Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/01/06

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 6th, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simon Villeneuve (talk • contribs) 15:07, 5 January 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]

@Simon Villeneuve: Who holds the copyright? How do you know they didn't license it freely?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 00:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What happened? When I uploaded this I got permission from the photographer who released it under the commons license on Flickr and as the file page says this was later confirmed by an administrator? I realize the Flickr page is gone but that does suddenly invalidate it?—-CyberGhostface (talk) 01:06, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just reading the description : © 2009 Koffel / Mylène Jampanoï . - Simon Villeneuve 01:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Simon Villeneuve: All freely licensed files are copyrighted. Please don't file any similar DRs.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:28, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep, no valid reason for deletion.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:28, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept (non-sysop closed): No valid reason for deletion. ---akko (talk) 14:14, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Purpose of photo change Young79cp (talk) 07:54, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 16:50, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amirmohabatmo12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvios.  JGHowes  talk 18:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error, did not want to upload this file Shiggy94 (talk) 18:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 18:24, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by BriefEdits as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: source does not hold copyright, therefore CC license does not apply


Deleted: per nomination, per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 21:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Karel Appel died in 2006, and this photo of a two-dimensional artwork by him will unfortunately only be uploadable to Wikimedia Commons when Appel's work becomes public domain, which may be 2076 if there'll be no change to current copyright law by then. It's highly unlikely that CODA Museum actually has the copyright over this work and the accompanying right to publish this digital reproduction with a Creative Commons license. As stated and referenced in his Wikidata item, Appel's rights are managed by the Karel Appel Foundation and the Artist Rights Society. Spinster (talk) 20:53, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inciting violence , per https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/06/twitter-pledges-action-on-any-calls-for-violence-in-capitol-riot.html Feoffer (talk) 23:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • 1st amendment: documentation allowed. Also, it's not inciting violence, other Trump tweets are. Give me strength. Kingsif (talk) 23:43, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note that after removal from Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, this is one of the few remaining places to access this first (as close to) in-person response from Trump to the Capitol storming that anyone could get. It's like a video of any autocrat - deplorable, but an essential part of the historical record. ɱ (talk) 00:18, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy kept: no valid reason for deletion per Commons:Deletion policy. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:20, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author died in 2004, so probably not OK in Germany until 01-01-2075.

Yann (talk) 22:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All these images are authorised by the Bundesarchiv, Federal Archive of the Federal Republic of Germany. There is no doubt about the rights according to german law. --22:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC) --Bahnmoeller (talk) 23:03, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why the Bundesarchiv would own the copyright of these works? Yann (talk) 23:06, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
See Commons:Bundesarchiv: „Wikimedia Germany and the Federal Archives have signed a cooperation agreement that, among other things, asserts that the Federal Archives owns sufficient rights to be able to grant this kind of license.“ --Johannnes89 (talk) 23:26, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hier war keine Möglichkeit, das überhaupt zu diskutieren. Ich halte viele der Freigaben des BA für höchst zweifelhaft, so auch hier. --Ralf Roletschek 16:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reopened again... --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 12:53, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Bundesarchiv claim that these are under a CC licence. That's not affected by their age, or the death of the photographer. The nomination seems confused between copyright and licensing. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:23, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • No, I don't confuse copyright and licensing. We have had several cases where institutions wrongly license works of art because they own a copy. Only the copyright holder can do that. If there is a special reason which allow the Bundesarchiv to license works from others it should be explained. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:01, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • These works are licensed as a CC licence. You have nominated them for deletion on the basis of the author's longevity (which affects copyright, but not licensing). So yes, you're very clearly confused between copyright issues and licensing!
If you want to make a second nomination for deletion, on a totally different basis, then you need to make that clear. If that basis is, "The Bundesarchiv are not competent at carrying out their basic function, on the word of a passing Commons editor", then you're going to have to start showing some convincing reason as to that. And no, the age of the photographer isn't one, or even relevant. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:11, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It seems you didn't even read what I wrote above. Talking to you isn't worth the ink. :( Yann (talk) 17:09, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Then if you refuse to even discuss your nomination, we should close this. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:53, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I ask questions, which are genuine and useful. Answering "We don't know and shut up" isn't useful, nor polite. Yann (talk) 20:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(Google-Translate): It is certain that the BA has copies of these photos (or negatives). But this does not justify any copyright claim. --Ralf Roletschek 21:28, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neben seiner beruflichen Filmtätigkeit fotografierte er aus eigenem Antrieb in den Hauptquartieren und auf seinen vielen Reisen durch die von deutschen Truppen besetzten Länder. und im Impressum: Alle auf dieser Website gezeigten Fotografien sind urheberrechtlich geschützt. Selbst wenn wir die hiesigen Fotos nicht auf der Homepage seines Sohnes finden sollten, heißt das nicht im Umkehrschluß, daß das BA Rechte an den Fotos besitzt. Anders als bei den dienstlich angefertigten Filmaufnahmen beansprucht der Sohn das Urheberrecht bei Fotos. --Ralf Roletschek 19:09, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Institutions miss licensing files is quite a common occurrence. Example: hundreds of files from the Category:Photographs in the Austrian National Library which were deleted, and then restored today after the photographer's rights expired. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:26, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete When any doubt exists fallback to COM:PCP The-Copyright-Enforcer (talk) 16:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Na prima, Weißwaschen per Bundesarchiv. So werden Urheberrechtsverletzungen durchgewunken, während Quitscheentchen und langweilige Betonbauten gelöscht werden. --Ralf Roletschek 12:10, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Translation via Google Translate: "Great, whitewashing by the Federal Archives Copyright violations are waved through, while rubber ducks and boring concrete structures are deleted." Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:54, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There have been several images where the Bundesarchiv has reviewed the licenses of the supplied images and recognized not to own the appropiate rights. In such cases they would send an email to the OTRS, and the images will be speedy deleted (mostly by User:Raymond). But this has not happened here, so I think we can rely on the licensing and permissions supplied by the Bundesarchiv. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 17:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Before 2007/2008, the Federal Archives either concluded new contracts with the photographers or the heirs that allow licensing under CC license, or the full rights of use went to the German Reich or the Federal Republic of Germany, since the photos were taken on their behalf (as employers). I have personally seen some of these new contracts in 2008. If any errors were discovered later (e.g. wrong attributions), these images were deleted, as Reinhard Kraasch|Reinhard wrote. Raymond 17:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Kept the Bundesarchiv images per Reinhard Kraasch and Raymond, I have no reason to doubt what they wrote. Deleted the one image not by the Bundesarchiv (which was not taken by Frentz BTW, but shows Frentz) because of insufficient information to determine its copyright status. --Rosenzweig τ 18:51, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violating COM:Fan_art and COM:EDUSE the photo is an artwork without obvious educational use. Licensing by hearsay is also a possible violation. Added in to Commons even if there is no consensus yet on the article's main photo discussion. The article target for this file was also nominated for deletion in Wikipedia. PyroFloe (talk) 02:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:05, 6 Januar 2021 UTC: Derivative work of non-free content (F3): Copyrighted character --Krdbot 03:25, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of File:Boston Scott (50804583318).jpg Denniscabrams (talk) 15:32, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 22:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of File:Antonio Gibson (50804571793).jpg Denniscabrams (talk) 15:35, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 22:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

WP:PENIS and possibly copyvio. Mys_721tx (talk) 06:28, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: sock abuse. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:16, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in unapproved draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and copied from FB. --Túrelio (talk) 09:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

previous uploads of the user were deleted already, this one doesn't look like self-made, too rubin16 (talk) 08:11, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvio from https://filarmonia.online/userfiles/modules/artist/_photo_276.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 15:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:31, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of File:Jalen Reagor (50805333986).jpg Denniscabrams (talk) 15:32, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deleted and redirected per COM:CSD#F8. -- CptViraj (talk) 09:15, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of File:Jalen Hurts, 2020.jpg Denniscabrams (talk) 15:34, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deleted and redirected per COM:CSD#F8. -- CptViraj (talk) 09:13, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of File:Jake Elliott field goal (50804572888).jpg Denniscabrams (talk) 15:37, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deleted and redirected per COM:CSD#F8. -- CptViraj (talk) 09:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded twice because of app error PeterFisk (talk) 16:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 10:51, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded twice because of app error PeterFisk (talk) 16:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 10:50, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of File:Nate Sudfeld (50805450302).jpg. Denniscabrams (talk) 15:30, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and redirected the other. --JuTa 09:32, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

changed mind — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timmy Cummins (talk • contribs) 13:32, 6 January 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per uploader's nom as a courtesy, along with complete lack of COM:EVID.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 19:24, 11 Januar 2021 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 03:23, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

First published at https://www.flickr.com/photos/thescorpionlair/46543826675/ under a non-commercial license, also missing summary information. Dylsss (talk) 16:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Túrelio (non-admin closure) Dylsss (talk) 12:33, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Francis PumJo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotional material from a globally blocked account

~nmaia d 02:34, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No need to keep. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 07:35, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hanooz as no permission (No permission since) JopkeB (talk) 02:56, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like that the painter and the uploader are the same. So by uploading his own work, he has given permission himself. Should there still be a formal permission by mail? JopkeB (talk) 02:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. We need permission via OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:15, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work (see EXIF, author is Vaspaan Shroff): copyvio or missing permission. Lymantria (talk) 10:36, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:13, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo of a user without valid contribs - m:Special:CentralAuth/Puiu_Muntean Gikü (talk) 10:36, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cant be own work. Wrong licence Каракорум (talk) 10:45, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:13, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stogerov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE: photos of a not-notable individual; promo attempts at en:Draft:Frank Myonk, en:Frank Myonk

Gikü (talk) 10:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 08:13, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cant be own work. Wrong licence Каракорум (talk) 10:48, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:13, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artist died in 1967; no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:26, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:10, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the flag of England, which in any case is St George's cross. St Andrew is the patron saint of Scotland. We have many genuine examples. Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:34, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:11, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marugiambruni90 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bogus CC licenses - the book from which the images were purported sourced is all rights reserved. Uploader is serial copyright violator.

Эlcobbola talk 18:37, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 21:35, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res, no EXIF, uploaded by copyvio sock - Duck/COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 20:28, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:09, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image taken from unfree source, https://www.pvamu.edu/cahs/carc/natural-resources-and-environmental-systems/ram-ray/. After tagging file for missing permission, uploader changed alleged source to another site., where the same image was uploaded only today. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:41, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Actually that image was neither created nor owned by that source. Sure, they use it, but it was not originally created by them. --21BoiDoi (talk) 20:42, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Then, who is the original photographer? --Túrelio (talk) 21:07, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio: Original photographer is not known, but this photo was created by Ram Ray, for himself. That much is confirmed. --21BoiDoi (talk) 22:30, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, then we need a formal permission from Ram Ray. --Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
But this particular image is in public domain and used across profiles and websites. That is what I am trying to say @Túrelio: — Preceding unsigned comment added by 21BoiDoi (talk • contribs) 15:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. PCP - we need OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:10, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Karel Appel died in 2006, and this photo of a two-dimensional artwork by him will unfortunately only be OK to upload to Wikimedia Commons when Appel's work becomes public domain, which may be 2076 if there'll be no change to current copyright law by then. Spinster (talk) 20:49, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:08, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Karel Appel died in 2006, and this photo of a two-dimensional artwork by him will unfortunately only be uploadable to Wikimedia Commons when Appel's work becomes public domain, which may be 2076 if there'll be no change to current copyright law by then. Spinster (talk) 20:50, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Karel Appel died in 2006, and this photo of a two-dimensional artwork by him will unfortunately only be uploadable to Wikimedia Commons when Appel's work becomes public domain, which may be 2076 if there'll be no change to current copyright law by then. Spinster (talk) 20:50, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from commercial website PtiBzh (talk) 21:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 08:08, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Karel Appel died in 2006, and this photo of a two-dimensional artwork by him will unfortunately only be uploadable to Wikimedia Commons when Appel's work becomes public domain, which may be 2076 if there'll be no change to current copyright law by then. Spinster (talk) 21:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:08, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate file of File:Muppets Now Logo.png Di (they-them) (talk) 21:28, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:03, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably a licence laundering via Flickr, the images are from "Scriptten Inc". Without a permission from the actual copyright holder via OTRS we have to delete this images!

Ras67 (talk) 22:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; likely LL. --Gbawden (talk) 08:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, ziro educational value Kotofey2016 (talk) 22:06, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

single upload of a blocked user; no meaningful description, purpose unclear, Not in use in any project (just on a bot list) Tine (talk) 23:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:03, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bignerd06 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

None of these are own work as claimed. EG 110 N Wacker has (PRNewsfoto/The Howard Hughes Corporation) in exif Wolf point east tower.jpg has a watermark

PCP based on uploaders history

Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:48, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

is it really trivial? per my view, it is not trivial enough to be kept rubin16 (talk) 15:30, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. @Rubin16: I'm confused – if something is not trivial that means that it is significant, no? Besides, many ministries have their logos on Wikipedia, at least I am certain that all German, Spanish and Ukrainian ministries have their logos on Commons and corresponding Wikipedia articles. – Demoxica (talk) 15:41, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ministries having their logos is a different question, some countries have specific provisions, that official logos are exempt - see {{PD-UA-exempt}}, for example. Furthermore, being trivial is being like a simple text or simple geometric figures, here we have something more creative and complicated (IMHO). It is a discussion, so, let's hear other opinions. rubin16 (talk) 15:45, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Surely PD-Coa-Turkey would apply. Fry1989 eh? 16:36, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: self-closing as PD-Coa-Turkey comment was correct. Updated the license. --rubin16 (talk) 12:29, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{PD-Coa-Turkey}} has now been deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-Coa-Turkey. Logo above the threshold of originality. Government works are not treated differently according to COM:TURKEY. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:09, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - Hi, it contains basic shapes. Jelican9 (talk) 20:10, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and per COM:NOP Turkey, only laws etc. are not protected. A logo of a ministry is protected in Turkey. Therefore the image must be deleted. If you do not agree with my decision to delete the file, please ask for undeletion on COM:UNDELETE. If you do so, formulate your motivation why this image can be maintained very clearly and base your motivation on the Commons policies. After that, another administrator will take a decision.. --Ellywa (talk) 14:25, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:50, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hrhabib05 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:50, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:49, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stanislav.kozlov.if (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:50, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stanislav.kozlov.if (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:50, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Meliii.15 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality personal pictures.

Lymantria (talk) 15:57, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:51, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 07:37, 15 Januar 2021 UTC: Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. --Krdbot 15:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of File:Terry McLaurin touchdown catch, 2020.jpg Denniscabrams (talk) 15:36, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 23:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:04, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphaned graphic, presumably taken from the uploader's own YouTube channel. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 01:20, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:25, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seyyedsalehfotouhi80 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope + needs OTRS permission. --Hanooz 17:23, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seyyedsalehfotouhi80 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Self-promotional covers without permission, not used anywhere.

Smooth O (talk) 14:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 17:39, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was uploaded or published to Pixabay on 22 March 2019 after Pixabay changed its license to an unfree license on January 9, 2019. Leoboudv (talk) 23:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The current "Pixabay License" is incompatible with Wikimedia Commons. --De728631 (talk) 07:25, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in the United States for 3D artworks. Subject is a 2005 sculpture by en:Lawrence Argent (1957-2017). Won't be public domain until 2088 (2017+71).

Howhontanozaz (talk) 08:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:46, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in the United States for 3D artworks. Subject is a 2005 sculpture by en:Lawrence Argent (1957-2017). Won't be public domain until 2088 (2017+71). Howhontanozaz (talk) 08:03, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 04:35, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in the United States. Subject is a 2020 sculpture by en:Gus and Lina Ocamposilva who are both still alive. Howhontanozaz (talk) 08:14, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 04:38, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in the United States for 3D artworks. Subject is a 2020 sculpture by en:Gus and Lina Ocamposilva who are both still alive. Needs permission from the artists (see COM:OTRS). Howhontanozaz (talk) 08:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 04:36, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in the United States for 3D artworks. Subject is a 2005 work by en:Binh Pho (1955-2017). Won't be public domain until 2088. Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:17, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't this Commons:UA (a vase)? --Sailko (talk) 11:19, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sailko: Just by my light reading of this compendium by the US Copyright Office, "However, copyright does protect the creative form of a work of artistic craftsmanship, such as a creatively-shaped necklace or decorative vase." Howhontanozaz (talk) 13:31, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 05:06, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in the United States for 3D artworks. Subject is a 2014 sculpture by en:Ai Weiwei who is still alive. Needs permission/licensing from artist via COM:OTRS. Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:44, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 04:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in the United States for 3D artworks. Subjects are sculptures unveiled in 2008 and designed by Los Angeles fire Capt. H. Dwayne Golden, who is apparently still alive (here). Needs permission/licensing from the artist via COM:OTRS. Howhontanozaz (talk) 15:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 04:54, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The PBS logo is non-free; ineligible for Commons Mvcg66b3r (talk) 17:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 05:16, 23 Januar 2021 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 09:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal logo of globally locked sockpuppet, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:16, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dijam1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Personal images not used anywhere. Most of them are also TV screenshots without permission.

Smooth O (talk) 13:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:17, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 14:45, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:18, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:18, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:19, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MosesBC2020 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Metadata credits Chris Garrison Photography, Inc.

Ytoyoda (talk) 15:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:18, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from book covers. Should be blanked to keep EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:19, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:19, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by فزعة (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:19, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:19, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:19, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:20, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture of non-notable "model". No educational value. Lymantria (talk) 15:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:20, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 16:01, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:20, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:20, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mattnewton94 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PENIS: solely self-promotional.

Mys_721tx (talk) 17:40, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:21, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mnewton94 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PENIS/COM:NOTHOST - junk with no educational value

Эlcobbola talk 22:38, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:24, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mnewton94 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PENIS: solely self-promotional.

Mys_721tx (talk) 17:41, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:21, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artist died in 1956; no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 18:26, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:22, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artist died in 2009; no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:23, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 13:37, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo on wikidata Minoraxtalk 02:33, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per the previous nomination. --Ahmadtalk 13:38, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freedom of Panorama in Finland does not include scupltures. Viktpr Jansson, the author, died in 1958. Estormiz (talk) 18:31, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Copyright Act in Finland:
Extended content

Section 25 (446/1995)

Use of works of arts that have been made public or transferred (607/2015) (1) Works of art made public may be reproduced in pictorial form in material connection with the text: 1) in a critical or scientific presentation; and 2) in a newspaper or a periodical when reporting on a current event, provided that the work has not been created in order to be reproduced in a newspaper or a periodical.

In Finnish: 25 §. (24.3.1995/446) Julkistetuista taideteoksista saa ottaa tekstiin liittyviä kuvia: arvostelevaan tai tieteelliseen esitykseen; sekä sanomalehteen tai aikakauskirjaan selostettaessa päiväntapahtumaa, edellyttäen ettei teosta ole valmistettu sanomalehdessä tai aikakauskirjassa toisinnettavaksi.

In this case the image is published in connection with the article about the sculptor Viktor Jansson. :Therefore the reproduction of the art in pictorial form is connected with the text in a scientific and educational presentation.
Furthermore, the Copyright Acct states:
Extended content

Section 14 (821/2005)

Use of works for educational activities and scientific research (607/2015)

(1) A work made public may, by virtue of extended collective licence, as provided in section 26, be reproduced for use in educational activities or in scientific research and be used in this purpose for communication to the public by means other than transmitting on radio or television. The provisions of this subsection shall not apply to reproduction by photocopying or by corresponding means.

(2) In educational activities, a work made public, performed by a teacher or a student, may be reproduced by direct recording of sound or image for temporary use in educational activities. A copy thus made may not be used for other purposes.

According to the Wikimedia movement Wikipedia is the first and the most a collection of educational content.
Teemu (talk) 10:18, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Per nominator. Sculpture won't enter public domain in Finland until 2029 (70 pma) and the U.S. until at least 2027 (1931+95+1). There is also no COM:FOP for sculptures in Finland per COM:FOP Finland. Howhontanozaz (talk) 09:59, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Per nominator and Howhontanozaz. ––Apalsola tc 15:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:30, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:NOTUSED. Random scribbles on a whiteboard. Doubt COM:EDUSE. BriefEdits (talk) 00:17, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The two bottom photographs couldn't be found in Commons. The others are OK (see File:Ciudad La Plata montage.jpg). Probably copyvio. Frodar (talk) 04:48, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in the United States for 3D artworks. Subject is a 2005 sculpture by en:Lawrence Argent (1957-2017). Won't be public domain until 2088 (2017+71). Howhontanozaz (talk) 08:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in the United States for 3D artworks. Subject is a 2013 sculpture by en:Gus and Lina Ocamposilva who are both still alive. Needs permission from the artists (see COM:OTRS). Howhontanozaz (talk) 08:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in the United States for 3D artworks. Subject is a 2014 sculpture by en:Gus and Lina Ocamposilva who are both still alive. Needs permission from the artists (see COM:OTRS). Howhontanozaz (talk) 08:25, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in the United States for 3D artworks. Subject is a 2017 sculpture by en:Gus and Lina Ocamposilva who are both still alive. Needs permission from the artists (see COM:OTRS). Howhontanozaz (talk) 08:26, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per MFAH Terms & Conditions, "All text, images, and data including without limitation audio and video, software, documentation, and other information on the MFAH Site (the “Materials”) are protected by copyright" and "Commercial use of any Materials on the MFAH Site is expressly forbidden". Template:PD-Art isn't applicable here since the underlying objects are not two-dimensional.

Howhontanozaz (talk) 09:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The source of each of these files, Museum of Fine Arts Houston, explicitly state that they are in the public domain. Each individual image has a caption that says "public domain". wilafa Jan 6, 2021--Wilafa (talk) 17:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Wilafa: I have written an email to the museum for clarification on the intent of that statement which I believe pertain to the objects rather than the photographs. Regards Howhontanozaz (talk) 19:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Wilafa: I have received a reply from the Photographic and Imaging Services Manager of the museum and it says, "Thank you for your email. The public domain statement refers to the object itself. The photography of the object is not public domain." So that clarifies any doubts with regards to that statement. Howhontanozaz (talk) 08:34, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is unclear exactly what question was asked, and how it was phrased? They said "The photography of the object is not public domain" but, I seems pretty clear to me reading the MFAH Terms & Conditions page that the museum is making these images available for educational use. MFAH Terms & Conditions page: https://www.mfah.org/terms/

4) AUTHORIZED USES "Commercial use of any Materials on the MFAH Site is expressly forbidden. Materials are made available for limited non-commercial, educational, and personal use." Users agree that they will limit their use of such Material to non-commercial, educational, personal, or fair use and will not violate the MFAH proprietary rights or any other party’s proprietary rights."

5) FAIR USE "Fair use is defined as use of copyrighted Materials for noncommercial purposes, such as teaching, scholarship, criticism, commentary, and news reporting (See, e.g., Title 17, Section 107 of the Copyright Act and the “Teach Act”). For use of images in accordance with fair use guidelines, Users may download, print or use Materials from the Site and may do so without MFAH express permission. Users must cite the artist, title, date, and source of Materials, and the citations should include the URL www.mfah.org but not in any way that implies endorsement of the User or User’s use of the Materials."

6) PUBLIC DOMAIN "Materials that the MFAH believes to be in the public domain (“Public Domain”), which are identified as Public Domain on the Site, may be downloaded for limited non-commercial, educational, and personal use only, or for “fair use” as defined by U.S. copyright laws." --Wilafa (talk) 23:55, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Wilafa: Unfortunately, fair use is not acceptable in Commons (See Commons:Fair use). Only files that allow unrestricted use, even commercial use, can be uploaded here. Howhontanozaz (talk) 08:20, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per the file's metadata, the image is credited to "Creative Vision Photographics/James Kane". Permission/licensing from him needed via COM:OTRS. Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in the United States for 3D artworks. Subject is a 1995 glass sculpture by en:Dale Chihuly who is still alive. Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't this Commons:UA (a chandelier)? --Sailko (talk) 11:19, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To my eyes, it's definitely not a chandelier and judging by its categorization (Category:Glass sculptures by Dale Chihuly in the United States, Category:Purple sculptures in the United States), people here seem to think that it's a sculpture too. Howhontanozaz (talk) 13:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in the United States for 3D artworks. Subject is a 2005 work by en:Karen LaMonte who is still alive. Needs permission/licensing from artist via COM:OTRS. Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, permission on file in Ticket:2020020410005535 does not cover this photo.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:49, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in the United States for 3D artworks. Subject is a 1991 work by en:Klaus Moje (1936—2016). Won't be public domain until 2087 (2016+71). Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:25, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is just a plate, I suppose it will fall under Commons:UA --Sailko (talk) 18:03, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
But why would a plate be displayed so carefully in an art museum? A painting is just pigments on a canvass, and a canvass is utilitarian, so does that mean paintings fall under COM:UA? Howhontanozaz (talk) 19:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I have photographed thousands of decorative-art objects in museums, and these plates where in a separate section for glassware, so I uploaded beacuse I though they were just (beautiful) utilitarian objects on display. --Sailko (talk) 13:31, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in the United States for 2D/3D artworks. Subject is a 1990 work by en:Klaus Moje (1936—2016). Won't be public domain until 2087 (2016+71). Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:28, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is just a glassware plate, I suppose it will fall under Commons:UA --Sailko (talk) 18:03, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, if you look at the video, you'll see this was an image of the screen at a concert, so the YouTube uploader, even though I believe they own the video, I don't think they own the picture of the screen - any more than if they took their video camera into a movie theater and filmed the movie playing there. It's a fine point. A different part of the YouTube video where they filmed the performer directly should be all right, but not this one. GRuban (talk) 13:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:26, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Map seems to be copied from http://reader.digitalbooks.pro/content/preview/books/36531/book/OEBPS/guerra_absoluta-20.xhtml, which shows no evidence of a free license. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:50, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with: File:Operación Chispa.jpg


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:26, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

US Mint Registered Copyrights

[edit]

A direct search here for "United States Mint" under "Name" reveals the following images are registered copyrights of the Mint and are therefore ineligible to be hosted on Commons. This website was also used to ensure that I was correctly identifying which designs were copyrighted. Although I was careful, please let me know if I have made any errors.  Mysterymanblue  13:56, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in the United States for sculptures. Subject is a 1997 work by Robert Graham (1938—2008). Won't be public domain until 2079 (2008+71). Howhontanozaz (talk) 15:11, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in the United States for sculptures. Subject is a 2003 work by Aldo (d. 2012) and Andrea Favilli who is still alive. Needs permission/licensing from artist via COM:OTRS. Howhontanozaz (talk) 15:33, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 15:36, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 15:45, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FOP in Russia. The monument was placed in 1959, the sculptors died in 1954 and 1960. The architector - in 1980. Locally saved in ru.wiki, could be deleted here rubin16 (talk) 16:32, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph of a frame in a short film. Unless the film itself is under a free license, we can't use it. I don't see any indicator that the short film is under a free license. Sorry. GRuban (talk) 21:07, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete: Hmm. You're right. It must've been an oversight on my part back in the day, my bad. I'll just re-upload this photo on en.wiki under fair use after this is taken down. Regards. — BriefEdits (talk) 22:10, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The immediate source, Internet Archive, has released the book with the image under the license NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International which is incompatible with the license requirements of Wikimedia Commons. While this is already sufficient to qualify the image for being a copyright infringement and thus be be removed, it is even doubtful that the book was uploaded legally at Internet Archive in the first place, since the impressum of the book states that all copyrights lie by Cambridge University Press. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 21:40, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The heirs recalled that the right to that particular photo had been sold to the museum. Celina Strzelecka (WMPL) (talk) 17:48, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no OTRS confirmation. --JuTa 09:54, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The heirs recalled that the right to that particular photo had been sold to the museum. Celina Strzelecka (WMPL) (talk) 17:49, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no OTRS confirmation. --JuTa 09:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The heirs recalled that the right to that particular photo had been sold to the museum. Celina Strzelecka (WMPL) (talk) 17:49, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no OTRS confirmation. --JuTa 09:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The heirs recalled that the right to that particular photo had been sold to the museum. Celina Strzelecka (WMPL) (talk) 17:49, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no OTRS confirmation. --JuTa 09:51, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low size image without metadata, unlikely to be own work. 176.59.44.17 11:38, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 10:34, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, undeclared derivative work from CD cover: https://www.amazon.de/Ein-M%C3%A4dchen-f%C3%BCr-immer/dp/B07MSPF274 91.34.43.125 12:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:34, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyvio: Name of copyvio in exif data, picture copyrighted according to https://www.schwarzmeerkosakenchor.de/impressum/ 91.34.43.125 13:06, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jacob Steinhardt died in 1968, his PDD will be in 2039 Goesseln (talk) 13:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload from commercial website PtiBzh (talk) 13:28, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encyclopedic purpose, outside of the project scope Ytoyoda (talk) 13:30, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from commercial website PtiBzh (talk) 13:31, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from commercial website PtiBzh (talk) 13:34, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from commercial website PtiBzh (talk) 13:34, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potential copyvio. Low file resolution and missing exifdata. SCP-2000 13:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from commercial website PtiBzh (talk) 13:42, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from commercial website PtiBzh (talk) 14:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Maudslay II (talk) 14:40, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Maudslay II (talk) 14:40, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata credits Jari Mäki-Kuutti Ytoyoda (talk) 15:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:31, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From the subject's Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?vanity=AgataTarczynskaOfficial&set=a.393493047704595 Ytoyoda (talk) 15:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:31, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be from https://etemadonline.com/content/443515/%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%8A%D9%86-%D8%B7%D8%A7%D9%87%D8%B1%DB%8C-%DA%A9%D8%B4%D8%AA%DB%8C-%DA%AF%DB%8C%D8%B1%DB%8C-%DA%A9%D9%87-%D8%B4%DA%AF%D9%81%D8%AA%DB%8C-%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%B2-%D8%B4%D8%AF Ytoyoda (talk) 15:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:31, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 15:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:31, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A formal PR picture that is used in at least one more place on the web (here). It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 16:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:31, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[[Category:Здравствуйте, Евгений! Это моя фотография, где сфотографирован я (прот. Вадим Леонов). Она была сделана два с половиной года назад сотрудником нашего храма по моей просьбе. Как она стала гулять по интернету - это отдельный вопрос. Если необходимы подтверждения моей личности, то могу предоставить их в частном порядке.]]

Попросите, пожалуйста, фотографа послать разрешение в Commons:OTRS (пример: Commons:Email templates). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:28, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Now has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 10:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MarianJestTylkoJeden (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Keeping those with OTRS, others already deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 10:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense Shahriar Kabir Pavel (talk) 16:53, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is taken myself. You can see this website,I decide the license is CC-BY-SA 3.0,so I can upload to here. https://hkbus.fandom.com/wiki/%E6%AA%94%E6%A1%88:KMB_ATS108_06-10-2014.jpg LN9267 (talk) 16:57, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

privacy and piracy 160.152.3.193 17:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 10:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It appears that this file is a screenshot from movie "The Dark Knight Rises". Zezops (talk) 17:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lack of quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uwca (talk • contribs) 10:23, 6 January 2021‎ (UTC)}[reply]

 Keep no valid deletiom reason. Can be brightened (some cosmetic edits), and also Germany has FOP if these architecture works are still copyrighted ({{FoP-Germany}}). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:07, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep i agree with JWilz12345.--RZuo (talk) 20:15, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maxsnowman00 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PENIS, series of accounts known to pass images on the internet as {{Own}}.

Mys_721tx (talk) 17:29, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INUSE - a google image search didn't find anything. More proof required to show that its not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 10:28, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Staylost (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No CC license at YouTube source, I would also note that this user was previously blocked for copyright violations and false license reviews, and they have continued.

Dylsss (talk) 17:32, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work Каракорум (talk) 17:33, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:31, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Add by mistake and want to delete it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hussaink.hasn (talk • contribs) 16:20, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete by courtesy. --Achim (talk) 17:36, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by Christian Ferrer. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, as per COM:ANU#User:Sciencia58. Yann (talk) 19:56, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ich stimme der Löschung zu. Das sollte nur dazu dienen, zu zeigen, dass ich die Wirkung der Erdkrümmung verstehe. Es war Weihnachtszeit, deshalb in dieser Form. Als Untergrund habe ich eine alte Grafik von mir verwendet um der Person etwas bewusst zu machen, die mir als einer studierten Geografin diese unglaubliche Unterstellung gemacht hat und den Administrator Jeff G. mit ihrer Behauptung - unbeabsichtigt von einer falschen Annahme ausgehend - manipuliert hat. Ich hatte bis zum 26. Dezember schöne glückliche Weihnachtstage. Jetzt sehe ich 10 Jahre älter aus, obwohl ich mein ganzes Leben immer 10 Jahre jünger ausgesehen hatte. Ich habe etwas daraus gelernt und ich hoffe Sitacuisses auch. Löscht es, ich möchte nicht mehr daran denken.
I agree with the deletion. This was just to show that I understand the effect of the curvature of the earth. It was Christmas time, therefore in this form. As background I used an old graphic of mine to bring some awareness to the person who made this unbelievable insinuation to me a studied geographer and - unintentionally from a false asumption - manipulated the administrator Jeff G. with her claim. I had a nice happy Christmas until December 26. Now I look 10 years older, even though I had always looked 10 years younger my whole life. I learned something from this and I hope Sitacuisses did too. Delete it, I do not want to think about it any more. Sciencia58 (talk) 08:44, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, as per COM:ANU#User:Sciencia58. Yann (talk) 19:56, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Die Horizontlinie ist nicht mit dem Meeresspiegel identisch. Der Meeresspiegel ist ein Durchschnittswert. Der Horizont wird durch die oberen Ränder der Wellen bestimmt. Ich brauchte die Zeichnung für die Fachdiskussion, um jemand zu zeigen, wie ich es meine. Es ist aber keine für die Wikipedia geeignete Zeichnung. Ich bin mit der Löschung einverstanden.
The horizon line is not the same as the sea level. The sea level is an average value. The horizon is determined by the upper edges of the waves. I needed the drawing for the technical discussion to show someone how I mean it. But it is not a drawing suitable for Wikipedia. I agree with the deletion. Sciencia58 (talk) 20:29, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deseo eliminar mi fotografía Jotabaressi (talk) 21:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement Kotofey2016 (talk) 23:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Complex logo, needs permission. --Gbawden (talk) 10:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Added a better photoquality of the bus OliverZenglein (talk) 00:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Checking Category:Wagen 169 (bad cat name, btw) this photo seems to be pretty unique. Nominator shouls always indicate the name of the better photo which would replace this one, too, and all these related DRs should have been bundled in a single one. (And my vote is the same for them all, too.) -- Tuválkin 22:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Tuválkin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:28, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Instagram file. E4024 (talk) 00:06, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No evidence of free license. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:29, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Added a better photoquality of the bus OliverZenglein (talk) 00:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Checking Category:Wagen 166 (bad cat name, btw) this photo seems to be pretty unique. Nominator shouls always indicate the name of the better photo which would replace this one, too, and all these related DRs should have been bundled in a single one. (And my vote is the same for them all, too.) -- Tuválkin 22:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Tuválkin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:29, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Added a better photoquality of the bus OliverZenglein (talk) 00:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Checking Category:Wagen 166 (bad cat name, btw) this photo seems to be pretty unique. Nominator shouls always indicate the name of the better photo which would replace this one, too, and all these related DRs should have been bundled in a single one. (And my vote is the same for them all, too.) -- Tuválkin 22:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Tuválkin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:29, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Added a better photoquality of the bus OliverZenglein (talk) 00:11, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Checking Category:Wagen 164 (bad cat name, btw) this photo seems to be pretty unique. Nominator shouls always indicate the name of the better photo which would replace this one, too, and all these related DRs should have been bundled in a single one. (And my vote is the same for them all, too.) -- Tuválkin 22:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:30, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Added a better photoquality of the bus OliverZenglein (talk) 00:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Checking Category:Wagen 161 (bad cat name, btw) this photo seems to be pretty unique. Nominator shouls always indicate the name of the better photo which would replace this one, too, and all these related DRs should have been bundled in a single one. (And my vote is the same for them all, too.) -- Tuválkin 22:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Tuválkin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:30, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Added a better photoquality of the bus OliverZenglein (talk) 00:30, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Checking Category:Wagen 160 (bad cat name, btw) this photo seems to be pretty unique. Nominator shouls always indicate the name of the better photo which would replace this one, too, and all these related DRs should have been bundled in a single one. (And my vote is the same for them all, too.) -- Tuválkin 22:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Tuválkin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:30, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Added a better photoquality of the bus OliverZenglein (talk) 00:32, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Checking Category:Wagen 160 (bad cat name, btw) this photo seems to be pretty unique. Nominator shouls always indicate the name of the better photo which would replace this one, too, and all these related DRs should have been bundled in a single one. (And my vote is the same for them all, too.) -- Tuválkin 22:18, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Tuválkin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:30, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Added a better photoquality of the bus OliverZenglein (talk) 00:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Checking Category:Wagen 157 (bad cat name, btw) this photo seems to be pretty unique. Nominator shouls always indicate the name of the better photo which would replace this one, too, and all these related DRs should have been bundled in a single one. (And my vote is the same for them all, too.) -- Tuválkin 22:18, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Tuválkin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:30, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Added a better photoquality of the bus OliverZenglein (talk) 00:40, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Checking Category:Wagen 157 (bad cat name, btw) this photo seems to be pretty unique. Nominator shouls always indicate the name of the better photo which would replace this one, too, and all these related DRs should have been bundled in a single one. (And my vote is the same for them all, too.) -- Tuválkin 22:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Tuválkin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:30, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Added a better photoquality of the bus OliverZenglein (talk) 00:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Checking Category:Wagen 156 (bad cat name, btw) this photo seems to be pretty unique. Nominator shouls always indicate the name of the better photo which would replace this one, too, and all these related DRs should have been bundled in a single one. (And my vote is the same for them all, too.) -- Tuválkin 22:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Tuválkin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:31, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Added a better photoquality of the bus OliverZenglein (talk) 00:48, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Checking Category:Wagen 156 (bad cat name, btw) this photo seems to be pretty unique. Nominator shouls always indicate the name of the better photo which would replace this one, too, and all these related DRs should have been bundled in a single one. (And my vote is the same for them all, too.) -- Tuválkin 22:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Tuválkin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:31, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Added a better photoquality of the bus OliverZenglein (talk) 00:50, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Checking Category:Wagen 155 (bad cat name, btw) this photo seems to be pretty unique. Nominator shouls always indicate the name of the better photo which would replace this one, too, and all these related DRs should have been bundled in a single one. (And my vote is the same for them all, too.) -- Tuválkin 22:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Tuválkin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:31, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Added a better photoquality of the bus OliverZenglein (talk) 00:51, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Checking Category:Wagen 153 (bad cat name, btw) this photo seems to be pretty unique. Nominator shouls always indicate the name of the better photo which would replace this one, too, and all these related DRs should have been bundled in a single one. (And my vote is the same for them all, too.) -- Tuválkin 22:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Tuválkin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:31, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Added a better photoquality of the bus OliverZenglein (talk) 00:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Checking Category:Wagen 153 (bad cat name, btw) this photo seems to be pretty unique. Nominator shouls always indicate the name of the better photo which would replace this one, too, and all these related DRs should have been bundled in a single one. (And my vote is the same for them all, too.) -- Tuválkin 21:56, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Tuválkin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:31, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Added a better photoquality of the bus OliverZenglein (talk) 00:56, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Checking Category:Wagen 151 (bad cat name, btw) this photo seems to be pretty unique. Nominator shouls always indicate the name of the better photo which would replace this one, too, and all these related DRs should have been bundled in a single one. (And my vote is the same for them all, too.) -- Tuválkin 22:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Tuválkin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:31, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user logo, out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 01:29, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:30, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of non-notable YouTube channel. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 01:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:29, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marketing screenshot of non-free software labelled as PD-textlogo (Ref: https://web.archive.org/web/20170519113619/http://www.google.com/intl/zh-CN/ime/pinyin/) -- Voidvector (talk) 02:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:31, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:44, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:45, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:48, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:49, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:49, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:50, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:51, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:36, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:53, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:36, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:54, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:54, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:55, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:56, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:56, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:57, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:07, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:09, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:11, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:11, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:14, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:14, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:33, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:33, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:33, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:33, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:33, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:17, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:33, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:17, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:32, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:18, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:32, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:18, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:32, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:19, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:32, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:20, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:32, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:20, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:32, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:29, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:30, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:30, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:06, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:07, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:39, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:07, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:39, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:07, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:39, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:39, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:39, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:40, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:09, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:40, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:09, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:40, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:09, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:42, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:42, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:42, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:42, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:42, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:11, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:42, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:11, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:42, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:11, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:42, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:42, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:42, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:14, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:14, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:14, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:40, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:40, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:40, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and fr:Utilisateur:Jackyc french/Brouillon with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:40, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

You stole posters? Stop stealing now. Lucifer our Lord (Talk to satanist) 15:43, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • KEEP- No copyright notice on this poster posted on a public wall. Unwarranted deletion request --Tibet Nation (talk) 18:38, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. «Stolen stuff» is neither a phrase applicable to copyright nor an argument. A poster/graffiti and other manifestations are covered by "freedom of panorama" (see COM:FOP Chile). --Warko (talk) 23:20, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Contains copyrighted imagery and sketches.  delete. Ianal
    • First, the image uploaded can't be considered a potential copyright infringement. Second, you are assuming (without source) the images contained in the poster are copyrighted, and even if they are, the poster itself is not necessarily a copyrght infringement, because there are copyright limitations regarding satire or parody. Best, --Warko (talk) 22:13, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion and covered under FOP in Chile. --Gbawden (talk) 13:45, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While there is COM:FOP Chile, per decision at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arte y protesta.jpg it appears posters like these are not covered: these are mainly temporal in nature and not permanent (per AntiCompositeNumber). So cannot benefit from Chilean FOP which requires permanence. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:35, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 03:53, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo; already uploaded at rowiki as fair use: ro:Fișier:Kanal D.png. Gikü (talk) 10:56, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 03:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo, exceeds COM:TOO Gikü (talk) 10:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 03:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of probably copyrighted covers. Uploader claims to have all rights to the covers. This claim must be verified through OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:29, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 03:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation COM:FOP Lithuania. The object was built in 2015. Maxinvestigator (talk) 18:50, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 03:55, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inflected form 'lasre' from lasern (German Wiktionary does not exist! See all inflections: lasern on German Wiktionary. File will never be used. Jeuwre (talk) 00:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Reinhard Kraasch at 15:39, 2 August 2021 UTC: uploader request --Krdbot 18:29, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe it is copyrighted. Permission is needed to use. Website original is at https://orientalinstruments.com/oriental-instruments/sold-instruments/item/862-mohammadi-rosewood-barbat Jacqke (talk) 06:38, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 00:09, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work. High quality image uploaded by a new user but no exif. PCP Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE per nomination The-Copyright-Enforcer (talk) 16:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 00:09, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Guru Ethic (talk) 18:01, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused personal image. --Túrelio (talk) 07:40, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free TV screenshot of Taiwan PTS. Tim Wu (talk) 16:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

這是我自己拍攝的照片,不是螢幕截圖 Sean Chiu (talk)


Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:13, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot of publicly available open source content Dnsmtc (talk) 18:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:14, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot of publicly available open source content Dnsmtc (talk) 18:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:17, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality duplicate of File:Claude Monet - Étretat, Coucher de Soleil.jpg StellarHalo (talk) 00:41, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is one in the complete set from Category:Images from wpi.art by Claude Monet --Maltaper (talk) 00:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason to delete. It is in use in other projects and on mentioned category. --Elly (talk) 18:57, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stolen stuff, the images are copyrighted Lucifer our Lord (Talk to satanist) 15:44, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:46, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While there's Chilean FOP, this type of work (a poster of some sort) is temporal. COM:FOP Chile requires permanence. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:43, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The nomination is a wrong interpretation of the Chilean law. A poster (or a mural) is a work permantently added to a public wall, thus FOP applies. --Warko (talk) 12:35, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Warko: see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arte y protesta.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Another wrong call. Unfortunately the deletion was decided before I could say anything. --Warko (talk) 16:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Warko: if you believe that judgment was incorrect, you may file a restoration request at COM:UNDEL for File:Arte y protesta.jpg. Regards, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:09, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. This poster is not permanent. According to COM:FOP Chile "artistic works that permanently adorn squares" can be reproduced. This is not permanent. Posters stay on location relatively short, depending on wheather. Murals are considered permanent, can stay for decades. --Elly (talk) 19:02, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a poster temporarily displayed to commemorate 75th anniversary of subject's death. Not de mínimis. William Avery (talk) 05:41, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 19:03, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is sourced from www.camiloparedes.eu, which does not appear to be freely licensed. Uploader's username does not give impression that they are the photographer. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 09:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and conclusion of M.nelson. --Elly (talk) 19:11, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source, no permission, no evidence for license. See also [1]. Druschba 4 (talk) 09:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 19:13, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source specifically claims © (bottom right corner). Can't see how {{PD-RO-exempt}} exempts this map. Gikü (talk) 11:07, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I chose PD-RO-exempt because it's just a data visualization, but, if they claim copyright over that, then fine. I didn't notice the ©, it's very small. How should I migrate this to the Romanian Wikipedia, though? If I make it super small for the sake of fair use, it becomes unreadable. — Andreyyshore (talk) 17:50, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. @Andreyyshore: - sometimes there is no solution. --Elly (talk) 19:17, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced map, probably taken from a youtube video. Beshogur (talk) 13:25, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agree that unsourced maps should be labeled as such. Is the map incorrect or disputed in some parts? Bcjohnston (talk) 19:58, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's from this video: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xuCn8ux2gbs

You can either ask the guy who made it for sources or consider your suspicions confirmed and delete the image. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2804:14C:B3:3284:E1FE:FC3E:3336:9A4E (talk) 23:44, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's actually from this video (with a timestamp): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6Wu0Q7x5D0&t=908s Xerxes8088 (talk) 02:50, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and remarks of others. Thanks, @Xerxes8088: for the link to the film. This film is not licenced CC-BY-SA, therefore the image needs to be deleted. --Elly (talk) 19:21, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused JPG file superseded by PNG file A1Cafel (talk) 15:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:REDUNDANT. --Elly (talk) 19:24, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free TV screenshot of Taiwan PTS. Tim Wu (talk) 16:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

這是我自己拍攝的照片,不是螢幕截圖 Sean Chiu (talk)


Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Elly (talk) 20:27, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD - sourcing insuccifient to demonstrate PD status PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:55, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 20:29, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is only a fake SVG with an embedded raster image, made from Vogel Buchverlag web.pdf which is also a fake PDF. Therefor i have made a raster version from it, no need for this pseudo vector version. Ras67 (talk) 17:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ras67:
 Info There is imho no rule how to handle fake SVG, expecially for those which can be realistically overwritten with a vectorized version.
 Request COM:EDUSE imho does imho not really apply, since FakeSVGs are often also COM:INUSE, FakeSVG are imho similar to {{Duplicate}}. Or why do you think COM:EDUSE apply?
 Delete No original, I would personally like to ban {{FakeSVG}}.
 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 10:15, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, discussion and per COM:REDUNDANT. --Elly (talk) 20:32, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader seems not to be the author, no panrama freedom in Luxemburg 87.65.83.203 17:51, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, photo of a copyrighted work of contemporary artist. --Elly (talk) 20:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader seems not to be the author, no panorama freedom in Luxemburg Les Meloures (talk) 17:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, photo of a copyrighted work of contemporary artist. --Elly (talk) 20:35, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader seems not to be the author original picture is on the website www.belvedere.lu/fr no notification of freedom Les Meloures (talk) 17:57, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Uploader did not comment after 8 months. --Elly (talk) 20:38, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete now, und undelete in January 2023. Thank you Mutter Erde (talk) 18:29, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. undelete in 2023 as Pietschmann died in 1952. . --Elly (talk) 20:40, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Karin Beate Nosterud is a photographer and not an illustrator and is probably not the creator of the painting in this image - and therefor cannot put a CC-license on someone else's work. Vätte (talk) 20:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 20:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

George Hayek used this image in his book, but it's not his own work. Maudslay II (talk) 15:20, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Trijnstel: do you think with hindsight that the person who gave permission for publication was entitled to do so, as he probably was not the photographer of this image? Perhaps he did have another license / permission to use the picture in the book. The subject died 1982. Concerns ticket:2012051410001941.
Note, derivatives of this image should be deleted as well when this image is deleted. They can be found in Category:Bachir Pierre Gemayel
Elly (talk) 19:35, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ellywa: Good question. It's been 9 years since I closed that ticket, so I don't know everything anymore. But back then they claimed to be the 'author, publisher and copyright-holder of the images'. I had no reason to doubt that. And as long as we don't have a strong reason to believe that it's someone else, then I don't see why we shouldn't allow this photo. (Besides: he uploaded and gave permission for 11 photos in 2012, so the outcome should also apply for them imo.) Trijnsteltalk 09:42, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Trijnstel. Thanks. --Elly (talk) 11:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy violation. Licsak (talk) 15:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Licsak: Sure this can't apply {{FoP-China}}? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:44, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To apply {{FoP-China}}, both the name of the original author and the name of the work must be attached. In the current state, the name of the original author is not written in the place of the author, so it is difficult to apply. --Licsak (talk) 12:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I do not consider this as calligraphy. It appears like standard Chinese lettering. The information on the panel is simple factual information. As such is it not copyrighted according to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/China. Imho the image can be kept. Elly (talk) 20:00, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Per {{PD-text}}. Per Elly, it is simple factual information. SCP-2000 15:22, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: because native speaker/reader confirms this is no calligraphy and factual info only. thanks!. --Elly (talk) 16:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy violation. Licsak (talk) 15:24, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Licsak: Sure this can't apply {{FoP-China}}? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:44, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To apply {{FoP-China}}, both the name of the original author and the name of the work must be attached. In the current state, the name of the original author is not written in the place of the author, so it is difficult to apply. --Licsak (talk) 12:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The sign on the image I do not consider as calligraphy. It appears like standard Chinese lettering. The information on the panel is simple factual information. As such is it not copyrighted according to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/China. The building on the background however is copyrighted and cannot maintained as the author and title is not mentioned according {{FoP-China}}. So I cropped the building from the image to maintain the sign and the hole in the ground. This cropped version can be maintained imho. The uncropped version can be deleted. Elly (talk) 20:26, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: cropped version can be kept. per discussion, thanks. --Elly (talk) 06:52, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Report prepared by third party contractor for US Federal Govt. I am not sure this can be treated as PD-US-Gov.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 08:53, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]