Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/02/01
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Created by User:Aryashahnaughty sockpuppet. Also serves no encyclopedic purpose. Eostrix (talk) 06:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors): Used in spam + created by blocked sock on enwiki. See w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aryashahnaughty. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:06, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
File:The Coronation of Mohammad Shah Qajar (1834 – 1250 A.H.)- محمد شاه قاجار در روز تاجگذاری (1213 ه ش – 1250 ه ق).jpg
[edit]Author is unknown. مجله فرهنگی هنری بخارا (Bukhara Magazine) is most probably just a re-user. 4nn1l2 (talk) 06:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- منبعش را پیدا کردم. حدس میزنم با یکی از الگوهای مرتبط با آمریکا بتوان نگهاش داشت. شاید PD-1923 مناسب باشد. Hanooz 15:55, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- ممنون. تاریخ و پروانه را اصلاح کردم. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:06, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --4nn1l2 (talk) 16:06, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Omar010123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Pictures taken of images on PC or TV screen.
- File:Mohmmad Salah sponsorship oppo .jpg
- File:Mohammad Salah with family .jpg
- File:Mohammad Salah12345.jpg
- File:Mohammad Salah1234.jpg
- File:Mohammad Salah.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:53, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work of non-free content (F3). --Эlcobbola talk 15:26, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Single upload, unlikely to be own work, no EXIF data. Smooth O (talk) 13:26, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
OTRS permission denied, permission given to hrwiki only - image copied to hrwiki Ivi104 (talk) 12:04, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 06:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 11:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shane.outram (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, compilation of personal selfies.
- File:Shane Alexander Outram.jpg
- File:Shane Outram cmp.jpg
- File:Shane Outram camp.jpg
- File:Shane A outram.jpg
- File:Shane A Outram .jpg
- File:Shane Outram 2020.jpg
- File:Shane Outram trlr.jpg
- File:Shane Outram 2019 nye.jpg
- File:Shane Alexander Charles Outram.jpg
- File:Shane Outram 2019.jpg
- File:Shane Outram.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 13:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:09, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zamania123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploader is claims to be the copyright holder of these images and they are their own work. Given the uploader's other copyright violations, this claim is dubious. For example, File:Up Dildarnagar police265 1295457031.jpg is identified as a police logo. File:Mughal Palace Ghazipur dildarnagar.jpg is clearly a scan of a drawing that has had some filters applied to add a green hue. Even images shot with a point and shoot are dubious. File:Dildarnagar photo.jpg would appear to be plausibly own work as something they could have photographed around town. But this is actually a copy of a Commons image by another editor. See File:Dildarnagar.jpg which was uploaded to Commons first.
- File:Mircha,kamsar.jpg
- File:Kurrah,kamsar.jpg
- File:Dildarnagar-tarighat train since 1880.jpg
- File:Ghazpurahiya train at dildarnagar since 1880.jpg
- File:Mughal Palace Ghazipur dildarnagar.jpg
- File:Dildarnagarthefuntown.gif
- File:Up Dildarnagar police265 1295457031.jpg
- File:1873 ajayab ghar 5.png
- File:1911 ajayab ghar 19.png
- File:1870 ajayab ghar 3.png
- File:1867 ajayab ghar 2.png
- File:1876 ajayab ghar 6.png
- File:1879 ajayab ghar 7.png
- File:1906 ajayab ghar 18.png
- File:1903 ajayab ghar 17.png
- File:1896 ajayab ghar 14.png
- File:1893 ajayab ghar 13.png
- File:1901 ajayab ghar 16.png
- File:Dildarnagar ajayab ghar 10.png
- File:Mughal Palace, Ghazipur.jpg
- File:Dildarnagar ajayab ghar 12.png
- File:Junction dildarnagar.jpg
- File:Dildarnagar photo.jpg
- File:Crescent convent school.JPG
Whpq (talk) 14:22, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:11, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Şair Ümit Arasan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion. Commons is not your personal free web host.
- File:Ümit Arasan Şair Sanatcı 49.jpg
- File:Ümit Arasan Şair Sanatcı 48.jpg
- File:Ümit Arasan Şair Sanatcı 47.jpg
- File:Ümit Arasan Şair Sanatcı 46.jpg
- File:Ümit Arasan Şair Sanatcı 42.jpg
- File:Ümit Arasan Şair Sanatcı 41.jpg
- File:Ümit Arasan Şair Sanatcı 40.jpg
- File:Ümit Arasan Şair Sanatcı 36.jpg
- File:Ümit Arasan Şair Sanatcı 35.jpg
- File:Ümit Arasan Şair Sanatcı 33.jpg
- File:Ümit Arasan Şair Sanatcı 31.jpg
- File:Ümit Arasan Şair Sanatcı 29.jpg
- File:Ümit Arasan Şair Sanatcı 26.jpg
- File:Ümit Arasan Şair Sanatcı 22.jpg
- File:Ümit Arasan Şair Sanatcı 18.jpg
- File:Ümit Arasan Şair Sanatcı 14.jpg
- File:Ümit Arasan Şair Sanatcı 13.jpg
- File:Ümit Arasan Şair Sanatcı 12.jpg
- File:Ümit Arasan Şair Sanatcı 11.jpg
- File:Ümit Arasan Şair Sanatcı 10.jpg
- File:Ümit Arasan Şair Sanatcı 08.jpg
- File:Ümit Arasan Şair Sanatcı 07.jpg
- File:Ümit Arasan Şair Sanatcı 06.jpg
- File:Ümit Arasan Şair Sanatcı 04.jpg
- File:Ümit Arasan Şair Sanatcı 01.jpg
- File:Ümit Arasan Şair Sanatcı 02.jpg
- File:Ümit Arasan Müzik Prodüksiyon Film Yapım Org Ajans Melis Fm.jpg
Achim (talk) 19:26, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:18, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:12, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Şair Ümit Arasan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:51, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
The photographs of Heinrich Hoffmann (1885–1957) are copyrighted in Germany until 70 years after Hoffmann's death. They will enter the public domain in Germany only on January 1, 2028. The copyright in Germany on these photos is owned by the German state. See Category:Heinrich Hoffmann Mutter Erde (talk) 08:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The photographs of Heinrich Hoffmann (1885–1957) are copyrighted in Germany until 70 years after Hoffmann's death. They will enter the public domain in Germany only on January 1, 2028. The copyright in Germany on these photos is owned by the German state. See Category:Heinrich Hoffmann Mutter Erde (talk) 08:26, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The photographs of Heinrich Hoffmann (1885–1957) are copyrighted in Germany until 70 years after Hoffmann's death. They will enter the public domain in Germany only on January 1, 2028. The copyright in Germany on these photos is owned by the German state. See Category:Heinrich Hoffmann
- File:Deutschland erwacht - Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP (IA deutschlanderwac00bade).pdf
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0038 Deutschland erwacht - Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 Wilfrid Bade (1906-1945) Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright restriction Hitlerputsch Gefallenen 1923 Cropped.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0038 Deutschland erwacht - Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 Wilfrid Bade (1906-1945) Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright restriction Hitlerputsch Gefallenen 1923.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0039 Deutschland erwacht - Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 Wilfrid Bade (1906-1945) Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright restriction Hitlerputsch Gefallenen 1923 Cropped.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0039 Deutschland erwacht - Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 Wilfrid Bade (1906-1945) Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright restriction Hitlerputsch Gefallenen 1923.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0049 Deutschland erwacht - Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 Wilfrid Bade (1906-1945) Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright restriction.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0049 Deutschland erwacht - Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 Wilfrid Bade Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright restriction Blutfahne Cropped.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0050 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 042 Horst Wessel an der Spitze seines Sturmes in Nürnberg 1929 Sturmabteilung Nazi salutes Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0050 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 042 Horst Wessel an der Spitze seines Sturmes in Nürnberg 1929 Sturmabteilung Nazi salutes W. Bade 1906-45 Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0051 Deutschland erwacht - Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 Wilfrid Bade (1906-1945) Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright restrictions Braunes Haus Arbeitszimmer colorised.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0051 Deutschland erwacht - Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 Wilfrid Bade (1906-1945) Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright restrictions Braunes Haus Fahnenhalle colorised.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0051 Deutschland erwacht - Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 Wilfrid Bade (1906-1945) Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright restrictions Braunes Haus München Photo colorised.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0051 Deutschland erwacht - Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 Wilfrid Bade (1906-1945) Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright restrictions Das Braune Haus München.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0052 Deutschland erwacht - Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 Wilfrid Bade (1906-1945) Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright restrictions Braunes Haus SA-Leute Kasino Hitler.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0052 Deutschland erwacht - Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 Wilfrid Bade (1906-1945) Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright restrictions Das Braune Haus München.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0053 Deutschland erwacht - Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 Wilfrid Bade (1906-1945) Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright restrictions Braunes Haus Chef des Stabes Hitler.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0053 Deutschland erwacht - Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 Wilfrid Bade (1906-1945) Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright restrictions Braunes Haus Dietrich-Eckart-Büste Ehrentafel.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0053 Deutschland erwacht - Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 Wilfrid Bade (1906-1945) Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright restrictions Braunes Haus Kartotheksaal.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0053 Deutschland erwacht - Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 Wilfrid Bade (1906-1945) Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright restrictions Das Braune Haus München.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0054 Deutschland erwacht - Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 Wilfrid Bade (1906-1945) Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright restrictions Braunes Haus Hitler verlässt.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0054 Deutschland erwacht - Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 Wilfrid Bade (1906-1945) Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright restrictions Das Braune Haus München.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0070 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 058 NS Jugendbewegung Fanfaren der Hitlerjugend Chemnitz HJ Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright Cropped card.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0070 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 058 NS Jugendbewegung Schwören am Flammenaltar, Deutsche zu sein Sonnenwende der Hitlerjugend Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright Cr.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0070 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 058 NS Jugendbewegung von Schirach W. Bade 1906-45 Cigaretten-Bilderdienst colorized cigarette cards USHMM No known copyright.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0071 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 059 NS Jugendbewegung Das Symbol der Deutschen wird gehisst Swastika Nazi salute BDM Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright Cropped card.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0071 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 059 NS Jugendbewegung Deutsche Mädels Ausfahrt BDM march Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright Cropped card.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0071 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 059 NS Jugendbewegung Trommeln, die zur deutschen Freiheit rufen HJ drummer boys Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright Cropped card.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0071 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 059 NS Jugendbewegung W. Bade 1906-45 Cigaretten-Bilderdienst colorized cigarette cards USHMM No known copyright.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0072 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 060 NS Jugendbewegung Hitlerjugend W. Bade 1906-45 Cigaretten-Bilderdienst cigarette cards USHMM No known copyright.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0072 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 060 NS Jugendbewegung Jugendtag 2. Oktober 1932 Potsdam Nazi salutes Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright Cropped card.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0072 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 060 NS Jugendbewegung Sächsische Jugend huldigt dem Führer Erfurt 1933 Hitler DJV HJ Nazi salutes Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyri.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0073 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 061 NS Jugendbewegung Hitlerjugend marschiert vor von Schirach Nürnberg 1933 Julius Streicher Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright Cr.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0073 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 061 NS Jugendbewegung Reichsjugendtag Potsdam 1932 HJ flags Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright Cropped card.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0073 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 061 NS Jugendbewegung W. Bade 1906-45 Cigaretten-Bilderdienst colorized cigarette cards USHMM No known copyright.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0074 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 062 NS Jugendbewegung BDM Jungvolk W. Bade 1906-45 Cigaretten-Bilderdienst colorized cigarette cards USHMM No known copyright.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0074 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 062 NS Jugendbewegung Das ist Deutschlands Zukunft Jungvolk Pimpfe DJ DVJ boys Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright Cropped card.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0074 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 062 NS Jugendbewegung Deutsche Mädels BDM girls window Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright Cropped card.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0075 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 063 NS Jugendbewegung Hitlerjugend bekennt sich zur nationalen Arbeit 1. mai 1933 Nazi salute Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright Crop.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0075 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 063 NS Jugendbewegung Hitlerjugend W. Bade 1906-45 Cigaretten-Bilderdienst cigarette cards USHMM No known copyright.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0076 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 064 NS Jugendbewegung Avantguardia Avanguardia besucht das Braune Haus München 1932 Fascist Youth Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyrigh.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0076 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 064 NS Jugendbewegung Avantguardia Avanguardia Braune Haus München 1932 W. Bade 1906-45 Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0110 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 096 Hitlerjugend Generalfeldmarschall Hindenburg Tage der Arbeit 1. Mai 1933 W. Bade 1906-45 Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0110 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 096 Hitlerjugend grüsst den Generalfeldmarschall am Tage der Arbeit 1. Mai 1933 von Hindenburg Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright C.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0111 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 097 Deutsche Jugend marschiert Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright Cropped card.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0111 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 097 Deutsche Jugend marschiert W. Bade 1906-45 Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright page.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0143 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 129 Heldenfriedhof Hohenstein-Ostpreussen Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright (1) Cropped card.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0143 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 129 Hitler Nazi Party members Heldenfriedhof Hohenstein-Ostpreussen Godesberg Rhein Heinrich Hoffmann W. Bade 1906-45 Cigaretten-Bilderdienst No kn.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0143 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 129 Im Banne der Worte des Führers Young Nazi Party members Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright Cropped card.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0143 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 129 Rhein bei Godesberg Hitler Heinrich Hoffmann SS member salute Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright Cropped card.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0154 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 138 Die Jüngsten bergrüssen ihren Führer Hitler Adjutant Brückner flowers children Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright Cropped.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0154 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 138 Die kleine Gratulantin Hitler girl Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright Cropped card.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0154 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 138 Ein Blumenstrauss von Kinderhand Hitler flowers children Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright Cropped card.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0154 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 138 Hitler with children cigarette cards W. Bade 1906-45 Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright.jpg
- File:Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0154 Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 138 Neuschwanstein 1933 Hitler boys Nazi Party members W. Bade 1906-45 Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright Cropped card.jpg
- File:Deutschland erwacht - Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP (IA deutschlanderwac00bade 0).pdf
Mutter Erde (talk) 08:32, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete aber Fotos aus der Nazizeit, speziell Hoffmann, werden hier ja prinzipiell behalten. Nur Quietscheentchen werden gelöscht. --Ralf Roletschek 09:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adella2021 (talk · contribs) and EllaRtvDiamant (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope photos of a non-notable individual; tried to self-promo at ro:Iustin Gondos. Adella2021 and EllaRtvDiamant are possible clones.
- Adella2021:
- EllaRtvDiamant:
Gikü (talk) 09:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment. See also: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by EllaRtvDiamant. Gikü (talk) 09:48, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 16:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from modern art.
- File:Наху гүний тулалдаан.jpg
- File:Аюурбалбад хааны хатан Раднашири.jpg
- File:Ардын засгийн анхны наадам зураачийн хамт.jpg
- File:Ардын засгийн анхны наадам.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Clearly just a screen capture of a BBC broadcast Sillyfolkboy (talk) 22:05, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Delete all. These should have been listed as a group, but the problem's much the same for all of them. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Clearly not own work as BBC property Sillyfolkboy (talk) 22:13, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Clearly screenshot of BC broadcast Sillyfolkboy (talk) 22:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
User has uploaded multiple copyrighted works as their own. Name fo this also suspect Sillyfolkboy (talk) 22:18, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
This is a non-free logo Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:19, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Exif data shows Photosport.co.nz as the copyright holder. Appears to be uploaded under the wrong license, and shouldn't be eligible on Commons. Gibbsyspin (talk) 03:07, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded this photo for a page that was rejected and I would please now like it deleted. Esmejames (talk) 05:48, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --E4024 (talk) 01:06, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
No lo quiero Juan José Echarte Pascual (talk) 06:10, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete OoS. --E4024 (talk) 01:09, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
no quiero esto ahora Juan José Echarte Pascual (talk) 06:43, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete OoS. --E4024 (talk) 01:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
This image is copyrighted. Delete it as soon as possible *•.¸♡ ℍ𝕒𝕣𝕕𝕒𝕣𝕤𝕙𝕒𝕟 𝔹𝕖𝕟𝕚𝕡𝕒𝕝 ♡¸.•*𝕋𝕒𝕝𝕜 08:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
test image Wikilover90 (talk) 08:34, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Personal photo of a user with no valid contribs - m:Special:CentralAuth/ScriitorulAdrianMatei Gikü (talk) 10:04, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
1928 sheet music cover that uses an image from a 1928 film. I don't see any indication the film is public domain, so this might need to wait until 2024 to be on Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 02:16, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Rubin16 at 13:30, 8 Februar 2021 UTC: No license since 31 January 2021 --Krdbot 21:24, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Afghanistan A1Cafel (talk) 08:43, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:30, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Afghanistan A1Cafel (talk) 08:43, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:30, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Rubin16 at 13:31, 8 Februar 2021 UTC: No license since 31 January 2021 --Krdbot 21:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Rubin16 at 13:31, 8 Februar 2021 UTC: No license since 31 January 2021 --Krdbot 21:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Personal photo of a user with no valid contribs: m:Special:CentralAuth/Petre Albert Ionuț Gikü (talk) 09:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:03, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW of the publication. LGA talkedits 07:12, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: As part of cleanup russavia (talk) 13:03, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
As in https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Air_Koryo_In-Flight_Reading_Material_(10043523963).jpg Matlin (talk) 11:53, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:02, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
found elsewhere, copyright violation: https://www.flash80.com/photos/stars/atlantique.jpg Jmax (talk) 13:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 06:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Owned by Disney - not own work https://twitter.com/DisneylandParis/status/1213384623964741632/photo/2 Sillyfolkboy (talk) 22:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:03, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
User has uploaded multiple copyrighted works as their own. Name of this also suspect Sillyfolkboy (talk) 22:18, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:04, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused file. Personal artwork with unhelpful description. Malcolma (talk) 17:20, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:13, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Looks like its screencap from this copyrighted video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pn48kOntQLw — Dudek1337 (talk) 18:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 16:12, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 16:12, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Looking at the YouTube link, unlikely that the YouTube uploader is the copyright holder. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The poster of the YouTube video disclaims in the description that it is an edit published under fair use, and that the rights to the footage belongs to the owners. Dancter (talk) 15:50, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:23, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Book cover. Copyrighted. GeorgHH • talk 20:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:22, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
RBG-meme with no educational value, base image likely copyvio → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 20:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:21, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused private image, no info, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 21:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:15, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
The uploader of the file is trying to get it deleted, as may be seen at page history and file TP (and they also asked me help in their own TP). As the file is not in use and there is an alternative image, I see no problem in deleting it. (What really is a problem for me is not knowing how to change this red link created by the uploader, to a blue one. So help me God! :) E4024 (talk) 17:57, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:29, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Per a Tineye search, the photo is from Shutterstock however all links of it lead to a 404 error page. Howhontanozaz (talk) 18:05, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:26, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in pt:Localização de instalações and pt:Usuário(a):Joanaac/Exercício 4 with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in pt:Localização de instalações and pt:Usuário(a):Joanaac/Exercício 4 with table equivalent:
I ≡ J = {1, 2, …, n} É um conjunto de vértices da rede em questão Fi(yj, xij) Custo de operar e construir uma facilidade em i ∈ I dij(xij) Custo de suprir a procura da àrea j ∈ J a partir de i ∈ I xij Fracção da procedura da àrea j ∈ J suprida a partir da facilidade i ∈ I yi É uma Variável discreta que assume apenas os valores 0 ou 1 yi = 1 Se uma facilidade for construída em i ∈ I yi = 0 caso contrário
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:40, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in pt:Localização de instalações and pt:Usuário(a):Joanaac/Exercício 4 with TeX equivalent:
A procura do vértice j no qual não existe nenhuma facilidade, à qual é alocada uma facilidade de nível 1 (hierarquia inferios) no vértice i A procura do vértice j (onde não existe facilidade alguma), à qual é alocada a uma facilidade de nível 2 (hierarquia superior) no vértice i A procura do vértice j é alocada a uma facilidade de nível 1 (nível 2) existente neste vértice Procura do vértice j (com facilidade 1) à qual é alocada uma facilidade de nível 2 Se uma facilidade de nível 1 for locado no vértice i, e iagual a zero caso contrário Se uma facilidade de nível 2 for locado no vértice i, e igual a zero no caso contrário
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in pt:Localização de instalações and pt:Usuário(a):Joanaac/Exercício 4 with table equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in pt:Localização de instalações and pt:Usuário(a):Joanaac/Exercício 4 with table equivalent:
Intensida de Importância Definição Explicação 1 Mesma importância As duas actividades contribuem igualmente para os objectivos 3 Pequena importância de uma sobre a outra A experiência e o julgamento favorecem uma actividade levemente em relação à outra 5 Grande importância ou essencial A experiência e o julgamento favorecem uma actividade fortemente em ralação à outra 7 Forte importância Uma actividade é fortemente favorecida em relação à outra e pode ser demonstrada na práctica 9 Importância absoluta A evidência favorece uma actividade em relação à outra com o mais alto grau de certeza 2, 4, 6, 8 Valores intermediários entre valores adjacentes Quando se procura uma condição de compromisso entre duas definições
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:43, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in pt:Localização de instalações and pt:Usuário(a):Joanaac/Exercício 4 with table equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:19, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Book Cover is copyright protected Mussklprozz (talk) 09:21, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Keep De minimis This is an author, at a book signing of her book. The cover adds context, but is far from central (or even complete).
- If this opinion was opposed, we'd still have the option of cropping out the cover. Which would be a less good image, but still better than deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:43, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The cover is de minimis. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 17:24, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: The book cover qualifies for Commons:De minimis. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:28, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Single upload, no EXIF data, unused file. Smooth O (talk) 14:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 15:04, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
insignificant, nonsense, without meaningful use Robins7 (talk) 14:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by JCimroman (talk • contribs) 15:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Very significant scientific discovery, useful in many ways, especially for programmers and binary mathematics lectors JCimroman (talk) 16:12, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It's not Commons' role to rule on the correctness of a topic or theory, merely to judge whether graphic representations of aspects of them are valid for the study of those theories. To censor the works of Jára Cimrman like this would be like deleting the works of de Selby. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:31, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 15:03, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Not used anywhere, probably "misattribution", inconsistent notation with PiIn15Mytes.png (en: Cimrman's_series.png) Mykhal (talk) 18:41, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- It's mine discovery and it's very useful 🤷🏻♂️ — Preceding unsigned comment added by JCimroman (talk • contribs) 19:16, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Re. @JCimroman: Has this discovery been documented and published in some form outside Commons (e.g. in a mathematical journal)? Omphalographer (talk) 21:34, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Andy Dingley (talk) 23:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 15:46, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Verbcatcher (talk) 14:53, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, the logos consist of text in a simple font and are public domain because they are below the UK threshold of originality, see COM:TOO UK. This has been raised at Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Occam logo. Verbcatcher (talk) 14:56, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, (I am the originator of the file.) The scans from of the excerpts of the book covers (original sources given) have a TM and an (R) mark, but this is not for the graphics, it was for the name of the programming language. This was meant to show how INMOS used to present the programming language. Neither the scanned texts nor the new composite graphics that I made are logos per se. Then, showing it in the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam_(programming_language) was then thought to add to that page. What triggered this was that a user on 26.Jan.2021 had created a private kind of logo that had no resemblance to INMOS' orignal work. –Aclassifier (talk) 15:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, per the above. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:20, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep pile-on: obvious case of PD-textlogo, previously missing template in place now. --El Grafo (talk) 14:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep PD-textlogo.--Vulphere 03:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Wdwd (talk) 15:01, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Complex book covers can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. The permission must come from photograher, not from book author or depicted person. Taivo (talk) 14:55, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Not an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:05, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:58, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Das Logo ist nicht aktuell und darf nicht zur freien Verfügung stehen. 95.88.156.59 15:10, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Kein Löschgrund. --Achim (talk) 19:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- I suggest a speedy close per COM:SNOW. intforce (talk) 01:46, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Please delete this logo as it is subject of copyright infringement. Also it is no longer up-to-date and should no longer be circulating 95.88.156.59 16:09, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- It is not a copyright infringement because it does not meet the threshold of originality and is therefore in the public domain. Not being up-to-date is not a reason for deletion. intforce (talk) 20:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Intforce. --Wdwd (talk) 14:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
By definition photographic shots of the screen, or screenshots, are copyright violations. So are photographs of promotional material. The shots are also poor quality and appear to represent only PR material for the product or corporation, serve no educational purpose, and are out of scope for Commons. COM:OTRS may be used if permission is granted by the copyright owner for their use
- File:Payment options.jpg
- File:Multi-eCommerce.jpg
- File:Multi-location.jpg
- File:ACID reports.jpg
- File:ACID TERM P.jpg
Timtrent (talk) 15:10, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 15:13, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:54, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 15:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:54, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:52, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your comment. Since uploading this image, I have replaced it in the relevant article with a higher quality version with less ambiguous copyright restrictions - so I am agreeable with this file being deleted. Floridada (talk) 16:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted, see log. --Wdwd (talk) 14:52, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused private gif, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 16:26, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:51, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 16:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:51, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
File:1979-Upstream by Roswell Weidner, Collection of the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts.jpg
[edit]I am the copyright owner of this artwork but not this photograph which I didn't realize until I uploaded it. I am talking with the author and copyright holder of the photograph but until they approve could you delete this photograph from WikiMedia? ArtLover113 (talk) 16:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete You are clearly not the maker of this art work: the artist died in 1999. So it unclear to me why you would be the copyright owner. Contemporary artist (death in 1999) = artwork still under copyright. Photo should be removed from Commons. Ecritures (talk) 20:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- I am the daughter of the artist and have the copyright. I have emailed with PAFA and they are fine with putting these photographs on WikiPedia and WikiMedia. How do I request an undelete or should I add them again? ArtLover113 (talk) 15:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
File:1964-The Willow Tree by Roswell Weidner, Collection of the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts.jpg
[edit]I am the copyright owner of this artwork but not this photograph which I didn't realize until I uploaded it. I am talking with the author and copyright holder of the photograph but until they approve could you delete this photograph from WikiMedia? ArtLover113 (talk) 16:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete You are clearly not the maker of this art work: the artist died in 1999. So it unclear to me why you would be the copyright owner. Contemporary artist (death in 1999) = artwork still under copyright. Photo should be removed from Commons. Ecritures (talk) 20:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
This is my first page for WikiPedia and my first contributions to WikiMedia - so I am still learning. I am the daughter of the artist (Roswell Weidner) and the 'heir' of the estate/copyright. I have a COI statement in my WikiPedia user page. Do I need a COI in WikiMedia, too? I asked a question about this in the Teahouse.
My concern with the images was that the photographs of the artwork were taken by others. After I submitted these 7 photographs for deletion from WikiMedia, the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts (copyright for 6 of the 7 photographs) replied back to me that I could use these low resolution photographs. There are actually lots of photographs of artwork attributed to PAFA - they have their own category (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Paintings_in_the_Pennsylvania_Academy_of_the_Fine_Arts).
Should I re-add these photographs in as new images? Or request they not be deleted? ArtLover113 (talk) 16:26, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:49, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
File:1958-Concrete, Steel, and Sky by Roswell Weidner, Collection of the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts.jpg
[edit]I am the copyright owner of this artwork but not this photograph which I didn't realize until I uploaded it. I am talking with the author and copyright holder of the photograph but until they approve could you delete this photograph from WikiMedia? Thank You. ArtLover113 (talk) 16:53, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete You are clearly not the maker of this art work: the artist died in 1999. So it unclear to me why you would be the copyright owner. Contemporary artist (death in 1999) = artwork still under copyright. Photo should be removed from Commons. Ecritures (talk) 20:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
This is my first page for WikiPedia and my first contributions to WikiMedia - so I am still learning. I am the daughter of the artist (Roswell Weidner) and the 'heir' of the estate/copyright. I have a COI statement in my WikiPedia user page. Do I need a COI in WikiMedia, too? I asked a question about this in the Teahouse.
My concern with the images was that the photographs of the artwork were taken by others. After I submitted these 7 photographs for deletion from WikiMedia, the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts (copyright for 6 of the 7 photographs) replied back to me that I could use these low resolution photographs. There are actually lots of photographs of artwork attributed to PAFA - they have their own category (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Paintings_in_the_Pennsylvania_Academy_of_the_Fine_Arts).
Should I re-add these photographs in as new images? Or request they not be deleted? ArtLover113 (talk) 16:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:47, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
File:1955-Burlesque Queen by Roswell Weidner, Collection of the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts.jpg
[edit]I am the copyright owner of this artwork but not this photograph which I didn't realize until I uploaded it. I am talking with the author and copyright holder of the photograph but until they approve could you delete this photograph from WikiMedia? Thank You. ArtLover113 (talk) 16:54, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete You are clearly not the maker of this art work: the artist died in 1999. So it unclear to me why you would be the copyright owner. Contemporary artist (death in 1999) = artwork still under copyright. Photo should be removed from Commons. Ecritures (talk) 20:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
This is my first page for WikiPedia and my first contributions to WikiMedia - so I am still learning. I am the daughter of the artist (Roswell Weidner) and the 'heir' of the estate/copyright. I have a COI statement in my WikiPedia user page. Do I need a COI in WikiMedia, too? I asked a question about this in the Teahouse.
My concern with the images was that the photographs of the artwork were taken by others. After I submitted these 7 photographs for deletion from WikiMedia, the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts (copyright for 6 of the 7 photographs) replied back to me that I could use these low resolution photographs. There are actually lots of photographs of artwork attributed to PAFA - they have their own category (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Paintings_in_the_Pennsylvania_Academy_of_the_Fine_Arts).
Should I re-add these photographs in as new images? Or request they not be deleted? ArtLover113 (talk) 16:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:47, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:55, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:49, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
File:1949-Dorcas Combing her hair by Roswell Weidner, Collection of the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts.jpg
[edit]I am the copyright holder of this artwork but not this photograph which I didn't realize until I uploaded it. I am talking with the author and copyright holder of the photograph but until they approve could you delete this photograph from WikiMedia? Thank You. ArtLover113 (talk) 16:55, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete You are clearly not the maker of this art work: the artist died in 1999. So it unclear to me why you would be the copyright owner. Contemporary artist (death in 1999) = artwork still under copyright. Photo should be removed from Commons. Ecritures (talk) 20:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
This is my first page for WikiPedia and my first contributions to WikiMedia - so I am still learning. I am the daughter of the artist (Roswell Weidner) and the 'heir' of the estate/copyright. I have a COI statement in my WikiPedia user page. Do I need a COI in WikiMedia, too? I asked a question about this in the Teahouse.
My concern with the images was that the photographs of the artwork were taken by others. After I submitted these 7 photographs for deletion from WikiMedia, the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts (copyright for 6 of the 7 photographs) replied back to me that I could use these low resolution photographs. There are actually lots of photographs of artwork attributed to PAFA - they have their own category (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Paintings_in_the_Pennsylvania_Academy_of_the_Fine_Arts).
Should I re-add these photographs in as new images? Or request they not be deleted? ArtLover113 (talk) 16:29, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:47, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:56, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
File:1938-The Country Fair by Roswell Weidner, Collection of the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts.jpg
[edit]I am the copyright holder of this artwork but not this photograph which I didn't realize until I uploaded it. I am talking with the author and copyright holder of the photograph but until they approve could you delete this photograph from WikiMedia? Thank You. ArtLover113 (talk) 17:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete You are clearly not the maker of this art work: the artist died in 1999. So it unclear to me why you would be the copyright owner. Contemporary artist (death in 1999) = artwork still under copyright. Photo should be removed from Commons. Ecritures (talk) 20:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
This is my first page for WikiPedia and my first contributions to WikiMedia - so I am still learning. I am the daughter of the artist (Roswell Weidner) and the 'heir' of the estate/copyright. I have a COI statement in my WikiPedia user page. Do I need a COI in WikiMedia, too? I asked a question about this in the Teahouse.
My concern with the images was that the photographs of the artwork were taken by others. After I submitted these 7 photographs for deletion from WikiMedia, the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts (copyright for 6 of the 7 photographs) replied back to me that I could use these low resolution photographs. There are actually lots of photographs of artwork attributed to PAFA - they have their own category (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Paintings_in_the_Pennsylvania_Academy_of_the_Fine_Arts).
Should I re-add these photographs in as new images? Or request they not be deleted? ArtLover113 (talk) 16:24, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:46, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
I am the copyright holder of this artwork but not this photograph which I didn't realize until I uploaded it. I am talking with the author and copyright holder of the photograph but until they approve could you delete this photograph from WikiMedia? Thank You. ArtLover113 (talk) 17:18, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete You are clearly not the maker of this art work: the artist died in 1999. So it unclear to me why you would be the copyright owner. Contemporary artist (death in 1999) = artwork still under copyright. Photo should be removed from Commons. Ecritures (talk) 20:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
This is my first page for WikiPedia and my first contributions to WikiMedia - so I am still learning. I am the daughter of the artist (Roswell Weidner) and the 'heir' of the estate/copyright. I have a COI statement in my WikiPedia user page. Do I need a COI in WikiMedia, too? I asked a question about this in the Teahouse. My concern with the images was that the photographs of the artwork were taken by others. I have submitted a request to use the photographs to the Reading Public Museum who took this photograph. ArtLover113 (talk) 16:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:45, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
As discussed on User_talk:GRuban#License_review_needed_-_Dimma21, this image is from an Indonesian government page, but I don't think it was necessarily made by the Indonesian government. The photo is of Didi Petet at the gala premiere of his film Catatan (Harian) Si Boy, while the page is about him making a statement about a Milan event as the chairman/director of Indonesia Pavilion, so I don't see any evidence that the photo was taken by the West Java Provincial Government government agency that made the page. GRuban (talk) 17:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator, support image deletion facts. -- Dimma21 (talk) 01:39, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
"Own work" by Achim Winter (metadata)? Seriously? This is not a selfie, this is a professional studio photo. 87.150.13.127 17:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo by non-contributor. --Wdwd (talk) 14:43, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Small file with transmission code and previous uploader activity makes this a dubious "own work. (IOW it gives the impression to have beeen taken from somewhere else, probably social media.) E4024 (talk) 01:20, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW of a copyrighted character. Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 20:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Argentina' A1Cafel (talk) 06:50, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 06:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:35, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 06:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:37, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 06:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 06:56, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:41, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 06:56, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- J'avoue ne pas comprendre pourquoi ma photographie de cet autocollant est génante. Il ne s'agit pas d'un scan de l'autocollant qui pourrait être assimilé à une reproduction, mais d'une photographie prise à une certaine distance. J'aimerais bien que l'on m'explique la différence avec celles autorisées sur Commonsː Category:Stickers in France. Et si c'est le manège Anton Schwarzkopf qu'il ne faut pas représenter, là aussi il y a de nombreuses photographies sur Commons: Category:Roller coasters manufactured by Anton Schwarzkopf. Cordialement. Keep. Altona (talk) 17:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 07:08, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:50, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Luxembourg A1Cafel (talk) 07:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:51, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No FOP in IRAN. 4nn1l2 (talk) 07:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- User:4nn1l2 چند مورد را باید در نظر بگیرید، این مجسمه متعلق به دوران قبل از انقلاب و همردیف با مجسمه آناهیتا در فومن است و یک اثر تاریخی به شمار میرود. در قوانین کپی رایت ایران اثری که پس از ۳۰ سال به نهادهای حقوقی واگذار شده باشد بلامانع است و این اثر بیش از ۴۰ سال است در اختیار شهرداری مراغه قرار گرفته است. همچنین در آزادی پانوراما گفته شده در همهٔ کشورها، حتی آنهایی که استثنای آزادی پانوراما ندارند، وقتی حق نشر اثری منقضی شود، میتوان آزادانه از آن عکسبرداری کرد. لذا حذف این تصویر بر اساس آزادی پانوراما اشتباه و نادرست است و نمیتوان آن را مشمول حق نشر کرد. --Hosseinronaghi (talk) 20:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Hosseinronaghi: لطفاً منبعی برای چهل ساله بودن این اثر ارائه کنید (و چه بهتر که این کار را در خود صفحهٔ عکس انجام دهید.) 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, if evidence is given, that the sculpture is more than 40 years old, then the photo can be restored. Taivo (talk) 20:59, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Nobody of relevance pictured. Possible personality rights problem, too. 2001:A61:3443:BD01:D8E9:6125:F861:609B 07:10, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- I don't think that is enough reason for deletion. It's a pretty boring picture, yeah, but not enough reason for deletion. --Running (talk) 07:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete @Running: Please note that COM:FOP South Korea is not suitable for Commons as it's limited to non-commericial purposes only. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:51, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no FOP problem here, simply out of scope. Taivo (talk) 21:03, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Luxembourg A1Cafel (talk) 07:10, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:06, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Luxembourg A1Cafel (talk) 07:10, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:08, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Photos of Artwork by James Turrell
[edit]- File:Blue Planet Sky at 21st Century Museum Kanazawa daytime.jpg
- File:Turrell's room at 21st Century Museum Kanazawa evening.jpg
- File:Outside in by James Turrell evening program.jpg
These photos are of artworks in Japan by James Turrell (1943–), but there is no FoP in US for artistic works. The names of the artworks are Blue Planet Sky (2004) and Outside In (2000). ネイ (talk) 07:10, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept, does not surpass threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 21:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 07:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:28, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
The work is not anonymous. You can go to page 3 of the actual journal ( https://www.marxists.org/history/international/comintern/negro-worker/files/1932-v2n4-apr.pdf ) and see the editorial board. There is a note on the same page that says "Editors are invited to reprint articles and resolutions which appear in the "Negro Worker"", but that is not a license of the front page. Running (talk) 07:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep User:Running is right that the clause about reprinting on page 3 is not a license. At the same time, the editors are not owning the copyright of the cover. That copyright is most likely with the designer (and with the photographer) of the front cover. As their names are not mentioned, they are stll anonymous. Copyright Act in Germany in similar cases is 70 years after publication: Urheberrecht in Deutschland: § 66 Anonyme und pseudonyme Werke, (1) Bei anonymen und pseudonymen Werken erlischt das Urheberrecht siebzig Jahre nach der Veröffentlichung. Unless the name of the designer of the cover is unveiled, this image came into the Public Domain in 2003. Vysotsky (talk) 09:29, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- As Vysotsky noted, editorial board members are not authors. Any possible copyright would lie with the illustrator/graphic designer... who is not identified in the publication, no copyright has been claimed and no identity of the illustrator/graphic designer has subsequently been revealed. --Goldsztajn (talk) 10:43, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Well, the difficulty is that what is on the cover is not simply a photograph, but, as far as I can see, an artistic photomontage, and hence a work of art. Even though it is buried deep in the German Copyright Act, the rule that the protection of anonymous and pseudoymous works ends 70 years following their publication/release rather than the death of the author does not apply to works of art created before 1 July 1995. See generally Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany#Anonymous and pseudonymous works. The reason is that until that day, the Copyright Act exempted works of art from s 66 (https://lexetius.com/UrhG/66,3, sub-s 4) and so the 1995 amendment would have curtailed the period of protection of anonymous works of art. But see s 137f(1), 1st sentence: "If, by application of this Act as amended on 1 July 1995, the term of protection of a previously accruing right is curtailed, the protection shall expire upon the expiry of the term of protection in accordance with the provisions applicable until 30 June 1995." Therefore, the treatises tell us that the anonymous works rules are of no use for older works of art (cf, eg, C-H Hartmann, "§ 137f" in P Möhring and K Nicolini (eds), Urheberrechtsgesetz (2nd edn, Vahlen 2000) paras 5f; T Dreier, "§ 66" in T Dreier and G Schulze (eds), Urheberrechtsgesetz (6th edn, Beck 2018) paras 12, 16). So I suppose that's a bit of a legal challenge here. — Pajz (talk) 09:03, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Comment Thanks for your addition. I had looked at that comment too, and I had looked at the Copyright Act, taking into account both the "old method" (prior to 1995) and the "new method" (after 1995), as prescribed in Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany#Anonymous and pseudonymous works. With both methods under § 66 the copyright ended 70 years after publication. The rules under the "old method" mention that the provision "does not extend to photographic works". Even though this is a compilation, it is still clearly a photographic work, whether edited or not. Vysotsky (talk)
- Vysotsky, yes but, as indicated (albeit in passing), such types of artistic arrangements—if sufficiently original, which this one seems to be—generally give rise to works of art, even if they are based on photographs (see G Schulze, "Werke der bildenden Kunst, der Baukunst und der angewandten Kunst" in U Loewenheim (ed), Handbuch des Urheberrechts (3rd edn, Beck 2021), § 9 paras 163f [photomontages and photocollages as works of art]; EI Obergfell, "§ 2" in W Büscher, S Dittmer, and P Schiwy (eds), Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz, Urheberrecht, Medienrecht (3rd edn, Heymann 2015) para 51 ("Nicht als Lichtbildwerk nach § 2 Abs. 1 Nr. 5, sondern als Werk der bildenden Kunst i.S.v. § 2 Abs. 1 Nr. 4 werden Fotocollagen und Fotomontagen geschützt"); OLG Hamburg ZUM-RD 2013, 121, 122 = openJur 2013, 21781 [assessing as a work of art a fundraising campaign poster consisting of a photograph of a human being and a photograph of a red emergency break included as a superimposed shadow]. — Pajz (talk) 15:08, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept, anonymously published. Taivo (talk) 21:37, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- Taivo, your explanation should address why you rejected the counterargument presented in this deletion request (cf Commons:Deletion requests: "Administrators closing deletion requests are expected to provide adequate explanation for their decision [...] In any event, administrators are expected to clarify or explain their decisions on request"; emphasis added). — Pajz (talk) 00:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- In my opinion Vysotsky explained that well. It is still photographic work. Here are no superimposed shadows. Taivo (talk) 09:15, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
I don't think it's correct that this is marked as PD. Despite Smithonian website saying so. The actual journal was made in Germany in 1932 and the authors are not anonymous (you can see editorial board here - https://www.marxists.org/history/international/comintern/negro-worker/files/1932-v2n7-jul.pdf ). Smithonian employee might have scanned this, but that doesn't make it PD. Running (talk) 07:30, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep User:Running is right that the Smithsonian Institute is not the copyright holder of this file, and their scanning of the file is not in any way decisive. At the same time, the editorial board is not owning the copyright of the cover. That copyright is most likely with the photographer of the photo on the front cover. As his or her name is't mentioned, this is a photograph by an anonymous photographer. Copyright Act in Germany in similar cases is 70 years after publication: Urheberrecht in Deutschland: § 66 Anonyme und pseudonyme Werke, (1) Bei anonymen und pseudonymen Werken erlischt das Urheberrecht siebzig Jahre nach der Veröffentlichung. Unless the name of the photographer is unveiled, this image came into the Public Domain in 2003. Vysotsky (talk) 09:43, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- As per Vysotsky, Running is conflating authorship with editorial responsibility. I have corrected the licence on the image. --Goldsztajn (talk) 12:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- OK! Thanks for the information. I conflated the two then. Should I remove this request (and the other one I put online?) --Running (talk) 13:03, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- I am looking more about this template Template:PD-EU-no_author_disclosure - it seems to me it still needs PD license from US, per URAA. Otherwise it's Template:Not-PD-US-URAA. However, there are many pictures that are wrong in Category:Public_domain_images_no_longer_eligible_for_claim_of_authorship - Template:Not-PD-US-URAA says "review is currently underway", with the last update of the review... in 2014. :D I don't know. This one random picture makes me go too deep into copyright law :D --Running (talk) 15:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept, anonymopusly published. Taivo (talk) 21:43, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. User page photo of a user with no valid contribs: m:Special:CentralAuth/Sitewikkipedia Gikü (talk) 08:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in South Africa A1Cafel (talk) 08:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:51, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in South Africa A1Cafel (talk) 08:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in South Africa A1Cafel (talk) 08:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 08:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Subjectively, on this score of course this and some pictures subject of deletion, are not quality images, and I hate cloudy or overcast photography with rare exceptions; hence, there are better photos in the subject Category which are there;
- Addendum - Nota Bene: I am not really in a position to comment on whether all or some of these photos are no longer needed; I defer the matter of deletion or retaining to Commons Engineers and Architects, specifically the Structural and even University professionals, since Criminal Law is my expertise, and I am not so familiar with the niceties of the Civil or Architectural elements of school buildings hereby noted sincerely ...
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 08:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Subjectively, on this score of course this and some pictures subject of deletion, are not quality images, and I hate cloudy or overcast photography with rare exceptions; hence, there are better photos in the subject Category which are there;
- Addendum - Nota Bene: I am not really in a position to comment on whether all or some of these photos are no longer needed; I defer the matter of deletion or retaining to Commons Engineers and Architects, specifically the Structural and even University professionals, since Criminal Law is my expertise, and I am not so familiar with the niceties of the Civil or Architectural elements of school buildings hereby Noted sincerely ...
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:00, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 08:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Subjectively, on this score of course this and some pictures subject of deletion, are not quality images, and I hate cloudy or overcast photography with rare exceptions; hence, there are better photos in the subject Category which are there;
- Addendum - Nota Bene: I am not really in a position to comment on whether all or some of these photos are no longer needed; I defer the matter of deletion or retaining to Commons Engineers and Architects, specifically the Structural and even University professionals, since Criminal Law is my expertise, and I am not so familiar with the niceties of the Civil or Architectural elements of school buildings hereby Noted sincerely ...
Deleted, in my opinion surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 22:03, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 08:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Subjectively, on this score of course this and some pictures subject of deletion, are not quality images, and I hate cloudy or overcast photography with rare exceptions; hence, there are better photos in the subject Category which are there;
- Addendum - Nota Bene: I am not really in a position to comment on whether all or some of these photos are no longer needed; I defer the matter of deletion or retaining to Commons Engineers and Architects, specifically the Structural and even University professionals, since Criminal Law is my expertise, and I am not so familiar with the niceties of the Civil or Architectural elements of school buildings hereby Noted sincerely ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Judgefloro (talk • contribs)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:04, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 08:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Subjectively, on this score of course this and some pictures subject of deletion, are not quality images, and I hate cloudy or overcast photography with rare exceptions; hence, there are better photos in the subject Category which are there;
- Addendum - Nota Bene: I am not really in a position to comment on whether all or some of these photos are no longer needed; I defer the matter of deletion or retaining to Commons Engineers and Architects, specifically the Structural and even University professionals, since Criminal Law is my expertise, and I am not so familiar with the niceties of the Civil or Architectural elements of school buildings hereby Noted sincerely ...
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Artwork of 1966; no proof uploader holds the copyright Gikü (talk) 08:40, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
@Gikü:
Buna ziua,
In legatura cu publicarea fotografiei copertii caietului-program:
-detinem fizic acest caiet -semnatura artistului este ilizibila si artistul nu este mentionat nicaieri in program -teatrul Nottara nu mai are arhive si a abdicat total de la mentinerea unei memorii a pieselor jucate pe scena sa -caietul in intregime a fost deja publicat de altii altunderi pe internet in indiferenta generala
Daca nu corespunde legilor Wiki bineinteles scoateti-l dar pentru Fundatia Henry Malineanu este important sa publicam cat mai multe date, inclusiv vizuale fiindca noi insine combatem fara succes jaful cultural al operei lui Henry Malineanu. (exemplu recentt : punerea in scena in 2020 la Teatrul din Petrosani a acestei piese, fara mentionarea autorilor, cu textul si muzica creditate altora)
Cu stima, Alexandre Malignan pentru FHM — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexandre Malignan (talk • contribs) 09:03, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, so this is anonymous work from 1966. It is protected with copyright and can be restored after copyright expiration in 2037 (70+1 years from publication). Taivo (talk)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 08:40, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 08:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:20, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 08:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- support deletion per no FOP in Azerbaijan. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 15:32, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:22, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 08:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- support deletion per no FOP in Azerbaijan. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 15:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:24, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 08:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Should also delete the original File:Trump International Hotel and Tower, Baku (P1090251).jpg that this is cropped from, if this is the case. Pinging User:MB-one who uploaded that one. --Lord Belbury (talk) 09:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- The original image may fulfill de minimis and can be kept on Commons. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:18, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, looking, how the original file is described, categorized and used, the original is not de minimis. I'll delete both. Taivo (talk) 22:28, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina A1Cafel (talk) 08:50, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:30, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina A1Cafel (talk) 08:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- You clearly don't understand this copyright law, so please read carefully the following: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Bosnia_and_Herzegovina#Freedom_of_panorama My-wiki-photos (talk) 11:30, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- I understand. It said
Not OK on Commons. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:33, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Google has been commercially using a view of the same building for a long time, so what really is the point of deleting my photo with a view of the same building!? https://www.google.com/maps/@43.8486328,18.3728905,3a,52.8y,143.32h,104.98t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1sAF1QipOh1q-8_NfgkHxjQQA4ZQfN7TRmCusZD0mZ1FO0!2e10!3e11!6shttps:%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipOh1q-8_NfgkHxjQQA4ZQfN7TRmCusZD0mZ1FO0%3Dw203-h100-k-no-pi-0-ya115.58065-ro0-fo100!7i7168!8i3584?hl=en My-wiki-photos (talk) 06:09, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- I understand. It said
Deleted, photos of modern buildings of Bosnia are prohibited in Commons. Taivo (talk) 22:33, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina A1Cafel (talk) 08:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:35, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina A1Cafel (talk) 08:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:37, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:UNITIC Twin Skyscrapers
[edit]No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina
- File:Momo i Uzeir - panoramio.jpg
- File:Old and new (6043328902).jpg
- File:Pickup visa day Sarajevo 110411 (110) (5619082067).jpg
- File:Sarajevo,blizanci.jpg
- File:Twin Skyscrapers Sarajevo.JPG
- File:UNITIC 2.jpg
- File:UNITIC World Trade Towers twilight.JPG
- File:UNITIC.jpg
- File:Zgrade Momo i Uzeir, Sarajevo.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 08:54, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:42, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:UNITIC Twin Skyscrapers
[edit]The building was completed in 1981 by Ivan Štraus (1928–2018). There is no freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The copyright term of the country lasted for 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2089.
- File:Sarajevo - UNITIC (49104470958).jpg
- File:Sarajevo - UNITIC (49121798913).jpg
- File:Sarajevo - UNITIC (49122479712).jpg
- File:Sarajevo - UNITIC (49122481542).jpg
- File:Sarajevo - UNITIC (49122481687).jpg
- File:UNITIC Sarajevo HQ.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:02, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bulgaria A1Cafel (talk) 08:57, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:50, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Created after 1991. Doctor Architect (talk) 20:40, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Doctor Architect: Fyi, a recent consensus is that in Ukraine, utilitarian buildings e.g. the New Safe Confinement are not protected by copyright, so we should know if this building is having utilitarian purposes or not. Ditto for all of your NoFOP DRs below. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:19, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: Many thanks for taking time to comment, I really appreciate it! I wasn't aware of this consensus. Please always ping me if you believe that my actions could be improved and I promise that it will be done. The bottom line is that to me, the more free images will be present, the better. At the end the goal of Commons is to share the information and not to limit it. But violations I do remove as I do not tolerate when those are done. I am not sure if church can be considered a utilitarian building. Usually utilitarian building have minimal artistic values as they are warehouses, barracks, and trash enclosures and etc. In this case it's a work of art as it'a a church. Plus, in this particular example I did only one nomination of this building despite that there are many others in this category for a simple reason that I would like to know what will be the final decision on those types of buildings. Not from the utilitarian point of view. What makes it a bit more complex is that in this case it's actually a rebuilt church. Original one was demolished and then a new copy was made from scratch. I'd like to learn what are the rules in those cases. Do we go only by the original author, do we go by the rules of derivative works (original author + rights of the architects who did restoration that is in fact a rebuilding). When this building was re-build it was no rebuild 100% as is, but with some deviations. Are those considered to be enough for the additional copyright? So I am looking forward to know the closure decision on this one to be able to become a bit more knowledgeable in those niche cases. Thank you again! Doctor Architect (talk) 15:31, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: @Liuxinyu970226: As I fully agree with you on the general idea, actually this plaque is not an utilitarian building but cit can be considered an artwork. Ruthven (msg) 16:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Created after 1991. Doctor Architect (talk) 20:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Summary
No FoP in Ukraine. We can't share pictures of buildings being built. Doctor Architect (talk) 21:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Is there any height of creation for that building? I guess no. But i dont care if someone urgently wants to delete the picture. --Arnd (talk) 07:57, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- I am sorry, but I am not sure how you comments adhere to FoP rule? Doctor Architect (talk) 15:33, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Keep Arnd meant there is no artistic value in this artwork.--Brunei (talk) 19:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep FoP refers to protection of creative artistic activity, while this picture depicts technical elements only, creative artistic elements are basically not there yet — NickK (talk) 22:52, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Per NickK, utilitarian buildings are not protected by copyright, happy to see another New Safe Confinement case. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:59, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 16:49, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Medical documentation with personal data Michał Sobkowski (talk) 08:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
I cant read the cyrillic, but guessing from the fact that it was implemented in many MRI pages, its miscategorized as such. It shows CT images. I agree with the patient data concerns. FbrG (talk) 11:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- The file name can be translated as "magnetic-resonance tomography". Michał Sobkowski (talk) 11:54, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept, this is uploader's own personal data. Probably he is happy to have that in Commons. The file is used in multiple projects, so in scope as well. Taivo (talk) 21:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Millenium Centre, Sofia
[edit]No freedom of panorama in Bulgaria
- File:GHMS Exterior (26).jpg
- File:GHMS Exterior 27.jpg
- File:Millenium Center (37139775904).jpg
- File:Millenium Center (37140586954).jpg
- File:Millennium Center Sofia, Bulgaria.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 09:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:16, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bulgaria A1Cafel (talk) 09:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Photo of a photo. Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Yuraily Lic: But then, COM:FOP Pakistan exists, are you sure that {{FoP-Pakistan}} can't apply? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:56, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: Are you sure the work is permanently situated in a public place? --A1Cafel (talk) 02:36, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Edwardcarp (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos of a user with no valid contribs: m:Special:CentralAuth/Edwardcarp. During his time at wiki he only did self-promo at ro:Utilizator:Edwardcarp.
Gikü (talk) 09:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, not own works, both are copyvios. Taivo (talk) 21:39, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Use of images from various artists/sources (http://www.trilobites.info/anohome.html, http://paleoexhibit.blogspot.com/, File:Hurdia_victoria_pair.jpg, File:Schinderhannes_NT2.jpg) without citiations. Junnn11 (talk) 09:34, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 21:42, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Use of images from various artists (Nobu Tamura, Satoshi Kawasaki) without citiations. Junnn11 (talk) 09:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 21:47, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Use of images from various artists (Nobu Tamura, Satoshi Kawasaki) without citations. Junnn11 (talk) 09:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 21:49, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
The copyright are Not Azzaro property The owner is the autor The Photographer Filipe da Rocha 78.252.11.132 09:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, not own work, but copyvio. I'll delete file:Azzaro-01-officiel-800x480.jpg due to same reason. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 21:54, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Use of images from various artists (Nobu Tamura, Satoshi Kawasaki, User:Ghedoghedo) without citations. Junnn11 (talk) 09:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 21:57, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Use of images from various artists (User:Philcha, User:Ghedoghedo) without citations. Junnn11 (talk) 09:49, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 21:58, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Likely copyvio and using it as a gallery/article Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete also file:Lamakh-ta-patriarh.jpg and file:Ламах Тарас Борисович.jpg due to same reason. These are the uploader's last remaining uploads. Taivo (talk) 22:00, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Variants of a copyrighted logo, not own work.
- File:Post-1061121-0-79171500-1611817441 thumb.png
- File:Prima-TV-va-avea-un-nou-logo.jpg
- File:Alternative PrimaTV 2020 SVG.png
Gikü (talk) 09:54, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is really borderline case, but I decide, that this is complex logo. Taivo (talk) 22:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted logos uploaded deceptively as Creative Commons.
- File:Logo playhouse disney.png
- File:Jetix logo tv jetix.jpg
- File:Download logo.png
- File:Focus Prima TV 2020.png
- File:Focus Prima TV 2018.png
- File:Focus Prima TV 2014.jpg
- File:% 3Ftirile Prima TV 2014.png
- File:Focus Prima TV 2008.png
- File:Focus Prima TV 2007.png
- File:Focus Prima TV 2004.png
- File:Focus Prima TV % 282003-2004% 29.png
- File:Focus% 2B Prima TV % 282001-2002% 29.png
- File:Focus Prima TV % 281999-2001% 29.png
- File:Disney Channel Russia logo.png
- File:Logo ch big new.png
- File:Disney Channel RS 2011.png
- File:Disney Channel 2002 logo.png
- File:Disney Channel logo 2011.png
- File:Tv paprika 2021 wide.png
- File:TV K Lumea.png
- File:Atomic TV.png
- File:LogoAtomicTv.png
- File:Digi 24.png
- File:Analog TV Timi% 3Foara.png
- File:OTV % 282009% 29.png
- File:OTV % 282006% 29.png
- File:OTV % 282001% 29.png
- File:De-ziua-noastra-am-pus-la-cale-un-show-cum-numai-o-data-la-17-ani-vezi-1-decembrie-se-traieste-la-protv size20.jpg
- File:Stirile protv.png
- File:Stirile Pro TV osb 2008.png
- File:Logo 2010 protv.png
- File:Logo 2014 new.png
- File:Index 8.png
- File:Canal 38 Amerom Bucure% 3Fti.png
- File:Prima 2004.png
- File:Cartoon Network logo 2010.png
- File:Disney Channel - logo (2019).png
- File:Logo 2011 disney junior.png
- File:Disney Junior logo 2011.png
- File:Logo summer disney channel.jpg
- File:Discovery Channel 2019.png
- File:Discovery Channel logo 2014.png
- File:Discovery Channel 2009 logo.png
- File:Discovery Channel 2000.png
- File:Discovery Channel 1995.png
- File:Disney Channel 2002 alt.png
- File:Happy Channel % 282020-present% 29.png
- File:Happy Channel % 282016-2020% 29.png
- File:Happy Channel % 282014-2016% 2C prelaunch% 29.png
- File:ZU TV % 282014-present% 29.png
- File:Zu channel logo 2013.png
- File:PRO Cinema % 282003-2004% 2C prelaunch% 29.png
- File:Acas% 3F % 281994-1998% 2C prelaunch% 29.png
- File:Acas% 3F Clasic.png
- File:Canal 31 % 28Romania% 29.png
- File:Playhouse Disney 2000.png
- File:Playhouse Disney Romania logo 2009.png
- File:Maxresdefault logo.jpg
- File:Prima TV % 282002% 29.png
- File:Prima 1999.png
- File:Prima 1997.png
- File:Post-1061121-0-16125700-1609149672 thumb.png
- File:PRO TV % 281994-1995% 2C prelaunch% 29.png
- File:Fox Kids Play logo 2003.png
- File:Jetix Play 2007.png
- File:Jetix Play 2004 V2.png
- File:Kanal D alt.png
- File:JimJam 2018.png
- File:JimJam (1).png
- File:JimJam logo.png
- File:PRO Gold % 282017% 29.png
- File:Acasa gold logo 2015.png
- File:Acasa Gold % 282012-2015% 29.png
- File:Kiss TV.png
- File:Kiss TV % 282008% 29.png
- File:Kiss TV Romania.png
- File:Cartoon Network Alternative logo.png
- File:Animal Planet 2018.png
- File:Animal Planet logos.png
- File:Animal Planet 2006 logo.png
- File:Animal Planet 1996.png
- File:TVR1 2019.png
- File:TVR 1 % 282010% 29.png
- File:TVR 1 % 282004% 29.png
- File:Romania1 2001.png
- File:Romania 1 99.png
- File:Tvr198.png
- File:TVR1 1996.png
- File:TVR 1 % 281994% 29.png
- File:TVR 1 % 281991% 29.png
- File:Tvr1 1990.png
- File:TVRL.png
- File:Televiziunea Rom% 3Fn% 3F % 281985% 29.png
- File:Programul 1 1980.png
- File:TVR 1 1973.png
- File:TVR oldest.png
- File:Antena 3 % 282016-present% 29.png
- File:Antena 3 A3.png
- File:Antena 3 % 282005-2009% 29.png
- File:% 3Ftirile Pro TV 2020 logo.png
- File:Stirile Pro TV logo 2017.png
- File:Stirile Pro TV logo 2016.png
- File:Stirile Pro TV logo 2015.png
- File:% 3Ftirile Pro TV 2013 LOGO.jpg
- File:% 3Ftirile Pro TV 2013.png
- File:% 3Ftirile Pro TV 2003.png
- File:% 3Ftirile Pro TV 1999.png
- File:% 3Ftirile Pro TV 1995.png
- File:PRO TV Interna% 3Fional % 282017% 29.png
- File:PRO TV Interna% 3Fional % 282008% 29.png
- File:PRO TV Interna% 3Fional % 282003% 29.png
- File:PRO TV Interna% 3Fional % 282000% 29.png
- File:PRO TV % 282017% 29.png
- File:PRO TV % 282016% 29.png
- File:PRO TV % 282015% 29.png
- File:Pro-tv-prezinta-reteta-pentru-o-toamna-de-succes.png
- File:PRO TV % 282008-2013% 29.png
- File:PRO TV % 282003-2008% 29.png
- File:PRO TV % 281995% 29.png
- File:Antena 2 logo 2006.png
- File:Antena 2 % 282007-2011% 29.png
- File:Acasa % 281998-2003% 2C s teni% 29.png
- File:Acasa % 282003-2012% 29.png
- File:Observator 2020.png
- File:Observator 2016.png
- File:Observator Logo 2007.png
- File:Boomerang 2015.png
- File:Boomerang TM Logo 2012.png
- File:Boomerang Europe.png
- File:Playhouse-disney logo.png
- File:National 24 Plus new.png
- File:N24Plus new.png
- File:N24 Plus 2009.png
- File:N24 2004.png
- File:National TV.png
- File:Na% 3Fional TV 2003.png
- File:Minimax 2021 (1).png
- File:Minimax3d logo.jpg
- File:Minimax logo (1).png
- File:Logo of minimax 1999 2004 recreation by andrewdaniel2k6 ddvh94p-fullview.png
- File:Realitatea TV % 282007-2015% 29.png
- File:Realitatea TV % 282006-2007% 29.png
- File:Realitatea TV % 282005-2006% 29.png
- File:Realitatea TV % 282004-2005% 29.png
- File:Realitatea tv 2001.png
- File:PRO Cinema % 282017% 2C with purple background% 29.png
- File:Pro-cinema-va-difuza-cea-de-a-13-a-editie-a-festivalului-de-film-studentesc-bdquo-geo-saizescu-rdquo size20.png
- File:PRO Cinema % 282009-2014% 29.png
- File:Daca-e-luni-la-pro-cinema-e-thriller size11.jpg
- File:PRO Cinema % 282004-2006% 29.png
- File:PRO X % 282017% 29.png
- File:Sport.ro % 282009-2017% 29.png
- File:Sport.ro % 282007-2009% 29.png
- File:TV Sport.png
- File:Antena 1 social media.png
- File:Antena 1 graphics 2006.png
- File:Antena 1 Mereu Aproape.png
- File:Antena 1 % 281993-1998% 2C on-screen bug% 29.png
- File:B1 logo 2021 2.png
- File:Png-transparent-logo-fox-kids-fox-broadcasting-company-television-show-high-school-dxd-logo-television-text-logo.png
- File:Jetix-Logo.png
- File:Realitatea Plus % 282020-present% 29.png
- File:Realitatea Plus % 282019-2020% 29.png
- File:Realitatea Plus % 282019% 29.png
- File:Realitatea Plus % 282015% 29.png
- File:Cartoon Network % 2B1 Alternative.png
- File:Cartoon Network 2004 Red2.png
- File:Cartoon Network % 282004% 29 % 28Gray% 29 % 28Alt% 29.png
- File:Antena 1 % 282010% 29.png
- File:Antena 1 % 282006% 29.png
- File:Antena 1 % 281998% 29.png
- File:Antena 1 % 281993% 29.png
- File:Cartoon Network 2004 Red.png
- File:Cartoon Network Alternative.png
- File:Disney Channel % 282010% 29.png
- File:Disney Channel 2002.png
Gikü (talk) 19:30, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:11, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Not own work. Account has endless previous uploads deleted for the same reason. Some logos in this list could stay because they don't exceed COM:TOO, but I'd still suggest deleting them because they lack sourcing and can thus be fake.
- File:Prima TV Logo 2022.webp
- File:A1 HD logo 2022.svg
- File:Antena 1 logo 2010.svg
- File:Antena 1 logo 2007.webp
- File:Antena 1 logo 1998.png
- File:Antena 1 logo 1993.png
- File:Noul logo Antena International.webp
- File:Antena International Logo 2022.webp
- File:Disney-Channel-Logo 2022-Prezent.png
- File:Logo 2017-2022.png
- File:Logo 2014-2017.png
- File:Logo 2011-2014.png
- File:Disney Channel 2002 alt.webp
- File:Disney-junior-disney-junior-logo-2019-text-alphabet-number-symbol-transparent-png-2827146.png
- File:Logo-Disney-Junior.png
- File:Playhouse Disney Logo.webp
- File:Logo Disney Junior 2019.png
- File:Disney Junior Logo Romania.webp
- File:Playhouse-disney romania logo 2009-2011.png
- File:Noul logo Prima TV din 2022.png
- File:Noul logo PRIMA TV din 2022.webp
- File:PRO TV Logo 2017-Prezent.png
- File:PRO TV Logo 2016-2017.png
- File:PRO TV Logo 2015-2016.png
- File:Playhouse-disney.png
- File:Disney Channel Logo 2022-Tentative.webp
- File:Cartoon Network Logo 2017-Prezent.webp
- File:Cartoon Network Logo 2010-2017.png
- File:Cartoon Network Logo 2009-2010.png
- File:Cartoon Network Logo 2008-2009.png
- File:Cartoon Network Logo 2006-2008.png
- File:Cartoon Network Logo 1998-2006.png
- File:B1 TV Logo 2021-Prezent.png
- File:B1 TV Logo 7 Mai 2021-Prezent.webp
- File:PRO ARENA Logo 2022-Prezent.jpg
- File:PRO X Logo 2017-2022.png
- File:TV Sport Logo 2003-2007.gif
- File:Disney Channel Logo 2022- Tentative.png
- File:Prima TV 29.png
Gikü (talk) 11:29, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:03, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio - photo found at https://www.facebook.com/AlunisuCluj/photos/1738976702922491 ; user has a long history of copyvio Gikü (talk) 10:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Photo of a photo. Needs proof of permission Gikü (talk) 10:12, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 22:13, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DynamiteIce (talk · contribs)
[edit]No claimed license found.
Larryasou (talk) 10:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, very beautiful girl, unfortunately copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 22:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DynamiteIce
[edit]The source indicates that the gifs are licensed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license and not acceptable in Commons.
- File:210405 스튜디오 문나잇 유연정 (1).jpg
- File:210405 스튜디오 문나잇 유연정 (2).jpg
- File:210405 스튜디오 문나잇 유연정 (3).jpg
- File:210405 스튜디오 문나잇 유연정 (4).jpg
- File:210405 스튜디오 문나잇 유연정 (5).jpg
KWANGYA 21:43, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 19:23, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Small size and logo of an external website. Ymblanter (talk) 10:31, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 22:17, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
useless test file, to delete Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 10:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:23, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since) This Congressional document contained an official photo taken by a photographer from the Senate. Mussklprozz (talk) 11:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Message from the uploader (First part translated from French):
- Photo taken by me of a document given by Senator Mathias. This Congressional document contained an official photo taken by a photographer from the Senate. To my knowledge the photo is in the public domain according to Wikimedia :
- « This United States Congress image is in the public domain. This may be because it was taken by an employee of the Congress as part of that person’s official duties, or because it has been released into the public domain and posted on the official websites of a member of Congress. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the image is in the public domain”.
To be discussed. --Mussklprozz (talk) 11:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept, I believe. Taivo (talk) 22:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
File:COLLEGIUM NOVUM UNIWERSYTETU JAGIELLOŃSKIEGO W KRAKOWIE, fot. M. Klag (MIK, 2007) (4559937773).jpg
[edit]Unknown author, not in PD Matlin (talk) 11:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:35, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
How can this be public domain if the artist died in 1952? Almost all Wikipedia language versions have May 26, 1952 as her date of death. Please provide evidence that this is wrong and she died in 1930 as this file claims. 87.150.13.127 11:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Please also see here. --87.150.13.127 12:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
The book seems to have been first published in 1935, which pushes the URAA restoration date to 2031--Ymblanter (talk) 09:17, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted, died in 1952. The image can be restored after copyright expiration in 2023 (70+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 22:40, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
File:SANKTUARIUM MATKI BOŻEJ TUCHOWSKIEJ W TUCHOWIE, fot. M. Klag (MIK, 2005) (3534717018).jpg
[edit]Unknown author, may not be in PD Matlin (talk) 11:52, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:41, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Poster, may not be in PD Matlin (talk) 11:53, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no freedom of panorama in source country. Taivo (talk) 22:43, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Work by Mona Saudi, not in PD Matlin (talk) 11:54, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Banner from musem, may be still not in PD Matlin (talk) 11:55, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, freedom of panorama in Grenada applies only for permanently installed objects. Taivo (talk) 22:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Uri Tours might have taken the photo of the screen but they don't own the copyright to the animation. This is effectively a screenshot of a movie, and the makers of the movie have not provided permission for CC licence (and unlikely they would do so in North Korea) Teemeah (talk) 09:51, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:38, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Photo from movie and as in https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:North_Korean_Animation_%22Awangnyo_Finds_the_Seed_of_Fire%22_(15170351600).jpg Matlin (talk) 11:55, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. Taivo (talk) 22:54, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Book cover still can be copyrighted. Matlin (talk) 11:56, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:55, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Useless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:37, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
This map can be still copyrighted. Matlin (talk) 11:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no freedom of panorama in Romania. Taivo (talk) 22:57, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Likely a reupload by Matlin (talk · contribs). If this is the same image, then this must be Delete as a copyrighted map in a country that does not grant commercial freedom of panorama for free uses of public art without artists' or architects' licensing permissions. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:05, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Screen from Second Life game Matlin (talk) 11:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Nedloh1234 (talk) 12:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 23:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Superseded by {{USStateArc}}. This template pre-fills a description page for a built-in-year category (e.g. Category:Built in Virginia in 1923), but since there are separate templates for each state, {{USStateArc}} was developed with a parameter to account for the specific state. With the possible exception of Washington, New York, and Georgia (which have parenthetical disambiguation), there's no longer any need for any templates like this one. If this DR results in deletion, I'm envisioning a group nomination. Nyttend (talk) 12:20, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, still unused. Taivo (talk) 23:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Suspicious copyright Maometto97 (talk) 12:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 23:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
This image is not of JG Strydom, but a manipulated photo of Vietnamese leader Ngo Dinh Diem. A Google search for images of Ngo Dinh Diem will confirm. Tamolyn (talk) 12:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 23:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
looks like self-promotion. See COM:PS Larryasou (talk) 12:56, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The background may potentially be copyvio. --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 00:58, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Photographer's copyright violation and derivative work of screenshot with unknown copyright status. Taivo (talk) 23:12, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
It is not a picture of Erik Dons. The source has removed it because of the mistake. 91.243.69.239 13:10, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 23:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F4, License review NOT passed: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source. However, the currently Commons:WikiProject Highways/Licensing#Asia says that {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} can be used for Filipino road signs, looks like something really vs.ed here. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:16, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete, no evidence of a free license found on baldrunner.com, wordpress.com, or aaroads.com for this photo. For COM:DW, we need freeness for both the photo AND the underlying sign. Also, the filename is misspelled. See also COM:VPC#File:Prohibied on Expressway sign in Philippines F102010.jpg. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Then you should still explain that why this isn't suitable for {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} mentioned above? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:14, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: this isn't suitable for {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} mentioned above because the photographer has rights. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:34, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: JWilz recently mentioned me at COM:VPC that he asked the guy, the actual author of this image, that they wanna free license this image. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:39, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: this isn't suitable for {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} mentioned above because the photographer has rights. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:34, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Then you should still explain that why this isn't suitable for {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} mentioned above? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:14, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- And assuming that we have evidence of permission from the photographer, and {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} doesn't apply, the sign is still PD per {{PD-text}}. pandakekok9 09:09, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- The sign itself seems fine to me (below the threshold of originality), no matter who made the sign. However, we need a license for the photograph. Not sure where the CC-BY-SA license is actually given. If the license is not actually posted by the author in the forum or on their website, we would need COM:OTRS permission directly from the author (not relayed by a third party). Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:51, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- See my latest comments at Commons:Village pump/Copyright#File:Prohibied on Expressway sign in Philippines F102010.jpg; anyway this is not my file so it's out of my concern. I've done my part in an attempt to contact the photographer/copyright holder. For the "derivative work", it is not an object of copyright (doesn't fall under the objects at COM:CRT/Philippines#Applicability). But, Delete this as an image from an external source. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 10:34, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
I found this picture in Category:Female genital mutilation. 134.102.186.160 15:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ƏXPLICIT 14:01, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
I found this picture in Category:Female genital mutilation. It has no place in there! 134.102.186.160 15:02, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ƏXPLICIT 13:59, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
"Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality." - also mirrored without purpose Drakosh (talk) 21:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:58, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 21:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:02, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 21:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:01, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 21:23, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:16, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 21:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:09, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 21:29, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:09, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 21:30, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:01, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 21:32, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:18, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 21:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:04, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 21:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:04, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 21:49, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:09, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 21:50, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:07, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Crimerussia, NataLiaPokLonSkaya 69.160.30.219 14:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense, no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 14:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
looks like official profile photo. most likely copyurighted — Dudek1337 (talk) 19:57, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:15, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bulgaria A1Cafel (talk) 14:11, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 20:55, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:07, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from photographer Gustavo Seclen (if dead, then from heir) is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:53, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:07, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
me lo pirateron les dio lepra a todos les lansaron un virus a cada imagen si buena broma jaja y mas encimas ese virus informatico se tralado a los dibujos que hacia y no me avía dado ni cuenta durante 1 año y medio gracias por su comprencion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amatarael (talk • contribs) 19 July 2020 00:54 (UTC)
Por que los pueden editar por eso los saco Amatarael (talk) 11:04, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
borralas haora dire jamas las publico por que me ganaron mis contingencias Amatarael (talk) 13:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
mejor me callo y soluciono mis problemas solo en este universo Amatarael (talk) 13:46, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Unused nonsense. E4024 (talk) 13:51, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Regrettably it has 1 external re-use: https://jindaolm.blogspot.com/2020/10/el-idea-o-la-idea.html . --Túrelio (talk) 14:21, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Birds cannot be identified, tree cannot be identified. Out of project scope due to missing educational value. Taivo (talk) 13:20, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Uploader @Ferdous: can you provide information such as the place the picture was taken, please? Thanks. Mateussf (talk) 13:29, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; No EDUSE, poor quality. --Gbawden (talk) 10:06, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
There is no indication that this file is freely licenced and its counterpart on enwiki is under fair use. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:49, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of licensing, keep non-free on local WP for now. TLSuda (talk) 10:40, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 23:22, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Logo
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, per protest by uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Not original enough. Obsolete logo since 2003. --Cjp24 (talk) 17:23, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Logo above COM:TOO France--A1Cafel (talk) 01:59, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:45, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Listed as PD-USGov, but it's actually a work of Utah and the page says "© Copyright - Utah Geological Survey - State of Utah". Prosfilaes (talk) 19:29, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 18:44, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
I don' believe this is own work. A higher resolution and larger image can be found here Wouter (talk) 21:06, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 18:45, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Philippe René Doumic died in 2013. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:8449:9475:DD42:91BC 13:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:19, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Philippe René Doumic died in 2013. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:8449:9475:DD42:91BC 13:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:18, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Philippe René Doumic died in 2013. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:8449:9475:DD42:91BC 13:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:18, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Philippe René Doumic died in 2013. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:8449:9475:DD42:91BC 13:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as Philippe René Doumic can't be the uploader (was dead since 6 years). --Túrelio (talk) 20:17, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Philippe René Doumic died in 2013. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:8449:9475:DD42:91BC 13:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:15, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Karl Ernstberger died 1972 Goesseln (talk) 17:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted in 2043. --Túrelio (talk) 20:24, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Neither CC-BY-SA, nor public domain. Source: https://www.itajubanoticias.com.br/noticia.php?estilo=Variedades&id=6975 Py4nf (talk) 19:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Neither CC-BY-SA, nor public domain. Source: http://dagobertoreitorunifei.blogspot.com/2016/07/como-oficialmente-o-campus-de-itabira.html Py4nf (talk) 19:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
NoFoP templates
[edit]There exist several templates in Category:FoP templates which are actually NoFoP templates, which create the wrong impression that it's ok to keep the images on Commons, which is not the case. I think the templates have to be deleted and files have to be individually reviewed.
Templates in question as of today:
- Template:NoFoP-Azerbaijan
- Template:NoFoP-Bahrain
- Template:NoFoP-Bhutan
- Template:NoFoP-Cambodia
- Template:NoFoP-France
- Template:NoFoP-France/licence
- Template:NoFoP-Greece
- Template:NoFoP-Iceland
- Template:NoFoP-Indonesia
- Template:NoFoP-Iran
- Template:NoFoP-Italy
- Template:NoFoP-Japan
- Template:NoFoP-Kazakhstan
- Template:NoFoP-Kuwait
- Template:NoFoP-Kyrgyzstan
- Template:NoFoP-Laos
- Template:NoFoP-Latvia
- Template:NoFoP-Lebanon
- Template:NoFoP-Luxembourg
- Template:NoFoP-Maldives
- Template:NoFoP-Mongolia
- Template:NoFoP-Morocco
- Template:NoFoP-Nepal
- Template:NoFoP-Qatar
- Template:NoFoP-Russia
- Template:NoFoP-Saudi Arabia
- Template:NoFoP-Senegal
- Template:NoFoP-Slovenia
- Template:NoFoP-South Korea
- Template:NoFoP-Sri Lanka
- Template:NoFoP-Tajikistan
- Template:NoFoP-Turkmenistan
- Template:NoFoP-UAE
- Template:NoFoP-Ukraine
- Template:NoFoP-Uzbekistan
- Template:NoFoP-Zambia
--Krd 13:16, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Krd: should I also nominate {{Not-free-US-FOP}}? {{FoP-Estonia}} may also be affected because someone is doubting why a "FoP-" prefixed template is happened under a country fall under NotOK. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:18, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Just came here after being mentioned by Krd. For the record, I mostly created "NoFoP templates" for most Asian countries (except for Japan's, UAE's, and Azerbaijan's, which have existed even before I created the first of my "NoFoP" templates, SoKor's, around late October 2020). However, if the intended purpose of the older templates (like {{NoFoP-France}} and {{NoFoP-UAE}}) can be questioned, I have no objection to the deletions of my no FOP templates. To note, while I intended the SoKor one for skylines and urban cityscapes, it has been abused to some point, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:FoP-South Korea. Also, de minimis seems nonexistent in SoKor: see Commons:Deletion requests/Files of the exterior of the N Seoul Tower in Category:N Seoul Tower. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Krd, lookinh from the SoKor case, it seems that somehow no FOP templates may be abused. Mentioning also @Liuxinyu970226 and A1Cafel: . JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:30, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
I find them to be quite useful in helping to identify categories which should be kept largely empty. Perhaps they could be reworded to emphasize that files should not be uploaded to these categories except in rare cases, where the primary object is not depicted in the image. - Themightyquill (talk) 14:05, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- I'd agree if they include {{speedy}} for file namespace transclusions, like {{Logo}} does. --Krd 14:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Notified creators of those templates that are not created by JWilz, PS. @LPfi, Esquilo, and Mardus: If you all don't oppose, should I also nominate {{FoP-Sweden}} again? That template has also a grey-red area reflected by this DR. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:12, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Themightyquill, Krd, and Mardus: one of these templates is unique actually: {{NoFoP-Japan}} as it is intended for categories only. So I might
Support the tweaking of all "noFoP templates", including those created by me, to resemble NoFoP-Japan's. Personally it is meaningless to use them in file pages, as some may treat them as "disclaimer" templates and "abuse" them by inserting these templates into problematic images, like some images of South Korean buildings now under pending deletion request which can be accessed in the link I gave above. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:35, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- I support that. As said below the templates should include {{speedy}} for file namespace transclusions, like {{Logo}} does. For other namespaces the Japan solution appears good to me. --Krd 09:04, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- One very good example of misuse of a "no FOP template": File:Samdaeheon (삼대헌, Three-Generation House).jpg. Note that there is no such thing as TOO for any FOP-reliant objects in SoKor, even de minimis/incidental/accessory inclusion is not recognized there. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:45, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- I support that. As said below the templates should include {{speedy}} for file namespace transclusions, like {{Logo}} does. For other namespaces the Japan solution appears good to me. --Krd 09:04, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Themightyquill, Krd, and Mardus: one of these templates is unique actually: {{NoFoP-Japan}} as it is intended for categories only. So I might
- Keep, but move to a non-FOP category (including Sweden). These templates are useful, as uploaders and editors can be informed as to whether an image can be retained on Commons or not. -Mardus /talk 00:15, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep for {{NoFoP-Slovenia}}; I have not checked the rest. It is informative regarding de minimis and the conditions for the reuse of the photo. --TadejM (t/p) 00:25, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Those templates are clearly labelled No-FoP and cannot be mistaken for a FoP authorisation. At least for NoFoP-France the problem involved is clearly stated. As above, these templates are useful to pinpoint potential problems. As for Template:NoFoP-France/licence, that is not a restriction tag and should not be included in the present discussion. Michelet-密是力 (talk) 08:22, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- My new poll: Keep but change all into category-only templates. See {{NoFoP-Japan}}. These shall serve as a warning to all people, including us uploaders and editors here, to not upload images of FoP-reliant objects from countries with partial FOP (e.g. Japan, U.S.A., and Russia, where their FOP provisions do not include national sculptures, monuments, and memorials) and no Commons-applicable FOP (e.g. France, Greece, and U.A.E.). I see the potential abuse of these templates if these were to be maintained as "for file namespace templates", one such case is now pending at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:FoP-South Korea. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:35, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- For my purposes, this is fine. I've never used these templates on a file since I don't really understand what legitimate purpose that would serve. - Themightyquill (talk) 22:56, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345:
Oppose There is {{NoUploads}} for alert purposes in the category. Therefore, it is recommended to use it in the file name space as it was, but have guidelines for use. For example, it notices that it can be used only if it is general cityscape photo or if de minimis is applicable. Ox1997cow (talk) 05:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: despite this, two more instances of misuse on the templates are seen at the files which I recently nominated for deletion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:A map with the main archaeological sites in Athens on one of the entrances to the Ancient Agora of Athens on September 15, 2020.jpg (No FOP in Greece) and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tour Majunga, Paris La Défense.jpg (No FOP in France). My input still prevails, convert all no FOP templates to the purpose of {{NoFoP-Japan}} (category only). I don't know the history and the original purpose of {{NoUploads}}, but in my opinion it is intended for categories of artists and their works (mostly not FOP reliant like paintings or murals from no FOP counntries). That template uses the word "artist", not "architect" or similar words. Just saw Jeff G.'s input at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Money of North Korea, and I agree to him that this template is not suitable for FOP reliant works like Dubai's Burj Khalifa or the Louvre Pyramid. France has a template named {{21st-century architecture in France}}, which I modified recently to look similar to NoUploads but more on context of copyrighted French architecture. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:49, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: If NoFoP templates are repurposed to make them available only in categories, there is no guarantee that they will not be misused. I have found cases where {{NoFoP-Japan}} has been misused. See these.
- @Ox1997cow: despite this, two more instances of misuse on the templates are seen at the files which I recently nominated for deletion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:A map with the main archaeological sites in Athens on one of the entrances to the Ancient Agora of Athens on September 15, 2020.jpg (No FOP in Greece) and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tour Majunga, Paris La Défense.jpg (No FOP in France). My input still prevails, convert all no FOP templates to the purpose of {{NoFoP-Japan}} (category only). I don't know the history and the original purpose of {{NoUploads}}, but in my opinion it is intended for categories of artists and their works (mostly not FOP reliant like paintings or murals from no FOP counntries). That template uses the word "artist", not "architect" or similar words. Just saw Jeff G.'s input at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Money of North Korea, and I agree to him that this template is not suitable for FOP reliant works like Dubai's Burj Khalifa or the Louvre Pyramid. France has a template named {{21st-century architecture in France}}, which I modified recently to look similar to NoUploads but more on context of copyrighted French architecture. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:49, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Taishacho Kizukihigashi, Izumo, Shimane Prefecture 699-0701, Japan - panoramio (20).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Taishacho Kizukihigashi, Izumo, Shimane Prefecture 699-0701, Japan - panoramio (6).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Taishacho Kizukihigashi, Izumo, Shimane Prefecture 699-0701, Japan - panoramio (9).jpg
- So, I think it's a good idea to keep them for the purpose of using them in the file namespace as they was, but add a phrase to notice the templates are for warning purposes and to guide us in the correct case to use the templates. And since architecture falls into the category of art, it's no problem with {{NoUploads}}. Ox1997cow (talk) 17:21, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hmm. Ox1997cow, seeing the files involved in the aforementioned Japanese FOP case, the first four files do not have the no FOP templates. The last three are actually Panoramio upload bot mass uploads as part of uploading freely-licensed files from Panoramio from late 2016 to early 2017, in response to the end of Panoramio service during that time. Their file histories show it was an admin (Túrelio) who added those templates, presumably to help other editors investigate those files. (Ex. [1]). BTW, I'm pinging Túrelio over their point of view on the usage and usefulness of the no FOP templates. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:22, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- So, I think it's a good idea to keep them for the purpose of using them in the file namespace as they was, but add a phrase to notice the templates are for warning purposes and to guide us in the correct case to use the templates. And since architecture falls into the category of art, it's no problem with {{NoUploads}}. Ox1997cow (talk) 17:21, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: I removed 4 inappropriate examples. And, like many photos uploaded to Flickr, in these three cases, it seems that the person who took the original photos and uploaded them did not fully understand the freedom of panorama in Japan and assigned a free license. In any case, it is the same that misuse will occur even if the purpose is changed. Ox1997cow (talk) 18:35, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- The original photos mentioned here are those that were uploaded to the now closed Panoramio. Ox1997cow (talk) 23:03, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
KeepUsed for de minimis pictures and should be kept on file pages, at least {{NoFoP-France}}. --Thibaut (talk) 00:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC)- @Thibaut120094: does the template {{De minimis}} already serves this purpose? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:59, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Indeed you’re right, note that if the template is deleted, it should be replaced by {{De minimis}} by a bot. --Thibaut (talk) 19:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Thibaut120094: does the template {{De minimis}} already serves this purpose? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:59, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep All, looks still useful, just change their categorization is enough. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:39, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep In my opinion, it is better to use it like this: If it is possible to use it even if the part protected by copyright is excluded, the file is kept with NoFoP Templates. However, if it is not possible to use it except for the part protected by copyright, the file is deleted.
For Example:
--Ox1997cow (talk) 15:12, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- I think it's good to add a caution so that the template is not misused. --Ox1997cow (talk) 15:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Info I added a poll section here, then a section where the discussion, including the reaso why that was your choice (again mentioning those commented above to enter their poll: @Krd, Themightyquill, Liuxinyu970226, Thibaut120094, Mardus, TadejM, Micheletb, and Ox1997cow: JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Usually file tagged with no-FoP templates are due to de minimis. It seems that these templates are redundant to {{De minimis}}. Also, these templates are easily to be misused by newcomers. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Speaking of as someone who gave the opinion of keep, I think these templates help to notice that there is no freedom of panorama. Many newcomers upload photos of buildings or sculptures without knowing whether they have freedom of panorama or not. And, "If a copyrighted architectural or artistic work is contained in this image and it is a substantial reproduction, this photo cannot be licensed under a free license, and will be deleted. Framing this image to focus on the copyrighted work is also a copyright violation." I think this sentence is a warning to these people to be careful when uploading photos of buildings or sculptures in countries where there is no freedom of panorama. De minimis is just another element that allows photographs of buildings or sculptures without freedom of panorama. --Ox1997cow (talk) 11:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Info I enclosed the poll section in a collapsible box, as Mardus claimed it just adds confusion. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:27, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Poll
|
|---|
@JWilz12345: So, how is discussion going now? Taking the various opinions that have come up so far, I think it is good to do the following. NoFoP templates are moved to NoFoP Category. And add a notice that NoFoP templates can only be used for photos of general cityscapes or for photos that can be used, excluding copyrighted parts. --Ox1997cow (talk) 22:53, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
|
Discussion (continued, including reason why that option was chosen)
- For my poll, it's still the same reason as above. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: Oppose I think these templates are well used for the purpose of warning that there is no freedom of panorama in the file namespace. If you find that the template is being misused for disclaimer purposes and not for warning purposes, you can request that the file be deleted. And de minimis exists in South Korea. (see COM:DM SK) Therefore, I think it is a good idea to inform each template page that these templates are for warning purposes and not for disclaimer purposes. For example, This template notes the lack of Wikimedia Commons-acceptable freedom of panorama in South Korea, and alerts users of Wikimedia Commons to images taken in public places in South Korea depicting copyrighted architectural or artistic works. (See {{NoFoP-South Korea}}) Ox1997cow (talk) 05:14, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: Comment Come to think of it, I think it's better to change to category-only template like NoFoP-Japan for NoFoP-Russia. (Except for NoFoP-Japan and NoFoP-Russia, they retain their use in the file namespace as they were.) The reason is that Russia, like Japan, has the freedom of panorama only for buildings.
- Ox1997cow (talk) 11:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: additional opinion from Russian Wikipedians may be needed for your proposal. @A.Savin and Rubin16: (I dunno who are the other Wikipedians based in Russia). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:41, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 08:50, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Le monument représenté sur cette est une œuvre d’art récente protégée par le droit d’auteur. Pas de liberté de panorama en France ! ;) Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 13:21, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose De minimis. --ComputerHotline (talk) 13:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per ComputerHotline. Ruthven (msg) 08:50, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Le monument représenté sur cette est une œuvre d’art récente protégée par le droit d’auteur. Pas de liberté de panorama en France ! ;) Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 13:22, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose De minimis. --ComputerHotline (talk) 13:29, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: here the monument is quite central in the image. Ruthven (msg) 08:52, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Le monument représenté sur cette est une œuvre d’art récente protégée par le droit d’auteur. Pas de liberté de panorama en France ! ;) Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 13:22, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose De minimis. --ComputerHotline (talk) 13:29, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per ComputerHotline. Ruthven (msg) 08:51, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, No educational value considering the large number of better images of the same ship. (Deletion request by creator) Bevegelsesmengde (talk) 13:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:53, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
low quality, never used. (creator requesting deletion) Bevegelsesmengde (talk) 13:43, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:52, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Salve, per motivi di copyright vi chiedo la cancellazione immediata delle mie foto da tutte le pagine di Wikipedia, comprese quelle in altre lingue. Grazie mille, Francesco Petrucci 93.41.113.47 14:03, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded in 2011 and in use.
Salve, per motivi di copyright vi chiedo la cancellazione immediata delle mie foto da tutte le pagine di Wikipedia, comprese quelle in altre lingue. Grazie mille, Francesco Petrucci 93.41.113.47 14:07, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
{{speedy|Author request deletion}}
- In use on 8 projects. License was CC-BY-SA 2.0 and has later been changed to ARR on flickr. --Achim (talk) 15:47, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 08:59, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
We've received Ticket:2021020110000767 regarding this file. However, the uploader and the customer seems not related with the production of the film. The file was previously uploaded to Flickr, but It can be a flickrwashing case (the uploaded in Flickr and the uploader in Wikimedia Commons have the same username) Ganímedes (talk) 15:30, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: the VRTS permission seems ok now. Ruthven (msg) 08:58, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
fichier créé pour vandaliser https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paillette&diff=prev&oldid=179462312 . Merci ~ Antoniex (discuter) 16:04, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:59, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Salve, per motivi di copyright vi chiedo la cancellazione immediata delle mie foto da tutte le pagine di Wikipedia, comprese quelle in altre lingue. Grazie mille, Francesco Petrucci Gongolo76 (talk) 16:12, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Salve, per motivi di copyright vi chiedo la cancellazione immediata delle mie foto da tutte le pagine di Wikipedia, comprese quelle in altre lingue. Grazie mille, Francesco Petrucci Gongolo76 (talk) 15:00, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
{{speedy|Author request deletion}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gongolo76 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- License was CC-BY-SA 2.0 and has later been changed to ARR on flickr. --Achim (talk) 15:43, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion.
Salve, per motivi di copyright vi chiedo la cancellazione immediata delle mie foto da tutte le pagine di Wikipedia, comprese quelle in altre lingue. Grazie mille, Francesco Petrucci Gongolo76 (talk) 16:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- For licensing reasons, you can't do this. This image was uploaded to Flickr, then uploaded here in 2011. At the time, you had this under a CC-by-sa licence. This was checked at the time, we can check it again today that in 2013 it was still licensed such: [2]. Part of the terms of the CC licence is that they're irrevocable. You can't tell people who have used this image correctly, according to the original licence, that they can no longer do so. Such a principle is key to the Wikimedia project and should be strongly defended (I don't care about this image, but I do care that we have to be able to rely on this in the future).
- That said, many of the admins here don't care and will just delete this anyway. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; per Andy Dingley. Ruthven (msg) 09:00, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
a 1985-dated photo, inelegible for the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 18:13, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:00, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
a 1985-dated photo, inelegible for the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 18:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:00, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
a 1986-dated photo, inelegible for the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 18:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:00, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Le monument représenté sur cette est une œuvre d’art récente protégée par le droit d’auteur. Pas de liberté de panorama en France ! ;) Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 13:22, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose De minimis. --ComputerHotline (talk) 13:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; the monument is too prominent in this picture for de minimis. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:06, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Le monument représenté sur cette est une œuvre d’art récente protégée par le droit d’auteur. Pas de liberté de panorama en France ! ;) Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 13:23, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; the monument is too prominent in this picture for de minimis. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:06, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Le monument représenté sur cette est une œuvre d’art récente protégée par le droit d’auteur. Pas de liberté de panorama en France ! ;) Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 13:23, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose De minimis. --ComputerHotline (talk) 13:29, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; the monument is too prominent in this picture for de minimis. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:06, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Le monument représenté sur cette est une œuvre d’art récente protégée par le droit d’auteur. Pas de liberté de panorama en France ! ;) Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 13:24, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose De minimis. --ComputerHotline (talk) 13:29, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; the monument is too prominent in this picture for de minimis. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:07, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Le monument représenté sur cette est une œuvre d’art récente protégée par le droit d’auteur. Pas de liberté de panorama en France ! ;) Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 13:24, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose De minimis. --ComputerHotline (talk) 13:29, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; the monument is too prominent in this picture for de minimis. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:07, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Le monument représenté sur cette est une œuvre d’art récente protégée par le droit d’auteur. Pas de liberté de panorama en France ! ;) Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 13:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose De minimis. --ComputerHotline (talk) 13:29, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; the monument is too prominent in this picture for de minimis. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:07, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Claim of own work is dubious, especially given the uploader's history of copyright violations. This looks like a scan of a publicity photo. Whpq (talk) 14:07, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
"no evidence that the flag was created in the 1926–1963 timeframe given" - Imzadi1979
- Keep - I'd like to inform @Imzadi1979: that I've just received a confirmation email from the City of Taylor's Communications & Marketing director on the flag and seal. He states "You should be able to use those images without problem. Attached are both the seal and the COT globe logo that is in common use. If you run into any other issues, please let me know." Then he proceeded to kindly give me downloadable PDF versions of various logos and icons used by the the city. If you feel in doubt then I strongly recommend you contact them on there website. Happy editing mate! --Cookieman1.1.1 (talk) 20:32, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- None of that is a copyright license. None of that supports the claim that the flag was created in the interval claimed to support the license tag placed on the file description page. Imzadi 1979 → 03:26, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Imzadi1979: Then change the tag. I'm contacting the city... again. --Cookieman1.1.1 (talk) 05:09, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete image does not comply with copyright and licensing requirements, and the city's email does not state otherwise. Imzadi 1979 → 03:26, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- None of the files here are even used on the city's page. --Cookieman1.1.1 (talk) 05:09, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Cookieman1.1.1; The permission letter you received from them is insufficient. The images would need to be release under a free license. What you have so far does not do that. Please see Commons:OTRS#If_you_are_NOT_the_copyright_holder. As is, without evidence of such released provided to and confirmed by Commons:OTRS, Delete. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:05, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Cookieman1.1.1: The flag and seal could qualify as a fair use upload to Wikipedia to use in the article for the city of Taylor, but not as it is uploaded to commons, since it is still copyrighted even though you got the city's blessing to use it in a Wikipedia article.--Molandfreak (talk) 03:31, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion - needs proper OTRS release. --Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
"no evidence of grant of a CC-BY-SA 4.0 license by the City of Taylor for the design; furthermore, the city's website bears: "All content © 2006-2020 Taylor, MI and its representatives. All rights reserved." - Imzadi 1979
- Keep - I'd like to inform @Imzadi1979: that I've just received a confirmation email from the City of Taylor's Communications & Marketing director on the flag and seal. He states "You should be able to use those images without problem. Attached are both the seal and the COT globe logo that is in common use. If you run into any other issues, please let me know." Then he proceeded to kindly give me downloadable PDF versions of various logos and icons used by the the city. If you feel in doubt then I strongly recommend you contact them on there website. Happy editing mate! --Cookieman1.1.1 (talk) 20:32, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- None of that is a copyright license. None of that supports the claim that the flag was created with a CC-BY-SA 4.0 license . Imzadi 1979 → 03:26, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Then simply change the tag --Cookieman1.1.1 (talk) 05:11, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete image does not comply with copyright and licensing requirements, and the city's email does not state otherwise. Imzadi 1979 → 03:26, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - needs proper OTRS release. --Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Smooth O as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion about whether this image isn't suitable as a generally usable stock-image. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:30, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Not sure what could be illustrated with it but its quality isnt so bad, so I tend to keep this file. GeorgHH • talk 21:19, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Keeping as a usable stock image. --Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
The image appears to be owned by Getty Images. See here. Getty credits "ullstein bild" for the image and states it is "not released". — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:03, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- The image can be found in the 1995-book "Third Axis Fourth Ally" by Mark Axworthy; no source is quoted. It is from 1942 - are you sure it can be legally owned by Getty Images? Lupishor (talk) 22:10, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Edit: I checked the Getty Images link above, it says the image can be used for non-commercial websites (see "Standard Editorial Rights" > "How can I use this image?"). Not sure if it refers that the image can be used for free, or only if bought. Anyway, the same image can be found on other places on the internet without the Getty Images license, which is where I have it from. Lupishor (talk) 22:16, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- That's not a compatible license, because our license allows all uses, including commercial use. Many images (and text too) appear at multiple places online. This has no impact on copyright status.— Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:17, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Diannaa: What about the book part? If the image is found in that book without any source stated, doesn't it mean it is (or was) free to use due to its author being unknown and not having a copyright claim over it? Add to that the 70-years-rule, which now counts. I'm not familiar on this topic; could Getty Images simply have started owning the photo at some point? Of course I agree with its deletion if it really is needed. Lupishor (talk) 13:04, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- The images in the book will not be there without sources or proper credit to the authors/copyright holders. Please have a look in the book for a "photo credits" section, which should specify who the copyright holder is. Or in some cases, the information is directly underneath or alongside the photo. It might be abbreviated, for example "BA" for Bundesarchiv or "IWM" for Imperial War Museum.— Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:15, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Diannaa: I have obviously done that already, otherwise I wouldn't have made such a statement. The credits are not stated alongside the photo, nor is there a "photo credits" section (neither at the book's beginning, nor at its end). The only info I've found is that the book is mainly based on military archives from the National Military Museum in Bucharest. It also says that "the most significant documents have been microfilmed and are held by the Ministry of Defence in Bucharest". There is no direct mention of the photo material, however. No single photo in the book has credits given. Lupishor (talk) 14:10, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- To sum up my points: Getty has the image at their website, and they credit the photo service Ullstein Bild. Getty states that the photo is "not released", and that the image can be used for "non-commercial websites", which is not compatible with our license, because we allow commercial use. The book does not give copyright or source information for any of their photos, which certainly does not mean that they are available for us to use, or that the authors of the images therein have been dead for 70 years. So in my opinion, unless there's something presented to the contrary, we have to assume that Getty bought the rights to the image from Ullstein Bild and now holds the copyright.— Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:38, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Diannaa: I have obviously done that already, otherwise I wouldn't have made such a statement. The credits are not stated alongside the photo, nor is there a "photo credits" section (neither at the book's beginning, nor at its end). The only info I've found is that the book is mainly based on military archives from the National Military Museum in Bucharest. It also says that "the most significant documents have been microfilmed and are held by the Ministry of Defence in Bucharest". There is no direct mention of the photo material, however. No single photo in the book has credits given. Lupishor (talk) 14:10, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- The images in the book will not be there without sources or proper credit to the authors/copyright holders. Please have a look in the book for a "photo credits" section, which should specify who the copyright holder is. Or in some cases, the information is directly underneath or alongside the photo. It might be abbreviated, for example "BA" for Bundesarchiv or "IWM" for Imperial War Museum.— Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:15, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Diannaa: What about the book part? If the image is found in that book without any source stated, doesn't it mean it is (or was) free to use due to its author being unknown and not having a copyright claim over it? Add to that the 70-years-rule, which now counts. I'm not familiar on this topic; could Getty Images simply have started owning the photo at some point? Of course I agree with its deletion if it really is needed. Lupishor (talk) 13:04, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- That's not a compatible license, because our license allows all uses, including commercial use. Many images (and text too) appear at multiple places online. This has no impact on copyright status.— Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:17, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Likely that Getty owns the image. --Gbawden (talk) 07:13, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Previously published in 2019 (https://www.instagram.com/p/Bwh7BU2neLz/). Needs permission from copyright holder via COM:OTRS. Howhontanozaz (talk) 22:07, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- I own the copyright of this photo, how to claim it ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lil dodo (talk • contribs) 17:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Lil dodo: Please modify the Instagram post and/or the Facebook post by adding a valid free license or contact the VRT. Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 09:17, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; needs OTRS. And scope?. --Gbawden (talk) 07:13, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:53, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:52, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Even that it looks like old it was created from scratch in 1999. Doctor Architect (talk) 20:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This is an interesting case. This cathedral was demolished by Stalinists in 1937 and was restored as close to the original as possible in 1997/98. The author of the restoration, uk:Лосицький Юрій Георгійович, claims that he succeeded at restoring plans and drawings of the cathedral using historical photographs only, thus achieving the accurate restoration of the destroyed cathedral using his patented technology. Thus the drawings of the cathedral are clearly a creative work of Лосицький Юрій Георгійович and are likely copyrighted (they did not exist, he recreated them using an original technology). However, the exterior of this cathedral is probably not really his creative work, as his goal was to restore exactly the work of 18th century Ukrainian Baroque art. I tend to think that this picture does not really depict anything created from scratch and that Лосицький Юрій Георгійович succeeded in his job of restoring the outside of the cathedral as close to the original as possible, in which case this would not qualify as a 18th century Ukrainian Baroque work (obviously not copyrighted anymore). The opposite would mean that Лосицький Юрій Георгійович did not succeed in accurately restoring the cathedral and basically his claim that his patented technology allowed to accurately restore the exterior is a lie (which is not what reliable sources say of him, the restoration of this cathedral is considered accurate) — NickK (talk) 23:32, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- @NickK: You mean we should have a new template, {{PD-Art}} like, to indicate a building is public domain because it's a "faithful reproduction of an existing old building"? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:48, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: Well, something like that. This is not a unique case, there were multiple cases of restoration of historic buildings, particularly following WWII. For instance, would we qualify Dresden Frauenkirche as a FoP violation if Dresden had no freedom of panorama? This is just the most emblematic case as the author of the restoration claims that he patented a particularly accurate restoration method — NickK (talk) 08:32, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- @NickK: You mean we should have a new template, {{PD-Art}} like, to indicate a building is public domain because it's a "faithful reproduction of an existing old building"? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:48, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: It is indeed an interesting case. Patents are not the same as copyright and don't create copyright either. If patented technology is used with the aim to restore a building as accurately as possible, the intention clearly is not to create any new work of creativity, as a claim to that would mean that the restorer has failed and created a new (different) work instead of restoring the previously existing one. If, on the other hand, Losytsʹkyy (if Google transliterates the name Лосицький correctly; I don't speak Ukrainian) succeeded in building a cathedral that looks exactly like the 18th century original, it is a copy of a public domain work and thus itself in the public domain. As NickK says that the restoration of the cathedral is considered accurate, I come to the same conclusion to keep this photograph. A new template to mark such cases could be discussed in a more fitting place than a deletion request, maybe at COM:VPC. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:41, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
fichier utilisé pour vandaliser un article fr.wikipedia https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tubercule&diff=179462700&oldid=179358761 ~ Antoniex (discuter) 14:57, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:33, 18 September 2021 UTC: CSD G3 (content intended as vandalism, threat, or attack): fichier utilisé pour vandaliser un article fr.wikipedia https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tubercule&diff=179462700&oldid=179358761 --Krdbot 12:28, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Istiqlal Mosque
[edit]The mosque was completed in 1978 by architect Friedrich Silaban (1912–1984). Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia. The copyright terms of the country lasted for 70 years, and they can be undeleted in 2055.
- File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM De Istiqlal moskee en de kathedraal TMnr 20018358.jpg
- File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM De Istiqlal moskee TMnr 20018349.jpg
- File:Eid ul-Fitr Family Istiqlal Mosque Jakarta.JPG
- File:Eid ul-Fitr morning Istiqlal Mosque.JPG
- File:Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi visits the Istiqlal Masjid in Jakarta (1).jpg - Keep but needs cropping JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:30, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- File:Istiqlal Mosque banner.jpg
- File:Istiqlal Mosque Front of Al Fattah Gate.JPG
- File:Istiqlal Mosque Jakarta.jpg
- File:Istiqlal mosque.JPG
- File:Istiqlal Mosque; 2007.jpg
- File:Jakarta Indonesia Istiqlal-Mosque-02a.jpg
- File:Jakarta Indonesia Istiqlal-Mosque-03a.jpg
- File:Masjid Istiqlal 2016 Bennylin 01.jpg
- File:Masjid Istiqlal dan Kemayoran - panoramio.jpg
- File:Masjid Istiqlal.jpg
- File:Mesjid Istiqlal.jpg
- File:Mosque Of Freedom.jpg
- File:Mosque-IMG 3537.JPG
- File:Touring the Istiqlal Mosque in Jakarta, Indonesia, with the First Lady and Grand Imam Ali Mustafa Yaqub, November 10, 2010.jpg - Keep but revdel. The rest images: Delete JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:30, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
A1Cafel (talk) 13:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- I object to this proposal to delete this image, because it's shared for non-commercial and educational purposes and the freedom of panorama in Indonesia acknowledges this. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.148.91.183 (talk) 14:08, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- @85.148.91.183: Non-commerical use was not accepted on Commons. Please read Commons:Licensing for further info. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:39, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- File:Touring the Istiqlal Mosque in Jakarta, Indonesia, with the First Lady and Grand Imam Ali Mustafa Yaqub, November 10, 2010.jpg was cropped. --Taterian (talk) 00:07, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
On hold Due to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:An-Nur Great Mosque. --Liuxxinyu970226 (talk) 01:59, 2 February 2021 (UTC)- I propose to nuke all pictures of buildings in Indonesia, until each uploader of said subject can proof that they have read our Commons:Licensing and provides the exact building completion date, the name and date of death of their architects, before they upload; and fully understand the copyright crime they committed if they didn't do so. Bennylin (yes?) 13:04, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Also this. Why does this even need to be discussed again and again and again and again and again? Just get done with them already. Bennylin (yes?)
- @Bennylin: perhaps these uploaders thought Commons can host educational-only content. Well that doesn't comply with COM:L#Acceptable licenses. Fortunately this is a building, and half (not all) can be moved to enwiki under restricted tag FoP-USonly. Not all because enwiki is not supposed to imitate Commons as it is not a repository in the first place (the reason why it has only three or four Burj Khalifa images). But recourse to enwiki is not indefinite: enwiki disallows images of copyrighted sculptures unless a few of them shall be uploaded and complying with enwiki's fair use guidelines. For these files, Delete all (except 2 images) as forum now archived at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2021/01#Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:An-Nur Great Mosque should be focused by professors in this grey area. Consensus remains: no Commons-acceptable or commercial FOP in Indonesia. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:08, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- The two images are File:Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi visits the Istiqlal Masjid in Jakarta (1).jpg and File:Touring the Istiqlal Mosque in Jakarta, Indonesia, with the First Lady and Grand Imam Ali Mustafa Yaqub, November 10, 2010.jpg, which may be COM:De minimis. But File:Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi visits the Istiqlal Masjid in Jakarta (1).jpg may need to be cropped so that most of the upper half of the mosque will be gone for good, to focus more on the people. The new question: is the cropped image removing a copyrighted building still useful or not? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:48, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: If buildings are off-limit, how about people like here: File:Touring the Istiqlal Mosque in Jakarta, Indonesia, with the First Lady and Grand Imam Ali Mustafa Yaqub, November 10, 2010.jpg? --Taterian (talk) 02:14, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Taterian: taking photos and publishing them under commercial licensing is different from touring by dignitaries. Both are different things. And the main aim of the image is the persons depicted, not the building which is not the main focus (plus the façade is not wholly shown). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:43, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: Thank you for your note. Does it mean that the image in question stays, or I need to remove background completely? --Taterian (talk) 04:38, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Taterian: the image is fine for me. The focus is on the people and not the mosque which is now in the background. However, since I noticed a while ago that this is a cropped version, the previous versions must be revision deleted (revdel), while leaving the current cropped version intact. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:47, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: Thank you for your answer, regarding deleting the previous versions, yes, I know, this is a common practice. --Taterian (talk) 17:41, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Taterian: the image is fine for me. The focus is on the people and not the mosque which is now in the background. However, since I noticed a while ago that this is a cropped version, the previous versions must be revision deleted (revdel), while leaving the current cropped version intact. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:47, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: Thank you for your note. Does it mean that the image in question stays, or I need to remove background completely? --Taterian (talk) 04:38, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Taterian: taking photos and publishing them under commercial licensing is different from touring by dignitaries. Both are different things. And the main aim of the image is the persons depicted, not the building which is not the main focus (plus the façade is not wholly shown). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:43, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: If buildings are off-limit, how about people like here: File:Touring the Istiqlal Mosque in Jakarta, Indonesia, with the First Lady and Grand Imam Ali Mustafa Yaqub, November 10, 2010.jpg? --Taterian (talk) 02:14, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No COM:FOP Indonesia. Agree with keep but revdel of the last one. -M.nelson (talk) 20:29, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:07, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Istiqlal Mosque
[edit]More files in Category:Istiqlal Mosque
[edit]Incomplete list and deletion. Please finish what you've started. We shall not stop the purge until there's no more Istiqlal images in Commons. And I hope we have some capable admin that will delete these files as soon as possible, not waiting 6 months like the request above. Bennylin (yes?) 12:29, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Are you really deleting an entire category of files? You should probbaly review the files more carefully then. For example, the reasoning you gave for the mass deletions was that "there is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia". Which is true. However, I'd argue that a lot of the files aren't panorama's. For example, File:Mihrab of Istiqlal Mosque, Jakarta Indonesia.jpg doesn't show a panorama, this includes other files such as File:Wudu Istiqlal Mosque.JPG and File:Istiqlal Mosque Wudhu (Ablution).JPG. Cheers, The man from Gianyar (talk) 14:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Reasoning as per OP:
- The mosque was completed in 1978 by architect Friedrich Silaban (1912–1984). Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia. The copyright terms of the country lasted for 70 years, and they can be undeleted in 2055.
- File:Ruangan utama Masjid Istiqlal Juni 2021.jpg
- File:Collectie NMvWereldculturen, TM-20020666, Dia, 'De Istiqlal moskee en de kathedraal', fotograaf Henk van Rinsum, 1980.jpg
- File:Collectie NMvWereldculturen, TM-20020667, Dia, 'De Istiqlal moskee', fotograaf Henk van Rinsum, 1980.jpg
- File:Collectie NMvWereldculturen, TM-20020674, Dia, 'De Istiqlal moskee en de kathedraal', fotograaf Henk van Rinsum, 1980.jpg
- File:Collectie NMvWereldculturen, TM-20020684, Dia, 'De Istiqlal moskee', fotograaf Henk van Rinsum, 1980.jpg
- File:Collectie NMvWereldculturen, TM-20023588, Dia, 'Schoolkinderen bij de Istiqlal moskee', fotograaf Jaap de Jonge, 02-1993 - 03-1993.jpg
- File:Collectie NMvWereldculturen, TM-20023596, Dia, 'De Istiqlal moskee', fotograaf Jaap de Jonge, 02-1993 - 03-1993.jpg
- File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM De Istiqlal moskee in aanbouw en de kathedraal TMnr 20025717.jpg
- File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM Gezicht vanaf het Nationaal Monument (Monas) richting Lapangan Banteng TMnr 20025716.jpg
- File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM Het hoofdpostkantoor met op de achtergrond de Istiqlal moskee in aanbouw TMnr 20018028.jpg
- File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM Istiqlal 20025716-20025717 merged.jpg
- File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM Schoolkinderen bij de Istiqlal moskee TMnr 20018350.jpg
- File:Eid ul-Fitr prayer Istiqlal Mosque.JPG
- File:Fountain Istiqlal Mosque Monas background.JPG
- File:Fountain Istiqlal Mosque.JPG
- File:Istiqlal Mosque Minaret.JPG
- File:Jakarta Indonesia Istiqlal-Mosque-03.jpg
- File:Masjid Istiqlal - Panoramio.jpg
- File:Masjid Istiqlal 2.jpg
- File:Mesjid agung di lihat dari monas - panoramio.jpg
- File:Muslim girls at Istiqlal Mosque jakarta.png
- File:Prasasti Peresmian Masjid Istiqlal tahun 1978-Pintu-As-Salaam.jpg
- File:Ruang 66 BP4 Pusat.jpg
- File:Secretary Kerry Pays Tribute to Islamic Faith During Visit to Istiqlal Mosque (12555626943).jpg
- File:View to the northeast from Monas.jpg
- File:Stamps of Indonesia, 082-08.jpg
More files in Category:Interior of Istiqlal Mosque
[edit]- File:Jakarta Indonesia Istiqlal-Mosque-06.jpg
- File:Barack Obama and Michelle Obama at the Istiqlal Mosque, Jakarta, Indonesia, Nov. 10, 2010.jpg
- File:Bedug at Istiqlal Mosque.jpg
- File:Collectie NMvWereldculturen, TM-20023594, Dia, 'Interieur van de Istiqlal moskee', fotograaf Paul Romijn, 02-1993 - 03-1993.jpg
- File:Eid ul-Fitr prayer Istiqlal Mosque women section.JPG
- File:Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi visits the Istiqlal Masjid in Jakarta (2).jpg
- File:Istiqlal Interior.jpg
- File:Istiqlal Mosque Eid ul Fitr Jamaah 1.JPG
- File:Istiqlal Mosque Eid ul Fitr Jamaah 2.JPG
- File:Istiqlal Mosque Eid ul Fitr Jamaah 3.JPG
- File:Istiqlal Mosque Eid ul Fitr Jamaah 4.JPG
- File:Istiqlal Mosque Eid ul Fitr Jamaah 5.JPG
- File:Istiqlal Mosque interior.jpg
- File:Istiqlal Mosque Minbar (cropped).jpg
- File:Istiqlal Mosque Minbar.jpg
- File:Istiqlal Mosque Reciting Al Quran.JPG
- Voted to be kept by Yann.
- File:Istiqlal Mosque Wudhu (Ablution).JPG
- File:Jakarta Indonesia Istiqlal-Mosque-01.jpg
- File:Jakarta Indonesia Istiqlal-Mosque-01a.jpg
- File:Jakarta Indonesia Istiqlal-Mosque-04.jpg
- File:Jakarta Indonesia Istiqlal-Mosque-05.jpg
- File:Jamaah Solat Ied Istiqlal.jpg
- File:Mihrab of Istiqlal Mosque, Jakarta Indonesia.jpg
- File:Roof of Grand Domed Prayer Hall in Istiqlal Mosque (12555508735).jpg
- File:Secretary Kerry Applauded After Banging Gong at Istiqlal Mosque (12555507775).jpg
- File:Secretary Kerry Bids Farewell to Female Students at Istiqlal Mosque (12555993344).jpg
- File:Secretary Kerry Signs Guest Book at Istiqlal Mosque (12555626353).jpg
- File:Wudu Istiqlal Mosque.JPG
@Bennylin: are you trying to make a point here? I clicked some of the images and none of them contain a deletion template and quite a few of them don't even include the mosque. In the current state this whole section should just be closed. Multichill (talk) 20:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Just in the nick of time. I've only recently know about VisualFileChange to make a mass deletion request. Please check the files again. Thanks. Bennylin (yes?) 20:08, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Bennylin: before this you were just being pointy, but just tagging blanketly all the images in a category for deletion without checking is clearly disruptive. Multichill (talk) 20:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Bennylin: Please review the files more carefully. Files like File:Istiqlal Mosque Reciting Al Quran.JPG should be OK. The subject here is the people, not the architecture. Thanks, Yann (talk) 20:17, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- I think we in Commons should rather err on the side of deletion. I'm just nominating files on the category, with the same deletion criteria as per nom. You may vote to keep, crop, or other things for the files you think should stay, but for every files with potential of breaking the law, there should be at least someone who would vote/vouch for it to be kept. Shouldn't the admin act more promptly on these matter? You pick one or two examples, but there are dozens on my list that are clearly infringing the rights of the architect. I don't know what to make of your hesitation. Bennylin (yes?) 09:11, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- We got a notice at Wikivoyage that File:WV banner Indonesian phrasebook - Mosque.jpg had been nominated for deletion. I don't see it anywhere on this page. If it's not nominated for deletion, revert the deletion notice from its page. If it is nominated for deletion, you had better state that plainly and give us time to upload it locally, but the focus of that banner is the people within the space, not really the architecture except to provide a sense of place and an appropriate setting for a phrasebook (not actually currently the Indonesian phrasebook but the Sundanese phrasebook). It's a little irritating to have Wikivoyage pagebanners nominated for deletion just because they're in some category or other, but if you all really decide to delete this pagebanner, we'll host it locally. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:49, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks! Bennylin (yes?) 09:11, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, much appreciated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:01, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Info the designer of the mosque was architect Fredrich Silaban who died in 1984 as per [3]. Thus, 1984+70 years+1 year (to complete the calendar) = January 1, 2055 (day on which this Silaban artwork falls in public domain). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:00, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, much appreciated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:01, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Keep
[edit]- Mosque is not the subject
- File:COLLECTIE_TROPENMUSEUM_Het_hoofdpostkantoor_met_op_de_achtergrond_de_Istiqlal_moskee_in_aanbouw_TMnr_20018028.jpg
- File:COLLECTIE_TROPENMUSEUM_Gezicht_vanaf_het_Nationaal_Monument_(Monas)_richting_Lapangan_Banteng_TMnr_20025716.jpg
- File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM De Istiqlal moskee in aanbouw en de kathedraal TMnr 20025717.jpg
- File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM Istiqlal 20025716-20025717 merged.jpg
- File:Fountain_Istiqlal_Mosque_Monas_background.JPG
- File:Fountain Istiqlal Mosque.JPG
- File:Stamps of Indonesia, 082-08.jpg
- Lidewij (talk) 10:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- also
- File:Secretary Kerry Pays Tribute to Islamic Faith During Visit to Istiqlal Mosque (12555626943).jpg
- File:Secretary Kerry Applauded After Banging Gong at Istiqlal Mosque (12555507775).jpg
- File:Secretary Kerry Bids Farewell to Female Students at Istiqlal Mosque (12555993344).jpg
- File:Secretary Kerry Signs Guest Book at Istiqlal Mosque (12555626353).jpg
- File:Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi visits the Istiqlal Masjid in Jakarta (2).jpg
- File:Bedug at Istiqlal Mosque.jpg
- Lidewij (talk) 10:18, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- If the claim is that the architectural design of the mosque is protected by copyright, then the infringing image would have to at least show that. Many of these (look at File:Secretary Kerry Applauded After Banging Gong at Istiqlal Mosque (12555507775).jpg, File:Secretary Kerry Bids Farewell to Female Students at Istiqlal Mosque (12555993344).jpg) are clearly de minimis and don't show anything of the architectural design.
- Then images such as File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM Het hoofdpostkantoor met op de achtergrond de Istiqlal moskee in aanbouw TMnr 20018028.jpg might record the construction of the mosque, but again they don't infringe upon the design. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:57, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Keep everything that isn’t solely of the building itself (i.e. everything where there are people or other buildings prominently featured). Indiscriminate bad faith nomination. The quality images should be transferred to Wikipedia so they can still be used. Stop wasting people’s time. Dronebogus (talk) 12:47, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Kept various images: DM, or no copyrightable elements visibel. Stamp is PD-IDGov. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:26, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Great Mosque of Central Java
[edit]The mosque was completed in 2006 by Ahmad Fanani. There is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia, thus permission from him is needed
- File:Batas suci - panoramio.jpg
- File:Masjid Agung Jawa Tengah Semarang.jpg
- File:Masjid Agung Jawa Tengah.jpg
- File:MASJID AGUNG SEMARANG - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:MASJID AGUNG SEMARANG - panoramio.jpg
- File:Masjid jateng ( dari atas menara ) - panoramio.jpg
- File:Masjide - panoramio.jpg
- File:Menara Masjid Agung Jawa Tengah, Indonesia.jpg
- File:Menara masjitd jateng - panoramio.jpg
- File:Mesjid Agung Semarang 2009.jpg
- File:The open pillars of Masjid Agung Jawa Tengah - panoramio.jpg
- File:Tower of Masjid Agung Jawa Tengah - panoramio.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 14:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Migrate to English Wikipedia and Delete from Commons - These works fall under the scope of w:Wikipedia:Non-U.S. copyrights and w:Template:FoP-USonly, and thus can be uploaded to the English Wikipedia with the appropriate tag. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- On hold Due to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:An-Nur Great Mosque. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:02, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Move to English Wikipedia half of these images (not all) and apply FoP-USonly template. Afterwards, Delete all as these freely-licensed images of a building from a no-FOP country violate the copyright of Mr. Fanani (no evidence of COM:OTRS permission in which the architect agreed for commercial licenses for the uploaders' images of his arhictectural artwork). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:57, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Move to English Wikipedia half of these images (not all) and apply FoP-USonly template. Afterwards,
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:06, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 14:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hapus saja. Toh, itu foto lama. Nanti saya bisa ganti atau unggah ulang dengan foto terbaru via kamera terbaru. Ezagren (talk) 10:10, 2 February 2021 (UTC+8)
- @Ezagren: The problem will stay even if you upload a new photo, this has been an issue (which i think just ridiculous but well). Wikimedia so far assumed Indonesia does not have freedom of panorama, so new photos might still get deleted and you keep uploading it will likely cause warnings. I suggest all Indonesian contributors to discuss about this issue deeper. Nyanardsan (talk) 11:47, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- On hold Due to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:An-Nur Great Mosque. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:37, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete forum now archived at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2021/01#Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:An-Nur Great Mosque should be focused by professors in this grey area. Consensus remains: no Commons-acceptable or commercial FOP in Indonesia. @Ezagren: pls. contact the architect or his/her heir and ask if he/she is willing to release his/her architectural work under the license you chose for your image. This can be done via COM:OTRS. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:02, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:04, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 14:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete result of that forum: consensus remains on no commercial FOP in Indonesia. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:59, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:05, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 14:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- On hold Due to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:An-Nur Great Mosque. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:37, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete forum now archived at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2021/01#Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:An-Nur Great Mosque should be focused by professors in this grey area. Consensus remains: no Commons-acceptable or commercial FOP in Indonesia. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:42, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:05, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
destiné à vandaliser fr.wikipedia https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Consanguinit%C3%A9&diff=prev&oldid=179462948 ~ Antoniex (discuter) 15:03, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:05, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
fichier destiné à vandaliser fr.wikipedia https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cassoulet&diff=prev&oldid=179458709 ~ Antoniex (discuter) 15:06, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:05, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
fichier utilisé pour vandalise fr.wikipedia https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Languedoc-Roussillon&diff=prev&oldid=179459010 ~ Antoniex (discuter) 15:24, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:05, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
fichier utilisé pour vandliser fr.wikipédia https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pastis&diff=prev&oldid=179461704 ~ Antoniex (discuter) 15:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:05, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
littering WC with private messages, not educationally useful Hladnikm (talk) 17:03, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope; no educational purpose. -M.nelson (talk) 22:29, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:06, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:02, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep There's no reason why this shouldn't be an image.
- This should be produced in LaTeX. But then there are many use cases where the rendered version of that LaTeX could then be useful for some purpose, such as a web page, where there's no embedded ability to render LaTeX. It would perhaps be more useful in svg than png (although why not LaTeX?). But neither of these are reasons to delete this bitmap, per our regular policy on not deleting bitmaps superseded by svgs. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:16, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Andy, if you want to use the content of the image you can take following code which contains even more information than the original image and is at least in parts readable for screenreaders:
- (1) Kerrotaan ensin termilla 2x. Seuraavaksi kerrotaan termilla 3.
- (2) Lopuksi lasketaan kertolaskut.
- (3) Saadaan sievennetty muoto.
- Hello Andy, if you want to use the content of the image you can take following code which contains even more information than the original image and is at least in parts readable for screenreaders:
- Lasketaan yhteen samanmuotoiset termit.
- Lasketaan yhteen samanmuotoiset termit.
- Lasketaan kuten edella.
- Lasketaan kuten edella.
-_محمد_شاه_قاجار_در_روز_تاجگذاری_(1213_ه_ش_–_1250_ه_ق).jpg){kind=link}
![17 File:Логотип ОАО "ТВЗ".jpg](#File:Логотип_ОАО_"ТВЗ".jpg){kind=link}
_logo.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(4559937773).jpg){kind=link}
_(3534717018).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![155 File:North Korean Animation "Awangnyo Finds the Seed of Fire" (15170351600).jpg](#File:North_Korean_Animation_"Awangnyo_Finds_the_Seed_of_Fire"_(15170351600).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
-_%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF_%D8%B4%D8%A7%D9%87_%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%AC%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%AF%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B2_%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%AC%E2%80%8C%DA%AF%D8%B0%D8%A7%D8%B1%DB%8C_(1213_%D9%87_%D8%B4_%E2%80%93_1250_%D9%87_%D9%82).jpg){kind=link}
-_%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF_%D8%B4%D8%A7%D9%87_%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%AC%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%AF%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B2_%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%AC%E2%80%8C%DA%AF%D8%B0%D8%A7%D8%B1%DB%8C_(1213_%D9%87_%D8%B4_%E2%80%93_1250_%D9%87_%D9%82).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Cigaretten-Bilderdienst_USHMM_No_known_copyright_restriction_Hitlerputsch_Gefallenen_1923_Cropped.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cigaretten-Bilderdienst_USHMM_No_known_copyright_restriction_Hitlerputsch_Gefallenen_1923.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cigaretten-Bilderdienst_USHMM_No_known_copyright_restriction_Hitlerputsch_Gefallenen_1923_Cropped.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cigaretten-Bilderdienst_USHMM_No_known_copyright_restriction_Hitlerputsch_Gefallenen_1923.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cigaretten-Bilderdienst_USHMM_No_known_copyright_restriction.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cigaretten-Bilderdienst_USHMM_No_known_copyright_restrictions_Braunes_Haus_Arbeitszimmer_colorised.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cigaretten-Bilderdienst_USHMM_No_known_copyright_restrictions_Braunes_Haus_Fahnenhalle_colorised.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cigaretten-Bilderdienst_USHMM_No_known_copyright_restrictions_Braunes_Haus_M%C3%BCnchen_Photo_colorised.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cigaretten-Bilderdienst_USHMM_No_known_copyright_restrictions_Das_Braune_Haus_M%C3%BCnchen.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cigaretten-Bilderdienst_USHMM_No_known_copyright_restrictions_Braunes_Haus_SA-Leute_Kasino_Hitler.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cigaretten-Bilderdienst_USHMM_No_known_copyright_restrictions_Das_Braune_Haus_M%C3%BCnchen.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cigaretten-Bilderdienst_USHMM_No_known_copyright_restrictions_Braunes_Haus_Chef_des_Stabes_Hitler.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cigaretten-Bilderdienst_USHMM_No_known_copyright_restrictions_Braunes_Haus_Dietrich-Eckart-B%C3%BCste_Ehrentafel.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cigaretten-Bilderdienst_USHMM_No_known_copyright_restrictions_Braunes_Haus_Kartotheksaal.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cigaretten-Bilderdienst_USHMM_No_known_copyright_restrictions_Das_Braune_Haus_M%C3%BCnchen.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cigaretten-Bilderdienst_USHMM_No_known_copyright_restrictions_Braunes_Haus_Hitler_verl%C3%A4sst.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cigaretten-Bilderdienst_USHMM_No_known_copyright_restrictions_Das_Braune_Haus_M%C3%BCnchen.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cropped_card.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![16:11, 1 February 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/02/01#c-EugeneZelenko-2021-02-01T16:11:00.000Z-File:Логотип_ОАО_"ТВЗ".jpg){kind=link}
![07:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/02/01#c-Fitindia-2021-02-08T07:56:00.000Z-File:Логотип_ОАО_"ТВЗ".jpg){kind=link}
_logo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_logo.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_logo.jpg){kind=link}
_logo.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(5619082067).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(4559937773).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(4559937773).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(3534717018).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3534717018).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
![09:51, 30 January 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/02/01#c-Teemeah-2015-01-30T09:51:00.000Z-File:North_Korean_Animation_"Awangnyo_Finds_the_Seed_of_Fire"_(15170351600).jpg){kind=link}
![02:38, 6 February 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/02/01#c-INeverCry-2015-02-06T02:38:00.000Z-File:North_Korean_Animation_"Awangnyo_Finds_the_Seed_of_Fire"_(15170351600).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![11:55, 1 February 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/02/01#c-Matlin-2021-02-01T11:55:00.000Z-File:North_Korean_Animation_"Awangnyo_Finds_the_Seed_of_Fire"_(15170351600).jpg){kind=link}
![22:54, 13 February 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/02/01#c-Taivo-2021-02-13T22:54:00.000Z-File:North_Korean_Animation_"Awangnyo_Finds_the_Seed_of_Fire"_(15170351600).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Taishacho_Kizukihigashi,_Izumo,_Shimane_Prefecture_699-0701,_Japan_-_panoramio_(20).jpg&diff=243135734&oldid=243134911){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_richting_Lapangan_Banteng_TMnr_20025716.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- I have transferred parts of this code to File:Polynomienkertolasku3.png. If these formulas are to be used in other languages, it is not a problem to translate them as they were entered in plain text. Do you now agree to delete the image? --WIKImaniac 18:29, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:25, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
File:ATA-trained bomb techs with the Royal Thai Police Metropolitan Police Bureau collect evidence after rendering safe an IED outside the Royal Thai Police headquarters in Bangkok on August 2, 2019. (49128762997).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Was previously tagged as a speedy delete, "Not a US federal work; description includes "Photo courtesy of Royal Thai Police"" but I think this is too complex for that. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:12, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Two questions spring to mind here.
- Does "Photo courtesy of Royal Thai Police" added by the DSS invalidate their PD dedication of it as US Gov? Or is that merely an annotation as a credit?
- What would the licensing be for a similar image directly from the Royal Thai Police? I know nothing of Thai government copyright. Does that country have anything comparable to "crown copyright", as many others do? (and so it would be freely licensed here anyway). Andy Dingley (talk) 14:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: According to the official account on Flickr, the image was put in PD. That they mention "Courtesy RTP" does not undermine this. Of course there might not be a contract, but it can be assumed the police agrees with publication in PD. --Elly (talk) 09:05, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
File:ATA-trained bomb techs with the Royal Thai Police Metropolitan Police Bureau collect evidence after rendering safe an IED outside the Royal Thai Police headquarters in Bangkok on August 2, 2019. (49128762997).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Photo courtesy of Thai Royal Police, which is not from the Diplomatic Security Service, thus the PD license is invalid. Note: Thailand does not have any "crown copyright" claims A1Cafel (talk) 07:55, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. It is unknown if there is contract or permission from TRP. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
File:ATA-trained bomb techs with the Royal Thai Police Metropolitan Police Bureau collect evidence after rendering safe an IED outside the Royal Thai Police headquarters in Bangkok on August 2, 2019. (49128762997).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
Photo courtesy of Thai Royal Police, which is not from the Diplomatic Security Service, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 09:04, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:46, 18 January 2024 (UTC)