Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/09/22
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_con_Richard_Stellman_fundador_del_movimiento_del_software_Libre.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_berlino_1911-13.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_01.png){kind=link}
File:Rafael Nuñez Aponte (RaFa Hacker) con Richard Stellman fundador del movimiento del software Libre.jpg
[edit]_con_Richard_Stellman_fundador_del_movimiento_del_software_Libre.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_con_Richard_Stellman_fundador_del_movimiento_del_software_Libre.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not used Wilfredor (talk) 02:49, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 06:40, 22 September 2020 UTC: not used --Krdbot 14:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
this file belongs to me I had clicked the photograph and uploaded on googlemaps in the month of Nov'2016. 103.232.224.224 13:58, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; wrong place. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 14:03, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
its mine image Gauravselenagomez (talk) 13:25, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Mistaken nomination. Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:08, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Annulation de la bio, donc suppression de la photo que j'ai mise en ligne Iamaarondaavy (talk) 10:05, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as before. --Rosenzweig τ 10:41, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Потому что это моя страница, которой я больше не пользуюсь. Здесь адрес моей почты, к-й я хочу, чтобы также отсюда был удален. 176.213.118.132 15:39, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: я скрыл почтовый адрес из истории страницы. Если хотите удалить, то напишите с самой учетной записи. --rubin16 (talk) 08:59, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
possible copyright violation of artwork on packaging Headlock0225 (talk) 17:43, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
possible copyright violation of artwork on packaging Headlock0225 (talk) 17:48, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
dubious "own" work because the other files uploaded by the user are copyvios Oesterreicher12 (talk) 20:01, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:47, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
I dont like Jeton fishti (talk) 06:08, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Túrelio. --Minoraxtalk 12:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Non-skol Иепшотльбо качестве (talk) 16:54, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 12:08, 23 September 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: https://tineye.com/search/cae3f9ab6b47685a4b9002b9c4e7a3ca7b6657e9?sort=size&order=desc&page=1 --Krdbot 20:43, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Implausible diagram by a user with a track record of uploading out-of-scope or fantasy diagrams. Real spanish election results of 1993 are not like this. Slashme (talk) 13:16, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:41, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
unused table of figures, uncited, no evidence that this is educational — billinghurst sDrewth 00:32, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:34, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
unused infographic, uncited, no evidence that this is educational as fact based — billinghurst sDrewth 00:33, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:34, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
unused infographic, uncited, no evidence that this is educational or fact-based — billinghurst sDrewth 00:34, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:34, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
metadata and claim of copyright do not match with the image; other uploads have come from uncited publication — billinghurst sDrewth 00:36, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:34, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
small file w/o camera EXIF; dubious own work. COM:PCP. E4024 (talk) 01:13, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:34, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Small file w/o camera EXIF; dubious own work. COM:PCP. Not in use, no cats. Any scope or F10? E4024 (talk) 01:21, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:22, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 06:40, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as F10. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:24, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:22, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
All claimed as own work but a mix of old maps and photos. PCP
- File:สุขาภิบาลหนองตองพัฒนา อำเภอหางดง จังหวัดเชียงใหม่.png
- File:สุขาภิบาลสามโก้.png
- File:สุขาภิบาลสระยายโสม.png
- File:สุขาภิบาลสาวชะโงก.png
- File:สุขาภิบาลไร่เก่า จังหวัดประจวบคีรีขันธ์.png
- File:สุขาภิบาลน้ำจืด อำเภอกระบุรี จังหวัดระนอง.png
- File:สุขาภิบาลเมืองพาน อำเภอพาน จังหวัดเชียงราย.png
- File:สุขาภิบาลป๊อกแป๊ก อำเภอเมืองสระบุรี จังหวัดสระบุรี.png
- File:สุขาภิบาลบางนกแขวก อำเภอบางคนที จังหวัดสมุทรสงคราม.png
- File:สุขาภิบาลกระดังงา อำเภอบางคนที จังหวัดสมุทรสงคราม.png
- File:สุขาภิบาลหนองโพ อำเภอโพธาราม จังหวัดราชบุรี.png
- File:สุขาภิบาลเขาขวาง อำเภอโพธาราม จังหวัดราชบุรี.png
- File:สุขาภิบาลบ้านเลือก อำเภอโพธาราม จังหวัดราชบุรี.png
- File:สุขาภิบาลเวียงสระ.png
- File:S 2596866.jpg
- File:S 2596868.jpg
- File:S 2588682.jpg
- File:S 2588674.jpg
- File:S 2990083.jpg
- File:S 2990082.jpg
- File:S 2973700.jpg
- File:S 2973698.jpg
- File:S 2965507.jpg
- File:S 2965506.jpg
- File:S 2957314.jpg
- File:แผนที่แสดงเขตสุขาภิบาลป๊อกแป๊ก.png
- File:สถานีรถไฟโคกมะกอก.jpg
- File:ที่ทำการเทศบาลตำบลโคกมะกอก.jpg
- File:รพ.น้ำเกลี้ยง.jpg
- File:สภ.น้ำเกลี้ยง.jpg
- File:ตัวอำเภอน้ำเกลี้ยง.jpg
- File:ที่ว่าการอำเภอน้ำเกลี้ยง.jpg
- File:ป่าสนสองใบ อำเภอน้ำเกลี้ยง.jpg
- File:อำเภอน้ำเกลี้ยง.png.jpg
- File:อำเภอบ้านไร่.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:04, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Variations of a complex logo, not own work, needs permission
- File:利用水溶液折射找出折射率.jpg
- File:壓克力折射率之探究.jpg
- File:轉轉球臺.jpg
- File:彈性體的特性---虎克定律.jpg
- File:運動獨立性.jpg
- File:微流道製作與流阻.jpg
- File:創意手搖發電機.jpg
- File:從單擺到物理擺.jpg
- File:球形透鏡成像之探究.jpg
- File:浮力大挑戰.jpg
- File:我的轉動玩具.jpg
- File:我的章魚轉不停.jpg
- File:光的三原色與簡易光譜儀.jpg
- File:利用壓克力圓柱測定未知液體折射率.jpg
- File:光碟片光柵繞射.jpg
- File:甘油折射率與臨界角之測定.jpg
- File:凸透鏡測定物體折射率.jpg
- File:凸透鏡成像.jpg
- File:氣爆的探究.jpg
- File:酵素的探討.jpg
- File:看遠看近-人體眼睛晶體彈性與視力的測量.jpg
- File:小人國的尺.jpg
- File:風光大縣行不行.jpg
- File:金奈米粒子之穩定性.jpg
- File:奈米碳粒尋蹤記.jpg
- File:S4e月相.jpg
- File:S4e視力檢測.jpg
- File:S4e「白光」真的是「白色」的光嗎？.jpg
- File:S4e明天運動會可能下雨嗎.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:41, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:07, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope: promotional for an obscure "actor". 4nn1l2 (talk) 08:49, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:23, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Thulo Sailung
[edit]Multiple OoS photos of his dog - we only need one - there is one at File:Sailung 870.jpg we can keep. Don't need all these
- File:Sailung 871.jpg
- File:Sailung 872.jpg
- File:Sailung 873.jpg
- File:Sailung 874.jpg
- File:Sailung 875.jpg
- File:Sailung 876.jpg
- File:Sailung 877.jpg
- File:Sailung 878.jpg
- File:Sailung 879.jpg
- File:Sailung 880.jpg
- File:Sailung 881.jpg
- File:Sailung 882.jpg
- File:Sailung 883.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Delete most I agree on most of these. Uploaded under the Wiki Loves Earth initiative, however the dog does dominate the landscape unfortunately. I think the best one which does capture the great scenery is File:Sailung 878.jpg and possibly File:Sailung 872.jpg. It would be a shame to loose the scenery, albeit with a dog in it, so I vote to keep those two (along with the best one of the dog as nominated), delete the rest. Thanks. Crep171166 (talk) 11:51, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Kept 2 per Crep171166. --Minoraxtalk 03:25, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal images, out of scope. Self promo on wikidata.
- File:B'Atista.jpg
- File:Rosto Divino B'Atista.jpg
- File:Perfil B'Atista, Divino.jpg
- File:Divino B'Atista 2.jpg
- File:Divino B'Atista3.jpg
Minoraxtalk 09:17, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete File:B'Atista.jpg is even a fresh reupload of a previously deleted picure File:Divino B'Atista.jpg.--QTHCCAN (talk) 20:24, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:08, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and previous section. I have warned the uploader. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:21, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 02:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ShuaibShamsAnsari (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope Commons is not a photo album
Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:08, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elçin İsmayıl Qazax (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a personal photo album. Out of scope.
- File:Elçin İsmayıl və həyat yoldaşı.jpg
- File:Elçin İsmayıl 89433.jpg
- File:Elçin İsmayıl 897945132.jpg
- File:Elçin İsmayıl 456613.jpg
- File:Elçin İsmayıl 003133.jpg
- File:Elçin İsmayıl 897987.jpg
- File:Elçin İsmayıl 54631214.jpg
- File:Elçin İsmayıl 32132.jpg
- File:Elçin İsmayıl 4523.jpg
- File:Elçin İsmayıl 012.jpg
- File:Elçin İsmayıl 0456.jpg
- File:Elçin İsmayıl 0647.jpg
- File:Elçin İsmayıl 5123.jpg
- File:Elçin İsmayıl 97842.jpg
- File:Elçin İsmayıl 345.jpg
- File:Elçin İsmayıl.jpg
- File:Elçin İsmayıl 6447.jpg
- File:Esas1.jpg
Minoraxtalk 12:05, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:10, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Firstclassunisexfashion (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope.
- File:Mr & mrs Emmanuel.jpg
- File:Adams Emmanuel 04.jpg
- File:Adams Emmanuel 01.jpg
- File:Adams Emmanuel 03.jpg
- File:Adams Emmanuel.jpg
Minoraxtalk 12:11, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:11, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
because this is mine photo. please delete it. Gauravselenagomez (talk) 13:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:26, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
cover of magazine, not free AwkwardChester (talk) 13:46, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:26, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:27, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 14:44, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:27, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:27, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:27, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Profoundism (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:The Old Man for God-The details-06.webm
- File:The Old Man for God-The details-05.webm
- File:The Old Man for God-The details-04.webm
- File:The Old Man for God-The details-03.webm
- File:The Old Man for God-The details-02.webm
- File:The Old Man for God-The details-01.webm
- File:Profoundism.webm
- File:The Old Man for God-The details.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:12, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Restored per OTRS permission. --Krd 18:50, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:27, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Deithon Jeighps (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/incosnsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Jalaron, with members of the Zoominglife Digital Media in 2019.jpg
- File:JM Jalaron Official portrait.jpg
- File:GPML Photo 1.jpg
- File:Jalaron and friends from the media.jpg
- File:GPML Photo 3.jpg
- File:Jalaron with Luna King.jpg
- File:Jalaron and ex-finace, Kolivas.jpg
- File:Jalaron nine years old.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:17, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Deithon Jeighps (talk · contribs)
[edit]vanity spam, dubious copyright claims, poor quality with no reasonable use
- File:Jalaron and ex-fiance Kolivas in 2017.jpg
- File:Remembrance by Deborah Lovelace.jpg
- File:2nd GPML Best Published Authors (rookie category) Co, Jalaron with Emerald Blake.jpg
- File:Jalaron in March 2021.jpg
- File:Dlovelace-signature.svg
- File:John Michael Jalaron aka Deborah Lovelace.jpg
- File:Deborah Lovelace official signature.png
- File:John Michael Jalaron candid portrait.jpg
- File:Jalaron in September 2020.jpg
- File:Deborah lovelace signature.png
_Co,_Jalaron_with_Emerald_Blake.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Praxidicae (talk) 14:11, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:32, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:27, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:27, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:التقنيات الحديثه لزراعة الغابات6.jpg
- File:التقنيات الحديثه لزراعة الغابات5.jpg
- File:التقنيات الحديثه لزراعة الغابات4.jpg
- File:التقنيات الحديثه لزراعة الغابات3.jpg
- File:التقنيات الحديثه لزراعة الغابات2.jpg
- File:احد افراد الكشاف يزرع احدى الشتول.jpg
- File:التقنيات الحديثه لزراعة الغابات1.jpg
- File:اعضاء منظمة ليبيا الجديده .jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:50, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --E4024 (talk) 18:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:27, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Scope, personal image, Wikimedia Commons ist not a family album Wilfredor (talk) 17:46, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:28, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Scope, personal image, Wikimedia Commons ist not a family album Wilfredor (talk) 17:46, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:28, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Scope, personal image, Wikimedia Commons ist not a family album Wilfredor (talk) 17:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:28, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Scope, personal image, Wikimedia Commons ist not a family album Wilfredor (talk) 17:48, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:28, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sorryplease (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely own works due to Facebook or smaller sizes, subjects, difference in white balance, one is obviously a screenshot, and so on.
- File:Friends Meeting in Lahore Gymkhana Club..Akhtar Aly Kureshy, Rana Naeem, Babar, Hamid Shabbir, Shamim Malik, Faisal.jpg
- File:Visited Punjab Judicial Academy and met with DG and other Academic personality.jpg
- File:Group photo Akhtar Aly Kureshy with Chief Justice Mamoon Rashid Shiekh, students & faculty members of Suoerior College of Law.jpg
- File:Students and faculty members of Suoerior College of Law visited Punjab Judicial Academy.jpg
- File:Playing golf in Lahore Garrison Golf & Country Club.jpg
- File:After attending the convocation of daughter Dua Kyreshi Government College University.jpg
- File:Akhtar aly kureshy in Lahore High Court.jpg
- File:Akhtar Aly Kureshy in a relaxing mood.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:32, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Muhammad236 (talk · contribs)
[edit]With apologies to those who do not like big nominations, I do not see any indication of own work on these images. There are historic pictures, postage stamps, images that appear to be from google street images, others of Facebook or Twitter sizes. Some have overprinting. Absolutely none of them have any useful metadata relative to camera. Some have ghostly overprinting such as arrows, words, etc.
- File:GHS-Jhamra.jpg
- File:Pakistan Biggest tree.jpg
- File:Chak 235 School.jpg
- File:AIOU.jpg
- File:Rumipp.jpg
- File:Masjid Sunni Rizvi.jpg
- File:Lasoori Shah.jpg
- File:Begum Vikur Nisa.jpg
- File:Baba Deen Mohammad.jpg
- File:Baba Qaim Sain jee sarkar.jpg
- File:BabaQaimSain.jpg
- File:Baba Qaim Sain Darbar.jpg
- File:Baba Qaim Sain Mosque.jpg
- File:Baba Qaim Sain Masjid.jpg
- File:STSM.jpg
- File:MaiBairport.jpg
- File:Buchiana Railway.jpg
- File:Main Gate GPGC.jpg
- File:236 GB School.jpg
- File:Baba Noor Shah Wali.jpg
- File:Baba Noor Shah wali 1.jpg
- File:Athar Shah khan jaidi.jpg
- File:Khawaja Amoor ul Hasan.jpg
- File:Rai Ahmad tomb.jpg
- File:Islamia high school.jpg
- File:Govt Commerace College FSD.jpg
- File:Al Qadir University.jpg
- File:Pakistani Gate JRW.jpg
- File:JRW2.jpg
- File:JHAKKA LADHANA.jpg
- File:Muhammad wala Railway station.jpg
- File:Mirza Sahiba Darbar.jpg
- File:Chak 236 GB Kilanwala.jpg
- File:Kot Daya Kishan.jpg
- File:Railway station Kot Daya Kishan.jpg
- File:Jaranwala Railway station.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:31, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, picture from the American TV serie 'Drop dead diva' https://eu.usatoday.com/story/life/tv/2013/03/04/drop-dead-diva/1962369/ AwkwardChester (talk) 19:24, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:33, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
COM:NOTHOST - unused image of non-notable person Эlcobbola talk 19:33, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:32, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
only used in an insignificant article Jan Myšák (talk) 19:35, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:32, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohamed.mesbahi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seems to be uploaded for promotional purpose. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sahm flow. Uploader has been blocked from en.wiki for Sockpuppetry
QTHCCAN (talk) 20:10, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:33, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
copyvio. Trade (talk) 23:06, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:22, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, promotional Wilfredor (talk) 02:40, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 05:48, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:46, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 06:40, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as F10. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:23, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:47, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
OoS, used on a promotional draft that will never get accepted Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:48, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by QueerEcofeminist as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: uploader is seen in the photo as per description and name + webhost vio
Comment they may use a tripod — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 09:34, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. --Minoraxtalk 12:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:49, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 12:12, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:50, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 12:14, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:50, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, Commons is not a personal family album Wilfredor (talk) 13:12, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:51, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, Commons is not a personal family album Wilfredor (talk) 13:12, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:51, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, Commons is not a personal family album Wilfredor (talk) 13:12, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:51, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, Commons is not a personal family album Wilfredor (talk) 13:12, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, Commons is not a personal family album Wilfredor (talk) 13:12, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, Commons is not a personal family album Wilfredor (talk) 13:12, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Only used for an insignificant article Jan Myšák (talk) 13:18, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope, personal photo; together with File:Adam Sida Vltava 2020.jpg. (The above-mentioned “article” was speedy-deleted.) --Mormegil (talk) 07:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete --Gampe (talk) 05:47, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Autopromoción Tramullas (talk) 16:32, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:53, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Non-skol Впгеегге ренаеан (talk) 23:10, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:54, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
No Exif metadata, does not support the claim of "own work" Infogapp1 (talk) 01:37, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete in peace, not used. --E4024 (talk) 02:25, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:26, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Does not appear to be "own work" as there's no Exif metadata Infogapp1 (talk) 01:38, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete in peace, not used. --E4024 (talk) 02:26, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:26, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:31 Building
[edit]Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. The architect Kim Joong-up died in 1988 and this building won't enter the public domain until 2059.
ƏXPLICIT 07:24, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 11:15, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
is this copyrighted? Oesterreicher12 (talk) 18:56, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:28, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Jacques Gestalder died in 2006. No freedom of panorama in France. 86.249.245.164 18:57, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:27, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Bust of Anders Svor created by w:Ørnulf Bast, that died in 1974. The image does not fulfils the 70 year rule. Premeditated (talk) 20:13, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- OK for me. Was not aware about date of death for creator. --Erik den yngre (talk) 16:27, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:27, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
It was uploaded using the Creative Commons - Share Alike 4.0 license, but this is a scene from a movie, with a screenshot made from an upload on Youtube. Sricsi (talk) 20:26, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:27, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Author www.imagephotoagency.it via www.imago-images.de Copyright holder imago images/Gribaudi/ImagePhoto per exif
Not own work as claimed
Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:30, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Taken from FB per MD, needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:30, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Both are (c) at source, need permission
Gbawden (talk) 10:06, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:30, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Independent03 (talk · contribs)
[edit]See [1]. Uploader cannot name the photographer and requests deletion.
Mussklprozz (talk) 14:25, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Ticket:2020091010011254. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:32, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:11, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Goutsoullac69 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Two of these photos are Facebook sized, one has transmission data, the others have no meta data but are unlikely own work. One has copyright data in the meta, the other two do not. There are three different cameras in metadata, and two pictures without camera data. These are all indications of "not own work" along with the widely varying file sizes and qualities. But of course the (C) data in one of the photos meta and the transmission data and file sizes really support that these are collected from internet.
- File:Олег Короташ ДУК.jpg
- File:Олег Короташ Форум 2012.jpg
- File:Олег Короташ.jpg
- File:Олег Гуцуляк.jpg
- File:Ігор Козлик.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:13, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Small file w/o camera EXIF; dubious own work by a one-time uploader. COM:PCP. E4024 (talk) 01:04, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 19:58, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Fake license Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The image is small and lacks EXIF data. Google search by image and TinEye return hundreds of hits. --Ahmadtalk 20:38, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
COM:PRP, very small image uploaded in 2020 of low quality. Surely if this is own work, uploader has a bigger one. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. It can also be found elsewhere on the web by using Google search by image/TinEye. --Ahmadtalk 21:18, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
personal image Sahagunethan (talk) 02:41, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- It is. However, it's being used and that fact brings scope to the file. Futile DR. --E4024 (talk) 03:04, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Tend to
Keep, I wonder if {{FoP-Canada}} applies here or not. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:19, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Speedy keep, insufficient rationale, the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license granted upon upload is irrevocable. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:48, 27 September 2020 (UTC)- Delete - It's an image of an identifiable minor that appears to be indoors. There might be a reasonable expectation of privacy (ambiguous, since it may be open to the public). We have lots of pictures of people on trampolines, including outdoors, with lots of people around. We don't need this image (unless there's a usage I'm unaware of because it was removed form an article I hadn't thought of). So, barring new information, the safest thing, seems to be to delete it. Perhaps we could trust the uploader to not violate somebody's privacy, but when the uploader themselves is saying there's a privacy issue, then there's a privacy issue. Note, I agree the copyright release is irrevocable. But, copyright isn't the issue. --Rob (talk) 00:41, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- When I wrote what I wrote above the file was in use on two WMF projects, now magically not in use anywhere... Therefore? --E4024 (talk) 21:18, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- When I made my vote, I assumed the uploader/nominator had removed uses, based on your comment (I'm guessing they added them originally). That may be reason for admin to engage with user. But, not a good reason to keep image. What if a parent doesn't want their kids picture on here? --Rob (talk) 23:47, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Thivierr: Then the parent shouldn't have uploaded it. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:32, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I don't think we can know who the parent(s) are, or if they approve, or if the kid approves. I see it was removed from en:Trampoline, which is stuffed with images already, including an indoor trampoline park, with multiple kids, that don't focus on any one. I understand the desire to respect other projects, and not remove images they lawfully use. But, in this case, it seems the uploader/nominator both added, then removed the image. There's nothing remotely unique or valuable in the image. An automated message appeared on the talk page of the article 21 days ago, giving anybody a chance to chime in. Nobody is arguing the image actually has value. The only arguments I see, are that we can, therefore we should, keep the image. --Rob (talk) 07:42, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Thivierr: Then the parent shouldn't have uploaded it. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:32, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- When I made my vote, I assumed the uploader/nominator had removed uses, based on your comment (I'm guessing they added them originally). That may be reason for admin to engage with user. But, not a good reason to keep image. What if a parent doesn't want their kids picture on here? --Rob (talk) 23:47, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Uploader requested, not of especially high educational value, so courtesy deletion is reasonable, without having to spell out lots of detail of who and why permanently in public. --Fæ (talk) 19:28, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and User:Fæ. File is replacable. So even if a cc-license is irrevocable we can still be nice and grant uploader a deletion. --MGA73 (talk) 17:00, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
False licensing. The original is a private studio portrait. It is not non-artistic (journalistic). The image clearly bears the signature of well-known Swedish studio Uggla & the author, thus, is far from unknown -SergeWoodzing (talk) 00:51, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:39, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Empty categories, result of miscategorization by the same person (blocked user Chyah):
- Category:1088 establishments in Iran
- Category:1121 establishments in Iran
- Category:1316 establishments in Iran
- Category:1334 establishments in Iran
- Category:1465 establishments in Iran
- Category:1597 establishments in Iran
- Category:1616 establishments in Iran
- Category:1617 establishments in Iran
- Category:1630 establishments in Iran
- Category:1773 establishments in Iran
- Category:1787 establishments in Iran
- Category:1812 establishments in Iran
- Category:1826 establishments in Iran
- Category:1835 establishments in Iran
- Category:1858 establishments in Iran
- Category:1879 establishments in Iran
- Category:2018 establishments in Iran
- Category:1310s establishments in Iran
- Category:1330s establishments in Iran
- Category:1460s establishments in Iran
- Category:1590s establishments in Iran
- Category:1770s establishments in Iran
- Category:1780s establishments in Iran
- Category:1810s establishments in Iran
- Category:1820s establishments in Iran
- Category:1830s establishments in Iran
- Category:1880s establishments in Iran
- Category:Establishments in Iran in the 10th century
- Category:Establishments in Iran in the 14th century
- Category:Establishments in Iran in the 15th century
- Category:Establishments in Iran in the 16th century
Also, useless redirects:
- Category:Sari, Iran by year
- Category:Sari, Iran by decade
- Category:Sari, Iran in the 2010s
- Category:Sari, Iran in the 21st century
--Orijentolog (talk) 03:53, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Sealle (talk) 05:48, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW. No permission. 85.212.250.233 06:35, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:50, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
This is a deliberately offensive crop of a notable historical figure, ref File:FukuzawaYukichi.jpg. The crop was created by a banned long term disruptive sockpuppeteer as a long running pattern of creating racist criminal style "mug shots" of various portraits of people to mislabel them as stereotypes of races of white, black, yellow, brown and orange people. Refer to User:Fæ/Scientific racism cases.
There is no such thing as a Negroid race or a Mongoloid race, and though the historic concepts may be validly illustrated by using images from material of the time, retrospectively cropping his portrait, losing his identity, and calling this Japanese Writer a "Mongoloid", which was the single reason this crop was created and previously named "Japanese Mongoloid", is not a reason to continue to host the crop of the main portrait.
This is out of scope as it has only negative educational value, in a deliberate sustained campaign over a period of years to promote misinformation about scientific racism. Fæ (talk) 07:21, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Makes a well-known Japanese intellectual look like a criminal, no educational value (or rather: negative value). Why use the crop if we have the full picture ? --Rsk6400 (talk) 18:02, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:52, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. VLu (talk) 08:15, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:52, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Non-skol 179.236.73.55 08:30, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: blatant copyvio. --Sealle (talk) 05:54, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Likely copyvio based on the WM Gbawden (talk) 08:44, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:55, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
This file is not own work as claimed by the uploader. The file can be found here https://digitaltmuseum.no/021018493748/welhavens-gate-7-i-moss-tidligere-gateadresse-var-kongens-gate-33 As shown the photographer is Gustaf Lindman (1871-1950) and the owner of the photograph is a museum; Moss by- og industrimuseum. They have released it under the lisence CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 09:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:58, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Piastu as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: As all pictures in Category:Nina Stiller – photo depicts Nina Stiller, author is set as 'Nina Stiller', but photo doesn't seem to be selfie – probably copyvio. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 09:36, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no author's permission. --Sealle (talk) 05:57, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
A version found here - https://www.d2rinteriors.com/ - think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:00, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
From her Insta, needs OTRS https://www.instagram.com/naa_ashorkor_/?utm_source=ig_embed Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:03, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Probably taken from http://vatican.old.mfa.gov.ua/en et al. Needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 10:12, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:07, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Not PD-GOV. Source says its a courtesy photo and exif concurs - ©Robert A. Lisak, 2018All Rights Reserved Gbawden (talk) 10:15, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:29, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
No source to prove PD status Gbawden (talk) 10:22, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, PCP. --Sealle (talk) 06:30, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Source Own work - false information or flag is not official O revolucionário aliado (talk) 05:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Source Own work - false information or flag is not official O revolucionário aliado (talk) 05:28, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
not a good photo of the Art Prize ZuJan-Ba (talk) 16:58, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
not a good quality 37.47.6.131 19:39, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 19:43, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by QueerEcofeminist as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Taken from https://skyroot.in/ blatant copyvio, no permission added and the website says its all copyrighted. thanks This looks to be below the threshold of originality in the United States and India. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 01:18, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: simple logo. ƏXPLICIT 04:59, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 05:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Files by Pixabay user 12019
[edit]This Pixabay user appears to have uploaded works that are not their own. Most are grossly upsampled. Some might be PD from elsewhere. File:Yemin-shipの火災.jpg/File:Burning container ship Hyundai Fortune yemin-ship-76682.jpg (duplicates), for example, is a work of the Royal Netherlands Navy.[2] (Not sure about copyright rules there.) Unless their actual sourcing can be identified and licensing verified, these will have to be deleted.
- File:Wyoming-2708261.jpg - Original from Unsplash[3], date listed as 1 September 2017, therefore incompatible unless proven that it was available before the licence change
- File:South-africa-2708259.jpg - From Unsplash[4]
- File:Yellowstone-national-park-1581879.jpg
- File:Ski resort in France.jpg
- File:Yosemite-national-park-2708292.jpg - From Unsplah[5]
File:Camp Randall Stadium aerial (cropped).jpg- From LOC, PDFile:Camp Randall Stadium aerial.jpg- From LOC[6], PD- File:Scotland-1761292 960 720.jpg
- File:Ankara'dan ilinden bir manzara.jpg
- File:Waterfall, Scotland.jpg
- File:South Africa Landscape Scenic Sky Clouds River.jpg
- File:Norway Cottage House Home Mountains Sky Clouds.jpg
- File:Yemin-shipの火災.jpg - Duplicate
- File:Rio De Janeiro Brazil City Urban Tourism Coastline.jpg
- File:Lake-oroville-1588677 960 720.jpg
- File:Indiana Dunes State Park 2016.jpg
File:Indianapolis-1872529 1920.jpg- From LOC[7], PD- File:Taipei-night-cityscape-2017.jpg
- File:Burning container ship Hyundai Fortune yemin-ship-76682.jpg - Original by the Royal Netherlands Navy, may be PD?
- File:Château de Castelnaud 4.jpg
File:Soyuz rocket.jpg- From NASA (File:Soyuz TMA-13 erected at Baikonur Cosmodrome launch pad.jpg), PD- File:Arizona Plains and mountains.jpg
- File:Sea-ranch-1587304 640.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
Paul_012 (talk) 12:52, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Also, is there a blacklist for Pixabay and other sites like Commons:Questionable Flickr images/Users? --Paul_012 (talk) 12:59, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- I left a note on the pixabay image I uploaded:
- Could you please clarify the copyright status of this image and the other images listed here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_found_with_Pixabay_12019
- I uploaded this one to the wikipedia, and other people uploaded other images you put on pixabay, and then a skeptic came along, and voiced doubts you took all these fine image, yourself.
- They claimed their research found this image was taken in 2006 by someone from the Dutch Navy.
- Paul 012, of course we should have procedures where we decided to blacklist sites. Since there is/was a bot that confirmed Pixabay licenses, similar to flickrreview, I'd like to review that discussion. Please link to that discussion here. Geo Swan (talk) 23:05, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete all. They were an absolutely prolific Pixabay uploader. I went through them and foudn other copyvios. It looks like a lot of their uploads are just retouches of photos from elsewhere. For example [8] is from [9]. Some are crazy heavy retouches that are going to evade automated detection. But there's no basis for believing that the license on any of them is valid. --B (talk) 00:49, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: I was able to identify the original sources of some; annotated above. --Paul_012 (talk) 02:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: the bad ones, kept the good ones. --ƏXPLICIT 05:17, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Wrong file SirVan24 (talk) 13:40, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 04:56, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Minorax as Fair use (Fair use), but I see an OTRS tag. Would an OTRS volunteer be so kind as to close this? Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- OTRS was added after I tagged it. --Minoraxtalk 02:51, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS permission confirmed. --ƏXPLICIT 05:20, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Appears to be a screenshot... it has that flat and gloomy look of a Derivative Work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 05:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Small file w/o camera EXIF; dubious own work. COM:PCP. E4024 (talk) 01:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:34, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Indlekoferw (talk · contribs)
[edit]More images from University of Basel. Others of user's uploads have been COM:OTRS approved. Require assistance from OTRS volunteers and uploader to get these correctly licensed as well.
- File:Michael N Hall 2014.jpg
- File:Attila Becskei 2012.jpg
- File:Dehio Christoph 2011.jpg
- File:Hanspeter Hauri 2008.jpg
- File:Juerg Rosenbusch 2009.jpg
- File:Thomas Mrsic-Flogel 2013.jpg
- File:Jean Pieters 07 2008.JPG
- File:Roderick Lim 2014.jpg
- File:Juergen Engel 2014.jpg
- File:Markus Rueegg 2011.jpg
- File:Peter Scheiffele 2011.jpg
- File:Torsten Schwede 2011.jpg
- File:Erik van Nimwegen 2011.jpg
- File:Andreas Engel 2009 masked.jpg
- File:Andreas Engel 2009.jpg
- File:Mihaela Zavolan 2011.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:29, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Dear Ellin Beltz
Thank you for your information. The "Declaration of consent for all enquiries" has been updated here: http://www.biozentrum.unibas.ch/services/wikipedia/
Best --Indlekoferw (talk) 11:00, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no doubt on authorship, see also https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Indlekoferw&oldid=100118583. --Polarlys (talk) 21:33, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete Copyright violation. Taken from https://cpsazamatgarh.com/images/ch5.jpg on https://cpsazamatgarh.com/index.php without any evidence the work is of the uploader. Site is clearly marked as copyrighted, with no license present that is compatible with Commons. Hammersoft (talk) 19:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:31, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No source Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:51, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:31, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unsourced Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:56, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:31, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
From file size and metadata this is unlikely own work in 2020. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:13, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
TinEye says from 2019, from a Japanese publication, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:13, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kaonagroup2020 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of user's own work on this pair of mirrored images and professional Portrait with Nikon metadata. Looks more like they were collected from the internet.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:25, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:11, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 31.33.62.154 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: There is no other infos so it's looks like his stole it While I do not entirely disagree, I would prefer that items going to speedy have provable problems, like the URL from which it came and so on. This was an anonymous nomination, converting to DN to create a trail and for consensus. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:11, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Appears to come from Facebook https://www.facebook.com/Dbytes.bytes/?ref=nf Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:10, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
dubious "own" work, look like a screenshot from tv, bad exif + title Oesterreicher12 (talk) 18:43, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:10, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
potential copyvio, see [10] Oesterreicher12 (talk) 18:48, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:09, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
i don't think its an "own work" Oesterreicher12 (talk) 19:20, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Not used nor even categorized; probably we are discussing an "out of scope" file... --E4024 (talk) 02:46, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:09, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation Timtrent (talk) 20:41, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:08, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Author Request Andrezadnik (talk) 08:27, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep used on four projects. One (de) is a user talk page, but the rest are articles. Ahmadtalk 13:40, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 19:25, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Unused low quality photo of video boxes. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 10:15, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:24, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Not own work, part of this series https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2017/06/20/donald-trump-welcomes-tech-bosses-awkward-looking-white-house/ - likey a getty photo Gbawden (talk) 10:34, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:23, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
appears to be using Commons to advertise Ytoyoda (talk) 13:23, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:22, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BarnabasNemeth (talk · contribs)
[edit]Watermark indicates copyright belongs to Teqball. One of the files has metadata that credits ARTS ILLUSTRATED STUDIOS.
Ytoyoda (talk) 13:24, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:22, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
not own work, come from here https://www.editions-rackham.com/biographie/cristina-portolano/ AwkwardChester (talk) 13:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:21, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation of the designs of the coins, see COM:CUR Germany. Verbcatcher (talk) 14:34, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Because it is the picture of the package of coins it should pass the copyright test. 5snake5 (talk) 05:16, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:21, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be replaced with mw:Help:Tabular Data if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Ok. I tried to put the whole table here but seems wikipedia can't processes properly as the table is so big. (5570 rows). If there is a way to put this table inside de article, I prefer. I would like to try if somebody give some hints and appreciate any help. --18610 Arthurdent (talk) 23:43, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:20, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Some files uploaded by Raluca.hogea (talk · contribs)
[edit]There are a ton of images of better quality without the useless watermark.
Gikü (talk) 15:38, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:18, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Clear copyvio. Originally published at https://musicmadnessmagazine.com/the-force-that-is-matty-mullins-and-memphis-may-fire/ Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:24, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Matty Mullins provided me this photo (I am his manager). We as Memphis May Fire's team provided the image to Music Madness Magazine per the above and are also providing it here. We own it.Jason Rudolph
Deleted: by Regasterios. --Didym (talk) 19:18, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
copyvio https://www.facebook.com/federicabbateof/photos/a.494574707347463/1628364313968491/ AwkwardChester (talk) 17:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:15, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP in Georgia, this obelisk is less than 70 years old meaning that it is still copyrighted (COM:Georgia) Buidhe (talk) 16:57, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 05:58, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
the work is not public domain in the source country as Pechstein is in no uploads until 2026 Goesseln (talk) 12:51, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:37, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
,_berlino_1911-13.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_berlino_1911-13.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
the work is not public domain, Pechstein died in 1956 1955 Goesseln (talk) 12:56, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep There is no claim of Public Domain, but see COM:FOP Germany Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:03, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- FOP in Germany is only outside of buildings, e.g. galleries or museums. --Goesseln (talk) 15:38, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:45, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Resolution 1080*720 and lack of metadata make me suspect this is a screencap. Google Images returns no hits, but does offer a whole lot of hand grenade pictures instead. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:45, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:22, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
No commercial watermark added by the uploader. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:50, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Do you explain to me what should I do to cancel the deletion
- What are the commercial watermark @:Magog the Ogre — Preceding unsigned comment added by معتز الوحيشي (talk • contribs)
- @Magog the Ogre: --Minoraxtalk 12:43, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- @معتز الوحيشي: I believe they are referring to the watermark. You have added a CC-BY-NC-SA license watermark to the image, but Commons does not accept NC/ND licenses. See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:الإمبراطورية الفرنجية في عام 843.png. Ahmadtalk 21:28, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 16:47, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Other then text, it lookslike copy pasted from https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/81FDL7sJtpL._SL1500_.jpg ☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 04:22, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:22, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Other then text, it lookslike copy pasted from https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/81FDL7sJtpL._SL1500_.jpg ☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 04:24, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:22, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
the better version now available: File:Philipp Friedrich Hetsch, Selbstbildnis.jpg rubin16 (talk) 13:19, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Wikimedia Commons does not decide editorial content on other projects. This specific version of the artowork is in use in articles on Wikipedia, therefore in scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:26, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Useless too blurry photo. Solomon203 (talk) 13:44, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Wikimedia Commons does not decide editorial content on other projects. This file is in use in articles on Wikipedia, therefore in scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Too blurry photo, lack of educational use. The better versions are File:Triumph Taipei Ximen Store 20210314.jpg and File:Triumph Bluewater Store.jpg. --Solomon203 (talk) 11:50, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Not taking pictures at the same shop, why do you say "better versions"?--Kai3952 (talk) 12:09, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:59, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Pelanggaran hak cipta: http://www.reformedindonesia.ac.id/personnel.jsp 182.2.70.185 14:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Description says it was copied from calwanarang.blogspot.com, but still no permission. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:48, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Pelanggaran hak cipta: https://www.jawaban.com/read/article/id/2013/05/10/90/130510100110/presiden_wcckesatuan_gereja_bukan_tujuan_akhir 182.2.70.185 14:30, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (even older version on http://www.balifan.de/84-News.htm). --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:49, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
soucing dubious, doubtful to be own work given the low res, licencing very questionable PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:20, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: This image can be found on https://dinmerican.wordpress.com/2010/10/29/introducing-andre-vltchek-the-west-perfecting-its-techniques-to-hurt-china/ which was archived back in 2010, which was before upload to Commons. Require permission/evidence be sent to COM:OTRS. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:52, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Superseded by a another svg coat of arms that follows the official blazon for the coat of arms. This one is of much lower quality. Plus it is being requested by the original uploader (me). Worldlydev (talk) 20:00, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Decided I am instead going to update this to be an exact duplicate of the file following the blazon correctly but without the royal crown. --Worldlydev (talk) 16:46, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by QueerEcofeminist as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Taken from https://skyroot.in/ blatant copyvio, no permission added and the website says its all copyrighted. thanks This looks to fail the American and Indian thresholds of originality. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 01:23, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: PD-text. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:59, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by QueerEcofeminist as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Taken from https://skyroot.in/ blatant copyvio, no permission added and the website says its all copyrighted. thanks This looks to be below the American and Indian thresholds of originality. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 01:24, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: unused text logo, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Needs source to confirm PD status - could have been taken by a reporter in the room Gbawden (talk) 10:24, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Here's the full video. It's just a screenshot from public record. [11] Pennsylvania2 (talk) 12:58, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Pennsylvania2: Please add that to the source field in the file description. Gbawden (talk) 15:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:05, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
This is a jpg file with an incorrect png extension; this has been corrected here, with a higher resolution. —Bruce1eetalk 15:30, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:39, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
This is a jpg file with an incorrect png extension; this has been corrected here, with a higher resolution. —Bruce1eetalk 15:34, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:39, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
This is a jpg file with an incorrect png extension; this has been corrected here, with a higher resolution. —Bruce1eetalk 15:34, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:39, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
ficou com erro Antony1864 (talk) 18:19, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:40, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
This image is a poor representation of an unknown Epilobium plan genus. This image has no educative purpose. Richard Avery (talk) 20:26, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:41, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
No commercial watermark added by uploader. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:51, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Do you explain to me what should I do to cancel the deletion
- What are the commercial watermark @:Magog the Ogre — Preceding unsigned comment added by معتز الوحيشي (talk • contribs)
- @Magog the Ogre: --Minoraxtalk 12:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- @معتز الوحيشي: you have a watermark which forbids commercial reuse. This contradicts the license you added to the page and is contrary to Commons requirements. To remove this DR, please let us know which license you accept. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:19, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Magog the Ogre: --Minoraxtalk 12:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- What are the commercial watermark @:Magog the Ogre — Preceding unsigned comment added by معتز الوحيشي (talk • contribs)
- @:Magog the Ogre: Excuse me, I'm new here in wikimedia do I change the license in the page to become identical license in the picture?
- Can I use this license {{GFDL or cc-by-nc-sa-2.0}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by معتز الوحيشي (talk • contribs) 04:41, September 24, 2020 (UTC)
- @معتز الوحيشي: no, we don't accept that anymore. We do accept the license you originally had on the file, but it was in contradiction with the watermark, which is cc-by-nc-sa. Can you confirm you are OK with cc-by-sa-4.0? If so, someone may remove the watermark but we can keep the file. Thanks. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:25, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Can I use this license {{GFDL or cc-by-nc-sa-2.0}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by معتز الوحيشي (talk • contribs) 04:41, September 24, 2020 (UTC)
- @:Magog the Ogre: Excuse me, I'm new here in wikimedia do I change the license in the page to become identical license in the picture?
Kept: watermark has been removed. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:44, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Still copyrighted in source country (India): Publish + 60 years. H78c67c (talk) 02:14, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:57, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:58, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- This isn't covered under FoP. This is a close crop that shows only the work of artistic craftsmanship that is permanently situated in a public place or building. This is specifically permitted under Copyright Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-42) section 32.2 (1) (b) (ii). --Robkelk (talk) 01:45, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Robkelk: According to current consensus on Commons about COM:FOP Canada, [the] freedom provided by the quoted section does not apply to typical two-dimensional works such as paintings, murals, advertising hoardings, maps, posters or signs. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:22, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Josve05a: , does that consensus include a legal opinion, gien by a lawyer familiar with Canadian law? --Robkelk (talk) 20:24, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not sure how that text has evolved over time (check the history) or been reached, but as with any other policy/guideline document here on Commons, it is a working document based on past interpretations in previous deletion requests and on COM:VP/C. It is also mentioned in the {{FoP-Canada}} template since 2009, that Commons current view is that this is not ok. Please elaborate why you think it would be. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:28, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Canadian law was originally derived from UK concepts and some of Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United Kingdom may therefore be of relevance, in particular the restricted legal meaning of "work of artistic craftsmanship". Some non-sculptural works can qualify for Canadian FOP under this clause, such as Body Shop Yonge.jpg for example. The freedom provided by the quoted section does not apply to typical two-dimensional works such as paintings, murals, advertising hoardings, maps, posters or signs. These cannot be uploaded to Commons without a license from the copyright holder even if they are permanently located in a public place, unless they are in the public domain.
- @Josve05a: , does that consensus include a legal opinion, gien by a lawyer familiar with Canadian law? --Robkelk (talk) 20:24, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Robkelk: According to current consensus on Commons about COM:FOP Canada, [the] freedom provided by the quoted section does not apply to typical two-dimensional works such as paintings, murals, advertising hoardings, maps, posters or signs. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:22, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- According to COM:FOP "Works of artistic craftsmanship" are OK, "graphic works" are not – see United Kingdom section for commentary. which links to COM:FOP UK --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:41, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Strong keep - sorry, but you made a similar deletion request to File:Marulan NSW mural.jpg and you obviously need to learn more about copyright. See the same reasoning I've given you on File:Marulan NSW mural.jpg. SHB2000 (talk) 07:47, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:58, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- rubin16, why didn't you explain why you deleted? Your expertise on Canadian copyright laws is greater than that of the deletion opponents? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:58, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:58, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:58, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:58, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There's no freedom of panorama for sculptures in the U.S. A previous discussion on Commons also concluded that the Urban Light met the threshold of originality, resulting in the deletion of five images: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_found_with_urban_light A 2014 deletion request resulted in the same: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Urban_Light,_LACMA.jpg Barte (talk) 06:06, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: I think lights are utilitarian and non-eligible. --rubin16 (talk) 19:00, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
There's no freedom of panorama for sculptures in the U.S. A previous discussion on Commons also concluded that the Urban Light met the threshold of originality, resulting in the deletion of five images: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_found_with_urban_light
A 2014 deletion request resulted in the same: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Urban_Light,_LACMA.jpg Barte (talk) 06:08, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: I think lights are utilitarian and non-eligible. --rubin16 (talk) 19:00, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Dubious source, no evidence this is created by the United Kingdom Government as stated. VLu (talk) 08:13, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Archive reference (The National Archives Kew (UK), KV 2/631) added. --Mitrius (talk) 09:55, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --rubin16 (talk) 19:00, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/www.facebook.com/DanScavino
[edit]File was removed from Facebook, undetermined copyright status (maybe license laundering such as repost)
- File:Dan Scavino taking photo of Taj Mahal.jpg
- File:Dan Scavino having a rest at the West Colonnade.jpg
- File:Dan Scavino and The Kushners at Taj Mahal.jpg
File:Dan Scavino and Benjamin Netanyahu at the Blair House - 2017.jpg- File:Miller, Scavino, Sanders and Lyons at Hanoi Summit.jpg
- File:Eric and Lara Trump in Scavino's Office May 2020.jpg
- File:Trump and Modi at a rally in NRG Stadium.jpg
- File:Donald Trump MAGA Rally in Sunrise, FL.jpg
- File:The Trumps at 2019 Christmas Tree Lighting.jpg
- File:West Wing in March 2019 B&W photo.jpg
- File:White House North View Night time March 2020.jpg
- File:Shinzo Abe with White House Senior staffs.jpg
- File:Trump back to White House after Pittsburgh trip.jpg
- File:Trump posted a photo with Kim at Hanoi summit.jpg
- File:Blue lights over New York Patriot Day 2019.jpg
- File:The Trumps in Bryant-Denny Stadium.jpg
- File:Donald Trump and Barham Salih during 2020 WEF.jpg
File:Donald Trump Justin Trudeau with the press in the Oval Office.jpg- File:White House lights in blue for 2020 World Autism Day.jpg
- File:White House West façade at 2018 Valentine's Night.jpg
- File:Donald and Melania at 2019 Halloween.jpg
- File:White House South in Sept 2019.jpg
- File:2018 New Year's Day Night in White House.jpg
- File:Seniors leaving the White House for Dorian's preparation.jpg
- File:White House in 45° view November 2018.jpg
- File:White House goes blue for 2017 police week.jpg
- File:U.S.–Australia bilateral dinner at G20 Osaka Summit.jpg
- File:Trump Macron Meeting at 30th NATO Summit.jpg
- File:White House in honor of 2018 World Autism Day.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 08:40, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Them being deleted is irrelevant - Template:PD-USGov-POTUS still applies, I see no valid reason for deeltion. –Davey2010Talk 11:48, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Facebook (or other posts from Twitter, Instagram, etc.) often contain repost, which is a case of license laundering. Without further checking, it is enough to arouse COM:PCP concern, and they may need to be deleted. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:33, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- A1Cafel So why upload them then?..... I assume the copyright licence was not in the posts so why upload the images in the first place? –Davey2010Talk 07:59, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Maybe a license reviewer or an admin could review them once more. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:55, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- A1Cafel maybe you could answer my question above which was "why upload them then in the first place?"?, You seemingly have no idea if they're CC licenced or not so again why upload them?. –Davey2010Talk 15:25, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- Maybe a license reviewer or an admin could review them once more. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:55, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- A1Cafel So why upload them then?..... I assume the copyright licence was not in the posts so why upload the images in the first place? –Davey2010Talk 07:59, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per Davey2010. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 15:15, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete
- File:Dan Scavino taking photo of Taj Mahal.jpg
- File:Dan Scavino having a rest at the West Colonnade.jpg
- File:Dan Scavino and The Kushners at Taj Mahal.jpg
- File:Miller, Scavino, Sanders and Lyons at Hanoi Summit.jpg
- File:Eric and Lara Trump in Scavino's Office May 2020.jpg
- File:Shinzo Abe with White House Senior staffs.jpg
- File:Donald Trump and Barham Salih during 2020 WEF.jpg
- File:U.S.–Australia bilateral dinner at G20 Osaka Summit.jpg
- File:Trump Macron Meeting at 30th NATO Summit.jpg
- Since Mr. Scavino is in the photo, it is impossible that he is the author of these photos. Unfortunately they may be deleted due to precautionary concern. I would suggest Keep the rest of them as Mr. Scavino is one of the White House employees, {{PD-USGov-POTUS}} obviously applied on all of his works. --116.49.138.167 07:04, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- @116.49.138.167: Please note that these may have possible to be selfies include his "friends" and him (though, in this case I would even doubt the entire listed files (@A1Cafel: include the striked two) has benefit here or not). --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:00, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: mostly kept and deleted those where Scavino is present himself. --rubin16 (talk) 19:03, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
All need permission. Various credited to Photo credits: Royal Norwegian Embassy in Madrid Photo credits: Financial Mechanism Office Photo credits: ©Cosmin Bumbuț
Photo credit: AYEN etc
- File:Financial Mechanism Office.png
- File:Sustainable city campus in Cork.png
- File:Vía de la Plata.png
- File:Sastipen NGO in Romania.png
- File:Active Youth Entrepreneurship Network.png
- File:Photo credits Royal Norwegian Embassy in Madrid.jpg
- File:Lifetime Lab 1.jpg
- File:EEA-and-Norway grants.png
- File:EEA Norway logos.gif
- File:UN Buffer Zone in Nicosia.jpg
- File:Ayen Launch Event.jpg
- File:2004-2009 EEA and Norway Grants.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 10:02, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- I think the logos (File:EEA-and-Norway grants.png, File:EEA Norway logos.gif) fit into {{PD-textlogo}}.--Strainu (talk) 11:28, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Strainu: doesn't that stylised N/Building push it over TOO? Gbawden (talk) 11:45, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- We already have logos of comparable complexity marked with that template: File:06_Hoechst_Entwurf_ca_1947.jpg, File:(4th_CREATIVE_PARTY)_pink_2018_new.png, File:02_Hoechst_MLB_Logo_ca_1923.jpg etc. I don't have a better reference as to what is acceptable and what not.--Strainu (talk) 12:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Strainu: doesn't that stylised N/Building push it over TOO? Gbawden (talk) 11:45, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
_pink_2018_new.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 19:06, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Needs a source to confirm PD status Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
It is from right here. [12] Pennsylvania2 (talk) 13:01, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Pennsylvania2: please provide a timestamp. I spent a few minutes looking and could not find this shot. DemonDays64 (talk) 04:06, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry wrong link. Here it is. [13]Pennsylvania2 (talk) 14:12, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: somewhere on 1:32:40, I guess. --rubin16 (talk) 19:08, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Keep. This guy is the CEO of a company being sued for its role in the opioid epidemic. His is a public figure now, that's why he makes the big bucks. We have a right to know what he looks like, for reasons. 174.76.42.133 20:22, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Also applies to:
- File:Priyabrata karmakar from sonamukhi.jpg
- File:Priyabrata Karmakar.jpg
This user has multiple personal images on Commons. Commons is not a webhost. I am not against having an image of yourself on your page, but not several. --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 10:45, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 19:09, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
The original was taken as part of film promotion and published with a copyright statement in 1954. This would need verification that copyright was not renewed in order to keep. Fæ (talk) 11:26, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: I haven't found renewal info - [14]. --rubin16 (talk) 19:12, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Technical nomination: Copyvio tag has been improperly removed, see COM:DG#Speedy deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 13:06, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- History: A {{Copyvio}} tag was added to the file by Ghoyt98, as follows:
- Copyvio|This photo is not in the public domain as it is a photo that was copy and pasted from the Nashua Telegraph|source=https://www.nashuatelegraph.com/news/2019/02/15/sununu-proposes-13-1-billion-two-year-budget/
- The tag was reverted by DemonDays64 with the follwing edit commary:
- that article is from 3 years after this photo was uploaded. This is not a copyright violation.
- This reversion was contrary to Commons:Deletion policy#Speedy deletion which says:
- If anyone disagrees with the speedy deletion of a particular file, please convert to a regular deletion request (see below).
- Discussion: DemonDays64 is correct that the presence of the image in a news report that is dated after its upload here is inadequate evidence of a copyvio. However, there are other reasons to suspect a copyvio:
- It has the appearance of a professional studio photograph. This is supported by the use of a professional Nikon D700 camera, indicated in the metadata.
- The uploader's user name Csununu suggests that the account may be operated by or on behalf of Christopher Sununu, the subject of the photo. This user has also edited the Chris Sununu article in English Wikipedia. The photograph is clearly not a selfie.
- The photograph is widely disseminated online, although I have not identified an example that predates its upload here.
- See also Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2020/09#Chris Sununu photos, which discusses issues with the photos uploaded by this user. Verbcatcher (talk) 13:32, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I was the person who asked about this at COM:VPC, pretty much for the same reasons that Verbcatcher has given above. I'd imagine it shouldn't be too hard to find or obtain an acceptably licensed photo of the en:Governor of New Hampshire, either from one posted online or from someone representing the governor. I would also imagine that the governor probably has someone on staff to monitor his online presence, and it seems that en:Chris Sununu would be high on the list of things being monitored. It would be quite foolish for the staff of someone holding such a high political office to be so lackadaisical about something that might reflect badly upon their boss, but image/media copyright matters don't seem to be given a lot of thought in recent times by politicans and their staffs. Anyway, my point I guess, is that this probably can be sorted out through COM:OTRS verification. There's a bot that adds notifications to Wikipedia article talk pages when a Commons file used in the article has been nominated or otherwise tagged for deletion and such a notification has already been added to en:Talk:Chris Sununu and well as en:Talk:Governor of New Hampshire. So, maybe someone watching the article will see the notifications and be able to resolve things. Otherwise, I agree with the assessment that the file can't be kept per COM:PCP since there are reasonable doubts about its en:provenance. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:12, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 19:13, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lomita as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Le nom du photographe est indiqué sur la photo...... A complaint from COM:UDR by User:84.97.73.198: Cette photo a été prise par un membre de mon équipe de tournage. J’ai son autorisation. Le photographe a céder l’ensemble de ses droits de diffusion à ma production. Ankry (talk) 14:02, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: has watermark that doesn't equal uploader's name, per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 19:14, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
According to the uploader at English Wikipedia's Template:Did you know nominations/Marina de Gabaráin, "The photograph is not of her stage debut, but has to be a publicity photo from the mid-1950s, when she was singing the title role in Carmen around the world. It is not known which production it portrays, and may well be a studio-posed production. I have tried to verify the photographer's name and copyright, with no success." That doesn't fit the criteria for Wikimedia Commons. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:30, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 19:14, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Von Nina selbst ! Ich kenne weder den Künstler noch habe ich eine Genehmigung. Ich nehme an, dass das eine Arbeit von Franz oder Willi Bucher ist, weiß es aber nicht. Vom Brüder würde ich wahrscheinlich die Genehmigung bekommen, Franz Bucher (Bildhauer) ist verstorben. 2003:DD:D716:378E:24F8:AD18:4C00:9F30 16:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: can't find it published elsewhere, high res, EXIF present, see no reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 19:15, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation. Banknote emitted after 31 december 1994. See https://colnect.com/es/banknotes/banknote/40901-5000_Colones-Edicion_2009-Costa_Rica Arjuno (talk) 17:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: com:CUR Costa Rica. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:58, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Banknote emitted after 31 december 1994. See https://colnect.com/es/banknotes/banknote/40901-5000_Colones-Edicion_2009-Costa_Rica Arjuno (talk) 17:29, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: com:CUR Costa Rica. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:59, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Banknote emitted after 31 December 1994. See https://colnect.com/es/banknotes/list/country/52-Costa_Rica/series/69158-Edicion_2009 Arjuno (talk) 17:34, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: com:CUR Costa Rica. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:59, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Banknote emitted after 31 december 1994. See https://colnect.com/es/banknotes/list/country/52-Costa_Rica/series/69158-Edicion_2009 Arjuno (talk) 17:35, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: com:CUR Costa Rica. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:59, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Jacques Gestalder died in 2006. No freedom of panorama in France. 86.249.245.164 18:53, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 06:34, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Ich kenne den Urheber nicht und kann nicht nachweisen, dass er bereits 70 Jahre verstorben ist. Ich meine, die Fenster sind in den 20iger Jahren entstanden. Wenn der Künstler in den 50 verstarb, dann sind jetzt 70 Jahre erst knapp vorbei. Kann ich aber nicht wissen ! 2003:DD:D716:378E:24F8:AD18:4C00:9F30 16:56, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Associated discussion at de:wp. According to this discussion, the artist could be Paul Hirt who died in 1951. Hirt designed stained glass windows for this church but it remains open whether this includes the window in this photograph. It would be great if the artist could be identified with certainty as this would allow us to restore the image as soon as the work becomes public domain. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:29, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Paul Hirt is not the only possible candidate. This page of the city of Oberndorf names more artists who worked on the stained glass windows in this church. Quote: “Weitere Kirchenfenster zeigen Glasmalereien von der Beuroner Schule (1921), von A. Blepp (1933) und Paul Hirt (1935).” The name “A. Blepp” appears to refer to the artist August Blepp who died in 1949 – his works are already in the public domain according to German law. “Beuroner Schule” refers to a group of artists, see Beuroner Schule, which followed the Nazarene movement. On the same page, this window is credited to Paul Hirt. Its Expressionist style matches that of the Philipp Jeningen window, hence Paul Hirt appears to be very likely the artist we are looking for. There are older windows in the church with names of the fallen of World War I like this one. Their Nazarene style is likely to be associated with the Beuroner Schule. --AFBorchert (talk) 19:02, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: we have no exact information but if it Paul Hirt (as discussion suggests to be the most likely author), it is unfree till 2022. --rubin16 (talk) 09:06, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Wrong license, MIT theses, so not automatically US Gov work. Possibly no notice... ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:37, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- I agree; this is
PD-US-no notice. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 14:59, 10 March 2021 (UTC).
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 09:06, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Yes. There's a Health Career for You!- A Career Guide Specially Designed for Middle and High School Youth (IA yesthereshealthc00unse).pdf
[edit]Not US Gov work - Publisher listed as University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. North Carolina Health Careers Access Program ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:02, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:07, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
This appears to be a complex logo not originally created by uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This isn't a logo, its a flag. The flag is acually based off an already uploaded png and it states that I made the svg but didn't create it originally. It is based off File:Flag of Waco, Texas.jpg which is free domain and has been up and used since 2006. --Cookieman1.1.1 (talk) 00:31, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: as derivative of File:Flag of Waco, Texas.jpg. --rubin16 (talk) 09:11, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
This image has been updated to a newly adopted flag that contains a trademarked logo. While the original file uploaded may not have been in violation, this one is. WebmasterWacoTX (talk) 17:20, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. complex logo.--RZuo (talk) 17:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Section 2(b) of the Lanham Act expressly forbids trademark protections for flags, coats of arms, or other insignia used by municipalities (or states or the Federal government). Houston already tried doing this and the US Court of Appeals already denied it in 2013. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 17:46, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- And, in any case, this is a pending application, filed on Feburary 14, which has not been reviewed. We can certainly take it down pending the challenge, but saying that it is currently trademarked is not accurate. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 17:51, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep PD-textlogo, in any case, and COM:INUSE. Commons does not enforce trademarks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:46, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Clearly below the threshold of originality in the US. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:34, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
also:
.jpg){kind=link}
no reason why these complex images are public domain.--RZuo (talk) 17:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- This one would be over COM:TOO US. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:49, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as {{PD-US-1978-89}}. Copyright for this design does not seem to have been registered within 5 years and there is no copyright notice. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:30, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:26, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Uploader did not create sign depicted, no permission. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz: A piece of paper with text cannot be copyrighted nor need permission to photograph. Image uploaded is good representation of current situation in stores and businesses wherever you go in Michigan. --Cookieman1.1.1 (talk) 21:24, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Yeah there are a couple physical objects that are copyrighted, but something like a piece of paper with words can't be copyrighted. Not to mention you wouldn't even be able to copyright that piece of paper because it is way too simple. Like how the SpaceX logo can't be copyrighted. SaluteVII (talk) 21:33, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The image is fine. The sign is too simple to attract a copyright, and the inclusion of anything else is de minimis. Imzadi 1979 → 04:49, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- It's over 11 words, it is a piece of paper with words on it. Like a book, or a letter or any other copyrightable item. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:23, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- You've got to be seriously kidding me. You can't copyright words, and that sign isn't a company slogan nor a quote from a book. The photo is perfectly fine and could be a great example of the pandemic in the future from an educational standpoint. --Cookieman1.1.1 (talk) 21:07, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Actually, you can copyright words, but I don't think the text has the requisite creativity to exceed the threshold of originality. As such, the statement there shouldn't be subject to copyright. Imzadi 1979 → 06:19, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: words themselves are copyrighted, too. Don't think that it is too short to be trivial. --rubin16 (talk) 09:13, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work. At source credited to " image by André Coutanche, 19 December 2007" Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:09, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Source is credited since i didn't make the flag itself but rather the SVG. If you look on the Village site there is no copyright for the city. http://www.rgvillage.com/ as nowhere does it say "all rights reserved". Also this doesn't meet the threshold of original work as it is based heavily off the flag of Wales. --Cookieman1.1.1 (talk) 20:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: it looks like dragon is from here and is free. Other is trivial. --rubin16 (talk) 09:17, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Report by contractor, grantee or Non-Federal agency. Not necessarily PD-US Gov ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:44, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:19, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Is there FOP wherever this was taken? Rather small for an own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: text is copyrighted and we have no evidence to consider it free due to FOP or something as we have no information about location, etc. --rubin16 (talk) 09:20, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
The uploader is a verified representative of the author, see Anja Failla Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 18:56, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 09:21, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
File:YOU CAN’T ALWAYS GET WHAT YOU WANT- EMPLOYEE AND ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSES TO PERCEIVED WORKPLACE INJUSTICES AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO INSIDER ATTACKS (IA youcantalwaysget1094562286).pdf
[edit]Work not necessarily by Fedral employee or serving US military ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:32, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- This work was produced by a “Captain,” but one of the “Fairfax County Fire and Rescue Department,” so it is most definitely under copyright. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 15:02, 10 March 2021 (UTC).
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Per request of Cameron Kerry - privacy issue raised - see OTRS Ticket 2020092210014701 Geoff Who, me? 20:22, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
All right, I will agree to the deletion of the signature.BacktoSchoolForever0700 (talk) 21:49, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: I don't have access to ticket but will stick to the information received here in nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:23, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
How is a 1970 publication cc-by-sa?? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:52, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- As fair as I know copyright in Russia for pre-2004 works is only 50 years. May fall under fair use (educational content) in any caseː https://rm.coe.int/1680783347 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_law_of_Russia WisDomUK
- @WisDom-UK:
- Pre-2008 (not 2004), it was 50 years after the death of the author, you didn't provide.
- 50 years hasn't even passed since date of publication
- By 2008, the law was superseded and now it's 70 years.
- You put cc-by-sa as the license.
- Wikimedia doesn't allow fair use except under limited circumstances.
- So none of what you've said applies. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- @WisDom-UK:
- Comment If anyone speak Russian you can read more here: http://minchanin.esmasoft.com/maps/hist1970/hist10-11.jpg --MGA73 (talk) 19:54, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment This image has Wikimedia Commons in the bottom right hand corner, suggesting it's a reupload of a file already on here? Extua (talk) 08:19, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:24, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Marked as own work, but the metadata points to the copyright being held by someone other than this user. Larry Hockett (talk) 22:16, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
This is an image that was taken by a photographer that works for David Arthur Vineyards. this images were paid for by David Arthur and were given to me by ownership of the company. If this is not sufficient I will happy change it for another but I see no copy right infringement with its use.
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:24, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
_01.png){kind=link}
_01.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The film is a valid copyright restored by GATT/URAA, see it here: [15] 122.2.10.69 22:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
_01.png){kind=link}
- This is not the film, but just a text image. Keep. --E4024 (talk) 22:58, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- It is still copyrighted in the UK, and then restored by GATT/URAA in the US, so Delete. --122.2.10.69 23:02, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: trivial to be non-eligible. --rubin16 (talk) 09:27, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
_01.png){kind=link}
_02.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_03.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
There are last two remaining files to be deleted, prior to GATT/URAA restoration with it's home country, UK. --122.2.10.69 23:05, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:27, 9 July 2021 (UTC)