Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/01/29

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 29th, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sexual content 97.83.164.180 12:04, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 09:50, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sexual content 97.83.164.180 19:55, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


[Non-admin closure, Speedy Kept] Mass closure DR added by 97.83.164.180 because of accidental create. StayC, Bae173 and music fans [ talk to me ] 04:45, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have a better video of this, file:Fellatio.webm, we can delete this file and redirect it so no uses are lost. Dronebogus (talk) 12:32, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep I realize this video's quality is not that good, but it's a much closer view, so unless there's a better-quality video with a comparably close view, it should be kept. I wouldn't be surprised if there is, but the one you linked isn't it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:05, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per previous & comment. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:23, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons nie jest amatorską stroną pornograficzną 188.147.12.36 21:51, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:24, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇ 121.147.126.41 02:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: nonsense. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:54, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Telifi alınmadı. Rasitgur (talk) 21:14, 29 January 2021 (UTC) {{Speedydelete|telif alınmadı}}[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvio (DW), per https://www.logoground.com/logo.php?id=105742. --Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violations, image from instagram JMKTIN (talk) 07:52, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation. --ƏXPLICIT 01:28, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bublish ncosjdcsod[ 37.40.20.253 18:20, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you are User:Wijdan12 log in please. --Achim (talk) 18:40, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete Twitter images from أبو مازن. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:11, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyright violation: https://twitter.com/abumazin96/status/1329085288023433219/photo/3. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:10, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused image, was used to spam en.wp, probably not really free, out of project scope Beeblebrox (talk) 03:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by India'sNo.1Communication (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM. Per file description and the username of uploader, seem these images were uploaded for the purpose of spam.

SCP-2000 04:40, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collage without educational use Drakosh (talk) 04:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collage without educational use Drakosh (talk) 04:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 04:56, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 04:56, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be an unused photo uploaded for the purpose of being used on a now deleted userpage Askeuhd (talk) 05:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be an unused photo uploaded for the purpose of being used on a now deleted userpage Askeuhd (talk) 05:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be an unused photo uploaded for the purpose of being used on a now deleted userpage Askeuhd (talk) 05:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be an unused photo uploaded for the purpose of being used on a now deleted userpage Askeuhd (talk) 05:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be an unused photo uploaded for the purpose of being used on a now deleted userpage Askeuhd (talk) 05:17, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Annas etika mulya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

selfies of non-contributor.

Larryasou (talk) 05:25, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Studio photo, no exif, unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 06:21, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WBARBER01 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: blatant misuse of Commons as a host for files related to a non-notable fictional realm, that are not going to be realistically used on a WMF project.

HyperGaruda (talk) 07:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, promotion only Trade (talk) 09:20, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

плохое Sergeyveremeevi (talk) 14:58, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete by courtesy. --Achim (talk) 15:36, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Trade (talk) 10:14, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private gif,of low quality, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:45, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 11:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 11:42, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry image, there ar e other images of same species available Papuass (talk) 11:48, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user logo, uploader's only other contributions were self-promotion on Wikidata that were promptly reverted. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 12:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems to be a mashup rather than serve an educational pupose; hence out of scope  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:13, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These are a series of personal mashups of flags with no apparent criteria, for no apparent educational use, so are out of scope


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Erick69mps (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos of photos. Unclear authors, sources, and dates of publication. May have been used on the Spanish Wikipedia on the uploader's userpage, which was speedily deleted in June 2020 as a violation of userpage policy. Possibly out of project scope.

ƏXPLICIT 13:22, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RamkiDevelopers (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, no EXIF data, small and blurry images, most of files available on-line in larger formats (like: https://ramkidevelopers.wordpress.com/2015/07/09/vijetha-smart-city-on-nh7-near-bangalore-airport/). Files not in use.

Smooth O (talk) 13:41, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JOHSPO (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:42, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Goloposo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 07:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chundakattil Creations (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotion of another famous youtuber. Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to any wm project.

Achim (talk) 15:39, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by André Andrade ferreira (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:57, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Himanshud201 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hkangranni (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maddoggsa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion of another famous rapper, out of project scope. No contributions to any wm project.

Achim (talk) 17:26, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in eu:Sistema konbinazional with text equivalent:

Egia = Piztuta = 1
Gezurra = Itzalita = 0

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:45, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in eu:Sistema konbinazional with table equivalent:

A
0
1

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in eu:Sistema konbinazional with table equivalent:

A B C
0 0 0
0 0 1
0 1 0
0 1 1
1 0 0
1 0 1
1 1 0
1 1 1

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in eu:Sistema konbinazional with table equivalent:

A B C D S Kokapena
0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 1 1 1
0 0 1 0 1 2
0 0 1 1 0 3
0 1 0 0 1 4
0 1 0 1 1 5
0 1 1 0 0 6
0 1 1 1 0 7
1 0 0 0 1 8
1 0 0 1 1 9
1 0 1 0 1 10
1 0 1 1 0 11
1 1 0 0 0 12
1 1 0 1 0 13
1 1 1 0 0 14
1 1 1 1 0 15

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:50, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in eu:Sistema konbinazional with table equivalent:

A C
0 8 10 2
B 4 12 14 6
D 5 13 15 7
1 9 11 3

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in eu:Sistema konbinazional with table equivalent:

a
b
c
d
00 01 11 10
00 1 1 1 1
01 1 0 0 0
11 1 0 0 0
10 1 1 0 0

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:53, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in eu:Sistema konbinazional with table equivalent:

a
b
0 1
0
1

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:54, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in eu:Sistema konbinazional with table equivalent:

a
b
c
 
00 01 11 10
0
1

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in eu:Sistema konbinazional with table equivalent:

a
b
c
d
00 01 11 10
00
01
11
10

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:56, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in eu:Sistema konbinazional with table equivalent:

Propiedades
conmutativa a + b = b + a a · b = b · a
distributiva a + b · c = (a + b) · (a + c) a ·(b + c) = a · b + a · c
asociativa a · (b · c) = (a · b) · c = a · b · c a + (b + c) = (a + b) + c = a + b + c

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:57, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in eu:Sistema konbinazional with table equivalent:

Postulados
Existe un complementario a + a̅ = 1 a · a̅ = 0
Idempotencia a + a = a a · a = a
Existe un elemento neutro a + 0 = a a · 0 = 0
Dominio del 0 y del 1 a + 1 = 1 a · 1 = 1
Doble complementación a̿ = a

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:58, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in eu:Sistema konbinazional with table and TeX equivalent:

Teoremas
Absorción a + (a · b) = a a · (a + b) = a
Unicidad de complementario
Dualidad

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in eu:Sistema konbinazional with table and TeX equivalent:

Leyes de De Morgan

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in eu:Sistema konbinazional with table equivalent:

CMOS TTL
74HC 4000B 74 74S 74LS 74AS 74ALS ECL
Potentzia xahupena (mW)
→ Estatikoa
→ Dinamika (100 KHz)

2.5x10-3
0.17

1x10-3
0.1

10
10

20
20

2
2

8
8

1.2
1.2

40
40
Zabalkundearen atzerapena 8 50 9 3 9.5 1.7 4 1
Erlojuaren maiztasuna (MHz) 40 12 35 12.5 45 200 70 300
Zarata tartea (V) 0.9 1.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.25

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, somebody's random selfie Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, somebody's random selfie, please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Imtiyaz Rasool3.jpg Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, somebody's random selfie Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:08, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, somebody's random selfie, please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Imtiyaz Rasool.jpg Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:20, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, somebody's random selfie Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:08, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, somebody's random selfie, please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Imtiyaz Rasool2.jpg Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, somebody's random selfie Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:09, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, somebody's random selfie Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:09, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, somebody's random selfie Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:09, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 21:25, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private gif, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 21:25, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 21:32, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no license Mielas (talk) 21:56, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

answer: this is a public image on longbow games webpage and in all the online gaming stores like steam of gogcom. To add to this, there are plenty of other games that have their boxshot shown in wikipedia


Deleted: by EugeneZelenko. --Minoraxtalk 09:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Entirewall (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused user photos, graphics, and signatures. Uploader has no other live global contributions. Out of project scope.

ƏXPLICIT 23:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo, no proof of free license Vera (talk) 07:53, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shahtiaz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo, logo and COA, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rcocharles (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This series of older photographs was uploaded by user labeled "own work." Small file sizes and poor quality suggest a series of COM:COPYVIO's instead. One image that had camera metadata was not nominated, but it needs better description.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:10, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:58, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rcocharles (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works: File:Nigeria vs Gabon 2014-05-02 04-04.jpeg is clearly cropped from somewhere else and File:Charles 234.jpg has been taken from FB as per EXIF data.

P 1 9 9   20:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work: transmission code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9   20:21, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A rapper whose image is being legalized by a US Embassy; why? How? Is there something I cannot see here? What do these pictures (there are others, an actress, a businessman, who knows who else) have to do with a USG official performing his/her official duties with a camera? When are we going to see a porn star's pic as such? (Because the person was sent to give moral to troops stationed at...?) E4024 (talk) 16:04, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: created by US Embassy employee, what the task of that employee and why he/she makes photos of rappers is less relevant here. --rubin16 (talk) 14:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kalisto9898 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Bulgaria.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from modern art. Should cropped/blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:40, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:42, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mpbklynbuf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nankanfrabonci (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from modern art.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:47, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Riccardo Gilardi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To jest zdjęcie ulicy Wiśniowej na Miedzyniu, a nie Słonecznej na Jarach. 2A00:F41:86F:B079:5C1E:CF30:701F:14D6 00:09, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, rationale copied to talk page. --Achim (talk) 20:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope/non-notable company, and potential copyvio. IWI (talk) 00:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 08:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 04:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 08:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from FB per MD, not own work Gbawden (talk) 13:26, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 11:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commodore Vanderbilt express.jpg 175.33.137.101 00:53, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural close: already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality, badly blurred. No use. MPF (talk) 00:58, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, as it documents a specific type of ship projector, mounted at the prow.-- Darwin Ahoy! 21:40, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Darwin; quality is low, but good enough to identify that ship projector. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own request by me as the uploader. Source is "Source: PIO-MARIKINA" which seem to not match with the Flickr uploader JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:16, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in France and the photo violates poster author's copyright. Taivo (talk) 15:53, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 13:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Article page. This is not Wikipedia, out of scope. Achim (talk) 22:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 13:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems like a book cover or a poster of Japanese singer en:Yuki Kashiwagi. Not own work, probably. Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Addition,

--Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 15:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free image, image belongs to Parsa Ara and can be seen as early as August 2019 https://atwoodmagazine.com/ecsh-social-house-feature-2019/ CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 02:28, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 15:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file description makes it clear that this file was originally uploaded for advertising purposes. As this file is a logo of a very insignificant company, and poorly drawn, it's unlikely to ever be useful for educational purposes and is therefore out of COM:SCOPE. Not a very active user (talk) 06:47, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:20, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality: proportions distorted, colours badly wrong. No educational use. MPF (talk) 00:27, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, distorted colours, not in use. Thuresson (talk) 21:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use file of a user with no other contributions to Wikimedia projects. The Commons cannot be a repository for just anything and it is not an online photo album. Ldorfman (talk) 00:48, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Unidentified woman. Uploader has no other known contributions to Wikimeda. Thuresson (talk) 21:07, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image uploaded as "own work", but there's no EXIF data or any other information provided to verify that claim. Seems like a professionaly taken image of a young, up-and-coming actor and is something that a professional photographer would release under a free license without at least providing more information about the image's en:provenance and claiming a little more credit. File can be seen used in a number of places online, but it's not sure how many of them got their version from Commons. This is the only file uploaded by the uploader so there's no established history of uploading acceptable images. It seems at the very least that this should be verified by OTRS per COM:PCP, but I'm bringing it up for discussion here just to see what others might think. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per COM:COPYVIO, via link from Curtis Brown. --Frontman830 (talk) 00:41, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 21:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Swastik Mridha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The files are various images taken by the Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, a state-owned enterprise of India. According to Template:GODL-India, the template only applies to Indian government agencies ("...that applies to all shareable non-sensitive data available either in digital or analog forms but generated using public funds by various agencies of the Government of India..."). As a result, it is doubted that whether the template is applicable to these files, and they may be copyrightable and unfree.

廣九直通車 (talk) 04:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, according to Section 3(23) of the General Clauses Act, 1897, there are no references to state-owned enterprises in the term "Government".廣九直通車 (talk) 04:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 21:13, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains a logo likely to be copyrighted. Center logo is on enwikip under a fair use claim, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Revolutionary_Workers_Party_logo.jpg Thespoondragon (talk) 04:22, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We must be sure that the logo is copyrighted before deleting it. Seekallknowledge (talk) 04:43, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Actually the opposite is true, we need evidence that the file is a free file in order to keep it, see COM:PCP. Per the Berne Convention which Russia is a party of, the copyright of works is automatic upon their creation. So for it to be able to be hosted here the work must be too simple to qualify for copyright protection, have its copyright protection expire due to being too old, or have the creator release it under a free or copyleft license. It is clearly too complex to be public domain under Russia's laws (fist, shading on flag), and as the party was formed in 1999 the copyright could not have expired due to age. There is no indication on the party's website that they have released their materials under a free or copyleft license, so unless if we find something by the party releasing it under such a license the file should be deleted. -Thespoondragon (talk) 06:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted per nomination. This party logo is also available as File:Logo of the Revolutionary Workers' Party (Russia).png. Thuresson (talk) 21:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo would leak author's privacy and the content of this picture is out of date. Luoxingyang000 (talk) 04:35, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, no relevant reasons to delete. Thuresson (talk) 21:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be an unused photo uploaded for the purpose of being used on a now deleted userpage Askeuhd (talk) 05:17, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted No obvious use in any Wikimedia project. Not in use today. Thuresson (talk) 21:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

You cannot hear the word 'Lapidary' at all. The audio was most likely recorded at the wrong split-second 2601:1C2:500:4CE0:969:75B1:3B1A:A2B 05:47, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept, new version uploaded. Thuresson (talk) 21:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a nonsense image without enyclopedic value created for "fun" Sabelöga (talk) 07:23, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 21:38, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Youtube uploader is not author of a video. It's a news video from Radio Television of Serbia. No permission. Smooth O (talk) 08:09, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 21:42, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-contradictory and implausible source/licensing declarations ("own work" and "PD-India"); artwork evidently from a print source, with artist's signature from 1999. Evident copyvio. Fut.Perf. 08:17, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. Uploaded by problematic user. Thuresson (talk) 21:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file with no educational value. Commons has numerous other maps of Australia with significantly higher quality than this one. Also, "Dreamslandia" doesn't seem to be a common nickname for Australia, making this file potentially misleading. Not a very active user (talk) 08:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. Not in use. Thuresson (talk) 21:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file with no realistic educational uses. This map depicts a location which doesn't even exist in real life, and has a very low quality, with parts of the text being cut off by the borders and most of the map's legend missing. The file also contains ridiculos amounts of blank space, with more than half of the file being blank. Commons has numerous fictional maps with significantly higher quality at Category:Maps of fictional places or locations, so I don't see any need for keeping this file. 46.132.188.241 13:04, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. Not in use. Thuresson (talk) 21:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Small photo without EXIF, not in use, almost single upload. Smooth O (talk) 13:34, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. Photo of a factory building. Image size 212 x 122 pixels. Thuresson (talk) 21:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is the scope of this file? Why do we keep a "text"? E4024 (talk) 13:48, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, this is a longer quote by Ayn Rand (1905-1982). Quotes can be published at Wikiquote with due regard to copyright. Thuresson (talk) 21:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used. We have File:KdoJeJohnGalt.jpg. Maybe we should delete one and keep only the better one. E4024 (talk) 13:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 21:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

living artist Martin Sg. (talk) 14:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, work of art by Peter Kodera, 1937-2014. Thuresson (talk) 22:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. Wikimedia users who wish to publish an autobiograhy should contact a publishing company. Thuresson (talk) 22:07, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The state of Minnesota is in the United States where Freedom of Panorama does not apply to murals on buildings and photographer Jason Taellious who uploaded the photo to Flickr is not the author of the art, thus he's not in position to release copyright to the mural. I had something similar removed and was told freedom of panorama does not extend to murals in the US and the mural is the primary subject of this photograph, thus for consistency this should be removed. Graywalls (talk) 07:56, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 02:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The mosque was completed in 2008. There is no freedom of panorama in Yemen, thus permission from the architect is needed.

A1Cafel (talk) 15:52, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure if this is standard, but this is an orphaned talk page, its contents have already been copied to the village pump and as it was a DMCA take-down that got the file deleted it is unlikely that it will be used again soon. I am not sure if nominating this file for deletion is how these are usually handled as this page might be handy for future reference. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 17:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 23:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of panorama in Ukraine and no permission to use cc-by-sa-3.0. This work of art was erected in 2009. The original uploader was Investigatio at Wikimedia Commons. Doctor Architect (talk) 04:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:52, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. The first author Topuz has died on October 29, 1999. The original uploader was Investigatio at Wikimedia Commons. Doctor Architect (talk) 14:27, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:53, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Volodymyr Zabolotny died in 1962. His works can't be used. Here is another example of the same building uploaded by the same photographer. The original uploader was Vadim Chuprina at Wikimedia Commons. Doctor Architect (talk) 14:40, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:06, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. The first author Topuz has died on October 29, 1999. The original uploader was Investigatio at Wikimedia Commons. Doctor Architect (talk) 14:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:54, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. The first author Topuz has died on October 29, 1999. The original uploader was Investigatio at Wikimedia Commons. Doctor Architect (talk) 15:26, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:54, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. The first author Topuz has died on October 29, 1999. The original uploader was Haidamac at Wikimedia Commons. Doctor Architect (talk) 15:32, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:08, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. The first author Topuz has died on October 29, 1999. The original uploader was Investigatio at Wikimedia Commons. Doctor Architect (talk) 15:38, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:54, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. This work of art was created in 1980. The author is still alive. The original uploader was Investigatio at Wikimedia Commons. Doctor Architect (talk) 15:48, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:07, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. The first author Topuz has died on October 29, 1999. The original uploader was ЯдвигаВереск at Wikimedia Commons. Doctor Architect (talk) 15:54, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:09, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. The first author Topuz has died on October 29, 1999. The original uploader was Wereskowa at Wikimedia Commons. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:13, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:10, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. The first author Topuz has died on October 29, 1999. The original uploader was ЯдвигаВереск at Wikimedia Commons. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:10, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. The first author Topuz has died on October 29, 1999. The original uploader was Serg Smith at Wikimedia Commons. Doctor Architect (talk) 15:29, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:52, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. The first author Topuz has died on October 29, 1999. The original uploader was Дмитрий Ванькевич at Panoramio and then uploaded by Bot. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:08, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. The first author Topuz has died on October 29, 1999. The original uploader was Haidamac at Wikimedia Commons. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:27, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:43, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. The first author Topuz has died on October 29, 1999. The original uploader was Haidamac at Wikimedia Commons. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:29, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:44, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. The first author Topuz has died on October 29, 1999. The original uploader was kuchin ster through Panoramio and then bot. Doctor Architect (talk) 18:50, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:45, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. The first author Topuz has died on October 29, 1999. The original uploader was kuchin ster through Panoramio and then bot. Doctor Architect (talk) 18:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:45, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. The first author Topuz has died on October 29, 1999. The original uploader was Сіліч Марія at Wikimedia Commons. Doctor Architect (talk) 18:57, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:46, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. The top right image is not free. Volodymyr Zabolotny died in 1962. His works can't be used. Here is a link to the top right image being deleted from Common due to the copyright violations. The easiest way would be to revert to this older version and then delete the newer version from the file history. The original uploader was Vadim Chuprina at Wikimedia Commons. Doctor Architect (talk) 14:48, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: nominated revision deleted. ƏXPLICIT 01:46, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The church was completed in 1973. There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 16:17, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 02:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The church was completed in 1973. There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 16:17, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 02:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The church was completed in 1973. There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 16:17, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 02:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. The first author Topuz has died on October 29, 1999. The original uploader was A1 at Wikimedia Commons. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:32, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:12, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. The first author Topuz has died on October 29, 1999. The original uploader was D.Rovchak at Wikimedia Commons. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:35, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:34, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. The first author Topuz has died on October 29, 1999. The original uploader was Prymasal at Wikimedia Commons. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:34, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. The first author Topuz has died on October 29, 1999. The original uploader was Дмитрий Жданов at Wikimedia Commons. Doctor Architect (talk) 17:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:33, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. The first author Topuz has died on October 29, 1999. The original uploader was Алексей Комаров through Panoramio and then bot. Doctor Architect (talk) 17:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:33, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks 2A00:1370:815E:3793:E8F9:ECC3:81EE:9A3E 23:21, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:17, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks 2A00:1370:815E:3793:E8F9:ECC3:81EE:9A3E 23:22, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:18, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original artwork without obvious educational use. Possibly made to attack the person shown in the image, as the file name contains a misspelled Polish profanity (wikt:kurwa). 46.132.188.241 16:09, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --jdx Re: 04:32, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

youtube動画のクロップであり、動画の著作権者に著作権が帰属する可能性がある。 IRishikawa521 (talk) 13:35, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The source video is licensed under the {{YouTube CC-BY}} that allows reuse and modification as long as the rights holder is credited. I don't see any reason to believe the copyright does not belong to the YouTube account holder. @IRishikawa521: クロップ元の動画はYouTubeで{{YouTube CC-BY}}ライセンスで配布されています。著作権者と投稿者が同一人物ではない証拠は見当たりません。確かにYouTubeでは著作権侵害が問題ですがこのユーザは信頼できると思います。Ytoyoda (talk) 14:39, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Ytoyoda. --Yasu (talk) 15:25, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair use content which is not allowed on Commons, please transfer to en.wiki. There, this image can be kept Mosbatho (talk) 07:50, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 18:24, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks like a scan from a book. Highly doubt this is the uploader's own work. Vera (talk) 08:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS received. — Racconish💬 18:24, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MujeresEnLaCiencia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All uploaded photos are either personal photos out of scope, or photos from various authors with statement "The author provided the image". No details and permission from original authors.

Smooth O (talk) 09:00, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Most seem to be in articles. DMBFFF (talk) 22:22, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted those provided by the author where a permission is needed. — Racconish💬 18:26, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artist died in 1959; no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 10:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 18:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kapçak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Artworks of tr:Mehmet Kapçak, and tr:Habip Aydoğdu. No permission.

Smooth O (talk) 12:58, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 18:37, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. The first author Topuz has died on October 29, 1999. The original uploader was Amakuha at Wikimedia Commons. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:47, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose Ukrainian law on FoP has a clause with an exception for "covering the current events". This photo was taken to cover the 2015 Odessa Film Festival. --Amakuha (talk) 17:28, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image of the building doesn't fit under current events only because the building has some advertisement on it. That law is meant specifically for news articles. Otherwise any concert hall or even any building could be uploaded claiming that it has some advertisement banner on it that is advertising some current event. Plus it should have "Minimal use" and "Significance". To cover the Film Festival there is no need to use the building. One can use film related images or a fragment of the building, but not the entire copyrighted structure. Here is strictly a building and some banners on it. 19:54, 29 January 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doctor Architect (talk • contribs) 19:54, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you can do that. You can also cover a current event without photographing people's faces: you can just take pictures of people's shoes :) But that doesn't mean that a good reporter will do that.
I was sent to Odessa as a reporter and I covered the event mostly by taking photos of cinematographers, but I also captured the venue in this photo, and I don't see any contradiction with the law here:

..it shall be permitted without the consent of the author (or other copyright holder) and with mandatory indication of the author's name and of the source of borrowing: ... to reproduce, in order to highlight current events by means of photography or cinematography, to carry out public notification or other public communication of the works seen or heard in the course of such events to the extent justified by the informational purpose

Also, I added the architect's name to comply with the law. And I don't see anything about "minimal use" and "fragments of buildings" in the law itself. --Amakuha (talk) 00:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for adding the architect name. It would be interesting to see if we can have such loophole for buildings protected by FoP outside of the news articles. I'd be glad to use it for my and my friends future architecture books then . One more point please. In case of an author currently the caption is misleading and it seems like you are the author of the building when you are the author of the picture. Usually at the first place it's agreed to indicate the author of the work and second the author of the click. Something like this (os similar):
Object
Henrikh Topuz
Photograph
Amakuha
In addition, this building had two architects and not just one. I don't belive that mentioning only one is a proper approach. Doctor Architect (talk) 00:52, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Frankly, I don't think it's a good photo of the building itself and I don't think that anyone would choose it for an architecture book. Many important features of the building are hidden behind the "drapes". Like the reliefs at the entrance and the entrance itself. Neither can you see the interior, which is clearly visible at night. All you can see here is some generic glass and part of the roof. Not a great architecture showcase… But it is suitable as a coverage of the Odessa Film Festival. --Amakuha (talk) 11:40, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't want to unintentionally offend you by saying what you have said in the first sentence, but I agree that this is definitely not the best photo of the building due to banners. (The photo itself is not bad at all.) I didn't mean to choose this particular photo for a book, but if it won't be deleted to upload other photos to Commons with some banner on them with the claim that they show current event that is on the banner, and then use them. In addition, in my opinion if someone will decide to leave the photo we will need to add attribution to the person who did the design of those banners (choice of color, font, size and placement) as they are now part of the derived image and a new view of the building. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:10, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: photo was made during film festival – current events. Falls under law exception. --Anatoliy (talk) 13:03, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A formal PR picture (as mentioned in the file's details in Hebrew) that appears in several places on the web. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 00:37, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:39, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair use on wikipedia fr:File:Logo nouveau CentraleSupelecParisSaclay.jpg, maybe meet COM:TOO France. Larryasou (talk) 05:41, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:39, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to this tweet, the photo is copyrighted by someone named Devendra Shrimali. Needs his/her permission via COM:OTRS. Howhontanozaz (talk) 07:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:39, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be "own work" Small file with lacking metadata. Howhontanozaz (talk) 07:50, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:40, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artist died in 1985; no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 10:34, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:40, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artist died in 1985; no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 10:35, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:40, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy-vio: https://postkolik.com/roportaj/pentagram-yeni-teklisi-bu-duzen-yikilsini-postkolike-anlatti Toghrul Rahimli (talk) 12:29, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:40, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright image. No Freedom of Panorama on 2D images in Canada. Themightyquill (talk) 14:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:40, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright image. No Freedom of Panorama on 2D images in Canada. Themightyquill (talk) 14:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:40, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright image. No Freedom of Panorama on 2D images in Canada. Themightyquill (talk) 14:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:40, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia is not a family photo albums (out of scope) and no META DATA proving the source is the uploader. Pierre cb (talk) 15:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:41, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from author Sadirac is needed. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:41, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The mosque was completed in 1982, there is no freedom of panorama in Guinea, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 16:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:42, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The mosque was completed in 1982, there is no freedom of panorama in Guinea, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 16:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:42, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Image of non-notable person used for cross-wiki spam. Creation of globally locked spammer. IWI (talk) 16:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:42, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private video hosting. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:26, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:42, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:26, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:42, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. original link- https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1725179481127829&set=p.1725179481127829 ArnabSaha (talk) 17:47, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:43, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. original link- https://www.facebook.com/baganjoddha/photos/886141474926098 ArnabSaha (talk) 17:56, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:43, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is the subject depicted in the photo. Requires COM:OTRS from original photographer. ƏXPLICIT 13:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:43, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

exact copy of File:Mouthless mask.jpg Aeroid (talk) 13:33, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:42, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Mural is in United States of America. Photojournalist Tony Webster is not in the position to grant usage permission to this photo, because the mural is the main subject and he is not the copyright owner of the art. I had something similar removed and was told freedom of panorama does not extend to murals and the mural is the primary subject of this photograph, thus for consistency this should be removed. Also see the following as precedent https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Checafemural.JPG Graywalls (talk) 07:40, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 09:58, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The person who UPLOADED has not shown to be the owner of the mural's copyright. Copyright violation. The State of Pennsylvania is in the US and I was told Freedom of Panaroma does not apply to murals in the US. I had something similar removed and was told freedom of panorama does not extend to murals in the US and the mural is the primary subject of this photograph, thus for consistency this should be removed. Graywalls (talk) 08:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:57, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obscene content 188.18.241.238 12:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep In Surgut, no doubt one would be scared of being discovered admiring a hairy naked guy. In New York and London, we have more explicit works hanging in our galleries that were painted in the 19th century. We don't censor them. -- (talk) 16:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, Commons is not censored. --Achim (talk) 22:00, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright 188.120.85.130 00:25, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Detstoreb: Have you nominated this photo for deletion and why? Thuresson (talk) 21:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: procedural close: already deleted by JuTa. --Gestumblindi (talk) 17:36, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Detstoreb (talk) 19:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 12:48, 28 March 2021, by JuTa. --P 1 9 9   14:10, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The mosque was completed in 2006. There is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia, thus permission from the architect is needed.

A1Cafel (talk) 16:04, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 On hold Due to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:An-Nur Great Mosque. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:12, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. plicit 12:01, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Orlando Paride

[edit]

This content belongs to a globally-locked sockpuppet. See Sockpuppet investigation on enwiki. This user, through block evasion on IP addresses, has continued his campaign of forcing his work into every article possible, regardless of quality or worthiness of other files. See this IP and this IP and this IP ad nauseam. The only way to stop this abuse of forcing photos into articles is to delete the photos themselves and to WP:DENY recognition to the abusive sockpuppets. --Elizium23 (talk) 14:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Some of these photos are in use in other Wikis, added by innocent parties such as yours truly on Wikivoyage, and your argument as I understand it is not that these photos are a problem on Commons but that the sockpuppet shouldn't be permitted to add them to other Wikis. So the recourse isn't to delete the photos but to revert the vandalism on other Wikis and remove the sockpuppet from Commons whenever their presence is discovered. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:09, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:ADVERT this abuser is engaging in self-promotion by force. The IPs are impossible to block. The ranges are in the 11-bit CIDR class: do you realize the collateral damage involved from that? There are acceptable replacements for all of these photos, none of them are unique, they are all heavily-photographed subject matter. If you only knew the pulling-teeth I have to go through to reduce the reference counts to these photos, if you had to endure the vandalism to your home account's contributions, to your user talk page, but you don't, do you? Elizium23 (talk) 05:20, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As a bureaucrat on Wikivoyage, I sure do have to endure vandalism to my home Wiki and my user talk page. I greatly appreciate that you substituted one of the photos on Wikivoyage. If you take the initiative to replace the photos on Wikivoyage, I'm OK with deleting these from Commons. I'll gladly cross out the opposing vote if I can count on your help in replacing any other photos that are visible in Wikivoyage articles, if there are any (I don't care about photos that are just in Wikidata listings). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:55, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I absolutely will assist in finding and replacing photos as needed. I have already been doing this on other articles. The only time I outright delete a Paride photo is if it is part of a gallery of many similar photos and its representation is unnecessary. There are always suitable replacements for these. Elizium23 (talk) 15:09, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Good. So I've crossed out my opposing vote as promised, although I think the keep arguments below are meritorious. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:23, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep We don't delete useful images on Commons because somebody is misusing them. I suppose these images are not substandard in any way, but rather among the better images we have of those subjects. COM:ADVERT mostly just says images have to be in scope, and to my understanding no one says these aren't. Of course, if some are redundant and inferior, those could be nominated. –LPfi (talk) 14:31, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that in the cases of old art, the user has misused the "author" field, inserting their name, while the intention is that "author" and "artist" should be synonymous. These could be corrected. –LPfi (talk) 14:36, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Then we would appreciate a little help in blocking the abusive user so he cannot misuse the photos. So far, metawiki has been insufficient. Elizium23 (talk) 15:10, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I will certainly revert changing photos to worse ones in the articles I monitor, and I hope other Wikipedians do likewise. And really, I think some of the image changes have made the articles worse. I reverted a few now. –LPfi (talk) 15:47, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Elizium23, I'm glad you thought better of your edit, but I assure you I took note of it and will be closely monitoring Wikivoyage to see if you choose to edit war with admins concerned solely with making sure the content of articles is as good as possible for travelers. All of us understand how frustrating it is to deal with vandalism. I've often been frustrated by periods of defenselessness against vandals. But if you find yourself losing all sense of perspective, take a break and do something offline or at least off-Wiki. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:09, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ikan, I think what happened is that I reversed the sense of what LPfi said. When I saw his edits he had reverted the sockpuppet. I am sorry that admins are "concerned solely with making sure the content of articles is as good as possible for travelers" because on the English Wikipedia, the admins also need to balance the collaborative needs of a community of editors, without which Wikimedia would not exist. So I hope that admins here and elsewhere would consider that editors need to be civil, collegial, and considerate of one another here, and this behavior is not condoned of forcing photos in using sockpuppets and abuse and edit-wars. Elizium23 (talk) 00:12, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What does what thumbnails we choose to have in our articles have to do with Wikipedia? Nothing, IMO. And this isn't about "forcing photos" onto Wikivoyage. When we see people putting terrible photos in our articles, some of us (certainly including me) revert the edits. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:17, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What you're not understanding is that this individual hasn't been causing trouble on Wikivoyage, so we're just regarding their contributions as among the images we could choose to use, nothing more nor less. I support and sympathize with any efforts to revert vandalism, but this isn't the vandalism we're seeing at Wikivoyage. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:20, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Paintings like File:Madonna di Senigallia 2020.jpg are of course not affected by FOP. --Achim (talk) 09:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Liuxinyu970226, I just read your link. I think it would be much better for Commons to cease allowing the commercial use of our photos than to delete every goddamned photo of Italy. What the hell kind of repository of images would this be with no photos of Italy? I just broached a proposal on Wikivoyage to upload every photo of Italy we want to continue to use locally, declare that commercial use of images on our site is banned and fork away from Wikimedia if you all at Commons are going to follow through with deleting all these images. This is way, way more serious than a question of whether to delete a few dozen images by one controversial user. Do it at the peril of the credibility and usefulness of the entire Wikimedia family of sites. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. If you want to argue about FoP, then let's close this DR and make a new one about the files that may be affected. –LPfi (talk) 11:23, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I strongly urge Commons to start applying very visible templates on some photos that say "Available for non-commercial use only. Anyone choosing to put this to commercial use may face prosecution." That serves the cause of sharing knowledge much better than insisting on deleting most photos from Italy because allowing every damn photo on the site to be used commercially is so goddamned important. Screw that, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
We don't accept media available only for non-commercial use. Wikipedia is available for commercial use, as are many (all?) of the sister projects. Restraining ourselves to media available for commercial use makes things much more straight forward: now I can choose the best image in a category or gallery, without checking licences, and we seldom have to have "requests for licence review" in addition to the deletion requests. We could have a separate repository for media for educational use only, but I don't see that as our mission. –LPfi (talk) 16:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete -- the only way to stop a long-term sockpuppeteer from repeatedly coming back is, to demonstrate that their activities are unwelcome in general and that it is a waste of time to even try to come back. Livio is unwelcome here for all times, period. However the template mentioned sounds like a serious problem, unfortunately. Does this mean Commons has to delete all pictures of Pisa Tower, Pompeji, Colosseum etc.pp. because it's all Cultural Heritage and in Italy images of CH are not allowed to be commercially used without special permission by officials? If so, it's an incredible problem for us and at the very least the Italian Wikimedia chapter should try to do something about it (maybe they do already, I don't know). Once again, I think the photos in this DR have to be deleted merely because of Livio. I sincerely hope we will never have to delete them or any other media due to Italian laws mentioned. --A.Savin 12:57, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • So if I as professional photographer, or film company, regret having uploaded my works under a free licence, all I have to do is to spam Wikipedia pages to get them deleted? We don't delete files of "good" users just because they changed their mind, why allow it for those not asking kindly? –LPfi (talk) 16:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • Per Commons:Deletion policy and COM:ADVERT, advertising or self-promotion is just cause for deletion of media. I would say that Livio does quite well to promote himself over and above anyone else that might have eligible photos. Elizium23 (talk) 16:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
        • The deletion policy refers to COM:ADVERT (which is in a guideline, not policy) and images uploaded for vandalism in the cases where they are not in scope. COM:ADVERT says you should not misuse Commons, but refers to COM:PS for actual policy: for deletion debates, educational use is what matters, not whether somebody is misusing an image. –LPfi (talk) 18:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • For the problem with Italian law, Creative Commons has three different licenses which forbid commercial use. Would changing the license for those photos to one of those & adjusting the text in "how to re-use ..." articles on various wikis solve the problem? Pashley (talk) 13:34, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Unfortunately it's kind of dogmatic for Commons, that only commercial use allowing licenses may be used. I guess, without this rule the main purpose of Commons ("you can take just any picture and use it for just anything you want") is not possible and Commons would be just "yet another picture repository on Internet". --A.Savin 13:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The answer would be to display a template on some of the photos on this site, stating that they cannot be put to commercial use. The rest would be usable for any purpose. That serves that cause of knowledge. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:52, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • The copyright owner would need to grant permission to change the license, and since the presumed owner is banned, blocked and globally locked, he has no voice for such a concession. Elizium23 (talk) 15:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Let's not handle the Italian FoP and cultural heritage issues in this DR, they are orthogonal to the selection of files and original argument for deletion. Also, the former does not affect photographs of old works (paintings/architecture), the latter is not a copyright restriction, and thus irrelevant according to Commons' current policy. –LPfi (talk) 16:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hate to say that, but if an Italian re-user in Italy risks prosecution by Italian state for commercial usage of (otherwise correctly licensed, not subject to NoFoP or other restrictions) media from Commons, I'm not really sure it's irrelevant according to Commons policy... --A.Savin 17:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, at least the good ones. IMHO, many of the pictures listed are well-executed; some of them are not perfect, but still usable on Wikipedia, so I wonder why they should be deleted. I have inspected them one by one (although I haven't checked if other versions available are better). Since most of them are good, I list here those having some technical problems or imperfections (of which it's more likely that better versions exist):

With blown highlights or with processing artifacts

Not-so-good lighting

Not ideal composition (too tight crop or too many empty space)

--Lion-hearted85 (talk) 18:05, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete The time spent hunting down and fighting sockpuppets is very important; It’s so much time wasted for the whole community. We cannot show weakness in front of unfair contributors. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:09, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • I understand your point. I agree that it's essential that each member, despite being bold in making decisions, respects each other's work, act fairly and in good faith. I believe that an objective solution (or compromise) can be found through discussion when ideas differ. Secondly, I believe that a contributor should not replace pictures arbitrarily, but only if they believe to make a clear improvement over the older one (and listen to other's opinions). If this is not the case, let's take countermeasures to save everyone's time. --Lion-hearted85 (talk) 14:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, starting from the bad quality ones indicated by Lion-hearted85. I replaced the files with better versions already on Commons. Kept the few that have no equivalent uploaded on Commons yet. (Of course, FoP in Italy isn't relevant here) Ruthven (msg) 21:36, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Orlando Paride (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This content belongs to a globally-locked LTA sockpuppet. See Sockpuppet investigation on Commons, Wikidata, and enwiki. This user, through block evasion on IP addresses, has continued his campaign of forcing his work into every article possible, regardless of quality or worthiness of other files. See this IP and this IP and this IP ad nauseam. The only way to stop this abuse of forcing photos into articles is to delete the photos themselves and to w:WP:DENY recognition to the abusive sockpuppets. The reasoning is thus: the photos existing here are the attractive force which brings Orlando back to edit and abuse dozens of Wiki projects. Let us remove his incentive to abuse us any further.

Elizium23 (talk) 00:37, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:05, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Ikan Kekek is right --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    "Support the rights of editors who contribute such beautiful images!"
    Elizium23 (talk) 17:47, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Don't punish the images or our readers. Why was the person banned, who contributes such beautiful images? Maybe it is time to reassess why the person was blocked and allow a start-over. --RAN (talk) 17:06, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Treating ego-centrism with recognition is like extinguishing fire with gasoline. --A.Savin 17:12, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Aîe aïe aïe ! Des images qui n'enfreignaient aucun droit d'auteur ont donc déjà été supprimées ? Pardon mais c'est une faute : il va falloir les restaurer (voir plus bas). Ne les remettez pas dans les articles où vous préférez voir les vôtres si vous voulez mais laissez-les vivre leur vie sur Commons : on est pas obligé de mettre uniquement vos images dans les articles il y a de la place pour tout le monde. Et donc une personne qui donne généreusement de son temps de son énergie et de son talent pour enrichir notre chère encyclopédie sans jamais enfreindre aucun droit d'auteur et ce malgré l'acharnement qu'elle subit serait égocentrique. Pardon encore mais un tel jugement est inqualifiable. C'est un fôné ? et alors ? faudrait arrêter d'être naïf : depuis plus de vingt ans que Wikipédia existe tout le monde est susceptible d'être le fôné de quelqu'un seuls les plus généreux se font taper sur les doigts les plus tordus ricanent. À ce compte là seule importe la qualité des articles et de leur illustration. La communauté s'est prononcée ici à ce sujet : Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2020/04#Request for comment: Deletion/undeletion of uploads by banned/blocked users : « Block/ban evasion/sockpuppetry on its own is not a valid reason to delete media or reject a request for undeletion ». Mandariine (talk) 19:00, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    PS : l'auteur de ces multiples requêtes est bloqué indef sur :en
    PPS : et comme si ça ne suffisait pas il se fend d'un superbe point Godwin : voir le titre du tableau supra et son commentaire non signé ! chouette !
    Vedo ora che l'aggressore a lungo termine sta sollecitando persone (come Mandariine, Randy Kryn, Ewulp, Richard Arthur Norton, Achim55 e SHB2000) a partecipare a queste conversazioni sull'eliminazione. Saluti. Elizium23 (talk) 20:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"non signé", infatti. Saluti. Elizium23 (talk) 20:04, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

je n'ai pas besoin qu'on me sollicite pour apprécier ceci à sa juste valeur ! je remets mes ps à leur place : évitez de dénaturer les interventions des autres ! et de procéder à des intimidations ! Mandariine (talk) 20:16, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Je déplore comme Mandariine ces suppressions... --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 20:46, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – No valid reason for deletion offered. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:12, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Keep. This entire proposed mass deletion "action" is the opposite of w:WP:DENY and for that reason alone would have been better, not to have been proposed at all. The proposed time cost and effort by volunteers would be a wastful negative effort. Time and effort will be better invested in "positive" contributions elsewhere on these projects. Also, image files should not be deleted as "tangential punishment" for the actions of any User. The files/ images are decoupled from any uploader. They stand on their own inherent value and any added value they may bring to each project. Deletions under this proposal would not benefit any project. Thanks, --
    Ooligan (talk) 23:35, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedy delete|G7}} I hereby withdraw this deletion request as a snow keep. Elizium23 (talk) 20:45, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept Elizium23 (talk) 23:25, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No 2D and 3D FoP in Russia. The original uploader was Amakuha at Wikimedia Commons. Doctor Architect (talk) 21:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: {{PD-text}} --Avsolov (talk) 13:55, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 05:30, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information about the original image taken in 1905, original research (colorization). Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Underlying 1905 might be PD, but lack of info keeps that from being determined; unclear source of colorization; not used.-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:57, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Waggie as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: file=Professional Referee Organization logo.svg|reason=later upload, scaled down, copy to be kept has much more accurate description and licensing explanation|user=Waggie
Converted to regular DR per Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates (JPEG->SVG). -- Túrelio (talk) 08:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:58, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded for a spoof-article on wp.fr [1], no source, false claim. Mogador (talk) 10:38, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ou est l'argumentation, puisqu'il suffit d'aller sur la page de Neufmanil pour voir que les armes des Desprez et que c'est bien bien une famille de la noblesse de Belgique. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A01:CB08:867C:F800:C98C:CCF3:2C95:5A2E (talk) 02:32, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted dubious license/info; unused. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:59, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I cannot understand how the US Embassy in some European capital may be the source for pics of this businessman (and other irrelevant people). I smell something fishy here. The gent already has a legit image here: File:Aaron Marko 02.jpg Therefore delete in peace. E4024 (talk) 14:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:10, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It shows copyrighted material of en:Hawaii Five-0 (2010 TV series), which the uploader is likely not the author of and thus can not license under a Creative Commons. Even if scaled down, it is fair use at best and should be put on Wikipedia, not Wikimedia Commons. LordPeterII (talk) 19:26, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 16:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It shows copyrighted material of en:The Listener (TV series), which the uploader is likely not the author of and thus can not license under a Creative Commons. Even if scaled down, it is fair use at best and should be put on Wikipedia, not Wikimedia Commons. LordPeterII (talk) 19:27, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 16:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture would leak author's privacy and the content of this picture is out of date. Luoxingyang000 (talk) 04:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep the original author could upload the updated map without the personal information then request to delete the old version. MNXANL (talk) 23:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
2022 is in the future, please explain in detail why the construction plans are out of date. Thuresson (talk) 21:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, requested by uploader, per COM:COURTESY. --Elly (talk) 10:09, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this is (a screenshot) from a "global livestream" and the uploader wasn't physically present to take that photo, it is a copyright violation. Tokfo (talk) 06:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There was an audience of 100 attendees allowed. This photo is from the official photographer of the event and permission has been granted for it's use in this article. Musiclover12345678 (talk) 09:26, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: @Musiclover12345678: you can follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission to publish the image on Commons with a free license. If successful, the images can be undeleted. --Elly (talk) 10:11, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redirecting file name Logo ASV Köln is not used anywhere. Logo ASV Köln (-2019) is used instead. Nordat (talk) 07:32, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 10:12, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jove as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: David Fernández 2015b.jpg
Converted to regular DR per Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates (PNG -> JPEG).-- Túrelio (talk) 08:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I applied for the deletion once I uploaded the image and I realized that's not from 2021 as long as there's another version in Commons from 2015. --Jove (talk) 08:42, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: requested by uploader, per COM:COURTESY. --Elly (talk) 10:13, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr account appears to be license laundering. File:Bartu Dizdaroğlu.jpg can be found here uncropped, File:Harun Süreç.jpg was published here nearly three weeks before the Flickr upload date, etc. The Flickr account "BerkkGun" matches one of the uploader's usernames (Berkkgun), while the other accounts are single-purpose accounts. Seems orchestrated by one person to intentionally and deceptively bypass scrutiny.

ƏXPLICIT 12:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Admin:Explicit, I have an objection of principles for the case of File:Mervealtinkayaresmi.jpg. This is a Facebook file. As you will probably recall, I was the champion of Facebook file deletions in Commons (FBMD at MD :), however lately I avoid asking the deletion of FB files because I have seen a couple of admins keeping a couple of those files. If I knew it was an exception (I ignore for which reason, they were as FBMD as this file, not less, not more) or that we were going to have a double standard, I would keep the links to those discussions to show in these cases. Regrettably I did not. (I will try to remember though.) Now, I can guess that both some users who argued "keep" at those Facebook files' DRs as well as admins that closed them as "keep" will read these lines. I am asking them, kindly, to come forward and express the same view for this file, or, propose the deletion of the similar files that were kept. We must have one stance for similar cases, similar files, if not, trust to the deletion process will vanish. Regards. --E4024 (talk) 13:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Definetely... It'a professional PR agency work @E4024: , you can see the whole case in here.--Nanahuatl (talk) 09:45, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:22, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We can not be sure, that this pornographic video was uploaded with consent of the people involved, especially the woman whose face can be seen? It does not look very professional, so there is a high risk that it was taken or uploaded secretly and without consent. Furthermore, it has no value, as there are accurate drawings that bear no risk to damage somebody's life. Tomcat1999 (talk) 12:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Therefore, please DELETE it!--217.94.52.228 13:40, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A further argument for my request is official commons policy, see Commons:Photographs of identifiable people#Defamation. And it is unnecessary for educational purposes, so  Delete.--Tomcat1999 (talk) 14:24, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete While I was unable to find a source on this image through reverse image search, I found another of the user's uploads (since deleted) was on "sexytitflash .com" before Wikimedia. Likely taken from porn website, not uploader's own work. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:09, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:22, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 77.205.18.182 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no permission
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:18, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: The only accessible capture of the inactive source-site on archive.org dates from Februar 2006[2] and does show an overview page without this specific image. At its bottom, it states "© Pierre-Emmanuel Weck" and a bit further up there is the line "Cette création est mise à disposition sous un contrat Creative Commons.", which links a CC-BY-NC-SA 2.0 license, which would be incompatible for Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 14:23, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:25, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

vector version is the same but better File:University_of_Virginia_School_of_Data_Science_logo.svg

Also I am uploader of both, and I am am employee of this organization. SVG is preferable to jpg.

Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:26, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author died in 1958, unfree until the end of 2028. Undelete in 2029.

Gumruch (talk) 16:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, license confirmed via OTRS. One file left. Gumruch (talk) 16:20, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS confirmed, except one. --Yann (talk) 11:28, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Two issues. 1. Wikipedia is not a family photo albums (out of scope) so the person in the front of the photo is not needed for Commons. 2. No FoP in Ukraine. The first architect of the building Topuz has died on October 29, 1999. The original uploader was Ljudmila.tch at Wikimedia Commons. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:19, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:29, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Title gives Zeng Tianpei as photographer, but license says own work. Joschi71 (talk) 16:31, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image can be found here which states copyright by Tianpei Zeng --Joschi71 (talk) 10:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This can in theory be {{FoP-Taiwan}} but the actual author should still provide evidences that they agree to free license it. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In qualità di autore della fotografia, non ritengo che debba essere divulgata sul web. 212.216.239.74 10:00, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 18:01, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Io, Luigi Apicella, sono autore della fotografia e l'ho caricata per errore. Desidero cancellarla. Luigi Apicella (talk) 16:42, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In qualità di autore della fotografia, non ritengo che debba essere divulgata sul web. 212.216.239.74 09:54, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 18:02, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Io, Luigi Apicella, sono autore della fotografia e l'ho caricata per errore. Desidero cancellarla. Luigi Apicella (talk) 16:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. (c) on the statue? i.e. no FoP in Italy. --Yann (talk) 11:31, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In qualità di autore della fotografia, non ritengo che debba essere divulgata sul web. 212.216.239.74 09:53, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 18:02, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Io, Luigi Apicella, sono autore della fotografia e l'ho caricata per errore. Desidero cancellarla. Luigi Apicella (talk) 16:45, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. (c) on the statue? i.e. no FoP in Italy. --Yann (talk) 11:32, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In qualità di autore della fotografia, non ritengo che debba essere divulgata sul web. 212.216.239.74 09:58, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 18:01, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Io, Luigi Apicella, sono autore della fotografia e l'ho caricata per errore. Desidero cancellarla. Luigi Apicella (talk) 16:45, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. PD-Art anyway. --Yann (talk) 11:33, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In qualità di autore della fotografia, non ritengo che debba essere divulgata sul web. 212.216.239.74 09:56, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 18:01, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Io, Luigi Apicella, sono autore della fotografia e l'ho caricata per errore. Desidero cancellarla. Luigi Apicella (talk) 16:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:33, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In qualità di autore della fotografia, non ritengo che debba essere divulgata sul web. 212.216.239.74 09:55, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 18:02, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Io, Luigi Apicella, sono autore della fotografia e l'ho caricata per errore. Desidero cancellarla. Luigi Apicella (talk) 16:50, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Poor quality, not used. --Yann (talk) 11:34, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In qualità di autore della fotografia, non ritengo che debba essere divulgata sul web. 212.216.239.74 09:59, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 18:01, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Io, Luigi Apicella, sono autore della fotografia e l'ho caricata per errore. Desidero cancellarla. Luigi Apicella (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:34, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In qualità di autore della fotografia, non ritengo che debba essere divulgata sul web. 212.216.239.74 09:57, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 18:01, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Io, Luigi Apicella, sono autore della fotografia e l'ho caricata per errore. Desidero cancellarla. Luigi Apicella (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:35, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In qualità di autore della fotografia, non ritengo che debba essere divulgata sul web. 212.216.239.74 09:56, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 18:02, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Io, Luigi Apicella, sono autore della fotografia e l'ho caricata per errore. Desidero cancellarla. Luigi Apicella (talk) 16:52, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:35, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In qualità di autore della fotografia, non ritengo che debba essere divulgata sul web. 212.216.239.74 09:53, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 18:02, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Io, Luigi Apicella, sono autore della fotografia e l'ho caricata per errore. Desidero cancellarla. Luigi Apicella (talk) 16:53, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:35, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In qualità di autore della fotografia, non ritengo che debba essere divulgata sul web. 212.216.239.74 09:52, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 18:02, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Io, Luigi Apicella, sono autore della fotografia e l'ho caricata per errore. Desidero cancellarla. Luigi Apicella (talk) 16:53, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:35, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In qualità di autore della fotografia, non ritengo che debba essere divulgata sul web. 212.216.239.74 09:52, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 18:03, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Io, Luigi Apicella, sono autore della fotografia e l'ho caricata per errore. Desidero cancellarla. Luigi Apicella (talk) 16:54, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:36, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Io, Luigi Apicella, sono autore della fotografia e l'ho caricata per errore. Desidero cancellarla. Luigi Apicella (talk) 16:57, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. (c) on the statue? i.e. no FoP in Italy. Poor quality, not used. --Yann (talk) 11:37, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EMPORIS watermark. Probable license laundering using the Panoramio account "jorgegaddiel".


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:37, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. The same images can be found on the websites. e.g. https://www.famousbirthdays.com/people/mirela-lilova.html Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:22, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image looks like a possible copyright violation because it has been published on other websites before being posted on WikiMedia Commons. I am replacing the speedy deletion template with an ordinary deletion request so that details can be discussed. Pbosakov (talk) 17:33, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This photo *is* my own work. It is a portrait photo of my wife. It was flagged because it has been published before on https://www.famousbirthdays.com/people/mirela-lilova.html, but that website is *not* the copyright owner. They are using the photo with our permission. Pbosakov (talk) 17:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, it's a great image! However, since it's been published elsewhere first, you need to verify that it's yours, and that you are releasing it. The usual way to do that is by contacting Commons:OTRS, and proving that you're you, and that you took the photo in a few emails, that link should explain how. --GRuban (talk) 18:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for pointing that out! I will contact OTRS and make sure the photo is released under a free license. Pbosakov (talk) 22:34, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Permission received. --Yann (talk) 11:38, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source is unreachable, the archive link to it https://web.archive.org/web/20180213070835/http://politikkon.com/ doesn't seem to say anything about Creative Commons license that I can find. Also, the image can be found at higher resolution elsewhere, for example https://twitter.com/TelevisaTVmx/status/558465520589365249/photo/1 (at over twice the height in pixels of our version). All in all, I doubt that this image was released by Politikkon, AND I doubt it was originally theirs, I think it was just a stock photo. GRuban (talk) 18:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:38, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jesica2609 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I made Commons:Deletion requests/File:67qs5k.jpg, then I decided to look at the user's other uploads, and I think they all have similar problems. Three of these are from peopleenespanol.com, People magazine, which does not release images under Creative Commons licenses in my experience; File:67qs5k.jpg I mentioned in that request; and File:Jose Pablo Minor.jpg is credited to "EstiloDF", which I don't know what that means, but from the precedent of the other 4, I strongly suspect it is another image lifted from some celebrity magazine web site: it's low resolution, and a professional posed image. If not for the other 4, I'd go looking on the Web and would likely find it in a few minutes on various places, but given the other 4, I'm not going to try.

GRuban (talk) 18:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Blatant copyright violation; should get speedy deleted. --Mosbatho (talk) 20:11, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:39, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Author died in 1978, unfree until the end of 2048.

Gumruch (talk) 18:38, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Gumruch: Please add <noinclude></noinclude> inside the undelete category, in order not to let the daily DR page displays on the category. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:06, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:40, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the Congressman's signature. The heart above the 'i' is fictional. CookieMonster755 (talk) 19:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:41, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Author Vojtěch Tittelbach died in 1971, unfree until the end of 2041. Gumruch (talk) 19:20, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:41, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

broken file. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 19:29, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. Sorry. It seems to work now. No need for deletion! Vincent Steenberg (talk) 19:38, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:41, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Author Jan Hála died in 1959, unfree until the end of 2029.

Gumruch (talk) 19:29, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:42, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower resolution duplicate of this image: Dr. Nancy Sullivan (27762904862).jpg TJMSmith (talk) 19:31, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:44, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EmmaKat98 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most likely copyright violation of designs by the Microsoft game Sea of Thieves. A map of the game world and the letter "o" in the game's logo are indicative of the origin of these files. The latter link to the game's home page also shows an "all rights reserved" notice in its footer.

HyperGaruda (talk) 19:53, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree.Ciaurlec (talk) 17:33, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:39, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request Jamieparton (talk) 20:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded more than 3 years ago, so no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 21:42, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 14:42, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quelle: https://www.bavarikon.de/object/bav:SMM-OBJ-0000000000190554?lang=de oder https://www.infranken.de/lk/bamberg/muenze-erinnert-an-hexenbischof-art-5155019 . Kein eigenes Werk. Commander-pirx (talk) 10:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Danke, das Originalbild ist vom Auktionator Klünker in Osnabrück, die Zeitung inFranken Bamberg hat darüber berichtet und das Bild verwandt (so ist es auch in der Quelle benannt. Das von mir hochgeladene Bild entspricht dem Bild des Auktionators dessen Zustimmung ich habe das Bild jederzeit zu verwenden. Da mir die Münze derzeit vorliegt kann ich gerne auch ein weiteres Bild machen und hochladen, leider kann ich allerdings die Qualität nicht erreichen. Für weitere Fragen stehe ich gerne zur Verfügung. Die angegebene Datei https://www.bavarikon.de/object/bav:SMM-OBJ-0000000000190554?lang=de zeigt eine andere Münze, aber ich habe nun die Datei durch ein eigenes Bild ersetzt. Ich hoffe nun dem Genüge getan zu haben. Ich fände es schön wenn auf der Seite F v Dornheim auch die von ihm in Auftrag gegebene Münze zu sehen ist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 8848hehe (talk • contribs) 21:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and per [[Commons:Currency ]]. Coins are 3D objects and the photographer should give permission for publication. --Elly (talk) 16:22, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Français : Les logos de marque déposée ne doivent pas être importés sur Wikimedia Commons mais localement sur fr.wiki afin de respecter les droits d'auteur. Voir import corrigé : fr:Fichier:Logo Union sportive issoirienne rugby 2019.png.
English: Non free logo, it should have been uploaded locally on fr.wiki.
- Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 21:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, false license, false claims. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:06, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not being used anywhere on Wikipedia, please remove this redundant file from the manager of Commons deleted this file - Karam06 (talk) 15:41, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, unused low-res personal photo; no other contributions by uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:05, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: имя автора загрузки и на снимке не совпадают. Необходимо подтверждение в OTRS 2A00:1370:815E:3793:E8F9:ECC3:81EE:9A3E 22:48, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, false license; reverse image search shows image posted on LiveJournal 3 years before Wikimedia upload. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:09, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото храма сделано до 1930-ых годах, скорее всего автор снимка неизвестен, оцифрован в наше время 2A00:1370:815E:3793:E8F9:ECC3:81EE:9A3E 22:57, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, false license, false claims, no actual source. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I highly doubt that this is a genuine representation of the real coat of arms as found here. See expecially the different brick at the bottom. This Coat of Arms is claimed to be that of the Urban District, but the original states that it is issued to the Shannon Town Commisioners. The Banner (talk) 23:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Archived link to Coat of Arms The Banner (talk) 08:11, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that this (personal) opinion would justify a deletion. Your link doesn't work though. — HaGlaSu (talk) 13:42, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What constitutes as a "genuine representation"? All emblazonments that follow an official blazon (which this does) are legitimate and can be used on Wikipedia. --JamBorgaire1 (talk) 14:06, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Close as Kept, no consensus to delete after being listed for almost 9 months. If there are doubts about the accuracy, discuss on file talk page. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:58, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

омнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото храма сделано в начале XX века, скорее всего автор снимка неизвестен, оцифрован в наше время 2A00:1370:815E:3793:E8F9:ECC3:81EE:9A3E 23:25, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, false claims, no actual source info. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:56, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото храма сделано в XIX веке, скорее всего автор снимка неизвестен, дата обнародования неизвестна, оцифрован в наше время 2A00:1370:815E:3793:E8F9:ECC3:81EE:9A3E 23:38, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, false license, false claim of authorship. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:54, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото храма сделано в 1926 году, скорее всего автор снимка и дата обнародования неизвестены, оцифрован в наше время 2A00:1370:815E:3793:E8F9:ECC3:81EE:9A3E 23:41, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, false license. Original might or might not be PD, but file lacks source info needed to determine status. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The mosque was completed in 2000. There is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia, thus permission from the architect is needed.

A1Cafel (talk) 15:25, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 On hold Due to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:An-Nur Great Mosque. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:12, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per above links, Commons best understanding of Indonesia FOP restrictions. (Too bad, some good photos, some in use in multiple projects) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:37, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Indonesia.

A1Cafel (talk) 06:58, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:18, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement. Pierre cb (talk) 15:44, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Closed as Kept, no consensus to delete. ({{Trademark}} added to image description page.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:40, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a 1988-dated photo, not in PD-Italy/PD-1996 — danyele 16:17, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per above. (Possibly precautionary. Not in use.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:44, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In qualità di autore della fotografia, non ritengo che debba essere divulgata sul web. 212.216.239.74 09:55, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 18:02, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Io, Luigi Apicella, sono autore della fotografia e l'ho caricata per errore. Desidero cancellarla. Luigi Apicella (talk) 16:44, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Close as Kept. Uploaded under free license in 2014, far too long ago for courtesy deletion. No explanation of supposed "error". Apparently unobjectionable and in-scope photo. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:47, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a legal document filed in US federal court. It is well-known that works created by the US federal government fall in the public domain ({{PD-USGov}}); however, this court filing was not written by the US federal government, but rather a private individual who submitted it to be considered by the government. It seems to me that because of this distinction, this document is not in fact in the public domain. Mz7 (talk) 18:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But it was accepted by the court, hence it's in the court's website — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loganmac (talk • contribs) 23:26, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Document is, at the very least, fair use. White v. Westlaw (2014), a case decided in the Southern District of New York (conveniently the same district in which this proceeding was introduced) found that legal briefs constituted fair use. That would include this one. AlexKitfox (talk) 08:46, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fair use isn't acceptable on commons. Elliot321 (talk) 10:11, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Under the Wikipedia rules, the work has to be originally written by a federal officeholder for it to be part of the public domain. Since it's written by a private individual and published by the federal government, then technically it does not follow that rule.Phillip Samuel (talk)



Deleted per above; not "a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties". -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:53, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Luigi Apicella as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Io, Luigi Apicella, ho caricato questa fotografia per errore, desidero cancellarla
Converted to regular DR, as file does not qualify for speedy deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:37, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Close as Kept; deletion asked for more than 6 years after upload, too long for courtesy deletion without explanation of pressing problem. Unrevokable free license, in scope, no problem evident. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tranwill (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:45, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tranwill (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: symbols for a made up country used in a mockup userspace page. More suitable for micronations.wiki. Multiple users and bots used their time/computing to shuffle the files around and added maintenance templates over the years. Rather than removing convert to svg (including questionable files in the category makes it harder to find files worth recreating as svg), checking categories and fixing other potential errors it's better to just delete them imo.

TFerenczy (talk) 19:44, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:56, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

yanlış yükleme NNeo11 (talk) 20:56, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Very small unused image, out of scope. --Yann (talk) 09:53, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pic doesn't show Jean Vigo, but Mikhail Kaufman.File:Mikhail_kaufman.jpg is identical. See also https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-dziga-vertov-vertof-pseudonym-of-david-abelevich-kaufman-directed-147068614.html?irclickid=3U-UJ-3R%3AxyLWX00EOSREQreUkEROV3aBwwh1w0&irgwc=1&utm_source=77643&utm_campaign=Shop%20Royalty%20Free%20at%20Alamy&utm_medium=impact Paulae (talk) 21:42, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. No source, no date. --Yann (talk) 09:54, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and substituted by File:L'ETNO - Museu Valencià d'Etnologia.png, which is the same with better quality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TaronjaSatsuma (talk • contribs) 2021-01-29T11:39:38‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:55, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aaron Marko.jpg. Is she working for USG that her files appear under USG agent/officer/public servant whatsoever works license? E4024 (talk) 14:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: published by the US embassy in Slovenia on facebook. Direct link to image: https://www.facebook.com/slovenia.usembassy/photos/a.10152861134248088.1073742052.53039228087/10152861134343088. Per linked discussion above. --Elly (talk) 14:20, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Eissink as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Possible copyright violation, might need OTRS, and at least the license is incorrect, see discussion: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump/Copyright&oldid=528736292#File:Ren%C3%A9e_Lebas_par_le_Studio_Harcourt_en_1951.jpg_and_other_files Yann (talk) 14:27, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't meet the criteria for a speedy deletion. Converted to a regular DR. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:28, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per various discussions and Ticket:2020112910005534. --Elly (talk) 14:34, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Épületen belül felállított kortárs szobor. Engedélyköteles a szobrászművész részéről. Engedély hiányában  Delete. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 14:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Téves, köztulajdon. A szobor közhasználatra átadott területen van, ahol érvényes a FOP. A törvény helyes értelme ez. Amúgy minden törvényt úgy kell értelmezni, ahogy szóhasználatának általános értelme szerint érthető illetve ahogy a közösség általánosan vett érdekeinek megfelel. Az ettől eltérő értelmezések károsak. A Kormányhivatal 2008. július 22-i állásfoglalása a közhasználat céljára átadott területekről: https://www.kormanyhivatal.hu/download/7/9b/00000/kozhaszn_celjara_atadott_ter_vegleges.pdf --Elekes Andor (talk) 14:53, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hát akár közterületnek átadott, akár nem, sajnos nem a szabadban van kiállítva. A törvény helyes értelmezése nem az, hogy úgy értelmezzük, ahogyan az nekünk megfelel, és ehhez kiforgatjuk az értelmét. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 15:23, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, és amikor zárva van, akkor nem mehet be a köz, tehát ez is kizárja a FOP-ot. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 15:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete indoor artwork. --Regasterios (talk) 15:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A jelölttel együtt ez is törlendő ugyanezen okból: File:Kmetty Ágoston (2).jpg. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 15:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ez a fénykép File:Kmetty Ágoston (2).jpg. nem szobrot ábrázol, hanem a Nagycsarnok belsejét. Nem jó semmit túllihegni. --Elekes Andor (talk) 19:36, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hát akkor ne lihegd túl! Nem mellesleg a képen túl jól látható a szobor, amit te is látsz rajta és láttad akkor is, hogy rajta van a szobor, amikor feltöltéskor a szobrot nevezted meg fájlnévként. Persze ha a szobrot mutató részt levágjuk, a kép többi része akár maradhatna is. Persze más fájlnéven. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 07:38, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Akinek nem tetszik, hogy fel lehet ismerni Kmetty Györgyot, az takarja ki az arcát. A Nagycsarnok fényképezését nem lehet betiltani. A törvény nem arról szól, hogy minden szobrot ki kellene vágni a panorámából. --Elekes Andor (talk) 16:59, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Te nem kicsit keverted itt össze a szezont (szerzői jog) a fazonnal (személyiségi jog). A fényképezést senki sem akarta betiltani (nem igazán értem, hogy jött ez ide), a kortárs beltéri szobrok esetében viszont a szobrász engedélye szükséges a Cc-by-sa licenc alatti közzétételhez. A fényképezés és a közzététel (pláne szabad licenc alatt) két nagyon különböző dolog. Nem is kell minden szobrot kivágni a panorámából, itt megint csúszós lejtőre tévedtél. A beltéri kortárs szobrokat kell levágni a képről (amennyiben technikailag megoldható), amennyiben a szobrásztól nincs megfelelő engedélyünk rá. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 13:01, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hungarikusz Firkász A szerzői jog nem abszolút jog, ahogy semmiféle jog nem abszolút, kizárólagos. Minden viszonylagos, még a szerzői jogi védelem is. A rómaiak ezt így fogalmazták meg: summum ius, summa iniuria. Magyarán a teljes, maximális jog biztosítása (az egyik fél részére) tökéletes jogtalanság lehet (a másik érdekelt részére. Itt és most ez annyit jelent, hogy a szerző esetleg (ha nem úgy kell figyelembe venni a közhasználatra átadott terület szerzői jogi jelentőségét, ahogy szerintem indokolt) igényt tarthat az egész szobrot, magát a szobrot ábrázoló fénykép esetén arra, hogy engedélye (a szerzőé) megadott legyen. Ennek hiányában szerzői jogot sérthet a közzététel. Ezt azonban nem lehet úgy érteni, hogy egy total plan fénykép, melyen mellékesen a szobor is rajta van, be lenne tiltva. Az ilyen továbbszolgáló logikát sem a szerzői jogi törvény szövege sem a józan ész nem támogatja. A szerzői jogi törvény ilyenfajta értelmezése a közösségnek és maguknak a szerzőknek a semmibevétele, joggal való visszaélés lenne. Tévedsz, szokás szerint. --Elekes Andor (talk) 17:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hát, hogy ki téved az majd kiderül a törlési megbeszélés végén, ugyebár? Ha törlik a képet, akkor te tévedtél (ámbátor amilyen arrogáns vagy, ezt soha, de soha nem látod be), ha megmarad, akkor én tévedtem. Arról persze lehetne vitatkozni, hogy ki az, aki szokás szerint szokott tévedni, de erről elegendő azt megnézni, hogy melyikünknek jelölték és/vagy törölték több alkalommal is a feltöltéseit. Vagy melyikünk is állította több, nem általa készített fényképről is, hogy annak ő a szerzője (hogy is van ez jogász tudor úr?). Vagy melyikünk is hamisította meg egy kép esetében azt, hogy mikor készült a kép, és ki a szerzője?
Sajnos azt nem érted meg, hogy ha ráközelítesz a szoborra, akkor az a képből ugyanúgy kinyerhető részlet, mintha magát a szobrot fényképezted volna le, amihez viszont már a szobrász engedélye szükséges. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 14:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Az kétségtelen a digitális technika mellett, hogy ha egy total plan fénykép kis mellékrészlete tartalmaz egy szobrot vagy más alkotást, akkor azt a kis részletet ki lehet akár nagyitani egész jó önálló fényképre. Az érvelésed azonban ott zavaros, hogy ez a kétségtelen körülmény miért is kellene azt eredményezze, hogy be legyen tiltva a fényképezés a Nagycsarnokban, hogy egyáltalán ne lehessen total plan fényképet készíteni a Nagycsarnokban. Csak azért, hogy a Nagycsarnok létezését megmentő Kmetty Ágostont sikerüljön eltüntetni. Amikor a Nagycsarnokot jelen formájában el akarták tüntetni, szupermarketté akarták alakítani a Batthyány téri csarnokhoz hasonlóan tönkretenni, Kmetty Ágoston volt az, aki az árusok ellenállását megszervezte. --Elekes Andor (talk) 21:17, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Úgy látom, még mindig nem fogtad fel, hogy van különbség a fényeképezés és a szabad licenc alatti közzététel között. Neked ezért zavaros az én érvelésem, nem azért, mert valóban zavaros. Amíg ezt a különbséget nem értetted meg, addig nincs értelme tovább vinni a dolgot. Látom, a kényes kérdéseket viszont elegánsan kikerülted. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 09:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per COM:FOP Hungary, there is only FOP outdoor in public places. This is clearly indoor, so the image must be deleted. The other image was not intended de minimis, because the filename relates to the person on the statue, Kmetty Ágoston. I cropped that image and deleted the copyrighted version. --Elly (talk) 15:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The mosque was completed in 1982, there is no freedom of panorama in Guinea, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 16:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel: I took the picture few years agao with the permission of the mosque security departement. And this mosque was renew by North Korea architect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vincentyang1912 (talk • contribs) 16:41, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Vincentyang1912: You should submit the permission to OTRS--A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, discussion and Per COM:FOP Guinea. --Elly (talk) 15:17, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The mosque was completed in 1982, there is no freedom of panorama in Guinea, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 16:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, discussion and Per COM:FOP Guinea. --Elly (talk) 15:17, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Construction began in 2007, so this building isn't in the public domain. Indonesia doesn't have freedom of panorama.

~ Rob13Talk 14:58, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:38, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Im not agree. This mosque was built by the Indonesian government. Built with government funds. Please... Rhmtdns (talk) 13:26, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The mosque was completed in 2014. There is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia, thus permission from the architect is needed.

A1Cafel (talk) 16:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold Due to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:An-Nur Great Mosque. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:12, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The current text COM:FOP Indonesia is clear, No Fop, for instance no commercial purposes. The material on Commons might be used for commercial purposes. therefore the photo's have te be deleted. --Elly (talk) 15:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a 1985-dated photo, not in PD-Italy/PD-1996 — danyele 16:20, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, taken from a film still, Sconosciuta. Copyrighted image. --Elly (talk) 15:33, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a 1988-dated photo, not a PD-Italy/PD-1996 — danyele 16:21, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, taken from a film still, Sconosciuta. Copyrighted image. --Elly (talk) 15:33, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. The first author Topuz has died on October 29, 1999. The original uploader was Tetiana Berezhok at Wikimedia Commons. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:38, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination and COM:FOP Ukraine. The architect, [Топуз Генріх Володимирович], died 1999. So this image can be undeleted in 2070. . --Elly (talk) 15:37, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In qualità di autore della fotografia, non ritengo che debba essere divulgata sul web. 212.216.239.74 10:01, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 18:01, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Io, Luigi Apicella, sono autore della fotografia e l'ho caricata per errore. Desidero cancellarla. Luigi Apicella (talk) 16:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and per COM:COURTESY. --Elly (talk) 15:44, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant near-duplicate of File:Ansan-map.png, save for the Hanja characters in the bottom right, some of which are rendered as a question mark. HyperGaruda (talk) 19:31, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Due to the question marks educational not useful and can be deleted because out of COM:SCOPE. Not used on projects. --Elly (talk) 15:46, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

alpha beta and gamma were converted to a, b and c ChristiaanPR (talk) 21:39, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination of uploader and per COM:COURTESY. --Elly (talk) 15:46, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: имя автора загрузки и на снимке не совпадают. Необходимо подтверждение в OTRS 2A00:1370:815E:3793:E8F9:ECC3:81EE:9A3E 22:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Uploader, who is still active, did not comment. --Elly (talk) 15:52, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: имя автора загрузки и на снимке не совпадают. Необходимо подтверждение в OTRS 2A00:1370:815E:3793:E8F9:ECC3:81EE:9A3E 22:52, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Uploader, who is still active, did not comment. --Elly (talk) 15:52, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото храма сделано до 1934 года, скорее всего автор снимка неизвестен, оцифрован в наше время. 2A00:1370:815E:3793:E8F9:ECC3:81EE:9A3E 22:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Copyrighted newspaper image, unknown photographer. May be safely undeleted 120 years after 1934, so in 2054. .. --Elly (talk) 15:54, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: имя автора загрузки и на снимке не совпадают. Необходимо подтверждение в OTRS 2A00:1370:815E:3793:E8F9:ECC3:81EE:9A3E 23:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Uploader, who is still active, did not comment. --Elly (talk) 16:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: имя автора загрузки и на снимке не совпадают. Необходимо подтверждение в OTRS 2A00:1370:815E:3793:E8F9:ECC3:81EE:9A3E 23:13, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Uploader, who is still active, did not comment. --Elly (talk) 16:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

в авторстве и лицензии: фото из храма, разрушенного в 1930-ых годах, скорее всего автор снимка неизвестен, оцифрован в наше время 2A00:1370:815E:3793:E8F9:ECC3:81EE:9A3E 23:23, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: May be safely undeleted 120 years after mentioned year 1930, so in 2050. . --Elly (talk) 16:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: имя автора загрузки и на снимке не совпадают. Необходимо подтверждение в OTRS 2A00:1370:815E:3793:E8F9:ECC3:81EE:9A3E 23:33, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Uploader, who is still active, did not comment nor take action with VRT. --Elly (talk) 16:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: имя автора загрузки и на снимке не совпадают. Необходимо подтверждение в OTRS 2A00:1370:815E:3793:E8F9:ECC3:81EE:9A3E 23:34, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Uploader, who is still active, did not comment nor take action with VRT. --Elly (talk) 16:03, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: имя автора загрузки и на снимке не совпадают. Необходимо подтверждение в OTRS 2A00:1370:815E:3793:E8F9:ECC3:81EE:9A3E 23:34, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Uploader, who is still active, did not comment nor take action with VRT. --Elly (talk) 16:03, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото храма сделано в нfчале XX века, скорее всего автор снимка неизвестен, оцифрован в наше время 2A00:1370:815E:3793:E8F9:ECC3:81EE:9A3E 23:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination May be safely undeleted 120 years after (estimated) 1930, so in 2050. . --Elly (talk) 16:04, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: храм разрушен в 1930-ых годах, дата обнародования, источник неизвестны, скорее всего автор снимка неизвестен, оцифрован в наше время 2A00:1370:815E:3793:E8F9:ECC3:81EE:9A3E 23:40, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: May be safely undeleted 120 years after (estimated) 1930, so in 2050. . --Elly (talk) 16:05, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]