood that some of these may be kept. However, it seems to me that all of the covers must be deleted. The artist was almost certainly not anonymous, but the credit would have been inside, so we do not have a name. As for the articles, some have already been shown to be written by people who were alive 70 years ago. None have been shown to be written by people who died before 1951, so unless someone decides to do the research, we must delete them all. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, consensus of Jim and Ruthven. i will revise the other DR. --Ellywa (talk) 14:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)