Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/11/22
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
![14 File:"Polyhedron with no vertex visible2 from center".jpg](#File:"Polyhedron_with_no_vertex_visible2_from_center".jpg){kind=link}
![15 File:"Polyhedron with no vertex visible .png".jpg](#File:"Polyhedron_with_no_vertex_visible_.png".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![96.27 File:POLYHEDRON WITH NO VERTEX VISIBLE FROM CENTER.png".jpg](#File:POLYHEDRON_WITH_NO_VERTEX_VISIBLE_FROM_CENTER.png".jpg){kind=link}
![96.42 File:План-схема Национального парка "Межигорье".jpg](#File:План-схема_Национального_парка_"Межигорье".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Not the artists own work. per watermark, BW stands for Belgrade Waterfront. This was promotional ad for some construction development. Likely taken from https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/mise-en-vente-anticipee-des-residences-belgrade-waterfront-offrant-des-panoramas-epoustouflants-de-la-confluence-de-la-save-avec-le-danube-et-de-la-tour-kula-belgrade-569223041.html copyrighted by PRNews. OlEnglish (talk) 04:33, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:33, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Phantasy, private. Tekstman (talk) 08:13, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: personal image by non-contributor (CSD#F10). --Wutsje 08:16, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
redirects to recently deleted file Mjrmtg (talk) 12:05, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 14:41, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
I have uploaded a different picture of my grandfather and I dont want this photo of his to be here, so I kindly as you to delete this picture. Thanks in advance! Ralakbarov (talk) 15:53, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 19:34, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted 2015 image. E4024 (talk) 19:31, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- As the file is not in use, I already marked it for SD and opened this page to leave a record behind.
Speedy delete E4024 (talk) 19:32, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:45, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
I, the creator of this specific map, uploaded a more accurate, renumbered, SVG version of this same map today (see here). Ponderosapine210 (talk) 04:12, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
I create this file and I'm wondering whether it's surpass threshold of originality in Korean or not. (Commons require file must be released in free license or in public domain in both U.S and source country of the work) Bill Cipher, Stan, Twins, Dipper - Gravity falls and J.Smile 14:14, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
-2020-11-22T14:14:00.000Z-File:StayC_logo.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:06, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Poor quality upload, looks like a screenshot. Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:06, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete (nominated the file for speedy deletion). Taivo (talk) 11:57, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:18, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as an unused personal photo. JIP (talk) 14:20, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:45, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be licensed correctly given other uploads by this user Simeon (talk) 12:16, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Very likely to be copyvio. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:54, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Google Maps screenshot by the looks of it, not freely reusable. — Yerpo Eh? 08:07, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nominator's reason. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:33, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:22, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Woozydrubs (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images and of no use to the project as a whole. Commons is not a web host
- File:Michael Anthony Saunders with his Action Figure The Penguin in a Snowy Forest with Cows. WIN 20201121 13 33 28 Pro edited (3).jpg
- File:Michael Anthony Saunders in Asia with his Action Figure The Penguin. WIN 20201121 13 33 28 Pro edited (2).jpg
- File:Mike on a Land next to Mountains and a Forest with his Action Figure The Penguin. WIN 20201121 13 33 28 Pro edited.jpg
- File:The Wonderful photo with Mike and his Action Figure The Penguin. WIN 20201121 13 33 28 Pro.jpg
- File:Michael Anthony Saunders and his Action Figure The Penguin. WIN 20201121 13 33 20 Pro.jpg
- File:Michael Anthony Saunders and his Action Figure Rey Mysterio Jr. WIN 20201018 00 03 57 Pro.jpg
- File:Michael Anthony Saunders on a Land near a Forest and Mountains WIN 20201120 22 09 45 Pro edited.jpg
- File:As3fa-spv1t.jpg
- File:Azi7o-nram6.jpg
- File:A40af-jxsag.jpg
- File:A761x-z3nyd.jpg
- File:The Wonderful Picture of Michael Anthony Saunders. WIN 20200911 17 22 56 Pro.jpg
- File:Aj2qu-88x1y (5).jpg
- File:Auljn-s6rua.jpg
- File:Michael Anthony Saunders on a Land near the Mountains and a Forest playing with his action Figuer the Rock.JPEG (File),.png
- File:The Great And Wonderful Picture About Michael Anthony Saunders And His Action Figure The Penguin. JPG WIN 20200915 19 18 09 Pro.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Herby talk thyme 08:48, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:22, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Flame Towers
[edit]This architecture was built in 2013 by HOK (Hellmuth, Obata + Kassabaum). In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for a certain period of time after the death of the creator (be it the last-surviving architect, engineer, designer, sculptor, engraver, or painter). An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception Commons:Freedom of panorama (FoP). Sadly, Azerbaijan has no Commons-applicable FoP. The country's copyright law should be amended to allow pictorial and videographic reproductions of copyrighted Azeri architecture and sculptures for commercial purposes, from T-shirt printing and postcards to commercial ads and commercial YouTube vlogs, without the need of authorization/permission from architects and other artists. One of the nominated files is a video, but 9/10's of the scene is focused on the towers. See also three of the deleted files at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Üç alov qüllələri.jpg.
- File:Flame Towers (221090127).jpeg
- File:Flame Towers in Baku.jpg
- File:Flame Towers, Azerbaijan.png
- File:Flame Towers, Baku.webm
- File:Flame Towers.jpg
- File:Panoram of Baku from Maiden Tower.JPG
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:52, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:43, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:24, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
No useful content; descrption is "photo". Possible test edit. Maybe a copyright violation of the text depicted. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:09, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
![14:09, 22 November 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/11/22#c-Pigsonthewing-2020-11-22T14:09:00.000Z-File:"Polyhedron_with_no_vertex_visible2_from_center".jpg){kind=link}
- Delete unused personal photo. Misleading name, this is not a polyhedron but a personal photograph. JIP (talk) 14:22, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:26, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
![05:26, 29 November 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/11/22#c-Minorax-2020-11-29T05:26:00.000Z-File:"Polyhedron_with_no_vertex_visible2_from_center".jpg){kind=link}
No useful content; subject not identifed. Description is "ABC". Possible test upload. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:11, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
![14:11, 22 November 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/11/22#c-Pigsonthewing-2020-11-22T14:11:00.000Z-File:"Polyhedron_with_no_vertex_visible_.png".jpg){kind=link}
- Delete unused personal photo. Misleading name, this is not a polyhedron but a personal photograph. JIP (talk) 14:22, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:26, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
![05:26, 29 November 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/11/22#c-Minorax-2020-11-29T05:26:00.000Z-File:"Polyhedron_with_no_vertex_visible_.png".jpg){kind=link}
Subject not identifed. Description is "xc". Possible test upload. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete unused personal photo. Misleading name, this is not a polyhedron but a personal photograph. JIP (talk) 14:23, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:27, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
No useful content; subject not identifed. Likely a selfie/ personal pic. Description is "salahudheen". Possible test upload. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:16, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete unused personal photo. Misleading name, this is not a polyhedron but a personal photograph. JIP (talk) 14:23, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:27, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Not own work as claimed. Taken from twitter or the personal websites per google
- File:Sarah michelle brown pic.jpg
- File:NatalieWoodprofilebowtie.jpg
- File:NWood-Bakergram-banana-fight-1.png
- File:Natalie Wood Twitter pic.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 15:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photo. License template recently removed by original uploader. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:42, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:29, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
File description page blanked by original uploader, assuming to be a request for deletion of an unused file. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:44, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:30, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Oluwamayowa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:30, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KwabenaKobby (talk · contribs)
[edit]All need permission. Taken from TripAdvisor, Twitter, YouTube, etc. No sources to verify license
- File:Okomfo Anokye sword site.jpg
- File:Kumasi, Ashanti.jpg
- File:Kumasi sports stadium aerial view.jpg
- File:Kumasi interchange.jpg
- File:Kejetia market.jpg
- File:Kumasi City.jpg
- File:Manhyia Palace Events & Photos.jpg
- File:Rattray park, Kumasi.jpg
- File:Unity Hall, KNUST.jpg
- File:Kumasi Adum CBD.jpg
- File:St Peter's Cathedral Basilica, Kumasi.jpg
- File:St Peters Basilical, Kumasi, Ghana.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 15:47, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:30, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mutahir showkat (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:31, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Akis Papadopoulos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Terepai Maoate.jpg
- File:Robert Woonton.jpg
- File:Geoffrey Henry.jpg
- File:Tom Davis.jpg
- File:Apenera Pera Short.jpg
- File:Lawrence Greig.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:36, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:33, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:33, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:34, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kabir Bin Samad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Kabir Bin Samad in hospital.jpg
- File:Kabir Bin Samad in studio.jpg
- File:Kabir Bin Samad pictute.jpg
- File:Kabir Bin Samad.jpg
- File:Kabir Bin Samad Vai.jpg
- File:Kabir Bin Samad joshor.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:40, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:34, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work of the uploader. jdx Re: 16:42, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:34, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Giannini Fabrizio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:43, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:34, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:47, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:34, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miler Dos Anjos Silva (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:48, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:35, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Raphaelit000 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:50, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:35, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:51, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:35, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ALL - Representation (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Cristian Rie selfie en maquillaje.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie personaje en ensayo.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie con sus hermanos.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie Jacket en Bogotá.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie rostro 2010.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie free.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie Fotos.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie familiar foto.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie flow negro.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie esquizofrenia.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie ensayo teatro JCB.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie en caballo antioquia.jpg
- File:Cristian rie en 6 pantallas.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie cumbia ninja actor.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie cumbia ninja.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie Cristian Rie.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie club de la pelea.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie chompa.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie claqueta happy birthday.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie carcajada.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie Brasil Amazonas.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie cara feliz.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie boton.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie beso labios.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie amigas Medellín.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie afro gafas.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie 3 cam.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie Wolfs - Boviere champagne.jpg
- File:Cristianrie.jpg
- File:Primer plano Cristian Rie.jpg
- File:Cristian Rie.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:52, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:36, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
F10: self-promotion, personal picture of not-relevant person, useless for educational purposes L736E (talk) 17:38, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:37, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
File created to mock someone : out of project scope Do not follow (talk) 17:48, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:37, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
File description page blanked by original uploader, assuming to be a request for deletion AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:37, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by B.sooshiant (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: for the reasons stated MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:50, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by B.sooshiant (talk · contribs)
[edit]not notable. out of com:PS.
Hanooz 19:05, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:39, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fateme taleb (talk · contribs)
[edit]not notable. out of com:PS.
Hanooz 19:19, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:39, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal Image. GeorgHH • talk 20:12, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:39, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, poor quality, not used. Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:20, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:40, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
out of scope, unused, unusable Cabayi (talk) 20:36, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:40, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Visible pixellation from upscaling; no original metadata: unlikely to be own work AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:11, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
I, the uploader, uploaded it to the wrong wiki, sorry Westbahnhof (talk) 22:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:42, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work of the uploader. jdx Re: 23:49, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:42, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dunkelberg (talk · contribs)
[edit]no evidence of PD or CC, text-only files also out of project scope
- File:Kritiken+Konzertprogramme.pdf
- File:Zwölf kürzere Vor- und Nachspiele für die Orgel.jpg
- File:Zehn alte Marienlieder.jpg
- File:Rorate, coeli, desuper.jpg
- File:Resonet in laudibus 1930.jpg
- File:Psalm 116.jpg
- File:Psalm 99.jpg
- File:Psalm 98.jpg
- File:Orgelbuch zum Lob Gottes.jpg
- File:Missa Veni Creator Spiritus.jpg
- File:Missa Sacerdos et Pontifex.jpg
- File:Missa pastoritia.jpg
- File:Corbinians-Messe.jpg
- File:Titelblatt Erich Weber Rezensionen.jpg
- File:Zwei Motetten für vierstimmigen, gemischten Chor.jpg
- File:Variationen und Fuge über Es ist ein Schnitter, der heißt Tod 2.jpg
- File:Variationen und Fuge über Es ist ein Schnitter, der heißt Tod 1.jpg
- File:Toccata und Doppelfuge über Großer Gotthard, wir verehren.jpg
- File:Motette für die Jahreschlussandacht.jpg
- File:Orgelsonate (wie soll ich dich empfangen).jpg
- File:Messe in E 2.jpg
- File:Marienhymnus.jpg
- File:Messe in E 1.jpg
- File:Fuge vierstimmig für Orgel.jpg
- File:Festliche Musik für Blechbläser und Orgel.jpg
- File:Festkantate zu Ehren des heiligen Augustinus.jpg
- File:Erlaubnis für Hochladen für Wikipedia von Erich Weber.jpg
- File:Musikverlag Dunkelberg Liederliste.pdf
- File:CCF09082012 00000.jpg
- File:O.D.Nippes-02.tif
- File:Zusammengefügt.pdf
- File:O.D.Linden-03.tif
- File:CCF14082012 00007.jpg
- File:Schriftliche Aussagen OD über NSDAP-Zeit.pdf
- File:CCF14082012 00006.jpg
- File:Riemer nachher 2 B.jpg
- File:Riemer nachher 2 A.jpg
- File:Entnazifizierung eidesstattliche Erklärungen.pdf
- File:Entlassungsschein.jpg
- File:Entlassung interner Schriftverkehr.jpg
- File:Riemer vorher Schriftverkehr KHD B.jpg
- File:Riemer vorher Schriftverkehr KHD A.jpg
- File:Riemer vorher C.jpg
- File:Riemer vorher B.jpg
- File:Riemer vorher A.jpg
- File:Riemer nachher später 1955.jpg
- File:Riemer nachher B.jpg
- File:Riemer nachher A.jpg
- File:Freilassungsantrag OD.jpg
- File:Domkapitel ab 1948.pdf
- File:Briefwechsel Bischof von Regensburg 1946-47.pdf
- File:Arrest Report.jpg
- File:Dunkelbergnachweis12.jpg
- File:Dunkelbergnachweis11.jpg
- File:Dunkelbergnachweis10.jpg
- File:Dunkelbergnachweis9.jpg
- File:Dunkelbergnachweis8.jpg
- File:Dunkelbergnachweis7.jpg
- File:Dunkelbergnachweis6.jpg
- File:Dunkelbergnachweis5.jpg
- File:Dunkelbergnachweis4.jpg
- File:Dunkelbergnachweis3.jpg
- File:Dunkelbergnachweis2b.jpg
- File:Dunkelbergnachweis2a.jpg
- File:Dunkelbergnachweis1.jpg
- File:Zeugnis-24.tif
- File:Zeugnis-19.tif
- File:Zeugnis-26a.jpg
- File:Zeugnis-15.tif
- File:Zeugnis-12.tif
- File:Zeugnis-02.tif
- File:Zeugnis-31.tif
- File:O.D.Passau Domorgel-02.jpg
- File:O.D.Porträt-01.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Didym (talk) 13:27, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Comment Many of there are used in de:Otto Dunkelberg. 3 images restored as pd-ineligible, for the rest there is no permission. --Krd 16:41, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/fondation vuitton
[edit]No COM:FOP in France. Some pictures were taken inside the building during an exhibition and showing copyrighted (modern) artwork.
- File:Fondation Louis Vuitton 3.jpg
- File:Fondation Louis Vuitton 2.jpg
- File:Fondation Louis Vuitton (44858811482).jpg
- File:Fondation Louis Vuitton.jpg
- File:Fondation Louis Vuitton (44858800252).jpg
- File:Paris - Fondation Louis Vuitton (23346852832).jpg
- File:Fondation Louis Vuitton 20160413 West 19.jpg
- File:Fondation Louis-Vuitton (15895047513).jpg
- File:Fondation Louis Vuitton 20160413 West 13.jpg
- File:Fondation Louis-Vuitton (16513494451).jpg
- File:Fondation Louis-Vuitton (16513498641).jpg
- File:Fondation Louis-Vuitton (16514183842).jpg
- File:Paris 4Y1A3706 (19695496530).jpg
- File:La Défense (44855625342).jpg
- File:POINT DE VUE (30507687480).jpg
- File:Orange columns and silhouettes (Unsplash).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:35, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 23:08, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/fondation vuitton
[edit]No COM:FOP in France.
- File:Fondation Louis Vuitton (29972306487).jpg
- File:Reflections - Nuit Blanche - Fondation Louis Vuitton 02.jpg
- File:Reflections - Nuit Blanche - Fondation Louis Vuitton 01.jpg
- File:Fondation Louis Vuitton - Flickr - Henry Marion.jpg
- File:Paris - Avenue du Mahatma Gandhi - Fondation Louis Vuitton - Entrée.jpg
- File:Orange columns reflection (Unsplash).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:33, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:44, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juan Francisco Cancino Lezama (talk · contribs)
[edit]Old photos taken from twitter. Needs permission
- File:Chile 1962 sorteo completado.jpg
- File:Sorteggio 1934.jpg
- File:Calendario Italia 1990.jpg
- File:Tercera etapa del Sorteo Chile 1962.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 15:42, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:31, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by G Eagarthóir (talk · contribs)
[edit]Author Conor McCabe Photography Ltd Copyright holder Conor McCabe Photography Ltd per exif in one, think they all need OTRS
- File:CiaraCathaoir.jpg
- File:Ciara Ní É le linn 2020.jpg
- File:Ciara Ní É at Trasna na dTonnta launch 2019.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 15:55, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:31, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RamuSR2212 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Nandikotkur Municipality Image.jpg
- File:Kamalapuram Railway Station.jpg
- File:Yerraguntla Railway Station.jpg
- File:Mydukur Town Board.jpg
- File:Rly Kodur Image.jpg
- File:Rajampeta Railway Board.jpg
- File:Badvel Town Overview.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:32, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:32, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shraddha rahul waghmare (talk · contribs)
[edit]How many pictures of one building do we need for the project?
- File:Bhim Janmabhoomi, birthplace of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar 4.jpg
- File:Bhim Janmabhoomi, birthplace of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar 5.jpg
- File:Bhim Janmabhoomi, birthplace of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar 1.jpg
- File:Bhim Janmabhoomi, birthplace of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar 2.jpg
- File:Bhim Janmabhoomi, birthplace of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar 3.jpg
Herby talk thyme 16:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:24, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Background is not too simple for copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:48, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Keep - The background is not clear enough, maybe we can consider it De minimis. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:06, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Per COM:De minimis. Simple shapes bearly visible. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:17, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
British Freedom of panorama only covers 3D artworks (e.g. architecture and sculptures) and 2D works of artistic craftsmanship. 2D graphic arts, like murals, are not covered so. As these murals are about COVID-19 (2020), these are far too recent to be considered as public domain, and permission from the painters and/or artists is required to host these images under free licensing/public domain.
- File:COVID-19 mural on The Olde Tavern, South Baileygate, Pontefract (17th July 2020) 001.jpg
- File:COVID-19 mural on The Olde Tavern, South Baileygate, Pontefract (21st June 2020) 002.jpg
- File:COVID-19 pandemic mural on the Beastfair Vaults, Pontefract (17th July 2020).jpg
_001.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_002.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:50, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:18, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Logo of a copyrighted video game. While the game itself originated from the United States, I'm doubting this logo would pass U.S. threshold of originality (the lettering seems not simple). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:18, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Canada#Freedom_of_panorama. Murals located in Canada, recent works. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:19, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Canada#Freedom_of_panorama. Murals located in Canada, recent works. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:20, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Canada#Freedom_of_panorama. Murals located in Canada, recent works. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:20, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Canada#Freedom_of_panorama. Murals located in Canada, recent works. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:20, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Canada#Freedom_of_panorama. Murals located in Canada, recent works. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:20, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Canada#Freedom_of_panorama. Murals located in Canada, recent works. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:20, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Canada#Freedom_of_panorama. Murals located in Canada, recent works. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:20, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Canada#Freedom_of_panorama. Murals located in Canada, recent works. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:20, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Canada#Freedom_of_panorama. Murals located in Canada, recent works. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:20, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Canada#Freedom_of_panorama. Murals located in Canada, recent works. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:20, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Trump statue is a temporarily display, cannot take advantage of FOP 119.237.234.201 04:10, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Copyrighted statue removed. Should be OK now. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:40, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep now that the copyrighted statue has been removed. But please remember to delete the original revision of the file. JIP (talk) 14:18, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep As per above.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:55, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per above. Version with statue has been hiden. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:21, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
British freedom of panorama only covers all 3D artworks (e.g. architecture and sculptures) plus 2D works of artistic craftsmanship. This painting or mural is a form of 2D graphic art, and such types of artworks are not covered by the British FOP. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:31, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:22, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope, logo of non-notable youtube channel, article repeatedly deleted on en Spicy (talk) 05:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: promotional, not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:22, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Hate to do this, because I love the picture, but there is no way this dates from 1920. She was born in 1914, and this is not a 6-year-old. Maybe 1930? Anyway, we don't have this on simple PD-US-expired, and presumably won't for another 5 or 6 years. Jmabel ! talk 05:33, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:24, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
No exif info, seems not uploader's own work.
(｀・ω・´) (talk) 07:31, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:10, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shafikelari (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope.
- File:الهه آب.jpg
- File:آوای رنگی.gif
- File:بخشز از کتاب آلیس در سرزمین نانو با تصویر سازی مهسا کوهستانی اردستانی.jpg
- File:Mahsa koohestani.jpg
- File:آلیس در سرزمین نانو.jpg
- File:Mahsa koohestani ardestani.webp
- File:Mahsa koohestani Rain of Mercy Exhibition.jpg
- File:Exhibition of Mahsa koohestani ardestani.jpg
- File:Mahsa Koohestani ardestani Milad Tower Exhibition, Tehran.png
- File:Mahsa Koohestani ardestani Milad Tower Exhibition.jpg
- File:Mahsa Koohestani ardestani Milad Tower Exhibition, Tehran.jpg
- File:Mahsa-koohestani-ardestani.jpg
- File:مهسا کوهستانی اردستانی نمایشگاه باران رحمت.jpg
- File:Imam reza Festival mahsa koohestani ardestani.png
- File:مهسا کوهستانی اختتامیه جشنواره باران رحمت.jpg
- File:K (21).jpg
- File:مهسا کوهستانی -نمایشگاه جشنواره رضوی.png
- File:Mahsa koohestani ardestani.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Hanooz 10:57, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:39, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shafikelari (talk · contribs)
[edit]copyrighted and out of the project scope
Hanooz 11:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:38, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
same as File:Siyyid-Kazim.jpg Deror avi (talk) 11:30, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, dfuplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 11:35, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fatma el shafie (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:39, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fatma el shafie (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:31, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Private Image gallery, all unused.
- File:MariaPazVila.png
- File:Pazpazpaz.png
- File:Pazvilama.png
- File:PazNacional.png
- File:MariaPazNacinal.jpg
GeorgHH • talk 18:22, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:39, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
This is the exact same image as File:Wiener.JPG, only with slightly smaller resolution. There is no need to keep two separate copies of the same image. JIP (talk) 14:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
OK Delete. --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 16:46, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 22:16, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
User:Roxymatic has a history of uploading other user's copyrighted work and claiming "own work". This metro map is a copy of DnaX' File:Metro București.svg. Thuresson (talk) 21:29, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 22:15, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:37, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:28, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:33, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:29, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:33, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Facebook image per "FBMD", permission is required Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 16:42, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:31, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Commons:Derivative works from toy. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:06, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:51, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:05, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This image was taken from https://www.correiobraziliense.com.br/app/noticia/cidades/2018/05/09/interna_cidadesdf,679426/meteoro-obra-de-arte-surpreende-alunos-e-funcionarios-da-unb.shtml, an online newspaper article which does not mention a Creative Commons license. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:First_steps/Uploading_files for more information on what you can upload to Wikimedia Commons. Spinster (talk) 18:34, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:05, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
It is not possible to know what this recognisable person is doing (see flickr original comments by photographer). It was not taken outside a police station, and the explanation gained was incoherant. The gentleman may not be well. It is difficult to see how this could be used for anything at all on WP. The file title is particularly inappropropriate as it is entirely speculative. Davidships (talk) 19:08, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope, unused. --Wdwd (talk) 13:02, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
File:X-ray of healthy lungs taken at the Institute of Tropical Medicine in Antwerp, on 9 December 2016 (1).tif
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Vincent Mia Edie Verheyen as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: GDPR 17 author/uploader request
Converted to regular DR, as image does not qualify for speedy deletion and to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:23, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Same with File:X-ray of healthy lungs taken at the Institute of Tropical Medicine in Antwerp, on 9 December 2016 (2).tif. --Túrelio (talk) 19:25, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Not a recent upload, no further explanation/reason for deletion;. --Wdwd (talk) 13:03, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
I am sorry but this is a professional architectural rendering and we do not have permission to use this image under a free license. Gnom (talk) 20:06, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- (Speedy) delete as no permission. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:07, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:40, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:13, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:40, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Metadata of this image carry Facebook/Instagram code, suggesting the image has been copied from there. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:19, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:39, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
I, the uploader, uploaded it to the wrong wiki Westbahnhof (talk) 21:58, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 12:35, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Photograph of a photograph, unclear copyright status Achim (talk) 13:42, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Disagree with the deletion of File:Venâncio Borges de Carvalho .jpg
Thanks for your opinion, but the image is public doninio, public people, public places, public images. A photograph of a public person under public law, a public image, a public place image, a photograph with a rights section, with public copyright, a public domain image[1], purchased by a public authority named Bom Jardim da Serra[2] SC Brazil (François Yvytu Tataendy (talk) 16:53, 22 November 2020 (UTC))
- Você não disse por que é de domínio público. Quem tirou a foto original? --Achim (talk) 17:45, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
A Lei de Direitos Autorais[3] é a norma que determina as regras de proteção dos direitos do autor e o prazo para as obras caírem em domínio público. Um exemplo é o caput do artigo 41 da Lei: "Art. 41. Os direitos patrimoniais do autor perduram por setenta anos contados de 1º de janeiro do ano subseqüente ao de seu falecimento, obedecida a ordem sucessória da lei civil." François Yvytu Tataendy (talk) 15:52, 26 November 2020 (UTC) Além do texto do que está previsto em Lei o qual prevê que, de regra, a fotografia é publica e esta sob domínio publico, uma vez que já se passaram mais de setenta anos da morte do primeiro prefeito de Bom Jardim da Serra, que por esclarecimento cabe mencionar ele é meu familiar, tio de meu avô conforme levado a Discussão[4] sobre a correção de erro de deve ser legitimada, acrescento que tenho contatado a Prefeitura Municipal,Secretaria de Educação do Município, Câmara de Vereadores,Secretaria de Turismo, Secretaria de Agricultura, além de amigos e moradores de Bom Jardim da Serra SC para fortalecer nosso pedido e garantir que as mudanças sejam condizentes com a verdade nos Artigos e edições dos Projetos dentro e fora da Wiki. François Yvytu Tataendy (talk) 17:03, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
- Closing admin, if you delete the file please also delete Category:Prefeitos de Bom Jardim da Serra SC. (If you delete the cat even before, no problem at all. :) --E4024 (talk) 19:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete Você não responde minhas perguntas. --Achim (talk) 19:35, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 04:22, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
References
Quero cuidar corrigir e ajudar, tenho essa capacidade, por isso solicito meu desbloqueio
[edit]
Todos os erros não existiriam se nas boas vindas eu tivesse acesso a estas informações : 1- O que não posso fazer : Quando comecei na Wikipedia não fui avisado sobre coisas básicas como porque certas páginas não tem o aviso de protegidas como este exemplo: Aqui:[1] Por favor! Pode me ajudar? O que devo fazer para ser desbloqueado?
![[1]](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:User-info.svg&action=edit){kind=link}
2- Como pedir ajuda: Quando comecei na Wikipedia não fui avisado sobre coisas básicas como por exemplo: se eu busco ajuda, posso usar aviso de pedido de ajuda, como este exemplo: Aqui: {{Helpme}}
Eu cometi erros e fui bloqueado, minha justiça me faltou, eu não vi nada errado no que fiz, mas se eu puder resolver tão somente o que estava errado nos artigos, saiba que eu corrigi na minha inocência e boa fé, ficaria muito contente, de alguém, talvez você pudesse me desbloquear, ou levar isso a discussão, eu quero continuar, vou evitar sofismas dessa vez vou ser mais cuidadoso . "Uma vez falei, ainda duas vezes, mas não voltarei a falar, por isso me arrependo no pó e nas cinzas" esta entre aspas uma frase da Bíblia Sagrada estriada do livro de Jó. Mas eu não sei referenciar aqui ainda, me comprometo a aprender a referenciar na página de testes, antes de editar qualquer artigo, e vou pedir orientação como regra, antes de fazer qualquer outra edição que possa ser considerada abusiva. Desculpe! Por Favor, peço para me desbloquear, com todo respeito, por gentileza. Obrigado! François Yvytu Tataendy (talk) 05:40, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Aqui:[2] Meu pedido de ajuda e minha apresentação pessoal foi excluída? Gostaria de solicitar a ciência a respeito do assunto, que a Administração e os demais interessados respondam diretamente na discussão, se possível, podemos orientar sobre como devem fazê-lo, ou que me informe o nome bem como informações do contrato se houver contrato com referência a foto de Venâncio Borges de Carvalho que é o tio do meu avô Sr. hidalgo Fúlvio Borges Nunes.
Aqui:[3]Também gostaria que a administração municipal as autoridades locais e os moradores que puderem defender a cidade reclamem através dos editores da Wiki sobre a legitimidade da nossa cidade como lugar onde esta a principal nascente do Rio Uruguai. Podem reclamar diretamente no editor compartilhado ou por meu intermédio basta entrar em contato @buscafamiliar
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ven%C3%A2ncio_Borges_de_Carvalho_.jpg){kind=link}
Aqui:[4]Precisamos de mais editores e colaboradores da nossa cidade pois alguns editores de outros lugares até outros países, resistem em confirmar a legitimidade nas edições sobre o primeiro prefeito da cidade Venâncio Borges de Carvalho e a primeira nascente e principal nascente do Rio Uruguai, que está localizada na cidade .
Venho pedir a ajuda de todos para resolvermos juntos esse tema.
Está correspondência encaminhada com as especificações a respeito da minha assinatura de acordo com o termo de uso de assinatura, não autorizo o uso de minha assinatura presencial ou eletrônica, que sejam feitas sem observar, as especificações deste termo o qual, tem autenticação de três fatores de confirmação, são eles e-mail, endereço residencial, número de Celular e número de referência da assinatura anotada no termo particular de referência e responsabilidade no uso de minha assinatura. Firma Reconhecida. Anotação física tem fé pública no local de assinatura e no livro eletrônico. Favor não copiar ou alterar esta mensagem a qual não deve ser recortada sob inteira responsabilidade de quem assim criminosamente proceder e corromper a interpretação do documento ora apresentado. Todos os direitos reservados.
Firma de Autenticação Cifrada Manual/Mecânica/Padrão/Ouro/ Anotações e memorial descritivo de minha autoria/ Reserva de direitos autorais
- CUPRAPN20D30MNS25FYQ378808FQQSELOFTJSCBRM11H11AUN20TDRARTO7602041DIGITO3*
Muriel Nunes da Silva
Nome Social: François Yvytu Tataendy
Nome de Tratamento: François
Ramo Bom Jardim/Serra "A Igreja de Jesus Cristo dos Santos dos Últimos Dias" Rua Manoel Borges Machado 224 Centro Bom Jardim da Serra SC CEP 88640000
email: standedit@gmail.com
celular: 48 99162-1205
All errors would not exist if I had access to this information during the welcome: 1- What I cannot do: When I started on Wikipedia I wasn't warned about basic things like why certain pages don't have a protected notice like this example: Here: [5] Please! Can you help me? What should I do to be unlocked?
2- How to ask for help: When I started on Wikipedia I was not warned about basic things such as: if I seek help, I can use a help request notice, like this example: Here: {{Helpme}}
I made mistakes and got blocked, my justice failed me, I didn't see anything wrong with what I did, but if I can only solve what was wrong in the articles, know that I corrected it in my innocence and good faith, I would be very happy, from someone, maybe you could unblock me, or bring it up for discussion, I want to continue, I’ll avoid sophistry this time I’ll be more careful. "I spoke once, twice more, but I will not speak again, so I regret the dust and the ashes" this is a quote from the Holy Bible striated from the book of Job. But I don’t know how to reference here yet, I commit to learning how to reference on the test page, before editing any article, and I will ask for guidance as a rule, before making any another edition that could be considered abusive. Excuse me! Please, I ask you to unblock me, with all respect, please. Thanks! François Yvytu Tataendy (talk) 05:40, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Here: [6] Has my request for help and my personal presentation been deleted? I would like to request the science on the matter, that the Administration and the other interested parties respond directly in the discussion, if possible, we can advise on how they should do it, or that they inform me the name as well as the contract information if there is a contract with reference the photo of Venâncio Borges de Carvalho who is the uncle of my grandfather Mr. hidalgo Fúlvio Borges Nunes.
Here: [7] I would also like the municipal administration, local authorities and residents who can defend the city to complain through the Wiki editors about the legitimacy of our city as the place where the main source of the Uruguay River is. You can complain directly in the shared editor or through me just contact @buscafamiliar
Here: [8] We need more editors and contributors from our city because some editors from other places to other countries, resist in confirm the legitimacy in the editions about the first mayor of the city Venâncio Borges de Carvalho and the first source and main source of the Uruguay River, which is located in the city.
I come to ask for your help to resolve this issue together.
Correspondence is sent with the specifications regarding my signature according to the signature use term, I do not authorize the use of my face-to-face or electronic signature, which are made without observing, the specifications of this term which, has three factors authentication confirmation, they are email, home address, mobile number, and subscription reference number noted in the particular term of reference and responsibility for using my subscription. Notarized signature. Physical note has public faith in the place of signature and in the electronic book. Please do not copy or alter this message, which should not be cut under the sole responsibility of those who do so criminally and corrupt the interpretation of the document now presented. All rights reserved.
Manual / Mechanical / Standard / Gold Encrypted Authentication Firm / Annotations and descriptive memorial of my own / Copyright reservation
- CUPRAPN20D30MNS25FYQ378808FQQSELOFTJSCBRM11H11AUN20TDRARTO7602041DIGITO3 *
Muriel Nunes da Silva
Social Name: François Yvytu Tataendy
Treatment Name: François
Bom Jardim / Serra Branch "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints" Rua Manoel Borges Machado 224 Centro Bom Jardim da Serra SC CEP 88640000
email: standedit@gmail.com
cell: 48 99162-1205- @François Yvytu Tataendy: Muriel Nunes da Silva foi bloqueado no ptwiki por Conde Edmond Dantès. François Yvytu Tataendy foi bloqueado no ptwiki por Tks4Fish. Ambos os blocos negaram o uso de páginas de discussão do usuário, portanto, esta é efetivamente uma ou duas solicitações de desbloqueio; no entanto, m:User talk:Tks4Fish#Quero cuidar corrigir e ajudar, tenho essa capacidade, por isso solicito meu desbloqueio não respondeu. O arquivo em questão é supostamente "a foto de Venâncio Borges de Carvalho que é o tio do meu avô Sr. hidalgo Fúlvio Borges Nunes." O local adequado para solicitar a remoção dele é COM:UDR.
- Muriel Nunes da Silva was blocked on ptwiki by Conde Edmond Dantès. François Yvytu Tataendy was blocked on ptwiki by Tks4Fish. Both blocks denied use of user talk pages, so this is effectively one or two unblock request(s); however, m:User talk:Tks4Fish#Quero cuidar corrigir e ajudar, tenho essa capacidade, por isso solicito meu desbloqueio has no reply. The subject file is allegedly "the photo of Venâncio Borges de Carvalho who is the uncle of [their] grandfather Mr. hidalgo Fúlvio Borges Nunes." The proper place to request undeletion of it is COM:UDR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:38, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Thanks for the notification! To tell you the truth, I have no idea what is being discussed here. I blocked the ptwiki account after an administrative decision, that is, I only applied the result of the sysop consensus. Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 01:00, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Conde Edmond Dantès: Thank you. If that consensus was documented publicly, where is that documentation? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:57, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- The consensus was linked by me in the justification of the blockade, this one. As you can see, the four sysop who participated agreed with the sanction applied. In addition to them, five more publishers also agreed. The minimum period of 72 hours was respected and there was unanimous consensus.
- So I don't know the reason for this objection from the blocked publisher. Even more so on Commons, it appears to be an attempt to evade. I even denied the right to edit the discussion because it was used improperly in the previous blocks. Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 17:36, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Conde Edmond Dantès: Thank you. If that consensus was documented publicly, where is that documentation? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:57, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Thanks for the notification! To tell you the truth, I have no idea what is being discussed here. I blocked the ptwiki account after an administrative decision, that is, I only applied the result of the sysop consensus. Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 01:00, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Blue/White/Red Marianne is above threshold of originality. Logos from French ministères are not under PD. No clear permission to release those logos under free license.
- File:ANCT Logo.svg
- File:Logo de la Republique francaise.svg
- File:Logo du Ministère de la cohésion des territoires et des relations avec les collectivités territoriales (2020).svg
- File:Logo du Ministère des solidarités et de la santé (2020).svg
- File:Logo du Ministère du travail (2020).svg
- File:Logo Ministère de l'économie et des finances (2020).svg
- File:Logo Ministère des Armées (2020).svg
- File:Ministère de la culture.svg
- File:Ministère de la justice (2020).svg
- File:Ministère de la Transfomation et de la Fonction Publiques.svg
- File:Ministère de la transition écologique et solidaire.svg
- File:Ministère des Outre-mer.svg
- File:Ministère des sports.svg
- File:MINISTÈRE INTÉRIEUR.svg
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:58, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:44, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Marianne drawing is above threshold of originality. Logos from French State organizations are not under PD. No clear permission to release those logos under free license.
Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:59, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 11:15, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Blue/White/Red Marianne is above threshold of originality. Logos from French ministères are not under PD. No clear permission to release those logos under free license.
Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 11:15, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Neveselbert (mobile) as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: UK photograph remains in copyright until PMA+70 in 2029 Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:47, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete This was previously uploaded as File:Leo Amery 1917.jpg and deleted by Jcb. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 19:39, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Notwithstanding the outcome of the past National Portrait Gallery and Wikimedia Foundation copyright dispute, this portrait is nonfree because the NPG's photographer, Walter Stoneman, died in 1958. As such, this photo will not be free of NPG's copyright restrictions until 2029 (and was previously deleted accordingly). Although non-free, it qualifies for Fair Use on en-wiki, however. JGHowes talk 16:52, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Per JGHowes. -- Geagea (talk) 11:19, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
derivative work of non-free book cover AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:39, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 11:20, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
instagram copyvio Jan Myšák (talk) 15:40, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 11:21, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Didym as no license (No license since). In Poland standard photos made for official documents a considered as a without original work, and by the law original work is prohibited. Fallaner (talk) 06:48, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Even if this is a photo made for a official document (which is uncertain), PD-ineligible is not applicable. --Didym (talk) 11:18, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:06, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Lo subí por error Yungelita (talk) 16:23, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
- I believe. No EXIF, small file and has definition in French (la única vez que Vd no habla en castellano)... Delete, not an "own work" as claimed. --E4024 (talk) 11:53, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
@E4024 No es necesario eleminar este archivo, pues no compromete mi privacidad, en cambio las otras (Nude artist woman y Naked slim woman 2) sí... Gracias en serio y espero entiendas el español... :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iammeandme (talk • contribs) 04:49, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- Pinging @E4024. Brianjd (talk) 05:28, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- User:Iammeandme solamente responda a esta pregunta: Quién sacó esta foto, Vd? Sí o no? Es lo único que necesitamos, una respuesta monosílaba. Gracias. E4024 (talk) 10:36, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- Yo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iammeandme (talk • contribs)
- In that case please upload a larger file with your camera EXIF. You recently said "Esta foto obviamente yo no la tomé, la tomó alguien cercano a mí" at a similar/parallel DR. --E4024 (talk) 17:25, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: I think we can survive another day without this file per the request of the nominator and E4024. --Missvain (talk) 23:10, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Lo subí por error Yungelita (talk) 16:23, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
- Firstly, it is a dubious own work and should be deleted per precaution. Secondly, even if it were a "real own work" (sorry, I do not believe that) we can give a courtesy deletion; of course the uploader/nominator should remove it from ES:WP where they themselves added it to an article. IMHO Delete. --E4024 (talk) 02:49, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:10, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Renamed per obvious name error. Redirect should be also deleted, by the same reason. Bestiasonica (talk) 08:21, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:10, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ARMcgrath as Copyvio (copyright) and the most recent rationale was: not own work
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion as nominator has provided Zero evidence for copyvio. Own Google-Images search did not yield any hit prior to our upload and none of later hits was credited to somebody else. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:43, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. This looks to me like a scan of an old snapshot, not professional quality. Absent any evidence of copyvio, I see no reason to delete. Station1 (talk) 01:09, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
I, Matthew Proujansky, am the photographer of this photograph. It is, as noted, a scan of an old photograph. I hereby affirm that it is my own work and I own the rights to it. I allow use of this photograph as licensed on its Wikimedia Commons page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattpro (talk • contribs) 19:34, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 23:11, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Merci de bien vouloir supprimer cette photo de Wikimedia Commons. Fabien.astic (talk) 08:52, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 23:11, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted statue, sculptor fi:Lauri Leppänen died in in 1977. No FOP for statues in Finland. Undelete in 2053. MKFI (talk) 09:08, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:11, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 09:11, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- This is a screenshot of fascist claims of one of Russian Wikipedia's active users — Павел Шехтман on Facebook. This file will be used in Russian Wikipedia's talk page about him.--Wertuose (talk) 21:28, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Wertuose: First, the file is not used on any page. Secondly, file has no educational significance except the text, is violates COM:PS. Finally, the article is not published by free license. Uploading to commons and publishing with free license is a copyright infringement. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 14:06, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:11, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
svg render error BrandonJCox (talk) 09:52, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:12, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
shouldn't it be deleted due to absense of Freedom of panorama in Ukraine? rubin16 (talk) 10:03, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:12, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Была загружена более качественная версия. Урыл (talk) 10:53, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:12, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Superseded by better vector file File:Flag of the Ewe people.svg. Centralismo (talk) 12:12, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:12, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
out of project scope, also no valid license Didym (talk) 12:36, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:12, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
very poor quality Hugo.arg (talk) 12:37, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:12, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
While some of these Japanese stamp probably qualify for {{PD-Japan}} (pre-1968) they don't appear to comply with URAA.
- File:Japanes stamps 8.jpg
- File:Japanes stamps 7.jpg
- File:Japanes stamps 6.jpg
- File:Japanes stamps 5.jpg
- File:Japanes stamps 4.jpg
- File:Japanes stamps 3.jpg
- File:Japanes stamps 2.jpg
- File:Japanes stamps.jpg
Ww2censor (talk) 13:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:13, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope, artwork without obvious educational use 2001:14BB:637:535A:B57E:DC64:397B:DA65 13:09, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:13, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Screenshot of image at https://www.sportbreizh.com/Actualites-Anthony-Jullien_-de-la-Sportbreizh-au-peloton-pro-1925-42698-0-0.html Ytoyoda (talk) 13:52, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:13, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
From https://www.sportbreizh.com/Actualites-LA-SPORTBREIZH-2019_-tout-ce-que-vous-vouliez-savoir-_-1925-41221-0-0.html Ytoyoda (talk) 13:54, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:13, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
“FBMD” in metadata indicate these are Facebook downloads
Ytoyoda (talk) 13:56, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:14, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Maybe copyvio ComputerHotline (talk) 13:58, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: 1963 artwork. --Missvain (talk) 23:14, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
No useful content; subject not identifed. Likely a selfie/ personal pic. Description is "OK". Possible test upload. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:12, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
![14:12, 22 November 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/11/22#c-Pigsonthewing-2020-11-22T14:12:00.000Z-File:POLYHEDRON_WITH_NO_VERTEX_VISIBLE_FROM_CENTER.png".jpg){kind=link}
- Delete unused personal photo. Misleading name, this is not a polyhedron but a personal photograph. JIP (talk) 14:22, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete speedy delete! --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 14:03, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:14, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
![23:14, 3 December 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/11/22#c-Missvain-2020-12-03T23:14:00.000Z-File:POLYHEDRON_WITH_NO_VERTEX_VISIBLE_FROM_CENTER.png".jpg){kind=link}
Probably not an own work. See also :
- File:Fendre Raymond.jpg
- File:Meyer Joseph maire.jpg
- File:Maire d'Osthouse.jpg
- File:Stanislas Zorn de Bulach.jpg
- File:Ehrhart Marcel René.jpg
VateGV ◦ taper la discut’ ◦ 14:25, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @Missvain: it seems like the first file has not been deleted yet. Thanks. VateGV ◦ taper la discut’ ◦ 12:24, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Done! Missvain (talk) 17:05, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
It doesn't appear that the DEA took this photograph. Seems to be an acquaintance. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:26, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Wrong license and logo still under copyrights. Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:43, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Wrong license and logo still under copyrights. Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:44, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep As the uploader/SVG creator; this logo was published first in 1965 ans used as the club visuals and replaced in 2001 by a new logo. The freedom of panorama in Tunisia says: "The work meets one of the following criteria: It is an anonymous work or pseudonymous work and 50 years have passed since the date of its publication (or creation, whatever date is the latest)". --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:42, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 23:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
File:DSC 0538. Madagascar, Isalo National Park. An unusual rock formation known as Lady Queen of Isalo. Also seen on the 1000 Ariary banknote.jpg
[edit]
COM:DW of bank note. No indication that Madagascar notes are free at COM:MADAGASCAR or COM:CUR. Эlcobbola talk 14:50, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Text is clearly readable and should be copyrighted. Possible infringement of literary copyright. Yasu (talk) 14:56, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
and Category:Material didático de Artes Visuais
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
File description page blanked by original uploader with comment Because I don’t want this on the internet. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:09, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- The article about her on EN:WP was deleted. The file is not being used other than in Wikidata. E4024 (talk) 20:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
@E4024: The article consists entirely of a CSD G7 tag. That does not mean it has been deleted (although it looks like it will be). Brianjd (talk) 09:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)- Article has now been deleted. Brianjd (talk) 05:38, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded more than 4 years ago. Given license cannot be revoked. Might be deleted by courtesy only. --Achim (talk) 20:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- Uploader also added file to enwiki article and left it there for more than 4 years. No good reason for courtesy deletion. Brianjd (talk) 09:57, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep In use. But the enwiki history and talk page suggest that the subject is not notable, at least by Wikipedia standards. Brianjd (talk) 09:57, 25 November 2020 (UTC) [edited: Brianjd (talk) 05:38, 26 November 2020 (UTC)]
- Note: Her WD item has also been deleted. Of course we can always keep people in Category:Women smiling with teeth. --E4024 (talk) 13:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- User:FeelTheJak1, if you want a courtesy deletion please write it below and sign. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 13:49, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
The uploader uploaded this image with the wrong license, and didn't even wrote the author. Does this respect the Threshold of originality? ValeJappo (talk) 16:20, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:43, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello EugeneZelenko.There is no copyright issue with this image. Resolution may have been lowered as the image was transferred by me through WhatsApp and Messenger twice before I uploaded it from my laptop. Spandan Beat (talk)
Kept: We're going to assume good faith while letting the uploader sent in permissions. --Missvain (talk) 23:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
The image used is copyrighted to Talwar Gallery as mentioned by the up-loader and would need OTRS permission. This is not own work. Please see this [9] - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:53, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Can you please explain what is being mentioned here? Not sure I follow what is being expected, nor do I follow the background. Thanks. Ktin (talk) 19:57, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Alright, found some more information that might clarify here. If you see this link [10], there are two uploads. The base version is the own work by the team at the gallery that has uploaded the content. So, that is the "own work" not by me, but by the user who has uploaded their work. I worked on cropping the image to use in the infobox. I have reuploaded the cropped image to the same location to show traceability prior to using the image in the infobox. I am not claiming that this is my "own work". Ktin (talk) 22:01, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
![[10]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1605980398183_0_Anjum.jpg){kind=link}
- In parallel, I have sent-in and email to OTRS. Awaiting follow-up. Ktin (talk) 06:47, 23 November 20
- OTRS received Ticket:2020112210006215 --- FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:14, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
- Email from the owner has been sent to the OTRS email ID. Updates requested from the OTRS Admin / Clerk. Should be good to close this thread / discussion. Ktin (talk) 18:34, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS pending. --Missvain (talk) 23:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright infringement, no real source is mentioned DZwarrior1 (talk) 21:09, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- that's not copyright infringement, it's clearly just a drawing inspired by the crest. the crest's copyright is based on "lion" and "1860", this file doesn't contain any of both.
- the creator marked his drawing as "gemeinfrei", when he posted it back then. source and creator is real, the links just don't work anymore.--Ampfinger (talk) 08:30, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
- btw: the official crest is marked as public domain.--Ampfinger (talk) 08:37, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Assuming good faith based on Ampfinger. --Missvain (talk) 23:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
photo of non-free image Dinamik (talk) 21:47, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Unused unnecessary crop. E4024 (talk) 21:55, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
No longer used on the frwiki project it was intended for, after the improvement of a template. Baidax (talk) 22:02, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Wit t-shirt met rode boorden, kleurenfoto van zwarte man, opschrift “CAPUT”, sticker met imitatie-beeldmerk Tommy Hilfiger, objectnr 76167.JPG
[edit]
I'm not sure if the image falls into de minimis or should be deleted instead, because Tupac's face. Although the image of the t-shirt is shared under a BY SA license, the photograph on it is a derivative work of this picture of Tupac taken by Danny Clinch for Rolling Stone. Gusama Romero </talk> 22:21, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
False: the file name suggests this is the coat of arms of Balcarce Partido. This is the true coat of arms File:Escudo de Balcarce.png. Frodar (talk) 22:52, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
False: the file name suggests this is the coat of arms of Berisso Partido. This is the true coat of arms File:Escudo-berisso.jpg. Frodar (talk) 22:53, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
derivative of book-content; requires permission at least for the photography. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:21, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:Mayor Bernal.jpg
- File:Usa servizio Militare.jpg
- File:Primer curso de colombia.jpg
- File:Dialogando con el Presidente Alfonso Lopez Pumarejo.jpg
- File:Revista de el Mayor.jpg
Deleted: procedural close: already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:53, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
I'm afraid this is a professional architecture rendering, so we would need the permission from the author to publish it under a free license. Gnom (talk) 12:24, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 07:04, 11 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 3 December 2020 --Krdbot 14:47, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright: "Glassgowfotografie" is attributed as author. There is no obvious link to the uploader si copyvio can be assumed. Wo st 01 (talk / cont) 15:23, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 06:41, 11 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 3 December 2020 --Krdbot 14:47, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:30, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 06:57, 11 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 3 December 2020 --Krdbot 14:47, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Auguste Biaggi died in 1965. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:F5DF:7D06:BE58:FC94 14:41, 22 November 2020 (UTC) Pourquoi vouloir retirer ce fichier ? Cette image est un bas relief de la main d'Auguste Biaggi. Ce bas relief lui a été demandé par mon père (Guy Morizet), parent d'Auguste & Lucienne Biaggi, en hommage à Alfred Recoura "patron" de l'atelier de l'École des Beaux-arts de Paris où G. Morizet étudié.
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 02:21, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Bonjour, de quel droit avec vous supprimé cette page et cette image ? Merci de bien vouloir la rétablir. Cordialement, C. Morizet
From twitter. Needs permission Gbawden (talk) 15:40, 22 November 2020 (UTC) Hi. I added the picture of Dianna Russini. I told her (and others) on a Twitter conversation that I fixed some joke edits to her page. She thanked me and asked if I would add a picture. I took the picture from her Twitter profile and added it. I have no idea if someone else owns it, but she uses it. Does anyone know if it is owned by someone else? Bob Caldwell CSL (talk) 15:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 02:21, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ITN-ENHANCE Project (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copied from various non-free sources (published journal articles or online databases/catalogs). They each have multiple refs but it's not clear which (if any) actually support what aspects of the specific content (except to the extent there are also in-image watermarks to nonfree sources on some of them). COM:PCP, this user's uploads are all suspect, except for the pure chemical diagrams (marked "**") that could instead be relicensed {{PD-chem}}. Though even some of those are poor enough to merit replacement. Listing it all here for unified handling.
- File:(1) Tris(ethylmethylamido)(tert-butylimido)tantalum(V), C13H33N4Ta.png (**) → replaced by File:Tris(ethylmethylamido)(tert-butylimido)tantalum(V)-2D-structure.svg. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:03, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- File:(1) Tris(diethylamido)(tert-butylimido)tantalum(V), (CH3)3CNTa(N(C2H5)2)3".png (**) → replaced by File:Tris(diethylamido)(tert-butylimido)tantalum(V)-2D-structure.svg. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 10:49, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- File:(1) Pentakis(dimethylamino)tantalum(V), Ta(N(CH3)2)5.png (**) → replaced by File:Pentakis(dimethylamino)tantalum(V)-2D-structure.svg. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:25, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- File:(3) Niobium ethoxide, Nb(OCH2CH3)5.png
- File:(2) Niobium ethoxide, Nb(OCH2CH3)5.png
- File:(1) Niobium ethoxide, Nb(OCH2CH3)5.png
- File:(2) Nb(OEt)5 , Niobium pentaethoxide, C10H25NbO5.png
- File:(1) Nb(OEt)5 , Niobium pentaethoxide, C10H25NbO5.png
- File:(1) Nb(thd)2Cl3, Bis-dipivaloylmethanate niobium N-chloride, C4H10Cl3NbO2.png
- File:(2) Nb(THD)4, Niobium tetrakis(2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dionate), C44H76NbO8.png
- File:(1) Nb(THD)4, Niobium tetrakis(2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dionate), C44H76NbO8.png
- File:(2) La(hfa)3diglyme.png
- File:(1) La(hfa)3diglyme.png
- File:(1) Ni(acac)2, Nickel(II) acetylacetonate, Ni(C5H7O2)2.png
- File:(1) Ni(tmhd)2,Nickel(II) bis(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedionate), Ni(OCC(CH3)3CHCOC(CH3)3)2.png
- File:(2) Ni(hfa)2tmeda.png
- File:(1) Ni(hfa)2tmeda.png
- File:(1) Fe(tmhd)3,Tris(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedionato)iron(III), Fe(C11H19O2)3.png (**) → replaced by File:Tris(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedionato)iron(III)-2D-structure.svg. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:31, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- File:(2) Bi(phenyl)3,Triphenylbismuth(III), (C6H5)3Bi.png
- File:(1) Bi(phenyl)3,Triphenylbismuth(III), (C6H5)3Bi.png (**) → replaced by high-quality skeletal formula File:Triphenylbismuth-2D-skeletal.svg based on cited literature.
- File:(3) Potassium 2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dionate, K(thd), K(tmhd), K(dpm), C11H19KO2.png
- File:(2) ((File-(1) Potassium 2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dionate, K(thd), K(tmhd), K(dpm), C11H19KO2.png-thumb-Potassium 2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dionate, K(thd), K(tmhd), K(dpm), C11H19KO2)).png
- File:(1) Potassium 2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dionate, K(thd), K(tmhd), K(dpm), C11H19KO2.png (**) → re-drawn
- File:(3) Potassium tert-butoxide (KOtBu) C4H9KO.png
- File:(2) Potassium tert-butoxide (KOtBu) C4H9KO.png
- File:(1) Potassium tert-butoxide (KOtBu) C4H9KO.png
- File:(1) Potassium-niobium hexakis(ethoxide), KNb(OEt)6.png
- File:(1) Sodium Tert Butoxide, NaOC(CH3)3.png
- File:(1) Sodium 2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dionate phenantroline, Na(thd)(phen).png
- File:(4) Sodium 2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dionate, Na(thd).png
- File:(2) Sodium 2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dionate, Na(thd).png
- File:(1) Sodium 2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dionate, Na(thd).png (**) → replaced by File:Sodium-2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dionate-2D-structure.svg. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:44, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
- File:(1) Sodium hexafluoroacetylacetonate, NaC5HF6O2.png (**) → replaced by File:Sodium-hexafluoroacetylacetonate-2D-skeletal.svg. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 11:03, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
- File:(1) Sodium cyclopentadienide, C5H5Na.png
- File:(1) Sodium niobium ethoxide, NaNb(OC2H5)6.png
- File:(2) Lithium niobium ethoxide, LiNb(OC2H5)6.png
- File:(1) Lithium niobium ethoxide, LiNb(OC2H5)6.png
- File:(2) (Li(OtBu))6, Lithium tert-butoxide, C4H9LiO.png
- File:(1) (Li(OtBu))6, Lithium tert-butoxide, C4H9LiO.png
- File:Lithium isopropoxide C3H7LiO.png (**) → replaced by File:Lithium-isopropoxide-2D-structure.svg. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 13:08, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- File:Li(acac), Lithium acetylacetonate, C5H7LiO2.png
- File:(2) Lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide, LiN(SiMe3)2.png
- File:(3) Li(TMHD), Lithium Tetramethylheptanedionate, C11H19LiO2.png
- File:(2) Li(TMHD), Lithium Tetramethylheptanedionate, C11H19LiO2.png
- File:Li(TMHD), Lithium Tetramethylheptanedionate, C11H19LiO2.png
- File:Lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide, LiN(SiMe3)2.png (**) → File:LiNtms2Trimer.png should be used instead.
_Tris(ethylmethylamido)(tert-butylimido)tantalum(V),_C13H33N4Ta.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
(tert-butylimido)tantalum(V)-2D-structure.svg){kind=link}
_Tris(diethylamido)(tert-butylimido)tantalum(V),_(CH3)3CNTa(N(C2H5)2)3%22.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
(tert-butylimido)tantalum(V)-2D-structure.svg){kind=link}
_Pentakis(dimethylamino)tantalum(V),_Ta(N(CH3)2)5.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
tantalum(V)-2D-structure.svg){kind=link}
_Niobium_ethoxide,_Nb(OCH2CH3)5.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Niobium_ethoxide,_Nb(OCH2CH3)5.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Niobium_ethoxide,_Nb(OCH2CH3)5.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Nb(OEt)5_,_Niobium_pentaethoxide,_C10H25NbO5.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Nb(OEt)5_,_Niobium_pentaethoxide,_C10H25NbO5.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Nb(thd)2Cl3,_Bis-dipivaloylmethanate_niobium_N-chloride,_C4H10Cl3NbO2.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Nb(THD)4,_Niobium_tetrakis(2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dionate),_C44H76NbO8.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Nb(THD)4,_Niobium_tetrakis(2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dionate),_C44H76NbO8.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_La(hfa)3diglyme.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_La(hfa)3diglyme.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ni(acac)2,_Nickel(II)_acetylacetonate,_Ni(C5H7O2)2.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ni(tmhd)2,Nickel(II)_bis(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedionate),_Ni(OCC(CH3)3CHCOC(CH3)3)2.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ni(hfa)2tmeda.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ni(hfa)2tmeda.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Fe(tmhd)3,Tris(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedionato)iron(III),_Fe(C11H19O2)3.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
iron(III)-2D-structure.svg){kind=link}
_Bi(phenyl)3,Triphenylbismuth(III),_(C6H5)3Bi.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Bi(phenyl)3,Triphenylbismuth(III),_(C6H5)3Bi.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Potassium_2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dionate,_K(thd),_K(tmhd),_K(dpm),_C11H19KO2.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_((File-(1)_Potassium_2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dionate,_K(thd),_K(tmhd),_K(dpm),_C11H19KO2.png-thumb-Potassium_2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dionate,_K(thd),_K(tmhd),_K(dpm),_C11H19KO2)).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Potassium_2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dionate,_K(thd),_K(tmhd),_K(dpm),_C11H19KO2.png){kind=link}
_Potassium_tert-butoxide_(KOtBu)_C4H9KO.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Potassium_tert-butoxide_(KOtBu)_C4H9KO.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Potassium_tert-butoxide_(KOtBu)_C4H9KO.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Potassium-niobium_hexakis(ethoxide),_KNb(OEt)6.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Sodium_Tert_Butoxide,_NaOC(CH3)3.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Sodium_2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dionate_phenantroline,_Na(thd)(phen).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Sodium_2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dionate,_Na(thd).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Sodium_2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dionate,_Na(thd).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Sodium_2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dionate,_Na(thd).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Sodium_hexafluoroacetylacetonate,_NaC5HF6O2.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Sodium_cyclopentadienide,_C5H5Na.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Sodium_niobium_ethoxide,_NaNb(OC2H5)6.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Lithium_niobium_ethoxide,_LiNb(OC2H5)6.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Lithium_niobium_ethoxide,_LiNb(OC2H5)6.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(Li(OtBu))6,_Lithium_tert-butoxide,_C4H9LiO.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(Li(OtBu))6,_Lithium_tert-butoxide,_C4H9LiO.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Lithium_acetylacetonate,_C5H7LiO2.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Lithium_bis(trimethylsilyl)amide,_LiN(SiMe3)2.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Li(TMHD),_Lithium_Tetramethylheptanedionate,_C11H19LiO2.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Li(TMHD),_Lithium_Tetramethylheptanedionate,_C11H19LiO2.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Lithium_Tetramethylheptanedionate,_C11H19LiO2.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
amide,_LiN(SiMe3)2.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
DMacks (talk) 05:57, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. All diagrams should be deleted instantly, the files marked with (**) might be replaced by better version. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:35, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: all except the marked (**) entries per discussion. --Leyo 11:58, 21 December 2020 (UTC) PS. Some of the kept files urgently need to get a correct or higher quality version.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:34, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Ok, well you can see that the original file is CC0 here https://archive.org/details/aprsemailraspberrypi. About the nobility; I am an amateur radio operator myself and have used this guide before. It is completely accurate and a great guide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HamRadioOperator73 (talk • contribs) 13:24, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:WEBHOST. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
These are images of old postcards that are no longer under copyright. Sanya3 (talk) 07:13, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- To clarify: This file was originally nominated for speedy deletion (no licence) by Didym. Brianjd (talk) 09:05, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Comment I have requested folks from Commons talk:WikiProject Postcards to come by and take a look at these. Sometimes US postcards are no known copyright, for example. Missvain (talk) 23:09, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The top two are undivided back postcards dating from 1907-1915 and are unquestionably {{PD-US-expired}}. Bottom right is linen (1930-1945) with no copyright marking and thus {{PD-US-no notice}}. Bottom left is white border (1915-1945); 99% of postcards from that era have no copyright marking, while the few that were copyright-marked were almost never renewed, so it's safe to also assume it's PD-US-no notice. These are simple scans, so {{PD-scan}} applies and there's no additional copyright there. I have updated the file page with the relevant dates and copyright tags. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:04, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: as per above. --Yann (talk) 22:17, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
See COM:FOP Nepal. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:24, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Magog the Ogre, This was actually built by a British guy in the UK. CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) 12:29, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
- But it's located in Nepal. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:17, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:09, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Image now has a license. Evrik (talk) 19:25, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Didym as no license (No license since). In Poland standard photos made for official documents a considered as a without original work, and by the law original work is prohibited. Because with foto was made before 1989 (Anna Jasińska died before this date) I changed license to avoid future nominations. Fallaner (talk) 06:51, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Museo Ardengo Soffici
[edit]Artworks by Ardegno Soffici, who died in 1964. All files will be PD in 2035 (70 ypma).
Several uploads were done during WLM 2019 in Italy, but the permission for the museum mentions: "immagini dei monumenti" (trans. Images of the monuments), not "images of the artworks hosted in the monuments". I reckon that this authorization is not sufficient to publish Soffici's artworks under a free license.
- File:Almanacco della guerra, 1915, disegni di ottone rosai.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, autoritratto, 1901.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, autoritratto, 1907.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, bozzetto 02.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, bozzetto per la fanciulla del west, atto secodno, 1954.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, bozzetto.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, casa del pio, 1940.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, casa di campagna, 1955.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, contadini, 1928.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, copertina per bïf§zf+18 simultaneità e chimismi lirici, 1915.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, copertina per la ghirba, n.1, 7 aprile 1918.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, disegno per la ghirba, 7 aprile 1918.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, donna nuda che si asciuga, 1910.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, due donne con rosario, 1907.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, due studi di nudo sdraiato.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, fanciullo dal fiore, 1928-29.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, figure (popolana e fanciulla), 1933.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, i mendicanti, 1907.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, la cena di emmaus, 1941.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, la ghirba, 14 aprile 1918, impiccato.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, la ghirba, 14 aprile 1918, xilografia.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, la ghirba, 14 aprile 1918.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, la ghirba, 21 aprile 1918, copertina censurata.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, la ghirba, 21 aprile 1918, copertina sostitutiva dopo censura.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, la ghirba, ultima pagina, 7 aprile 1918.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, la potatura, 1962.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, la route, 1911.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, laura, 1943.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, le bagnanti, 1911.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, lettera ad ottone rosai, 11 maggio 1915.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, mamma egle, 1904.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, margherite, 1911.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, mendicante, 1913, vitografia.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, miracolo di san francesco, studio ad acquerello e matita, 1933-34.JPG
- File:Ardengo soffici, miracolo di san francesco, studio per la sistemazione dell'affresco, 1933-34.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, Natura morta con popone. 1948, cocomero.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, Natura morta, 1933.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, nevicata, 1943.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, nudo sdraiato, 1927.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, paesaggio a chiavris, 1916.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, paesaggio con alberi, 1942, 01.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, paesaggio con alberi, 1942, 02.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, paesaggio toscano, 1952, 01.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, paesaggio toscano, 1952, 02.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, paesaggio toscano, viottola, 1925.JPG
- File:Ardengo soffici, processione II, 1933, 01.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, processione II, 1933, 02.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, regolatore per i tiri indiretti dell'artiglieria.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, riproduzione del distrutto 'compenetrazione di piani plastici' (1913), nella cornice originale.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, ritratto della moglie, 1942.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, ritratto di guillaume apollinaire, 1914.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, ritratto di valderia, 1941.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, Scomposizione di piani di zuccheriere e bottiglia, 1913.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, strada di granaio, 1942.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, Strada di Poggiali.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, strudio per miracolo di san francesco, 1933-34, frati.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, strudio per miracolo di san francesco, 1933-34, paesaggio.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, tramonto a poggio, 1925.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, trasporto funebre, 1910.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, vaso giallo con fiori, 1951.jpg
- File:Ardengo soffici, vaso rosso con fiori, 1929.jpg
- File:La cara mamma.jpg
File:Medardo rosso, gavroche, 1882.jpgMedardo Rosso is an artist in PD anyway --Sailko (talk) 20:44, 22 November 2020 (UTC)- File:Pianta della battaglia di vittorio veneto, 24 ottobre-4 novembre 1918.jpg
,_1933.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_nella_cornice_originale.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ruthven (msg) 16:58, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, pcp. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:13, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep In museum Soffici what else were you supposed to take picture of? The buildings is "Scuderie Medicee" (second in the list), so if they listed separately the authorization is obviously for the artworks, which were donated to the municipality by Soffici itself. In 2 years the municipality did not complain. User:Alexmar983 can clarify --Sailko (talk) 20:44, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- As far as I remember they actually intended also the artworks since they got them as a donation, similarly to other situations, where we trust the local authorities when they say they can do so (I hope nobody make the comment when you say that the permission of the artist or the family is always necessary, you trust one part involved (who takes the responsibility) or you ask for 'both of them; you can go on both ways depending on how accurate you want to be but the idea that only the first one of these requirements is necessary to be sure about the rights is something some commons users think but it's not like that... rights can be given with the artworks, it depends on the situation, you can have something that protects you legally or be accurate, in this case it was intended to be the first scenario). At the time I was still trying to use the templates from WMI, now I use more precise versions if I got a clear feedback and of course we also do not include some of them if they are not sure. I have no time to ask the municipality right now for a more precise signed statement, especially with the pandemics they have more important things to do and maybe the people involved were also changed in the meantime. Considering that the images existed since circa two years with nobody having any issue, people could have simply asked and we could have fixed it I suppose, but if a direct deletion is started is mostly because it's not the fixing part that we are focused here, and I really have no energy now to be focused on that myself.--Alexmar983 (talk) 22:52, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Sailko: A "painting" is not a "monument". The permission is clearly for the building (as all the other permissions in that document) and you were allowed to photograph it.
- @Alexmar983: You understand that we need a written permission for the artworks, otherwise anybody "can remember" that the permission was for <write here anything you like to photograph>. In this case I trust that the museum had the permission from the heirs, given its name (but it is not so clear from the museum description: no link with the family of the artist appears, so they could hold a permission for their catalogues only, unless proven otherwise). If you can have a precise statement from the Museum and/or the Municipality that they are the copyright holders of all the museums artworks, and that they authorise WLM to publish them with a Creative Commons license, we'll be happy to undelete them. Mind, we need this exact wording, so that they assume the legal responsability of declaring that they own the copyright, in case of dispute. --Ruthven (msg) 18:25, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- Ruthven do you understand that in 2018 I was still trying to follow the template of WMI? Now I simply do something else. I know what you need, it's not the right moment to ask. So delete.--Alexmar983 (talk) 18:39, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Alexmar983: You understand that if we wanted to "delete" without looking for a solution, I (or another admin) could have done that already (and also blocked Sailko, given that it's not his first problematic upload). If WLM wants to approve permissions (or WMI for what it matters), it has to abide to the same standards we follow on this project. This requires to the organisers to be precise and rigorous in verifying the obtained permissions. Clearly it hasn't be done in this specific case. I am sorry that it's not the right moment for you, but I reckon that's not the central point of this DR: we hope that a solution can come from the users writing here. --Ruthven (msg) 11:55, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- I don't put it for the artworks. it was precise. For some artworks we do but in this case that's not what happened. I verify about the building (and I do it much more than WMI) and if the interior is fine I keep it, I cannot put "exterior" tag always, which we do in Tuscany much more than in other regions. For example this image is descriptive and a de minimis, and the museum is an historic building per se. Our list are getting so precise that we even put single items inside a building to focus on those and not the other ones... there were authorizations rewritten for this purpose. I have been asking for years for a more defined tag systems with no reply (in the huge framework of things to fix as well), you can ask every museum on the list and discover dozens who begged me to put this or that with me removing them (and you can see from the difference between lists and authorizations as well). I was criticized right this edition by a museum for forcing the insertion of the exterior tag in the list, that WMI instead did not put with no check.
- The more we are free, the more we can fix it for sure. So if you want to ask to an organizer ask WMI first. You had enough clues when you were a national WLM juror to see that they have not set up any standardized way to exclude the artworks and you should know by now since I have pointed it many times in WMI that this control is NOT done in almost all the other regions. But since you care here, that means I am finally morally authorized to fix this once for all. I will ignore the protest of the national organizers if they disagree with my choices, they had years to fix the issue. So i have no clue what you told them in private but thanks for telling me in public right now. They can't stop me because it's not fair for people to pay about the disfunctionality of the system. If you had done this in public inside WMI the problem would have been already fixed for all other regions where it can be much worse, since almost all towns are putting random museums everywhere right now (and I told them NOT to automatize the process also for this reason, ignored). I could keep track of it much better if I did not have to spend my whole time redrafting dozens of poorly written authorizations every year that we specifically ask WMI not to ask and collect...--Alexmar983 (talk) 02:11, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- When Sailko insert something inside a museum whose interior is technically free, I mostly see during the voting procedure and ask later. It's not about "before", it's "after". At that point a range of options can occur. Even if they don't send me anything I certainly do not start a deletion if they still tell me they have the rights. Some museums tell me that "WMi does not ask me about that in their mails" and close the phone, it's "certified mail" and mine is just a phone call. Everybody cuts a corner. For them the concept expressed by Sailko (that the presence of a separate line for museums was enough) was sufficiently clear. I act if they clearly tell me they DON'T have the rights, or so does the artist themselves(and I know a few after some years). If they want to fix it later, they still can. In no way the list forces you to upload the images of what is inside, but still I cannot just put "exteriors" tag to avoid this at all, it depends. You saw how some artworks were free in any case, I could not skip that oppotunity as well. Also, what is the structure of the complex? is there a de minimis image that is possible? Are there internal spaces without the museusm? If it suggests to put artworks "directly" it is only because the architecture of the list as a whole is crappy, but we know it's crappy, you can find examples of me telling people (if they ask me) NOT to upload this or that complaining how crappy it is.
- Coming to this case, you can get some piece of paper to fix it but just not now. As a jurors of WLM you should know how complex the real process is if done correctly, I have been telling for years to WMI that "the send a mail and copy and paste in a list" is not enough, it takes a huge amount of preparation (one or two months per cultural institution, usually) sometimes scrolling the whole list of inventory and a one week deletion procedure is simply not enough time even if the museum agreed and even in normal time and even if you have a direct contact. I am still surpised I do it for fre and they don't really pay anybody to do it properly. From the practical point of view, it's just not possible. So delete them. When this COVID mess is over, if they can they will send the updated authorizations. You can delete all similar images uploaded from museums in WMI as well, and see that noone of them will be resolved in one week.--Alexmar983 (talk) 02:11, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Alexmar983: You understand that if we wanted to "delete" without looking for a solution, I (or another admin) could have done that already (and also blocked Sailko, given that it's not his first problematic upload). If WLM wants to approve permissions (or WMI for what it matters), it has to abide to the same standards we follow on this project. This requires to the organisers to be precise and rigorous in verifying the obtained permissions. Clearly it hasn't be done in this specific case. I am sorry that it's not the right moment for you, but I reckon that's not the central point of this DR: we hope that a solution can come from the users writing here. --Ruthven (msg) 11:55, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- Ruthven do you understand that in 2018 I was still trying to follow the template of WMI? Now I simply do something else. I know what you need, it's not the right moment to ask. So delete.--Alexmar983 (talk) 18:39, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - There might be many reasons for a mistake or a misunderstanding, but what is really clear is only that the authorization was released for "images of monuments"; this phrase has a concrete legal meaning, since the Scuderie Medicee are a properly called monument in themselves (with a story and an autonomous artistic value), independently from the artworks they contain. Reading what has been written, nothing can be found about Soffici's artworks. So we have to keep on what can be read into the document, and not on what we all think that they should have written into it: they didn't write it, and quod non est in actis non est in mundo (what is not in the acts, [legally] simply doesn't exist). Additionally, the countercheck says that what has been written has a legal meaning and makes sense even without Soffici's works. Btw, pcp explains what shouldn't be objected in these cases, and why.
@Ruthven: , the mere possession of the artworks doesn't necessarily imply that the copyright has been handed over, as well, not even in case of long-lasting possession; it seems unlikely that it hadn't, I thoroughly agree, yet we still need someone that (credibly) takes a (plausible) responsibility about it. To date, Soffici's artworks are 56 pma and if a speculation can be made, is that Soffici's heirs should hold the copyright, unless otherwise (credibly) explained. --g (talk) 02:14, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- of course it i clear, I never said to keep them. They could have redrafted it at the time, or it could have been a better moment but whatever. Also of course the mere possession does not say the copyright is not theirs. What Commons users forget is that the mere statement of the authors does not imply they still have the rights as well. So again, and I will always repeat it whenever possible: if you want to be legally covered, just one of the part should take responsibility, If you want to be precise you always need both of them. I have a sufficient archive of real life examples to prove that. Most of the time artists sign this or that and than the agents claim otherwise, they are quite clueless. Like, this year a municipality said that it owns the right of an artwork because of the contract, they were very clear. Still the artist apparently said otherwise, but he was probably not right, he just did not accept what he agreed years ago. Just to be sure, I did not put it in the list. So never think that asking only the artists tell you the whole story, every contract is different. So if you want to be precise you ask for both, which means that all images authorized by artist but NOT authorized by current owner if copy of the contract is not shown should be removed from Commons. (and some contracts are "classified" upon request...) This is excessive, and you ask what is needed to be be legally protected, and the reason why I remind this is not because they are in this case, but only because it took us years to make people understand this concept and cut the asymmetry of the interpretation, and I therefore remind it every time. We don't want -if the authorization from the museum appears - to start the deletion procedures again, so it's better be clear.--Alexmar983 (talk) 02:11, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- I was just pointing out a detail about the relationship between the author and the possessor, which is also a distinction between ownership and possession in the classical legal sense: sometimes the artwork can be detained by someone while the artist withholds his rights on it. This is why, when you need to investigate - and you usually don't need to - you better ask the author (or his heirs): whatever the author/heirs tell you, be it true or false, you have asked the most important ring of the chain, the starting one. In case he lies about it, it would be his own and sole responsibility, he will eventually explain it to those whom he handed over the copyright to, not to me, not to you: we will just say "the author told us", and that will be reasonably enough for us. Of course, when it is an institution that detains an artwork and tells you "we hold all the rights on it", there is no reason not to believe them: in case of claims we will just say "an institution told us, go and ask them, sue them and wish them bad luck, do whatever you like with them". And that would be reasonably enough for us.
But we've got far into theoretics, now, this case is instead, more simply, just another kind of incident: they told you something and they didn't write it. Everybody trusted them, because our attitude is not against anyone, because why should we distrust an institution; but when the moment comes to look at the permission, they didn't write it. We don't have a permission for Soffici's artworks. We have it for the monument. So this would be a correctly authorized shot: this is the monument. To have Soffici's artworks undeleted, instead, either the museum sends a better permission, or Soffici's heirs send OTRS their clearance. Or we wait 14 years and in the meantime Italian law (Codex Urbanii and descendants) will also have been brought back to common sense. --g (talk) 09:48, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- I was just pointing out a detail about the relationship between the author and the possessor, which is also a distinction between ownership and possession in the classical legal sense: sometimes the artwork can be detained by someone while the artist withholds his rights on it. This is why, when you need to investigate - and you usually don't need to - you better ask the author (or his heirs): whatever the author/heirs tell you, be it true or false, you have asked the most important ring of the chain, the starting one. In case he lies about it, it would be his own and sole responsibility, he will eventually explain it to those whom he handed over the copyright to, not to me, not to you: we will just say "the author told us", and that will be reasonably enough for us. Of course, when it is an institution that detains an artwork and tells you "we hold all the rights on it", there is no reason not to believe them: in case of claims we will just say "an institution told us, go and ask them, sue them and wish them bad luck, do whatever you like with them". And that would be reasonably enough for us.
- of course it i clear, I never said to keep them. They could have redrafted it at the time, or it could have been a better moment but whatever. Also of course the mere possession does not say the copyright is not theirs. What Commons users forget is that the mere statement of the authors does not imply they still have the rights as well. So again, and I will always repeat it whenever possible: if you want to be legally covered, just one of the part should take responsibility, If you want to be precise you always need both of them. I have a sufficient archive of real life examples to prove that. Most of the time artists sign this or that and than the agents claim otherwise, they are quite clueless. Like, this year a municipality said that it owns the right of an artwork because of the contract, they were very clear. Still the artist apparently said otherwise, but he was probably not right, he just did not accept what he agreed years ago. Just to be sure, I did not put it in the list. So never think that asking only the artists tell you the whole story, every contract is different. So if you want to be precise you ask for both, which means that all images authorized by artist but NOT authorized by current owner if copy of the contract is not shown should be removed from Commons. (and some contracts are "classified" upon request...) This is excessive, and you ask what is needed to be be legally protected, and the reason why I remind this is not because they are in this case, but only because it took us years to make people understand this concept and cut the asymmetry of the interpretation, and I therefore remind it every time. We don't want -if the authorization from the museum appears - to start the deletion procedures again, so it's better be clear.--Alexmar983 (talk) 02:11, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
deleted per nomination and discussion. It appears to me that there was enough time since november 2020 to obtain permission from the heirs of the artist. Elly (talk) 22:12, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Didym as no license (No license since). In Poland standard photos made for official documents a considered as a without original work, and by the law original work is prohibited. Because with foto was nade before 1989 I changed license to avoid future nominations. Fallaner (talk) 06:52, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- More [Encyklopedia Fantastyki http://encyklopediafantastyki.pl/index.php?title=Strona_główna] is on the Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0) licence. --Fallaner (talk) 06:55, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The file is now correctly tagged PD, per nominator -M.nelson (talk) 11:53, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- Comment No correct date is provided. Can we find out more about the provenance of the original image? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:57, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Even if Encyklopedia Fantastyki were the original source of this photo, it appears that the CC-BA-SA-3.0 is for "Tekst udostępniany na licencji", ie. the text, not the included photo, but this doesn't matter for the PD claim. The PD claim requires that the original photograph was published without a copyright notice before 23 May 1994, but no evidence is provided of this. —RP88 (talk) 16:35, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Here, I have written my ideas in the title that talks about related template. If OTRS members verify the relevant ticket, they understand that the confirmation has been given for use informational purposes only on Wikipedia. This ticket doesn't specify or mean that it is permission for commercial use. See the discussions give links to this template. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Turkish Gendarmerie.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/09/02 Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/09/07 Commons:Deletion requests/File:OtokarCobraBorderDuty.JPG Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Attribution-TRGov-Military-Navy. Other permissions templates of military institutions in Turkey allow has been deleted because it is invalid. I think this template and the files using this template should be deleted. Uncitoyen (talk) 12:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Question can a OTRS/VRT member verify this interpretation of the ticket? The nomination sounds like a valid basis for deletion. -M.nelson (talk) 11:58, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Not just VRT, but a VRT member who speaks Turkish. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:58, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and prior linked discussion, the VRT ticket this template relied upon is invalid, and has not been able to be corrected in the nine months this DR has been open. Absent a VRT ticket, by default media from TR navy sites do not meet COM:L, as, for example Türkiye Deniz Kuvvetleri Komutanlığı says "© 2021 Deniz Kuvvetleri Komutanlığı". —RP88 (talk) 05:22, 18 August 2021 (UTC)