Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:FoP-South Korea

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{NoFoP-South Korea}} cannot be applied in these images as the architecture (the houses or buildings) are the main and substantial subjects of these images. There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea for commercial reuses of images without architects' and/or sculptors' authorization. South Korea has also very low bar on threshold of originality, in which even simple buildings are copyrighted (ex. a 2008 court case of Architect Min Gyu-am  versus Pomato Company), and even parts of a building can be copyrighted by the architect/s.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:03, 14 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

 Delete {{NoFoP-South Korea}} template should only be used for photos to which de minimis can be applied. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:27, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Answer To Deletion Request In brazilian portugueseː Olá. Quando fiz o upload destas imagens (ver abaixo), eu entrei em contato com o escritório de arquitetura Mecanoo, que projetou a Namdaemum Tower. Estas imagens ficavam disponíveis no site, e com a permissão deles eu trouxe para a Wikimedia para fins de melhora de artigo sobre o escritório e seus projetos. Não tenho qualquer ligação de trabalho com eles. Sou apenas um estudante de arquitetura que gostaria de escrever um artigo completo. Portanto, creio que a proposição da eliminação destas imagens é indevida, principalmente por não estar sendo utilizada para fins comerciais aqui dentro da Wikimedia.

João Victor Costa (talk) 16:23, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.

I included the three files discussed above because (a) the permission from the architects must be in writing via OTRS and (b) João Victor Costa notes that Commons is not commercial. It is likely that the architect's permission assumed non-commercial use while Commons requires that images be availablwe for any use by anyone anywhere.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]