Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/02/21
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
File:DERIVATIVE of Michael Westley Retaining wall, former trackbed, UIlesthorpe CC BY-SA 2.0.jpg
[edit]I created this file and licensed it another another account/user name: gen-email@dr.com. I canceled the email confirmation because I don't want to use that account or user name. I have created a new account under mariafreelancewriter and the email is maria@mariafreelancewriter.com. I need to upload and license this image under that account but can't because it's a dupe of the one I uploaded on the other account. I couldn't find a way to change my user name, so I had to create a new account. Please, can this be deleted so I can upload it under the proper account? Thanks. 2603:8001:C83E:D952:50FF:1422:5BD:943F 06:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:00, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
How can I delete one of my own files Zanyma (talk) 09:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 10:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Redirected to Category:Ireland in the 18th century. Category:Ireland is no longer about just the ROI. -- Themightyquill (talk) 11:08, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: accidental nomination. --Themightyquill (talk) 11:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope nudity, no encyclopedic use. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 13:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC) Nomination withdrawn - see below. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 13:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Firefly: Could you elaborate on this? It seems to have been in legitimate use on ru:Головка полового члена as early as December 2020, as well as two other Wikipedia articles. To me, this looks like:
Speedy keep. Brianjd (talk) 13:50, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Whoops, yes, this one shouldn't have made it to deletion. I was batch-nominating a bunch of such images that have no use and have recently been used for vandalism at enwiki, but this one shouldn't have been nominated. Consider this withdrawn. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 13:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. Brianjd (talk) 13:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
The image was uploaded accidentally. Please delete Lady6969 (talk) 18:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 18:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
This seems a copy of an earlier image from unknown origin. GZWDer (talk) 19:17, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:31, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
As per COM:ADVERT , self promotion Ts12rAc (talk) 16:21, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Dyolf77 at 16:44, 20 Januar 2021 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vinod young.jpg: As per COM:ADVERT , self promotion --Krdbot 21:38, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
As per COM:ADVERT , self promotion Ts12rAc (talk) 15:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
File information is insufficient. And it is clear that this photo isn't taken by this person. For these reasons, I think the copyright status is unclear and this file should be deleted. Uncitoyen (talk) 11:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- I think it would be easier to block Vinod young from adding OoS pictures here, instead of opening redundant DRs. --E4024 (talk) 13:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- @E4024: I created a candidate for deletion automatically. It seems that this file with this same name to have been deleted multiple times. I think the deletion requests within the same file are automatically opened again on this page. Please correct me if this situation is wrong. Uncitoyen (talk) 19:40, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 19:48, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
As per COM:ADVERT , self promotion Ts12rAc (talk) 07:35, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Until the self-promo account is barred, we will have to use our energy with these... E4024 (talk) 12:51, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:59, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
out of scope see COM:PS excluded educational content "files that contain nothing educational other than raw text" Headlock0225 (talk) 22:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
This photo got a wrong title. Masked PopArt.jpg is ANOTHER photo from me, which was correctly uploaded. It is better to make a FULL DELETION, not to rename it because we have this photo now TWICE, once in a smaller and once in a bigger version and once with the RIGHT title Vincent of the 20th Century.jpg Monika Hoerath (talk) 16:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Wrong title. I have uploaded a new version of this picture (in bigger size) under this new titleː Multiple Vincent of the 20th Century.jpg Monika Hoerath (talk) 17:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, G7. --Túrelio (talk) 16:25, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Modern art work; requires OTRS permission from the artist. E4024 (talk) 17:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
While I repeated the upload of this picture to Wikimedia Commons, I gave (sorry) a better description that I am the O N L Y artist. It is not necessary that I give a OTRS permission for my own work.
Please be so kind and delete only the double version.
With kind regards, Monika Hoerath — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 95.91.207.227 (talk) 21:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
This file should be deleted because of the informations that I gave to User E4024 a few time ago. Nevertheless, I am the ONLY artist of this work Monika Hoerath (talk) 22:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, G7. --Túrelio (talk) 16:24, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Accidental duplicate upload of File:Bust of York, Mount Tabor, 2021 2.jpg Another Believer (talk) 18:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 10:35, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Accidental duplicate upload of File:Bust of York, Mount Tabor, 2021 3.jpg Another Believer (talk) 18:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 10:33, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Was apparently started as a joke page and never finished. Misleading and unhelpful. Elliot321 (talk) 05:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 23:55, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Spam in wikidata. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 00:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:25, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Apparent copyvio by sbstransit ZKang123 (talk) 00:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:28, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Omar ChapaJ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-quality, suspicious exif information does not seem to be uploader's own work.
- File:Plaza principal Miguel Hidalgo.jpg
- File:Parroquia San José de Sabinas Hidalgo.jpg
- File:Cumbres de Los Tres Picos.jpg
- File:Parque Charco del Lobo.jpg
- File:Parque La Turbina.jpg
- File:Presa Mariano Escobedo.jpg
- File:Ojo de Agua de Sabinas Hidalgo.jpg
- File:Panorámica de Sabinas Hidalgo.jpg
- File:SierradePicachos.jpg
- File:WipeOut36 20 2021 103606.119000.jpg
- File:Sierra de la Iguana.jpg
- File:Sierras de Sabinas Hidalgo.jpg
- File:Sierra de la Iguana y Minas Viejas.jpg
- File:Río Sabinas en el Huracán Alex.jpg
- File:Sequía en Sabinas Hidalgo 2011.jpg
- File:Inundaciones en Sabinas Hidalgo 2017.jpg
- File:Inundaciones en Sabinas Hidalgo 2007.jpg
- File:Daños en La Turbina.jpg
- File:Río Sabinas a su máxima capacidad el 1 de Julio de 2010 durante el Huracán Alex.jpg
(｀・ω・´) (talk) 00:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:28, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:28, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Galahad (sasageyo!) 02:15, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:29, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andrea Papaccio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused PNG duplicates, many poor quality, of existing SVG election maps. Many appear to be derivative works with a false claim of own work. At least one (File:Election'12.png) has blatant factual errors.
- File:Elezioni1789.png
- File:Washington.png
- File:Collegialità'1804.png
- File:ElectoralCollege1808.png
- File:Elezioni 1812 finalmente!!.png
- File:Alfa1816.png
- File:Election'1820.png
- File:1904 NEW Electoral Map.png
- File:ELECTION '12.png
- File:Election'1912.png
- File:1916@ elezioni.png
- File:1916 elezioni.png
- File:Election'12.png
- File:Election'96.png
- File:Election'92.png
- File:Election'80.png
- File:Election'88.png
- File:Election84.png
- File:Election'68.png
- File:Election'76.png
- File:Election'72.png
- File:Election'64.png
- File:Election'60.png
- File:Election'56.png
- File:'election48.png
- File:'52election.png
- File:Election'44.png
- File:Election'40 vero.png
- File:Election'36.png
- File:Election'32.png
- File:Election28.png
- File:Election '24.png
- File:Election'20.png
- File:Election'08.png
- File:Election'04.png
- File:Election '00.png
- File:Presidential adams 1824.png
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:24, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:32, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://cutewallpaper.org/download.php?file=/21/wasim-akram/120174042080510001793.jpg AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:30, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
{{Vd}} per above and COM:NETCOPYVIO.— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Keep They also have https://cutewallpaper.org/download.php?file=/21/wasim-akram/27365295929175446829905.jpg which is an unattributed copy of File:Wasim Akram.jpg. Cute Wallpaper looks like a cesspit of copyvios and misleading links. Pelagic (talk) 11:48, 22 February 2021 (UTC)- Keep That is my photo that I took personally from 18 March 2018. -- Fuzheado (talk) 14:55, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Given statement from Fuzheado who uploaded the image, easy call. Wouldn't have minded some metadata that would have made this easier up front ... Ravensfire (talk) 17:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep right now Per above, Fuzheado's edition is earlier than cutewallpaper.org's per EXIF. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per above, sorry for the confusion. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:11, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Minoraxtalk 01:38, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:17, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
May fulfill COM:SPAM. Majority of these are unused images of an unremarkable overpass. Similar to case at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Judgefloro#Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 3. Suggest to keep only 5 images (these are the ones that I didn't mark for deletion).
- File:09460jfPritil Farm Crossing NLEX, Guiguinto, Bulacanfvf 01.jpg
- File:09460jfPritil Farm Crossing NLEX, Guiguinto, Bulacanfvf 02.jpg
- File:09460jfPritil Farm Crossing NLEX, Guiguinto, Bulacanfvf 05.jpg
- File:09460jfPritil Farm Crossing NLEX, Guiguinto, Bulacanfvf 06.jpg
- File:09460jfPritil Farm Crossing NLEX, Guiguinto, Bulacanfvf 08.jpg
- File:09460jfPritil Farm Crossing NLEX, Guiguinto, Bulacanfvf 09.jpg
- File:09460jfPritil Farm Crossing NLEX, Guiguinto, Bulacanfvf 10.jpg
- File:09460jfPritil Farm Crossing NLEX, Guiguinto, Bulacanfvf 11.jpg
- File:09460jfPritil Farm Crossing NLEX, Guiguinto, Bulacanfvf 13.jpg
- File:09460jfPritil Farm Crossing NLEX, Guiguinto, Bulacanfvf 15.jpg
- File:09460jfPritil Farm Crossing NLEX, Guiguinto, Bulacanfvf 16.jpg
- File:09460jfPritil Farm Crossing NLEX, Guiguinto, Bulacanfvf 19.jpg
- File:09460jfPritil Farm Crossing NLEX, Guiguinto, Bulacanfvf 22.jpg
- File:09460jfPritil Farm Crossing NLEX, Guiguinto, Bulacanfvf 24.jpg
- File:09460jfPritil Farm Crossing NLEX, Guiguinto, Bulacanfvf 25.jpg
- File:09460jfPritil Farm Crossing NLEX, Guiguinto, Bulacanfvf 26.jpg
- File:09460jfPritil Farm Crossing NLEX, Guiguinto, Bulacanfvf 27.jpg
- File:09460jfPritil Farm Crossing NLEX, Guiguinto, Bulacanfvf 36.jpg
- File:09460jfPritil Farm Crossing NLEX, Guiguinto, Bulacanfvf 37.jpg
- File:09460jfPritil Farm Crossing NLEX, Guiguinto, Bulacanfvf 39.jpg
- File:09460jfPritil Farm Crossing NLEX, Guiguinto, Bulacanfvf 40.jpg
- File:09460jfPritil Farm Crossing NLEX, Guiguinto, Bulacanfvf 44.jpg
- File:09460jfPritil Farm Crossing NLEX, Guiguinto, Bulacanfvf 45.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Gandang Mabagyong Hapon sa Imo; if you were the one taking photos of this Guiguinto great scenery, for sure, you will have a problem in angle photos, since this bridge is poorly built, I tried my best to take the best sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 11:04, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Judgefloro: two or three photos suffice. Poorly-built bridge is not a good reason to take highly redundant photos of it. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:19, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work of the uploader. jdx Re: 08:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:19, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
As per COM:ADVERT , self promotion Ts12rAc (talk) 08:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 02:19, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
low quality personal image of a non-notable person, out of project scope Kotivalo (talk) 12:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:20, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 12:58, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:20, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 15:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:21, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Blurry Sahopradipp (talk) 16:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 02:21, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, no indication of who this person is or why they are notable. Possibly a selfie, but unclear. Elliot321 (talk) 16:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:21, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: screenshot of a website CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:22, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: website screenshot with visible copyright CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:22, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: screenshot of a website CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:08, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:22, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:22, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Large watermark, likely uploaded for promotional purposes due to this section of the uploader's talk page. Perryprog (talk) 17:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:22, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Large watermark, likely uploaded for promotional purposes due to their username and probable connection to the uploader of this file. Perryprog (talk) 17:15, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:22, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot of this site and Google Chrome (see COM:SS#Web browsers). While site is potentially own work due to the uploader's username, it's still out-of-scope and of non-free software. Perryprog (talk) 17:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:22, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Me "Edo Ekigawa" have right from Mayanesia.com to share picture on their website Edo akigawa (talk) 22:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Where is the evidence? --Túrelio (talk) 08:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
"Images cant be sold but can be using for personal and commercial purpose" on mayanesia.com homepage Edo akigawa (talk) 23:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Elcobbola. --Minoraxtalk 02:24, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Me "Edo Ekigawa" have right from Mayanesia.com to share picture on their website Edo akigawa (talk) 22:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Where is the evidence? --Túrelio (talk) 08:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
we can see homepage mayanesia.com "Images cant be sold but can be using for personal and commercial purpose" Edo akigawa (talk) 23:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Elcobbola. --Minoraxtalk 02:24, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Me "Edo Ekigawa" have right from Mayanesia.com to share picture on their website Edo akigawa (talk) 22:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Where is the evidence? --Túrelio (talk) 08:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
"Images cant be sold but can be using for personal and commercial purpose" on mayanesia.com homepage Edo akigawa (talk) 23:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Elcobbola. --Minoraxtalk 02:24, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Me "Edo Ekigawa" have right from Mayanesia.com to share picture on their website Edo akigawa (talk) 22:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Where is the evidence? --Túrelio (talk) 08:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
"Images cant be sold but can be using for personal and commercial purpose" on mayanesia.com homepage Edo akigawa (talk) 23:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Elcobbola. --Minoraxtalk 02:24, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Me "Edo Ekigawa" have right from Mayanesia.com to share picture on their website Edo akigawa (talk) 22:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Where is the evidence? --Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
"Images cant be sold but can be using for personal and commercial purpose" on mayanesia.com homepage Edo akigawa (talk) 23:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Elcobbola. --Minoraxtalk 02:24, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Me "Edo Ekigawa" have right from Mayanesia.com to share picture on their website Edo akigawa (talk) 22:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Where is the evidence? --Túrelio (talk) 08:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
"Images cant be sold but can be using for personal and commercial purpose" on mayanesia.com homepage Edo akigawa (talk) 23:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Elcobbola. --Minoraxtalk 02:24, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Me "Edo Ekigawa" have right from Mayanesia.com to share picture on their website Edo akigawa (talk) 22:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Where is the evidence? --Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
= "Images cant be sold but can be using for personal and commercial purpose" on mayanesia.com homepage Edo akigawa (talk) 23:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Elcobbola. --Minoraxtalk 02:24, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Me "Edo Ekigawa" have right from Mayanesia.com to share picture on their website Edo akigawa (talk) 22:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Where is the evidence? --Túrelio (talk) 08:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
"Images cant be sold but can be using for personal and commercial purpose" on mayanesia.com homepage Edo akigawa (talk) 23:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Elcobbola. --Minoraxtalk 02:23, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
COM:Derivative work of a product packaging (see COM:PACKAGING). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 12:18, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Building was completed in 2008. There is no freedom of panorama in Sudan. Fails COM:De minimis criteria as cropping or blurring it out will make the image useless. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:22, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Building was completed in 2008. There is no freedom of panorama in Sudan. Fails COM:De minimis criteria as cropping or blurring it out will make the image useless. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:23, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Private unused prediction map from 2018, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 22:29, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
author request Aaronw1109 (talk) 00:04, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per Jahobr's nomination and uploader's agreement in deleting the file. -- CptViraj (talk) 12:41, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio. Source: https://www.facebook.com/udalostikomentare/photos/10158882941797235/ Michal Bělka (talk) 00:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 23:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 23:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 23:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 23:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 23:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Antoniovescio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolution photos from the 1940`s, unlikely to be own work
- File:Maria de Seta e sua figlia Bona fotografate da Ghitta Carell.jpg
- File:Emanuele, Francesco, Maria de Seta, Bona e Vittorio fotografati nel 1942 dalla famosa fotografa ungherese, Ghitta Carrel.jpg
Vera (talk) 00:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 22:56, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio. Source: https://www.facebook.com/udalostikomentare/photos/10159044408657235 Michal Bělka (talk) 00:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 23:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio. Source: https://www.facebook.com/udalostikomentare/photos/10159044408657235 Michal Bělka (talk) 00:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 23:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio. Source: https://www.facebook.com/udalostikomentare/photos/10158882942642235 Michal Bělka (talk) 00:24, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 23:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio. Source: https://www.facebook.com/udalostikomentare/photos/10158882944027235 Michal Bělka (talk) 00:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 23:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 22:14, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Anthropologist Gustaf Retzius in the process of measuring the skull of a sami man. Sweden 1905. (46761734962).png
[edit]Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:16, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Same as https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Antropologen_Gustaf_Retzius_i_f%C3%A4rd_med_att_m%C3%A4ta_h%C3%A4rjedalssamen_Fjellstedts_huvud_-_Nordiska_Museet_-_NMA.0052720.jpg in public domain. VisbyStar (talk) 20:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Kept, original is public domain. Thuresson (talk) 23:15, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Name banner of an unknown person, unused and with no educative value. Richard Avery (talk) 14:30, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 23:21, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work of an informational poster/tarpaulin. Whilst the underlying images are assumed to be public domain, the text to the right is obtained from Manila Bulletin (see the source at the bottom right). Should this be a paraphrased one, then another problem exists: there is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines for textual/literary works. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:15, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:38, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:SM City Baliwag
[edit]Architecture is considered as a form of fine arts in the Philippine artistic sphere and society. Per two news articles (Philippine Star and Inquirer via PressReader), the shoebox-type designs of SM malls were conceptualized by the mall corporation's founder Henry Sy, Sr., and he is considered by the company as the first architect of the SM Supermalls. As there is no FOP right now in the Philippines, permission from Sy's heir in SM mall shoebox designs, SM's Engineering, Design, and Development is required. Mall building is a recent one (dates to 2008).
- File:3308SM City Baliwag 03.jpg
- File:3308SM City Baliwag 04.jpg
- File:3308SM City Baliwag 05.jpg
- File:Baliuag,Bulacanjf9003 13.JPG
- File:Baliuagjf9367 05.JPG
- File:Baliuagjf9367 06.JPG
- File:Baliuagjf9367 07.JPG
- File:Baliuagjf9367 08.JPG
- File:Baliuagjf9367 09.JPG
- File:Baliuagjf9367 10.JPG
- File:JfBaliuag648Bulacanfvf.JPG
- File:JfBaliuag654Bulacanfvf.JPG
- File:JfPagala9636SMBaliwagVincafvf 12.JPG
- File:Smbaliuagjf333.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Urgent and Fervent Appeal to Commons Community to Put On Hold the Mass Deletion Requests Non-Stop and Unlawful under the Strict Provisions of Philippines Criminal (Penal) Law on Cybercrimes-stalking : to Defer possible Mass Deletions - Erasing of Valued Photos of National Interest from the Herein User Deleter, based on Moral grounds and most certain irreparable Damage and Injury to Commons files and contrary to the Universal Code of Conduct of Users, with all Due Respect: I am reproduce herein as part hereof My Legal Treatise for the kindness of the Commons Community to review and to Declare Null and Void Ab Initio all the Mass Deletions by herein Nominator: to wit - Judgefloro (talk) 11:09, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- CONSOLIDATED REPLY-OBJECTION: SYNOPSIS - The En Masse Nominations Request for Deletion by the herein Nominator in no uncertain terms, falls within the 4 corners of the The Cyberstalking and 2012 Cybercrime Law of the Philippines which provides grave penalties for its Violations of this Act: the Series of Unlawful Mass Deletions now being started by herein Nominator will cause irreparable damage and injury to the Meta Files of Wikimedia Commons: I vehemently object to the deletion on Substantive Legal Grounds, under my Lawyer's and Judge's Oath of Office, and as Authority on Criminal Law Review based on my Ateneo Law School records; I submit to the Commons Community In Seriatim, objectively (and based on USA and Philippine Jurisprudence vis-à-vis Substantive laws both Civil - Copyright law of the Philippines amending the New Civil Code provisions on the Law of Property) and Criminal law 1932 Revised Penal Code as amended by the Penal Provisions of both [ https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2012/09/12/republic-act-no-10175/ Republic Act No. 10175] - Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 and Copyright Penal Provisions especially [https://acg.pnp.gov.ph/main/2-uncategorised/263-acg-cyber-security-bulletin-no-132-understanding-the-risk-of-cyberstalking Cyberstalking Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, group, or organization - monitoring, threats, or gathering information that may be used to threaten or harass);
- Now a) Who can question with Legal Personality to the Special Courts on Copyright and Trademark Infringement - Vide: The Intellectual Property of the Philippines (IPOPHL) vis-à-vis the Supreme Court’s (SC) 2020 Special Rules on the Prosecution of Intellectual Property (IP) Cases; and b) within what period of time based on Civil Law on Extinctive Prescription); here are my legal grounds to dismiss the Nomination or Request for Deletion, to wit:
- i) I talked to the former Parish Priest Msgr. Jo Aguilan whom I healed as healing Judge in the Barasoain Convent and in his room, now deceased and b) Parish Priest on 24 August 2014, 18:50:54 Fr. Dario V. Cabral, incumbent Parish Priest of Barasoain Church; he confirmed in our discussion, that the Titular Bishop Oliveros now Dennis Villarojo has acquired all rights and properties, Torrens titles of Barasoain Church including all the Monuments therein; hence, the Creator of the Statues transferred all his rights by virtue of the Strict Provisions of Canon law of the Catholic Church on Parish Creation; and in this case, Saint Andrew the Apostle Church the Titular Bishop of Broderick Pabillo the apostolic administrator of the sede vacante Archdiocese of Manila.
- ii) I also talked with the PIO Office of Baliuag including Tourism Office, when I was requesting for photos of the Feb 2 2021 Episcopal Coronation; I was told that Mayor Ferdie Estrella, as SOP, following the Strict LGU DILG guidelines, has a signed written contract between the paid official photographer to have waived all his rights in favor of the Municipal government of Baliuag whoever is the Mayor; under the Local Government Code and DILG Laws, all architects and sculptors cannot retain copyrights without violating the Penal Provisions of these codes and the Anti-Graft Law RA 3019 as amended; Ergo, all LGUs including the herein Malolos City Government ipso facto acquires all moral rights surrendered by alleged and all creators of Copyrights subjects and objects;
- ii) I will quote here my past rendition for emphasis: 29 January 2012 [File:Emilio222jf.JPG this file] by virtue of Substantive Philippine law on Extinctive prescription of FOUR YEARS from Commons Uploading, that is, legal public and open publishing in any forum or format, nobody including the alleged creators can now question in any court or forum even by the Creator; [File:FvfMalolos1335 01.JPG this also] 18 April 2014, 15:45:57; This also, [File:FvfMalolosCity1317 15.JPG This also] This also [File:FvfMalolosCity1317 17.JPG This also] 18 April 2014, 15:42:36; assuming Ex Gratia Argumenti or Arguendo, that Flickr Photobucket or any Commons Editor has opined otherwise, even if the IPO Bureau of Copyright and IPO Director now incumbents, would say otherwise, even if possibly reversing the former Learned Verbal Answers to my Personal Query and long discussions with my Ateneo School Mate Director Blancaflor, still, the Laws, I cited hold; it is for the Commons Community to decide between my submitted Legal Treatise any the alleged IPO zooms and others;
- At this point, I humbly ask a transcript of the IPO Zooms for the guidance of the Bench and the Bar; I would like to examine Legally the contents thereof for a single purpose: I will try my best if I have time and access due to COVID 19 restrictions to personally talk with the a) Integrated Bar of the Philippines President at Pasig City Main Office and b) the IPO Director and Bureau of Copyrights; if they will maintain wrong legal Opinions, then I reserve my Lawyer's Judge's Right to question them individually with the Ombudsman regarding Gross Ignorance of the Law or possible Disbarment in the IBP Office;
- Counter-Argument versus alleged Dicta, sayings, Virtual Answers or even Email correspondence of the Bureau of Copyright and IPO Director: Burden of proof (law) - Rule 131. BURDEN OF PROOF AND PRESUMPTIONS - Burden of Evidence and Preponderance of the evidence : Judicial Supremacy of the S.C. of the Philippines:
- i) FIRST, the Copyright Law cannot be interpreted by them for ONLY the Supreme Court of the Philippines (in a ripe judicial controvery elevated to it either by Petition for Review or Appeal from Special Courts on Copyrights towards Certiorari under Rule 65 to the Court of Appeals) has original and exclusive Jurisdiction expressly GRANTED and mandated by the 1987 Constitution to Say with definiteness what the Law is, that is Stare Decisis or Philippine Specific Jurisprudence on a) who has the copyright or moral rights with legal personality to file in the Special Courts created under the law and S.C. latest Circulars under C.J. Peralta - infringement of copyrights or trademarks b) within 4 years from publication so public in public domain like Commons Uploading in Meta Details, under the New Civil Code law on Extinctive Prescription and Copyright Law; c) any ruling issued on Copyright whether virtual, email or correspondence including Zoom Zoom Zoom or Arbitration FB discussions; d) any ruling or the DOJ Opinion by the Secretary of Justice my classmate; Vide: 2019 Amendments to the 1989 Revised Rules on Evidence A.M. No. 19-08-15-SC
- ii) SECOND: it is legally absurd to claim that the Burden of Evidence is upon the herein Uploader Editor; in any country including Germany and USA, inter alia, the Burden of Proof vis-a-vis Burden of Evidence are clearly defined by Federal Rules and here the 1989 Rules on Evidence as amended by C.J. Peralta's Watch New Rules of Court - Burden of Proof is fixed: it stays with the a in Criminal cases particulary Penal Provisions of Copyright Law, the Complainant, here, the creators, architect or sculptors and owners of trademarks and their heirs, assigns or successors-in-interest, must must must, alleged in the Criminal Information to be filed by the Private Prosecutor under the control of the Fiscal, the ultimate facts, their rights to Copyright or Trademark; the Proof of the Burden is Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt, that is Moral Certainty to Convict by Majority Vote of S.C. Justices on Appeal; any Decision whether by the Special Court or IPO or Bureau or DOJ if not elevated and ruled upon by the S.C. are or is not Law or Jurisprudence b) in Civil Cases, the Proof is Preponderance of Evidence resting on the Plaintiff, the creators, architect or sculptors and owners of trademarks and their heirs, assigns or successors-in-interest; III) the Burden of Evidence shifts from the Proponent, that is, the Plaintiff, or herein Nominator of Deletion Request in Commons, or in Flickr or in any Fora, if he or she has the right emanating by Special Power of Attorney from the creators, architect or sculptors and owners of trademarks and their heirs, assigns or successors-in-interest; the Burden of Evidence is shifted by Law on Evidence to the defendant, that is, the alleged Copyright violator, when the Judge rules in the Trial amid objections from the opposing counsel or parties; iv) The IPO Director and Bureau of Copyright Head, can never interpret the Copyright Law; it is only in one case that the Executive Department acquired quasi-judicial powers to rule: in P.D. 1529, the LRA Administrator can say what is the Law on Torrens title upon filing of fees in En Consulta cases versus the Register of Deeds; but but but that is not jurisprudence; the ruling only becomes jurisprudence when elevated to the C.A. and finally to the S.C. issuing a Stare Decisis Decision; this is the same banana with Quasi-Judicial Powers and Rulings of the Executive Agencies, like Immigration, Bureaus of Customs, here Bureau of Copyright (who has no such power); v) The Integrated Bar of the Philippines has jurisdiction to discipline the IPO Director and Bureau of Copyright heads if lawyers based even on Anonymous Complaint more frequently under R.A. 6713 which is broader than Sunlights in the Philippines, or R.A. 3019; the IBP has concurrent jurisdiction with the SC Disbarment Office to suspend or dismiss lawyers including IPO Director and Bureau of Copyright heads if they issue comedy of errors or simply put, refusal to reply to my 2 Letters within a fast time required thereat; but the Lawyer under and representing Director Blanclaflor replied to my query: Can I upload any photos falling under FOP in Commons? He replied yes, since if there is no proviso in the Copyright law prohibiting it, then, the Law permits what is not prohibited; I understand that Blancaflor was succeeded by the former and the incumbent IPO Director; YES, they can reply by email and they should under the mandatory provisions of R.A. 6713 "Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees" or even via Zoom Zoom Zoom or Arbitration Virtual under COVID-19 pandemic restrictions; but they can never interpret the Copyright Law, only, they should as they had issued Implementing Guidelines or Circulars;
- vi) More important Now is the Exclusive Original Jurisdiction of the Department of Justice via the NBI's Cybercrime Monitoring Division to assume jurisdiction even upon Anonymous Complaint or NOW by Pandemic Emails against 2 matters that I often repeat and repeat herein as Law and Jurisprudence : a) creation of Anonymous Accounts b) Cyberstalking (which incidentally, I state as my opinion, is part and parcel of the specific provisos of the 2012 Cybercrime Philippine Law, as I did read Wikipedia's edit regarding Congress Bills on the matter; for me that is a surplusage; c) Cybercrime proper : to be specific En Masse (including schemes, habit or trends towards) deletion of Photobucket, Flickr, Instagram or here, Commons Valued Photos of National Interest like Churches, Schools, Monuments and Memorial which are Owned by the Domain here Commons Photos uploaded under Public Domain License, like mine, specifying that My Authorship need not be cited when anybody copies my Commons Photos, permanently transferred to Commons Ownership without anything remaining to me; Vi) In all my archives including my Ramon FVelasquez Photos, I never objected to deletions but most rarely; in Template, I just say submitted to the sound discretion of Commons Community; since 2012, many of my files were deleted under either Speedy Deletion or Regular Deletions filed even by Commons Administrators; Vii) But now, I have a reasonable Ground to fear that there is a "Testing of the Waters", that is a) start or stub deletions by trickles just 1% of 99% edits by a specific editor that apparently is aimed towards b) Domino Deletions or En Masse Deletions as had been done by a) Parent and b) Child anonymous Mass Deleters beginning September 2020 stopping just lately but Nakaabang lang po or just watching for opportune time; On the advice that I should obtain COM:OTRS from the Sculptors, I state with all fairness and legality, that it is a legal absurdity to obtain any permission from the heirs of the Deceased alleged but not proven Copyright holder; Anastacio Caedo (14 August 1907 – 12 May 1990) was a Filipino sculptor; and FYI, the Intestate or Testate Courts would first issue Letters Testamentary or Letters of Administration with the Will Annexed(Letters of Administration by Probate Court Letters Testamentary) only the One Armed with the RTC Probate Orders of Appointment can legally issue the COM:OTRS; and this will take maybe 20 years of protracted litigations;
- Example of stupidity because of False News: Fr. Ladra said the church’s interior now features a ceiling painting called “Communion of Saints” by Maestro Eladio Santos; I always come to this Church; I witnessed personally how the ceiling was painted; I saw with my 2 eyes the Bayanihan or Communal Donation of Money and Labor; specifically, it is next to impossible for Maestro Eladio Santos to have painted the ceiling; Does he have the legs to climbs thereat look at his age - paid workers, like stonemasons, carpenters, catwalks scaffoldings and painters were paid sorry to say minimum wages and other for free due to Bayanihan; I saw Fr. Labra talking to architects; but I suppose these architects and alleged Maestro Eladio Santos may have suggested the Brand of Oil Paints or sketches; but Why deny these Men at Work in Bulacan the Copyrigthts they waived for this Great Shrine? “Communion of Saints” was not done by Maestro Eladio Santos: PROMISE.
- Keep I humbly submit the Unabridged Legal Treatise, ONLY as persuasion to Keep; I underscore that amid my Legal Expertise, I have just One Commons Editor Vote co-equal with any Nominator or Opposing Uploader under the Commons Admin who will keep or deletes; the foregoing Legal Submissions are not meant to touch upon Commons Legal Policy on FOP;
- Keep PREMISES CONSIDERED, I humbly submit and register a the Strongest Legal Objection EVER to the Requested Deletion and Fervently Appeal to Commons Community to wait for the Supreme Court Ruling on the Matter of FOP and I guess that would be my starting point... I reiterate with all due respect, that I respectfully and humbly submit to the Sound Discretion of the Commons Community considering that the subject photos are National Cultural Treasures Most Valued Photos for present and future generations, very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 11:09, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 04:38, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Too small, not sure where the image is from. GZWDer (talk) 19:29, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:16, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
fictional map for the future. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 18:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:26, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Fictional map for the future. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 18:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:26, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 18:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:28, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 18:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:27, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Fictional map "for fun", no description. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:27, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Fictional map for the future. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 18:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:28, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Fictional map for the future. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 18:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:28, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Philippines. Building from 2003 according to en:SM City Marilao. Stefan4 (talk) 12:37, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:TOO. I can hardly see what is copyrightable about this building. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:59, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- All of those examples are from France and are based on guessing what the words "without a particular or original character" in COM:FOP#France mean. The formulation is very vague, so it is entirely possible that some or all of those DRs got a wrong closure. Also, the threshold of originality in the Philippines may differ from that in France. Do you have any examples from the Philippines? --Stefan4 (talk) 18:50, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- Let's keep our discussion to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sm megamall.jpg. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:46, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- All of those examples are from France and are based on guessing what the words "without a particular or original character" in COM:FOP#France mean. The formulation is very vague, so it is entirely possible that some or all of those DRs got a wrong closure. Also, the threshold of originality in the Philippines may differ from that in France. Do you have any examples from the Philippines? --Stefan4 (talk) 18:50, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Kept: as per KoH. Yann (talk) 16:40, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Architecture is considered as a form of fine arts in the Philippine artistic sphere and society. Per two news articles (Philippine Star and Inquirer via PressReader), the shoebox-type designs of SM malls were conceptualized by the mall corporation's founder Henry Sy, Sr., and he is considered by the company as the first architect of the SM Supermalls. As there is no FOP right now in the Philippines, permission from Sy's heir in SM mall shoebox designs, SM's Engineering, Design, and Development is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:53, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Freedom of panorama is not yet provided in the copyright law. Permission from the architect is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:49, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
COM:Derivative work of a billboard. No FOP in the Philippines, and permission from the graphics artist is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:49, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused crop. (I asked for the separation of a different image which I reverted to the original and suddenly began to appear as uploader of this unnecessary crop.) E4024 (talk) 03:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:04, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
VO1 is not mentioned in en.wiki. In my opinion the logo is non-notable and out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: This file has to do with a radio station hoax by this and another user and should be deleted. Sammi Brie (talk) 01:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Delete per Sammi Brie.--Tdl1060 (talk) 01:19, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 05:34, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Personal image of an OoS person used at a declined draft. E4024 (talk) 17:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 05:54, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
COM:Derivative work of a movie poster. COPYVIO. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:33, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:18, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
COM:Derivative work of a statue of Batman inside SM City Baliwag in Baliwag, Philippines. Per Majora at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ויקיג'אנקי: "The Batman, Superman, and Wonder Woman statues are COM:TOYS and again, are copyrighted characters owned by Marvel." No indication that Marvel has permitted the uploader to license his image of a statue of their character under a commercial license. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:17, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:10, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
no need to show Vkchudasama (talk) 15:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of scope. --jdx Re: 12:56, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for 2D art in the USA. Elliot321 (talk) 16:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 09:57, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
This does not appear to represent any actual parliament. Elliot321 (talk) 16:50, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Similar files, also uploaded by User:Mattia170692 that should also be considered: File:Primarie repoll Parliament 2021.svg and File:Primerie Parliament 2021.svg. --Slashme (talk) 11:18, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:17, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: book cover from 2003 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 18:45, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 22:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 22:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 22:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Fictional “alternative history”. Private artwork with no educational value, and therefore out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 12:34, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:38, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Fictional “alternative history”. Private artwork with no educational value, and therefore out of scope. (Compare the real map here File:ElectoralCollege1948.svg) Jahobr (talk) 12:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:39, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 18:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:50, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 18:05, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Fictional map for the future. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 18:51, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:13, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 22:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:18, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely uploader own work. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 00:34, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MorganKevinJ(talk) 01:09, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in mk:Биоелектричен потенцијал with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 09:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MorganKevinJ(talk) 01:16, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Work by Renato Guttuso (26 December 1911 – 18 January 1987) Vera (talk) 00:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Not out of copyright yet. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:27, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Capture d’écran: Not so simple, no info about status on the source, not used. E4024 (talk) 00:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:47, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Exif show this image origin source is Facebook, seems not uploader's own work. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 00:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Keep obviously this is a selfie from the uploader. Seems to be her own photo like the uploaders other recent photos.--ProfessorX (talk) 09:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- @ProfessorX She isn't uploader. See file info and uploader user name. In addition, what do you think of exif information? If it is uploader's own work, there should be no information such as FB***. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 10:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Does that make her the photographer? If the uploader is herself, it is impossible that she will stay here without a pic. If you know her, tell her to take a selfie with her cellphone and upload it here. No-one will object to that. E4024 (talk) 12:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:54, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
didn't realize there were already higher-quality images of this Nick Number (talk) 00:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:15, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
The source claims copyright (bottom left). E4024 (talk) 00:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Keep obviously it comes from the uploader's personal website [1]. Seems to be her own photo like the uploaders other recent photos.--ProfessorX (talk) 09:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Does that make her the photographer? If the uploader is herself, it is impossible that she will stay here without a pic. If you know her, tell her to take a selfie with her cellphone and upload it here. No-one will object to that. --E4024 (talk) 12:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:GitHub
[edit]See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Página principal de GitHub.png -- screenshots of the website of GitHub are not under a free license per https://help.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-terms-of-service#g-intellectual-property-notice
- File:Developers-against-repressions case-212 (GitHub repository screenshot 2019-09-18).png
- File:Github access token.png
- File:GitHub Actions Workflow.png
- File:GitHub branch is 420 commits behind.png
- File:GitHub for Windows right-click menu.png
- File:Github hook configuration.png
- File:Pull Request GitHub August 2019.png
- File:PWNAGERobotics-master into torvalds-master.png
Pppery (talk) 16:20, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- I'm File:GitHub Actions Workflow.png uploader. That's exactly right, I couldn't find that license then. sorry😭 --Misato Kano (talk) 17:46, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 19:16, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:GitHub
[edit]Screenshots of the website of GitHub are not under a free license, see https://docs.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-terms-of-service#g-intellectual-property-notice
- File:Github Action.jpg
- File:Github Actions.png
- File:Screen Shot - Branches - 2.png
- File:Screen Shot - Branches - 3.png
- File:Screen Shot - Branches - 4.png
- File:Screen Shot - Issues - 1.png
- File:Screen Shot - Issues - 2.png
- File:Screen Shot - Issues - 3.png
- File:Screen Shot - Issues - 4.png
- File:Screen Shot -Branches - 1.png
Pppery (talk) 03:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
The suspicious exif information does not seem to be uploader's own work. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 00:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, transmission code in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:52, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
didn't realize there were already higher-quality images of this Nick Number (talk) 00:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Not match {{PD-Mexico}} (｀・ω・´) (talk) 00:54, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, historical photo, missing original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:54, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Clearly not own work, but taken from here. May be eligible for PD-UK, but publication info is not detailed. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:51, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:55, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Drakosh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: 1986 y photo of unknown author, not own work AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:57, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own work and dubious scope. E4024 (talk) 03:35, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:57, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
The source that appears here either belongs to this file or to File:Shaheer Sheikh at Smilie Suri Christmas Party.jpg (or to both of them). As the link to the source (8 years old) has been lost in time, I cannot check at the origin. E4024 (talk) 03:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Bogus license review that was clearly copied from another file. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Martin H. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q30EvXrIuLg, 5:46. Previous discussion on File talk:James Parkes vigil.png AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:07, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
This appears to be copied from File:Yavapai County Courthouse (Fall 2017).jpg MB (talk) 03:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:17, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
I do not want this photo up on Wikipedia anymore. Aishaelizabethphotography (talk) 04:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: 21:17, 27 February 2021, by Minorax. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:08, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
I do not want this photo up on Wikipedia anymore. Aishaelizabethphotography (talk) 04:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:08, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
The painting is old enough but the photographer also has copyrights, no? The source has a copyright note at the bottom of the link. E4024 (talk) 04:29, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly
{{PD-Art}}. Tm (talk) 13:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Tm. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:13, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Small file w/o camera EXIF; dubious own work. Photographer's copyright must be protected. Please also see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bartolomeo il Vecchio.jpg. E4024 (talk) 04:34, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Painting by Giacinto Santagostino, so clearly
{{PD-Art}}. Tm (talk) 13:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Tm. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:18, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Suspicious exif information, seems not uploader's own work. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 05:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:20, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
It seems that the picture is not freely licenced and it is copied from here. Puppe100 (talk) 06:16, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:21, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
This is a cellphone photo from a Roscosmos/GCTC portrait and not free to publish! Ras67 (talk) 06:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
This photo was provided by Gennady Padalka personally to be published on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2001:16B8:24E6:4900:E01A:CDCD:FD2A:3D87 (talk) 13:05, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- So what? Has Gennady the right to do that? We need the permission via OTRS directly from Roscosmos/GCTC to publish his portrait under a free licence. I don't believe that Roscosmos is happy, that you are pretending to be the author like at this time. Warm regards --Ras67 (talk) 18:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. João Justiceiro (talk) 06:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
DW no permission Krd 06:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:23, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
لأنها صورة عشوائية من الإنترنت Aelrhman2007 (talk) 23:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Google Translate:"Because it is a random image from the internet".
- Keep Photo from the interior of Årsta slott, a historic landmark. Thuresson (talk) 23:09, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion, not found using Google Images. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:25, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ilhomjon001 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata.
- File:BBTI3431.jpg
- File:BPPE0362.jpg
- File:EKIL6138.jpg
- File:Professor Khudoyberdiev.jpg
- File:Professor na lekcii.jpg
Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:26, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Fantasy election hoax map, out of project scope. Hog Farm (talk) 07:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
It is a fantasy map, not a hoax map (hoaxes claim to be real). I don't care if you delete it (in fact, please do Hoggy) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymoushoneybader1556 (talk • contribs) 16:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:27, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Fantasy election hoax map, out of project scope. Hog Farm (talk) 07:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
It is a fantasy map, not a hoax map (hoaxes claim to be real). I don't care if you delete it (in fact, please do Hoggy) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymoushoneybader1556 (talk • contribs) 16:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:27, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Fantasy election hoax map, outside of project scope. Hog Farm (talk) 07:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
It is a fantasy map, not a hoax map (hoaxes claim to be real). I don't care if you delete it (in fact, please do Hoggy) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymoushoneybader1556 (talk • contribs) 16:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:27, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Cleanup: unused redundant image to File:08184jfPunta Santa Ana Iglesia ni Cristo Museum Manila Felix Y. Manalo Streetfvf 01.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Also: File:08158jfPunta Santa Ana Iglesia ni Cristo Museum Manila Felix Y. Manalo Streetfvf 25.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo out of SCOPE Drakosh (talk) 07:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:29, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Fantasy election hoax map, out of project scope. Hog Farm (talk) 07:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
It is a fantasy map, not a hoax map (hoaxes claim to be real). I don't care if you delete it (in fact, please do Hoggy) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymoushoneybader1556 (talk • contribs) 16:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:29, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo out of SCOPE Drakosh (talk) 07:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:29, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Fantasy election hoax map is out of project scope. Hog Farm (talk) 07:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
It is a fantasy map, not a hoax map (hoaxes claim to be real). I don't care if you delete it (in fact, please do Hoggy) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymoushoneybader1556 (talk • contribs) 16:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:29, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Fantasy election hoax map is out of project scope. Hog Farm (talk) 07:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
It is a fantasy map, not a hoax map (hoaxes claim to be real). I don't care if you delete it (in fact, please do Hoggy) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymoushoneybader1556 (talk • contribs) 16:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:29, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal images, outside project scope. Previously deleted, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Amitthakur420. —Ts12rAc (talk) 07:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Fantasy election hoax map falls outside of project scope. Hog Farm (talk) 07:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
It is a fantasy map, not a hoax map (hoaxes claim to be real). I don't care if you delete it (in fact, please do Hoggy) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymoushoneybader1556 (talk • contribs) 16:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused poor angle of the museum, unlikely to be used by anyone and redundant to other better images at Category:Iglesia ni Cristo Museum, Punta, Santa Ana, Manila. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Hoax fantasy election map, outside of project scope. Hog Farm (talk) 07:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
It is a fantasy map, not a hoax map (hoaxes claim to be real). I don't care if you delete it (in fact, please do Hoggy) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymoushoneybader1556 (talk • contribs) 16:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused poor angle of the museum, unlikely to be used by anyone and redundant to other better images at Category:Iglesia ni Cristo Museum, Punta, Santa Ana, Manila. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:33, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Fantasy election hoax, falls outside of project scope. Hog Farm (talk) 07:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
It is a fantasy map, not a hoax map (hoaxes claim to be real). I don't care if you delete it (in fact, please do Hoggy) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymoushoneybader1556 (talk • contribs) 16:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused poor angle of the museum, unlikely to be used by anyone and redundant to other better images at Category:Iglesia ni Cristo Museum, Punta, Santa Ana, Manila. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:33, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused poor angle of the museum, unlikely to be used by anyone and redundant to other better images at Category:Iglesia ni Cristo Museum, Punta, Santa Ana, Manila. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Gandang Mabagyong Hapon sa; I just want to state that if you were in my place, as Roman Catholic, it is extremely difficult to take photographs alone, I was so nervous for reasons that you probably know; in Sapang Maisac, while was taking photos of the Barangay Stage and the adjacent Catholic Chapel, I was almost arrested because of the fact that I did not notice that the Barangay stage had had a religious ceremony not ours; the same in Kalikid Nueva Ecija, they ran after me; it was the hot hours of the controversies hounding the Churches; and therefore, I offer thee a Folk Song and Dance, since Wikimedia has for February a Folk Contest on Images Imo; sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 11:03, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:33, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused redundant and nearly-duplicate image to File:369Pulilan Baliuag Diversion Road 02.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:33, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
TinEye detected a smaller resolution at https://wn.com/2421 (dated Sep 8, 2017, which is about 4 years prior to the upload date of this questionable image). Exact image: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/POIqE9-mVRI/0.jpg. While this is of lower resolution, one may notice that this lower resolution image is the larger one, as it contains parts that seem to have been cropped in this image. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, previously published, needs COM:OTRS. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation: this is from the Osprey book on the Second Italo-Abyssinian War, cf. https://ospreypublishing.com/the-italian-invasion-of-abyssinia-1935-36-36357 2A02:8388:8A83:9400:956:5B8A:DE5E:41BE 08:29, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Terencebaylon (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Terence Baylon at Beirut International Airport in 2012 2013-08-30 10-07.jpg
- File:Terence Baylon at Beirut International Airport 2013-08-26 18-18.jpg
- File:Terence Baylon at Beirut International Airport 2013-08-26 18-13.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work of the uploader. jdx Re: 08:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
This photo was shared on 20 April 2019 by M2 Ukraine. see Probably the user who upload this photo isn't the creator of this photo. Therefore, I suggest you delete it. Uncitoyen (talk) 09:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, taken from FB as per EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:40, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:HTC Salsa
[edit]These images contain non-free UI elements.
- File:HTC Salsa China version - HTC Sense.jpg
- File:HTC Salsa China version - Weibo Button.jpg
- File:HTC Salsa China version - Weibo Phone.jpg
Larryasou (talk) 09:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:40, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 09:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 09:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 09:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 09:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 09:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 09:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 09:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 09:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 09:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hashemseleh (talk · contribs)
[edit]These photos are apparently a part of Awsan Foundation's Rahal Intiative. There is no evidence on the website indicating the works by the said foundation are available under a free license. OTRS permission needed.
Ahmadtalk 09:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:44, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
This photo was shared on 19 April 2019 by Delixesound. see Probably the user who upload this photo isn't the creator of this photo. Therefore, I suggest you delete it. Uncitoyen (talk) 09:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, taken from FB as per EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:44, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Professional touch but blurry, no EXIF data, so likely copied from somewhere Kotivalo (talk) 09:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:46, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Author requested. I mistakenly uploaded the same image twice. Pjposullivan (talk) 09:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:50, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 09:50, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:50, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Pretty sure this has never been an actual logo of the Anti Revolutionary Party. Also this kind of logos should preferably not be uploaded in JPEG format. Strepulah (talk) 10:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:51, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in uk:Обговорення користувача:Володимир Хомич and uk:wikt:Геодезія/Оцінка точності рядів і мереж трилатерації і лінійно-кутових мереж with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:35, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in uk:Обговорення користувача:Володимир Хомич and uk:wikt:Геодезія/Оцінка точності рядів і мереж трилатерації і лінійно-кутових мереж with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:36, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in uk:Обговорення користувача:Володимир Хомич and uk:wikt:Геодезія/Оцінка точності рядів і мереж трилатерації і лінійно-кутових мереж with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:36, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in uk:Обговорення користувача:Володимир Хомич and uk:wikt:Геодезія/Оцінка точності рядів і мереж трилатерації і лінійно-кутових мереж with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:36, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in uk:Обговорення користувача:Володимир Хомич and uk:wikt:Геодезія/Оцінка точності рядів і мереж трилатерації і лінійно-кутових мереж with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:36, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in uk:Обговорення користувача:Володимир Хомич and uk:wikt:Геодезія/Оцінка точності рядів і мереж трилатерації і лінійно-кутових мереж with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in uk:Обговорення користувача:Володимир Хомич and uk:wikt:Геодезія/Оцінка точності рядів і мереж трилатерації і лінійно-кутових мереж with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in uk:Обговорення користувача:Володимир Хомич and uk:wikt:Геодезія/Оцінка точності рядів і мереж трилатерації і лінійно-кутових мереж with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in uk:Обговорення користувача:Володимир Хомич and uk:wikt:Геодезія/Оцінка точності рядів і мереж трилатерації і лінійно-кутових мереж with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in uk:Обговорення користувача:Володимир Хомич and uk:wikt:Геодезія/Оцінка точності рядів і мереж трилатерації і лінійно-кутових мереж with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in uk:Обговорення користувача:Володимир Хомич and uk:wikt:Геодезія/Оцінка точності рядів і мереж трилатерації і лінійно-кутових мереж with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in uk:Обговорення користувача:Володимир Хомич and uk:wikt:Геодезія/Оцінка точності рядів і мереж трилатерації і лінійно-кутових мереж with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in uk:Обговорення користувача:Володимир Хомич and uk:wikt:Геодезія/Оцінка точності рядів і мереж трилатерації і лінійно-кутових мереж with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in uk:Обговорення користувача:Володимир Хомич and uk:wikt:Геодезія/Оцінка точності рядів і мереж трилатерації і лінійно-кутових мереж with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in uk:Обговорення користувача:Володимир Хомич and uk:wikt:Геодезія/Оцінка точності рядів і мереж трилатерації і лінійно-кутових мереж with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in uk:Обговорення користувача:Володимир Хомич and uk:wikt:Геодезія/Оцінка точності рядів і мереж трилатерації і лінійно-кутових мереж with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in uk:Обговорення користувача:Володимир Хомич and uk:wikt:Геодезія/Оцінка точності рядів і мереж трилатерації і лінійно-кутових мереж with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in uk:Обговорення користувача:Володимир Хомич and uk:wikt:Геодезія/Оцінка точності рядів і мереж трилатерації і лінійно-кутових мереж with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in uk:Обговорення користувача:Володимир Хомич and uk:wikt:Геодезія/Оцінка точності рядів і мереж трилатерації і лінійно-кутових мереж with TeX equivalent:
![{\displaystyle {\frac {[S]}{L}}\leq 1{,}3}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/277df1bc7027de1493b50edf6cc22c2adfe748cf)
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in uk:Обговорення користувача:Володимир Хомич and uk:wikt:Геодезія/Оцінка точності рядів і мереж трилатерації і лінійно-кутових мереж with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in uk:Обговорення користувача:Володимир Хомич and uk:wikt:Геодезія/Оцінка точності рядів і мереж трилатерації і лінійно-кутових мереж with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in uk:Нумерації with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:57, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
The link is dead, Unable to verify the copyright status. Larryasou (talk) 10:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Quarto Gradu Crusis" (Fourth Level Cross) must not be compared to the Swastika Cross. "The fourth level" is mentioned in certain circles as being the expression of Europe's liberation from Islam.jpg
[edit]Possibly out of scope - Google Image Search and TinEye does not seem to have any similar images available, and googling some of the information from the file yields nothing similar. File is unused. Askeuhd (talk) 11:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:59, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo-file, possible self-promotion Askeuhd (talk) 11:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:59, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, want to reupload using PDF as source. Mbee-wiki (talk) 11:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:59, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused file from single-contribution user; Title translates to "Banke [name] is ugly" and description translates to "Banke [name] is very ugly and fat" Askeuhd (talk) 11:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- This looks like a useful file; I would like to keep it and just change the name and description. Unfortunately, the metadata suggests it may be a copyright violation. Brianjd (talk) 14:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and taken from FB. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:00, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
This is not the own work of Series114-85, rather it looks like a former version grabbed from Google Maps, thus COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 11:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unlikely uploader has own satellite. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:02, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo from defunct website - possible copyvio as well Askeuhd (talk) 12:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
exept for a small crop a low quality duplicate of File:Lensshoe hubble.jpg. not own work, licence wrong. Jahobr (talk) 12:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Fictional “alternative history”. Private artwork with no educational value, and therefore out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 12:33, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Fictional “alternative history”. Private artwork with no educational value, and therefore out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 12:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Fictional “alternative history”. Private artwork with no educational value, and therefore out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 13:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Fictional “alternative history”. Private artwork with no educational value, and therefore out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 13:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Clawscoals (talk · contribs) 1
[edit]See image below.
(I apologise for the long image however converting all images to tables with images and text would take forever so figured this way would be a lot quicker), Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 17:31, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Very long image with deletion reasons given for each file
|
|---|
|
|
- File:50000px x 50000px solid white.png
- File:10000px x 10000px solid white.png
- File:5000px x 5000px solid white.png
- File:2000px x 2000px solid white.png
- File:500px x 500px solid white.png
- File:1000px x 1000px solid white.png
- File:200px x 200px solid white.png
- File:100px x 100px solid white.png
- File:50px x 50px solid white.png
- File:20px x 20px solid white.png
- File:2px x 2px solid white.png
- File:5px x 5px solid white.png
- File:10px x 10px solid white.png
- File:20000px x 20000px solid white.png
- File:Universe Sandbox ² - 20200220-191454.png
- File:Universe Sandbox ² - 20200220-191734 Video.gif
- File:Universe Sandbox ² - 20200220-193653 Video.gif
- File:Universe Sandbox ² - 20200220-191721 Video.gif
- File:Universe Sandbox ² - 20200208-190538 Video.gif
- File:Universe Sandbox ² - 20200208-190040 Video.gif
- File:Universe Sandbox ² - 20200208-190407 Video.gif
- File:Universe Sandbox ² - 20200208-185736 Video.gif
- File:Universe Sandbox ² - 20200206-170610 Video.gif
- File:Universe Sandbox ² - 20200208-185647 Video.gif
- File:Universe Sandbox ² - 20190618-182402 Video.gif
- File:Universe Sandbox - 20200607-220125 Video.gif
- File:Universe Sandbox - 20200803-145513 Video.gif
- File:Universe Sandbox - 20200803-151929 Video.gif
- File:Universe Sandbox - 20200803-151920 Video.gif
- File:Dots .png
- File:Universe Sandbox - 20200803-145527 Video (supernova).gif
- File:Xa2epkl6.gif
- File:Tryui76m76 tngj76 gyjnnj76t 345 cjgngv.png
- File:Tyurjnuyuhty.png
- File:1d tyhjnhh.png
- File:20200803 124156 fghy.webm
- File:20200802 194841 76huuyjh j.webm
- File:20200802 225704 ygku.webm
- File:20200802 000737 hgkj.webm
- File:Gfh658756.jpg
- File:20200801 223743 hujuio.jpg
- File:Żar-2.jpg
File:Czerniakowskie-1.jpg- File:Żar-1.jpg
File:Most Poniatowskiego 4.jpgFile:Most Poniatowskiego 3.jpgFile:Most Poniatowskiego 2.webm- File:Most Poniatowskiego 1.jpg
File:Wisła-2.jpgFile:Fontanna.webm
–Davey2010Talk 17:19, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Clawscoals (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]See image below.
(I apologise for the long image however converting all images to tables with images and text would take forever so figured this way would be a lot quicker), Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 17:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Very long image with deletion reasons given for each file
|
|---|
|
|
File:Wisła-1.jpgFile:20200801 184544 ygfyt.webm- File:Kostidfhfgf.png
- File:Small pixel project.png
- File:Very transparent pixel.png
- File:Transparent pixel.png
- File:White pixel.png
- File:Very black pixel.png
- File:Black pixel.png
- File:Very blue pixel.png
- File:Blue pixel.png
- File:Very green pixel.png
- File:Green pixel.png
- File:Very red pixel.png
- File:Red pixel 556654.png
- File:Fggf 1d 5yhg i hghj ☻ kołovb.png
- File:20200731 191034 gfjhhgh.jpg
- File:20200731 191028 gh.jpg
- File:20200731 191031 yt.jpg
- File:20200731 191026 y576.jpg
- File:20200731 191019 ghhj.jpg
- File:20200731 191021 hg.jpg
- File:20200731 191024 hgjhg.jpg
- File:20200731 191013 h.jpg
File:20200731 191010 ty.jpg- File:20200731 191006 rtet.jpg
- File:20200731 190954 rhtryr.jpg
- File:20200731 190952 hhgghf.jpg
- File:20200731 190948 jygIvbbRRhrt.jpg
- File:20200731 190926 gfgf.jpg
- File:20200731 190917 ghjh.jpg
- File:20200731 190848 yyyrt.jpg
- File:20200731 190912fgd.jpg
- File:20200731 190832 uiiu.jpg
File:20200731 190744 gf56trty.jpg- File:20200731 190732 trry.jpg
- File:20200731 190718 hghgj.jpg
- File:20200731 190638 rtyuuyt.jpg
- File:20200731 190657 yghcf5!df.jpg
- File:20200731 190614 gfhg.jpg
- File:20200731 190556 df.jpg
- File:20200731 190554 rtrth.jpg
- File:20200731 190552 hggh.jpg
- File:20200731 190550 u.jpg
- File:20200731 190439 trrhttr.jpg
- File:20200731 190435 ffdh.jpg
File:20200731 185833 rtr.webm- File:20200731 185827 ikygh.jpg
- File:20200731 185821 yuyu.jpg
- File:20200731 185801 tyg jfd☻hj ^hjjh.jpg
–Davey2010Talk 17:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Clawscoals (talk · contribs) 3
[edit]See image below.
(I apologise for the long image however converting all images to tables with images and text would take forever so figured this way would be a lot quicker), Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 17:31, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Very long image with deletion reasons given for each file
|
|---|
|
|
- File:20200731 185728 e.jpg
- File:0123456789 transparent.png
- File:0123456789 ervgoreg.png
- File:67yh11wr4432ygg tgtg (v2).png
- File:67yh11wr4432ygg tgtg.png
- File:Sunset 2333232.jpg
- File:Sunset 73466374455554545345545607892149.jpg
- File:Sunset 20200730 205634.jpg
- File:Sunset 0.jpg
- File:Sunset 765463355.jpg
- File:Sunset 85585748.jpg
- File:Sunset 7654633.jpg
- File:Bazgroły16.png
- File:Bazgroły15.png
- File:Bazgroły14.png
- File:Bazgroły13.png
- File:Bazgroły11.png
- File:Bazgroły12.png
- File:Bazgroły10.png
- File:Bazgroły9.png
- File:Bazgroły8.png
- File:Bazgroły7.png
- File:Bazgroły6.png
- File:Bazgroły5.png
- File:Bazgroły4.png
- File:Bazgroły2.png
- File:Bazgroły3.png
- File:Bazgroły1.png
- File:Bez t4ytułu.png
–Davey2010Talk 18:25, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:17, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Clawscoals (talk · contribs)
[edit]All out of scope images. The Kopia file could be in scope if it was used somewhere however it's not, Thanks,
- File:Jhkjjky4ttg364gf636fr6rt766we4wew3dq1a3ftvtyty9767fg6vt.png
- File:Wiki commons — kopia.png
- File:CAPTCHA.png
- File:Gdfdgggggdfdgdf.png
- File:3d fractal.png
–Davey2010Talk 17:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Clawscoals (talk · contribs)
[edit]Apologies forgot to include these above - No metadata is included with these files and I'm sceptical that these were made by the uploader. Thanks,
–Davey2010Talk 13:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:06, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation Theroadislong (talk) 13:15, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, taken from FB. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:16, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation Facebbok Theroadislong (talk) 13:16, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Files my by User:Oliver Lambkin
[edit]- File:Kingdomofpoland.png
- File:1984altelectoralmap.png
- File:1984altelectoralmap.png
- File:1984electoralmap.png
- File:EuropaFlag.png
- File:Place In the Sun- Parliamentary DIagram.png
- File:Charlesevanshughes.jpg
- File:Flag of the Emu Empire.png
- File:Holy Kingdom of Europa map.png
- File:Coat of arms of the holy kingdom of europa.png
- File:Flag of the Holy Kingdom of Europa.png
- File:Principist Party Logo (China).png
These files by User:Oliver Lambkin look like ordinary election maps and flags but are purely fictional. They are unused and in my opinion private artwork with no educational value, and therefore out of scope. --Jahobr (talk) 13:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Kathisma (talk) 16:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:19, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Cover of Charlie Hebdo #1012 with artist's signature "Luz". Thuresson (talk) 13:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:20, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Probably not own work: reverse Google search indicates two websites also using this image: http://origenesconsulting.com/projects/commercial and, https://www.smsupermalls.com/mall-directory/north-luzon/. Most likely image came from SM's website (the latter). No evidence that this image is CC-licensed on the website. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:24, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- May be also no freedom of panorama yet in the Philippines, please see the previous deletion request. - 49.144.138.181 03:25, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Might be @49.144.138.181: . But, even if FOP is officially and formally introduced here, this image is still a copyvio as it was grabbed from SM Supermall's official website. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:00, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:21, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
See EXIF- Copyright holder, Uwe Köhn 2003:DE:722:E7C9:E062:4E89:32C2:7610 13:36, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:21, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Derivatives of copyrightted work Ymblanter (talk) 15:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:23, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
file in copyviol, cf. Google Images — danyele 15:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:23, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
This photograph was not generated in 1911, has no source, and was taken by someone somewhere. Without that person's permission, this looks like a copyright violation to me, not an "ineligible" for protection. A loose necktie (talk) 15:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:23, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:25, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:36, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- KEEP - multimedia coloring progression and highlighting is necessary to make this dense material much more accessible to readers that might otherwise be deterred by a "text wall" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deleteopedia (talk • contribs) 01:45, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:28, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:50, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:28, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Blurry. Longwinded but unusual file description. Holiday snap? 62.216.207.152 16:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:29, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Holiday snap? No person of encclopaedic relevance. No useable description. 62.216.207.152 16:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:29, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Blurry image. Nothing of importance to be seen. 62.216.207.152 16:58, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:29, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 17:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:30, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 17:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:31, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 17:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:31, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
At the talk page of the file, the uploader, @Antonio Fumetti: claims he is Carlo Fumo, the property owner credited on the poster. Moving this to slow deletion to give him time to contact Commons:OTRS Ymblanter (talk) 17:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 17:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:31, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Alternate History files by UserFuzzy1970
[edit]- File:ElectoralCollege1996AltHarkin.svg
- File:BarbosaVCollor2010.svg
- File:2010svgtest.svg
- File:Alt Presidentielle 8819.svg
- File:Fake Primary Results, SVG Test 92.svg
- File:WilsonvGlenn.svg
- File:LulavGuimaraes.svg
- File:Udallpic1234.png
- File:Bakerpic1234.png
- File:ElectoralCollege1976Udall2.svg
- File:ElectoralCollege1976Udall.png
- File:Alternate 1976 elect 123.png
Fictional "alternate History" maps and characters. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. some of the election maps are mixed in the categories of the normal election maps, what is in my opinion just inviting embarrassing mistakes by unsuspecting users. --Jahobr (talk) 18:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Per COM:EDUSE. It would be misleading to keep these photos inside of Commons. — BriefEdits (talk) 20:37, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:33, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 18:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Comment the maps is similar but fake, compare File:2008 Senate election results map.svg Minnesota upper center. --Jahobr (talk) 18:15, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:33, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Unacceptable watermarks NMW03 (talk) 18:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, watermark suggests copyvio. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Unacceptable watermarks. NMW03 (talk) 18:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, watermark suggests copyvio. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in hy:Ռադիոալիքների տարածումը ներքնոլորտում with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in hy:Ռադիոալիքների տարածումը ներքնոլորտում with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in hy:Ռադիոալիքների տարածումը ներքնոլորտում with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Very bad quality. We have enough better photos about the bridge. Taivo (talk) 18:29, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Fictional map for the future. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 18:30, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Geledi territory in 1840s would reflect this map but in 1880 it was radically smaller WanderingGeeljire (talk) 18:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Under Sultan Yusuf Mahamud Ibrahim the Geledi would control or have in their sphere of influence this general amount of territory and in the resurgence of Ahmed Yusuf but the Historical Dictionary of Somalia makes it quite clear that Osman Ahmed in 1880 was losing control of his allies and even stopped receiving tribute in 1882 according to Georges Revoil. It also touches on the weakness of Osman Ahmed. As the original creator of the map I would like to see it deleted.[1] WanderingGeeljire (talk) 18:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Fictional map for the future. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 18:33, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:36, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
I originally uploaded this file and I will delete it if someone can tell me how. → MrOinkingPig 15:28, 21 February 2021 (CST)
Fictional map for the future. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 18:34, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:36, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Fictional map for the future. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 18:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:36, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Fictional map for the future. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 18:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:36, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 18:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Fictional map for the future. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 18:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation 86.212.183.132 18:51, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Taken from twitter where it had been uploaded in 2017. --Achim (talk) 20:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:39, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Fictional map for the future. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 18:54, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Yes, agreed. I used it in the sandbox page last year and didn't think it was saved. --Francophilique (talk) 15:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)--208.255.152.218 15:29, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:39, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Fictional map for the future. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 19:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:39, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation 86.212.183.132 19:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, found online previously published. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arnaud Delcros (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images uploaded for clearly promotional purposes, all but two of which were used on fr:Utilisateur:Arnaud Delcros/Brouillon which looks to be a blatant advertisement (editing to add: since deleted 13:53, 22 February 2021 (UTC)). Probably out of scope (assuming that page is deleted, per COM:INUSE), unlikely to be own work, and appear to be copyrighted. (Choosing DR over speedy due to the amount as well as three of the images being fairly plain logos.)
- File:07 Serelys FEMAXEEN2 v2 (1).png
- File:Serelys MENOPAUSE m.png
- File:07 Serelys FEMAXEEN2 v2.png
- File:05 Serelys SPM CONFORT m.png
- File:04 Serelys Osteo m.png
- File:03 Serelys 40 v2.png
- File:02 SerelysONE m.png
- File:Purecytonin.png
- File:Logo Serelys Pharma.png
- File:Serelys-pharma.jpg
Perryprog (talk) 19:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:42, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope nudity - Commons is not for exhibitionism. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 19:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:42, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Very small, blurry image. Unused, of little educative or exemplar value Richard Avery (talk) 20:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:43, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in ar:قياس القدرة الاحتكاكية with text equivalent:
- Ip1 = bp,tot _ bp2,3,4
- IP1: القدرة النظرية للإسطوانة الأولي
- bp,tot: القدرة الفرملية الكلية للمحرك
- bp2,3,4: القدرة الفرملية للإسطوانات 2 و3 و4
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 20:05, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:44, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in ar:قياس القدرة الاحتكاكية with text equivalent:
- Ip2 = bp,tot _ bp1,3,4
- Ip3 = bp,tot _ bp1,2,4
- Ip4 = bp,tot _ bp1,2,3
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 20:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:44, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in ar:قياس القدرة الاحتكاكية with text equivalent:
- Ip,tot = Ip1 + Ip2 + ip3 + ip4
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 20:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:44, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in ar:قياس القدرة الاحتكاكية with text equivalent:
- Fb = Ip,tot _ bp,tot
- Fb: القدرة الاحتكاكية
- Ip,tot: القدرة النظرية الكلية
- bp,tot: القدرة الفرملية الكلية
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 20:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:44, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Image of equation, replaced by TeX DMacks (talk) 09:44, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Please replace by TEX. Ruthven (msg) 19:01, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Replaced in ar:قدرة (فيزياء) with TeX equivalent:
_001.jpg){kind=link}
_002.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![87 File:Portada del libro "La Tercera Crisis del Petróleo".jpg](#File:Portada_del_libro_"La_Tercera_Crisis_del_Petróleo".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_at_Rosehill_Cemetery,_Chicago_1.jpg){kind=link}
_at_Rosehill_Cemetery,_Chicago_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![153 File:Расчетный метод "Ватт".jpg](#File:Расчетный_метод_"Ватт".jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![189 File:Quarto Gradu Crusis" (Fourth Level Cross) must not be compared to the Swastika Cross. "The fourth level" is mentioned in certain circles as being the expression of Europe's liberation from Islam.jpg](#File:Quarto_Gradu_Crusis"_(Fourth_Level_Cross)_must_not_be_compared_to_the_Swastika_Cross._"The_fourth_level"_is_mentioned_in_certain_circles_as_being_the_expression_of_Europe's_liberation_from_Islam.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_(recorte).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Tank_number_234,_Budapest,_Hungary,_15_or_16_October_1944_during_Operation_Panzerfaust._(50247534468).jpg){kind=link}
_auf_Panzerkampfwagen_I_Ausf_B_(Sturmpanzer_I_Bison)_in_the_Soviet_Union,_1942._(48091208901).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![313 File:"Soldat" by August Sander. (49110096621).jpg](#File:"Soldat"_by_August_Sander._(49110096621).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_001.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_001.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_001.jpg){kind=link}
_001.jpg){kind=link}
_002.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_002.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_002.jpg){kind=link}
_002.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![16:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/02/21#c-CoffeeEngineer-2021-02-21T16:56:00.000Z-File:Portada_del_libro_"La_Tercera_Crisis_del_Petróleo".jpg){kind=link}
![18:45, 28 March 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/02/21#c-Ezarate-2021-03-28T18:45:00.000Z-File:Portada_del_libro_"La_Tercera_Crisis_del_Petróleo".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_at_Rosehill_Cemetery,_Chicago_1.jpg){kind=link}
_at_Rosehill_Cemetery,_Chicago_1.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_at_Rosehill_Cemetery,_Chicago_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_at_Rosehill_Cemetery,_Chicago_2.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![09:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/02/21#c-WIKImaniac-2021-02-21T09:12:00.000Z-File:Расчетный_метод_"Ватт".jpg){kind=link}
![15:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/02/21#c-P199-2021-04-12T15:41:00.000Z-File:Расчетный_метод_"Ватт".jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_must_not_be_compared_to_the_Swastika_Cross._%22The_fourth_level%22_is_mentioned_in_certain_circles_as_being_the_expression_of_Europe%27s_liberation_from_Islam.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_must_not_be_compared_to_the_Swastika_Cross._%22The_fourth_level%22_is_mentioned_in_certain_circles_as_being_the_expression_of_Europe%27s_liberation_from_Islam.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 20:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. DMacks (talk) 21:05, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:45, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused image that should not be an image.
Could be replaced with text equivalent:
- Ip1 = bp,tot _ bp2,3,4
- IP1: القدرة النظرية للإسطوانة الأولي
- bp,tot: القدرة الفرملية الكلية للمحرك
--WIKImaniac 20:16, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:44, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Photo of possible copyrighted COM:DW derivative images. Leoboudv (talk) 20:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Pictures there are very small and unidetificable. Only illustrative photo from the exhibition.--Svajcr (talk) 20:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Svajcr, in use and DM. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:46, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Election map for a nonexistent state proposed in 1939; given that this is not and has never been a state, I don't see how this map is within project scope. Hog Farm (talk) 20:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:46, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Collage of pictures presumably taken from «Azərbaycanım» magazine and probably uploaded by its editor. OTRS needed. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:47, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Source page has no indication this image is freely licensed Daniel Case (talk) 21:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It is recommended to keep the image. Thanks. --Jujiang (talk) 21:50, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete @Jujiang: Please note that the FOP US is for buildings only, not suitable for artworks. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:58, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- That link does not go to the source page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:49, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, they are different pages, but the author of these pages is the same. Hence it would not affect the effectiveness of the copyright statement. SCP-2000 03:30, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- This website has been license-laundering obvious selfies as own works. It is questionable that they are the authors to begin with. -Mys_721tx (talk) 22:49, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Indeed, Mys 721tx's comment gave me another reason to delete it: COM:LL. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:11, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, they are different pages, but the author of these pages is the same. Hence it would not affect the effectiveness of the copyright statement. SCP-2000 03:30, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- That link does not go to the source page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:49, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per Mys 721tx. Most of the images of that website were taken from other places, e.g. [2]. Also the image is missing exifdata and low image resolution. COM:OTRS permission is necessary. Based on COM:PCP, this image should be deleted. SCP-2000 11:47, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Furthermore, Most of the images in the source article were taken from these Youtube videos [3][4] . These video were published on 2019/10/29 and the article was published on 2019/11/7.Thus these images may not own work and I doubt other images were taken from the internet too. SCP-2000 03:58, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- "this copyright statement" (these pictures have the best sharpness) and "[5]" are two websites with completely different sources. There is obviously no relationship between the two, but the two users have the same name. --Jujiang (talk) 02:57, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, you are right. These photos were not taken from these videos. However, since the shooting angle of these photos are similar to these videos, and also there are some selfies in the article, seem these photos were not taken by 無悠藝 and the original author is 胡志颖. SCP-2000 13:37, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:49, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anonymoushoneybader1556 (talk · contribs)
[edit]These are all more of the fantasy election maps created by Anonymoushoneybader1556. These do not reflect actual events and are all out of project scope. I nominated most of them for deletion earlier, but missed a few.
Hog Farm (talk) 21:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Feel free to delete them, I made them while messing with the sandbox feature for a fantasy political forum. Note, they are purposely fantasy. Thanks Hogmaster. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymoushoneybader1556 (talk • contribs) 11:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:52, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, probably taken from a stock site. ~Cybularny Speak? 21:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier fait double emploi Lidine Mia (talk) 21:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination, near duplicate of File:Eckbolsheim vu du Canal de la Bruche.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 22:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:55, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Fictional map for the future. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 22:54, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:56, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Stevewhite11
[edit]- File:Snake aka lonesoldier.jpg
- File:Snake Aka Lonesoldier.jpg
- File:Snake aka lonesoldier wiki pic.jpg
- File:Snake bio pic.jpg
Personal photos by a non-contributor. Only edits have been to their own user pages on en.wiki and vandalism. — BriefEdits (talk) 22:54, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:56, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Not accurate to any US congress - potential "alternative history" or maybe uploaded by a misinformed user. Either way, it should be deleted. Elliot321 (talk) 23:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:57, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Blurry image, File:Light of the Desert (cropped).jpg fulfills same purpose (demonstrating the gem's appearance and fire) from nearly identical angle. Replaced on various local Wiki projects with higher quality substitute already. RA0808 (talk) 23:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope nudity, has no encylopedic use. Used for vandalism on enwiki. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 13:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:25, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope nudity, no encyclopedic use. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 13:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:25, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope nudity, no encyclopedic use. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 13:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete unused. Elli (talk) 01:19, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:25, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
_(recorte).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(recorte).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: newspaper clip from 2012. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
_(recorte).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:45, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
_(recorte).jpg){kind=link}
The photo shows Alte Rathsapotheke in Lüneburg, not in Bremen Monika Hoerath (talk) 08:02, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Monika Hoerath: That's no reason for deletion. You'll find instructions at COM:RENAME. --Sitacuisses (talk) 14:00, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 12:04, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Wrong location, the pharmacy with the same name is in Lüneburg. Replaced on September 4, 2019 by correct upload Monika Hoerath (talk) 20:14, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 12:05, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
The photo shows not the Alte Rathsapotheke in Bremen. It shows the Alte Rathsapotheke in Lüneburg. Wikimedia Commons has (in dies case CORRECT) the SAME photo under this titleː Alte Rathsapotheke Lüneburg, Große Bäckerstraße 9.jpg Monika Hoerath (talk) 16:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: not exact duplicate; I suggest merging of the images. --Ankry (talk) 09:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
I have uploaded a new version of this picture (in bigger size) under this new titleː Multiple Vincent of the 20th Century.jpg Monika Hoerath (talk) 17:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 10:34, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Modern art work; requires OTRS permission from the artist. E4024 (talk) 17:34, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
While I repeated the upload of this picture to Wikimedia Commons, I gave (sorry) a better description that I am the O N L Y artist. It is not necessary that I give a OTRS permission for my own work.
Please be so kind and delete only the double version.
With kind regards, Monika Hoerath — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 95.91.207.227 (talk) 21:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
This file should be deleted because of the informations that I gave to User E4024 a few time ago. Nevertheless, I am the ONLY artist of this work Monika Hoerath (talk) 22:58, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal art: out of scope. --Ankry (talk) 10:31, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Modern art work; requires OTRS permission from the artist. E4024 (talk) 17:36, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
While I repeated the upload of this picture to Wikimedia Commons, I gave (sorry) a better description that I am the O N L Y artist. It is not necessary that I give a OTRS permission for my own work.
Please be so kind and delete only the double version.
With kind regards, Monika Hoerath — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 95.91.207.227 (talk) 21:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
This file should be deleted because of the informations that I gave to User E4024 a few time ago. Nevertheless, I am the ONLY artist of this work Monika Hoerath (talk) 22:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal work: out of scope. --Ankry (talk) 10:28, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by %USER% as no license Sandra Hanbo (talk) 23:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 06:49, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Files upload with Seri Özeti
[edit]- File:Miray Akay.jpg
- File:Berk Atan.jpg
- File:Hande Erçel.jpg
- File:Burcu Özberk.png
- File:Burcu Özberk.jpg This file is in another deletion request.
These are the actors in a TV serie named Güneşin Kızları in Turkey. A TV channel (Extra Turki) also interviewed these actors. These images have been uploaded with videos on Youtube. The channel that added these videos to Yotuube is named Seri Özeti (in English: Summary of TV Serie). However, these interviews have been made by a TV Channel named Extra Turki. If you examine this Youtube channel, it adds videos related with Turkish TV series, but it isn't the owner of these videos. This licensing isn't valid because it isn't the owner of these videos. I suggest that these images will be deleted. Uncitoyen (talk) 10:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Also thank you for all users' opinions in this subject. @C1K98V, 4nn1l2, LuCKY, and E4024: Regards. Uncitoyen (talk) 10:05, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- I upload files from Seri Özeti a YouTube named channel. Before proceedings I took help from E4024, to understand the language. I did research before uploading the snap from YouTube video, but GOOGLE RIS was of no help, it doesn't show any hit available on web. Few other files from the same YouTube link which I uploaded has been already tagged CSD.G7 and deleted, as those files were unsused. Also after the files are deleted do considered to delete the category created by me and E4024 related to the Gunesin Kizlari series. Thanks --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 11:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- User:Uncitoyen, why do I see you so frequently opening DRs about Turkish people? Is it because Turkey is my country (I saw on your user page that you declare Turkish as your native language) and those DRs attract my attention more than others? Why are you questioning even license-review-passed files about Turks? E4024 (talk) 12:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- The reason I opened DRs yesterday was because I saw Lucky uploaded these photos on the celebrity persons' page on the Turkish Wikipedia. First of all, I thought that Lucky took these photos. Therefore, I needed research. Since my native language is Turkish, it draws my attention to suspicious files related to Turkey. You can look at all my contributions for years. Regards. Uncitoyen (talk) 12:16, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- AFAICS your contributions to Commons are mostly deletion requests, only a handful of -or less- original uploads. E4024 (talk) 18:55, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: In this case I think the youtube license may be valid unless someone can prove otherwise. --Gbawden (talk) 14:36, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Author is claimed to be "Picture people". In my opinion this is copyright violation. OTRS-permission from photographer (not from depicted person) is needed. Taivo (talk) 16:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Die Genehmigung von "Picture People" für die Veröffentlichung ist vorhanden. Dies wurde im Vorfeld abgeklärt. Sonst hätte ich das Foto nicht hochgeladen. --Christine R. Auer (talk) 07:19, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- This permission must be confirmed through OTRS.
- Google Übersetzung. Diese Erlaubnis muss durch OTRS bestätigt werden. Taivo (talk) 10:09, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- This permission must be confirmed through OTRS.
Deleted: per nomination, no permission after 8 months. --Rosenzweig τ 12:52, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Images of the Statue of Pehr Evind Svinhufvud
[edit]The following photographs are derivative works of the Statue of Pehr Evind Svinhufvud (Wikidata:Q56402352), a 1959 sculpture by Wäinö Aaltonen (1894–1966; Wikidata:Q213619), located in Helsinki, Finland:
- File:Pehr Evind Svinhufvuds staty 01.png
- File:Pehr Evind Svinhufvuds staty 02.png
- File:Pehr Evind Svinhufvuds staty 03.png
- File:Pehr Evind Svinhufvuds staty 04.png
The original work (the sculpture) is still under copyright and thus not in public domain until 2037-01-01. Freedom of panorama in Finland is for buildings only. ––Apalsola t • c 16:54, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:34, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:15, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:51, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Liberated prisoner of the Ebensee concentration camp in Austria, 8 May 1945. (45899003575).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:17, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. The original photograph is in the public domain as taken as part of Heslop's duties as U.S. Army photographer and the free license of the colorized version was verified by FlickreviewR 2. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:50, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per Asclepias. --Rosenzweig τ 11:53, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Prisoners from Buchenwald and Jan Sowka awaiting execution in the forest near the camp, 11 may 1942. (49026420722).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:17, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:55, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:55, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose: given the age/date of the photo, it ought to be PD by now. --Mindaur (talk) 11:25, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. "ought to be PD" is not enough, it needs to be more concrete than that. --Rosenzweig τ 11:58, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Tiger II tank of the 503rd Heavy Panzer Battalion (schwere Panzer Abteilung 503.) Tank number 234, Budapest, Hungary, 15 or 16 October 1944 during Operation Panzerfaust. (50247534468).jpg
[edit]_Tank_number_234,_Budapest,_Hungary,_15_or_16_October_1944_during_Operation_Panzerfaust._(50247534468).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Tank_number_234,_Budapest,_Hungary,_15_or_16_October_1944_during_Operation_Panzerfaust._(50247534468).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:59, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
File:A 15 cm sIG 33 (Sf) auf Panzerkampfwagen I Ausf B (Sturmpanzer I Bison) in the Soviet Union, 1942. (48091208901).jpg
[edit]_auf_Panzerkampfwagen_I_Ausf_B_(Sturmpanzer_I_Bison)_in_the_Soviet_Union,_1942._(48091208901).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_auf_Panzerkampfwagen_I_Ausf_B_(Sturmpanzer_I_Bison)_in_the_Soviet_Union,_1942._(48091208901).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:00, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
File:A Panzer IV moving through a burning village in the Soviet union, June July 1942. (50248370502).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:00, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
File:A tiger I of the 502nd Heavy Panzer Battalion in Northwestern Russia, June 1943. (48896962027).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The photographer of this one is named as Georg Schmidt-Scheeder, who accd. to data from the German National Library was born in 1913 and apparently still alive in 1990, so this cannot be in the PD. We have some photos by him under license from the Bundesarchiv (Category:Photographs from the German Federal Archive by Georg Schmidt), but not this one. --Rosenzweig τ 12:05, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Danish volunteers prepare to counterattack after Soviet forces managed to break into their lines. The Danes completed the counterattack after a few hours, 1944. (49275820357).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:07, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. The photographer is named as "Zoll", year of death is unknown, so he could have lived beyond 1950. We have some photos by him under license from the Bundesarchiv (Category:Photographs by Zoll, PK), but not this one. --Rosenzweig τ 12:11, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:German infantry advanced through hilly terrain alongside panzer III’s, Soviet Union, July 1941. (50102074041).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The photographer is named as Arthur Grimm, who accd. to de:Arthur Grimm (Fotograf) died in 2000, so this cannot be in the PD. We have some photos by him under license from the Bundesarchiv (Category:Photographs by Arthur Grimm), but not this one. --Rosenzweig τ 12:16, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:21, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We have the original version of this photo under license from the Bundesarchiv at File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-215-0354-12A, Russland, Panzersoldaten im Panzerturm.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 12:24, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Possibly in a position located in the Vosges mountain range in eastern France, gasmask-wearing Saxon infantrymen cram together for a memento photograph. (50591114608).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:28, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
File:SS-Panzergrenadiers running past a burning a Russian T-34 tank on the eastern front, 18 August 1944. (49026415462).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The photographer is named as Hermann Grönert, but I couldn't find when he died, so he might have lived beyond 1950. --Rosenzweig τ 12:35, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:37, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:29, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:37, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:29, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
![11:29, 21 February 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/02/21#c-JuliusBackman-2021-02-21T11:29:00.000Z-File:"Soldat"_by_August_Sander._(49110096621).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. "by August Sander" presumably refers to the photographer, and that would be de:August Sander, who died in 1964. The file can be restored in 2035. --Rosenzweig τ 12:40, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
![12:40, 20 November 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/02/21#c-Rosenzweig-2021-11-20T12:40:00.000Z-File:"Soldat"_by_August_Sander._(49110096621).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:29, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We have the original photo under license from the Bundesarchiv at File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-R1222-501, Stalingrad, deutscher Soldat mit Zigarette.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 12:43, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:30, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:49, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Men from the 5th SS Panzer Division Wiking in a Marder II, Soviet Union, 1942. (48091206101).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:49, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The photographer is named as "Niquille", but I couldn't find out more about this person, so he could have lived beyond 1950. --Rosenzweig τ 12:52, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Images of the Sibelius Monument 13
[edit]The following photographs are derivative works of the Sibelius Monument (Q2584017), a 1967 sculpture by Eila Hiltunen (1922–2003; Q460402), located in Helsinki, Finland:
- File:Lapsia Sibelius-monumentilla Sibeliuksen puistossa - N211489 - hkm.HKMS000005-0000053a.jpg
- File:Matkailijoita katsomassa Sibelius-monumenttia Sibeliuksen puistossa - N211483 - hkm.HKMS000005-00000534.jpg
- File:Matkailijoita katsomassa Sibelius-monumenttia Sibeliuksen puistossa - N211484 - hkm.HKMS000005-00000535.jpg
- File:Matkailijoita katsomassa Sibelius-monumenttia Sibeliuksen puistossa - N211485 - hkm.HKMS000005-00000536.jpg
- File:Matkailijoita katsomassa Sibelius-monumenttia Sibeliuksen puistossa - N211486 - hkm.HKMS000005-00000537.jpg
- File:Matkailijoita katsomassa Sibelius-monumenttia Sibeliuksen puistossa - N211488 - hkm.HKMS000005-00000539.jpg
- File:Matkailijoita katsomassa Sibelius-monumenttia Sibeliuksen puistossa - N213495 - hkm.HKMS000005-000012gy.jpg
- File:Matkailijoita katsomassa Sibelius-monumenttia Sibeliuksen puistossa - N213496 - hkm.HKMS000005-000012h0.jpg
- File:Matkailijoita katsomassa Sibelius-monumenttia Sibeliuksen puistossa - N213497 - hkm.HKMS000005-000012h1.jpg
- File:Matkailijoita katsomassa Sibelius-monumenttia Sibeliuksen puistossa - N213498 - hkm.HKMS000005-000012h2.jpg
- File:Matkailijoita katsomassa Sibelius-monumenttia Sibeliuksen puistossa - N213499 - hkm.HKMS000005-000012h3.jpg
- File:Matkailijoita katsomassa Sibelius-monumenttia Sibeliuksen puistossa - N213500 - hkm.HKMS000005-000012h4.jpg
- File:Valokuvaaja kuvaa Sibeliusmonumenttia Sibeliuksen puistossa - N211482 - hkm.HKMS000005-00000533.jpg.
- File:Stainless Steel - Flickr - timonoko.jpg
The Sibelius Monument is still under copyright and thus not in public domain until 2074-01-01. Freedom of panorama is for buildings only in Finland.
Related cases:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Helsinki. Sibelius-monumentti. Valokuva Victor Belousov. - panoramio.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibelius Monument - Helsinki, Finland - panoramio.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:SIBELIUS MONUMENT, HELSINKI, FINLAND.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/Images of the Sibelius Monument
- Commons:Deletion requests/Images of the Sibelius Monument 2
- Commons:Deletion requests/Images of the Sibelius Monument 3
- Commons:Deletion requests/Images of the Sibelius Monument 4
- Commons:Deletion requests/Images of the Sibelius Monument 5
- Commons:Deletion requests/Images of the Sibelius Monument 6
- Commons:Deletion requests/Images of the Sibelius Monument 7
- Commons:Deletion requests/Images of the Sibelius Monument 8
- Commons:Deletion requests/Images of the Sibelius Monument 9
- Commons:Deletion requests/Images of the Sibelius Monument 10
- Commons:Deletion requests/Images of the Sibelius Monument 11
- Commons:Deletion requests/Images of the Sibelius Monument 12
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jean Sibelius (100505764).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibeliuksenpääsibeliuspuistossa.JPG
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibelius monument 2.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibelius monument Helsinki.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibelius Monument in Helsinki.JPG
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibelius monument.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibeliusmonumentti2005.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Sibelius Monument (100484627).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibelius park3.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Helsinki. Sibelius-monumentti. Valokuva Victor Belousov. - panoramio.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Monument a Jean Sibelius - Sibelius-monumentti, Helsinki (febrer 2012) - panoramio.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jean Sibelius, finnischer Komponist.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hammond Slides Unidentified 07.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibelius-monumentti Helsinki (Töölö), kuvanveistäjä Eila Hiltunen 1967 (Passio Musicae), haponkestävä teräs.tif
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:2018 January in Helsinki (40074654433).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jean Sibelius monument. Helsinki, Finland.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
––Apalsola t • c 16:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC) –– (one more file added) Apalsola t • c 16:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Just to confirm that I am uploader (as operator of the bot) and these are clear cases of photos of artworks which is still under copyright and should be deleted until 2074-01-01 as Apasola wrote. --Zache (talk) 16:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Isn't the sculpture owned by the city of Helsinki? The old photographs from the National Library of Finland are owned by the city of Helsinki and have been given ahead with the CC BY 4.0 permission. Even when the work is sold it's still possible the "postcard right" isn't handed over unless explicitly stated so, but as they have actually sold postcards of this work, it seems it has been handed over. The city of Helsinki also seems to have complete freedom to repeatedly distribute photographs of the work online. 213.216.252.228 08:21, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- It was confirmed by the Helsinki city museum that the CC-BY permission covers only the rights of the photographer. So if there is something else in the photograph which have distinct copyright (in example artwork) then its status is currently unknown. We hope that license information in Finna will be more exact when the Helsinki city museums database system is updated so this should be fixed at some point. --Zache (talk) 10:52, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 14:00, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Images of the Ilmatar and the Scaup by Aarre Aaltonen
[edit]The following files are derivative works of the Ilmatar and the Scaup (Q12220761), a 1946 sculpture by Aarre Aaltonen (1889–1980; Q9384810), located in Helsinki, Finland:
- File:Börje Dilen - Photograph of the “Ilmatar ja sotka” statue by Aarre Aaltonen.jpg
- File:Sibeliuksen puisto - ser140536 - hkm.HKMS000005-km0000p5z8.jpg
The original work (the sculpture) is still under copyright and thus not in public domain until 2051-01-01. Freedom of panorama is for buildings only in Finland. ––Apalsola t • c 16:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, photos should be deleted. I am uploader (as operator of the bot) and these are clear cases of photos of artworks which is still under copyright and files should be deleted until 2051-01-01 as Apasola wrote. --Zache (talk) 16:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Isn't the sculpture owned by the city of Helsinki? Both of these old photographs from the National Library of Finland are owned by the city of Helsinki and have been given ahead with the CC BY 4.0 permission. Even when the work is sold it's still possible the "postcard right" isn't handed over unless explicitly stated so, but as they have actually sold postcards of this work, it seems it has been handed over. The city of Helsinki also seems to have complete freedom to repeatedly distribute photographs of the work online. 213.216.252.228 08:08, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- First, even though the City of Helsinki probably owns the sculpture (a copy of copyrighted work), that does not mean that it would be the copyright holder of it (the copyrighted art itself). Second, the Cc-by-4.0 at the Finna site only applies to the photograph but not the original work. (This has been confirmed in previous cases.) Third, if the copyright holder has licensed the work to someone to make and sell postcards of the sculpture, does not mean that he would waive his/her rights completely. ––Apalsola t • c 14:03, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 14:02, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Retail 247 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Retail logos uploaded as own work are probably copyvios.
- File:Hechinger logo.png
- File:Builders Square store logo.png
- File:Twin Fair stores logo.png
- File:Pergament Home Centers Logo.png
- File:Gee Bee Stores Logo.png
- File:Noodle Kidoodle store logo.png
- File:County Seat stores logo.png
- File:Ellman's catalog store logo.png
- File:Davega stores logo.png
- File:Barkers (discount) store logo.png
- File:Fedmart stores logo.png
- File:Grand Central stores logo.png
- File:Camelot Music logo.png
- File:Topps stores logo.png
- File:Sky City Stores Logo.png
- File:RI Mall logo.png
- File:Apex stores logo.gif
- File:Apex Companies Logo.jpg
- File:Chess King Logo.png
- File:Gad Zooks Logo.png
- File:J J Newberry Logo.png
- File:Mammoth Mart Store Logo.png
- File:Outlet Department Store Logo.png
- File:Sketch-1604936924911.png
- File:Ann And Hope Store Logo.png
_store_logo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:33, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Can't we just change these to being marked as copyright like any other logo rather than deleting these files and having to replace them with new ones.? Pokemonprime (talk) 16:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Pokemonprime: What you are describing is Fair Use. Sorry, we do not accept Fair Use here on Commons. The images may still be uploaded to English Wikipedia in compliance with en:WP:F — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Fair enough, I didn't realize FU logo images were hosted on Wikipedia itself and not commons. Pokemonprime (talk) 17:23, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 18:58, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Retail 247 (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Retail logos uploaded as own work are probably copyvios. See also previous discussion above.
- File:Noodle Kidoodle store logo.png
- File:Gee Bee stores logo.png
- File:Builders Square Store Logo.png
- File:Almacs.png
- File:ADAP Auto Parts Logo.png
- File:ADAP Discount Auto Parts logo.png
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The logos are too simple for copyright protection, but source must be given. Files without source cannot stay in Commons. Taivo (talk) 10:46, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hi - Its a shame to see that photo go, is there any reason why? Also is it possible to get it legally there or remedy the issue for it being deleted? ChrisHummus (talk) 08:34, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: File:Almacs.png, which is so simple that I think it is below the US threshold of originality. The other files were all already deleted by others. --Rosenzweig τ 13:40, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
A photo of a soviet spy... own work seems unlikely, PMA+70 nigh-on impossible. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:55, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:16, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Matsievsky as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: В соответствии с лицензией на почтовые марки СССР, текст которой находится на этой странице, данный фрагмент почтовой марки, не имеющий номинала и названия страны, является объектом авторского права художника миниатюры, изображенной на почтовой марке. |source=File:The Soviet Union 1990 CPA 6266 stamp (Soviet Intelligence Agents. Kim Philby).jpg AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Speedy delete Это фрагмент почтовой марки СССР. Изображение этой почтовой марки СССР не охраняется авторским правом только целиком. Фрагмент этого изображения без номинала и названия страны охраняется авторским правом художника марки. По факту нарушение авторских прав. Не понимаю, что здесь можно обсуждать. --Matsievsky (talk) 03:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Stamps of Russia are in PD, but parts of stamps are not. Note the text on Template:PD-RU-exempt: Warning – This Russian official document, state symbol or sign (postage stamps, coins and banknotes mainly) may incorporate one or more works that can be copyrightable if separated from this document, symbol or sign. In such a case, this work is not an object of copyright if reused in its entirety but, at the same time, extracting specific portions from this work could constitute copyright infringement. --Ellywa (talk) 14:37, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Matsievsky as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: В соответствии с лицензией на почтовые марки СССР, текст которой находится на этой странице, данный фрагмент почтовой марки, не имеющий номинала и названия страны, является объектом авторского права художника миниатюры, изображенной на почтовой марке. |source=File:The Soviet Union 1990 CPA 6264 stamp (Soviet Intelligence Agents. S.A.Vaupshasov).jpg AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Speedy delete Это фрагмент почтовой марки СССР. Изображение этой почтовой марки СССР не охраняется авторским правом только целиком. Фрагмент этого изображения без номинала и названия страны охраняется авторским правом художника марки. По факту нарушение авторских прав. Не понимаю, что здесь можно обсуждать. --Matsievsky (talk) 03:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- I am not opposed to deletion per Matsievsky’s rationale, they seem to be correct. (The file was uploaded by me in 2012, so I hope this can be understood as a case of me not knowing some things 8 years ago.) stjn[ru] 10:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- И я раньше загружал такие файлы. Но нашлись пользователи, которые удалили мои файлы и объяснили причину удаления. Видимо, сейчас этих пользователей уже нет. --Matsievsky (talk) 11:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Stamps of Russia are in PD, but parts of stamps are not. Note the text on Template:PD-RU-exempt: Warning – This Russian official document, state symbol or sign (postage stamps, coins and banknotes mainly) may incorporate one or more works that can be copyrightable if separated from this document, symbol or sign. In such a case, this work is not an object of copyright if reused in its entirety but, at the same time, extracting specific portions from this work could constitute copyright infringement. --Ellywa (talk) 14:45, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
2002 cast of Mary Tyler Moore installed in Minneapolis; no freedom of panorama for artworks in the US. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 04:30, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. 2002 work by en:Gwen Gillen, who died in 2017. So guess life + 70 applies here and the file can be restored in 2088. --Rosenzweig τ 16:30, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused photo of non-notable band, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:05, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I prefer to wait in these cases. If they are not notable today, they may be notable tomorrow (in 2025 for instance). For me it is enough reason to keep an image of a musical group if we know they exist. Notability is not -or must not be- a concern for Commons. Musicians can suddenly become very famous, it takes only a 3-4 minute long song... My 2 cents. --E4024 (talk) 02:15, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Maybe become notable in a few years...? That could be said about every photo of every unknown person. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:30, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Link to the album does not work anymore. Facebook page has not been updated since March 2020. --Ellywa (talk) 12:16, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Dubious claim of "own work" given that this is pretty blatantly a selfie by the subject of the picture. No metadata. Note that if this file is deleted, File:Michael_Sayman_(cropped).jpg should go too since it's derived from this one. GeneralNotability (talk) 03:36, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader did not comment or take action to show permission. --Ellywa (talk) 12:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
It says on Youtube thar the copyright owner has changed. Wxmarshall (talk) 05:08, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Youtube said "This video contains content from Media Prima Malaysia", however the video can't be captured or made by "Media Prima Malaysia" or the other Malaysian media. Maybe you should provide more info (like their statement about copyright). --ClayM300 (talk) 13:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per COM:PCP and COM:EVID. SCP-2000 06:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and remark of SCP-2000. --Ellywa (talk) 16:22, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
This restoration are very inaccurate and is not in use at the Wiki sites. I recently made an updated version of this restoration, and therefore suggest this original to be deleted. Conty (talk) 06:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Whether an image is accurate or correct is not decided by Commons. --Ellywa (talk) 16:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:HTC Sensation
[edit]These images show non-free software elements.
- File:HTC Sensation in hand.jpg
- File:HTC Sensation XE с BeatsAudio.jpg
- File:HTC Sensation.jpeg
- File:HTCSensationXL.jpg
Larryasou (talk) 09:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- I see no opposition to delete being relatively low-quality pictures. Thank you for the notification. Kind regards, Vascer (talk) 14:43, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 16:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Unusable picte. Not clear what is depicted. The Banner (talk) 09:54, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The current image does not provide sufficient information to make it educational useful. The draft article does not give sufficient additional information. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:HyperChem. Therefore the image is out of scope. --Ellywa (talk) 16:25, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:HTC Hero
[edit]These images show non-free software elements.
- File:Bye bye Hero. Welcome Desire. (5229585690).jpg
- File:HTC Hero (CDMA - Sprint).jpg
- File:HTC Hero.jpeg
- File:T-MobileG2.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Larryasou (talk) 10:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep all as have blanked screens out - No objections to anyone reuploading better photoshops of these. Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 16:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: kept, but deleted previous versions with non-free elements. --Ellywa (talk) 16:27, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
At author request this image is requested deleted. Lapoderosa (talk) 10:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:COURTESY. Image is not used on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 16:28, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
COPYVIO, raster duplicate of non-free file on Wikipedia, see en:File:Coat_of_arms_of_South_Africa.svg Thespoondragon (talk) 10:54, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- This photo is taken from Ukrainian Wikipedia. uk:File:Coat_of_arms_of_South_Africa.svg--121.200.86.194 05:12, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- @121.200.86.194: To take screenshot of vector image and save it as raster image? For what? --Рассилон (talk) 11:41, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: image is used on the project. If it is replaced by the svg version, the png may be deleted per COM:DUPE. Please notify if that has been realised. --Ellywa (talk) 16:30, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Fair use is not permitted on Commons. The version on en Wikipedia is fair use en:File:Coat of arms of South Africa.svg - no indication that this is freely licensed Gbawden (talk) 08:10, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, false license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:51, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
File:THE BRITISH ARMY IN NORTH-WEST EUROPE 1944-45 The grave of a British airborne soldier killed during the battle of Arnhem in September 1944, photographed by liberating forces on 15 April 1945. On tb (46761579152).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, taken from Flickr in good faith, but it is an older image of which the copyright notice is unsure. Can be safely undeleted in 2065. . --Ellywa (talk) 17:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, taken from Flickr in good faith, but it is an older image of which the copyright notice is unsure. Can be safely undeleted in 2069. . --Ellywa (talk) 17:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Colorizer of this image: uncertainty about the original license. should be removed to be on the safe side of copyright JuliusBackman (talk) 11:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, taken from Flickr in good faith, but it is an older image of which the copyright notice is unsure. Can be safely undeleted in 2057. . --Ellywa (talk) 18:00, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
no mention of it being under any CC license, cf. https://web.archive.org/web/20161130152717/https://la-dissidence.org/notre-embleme/ Veverve (talk) 13:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 16:34, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused QR-code. Duplicate. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 16:35, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and 'Files that contain nothing educational other than raw text." are out of scope according to COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 16:37, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- The user is a real creator of the work. He can be contacted here https://www.facebook.com/korenevd
- It was me who asked Dmitry to upload the photo. --Perohanych (talk) 22:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Photo was uploaded by the photograper, Дмитрий Коренев. --Ellywa (talk) 18:09, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Jiří Louda
[edit]This file was initially tagged by TFerenczy as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: More coat of arms artwork created by Jiří Louda (1920–2015), not own work. Some have his signature some don't but the style is consistent. (compare)
- File:COA Smiřický.jpg
- File:COA Páni z Michalovic.jpg
- File:COA Nosticové.jpg
- File:COA Lažanský.jpg
- File:COA Špork.jpg
- File:COA Zajíc z Házmburka.jpg
- File:COA z Janovic.jpg
- File:COA Berchtold z Uherčic.jpg
- File:COA Zierotin.jpg
- File:COA Schlick.jpg
- File:COA of Hložek of Žampach.jpg
- File:COA of Budovec of Budov.jpg
- File:COA of Štampach Family.jpg
- File:COA of Věžník family.jpg
- File:COA Haugwitz.jpg
- File:COA of Straka z Nedabylic.jpg
- File:COA of Slavata Family.jpg
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Jiří Louda's work, indeed. These are not out of copyright. Kathisma (talk) 15:48, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. Artist died in 2015. The image(s) will be in PD 70 years after this year and can be undeleted in 2086. Can be undeleted earlier if permission for publication with a free licence is obtained from the heirs per VRT. --Ellywa (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
na dole znajdują się inicjały strony, która kiedyś wykorzystywała to czarno-białe zdjęcie. Zdjęcie jest otwarte Piro (talk) 17:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. The uploader did not give evidence that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence, per COM:EVID. Therefore the file has to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as Dw no source since (dw no source since) -- Geagea (talk) 17:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- The source is Gonen Sharon (Q29883917). An Israeli archaeologist that made the maps and the photo. -- Geagea (talk) 18:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- The map with the picture was recieved from Gonen Sharon, an Israeli archaeologist. This is part of is report. I am surprised to see that a picture that has OTRS permissin was nominated for deletion. Hanay (talk) 20:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Was aerial photo made by same person? Or derived from map service? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Today we have a lots of kind of drones with camera. You can find in less then 100 USD. There is no need of "map service" for that. -- Geagea (talk) 22:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Anyway I have forwarded question to the archaeologist if he is using map service of any kind and the answer was: no. The map and the ariel photo are own work by him. -- Geagea (talk) 11:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- It is amazing that an image with OTRS approval was uploaded for a deletion vote. User:EugeneZelenko seems to have no knowledge on archeology, because this kind of map is used in many archeological reports. I know the archaeologist Dr.Gonen Sharon (Category:Gonen Sharon). The uploader of the file Maor97 is his student. When I saw that Maor uploaded this file I asked him if he got permission from Gonen Sharon to upload the picture, and he said yes. I called Gonen and took care of getting OTRS permission. This deletion vote is unnecessary Hanay (talk) 17:05, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Anyway I have forwarded question to the archaeologist if he is using map service of any kind and the answer was: no. The map and the ariel photo are own work by him. -- Geagea (talk) 11:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Today we have a lots of kind of drones with camera. You can find in less then 100 USD. There is no need of "map service" for that. -- Geagea (talk) 22:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Was aerial photo made by same person? Or derived from map service? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- The map with the picture was recieved from Gonen Sharon, an Israeli archaeologist. This is part of is report. I am surprised to see that a picture that has OTRS permissin was nominated for deletion. Hanay (talk) 20:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: permission is received for this (and other) images, as far as I can interprete the ticket, which is in Hebrew. If this is still contested, please post a question on the VRT village pump. --Ellywa (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Not in public domain as it is an official portrait of a State of Illinois official. Uploader needs to provide proof otherwise of owning copyright. BWellsOdyssey (talk) 19:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Like most other official portraits, this is a public domain image. I cannot find any document, website or legislation stating that official portraits are not public domain. I did find two websites using this image without a license, though. ILLINOIS DEMOCRATS PICK WELCH FOR HOUSE SPEAKER; MADIGAN OUT and How Chris Welch Became Speaker→ MrOinkingPig 15:28, 21 February 2021 (CST)
- @MrOinkingPig: You seem to have it the wrong way around. Everything is copyrighted unless there is a specific reason that it is in the public domain. There seems to be no reason for Illinois official portraits (as works of a US state government) to be in the public domain. Brianjd (talk) 12:44, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- This deletion request has been active since February. Has there been any decision made as to whether Wikimedia Commons is able to host the image? BWellsOdyssey (talk) 14:45, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- @MrOinkingPig: You seem to have it the wrong way around. Everything is copyrighted unless there is a specific reason that it is in the public domain. There seems to be no reason for Illinois official portraits (as works of a US state government) to be in the public domain. Brianjd (talk) 12:44, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- We should check the uploader’s other uploads too, especially File:Official portrait of Senator Robert Peters (D) Illinois General Assembly.jpg. Brianjd (talk) 12:44, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per above discussion + the deletion of the other file. Brianjd (talk) 14:50, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
_Illinois_General_Assembly.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. The source website, https://www.ilga.gov/house/Rep.asp?MemberID=2419, does not show this image is licenced with CC0 or any other free licence. --Ellywa (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
File:WINNER NP AWARDS BEST NORDIC SHORT FILM NORDISK PANORAMA 2013 ON SUFFOCATION JENIFER MALMQVIST .jpg
[edit]
Low quality promotional image for a short film. Adds nothing to the individual articles. BriefEdits (talk) 20:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: image is currently in use on the projects, so not out of COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 13:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
The uploader provided contradicting information: (1) they claim to be the author of the photo (the photographer) and (2) they used copyright template that is valid only for unknown photographers. In the first case, we need a valid license declaration, and in the second, we need information about the photo source providing an evidence that the photographer is indeed unknown. Ankry (talk) 21:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Info The rationale above is also goes for File:Aleksander Kreek Stockholm 1947 2.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 13:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Me "Edo Ekigawa" have right from Mayanesia.com to share picture on their website Edo akigawa (talk) 22:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Where is the evidence? --Túrelio (talk) 08:22, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
"Images cant be sold but can be using for personal and commercial purpose" on mayanesia.com homepage Edo akigawa (talk) 23:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I think I found a ticket sample on Nasa's website - https://mars.nasa.gov/participate/send-your-name/insight/invite/
- Although the source/license information provided by the uploader are nonsense license laundering, is this not the work of NASA and thus {{PD-USGov-NASA}}? Weak keep if so (would be preferable to have a blank pass without the "Mas Juki.") Эlcobbola talk 21:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
"Images cant be sold but can be using for personal and commercial purpose" on mayanesia.com homepage Edo akigawa (talk) 22:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. The uploader did not give evidence that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence, per COM:EVID. Therefore the file has to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 13:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Actualmente existe una nueva versión del archivo, por lo cual nadie usa este archivo Drackspedia (talk) 22:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: @Drackspedia: if this file is a duplicate, please provide a link to the other image and ping me on this page, so I can reconsider to delete the image. --Ellywa (talk) 13:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, out of project scope. Leyo 23:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. This files consists of raw text and can be better represented in another manner, therefore out of COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 13:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Questionable PD-textlogo claim. See COM:TOO Netherlands. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:33, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 13:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Too complex or PD-textlogo. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:36, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 13:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Too complex for PD-textlogo Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - I disagree. The logo is simple enough. --Sreejith K (talk) 03:32, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Perhaps to too complex, but this file is also out of scope, irrelevant radio station, not used on the projects, of no educational value, per COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 13:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Violetbonmua as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The film was published in Vietnam in 1957 by Alpha Film Studio, so it is not considered to be in the public domain in VN until 2032 AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:16, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- The file was out of copyright in Vietnam in 2007 by the 2005 law, before 2010 (when the 2009 amendment starts effect). I don't know about its copyright status in the US though. sB talk 18:39, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Buiquangtu: Oops! I forgot about that. You're right. It's in the PD in VN, but not in the US yet because it was published outside the U.S. between 1926 and 1977 it wasn't in the PD in Vietnam on January 1, 1996. ~ Ultraviolet (talk2me) ~ 13:49, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:21, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- ↑ Historical Dictionary of Somalia, page 29